October 15, 2024 • 35 mins
Dan Kaplis talks about how Kamala Harris will perform on Brett Baier's show tomorrow as the Democrats scramble to find an answer for Donald Trump with 21 days left until the election. Dan then talks with callers about the most pressing Colorado ballot initiatives.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. A lot to
do today nationally and locally. But come on, hey, we're
in the shadow of now. You can reach out, you
(00:20):
can touch it. This election with out question. You know,
we'll end up, you know, setting a path for America
probably for decades to come, because it will be stuff
that happens in the next four years depending on who
wins that that simply cannot be easily unwound. And so yeah,
plenty to talk about as we add into that. The
(00:41):
good news is that so much of the data points
to a Trump victory, with plenty of suggestions that it
might be a pull away type of victory that might
pick up some extra GOP Senate seats and House seats,
but certainly not a done deal at this point. One
thing I want to get your take on is, Okay,
so they obviously have been blasted out of the bunker, right,
(01:03):
and so Biden was able to get away with being
in the basement. You know, all the way through the campaign,
Harris wasn't able to pull that off. And we all
know the reasons why we've talked about it a bunch.
So they know now that she's losing. They know now
on the current trajectory, she's going to lose, which is
the only way they're taking this risk of putting her
(01:24):
up there. But now that you're starting to see a
bunch of her, you know, what do you think the
net's going to be on that? Do you think it's
going to help or hurt her? And I know it
may sound like a silly question, right because my guess
is you see her accurately as I do, and most
of the folks on this show or who call the
show or text the show, whatever, do and can see that,
(01:47):
you know, red Jersey, blue Jersey aside, she just obviously
is one of the least qualified people that we've ever
seen be a major party nominee for president, and more importantly,
just wholly unqualified to do the job. And you know,
I think that's more than obvious. But if you try
to put your shoeself in the shoes of the more
(02:08):
typical American voter, you know who's a smart person.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
They're a busy person.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
They just don't they're not interested in politics the way
people who listen to a show like this are, et cetera.
And all they know now is that, Okay, she's out
there a lot more now. Does she gain just by
being out there a lot more now? Because obviously you
can't elect somebody president who's afraid to go do an interview,
et cetera. So no matter how bad those interviews are,
(02:34):
is it actually a net gain for her?
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Would love your take on that.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
Eight five five for zero five eight two five five
the number text d an five seven seven three nine,
As always, will go deep into the polling, though, you know,
at this point in a campaign it gets it gets
a little bit weird because you get all these polls
generated by left leaning or right leaning entities that are
(02:58):
meant to influence behavior rather than to measure it, and
it's hard to separate out the effect of those from
the very few legitimate polls. So pulling over the next
few weeks is going to be I think a little
more dicey, and it's going to be magnified by the
exploding head effect and what we've been talking about and
(03:20):
seeing and predicting for a long time that as it
gets closer and closer and more and more clear that hey,
there is a real chance Trump will win, and you
know my view, I think it's likely he'll win. You know,
at that point, you're going to see the left doing
wilder and crazier things. In fact, they're going to start
the show today with one of those. And also because
it may be on your radar, because the left is
(03:41):
trying to generate a lot of headlines with this because
they are so desperate, right they can't win on the issues,
and their normal tactics aren't working, so they're claiming that
President Trump. They're claiming President Trump had some kind of
major disqualifying medical event last night during a rally, actually
(04:02):
a town hall in Pennsylvania, when the truth is nothing
of the sort occurred. But the fact that they're trying
to go there is just well, it's so much fun
and it's so encouraging because it shows how.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
Desperate they are.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
But I do want to start with that because it
does need to be clarified. And the beautiful thing here
is that even ABC News stepped down on behalf of
Trump and said, no, this is absolute nonsense. So let's
pick up the CNN reporting on this where they're talking
about and this is after Kamala Harris herself, in one
(04:39):
of her own tweets, triggered all of this by tweeting
out about Trump and showing a really misleading snippet of
video from the Pennsylvania town hall, tweeted.
Speaker 2 (04:50):
Out are you okay? Question mark?
Speaker 1 (04:53):
And it was again, it was just so profoundly dishonest
the way, first of all, the way the video was edited,
but then secondly the fact that the simple truth, which
cannot be denied or contradicted by anybody is there was
no hint of a medical issue for Trump.
Speaker 2 (05:09):
He was in fact pausing the.
Speaker 1 (05:11):
Q and A and terminating early the town hall because
of two people in the crowd who had medical events.
And instead Trump just had music played and he was
up there kind of doing a DJ thing. So here's
David Shehallion on CN it what we saw there.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
Because there are a lot of ways to look at it,
and it really depends on who you ask. Let's just
start with team Trump. You know, they argue, well, he
can have fun, well there is joy there, and then
team Harris, he's completely lost it. And I'll get to
the second part in a minute. But you know, he
(05:48):
was supposed to be taking questions. He then went off
into whatever that.
Speaker 4 (05:53):
Was after there were a couple of medical incidents in
the crowd in the very hub environment. And yeah, people
think it exactly, And so he sort of pivoted the event.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
Yeah, pivoted the event. Right, This was no medical issue for.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
Him, obviously, Let's be clear, that's not normal behavior for
a candidate, right, Like, we've not seen that, and I
think you can find people that have covered Donald Trump,
like have gone to more than one hundred Donald Trump.
They've never seen that. So we should just separate that
out that you know, here we are three weeks out
from an election and he's doing something that he's never
done before.
Speaker 1 (06:28):
And that's a second think about how desperate they are.
First of all, with Trump. That's how he became president.
That's the reason that we even know him. He doesn't
do things the normal way, and that's worked out very
well for the country for the most part and his presidency.
So now they're so desperate to try to do something
(06:48):
to blunt his momentum that they know they can't just
come out and say, oh, yeah, that was a medical event.
It'siter because they know that's a lie, but they have
to try to give that implication. And their basis is
that we haven't seen him do that before. We haven't
seen him stand on stage and just play music forft
an hour. Yeah, because he hasn't had two people in
his crowd keel over before. And by the way, and
you'll hear it in the ABC explanation that follows here,
(07:13):
he had done Q and A for for a good
long time, you know, before two people in the crowd
had those issues. Now here's ABC and credit ABC, which
has been an extension of the Harris campaign often i e.
The so called debate in a very dishonest way. But
ABC at least getting this one right.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
But then, thirty minutes in, two attendees suffered medical emergencies.
Speaker 6 (07:37):
A doctor plus doctor.
Speaker 2 (07:40):
The incidents shifted the mood, prompting Trump to.
Speaker 5 (07:42):
Cut the question short and instead play some of his
favorite music.
Speaker 7 (07:47):
How about this, We will play YMCA and you'll go home.
Speaker 5 (07:54):
Trump kept DJing, and most of his supporters stayed for
another thirty minutes. Of his players, well, in certain quarters
of social media, people had a field day with that.
And I guess on the screens.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
It might have looked quite.
Speaker 8 (08:09):
Strange inside that hall. However, people were having a good time.
Speaker 2 (08:12):
What can I tell you? It did not seem out
of the order. It seemed almost intimate. And at the end.
Speaker 5 (08:18):
Trump did something he very rarely does. He came down
off the stage and mingled with his supporters. He was
signing autographs and shaking.
Speaker 2 (08:25):
Hands and the light.
Speaker 1 (08:27):
You always love it when your opponent gets desperate, right,
and not only is lying but telling wild, desperate lies
that are easily disproved. Yeah, we have reached that very
fun stage of and you can't even call it a
race at this point. Right, Trump already won the race
against Biden, so he's already beat the Democrat nominee. Then
you saw the coup, and now they get a mulligin
(08:50):
and he's in the process of overtaking the Mulligan candidate.
And so now I don't know that you can say
it's head's exploding. Now it's going to be like whole
lefty bottom. He's exploding for the next twenty one days.
So hey, it's going to be one of the best
times in your life. Eight five to five for zero
five eight two five five text DN five seven seven
(09:10):
three nine. You're on the Dan Kapler Show.
