November 1, 2024 • 34 mins
As the Left cries wolf and continues to perpetrate hoaxes on Trump - like he's trying to control women's bodies by saying he wants to protect them, or that he wants Liz Cheney to face a firiing squad when he's really criticizing her as a chicken hawk on foreign wars - even Jake Tapper has to pump the brakes on CNN to prevent their entire crazy narrative from going off the rails.
The freakout on the Left is palpable, signaling panic at the disco over a potential Trump victory on Tuesday.
The freakout on the Left is palpable, signaling panic at the disco over a potential Trump victory on Tuesday.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Kapls and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. This as we
predicted right that the left is totally melting down right now,
heads exploding, doing insane, stupid, counterproductive things because they see
(00:24):
that train coming down the track and they know there's
a real good chance they're going to lose Tuesday. You
just heard a perfect example at the start of this hour.
ABC News National, just a profoundly dishonest report on Donald Trump,
taking completely out of context his his comments about Liz Cheney.
Trump was talking about her as a warhawk, willing to
(00:46):
send everybody else's kids out to face the enemy. And
would Liz Cheney feel if all of a sudden those
guns were pointed at her? But ABC completely distorts it,
and they knew they were distorting it, fundamentally dishonest.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
But they're desperate. They're desperate.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
But this is what I've been talking about the beauty
of this, because what we really need here, first and
foremost is a Trump victory to save America. But then
we also need in the process to expose the left
for who they really are and how dishonest they really are,
and what the Democratic Party has become under leftist control.
So each time you get an ABC do something like that,
(01:25):
and we've been pointing all these other examples. I think
it's going to help long term because trust me, I mean,
vast majority of my out of state relatives are Democrats.
And the more of this we see, the more dishonesty
from the left, etc. The easier it's going to be
one by one to pry them away from the habit
(01:45):
of voting for Democrats. I'm not saying they'll go straight
to Republicans. Maybe they won't vote for Democrats for a while,
then they'll vote for Republicans. But yeah, we've got to
expose the left in the process of also securing a
Trump victory, and the left is you're helping us with that.
As we go back to the phone lines which are jammed,
let's start with Mike and Loveland. You're on the Dan
kapitlis Shall welcome, Mike.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
Oh can you hear me?
Speaker 4 (02:10):
Dad?
Speaker 3 (02:11):
Yes, sir, thank you, goodness. Hi, I'm so true with
your show.
Speaker 5 (02:17):
I'm from Actress, Alaska. I'm a tramspot wonderful.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
Nothing down here, and I just came from Alaska. It's
like it could be off topic, but I just want
to get a friendly warning to everyone out there that
hasn't voted. And I don't know the status right now
of right choice voting, but I do know it's a curse.
It's evil. What Murkowski and McConnell did to Alaska. There
(02:45):
was a crime, and I hope Alaska votes it down.
We'll find out liberals have attacked Alaska big time and
it's the worst thing in the world. Kowski was not
the learner. It was Kelly Jabos.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
Well, Mike, I appreciate your kind words in sharing your
Alaska experience.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Thank you for that.
Speaker 1 (03:06):
We're going to be talking about more on one thirty
one on Monday. Thank you for that. Michael Warren in
Colorado Springs. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6 (03:13):
Oh Dan, it's been a while since I talked to you.
I'd like to make a statement regarding our policy. If
we're going troops American troops, and it's about twenty five
to thirty seconds long, and it ends the last word
is border, which I'm sure you have a response because
you're good with words. But before I make the statement,
I want to make sure that you know that I
don't believe it's all wrong. Oh if I can say that,
(03:36):
I don't think it's all been wrong. But let me
start please. In eighteen forty six eighteen forty eight, American
troops were in Mexican territory, killing Mexicans. In eighteen ninety eight,
American troops were in Cuba killing Cubans. In the first
part of the nineteen hundreds, American troops were in the
Philippine Islands killing Filipinos. In nineteen eighteen, American troops were
(03:59):
in France killing Germans. In the early nineteen twenties, American
troops are in Haiti and the Karago killing a few
of their people. In nineteen forty two through nineteen forty five,
American troops were in the Pacific Ocean area killing Japanese.
In nineteen June nineteen fifty the summer of nineteen fifty three,
American troops were in Korea, killing North Koreans and Chinese.
(04:21):
In nineteen sixty four through the end of nineteen seventy two,
American troops from Vietnam killing Vietnamese. In nineteen ninety one,
American troops were in Ukarate killing Iraqis, and then again
in nineteen twenty three, American troops are back in Iraq
killing Iraqis and also in Afghanistan. But the bad guys
(04:43):
are now perceived to be the Russian leadership because they
are using their military aggressively against what they perceived as
a threat from a military organization financed and mostly run
by the United States in regards to their own border.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Warren those, with all due respect, those compare persons our madness.
I mean, what it all boils down to is weather
force is justified, and Russia had no justification whatsoever to
go in and rape and pillage Ukraine. This way, Ukraine
was not attacking their territory, not attacking Russia. So you're
(05:17):
going to compare if Vladimir Putin was Satan on Earth
going in and raping.
Speaker 2 (05:22):
And pillaging Ukraine, You're going to compare that to our.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
Troops going to Germany to liberate the world.
Speaker 6 (05:29):
I didn't say I think it was wrong. Real War
two was justified against dear but stuff.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
You just gave all those examples, and so what it
boils down to for your Warren, if I understand correctly,
is you believe Putin is justified because he perceived Ukraine
to be a long term threat, So he's justified in
going in and mass mass killing in Ukraine?
Speaker 2 (05:50):
Is that right?
Speaker 5 (05:51):
No?
Speaker 6 (05:52):
No, you don't, you don't understand you you need to
watch John ruschamiern Us and kind of video one.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
So can you tell us in sentence what Putin's justification
is for going into Ukraine and killing all those people?
Speaker 6 (06:07):
Okay, Crabia, Kreamia is part of Ukraine, right if Ukraine
becomes NATO, which they were threatening to do, which we
promised we would never do that. When so you collapsed,
Krimia has a port which has been in Russia port
for several hundred years.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
It was gone, Warren, I got interrupt. Sorry, don't mean
to be disrespectful. I'll put one and all. Don't mean
to be disrespectful. God interrupt. We're talking about the election
right now. Crimea was taken under Obama, that was already gone.
And then remember Putin didn't do anything when Trump was
in office, and then he went in to Ukraine. He
went into Ukraine after that, So can you tell us
(06:44):
in one sentence, Warren, again, don't mean to be disrespectful.
We're talking the election today. Can you tell us in one.
Speaker 6 (06:49):
Sentence the American military industrial complex and deep state people,
now of the Russians were going to behave this way
back in the early part of the thank you, and
wanted them to happen so they could spend money in him,
the military industrial complex, and that's exactly what's happened.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Yeah, Warren, appreciate the call. It sure didn't happen under Trump.
And that's why Ryan, I think that the left is
making a big mistake. They're flelling right now right I
think they're making a big mistake and tying themselves in
the final days to this lie that Donald Trump called
for violence against Liz Cheney, and anybody who sees the
full clip we played it we will again knows that
(07:26):
it's a lie. But where they're making a huge mistake
is tying themselves to Cheney a and tying themselves to
Cheney on an issue that pertains to war. Because right now,
you look at all the polling Americans do not have
an appetite for the approach of the Biden administration to
the war in Ukraine. And Trump has drawn a clear contrast.
