February 20, 2025 • 36 mins
In the first hour of today's edition of The Dan Caplis Show, Dan looks at how Mayor Johnston is wasting Colorado's tax dollars with a ludicrous legal budget to defend his sanctuary state claims.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Kaplis, and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Well, you're going
to be glad you're here for this one.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
We're going to start with somebody who is fighting for
the American way in all of the best senses, and
that is a woman named Heather McCormick.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
And she's going to tell you a story. Even if you've.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Heard it, you haven't heard it from her. She's going
to tell you a story that will infuriate you and
you will want to demand action right now. And that's
good and that's why we've asked Heather to come on,
because every good Colorado across all lines should want action
taken on this. And then we're going to be reporting
on a very big story today. Mike Johnston, mayor of Genver,
(00:51):
now spending two million dollars of Denver taxpayer money on
a big fancy DC law firm for what purpose, Well,
pretty clearly protect Mike Johnston. So we'll get to that
in a bit, but let's come out of the gate
with a woman named Heather McCormick. And Heather McCormick has
spoken out publicly at this point too. Shan Boyd in
(01:13):
a CBS four story about a situation at Columbine High School.
You won't even believe. And if you're already familiar with
the story, Heather, we'll add some more detail. Heather is
friends of the family involved, friends of the parents who
have had to endure something that has to be a nightmare,
absolutely heartbreaking for them. And I'll turn it over to
(01:35):
Heather now. Heather, thanks for joining me. Sure, appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (01:38):
Thanks happy to be here.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
Well, if you would please just tell people this story,
your understanding of it, and then obviously you've been in
touch with the family and that's where you get your perspective,
but please just take the floor and bring people up
to speed.
Speaker 4 (01:58):
Well, I guess we have to start all the way
back in the school year twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, when
this student was in Partney's ap was for ap Street class.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
Heather, may I interrupt for a second. Don't mean to
be rude, but we have a bad connection. Does the
cell sound okay on your end?
Speaker 4 (02:20):
It does have a pay on my end.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Oh yeah, yeah. So what's going to happen now, Heather
is our amazing crew of engineering wizards are going to
try to modulate some stuff behind the glass and hopefully
we can get the sound quality better. So why don't
we pick it up from your point that twenty eighteen
(02:42):
twenty nineteen school year.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
What happens then?
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Okay, we're making those adjustments, and trust me, you're really yeah,
you're really going to want to hear from Heather on
this because Heather's going to tell you a story about
what happened to Columbine that I couldn't even believe when
I first heard it. Heather, let's pick it up with
the twenty eighteen twenty nineteen school year.
Speaker 4 (03:10):
Okay, hopefully you can hear me out.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
My lord, it sounds like you're in the same room.
Speaker 4 (03:16):
Okay, great, during that school year, this is the school
year that the student was in Carney's history class, and
so that's where they first met. That was twenty eighteen,
twenty nineteen school year. And the teacher also at that
time discussed with the speech pathologist Ashley Thomas at the school,
(03:40):
just inquiring about how a student can be declared homeless
to contact. So that's kind of where it all started out.
If you fast forward a little bit to the twenty
and twenty one year, that's when the parents later found
out as they're going back and investigating and trying to
figure out what all happened, that there were over two
(04:04):
twenty thousand text messages exchanged between this teacher and their child,
and like over forty hours of talking on the phone.
So there was clearly more in this relationship than should
have been between teacher and student. And so anyways, if
we go to April twenty twenty two, this is her
(04:27):
senior year and kind of where everything sort of spirals
out of control for the family when they start finding
out all of the things that have been going on
behind their backs. So Ashley Thomas has reported some of
this information, filling in some of these gaps that she
was asked to take in this student. She had previously
(04:52):
taken in a homeless student. Well, when they met with
Christy and he said this the Scott Christy, the principal,
I call it my high school, and he said that
she had taken in homeless. You speak before, of course
the parents' first responses, but my kid isn't homeless, so
why would this be even on the radar. And so
(05:14):
at this point they didn't realize that what had been
happening is that their daughter had talked to her counselor
expressed as most teenagers do their you know, their frustrations
with their home life, and instead of talking to this
student working through it, and or if they felt there
(05:37):
was a real concern reporting it the way they are
mandatory reporters that have reported it to Child Protective Services,
instead they pursued this homeless status for this student so
that she could move out and in with a teacher.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Lord, let me ask you about a couple of names
for those not familiar with the story. You mentioned a
Kerney in the beginning. Is that Leanne Michelle Kearney a teacher?
Speaker 4 (06:04):
Yep, she was a teacher? Uh huh?
Speaker 2 (06:07):
And Ashley Thomas then, how again does she fit into it?
Speaker 4 (06:12):
So, Ashley Thomas was the elogist at Columbine at that time,
and she had spoken with Karney. Well, Karney had spoken
to her about this because she had previously taken in
a child who was actually homeless, and so then when
they brought her back into the fold, she kind of
(06:33):
assumed that because the principal had known what was going on,
and the counselor had known what was going on, that
this was something that you know, they were in communication
with the parents about. So she went through the motions. Now,
Ashley Thomas is a speech pathologist, and this student was
(06:53):
a great student. She had a four point six gpa,
she was top ten percent of her class, She was
state swim, she was on the state so she was
a great student there. She wasn't there was no reason
for her to have any contact with the speech pathologist
at the school.
Speaker 5 (07:12):
Right.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
And when you say that she had taken in a
homeless student before, do you mean the teacher Kearnie or
Ashley Thomas.
Speaker 4 (07:23):
Ashley Thomas had taken him before. That's why Kearnie had
talked to her about what that looked like, how to
declare her homeless and who took contact to do that?
Speaker 3 (07:34):
Okay?
Speaker 2 (07:34):
And then is the belief at this point that Kearnie
had been having some type of intimate relationship with the student.
Speaker 4 (07:45):
Yes, now, in hindsight, with all the information they have
and the text messages and that you know, the hours
of talking and things they if now and currently she
is they have moved out of state and continued a
relationship post graduation.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
So so this student now lives with Kearnie, the former
teacher she did.
Speaker 4 (08:12):
I can't say first certain right now they live in
the same state, but I they were after they left here,
they moved to California. So the the family has a younger,
a sibling, So this student had a brother at school
with her at the same time that all this was
(08:35):
going on, and so after she graduated, he had heard
that his sister had moved to this small town in
California and son then they pieced that together that she
too right.
Speaker 2 (08:47):
And obviously Kearnie at this point has not been charged
with any crime, presumed innnicent of any crime, et cetera.
But what really concerns me just as a citizen of
the community and as a parent, because I think about
the parents, the heartbreak they must be suffering. And if
you can stay for another segment, Heather, I'd like you
to talk about some of what the parents have been
(09:08):
through that the whole situation just cries out for more,
more investigation, more action. I'd like to talk to you
about has anything been done, any consequences for any of
the folks, at Columbine.
Speaker 3 (09:22):
I'm a huge fan of Columbine, but I.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
Know even great institutions sometimes fail horribly. And you know,
is there an ongoing investigation of Columbine. So can you
stay with us for another segment? Absolutely great, Well, we'll
be back with Heather McCormick. And the more you know
about this story, I think the more you're going to
want answers for the good of everybody in the community.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
You're on the Dan Caplas Show and now back to
the Dan Kaplass Show podcast. Oh wow, Ryan, maybe your
best ever.
