Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
You know, it really does not get any better than this.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
I mean, let's just I know your life's busy, My
life's busy, everybody's life's busy. But let's just take a
pause here at five oh six on this gorgeous Friday afternoon.
And yeah, we need the rain, right, it's going to
be a little rainy.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
And cool this weekend.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
But let's just step back, guys on the road, But
just think about the moment we're living in and how
does it politically, How does it get any better than this?
Because think about what's happening. Think about what's happening right now.
If I'm right, and I've been right on an awful
lot during this cycle, if I'm right, and as predicted,
it's all falling apart for Kamala Harris right now, it's
(00:54):
all falling apart for the left. And despite all of
their dishonesty, all of their viciousness, all of their awfulness,
all of their inhumanity, you know, willingness to do anything
under the sun.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
To win and keep power. It's all falling apart.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
And of course I had been predicting for a year
and a half it all fell apart earlier. And they
just they just overturned democracy. They overturned the vote of
the people. In a background deal in the middle of
the night, they deposed the democratically elected Democrat nominee and
they you know, he forced Haras on them, and they
were stuck with her. But hey, they were willing to
(01:35):
do that, but they had time to do that. There's
no time to replace her. And as you look at
the polling and you look at all sorts of other
hard data indicators, harder data than polling, you can see
that it's it's all apparently starting to fall.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
Apart for them.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
So then what happens next and what I predicted Ryan
this very place is very time yesterday confirmed today because
with the wonderful Heidi ganal I said right here on air, Okay,
I've had the next political epiphany.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
The time has come.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
This is the time that they either run Joe Biden
out of the presidency in a last ditch effort to
revive Harris's campaign, they make her president, or they decide
they're better off with her.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
Losing, because hey, if she wins, she's.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
Going to get them wiped out in twenty six and
twenty eight.
Speaker 2 (02:25):
So this is the moment. And then what do we
see this morning?
Speaker 1 (02:28):
You see something we've never seen in America before. We
see a cabinet meeting happening for the first time in
so many moons you can't even count them. And who's
at the head of the table Joe Biden. Now, Joe
Biden is there, at least in some form he's there.
But Joe Biden at the head of the table. And
what do you think that messages? That confirms in my mind,
(02:53):
that confirms that what I said is true. And they're
trying to run him out of the presidency. And Joe
Biden was making a very public statement over my dead body,
are you running him out of the presidency?
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Running us out of the presidency? You're gonna love this reference,
I know you always do.
Speaker 3 (03:09):
Even Edith Wilson only did this behind closed doors and
prevented people from seeing Woodrow Wilson after his stroke. Here's
doctor Jill in full view double barrel middle finger to
anybody trying to kick Joe out. You're right, Dan, that
was the strongest visual symbolism that could possibly be put
on display by her. And real quick on polling, this
(03:31):
one really caught my eye because you're talking about trends, Dan,
there's some that look like they're favoring Kamala.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
I'm not buying it.
Speaker 3 (03:37):
Here's one more reason why University of Mary Washington poll Virginia.
Speaker 4 (03:41):
No.
Speaker 3 (03:41):
Yeah, several series of polls now we've seen Virginia is
in play Harris plus one forty seven, forty six. And
to bolster this poll, Tim Kaine, a senator, he's outpacing
her against his Republican opponent in the Senate race by
six forty nine forty three.
Speaker 1 (03:58):
Yeah, which had some credibility. No, listen, I doubt anybody
other than you had ever heard of University of Mary
Washington before this poll.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
But the point is we have this.
Speaker 1 (04:10):
Very valuable comparison right from twenty to today. I still
don't know what the University of Mary Washington is or
where it is, but here's the comparison that matters whether
they poll well or they pull poorly. In September of
twenty twenty, they had Biden up seventeen. At the same
(04:30):
time September of twenty twenty four, they have Harris up one. Now,
the point is this matches a trend we see across
the polling. So if you look at polling averages right now,
take Real Clear Politics or anybody else, and whether they
have Trump up a little bit or Trump down a
little bit, what you see is the comparison with twenty.
(04:51):
The comparison with twenty, they had Trump down much more
everywhere they have them down, and they have them up
less everywhere they him up if they had him up anywhere.
So the point is when you compare twenty to today,
and you can go back to sixteen, in the same trend,
though not as dramatic, is always present, Trump outperforms his polls.