(07:48):
He's the peace candidate he was when he was in office.
It's not because he retreated from the enemy. He forced
the enemy to retreat from him. So they want to
finish the campaign on these grounds.
Speaker 7 (07:59):
Send the limbl for yes. And it's two things, Dan.
It's scattershot, as they've always been against Trump. They're trying
to throw spaghetti against the wall and see what sticks.
And it's crying Wolfe syndrome. People aren't gonna believe these
clowns anymore. They were just saying that he was trying
to protect women and that that had something to do
with abortion. They were trying to run that charade out.
And now they're doing the same with Liz Cheney saying
(08:21):
that he wants to put her up in a firing squad.
It's ridiculous on its face, but then it's a pattern
of these people. They can't bring this man down, and
they're so desperate and to your point, flailing about it.
They needed to have a targeted approach. How do we
defeat Donald Trump? What is the central ethos to that message?
And they never arrived at it.
Speaker 2 (08:39):
And one of the.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
Many reasons why this will backfire on them is because
it was Trump who's been shot at. It was Trump
who was shot. And the other thing is it's like
the boy you cried wolf. This party has lied about
Trump so many times, and the American people have clearly
seen that that now, even if they had something bad
(09:01):
to say about Trump that was true, the people wouldn't
believe it. But I got to give you this before
we hit this break. Here is the official quote from
the Trump campaign that was issued to the press about
acclaimed by David Pluff, who is high ranking in the
Harris campaign, that the Madison Square Garden event turned undecided
voters toward Harris and that the profile excuse me, of
(09:25):
the remaining undecided is better for Harris than Trump.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
So here's the official response to the Trump.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
Campaign quote, what the hell is he going to say
he's losing? Well, let me give it proper intonation. What
the hell is he going to say he's losing? Referring
to Pluff in the Harris campaign. Fact of the matter is,
David can't do anything but bs. They use the full
word until Tuesday because we are kicking his blank. The
(09:51):
only thing the Harris campaign has functional at this point
is a bs full word machine that is dutifully repeated
by the legacy legacy media is fact so that the
response of the Trump campaign eight five was five two
five five. The number text us at d N five
seven seven three nine.
Speaker 8 (10:12):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast, Dan.
Speaker 1 (10:16):
Trump actually said about Liz Jennie, but his daughter is
a very dumb individual, very dumb.
Speaker 9 (10:24):
She's a radical warhawk. Let's put her with a rifle
standing there with nine barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's
see how she feels about it. You know, when the
guns are trained on her face.
Speaker 2 (10:36):
You know, there are war hawks when.
Speaker 9 (10:38):
They're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh gee,
will let's send let's send ten thousand troops right into
the mouth of the enemy.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
And the left wants to cut that last part off,
and in fact, the whole second half of he was
obviously talking about what would her attitude be if she
was the one who had to go to war and
have those weapons trained on her. But the left right
now is so freakd they're so panic plus and I'm
not talking about democrats, I'm talking about the left that
(11:06):
the powers on the left to control the party. So
many of those powers on the left that control that
party are flat and moral that they will flat out lie,
They will they will pervert the criminal justice system to
try to jail a political opponent they can't beat at
the polls. This is something we really haven't experienced in
America before, and it's the reality right now, and it
(11:29):
makes this election even more important right because so much
of world history has been this ongoing battle between right
and wrong, and right now you could not have a
starker choice. And again that's not a reflection on Democrats,
but it's not your everyday Democrat who controls that party
right now. It is the far left, secular hard course
(11:51):
who control that party. And there is just this level
of immorality and willingness to lie and personally destroy that
I think really threatens the existence of this country as
we know it. Let's go to the phone lines and
thank you again to the founders and those who have
fought in wars, who've given us this great gift of
(12:12):
being able to save our country simply through the electoral process.
Jim in Denver, you're on the dan Kaplas, You're welcome.
Speaker 4 (12:21):
Yes, Dan, I got diverted from my point when I
talked here earlier. But Yim, when Donald Trump, I mean
he motivated that mob to attack the Congress. Now well,
I mean that's what everyone said.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
Yeah, but how Jim, it's not true. So explain to me, please,
how he did that. I mean, you know that if
the Biden administration could have charged him with incitement, they
would have charged him. Even the Biden administration, which abused
that the justice system to go after him, didn't even
try to charge him with incitement.
Speaker 4 (13:03):
Yeah, well they're I think they charged them with interfering
with the transfer of power.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
They didn't. I don't think that was.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
But Jim, they did not charge him with incitement. So
please explain to everybody what Donald Trump did to incite
violence at the Capitol.
Speaker 4 (13:22):
Uh, everyone to a man. When prosecutors asked them why
they did why they were doing what they did, they
all said because they thought that's what Donald Trump wanted
them to do.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
And how many people were there who heard Donald Trump
but did not commit any crimes at the Capitol.
Speaker 5 (13:46):
I couldn't give you the number.
Speaker 1 (13:48):
It's the great majority committed crimes at the Capitol.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
No, correct.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
And so the point is this, Donald Trump said, go peace,
go peacefully. Listen, I was peacefully and patriotically. I was
very critical that day. Go back and look at my
real time tweets, and I stand by everything I said
that day. The people who committed crimes at the Capitol
needed to be prosecuted. But Donald Trump did not incite
(14:20):
anybody to commit crimes at the Capitol. Donald Trump, and
I've said this then and I stand by it now,
was too slow to respond and should have done more
that day. And you know, voters can take that into
account along with the good, which I think far far
outways the bad. But he did not incite violence.
Speaker 4 (14:39):
What Dan my opinion, that was a cya, And I
think you can spot a cya. And he told if
you get people fighting mad, if you give an hour
and a half speech that gets them furious and tells
them the most prized possession is being stolen from them
(15:00):
and it's right down the street, and then for one
second you use the word peacefully after you've spent an
hour and a half getting them fighting mad. I just
don't think that qualifies.
Speaker 1 (15:12):
Okay, So Jim, let me ask you what. Let me
ask you, my friend about that standard. Then, so we
talk about all of these issues now that are of
such enormous importance, right, I mean you could go back
to slavery, use slavery as an example. Should on that
issue or any other major life and death issue of
the day, should people not be allowed to speak the
(15:34):
truth about how horrible the behavior that needs to be
stopped is because of fear of violence. Now, listen, I've
been very consistent all along. I have not seen proof
that election was stolen. I disagree with President Trump. I
did then and I do now about whether there's proof
the election was stolen. But according to your standard, Jim,
(15:55):
nobody should be able to even speak that the truth
about something if that something is so awful that there's
a risk some nut job may go out and act
on it violently. How can America exist with your standard?
Speaker 4 (16:13):
I agreed Dan, with it being you can't say you
don't know, but there's a mountain of evidence that it
wasn't stolen.
Speaker 1 (16:24):
Okay, So as long as Trump and you agreed, Jim.
And the only reason I interrupt is we're on like
our fifth segment with you and the time constraints of
talk radio, and I appreciate you being here so much, Jim,
But when we come back to it. The starting point
has to be an acknowledgment that Trump did not incite violence.
That's why the government didn't charge him with that. So
(16:46):
what you're now saying is, Okay, we've got to extend
the law so that even if somebody is not inciting
people to violence, they cannot voice certain opinions unless those
opinions are judge to be true by some other individual
or body. That's what you're saying, Jim.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
I disagree with you when you say that the government didn't.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
Okay, well, you're just wrong. I'm sorry, Jim, not to
be disrespectful. You're flat wrong. They did not charge him
with incitement period.