Speaker 2 (09:59):
We're talking to about a story at a Columbine that
should concern everybody in the state. We're fortunate to have
Heather McCormick with us. She's a friend of the family
involved and a friend of the parents whose daughter and
we've heard the Sean Boyd CBS story. We've heard what
Heather just said. Heather will continue in a second. But
their daughter four, well close to a four point zero student,
(10:23):
I believe, a successful athlete. Their daughter a student at
Columbine back in twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen. And then according
to what Heather's telling us in the Sean Boyd's story,
and it sounds as if there were over twenty thousand
texts between this teacher and the student, and then the
student ends up after graduation moving with the teacher.
Speaker 3 (10:46):
Out of state.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
And in the middle of all this, if I understand
it correctly, Heather, in the middle of all this, it
is discovered that there were a number of people in
authority at Columbine working together to have this student declared homeless,
even though she has a home, she has a mother
and a father and a brother in the school, she
(11:07):
has a home, she's doing well in school, she's doing
well as an athlete, and they're working together behind the
parents' back.
Speaker 3 (11:14):
It sounds like to have her declared homeless. Is that
what occurred here?
Speaker 6 (11:20):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (11:21):
And I think that, like this part is so it's
so crazy to me that it made it through so
many levels of people without anybody reporting anything, either to
child protective protective services or contacting the family to make
(11:41):
sure that they were doing the right thing for this student.
So yeah, the counselor that the student had at the
time was working together with the family liaison from the
district her hownless. And the craziest part is that not
(12:03):
only were they doing this, but they specifically mentioned, don't
contact her on the phone number that's a INFINET campus
because that's the parent's phone number.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
Don't use the.
Speaker 4 (12:14):
Address of her home, use the school address or the
district address, So very specifically leaving the parents out as
they did this, and clearly on purpose, so as my
friend had said, like they would have preferred that they
called child chective services on them, so that they would
(12:37):
have shown up at the door and figured out that
this was not correct and we could have avoided this
whole thing. So the fact that they didn't, and also
there was another student at that school and at other
schools in jeff Coo that lived in this home that
they never checked in on. If it was a big
enough of concern to declare her homeless, maybe they should
(12:58):
have checked on the other kids in the home well.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
And if it's a big enough concern to declare homeless,
don't you have to call child protective services. I don't
practice criminal law, so I don't mean this as a
comment on the law. But aren't there mandatory reporting requirements
if you believe a child's in danger, which from everything
I've heard it's the opposite that the child had a
very stable, supportive family, and hey, anybody who's ever had kids,
(13:23):
anybody who's ever had teenagers, there's occasionally going to be
a bump in the road. But it's not for the
school to declare them homeless hide it from the parents.
And isn't part of this story that the mom eventually
found some evidence that the teacher and the child had
been kissing.
Speaker 4 (13:41):
Yeah, well, first with the homeless the homeless paperwork, actually,
the mom also discovered so she had set up an
appointment with Scott Christie, the principal at the school, to
discuss sort of this. She had sent the teacher, mss
Carney a text message saying, please don't contact my student
(14:02):
any further. I never heard back from the teacher, never
heard back from anybody. So they went and talked to
the principal and the principal said that he was aware
of the text message that should have been a red
flag for him, and that you know, this teacher, you know,
(14:23):
has worked with other homeless students before. And the mom
was like, well, my kid's not homeless. And so the
very next day the mom found the homeless paperwork underneath
her daughter's bed in her house, and otherwise she would
have never known that this was even filed. Oh my lord,
So she did find also, in reference to what you
(14:46):
were talking about, she did find some evidence of that.
So this student was hired on at the gym that
this teacher works out at. And she said that when
the mom found evidence of her saying that they had kids,
she said that it was a journal tree and it
was a dream. She was writing about a dream. She
(15:08):
just kind of wrote it off as as that the
student did.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
But yeah, and the twenty thousand texts between the teacher
and the student, how does the school explain that?
Speaker 3 (15:19):
How does the school justify any of this?
Speaker 4 (15:22):
Honestly, they don't. Scott Christy honestly, during their meeting with
him several times just said that's a good question.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
Oh my lord. Wow.
Speaker 2 (15:35):
And was there some comments somewhere about referring to the teacher, Oh,
she's helped students navigate their sexuality before something like that.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
Yes, Scott Christy did say that about.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
The teacher, that she has helped other students navigate their sexuality.
Speaker 4 (15:53):
Yeah, that she takes interest in helping students navigate their sexuality.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Wow, we're going to try to get mister Christy on.
I think Ryan has already invited him because we sure
want to hear his side of this, because anybody listening
to this story and listening to the great work Sewan
Boyd did in that piece, and I've read the police
report has to be horrified, and I'd really like to
(16:20):
know how the school can possibly justify any of this.
And have there been investigations, Have there been investigations by
a professional society, investigations by law enforcement? I mean, obviously
I've seen the police report, I know what they did
with regard to the teacher, But what about the people
at Columbine. And I'm not saying anybody committed a crime.
I don't know the bottom line answer, but there's a
(16:42):
hell of a question. Has anybody investigated that question?
Speaker 4 (16:46):
Well, definitely, I mean, I would imagine that fraudulent filing
of homework homeless paperwork for the purpose of filling out
fast that paperwork would be illegal and not reporting and
not you know, as a mandatory reporter, if you don't,
if you fail to report according to the state, yes,
(17:08):
there are you know, consequences for that. So but no,
the district did sort of an internal investigation, but they
didn't they didn't pursue anything. So Carney.
Speaker 5 (17:24):
The teacher.
Speaker 4 (17:26):
Quit when she got back, she's she was deployed until
so the student graduated in May, and this teacher was
deployed until about October in the fall, and when she went,
you know, when she was coming back, she just chose
not to come back to Jeffco. So she wasn't fired,
she wasn't asked to leave. And then once she was gone,
(17:47):
the districts kind of just wiped their hands of it.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
Well, what I'd love to do, Heather, because this story,
this story has to stay alive, it has to continue.
We have to get to a bottom line on this.
If it be comes just the accepted norm that if
the school did everything that it sounds like they did,
they can just get away with that, then that's crazy
for society, it's crazy for these kids.
Speaker 3 (18:12):
So why don't we do this?
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Can we get you back on air sometime in the
next few days, talk about consequences, what the parents would
like to see. And in the meantime, what I'd like
to do is like to try again to get mister
Christy on the show. We'll reach out to Ashley Thomas,
We'll dig into the law enforcement side of it as well.
So thank you Heather for being with us today and
(18:35):
we'll look forward to visiting with you again soon. Sure,
thanks so much, and thank you for shedding light on
this because this is so important for I think the
parents and for every parent out there and every kid
out there.
Speaker 3 (18:48):
So Heather, thank you.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
When we come back, big breaking news about Mayor Mike
Johnston in Denver, You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3 (19:04):
And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (19:08):
What you just heard Heather McCormick on our show courageously
speaking out Sean Boyd's tremendous piece on this these allegations
about Columbine, that you had a top administrator and others
working together to have a student declared homeless who had
a very solid, stable home with great parents, and this
(19:29):
student getting over twenty thousand text exchanges with a female
teacher who she then moves in with after she graduates,
and everybody no disciplinary action we know of.
Speaker 3 (19:41):
Everybody's still sitting there with their jobs. What's going on here?
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Well, George Brockler, the DA first DA in the twenty third,
kind enough to join us, and George, I know you've
spoken publicly through social media a little bit about this,
So appreciate your take as a DA, as a parent, as.
Speaker 3 (19:59):
A guy who who knows the world, But what's your
take on all this?
Speaker 6 (20:05):
I shocking?
