Dan lived through the JFK assassination as a young boy, and has formed strong opinions - based on severe doubts about what we were told by our government agencies and leaders - on who may have been behind the plot to kill the 35th U.S. President.
President Trump mentioned in his inaugural address that he believes he was spared by God in the Butler assassination attempt in order to make America great again, and Dan agrees.
President Trump mentioned in his inaugural address that he believes he was spared by God in the Butler assassination attempt in order to make America great again, and Dan agrees.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, and the
American Way is winning now, particularly since election Day, since
Inauguration Day, has taken off like a rocket, and there's
(00:23):
something to celebrate each and every day. Glad you hear
the work far from finished obviously, right, Colorado for example,
still deep blue and lots to be done here, but
very encouraging now. I do think we're at tipping point
in American history, and of course it's not guaranteed have
to keep it going, but Trump doing his part, so
(00:43):
we'll enjoy.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
All of that together. Quick view at the show today.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
I've got to sink my teeth into this whole idea
of birthright citizenship, because the idea that the Founders ever
would have intended that virtually anybody who just happens to
be born in America is now an American citizen and
a citizen of the state in which they.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
Were born is crazy.
Speaker 3 (01:09):
There's no way that's what the founders intended, and so
we'll talk about the federal court. I believe it was
a federal Court judge out of Seattle who today enjoined
put on hold, you know, President Trump's executive order on
birthright citizenship, saying no, we're not going to do that
anymore in America.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
And it was expected that a court somewhere would put
it on hold.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
But that's fine, because we needed to get to the
US Supreme Court. Yes, I wish President Trump's order would
simply be honored by everybody and upheld because I think
he is clearly President Trump is correct, but as a
practical matter, it needs to get to this US Supreme Court,
which I believe, without any doubt will say no, the
(01:51):
US Constitution does not provide for automatic birthright citizenship, particularly
for children who are born to somebody here illegally. So well,
we'll get into that in some real depth. But when
you step back and really look at it, it's kind
of a crazy idea, right that our founders would have
(02:12):
intended that first, Why in the world would you do that? Obviously,
the Fourteenth Amendment was solely one hundred percent focused on
writing one of the worst wrongs in world history, slavery.
And it was focused on making sure that people who
had been enslaved in this nation, that black people who'd
(02:34):
been enslaved in this nation, what would be citizens of
the United States of America. There's no rational argument out
there that our founders intended when they passed the fourteenth
Amendment to somehow say, yeah, anybody here illegally from any country. Hey,
if you can get a child born here, they're automatically
(02:54):
US citizens. There's no rational basis for believing that was
their intent. So anyway, we'll break it down in more detail,
and now is the time to do it right. That
it's a real issue and it's tracking toward the US
Supreme Court. The big question is how quickly. Let's hope,
very quickly, but much more to talk about today. What
(03:15):
a joyous day in America, not just because a good
thing was done by President Trump in pardoning the pro
life activist who had been convicted wrongfully politically motivated by
the Biden administration. Some in prison, including a young African
American mother with young children. But so part of it
(03:35):
is celebrating that the right thing has now been done.
The other part of it is celebrating that this very
evil practice in America is in the process of being corrected.
And what I mean by the evil practice is.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
Unequal treatment under the law.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
And that is what, more than I'd say anything else,
retins the very existence of America. I mean, we're founded
around the idea of equal treatment under the law. And
you look at this Biden administration, you look at the left,
you look at the left in Colorado and their commitment
to unequal treatment under the law that Hey, if you're
(04:16):
a conservative, we're going to look for a way to
throw you in jail. And if you haven't violated any crime,
then we're going to convict you anyway.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
And if you've done things.
Speaker 3 (04:27):
That we would not even charge a liberal for, well
we're going to charge you and we're going to sentence
you to the maximum.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
And if you happen to.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
Be part of the favored political class and you spout
the quote right ideas meaning lefty ideas, well, then we're
not even going to think of charging you, let alone
convicting you, let alone sentencing you the same way we
sentence conservatives.
Speaker 2 (04:49):
So when we talk about threats.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
To America, that this unequal treatment under the law is
probably the most toxic threat out there. And we saw
it on full display when it came to the persecution
of pro lifers, because you would have liberals engaging in
all of this different type of criminal conduct, they'd never
even think of charging them. By the way, you want
(05:12):
to look at a local example, Ryan, unless I miss something,
and I admit i've I've been very busy in my
law practice preparing for trial. But unless I miss something,
whoever burned down the Life Choice's pregnancy center.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
Up in northern Colorado.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
I think they're still happily prancing around out there free,
aren't they.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
While we've had.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
Grandma's and young moms imprisoned by the Biden administration for
protesting at abortion clinics. So are you telling me that
the Biden administration, with the vast resources and immense talent
in dj it, couldn't track down whoever lit up that
pregnancy center to protest the fall of Roe? Are you
(05:52):
really telling me that not a chance, They just didn't
want to. They clearly didn't want to. And that's what
I mean by unequal treatment under the law is you
cannot be out there prosecuting your political opponents for things
you will not prosecute your political allies for you can't
do that. That destroys America. That is unequal treatment under
(06:15):
the law. But that's exactly what we've had under the
Biden administration. So ding dong, the witch is dead on
that one. Because you want to talk about how scary
We were talking about it the other day, right, Ryan,
that witch from the Wizard of Oz, How scary she was,
how remarkable there was for a movie produced back in
the Stone Age.
Speaker 2 (06:31):
But you want to talk about the.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
Wicked Witch threatening America. Yeah, that that wicked witch is.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
Unequal treatment under the law.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
And that's what the left was all about, you know,
prosecute conservatives for things they never prosecute liberals for, and
then max sentences, max punishment. A nation can't exist that way.
A nation can't continue that way. So once again American
people and Donald Trump's saving us from that. But will
it be long term depends on what happens after this term.
(07:01):
Right have we ever seen Ryan, You're too young to
have long term perspective, But have we ever seen any
president get off to this fastest start?
Speaker 4 (07:11):
No, not at all, not even close, Not even Trump
the first time around. Oh yeah, the first time around,
God love them. I mean that was a blank show right.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
I mean, God love him for winning and saving the country,
but you've got Amarosa running around the right White House. Scaramucci,
it was wild, wild West, a lot of clowns and
amazing he was able to accomplish what he did in
the face of the coup attempt and everything else. But
now they're coming in like a machine. That's why again,
I know we're beating a dead horse here, but this
(07:43):
second term is going to be so much more productive
than a consecutive second term would have been because he's
had all this time to think about you know, what
he would do if he got that chance. So it's
going to be amazing. And uya never anything close to
this fast start.
Speaker 2 (07:59):
So that's all on the agenda to day.
Speaker 3 (08:02):
Do want to kick around now that the President's confirm
that he's about to release, we're.
Speaker 2 (08:07):
Told the rest of them.
Speaker 3 (08:07):
We'll see if anything's held back, and that's something will
be I'm not saying nefariously, but you know the remaining
JFK assassination files rfk MLK assassination files.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
And I got to tell you I'm a young man,
but I.
Speaker 3 (08:21):
Vividly, vividly like it was thirty seconds ago. Remember each
of those days, each of those moments when I found out,
and I can't wait to dig into all of that stuff.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
What do you think it's going to show.
Speaker 5 (08:35):
It's hard to know. We don't know what we don't know.
Speaker 4 (08:37):
At this point, I think hopefully it'll confirm or subside
any of the conspiracy theories. And they are vast out there,
as you are well aware, Dan, and you lived through it.
You were a very young boy when it happened, but
you know everything that happened in the aftermath, and it
was filling a void of information. And that's what happens.
People are going to kind of make up their own
details if they're not provided them by this government that
(08:59):
we've grown to distrust.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
Yeah, and that's a remarkable thing just in my short lifetime,
is as a boy growing up and then a young man,
there being an awful lot of trust for government. Not
totally blind and all that, but put an awful lot
of trust for government to the point now where I
think anybody who just kind of largely trusts government on
its face is crazy, right, And what a transformation in America.