Speaker 7 (09:14):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 9 (09:17):
I mean, the top line is the five point advantage
that Kamala Harris had in our last boll is gone.
Speaker 2 (09:22):
What's behind that chef?
Speaker 7 (09:23):
Yeah, exactly, Savan.
Speaker 9 (09:24):
I may just look at them side by side and
you can see it.
Speaker 7 (09:27):
Remember that poll we took a month ago.
Speaker 9 (09:28):
That you see here, it was just after that first
Trump Harris debate. Since then, we've had the VP debate,
There've been some campaign activities, some interviews, some things that
have changed in that time. I think this might be
the biggest for Harris. We just asked the basic image
perception people have, is it positive or negative?
Speaker 2 (09:45):
Of these candidates.
Speaker 9 (09:45):
The Trump number has always been somewhere in this territory.
In fact, this is a little bit high for him,
believe it or not. Forty three percent positive. But look
at Harris forty three positive, forty nine negative. The significance
We polled this a month ago, she was forty eight
per positive and forty five negative.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
He was above water.
Speaker 9 (10:04):
As they say, that's completely reversed. It now looks very
similar to Trump's. That's a pretty big shift when you're
talking about erase this close.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
Yeah, but it's exactly what we've been talking about forever,
right once people got to know or remember the real
Kamala Harris, and how did that happen exactly because of
the stuff you and I aren't seen.
Speaker 2 (10:24):
Now we see someone.
Speaker 1 (10:25):
We're watching, say football or maybe a playoff game Baseball,
playoff game where we get some of those national ads
where they're running these devastating ads on Kamala Harris. But
the swing states are saturated with them, and there's never
been more of this political ammo against a political opponent ever.
And just think of the one ad We've talked a
(10:45):
lot about it on the show, that the one ad
that I think will go down as the most impactful
ad in modern presidential history. You know, the ad where
they've got Harris in her own voice saying that yes,
she wants to use your taxpayer dollars to pay for
sex change operations for prisoners, and then they give an
example of one of those prisoners, and that's just crushing
(11:06):
on multiple levels.
Speaker 2 (11:08):
So yeah, no.
Speaker 1 (11:09):
Wonder her popularity is going down, it's because of the
truth and the truth about her eight five to five
or is there a five A two five five, text
D An five seven, seven through nine. Man, I do
miss being a swing state, right, I mean there was
when you get to see all these ads and all
that stuff. But but yeah, and as we talked about before,
(11:29):
after the debate, what would be there to break her fall?
As the truth about Kamala Harris started to sink in nothing.
That's why Trump again so wise not to agree to
a third debate. Let me get to some text and calls.
We'll start with Jack in Beautiful Cheyenne. You're on the
Dan Kafli show.
Speaker 10 (11:47):
Welcome Jack, Dan, And we're trying to be as quick
as I possibly can. And I know you always cut
me off, so try.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Not to do it this then all right, never mind.
Speaker 10 (11:56):
I am absolutely infensed that that Harris is using somebody
by the name of Charlemagne. And here's here's where I'm
coming from. The name, historically, charle Magne was a Frenchman
who claimed to be emperor the Roman Empire in the
eighth century. And that's that's legitimate, and that's historical, and
that's what the name of Charlemagne is. I talked to Kelly,
(12:19):
who's brilliant, and she told me that Charlemagne is a
New York City tell radio commentator. He's adopted the name
of Charlemagne. If he can't produce a birth certificate that
has his first or last name is Charlemagne, then I'm
going to go ahead and say to what the guy
is doing. He's reaching back into history using the name
that he thinks will give him credibility to go ahead
(12:42):
and advance to the communist program of the Democrats. Now,
don't I don't know what that is. I'm going to
ask you to get to the bottom of it because
you don't adopt. Okay, my name is Jack Chandstein.
Speaker 1 (12:58):
This is talk show host mail practice. I no offense.
It's not personal. I should have cut you off in
the first fifteen seconds. I should have cut you off
at Charlemagne because you have called your smart guy. You've
called this show with some really smart points in the past.
But respectfully, how is this interesting anybody?
Speaker 11 (13:19):
Because it's a fraud.
Speaker 10 (13:21):
Perpetrated by the Democrats on everybody to give credit.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Guys a talk show host, he's not part of the
Harris campaign. He's been ripping the Harris campaign as much
as he's ripped Trump. Yeah, Jack, No, I very much
appreciate the call, and I say that just to be respectful.
Eight five five or zero five eight two five five
the number Jack has often called with great points to
make we all have bad days. Dan Trump stopped for
(13:48):
a medical event in the rees recent Pennsylvania event as well. Yeah,
I got to remember. I mean, this is so interesting.
CNN as is now trying to walk back that story.
Speaker 2 (13:58):
I just saw.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
Headline and c and where they're talking about how Trump
swayed to the music after the event had ended, which
they omitted from their original report. Just trying to carry
water for the Democrats on this. Yeah, listen, The point
is that Trump has such deep support. People get there.
If somebody's near the front of one of their events,
(14:19):
they probably started camping out in July for it, right,
so they get there super early. And then his events
are really really crowded, so you know, they tend to
be warmer, and you know, you get some folks, I'm
guessing these are probably older folks, and yeah, you get
more people killing over at Trump events than other events.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
And can you imagine? Can anybody imagine what would.
Speaker 1 (14:43):
Be happening right now if Trump had just plowed through,
If Trump had just plowed through when he's got people
down in front of him, Oh, heartless drum. Trump doesn't
care about his supporters, et cetera. The guy stops the
event and just starts playing music. The last one I
think in Pennsylvania started praying for the person who went down.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
No, but this is what I mean by you know,
they're desperate, they know they're losing. They're absolutely desperate. Texted Dan,
what would you be saying today if Kamala had stood
swaying on the stage for thirty nine minutes. I have
a feeling you'd have comments. He only took four questions
before listen he had he ended the event because of
medical emergency. And then as ABC described that, we played
(15:28):
the ABC report, you know, out of respect for he
enjoys being with the ABC described it as intimate connection
with the folks who came out to see him. He
stayed with them. He couldn't sit up there talking about
the substance while you had people down, but he stayed
with them. Yes, So again, I wish the Texter would
call because we'd be able to explore deeper. You know
(15:49):
this and imagine, I mean being kind about this. Imagine
if you were on the other side of this right now,
If you haven't agree with me on the stakes in
this election and that it's critical that Trump win and
the left loose for the future of America, Imagine if
we were on the other side of this, and if
(16:11):
we had all these indicators now that Harris was going
to win, Think about how awful that would be.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
Think about the awful.
Speaker 1 (16:19):
Feeling you'd go to sleep with, you'd wake up with
just the sense of dread because of how horrible it
was going to be for the nation.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
Could she still win?
Speaker 1 (16:27):
Sure, come on, you know it's not over till it's over.
But I think Trump would have to actively give it
away for her to win, and I don't see any
sign of that happening. I mean, sixteen and twenty. You know,
he was a very very good closer. And no human's
ever going to be perfect, not out on the campaign, certainly,
no disruptor candidates is going to be perfect. But boy,
(16:47):
Trump overall has been very very good. In fact, Ryan,
I think he just taped today town hall women only
town hall, and I think that's going to be broadcast tomorrow.
By the way, when we come back, i'd love to
get your take on this eight five five four zero
five eight two five five the number you can text
d A N five seven seven three nine. You've got
(17:08):
Kamala Harris tomorrow sitting down with Brett Behar. It's going
to be half an hour and it's going to be
straight to tape, So it's going to be straight through
this half hour, no commercial breaks during the tape, no
breaks during the taping, right, and no commercial breaks when
it's aired. Now, obviously a half hour is not that long.
You would hope that the interview would be longer, but
(17:30):
a half hour is enough to do some follow up because,
as you well know, follow up is everything. The initial
questions meaningless because a candidate can easily.
