Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Kaples, and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Let the celebration.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Continue, and I am resolved to start every show that
way for maybe the next twenty or thirty years. Eight
five five for zero five A two five five the
number because it is true and it should happen, and
we just have to let that joy fuel more victory,
not for this party or that party, but for America,
because truly, this is what this is going to be.
(00:37):
Eight five for zero five A two five five texts
Dan five seven seven three nine. I'll get to those
texts right away as well as calls.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
If you just joined us, thank you, I'd say.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
Kind of the big headlines of the day, we're seeing
very concrete, very concrete improvement in America and the world
just in these few hours after Trump was elected. Cutter
at this point throwing leadership out major step forward for
the world to Moss leadership saying they want peace now,
and you can see why, right It's peace through strength
(01:10):
and people know Donald Trump will deliver also a lot
of talk about the US Supreme Court. My prediction, and
again I'm sorry to be a spoiler. I know that
I'd taken the suspense out of this election when I
told you a year and a half ago Biden would
not be their nominee.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
They'd depose him.
Speaker 1 (01:25):
And then when Harris was looking like she was skyrocketing
to victory, so I don't worry, she's going to start
to fall. And once her numbers start to fall, there's
nothing to stop them as long as Trump doesn't agree
to a second debate. He wisely did not, and what
happened happened as all of her weaknesses were fully exposed.
But here's what you have to look forward to. And
(01:45):
it's such a beautiful thing, right, is that what's going
to happen. I predict is that two tremendously great Americans
with historically positive impact on this country, Justice is Alito
and Thomas Alito first, and then Justice Thomas last. I
predict we'll leave the bench later in Trump's term so
that Trump can appoint their replacements, and it will be
(02:07):
an extension of their tremendous service to this nation. Now,
the left at the same time, is trying to push
out Justice so to my or who's only like seventy,
you know, and are trying to push her out.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
And some on the left want Biden to a point.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
Kamala Harris to that spot. So that's percolating. You think
Justice sot to my ar will go Ryan, do you
see that happening?
Speaker 3 (02:29):
No way in the timetable's way too short, and you
got Mitch McConnell in a closely divided Senate. They would
have to have mansion and cinema on board. I don't
see that playing out the way McCary Sellers wants it to.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
I don't either, but you never know it because obviously
Justice Ginsburg hung on and that turned out to be
a phenomenal service to America, you know, because we ended
up with the court we now have.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
We ended up with.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
Justice Barrett, who's only fifty three and hopefully we'll serve
for at least another thirty.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
Years or so.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
The Texter says, Dan, Why on earth would Biden even
consider appointing Harris to the Supreme Court?
Speaker 2 (03:06):
She was part of the coup.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
Thoughts from Marilyn Maryland, thank you for the question, respectfully, disagree.
Biden owes Harris bigly because if Kamala Harris had done
her constitutional duty, Joe Biden would have been removed under
the twenty fifth Amendment. So among the many disservices to
this nation by Kamala Harris, first on the list is
(03:28):
failing to do her constitutional duty.
Speaker 2 (03:30):
She covered for Joe Biden.
Speaker 1 (03:33):
We have had an incompetent, incapable president for a long time,
putting America at grave risk. America in the world have
paid a grave price, and she, for her own political purposes,
covered for and then Biden, in one of his lucid moments,
brilliantly out maneuvered Obama, Pelosi and the other cousters by
(03:54):
forcing Harris on them. As I said at the time,
because he knew she would lose. Where some of the
other might have had a chance to win, she was
certain to lose. He knew that, and he did it,
and he outmaneuvered him. In fact, Pelosi admitted that today.
Did you see that? Pelosi admitted that today publicly Eric
that when Biden, when Biden immediately backed Harris, it took
(04:15):
away the option of getting other people involved. So Pelosi, now,
who was just strutting around taking credit for pushing Biden.
