September 16, 2024 • 35 mins
Dan asks the question as countless examples of ratcheted-up rhetoric from the Left has created a white-hot political climate that has now produced two assassination attempts against Donald Trump. Are these connected as a simple cause and effect? Or will the media continue blaming the former President for the deranged lunacy targeting him?
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Did God save
President Trump? Again? As you know, I believe that God
did save President Trump in that first assassination attempt in Pennsylvania.
(00:24):
You look at the whole way that came down, and
then Sunday, thank God, thank God, that this second assassin
did not succeed. Can you imagine the consequences for this nation,
obviously the President's family and beyond, so that this nation
should we should all be on our niece today, very
very thankful eight five five for zero five eight two
(00:44):
five five the number text d A N five seven
seven three nine. Obviously, so much to talk about. I
won't even try to rein it in, so you just
you know, call when you want to call about whatever
you want to talk about. Obviously, much of the conversation
is going to center around this second assassination attempt and
all the issues flowing out of that. Now, one thing
(01:06):
we have got to talk about under that umbrella is
What do you think the political consequence is going to be,
because you know, we look at what are we now
fifty days away from the election. I'll do the math,
but we are so close to election day, mel ballots
coming out in many different places soon. What do you
think the political impact of this will be? Whether you
(01:29):
think it'll be for Trump against Trump? Absolutely neutral, would
love your take on that. Eight five five four zero
five eight two five five, the number text, dam five seven,
seven thirty nine, and then so much more to cover
we had promoted for today, and I think it's still relevant.
I would say even more relevant, you know, the the
(01:50):
issue of the Taylor Swift endorsement, what outcome on the campaign,
and as you may know by now yesterday morning, obviously
before this assassination attempt, President Trump had posted on true
Social and then went up via ex I hate Taylor Swift.
So we'll talk about that as well, because you can
(02:11):
be sure the left is going to be doing everything
they possibly can with that. But is that going to
actually backfire on them? But again, we'll center most, if
not all, of the conversation today on issues rolling out
of the second assassination attempt. Heiers speaker Mike Johnson on
that night. I would really like your take on it.
(02:31):
I think that thoughtful people across the political spectrum have
this issue on their mind.
Speaker 2 (02:38):
It's a remarkable thing. And Kelly and I spoke with
him at great length about that, because it is something
that no one can deny. God has spared his life
twice now, and I told him that it reminded me
of the bulletproof George Washington, our first president, who evaded
being shot when he was an army colonel. The famous
incident of the French and America in any war where
(02:59):
they all took shots at and bullet holes went through.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
His jacket and it didn't take him down.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
That event took place, ironically, less than fifty miles from
where President Trump was shot on the stage at Butler, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (03:09):
So your thoughts on that. I can't wait to see
what Texters have to say today. Obviously, it's unprecedented, right
so when we ask questions like, holy cow, what's the
political impact going to be? We've never had anything remotely
like this in American political history, these two assassination attempts
(03:30):
in a very short period of time. You know, how
do when the only voters who matter here, right are
the base voters the both party depends on parties dependent,
but also obviously the six key swing states and within
those swing states the undecided. So I just want to
get your take on that. I want to get you
some more sound of the day. So many issues rolling
(03:51):
out of both of these pressers and credit to authorities,
even though, like me, you're probably frustrated there isn't more
information out of these pressers at least the right. Remember
after Trump being shot in Pennsylvania, you know, authorities just
for the most part, you know, just went cold and
went silent, which obviously fueled the suspicions arising out of
(04:13):
that President Trump. I'm looking at a CNN headline right now.
Trump lashes out at Harris over assassination attempts. So we'll
follow up with that on you and then their next
headline Fans doubles down on false pet eating claims at
the latest CNN headline. There, but who do you blame?
(04:34):
Who do you blame for this? Right? Because we got
to start with this completely unacceptable, completely unacceptable should be
anywhere on the planet, but in the United States of
America to be able to have, you know, assassins in
position in position to assassinate the president and the first
one out. How can anybody doubt that that was gone
(04:57):
directly saving Trump? And I don't doubt that happened here either,
And you know, happy to debate that if you don't
agree with me. But but we know this nation cannot
allow this to happen, so it cannot be the new normal.
So who do you blame and how do you stop it?
Do you blame the rhetoric of the Democrats. Do you
(05:17):
blame the Biden administration for not giving Trump better protection?
Do you blame all of the above, do you add
to that mix? And above all, because we're not just
about cursing the darkness, we want to light the candle.
How do you fix this? Eight five five four zero
five eight two five five the number text d A
N five seven seven three nine. Let's start in Lakewood,
Colorado with Mike. You're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4 (05:40):
Welcome, Hidian, thanks for taking my call. I would like
to draw an analogy to nine to eleven. First plane
hits the tower. Oh, what a tragic accident. Second plane
hits the second tower. Now we have a conspiracy. Same
thing I think is going on here.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
Do you think that two are related.
Speaker 4 (06:02):
Oh, absolutely, I listened. Well, let me explain. I listened
to an episode of.
Speaker 5 (06:10):
The Seawan Ryan podcast with the former head of the
Blackwater organization. He said he has contacts in the federal
government and the first shooter from Pennsylvania the beds with
the phone and found out that he was in contact
with somebody in Washington, DC.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
Yeah, and Mike, you know, the challenge, as you know,
is that anybody can say anything they want on the
internet or on a podcast, but is there the evidence
out there to back it up?
Speaker 5 (06:45):
Well, I you know, I would assume so, given that
he was pretty clear about his statements on that podcast
and listening to Ryan earlier, this event was not on
President Trump's schedule, so apparently hardly anybody knew about it
(07:06):
and that this shoe was mining in ambush since two
o'clock in the morning, twelve hours until the Secret Service
came across that Rifel Beryl sticking to the path.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
Yeah. Very very fair question there, Mike, And we're gonna
have to this break, but thank you for kicking it off,
my friend. Very very fair question, right, And credit to
authorities for not trying to bury it. And they brought
it up in the second presser today as well. In fact,
they emphasized it that that wait a second, this golf
was was kind of a late addition to the schedule,
and and you know, so they weren't trying to throw
(07:40):
cold water on this very good question of how would
this killer have no right? How would this killer have known? Now,
of course, there's the theory that, hey, you can be
monitoring mar Lago and once the motorcade goes on the move,
you can follow the motorcade and get positioned. But then
the information we get today that you've got cell phone
data in that hour twelve in that area, twelve hours
(08:03):
in advance. Now, of course, what you and I can't
know just sitting here today is all right, so you've
got his cell phone, there was he there with it?
Or was the cell phone just positioned along with the
GoPro already up along the fence. We can't know the
answer to that, but I think it's fair right now
to look at an analysis that would include him being
(08:24):
in that immediate area for twelve hours before. And so
that is a screaming question, right if golf was a
late addition, how would he know twelve hours before Yeah,
and then here's a question for you. What kind of
process would you trust to get to the bottom of
all this? And listen, does my gut tell me right
(08:45):
now that these two assassination attempts are directly linked? No,
but that doesn't mean they aren't. So what we know
is we need true, complete, trustworthy investigations into both of these,
including that the potential of any possible linkage. So who
would you trust to do that? What would that process
(09:06):
have to look like to satisfy you? And this is
a very very serious question because America needs to know
and America needs to have confidence that it knows the
full truth here. You know, for lots of different reasons,
including protecting the president of the future. I think he's
going to win this election. He's going to be president.