(05:13):
And here there's even more reason to believe that Trump
is going to outperform his and Harris is going to
underperform hers. So that's why I say we are at
that moment. The smart people on the left have all
these terrible ideologies and plans, but these smart political operators,
they know this thing's getting away from he in a hurry,
and they can't replace her in the dead of Night
(05:33):
the way they did Biden.
Speaker 2 (05:34):
And the last two cycles.
Speaker 3 (05:35):
Dan Donald Trump had extraordinarily strong octobers. That includes his
win over Hillary Clinton. He had a magnificent October and
in twenty twenty. Rather it was different because he had
COVID and all the different rules that were in place,
they were not set up for him to succeed. He
still did better both in October and overall the polls
than he was throughout the entire election cycle.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
Against Joe Biden. So if you just use those two
as a measure.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
The only part I wanted to make about your Harry
Entons sound from earlier. There's one more clip there. I
don't know if you want to get to it. They
were talking about twenty twenty two. But there's an extenuating circumstance.
You and I both know about twenty twenty two and
why the Dems outperform their polls.
Speaker 5 (06:15):
Yes, yes, there are big elections since twenty twenty that
involved twenty twenty two midterms. What if it was off then,
now compare it to the pulling offage of twenty twenty two.
Speaker 6 (06:27):
Look, I think a lot of people are focusing on
on the twenty twenty polling Aaron believing, Oh, the polls
always underestimate Republicans. Not always, because look at what happens
if the polls were off like they were in twenty
twenty two, Well, Kamala Harris goes from losing that election
to winning it with three hundred and nineteen electoral votes.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Why because the.
Speaker 6 (06:44):
Polls underestimated Democrats in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 2 (06:47):
So Kamala Harris.
Speaker 6 (06:48):
Gets back all of these great Lake battleground states, but
she adds to a column North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada.
The bottom line is this race is way too close
to call, and the past election, Oh, it's way too
close to call because Paul's are a tool.
Speaker 2 (07:02):
They are not. No stra Damis.
Speaker 5 (07:05):
It is interesting to look at it in this way though,
just reminding us all in summary, just stand by to
stand by.
Speaker 2 (07:12):
Stand by, stand by. Voters make the difference, not the pulse.
Who who wasn't on the ballot in twenty twenty two?
Point one? Yeah, point two, Dan, what happened in twenty
twenty two? You're gonna tell me.
Speaker 3 (07:25):
Roe versus Wade was overturned and there was a backlash
from Democratic voters that wanted to show up, and they did,
and I think that muted a lot of the races
that prompted. As you might recall, too, Dan down Donald
Trump to criticize pro life voters by saying, you're pushing
this issue too hard.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
It's turning off a lot of people in the middle.
Speaker 3 (07:45):
And that's how he explained why Republicans underperformed in those midterms.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
And what was so significant to me was that even
after Roe was overturned, which needed to happen, and thank
god it happened, but.
Speaker 2 (07:58):
You knew there'd be a backlash in some form, Well.
Speaker 1 (08:00):
You know, yes, But keep in mind that even weeks,
just weeks, right after Roe was overturned, the GOP won
the House.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
They took back the House, right, And.
Speaker 1 (08:11):
You had camp in Georgia, you know, favors a six
week heartbeat bill win in a tough swing state by
six points.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
That's also correct. And you had.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
Abbott win big in Texas. You had DeSantis win big
in Florida, in Towasa Olisle.
Speaker 7 (08:25):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:26):
Yeah. So to me, my brother, I think the big
difference is Trump. Listen it.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Trump just has a unique appeal, a unique ability to
turn out voters, including voters who don't normally vote for
a Republican. And that's why what have I been saying.
I think you have two it's sixteen all over again.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
That's the one that it most resembles.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
I think all these trends, Dan, and you covered it
as well as I did back then eight years ago.
This mirrors and reflects so much closer to what we
saw in twenty sixteen than all the extenuating circumstances that
were present in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
And I think even more favorable to Trump and sixteen.
But your point about how he's been a very good closer, correct, Yeah,
I mean, look how strong he closed in sixteen after
what many thought, you know, with the excess Hollywood tapes
just head ended the campaign. He closed very strong in
twenty after that disastrous first debate when I think he
had COVID, closed very strong. But this brings us back
(09:21):
to where we started the show, right, and what I've
been saying for a very very long time, predating the
predicted demise of Biden as the nominee. It's all about Trump.
This is Trump's to lose. It's all about Trump. If
Trump does Trump well, if Trump closes well, the race
(09:41):
is his and it's probably not even going to be close.