Now when Harris was up in the polls Now, there's
not enough room under that bus for everybody Pelosi wants
to throw. There, she's throwing Kamala, she's throwing Biden.
Speaker 3 (04:33):
She's thrown pretty much everybody except Pelosi and putting some
puzzle pieces together. Dan I saw a Biden Aid was
quoted by saying they were blaming Obama for orchestrating at
all behind the scenes and knowing that they didn't want
Kamala Harris. The Obamas didn't want Kamala Harris. And it
goes to the point I think you made right away
that Biden endorsed Kamala to kind of oh block them
(04:55):
from putting who they wanted in and there's nothing they
could do.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Obama had a plan. You think that, and I know
you don't, but it's just a coincidence. George Clooney pens
that op ed. You know that, you know we can't
Abiden this. No Obama was orchestrating the whole saying, but
he was orchestrating the whole saying for some other candidate
to be the nominee.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
And then all of a sudden Biden out.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
Maneuvers them, or maybe it was Jill or whoever, but
once they immediately backed Harris. Yeah, that was such a
beautiful thing, right, and we said it at the time,
thank you, thank you, because she could not win. Who
do you think who do you think Obama's were gearing
it for? And if you go back look at the
contemporaneous press and the statement issued by Barack and Michelle Obama,
(05:38):
they did not jump on the Harris bandwagon immediately. They
said they wanted an open process, and then a day
or two later they had to succumb. But who do
you think they were planning to put in that job?
Speaker 2 (05:49):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (05:50):
I mean, your theory all along was maybe Michelle off
the top rope, but I don't know.
Speaker 4 (05:55):
I really don't.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Yeah, I mean, I don't know it was mische else
if she wanted it. We've all known that for a
long time she would have been if it had been,
you know, the the one version of Michelle Obama who
we sometimes see in public, who is incredibly and listen,
I'm her ideologies backwards, but incredibly charming and articulate, et cetera.
(06:18):
That Michelle Obama would have been by far their best candidate.
But again it comes back to you saw the way
that Barack and Michelle Obama went out and campaigned for Harris,
which I said at the time was clearly calculated to
defeat Harris. The way they campaigned for they wouldn't have
campaigned for Michelle Obama that way. They wouldn't have campaigned
(06:40):
for whoever they wanted the nominee to be that way,
whether it was Michelle Obama or someone else. If not
Michelle Obama, who do you think they wanted? I think,
I know you do. Think you do think, I know
think ally that they would have been strongly behind You.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
Don't think Josh Shapiro, Yes, yes, Josh Shapiro. Because Josh Shapiro,
I mean, it's it's become like an snl skit. Now
he must go home at night and watch videos of
Barack Obama and he's trying to It's like that Nebraska quarterback,
you know, who's just trying to imitate Patrick Mahomes, Which
(07:19):
makes sense, right, Patrick Mahomes is very successful, but the
mannerisms and everything else, Josh Shapiro is clearly in front
of the mirror trying to imitate Barack Obama's speaking cadence,
his mannerisms, the way he walks, the way he talks. Yeah, no,
I think if it wasn't Michelle, I think Shapiro was
their guy.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
You may be right, but to thank goodness, Biden, he
outmaneuvered them all because she just was not gonna win.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
For day one, she was not going to win. Benjamin Albright,
of all people not against Trump. Benjamin Albright, who's a
reporter on the sports side for Broncos stuff, has a
lot of sources, but he's got political sources as well.
And Dan, as you know, he co anchored the election
that coveraged with me, and he suggested, he insinuated that
a source that he didn't want to name said that
Josh Shapiro me indeed, had been offered the vice presidential
(08:06):
spot on the ticket and turned it down.
Speaker 5 (08:09):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
I've read and I can't remember who wrote the piece,
but they were credible that Josh Shapiro walked out of
the meeting with Harris that occurred over that weekend saying.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
I don't think I want to do this right? Can
you blame them right?
Speaker 1 (08:23):
No?