Speaker 5 (20:06):
I mean, this is shocking, shocking stuff. Not as shocking
that a teacher would try to groom a child, unfortunately,
you and I have seen that a bunch over the years,
and that's offensive. But the role that administrators seem to
have played in trying to facilitate it, and the steps
that were taken. I mean, Sean Boyd's piece is explosive,
(20:27):
and Dan, two things are going on simultaneously, and it's
just like you. I mean, you've been in this game
so long that when people start telling you things, your
brain is broken to start analyzing them from.
Speaker 6 (20:37):
What are the lead?
Speaker 5 (20:38):
You know, what's the liability, what's the duty, what's the
you know what I mean, you.
Speaker 3 (20:41):
Just start doing it.
Speaker 5 (20:42):
When I watched the story from Sean Boyd and she
does such an incredible job, I'm like, hang on, hang on,
hang on, hang on. Maybe there's nothing here, but instantly
I want to know what federal forms were filled out
and were they forged? Was their misinformation placed on them?
Speaker 6 (20:57):
You know, there's a kidnapping charge that.
Speaker 5 (20:59):
Exist for kids under the age of eighteen when they
are taken to different places without the consent of their parents.
And there's some other words in there, but this feels
to me like something that at least ought to be
looked at. And if there's a crime there, all the
steps these other administrators take, arguably don't know that, it's
for sure, are conspiratorial. They're part of this whole thing,
(21:23):
whether they're accomplices or conspirators or both. It just feels
like there's something that needs to be done there. So
you know, again, Alexis King is a veteran prosecutor out there.
She has some great prosecutors that work for her that's
out in the first judicial district. It just seems to
me this is one of those things where someone wants
to ask, Hey, did you guys look into this right?
(21:43):
Did anybody bring you a filing? Did the sheriff's office,
who has combine, did they bring you a filing or what?
Speaker 2 (21:51):
And what about a grand I don't know, Jurie, can
you speak to that, George. I know they're not that common,
but it seems like if anything's going to be important
enough to justify grand jury, it's going to be.
Speaker 3 (22:01):
The safety of children in Jeff COO's schools. And when
you have.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
Something like this, it's very much about this individual student,
but it's about all students. It's about what the standard is,
what's going to be accepted as the new norm. And
if this is the new norm, then I think people
want to run fleeing, right. And I know there are
a lot of great things going on in Jeffco's schools.
But if this is acceptable, then people need to think twice.
Speaker 5 (22:29):
The grand jury and any jurisdiction that has an excess
of three hundred thousand people and it has a standing
grand jury, and I know Jeff co does.
Speaker 6 (22:37):
When we were in the eighteenth we.
Speaker 3 (22:38):
Used to have two.
Speaker 5 (22:41):
That grand jury exists for things where they're superpowers, and
the grand jury has superpowers, most of them subpoena powers,
whether it's for documents or testimony or both, where you
need that to get to some information in the truth.
And this is the kind of case where that could happen.
You can compel testimony. There is certain immunities that a
(23:01):
prosecutor can extend to certain witnesses who are like, hey,
I don't want to talk about this because I think
it exposes me to criminal liability. And you can say
that's okay, I'm not looking at you for that, or
I'm not going to use this against you.
Speaker 6 (23:12):
I want to get information on the other person.
Speaker 5 (23:14):
This case, superficially to me, seems like it's built for
something like that, especially if the goal is to try
to determine if this is widespread, like is this a
common practice or was this specific just to this individual kid?
Speaker 3 (23:27):
Yeah, boy, George Brockler, our guest.
Speaker 2 (23:30):
And the one thing seems absolutely clear there is no excuse,
no rationale whatsoever for not doing a full investigation, getting
to the absolute bottom of this, putting it out there
for the public to see, because at this point people
need that information to make safety decisions for their own students.
Speaker 6 (23:51):
Oh my gosh, Dan, one hundred percent. I mean I
grew up in Jeffco.
Speaker 5 (23:55):
Columbine was the next school down from where I graduated.
I graduated from Bear Creek. I can tell you if
this had happened at my school or call, my parents
would have framed. But you know, Jeffco has changed hands
here in terms of partisanship and politics, and I just
simply can't believe that there can't be appropriate pressure brought
(24:15):
on the school board to say you need to do
something here, and if you've done something and you came
to an answer, you've got to give that answer to
the public. This isn't one of those well we looked
into it.
Speaker 6 (24:24):
Nothing to see here, that's not this moment.
Speaker 2 (24:27):
Well, and what we appear to know, George and I
may be wrong on some of this, but we appear
to know that mister is it Christy Is that his
name right in the middle of it, if I understand
the story correctly, is still in his position. My understanding
is nobody's lost their job over it. The teacher voluntarily
left after a deployment. How could that be? So it
(24:49):
seems to me that's the big issue right now. My
heart breaks for the parents and everything they suffered through,
But right now the issue is what is the standard
in Jeffco.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
Is this the acceptable stand Jeffco?
Speaker 2 (25:01):
Because it's either yes or no to that, right because
if these people all still have their jobs and there
have been no major negative consequences, that's just the jeff
Goo School District saying, hey, every other teacher, every other administrator,
you can do this. This is acceptable, and if it's acceptable,
they won't have five students left in their schools.
Speaker 5 (25:22):
Cool, you've hit the nail on the head, Dan. The
only two options here are either this was legal and
we need to now have a serious conversation about changing
the law or people moving on from that school district.
Or it was illegal and if it was illegal, there
has to be consequences. Yeah, this isn't a one off
shrug it off and be like, oh, well, you know
they're happy together now in southern California. That's just not
(25:43):
how this can play out. It's crazy.
Speaker 3 (25:46):
Sorry.
Speaker 2 (25:47):
I didn't mean to interrupt you there, George. But let
me ask you about this text, Dan, what if this
had been a male teacher and a female student out
that things would be handled differently. What's your immediate reaction
to that?
Speaker 5 (26:00):
Not in the twenty third I can tell you that, right,
Oh yeah, no, But I can tell you there is
a bias out there and it still persists, and it
even persists around some prosecutors too, And that is this
notion that somehow the standard is different one when it's
a female teacher. But I worry about the fact that
this has become one of these politically sensitive issues because
(26:22):
of the lesbian issue. Yeah, like Oh, well, you know
it's the sexuality.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
Who cares.
Speaker 5 (26:29):
You're talking about an innocent sixteen year old student and
a teacher. Any teacher that exploits their position for sexual
gratification or even romantic gratification, ought to be done in
That's it over.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
Which goes to another text, And this comes from Abe,
who has always texts crazy stuff.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
This is the first one that's ever made any sense
to me.
Speaker 2 (26:50):
It says Dan, I smell a bunch of liberal school employees,
excuse me, enabling an adolescent lesbian relationship.
Speaker 3 (26:58):
That's abe suspicion. Do you share that?
Speaker 5 (27:02):
Yeah, but that text actually is right in line with
what you were just asking about in this way. Can
you imagine the same administrators facilitating this kind of thing.
If it was a male teacher, we'd all be like,
oh my god, are you crazy? But when it's a
woman teacher, and then a woman teacher and a woman's student,
(27:23):
people are like, well, you know, she's helping her explore
her sexuality. I read that somewhere and I thought, if
I ever hear of a teacher trying to help my
kids explore their sexuality, there's going to be a trial.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
But it's going to be mine well, and this I'm
sure this story should horrify people across all party lines
in Colorado.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
But got to speak the truth as I see it.
Speaker 2 (27:43):
And in so many different situations, I see the left
putting their politics, their ideology, their agenda ahead of the
interest of children in ways large and small. And that's
my spider sense as to what's going on here.