Speaker 4 (17:18):
Because it's a harder charge.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
To prove, well, because he didn't do it.
Speaker 1 (17:22):
I mean, come on, you got these you got these
people out there charging him with everything they can imagine.
You don't think they would have loved to charge him
with incitement, but they knew he didn't do that.
Speaker 4 (17:34):
Dan, how did the thousand people that all said they
were doing what he wants?
Speaker 1 (17:39):
Okay, Okay, okay, So Jim, let me get well. First
of all, incitement can't be based on somebody who has
decided they're going to violate the law and somebody is so.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
Now, it's the.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
Credibility of the people who committed criminal acts at the
capital that you rely on. No, incitement has to be
based upon whether the speaker actually did those things that
are forbidden under the law, such as saying to people,
go now there, commit violence. That that's the standard for incitement,
(18:15):
not what somebody who decided to break the law then
later claims. So no, you can bet if the Biden
administration could have charged Trump with incitement, they would have
done it in a heartbeat.
Speaker 2 (18:26):
But they couldn't because he didn't. You're on the Dan
Capla Show.
Speaker 8 (18:36):
You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (18:39):
Where Trump said he was going to do something for women,
whether they like it or not, whether the women.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
Like it or not.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
He was talking about protecting women, protecting women, whether they
like it or not.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
Certainly you can take a shue with the language.
Speaker 7 (18:51):
But he wasn't saying he was just going to do
whatever he wanted, regardless.
Speaker 1 (18:54):
Of you know, anyway, even Jake Tapper trying to clarify
that I love this because as predicted, we've got all
these lefty heads exploding down the stretch and they're saying
all these obviously untrue things and just flailing wildly in
ways that I think hurts them in the end, Like
this all okay, Their big line of attack is going
(19:14):
to be Trump says he's going to protect women, whether
they like it or not, yet protect them from illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2 (19:21):
Do you think that's going to hurt Trump on balance?
I don't think so.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
And coming out today now, they're hitching their start to
Liz Cheney and they're lying about what Donald Trump really
said about her. But they're hitching their star to Liz
Cheney in the closing days of the campaign. They think
that's going to help them. Oh and by the way,
for anybody who pays attention, his comments are about Liz
Cheney when it comes to war and when it comes
(19:45):
to war candidate versus peace candidate. That cuts in Trump's
favor every single day. So, boy, you can tell it's
going to get even crazier as we expected, and in
the end, I believe that's going to help Trump. Scott
and little Tenure on the Dan Kapalash'll welcome.
Speaker 5 (20:03):
Hey, how are you dam living the dream?
Speaker 2 (20:04):
My friend? How about you?
Speaker 5 (20:07):
That that last call? I just I've got an anxious
I was just too too long for that person anyway,
I you know, I just dropped my belt off, and
uh it was for Donald Trump. But you know when
when you think about it, can't imagine the country. This
(20:30):
gray was such pathetic uh individuals to uh to have
to vote for. And what gets me about that? At
first I'd never vote for Democrat, just the party has
gone the hill. But I disagree with you on Donald Trump.
The way this guy speaks, the way he presents things
(20:56):
is almost insane for someone that has, you know, that
much power, has done so much in this country as
far as you know, his real estate and this towers
and all that great stuff. The man just doesn't know
how to present a point without just digging a big hole.
(21:22):
And he would win by a landslide if he could
just speak, you know, diligently, like a you know, like
the governor down in Florida or something where there's so
many other people, Ted Cruz, you know, these people, but
he's got to just you know, it's not a potty mouse,
it's a stupid mouse.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
Let me ask you, what are you married? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (21:47):
Okay, and I'm married too, and I'm sure like me,
you're married to a wonderful, wonderful woman who we're both
very lucky to be married to our separate wives. Is
there anything about you your wife would like to see improved?
Oh God, yes, yeah, and me too, and I agree
with her. So what I'm saying is, yeah, we can
(22:08):
look at anybody, including Donald Trump, and say, oh, I
could imagine a better version of that person.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
I get that.
Speaker 1 (22:15):
But when it comes to Trump, obviously it's a choice
between these two. But then your fair question about Ron
DeSantis or Ted Cruz, both of whom got thoroughly selected
by Trump in the primaries. So since you got to
win the presidency to be able to save the country,
I think Donald Trump is a gift in this sense.
And listen, he says and does plenty of things I
(22:35):
disagree with, but he's been able to accomplish some phenomenally
great things because he's able to put together these coalitions
to actually get elected. There's no guarantee Ron DeSantis would
have been able to accomplish that, even though I think
DeSantis would have been a tremendous president.
Speaker 5 (22:54):
Well, I mean, I agree with you, but if you
go back to the point of us beingmarried, you know,
if if it was my wife married to Donald Trump.
That would be one of the things she would tell
him is you need to clean up your act and
present things in a more sane and dignified manner.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
Well, he's admitted Millennia has told them that.
Speaker 5 (23:22):
Well. I mean, she speaks bitter and he does well.
Speaker 1 (23:27):
But he does some things uniquely well that other people
don't do. And I mean, for example, Scott, let me
ask you, how many folks do you know, under the
same circumstances after just having been shot in the ear
and you're bleeding and you're on the floor, would have
had the composure, the strength, the presence of mind to
(23:48):
jump back up and assure the crowd with fight, fight Fight.
Speaker 2 (23:51):
How many have that in him?
Speaker 5 (23:54):
Oh? Very very few. I I probably wouldn't, and I'm
pretty strong person of that. Lot of bad things happen
to me that I've had to get up from. But
that is a little different. Well, but it's as well
by you and chilling someone behind you. I agree with
you one hundred percent on that. The man has got
(24:16):
he's got some stones and he's you know, he is successful.
I think he The one thing about him and I
have no trouble voting for I. You know a lot
of people say, well, he's doing this for power. Well
maybe a little bit, but he's doing this, in my opinion,
(24:37):
because he really wants to make a differences in this country,
and he wants to make a difference. I'll get you
someone else probably wants to get on.
Speaker 1 (24:47):
Thank you appreciate the car man. Thank you really appreciate
that conversation. Let's go to Dean in Arvada. You're on
the dan KAPLA. You'll welcome you.
Speaker 5 (24:56):
Hey, hey, thank you sir. Yeah, that previous call to
this guy. I mean when people broadstroke, Well everybody said
that Donald Trump is the reason I got convicted is
because or I took the tea or condition because he
told me to go to the Capitol and fight like
blah blah blah. How does he know what the broad
stroke of everyone that's sat there with the DOJ getting
(25:20):
rated to hammer you to ten years if you don't
take a flee. Yeah, when big when Big d OJ
says you're guilty, you say how much? And please be
merciful on me because you can't defend yourself unless you're
Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Yeah, we never tried to.
Speaker 5 (25:33):
Just way out of line, for broad stoking people.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
We never tried to blame Bernie Sanders for the supporter
of his who was going to mass murder all those Republicans, right.
Speaker 5 (25:44):
I mean, Maxwell has come out and says we need
to go after him. Kamala says, we need to go
after these people and don't stop. We will fail him
out and fight. I mean, there's just so much rhetoric
from the left, and you know, these guys come on
and you could this. Everyone said that Donald Trump made
us an insurrection? Well, why didn't Jack Smith charge you
(26:06):
with insurrection? Chlsey didn't do an insurrection?