Speaker 3 (08:24):
Would you want to hit your start to Kamala Harris? Nope,
he can start cleaning it fresh in twenty eight.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
Yeah, no, that's right.
Speaker 1 (08:30):
So I don't know if he formally turned it down,
but it sure sounds like you walked out of that
meeting thinking, no.
Speaker 2 (08:34):
This is too whack, this is too whack. Let me
get to some text.
Speaker 1 (08:39):
My opinion is simple. I don't care who you are.
If you want to identify as a woman, no problem.
But if you want to be in the lady's locker
room bathroom, you had better be committed to your new
identity and had your plumbing changed or we may have
a bit of a problem.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
Sarah.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
Yeah, that has become a total anchor for the Dems,
and it's going to be interesting to see how they try.
Speaker 2 (08:56):
To get out of that.
Speaker 1 (08:58):
Eight five zero five eight two five. Hey, when we
come back. This is one of the most fun things ever.
And this big movement on the left right now where
they're trying to convince women to deny their husbands and
significant others intimacy for voting for Trump and and denying
(09:21):
intimacy until they get their way politically. How do you
think this is going to work out for him? Eight
five five for zero five eight two five five will
have one of those folks with us after the break,
you're on the Dan Capitlas Show.
Speaker 4 (09:35):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 6 (09:38):
Taylor like was like his ex girlfriend, and it's like
now deciding she's like warning people against Trump. I'm like, well,
wait a second, So how many people did she want
against Diddy?
Speaker 5 (09:49):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (09:50):
Zero? Okay?
Speaker 6 (09:51):
Well maybe we' shronm trust her opinion. It is sounds
rough man.
Speaker 3 (09:55):
Well, it's just amazing how many people in the Diddy
party list that are supporting Kamalos.
Speaker 2 (09:58):
Yes, seriously, it's like publically openly like all in, yes,
when are we going to get that list?
Speaker 3 (10:04):
One thing too, Dan, were there any endorsements on the
left that meant a fraction as much as Elon Musk
and Joe Rogan? Oh?
Speaker 2 (10:12):
Lord, no, Lord no, not even remotely close.
Speaker 3 (10:15):
And remember what we've been talking about for months, is okay,
Taylor Swift, she's going to endorse Harris, Fine, that doesn't
matter much.
Speaker 2 (10:23):
But is she going to go into the.
Speaker 1 (10:25):
Swing states and campaign with her and do shows and
everything else? And she wisely chose not to. And I'm
glad I'm not saying that would have made the difference
the way this race turned out. It would not have clearly,
but it's interesting she made the decision not to do that.
But my goodness, Yeah, Joe Rogan that show in his endorsement,
I would say literally ten thousand times more influential than
(10:49):
Taylor Swift's endorsement and Elon Musk's involvement at least is great, right,
and one of the reasons.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
I'm one of many I'm so excited for this next term.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
One thing I'd quibble with in your bumper music, winner
takes it all, loser has to fall. I don't mean
to sound all cliche here, but the truth is other
than that the secular left political activist, the people who
voted against Trump are going to be winners too, in
the sense that they're going to benefit from this much
(11:20):
better America.
Speaker 4 (11:21):
Yeah, make sure they remind them and tell them you're welcome.
Speaker 3 (11:24):
Whenever anything right goes under Donald Trump's watch, it's going.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
To go over great. Daryl and Loveland, You're on the
Dane Caplis Show.
Speaker 5 (11:33):
Welcome, Hey Dan, Hello, quick presentation of my credentials. University
of Wichita Graduate Commission set all over. Wichita Media bought
two Loveland radio stations. I had them for thirteen years
did fifteen years elected office, city council and Larimer County commissioner.
(11:59):
A couple of points on the election. I think your
appointments to the cabinet, I highly recommend. My first choice
for President of the United States after listening to this
guy over and over and over, is Mike Pompeia. This
guy is I hope Trump quickly names him Secretary of State,
(12:22):
Secretary of Defense, whichever this guy. You listen to him.
