BRONY BOMBER?! FBI's Pipe Bomber subject revealed to be part of "the Herd" | Ep 692 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:11):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome

(00:38):
to the Kyle Seraphin show. Today is Tuesday, it is December
the 9th and thanks for joining me.
You know, it is the Advent season, which is to say the lead
up to Christmas and every singleday, just like an advent
calendar, I open the news and our friends and our government
give me a lovely gift. Today's lovely gift is the gift

(01:01):
of the brownies. Some of you may not be familiar
with a community of men who loveMy Little Pony.
That's not something you knew about, but I did.
I was telling some of my buddiesin the suspendables chat, our
little group chat earlier that some folks have adopted Internet

(01:24):
culture and they've, they've joined it and they've, they've
realized that there are some dark corners of the Internet.
But I've essentially grew up, I came of age during the time that
the Internet started. I remember the first Internet
cafes, the first Internet chats.I recall being in this thing
called the Irish Internet cyber chat when I was in high school.

(01:47):
I could spend my free periods onthere, like talking to people in
Ireland and something like that.I know all kinds of weird stuff
about all the weird fetishes andaffectations of people on the
Internet. So it was no surprise to me to
learn that there is in fact a whole culture of these people
because I've been aware of them for years.
Friend George Hill reached out and he said you cannot be
serious. The guy's a brownie.

(02:07):
So in the in the tradition of online branding, Julie Kelly,
who is spending a lot of time onBannon and goes on Real
America's Voice and some other sort of news programs when used
to be a good regular guest of the Dan Bongino show.
She has referred to Shawnie Kirkhoff as the Blaze Bomber,
and that is the person that the Blaze Media and Steve Baker have

(02:32):
determined to be their leading suspect for the pipe bomber on
January 5th in 2021. Blaze Bomber.
I propose that Brian Cole be dubbed the Brony Bomber and then
we'll just see which one of themhas more evidence.

(02:54):
We're not going to we're not going to see Brian Cole doing
like a totally normal thing thata guy might do in his car on
January the 5th driving around because the cell phone pings
were dismissed in 2021 by the FBI.
We're not going to see that, right?
That wouldn't be the case. We're going to have a lot of fun
today. I'm just going to tell you that.

(03:14):
And also racism and Somali fatigue and a bunch of other
stuff that I want to kind of cover down on the world has not
just stopped, even though it hasfor me in in many ways.
And the one thing that did stop was our normal downloading
route. I, I download clips every single
day. I, I catalog them overnight and
then they, they go into this thing called the Twitter
download machine or something that effect.

(03:35):
It's a website I use and it was not working today.
So I'm going to have to use an alternative method of showing
you guys clips. And I have a whole bunch of
them. So we'll see how that plays out.
I've also got a little bit of snark to get started.
You guys are going to be shockedabout that.
Let's start off with a sponsor read from our friends over at my
Patriot Supply. If you think things are getting
worse, maybe they are. It's the Christmas season.
One thing you might be concernedabout is the the possibility of

(03:57):
running out of food like the grocery stores like we saw
during COVID. The gift of food security can be
an amazing deal from the friendsover at my Patriot Supply.
It's called the buy one get 2 free.
It's a Christmas special they'redoing and so you can prep
yourself and you can prep those you love.
Ain't that something all month long?
Just like the FBI, they are giving out some gifts to you.
If you want to choose to buy their emergency food kit for one

(04:17):
month, you can get 2 free food kits to give as gifts.
That's right, a four week emergency food kit supply for
yourself, which prepares there'syou and then you can throw in
these two additional one week food kits that you can give away
as gifts. What's better than that?
Make it the perfect gift for someone who has not, who has not
paid attention and maybe they need a little nudge in the right
direction when it comes to preparing themselves for God

(04:38):
knows what. These things will last for up to
25 years in storage, so it's notsomething they have to use right
away. But you never know when an
emergency will pop up and you might need it.
Maybe just get snowed in. Maybe the power goes out is buy
one, get 2 free Christmas deal. You're getting yourself squared
away with a unique and meaningful Christmas gift for
you and your friends and your families.
Go to mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle.

(04:59):
That's mypatriotsupply.com/kyle again, mypatriotsupply.com/kyle.
There is a link as usual in the show description.
If you were to scan down, you might as well leave me a comment
while you're there. Let's get into today's program
with a little bit of fun, a little bit of sarcasm, and yeah,
some music. I've got some music for you too.
You guys are going to be shocked.

(05:29):
All right, all right, all right,all right.
OK, so the one thing that occurred to me, I got a text
message from a a journalist fromfrom an outlet that you would
recognize. And this person suggested that I
might be getting a little bit fatigued in attacking our
government agencies. Do you ever tire of debt, Kyle?
And I immediately remembered oneof the most inspirational

(05:52):
figures in my lifetime that continues to give me strength
when things get difficult. And I think, do I have enough
energy to get up this morning, this Tuesday, put my toes on the
on the the floor, put on my pants, get to work and smash the
bullshit narrative of the FBI? Do I have that?
I wonder, am I too fatigued? And then I remember these

(06:16):
inspirational word. I don't feel no ways tired.
I come too far from where I started from.
Nobody told me that the road would be easy.
I don't believe he brought me this far to leave me.

(06:39):
I don't feel no way. He's tired.
I love the way that sounds. It always makes me feel so
motivated. I'm just like, yes, the first
female president of the America.That clip lives in my head and
seriously, if people ask me if I'm tired, that's where my brain
immediately goes 'cause I have that weird, twisted, dark sense
of strange humor. We're in the middle of doing

(07:01):
some of the responses. Our lawsuit is ongoing and the
defense of free speech is something that we continue to
do. And so I've got my attorney
sending this stuff and they keepmentioning my sarcastic and
tongue in cheek style and legal documents and I'm like me,
sarcastic. Nah, bro, that's not what I'm
all about. Of course, we are a little bit

(07:21):
sarcastic here, so I've got somefun stuff.
Let's start off with this thing which was kind of the
controversy over the weekend. And I don't think it's, I don't
think it's out of place. Wisconsin Cinnabon worker was
fired after a racist tirade against a couple.
You're going to be shocked to find out that this is NBC News
who reports it in this way. A video showed the woman telling

(07:42):
the couple I am racist and then directing racial slurs at them.
What it doesn't show is the the beginning of this sort of
interaction. It's obviously clipped out and
apparently for the full context,this woman was being dressed
down because she would not give a Somali couple additional
caramel on a Cinnabon. I think that if you're a Somali

(08:08):
person and you are worried aboutracist white women who are
attacking you as you desire morecaramel on your Cinnabon,
there's really only one solutionthat's going to make sure that
you can be safe because these people.
The Somali couple went out and started a GoFundMe account to
heal from the racism. Now, the woman who said the

(08:32):
racist slurs also opened a give send go account the the
alternative. And so she was able to raise
like $100,000 for being fired, which is probably more money
than she made working for Cinnabon if I had to guess.
I'm just going to assume that the Cinnabon job is not all that
highly paid. What I think is, is rather than
trying to heal from the racism, the best thing that these Somali

(08:54):
people could do so they are not offended by women who don't wear
hijabs. They can go back to a country
where women wear hijabs. And I suggest they ask Cinnabon
Mogadishu if they could just getmore caramel on their Mogadishan
Somali Cinnabon. Now, the portions, as you
probably recognize, are skinnierat Cinnabon Mogadishu.