Speaker 2 (26:09):
Well, and you could.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
You come back to Kamala Harris deciding very systemically to
compare Trump to Hitler. And under these circumstances, of course,
she knows that that may very well green lights some
deranged person, you know, who may then go out and
try to assassinate Trump. But she's willing to go that far.
(26:30):
And listen, I had defended her in the left, even
though I completely disagree with the premise when they had
continued to label Trump a threat to democracy even after
the assassination attempts, Because while I believe that's a lie
and that in fact it's the Democrats who are the
threat to democracy is proven by the coup they pulled
on Joe Biden.
Speaker 2 (26:51):
You know, I felt.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
That that that's the kind of political speech that they
should still have a right to advance, even though it
posed a heightened day injured to Donald Trump, just because
I think our protection of free speech is so important.
But when they decide to go to Trump is hitler.
That was the essential message. First of all, that is
(27:13):
so far beyond that, that is so far beyond anything
logical or reasonable that it could even potentially be justified.
And they know the climate winner right now, where they know,
they know there's at least one nation state trying to
assassinate him. No, No, I think they revealed themselves in
that moment, just as Donald Trump revealed himself in that
(27:35):
moment where he was shot in Pennsylvania, and he showed
this nation a strength and a courage and intelligence, a
presence of mind, and showed this nation the kind of
strength that any sant American would want an our leader
in a dangerous world.
Speaker 2 (27:50):
He showed his true self there. And that's another.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Reason why I believe he's going to win, and I
think he's probably going to win comfortably. America got to
see the real and even for people who say, oh,
the guy's an SOB, well, they're going to be an
awful lot of people who say he's an SOB, who say,
but he's my SOB, and we need him on the wall.
We need somebody that tough, that fear, somebody the enemy
(28:16):
will fear on the wall, because that's the only way
we're going to keep the enemy at bay. You're on
the Dan Capless Show.
Speaker 8 (28:25):
And now back to the Dan Tapless Show podcast Useless Information.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
Our lines are and flag as you expect. On the
Friday afternoon before election Day, the left melting down saying
and dude in crazy crazy things, lying through their teeth,
but in ways it's more likely to hurt them than
help them.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
This is a beautiful thing to behold.
Speaker 1 (28:44):
And I can't wait for next week with you. Let's
go to the phone lines right now. I did want
to mention though I've done a little research on this,
this thing I had happened yesterday and Halloween and whether
it was a ghost or a mechanical. When I was
back in my car out and every time I and
to reverse, the trunk opened because I have a hatchback
SUV and there is no it appears no possible mechanical
(29:09):
explanation for it. So Halloween, you know, I think somebody
I know in the great Beyond was just having a
little fun with me, and that's that's pretty cool to
think about. Let's go to Eric in Denver. You're on
the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 10 (29:20):
Welcome, Hey, Dan, I just wanted to talk real quick
about the Trump's or march, the ladists or marks that
they're taking out of context. And don't you think that
he kind of knows what he's doing like that, he
just can't help himself for making these sort of double
on condres. It's just like he's he's pushed, purposely pushing buttons,
(29:47):
saying things that could it could be taken out of
context and become realiant inflammatory well.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
Or to extend your point of step, maybe saying things
in such a stark way that he knows they're going
to get a lot of attention. I think that certainly
happens sometimes. For example, his his comments seems like five
years ago that you know is Kamala Harris Black. I
think that was premeditated, deliberate. He knew the firestorm it
(30:16):
would create, but he wanted to plant that seed, and
I had disagreed with that and still do, but I
think that was very intentional. Sometimes listen, the guy's only
human right and a big part of his appeal Eric
is that he's not some packaged kind of political professional.
Speaker 4 (30:33):
You know.
Speaker 1 (30:33):
He speaks from the heart and from the cuff, and
so sometimes some things aren't going to be said exactly right.
So I think part of it's a too yeah, but
that's part of his appeal. That's part of his his
appeal to people. People don't want politicians as usual.
Speaker 10 (30:52):
I agree, I just for me, I'm thinking back to
his comment that he's the father of in beature of fertilization.
Speaker 5 (31:01):
Which is just struck me, as.
Speaker 1 (31:05):
You know, And the thing with Trump thanks to the
comment is is to me, you know, sometimes you get
this puffery and sometimes you get this exaggeration, and sometimes
he exaggerates a point like all legal scholars disagreed with
throw where the truth is a vast majority of honest
legal scholars disagreed with the constitutional basis because there really
(31:26):
wasn't one. But my point is you can trust that
with the left, where they just flat down so they
sit down, they can cock these lies. I don't mean Democrats,
I mean the left that owns and operates the party,
and they go out and tell the most terrific lies
over and over again, knowing their lies, just because they
lack morality and they believe that's the way to win.
And that's that's how high the stakes are in this election.
(31:49):
Just have to defeat the left. The irony, of course,
is that the left is in big, big trouble if
Kamala Harris wins. Their biggest problem is if she wins,
because if Kamala Harris wins, they know she's going to
be horrific.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
She's going to be offul in office.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
It's going to hurt their brand. It's going to get
them wiped out in twenty six and twenty eight. So
the left's in trouble one way or the other. Brian
and Arvada, you're on the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 5 (32:16):
Welcome, Hey Dan, I wouln't voted today. Awesome vote in there.
Speaker 2 (32:22):
What'd you do on seventy nine?
Speaker 11 (32:23):
I drugged my neighbor. He was like twenty six d
and what drug did you use? Well, I mean he
said you drugged your neighbor, you know, and we would
at a lot of these young kids have the same opinion.
But there are you know, guys that are like, we
were not thinking about that stuff when you're young. So
(32:44):
we got to kind of help him along. So I
drug him in there. He voted too, so I'm too
up on the situation.
Speaker 1 (32:52):
Well, I'm glad you went and hopefully you voted. Excuse me,
I'm not getting emotional. It's peanut butter against seventy nine.
I hope you voted it, because since we're not a
swing state, I think the most important vote any of
us can cast in this election is against the hideous
Amendment seventy nine, which would put in our constitution in fantaside,
(33:14):
that is, putting infanticide.
Speaker 11 (33:16):
Into the constitution.
Speaker 1 (33:17):
Good good, and please get everybody you know, even many
people who are unfortunately pro abortion, get them to vote
against seventy nine.
Speaker 2 (33:25):
It's hideous.
Speaker 1 (33:28):
Oh we lost our friend Brian. Hopefully, I'm sure we'll
get him back Monday. Can you imagine Monday show? I
mean I can't wait for all three of those shows
next week, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, because can you imagine Ryan
the lunacy over this weekend?
Speaker 5 (33:42):
Oh?
Speaker 1 (33:43):
Boy, with the left melting down right now, they'll tell
any lie they're flailing. And then Trump is going to
be so active, He's going to close so strong. And
then Monday show as we get the final polls. So
many of these posters are doing the final polls. Nate
Silveru approaches it from the left, but he's not a psycho.
(34:03):
Lefty said that the one poll that he's waiting to
see because he thinks they're honest. New York Times Siena.
Everybody else, he says, is hurting, but he believes they're honest.
I think New York Times Sienna has been way off
in favor of Democrats time after time after time. So
but we'll have all that data on Monday, so much
(34:24):
to talk about them, the latest on the Secretary of
State scandal in Colorado, and then of course Tuesday and Wednesday. Ryan,
thank you very much for everything. Kelly, you're the best everybody.