He says everything correctly. This guy is one of the
most knowledgeable and I hope Trump gets him on his
cabinet very quickly.
Speaker 2 (12:35):
Okay, okay, okay.
Speaker 5 (12:39):
Second point. The reason that the dams lost the election,
in my judgment, for one thing that Joe Biden did.
He opened up the southern border to millions of illegal aliens,
and that is the sole reason in my judgment, along
with some other things, is the reason the Dam's lost.
(13:02):
The destruction they have placed upon cities of the United
States of America welcoming one hundred and sixty two countries
from around the world with a welcome matg to come
into the United States of America. This is what cost
the dams. Anything else that's.
Speaker 1 (13:20):
Me prices yeah, I think prices. You know, it's it's
hard to argy. Thank you for the call, my friend.
It's hard to argue against the southern border being maybe
the major, the major driver, right because people knew Trump
from twenty fifteen at the latest forward was all about
(13:41):
closing the border and he did a lot of good
things in office on that. So once Biden and Harris
opened it up, and we all know why they opened
it up, right, it was such insanity. It was so
anti American, it was so damaging to America. Which is
no reflection on the people living south of our border.
It's just the reality. You cannot have a country if
you don't have a border. You can't have a house
(14:03):
if you don't have a door. And so we know
they did that for the most far left political purposes,
which was to you know, flood our swing states with
the new voters from other countries, people they were sure
would eventually get the vote, etc. And create permanent political
(14:24):
power for the left. They were willing to undermine America.
They knew, I mean they knew going in and again
this is not a reflection on your typical person living
south of the border, but they knew if they opened
that border up. Let all these people in unvetted. They
knew for a fact there would be American women raped,
there would be American women killed, there would be American men,
(14:46):
women and children killed, be it on roadway crashes or whatever.
They knew that, and they were willing to pay that
price with innocent American lives. Again, no reflection on the
typical person south of the border. But let all these
people in unvetted. You know that's going to happen. And
so that's again why this is a Hinge election, and
it's so very important because now we're going to see major, long,
(15:11):
long lasting change there, and we're going to see it quickly.
Speaker 2 (15:14):
Let's go back to the text calls.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
This texture disagrees with our last friend, He says Dan,
I hope Mike Pompeio is far away from the Trump administration.
Great clip of Tucker discussing a call with Pompeio. You know,
I saw another clip today, and I've always thought positively
of Mike POMPEII and I still do, but this clip
concerned me where he was hammering, at least in this
one clip Trump after the Marilago raid. So I want
(15:39):
to learn more about that I want to learn if
he has accused, as alleged, supported the Mari Lago raid.
I do not believe for a second he did. I
don't think any a good saying American could support that
Mari a Lago raid. And that's separate question from whether
Trump handled every document properly. But that kind of raid
(16:01):
under those kinds of circumstances, yeah, So I want to
learn more about that.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
But but in the past.
Speaker 1 (16:05):
There have been so many reasons to be impressed with Pompeio,
and I get the impression that Trump.
Speaker 2 (16:10):
Still, oh very much respects what's going on. There is
Trump down on him.
Speaker 3 (16:17):
You're saying, then he was the one that convinced Donald
Trump not to release the JFK assassination files in the
War and Commission report, and Tucker Carlson reported that that
was seconded by RFK Junior as a matter of fact.
So my opinion is no neo cons in the new cab,
that this is a new Trump two point zero administration.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
Speaking of neo cons, and listen, I love Trump's commitment
to no unnecessary wars, right, peace through strength, and he
was beautiful at that in the first term while using strength, right,
Look what he did dices and and the isis leader.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
Look what he did to solo money.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
And so people who get this idea that that wait
a second, Donald Trump is not willing to fight. No,
that or that he's retreating. No, Donald Trump is causing
the enemies.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
To retreat, correct peace through strength.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
But this is a very very serious question I want
to get to after the break as well. We now know,
and we got more detail today, that Iran has taken
very substantial steps toward killing Donald Trump. And so doesn't
this nation have to respond? Shouldn't the Biden administration have
(17:26):
responded already?