Could it still be lost? Yeah, Harris cannot win the race,
but Trump could lose it. But fortunately his tendency has
been to close.
Speaker 2 (09:53):
Well.
Speaker 1 (09:54):
If he closes, well, now, good chance it's not even close.
Eight five five for zero five eight two five the
number when we come back. Should Mayor Kaufman appear with
Donald Trump? He made some comments suggesting he may not
if the mayor comes to Aurora as promised. And we'll
get to our infuego text here on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 8 (10:15):
And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
I give you five of my hard earned dollars. Sure,
who would have bet on he will or won't come?
Which way would you bet? It's an absolute push at
this point. I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 9 (10:26):
I mean, to paraphrase Donald Trump in the Reason debate,
I think he has the concepts of a plan of
coming here, but that is very different than an actual
plan to come to Aurora, and there would be clear
logistical challenges about him doing this. This is a man
who thrives off of big rallies, not small listening sessions.
So where precisely in Aurora would he hold there's.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
No logistical problem with coming to Aurora, Colorado. Do you
think you will should come? Should Mayor Kaufman appear with
the President publicly? If he comes? I think that's a
no brainer.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
He should.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
We try to get the mayor on this afternoon Une
and have not been able to accomplish that, but he's
been great about coming on the show, and I'm sure
we'll connect with him shortly eight five to five for
zero five eight two five five, the number takes d
A N five seven seven three nine. Talking about so
much and so many good things, there's so many reasons
to be optimistic right now.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
And think about the magnitude of the.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
Accomplishment if Trump, as I fully expect at this point,
wins a second term, and think about how much damage
it does to the left and what a coalition shift
there will be going forward if Trump accomplishes this, as
I believe he is on the verge of doing. Got
a Texter here says Trump shouldn't go to it or
(11:45):
I'll tackle that in a second.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
I want to go down to.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Beautiful Peblo, Colorado, where we're privileged to be carried on
the great k CSJ. Patrick here on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Welcome.
Speaker 4 (11:55):
Hello Dan oh Man. First of all, that Paco Raban
statement really made me got.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
Me going, man, have have you ever worned Paco Rabon?
Speaker 4 (12:06):
You know what? I have a suit by Paco Rabon?
No suit, Yes, I do.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
Is it green?
Speaker 4 (12:13):
It's it's an old you know, it's it's during the time.
It was the thing.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
Man, it was really cool. You know they made suits.
Did the suit smell like Paco Rabon?
Speaker 6 (12:25):
Uh?
Speaker 4 (12:26):
Well, if once I wore the Paco Rabon and the suit, yeah,
it's oh yeah.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
That would do it. Yeah, you probably still smell.
Speaker 4 (12:34):
And I've got an idea for a Trump political ad,
and that is uh, you know, they've got plenty of
footage of Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, Biden. Uh. You know,
it goes down the list, Uh Cheney, WHOOPI Goldberg, all
these people. They need to put a deal together with
all them saying all this stuff about Trump and this
(12:56):
and the Supreme Court and all this other stuff, and
then show that bullet hitting him in the ear, and
then at the end just say threat to democracy with
a big question.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
Mark Patrick, I love the concept, and I've got the
concept of a plan here, and the plan would be
the threat to democracy ad built around deposing the democratically
elected nominee Joe Biden and installing Kamala Harris. I still
think that's a very valuable point to be made. That
(13:28):
wait a second, they say that the Party of Democracy.
She isn't even a real nominee. She didn't get a
single vote. She's the product of a backroom deal. Patrick
appreciate the call as always. Patrick the author of Defund
the Police, which was absolutely one of the more brilliant
creations in a long long time. But speaking of new
Trump ads, before I get back to that, texture says
(13:51):
Trump should not come to Aurora. Here is one of
the very best Trump ads. Now, as you listen to
this picture of the visuals which include you may have
seen these pictures over time of Kamala Harris with in
the White House with lots of different men pretending to
be women, pictures which to many Americans I think are
(14:11):
very jarring.
Speaker 2 (14:13):
But listen to the ad.
Speaker 10 (14:14):
Kamala supports taxpayer funded sex changes for prisoners, surgery for prisoners.
Speaker 6 (14:20):
For prisoners, Every transgender inmate in the prison system would
have access.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
It's hard to believe, but it's true. Even the liberal
media was shocked.