(09:23):
Hopefully Trump will will help to start to write some
of that in a healthy way. You never want an
irrational trust. You never want an unearned trust. You want
to get to the point where government's doing it so
right that they've earned your trust.
Speaker 2 (09:36):
Eight five to five four.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Zero five A two five five text d A N
five seven seven through nine. Take a shot at all
of that, And there's much more ahead in the show
today as well, but let's start with that. It seems
like it seems I could make for a segment or
two write birthright citizenship, that the pardoning of the pro
life activist. And then, by the way, do you really
(09:59):
think the Biden administry couldn't figure out who burned down
that pregnancy center up in northern Colorado that the day
after Row was struck down?
Speaker 2 (10:06):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (10:07):
Right, eight five five for zero five eight two five
five the number. What do you think these soon to
be released files will show about who really was behind
the murders of JFK, MLK and RFK.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
You're on the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 6 (10:22):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 7 (10:26):
To port all immigrants here illegally. I will note the
ABC News Paul ask about undocumented immigrants, so we have
slightly different questions, but these were all taken within the
last month. And there's real uniformity here. That's what I
really think.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
You see.
Speaker 7 (10:37):
You see real uniformity all immigrants who are here illegally
fifty five percent of the New York Times, Marquette sixty
four percent, CBS News fifty seven percent, ABC News with
a slightly different question fifty six percent.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
So what you're seeing essentially.
Speaker 7 (10:50):
Here is very clear indication that a majority of Americans,
in fact, when they're asked this one question, which I
believe gets that the underlying feelings, do in fact want
the port all immigrants who are here illegally.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
There's no arguing with.
Speaker 7 (11:03):
These different numbers because they're all essentially the same across
four different posters.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
Yeah, and that's MSNBC. Boy, I would love to see
a Colorado pole on that. What do you think a
Colorado pole on that would say?
Speaker 4 (11:16):
Just slight correction that it was CNN for Harry Enton, so,
oh my bad, rather than MSBC. He's on with Kate Bolden.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (11:23):
Here in Colorado, I think our numbers would be below
the national average.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
Which I guess, pick a number, any number.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
Forty eight percent would favor the deportation of criminal aliens.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
Yeah, You're probably right, but still seismic landscape shifting. And
this goes back to the point I made yesterday. I
won't belabor it because I made it yesterday and I'll
probably make it again tomorrow, which is that John Hickenlooper
is vulnerable in Colorado when he votes against the Lake
and Riley.
Speaker 2 (11:53):
I think about that.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
You've got a liberal network with a national poll uniformity
across four poles, a strong ority of Americans want to
deport everybody here illegally, and then the number slightly.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
Lower, i'd bet in Colorado.
Speaker 3 (12:06):
But then you got John Higginlooper, who votes against a
bill that would have just said you deport the folks
here illegally who've committed other crimes that, combined with other things,
I think he is now vulnerable in Colorado. Eight five
five forour zero five eight two five five the number.
And while I don't think that strong national sentiment against
(12:28):
illegal immigration is necessarily going to affect the US Supreme Court,
I think the US Supreme Court would do this anyway.
I do believe the US Supreme Court is going to
loudly and clearly, as soon as the case gets there,
say no, there is no birthright citizenship in America. It's
madness to think the Founders ever intended that somebody here illegally,
(12:51):
if they had a child born on American soil, would
then have an American citizen.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
No, no way. The Founders intended that, I.
Speaker 4 (12:58):
Have a question from your legal perspective and just knowledge
of this issue law, et cetera. So, if somebody's here illegally,
a couple, and they have a baby, and their claim
is that the child's born here, they're American. Okay, I'm
going to walk you through a scenario. I want you
to respond to it. A foreign national, not a citizen
of this country, travels to the United States, does so
legally with a passport. A pregnant woman is on this flight,
(13:21):
goes to labor as they land, goes to an American hospital, delivers.
Speaker 5 (13:24):
Is that baby an American?
Speaker 2 (13:26):
No?
Speaker 5 (13:27):
The why not?
Speaker 2 (13:28):
Well, the reason being, I say no.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
If the Constitution's correctly interpreted right now under current law, yes,
But but no, And here's why, because they're not subject
to the jurisdiction thereof right under the meaning, under the
meaning intended by the Founders. If you look back historically,
(13:51):
what the Founders meant by this subject to the jurisdiction
thereof language, was undivided loyalty to this nation. And if
somebody is a citizen of another country, if somebody's.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Here illgally, that is not the case.
Speaker 4 (14:07):
And if I reverse engineer it, John McCain was not
born in this country. He was born in the Panama
Canal zone. His father served in the military and was
stationed there. And of course John McCain is an American,
but that's the reverse scenario, and we acknowledge that his
parents are Americans, delivered birth to John McCain, and even
though he wasn't born in this country, he was an
(14:28):
American citizen, right, And.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
So it just brings us back to the idea.
Speaker 3 (14:33):
And this is part of the Golden age I think
that we're entering into right now with this Trump victory,
and that is this opportunity to just step back. It's
like the spell's been broken and enough people can now
see the utter goofiness of so many things that have
been beat into people as somehow political or legal gospel.
(14:56):
The ultimate utter goofiness of thinking there's more than two genders, right,
I mean, just nonsense like that, the goofiness of thinking
that oh yeah, the Founders intended that if somebody here
illegally has a child who's born here, they're automatically an
American citizen. No, why in the world would the Founders
(15:16):
ever do that. Why in the world would the Founders
ever invite that problem incentivize illegal immigration.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
Nobody in the right mind would do that.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
Now, listen, if people want to have a separate public
policy debate and argue that that should be the law
of the land made by Congress, knock yourself out. But
you aren't going to get many people who agree, right,
because it's madness.
Speaker 4 (15:38):
Do you think, Dan, that Trump signed that executive order
with the explicit intent that it would be challenged and
brought to the Supreme Court so that Scotus would decide
on it.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
Yes, yes, and it's brilliant.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
I tell you, I don't want to get all wonky now,
and you already know this, But one of the most
encouraging things is when you start to look into these
executive orders.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
This is not like something written on the back of
a napkin at McDonald's.
Speaker 3 (16:04):
You know, these are really well thought out, very well written,
put together type executive orders.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
The ones I've been able to see any substance on
at this.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
Point, and it goes to your point, Ryan, that that
this is part of a very carefully crafted strategy to
get certain issues that they knew would be opposed and
joined by this court, or that get them to the
US Supreme Court as quickly as possible, while we've got
a court that actually interprets the law rather than legislates.
(16:35):
And so it's a very very well thought out plan.
And I won't get into the weeds on this because
it would be too hard to follow. Meaning this on
a radio show, we get into too many layers that
to get boring. But the executive order that Trump put
together on DEI is legally brilliant. It's so carefully put together,
(16:58):
it is very very well thought out, and it is
a very very high likelihood of legal success.
Speaker 2 (17:05):
And being upheld.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
So I'm just telling you that these people have been
working hard, they're smart, they're organized, and their.
Speaker 2 (17:12):
Positioned to win eight five two, five to five.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
The number text DN five seven seven thirty nine will
get to some text as well. I'd love to hear
somebody call and make the argument for birthrights citizenship, and
I understand that people will need jerk just go to
the first line of the fourteenth Amendment. Hey, if you're
born in the US and you're subject to the jurisdiction
(17:38):
thereof you're a US citizen. And I know everybody reverts
back to that argument, but as a matter of law,
it does not end there. As a matter of constitutional interpretation,
you have to look at the true intent. You have
to look at what those words actually meant at the time.
But could anybody call the show, Ryan, Could anybody call
this show and actually make a coach and argument in
(18:00):
favor of an.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Actual public policy?