Speaker 2 (17:27):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Why didn't we get this additional detail before election day?
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (17:33):
So I would like your take on that. Listen, none
of us want unnecessary military conflict.
Speaker 3 (17:39):
I think Trump's good at avoiding a broader war and
getting dragged into a quagmire. But he's very good with
precise strikes like the ones you described, DW.
Speaker 1 (17:46):
Yeah, so we know now, we know now that that
this regime took concrete steps toward killing Donald Trump, toward
killing a former president leading candidate for president. Doesn't there
have to be some kind of very very strong response
to that. What should that response look like?
Speaker 5 (18:08):
So?
Speaker 1 (18:09):
We'll talk about that much more when we come back.
Great days ahead in so many different ways. And then
what do we do now? What do we do now
to win in Colorado? Save Colorado from the left. You're
on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4 (18:24):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 7 (18:28):
Trump AND's Republican friends want to do? And what another
giant tax cut for the wealthy?
Speaker 5 (18:34):
Now?
Speaker 7 (18:34):
I know some of you guys are attempted to think
as macho guys.
Speaker 8 (18:37):
I'll tell you what.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Man, Remember we used to have a little trouble going
down the plot once in a while, But I'm serious, these.
Speaker 7 (18:48):
Are the kind of guys you like a smacking ass.
Speaker 2 (18:52):
I'm sorry, I just had to play there. That's so good.
What was that? What? What does it even mean? I
don't know. I don't want to hurt that expression as
I don't even understand that.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
Yeah, wow, you think he makes it to election to
or till inauguration?
Speaker 3 (19:14):
Of course, it's his legacy and doctor Jill will have
nothing less than him serving out his term well.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
And I only wish him the best physically and mentally,
et cetera.
Speaker 2 (19:24):
But he's staying pretty fast. Do you think he'll be
at the inauguration because Trump. Yet listen, Trump didn't attend his.
Speaker 1 (19:36):
The second happiest person on election night after me, was
Joe Biden, Right. I mean, I know he hates Trump,
but more than anything, he just he just wanted to
humiliate the people who humiliated him. He sure as heck
did not want them to win. The people who had
deposed him pulled the coup.
Speaker 4 (19:57):
He's the only one of three candidates that beat Trump.
Speaker 2 (19:59):
You think Obama will be at an inauguration? Of course,
there's his chance to shine for the public.
Speaker 1 (20:05):
I wonder if the Democrats are going to start getting
a little tired of him.
Speaker 3 (20:09):
I think it's over their influence, their power over the party. Dan,
I think it's done. It didn't really move the needle
him or Michelle, And yeah, I think that era is over.