Speaker 10 (14:31):
Kamala supports taxpayer funded sex changes for prisoners and illegal aliens.
Speaker 2 (14:36):
Every transgender inmate would have access. Kamalas for they them,
President Trump is for you. I'm Donal Jenie Trump, and
I improve this message. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
I think this ad is going to be tremendously impactful
for this reason. Sometimes, as you know that, there are
certain things a person says or does that cut through
the noise and tell you everything you need to know
about that person. In this examples, as a candidate, as
a potential president, taxpayer funded sex change operations for prisoners,
(15:11):
that tells you everything you need to know about how
radical she is. So I think that cuts through the
noise and that connected with the visuals. And again, this
is a nation, and I know I have some textures
who disagree, but this is a nation in my opinion
of people who there's no animosity toward gays, there's no
animosity toward trans people. There are enormous policy differences as to,
(15:35):
you know, how they should be addressed in public policy,
but there's not this this pervasive personal animosity at all.
But at the same time, there are there are tremendous
concerns on a policy level. So when Kamala Harris, you know,
features herself at the White House, in the White House,
you know, with men pretending to be women in very
(15:57):
jarring imagery, I think that cuts through the clutter, and
that reaches a lot of people who normally don't vote
for Republicans eight five five for zero five eight two
five five. And it also gets into the I think
very very important to lots of moms and dads out
there who don't vote Republican often issue of boys and
(16:17):
men in girls' bathrooms and girls showers and girls' sports.
You know, people love their children more than they love
their political party. And you know we were created this way, right.
Dads are protective, moms are uber protective. And how many
sane people want to pardon the expression somebody, how many
see people want somebody with a penis in their in
(16:39):
their girls' bathroom or shower, or playing sports against their girl. Yeah,
that transcends party lines in a way nobody will ever
admit to pollsters, and I don't think pollsters poll on
this directly very often, but a way that may cause
somebody to maybe skip that presidential race when they turn
out to vote on everything else, or maybe not vote
at all, or even go all the way to voting
(17:01):
Republican eight.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
Five zero five two five five the number.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
Let's get to that texture who has so intrigued me
and says that, Dan, I don't think Trump should go
to Aurora. He can say the Secret Service thought it
would be too dangerous and bow out. Why because you
and I know they'll have it cleaned up and it
will become another quote Cat and Dog song. Do we
have that song Handy Ryan, the latest version which which
is kind of sweeping the country and I think is amazing.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
I have one that I really like. I want me
to play it coming back. Oh yeah, is this one
we haven't heard before? You may not have heard it,
but it's yeah. You hear everything. Listen.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
I respectfully disagree with this text. I think Trump one
hundred percent should go to Aurora, Colorado. That the mayor
said it on the show. He was sitting in the studio.
This did happen. You had apartment complexes taken over by
Venezuelan gangs. That video we've seen is true. What's depicted
on the video is true.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
And this is a.
Speaker 1 (17:57):
Glaring example of what happens when Kamala Harris opens up
the border along with plenty of good people, but we
need control border anyway, whether people are good or bad.
We can only take the number of people the country
can handle. But along with plenty of good people, come
way way, way too many. One would be too many,
but way more than one. Super dangerous murders, rapist, et cetera.
(18:20):
And the reality of that is something the American people
need to see.
Speaker 8 (18:28):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (18:31):
They're eating the dogs, They're eating the cats.
Speaker 2 (18:37):
They're eating the pets of the people that live there.
They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, and I
wish I was gonna beature. They're eating the pets of
the people that people love spring.
Speaker 5 (18:56):
My cats.
Speaker 2 (18:58):
Well, would you do eat something else?
Speaker 10 (19:04):
People love Springfield?
Speaker 2 (19:05):
Please don't eat my dog. Here's a cattle lock of
other things to eat.
Speaker 3 (19:13):
They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, and they're
eating the pets of the people that live.
Speaker 2 (19:23):
They're eating Time to go to the islands? My friend,
did you play that song there? Oh, it's hard to
get that song out of your mind. How would eat
you feel about that?
Speaker 4 (19:31):
When?
Speaker 2 (19:33):
Oh, she loves dogs and cats and not eating them. Well,
loves them as pets, but yeah, as most people right right,
exactly exactly. The only place in Colorado I know they
eat dogs, lots of dogs anyway, would be Coarsefield.
Speaker 3 (19:48):
You snuck that into them with mustards this week with mustard. Yes,
I think you threw some listeners off with that one.