These assassination attempts are not going to stop. And then
(09:29):
that's one reason I am a little bit concerned about
the political consequence. I mean, I can definitely see a
rally around the flag, rally around this courageous former president phenomena.
I hope that's what occurs, and people say, no way,
we're going to let these killers and assassins and haters
win and we're electing this guy, and obviously that's what
(09:50):
I hope happens, and I think that's the more likely phenomena.
On the other hand, we haven't seen this before. We
don't can't cite a president. Are we going to have
people say, well, you know, they're going to be trying
to kill him every single day of his four years
in office? And I don't know if I want that.
I hope to god we don't get that kind of
weak need surrender to the killer attitude out there among voters.
(10:10):
But again, we haven't seen this thing before. Which way
do you think that's going to cut? We'll come back
to that and much more. You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 6 (10:20):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 7 (10:24):
Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
public office again. He is not only unfit, he is
destructive to our democracy and he.
Speaker 3 (10:36):
Has to be He has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
And he doesn't think that green Light's an attack on Trump.
He has to be eliminated. Really, President Trump coming out
today and telling Fox News Digital that the suspect quote
believe the rhetoric of Biden and Harris, and he acted
on it their rhetoric is causing me to be shot.
At what I am the one is who is going
(11:02):
to save the country, and they are the ones that
are destroying the country, both from the inside and out.
Eight five five or zero five A two five five
the number? Do you agree with the President on that? Obviously,
right now none of us can know conclusively, but I
think any reasonable person could could infer from the evidence
(11:24):
available that the President's exactly right on that eight five
five for zero five A two five five the number?
Now does that mean, and I'll go to our jam lines,
does that mean that Biden and Harris have been trying
to get Trump killed by saying that he is a
threat to democracy by all of these other things that
they say about him regard And I am not saying
(11:47):
that there's an that's their intent to get him killed.
That is not my point. But I think a reasonable
person looking at what we know now could infer that
that A it would be foreseeable to them when they
say these kinds of things about him, that it might
cause somebody to try to kill him, and b is
there an actual in fact cause a link here? Too
(12:10):
early to tell, We just need much more information, But
I think any reasonable person, any honest person, would have
to see that as an active possibility that has to
be investigated. Here, let's go to the phone lines and
start with Jack and Adams County. You're on the Dan
Kaplis Show.
Speaker 8 (12:26):
Welcome, Hi Dan, how are you doing?
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Upset? How about you?
Speaker 8 (12:32):
Yeah, it's really scary. I'm going to give you some
information that just dropped last hour on Real America's Voice
and on X The.
Speaker 4 (12:41):
Name I'll give you is and so Ryan.
Speaker 8 (12:43):
Can check this up real fast. Eric Prince, former high
level security with Blackrock. He's just released information that both
shooters appeared in Blackrock television commercials. He said, statistically impossible.
Speaker 9 (13:02):
I don't know what that means.
Speaker 8 (13:04):
I'm just throwing that out there. And if you go
to Eric Prince you can see the broadcast he did
on Real America's Voice with a Natalie Winner. Yeah, so
if that's true, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
I appreciate the call on that, and I've seen I've
seen those reports, whether they're true or not. I've seen
multiple reports to that effect. Yeah, so we'll follow up
on that.
Speaker 10 (13:29):
I haven't seen Ryan Ralph the most recent would be
shooter and involved with black Rock. Specifically, but like you said,
the reporting could have come down the last hour. You
did see though, Dan Thomas Crooks, the original shooter who
killed Corey comparator who wounded Donald Trump. He was featured
in a black Rock add that they pulled off of
their site.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
That's a fact. And this gets back to the question
of what kind of investigation here would you trust, who
would it have to be done by, what would it
have to look like mechanically? Here's President Trump at that
to September tenth quote debate. This is the one that weaponized,
not me. She weaponized.
Speaker 11 (14:05):
I probably took a bullet to the head because.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
Of the things that they say about me.
Speaker 11 (14:11):
They talk about democracy.
Speaker 1 (14:13):
I'm a threat to democracy.
Speaker 11 (14:14):
They're the threat to democracy. Was it take Russia Russia
Russia investigation that went nowhere?
Speaker 1 (14:21):
Yeah? I thought that was one of his best points
in the debate, has proven by the fact that one
of the three debaters against him then interrupted him as
he was making it. Let's go to our vediable talk
to Brian. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 12 (14:32):
Welcome, hey, Dan.
Speaker 13 (14:36):
At some point, guys, we gotta start putting the you know,
the pieces of the puzzle together. Come on to assassination
attempts and guess who's investigating it. Oh, the same people
that tried to take him out, Christopher Ray and Garland.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
Now these are what's your proof that they tried to
take him out? You mean tried to take them out
physically or tried to take him out legally.
Speaker 4 (14:59):
Dan, there's got to be a mole in the situation.
Speaker 12 (15:01):
Nobody knows where to go.
Speaker 4 (15:03):
Oh okay. First they leave a building wide open, okay,
and we all just try to make excuses.
Speaker 12 (15:08):
Well, maybe they were just you know, they have the
security of a third grader.
Speaker 4 (15:11):
I don't know.
Speaker 12 (15:12):
And now all of a sudden, oh man.
Speaker 4 (15:15):
There's just the bushes right there. He's laying in waite.
Speaker 12 (15:18):
How did he know about that? These people are so
corrupt and these are the same people rip mind you. Okay,
remember Epstein, guys, Okay, remember Epstein. Oh man, he just
committed suicide.
Speaker 4 (15:30):
Guys.
Speaker 12 (15:30):
But you know what, we haven't found any of those
people that molested those children. Now imagine that these are
the same people that are in charge of the investigation.
And we're all just gonna stick our head in the
sand like we're stupid, and.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
We're gonna overanalyze everything.
Speaker 12 (15:45):
No, it couldn't be them.
Speaker 4 (15:46):
It's got to be a lone wolf. Guys start putting
it together. And this ain't the last attempt.
Speaker 12 (15:51):
Trust me. There's too much money on the light.
Speaker 4 (15:53):
Just like with Puddity when he was gonna break up
the CIA and stuff and he ended up dead. There
is too much money. They're like a mafia and that's
what their money. They're coming after you.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
Brian, appreciate the call. I want to try to get
everybody in Listen. I think there needs to be a
full nine to eleven commission type investigation into this. I
don't think it should be left to any individual agency.
I think individual agencies can be involved and do their
normal job, but I think we need a full nine
to eleven type commission because one thing I agree with
(16:25):
Brian on is we have not seen the last of this, right.
I mean, listen, wait a second. I talked about this
on er. It seems like years ago Ryan Iran put
out a video showing them killing Trump at his golf course. Now,
I'm not saying there's an Iranian connection to what happened yesterday,
but it needs to be investigated. The Biden administration knew
(16:47):
before the Pennsylvania assassin that Iran was trying to assassinate Trump,
but Iran put out a video showing them killing him
at his golf course. So why didn't Trump get the
same level of protection at that golf course yesterday that
a sitting president would have had. Dan and Centennial Welcome
to the show.
Speaker 14 (17:06):
Hey, Dan, thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Sure.