I do think. I think George W. Bush voted for Trump,
and I know that Jeb did. I just Jeb Bush
seems really excited about a Trump administration, and I fully
expect President Bush to be there at the inauguration.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
I respect I respect Bush for for not undermining Trump actively,
right like Chaney was calling on him to come out
and support Kamala Harris. I respect him for not going
down that road, right, but no, let's talk inauguration for
a second. I do bet there are a lot of
(20:53):
Democrats starting to get tired of Obama. Obama was obviously
behind the coup, and then Biden not maneuvered and Pelosi
admits it today, Biden not maneuvered him by immediately backing Harris,
and then they were stuck with a loser. So, you know,
you think of the lack of guts, you think of
the lack of guts on the left right, And we
(21:14):
got to be so grateful for that, because if Newsom
had guts, he would have just taken Obama on at
the beginning of the year at the latest. Pardon me,
same thing, right, He would have taken Biden on at
the beginning of the year at the latest, and he
would have just said all the obligatory stuff, Appreciate what
he's done, love him, etc. But he's not capable now
(21:35):
of seeing it through this race, and he would have
got out ahead. And I'm not saying Newsom would have
beat Trump. I'm not saying that at all. I'm just
saying he would have been a lot tougher than Harris
and it would have opened the door to others. And
you know the lack of guts of Polis. You know,
Polus kind of danced around trying to position himself, but
you know he didn't have the guts to just jump
(21:56):
in early and say, oh, Biden great, did all this
great stuff. But he's just clearly it's time for him
to pass the torch and for the good of the party,
et cetera, I have to get in. It doesn't mean
Paulus would have become their nominee, and he's sure as
hell wouldn't have beaten Trump, but he had that window,
he had that opportunity to do something dramatic.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
But all these people were chicken.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
All these people are chicken, and they all backed this
charade that Biden was competent. And Kyla Harris it was
worse than that, right, I mean, you got your constitutional
duty as VP, you know, you got to invoke the
twenty fifth and.
Speaker 2 (22:30):
She wouldn't do that. Yeah. So it's so.
Speaker 1 (22:34):
And this isn't sitting back here wanting bad things to
happen to them. That's not the way I'm wired. That's
not how I get my kicks. But it's sitting back
here celebrating the fact that these bad actors are being
exposed and these bad actors are being undermined, which really
helps set the table for America to move forward in
(22:56):
a dramatic way, a sudden way, a tipping point kind
of way. So many of the stars are aligning for that.
It brings me back to my personal belief. Can't prove it,
can't know for sure, but my personal belief that God
did save Trump in that field in Butler. And then
when you see all these things falling into place and
all the improvement in the world already just a few
(23:18):
days after his election because he was elected, it just
kind of reinforces that for me. And then you see
these bad actors who are being publicly exposed, and to me,
that backs it as well, because I'm with the founders, man.
They truly believed. There's no doubt they wrote it right, Ryan,
I mean, it's the last line of the Declaration of
(23:39):
Independence that didn't get there through AI. They wrote it,
and they truly believed in divine providence like they were
probably going to get hung after that deal. Vegas had
him as big underdogs, and so they were pretty much
signing up to get hung and They said, we're going
to take that bet because we believe that because we're
(23:59):
doing this religious freedom and all these other freedoms and
freedom comes from God. We're betting that God intervenes to
help us. That's what they meant by divine providence. They
bet on that. I do believe in it too, And
I understand people always have that good question about, well,
then why didn't God intervene to save this innocent person
(24:20):
or that innocent person? And I get and respect that question.
I don't claim to have the answer, but I do
absolutely believe in divine providence. First because God says that
that's what he does. And second because we've seen things
that just couldn't be explained otherwise. So I just think
there are phenomenal things ahead. Can we screw it up? Sure,
but odds are really on our side with this one.
(24:42):
Let's go out to Bennett. Talk to Mike. You're on
the dan Kaplis show. Welcome, Hey, Mike, Mike's the quiet sort,
don't you think?
Speaker 2 (24:53):
Rian? Yeah? Or maybe a phone issue Plattville.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
I spent a lot of time in play Phil Colorado,
great client of mine out there, Gordon, are on the
dan Kaplas she'll welcome.
Speaker 8 (25:05):
Yeah, let me try and be brief, although that's not
a strong suit with me. First of all, I absolutely
enjoy that the Democrats are forming their own circular firing
squad after watching Republicans do it for years. Yes, the
interesting point is, and it's a small one, but you
know they came up were a significant number of African
(25:26):
American men. Even if it's only twenty five or thirty percent,
that's more than a support of Donald Trump. And I
have a theory on that based upon I served eight
years in the military and my last three years I
made sergeants, so I became a supervisor and I supervised
automotive maintenance team in a combat unit in Germany, people
(25:47):
repairing tanks, trucks, and chiefs. I had four African American
men in my section, and the things that stand out
where the pride they took in themselves and their appearance.