Speaker 3 (18:03):
But yeah, if somebody just manages to get here illegally
and have a child born here, they're automatically a US citizen, Right,
Could anybody even hypothetically put together an argument in favor
of that?
Speaker 5 (18:15):
Doubtful.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
I don't think anybody ever could. So I think this
is going to get to Scotus.
Speaker 3 (18:21):
Let's hope it's rocket docketed, because it needs to be
hit five.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
To five for zero five eight two five five the numbers.
Speaker 3 (18:27):
So when we come back, give you my thoughts, now
that the rest of these files about to be released,
what really happened with these assassinations of these three great Americans?
M OKJFKRFK, you're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6 (18:40):
You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 8 (18:43):
And then finally he repeated his claim that he says,
I think under Biden, we had probably the highest inflation
in US history. Yes, it was high, about a forty
year high at one point in twenty twenty two. Never
close to the all time record of more than twenty
percent decades past.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
You know it's your time, right when that's the best
CNN can do fact checking you.
Speaker 2 (19:05):
Oh, Trump said highest inflation ever. No, No, just highest
inflation in the last forty years. I mean, this is such.
Speaker 3 (19:11):
A wonderful time and lots of reasons to believe it's
going to continue. Eight five to five for zero five
A two five five text D an five seven, seven
through nine.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
If you just joined us, thank you. We've got some
really interesting stuff going.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
We're talking about the goofiness of thinking the founders ever
intended that somebody born in America appearance here illegally would
automatically be a citizen. Obviously the Founders didn't intend that,
and we think this Supreme Court is going to strike
it down. So we're talking about that. And then as well,
now that Trump's going to release the rest of or
(19:45):
much of it mlkjfkrfk assassination files, what do you think
that's going to show. We haven't talked much about it
on this program, but i'd really like to today and
the don't want to get to one of the most
striking moments on Inauguration Day in the address when President
Trump said that God saved him and God saved him
(20:06):
to make America great again.
Speaker 2 (20:08):
So I want to get your reaction to that.
Speaker 3 (20:10):
As we've talked about on the show before, I personally
believe none of us can know for sure until we
hopefully have the chance to meet God face to face,
whether in fact he saved Trump, but I believe he did.
And then the second question, did he did God save
Trump to make America great again? Or did God save
Trump for some other reasons. So we'll get in all
(20:30):
that fun stuff, but in the meantime, let's go up
to beautiful Fort Collins.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
Talk to Bob. You're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome Bob,
Thank you.
Speaker 9 (20:40):
I was calling.
Speaker 10 (20:41):
And this story is a little older, but back in
the nineties, when I was working in Southern California law enforcement,
I came upon a situation where I was in a
found myself in a home that had no furniture in
the living room but about twelve or fifteen identical baths
and that, which you know, obviously was very odd and
(21:02):
it didn't appear to be any kind of normal daycare setup.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
But when did you visit?
Speaker 10 (21:08):
Rhy Oh?
Speaker 2 (21:11):
Sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 10 (21:11):
My friend through investigation, found out that this home was
set up to cater to wealth South Korean women who
would fly in pregnant to the Los Angeles, stay here,
have their baby, no intent to stay. Apparently we just
wanted a dual citizenship for their child to avoid I
(21:33):
guess mandatory military service.
Speaker 2 (21:36):
Yeah, great point, and thanks for passing that along.
Speaker 3 (21:38):
Which just goes back to the obvious, right, It is
just utter madness to think the Founders intended the fourteenth
Amendment to mean that you could do something like that,
or that somebody who came here illegally would then have
their child automatically be an American citizen. Why in the
world would the Founders pretty serious cats ever incentify that.
(22:00):
But you don't even have to get to that, right, Bob,
because there is no doubt what the Founders were up
to they were focused on slavery. The fourteenth Amendment was
all about slavery, was all about saying, these fellow human
beings who happened to be black, you know, who were
brought here to be slaves or the children of those
brought here to be slaves. No, they are American citizens.
(22:21):
They were born here, their parents are subject to the jurisdiction,
meaning that their exclusive loyalty was to the United States
of America. That's clearly what the founders intended. So thanks
for that example, my friend. It helps point out the
absurdity of the other argument. A five to five for
thank you, my friend, A five for zero five A
(22:42):
two five five text d An five seven, seventh through nine.
And the reason we're talking about it today is the
good news is that as expected, I mean, Trump executive
order very appropriate, Trump's right. It was certainly expected it
would be challenged in court, and that's somewhere a federal
court judge would enjoin put on hold the executive order.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
That's happened.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
So the good news is that now hopefully it can
get fast tracked to the US Supreme Court. Might take longer,
but hopefully gets to this US Supreme Court, which actually
interprets law rather than legislates, and once and for all
we can get this cleared up the right way.
Speaker 2 (23:21):
And then, which means.
Speaker 3 (23:22):
The Constitution does not provide automatic birthright citizenship.
Speaker 2 (23:27):
And then if folks think that should.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
Be the public policy of America, then convince Congress. And
I imagine we'll be able to convince Congress much more
quickly to make Ryan the owner of every major league
team in every sport, right, because no sane Congress would.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
Make that the policy of this nation. If you could be.
Speaker 3 (23:49):
Ryan, if you could be the owner of any team
in all of sports, what would it be?
Speaker 5 (23:54):
Oh, that's a great question.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
Probably the Tigers, because I know the most about baseball,
and I think i'd be able to have most knowledge
of that sport and the players in it.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
M Yeah, it seems like a boring choice to me,
but what what? What do I know? My friend?
Speaker 3 (24:08):
Yeah, I'd rather see you take over the Lions because
they obviously needs somehow help.
Speaker 2 (24:13):
I've not had a chance yet to.
Speaker 3 (24:15):
Express my condolences there, but I really felt bad for
you when.
Speaker 2 (24:20):
You know what it reminded me of.
Speaker 3 (24:21):
And I text, and I won't name drop, but I
text a friend of mine who was a star in
the Broncos back in those days. It reminded me of
that horrible Bronco loss to Jacksonville. The look the year
it looked like the Broncos were tracking for the Super Bowl. Yeah,
and it was just it gutted all of us in
the city. But it's at the stage for those back
to back Super bowls somself.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
There. See what happens with your allions. Let me get
to some of these text.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
Dan, mother is legal citizen, father is not a poor
child and father.
Speaker 2 (24:52):
No, no, no, no no.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
If a mother is a US citizen and that baby
is born to the mother, that baby's a US citizen
because listen, come back to the fourteenth Amendment. All persons
born or naturalized in the United States and subject to
the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States. Now
(25:15):
naturalized means in Congress controls these laws. Right, Okay, what
are the laws that say when you're a citizen and
the laws you're born to an American citizen, you're a citizen.
So no, if that baby doesn't matter that the father
may be here illegally. The mother's an American citizen, the
baby's an American citizen. But if you've got if you've
(25:35):
got parents who are here illegally, or one parent here
illegally gives birth to the child, the other parents not
an American citizen in some other country.
Speaker 2 (25:46):
No, our constitution.
Speaker 3 (25:47):
I understand the current interpretation is that our constitution says
that child's an American citizen. But that's a misread of
our constitution. And I don't think there's any credible argument
that the founders actually intended that with the fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 2 (26:02):
Let's get back to some more of our text.
Speaker 3 (26:04):
I'm really surprised, Ryan, we don't have some calls and
text on JFK, MLK and RFK assassinations and beliefs as
to what actually happened. Now that Trump's going to release
those records, maybe people are just waiting for the records.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
But I would have to ask you this.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
Does anybody really believe And if so, you'll have to
tell me why that Oswald just came up with this
on his own and did it all on his own
with the assassination of JFK.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
And why would anybody.
Speaker 3 (26:34):
Believe that given everything we've seen and heard already and
not having even seen this secret stuff yet.
Speaker 5 (26:40):
If I may just to throw this out there, I
do believe James R.
Speaker 2 (26:43):
Olreay, give me a break.