Speaker 2 (17:38):
Avoid that, but it's all in the follow up.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
And Brett Behar, I think, is going to follow up
very well because you know, for Brett bear Tomorrow it's
his reputation on the line. So yes, he's going to
be very careful to appear very fair to her. But
at the same time, nobody wants to be thought of
as a whimp. Nobody wants to be thought of as
as somebody who is two weak to ask the tough questions.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
So I want to hear from.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
You if you could be Brettbaar tomorrow or give him
a question to pose to errors.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
More importantly, the follow up, what would it be?
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Eight five five four zero five A two five five
text d am five seven seven three nine year on
The Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 7 (18:19):
You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 9 (18:23):
The point of the fact she's the VP in an
unpopular administration. We asked about President Biden's policies, are they
helping or hurting your family? Just a quarter of voters
said they're helping, nearly have said they're hurting.
Speaker 2 (18:35):
And then here's the interesting twist.
Speaker 9 (18:37):
We also asked folks think back to when Donald Trump
was president, did his policies help or hurt your family?
And look at the difference forty four percent helping, thirty
one hurting. Trump's the retrospective, you would say, opinion of
Trump's presidency among voters arguably higher now than when he
was president.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
Yeah, so what do we have And listen, you can
find a poll here there that disagrees with the arc.
But that's the NBC poll, right, And they've got absolutely
every motive to defeat Trump. And I think you know,
all of these major networks, other than Fox have done
a lot to try to accomplish that, and they've got
to acknowledge that she's leaking oil. She's lost five points
(19:19):
in favorability and five points in the polls since she
started doing all of these interviews and obviously these hard hitting,
very true spots running heavily in the swing states and
critically what you just heard, right, because you all know
you know it from yourself. I mean, when you go
in there and vote, I think the vast majority of
people in the end, I mean, they may talk about
(19:40):
and they may talk about, you know, with friends and neighbors,
this and that, the things that make them angry. They
vote on the things that affect them, that affect them.
And when you have people telling these pollsters that, hey,
you know, yeah, bottom line, my life and that's going
to mean the life of their family, which is what
all of us are fiercely devoted to.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Right better under Trump?
Speaker 1 (20:00):
I mean I think what that means is once again
Trump's going to outperform the post because you probably got
people telling these posters, no, I'm voting for Harris, but
some of the same people saying my life was better
under Trump. What do you think is going to win
out in the end. Date five to five or zer
a five A two five five the number. Let's get
to the phone lines. Eerie, Mike kind enough to join
us on the Dan Caplis show.
Speaker 6 (20:19):
How you doing, Eerie fine lyle?
Speaker 2 (20:23):
How are you living the dream? My friend?
Speaker 8 (20:27):
Hey, you asked us a put what question would we
if we were Brett bar Yes, we pose to Kamala Harris.
I would give a lot of money to be able
to pose this question. The question would be, well, would
you be willing to sit side by side in a
televised cognitive test with Donald Trump side my side televised?
(20:49):
That would be the question.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
Oh man, you could retire the national debt with that one.
Just just go pay per view on that. Yeah, thank you, Mike.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
I like that. No, I would pay to watch that.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
But the truth is we have that cognitive exam every
day and in a much more reliable fashion, right because
I I'm privileged to be able to try a lot
of cases and a lot of really serious injury cases,
including serious brain damage cases, and so I'm presenting brain
damage evidence to juries all the time. And when you
(21:20):
get you get this cognitive testing done right, and the
results are usually based on this anonymous this anonymous pool
out there. If you're talking about neuropsych testing, you know
this anonymous pool of folks out there, and then you're
comparing somebody against quote baseline for somebody in their demo
and is I like to tell juris because it's one
(21:40):
thousand percent true. Now, the study you should rely on
is from the University of your eyeballs. It's from the
University of Real Life. And we bring in witnesses who
talk about how the person was before the brain injury
and how they are after the brain injury. That's where
the truth lies, not in some numerical scale, in a
cognitive test. So people get to see every day the
(22:03):
truth the real lifetime cognitive testing of Kamala Harris and
Donald Trump. And that's going to be far more revealing
than anything you could get out of one of these
scientific type cognitive tests. And I think any fair minded
person would have to look at this and say, there's
(22:24):
some well, let's.
Speaker 2 (22:25):
Put it as charitably as possible.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris's intellectual abilities are completely unsuitable for
the presidency. That she lacks the intellectual capabilities necessary to
be precedent in a way that we've never seen before.
And I'd love to hear from you on this, Texters
those who disagree. First, have we ever had a major
(22:50):
party nominee who so clearly lacked that the cognitive capacity
to be president? Doesn't mean they're dumb, doesn't mean they're
this name, that name, But when it comes to the
cognitive skill sets necessary to be president, we're so obviously lacking.
Speaker 10 (23:05):
Now.
Speaker 1 (23:06):
You may have disagreed with candidates fiercely on policy or
morality or this or that, but just plain old cognitive
ability to do the job. I can't think of anybody
in our lifetime who even comes close to the deficit
she brings to the table. Let's go to Paul in
Colorado springs here on the Dan Capitlo Show. It should
be this simple, right, if you cannot do a press conference,
(23:28):
if you don't have the cognitive capacity to do a
press conference, you don't have the cognitive capacity to be president. Paul,
Welcome to the show.
Speaker 6 (23:38):
Hey Dan, I hate switched gears on you, but I
got my ballad in the mail yesterday and I was
spilling it all out and then got to some of
the amendments stuff and I was like, man, this is
kind of odd because it's pretty vague. So I was
wondering if you could, you could walk through the amendments
that are proposed and and what you think about them.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
My friend, thank you for that.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
And you know what I'd like to do, if you
don't mind, is I want to do the same thing.
I want to sit down with them and I want
to go through them all and I want to be
able to offer some fully informed, educated opinions. There's one
amendment that I've been most focused on, and we're going
to have a special guest on at five oh six,
a doctor Christine Wheeler. I've been very focused on seventy nine,
(24:24):
which would enshrine infanticide in Colorado's constitutions. Say you could
a perfectly healthy mom, perfectly healthy baby, the mom's about
to deliver and not just kill the baby, and it
would enshrine it in the constitutions, say Paul from Colorado
Springs has to pay for it and take away parental notifications.
So I've been very focused on that campaign. And I
(24:47):
know we're getting Christy Burton Brown on soon right on
school choice, which is eighty and they're also running a
great ballot measure on support for law enforcement financial support
for law enforcement.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
But can you give me a few.
Speaker 1 (25:00):
Days to just just go through everything and do a
full show on it.
Speaker 8 (25:06):
Yeah, I can do that.
Speaker 6 (25:07):
And yeah, I already voted on the abortion one. I'm
totally anti totally cool life and anti abortion. And I've
already voted on the marijuana one, so anti marijuana, and
and I'm pro school choice. But there's a couple in
there that I'm computing.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
Which ones which ones because that I'll pay special attention.
Speaker 8 (25:28):
The ones that have changing to the election laws.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
Oh yeah, yeah, all the rank choice voting stuff.
Speaker 8 (25:35):
No, no, right, I voted against rank troy voting.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Okay.
Speaker 6 (25:39):
But then there's ones that are like should we change deadlines?
Speaker 2 (25:42):
And okay?
Speaker 11 (25:44):
And I'm like, yeah, yeah, And.
Speaker 6 (25:45):
Then maybe you could help us out with some judges,
because I don't know any of these judges and if
they're good or bad.
Speaker 1 (25:51):
You know, that's a fair question and something I've said
on here before, Paul, so thanks for the chance to
repeat it.
Speaker 2 (25:56):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
You know, my real job is I'm a practicing trial
lawyer and in front of judges here and elsewhere all
the time, and so my role on air for the
almost thirty years I've been on air. Is I will
never say anything on air that I don't believe. But
I will never criticize a judge on air because I'm
a practicing trial lawyer and I've just got to put
(26:17):
my clients first.
Speaker 8 (26:19):
And so I maybe you could bring somebody else on there.