(09:19):
But I do think that that would be the right place for them to
go. That's where they should
probably start with their problems.
I've got kind of some coverage of this, of this lady and this
nasty sort of interchange. And here is a man who is going
to break it down. I think his name is Andre
Williams or Wilson. I had to double check I had his

(09:39):
name yesterday and then I forgotabout it.
Anyway, this is some interestingcommentary.
And that way you can get a little taste.
If you didn't see this in the social media sphere, this is
what she was talking about. Somali fatigue is growing.
That's *** I am racist and you are a *** You are an idiot.
No, I'm racist and I'll say thatto the whole entire world.

(10:00):
You ruin your. Life, by the way, talking about
you, Talking about respect. You're talking about respect.
You are fired from this place, motherfucker.
You're not going to be working here.
Suck it. Suck what?
Look how you fucking look like. What's wrong with you, you
fucking ugly bitch? It's come out that these

(10:20):
Somalians were actually harassing her and intimidating
her. And she got.
Fed up and started to call them *** and of course she was fired
from her job, but she's raised $30,000 after it all.
People don't like Somalians for a reason.
The rule They're entitled and they're incompatible with
civilized society. They don't have a place here and
don't belong in America. They show this every fucking
day. And because that Somalians have

(10:41):
learned from *** they've learnedhow to play victim too.
Hopefully these Somalians get stripped of their citizenship
and she can make it to $100,000.Something about having the music
in the background, like some very gentle piano music.
How nice. So this is the story NBC News
was reporting. And of course she did get fired

(11:02):
and I think she has gotten pretty close to 100,000.
I stopped looking in on it, but it was well over 90,000 the last
time I look. The Cinnabon spokesperson said
that the video was deeply troubling.
It is deeply troubling actually,that people would decide to film
themselves asking for something that they're not entitled to
without paying for. And then dressing down at the
beginning of that little clip was talking about how she was

(11:23):
sexualizing her body for not wearing a hijab.
And they kind of cut that bit out a little bit to kind of hone
in on the the offensive part. It's an ongoing concern for
those of us who have lived around it.
I actually had this major issue.I was very much concerned about
this exact interaction. Not that my wife would drop the
N bomb or anything, but when we were living in Northern
Virginia, I had this concern. It was pretty awkward.

(11:46):
We went to some malls, includingin Tyson's Corner, if you guys
know what I'm talking about. It's a very wealthy, not not
cheap area. It's not a cheap mall either.
And we went to Tyson's Corner and we went to a mall and it was
on a Thursday or Friday. And I think this must have been
before we had children. I think it was.
And we were going there. I don't know.
We were doing like, getting a jacket or something.
I'd gotten a jacket sized, and it was something for work.

(12:09):
And so the two of us are walkingin there, and we walk into the
mall, and it is nothing but young Muslim youths, all
immigrants, women wearing hijabs, young men kind of
congregating around, taking up all the spaces of the food court
and stuff like that. We walked in there and we were
like, what in the hell is this? We're right outside the nation's

(12:30):
capital and it doesn't even feellike America and we got leering
looks from everybody because Godforbid, like my wife's shoulders
are showing, you know, and they I don't know what what the deal
is very strange to kind of experience not America in
America. And I think people that are in
Minnesota and are in Wisconsin like this, they're fed up with

(12:52):
it. The fatigue is real.
And even people who came to thiscountry who have accents, who
had to, you know, to, to get naturalized as citizens, The
reasons why people don't get mad, like you don't hear a ton
of people screaming about a lot of different cultures.
It's pretty specific about the ones that they're frustrated
with. It's because they didn't
assimilate. The ones that came here and did

(13:12):
American things right away, likestart businesses and, you know,
join our churches and they show up right next to us.
We had tons of Filipino people in the churches that I was
growing up in, in California, Same story.
It turns out a lot of Vietnamesepeople in the churches that I
grew up in, in Texas, by the time I'm 10 years old, we had a
very heavy Vietnamese population.
It was like, Oh well, they have the same worship as we do.

(13:35):
Maybe they have a Vietnamese Mass one time on the weekend,
But generally speaking, they assimilated.
They drove cars, they looked like us.
They sounded like us. They learned how to speak.
By the time you have the second generation here, the first
generation born in America, theyspeak without an accent.
This is a guy kind of saying, why is it that we have to just
be so gentle to a culture that clearly doesn't assimilate and
doesn't want to be part of it? And it sounds even more powerful

(13:57):
for me because he's clearly an immigrant and came here and
adopted what we think. And he even swears like an
American seeing when the fuck did we have to bow down to
certain communities? Look, I'm Asian, I'm Vietnamese.
OK, Well, we have our own communities too.
Our communities thriving. You know, we have businesses.

(14:18):
We've been here only what, less than 50 years since the after
the 1975. Our committees are thriving
throughout the United States. If you look at our numbers,
there's only about 2 million of us here in the United States.
And all that 2 million people that we have, majority of us are
have businesses, scientists, engineer, doctors, bright minded

(14:43):
people that that given back to this country more than we've
taken. And we have never asked anybody
to bow down or speak our language.
OK, since when the fuck this stupid ass mayor of the little
pirate motherfucking land pirates Mullion in Minnesota
have to speak their language andapologizing for those

(15:04):
motherfucking crook ass pirates.Since when we have to do that?
He's just a fucking crook and he's a Jewish dude.
What a shame. You know what a shame.
What the fuck's wrong with him? That's pretty blunt.
But, but the guys, I, I think that's probably more commonly

(15:25):
understood than not, which is why we have this really weird
moment right now where you've got a certain number of people
with call it suicidal empathy, call it just sort of progressive
values and, and not being able to look into the 2nd and 3rd
order effects. We're seeing people that are
crying about it. This is a story that came from
CBS. Is this CBS?
No, sorry. This is an ABC story.
Here's how immigration enforcement is affecting school

(15:47):
enrollment. Well, the crazy thing is, is
that if you guys were to look atit and you'd say, oh, OK, our
our tax dollars, which usually come from property taxes in a
lot of states that are funding the schools, and you keep
getting these, these bond proposals where I live right
now. Last year, the people in my town
voted down another $10 million bond proposal by the school.