Oh you think so a little bit, and you salvashed it.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
I've heard no reports in Colorado. You let them off
the ho jd.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Van says that he's had constituents tell him about pet
eating in Springfield, Ohio, and then we played some sound
of people addressing it in a city council made. But personally,
I have never been to Springfield, so I cannot cannot
provide eyewitness testimony.
Speaker 3 (20:18):
It's so bizarre, Dan, that this is where this would
be happening. Springfield's about halfway between Dayton and Columbus. It's
like right in the middle, kind of rural, nondescript, down
in middle of nowhere, and here it is the center
of the universe when it comes to this.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Yeah, it's just how life works and is what we promised.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
Right.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
We go back to July first, by the way, January
first of this year, Ryan does a tremendous show in
the Denver market. Before this show airs, Ryan on six
point thirty Kitchen w in Denver. But we've been talking
about how this was going to be the wildest political
year of our lifetime, true right in every way. But
these last days, what are we down to? Forty six?
(20:56):
Now it's going to be even more insane. I mean,
how does it get more insane than the cabal in
the dark of night overturning democracy and stripping the democratically
elected nominee of that role and installing Kamala Harrison.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
You know what can top or bottom that?
Speaker 1 (21:14):
Well, We're about to find out, because it's pretty darn
clear now. I believe from the trend in the polling
that as predicted, you know, her campaign is running out
of gas and they have no way now to revive
it in any traditional way because Trump brilliantly declined a
third debate, and so now what do they have left?
(21:35):
They've just pulled the ploy and it'll help her of
this politically motivated half point reduction in interest rates after
all these months with no change in interest rates. Wow,
forty seven days before election day? Anybody believes that's a coincidence,
got something to sell you.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
But what do they have left? They always have something
left if they really want her to win.
Speaker 3 (21:57):
Well, they tried this big event in Oakland County, Michigan's
swing state, kind of a swingish county that leans blue.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
It fell flat. It was a disaster. She was an embarrassment.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Oprah Winfrey was wincing at times and trying to help
her at others.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
I don't think that moves the needle at all. Fall
to look at.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
Oprah's face, Yeah, at different times in that whatever you
want to call You can't call it an interview, that spongebath.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
But as big as that was, Dan, it doesn't help her.
So what else is there out there that's help? That's
the point. They really really needed that second debate. But
obviously we and others have been talking for a while about, Okay,
do that does the same cabal that strip Joe Biden
of the nomination now strip them of.
Speaker 2 (22:38):
The presidency and do they install her?
Speaker 1 (22:41):
Hoping that revives her campaign down the stretch because the
way things are trending now and I've as I've said
all along, you're never going to see that straight line
drop down. That's not how things work in life. But
you look at the trend line, it's down. And with
this many days to go before election day, and I
know early voting starts, but not every everybody votes on
the first day of early voting, it could get so
(23:03):
ugly for them by election day as the truth about
Kamala Harris gets exposed to more and more people that
then they're back in the same boat they were with Biden,
where they're not only going to lose the presidency, but
they're going to lose you know, congressional races and Senate
races they'd otherwise win. So do they pull this move
and strip Biden to the presidency or do they just decide, Hey,
(23:27):
at this point, at this point, we're better off with
her losing because she'd be such a disaster. We'd get
crushed in twenty six mid terms, We'd getrushed crushed in
twenty eight. The brand of the party would go right
down the tubes because she will be that bad. So
they're going to make that choice. But the fact Joe
Biden shows up today at the head of the table
(23:47):
in the first cabinet meeting forever, I think proves to
us that they have already made a move on Biden
to depose them, and Joe Biden's going public to say,
over my dead Biden body.
Speaker 3 (23:58):
I still think there are a lot and a lot
of cynical pragmatists who off the record would say it
won't be that bad if Donald Trump wins these next
two years.
Speaker 2 (24:08):
We can reload and regroup.
Speaker 3 (24:10):
We'll go for the mid terms in twenty twenty six,
win back the House and Senate, and just strategically thinking
about it, Dan, you've outlined this very well. You get
Gavin Knwsom, Gretchen Whitmer, all these other I you know,
they think high talent Dems. In a primary, you get
a best candidate of your choice. In twenty twenty eight,
the Republican has got to come up with a new candidate,
maybe Rond De Santis, maybe somebody else. They've got to
(24:32):
like those chances a heck of a lot more than
four years of a disastrous Kamala Harris presidency, which it
would be, and she'd have to be allowed to run
for reelection at that point unless they depose her, and
then at that point the Democratic Party would be so
unpopular they're gonna get absolutely annihilated in twenty.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
Yeah, right, exactly what I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (24:50):
I mean, And I think you know, you got a
lot of smart people on the left who have diabolical
plans for this country and horrible ideologies, but they're smart
political operators, and clearly, Ryan, this is not rocket science.