Speaker 1 (26:22):
Yeah, maybe on the Ryan's Show.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
Yeah, but no, it's it's a very fair question, man.
Speaker 6 (26:29):
I just think about these judges and it's like, hey, no,
I'll just give us a rundown on the good ones
versus the bad ones.
Speaker 8 (26:36):
So we know, have put on the judges because I
don't spend.
Speaker 6 (26:38):
My life in court.
Speaker 8 (26:40):
Yeah, and who's the good ones and who's the bad ones?
I don't follow it that close.
Speaker 1 (26:45):
Very fair question. What I'm about to say to you
now is absolutely true. It's not meant to try to
kiss up or anything else. But I was I was
sitting down with a friend because they had the same
question for me, and the friend.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
I think it was you Ryan, wasn't it. Didn't you
show me your yesterday?
Speaker 1 (27:01):
Yeah, And we were just going through Ryan's bellot because
he had the same question. He said, you know, hey,
you know which of these judges should I vote for
or against? And I went through the entire list, and
there were some I didn't know simply because you know,
I'm a trial lawyer. I'm operating at the trial court level.
For appeals, we bring in a pellet specialist on the
rare occasions there are appeals. But I didn't see a
(27:24):
single judge on either the appellate list or the trial
court list who I would have been critical of. Oh,
and I saw a number I think are stars, So
I know that it.
Speaker 2 (27:35):
Kiss up stuff. But I'm just Ryan, and I had
that conversation.
Speaker 7 (27:38):
Yeah, obviously I'm going to turn to you as an
expert on the subject, and I guess compared to me,
And yeah, you definitely recommended a reference to that. You
had strongly positive opinions.
Speaker 1 (27:48):
Of him, Yeah, and no negative opinions about any of them.
So Paul, Yeah, let me dig into all that stuff
and then we'll do a show on it next week.
But but I appreciate you wanting my opinion.
Speaker 6 (28:00):
Well, I listen to you every day, thank you on
the podcast, and I appreciate your opinions. So when you're wrong, well.
Speaker 2 (28:07):
No, you sound like my wife there.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
But I would do this Paul, I would I would
respectfully ask you this on seventy nine. You must know
a ton of pro abortion people, right they call themselves
pro choice. But what I'd say is, if you know,
if you know any pro abortion people, please try to
talk to him about seventy nine because the key to
defeating seventy nine. They need fifty five percent because it's
(28:31):
a constitutional amendment. The key to defeating seventy nine is
getting to pro abortion people who just think this is
way too far to strip away parental notification, to make
taxpayers pay for it, pay for abortion, to allow abortion
onhealthy babies and moms at nine months. So please try
to work on some of those folks, and Paul appreciate
(28:52):
the call.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
My friend up against a heartbreak. You're on the Dan
Kapla Show.
Speaker 7 (28:57):
And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast the place.
Speaker 12 (29:01):
But when I fixing out, the markets are looking at
the fact you are making all these promises. Latest one
was Carloans. You're flooding the thing with I giving giveaways.
But when I was actually quite kind to you, I
use seven trillion. The upper estimate is fifteen trillion. People
like the Wall Street Journal, who's hardly a communist organization.
But you know they have criticized you on this as well.
(29:23):
You are running out enormous debt.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
What is the Wall Street Journal now I'm meeting with
them tomorrow. What is the Wall Street Journal? That they've
been wrong about everything?
Speaker 8 (29:30):
So have you?
Speaker 2 (29:30):
By the way, you've been wrong.
Speaker 12 (29:32):
You're trying to turn this, You're trying to turn this young.
Speaker 6 (29:35):
You're trying to turn.
Speaker 8 (29:36):
You're trying to turn this into debates. There are business there,
but you're wrong.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
You've been wrong. You've been wrong all your life on
this stuff. And think about it.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
This is going on at the same time that that
Harris obviously just broke and and completely desperate. Now is
that Trump doesn't have the cognitive ability to be present, right,
because everybody can see sheep doesn't. When was it this
guy chooses he wasn't kidnapped, There were no handcuffs, there
was no bag over his head. He chose to go
on stage with that guy that the Bloomberg News editor
(30:07):
in chief and talk about the economy, and then whether
you agree or disagree with his policies, you listen to
the way that he handled it. Yeah, and that's one
of the many reasons now why he is trending toward victory,
and probably a very significant victory. Let's get to the
phone lines, which are in fuego. Allow me to respond
to one text before that, and this is a Texter.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
Who's challenge to me.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
Dan, Are you saying Kamala is less cognitive than Biden
was in the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
Absolutely?
Speaker 1 (30:38):
Absolutely, Joe Biden in that twenty twenty election infinitely superior
cognitively if you're talking about the cognitive skills necessary to
be president, and as deficient as Biden was, and I
think Biden was cognitively disqualified in twenty twenty. In twenty twenty,
Biden did not have the cognitive ability to become pres
(31:00):
in the United States, as I said at the time,
but even in that state, he had far more cognitive
capacity for this job than Harris. Because remember in twenty twenty,
there were times during debates, etc.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
When Biden could be very.
Speaker 1 (31:17):
Cogent and lucid for an hour or two, and he
could form these thoughts, he could articulate these thoughts, he
could defend arguments in ways light years beyond what we've
ever seen from Harris. Let's go back to the phone lines,
we'll start with Bill and Broomfield.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
You're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 11 (31:33):
Welcome, Oh hey, Dan, how are you great?
Speaker 2 (31:37):
Thank you?
Speaker 1 (31:37):
And it goes back to a point I think that
Ryan made one time. Let me see if you can
answer this question. Have can you remember a single brilliant
thing that Kamala Harris ever said? And does the left
point to anything in particular? Oh you say she doesn't
have the cognitive ability. Look at this speech or that speech.
The left can't find a single thing to point to.
(32:00):
But that's not why you call Bill fire away my friend.
Speaker 11 (32:03):
Okay, real quick, A couple of things about my first
vote was for Ronald Reagan in nineteen eighty. I was
all in for Trump in sixteen he won. Between me
and you, I think in the audience that twenty twenty,
I said, we officially became a Banana Republic. I know.
(32:24):
And I've heard you say you don't think it was
rig I do, and case in point. And we saw
all those things after the elections. But here's my point, Dan,
is that the left will do anything to still the election.
And I've heard you know, we talked about long term
(32:45):
like twenty you know, the midterms in twenty eight I
don't think the left the way terris one thing they'll
do when the right, when we get a victory, we celebrate,
and when the left loses, we'll just keep going. And
you know you're going. And what I do worry about
is the election coming out. And you know, damn, I
(33:06):
saw this after twenty sixteen, and I don't know, but
I heard the audio. There was a bunch of Google
people and there was one lady Dan who specifically said, well,
you will not let this happen again. So I am
you know, I am drawing some stringfall how you feel
about everything. And I appreciate it some of the audience,
(33:29):
but I'm just not quite sure they're going to steal
this thay you can Dan.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
Hey, Bill, appreciate the con and you are not alone
and having that concern.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
My friend.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
I told the story on air. We have a bad
connection with you, Bill. I told the story on air
a couple of months ago about somebody I considered to
be maybe the most conservative person I've ever met, not politically,
but just in terms of being a very careful person,
careful with their words. Former bank president, somebody you know,
(33:58):
not the opposite of a flame thrower, and we were
just sitting at dinner one night and he just said,
I'm afraid they're going to steal it. And I said what,
and because we were talking about how the polls are
shaping up and everything else, and he said, yeah, he said,
I'm afraid they're going to steal it. And I'm thinking,
you know what, this is one of the most intelligent
(34:19):
people I've ever met, one of the most grounded people.
I've never heard him say a single word that could
be characterized as bomb throwing or anything like that. Always
very temperate in his choice of words, and I was
absolutely stunned. Now, you see all the polls where you
have very large numbers of people, particularly in the Republican Party,
(34:39):
who share that concern, and so I believe me, I'm
not in any way, shape or form trying to discount
Bill's fears. What I'm saying is we got to control
everything we can control and just go out there and
do everything we can to help Trump and all these
other candidates get all the boats they possibly can.