I hope you can have a wonderful weekend here in
Colorado or across the country and then join us Monday,
ready to roll on The Dan Kapla Show.
This is Dan Kapls and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. This as we
predicted right that the left is totally melting down right now,
heads exploding, doing insane, stupid, counterproductive things because they see
(00:24):
that train coming down the track and they know there's
a real good chance they're going to lose Tuesday. You
just heard a perfect example at the start of this hour.
ABC News National, just a profoundly dishonest report on Donald Trump,
taking completely out of context his his comments about Liz Cheney.
Trump was talking about her as a warhawk, willing to
(00:46):
send everybody else's kids out to face the enemy. And
would Liz Cheney feel if all of a sudden those
guns were pointed at her? But ABC completely distorts it,
and they knew they were distorting it, fundamentally dishonest.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
But they're desperate. They're desperate.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
But this is what I've been talking about the beauty
of this, because what we really need here, first and
foremost is a Trump victory to save America. But then
we also need in the process to expose the left
for who they really are and how dishonest they really are,
and what the Democratic Party has become under leftist control.
So each time you get an ABC do something like that,
(01:25):
and we've been pointing all these other examples. I think
it's going to help long term because trust me, I mean,
vast majority of my out of state relatives are Democrats.
And the more of this we see, the more dishonesty
from the left, etc. The easier it's going to be
one by one to pry them away from the habit
(01:45):
of voting for Democrats. I'm not saying they'll go straight
to Republicans. Maybe they won't vote for Democrats for a while,
then they'll vote for Republicans. But yeah, we've got to
expose the left in the process of also securing a
Trump victory, and the left is you're helping us with that.
As we go back to the phone lines which are jammed,
let's start with Mike and Loveland. You're on the Dan
kapitlis Shall welcome, Mike.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
Oh can you hear me?
Speaker 4 (02:10):
Dad?
Speaker 3 (02:11):
Yes, sir, thank you, goodness. Hi, I'm so true with
your show.
Speaker 5 (02:17):
I'm from Actress, Alaska. I'm a tramspot wonderful.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
Nothing down here, and I just came from Alaska. It's
like it could be off topic, but I just want
to get a friendly warning to everyone out there that
hasn't voted. And I don't know the status right now
of right choice voting, but I do know it's a curse.
It's evil. What Murkowski and McConnell did to Alaska. There
(02:45):
was a crime, and I hope Alaska votes it down.
We'll find out liberals have attacked Alaska big time and
it's the worst thing in the world. Kowski was not
the learner. It was Kelly Jabos.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
Well, Mike, I appreciate your kind words in sharing your
Alaska experience.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Thank you for that.
Speaker 1 (03:06):
We're going to be talking about more on one thirty
one on Monday. Thank you for that. Michael Warren in
Colorado Springs. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6 (03:13):
Oh Dan, it's been a while since I talked to you.
I'd like to make a statement regarding our policy. If
we're going troops American troops, and it's about twenty five
to thirty seconds long, and it ends the last word
is border, which I'm sure you have a response because
you're good with words. But before I make the statement,
I want to make sure that you know that I
don't believe it's all wrong. Oh if I can say that,
(03:36):
I don't think it's all been wrong. But let me
start please. In eighteen forty six eighteen forty eight, American
troops were in Mexican territory, killing Mexicans. In eighteen ninety eight,
American troops were in Cuba killing Cubans. In the first
part of the nineteen hundreds, American troops were in the
Philippine Islands killing Filipinos. In nineteen eighteen, American troops were
(03:59):
in France killing Germans. In the early nineteen twenties, American
troops are in Haiti and the Karago killing a few
of their people. In nineteen forty two through nineteen forty five,
American troops were in the Pacific Ocean area killing Japanese.
In nineteen June nineteen fifty the summer of nineteen fifty three,
American troops were in Korea, killing North Koreans and Chinese.
(04:21):
In nineteen sixty four through the end of nineteen seventy two,
American troops from Vietnam killing Vietnamese. In nineteen ninety one,
American troops were in Ukarate killing Iraqis, and then again
in nineteen twenty three, American troops are back in Iraq
killing Iraqis and also in Afghanistan. But the bad guys
(04:43):
are now perceived to be the Russian leadership because they
are using their military aggressively against what they perceived as
a threat from a military organization financed and mostly run
by the United States in regards to their own border.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Warren those, with all due respect, those compare persons our madness.
I mean, what it all boils down to is weather
force is justified, and Russia had no justification whatsoever to
go in and rape and pillage Ukraine. This way, Ukraine
was not attacking their territory, not attacking Russia. So you're
(05:17):
going to compare if Vladimir Putin was Satan on Earth
going in and raping.
Speaker 2 (05:22):
And pillaging Ukraine, You're going to compare that to our.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
Troops going to Germany to liberate the world.
Speaker 6 (05:29):
I didn't say I think it was wrong. Real War
two was justified against dear but stuff.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
You just gave all those examples, and so what it
boils down to for your Warren, if I understand correctly,
is you believe Putin is justified because he perceived Ukraine
to be a long term threat, So he's justified in
going in and mass mass killing in Ukraine?
Speaker 2 (05:50):
Is that right?
Speaker 5 (05:51):
No?
Speaker 6 (05:52):
No, you don't, you don't understand you you need to
watch John ruschamiern Us and kind of video one.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
So can you tell us in sentence what Putin's justification
is for going into Ukraine and killing all those people?
Speaker 6 (06:07):
Okay, Crabia, Kreamia is part of Ukraine, right if Ukraine
becomes NATO, which they were threatening to do, which we
promised we would never do that. When so you collapsed,
Krimia has a port which has been in Russia port
for several hundred years.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
It was gone, Warren, I got interrupt. Sorry, don't mean
to be disrespectful. I'll put one and all. Don't mean
to be disrespectful. God interrupt. We're talking about the election
right now. Crimea was taken under Obama, that was already gone.
And then remember Putin didn't do anything when Trump was
in office, and then he went in to Ukraine. He
went into Ukraine after that, So can you tell us
(06:44):
in one sentence, Warren, again, don't mean to be disrespectful.
We're talking the election today. Can you tell us in one.
Speaker 6 (06:49):
Sentence the American military industrial complex and deep state people,
now of the Russians were going to behave this way
back in the early part of the thank you, and
wanted them to happen so they could spend money in him,
the military industrial complex, and that's exactly what's happened.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Yeah, Warren, appreciate the call. It sure didn't happen under Trump.
And that's why Ryan, I think that the left is
making a big mistake. They're flelling right now right I
think they're making a big mistake and tying themselves in
the final days to this lie that Donald Trump called
for violence against Liz Cheney, and anybody who sees the
full clip we played it we will again knows that
(07:26):
it's a lie. But where they're making a huge mistake
is tying themselves to Cheney a and tying themselves to
Cheney on an issue that pertains to war. Because right now,
you look at all the polling Americans do not have
an appetite for the approach of the Biden administration to
the war in Ukraine. And Trump has drawn a clear contrast.
(07:48):
He's the peace candidate he was when he was in office.
It's not because he retreated from the enemy. He forced
the enemy to retreat from him. So they want to
finish the campaign on these grounds.
Speaker 7 (07:59):
Send the limbl for yes. And it's two things, Dan.