Speaker 3 (26:44):
I mean, I'm not saying he wasn't involved with the
idea that he was acted alone.
Speaker 4 (26:49):
Really, as per Lee Harvey Oswald, he was very delusional,
if I am correct, he also served in our military.
Speaker 6 (26:56):
He also had.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
Sympathies to the Soviet Union communists him and may have
thought he was doing a favor for the Soviets in
his deluded mind that there would be motivation for him
to do this in a very delusions of grandeur kind
of way.
Speaker 2 (27:11):
So why did Jeck Ruby kill him? And how did
Jack Ruby get access to him?
Speaker 4 (27:15):
Again, the simplified explanation would be Jack Ruby was a completely.
Speaker 5 (27:24):
He was a devastated American. He loved JFK.
Speaker 4 (27:26):
He was a patriot and thought he was doing the
right thing for his country by taking Oswald out.
Speaker 5 (27:31):
I'm not saying I believe that.
Speaker 3 (27:32):
I'm just saying, startingbody, a patriot who loves this country
thinks they're doing a service to the country by taking
Oswald out, by.
Speaker 5 (27:41):
Killing JFK's assassin.
Speaker 3 (27:43):
Yeah, right, But anybody would know the service to the
country would be getting to the bottom of who was
now with Oswald, I know, was the saying, I appreciate
the way your mind works, Ryan, and I do, and
I understand the point that you're making. I'm just saying that,
you know, I'm an evidence based guy. Followed, I don't
buy that Oswald acted alone. Just my personal conclusion. Maybe
(28:05):
what we'll see in these files it'll be released, Well,
we'll tell me. Oh no, it's pretty clear Oswald acted alone.
What why do you think? But I'm not expecting that.
Why do you think they've sat on the files? And
Sir Hans, Sir Han, anybody believe he acted alone?
Speaker 2 (28:17):
I don't know. What.
Speaker 3 (28:18):
Why do you think they've sat on these classified files
all these years?
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Republicans and Democrats?
Speaker 4 (28:24):
Yeah, well Pompeo is the one, and Trump named him
in the interview with Hannity last night that convinced him
not to release them. Of course, Pompeo was the one
time director of the CIA. There's something about the CIA
detail there, Dan that they either knew something or should
have known something, or maybe Oswald was on their radar
and they failed to act and they allowed him to
kill the president. And it's embarrassing for them. That's kind
(28:47):
of the vibe I'm going with, But that's just a
working theory.
Speaker 3 (28:50):
Okay, Hey, when we come back, we'll keep talking about this.
We'll keep talking about birthright citizenship and why it's so
clear that that's not what the founders handed why I'm
confident this US Supreme Court will make it clear that
that should not be the law of the land, or
at least not the correct constitutional interpretation. If Congress wants
(29:11):
to go ahead and do it, they can knock theirselves out.
Be anybody knows Congress won't do that. And then come
back to that sound of the president Saint God's saved
him to make America great again?
Speaker 2 (29:21):
Do you agree? And why you're on the Dan Capitla Show.
Speaker 6 (29:26):
And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 11 (29:29):
Over the past eight years, I have been tested and
challenged more than any president in our two hundred and
fifty year history, and I've learned a lot along the way.
Speaker 5 (29:39):
The journey to reclaim.
Speaker 11 (29:41):
Our republic has not been an easy one. That I
can tell you. Those who wish to stop our cause
have tried to take my freedom and indeed to take
my life. Just a few months ago, in a beautiful
Pennsylvania field and assassin's bullet rip through my ear. But
(30:03):
I felt then and believe even more so now that
my life was saved for a reason. I was saved
by God to make America great again.
Speaker 10 (30:16):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (30:17):
Just one of those chills moment, Thank you, Ryan, Just
one of those chills moment for me, for me, kind
of the personal highlight of the inaugural address, and I
thought there were many. But I do believe that. As
I said at the time, personally I do believe. I
can't prove it. I can't even be certain right until
hopefully we all get a chance to have a conversation
(30:39):
with God face to face, but yeah, strongly personally believe
that God did save Trump. There then you get to
the and the reasons why we've already discussed, right and
you're probably familiar with those, But then we get to
the second question, why did he save Trump? Did God
save Trump so that Trump would be elected president and
(30:59):
make a Marria great again? My personal belief, and this
is just one guy, but my personal belief is some really,
really really confident that God did save Trump.
Speaker 2 (31:13):
And I believe that God saved Trump in order.
Speaker 3 (31:17):
To spare America because America is the world's greatest hope,
pride for freedom, religious liberty, defeat evil, keep the world
relatively free, expand freedom. I do believe, like the Founders believed,
that there was divine intervention to help the Founders win
America's freedom. So I share the founder's view. So my
(31:40):
personal belief, God saved Trump in.
Speaker 2 (31:42):
Order to.
Speaker 3 (31:44):
Preserve America in the sense that in order to prevent
America from being torn asunder internally, and can you even imagine,
and I'll throw that out there for your thoughts and
your text, et cetera, what America would have looked like
the moment after had God forbid that assassin succeeded in
the Butler field. But I think personally, yeah, God saved
(32:09):
Trump in order to spare America from being torn asunder
like that, but then to give Americans the opportunity to
make that choice, because that personally my belief is that
God's all about free will, and that's why there are
bad things in the world. He gives us the free
will to do right or wrong. So I think Americans
(32:31):
were then given the free will, that opportunity to elect
Trump or not, and by electing him, they have accomplished
all of these great things, as JFK said, Right, wasn't
it the last line?
Speaker 2 (32:42):
Ryan? You would know this, you know all this stuff.
Wasn't it the.
Speaker 3 (32:45):
Last line of JFK's inaugural address. Now, let God's work
on Earth truly be our own. I think that was
the last line, which is why JFK would be thrown
out of the Democratic Party today. Right, he couldn't be
elected dog catcher in the far left, secular Democratic Party today.
But that was the last line of his inaugural address.
(33:05):
And I think I think God spared Trump in that
Butler field, so the Americans would then have that choice
free will. Americans made the right choice, and now there's
a real chance for God's work to truly be our
own in this country, and we've been saved from the
far left, secular, anti Christian, anti religion, anti faith forces
(33:26):
that were controlling this country, many of them obviously. Colorado's
still deep blue, but more work to come. Eight five
to five for zero five eight two five to five
the number of thoughts on that, my educated friend.
Speaker 4 (33:39):
Well, we can turn to the callers too, Mike and
Lakewood has a thought on the Kennedy assassination.
Speaker 2 (33:44):
Does does he? Well? Thank you for directing me to
my text. I'm remote today.
Speaker 3 (33:47):
As you may have guessed from this, Let's go in
fact to Mike and Lakewood are on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 9 (33:53):
Welcome Mike, Hi, Ryan Indian, Thanks for taking my call. Ryan.
Instead of watching JFK tonight, watch a documentary that's available
on YouTube called JFK The Smoking Gun. Dan, Have you
had a chance to watch that?
Speaker 2 (34:12):
No, but I haven't seen Gone with the Wind.
Speaker 9 (34:15):
Okay, just dip your interest. This is a documentary by
an Australian detective that blew the Warrant Commission out of
the water completely. He didn't believe. It turns out that
back in the day, CBS I believe conducted an experiment
(34:38):
with a handful of shooters trying to recreate the motor key.
None of the shooters were able to get off three
rounds in the same amount of time until their second
or third try. One of the shooters after that did
some ballistics testing. So the first shot was a myths
(34:58):
a ricochet, the second shot was the magic bullet. The
third shot was fired out of an AR fifteen by
the United States Secret Service. In a follow up, Car.
Speaker 3 (35:10):
And Mike appreciate appreciate the call, my friend. That the
music means we've got a bail now. What's the name
of that video.
Speaker 9 (35:15):
Again, JFK the Smoking Gun.
Speaker 2 (35:19):
Thank you, my friend. We'll left to bail here.