Speaker 14 (17:08):
As a couple of points, the first one has is
that I find it very interesting that after about six years,
and I know I've been calling in a long time,
all of a sudden now things like deep states, deep state,
and conspiracy theory and corruption and Biden's laptop is all
common discussion. When you used to be called a wacko
(17:29):
right on the assassination tempt.
Speaker 12 (17:33):
Here's the problem.
Speaker 14 (17:34):
We've got a military and a government, FBI, Secret Service
and all those agencies. We can send a rocket to
the moon. We can see a mouth part at five
hundred miles in the pitch black. These things are way
too easy. That's the problem. It's like everybody's wait a minute,
how does this guy sit in a bushes.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
For twelve hours?
Speaker 14 (17:55):
They have infrared heat SAgs, we got drug dogs and
dogs that can find explosive guns, bullets, cell phones, they
can smell it. They're trained.
Speaker 4 (18:04):
I work with them.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Yeah, and Dan, the music means are out of time.
You raise obviously a lot of really important questions, and
at top of the list right now is how did
you know Trump was going to be there? And this
twelve hours cell phone data twelve hours before? Who do
you blame? How do we fix it? You're on the
Dankplas Show.
Speaker 6 (18:26):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
If you had to be stuck at an elevator with
either President Trump, Mike Panser, Jeff Sessions, who would it be?
Speaker 3 (18:36):
Does one of us have to come out alive?
Speaker 1 (18:41):
Really really funny coming. It's amazing And that's obviously dated.
That's a flashback. But how often the left talks about
jokes about political violence, right, because if you look historically,
violence is a tool I'm talking about the left generally.
You know, throughout world history, violence is a tool of
(19:01):
the left. And we've certainly seen violence used in America
by the left. I'm not talking Democrats versus Republicans, but
by the left in America. And we've seen that frequently
and very very very rarely from the right, and so
I think we have to be realistic about that. All
of this effort of the left right now to say,
(19:22):
oh there's you know, shared responsibility, it's their rhetoric to
blah blah blah. Now you look historically, because listen, the
left can't win. They can't win on the facts, they
can't win on logic, they can't win on morality, so
they have to censor and then they have to commit
acts of violence. I mean, it's it has been part
(19:42):
of the playbook. Not everyone on the left, and again
I'm not talking Democrat versus Republican, but the hard left.
It has been part of the playbook historically. And so
yet the Democrats and for a very long time, you know,
have have just joked about or used that violent imagery.
I am never going to to criticize anybody from either
party or no party at all who uses kind of
(20:05):
common words, common words in a political context. Hey, we
got to fight, man, we got to take it to them.
You know, we've got to win this war in this election.
Things like that. I'm never going to criticize anybody for
stuff like that. Right now, somebody might say something like
that in a particularly exquisite context, say like an hour
(20:28):
after the second assassination attempt on the president, and then
you can view that differently in all fairness, but generally speaking, no,
these kind of fighting war battle metaphors have been part
of political discourse on both sides forever. What I'm talking
about is stuff that goes beyond that, stuff that goes
(20:49):
beyond that. And again, looking at the context first, before
this first assassination attempt on Trump would listen any reasonable person.
Any reasonable person when say certain things, could absolutely envision
that it might trigger some kind of wacko to take
action against Trump. I don't think there's any doubt about that.
(21:10):
But here's I think a real important point we have
to consider. We cannot become a society you know some
people called a Heckler's meto. We can't become a society
where all of a sudden, we can't say things because
there might be some psychopath, some sociopath, some wacko, some
(21:30):
homicidal maniac who might take a statement and then in
a perverted way, twisted into a justification to go out
and commit some kind of crime. We can't become a
self censoring society like that. So I'm not suggesting blaming
anybody for or limiting conversation when it's that political metaphorical
(21:52):
kind of rhetoric. That's not my point. But can somebody
explain to me a statement like this from Democratic Congressman
Dan Goldman, And again this is a past statement, but
not that long ago.
Speaker 7 (22:05):
Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
public office again.
Speaker 3 (22:12):
He is not only unfit, he.
Speaker 7 (22:14):
Is destructive to our democracy and.
Speaker 3 (22:17):
He has to be he has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1 (22:21):
Yeah, eight five to five for zero five A two
five five text d an five seven seven three nine.
I don't know that you can read anything into this
one word extremely serious, but in this context as a guy, Yeah,
in this context, I think this word is probably meaningful.
The FBI saying that they view this as an extremely
(22:45):
serious assassination attempt. I don't know if that implies. And
I know at this point authorities are denying any evidence
of another party being involved, et cetera. But that language
used today suggests to me just that there's going to
be additional evidence we don't know about yet showing how
(23:05):
carefully planned this was and how likely it was to succeed,
you know, had it not been for this sharp eyed
agent doing a very good job there. But let's face it,
after what happened in Pennsylvania, and arguably before what happened
in Pennsylvania, Trump should be getting the same kind of
protection as a sitting president and there is no way
(23:25):
that street should have been opened yesterday. Raziel in Denver,
you're on the Dan Kaplas show. Welcome.
Speaker 15 (23:35):
I mean, insanely infuriated with a yellow journalist media. But
this has been to betake that this was going.
Speaker 16 (23:46):
To happen again, and it's going to continue until someone
has a malls to stop now now the system. I
actually have a short list of people that I would
like to recommend for Trump's cabinet when he wins. You
and Michael Brown of course are anothers You as Attorney general.
Speaker 17 (24:07):
We have a great future homemation security. Second, what's my
job going to be director of CDC? Dan Bongino as
director of the Secret Service? King House because he's worked
there and he's got people there. And of course Tulsa
Gabbard as a Secretary of Defense.
Speaker 1 (24:30):
And what job for Ryan?
Speaker 13 (24:34):
What's up?
Speaker 1 (24:34):
What job for Ryan shooting?
Speaker 8 (24:39):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (24:41):
Come on, you can come up with one. Oh yeah,
he would do a good job and anything, but but
thank you, Rosie, I really appreciate you. Behind the scenes
is like comms director. You know who would do a
great job in the administration is Michael Brown?
Speaker 10 (24:53):
Yes, he would, he has done I think I don't
want to misquote him, but that if he were to
be asked, he would serve.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
And I am un begging. I'm sorry, I'm just done begging.
But I would be a great Press secretary for President Trump.
That would be entertaining. Yeah, I would rab much rather
do that than be ag. Really, you know who should
be a g And this is unfair because you've got
a million things going on back there. If you had
time to think about it here, yet you'd get it
in a blink of an eye, HARMI dyllon Andy McCarthy, Well.
Speaker 10 (25:22):
Yeah, because he'd be kind of a consensus building candidate, right,
he's not like really pro Trump, but he's very pro constitution,
you know, and a very good lawyer.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
Obviously extraordinarily qualified. Correct. Yeah, and even though he doesn't
like Trump, he has been the best defender of Trump
in so many different ways. But yeah, I'm sure we'll
be spending a lot of shows after election Day talking
about Trump's cabinet today. Though I really would love your take,
President Trump, I thought, in very carefully chosen words, it
(25:53):
came out and blamed the rhetoric of Harrison Biden for
yet this second assassination attempt, and he had alluded to
it as well in the so called debate. Right, So
do you agree with the president on that? Do you
think anything's going to change from the left and us
I got that question out, I realized I just wasted
four seconds of your time that you will never get back.