Speaker 2 (34:58):
Here on the Dan Kapla Show,
This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. A lot to
do today nationally and locally. But come on, hey, we're
in the shadow of now. You can reach out, you
(00:20):
can touch it. This election with out question. You know,
we'll end up, you know, setting a path for America
probably for decades to come, because it will be stuff
that happens in the next four years depending on who
wins that that simply cannot be easily unwound. And so yeah,
plenty to talk about as we add into that. The
(00:41):
good news is that so much of the data points
to a Trump victory, with plenty of suggestions that it
might be a pull away type of victory that might
pick up some extra GOP Senate seats and House seats,
but certainly not a done deal at this point. One
thing I want to get your take on is, Okay,
so they obviously have been blasted out of the bunker, right,
(01:03):
and so Biden was able to get away with being
in the basement. You know, all the way through the campaign,
Harris wasn't able to pull that off. And we all
know the reasons why we've talked about it a bunch.
So they know now that she's losing. They know now
on the current trajectory, she's going to lose, which is
the only way they're taking this risk of putting her
(01:24):
up there. But now that you're starting to see a
bunch of her, you know, what do you think the
net's going to be on that? Do you think it's
going to help or hurt her? And I know it
may sound like a silly question, right because my guess
is you see her accurately as I do, and most
of the folks on this show or who call the
show or text the show, whatever, do and can see that,
(01:47):
you know, red Jersey, blue Jersey aside, she just obviously
is one of the least qualified people that we've ever
seen be a major party nominee for president, and more importantly,
just wholly unqualified to do the job. And you know,
I think that's more than obvious. But if you try
to put your shoeself in the shoes of the more
(02:08):
typical American voter, you know who's a smart person.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
They're a busy person.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
They just don't they're not interested in politics the way
people who listen to a show like this are, et cetera.
And all they know now is that, Okay, she's out
there a lot more now. Does she gain just by
being out there a lot more now? Because obviously you
can't elect somebody president who's afraid to go do an interview,
et cetera. So no matter how bad those interviews are,
(02:34):
is it actually a net gain for her?
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Would love your take on that.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
Eight five five for zero five eight two five five
the number text d an five seven seven three nine,
As always, will go deep into the polling, though, you know,
at this point in a campaign it gets it gets
a little bit weird because you get all these polls
generated by left leaning or right leaning entities that are
(02:58):
meant to influence behavior rather than to measure it, and
it's hard to separate out the effect of those from
the very few legitimate polls. So pulling over the next
few weeks is going to be I think a little
more dicey, and it's going to be magnified by the
exploding head effect and what we've been talking about and
(03:20):
seeing and predicting for a long time that as it
gets closer and closer and more and more clear that hey,
there is a real chance Trump will win, and you
know my view, I think it's likely he'll win. You know,
at that point, you're going to see the left doing
wilder and crazier things. In fact, they're going to start
the show today with one of those. And also because
it may be on your radar, because the left is
(03:41):
trying to generate a lot of headlines with this because
they are so desperate, right they can't win on the issues,
and their normal tactics aren't working, so they're claiming that
President Trump. They're claiming President Trump had some kind of
major disqualifying medical event last night during a rally, actually
(04:02):
a town hall in Pennsylvania, when the truth is nothing
of the sort occurred. But the fact that they're trying
to go there is just well, it's so much fun
and it's so encouraging because it shows how.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
Desperate they are.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
But I do want to start with that because it
does need to be clarified. And the beautiful thing here
is that even ABC News stepped down on behalf of
Trump and said, no, this is absolute nonsense. So let's
pick up the CNN reporting on this where they're talking
about and this is after Kamala Harris herself, in one
(04:39):
of her own tweets, triggered all of this by tweeting
out about Trump and showing a really misleading snippet of
video from the Pennsylvania town hall, tweeted.
Speaker 2 (04:50):
Out are you okay? Question mark?
Speaker 1 (04:53):
And it was again, it was just so profoundly dishonest
the way, first of all, the way the video was edited,
but then secondly the fact that the simple truth, which
cannot be denied or contradicted by anybody is there was
no hint of a medical issue for Trump.
Speaker 2 (05:09):
He was in fact pausing the.
Speaker 1 (05:11):
Q and A and terminating early the town hall because
of two people in the crowd who had medical events.
And instead Trump just had music played and he was
up there kind of doing a DJ thing. So here's
David Shehallion on CN it what we saw there.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
Because there are a lot of ways to look at it,
and it really depends on who you ask. Let's just
start with team Trump. You know, they argue, well, he
can have fun, well there is joy there, and then
team Harris, he's completely lost it. And I'll get to
the second part in a minute. But you know, he
(05:48):
was supposed to be taking questions. He then went off
into whatever that.
Speaker 4 (05:53):
Was after there were a couple of medical incidents in
the crowd in the very hub environment. And yeah, people
think it exactly, And so he sort of pivoted the event.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
Yeah, pivoted the event. Right, This was no medical issue for.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
Him, obviously, Let's be clear, that's not normal behavior for
a candidate, right, Like, we've not seen that, and I
think you can find people that have covered Donald Trump,
like have gone to more than one hundred Donald Trump.
They've never seen that. So we should just separate that
out that you know, here we are three weeks out
from an election and he's doing something that he's never
done before.
Speaker 1 (06:28):
And that's a second think about how desperate they are.
First of all, with Trump. That's how he became president.
That's the reason that we even know him. He doesn't
do things the normal way, and that's worked out very
well for the country for the most part and his presidency.
So now they're so desperate to try to do something
(06:48):
to blunt his momentum that they know they can't just
come out and say, oh, yeah, that was a medical event.
It'siter because they know that's a lie, but they have
to try to give that implication. And their basis is
that we haven't seen him do that before. We haven't
seen him stand on stage and just play music forft
an hour. Yeah, because he hasn't had two people in
his crowd keel over before. And by the way, and
you'll hear it in the ABC explanation that follows here,
(07:13):
he had done Q and A for for a good
long time, you know, before two people in the crowd
had those issues. Now here's ABC and credit ABC, which
has been an extension of the Harris campaign often i e.
The so called debate in a very dishonest way. But
ABC at least getting this one right.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
But then, thirty minutes in, two attendees suffered medical emergencies.
Speaker 6 (07:37):
A doctor plus doctor.
Speaker 2 (07:40):
The incidents shifted the mood, prompting Trump to.
Speaker 5 (07:42):
Cut the question short and instead play some of his
favorite music.
Speaker 7 (07:47):
How about this, We will play YMCA and you'll go home.
Speaker 5 (07:54):
Trump kept DJing, and most of his supporters stayed for
another thirty minutes. Of his players, well, in certain quarters
of social media, people had a field day with that.
And I guess on the screens.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
It might have looked quite.
Speaker 8 (08:09):
Strange inside that hall. However, people were having a good time.
Speaker 2 (08:12):
What can I tell you? It did not seem out
of the order. It seemed almost intimate. And at the end.
Speaker 5 (08:18):
Trump did something he very rarely does. He came down
off the stage and mingled with his supporters. He was
signing autographs and shaking.
Speaker 2 (08:25):
Hands and the light.
Speaker 1 (08:27):
You always love it when your opponent gets desperate, right,
and not only is lying but telling wild, desperate lies
that are easily disproved. Yeah, we have reached that very
fun stage of and you can't even call it a
race at this point. Right, Trump already won the race
against Biden, so he's already beat the Democrat nominee. Then
you saw the coup, and now they get a mulligin
(08:50):
and he's in the process of overtaking the Mulligan candidate.
And so now I don't know that you can say
it's head's exploding. Now it's going to be like whole
lefty bottom. He's exploding for the next twenty one days.
So hey, it's going to be one of the best
times in your life. Eight five to five for zero
five eight two five five text DN five seven seven
(09:10):
three nine. You're on the Dan Kapler Show.
Speaker 7 (09:14):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 9 (09:17):
I mean, the top line is the five point advantage
that Kamala Harris had in our last boll is gone.