Speaker 3 (35:21):
The reason we're talking about all this now is is
Trump has ordered that classified information on the JFK MLKRFK
assassinations be released. What do you think it's going to
show back in a flash. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
This is Dan Kaplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, and the
American Way is winning now, particularly since election Day, since
Inauguration Day, has taken off like a rocket, and there's
(00:23):
something to celebrate each and every day. Glad you hear
the work far from finished obviously, right, Colorado for example,
still deep blue and lots to be done here, but
very encouraging now. I do think we're at tipping point
in American history, and of course it's not guaranteed have
to keep it going, but Trump doing his part, so
(00:43):
we'll enjoy.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
All of that together. Quick view at the show today.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
I've got to sink my teeth into this whole idea
of birthright citizenship, because the idea that the Founders ever
would have intended that virtually anybody who just happens to
be born in America is now an American citizen and
a citizen of the state in which they.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
Were born is crazy.
Speaker 3 (01:09):
There's no way that's what the founders intended, and so
we'll talk about the federal court. I believe it was
a federal Court judge out of Seattle who today enjoined
put on hold, you know, President Trump's executive order on
birthright citizenship, saying no, we're not going to do that
anymore in America.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
And it was expected that a court somewhere would put
it on hold.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
But that's fine, because we needed to get to the
US Supreme Court. Yes, I wish President Trump's order would
simply be honored by everybody and upheld because I think
he is clearly President Trump is correct, but as a
practical matter, it needs to get to this US Supreme Court,
which I believe, without any doubt will say no, the
(01:51):
US Constitution does not provide for automatic birthright citizenship, particularly
for children who are born to somebody here illegally. So well,
we'll get into that in some real depth. But when
you step back and really look at it, it's kind
of a crazy idea, right that our founders would have
(02:12):
intended that first, Why in the world would you do that? Obviously,
the Fourteenth Amendment was solely one hundred percent focused on
writing one of the worst wrongs in world history, slavery.
And it was focused on making sure that people who
had been enslaved in this nation, that black people who'd
(02:34):
been enslaved in this nation, what would be citizens of
the United States of America. There's no rational argument out
there that our founders intended when they passed the fourteenth
Amendment to somehow say, yeah, anybody here illegally from any country. Hey,
if you can get a child born here, they're automatically
(02:54):
US citizens. There's no rational basis for believing that was
their intent. So anyway, we'll break it down in more detail,
and now is the time to do it right. That
it's a real issue and it's tracking toward the US
Supreme Court. The big question is how quickly. Let's hope,
very quickly, but much more to talk about today. What
(03:15):
a joyous day in America, not just because a good
thing was done by President Trump in pardoning the pro
life activist who had been convicted wrongfully politically motivated by
the Biden administration. Some in prison, including a young African
American mother with young children. But so part of it
(03:35):
is celebrating that the right thing has now been done.
The other part of it is celebrating that this very
evil practice in America is in the process of being corrected.
And what I mean by the evil practice is.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
Unequal treatment under the law.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
And that is what, more than I'd say anything else,
retins the very existence of America. I mean, we're founded
around the idea of equal treatment under the law. And
you look at this Biden administration, you look at the left,
you look at the left in Colorado and their commitment
to unequal treatment under the law that Hey, if you're
(04:16):
a conservative, we're going to look for a way to
throw you in jail. And if you haven't violated any crime,
then we're going to convict you anyway.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
And if you've done things.
Speaker 3 (04:27):
That we would not even charge a liberal for, well
we're going to charge you and we're going to sentence
you to the maximum.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
And if you happen to.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
Be part of the favored political class and you spout
the quote right ideas meaning lefty ideas, well, then we're
not even going to think of charging you, let alone
convicting you, let alone sentencing you the same way we
sentence conservatives.
Speaker 2 (04:49):
So when we talk about threats.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
To America, that this unequal treatment under the law is
probably the most toxic threat out there. And we saw
it on full display when it came to the persecution
of pro lifers, because you would have liberals engaging in
all of this different type of criminal conduct, they'd never
even think of charging them. By the way, you want
(05:12):
to look at a local example, Ryan, unless I miss something,
and I admit i've I've been very busy in my
law practice preparing for trial. But unless I miss something,
whoever burned down the Life Choice's pregnancy center.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
Up in northern Colorado.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
I think they're still happily prancing around out there free,
aren't they.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
While we've had.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
Grandma's and young moms imprisoned by the Biden administration for
protesting at abortion clinics. So are you telling me that
the Biden administration, with the vast resources and immense talent
in dj it, couldn't track down whoever lit up that
pregnancy center to protest the fall of Roe? Are you
(05:52):
really telling me that not a chance, They just didn't
want to. They clearly didn't want to. And that's what
I mean by unequal treatment under the law is you
cannot be out there prosecuting your political opponents for things
you will not prosecute your political allies for you can't
do that. That destroys America. That is unequal treatment under
(06:15):
the law. But that's exactly what we've had under the
Biden administration. So ding dong, the witch is dead on
that one. Because you want to talk about how scary
We were talking about it the other day, right, Ryan,
that witch from the Wizard of Oz, How scary she was,
how remarkable there was for a movie produced back in
the Stone Age.
Speaker 2 (06:31):
But you want to talk about the.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
Wicked Witch threatening America. Yeah, that that wicked witch is.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
Unequal treatment under the law.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
And that's what the left was all about, you know,
prosecute conservatives for things they never prosecute liberals for, and
then max sentences, max punishment. A nation can't exist that way.
A nation can't continue that way. So once again American
people and Donald Trump's saving us from that. But will
it be long term depends on what happens after this term.
(07:01):
Right have we ever seen Ryan, You're too young to
have long term perspective, But have we ever seen any
president get off to this fastest start?
Speaker 4 (07:11):
No, not at all, not even close, Not even Trump
the first time around. Oh yeah, the first time around,
God love them. I mean that was a blank show right.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
I mean, God love him for winning and saving the country,
but you've got Amarosa running around the right White House. Scaramucci,
it was wild, wild West, a lot of clowns and
amazing he was able to accomplish what he did in
the face of the coup attempt and everything else. But
now they're coming in like a machine. That's why again,
I know we're beating a dead horse here, but this
(07:43):
second term is going to be so much more productive
than a consecutive second term would have been because he's
had all this time to think about you know, what
he would do if he got that chance. So it's
going to be amazing. And uya never anything close to
this fast start.
Speaker 2 (07:59):
So that's all on the agenda to day.
Speaker 3 (08:02):
Do want to kick around now that the President's confirm
that he's about to release, we're.
Speaker 2 (08:07):
Told the rest of them.
Speaker 3 (08:07):
We'll see if anything's held back, and that's something will
be I'm not saying nefariously, but you know the remaining
JFK assassination files rfk MLK assassination files.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
And I got to tell you I'm a young man,
but I.
Speaker 3 (08:21):
Vividly, vividly like it was thirty seconds ago. Remember each
of those days, each of those moments when I found out,
and I can't wait to dig into all of that stuff.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
What do you think it's going to show.
Speaker 5 (08:35):
It's hard to know. We don't know what we don't know.
Speaker 4 (08:37):
At this point, I think hopefully it'll confirm or subside
any of the conspiracy theories. And they are vast out there,
as you are well aware, Dan, and you lived through it.
You were a very young boy when it happened, but
you know everything that happened in the aftermath, and it
was filling a void of information. And that's what happens.
People are going to kind of make up their own
details if they're not provided them by this government that
(08:59):
we've grown to distrust.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
Yeah, and that's a remarkable thing just in my short lifetime,
is as a boy growing up and then a young man,
there being an awful lot of trust for government. Not
totally blind and all that, but put an awful lot
of trust for government to the point now where I
think anybody who just kind of largely trusts government on
its face is crazy, right, And what a transformation in America.
(09:23):
Hopefully Trump will will help to start to write some
of that in a healthy way. You never want an
irrational trust. You never want an unearned trust. You want
to get to the point where government's doing it so
right that they've earned your trust.