(26:14):
Of of course, it isn't going to change what the
left does. If anything, they're going to intensify it.
Speaker 4 (26:19):
This is the.
Speaker 1 (26:20):
One that weaponized, not me. She weaponized.
Speaker 11 (26:23):
I probably took a bullet to the head because of
the things that they say about me. They talk about democracy,
I'm a threat to democracy. They're the threat to democracy
or the fake Russia Russia Russia investigation.
Speaker 8 (26:37):
A lot that went nowhere.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
Amen, And you know he was making a great point
because the third debate are in there on the Aharis
side interrupted him on that. By the way, I love
seeing this, just love seeing this. Trump just announced he's
going to attend the Alabama Georgia football game. I love
seeing that. I think that's what not this weekend, the
next weekend. I love seeing that. Just get right back
(27:00):
out there, front and center. And you saw his post,
Ryan right the h to two post zero dash two
for over two on assassination attempts. But listen, we know
more are coming. Right and again, I think that is
a testament in many ways to how great he has
been for this country, because you've got Iran openly right now.
(27:22):
Iran's trying to kill him. The administration knew that before Pennsylvania,
before what happened yesterday. I'm not saying Iron's linked to yesterday,
though that obviously has to be investigated. But Roan, we
talked about it a year ago on the show. Aroan
put out a video showing Iran killing Trump at his
golf course. So we know there are more assassination attempts coming.
What political impact do you think that's going to have?
(27:44):
And do you think this Biden administration will finally do
what they should have been doing a long long time
ago and give him a presidential level of security? Who
do you blame? How do we fix it? You're on
the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6 (27:57):
And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast. I
just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all of
the country, and maybe there will be.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
People need to start taking to the streets.
Speaker 14 (28:07):
This is a dictator, you know.
Speaker 7 (28:09):
There needs to be unrest in the streets for as
all as there's unrest in our lives.
Speaker 10 (28:13):
Enemies of the state, show me where it says that
protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Do something about your dad's immigrational practices effect less time
they go low, we can how do you resist the
temptation to run up and ring her neck?
Speaker 13 (28:27):
Biggest tariff red in this country is white men, most
of them radicalized right up to the right.
Speaker 1 (28:34):
I thought you.
Speaker 18 (28:34):
Should have punched him in the face this and even
if you lost, he insulted j why he's on the
escalator in a called Mexican's Rapist immersed He said, well,
what do you think I should done?
Speaker 7 (28:41):
So?
Speaker 15 (28:41):
I think you should push him in the face and
then gotten out of the race.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
You would have been a hero. I'd like to punch
him in the face.
Speaker 18 (28:46):
I said, if we're in high school, I take you
behind the gym and beat the hell out of them.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
You know, and there's so much more of that, right,
But we hear this from the left all the time.
I'm not talking about typical metaphorical stuff in politics. Never
criticize anybody. Fay, we got to fight, we got to win.
This is the war to save the country. I'm talking
about something else, another level. It's like obscenity. You know
it when you see it. Interesting text here. If Jason
(29:12):
Crow is part of the investigation, it's a joke. He
is soft on crime, he loves illegals in this country.
So I thought. I saw Jason Crow this morning saying
he's part of the investigation, so nothing's going to be found.
It's interesting. Trump campaign ting just put out a partial
list of Democrats who they say have made violent threats
(29:33):
or have engaged in rhetoric that could lead to violence,
and Jason Crow is on that list. The quote they
attribute to him is Trump is an extreme danger to
our democracy. So you tell me, should that kind of
statement without more be condemned as inciting people to violence?
(29:57):
I don't think so. Now. I don't agree with Crow
on that, not one little bit. I think that the
people Jason Crow supports are extreme threat to our democracy.
And they proved it. They just opposed as sitting president,
and by the way, Jason Crowe had encouraged that. Right,
They just opposed as sitting president who is the party's
(30:19):
duly elected nominee. They obviously didn't depose him as president
though I think as a practical matter, we don't have
a president whose name we know right now. But they
certainly deposed him as the duly elected nominee of the
party in a back room deal at night and then
installed their own candidate. And Jason Crowe supports all of that.
(30:40):
So you want to talk about threats to democracy, Yeah,
but no, I would not condemn Jason Crowe for that
statement or suggests that that statement Trump is an extreme
danger to our democracy is something Jason Crow should not
be free to say because he's concerned it's going to
cause somebody to kill Trump. No, I would. I would
(31:02):
defend Jason Crow's right to say that, as wrong as
he is on it. Now, when you talk about from
the highest levels a sustained campaign, a sustained campaign saying
that Donald Trump and his supporters represent this existential threat
to our nation, you know that that's when that's when
(31:24):
you start to to have real questions, right too, much.
Speaker 18 (31:28):
Of what's happening in our country today is not normal.
Donald Trump and the Marga Republicans represented extremism that threatens
the very foundations.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
Of our republic as a.
Speaker 18 (31:42):
Republican party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald
Trump and the Marga Republicans, and that is a threat
to this country.
Speaker 1 (31:53):
And then you look at the context, right, and there's
much more. You remember it when when Biden got all
those those color out that resembled I'm not saying that
it was his intent Nazi Germany. And then this dark,
dark setting, I think it was in Philadelphia and he's
talking about Trump. Is this extreme threat to democracy? You know,
there are there are different levels of this. But I
(32:15):
would defend Jason Crow's right to say what he said there.
But how does anybody defend this? This is a Democrat.
Congressman Dan Goldman.
Speaker 7 (32:24):
Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
public office again. He is not only unfit, he is
destructive to our democracy and.
Speaker 3 (32:36):
He has to be he has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1 (32:40):
Let's go to Mike, not Michael Bennett. You're on the
Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome Mike.
Speaker 9 (32:45):
Oh, great to talk to you, Dan, Thank you. Hey,
you were asking how we can straighten this up. I'm thinking,
if the Fox is watching the Hen House right now,
which is Biden and his U Vice president are watching
over Trump to make sure they didn't get killed, and
Trump being the hens, that doesn't seem very fair. I
(33:08):
think that maybe we can pass a bill on the
House floor that states that if you've been attempted fascination,
that maybe you can tick three of your own people
to lead up your secret Service detail and not from
the government. That way, there's not that false look at
(33:28):
the government. You've got your own people running the security
around you, and you should have the government running your systems. Yeah,
otherwise they're always they're always going to be pegged as
the ones doing the bad job.
Speaker 1 (33:42):
Yeah, thank you for that tremendous point, Mike, and we
talked about that after Pennsylvania. Wait a second, you're letting
Trump's political opponent determine his level of protection. When when
the political opponent, Biden, knows that Iron is actively trying
to kill Trump, and then Trump ends up with this
(34:03):
really pitiful, really pitiful approach to his protection in Pennsylvania,
you know what could possibly go wrong? Right, and I'm
not saying that Biden wanted Trump killed. I'm not saying
that Biden set it up so Trump would be killed.
But in a nation where where we have to get
(34:25):
along well enough to be a nation, we have to
trust each other well enough to be a nation, allowing
the political opponent to determine how much security the other
political opponent gets his political opponent gets, especially when the
sitting president knows that Iran is trying to assassinate his
(34:45):
political opponent, and then you end up in a situation
where every honest person agrees the level of protection was foreseeably,
foreseeably pitiful and inadequate. We just can't have that as
a nation. That's got to be a different system. So
who do you blame for this? How do we stop it?