Speaker 2 (09:22):
What's behind that chef?
Speaker 7 (09:23):
Yeah, exactly, Savan.
Speaker 9 (09:24):
I may just look at them side by side and
you can see it.
Speaker 7 (09:27):
Remember that poll we took a month ago.
Speaker 9 (09:28):
That you see here, it was just after that first
Trump Harris debate. Since then, we've had the VP debate,
There've been some campaign activities, some interviews, some things that
have changed in that time. I think this might be
the biggest for Harris. We just asked the basic image
perception people have, is it positive or negative?
Speaker 2 (09:45):
Of these candidates.
Speaker 9 (09:45):
The Trump number has always been somewhere in this territory.
In fact, this is a little bit high for him,
believe it or not. Forty three percent positive. But look
at Harris forty three positive, forty nine negative. The significance
We polled this a month ago, she was forty eight
per positive and forty five negative.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
He was above water.
Speaker 9 (10:04):
As they say, that's completely reversed. It now looks very
similar to Trump's. That's a pretty big shift when you're
talking about erase this close.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
Yeah, but it's exactly what we've been talking about forever,
right once people got to know or remember the real
Kamala Harris, and how did that happen exactly because of
the stuff you and I aren't seen.
Speaker 2 (10:24):
Now we see someone.
Speaker 1 (10:25):
We're watching, say football or maybe a playoff game Baseball,
playoff game where we get some of those national ads
where they're running these devastating ads on Kamala Harris. But
the swing states are saturated with them, and there's never
been more of this political ammo against a political opponent ever.
And just think of the one ad We've talked a
(10:45):
lot about it on the show, that the one ad
that I think will go down as the most impactful
ad in modern presidential history. You know, the ad where
they've got Harris in her own voice saying that yes,
she wants to use your taxpayer dollars to pay for
sex change operations for prisoners, and then they give an
example of one of those prisoners, and that's just crushing
(11:06):
on multiple levels.
Speaker 2 (11:08):
So yeah, no.
Speaker 1 (11:09):
Wonder her popularity is going down, it's because of the
truth and the truth about her eight five to five
or is there a five A two five five, text
D An five seven, seven through nine. Man, I do
miss being a swing state, right, I mean there was
when you get to see all these ads and all
that stuff. But but yeah, and as we talked about before,
(11:29):
after the debate, what would be there to break her fall?
As the truth about Kamala Harris started to sink in nothing.
That's why Trump again so wise not to agree to
a third debate. Let me get to some text and calls.
We'll start with Jack in Beautiful Cheyenne. You're on the
Dan Kafli show.
Speaker 10 (11:47):
Welcome Jack, Dan, And we're trying to be as quick
as I possibly can. And I know you always cut
me off, so try.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Not to do it this then all right, never mind.
Speaker 10 (11:56):
I am absolutely infensed that that Harris is using somebody
by the name of Charlemagne. And here's here's where I'm
coming from. The name, historically, charle Magne was a Frenchman
who claimed to be emperor the Roman Empire in the
eighth century. And that's that's legitimate, and that's historical, and
that's what the name of Charlemagne is. I talked to Kelly,
(12:19):
who's brilliant, and she told me that Charlemagne is a
New York City tell radio commentator. He's adopted the name
of Charlemagne. If he can't produce a birth certificate that
has his first or last name is Charlemagne, then I'm
going to go ahead and say to what the guy
is doing. He's reaching back into history using the name
that he thinks will give him credibility to go ahead
(12:42):
and advance to the communist program of the Democrats. Now,
don't I don't know what that is. I'm going to
ask you to get to the bottom of it because
you don't adopt. Okay, my name is Jack Chandstein.
Speaker 1 (12:58):
This is talk show host mail practice. I no offense.
It's not personal. I should have cut you off in
the first fifteen seconds. I should have cut you off
at Charlemagne because you have called your smart guy. You've
called this show with some really smart points in the past.
But respectfully, how is this interesting anybody?
Speaker 11 (13:19):
Because it's a fraud.
Speaker 10 (13:21):
Perpetrated by the Democrats on everybody to give credit.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Guys a talk show host, he's not part of the
Harris campaign. He's been ripping the Harris campaign as much
as he's ripped Trump. Yeah, Jack, No, I very much
appreciate the call, and I say that just to be respectful.
Eight five five or zero five eight two five five
the number Jack has often called with great points to
make we all have bad days. Dan Trump stopped for
(13:48):
a medical event in the rees recent Pennsylvania event as well. Yeah,
I got to remember. I mean, this is so interesting.
CNN as is now trying to walk back that story.
Speaker 2 (13:58):
I just saw.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
Headline and c and where they're talking about how Trump
swayed to the music after the event had ended, which
they omitted from their original report. Just trying to carry
water for the Democrats on this. Yeah, listen, The point
is that Trump has such deep support. People get there.
If somebody's near the front of one of their events,
(14:19):
they probably started camping out in July for it, right,
so they get there super early. And then his events
are really really crowded, so you know, they tend to
be warmer, and you know, you get some folks, I'm
guessing these are probably older folks, and yeah, you get
more people killing over at Trump events than other events.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
And can you imagine? Can anybody imagine what would.
Speaker 1 (14:43):
Be happening right now if Trump had just plowed through,
If Trump had just plowed through when he's got people
down in front of him, Oh, heartless drum. Trump doesn't
care about his supporters, et cetera. The guy stops the
event and just starts playing music. The last one I
think in Pennsylvania started praying for the person who went down.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
No, but this is what I mean by you know,
they're desperate, they know they're losing. They're absolutely desperate. Texted Dan,
what would you be saying today if Kamala had stood
swaying on the stage for thirty nine minutes. I have
a feeling you'd have comments. He only took four questions
before listen he had he ended the event because of
medical emergency. And then as ABC described that, we played
(15:28):
the ABC report, you know, out of respect for he
enjoys being with the ABC described it as intimate connection
with the folks who came out to see him. He
stayed with them. He couldn't sit up there talking about
the substance while you had people down, but he stayed
with them. Yes, So again, I wish the Texter would
call because we'd be able to explore deeper. You know
(15:49):
this and imagine, I mean being kind about this. Imagine
if you were on the other side of this right now,
If you haven't agree with me on the stakes in
this election and that it's critical that Trump win and
the left loose for the future of America, Imagine if
we were on the other side of this, and if
(16:11):
we had all these indicators now that Harris was going
to win, Think about how awful that would be.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
Think about the awful.
Speaker 1 (16:19):
Feeling you'd go to sleep with, you'd wake up with
just the sense of dread because of how horrible it
was going to be for the nation.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
Could she still win?
Speaker 1 (16:27):
Sure, come on, you know it's not over till it's over.
But I think Trump would have to actively give it
away for her to win, and I don't see any
sign of that happening. I mean, sixteen and twenty. You know,
he was a very very good closer. And no human's
ever going to be perfect, not out on the campaign, certainly,
no disruptor candidates is going to be perfect. But boy,
(16:47):
Trump overall has been very very good. In fact, Ryan,
I think he just taped today town hall women only
town hall, and I think that's going to be broadcast tomorrow.
By the way, when we come back, i'd love to
get your take on this eight five five four zero
five eight two five five the number you can text
d A N five seven seven three nine. You've got
(17:08):
Kamala Harris tomorrow sitting down with Brett Behar. It's going
to be half an hour and it's going to be
straight to tape, So it's going to be straight through
this half hour, no commercial breaks during the tape, no
breaks during the taping, right, and no commercial breaks when
it's aired. Now, obviously a half hour is not that long.
You would hope that the interview would be longer, but
(17:30):
a half hour is enough to do some follow up because,
as you well know, follow up is everything. The initial
questions meaningless because a candidate can easily.