(16:09):
And they're like, we need more administrators and teachers and
fill in the blank. And people went like, no, we
don't want to spend more money on something because there's a
really decent chance that the money we're spending is not
actually going to the people that are paying the property
taxes. It's not actually going to the
people who have children in the school.
It's going to people that came here illegally.

(16:30):
And they came in under the Bidenadministration, but they've been
coming in for decades more and more.
So they're looking at this in this like, well, how do we be
the nicest way possible? But if you were to expand it
out, it's not nice to the peoplewho came here because they're
getting subpar versions of America.
You expanded a little further than that.
You're screwing over the people that gave everything and you're
really screwing over the people which you'd think that the

(16:51):
political left would generally speaking, fall all over
themselves to help. The more immigration coming in
that drives up the price of housing doesn't hit the upper
middle class in the same way it does the lower middle class and
the lower working class. The people that are most injured
by the thing, the policy that these people are talking about.

(17:13):
You know, I've, I've heard mediapersonalities talk about it.
Oh, if the price of gas goes up to $5 a gallon, do you guys
remember talking about that under Biden, the $5 a gallon
gasoline possibility, some people would no longer be able
to drive. There are a a huge number of
folks that would have to look down and go, is this an
essential trip for me? Can I actually afford to drive

(17:35):
at $5 a gallon? And then there's people who are
making enough money where it's like, that's really an
inconvenience. But in fact, I'm going to still
make that choice. I'm just going to bitch about
it. The people that get most inner
like most hit by inflation, by by poor educational outcomes
because you've flooded the schools with people that don't
belong there, who get hit with all of these sort of impacts of

(17:58):
illegal immigration. It's almost always the people
that actually also end up voting, at least in the urban
areas. They're voting for the left.
They're voting for more of the same bad policies.
It seems really illogical to me.Anyhow, this is how it is
affecting school enrollment in some districts.
The Trump administration surge in law enforcement has created a
chilling effect on student attendance.
It makes no sense to me because students, I mean, well, unless

(18:20):
they're just trying to play hooky, students should have
nothing to do with it because they should all be legally here
in the 1st place. But it does appear that
preliminary data and attendance trackers show some districts do
not show a large scale enrollment plunge, but others
do. In September, Donald Trump sent
federal troops to aid immigration enforcement in
Chicago. We've already seen the videos.
We've covered it on this program, the stuff that happened

(18:42):
in North Carolina, in Washington, DC.
The city's local law enforcementhave always worked alongside
federal agencies. And after it saw a surge in
troops in August and September during a 30 day federal
takeover. That's really good language,
isn't it? Preliminary data shows that the
attendance rate was within within 1% of the same period.
And yet they're crying about it in certain areas because clearly

(19:03):
illegal aliens move into the same spots where they know they
can be safe. And all they do there is drive
up the cost of certain things. They make individual housing
more expensive for everybody. And I'll tell you this, from
working in the DC area, especially in the surrounding
suburbs, what we regularly saw was that the illegal aliens that
were living there, we're doing something that was kind of

(19:24):
diabolical. They would move 20 or 30 people
into a regular 3 bedroom household.
So what would otherwise be a rental single family home where
maybe you and your two kids and your wife would live, they would
have eight families in there or four families with a bunch of
kids. And so they could afford to pay

(19:46):
a lot more because they were paying less per capita per
family. And it would actually end up
driving up the cost of the housing in the area and it would
lower the quality of everything about it.
And of course, you're putting a double drain or a triple drain
or a quadruple drain on the education system if they send
them to schools. And amazingly, the guy who used
to be president thinks that he was doing a great job.

(20:07):
They've trotted Joe Biden back out again.
Guys, he's out on the the speaking circuit.
I've seen this, like this clip of him talking.
There's a couple different little clips that came out.
He spoke to the LGBTQ Plus Victory Institute.
This sounds like a way to launder more money.
I'm making not an allegation, but just a casual observation
that former presidents get paid a lot of money to go speak.

(20:29):
And I'm wondering how much he got paid for this ridiculous
thing. I actually think Joe Biden might
actually believe himself at thispoint, which is kind of wild.
All right, we're doing an alternative way of playing these
clips, so let's make sure this thing comes through.
I think you can hear the riveting words of the former
president right now. My dad used to say it's all
about can you look your child inthe eye and say it's going to be

(20:50):
OK? That's where.
We were. Yeah.
He's with me. Hard to.
Do during my administration in those four years we created
16,000,000 new jobs, unemployment drop, unemployment
drop to a 50 year low. We lowered the price of
everything from healthcare to Costa College to junk fees and

(21:11):
airline tickets and credit cards.
We made a lot of progress. We had so much more we had to do
to make life affordable for every American.
My dad. That's a hell of a pitch, Biden
said. They made things more
affordable. Even though we saw skyrocketing
inflation and it went up by 9% in some months at a time.

(21:34):
I think the cost of bacon doubled where I was.
We stopped buying it. We stopped buying other
products, too. If you guys were wondering,
like, hey, was he asleep? Yeah, he was asleep.
Unlike Hillary Clinton, he is now feeling quite a ways tired.
And this road has been quite long.
It's an it's an amazing claim tocompletely ignore the past

(21:54):
reality and just say, yeah, everything's better.
And I did it. That doesn't mean that the MAGA
team did the thing that we thought they were going to do.
There were three major things that needed to be done.
I think you needed to shut the border.
That needed to happen. They needed to deport millions
of people and immediately take sort of the load or the pressure

(22:15):
off the American people that have been carrying these folks
around. We needed to de weaponize the
most dangerous parts of the government.
We got one out of three that would be a failing grade.
But I don't, I don't consider Trump's first president so far,
our first presidency in the first year of it so far to be a
failure because my friend's not in prison and he's able to keep

(22:36):
punching holes in government narratives.
And maybe, just maybe through their own sort of missteps and,
and finding a brony who's autistic, who likes to wear
Crocs and accusing him of being the Super sophisticated five
year evader of the FBI pipe bomber.
Maybe they actually destroyed themselves.
Maybe. In any case, Marjorie Taylor

(22:58):
Green went out and did somethingover the weekend.
You guys may have seen this. I wanted to cover the story
because it's not, it's not outside of our purview to talk
about what happens. I told you, I thought MTG made a
good jump. I'm not a big fan of MTG in
general. I don't, I don't much care for
what she had to say. I don't care for the way she
says it. I don't think her values align
with mine, but she did vote withDonald Trump 98% of the time,
which gave her a lot of credibility to the people that

(23:19):
put MAGA in their bio. I am not one of those people.
She's a former MAGA loyalist, but she says that Trump's
policies are not America First. I mean, obviously a lot of the
stuff that he's doing is not what you guys thought.
When you heard the words AmericaFirst.
You probably just thought he meant America comes first.
That's what I would assume. Like I said, I'm kind of more of
an America only guy and what we saw was something a little bit

(23:42):
different. It was like America First TM, it
was like a branded version of it.
So it's not exactly what you thought it might be just on the
plain onset by reading the words.
MTG voted 98% with President Trump before her relationship
with him fractured, and she's accused the president in a
recent interview of forsaking his own base.