You know, as a super riser, one thing you hate
jobs that come back because they're not done right. I
never had a problem. It was just a positive experience.
But there was one thing I knew that irritate him
(26:09):
and people that talk down to them and were condescending
about race.
Speaker 5 (26:14):
Boy would that get their back up?
Speaker 2 (26:16):
Sure, and I think that that's.
Speaker 8 (26:17):
Why, you know, an Indian woman pretending to be an
African American. I that that didn't set too well with
a lot of our African American brothers, you know, just
the thought.
Speaker 1 (26:29):
And you know, I know it's always dangerous to generalize,
but there but there are so many common positive attributes
among African American people, including a strength, the toughness that
I think comes from kind of the the historic disadvantages
and oppression.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
And what I'm leading up to, Gordon is strength. I
mean Donald.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
Trump, you know who agrees with them on every policy,
not probably very few, but he is undeniably strong. He's strong,
he has the strength of his convictions. He's an ultimate fighter.
And as I said that the Monday Show after and
I know this wasn't original on my part, the Monday
Show after Butler he won the election. He won the
(27:14):
election of those fifteen seconds between the time he was
shot and the time he got back up leading and
said fight, fight, fight.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
I mean that kind of.
Speaker 1 (27:22):
Strength resonates with people who have faced tough fights, who
have to be strong to survive in their own lives.
I think that was a bond that went way beyond party.
Speaker 8 (27:34):
Oh, I would agree, I would agree one hundred percent.
Speaker 2 (27:36):
Yeah, hey man, thanks for your service. Appreciate that.
Speaker 8 (27:39):
Oh I thank you for letting me make a comment.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
You have a good evening.
Speaker 1 (27:41):
Thank you you two eight five five or Zer five
eight two five five text DN five seven seventh through
nine has promised when we come back, we'll have the
sound of one of the women. Apparently there are allegedly
many hopefully none that Ryan knows who are at this
point withholding intimacy to protest the election of Donald Trump
and teach shows mental lesson. You're on the Dankpla Show.
Speaker 4 (28:03):
And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (28:06):
Let the celebration continue.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
As tell Ryan, I'm going to have the most fun
a guy can have tonight when his wife's out of town.
And yeah, she left an election day. It's a proud
tradition of her.
Speaker 4 (28:19):
Have you spoken to you since election night?
Speaker 3 (28:21):
I spoke with her this morning about the election though, no.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Sorry, yeah, no, that'll take a while. Yeah, yeah, I'm
sure she's very hat I look at that.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
Yeah, a little no, no no, And listen, she's she's
a great American and she has voted for some Republicans
before John McKay est to host a town hall firm
she did that. She no, no, just we just disagree on.
Speaker 2 (28:48):
This one Scotch and set. Yeah, I should have expounded
on that. You saved me, Thank you, Ryan. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
So so here is to me, at least, the perfect night,
the most fun you can have when your wife's on
the road. Gonna grill up a big steak, gonna have
a bottle of Johnny Walker red, and I'm gonna sit
there and I'm gonna watch the rerun of election night coverage.
I'm gonna start with ABC because they tried to rig
(29:18):
this election against Trump with that fraudulent debate they conducted.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
Then CBS because they tried.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
To rig it against Trump with the fraudulent VP debate
they conducted.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
I'll throw in a little NBC.
Speaker 1 (29:32):
CNN actually did a heck of a job uber professional
election night. I was watching them, and then I'm gonna
cap it off if I'm still awake with MSNBC.
Speaker 2 (29:43):
I mean, that's that's like a perfect night. Right.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
We'll get to the calls. I did promise this sound.
I'm going to deliver on it in a second. And
there are many, many of these videos up now with
women threatening to withhold intimacy from men because of the
election of Donald Trump. Dan, do you think God is
it all okay with the way Trump treats many fellow
human beings? I believe for all God's people, not just
(30:06):
so as lucky enough to be born in the US, etc.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
Texter, thank you.