Speaker 2 (09:36):
Eight five to five four.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Zero five A two five five text d A N
five seven seven through nine. Take a shot at all
of that, And there's much more ahead in the show
today as well, but let's start with that. It seems
like it seems I could make for a segment or
two write birthright citizenship, that the pardoning of the pro
life activist. And then, by the way, do you really
(09:59):
think the Biden administry couldn't figure out who burned down
that pregnancy center up in northern Colorado that the day
after Row was struck down?
Speaker 2 (10:06):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (10:07):
Right, eight five five for zero five eight two five
five the number. What do you think these soon to
be released files will show about who really was behind
the murders of JFK, MLK and RFK.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
You're on the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 6 (10:22):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 7 (10:26):
To port all immigrants here illegally. I will note the
ABC News Paul ask about undocumented immigrants, so we have
slightly different questions, but these were all taken within the
last month. And there's real uniformity here. That's what I
really think.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
You see.
Speaker 7 (10:37):
You see real uniformity all immigrants who are here illegally
fifty five percent of the New York Times, Marquette sixty
four percent, CBS News fifty seven percent, ABC News with
a slightly different question fifty six percent.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
So what you're seeing essentially.
Speaker 7 (10:50):
Here is very clear indication that a majority of Americans,
in fact, when they're asked this one question, which I
believe gets that the underlying feelings, do in fact want
the port all immigrants who are here illegally.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
There's no arguing with.
Speaker 7 (11:03):
These different numbers because they're all essentially the same across
four different posters.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
Yeah, and that's MSNBC. Boy, I would love to see
a Colorado pole on that. What do you think a
Colorado pole on that would say?
Speaker 4 (11:16):
Just slight correction that it was CNN for Harry Enton, so,
oh my bad, rather than MSBC. He's on with Kate Bolden.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (11:23):
Here in Colorado, I think our numbers would be below
the national average.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
Which I guess, pick a number, any number.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
Forty eight percent would favor the deportation of criminal aliens.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
Yeah, You're probably right, but still seismic landscape shifting. And
this goes back to the point I made yesterday. I
won't belabor it because I made it yesterday and I'll
probably make it again tomorrow, which is that John Hickenlooper
is vulnerable in Colorado when he votes against the Lake
and Riley.
Speaker 2 (11:53):
I think about that.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
You've got a liberal network with a national poll uniformity
across four poles, a strong ority of Americans want to
deport everybody here illegally, and then the number slightly.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
Lower, i'd bet in Colorado.
Speaker 3 (12:06):
But then you got John Higginlooper, who votes against a
bill that would have just said you deport the folks
here illegally who've committed other crimes that, combined with other things,
I think he is now vulnerable in Colorado. Eight five
five forour zero five eight two five five the number.
And while I don't think that strong national sentiment against
(12:28):
illegal immigration is necessarily going to affect the US Supreme Court,
I think the US Supreme Court would do this anyway.
I do believe the US Supreme Court is going to
loudly and clearly, as soon as the case gets there,
say no, there is no birthright citizenship in America. It's
madness to think the Founders ever intended that somebody here illegally,
(12:51):
if they had a child born on American soil, would
then have an American citizen.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
No, no way. The Founders intended that, I.
Speaker 4 (12:58):
Have a question from your legal perspective and just knowledge
of this issue law, et cetera. So, if somebody's here illegally,
a couple, and they have a baby, and their claim
is that the child's born here, they're American. Okay, I'm
going to walk you through a scenario. I want you
to respond to it. A foreign national, not a citizen
of this country, travels to the United States, does so
legally with a passport. A pregnant woman is on this flight,
(13:21):
goes to labor as they land, goes to an American hospital, delivers.
Speaker 5 (13:24):
Is that baby an American?
Speaker 2 (13:26):
No?
Speaker 5 (13:27):
The why not?
Speaker 2 (13:28):
Well, the reason being, I say no.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
If the Constitution's correctly interpreted right now under current law, yes,
But but no, And here's why, because they're not subject
to the jurisdiction thereof right under the meaning, under the
meaning intended by the Founders. If you look back historically,
(13:51):
what the Founders meant by this subject to the jurisdiction
thereof language, was undivided loyalty to this nation. And if
somebody is a citizen of another country, if somebody's.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Here illgally, that is not the case.
Speaker 4 (14:07):
And if I reverse engineer it, John McCain was not
born in this country. He was born in the Panama
Canal zone. His father served in the military and was
stationed there. And of course John McCain is an American,
but that's the reverse scenario, and we acknowledge that his
parents are Americans, delivered birth to John McCain, and even
though he wasn't born in this country, he was an
(14:28):
American citizen, right, And.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
So it just brings us back to the idea.
Speaker 3 (14:33):
And this is part of the Golden age I think
that we're entering into right now with this Trump victory,
and that is this opportunity to just step back. It's
like the spell's been broken and enough people can now
see the utter goofiness of so many things that have
been beat into people as somehow political or legal gospel.
(14:56):
The ultimate utter goofiness of thinking there's more than two genders, right,
I mean, just nonsense like that, the goofiness of thinking
that oh yeah, the Founders intended that if somebody here
illegally has a child who's born here, they're automatically an
American citizen. No, why in the world would the Founders
(15:16):
ever do that. Why in the world would the Founders
ever invite that problem incentivize illegal immigration.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
Nobody in the right mind would do that.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
Now, listen, if people want to have a separate public
policy debate and argue that that should be the law
of the land made by Congress, knock yourself out. But
you aren't going to get many people who agree, right,
because it's madness.
Speaker 4 (15:38):
Do you think, Dan, that Trump signed that executive order
with the explicit intent that it would be challenged and
brought to the Supreme Court so that Scotus would decide
on it.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
Yes, yes, and it's brilliant.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
I tell you, I don't want to get all wonky now,
and you already know this, But one of the most
encouraging things is when you start to look into these
executive orders.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
This is not like something written on the back of
a napkin at McDonald's.
Speaker 3 (16:04):
You know, these are really well thought out, very well written,
put together type executive orders.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
The ones I've been able to see any substance on
at this.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
Point, and it goes to your point, Ryan, that that
this is part of a very carefully crafted strategy to
get certain issues that they knew would be opposed and
joined by this court, or that get them to the
US Supreme Court as quickly as possible, while we've got
a court that actually interprets the law rather than legislates.
(16:35):
And so it's a very very well thought out plan.
And I won't get into the weeds on this because
it would be too hard to follow. Meaning this on
a radio show, we get into too many layers that
to get boring. But the executive order that Trump put
together on DEI is legally brilliant. It's so carefully put together,
(16:58):
it is very very well thought out, and it is
a very very high likelihood of legal success.
Speaker 2 (17:05):
And being upheld.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
So I'm just telling you that these people have been
working hard, they're smart, they're organized, and their.
Speaker 2 (17:12):
Positioned to win eight five two, five to five.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
The number text DN five seven seven thirty nine will
get to some text as well. I'd love to hear
somebody call and make the argument for birthrights citizenship, and
I understand that people will need jerk just go to
the first line of the fourteenth Amendment. Hey, if you're
born in the US and you're subject to the jurisdiction
(17:38):
thereof you're a US citizen. And I know everybody reverts
back to that argument, but as a matter of law,
it does not end there. As a matter of constitutional interpretation,
you have to look at the true intent. You have
to look at what those words actually meant at the time.
But could anybody call the show, Ryan, Could anybody call
this show and actually make a coach and argument in
(18:00):
favor of an.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Actual public policy?
Speaker 3 (18:03):
But yeah, if somebody just manages to get here illegally
and have a child born here, they're automatically a US citizen, Right,
Could anybody even hypothetically put together an argument in favor
of that?
Speaker 5 (18:15):
Doubtful.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
I don't think anybody ever could. So I think this
is going to get to Scotus.