Speaker 6 (28:00):
I think you're right.
Speaker 5 (28:00):
I think, depending upon how far back this goes, the
statue limitations has not expired, not even close, and I
mean even for the administrators, And so without indicting them
here on the radio, because I don't know and they're
presumed in us, we need to know wherever the truth
takes us.
Speaker 3 (28:17):
We need to know.
Speaker 5 (28:19):
We got to know. But the investigation can happen and
people can be brought to account, and that's the purpose
of this. If this is the way it seems to you,
to me, to the listeners, then it seems to me
this is the case where you go so over the
top hardcore and accountability, so that anyone that ever dreamed
of doing this would say not worth it.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
Amen, and every parent, every child in the Jeffco School
District deserves an answer to this. I wish this was
in the twenty third it's not, but we'll try to
get the DA Alexis King on and have her comment
on this as well. But George really appreciate your expertise
and look forward to the next one.
Speaker 6 (29:00):
Yeah, we'll talk to you soon.
Speaker 2 (29:01):
Thank you, my friend. That is George Bronckler. What a
tremendous resource. Eight five five four zero five eight two
five five the number text d an five seven seven
three nine your thoughts on this and I think a
very very important story about Mayor Mike Johnston. Have it
for you after the break you're on the Dan Kaplas show.
(29:29):
Enormously important story. This one brand new. When Ryan sent
it to me today, I couldn't believe it. I thought
it was April Fole's Day or something. But I can't
wait to get into it with you and what it
means in my opinion, which is a lot not my opinion.
Who cares about that, right? I hope you care about
my logic and facts and reasoning. But the point is,
(29:51):
I think this story tells us a lot about the
kind of trouble that Mayor Mike Johnston thinks he's in.
Listen to that, Denver seven package.
Speaker 3 (30:02):
Please have it.
Speaker 7 (30:07):
The City of Denver is bracing for a fight in Washington,
and to prepare the mayor, City Council approved a two
million dollar contract with an elite law firm, Covington and Burling, LLP.
Says they will perform services for the city at a
discounted rate of one thousand dollars per hour, including preparation
in advance of the hearing and initial work related to
(30:28):
document and review. March fifth, Mayor Mike Johnston is being
asked to go to DC to defend Denver's immigration policies
by the US House Committee on Government Reform city policies
that were adopted back in twenty sixteen under then Mayor
Michael Hancock. Council members approved the funding in a block
vote along with other bills last night. The only council
(30:48):
member to comment with Sarah Parity. She spoke about the
possible need to expand support of the Denver Immigrant Legal Services.
Speaker 8 (30:55):
Fund really for reasons that are at their heart similar
to why we're approving this legal bill for this DC
law firm today, which is that we're going to continue
to defend our entirely legal local policies, not to do
the dirty work of deportation for the federal government, and
not to ignore the overarching international human rights law that
says that when people are fleeing really of businal circumstances,
(31:17):
they have a right to claim asylum.
Speaker 7 (31:19):
Part of the contract between the law firm and the
city states quote the parties mutually agree that investigative activity
is likely to continue following this hearing, and that city
Council may be asked to approve war funding beyond the
two million dollars already approved. So we have questions today
for the Mayor and City Attorney about the necessity for
such an expenditure at taxpayer expense for hearing that is,
(31:42):
by all accounts optional. In a statement, the city attorney's
office said, quote, this legal council allows the City of
Denver's leadership to focus on delivering the high quality services
residents expect and deserve while navigating complex legal matters, including
federal government actions.
Speaker 3 (32:00):
Context here.
Speaker 7 (32:00):
Denver has never officially called itself a sanctuary city. It
was given that title during Trump's first administration in twenty seventeen.
His administration asked for so called sanctuary cities like Denver
to help ices crack down on immigration. In response, than
Mayor Michael Hancock signed and executive order directing city agencies
to help immigrants living in the country illegally and to
(32:22):
set up a legal defense fund. In the order, Hancock
called Denver a safe and welcoming city, but never used
the word sanctuary enough.
Speaker 2 (32:30):
For that nonsense. First of all, sanctuary city for Denver.
That term but began long, long, long before anybody ever
thought of Donald Trump running for president. So that part
of the story is just completely inaccurate. And it's so
interesting to me because great story, the first part, but
then apparently launching into this defense.
Speaker 3 (32:50):
Of the mayor. Let me give you my take on this.
Speaker 2 (32:52):
Okay, this is my opinion as a guy who's practiced
law for forty years.
Speaker 3 (32:56):
Take it or leave it.
Speaker 2 (32:57):
I don't know if it's right or wrong, but I
obviously believe it's correct.
Speaker 3 (33:01):
Two million dollars right, and this is they made it.
Speaker 2 (33:04):
Clear this is a first installment, right, because that statement
you heard, Red, Hey, this investigation may continue, et cetera.
Speaker 3 (33:13):
Two million dollars at a.
Speaker 2 (33:14):
Discounted rate of one thousand dollars an hour. Well, by
my math, Ryan, that's two thousand hours, right, Yep. Two thousand,
thousand equals two millions, so two thousand hours. So is
somebody trying to suggest to you that it's going to
take two thousand hours of Washington DC attorney time to
(33:37):
protect Mayor Johnston, to prepare and protect Mayor Johnston at
this hearing? Well do the math right? My constitutionally protected
opinion is this has something to do with the hearing,
but mostly this has to do with Mike Johnston and
(33:58):
others in power and den are trying to protect themselves
from criminal prosecution. I'm not telling you that Mike Johnston
has committed any crime. I don't know if he has
or not, but this tells me he's worried about whether
he has that he now at this time, Ryan, have
you called nine to one one in Denver lately and
(34:20):
the people working there do a great job, but you
can call now and get a recorded message sometimes because
the city has so little money, and Mike Johnson's going
to spend, for starters two million of taxpayer money on
lawyers to advise Mike Johnston, and not just any lawyers.
According to this Denver Right piece I'm reading, Mike Johnston
(34:41):
has decided to hire Dana Remis. I think it's pronounced
ori em us. Previously, the story says the White House
counsel for President Joe Biden, So.
Speaker 3 (34:51):
Diamond Mike, right, I nicknamed him that a long time ago.
When it comes to your money, Hey, Diamond.
Speaker 2 (34:55):
Mike's a big spender. So he's not going to some
great Denver law firm. And you have a lot of
great Denver law firms who do that kind of work.
I do catastrophic injury. There are others who do that
kind of work, you know, criminal and government, et cetera. No,
he's going straight to Joe Biden's former White House Council
because when Diamond Mike's in trouble, hey, money's no object, right,
(35:16):
as long as it's your money eight five five for
zero five eight two five five texts d An five
seven seven three nine.
Speaker 3 (35:24):
That's my take on it, Ryan.
Speaker 2 (35:25):
He is concerned that he may have violated the law,
and he may be continuing to violate the law.
Speaker 3 (35:32):
I think is his concern.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
I think city council members, other in others in charge
there are worried about the same thing, and I think
they're worried about potential prosecution.
Speaker 3 (35:42):
Yep.
Speaker 5 (35:43):
I think you nailed it and these were sanctuary cities
until they weren't.
Speaker 3 (35:45):
Democrats were once very proud of that term.
Speaker 5 (35:48):
Dan shouted it from the mountaintops.
Speaker 2 (35:50):
And it's still a sanctuary state thanks to Jared Polus
and the rest of these left he So, I want
to come down and get your reaction to this story.