It's scattershot, as they've always been against Trump. They're trying
to throw spaghetti against the wall and see what sticks.
And it's crying Wolfe syndrome. People aren't gonna believe these
clowns anymore. They were just saying that he was trying
to protect women and that that had something to do
with abortion. They were trying to run that charade out.
And now they're doing the same with Liz Cheney saying
(08:21):
that he wants to put her up in a firing squad.
It's ridiculous on its face, but then it's a pattern
of these people. They can't bring this man down, and
they're so desperate and to your point, flailing about it.
They needed to have a targeted approach. How do we
defeat Donald Trump? What is the central ethos to that message?
And they never arrived at it.
Speaker 2 (08:39):
And one of the.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
Many reasons why this will backfire on them is because
it was Trump who's been shot at. It was Trump
who was shot. And the other thing is it's like
the boy you cried wolf. This party has lied about
Trump so many times, and the American people have clearly
seen that that now, even if they had something bad
(09:01):
to say about Trump that was true, the people wouldn't
believe it. But I got to give you this before
we hit this break. Here is the official quote from
the Trump campaign that was issued to the press about
acclaimed by David Pluff, who is high ranking in the
Harris campaign, that the Madison Square Garden event turned undecided
voters toward Harris and that the profile excuse me, of
(09:25):
the remaining undecided is better for Harris than Trump.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
So here's the official response to the Trump.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
Campaign quote, what the hell is he going to say
he's losing? Well, let me give it proper intonation. What
the hell is he going to say he's losing? Referring
to Pluff in the Harris campaign. Fact of the matter is,
David can't do anything but bs. They use the full
word until Tuesday because we are kicking his blank. The
(09:51):
only thing the Harris campaign has functional at this point
is a bs full word machine that is dutifully repeated
by the legacy legacy media is fact so that the
response of the Trump campaign eight five was five two
five five. The number text us at d N five
seven seven three nine.
Speaker 8 (10:12):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast, Dan.
Speaker 1 (10:16):
Trump actually said about Liz Jennie, but his daughter is
a very dumb individual, very dumb.
Speaker 9 (10:24):
She's a radical warhawk. Let's put her with a rifle
standing there with nine barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's
see how she feels about it. You know, when the
guns are trained on her face.
Speaker 2 (10:36):
You know, there are war hawks when.
Speaker 9 (10:38):
They're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh gee,
will let's send let's send ten thousand troops right into
the mouth of the enemy.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
And the left wants to cut that last part off,
and in fact, the whole second half of he was
obviously talking about what would her attitude be if she
was the one who had to go to war and
have those weapons trained on her. But the left right
now is so freakd they're so panic plus and I'm
not talking about democrats, I'm talking about the left that
(11:06):
the powers on the left to control the party. So
many of those powers on the left that control that
party are flat and moral that they will flat out lie,
They will they will pervert the criminal justice system to
try to jail a political opponent they can't beat at
the polls. This is something we really haven't experienced in
America before, and it's the reality right now, and it
(11:29):
makes this election even more important right because so much
of world history has been this ongoing battle between right
and wrong, and right now you could not have a
starker choice. And again that's not a reflection on Democrats,
but it's not your everyday Democrat who controls that party
right now. It is the far left, secular hard course
(11:51):
who control that party. And there is just this level
of immorality and willingness to lie and personally destroy that
I think really threatens the existence of this country as
we know it. Let's go to the phone lines and
thank you again to the founders and those who have
fought in wars, who've given us this great gift of
(12:12):
being able to save our country simply through the electoral process.
Jim in Denver, you're on the dan Kaplas, You're welcome.
Speaker 4 (12:21):
Yes, Dan, I got diverted from my point when I
talked here earlier. But Yim, when Donald Trump, I mean
he motivated that mob to attack the Congress. Now well,
I mean that's what everyone said.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
Yeah, but how Jim, it's not true. So explain to me, please,
how he did that. I mean, you know that if
the Biden administration could have charged him with incitement, they
would have charged him. Even the Biden administration, which abused
that the justice system to go after him, didn't even
try to charge him with incitement.
Speaker 4 (13:03):
Yeah, well they're I think they charged them with interfering
with the transfer of power.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
They didn't. I don't think that was.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
But Jim, they did not charge him with incitement. So
please explain to everybody what Donald Trump did to incite
violence at the Capitol.
Speaker 4 (13:22):
Uh, everyone to a man. When prosecutors asked them why
they did why they were doing what they did, they
all said because they thought that's what Donald Trump wanted
them to do.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
And how many people were there who heard Donald Trump
but did not commit any crimes at the Capitol.
Speaker 5 (13:46):
I couldn't give you the number.
Speaker 1 (13:48):
It's the great majority committed crimes at the Capitol.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
No, correct.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
And so the point is this, Donald Trump said, go peace,
go peacefully. Listen, I was peacefully and patriotically. I was
very critical that day. Go back and look at my
real time tweets, and I stand by everything I said
that day. The people who committed crimes at the Capitol
needed to be prosecuted. But Donald Trump did not incite
(14:20):
anybody to commit crimes at the Capitol. Donald Trump, and
I've said this then and I stand by it now,
was too slow to respond and should have done more
that day. And you know, voters can take that into
account along with the good, which I think far far
outways the bad. But he did not incite violence.
Speaker 4 (14:39):
What Dan my opinion, that was a cya, And I
think you can spot a cya. And he told if
you get people fighting mad, if you give an hour
and a half speech that gets them furious and tells
them the most prized possession is being stolen from them
(15:00):
and it's right down the street, and then for one
second you use the word peacefully after you've spent an
hour and a half getting them fighting mad. I just
don't think that qualifies.
Speaker 1 (15:12):
Okay, So Jim, let me ask you what. Let me
ask you, my friend about that standard. Then, so we
talk about all of these issues now that are of
such enormous importance, right, I mean you could go back
to slavery, use slavery as an example. Should on that
issue or any other major life and death issue of
the day, should people not be allowed to speak the
(15:34):
truth about how horrible the behavior that needs to be
stopped is because of fear of violence. Now, listen, I've
been very consistent all along. I have not seen proof
that election was stolen. I disagree with President Trump. I
did then and I do now about whether there's proof
the election was stolen. But according to your standard, Jim,
(15:55):
nobody should be able to even speak that the truth
about something if that something is so awful that there's
a risk some nut job may go out and act
on it violently. How can America exist with your standard?
Speaker 4 (16:13):
I agreed Dan, with it being you can't say you
don't know, but there's a mountain of evidence that it
wasn't stolen.
Speaker 1 (16:24):
Okay, So as long as Trump and you agreed, Jim.
And the only reason I interrupt is we're on like
our fifth segment with you and the time constraints of
talk radio, and I appreciate you being here so much, Jim,
But when we come back to it. The starting point
has to be an acknowledgment that Trump did not incite violence.
That's why the government didn't charge him with that. So
(16:46):
what you're now saying is, Okay, we've got to extend
the law so that even if somebody is not inciting
people to violence, they cannot voice certain opinions unless those
opinions are judge to be true by some other individual
or body. That's what you're saying, Jim.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
I disagree with you when you say that the government didn't.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
Okay, well, you're just wrong. I'm sorry, Jim, not to
be disrespectful. You're flat wrong. They did not charge him
with incitement period.
Speaker 4 (17:18):
Because it's a harder charge.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
To prove, well, because he didn't do it.