Speaker 3 (18:21):
Let's hope it's rocket docketed, because it needs to be
hit five.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
To five for zero five eight two five five the numbers.
Speaker 3 (18:27):
So when we come back, give you my thoughts, now
that the rest of these files about to be released,
what really happened with these assassinations of these three great Americans?
M OKJFKRFK, you're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6 (18:40):
You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 8 (18:43):
And then finally he repeated his claim that he says,
I think under Biden, we had probably the highest inflation
in US history. Yes, it was high, about a forty
year high at one point in twenty twenty two. Never
close to the all time record of more than twenty
percent decades past.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
You know it's your time, right when that's the best
CNN can do fact checking you.
Speaker 2 (19:05):
Oh, Trump said highest inflation ever. No, No, just highest
inflation in the last forty years. I mean, this is such.
Speaker 3 (19:11):
A wonderful time and lots of reasons to believe it's
going to continue. Eight five to five for zero five
A two five five text D an five seven, seven
through nine.
Speaker 2 (19:20):
If you just joined us, thank you. We've got some
really interesting stuff going.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
We're talking about the goofiness of thinking the founders ever
intended that somebody born in America appearance here illegally would
automatically be a citizen. Obviously the Founders didn't intend that,
and we think this Supreme Court is going to strike
it down. So we're talking about that. And then as well,
now that Trump's going to release the rest of or
(19:45):
much of it mlkjfkrfk assassination files, what do you think
that's going to show. We haven't talked much about it
on this program, but i'd really like to today and
the don't want to get to one of the most
striking moments on Inauguration Day in the address when President
Trump said that God saved him and God saved him
(20:06):
to make America great again.
Speaker 2 (20:08):
So I want to get your reaction to that.
Speaker 3 (20:10):
As we've talked about on the show before, I personally
believe none of us can know for sure until we
hopefully have the chance to meet God face to face,
whether in fact he saved Trump, but I believe he did.
And then the second question, did he did God save
Trump to make America great again? Or did God save
Trump for some other reasons. So we'll get in all
(20:30):
that fun stuff, but in the meantime, let's go up
to beautiful Fort Collins.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
Talk to Bob. You're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome Bob,
Thank you.
Speaker 9 (20:40):
I was calling.
Speaker 10 (20:41):
And this story is a little older, but back in
the nineties, when I was working in Southern California law enforcement,
I came upon a situation where I was in a
found myself in a home that had no furniture in
the living room but about twelve or fifteen identical baths
and that, which you know, obviously was very odd and
(21:02):
it didn't appear to be any kind of normal daycare setup.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
But when did you visit?
Speaker 10 (21:08):
Rhy Oh?
Speaker 2 (21:11):
Sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 10 (21:11):
My friend through investigation, found out that this home was
set up to cater to wealth South Korean women who
would fly in pregnant to the Los Angeles, stay here,
have their baby, no intent to stay. Apparently we just
wanted a dual citizenship for their child to avoid I
(21:33):
guess mandatory military service.
Speaker 2 (21:36):
Yeah, great point, and thanks for passing that along.
Speaker 3 (21:38):
Which just goes back to the obvious, right, It is
just utter madness to think the Founders intended the fourteenth
Amendment to mean that you could do something like that,
or that somebody who came here illegally would then have
their child automatically be an American citizen. Why in the
world would the Founders pretty serious cats ever incentify that.
(22:00):
But you don't even have to get to that, right, Bob,
because there is no doubt what the Founders were up
to they were focused on slavery. The fourteenth Amendment was
all about slavery, was all about saying, these fellow human
beings who happened to be black, you know, who were
brought here to be slaves or the children of those
brought here to be slaves. No, they are American citizens.
(22:21):
They were born here, their parents are subject to the jurisdiction,
meaning that their exclusive loyalty was to the United States
of America. That's clearly what the founders intended. So thanks
for that example, my friend. It helps point out the
absurdity of the other argument. A five to five for
thank you, my friend, A five for zero five A
(22:42):
two five five text d An five seven, seventh through nine.
And the reason we're talking about it today is the
good news is that as expected, I mean, Trump executive
order very appropriate, Trump's right. It was certainly expected it
would be challenged in court, and that's somewhere a federal
court judge would enjoin put on hold the executive order.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
That's happened.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
So the good news is that now hopefully it can
get fast tracked to the US Supreme Court. Might take longer,
but hopefully gets to this US Supreme Court, which actually
interprets law rather than legislates, and once and for all
we can get this cleared up the right way.
Speaker 2 (23:21):
And then, which means.
Speaker 3 (23:22):
The Constitution does not provide automatic birthright citizenship.
Speaker 2 (23:27):
And then if folks think that should.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
Be the public policy of America, then convince Congress. And
I imagine we'll be able to convince Congress much more
quickly to make Ryan the owner of every major league
team in every sport, right, because no sane Congress would.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
Make that the policy of this nation. If you could be.
Speaker 3 (23:49):
Ryan, if you could be the owner of any team
in all of sports, what would it be?
Speaker 5 (23:54):
Oh, that's a great question.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
Probably the Tigers, because I know the most about baseball,
and I think i'd be able to have most knowledge
of that sport and the players in it.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
M Yeah, it seems like a boring choice to me,
but what what? What do I know? My friend?
Speaker 3 (24:08):
Yeah, I'd rather see you take over the Lions because
they obviously needs somehow help.
Speaker 2 (24:13):
I've not had a chance yet to.
Speaker 3 (24:15):
Express my condolences there, but I really felt bad for
you when.
Speaker 2 (24:20):
You know what it reminded me of.
Speaker 3 (24:21):
And I text, and I won't name drop, but I
text a friend of mine who was a star in
the Broncos back in those days. It reminded me of
that horrible Bronco loss to Jacksonville. The look the year
it looked like the Broncos were tracking for the Super Bowl. Yeah,
and it was just it gutted all of us in
the city. But it's at the stage for those back
to back Super bowls somself.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
There. See what happens with your allions. Let me get
to some of these text.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
Dan, mother is legal citizen, father is not a poor
child and father.
Speaker 2 (24:52):
No, no, no, no no.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
If a mother is a US citizen and that baby
is born to the mother, that baby's a US citizen
because listen, come back to the fourteenth Amendment. All persons
born or naturalized in the United States and subject to
the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States. Now
(25:15):
naturalized means in Congress controls these laws. Right, Okay, what
are the laws that say when you're a citizen and
the laws you're born to an American citizen, you're a citizen.
So no, if that baby doesn't matter that the father
may be here illegally. The mother's an American citizen, the
baby's an American citizen. But if you've got if you've
(25:35):
got parents who are here illegally, or one parent here
illegally gives birth to the child, the other parents not
an American citizen in some other country.
Speaker 2 (25:46):
No, our constitution.
Speaker 3 (25:47):
I understand the current interpretation is that our constitution says
that child's an American citizen. But that's a misread of
our constitution. And I don't think there's any credible argument
that the founders actually intended that with the fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 2 (26:02):
Let's get back to some more of our text.
Speaker 3 (26:04):
I'm really surprised, Ryan, we don't have some calls and
text on JFK, MLK and RFK assassinations and beliefs as
to what actually happened. Now that Trump's going to release
those records, maybe people are just waiting for the records.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
But I would have to ask you this.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
Does anybody really believe And if so, you'll have to
tell me why that Oswald just came up with this
on his own and did it all on his own
with the assassination of JFK.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
And why would anybody.
Speaker 3 (26:34):
Believe that given everything we've seen and heard already and
not having even seen this secret stuff yet.
Speaker 5 (26:40):
If I may just to throw this out there, I
do believe James R.
Speaker 2 (26:43):
Olreay, give me a break.
Speaker 3 (26:44):
I mean, I'm not saying he wasn't involved with the
idea that he was acted alone.
Speaker 4 (26:49):
Really, as per Lee Harvey Oswald, he was very delusional,
if I am correct, he also served in our military.