Break it down in more detailed text. Does d An
seven three nine thousand bucks an hour? You're on the
Dan Kapla Show.
This is Dan Kaplis, and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Well, you're going
to be glad you're here for this one.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
We're going to start with somebody who is fighting for
the American way in all of the best senses, and
that is a woman named Heather McCormick.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
And she's going to tell you a story. Even if you've.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Heard it, you haven't heard it from her. She's going
to tell you a story that will infuriate you and
you will want to demand action right now. And that's
good and that's why we've asked Heather to come on,
because every good Colorado across all lines should want action
taken on this. And then we're going to be reporting
on a very big story today. Mike Johnston, mayor of Genver,
(00:51):
now spending two million dollars of Denver taxpayer money on
a big fancy DC law firm for what purpose, Well,
pretty clearly protect Mike Johnston. So we'll get to that
in a bit, but let's come out of the gate
with a woman named Heather McCormick. And Heather McCormick has
spoken out publicly at this point too. Shan Boyd in
(01:13):
a CBS four story about a situation at Columbine High School.
You won't even believe. And if you're already familiar with
the story, Heather, we'll add some more detail. Heather is
friends of the family involved, friends of the parents who
have had to endure something that has to be a nightmare,
absolutely heartbreaking for them. And I'll turn it over to
(01:35):
Heather now. Heather, thanks for joining me. Sure, appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (01:38):
Thanks happy to be here.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
Well, if you would please just tell people this story,
your understanding of it, and then obviously you've been in
touch with the family and that's where you get your perspective,
but please just take the floor and bring people up
to speed.
Speaker 4 (01:58):
Well, I guess we have to start all the way
back in the school year twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, when
this student was in Partney's ap was for ap Street class.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
Heather, may I interrupt for a second. Don't mean to
be rude, but we have a bad connection. Does the
cell sound okay on your end?
Speaker 4 (02:20):
It does have a pay on my end.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Oh yeah, yeah. So what's going to happen now, Heather
is our amazing crew of engineering wizards are going to
try to modulate some stuff behind the glass and hopefully
we can get the sound quality better. So why don't
we pick it up from your point that twenty eighteen
(02:42):
twenty nineteen school year.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
What happens then?
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Okay, we're making those adjustments, and trust me, you're really yeah,
you're really going to want to hear from Heather on
this because Heather's going to tell you a story about
what happened to Columbine that I couldn't even believe when
I first heard it. Heather, let's pick it up with
the twenty eighteen twenty nineteen school year.
Speaker 4 (03:10):
Okay, hopefully you can hear me out.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
My lord, it sounds like you're in the same room.
Speaker 4 (03:16):
Okay, great, during that school year, this is the school
year that the student was in Carney's history class, and
so that's where they first met. That was twenty eighteen,
twenty nineteen school year. And the teacher also at that
time discussed with the speech pathologist Ashley Thomas at the school,
(03:40):
just inquiring about how a student can be declared homeless
to contact. So that's kind of where it all started out.
If you fast forward a little bit to the twenty
and twenty one year, that's when the parents later found
out as they're going back and investigating and trying to
figure out what all happened, that there were over two
(04:04):
twenty thousand text messages exchanged between this teacher and their child,
and like over forty hours of talking on the phone.
So there was clearly more in this relationship than should
have been between teacher and student. And so anyways, if
we go to April twenty twenty two, this is her
(04:27):
senior year and kind of where everything sort of spirals
out of control for the family when they start finding
out all of the things that have been going on
behind their backs. So Ashley Thomas has reported some of
this information, filling in some of these gaps that she
was asked to take in this student. She had previously
(04:52):
taken in a homeless student. Well, when they met with
Christy and he said this the Scott Christy, the principal,
I call it my high school, and he said that
she had taken in homeless. You speak before, of course
the parents' first responses, but my kid isn't homeless, so
why would this be even on the radar. And so
(05:14):
at this point they didn't realize that what had been
happening is that their daughter had talked to her counselor
expressed as most teenagers do their you know, their frustrations
with their home life, and instead of talking to this
student working through it, and or if they felt there
(05:37):
was a real concern reporting it the way they are
mandatory reporters that have reported it to Child Protective Services,
instead they pursued this homeless status for this student so
that she could move out and in with a teacher.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Lord, let me ask you about a couple of names
for those not familiar with the story. You mentioned a
Kerney in the beginning. Is that Leanne Michelle Kearney a teacher?
Speaker 4 (06:04):
Yep, she was a teacher? Uh huh?
Speaker 2 (06:07):
And Ashley Thomas then, how again does she fit into it?
Speaker 4 (06:12):
So, Ashley Thomas was the elogist at Columbine at that time,
and she had spoken with Karney. Well, Karney had spoken
to her about this because she had previously taken in
a child who was actually homeless, and so then when
they brought her back into the fold, she kind of
(06:33):
assumed that because the principal had known what was going on,
and the counselor had known what was going on, that
this was something that you know, they were in communication
with the parents about. So she went through the motions. Now,
Ashley Thomas is a speech pathologist, and this student was
(06:53):
a great student. She had a four point six gpa,
she was top ten percent of her class, She was
state swim, she was on the state so she was
a great student there. She wasn't there was no reason
for her to have any contact with the speech pathologist
at the school.
Speaker 5 (07:12):
Right.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
And when you say that she had taken in a
homeless student before, do you mean the teacher Kearnie or
Ashley Thomas.
Speaker 4 (07:23):
Ashley Thomas had taken him before. That's why Kearnie had
talked to her about what that looked like, how to
declare her homeless and who took contact to do that?
Speaker 3 (07:34):
Okay?
Speaker 2 (07:34):
And then is the belief at this point that Kearnie
had been having some type of intimate relationship with the student.
Speaker 4 (07:45):
Yes, now, in hindsight, with all the information they have
and the text messages and that you know, the hours
of talking and things they if now and currently she
is they have moved out of state and continued a
relationship post graduation.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
So so this student now lives with Kearnie, the former
teacher she did.
Speaker 4 (08:12):
I can't say first certain right now they live in
the same state, but I they were after they left here,
they moved to California. So the the family has a younger,
a sibling, So this student had a brother at school
with her at the same time that all this was
(08:35):
going on, and so after she graduated, he had heard
that his sister had moved to this small town in
California and son then they pieced that together that she
too right.
Speaker 2 (08:47):
And obviously Kearnie at this point has not been charged
with any crime, presumed innnicent of any crime, et cetera.
But what really concerns me just as a citizen of
the community and as a parent, because I think about
the parents, the heartbreak they must be suffering. And if
you can stay for another segment, Heather, I'd like you
to talk about some of what the parents have been
(09:08):
through that the whole situation just cries out for more,
more investigation, more action. I'd like to talk to you
about has anything been done, any consequences for any of
the folks, at Columbine.
Speaker 3 (09:22):
I'm a huge fan of Columbine, but I.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
Know even great institutions sometimes fail horribly. And you know,
is there an ongoing investigation of Columbine. So can you
stay with us for another segment? Absolutely great, Well, we'll
be back with Heather McCormick. And the more you know
about this story, I think the more you're going to
want answers for the good of everybody in the community.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
You're on the Dan Caplas Show and now back to
the Dan Kaplass Show podcast. Oh wow, Ryan, maybe your
best ever.