Speaker 2 (25:03):
It's clear as day that is.
Speaker 1 (25:06):
I think they've calculated if President Trump wins, and I
think we desperately need President Trump to win this race
for the safety of this country, for first starters, we
need him to win. But if their calculation is purely political, yeah,
they're thinking they're better off with Trump winning and they
can keep their factions united around hating Trump and roll
(25:28):
through the midterms and then find their best candidates for
twenty eight.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
I think you got a lot of political operators on
the left thinking that at the same time, the country
needs Trump to win right now, no matter what the
political fallout, the country needs Trump to win.
Speaker 2 (25:45):
So it's going to be amazing to watch.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
Now, let me ask you this, what what do you
think are the telltale signs if the decision of the
left now is to back off the effort to strip
Biden of the presidency, If Joe Biden's just not going
to go peacefully into that good night. If it's going
to get too messy, what are going to be the
telltale signs that they've given up on that? And they've
(26:08):
just given up on her campaign.
Speaker 3 (26:10):
Because they're using her just as a driving wedge to
maybe raise money.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
They've gotten a lot of that.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
They've they've won back that kind of support that they
didn't have with Joe Biden. No win in the sales,
they've got that, Dan, I believe the Democratic strategy right
now is to focus on the House. Focus on all
these house races throughout the United Bates. I mean, they're
leading a lot of Senate races, but no, they're gonna lose.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
Get close.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Yeah, they're gonna lose the Senate. They're going to lose
West Virginia. That time Montana's done, that's fifty one, it's over.
They've got to win the House. Gives them power of
the purse, give them the ability to impeach, impeach Donald Trump,
even if he's not convicted in the Senate. They can
raise all kinds of hell for him. I think that's
the Democrats only smart move at this point is to
focus on the House races.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
Yeah, and what do you think it will look like
if if they make they the Cabal make that decision.
It's not like they're just going to unplug her campaign.
And she's got enough money right now to run three
more presidential campaigns, So what would that end up looking like.
That's that's interesting to think about. But again, I think
we got the proof today of what I predicted yesterday.
(27:13):
Right Clearly, either the Cabal has made the move to
strip Biden of the presidency or Joe Biden thinks it's
about to happen, because she shows up today at the
head of the table in a cabinet meeting, which, by
the way, we haven't had one since Ryan was what four,
it's been a while, Yeah, it's been a while. Eight
five five for zero five eight two five five the
(27:34):
number when we come back. The latest on Operation grim
Beeper and one of the most stunning self defense military
operations in world history. And obviously we're entering into a
very serious phase there. And want to give you some
poll results because if you're like me, and you're like
Ryan and you want to see Trump win, they will
(27:55):
put a big old smile on your face.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 8 (28:00):
And now back to the Dankamplass Show podcast.
Speaker 5 (28:03):
Now in the realm of playing the hypothetical, yes, so
let's do that.
Speaker 2 (28:08):
Yes, I love those.
Speaker 5 (28:09):
Comparing How if the polling is off, If the polling
is off like it was in twenty twenty, what would
that do to the electoral map?
Speaker 6 (28:17):
So look at Donald Trump's electoral vote total right now.
If the polls are exactly right, two hundred and sixty two.
But let's say the polls are off like they were
back in twenty twenty, Look where he goes. He goes
to three hundred and twelve. Why is that because the
polls underestimated Donald Trump in twenty twenty. So the bottom
line is, instead of losing those great lake battleground states,
(28:38):
he wins all of them. He obviously holds on to
North Carolina, Georgia, and Arizona, and he gains Nevada. So
if the polls are as good as they were in
twenty twenty, despite the fact that at this particular hour,
Donald Trump trails in Upstates to give Kamala Harris the victory,
the polls are off like they were in twenty twenty,
donald Trump would.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
Actually win the election.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
Yeah, And the polls if far more likely the polls
are not only off the way they were in twenty twenty,
they're even more off, and even more off in the
democrats favor for all the obvious reasons that we've broken
down before. So and keep in mind the first part
of that, and this is on CNN with Harryton, that
even if the current polls are accurate, you know, Trump's
(29:19):
just losing by a few Electoral College votes. So so
many reasons to believe at this point, including with many
weeks to go before election day and even a few
weeks to go before most of the early voting starts,
there's still so much more time for people to learn
who Kamala Harris really is.