You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Did God save
President Trump? Again? As you know, I believe that God
did save President Trump in that first assassination attempt in Pennsylvania.
(00:24):
You look at the whole way that came down, and
then Sunday, thank God, thank God, that this second assassin
did not succeed. Can you imagine the consequences for this nation,
obviously the President's family and beyond, so that this nation
should we should all be on our niece today, very
very thankful eight five five for zero five eight two
(00:44):
five five the number text d A N five seven
seven three nine. Obviously, so much to talk about. I
won't even try to rein it in, so you just
you know, call when you want to call about whatever
you want to talk about. Obviously, much of the conversation
is going to center around this second assassination attempt and
all the issues flowing out of that. Now, one thing
(01:06):
we have got to talk about under that umbrella is
What do you think the political consequence is going to be,
because you know, we look at what are we now
fifty days away from the election. I'll do the math,
but we are so close to election day, mel ballots
coming out in many different places soon. What do you
think the political impact of this will be? Whether you
(01:29):
think it'll be for Trump against Trump? Absolutely neutral, would
love your take on that. Eight five five four zero
five eight two five five, the number text, dam five seven,
seven thirty nine, and then so much more to cover
we had promoted for today, and I think it's still relevant.
I would say even more relevant, you know, the the
(01:50):
issue of the Taylor Swift endorsement, what outcome on the campaign,
and as you may know by now yesterday morning, obviously
before this assassination attempt, President Trump had posted on true
Social and then went up via ex I hate Taylor Swift.
So we'll talk about that as well, because you can
(02:11):
be sure the left is going to be doing everything
they possibly can with that. But is that going to
actually backfire on them? But again, we'll center most, if
not all, of the conversation today on issues rolling out
of the second assassination attempt. Heiers speaker Mike Johnson on
that night. I would really like your take on it.
(02:31):
I think that thoughtful people across the political spectrum have
this issue on their mind.
Speaker 2 (02:38):
It's a remarkable thing. And Kelly and I spoke with
him at great length about that, because it is something
that no one can deny. God has spared his life
twice now, and I told him that it reminded me
of the bulletproof George Washington, our first president, who evaded
being shot when he was an army colonel. The famous
incident of the French and America in any war where
(02:59):
they all took shots at and bullet holes went through.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
His jacket and it didn't take him down.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
That event took place, ironically, less than fifty miles from
where President Trump was shot on the stage at Butler, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (03:09):
So your thoughts on that. I can't wait to see
what Texters have to say today. Obviously, it's unprecedented, right
so when we ask questions like, holy cow, what's the
political impact going to be? We've never had anything remotely
like this in American political history, these two assassination attempts
(03:30):
in a very short period of time. You know, how
do when the only voters who matter here, right are
the base voters the both party depends on parties dependent,
but also obviously the six key swing states and within
those swing states the undecided. So I just want to
get your take on that. I want to get you
some more sound of the day. So many issues rolling
(03:51):
out of both of these pressers and credit to authorities,
even though, like me, you're probably frustrated there isn't more
information out of these pressers at least the right. Remember
after Trump being shot in Pennsylvania, you know, authorities just
for the most part, you know, just went cold and
went silent, which obviously fueled the suspicions arising out of
(04:13):
that President Trump. I'm looking at a CNN headline right now.
Trump lashes out at Harris over assassination attempts. So we'll
follow up with that on you and then their next
headline Fans doubles down on false pet eating claims at
the latest CNN headline. There, but who do you blame?
(04:34):
Who do you blame for this? Right? Because we got
to start with this completely unacceptable, completely unacceptable should be
anywhere on the planet, but in the United States of
America to be able to have, you know, assassins in
position in position to assassinate the president and the first
one out. How can anybody doubt that that was gone
(04:57):
directly saving Trump? And I don't doubt that happened here either,
And you know, happy to debate that if you don't
agree with me. But but we know this nation cannot
allow this to happen, so it cannot be the new normal.
So who do you blame and how do you stop it?
Do you blame the rhetoric of the Democrats. Do you
(05:17):
blame the Biden administration for not giving Trump better protection?
Do you blame all of the above, do you add
to that mix? And above all, because we're not just
about cursing the darkness, we want to light the candle.
How do you fix this? Eight five five four zero
five eight two five five the number text d A
N five seven seven three nine. Let's start in Lakewood,
Colorado with Mike. You're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4 (05:40):
Welcome, Hidian, thanks for taking my call. I would like
to draw an analogy to nine to eleven. First plane
hits the tower. Oh, what a tragic accident. Second plane
hits the second tower. Now we have a conspiracy. Same
thing I think is going on here.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
Do you think that two are related.
Speaker 4 (06:02):
Oh, absolutely, I listened. Well, let me explain. I listened
to an episode of.
Speaker 5 (06:10):
The Seawan Ryan podcast with the former head of the
Blackwater organization. He said he has contacts in the federal
government and the first shooter from Pennsylvania the beds with
the phone and found out that he was in contact
with somebody in Washington, DC.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
Yeah, and Mike, you know, the challenge, as you know,
is that anybody can say anything they want on the
internet or on a podcast, but is there the evidence
out there to back it up?
Speaker 5 (06:45):
Well, I you know, I would assume so, given that
he was pretty clear about his statements on that podcast
and listening to Ryan earlier, this event was not on
President Trump's schedule, so apparently hardly anybody knew about it
(07:06):
and that this shoe was mining in ambush since two
o'clock in the morning, twelve hours until the Secret Service
came across that Rifel Beryl sticking to the path.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
Yeah. Very very fair question there, Mike, And we're gonna
have to this break, but thank you for kicking it off,
my friend. Very very fair question, right, And credit to
authorities for not trying to bury it. And they brought
it up in the second presser today as well. In fact,
they emphasized it that that wait a second, this golf
was was kind of a late addition to the schedule,
and and you know, so they weren't trying to throw
(07:40):
cold water on this very good question of how would
this killer have no right? How would this killer have known? Now,
of course, there's the theory that, hey, you can be
monitoring mar Lago and once the motorcade goes on the move,
you can follow the motorcade and get positioned. But then
the information we get today that you've got cell phone
data in that hour twelve in that area, twelve hours
(08:03):
in advance. Now, of course, what you and I can't
know just sitting here today is all right, so you've
got his cell phone, there was he there with it?
Or was the cell phone just positioned along with the
GoPro already up along the fence. We can't know the
answer to that, but I think it's fair right now
to look at an analysis that would include him being
(08:24):
in that immediate area for twelve hours before. And so
that is a screaming question, right if golf was a
late addition, how would he know twelve hours before Yeah,
and then here's a question for you. What kind of
process would you trust to get to the bottom of
all this? And listen, does my gut tell me right
(08:45):
now that these two assassination attempts are directly linked? No,
but that doesn't mean they aren't. So what we know
is we need true, complete, trustworthy investigations into both of these,
including that the potential of any possible linkage. So who
would you trust to do that? What would that process
(09:06):
have to look like to satisfy you? And this is
a very very serious question because America needs to know
and America needs to have confidence that it knows the
full truth here. You know, for lots of different reasons,
including protecting the president of the future. I think he's
going to win this election. He's going to be president.