Speaker 2 (17:38):
Avoid that, but it's all in the follow up.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
And Brett Behar, I think, is going to follow up
very well because you know, for Brett bear Tomorrow it's
his reputation on the line. So yes, he's going to
be very careful to appear very fair to her. But
at the same time, nobody wants to be thought of
as a whimp. Nobody wants to be thought of as
as somebody who is two weak to ask the tough questions.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
So I want to hear from.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
You if you could be Brettbaar tomorrow or give him
a question to pose to errors.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
More importantly, the follow up, what would it be?
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Eight five five four zero five A two five five
text d am five seven seven three nine year on
The Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 7 (18:19):
You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 9 (18:23):
The point of the fact she's the VP in an
unpopular administration. We asked about President Biden's policies, are they
helping or hurting your family? Just a quarter of voters
said they're helping, nearly have said they're hurting.
Speaker 2 (18:35):
And then here's the interesting twist.
Speaker 9 (18:37):
We also asked folks think back to when Donald Trump
was president, did his policies help or hurt your family?
And look at the difference forty four percent helping, thirty
one hurting. Trump's the retrospective, you would say, opinion of
Trump's presidency among voters arguably higher now than when he
was president.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
Yeah, so what do we have And listen, you can
find a poll here there that disagrees with the arc.
But that's the NBC poll, right, And they've got absolutely
every motive to defeat Trump. And I think you know,
all of these major networks, other than Fox have done
a lot to try to accomplish that, and they've got
to acknowledge that she's leaking oil. She's lost five points
(19:19):
in favorability and five points in the polls since she
started doing all of these interviews and obviously these hard hitting,
very true spots running heavily in the swing states and
critically what you just heard, right, because you all know
you know it from yourself. I mean, when you go
in there and vote, I think the vast majority of
people in the end, I mean, they may talk about
(19:40):
and they may talk about, you know, with friends and neighbors,
this and that, the things that make them angry. They
vote on the things that affect them, that affect them.
And when you have people telling these pollsters that, hey,
you know, yeah, bottom line, my life and that's going
to mean the life of their family, which is what
all of us are fiercely devoted to.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Right better under Trump?
Speaker 1 (20:00):
I mean I think what that means is once again
Trump's going to outperform the post because you probably got
people telling these posters, no, I'm voting for Harris, but
some of the same people saying my life was better
under Trump. What do you think is going to win
out in the end. Date five to five or zer
a five A two five five the number. Let's get
to the phone lines. Eerie, Mike kind enough to join
us on the Dan Caplis show.
Speaker 6 (20:19):
How you doing, Eerie fine lyle?
Speaker 2 (20:23):
How are you living the dream? My friend?
Speaker 8 (20:27):
Hey, you asked us a put what question would we
if we were Brett bar Yes, we pose to Kamala Harris.
I would give a lot of money to be able
to pose this question. The question would be, well, would
you be willing to sit side by side in a
televised cognitive test with Donald Trump side my side televised?
(20:49):
That would be the question.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
Oh man, you could retire the national debt with that one.
Just just go pay per view on that. Yeah, thank you, Mike.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
I like that. No, I would pay to watch that.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
But the truth is we have that cognitive exam every
day and in a much more reliable fashion, right because
I I'm privileged to be able to try a lot
of cases and a lot of really serious injury cases,
including serious brain damage cases, and so I'm presenting brain
damage evidence to juries all the time. And when you
(21:20):
get you get this cognitive testing done right, and the
results are usually based on this anonymous this anonymous pool
out there. If you're talking about neuropsych testing, you know
this anonymous pool of folks out there, and then you're
comparing somebody against quote baseline for somebody in their demo
and is I like to tell juris because it's one
(21:40):
thousand percent true. Now, the study you should rely on
is from the University of your eyeballs. It's from the
University of Real Life. And we bring in witnesses who
talk about how the person was before the brain injury
and how they are after the brain injury. That's where
the truth lies, not in some numerical scale, in a
cognitive test. So people get to see every day the
(22:03):
truth the real lifetime cognitive testing of Kamala Harris and
Donald Trump. And that's going to be far more revealing
than anything you could get out of one of these
scientific type cognitive tests. And I think any fair minded
person would have to look at this and say, there's
(22:24):
some well, let's.
Speaker 2 (22:25):
Put it as charitably as possible.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris's intellectual abilities are completely unsuitable for
the presidency. That she lacks the intellectual capabilities necessary to
be precedent in a way that we've never seen before.
And I'd love to hear from you on this, Texters
those who disagree. First, have we ever had a major
(22:50):
party nominee who so clearly lacked that the cognitive capacity
to be president? Doesn't mean they're dumb, doesn't mean they're
this name, that name, But when it comes to the
cognitive skill sets necessary to be president, we're so obviously lacking.
Speaker 10 (23:05):
Now.
Speaker 1 (23:06):
You may have disagreed with candidates fiercely on policy or
morality or this or that, but just plain old cognitive
ability to do the job. I can't think of anybody
in our lifetime who even comes close to the deficit
she brings to the table. Let's go to Paul in
Colorado springs here on the Dan Capitlo Show. It should
be this simple, right, if you cannot do a press conference,
(23:28):
if you don't have the cognitive capacity to do a
press conference, you don't have the cognitive capacity to be president. Paul,
Welcome to the show.
Speaker 6 (23:38):
Hey Dan, I hate switched gears on you, but I
got my ballad in the mail yesterday and I was
spilling it all out and then got to some of
the amendments stuff and I was like, man, this is
kind of odd because it's pretty vague. So I was
wondering if you could, you could walk through the amendments
that are proposed and and what you think about them.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
My friend, thank you for that.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
And you know what I'd like to do, if you
don't mind, is I want to do the same thing.
I want to sit down with them and I want
to go through them all and I want to be
able to offer some fully informed, educated opinions. There's one
amendment that I've been most focused on, and we're going
to have a special guest on at five oh six,
a doctor Christine Wheeler. I've been very focused on seventy nine,
(24:24):
which would enshrine infanticide in Colorado's constitutions. Say you could
a perfectly healthy mom, perfectly healthy baby, the mom's about
to deliver and not just kill the baby, and it
would enshrine it in the constitutions, say Paul from Colorado
Springs has to pay for it and take away parental notifications.
So I've been very focused on that campaign. And I
(24:47):
know we're getting Christy Burton Brown on soon right on
school choice, which is eighty and they're also running a
great ballot measure on support for law enforcement financial support
for law enforcement.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
But can you give me a few.
Speaker 1 (25:00):
Days to just just go through everything and do a
full show on it.
Speaker 8 (25:06):
Yeah, I can do that.
Speaker 6 (25:07):
And yeah, I already voted on the abortion one. I'm
totally anti totally cool life and anti abortion. And I've
already voted on the marijuana one, so anti marijuana, and
and I'm pro school choice. But there's a couple in
there that I'm computing.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
Which ones which ones because that I'll pay special attention.
Speaker 8 (25:28):
The ones that have changing to the election laws.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
Oh yeah, yeah, all the rank choice voting stuff.
Speaker 8 (25:35):
No, no, right, I voted against rank troy voting.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Okay.
Speaker 6 (25:39):
But then there's ones that are like should we change deadlines?
Speaker 2 (25:42):
And okay?
Speaker 11 (25:44):
And I'm like, yeah, yeah, And.
Speaker 6 (25:45):
Then maybe you could help us out with some judges,
because I don't know any of these judges and if
they're good or bad.
Speaker 1 (25:51):
You know, that's a fair question and something I've said
on here before, Paul, so thanks for the chance to
repeat it.
Speaker 2 (25:56):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
You know, my real job is I'm a practicing trial
lawyer and in front of judges here and elsewhere all
the time, and so my role on air for the
almost thirty years I've been on air. Is I will
never say anything on air that I don't believe. But
I will never criticize a judge on air because I'm
a practicing trial lawyer and I've just got to put
(26:17):
my clients first.
Speaker 8 (26:19):
And so I maybe you could bring somebody else on there.
Speaker 1 (26:22):
Yeah, maybe on the Ryan's Show.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
Yeah, but no, it's it's a very fair question, man.