Speaker 1 (30:12):
I do not think God's okay with the way any
of us treat our fellow human beings. I think we've
all got work to do there. I think God is
probably super okay with the great things Trump has done
on a large scale to protect and save innocent human life,
to bring peace to the world.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
A lot about the insinuation that text that I'm not
okay with, Dan, that it implies open borders. We shouldn't
discriminate it against anybody that wants to cross into our
country and just come over willy nilly. Illegal immigrants shouldn't
be considered illegal. That's where I think that text is
coming from.
Speaker 1 (30:49):
No good point, that's just goofy in my opinion. I mean,
the archbishop but one of the greatest Catholics in my lifetime,
and we've been blessed with so many in Denver we've had,
you know, Cardinal Stafford, Archbishop Shepew, and now the great
Archbishop Sam Aquilla. But Archbishop Shephew sat right there. I
mean I could like reach out and touch him from here.
(31:11):
He sat right there and said, No, a nation's entitled
to have its borders, and then it's a matter of
treating people with basic human dignity and respect. But a
nation's entitled to have its borders. So yeah, I would
love to have that texture call and have that conversation.
Of his point is that that our faith requires us
to have these open borders. I would love to have
(31:35):
that conversation because I don't get that at all, treating
all people, because the reality is, excuse me, God did
make everybody. But does that mean then that you have
to leave the door to your house open at night
and just let anybody wants to come in come in?
Because if you just leave your borders open, you're getting
a mix of unvetted people, which is you know, going
(31:58):
to include a certain number of rapists, murderers, drug peddlers, etc.
Along with good honest people looking for a better life.
But the truth is, even if it's a good honest
people looking for a better life, you cannot have an
unlimited number without undermining the good, honest people already in
your own country. So no, I just fundamentally disagree with
(32:19):
that texture. I think what we'd agree on is that
everybody has to be treated with basic human dignity. But no,
that open border stuff. No, I don't think as a
matter of faith we're required to do that. I think
is a matter of faith. If somebody shows up in
front of us and they don't have food to eat,
(32:40):
they don't have clothes to wear, they don't have a
roof over your head.
Speaker 2 (32:44):
I'm just speaking for me.
Speaker 1 (32:45):
I think, you know, people of faith, we each have
an obligation to do what we can to care for
them and tend to them. But that doesn't mean open
borders as a nation. Mike and Bennett, you're on the
Dan Kapli Show.
Speaker 2 (32:56):
Welcome.
Speaker 7 (32:58):
Hey, how you doing Dan in the Dream? Well, that's
great news. Yeah, I've been asking you over the years,
and I'll ask you another question here that's similar in
the same question, and I'm a big supporter of yours.
You're probably one of the best shows that I've ever
listened to. Thank you, But I want to mention that
(33:20):
how many people would it take over the amount of
registrated voters that voted, let's say twenty or thirty million
more than have registered across the United States, would you
allow to see the proof that election was stolen? And
(33:41):
I am going to ask you this because I think
that I am glad that Donald Trump did not win
the last election. That gives him more information and knowledge
of what to do during this administration. But I just
want a number of how many people over the amount
of registration you would allow to say that there was
(34:05):
no purer cheating going off zero.
Speaker 1 (34:09):
We can't have more people voting than we have registered
voters that.
Speaker 2 (34:13):
That would be proof of fraud. Let me ask you, Michael.
Speaker 1 (34:17):
The music means we're done, Michael, god willing. We literally
have ten seconds. God willing, Michael. I'll be back here
Monday at four oh six. Give me a call, then
we'll continue the conversation. Thanks to the kind words, Ryan,
thank you for everything this week and beyond.
Speaker 2 (34:30):
Kelly, You're the best. Join us Monday on The Dan
Kapla Show.