These assassination attempts are not going to stop. And then
(09:29):
that's one reason I am a little bit concerned about
the political consequence. I mean, I can definitely see a
rally around the flag, rally around this courageous former president phenomena.
I hope that's what occurs, and people say, no way,
we're going to let these killers and assassins and haters
win and we're electing this guy, and obviously that's what
(09:50):
I hope happens, and I think that's the more likely phenomena.
On the other hand, we haven't seen this before. We
don't can't cite a president. Are we going to have
people say, well, you know, they're going to be trying
to kill him every single day of his four years
in office? And I don't know if I want that.
I hope to god we don't get that kind of
weak need surrender to the killer attitude out there among voters.
(10:10):
But again, we haven't seen this thing before. Which way
do you think that's going to cut? We'll come back
to that and much more. You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 6 (10:20):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 7 (10:24):
Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
public office again. He is not only unfit, he is
destructive to our democracy and he.
Speaker 3 (10:36):
Has to be He has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
And he doesn't think that green Light's an attack on Trump.
He has to be eliminated. Really, President Trump coming out
today and telling Fox News Digital that the suspect quote
believe the rhetoric of Biden and Harris, and he acted
on it their rhetoric is causing me to be shot.
At what I am the one is who is going
(11:02):
to save the country, and they are the ones that
are destroying the country, both from the inside and out.
Eight five five or zero five A two five five
the number? Do you agree with the President on that? Obviously,
right now none of us can know conclusively, but I
think any reasonable person could could infer from the evidence
(11:24):
available that the President's exactly right on that eight five
five for zero five A two five five the number?
Now does that mean, and I'll go to our jam lines,
does that mean that Biden and Harris have been trying
to get Trump killed by saying that he is a
threat to democracy by all of these other things that
they say about him regard And I am not saying
(11:47):
that there's an that's their intent to get him killed.
That is not my point. But I think a reasonable
person looking at what we know now could infer that
that A it would be foreseeable to them when they
say these kinds of things about him, that it might
cause somebody to try to kill him, and b is
there an actual in fact cause a link here? Too
(12:10):
early to tell, We just need much more information, But
I think any reasonable person, any honest person, would have
to see that as an active possibility that has to
be investigated. Here, let's go to the phone lines and
start with Jack and Adams County. You're on the Dan
Kaplis Show.
Speaker 8 (12:26):
Welcome, Hi Dan, how are you doing?
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Upset? How about you?
Speaker 8 (12:32):
Yeah, it's really scary. I'm going to give you some
information that just dropped last hour on Real America's Voice
and on X The.
Speaker 4 (12:41):
Name I'll give you is and so Ryan.
Speaker 8 (12:43):
Can check this up real fast. Eric Prince, former high
level security with Blackrock. He's just released information that both
shooters appeared in Blackrock television commercials. He said, statistically impossible.
Speaker 9 (13:02):
I don't know what that means.
Speaker 8 (13:04):
I'm just throwing that out there. And if you go
to Eric Prince you can see the broadcast he did
on Real America's Voice with a Natalie Winner. Yeah, so
if that's true, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
I appreciate the call on that, and I've seen I've
seen those reports, whether they're true or not. I've seen
multiple reports to that effect. Yeah, so we'll follow up
on that.
Speaker 10 (13:29):
I haven't seen Ryan Ralph the most recent would be
shooter and involved with black Rock. Specifically, but like you said,
the reporting could have come down the last hour. You
did see though, Dan Thomas Crooks, the original shooter who
killed Corey comparator who wounded Donald Trump. He was featured
in a black Rock add that they pulled off of
their site.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
That's a fact. And this gets back to the question
of what kind of investigation here would you trust, who
would it have to be done by, what would it
have to look like mechanically? Here's President Trump at that
to September tenth quote debate. This is the one that weaponized,
not me. She weaponized.
Speaker 11 (14:05):
I probably took a bullet to the head because.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
Of the things that they say about me.
Speaker 11 (14:11):
They talk about democracy.
Speaker 1 (14:13):
I'm a threat to democracy.
Speaker 11 (14:14):
They're the threat to democracy. Was it take Russia Russia
Russia investigation that went nowhere?
Speaker 1 (14:21):
Yeah? I thought that was one of his best points
in the debate, has proven by the fact that one
of the three debaters against him then interrupted him as
he was making it. Let's go to our vediable talk
to Brian. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 12 (14:32):
Welcome, hey, Dan.
Speaker 13 (14:36):
At some point, guys, we gotta start putting the you know,
the pieces of the puzzle together. Come on to assassination
attempts and guess who's investigating it. Oh, the same people
that tried to take him out, Christopher Ray and Garland.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
Now these are what's your proof that they tried to
take him out? You mean tried to take them out
physically or tried to take him out legally.
Speaker 4 (14:59):
Dan, there's got to be a mole in the situation.
Speaker 12 (15:01):
Nobody knows where to go.
Speaker 4 (15:03):
Oh okay. First they leave a building wide open, okay,
and we all just try to make excuses.
Speaker 12 (15:08):
Well, maybe they were just you know, they have the
security of a third grader.
Speaker 4 (15:11):
I don't know.
Speaker 12 (15:12):
And now all of a sudden, oh man.
Speaker 4 (15:15):
There's just the bushes right there. He's laying in waite.
Speaker 12 (15:18):
How did he know about that? These people are so
corrupt and these are the same people rip mind you. Okay,
remember Epstein, guys, Okay, remember Epstein. Oh man, he just
committed suicide.
Speaker 4 (15:30):
Guys.
Speaker 12 (15:30):
But you know what, we haven't found any of those
people that molested those children. Now imagine that these are
the same people that are in charge of the investigation.
And we're all just gonna stick our head in the
sand like we're stupid, and.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
We're gonna overanalyze everything.
Speaker 12 (15:45):
No, it couldn't be them.
Speaker 4 (15:46):
It's got to be a lone wolf. Guys start putting
it together. And this ain't the last attempt.
Speaker 12 (15:51):
Trust me. There's too much money on the light.
Speaker 4 (15:53):
Just like with Puddity when he was gonna break up
the CIA and stuff and he ended up dead. There
is too much money. They're like a mafia and that's
what their money. They're coming after you.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
Brian, appreciate the call. I want to try to get
everybody in Listen. I think there needs to be a
full nine to eleven commission type investigation into this. I
don't think it should be left to any individual agency.
I think individual agencies can be involved and do their
normal job, but I think we need a full nine
to eleven type commission because one thing I agree with
(16:25):
Brian on is we have not seen the last of this, right.
I mean, listen, wait a second. I talked about this
on er. It seems like years ago Ryan Iran put
out a video showing them killing Trump at his golf course. Now,
I'm not saying there's an Iranian connection to what happened yesterday,
but it needs to be investigated. The Biden administration knew
(16:47):
before the Pennsylvania assassin that Iran was trying to assassinate Trump,
but Iran put out a video showing them killing him
at his golf course. So why didn't Trump get the
same level of protection at that golf course yesterday that
a sitting president would have had. Dan and Centennial Welcome
to the show.
Speaker 14 (17:06):
Hey, Dan, thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Sure.
Speaker 14 (17:08):
As a couple of points, the first one has is
that I find it very interesting that after about six years,
and I know I've been calling in a long time,
all of a sudden now things like deep states, deep state,
and conspiracy theory and corruption and Biden's laptop is all
common discussion. When you used to be called a wacko
(17:29):
right on the assassination tempt.