Speaker 1 (17:22):
I mean, come on, you got these you got these
people out there charging him with everything they can imagine.
You don't think they would have loved to charge him
with incitement, but they knew he didn't do that.
Speaker 4 (17:34):
Dan, how did the thousand people that all said they
were doing what he wants?
Speaker 1 (17:39):
Okay, Okay, okay, So Jim, let me get well. First
of all, incitement can't be based on somebody who has
decided they're going to violate the law and somebody is so.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
Now, it's the.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
Credibility of the people who committed criminal acts at the
capital that you rely on. No, incitement has to be
based upon whether the speaker actually did those things that
are forbidden under the law, such as saying to people,
go now there, commit violence. That that's the standard for incitement,
(18:15):
not what somebody who decided to break the law then
later claims. So no, you can bet if the Biden
administration could have charged Trump with incitement, they would have
done it in a heartbeat.
Speaker 2 (18:26):
But they couldn't because he didn't. You're on the Dan
Capla Show.
Speaker 8 (18:36):
You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (18:39):
Where Trump said he was going to do something for women,
whether they like it or not, whether the women.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
Like it or not.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
He was talking about protecting women, protecting women, whether they
like it or not.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
Certainly you can take a shue with the language.
Speaker 7 (18:51):
But he wasn't saying he was just going to do
whatever he wanted, regardless.
Speaker 1 (18:54):
Of you know, anyway, even Jake Tapper trying to clarify
that I love this because as predicted, we've got all
these lefty heads exploding down the stretch and they're saying
all these obviously untrue things and just flailing wildly in
ways that I think hurts them in the end, Like
this all okay, Their big line of attack is going
(19:14):
to be Trump says he's going to protect women, whether
they like it or not, yet protect them from illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2 (19:21):
Do you think that's going to hurt Trump on balance?
I don't think so.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
And coming out today now, they're hitching their start to
Liz Cheney and they're lying about what Donald Trump really
said about her. But they're hitching their star to Liz
Cheney in the closing days of the campaign. They think
that's going to help them. Oh and by the way,
for anybody who pays attention, his comments are about Liz
Cheney when it comes to war and when it comes
(19:45):
to war candidate versus peace candidate. That cuts in Trump's
favor every single day. So, boy, you can tell it's
going to get even crazier as we expected, and in
the end, I believe that's going to help Trump. Scott
and little Tenure on the Dan Kapalash'll welcome.
Speaker 5 (20:03):
Hey, how are you dam living the dream?
Speaker 2 (20:04):
My friend? How about you?
Speaker 5 (20:07):
That that last call? I just I've got an anxious
I was just too too long for that person anyway,
I you know, I just dropped my belt off, and
uh it was for Donald Trump. But you know when
when you think about it, can't imagine the country. This
(20:30):
gray was such pathetic uh individuals to uh to have
to vote for. And what gets me about that? At
first I'd never vote for Democrat, just the party has
gone the hill. But I disagree with you on Donald Trump.
The way this guy speaks, the way he presents things
(20:56):
is almost insane for someone that has, you know, that
much power, has done so much in this country as
far as you know, his real estate and this towers
and all that great stuff. The man just doesn't know
how to present a point without just digging a big hole.
(21:22):
And he would win by a landslide if he could
just speak, you know, diligently, like a you know, like
the governor down in Florida or something where there's so
many other people, Ted Cruz, you know, these people, but
he's got to just you know, it's not a potty mouse,
it's a stupid mouse.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
Let me ask you, what are you married? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (21:47):
Okay, and I'm married too, and I'm sure like me,
you're married to a wonderful, wonderful woman who we're both
very lucky to be married to our separate wives. Is
there anything about you your wife would like to see improved?
Oh God, yes, yeah, and me too, and I agree
with her. So what I'm saying is, yeah, we can
(22:08):
look at anybody, including Donald Trump, and say, oh, I
could imagine a better version of that person.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
I get that.
Speaker 1 (22:15):
But when it comes to Trump, obviously it's a choice
between these two. But then your fair question about Ron
DeSantis or Ted Cruz, both of whom got thoroughly selected
by Trump in the primaries. So since you got to
win the presidency to be able to save the country,
I think Donald Trump is a gift in this sense.
And listen, he says and does plenty of things I
(22:35):
disagree with, but he's been able to accomplish some phenomenally
great things because he's able to put together these coalitions
to actually get elected. There's no guarantee Ron DeSantis would
have been able to accomplish that, even though I think
DeSantis would have been a tremendous president.
Speaker 5 (22:54):
Well, I mean, I agree with you, but if you
go back to the point of us beingmarried, you know,
if if it was my wife married to Donald Trump.
That would be one of the things she would tell
him is you need to clean up your act and
present things in a more sane and dignified manner.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
Well, he's admitted Millennia has told them that.
Speaker 5 (23:22):
Well. I mean, she speaks bitter and he does well.
Speaker 1 (23:27):
But he does some things uniquely well that other people
don't do. And I mean, for example, Scott, let me
ask you, how many folks do you know, under the
same circumstances after just having been shot in the ear
and you're bleeding and you're on the floor, would have
had the composure, the strength, the presence of mind to
(23:48):
jump back up and assure the crowd with fight, fight Fight.
Speaker 2 (23:51):
How many have that in him?
Speaker 5 (23:54):
Oh? Very very few. I I probably wouldn't, and I'm
pretty strong person of that. Lot of bad things happen
to me that I've had to get up from. But
that is a little different. Well, but it's as well
by you and chilling someone behind you. I agree with
you one hundred percent on that. The man has got
(24:16):
he's got some stones and he's you know, he is successful.
I think he The one thing about him and I
have no trouble voting for I. You know a lot
of people say, well, he's doing this for power. Well
maybe a little bit, but he's doing this, in my opinion,
(24:37):
because he really wants to make a differences in this country,
and he wants to make a difference. I'll get you
someone else probably wants to get on.
Speaker 1 (24:47):
Thank you appreciate the car man. Thank you really appreciate
that conversation. Let's go to Dean in Arvada. You're on
the dan KAPLA. You'll welcome you.
Speaker 5 (24:56):
Hey, hey, thank you sir. Yeah, that previous call to
this guy. I mean when people broadstroke, Well everybody said
that Donald Trump is the reason I got convicted is
because or I took the tea or condition because he
told me to go to the Capitol and fight like
blah blah blah. How does he know what the broad
stroke of everyone that's sat there with the DOJ getting
(25:20):
rated to hammer you to ten years if you don't
take a flee. Yeah, when big when Big d OJ
says you're guilty, you say how much? And please be
merciful on me because you can't defend yourself unless you're
Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Yeah, we never tried to.
Speaker 5 (25:33):
Just way out of line, for broad stoking people.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
We never tried to blame Bernie Sanders for the supporter
of his who was going to mass murder all those Republicans, right.
Speaker 5 (25:44):
I mean, Maxwell has come out and says we need
to go after him. Kamala says, we need to go
after these people and don't stop. We will fail him
out and fight. I mean, there's just so much rhetoric
from the left, and you know, these guys come on
and you could this. Everyone said that Donald Trump made
us an insurrection? Well, why didn't Jack Smith charge you
(26:06):
with insurrection? Chlsey didn't do an insurrection?
Speaker 2 (26:09):
Well, and you could.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
You come back to Kamala Harris deciding very systemically to
compare Trump to Hitler. And under these circumstances, of course,
she knows that that may very well green lights some
deranged person, you know, who may then go out and
try to assassinate Trump. But she's willing to go that far.