(24:02):
I do think that is a case. There are there are spaces being
held, there are discussions being had on other podcasts
where people are saying, you know, what is mega?
Who are we? What defines us?
I saw all this quibbling last night about it.
So I was like, well, MAGA alwayshad two meanings.
One of them was people who sort of said, yes, I agree with the
principle that America should begreat again.

(24:23):
And the do it. We're going to have to do things
like get rid of some people. We're going to have to break
some eggs. We're going to have to hurt some
feelings. We're going to have to do the
hard reality. Kind of the difference between
mom and dad in discipline. You know, mom says everything's
OK, that not all moms, but a lotof moms.
This is historically the way it went, especially in the 80s,
where mom would say yes and thendad would have come in and be
the disciplinarian. That was kind of a thing in a
lot of functional households. Mom was the pushover, a little

(24:46):
bit softer. I think now dads are more
pushovers, at least on some things.
I am. My son says, like, dad, I want a
cowboy gun. I'm like, Yep, lever action
coming your way. What caliber are we going to
get, buddy? But we thought that we were
going to get sort of like daddy's home.
That was the attitude. In fact, the White House has
even been putting these out on social media.
Daddy's back in the White House,which means that there should be

(25:08):
discipline and some some some crying and some hard faces where
we don't care. You think good cop, bad cop,
mom, dad, masculine, feminine, yin Yang.
This is kind of like what we thought we were getting into.
But the problem is a lot of the people that would put MAGA in
the bio, people that would define themselves or wear the
hat, what they actually meant was whatever Donald Trump says

(25:29):
today is good enough for me. And that's actually kind of a
dangerous place to be. Mr. Trump has called
affordability A hoax created by Democrats.
I'm seeing this trend, and I'm going to play you a clip in a
minute regarding the bomber situation.
Donald Trump says things that hedoesn't like are Democrat
hoaxes. I don't know if that was like a
focus group or if they pulled it.

(25:50):
And maybe you guys saw maybe someone called you up and was
like, how do you feel about the term Democrat hoax?
And you're like, oh, I think that's good for things that I
don't like or not. But he said this about, he said
it about affordability. America is not that much more
affordable. For those of you looking at gas
prices, it's hit or miss, especially where I live.
And gas prices are way cheaper where I live than most of you.

(26:11):
In Texas. It's it's a dollar cheaper on
any given day than where my parents live in Arizona.
It's probably 2 or $3 cheaper a gallon than where people live in
California. I don't know what you're doing
in California. Fix yourself.
But there's clearly an affordability issue.
Housing prices are still insane.For any of you who've been
looking in the market, it's difficult to see.
So what the heck are we talking about here?
And to act like it's not happening and claim it as a hoax

(26:33):
is that it's not. You can't gaslight your own base
for too long. At some point it'll fail.
The affordability for health insurance has caused Green to
side with the Democrats. I don't like that at all because
the conservative position is is what the hell is the government
doing involved in in health insurance to begin with?
But if you're going to talk about like the Everyman problems
and people are talking, I talkedto some people last night and

(26:54):
they were telling me they paid $1200 a person for health
insurance, $15,000 a year, give or take.
I said, what are you getting forthat?
He goes, not a lot. I go, why do you pay it?
You know, so maybe some of the things that has to be done is an
assessment of, of how much responsibility do you want to
take on yourself and how much you going to give it to daddy
government and think they're going to solve it for you.
The conservative position is thegovernment shouldn't be solving

(27:15):
your problems. Even if they're trying to solve
other people's problems. You just sort of opt out.
I remember when I went down 14 months without a paycheck from
the FBI. I never once collected
uninsurance or what do they callit, unemployment insurance?
I never got a paycheck for unemployment when I left the
FBII just didn't. I didn't even think of it,
honestly. It didn't even occur to me.
I had money invested. It was feeding me and we went

(27:36):
out and just got after it. I don't think Airedo Boyle did
either and I'm pretty sure SteveFriend didn't either.
I will have to ask him. We, we never thought to rely on
the government and there is a position that says that in any
case. Now this, this whole interview
is kind of interesting because people think that she's
betraying the base and the people that are like 100% no
matter what Trump does. He's my guy.
It doesn't look good. It doesn't work out well.

(27:57):
She said she never imagined she'd be standing with Democrats
on the Affordable Care Act subsidies.
I don't think we should be subsidizing healthcare.
If it's affordable, why does it need government subsidies?
Oh, wait, that's obviously what happened.
This was always redistribution. She's the only member of the
Republican Party. She obviously stepped away.
She managed to get a pension. I don't hate her for any of
that. She did increase her net worth
by a lot by going to Congress, so a lot of people can make that

(28:18):
point. Again, she's not my favorite,
but I do think she stepped out from a losing team, at least as
it looks right now. And there will be a loss in the
midterms because of the way thishas gone down, because the
problems are not being solved. And if you don't solve the
problems in front of you, you, you're not going to have a good
outcome. Like these people on the left.
They don't miss. For whatever it's worth, I said
it the other day, someone clipped it out and I appreciate

(28:39):
the clip. I actually get a kick out of it
when you guys do it because I don't have the attention to do
it. There is no question in my mind
that this is a game for keeps and that the left, when they
come back around, they've seen the indictment of comedy that
failed. They've seen the attempt to put
Letitia James in her place. And I don't know if that'll be
successful either. And they're like, OK, so you got
John Bolton and no one else, andyou can't even get Jim Comedy.

(29:04):
You haven't gone after Ray or any of the other people that we
think were involved in weaponized government.
The reason is because what they did was legal.
That's the real problem. You think the left misses, They
barely missed shooting Trump in the head, right?
They actually got a conviction in New York that has been stayed
and we've sort of just ignored the fact that he was convicted
on the political right. We don't worry about that.
It is a failure to assume that this is the status quo from now

(29:27):
on and everybody is safe becausebecause 20241 and we saved the
country. We have a quiet resting, storing
up energy, watching for weakness, enemy inside of the
the federal government, a coiledsnake, if you will.
And they're just going to buy their time.
That's what they do. They have patient.