Speaker 12 (17:33):
Here's the problem.
Speaker 14 (17:34):
We've got a military and a government, FBI, Secret Service
and all those agencies. We can send a rocket to
the moon. We can see a mouth part at five
hundred miles in the pitch black. These things are way
too easy. That's the problem. It's like everybody's wait a minute,
how does this guy sit in a bushes.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
For twelve hours?
Speaker 14 (17:55):
They have infrared heat SAgs, we got drug dogs and
dogs that can find explosive guns, bullets, cell phones, they
can smell it. They're trained.
Speaker 4 (18:04):
I work with them.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Yeah, and Dan, the music means are out of time.
You raise obviously a lot of really important questions, and
at top of the list right now is how did
you know Trump was going to be there? And this
twelve hours cell phone data twelve hours before? Who do
you blame? How do we fix it? You're on the
Dankplas Show.
Speaker 6 (18:26):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
If you had to be stuck at an elevator with
either President Trump, Mike Panser, Jeff Sessions, who would it be?
Speaker 3 (18:36):
Does one of us have to come out alive?
Speaker 1 (18:41):
Really really funny coming. It's amazing And that's obviously dated.
That's a flashback. But how often the left talks about
jokes about political violence, right, because if you look historically,
violence is a tool I'm talking about the left generally.
You know, throughout world history, violence is a tool of
(19:01):
the left. And we've certainly seen violence used in America
by the left. I'm not talking Democrats versus Republicans, but
by the left in America. And we've seen that frequently
and very very very rarely from the right, and so
I think we have to be realistic about that. All
of this effort of the left right now to say,
(19:22):
oh there's you know, shared responsibility, it's their rhetoric to
blah blah blah. Now you look historically, because listen, the
left can't win. They can't win on the facts, they
can't win on logic, they can't win on morality, so
they have to censor and then they have to commit
acts of violence. I mean, it's it has been part
(19:42):
of the playbook. Not everyone on the left, and again
I'm not talking Democrat versus Republican, but the hard left.
It has been part of the playbook historically. And so
yet the Democrats and for a very long time, you know,
have have just joked about or used that violent imagery.
I am never going to to criticize anybody from either
party or no party at all who uses kind of
(20:05):
common words, common words in a political context. Hey, we
got to fight, man, we got to take it to them.
You know, we've got to win this war in this election.
Things like that. I'm never going to criticize anybody for
stuff like that. Right now, somebody might say something like
that in a particularly exquisite context, say like an hour
(20:28):
after the second assassination attempt on the president, and then
you can view that differently in all fairness, but generally speaking, no,
these kind of fighting war battle metaphors have been part
of political discourse on both sides forever. What I'm talking
about is stuff that goes beyond that, stuff that goes
(20:49):
beyond that. And again, looking at the context first, before
this first assassination attempt on Trump would listen any reasonable person.
Any reasonable person when say certain things, could absolutely envision
that it might trigger some kind of wacko to take
action against Trump. I don't think there's any doubt about that.
(21:10):
But here's I think a real important point we have
to consider. We cannot become a society you know some
people called a Heckler's meto. We can't become a society
where all of a sudden, we can't say things because
there might be some psychopath, some sociopath, some wacko, some
(21:30):
homicidal maniac who might take a statement and then in
a perverted way, twisted into a justification to go out
and commit some kind of crime. We can't become a
self censoring society like that. So I'm not suggesting blaming
anybody for or limiting conversation when it's that political metaphorical
(21:52):
kind of rhetoric. That's not my point. But can somebody
explain to me a statement like this from Democratic Congressman
Dan Goldman, And again this is a past statement, but
not that long ago.
Speaker 7 (22:05):
Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
public office again.
Speaker 3 (22:12):
He is not only unfit, he.
Speaker 7 (22:14):
Is destructive to our democracy and.
Speaker 3 (22:17):
He has to be he has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1 (22:21):
Yeah, eight five to five for zero five A two
five five text d an five seven seven three nine.
I don't know that you can read anything into this
one word extremely serious, but in this context as a guy, Yeah,
in this context, I think this word is probably meaningful.
The FBI saying that they view this as an extremely
(22:45):
serious assassination attempt. I don't know if that implies. And
I know at this point authorities are denying any evidence
of another party being involved, et cetera. But that language
used today suggests to me just that there's going to
be additional evidence we don't know about yet showing how
(23:05):
carefully planned this was and how likely it was to succeed,
you know, had it not been for this sharp eyed
agent doing a very good job there. But let's face it,
after what happened in Pennsylvania, and arguably before what happened
in Pennsylvania, Trump should be getting the same kind of
protection as a sitting president and there is no way
(23:25):
that street should have been opened yesterday. Raziel in Denver,
you're on the Dan Kaplas show. Welcome.
Speaker 15 (23:35):
I mean, insanely infuriated with a yellow journalist media. But
this has been to betake that this was going.
Speaker 16 (23:46):
To happen again, and it's going to continue until someone
has a malls to stop now now the system. I
actually have a short list of people that I would
like to recommend for Trump's cabinet when he wins. You
and Michael Brown of course are anothers You as Attorney general.
Speaker 17 (24:07):
We have a great future homemation security. Second, what's my
job going to be director of CDC? Dan Bongino as
director of the Secret Service? King House because he's worked
there and he's got people there. And of course Tulsa
Gabbard as a Secretary of Defense.
Speaker 1 (24:30):
And what job for Ryan?
Speaker 13 (24:34):
What's up?
Speaker 1 (24:34):
What job for Ryan shooting?
Speaker 8 (24:39):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (24:41):
Come on, you can come up with one. Oh yeah,
he would do a good job and anything, but but
thank you, Rosie, I really appreciate you. Behind the scenes
is like comms director. You know who would do a
great job in the administration is Michael Brown?
Speaker 10 (24:53):
Yes, he would, he has done I think I don't
want to misquote him, but that if he were to
be asked, he would serve.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
And I am un begging. I'm sorry, I'm just done begging.
But I would be a great Press secretary for President Trump.
That would be entertaining. Yeah, I would rab much rather
do that than be ag. Really, you know who should
be a g And this is unfair because you've got
a million things going on back there. If you had
time to think about it here, yet you'd get it
in a blink of an eye, HARMI dyllon Andy McCarthy, Well.
Speaker 10 (25:22):
Yeah, because he'd be kind of a consensus building candidate, right,
he's not like really pro Trump, but he's very pro constitution,
you know, and a very good lawyer.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
Obviously extraordinarily qualified. Correct. Yeah, and even though he doesn't
like Trump, he has been the best defender of Trump
in so many different ways. But yeah, I'm sure we'll
be spending a lot of shows after election Day talking
about Trump's cabinet today. Though I really would love your take,
President Trump, I thought, in very carefully chosen words, it
(25:53):
came out and blamed the rhetoric of Harrison Biden for
yet this second assassination attempt, and he had alluded to
it as well in the so called debate. Right, So
do you agree with the president on that? Do you
think anything's going to change from the left and us
I got that question out, I realized I just wasted
four seconds of your time that you will never get back.
(26:14):
Of of course, it isn't going to change what the
left does. If anything, they're going to intensify it.