(26:30):
And listen, I had defended her in the left, even
though I completely disagree with the premise when they had
continued to label Trump a threat to democracy even after
the assassination attempts, Because while I believe that's a lie
and that in fact it's the Democrats who are the
threat to democracy is proven by the coup they pulled
on Joe Biden.
Speaker 2 (26:51):
You know, I felt.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
That that that's the kind of political speech that they
should still have a right to advance, even though it
posed a heightened day injured to Donald Trump, just because
I think our protection of free speech is so important.
But when they decide to go to Trump is hitler.
That was the essential message. First of all, that is
(27:13):
so far beyond that, that is so far beyond anything
logical or reasonable that it could even potentially be justified.
And they know the climate winner right now, where they know,
they know there's at least one nation state trying to
assassinate him. No, No, I think they revealed themselves in
that moment, just as Donald Trump revealed himself in that
(27:35):
moment where he was shot in Pennsylvania, and he showed
this nation a strength and a courage and intelligence, a
presence of mind, and showed this nation the kind of
strength that any sant American would want an our leader
in a dangerous world.
Speaker 2 (27:50):
He showed his true self there. And that's another.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Reason why I believe he's going to win, and I
think he's probably going to win comfortably. America got to
see the real and even for people who say, oh,
the guy's an SOB, well, they're going to be an
awful lot of people who say he's an SOB, who say,
but he's my SOB, and we need him on the wall.
We need somebody that tough, that fear, somebody the enemy
(28:16):
will fear on the wall, because that's the only way
we're going to keep the enemy at bay. You're on
the Dan Capless Show.
Speaker 8 (28:25):
And now back to the Dan Tapless Show podcast Useless Information.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
Our lines are and flag as you expect. On the
Friday afternoon before election Day, the left melting down saying
and dude in crazy crazy things, lying through their teeth,
but in ways it's more likely to hurt them than
help them.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
This is a beautiful thing to behold.
Speaker 1 (28:44):
And I can't wait for next week with you. Let's
go to the phone lines right now. I did want
to mention though I've done a little research on this,
this thing I had happened yesterday and Halloween and whether
it was a ghost or a mechanical. When I was
back in my car out and every time I and
to reverse, the trunk opened because I have a hatchback
SUV and there is no it appears no possible mechanical
(29:09):
explanation for it. So Halloween, you know, I think somebody
I know in the great Beyond was just having a
little fun with me, and that's that's pretty cool to
think about. Let's go to Eric in Denver. You're on
the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 10 (29:20):
Welcome, Hey, Dan, I just wanted to talk real quick
about the Trump's or march, the ladists or marks that
they're taking out of context. And don't you think that
he kind of knows what he's doing like that, he
just can't help himself for making these sort of double
on condres. It's just like he's he's pushed, purposely pushing buttons,
(29:47):
saying things that could it could be taken out of
context and become realiant inflammatory well.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
Or to extend your point of step, maybe saying things
in such a stark way that he knows they're going
to get a lot of attention. I think that certainly
happens sometimes. For example, his his comments seems like five
years ago that you know is Kamala Harris Black. I
think that was premeditated, deliberate. He knew the firestorm it
(30:16):
would create, but he wanted to plant that seed, and
I had disagreed with that and still do, but I
think that was very intentional. Sometimes listen, the guy's only
human right and a big part of his appeal Eric
is that he's not some packaged kind of political professional.
Speaker 4 (30:33):
You know.
Speaker 1 (30:33):
He speaks from the heart and from the cuff, and
so sometimes some things aren't going to be said exactly right.
So I think part of it's a too yeah, but
that's part of his appeal. That's part of his his
appeal to people. People don't want politicians as usual.
Speaker 10 (30:52):
I agree, I just for me, I'm thinking back to
his comment that he's the father of in beature of fertilization.
Speaker 5 (31:01):
Which is just struck me, as.
Speaker 1 (31:05):
You know, And the thing with Trump thanks to the
comment is is to me, you know, sometimes you get
this puffery and sometimes you get this exaggeration, and sometimes
he exaggerates a point like all legal scholars disagreed with
throw where the truth is a vast majority of honest
legal scholars disagreed with the constitutional basis because there really
(31:26):
wasn't one. But my point is you can trust that
with the left, where they just flat down so they
sit down, they can cock these lies. I don't mean Democrats,
I mean the left that owns and operates the party,
and they go out and tell the most terrific lies
over and over again, knowing their lies, just because they
lack morality and they believe that's the way to win.
And that's that's how high the stakes are in this election.
(31:49):
Just have to defeat the left. The irony, of course,
is that the left is in big, big trouble if
Kamala Harris wins. Their biggest problem is if she wins,
because if Kamala Harris wins, they know she's going to
be horrific.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
She's going to be offul in office.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
It's going to hurt their brand. It's going to get
them wiped out in twenty six and twenty eight. So
the left's in trouble one way or the other. Brian
and Arvada, you're on the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 5 (32:16):
Welcome, Hey Dan, I wouln't voted today. Awesome vote in there.
Speaker 2 (32:22):
What'd you do on seventy nine?
Speaker 11 (32:23):
I drugged my neighbor. He was like twenty six d
and what drug did you use? Well, I mean he
said you drugged your neighbor, you know, and we would
at a lot of these young kids have the same opinion.
But there are you know, guys that are like, we
were not thinking about that stuff when you're young. So
(32:44):
we got to kind of help him along. So I
drug him in there. He voted too, so I'm too
up on the situation.
Speaker 1 (32:52):
Well, I'm glad you went and hopefully you voted. Excuse me,
I'm not getting emotional. It's peanut butter against seventy nine.
I hope you voted it, because since we're not a
swing state, I think the most important vote any of
us can cast in this election is against the hideous
Amendment seventy nine, which would put in our constitution in fantaside,
(33:14):
that is, putting infanticide.
Speaker 11 (33:16):
Into the constitution.
Speaker 1 (33:17):
Good good, and please get everybody you know, even many
people who are unfortunately pro abortion, get them to vote
against seventy nine.
Speaker 2 (33:25):
It's hideous.
Speaker 1 (33:28):
Oh we lost our friend Brian. Hopefully, I'm sure we'll
get him back Monday. Can you imagine Monday show? I
mean I can't wait for all three of those shows
next week, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, because can you imagine Ryan
the lunacy over this weekend?
Speaker 5 (33:42):
Oh?
Speaker 1 (33:43):
Boy, with the left melting down right now, they'll tell
any lie they're flailing. And then Trump is going to
be so active, He's going to close so strong. And
then Monday show as we get the final polls. So
many of these posters are doing the final polls. Nate
Silveru approaches it from the left, but he's not a psycho.
(34:03):
Lefty said that the one poll that he's waiting to
see because he thinks they're honest. New York Times Siena.
Everybody else, he says, is hurting, but he believes they're honest.
I think New York Times Sienna has been way off
in favor of Democrats time after time after time. So
but we'll have all that data on Monday, so much
(34:24):
to talk about them, the latest on the Secretary of
State scandal in Colorado, and then of course Tuesday and Wednesday. Ryan,
thank you very much for everything. Kelly, you're the best everybody.
I hope you can have a wonderful weekend here in
Colorado or across the country and then join us Monday,
ready to roll on The Dan Kapla Show.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.