Speaker 6 (26:56):
He also had.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
Sympathies to the Soviet Union communists him and may have
thought he was doing a favor for the Soviets in
his deluded mind that there would be motivation for him
to do this in a very delusions of grandeur kind
of way.
Speaker 2 (27:11):
So why did Jeck Ruby kill him? And how did
Jack Ruby get access to him?
Speaker 4 (27:15):
Again, the simplified explanation would be Jack Ruby was a completely.
Speaker 5 (27:24):
He was a devastated American. He loved JFK.
Speaker 4 (27:26):
He was a patriot and thought he was doing the
right thing for his country by taking Oswald out.
Speaker 5 (27:31):
I'm not saying I believe that.
Speaker 3 (27:32):
I'm just saying, startingbody, a patriot who loves this country
thinks they're doing a service to the country by taking
Oswald out, by.
Speaker 5 (27:41):
Killing JFK's assassin.
Speaker 3 (27:43):
Yeah, right, But anybody would know the service to the
country would be getting to the bottom of who was
now with Oswald, I know, was the saying, I appreciate
the way your mind works, Ryan, and I do, and
I understand the point that you're making. I'm just saying that,
you know, I'm an evidence based guy. Followed, I don't
buy that Oswald acted alone. Just my personal conclusion. Maybe
(28:05):
what we'll see in these files it'll be released, Well,
we'll tell me. Oh no, it's pretty clear Oswald acted alone.
What why do you think? But I'm not expecting that.
Why do you think they've sat on the files? And
Sir Hans, Sir Han, anybody believe he acted alone?
Speaker 2 (28:17):
I don't know. What.
Speaker 3 (28:18):
Why do you think they've sat on these classified files
all these years?
Speaker 2 (28:23):
Republicans and Democrats?
Speaker 4 (28:24):
Yeah, well Pompeo is the one, and Trump named him
in the interview with Hannity last night that convinced him
not to release them. Of course, Pompeo was the one
time director of the CIA. There's something about the CIA
detail there, Dan that they either knew something or should
have known something, or maybe Oswald was on their radar
and they failed to act and they allowed him to
kill the president. And it's embarrassing for them. That's kind
(28:47):
of the vibe I'm going with, But that's just a
working theory.
Speaker 3 (28:50):
Okay, Hey, when we come back, we'll keep talking about this.
We'll keep talking about birthright citizenship and why it's so
clear that that's not what the founders handed why I'm
confident this US Supreme Court will make it clear that
that should not be the law of the land, or
at least not the correct constitutional interpretation. If Congress wants
(29:11):
to go ahead and do it, they can knock theirselves out.
Be anybody knows Congress won't do that. And then come
back to that sound of the president Saint God's saved
him to make America great again?
Speaker 2 (29:21):
Do you agree? And why you're on the Dan Capitla Show.
Speaker 6 (29:26):
And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 11 (29:29):
Over the past eight years, I have been tested and
challenged more than any president in our two hundred and
fifty year history, and I've learned a lot along the way.
Speaker 5 (29:39):
The journey to reclaim.
Speaker 11 (29:41):
Our republic has not been an easy one. That I
can tell you. Those who wish to stop our cause
have tried to take my freedom and indeed to take
my life. Just a few months ago, in a beautiful
Pennsylvania field and assassin's bullet rip through my ear. But
(30:03):
I felt then and believe even more so now that
my life was saved for a reason. I was saved
by God to make America great again.
Speaker 10 (30:16):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (30:17):
Just one of those chills moment, Thank you, Ryan, Just
one of those chills moment for me, for me, kind
of the personal highlight of the inaugural address, and I
thought there were many. But I do believe that. As
I said at the time, personally I do believe. I
can't prove it. I can't even be certain right until
hopefully we all get a chance to have a conversation
(30:39):
with God face to face, but yeah, strongly personally believe
that God did save Trump. There then you get to
the and the reasons why we've already discussed, right and
you're probably familiar with those, But then we get to
the second question, why did he save Trump? Did God
save Trump so that Trump would be elected president and
(30:59):
make a Marria great again? My personal belief, and this
is just one guy, but my personal belief is some really,
really really confident that God did save Trump.
Speaker 2 (31:13):
And I believe that God saved Trump in order.
Speaker 3 (31:17):
To spare America because America is the world's greatest hope,
pride for freedom, religious liberty, defeat evil, keep the world
relatively free, expand freedom. I do believe, like the Founders believed,
that there was divine intervention to help the Founders win
America's freedom. So I share the founder's view. So my
(31:40):
personal belief, God saved Trump in.
Speaker 2 (31:42):
Order to.
Speaker 3 (31:44):
Preserve America in the sense that in order to prevent
America from being torn asunder internally, and can you even imagine,
and I'll throw that out there for your thoughts and
your text, et cetera, what America would have looked like
the moment after had God forbid that assassin succeeded in
the Butler field. But I think personally, yeah, God saved
(32:09):
Trump in order to spare America from being torn asunder
like that, but then to give Americans the opportunity to
make that choice, because that personally my belief is that
God's all about free will, and that's why there are
bad things in the world. He gives us the free
will to do right or wrong. So I think Americans
(32:31):
were then given the free will, that opportunity to elect
Trump or not, and by electing him, they have accomplished
all of these great things, as JFK said, Right, wasn't
it the last line?
Speaker 2 (32:42):
Ryan? You would know this, you know all this stuff.
Wasn't it the.
Speaker 3 (32:45):
Last line of JFK's inaugural address. Now, let God's work
on Earth truly be our own. I think that was
the last line, which is why JFK would be thrown
out of the Democratic Party today. Right, he couldn't be
elected dog catcher in the far left, secular Democratic Party today.
But that was the last line of his inaugural address.
(33:05):
And I think I think God spared Trump in that
Butler field, so the Americans would then have that choice
free will. Americans made the right choice, and now there's
a real chance for God's work to truly be our
own in this country, and we've been saved from the
far left, secular, anti Christian, anti religion, anti faith forces
(33:26):
that were controlling this country, many of them obviously. Colorado's
still deep blue, but more work to come. Eight five
to five for zero five eight two five to five
the number of thoughts on that, my educated friend.
Speaker 4 (33:39):
Well, we can turn to the callers too, Mike and
Lakewood has a thought on the Kennedy assassination.
Speaker 2 (33:44):
Does does he? Well? Thank you for directing me to
my text. I'm remote today.
Speaker 3 (33:47):
As you may have guessed from this, Let's go in
fact to Mike and Lakewood are on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 9 (33:53):
Welcome Mike, Hi, Ryan Indian, Thanks for taking my call. Ryan.
Instead of watching JFK tonight, watch a documentary that's available
on YouTube called JFK The Smoking Gun. Dan, Have you
had a chance to watch that?
Speaker 2 (34:12):
No, but I haven't seen Gone with the Wind.
Speaker 9 (34:15):
Okay, just dip your interest. This is a documentary by
an Australian detective that blew the Warrant Commission out of
the water completely. He didn't believe. It turns out that
back in the day, CBS I believe conducted an experiment
(34:38):
with a handful of shooters trying to recreate the motor key.
None of the shooters were able to get off three
rounds in the same amount of time until their second
or third try. One of the shooters after that did
some ballistics testing. So the first shot was a myths
(34:58):
a ricochet, the second shot was the magic bullet. The
third shot was fired out of an AR fifteen by
the United States Secret Service. In a follow up, Car.
Speaker 3 (35:10):
And Mike appreciate appreciate the call, my friend. That the
music means we've got a bail now. What's the name
of that video.
Speaker 9 (35:15):
Again, JFK the Smoking Gun.
Speaker 2 (35:19):
Thank you, my friend. We'll left to bail here.
Speaker 3 (35:21):
The reason we're talking about all this now is is
Trump has ordered that classified information on the JFK MLKRFK
assassinations be released. What do you think it's going to
show back in a flash. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.