Speaker 2 (09:59):
We're talking to about a story at a Columbine that
should concern everybody in the state. We're fortunate to have
Heather McCormick with us. She's a friend of the family
involved and a friend of the parents whose daughter and
we've heard the Sean Boyd CBS story. We've heard what
Heather just said. Heather will continue in a second. But
their daughter four, well close to a four point zero student,
(10:23):
I believe, a successful athlete. Their daughter a student at
Columbine back in twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen. And then according
to what Heather's telling us in the Sean Boyd's story,
and it sounds as if there were over twenty thousand
texts between this teacher and the student, and then the
student ends up after graduation moving with the teacher.
Speaker 3 (10:46):
Out of state.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
And in the middle of all this, if I understand
it correctly, Heather, in the middle of all this, it
is discovered that there were a number of people in
authority at Columbine working together to have this student declared homeless,
even though she has a home, she has a mother
and a father and a brother in the school, she
(11:07):
has a home, she's doing well in school, she's doing
well as an athlete, and they're working together behind the
parents' back.
Speaker 3 (11:14):
It sounds like to have her declared homeless. Is that
what occurred here?
Speaker 6 (11:20):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (11:21):
And I think that, like this part is so it's
so crazy to me that it made it through so
many levels of people without anybody reporting anything, either to
child protective protective services or contacting the family to make
(11:41):
sure that they were doing the right thing for this student.
So yeah, the counselor that the student had at the
time was working together with the family liaison from the
district her hownless. And the craziest part is that not
(12:03):
only were they doing this, but they specifically mentioned, don't
contact her on the phone number that's a INFINET campus
because that's the parent's phone number.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
Don't use the.
Speaker 4 (12:14):
Address of her home, use the school address or the
district address, So very specifically leaving the parents out as
they did this, and clearly on purpose, so as my
friend had said, like they would have preferred that they
called child chective services on them, so that they would
(12:37):
have shown up at the door and figured out that
this was not correct and we could have avoided this
whole thing. So the fact that they didn't, and also
there was another student at that school and at other
schools in jeff Coo that lived in this home that
they never checked in on. If it was a big
enough of concern to declare her homeless, maybe they should
(12:58):
have checked on the other kids in the home well.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
And if it's a big enough concern to declare homeless,
don't you have to call child protective services. I don't
practice criminal law, so I don't mean this as a
comment on the law. But aren't there mandatory reporting requirements
if you believe a child's in danger, which from everything
I've heard it's the opposite that the child had a
very stable, supportive family, and hey, anybody who's ever had kids,
(13:23):
anybody who's ever had teenagers, there's occasionally going to be
a bump in the road. But it's not for the
school to declare them homeless hide it from the parents.
And isn't part of this story that the mom eventually
found some evidence that the teacher and the child had
been kissing.
Speaker 4 (13:41):
Yeah, well, first with the homeless the homeless paperwork, actually,
the mom also discovered so she had set up an
appointment with Scott Christie, the principal at the school, to
discuss sort of this. She had sent the teacher, mss
Carney a text message saying, please don't contact my student
(14:02):
any further. I never heard back from the teacher, never
heard back from anybody. So they went and talked to
the principal and the principal said that he was aware
of the text message that should have been a red
flag for him, and that you know, this teacher, you know,
(14:23):
has worked with other homeless students before. And the mom
was like, well, my kid's not homeless. And so the
very next day the mom found the homeless paperwork underneath
her daughter's bed in her house, and otherwise she would
have never known that this was even filed. Oh my lord,
So she did find also, in reference to what you
(14:46):
were talking about, she did find some evidence of that.
So this student was hired on at the gym that
this teacher works out at. And she said that when
the mom found evidence of her saying that they had kids,
she said that it was a journal tree and it
was a dream. She was writing about a dream. She
(15:08):
just kind of wrote it off as as that the
student did.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
But yeah, and the twenty thousand texts between the teacher
and the student, how does the school explain that?
Speaker 3 (15:19):
How does the school justify any of this?
Speaker 4 (15:22):
Honestly, they don't. Scott Christy honestly, during their meeting with
him several times just said that's a good question.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
Oh my lord. Wow.
Speaker 2 (15:35):
And was there some comments somewhere about referring to the teacher, Oh,
she's helped students navigate their sexuality before something like that.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
Yes, Scott Christy did say that about.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
The teacher, that she has helped other students navigate their sexuality.
Speaker 4 (15:53):
Yeah, that she takes interest in helping students navigate their sexuality.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Wow, we're going to try to get mister Christy on.
I think Ryan has already invited him because we sure
want to hear his side of this, because anybody listening
to this story and listening to the great work Sewan
Boyd did in that piece, and I've read the police
report has to be horrified, and I'd really like to
(16:20):
know how the school can possibly justify any of this.
And have there been investigations, Have there been investigations by
a professional society, investigations by law enforcement? I mean, obviously
I've seen the police report, I know what they did
with regard to the teacher, But what about the people
at Columbine. And I'm not saying anybody committed a crime.
I don't know the bottom line answer, but there's a
(16:42):
hell of a question. Has anybody investigated that question?
Speaker 4 (16:46):
Well, definitely, I mean, I would imagine that fraudulent filing
of homework homeless paperwork for the purpose of filling out
fast that paperwork would be illegal and not reporting and
not you know, as a mandatory reporter, if you don't,
if you fail to report according to the state, yes,
(17:08):
there are you know, consequences for that. So but no,
the district did sort of an internal investigation, but they
didn't they didn't pursue anything. So Carney.
Speaker 5 (17:24):
The teacher.
Speaker 4 (17:26):
Quit when she got back, she's she was deployed until
so the student graduated in May, and this teacher was
deployed until about October in the fall, and when she went,
you know, when she was coming back, she just chose
not to come back to Jeffco. So she wasn't fired,
she wasn't asked to leave. And then once she was gone,
(17:47):
the districts kind of just wiped their hands of it.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
Well, what I'd love to do, Heather, because this story,
this story has to stay alive, it has to continue.
We have to get to a bottom line on this.
If it be comes just the accepted norm that if
the school did everything that it sounds like they did,
they can just get away with that, then that's crazy
for society, it's crazy for these kids.
Speaker 3 (18:12):
So why don't we do this?
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Can we get you back on air sometime in the
next few days, talk about consequences, what the parents would
like to see. And in the meantime, what I'd like
to do is like to try again to get mister
Christy on the show. We'll reach out to Ashley Thomas,
We'll dig into the law enforcement side of it as well.
So thank you Heather for being with us today and
(18:35):
we'll look forward to visiting with you again soon. Sure,
thanks so much, and thank you for shedding light on
this because this is so important for I think the
parents and for every parent out there and every kid
out there.
Speaker 3 (18:48):
So Heather, thank you.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
When we come back, big breaking news about Mayor Mike
Johnston in Denver, You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3 (19:04):
And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (19:08):
What you just heard Heather McCormick on our show courageously
speaking out Sean Boyd's tremendous piece on this these allegations
about Columbine, that you had a top administrator and others
working together to have a student declared homeless who had
a very solid, stable home with great parents, and this
(19:29):
student getting over twenty thousand text exchanges with a female
teacher who she then moves in with after she graduates,
and everybody no disciplinary action we know of.
Speaker 3 (19:41):
Everybody's still sitting there with their jobs. What's going on here?
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Well, George Brockler, the DA first DA in the twenty third,
kind enough to join us, and George, I know you've
spoken publicly through social media a little bit about this,
So appreciate your take as a DA, as a parent, as.
Speaker 3 (19:59):
A guy who who knows the world, But what's your
take on all this?
Speaker 6 (20:05):
I shocking?