(29:49):
When the midterms change, Trump will be in battle for the next
two years. We've got about a little bit
less than a year left for that or a little bit more than a
year. I guess it starts in January of
20/20/27. That's when the new Congress
comes in, midterms are over, You're going to just see the guy
screwed. He's going to constantly be
fighting uphill and he's alreadyseeing stupid things like we're

(30:12):
hearing arguments on the SupremeCourt.
And I want to play you guys thisafter a quick sponsor read.
There's an argument being made by the leftist on the court,
which by the way, Biden put in at least one of them, right?
Not the smartest person on the court, probably the dumbest
person on the court. The argument is, is that that
there is a requirement that the federal government have

(30:33):
executive functions that are independent of the executive,
the chief executive that we elect.
That's the left. That's the left telling you what
they believe. They actually do believe that
the government is meant to standalone and that the president is
not supposed to be in charge unless their president is.
They don't miss and they stack it up and they're out there
fighting this tooth and nail. We're going to play you a couple
of little clips from the SupremeCourt arguments.

(30:55):
Essentially, the question is, can the chief executive, the
Article 2 powers where all the executive power is vested?
I just, I don't know. I've read the Constitution,
that's what it says. Can that person actually be in
charge of the executive? And the Supreme Court is
actually doing their best to fight back against it, at least
the liberal side of the court is, which is nuts.
And to hear them say it out loudis even more nutty.

(31:16):
So I'm going to let them say it in their own words.
Before we do that, let's do a quick read for my friends over
at Silent. It doesn't matter whether you
think it's government or whetheryou think it's big tech or do
you think it's anybody else thatmay be wanting to get access to
your data? Somebody is trying to get it
because your phone is a trackingdevice.
That's why why I keep mine in here during the show.
I also keep it in here during dinners.
When I'm doing my job. I'm doing it less and less
because it's been such a wild last couple weeks.

(31:38):
But government agencies, big tech, corporate data brokers,
cybercriminals, take your pick. They all want a piece of that
digital footprint. They all want a piece of where
you've been and what you do and what your habits are and how you
do it. They don't have to ask for it.
They just take it. Most of these user agreements
will allow them to. Your phone data should belong to
you, but in fact, it actually belongs to whoever can collect
it. And that's why we have companies
like Silent. It's SLNT.

(31:59):
It's Silent without all the vowels.
They exist because they make great Faraday products that
block wireless signals. They are not the cheapest
product on the market. They are a good product that
actually works. Having bought the cheapest
Chinese IAM garbage when I was in the FBI and testing them and
them all failing, we ended up just using tinfoil and ammo
cans. If that is not an elegant
solution that you care to be walking around in your corporate
environment or around your house, or if your wife thinks

(32:20):
it's really ugly, which it really is.
If you can't get away with doingthat in the trunk of your Bureau
car, maybe you check out Silent and you just fire and forget and
get something that works. It blocks all wireless signals
like cellular and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth and GPS and RFID and
near field communications and whatever else comes out of that
damn phone. No signal means no tracking, no
remote access, and you guys can save 15% with my name.

(32:41):
It's slnt.com/kyle. You'll see a couple of things we
use there. I use their dry bag, which is a
great option if you're travelingand you might be going into the
rain. It's the raining and the snowing
season right now. You can check out their smaller
stuff if you guys want to get something that just puts it out
of pocket. They'd make some really neat
carry bags like they make a little like a waste back, which
would be a pretty good get a pretty good little Christmas

(33:02):
gift. And you can do one of two
things. You can either block the RF from
going into your body, which somepeople worry about.
And so it actually is a shield between you and the phone or you
can put the phone in completely silent mode.
Both are really great. So you can stay on the grid when
you want to at your choice, dropyour phone in a silent Faraday
sleeve and get off and be silentand and be invisible to the
clowns that are trying to attackyou.
If you guys are so inclined, there's a link in the show

(33:24):
description. I 100% endorse the products that
I've used and I've got about 8 of their products.
Again, not cheap, but very good.So if you're the kind of person
wants to get a gift that somebody can really appreciate,
like how well it's made and designed, look at my friends
over at Silent. And this backpack you're seeing
on the screen is outstanding. I actually showed it off to
Clint Russell the other day whenwe were talking about bags.
He was like, oh, yeah. OK, anyhow, let's keep going a

(33:45):
little bit. I want to do this.
I want to do this crazy bit fromthe Supreme Court.
It is actually pretty crazy. I'm going to leave this on the
screen in kind of a funky way. All right, this is Ketenji
Jackson Browne or Brown Jackson.However she goes, she claims
that the president has no right to fire experts.
She thinks that experts should be the ones that run the
government. This is essentially the claim

(34:05):
she's making, and it is a wild claim.
Again, Article 2, that's where all the executive power vests.
This is my problem with the Capitol Police, why I don't
think they should exist. It's confusing to me that you
can have executive authority that exists outside of the state
of authority that the that the that the Constitution gives them
Article 1 legislation. You get to define things, you
get to divvy up money. Article 2 you get to execute and

(34:28):
do. How would it be that you could
have the article one seed power that is not theirs to an
unaccountable independent expertrun government agency and nobody
would have any say in that? That seems expressly and on its
face unconstitutional, but that's what's going on.
This is Trump V Slaughter and the dumbest Supreme Court

(34:48):
Justice talking. Some issues, some matters, some
areas should be handled in this way by nonpartisan experts that
Congress is saying that expertise matters with respect
to aspects of the economy and transportation and the various

(35:08):
independent agencies that we have.
So having a president come in and fire all the scientists and
the doctors and the economists and the pH DS and replacing them
with loyalists and people who don't know anything is actually
not in the best interest of the citizens of the United States.
These issues should not be in presidential control.

(35:31):
So can you speak to me about thedanger of allowing in these
various areas, the president to actually control the
Transportation Board and potentially the Federal Reserve
and all these other independent agencies in these particular
areas? We would like to have
independence. We don't want the president
controlling. I guess what I don't understand

(35:53):
from your overarching argument is why that determination of
Congress, which makes perfect sense given its duty to protect
the people of the United States,why that is subjugated to a
concern about the president not being able to control
everything. I mean, I appreciate there's a
conflict between the two, but one would think under our

(36:15):
constitutional design, given thehistory of the monarchy and the
concerns that the framers had about a president controlling
everything, that in the clash between those two, Congress's
view that we should be able to have independence with respect
to certain issues should take precedence.
Well, that's a hell of a claim. If only we had a document that

(36:39):
would be something you could go back to and decide whether or
not do they ever use the word nonpartisan?
Let's do nonpartisan in the Constitution.
No, that doesn't exist. What about partisan?
Is that a problem par the sin? That's also not in the
Constitution. What about independent?