Speaker 4 (26:19):
This is the.
Speaker 1 (26:20):
One that weaponized, not me. She weaponized.
Speaker 11 (26:23):
I probably took a bullet to the head because of
the things that they say about me. They talk about democracy,
I'm a threat to democracy. They're the threat to democracy
or the fake Russia Russia Russia investigation.
Speaker 8 (26:37):
A lot that went nowhere.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
Amen, And you know he was making a great point
because the third debate are in there on the Aharis
side interrupted him on that. By the way, I love
seeing this, just love seeing this. Trump just announced he's
going to attend the Alabama Georgia football game. I love
seeing that. I think that's what not this weekend, the
next weekend. I love seeing that. Just get right back
(27:00):
out there, front and center. And you saw his post,
Ryan right the h to two post zero dash two
for over two on assassination attempts. But listen, we know
more are coming. Right and again, I think that is
a testament in many ways to how great he has
been for this country, because you've got Iran openly right now.
(27:22):
Iran's trying to kill him. The administration knew that before Pennsylvania,
before what happened yesterday. I'm not saying Iron's linked to yesterday,
though that obviously has to be investigated. But Roan, we
talked about it a year ago on the show. Aroan
put out a video showing Iran killing Trump at his
golf course. So we know there are more assassination attempts coming.
What political impact do you think that's going to have?
(27:44):
And do you think this Biden administration will finally do
what they should have been doing a long long time
ago and give him a presidential level of security? Who
do you blame? How do we fix it? You're on
the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6 (27:57):
And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast. I
just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all of
the country, and maybe there will be.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
People need to start taking to the streets.
Speaker 14 (28:07):
This is a dictator, you know.
Speaker 7 (28:09):
There needs to be unrest in the streets for as
all as there's unrest in our lives.
Speaker 10 (28:13):
Enemies of the state, show me where it says that
protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Do something about your dad's immigrational practices effect less time
they go low, we can how do you resist the
temptation to run up and ring her neck?
Speaker 13 (28:27):
Biggest tariff red in this country is white men, most
of them radicalized right up to the right.
Speaker 1 (28:34):
I thought you.
Speaker 18 (28:34):
Should have punched him in the face this and even
if you lost, he insulted j why he's on the
escalator in a called Mexican's Rapist immersed He said, well,
what do you think I should done?
Speaker 7 (28:41):
So?
Speaker 15 (28:41):
I think you should push him in the face and
then gotten out of the race.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
You would have been a hero. I'd like to punch
him in the face.
Speaker 18 (28:46):
I said, if we're in high school, I take you
behind the gym and beat the hell out of them.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
You know, and there's so much more of that, right,
But we hear this from the left all the time.
I'm not talking about typical metaphorical stuff in politics. Never
criticize anybody. Fay, we got to fight, we got to win.
This is the war to save the country. I'm talking
about something else, another level. It's like obscenity. You know
it when you see it. Interesting text here. If Jason
(29:12):
Crow is part of the investigation, it's a joke. He
is soft on crime, he loves illegals in this country.
So I thought. I saw Jason Crow this morning saying
he's part of the investigation, so nothing's going to be found.
It's interesting. Trump campaign ting just put out a partial
list of Democrats who they say have made violent threats
(29:33):
or have engaged in rhetoric that could lead to violence,
and Jason Crow is on that list. The quote they
attribute to him is Trump is an extreme danger to
our democracy. So you tell me, should that kind of
statement without more be condemned as inciting people to violence?
(29:57):
I don't think so. Now. I don't agree with Crow
on that, not one little bit. I think that the
people Jason Crow supports are extreme threat to our democracy.
And they proved it. They just opposed as sitting president,
and by the way, Jason Crowe had encouraged that. Right,
They just opposed as sitting president who is the party's
(30:19):
duly elected nominee. They obviously didn't depose him as president
though I think as a practical matter, we don't have
a president whose name we know right now. But they
certainly deposed him as the duly elected nominee of the
party in a back room deal at night and then
installed their own candidate. And Jason Crowe supports all of that.
(30:40):
So you want to talk about threats to democracy, Yeah,
but no, I would not condemn Jason Crowe for that
statement or suggests that that statement Trump is an extreme
danger to our democracy is something Jason Crow should not
be free to say because he's concerned it's going to
cause somebody to kill Trump. No, I would. I would
(31:02):
defend Jason Crow's right to say that, as wrong as
he is on it. Now, when you talk about from
the highest levels a sustained campaign, a sustained campaign saying
that Donald Trump and his supporters represent this existential threat
to our nation, you know that that's when that's when
(31:24):
you start to to have real questions, right too, much.
Speaker 18 (31:28):
Of what's happening in our country today is not normal.
Donald Trump and the Marga Republicans represented extremism that threatens
the very foundations.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
Of our republic as a.
Speaker 18 (31:42):
Republican party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald
Trump and the Marga Republicans, and that is a threat
to this country.
Speaker 1 (31:53):
And then you look at the context, right, and there's
much more. You remember it when when Biden got all
those those color out that resembled I'm not saying that
it was his intent Nazi Germany. And then this dark,
dark setting, I think it was in Philadelphia and he's
talking about Trump. Is this extreme threat to democracy? You know,
there are there are different levels of this. But I
(32:15):
would defend Jason Crow's right to say what he said there.
But how does anybody defend this? This is a Democrat.
Congressman Dan Goldman.
Speaker 7 (32:24):
Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
public office again. He is not only unfit, he is
destructive to our democracy and.
Speaker 3 (32:36):
He has to be he has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1 (32:40):
Let's go to Mike, not Michael Bennett. You're on the
Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome Mike.
Speaker 9 (32:45):
Oh, great to talk to you, Dan, Thank you. Hey,
you were asking how we can straighten this up. I'm thinking,
if the Fox is watching the Hen House right now,
which is Biden and his U Vice president are watching
over Trump to make sure they didn't get killed, and
Trump being the hens, that doesn't seem very fair. I
(33:08):
think that maybe we can pass a bill on the
House floor that states that if you've been attempted fascination,
that maybe you can tick three of your own people
to lead up your secret Service detail and not from
the government. That way, there's not that false look at
(33:28):
the government. You've got your own people running the security
around you, and you should have the government running your systems. Yeah,
otherwise they're always they're always going to be pegged as
the ones doing the bad job.
Speaker 1 (33:42):
Yeah, thank you for that tremendous point, Mike, and we
talked about that after Pennsylvania. Wait a second, you're letting
Trump's political opponent determine his level of protection. When when
the political opponent, Biden, knows that Iron is actively trying
to kill Trump, and then Trump ends up with this
(34:03):
really pitiful, really pitiful approach to his protection in Pennsylvania,
you know what could possibly go wrong? Right, and I'm
not saying that Biden wanted Trump killed. I'm not saying
that Biden set it up so Trump would be killed.
But in a nation where where we have to get
(34:25):
along well enough to be a nation, we have to
trust each other well enough to be a nation, allowing
the political opponent to determine how much security the other
political opponent gets his political opponent gets, especially when the
sitting president knows that Iran is trying to assassinate his
(34:45):
political opponent, and then you end up in a situation
where every honest person agrees the level of protection was foreseeably,
foreseeably pitiful and inadequate. We just can't have that as
a nation. That's got to be a different system. So
who do you blame for this? How do we stop it?
You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.