Speaker 5 (20:06):
I mean, this is shocking, shocking stuff. Not as shocking
that a teacher would try to groom a child, unfortunately,
you and I have seen that a bunch over the years,
and that's offensive. But the role that administrators seem to
have played in trying to facilitate it, and the steps
that were taken. I mean, Sean Boyd's piece is explosive,
(20:27):
and Dan, two things are going on simultaneously, and it's
just like you. I mean, you've been in this game
so long that when people start telling you things, your
brain is broken to start analyzing them from.
Speaker 6 (20:37):
What are the lead?
Speaker 5 (20:38):
You know, what's the liability, what's the duty, what's the
you know what I mean, you.
Speaker 3 (20:41):
Just start doing it.
Speaker 5 (20:42):
When I watched the story from Sean Boyd and she
does such an incredible job, I'm like, hang on, hang on,
hang on, hang on. Maybe there's nothing here, but instantly
I want to know what federal forms were filled out
and were they forged? Was their misinformation placed on them?
Speaker 6 (20:57):
You know, there's a kidnapping charge that.
Speaker 5 (20:59):
Exist for kids under the age of eighteen when they
are taken to different places without the consent of their parents.
And there's some other words in there, but this feels
to me like something that at least ought to be
looked at. And if there's a crime there, all the
steps these other administrators take, arguably don't know that, it's
for sure, are conspiratorial. They're part of this whole thing,
(21:23):
whether they're accomplices or conspirators or both. It just feels
like there's something that needs to be done there. So
you know, again, Alexis King is a veteran prosecutor out there.
She has some great prosecutors that work for her that's
out in the first judicial district. It just seems to
me this is one of those things where someone wants
to ask, Hey, did you guys look into this right?
(21:43):
Did anybody bring you a filing? Did the sheriff's office,
who has combine, did they bring you a filing or what?
Speaker 2 (21:51):
And what about a grand I don't know, Jurie, can
you speak to that, George. I know they're not that common,
but it seems like if anything's going to be important
enough to justify grand jury, it's going to be.
Speaker 3 (22:01):
The safety of children in Jeff COO's schools. And when
you have.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
Something like this, it's very much about this individual student,
but it's about all students. It's about what the standard is,
what's going to be accepted as the new norm. And
if this is the new norm, then I think people
want to run fleeing, right. And I know there are
a lot of great things going on in Jeffco's schools.
But if this is acceptable, then people need to think twice.
Speaker 5 (22:29):
The grand jury and any jurisdiction that has an excess
of three hundred thousand people and it has a standing
grand jury, and I know Jeff co does.
Speaker 6 (22:37):
When we were in the eighteenth we.
Speaker 3 (22:38):
Used to have two.
Speaker 5 (22:41):
That grand jury exists for things where they're superpowers, and
the grand jury has superpowers, most of them subpoena powers,
whether it's for documents or testimony or both, where you
need that to get to some information in the truth.
And this is the kind of case where that could happen.
You can compel testimony. There is certain immunities that a
(23:01):
prosecutor can extend to certain witnesses who are like, hey,
I don't want to talk about this because I think
it exposes me to criminal liability. And you can say
that's okay, I'm not looking at you for that, or
I'm not going to use this against you.
Speaker 6 (23:12):
I want to get information on the other person.
Speaker 5 (23:14):
This case, superficially to me, seems like it's built for
something like that, especially if the goal is to try
to determine if this is widespread, like is this a
common practice or was this specific just to this individual kid?
Speaker 3 (23:27):
Yeah, boy, George Brockler, our guest.
Speaker 2 (23:30):
And the one thing seems absolutely clear there is no excuse,
no rationale whatsoever for not doing a full investigation, getting
to the absolute bottom of this, putting it out there
for the public to see, because at this point people
need that information to make safety decisions for their own students.
Speaker 6 (23:51):
Oh my gosh, Dan, one hundred percent. I mean I
grew up in Jeffco.
Speaker 5 (23:55):
Columbine was the next school down from where I graduated.
I graduated from Bear Creek. I can tell you if
this had happened at my school or call, my parents
would have framed. But you know, Jeffco has changed hands
here in terms of partisanship and politics, and I just
simply can't believe that there can't be appropriate pressure brought
(24:15):
on the school board to say you need to do
something here, and if you've done something and you came
to an answer, you've got to give that answer to
the public. This isn't one of those well we looked
into it.
Speaker 6 (24:24):
Nothing to see here, that's not this moment.
Speaker 2 (24:27):
Well, and what we appear to know, George and I
may be wrong on some of this, but we appear
to know that mister is it Christy Is that his
name right in the middle of it, if I understand
the story correctly, is still in his position. My understanding
is nobody's lost their job over it. The teacher voluntarily
left after a deployment. How could that be? So it
(24:49):
seems to me that's the big issue right now. My
heart breaks for the parents and everything they suffered through,
But right now the issue is what is the standard
in Jeffco.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
Is this the acceptable stand Jeffco?
Speaker 2 (25:01):
Because it's either yes or no to that, right because
if these people all still have their jobs and there
have been no major negative consequences, that's just the jeff
Goo School District saying, hey, every other teacher, every other administrator,
you can do this. This is acceptable, and if it's acceptable,
they won't have five students left in their schools.
Speaker 5 (25:22):
Cool, you've hit the nail on the head, Dan. The
only two options here are either this was legal and
we need to now have a serious conversation about changing
the law or people moving on from that school district.
Or it was illegal and if it was illegal, there
has to be consequences. Yeah, this isn't a one off
shrug it off and be like, oh, well, you know
they're happy together now in southern California. That's just not
(25:43):
how this can play out. It's crazy.
Speaker 3 (25:46):
Sorry.
Speaker 2 (25:47):
I didn't mean to interrupt you there, George. But let
me ask you about this text, Dan, what if this
had been a male teacher and a female student out
that things would be handled differently. What's your immediate reaction
to that?
Speaker 5 (26:00):
Not in the twenty third I can tell you that, right,
Oh yeah, no, But I can tell you there is
a bias out there and it still persists, and it
even persists around some prosecutors too, And that is this
notion that somehow the standard is different one when it's
a female teacher. But I worry about the fact that
this has become one of these politically sensitive issues because
(26:22):
of the lesbian issue. Yeah, like Oh, well, you know
it's the sexuality.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
Who cares.
Speaker 5 (26:29):
You're talking about an innocent sixteen year old student and
a teacher. Any teacher that exploits their position for sexual
gratification or even romantic gratification, ought to be done in
That's it over.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
Which goes to another text, And this comes from Abe,
who has always texts crazy stuff.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
This is the first one that's ever made any sense
to me.
Speaker 2 (26:50):
It says Dan, I smell a bunch of liberal school employees,
excuse me, enabling an adolescent lesbian relationship.
Speaker 3 (26:58):
That's abe suspicion. Do you share that?
Speaker 5 (27:02):
Yeah, but that text actually is right in line with
what you were just asking about in this way. Can
you imagine the same administrators facilitating this kind of thing.
If it was a male teacher, we'd all be like,
oh my god, are you crazy? But when it's a
woman teacher, and then a woman teacher and a woman's student,
(27:23):
people are like, well, you know, she's helping her explore
her sexuality. I read that somewhere and I thought, if
I ever hear of a teacher trying to help my
kids explore their sexuality, there's going to be a trial.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
But it's going to be mine well, and this I'm
sure this story should horrify people across all party lines
in Colorado.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
But got to speak the truth as I see it.
Speaker 2 (27:43):
And in so many different situations, I see the left
putting their politics, their ideology, their agenda ahead of the
interest of children in ways large and small. And that's
my spider sense as to what's going on here.
Speaker 6 (28:00):
I think you're right.