(37:00):
Independence is is stated, but nothing about an independent.
Let me see. Actually, there's two other
instances. Let me not lie to you guys.
Nope, that's the declaration. And that's also things that are
just on the on the website. Nope.
It turns out the word independent.
There's no such thing. What about experts?
Maybe experts? They must say something about
how the experts are supposed to run things.
I had. I should have done this before.

(37:21):
Oh, there's zero instances of the word experts.
What about experts? No, no, not there either.
OK, let's just look Article 1. All legislative powers here in
granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States,
which will have two houses and they lame what they are.
Let's go down here to Article 2.The exec, the executive power.

(37:42):
I Is it all the executive power?It turns out it's all the
executive power shall be vested in a President of the United
States of America. Huh, weird.
How is it then that this woman wants to make an argument that
Congress should be able to cede power, which is not vested in
their branch to somebody else who's an independent, who's an

(38:04):
expert because the monarchy or some other such thing.
Yeah. The people who founded the the
thing didn't want a president who was a constitution.
They didn't want a constitution to create a monarchy.
They didn't want a president whowas a king.
But they also didn't say that unelected bureaucrats, they seem
to have problems with the bureaucrats.
That seemed like why we went outthere.
This is Andrew Braca and Branca,sorry.

(38:26):
And he is doing sort of making fun of Elena Kagan, which is
kind of amusing. He refers to as Elena, never
been married, never had kids. Why do you ask Kagan in this
clip? And I'm going to play this is
kind of like jutting in. And again, this idea that
there's such a thing as an independent executive agency is
absurd. At least it is to me.
I don't understand how you get away with making the claim but

(38:48):
for the mine. Run of these multi member
executive agencies they're clearly exercising executive
power they're doing stuff that what you know the MLRB does that
the MSPB does so how about thoseso you you you're you are here
saying the MLRB goes down the MSPB goes down notwithstanding

(39:08):
that they do all their work or almost all their work in.
They go down like they'll be destroyed.
They would still exist. The question is, does the
president get to choose who heads them and exercises his
executive authority? Judicial type proceedings, I
wouldn't say goes down. I would be saying they were

(39:29):
restored to democratic accountability and
constitutional structure. But we have contended on current
versions of those agencies goes down.
We have challenged those in thiscourt, MRBNSMSPB and there there
are others in this court and saythe law, I mean there's various
lists out there how? About inferior officers, we
haven't challenged any. Restrictions, Ketanji Jackson's

(39:50):
trying to butt in how CERN before I don't understand.
Can you explain? I don't understand.
They're making the argument theywant to go all the way down,
sort of the let's get down to the granular minutiae.
If you apply it to this, that the agency is not independent of
the president, then are all the inferior officers.
And at the end of the day, I think the argument actually is

(40:10):
yes, although they're not makingthat argument today.
I don't know how you think otherwise.
Literally you just go back to the Constitution.
How about Article 2? It seems really, really
straightforward. I'm not crazy, I don't think.
Let's just read what the words say.
They can't go anywhere else. The executive power is vested in
the president of the United States.
If it's an executive agency, if it involves doing an executive

(40:31):
function, how could it be something else?
But all this clip actually ends up proving, I guess, is that
politics is show business for ugly people and sometimes ugly
voices. Those are atrocious things to
listen to. All of that is really, really
bad. So in any case, it's just a
strange time to be in where we are hearing these arguments.

(40:52):
I got one more here that it might be that in the best
interest of the American people for certain issues to be handled
by experts. That's a claim that I don't see
you being it. I don't know how you make that
claim because we don't put experts in.
We put people that represent us.A lot of times it's just people
that we like the way they talk. Hence Donald Trump, expert on
all these things, definitely notgot people to vote for him.

(41:14):
That's what it's about. Let me ask you about Justice
Kagan's invitation to expound upon comparative risks.
I don't know if we got back to that, but before you do that,
let me just also focus in on Justice Kavanaugh's question
about losing on the merits and the extent to which the answer

(41:37):
would be just striking down the four clause removal protections.
I mean, I, I, I appreciate that,but doesn't that create pretty
significant risks with respect to the missions of the various
agencies? I mean, it's not just we, we
don't have for cause removal andthe agency continues.
That would then I think open thedoor for the president to come

(42:01):
in each new president and clean house in terms of all of the
individuals who are running thatagency, notwithstanding their
expertise and knowledge and experience and the things that
they are doing to promote the mission of the agency.
And presumably the president could install whoever he wanted

(42:22):
in those positions. And that I think creates risks.
So. What are what?
I don't know where these risks come from, But by the way, what
she's saying is, of course, the case.
How nuts is it? I'm like, how dumb is it that we
have to have someone who went tolaw school and went through this
entire process and can't grasp that the president should be
able to come in and run the executive agency because it has
all the executive power. And that's what executive

(42:43):
functions are. Wait, the executive gets to
decide what the executive does? Yeah.
And so this is the craziest partabout judicial review,
especially the way that we have it now, especially with these
activist judges, which is what he has not solved.
For whatever it's worth, this has not been solved and this
morass is going to continue and it's going to haunt the Trump
administration all the way to the end because you've got these

(43:04):
dimwitted bulbs. This is one of the major,
probably lifelong consequences for me of the Biden era.
We're going to have this lady saying things that are
completely illogical just from the basic reading.
She didn't have to read a bunch of case law.
Go back to the original text. The first sentence of Article 2
explains what you want to know. We're going to have risks

(43:24):
because the president might comein and gut all the top of the
executive agencies and put it inhis own people.
Yeah. There's no guarantee.
Like, none of these, these executive agencies are defined.
They're not defined in the Constitution.
Anyhow. I I get blown away by how stupid
some of this stuff is because they're in here, like, quibbling

(43:44):
about minutia. And This is why lawyers are
really frustrating to us who have just regular common sense.
We're like, wait a minute. No, no, no, no.
On its face, it is a ridiculous question on whether or not the
president can fire people that work under the the agencies that
get answer to the president. Yeah, doesn't, it doesn't stop
them, but I guess that's just the nature of the beast when you

(44:06):
consider what people do actuallytake in.
I might come back to this clip. Russell Brand and Candace Owens
have this little 2 minute exchange that I that I held onto
and I don't know why I thought it was fascinating, but it's
fascinating that it actually resonates with enough people.
I don't think Candace Owens is agood actor.
I don't think that she says things that are intelligent.
I don't think Russell Brand saysthings are intelligent, but they
sound good. He's kind of contend G Jackson