Speaker 6 (26:29):
I just think about these judges and it's like, hey, no,
I'll just give us a rundown on the good ones
versus the bad ones.
Speaker 8 (26:36):
So we know, have put on the judges because I
don't spend.
Speaker 6 (26:38):
My life in court.
Speaker 8 (26:40):
Yeah, and who's the good ones and who's the bad ones?
I don't follow it that close.
Speaker 1 (26:45):
Very fair question. What I'm about to say to you
now is absolutely true. It's not meant to try to
kiss up or anything else. But I was I was
sitting down with a friend because they had the same
question for me, and the friend.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
I think it was you Ryan, wasn't it. Didn't you
show me your yesterday?
Speaker 1 (27:01):
Yeah, And we were just going through Ryan's bellot because
he had the same question. He said, you know, hey,
you know which of these judges should I vote for
or against? And I went through the entire list, and
there were some I didn't know simply because you know,
I'm a trial lawyer. I'm operating at the trial court level.
For appeals, we bring in a pellet specialist on the
rare occasions there are appeals. But I didn't see a
(27:24):
single judge on either the appellate list or the trial
court list who I would have been critical of. Oh,
and I saw a number I think are stars, So
I know that it.
Speaker 2 (27:35):
Kiss up stuff. But I'm just Ryan, and I had
that conversation.
Speaker 7 (27:38):
Yeah, obviously I'm going to turn to you as an
expert on the subject, and I guess compared to me,
And yeah, you definitely recommended a reference to that. You
had strongly positive opinions.
Speaker 1 (27:48):
Of him, Yeah, and no negative opinions about any of them.
So Paul, Yeah, let me dig into all that stuff
and then we'll do a show on it next week.
But but I appreciate you wanting my opinion.
Speaker 6 (28:00):
Well, I listen to you every day, thank you on
the podcast, and I appreciate your opinions. So when you're wrong, well.
Speaker 2 (28:07):
No, you sound like my wife there.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
But I would do this Paul, I would I would
respectfully ask you this on seventy nine. You must know
a ton of pro abortion people, right they call themselves
pro choice. But what I'd say is, if you know,
if you know any pro abortion people, please try to
talk to him about seventy nine because the key to
defeating seventy nine. They need fifty five percent because it's
(28:31):
a constitutional amendment. The key to defeating seventy nine is
getting to pro abortion people who just think this is
way too far to strip away parental notification, to make
taxpayers pay for it, pay for abortion, to allow abortion
onhealthy babies and moms at nine months. So please try
to work on some of those folks, and Paul appreciate
(28:52):
the call.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
My friend up against a heartbreak. You're on the Dan
Kapla Show.
Speaker 7 (28:57):
And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast the place.
Speaker 12 (29:01):
But when I fixing out, the markets are looking at
the fact you are making all these promises. Latest one
was Carloans. You're flooding the thing with I giving giveaways.
But when I was actually quite kind to you, I
use seven trillion. The upper estimate is fifteen trillion. People
like the Wall Street Journal, who's hardly a communist organization.
But you know they have criticized you on this as well.
(29:23):
You are running out enormous debt.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
What is the Wall Street Journal now I'm meeting with
them tomorrow. What is the Wall Street Journal? That they've
been wrong about everything?
Speaker 8 (29:30):
So have you?
Speaker 2 (29:30):
By the way, you've been wrong.
Speaker 12 (29:32):
You're trying to turn this, You're trying to turn this young.
Speaker 6 (29:35):
You're trying to turn.
Speaker 8 (29:36):
You're trying to turn this into debates. There are business there,
but you're wrong.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
You've been wrong. You've been wrong all your life on
this stuff. And think about it.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
This is going on at the same time that that
Harris obviously just broke and and completely desperate. Now is
that Trump doesn't have the cognitive ability to be present, right,
because everybody can see sheep doesn't. When was it this
guy chooses he wasn't kidnapped, There were no handcuffs, there
was no bag over his head. He chose to go
on stage with that guy that the Bloomberg News editor
(30:07):
in chief and talk about the economy, and then whether
you agree or disagree with his policies, you listen to
the way that he handled it. Yeah, and that's one
of the many reasons now why he is trending toward victory,
and probably a very significant victory. Let's get to the
phone lines, which are in fuego. Allow me to respond
to one text before that, and this is a Texter.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
Who's challenge to me.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
Dan, Are you saying Kamala is less cognitive than Biden
was in the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
Absolutely?
Speaker 1 (30:38):
Absolutely, Joe Biden in that twenty twenty election infinitely superior
cognitively if you're talking about the cognitive skills necessary to
be president, and as deficient as Biden was, and I
think Biden was cognitively disqualified in twenty twenty. In twenty twenty,
Biden did not have the cognitive ability to become pres
(31:00):
in the United States, as I said at the time,
but even in that state, he had far more cognitive
capacity for this job than Harris. Because remember in twenty twenty,
there were times during debates, etc.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
When Biden could be very.
Speaker 1 (31:17):
Cogent and lucid for an hour or two, and he
could form these thoughts, he could articulate these thoughts, he
could defend arguments in ways light years beyond what we've
ever seen from Harris. Let's go back to the phone lines,
we'll start with Bill and Broomfield.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
You're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 11 (31:33):
Welcome, Oh hey, Dan, how are you great?
Speaker 2 (31:37):
Thank you?
Speaker 1 (31:37):
And it goes back to a point I think that
Ryan made one time. Let me see if you can
answer this question. Have can you remember a single brilliant
thing that Kamala Harris ever said? And does the left
point to anything in particular? Oh you say she doesn't
have the cognitive ability. Look at this speech or that speech.
The left can't find a single thing to point to.
(32:00):
But that's not why you call Bill fire away my friend.
Speaker 11 (32:03):
Okay, real quick, A couple of things about my first
vote was for Ronald Reagan in nineteen eighty. I was
all in for Trump in sixteen he won. Between me
and you, I think in the audience that twenty twenty,
I said, we officially became a Banana Republic. I know.
(32:24):
And I've heard you say you don't think it was
rig I do, and case in point. And we saw
all those things after the elections. But here's my point, Dan,
is that the left will do anything to still the election.
And I've heard you know, we talked about long term
(32:45):
like twenty you know, the midterms in twenty eight I
don't think the left the way terris one thing they'll
do when the right, when we get a victory, we celebrate,
and when the left loses, we'll just keep going. And
you know you're going. And what I do worry about
is the election coming out. And you know, damn, I
(33:06):
saw this after twenty sixteen, and I don't know, but
I heard the audio. There was a bunch of Google
people and there was one lady Dan who specifically said, well,
you will not let this happen again. So I am
you know, I am drawing some stringfall how you feel
about everything. And I appreciate it some of the audience,
(33:29):
but I'm just not quite sure they're going to steal
this thay you can Dan.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
Hey, Bill, appreciate the con and you are not alone
and having that concern.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
My friend.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
I told the story on air. We have a bad
connection with you, Bill. I told the story on air
a couple of months ago about somebody I considered to
be maybe the most conservative person I've ever met, not politically,
but just in terms of being a very careful person,
careful with their words. Former bank president, somebody you know,
(33:58):
not the opposite of a flame thrower, and we were
just sitting at dinner one night and he just said,
I'm afraid they're going to steal it. And I said what,
and because we were talking about how the polls are
shaping up and everything else, and he said, yeah, he said,
I'm afraid they're going to steal it. And I'm thinking,
you know what, this is one of the most intelligent
(34:19):
people I've ever met, one of the most grounded people.
I've never heard him say a single word that could
be characterized as bomb throwing or anything like that. Always
very temperate in his choice of words, and I was
absolutely stunned. Now, you see all the polls where you
have very large numbers of people, particularly in the Republican Party,
(34:39):
who share that concern, and so I believe me, I'm
not in any way, shape or form trying to discount
Bill's fears. What I'm saying is we got to control
everything we can control and just go out there and
do everything we can to help Trump and all these
other candidates get all the boats they possibly can.
Speaker 2 (34:58):
Here on the Dan Kapla Show,
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.