Speaker 2 (29:39):
And you see this steady trend.
Speaker 1 (29:41):
The more they learn about her, the more in the
swing states people are saying, sorry, that's that's crazy, We're
not going there. Eight five five for zero five eight
two five five The number.
Speaker 3 (29:50):
Quick question, den Yes, who do you think does worse
with men? Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris?
Speaker 2 (29:58):
And why? What a great question.
Speaker 1 (30:02):
I think they're both going to do very poorly. I
think Kamala Harris is going to do worse with men.
I agree she's going to do worse with black men. Yep,
she's going to do worse with Latino men. And it
boils down to weakness. It boils down to strength versus weakness. Yeah,
because with Hillary Clinton, listen, she would have been beyond awful, right.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
But she's a strong person and smart and smart.
Speaker 1 (30:26):
And when it comes and listen, I'm not going to
call and I never have called Kamala Harris dumb, et cetera.
I think Kamala Harris she just she doesn't think well
enough to be president in the United States. She doesn't
have those basic skills. But with Hillary Clinton, very smart
and strong, and when it comes to this nation's enemies,
(30:48):
and there are many, with Hillary Clinton, they'd have to
think twice. With Kamala Harris, they're just going to feast,
They're going to salivate. Her weakness is going to invite,
is going to to, as Mike Pence says, arouse evil
and we're going to see evil on the march across
the globe as we saw under Biden, but even worse.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
So yeah, I think that.
Speaker 1 (31:10):
She loses men. She loses men even worse than Hillary did.
Eight five five for zero five eight two five five
the number want to get to some more of these
texts today. Also wanted to get to this song. This song,
it's kind of sweeping the country. Do you know this,
John con Guy, I'm about to play it.
Speaker 3 (31:27):
It's a song about Trump, not extremely well, but the
song is very good.
Speaker 1 (31:31):
Yeah, and if the visuals obviously are a big part
of it, and you can just google that up.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
J O. N. Kahn is the artist.
Speaker 7 (32:00):
Smiling through the taste flooding mound.
Speaker 2 (32:04):
Now we're freaking Trump as I got brosed and broken bondes.
Speaker 5 (32:13):
They don't know why.
Speaker 7 (32:15):
In this ring alone, I'm fier. Don't one can say it.
I'm a rod and hider. I was owned a big
til dier.
Speaker 4 (32:33):
I'm making right and you.
Speaker 7 (32:34):
Don't throw our towel just yeah, don't catch him that
last time? How you are the wind time?
Speaker 2 (32:45):
I'm a fighter. I get back up. That's what I feel.
Speaker 7 (32:58):
I can solder all this bar like your shot. That
all he got far to bet?
Speaker 1 (33:34):
Yeah, and that ties into what we were just saying
that there are certain things that reasonable people don't disagree about.
Trump's brand is strength. He has earned that. He has
proven it. He proved it in office, He's proven it
out of office.
Speaker 2 (33:48):
With with all of this.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
You know lawfair, He's faced, he proved it after he
was shot in the head. He's a fighter, he is strong.
He's the epitome of whether you like other stuff or not.
Nobody can disagree with that. Harris the epitome of weakness.
And so in the end, I think that distinction alone,
that brings us back to the core point Ryan, which
(34:12):
I've been saying for a long time. It's Trump's race
to lose. Harris cannot win this race. Trump could lose it.
Harris cannot win it. So if Donald Trump conducts himself
well over the rest of the campaign, it's not even
going to be close.
Speaker 2 (34:27):
And does so.
Speaker 1 (34:28):
Wow, and the show the way I started it, What
an amazing time to be alive.
Speaker 2 (34:33):
It doesn't get any better than this.
Speaker 1 (34:35):
The stakes are as high as they can get, it's
as interesting as it can be, and the good guys
and gals are winning.
Speaker 2 (34:42):
Just need to finish strong.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
Ryan one of those good guys, Kelly, one of those
good gals. Thank you, Ryan for the great job. Kelly,
You're the best. Hope you feel better this weekend. Enjoy
the weekend, please and join us Monday on the Dankpla
show