(44:27):
Brownish. He says a lot of words and he
says them in a relatively articulate manner and he says
them with an accent, which is quite charming.
And then you're like, but what did you even say?
And did it even mean anything? Sometimes he hits it, sometimes
he doesn't. Sometimes he sounds like a goof.
That's one of this particular clip that we play seems to have
that sort of instinct for me. So we're living in a dangerous

(44:50):
time because of this stuff. We're living in a time when I
don't think that there is any room for screw ups.
And so maybe what you wouldn't want to do is unforced errors.
I'm going to show you an unforced error.
It's right here. That's Neil Team 6.
If you were just listening, in fact, now's a great time to plug

(45:11):
it. If you're just listening, you're
missing out on the best part. Some of the video.
We actually do some work on the video and here I think it's
enjoyable. 1000% more people arewatching our video on Spotify
than they were last year. So thanks for joining us.
On Spotify. We were a top 5%, like a 95th
percentile video podcast on spoton Spotify last year.
We're a 99th percent video podcast this year, so join us

(45:32):
over there. If you're listening in any
format and you're not on Spotify, you're missing out on
the part where you can click between and see what I'm talking
about occasionally. Kyle serafinshow.com, That is
the sort of redirect for you. You can also join us over at
kyleserafin.com with locals, which allows us to continue to
operate even if everybody pulls their support.
Both of those are very, very good place to go for us.
Otherwise, if you're watching onYouTube right now, I mean you're

(45:53):
watching right now like almost 800 people watching on YouTube.
That's pretty cool. Give us a thumbs up.
Same thing on Rumble. You guys on Rumble are starting
to to creep back up in numbers again.
Maybe they've taken their their boot off our neck.
Make sure you're liking these videos, boost them up in the
algorithm. If you're new to the program,
you guys haven't been here before.
We welcome you. I'm seeing a lot of people in
the comments saying that and you've come from Clint Russell
show and maybe you've come from Infowars or you've come from

(46:16):
somewhere else. And I appreciate you.
I appreciate you giving me a chance to listen and hopefully
this is adding some value to you.
Let me add the value that we have the extra special expertise
in and it is right here. This is Neil team 6.
I know about eight of these people by name and apparently
they've decided that being fired4 plus years, maybe five years

(46:40):
after the inciting incident is not fair.
And I tend to agree with them. It's kind of like punishing a
child. Some of you guys have tried to.
I get chastised for this. Dad comes home from work.
Let's do the dad and mom analogyagain.
Dad comes home from work, maybe a business trip where he's been
out of town for like a week. And on the Monday of the week,
fill in the blank young boy doesbad thing #1 and mom told Dad

(47:05):
about it. And Dad's been holding on to it
since. He gets on.
He gets on the plane, he flies back home from business.
There he is. Boom.
And he says, I am now going to punish you, son, for the thing
you did five days ago. I know you're 4.
I know that you have no sense oftemporal understanding.
And like, you can't figure out what the hell happened and how
this thing, how this punishment is connected to that bad deed
you did five days ago that you've already forgotten about.

(47:28):
This is the problem. If they had taken swift action,
which they couldn't have done because Chris Wray was in
charge, if they had taken swift action against these people for
this tactically unsound, politically inappropriate
action, then it would have been fine.
And you probably could have terminated them on site for that
time in 2020 when this happened.This was like June, July of
2020. This was inherently dangerous

(47:51):
because taking a knee while you're armed in front of a
potentially dangerous mob, whichis what they claimed is
unacceptable. It's also unacceptable because
it made it dangerous for me as Iwent out a couple hours later to
go walk around in the same area.Now, you've set a precedent that
FBI agents will kneel for your political BS, and we don't
accept that. But more importantly, they were

(48:12):
actually not under duress and they were not surrounded.
And there was not a violent mob.These were a bunch of people
that were like 75 feet to 100 feet away from them.
And they were just kind of, generally speaking, cheering at
them. And these people, including
supervisors, multiple supervisors, some of whom got
multiple promotions. If you look in the middle of the
screen right now, you'll see Sarah Linden.

(48:32):
She's the heavyset gal. She, from what we can tell, is
Jane doe #5 in the lawsuit, because they all fired a
lawsuit. And when I say Jane Doe, I mean
DOUGH Doe. Jane Doe.
We ate too much dough. Jane Doe in the lawsuit is
involved in suing the Trump administration, specifically

(48:55):
suing Ban Bonnie and Patel. Because this was an improper
action. It was a bad employment action.
Guys. We actually told Patel how to
solve this problem a long time ago.
We being me and Steve friend whowas sent home yesterday after
they said we can't give you anything that make you an agent,
but you're on the payroll now. But but you're also not on the

(49:18):
payroll and we can't have you come in, but you can come in,
but don't come in and don't spend too much money because we
don't have a credit card for youto fill up your gas card.
But here's a car. So take the car with the gas
that it has and then try not to use it.
By the way, why don't you take the rest of the year off, use
your leave, don't come back in for a bit.
So he's OK, Steve Friends, OK, but we probably won't have on
the program for a little bit. He doesn't need to poke the bear
any more than he did. How many people go on a podcast

(49:40):
on Friday afternoon and on Monday morning they get brought
in for the first time in three years to the FBI?
The answer is done. Steve Friends is a legend, all
right. This is a federal civil lawsuit
that was filed on Monday, yesterday with a dozen former
agents seeking their job back, claiming that they were fired
during the Trump administration for their efforts in 2020 to
head off a riot in the wake of the George Floyd killing.

(50:02):
The facts are not in their favorwhen it comes to this as far as
heading off a riot and stopping things that were dangerous.
But the FBI will in fact, back that up.
And of course, they substantiateit at the time and the FBI
executives who were backing their play, and that includes
people like Larissa Knapp, who ended up being the executive
assistant director of the national security branch and the

(50:22):
deputy director and Chris Ray, who came in and gave some of
them hugs. They all substantiated their
position. So to switch it up this time, it
was a mistake. Those people should not have
been in positions of authority. They certainly should not have
been promoted the way they were.Sarah Linden, the heavyset gal
that we saw, was promoted to deputy assistant director, which

(50:42):
is one step behind the number four people.
It's a very high level position in the FBI to the point where,
funny story, I once met a deputyassistant director when I was
doing surveillance and we were showing doing like the dog and
pony show. Anybody who's been in the
military knows what a dog and pony show is.
The general, the the Colonel, whatever.
Your base commander comes in andwants to see what your unit's up
to, so you clean everything up. And I used to do those all the