Speaker 5 (28:00):
I think, depending upon how far back this goes, the
statue limitations has not expired, not even close, and I
mean even for the administrators, And so without indicting them
here on the radio, because I don't know and they're
presumed in us, we need to know wherever the truth
takes us.
Speaker 3 (28:17):
We need to know.
Speaker 5 (28:19):
We got to know. But the investigation can happen and
people can be brought to account, and that's the purpose
of this. If this is the way it seems to you,
to me, to the listeners, then it seems to me
this is the case where you go so over the
top hardcore and accountability, so that anyone that ever dreamed
of doing this would say not worth it.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
Amen, and every parent, every child in the Jeffco School
District deserves an answer to this. I wish this was
in the twenty third it's not, but we'll try to
get the DA Alexis King on and have her comment
on this as well. But George really appreciate your expertise
and look forward to the next one.
Speaker 6 (29:00):
Yeah, we'll talk to you soon.
Speaker 2 (29:01):
Thank you, my friend. That is George Bronckler. What a
tremendous resource. Eight five five four zero five eight two
five five the number text d an five seven seven
three nine your thoughts on this and I think a
very very important story about Mayor Mike Johnston. Have it
for you after the break you're on the Dan Kaplas show.
(29:29):
Enormously important story. This one brand new. When Ryan sent
it to me today, I couldn't believe it. I thought
it was April Fole's Day or something. But I can't
wait to get into it with you and what it
means in my opinion, which is a lot not my opinion.
Who cares about that, right? I hope you care about
my logic and facts and reasoning. But the point is,
(29:51):
I think this story tells us a lot about the
kind of trouble that Mayor Mike Johnston thinks he's in.
Listen to that, Denver seven package.
Speaker 3 (30:02):
Please have it.
Speaker 7 (30:07):
The City of Denver is bracing for a fight in Washington,
and to prepare the mayor, City Council approved a two
million dollar contract with an elite law firm, Covington and Burling, LLP.
Says they will perform services for the city at a
discounted rate of one thousand dollars per hour, including preparation
in advance of the hearing and initial work related to
(30:28):
document and review. March fifth, Mayor Mike Johnston is being
asked to go to DC to defend Denver's immigration policies
by the US House Committee on Government Reform city policies
that were adopted back in twenty sixteen under then Mayor
Michael Hancock. Council members approved the funding in a block
vote along with other bills last night. The only council
(30:48):
member to comment with Sarah Parity. She spoke about the
possible need to expand support of the Denver Immigrant Legal Services.
Speaker 8 (30:55):
Fund really for reasons that are at their heart similar
to why we're approving this legal bill for this DC
law firm today, which is that we're going to continue
to defend our entirely legal local policies, not to do
the dirty work of deportation for the federal government, and
not to ignore the overarching international human rights law that
says that when people are fleeing really of businal circumstances,
(31:17):
they have a right to claim asylum.
Speaker 7 (31:19):
Part of the contract between the law firm and the
city states quote the parties mutually agree that investigative activity
is likely to continue following this hearing, and that city
Council may be asked to approve war funding beyond the
two million dollars already approved. So we have questions today
for the Mayor and City Attorney about the necessity for
such an expenditure at taxpayer expense for hearing that is,
(31:42):
by all accounts optional. In a statement, the city attorney's
office said, quote, this legal council allows the City of
Denver's leadership to focus on delivering the high quality services
residents expect and deserve while navigating complex legal matters, including
federal government actions.
Speaker 3 (32:00):
Context here.
Speaker 7 (32:00):
Denver has never officially called itself a sanctuary city. It
was given that title during Trump's first administration in twenty seventeen.
His administration asked for so called sanctuary cities like Denver
to help ices crack down on immigration. In response, than
Mayor Michael Hancock signed and executive order directing city agencies
to help immigrants living in the country illegally and to
(32:22):
set up a legal defense fund. In the order, Hancock
called Denver a safe and welcoming city, but never used
the word sanctuary enough.
Speaker 2 (32:30):
For that nonsense. First of all, sanctuary city for Denver.
That term but began long, long, long before anybody ever
thought of Donald Trump running for president. So that part
of the story is just completely inaccurate. And it's so
interesting to me because great story, the first part, but
then apparently launching into this defense.
Speaker 3 (32:50):
Of the mayor. Let me give you my take on this.
Speaker 2 (32:52):
Okay, this is my opinion as a guy who's practiced
law for forty years.
Speaker 3 (32:56):
Take it or leave it.
Speaker 2 (32:57):
I don't know if it's right or wrong, but I
obviously believe it's correct.
Speaker 3 (33:01):
Two million dollars right, and this is they made it.
Speaker 2 (33:04):
Clear this is a first installment, right, because that statement
you heard, Red, Hey, this investigation may continue, et cetera.
Speaker 3 (33:13):
Two million dollars at a.
Speaker 2 (33:14):
Discounted rate of one thousand dollars an hour. Well, by
my math, Ryan, that's two thousand hours, right, Yep. Two thousand,
thousand equals two millions, so two thousand hours. So is
somebody trying to suggest to you that it's going to
take two thousand hours of Washington DC attorney time to
(33:37):
protect Mayor Johnston, to prepare and protect Mayor Johnston at
this hearing? Well do the math right? My constitutionally protected
opinion is this has something to do with the hearing,
but mostly this has to do with Mike Johnston and
(33:58):
others in power and den are trying to protect themselves
from criminal prosecution. I'm not telling you that Mike Johnston
has committed any crime. I don't know if he has
or not, but this tells me he's worried about whether
he has that he now at this time, Ryan, have
you called nine to one one in Denver lately and
(34:20):
the people working there do a great job, but you
can call now and get a recorded message sometimes because
the city has so little money, and Mike Johnson's going
to spend, for starters two million of taxpayer money on
lawyers to advise Mike Johnston, and not just any lawyers.
According to this Denver Right piece I'm reading, Mike Johnston
(34:41):
has decided to hire Dana Remis. I think it's pronounced
ori em us. Previously, the story says the White House
counsel for President Joe Biden, So.
Speaker 3 (34:51):
Diamond Mike, right, I nicknamed him that a long time ago.
When it comes to your money, Hey, Diamond.
Speaker 2 (34:55):
Mike's a big spender. So he's not going to some
great Denver law firm. And you have a lot of
great Denver law firms who do that kind of work.
I do catastrophic injury. There are others who do that
kind of work, you know, criminal and government, et cetera. No,
he's going straight to Joe Biden's former White House Council
because when Diamond Mike's in trouble, hey, money's no object, right,
(35:16):
as long as it's your money eight five five for
zero five eight two five five texts d An five
seven seven three nine.
Speaker 3 (35:24):
That's my take on it, Ryan.
Speaker 2 (35:25):
He is concerned that he may have violated the law,
and he may be continuing to violate the law.
Speaker 3 (35:32):
I think is his concern.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
I think city council members, other in others in charge
there are worried about the same thing, and I think
they're worried about potential prosecution.
Speaker 3 (35:42):
Yep.
Speaker 5 (35:43):
I think you nailed it and these were sanctuary cities
until they weren't.
Speaker 3 (35:45):
Democrats were once very proud of that term.
Speaker 5 (35:48):
Dan shouted it from the mountaintops.
Speaker 2 (35:50):
And it's still a sanctuary state thanks to Jared Polus
and the rest of these left he So, I want
to come down and get your reaction to this story.
Break it down in more detailed text. Does d An
seven three nine thousand bucks an hour? You're on the
Dan Kapla Show.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!