(51:04):
time because my boss didn't likehim.
My boss's name was John Nance, and he was a lazy piece of
garbage. So he would send me over to do
the dog and pony show, which I didn't mind because I don't care
about talking to strangers. So they sent me over there and
this woman comes out to me, veryhandsome woman, 50 years old,
blue suit, thin, kind of tall. And she's some kind of special
assistant something or other. I don't think she was an agent.
She seemed like an admin type. And she said, OK, well the

(51:26):
following people are going to behere.
And we have this and we have that and we have this.
We have we have the DAD of so and so whatever it was, I don't
remember. And I go, OK, cool, yeah, got
it. OK, whatever.
My presentation is always the same.
So I did my presentation and I explained what it was and then
she comes back and she was like,and I said something like pretty
crass probably, or kind of like blunt because I just don't

(51:47):
really get that excited about people's titles.
And she goes, do you know who that was?
And I'm like, yeah, I think thatwas Chris because he introduced
himself. Like Chris, he comes up DA DS
everybody that are senior executive in the FBI, especially
under Chris Wray. They would go out there and they
try to be like a cool guy. They come up and be like, how's
it going? I'm Brian.
And you're like, OK, Brian, likeI don't know what your position
is. So I'm not going to call you
Sir. I'm just going to call you Brian
because you introduced yourself as Brian.
I'm Kyle. That's how we would do it.

(52:08):
I just don't care. So we would go this back and
forth. This guy comes up to, you know,
let's say his name is Brian. Brian.
And she was like, do you know that was.
And I was like, yeah, that was Brian.
And she was like, no, no, no, Brian is Adad.
And I was like, right. Oh, that's cool.
That's cool. I'm Adad too.
Yeah. I got like, I got 2 little
girls. Yeah.
We should have a lot in common. That would be no problem.
No problem. Happy to meet Brian.

(52:29):
She was like looking over at my colleague.
Does he know? Does he know who they are?
There's this weird reverence inside the FBI once you get up
to the set, the SES levels, the special agent charge, the DAD,
stuff like that. I don't get it.
I got to tell you, I don't get it.
I don't understand it. I never understood it.
I never understood like worshipping people for title.
But it's a big thing in the in the FBI that you're kind of
untouchable once you get into the SES ranks.

(52:49):
Sarah Linden was one of them. She got promoted to DAD.
She was in charge of Russian counterintelligence, if memory
serves, and she got fired. She shouldn't have been there in
the 1st place, to be fair. But this lawsuit I don't think
is going to go well for the Trump administration at all.
I think it's going to go really poorly.
I'm going to show you it on the screen real quick.
They've named Cash Patel, yet another unnecessary distraction
when they should have been doingthe right thing.

(53:10):
They instead went out there and tried to do some petty grievance
thing and thought that by firinga bunch of people for a headline
was going to be really effective.
And the fact of the matter is, is that these headlines are just
going to get them mired in legalBS for the next, you know,
decade. This is something talking about
the First Amendment says you can't get rid of them for
partisan reasons. By the way, this lawsuit would

(53:30):
have been really nice for those of us who were fired under
COVID. Political patronage, where
public employees hold their job in the condition they provide in
some acceptable manner. Support for the favored
political party is unconstitutional because no
official hire petty can prescribe what orthodox in
politics, nationalism, religion or other matters of opinion.
That's from L Rod V Burns 1976. You know what's real wild about

(53:52):
these things when you start reading like the Democrats
suddenly have principles and they want to go out there and
talk constitution. This is the same Democrats that
hope that like a Katanji JacksonBrowne is going to be their
judge. Where the hell were you guys in
2020? Where were you in 2021 when we
were making a strong religious argument and saying that we
shouldn't have to be, you know, subservient to a political

(54:14):
agenda of a president? I actually do believe that
people should be able to leave their politics at home.
And I don't think that you should be fired for your
politics. But that goes both ways.
None of you people gave a rats when it was us getting tossed
out. And now suddenly they're crying
about it and they're suing and they're going to act like this
is it. The bedrock constitutional
protection for public employees preserves George Washington's

(54:36):
vision of a common government? Really.
They all wrapped themselves in the flag.
When this stuff happens anyway, I think it'll be successful, but
whatever it's worth. I think the people that got
fired that were in this picture,that were dropping a knee and
doing something dangerous and illogical, they should have been
moved into post. That did not matter.
They should have been put placesin the broom like closet.
We used to say being commander of the broom closet was what you
did with people who were no good.

(54:57):
They actually had a position at the Washington Field office
where all these people worked and it was the supervisor of a
squad of no one. It was called the the SSSAI
think or something like that, orSSAS, I don't remember.
It was literally a supervisor level position, AGS 14
supervisor position where you were in charge of like data but
not people. And they would just give a

(55:18):
presentation once every quarter.It was a penalty box time out
for people that like, you know, were AGS 14 and they didn't want
to demote them. The Bureau never got rid of
people and they certainly didn'tget rid of them by firing them
like that. And it's not going to age well.
I don't think it'll do well at all in the courts.
It doesn't mean that those people shouldn't, you know, have
lost their jobs at the time. I don't think they will now.

(55:39):
It's just one more misstep in the nonsense that these people
keep doing. So let me give you what you guys
came for because this is the best part of it.
The, the story like these are, these are deliberate step on
Rakes, but it's not like someoneelse placed the Rakes in the
darkness. And the FBI director, the deputy
director, the whoever is firing these people in HR, it's not
like they, like they, they didn't know the Rakes were

(56:00):
there. They put the Rakes down
themselves, got into a little back and forth discussion, and I
end up going directly and talking to her.
Brianna Morello, who's on Infowars, and I think she's on
right now or she was on right now like a few minutes ago.
Brianna was kind of making the claim that it's that the Biden
administration set up the guys that are currently in DOJ and
screwed them over. And that is not what happened.

(56:21):
People, if you go out there and you assess that you have now a
new suspect that was previously cleared by the previous
administration and you set yourself up for failure and you
didn't know all of his back story and you and you rushed it
together, remember, remember thesort of context of this.
Let me play it if I can. We got John Solomon claiming

(56:42):
that the entire Relook and New Look was a red cell
organization. I can't stand listening to this
man because he sounds like just a sycophantic piece of garbage.
And I know that he's a snake, having dealt with him myself.
He's always trying to con you. You guys ever talked to somebody
who's like a who's a real shiftycharacter on the on the phone,
John Solomon would call me up and try to act like he was, he

(57:02):
was like a shitty car salesman. Now sitting there listening to
him is like, you don't know as much as I know.
You're acting like you know morethan you do.
Just because you have access doesn't mean you have
understanding the culture. And so he's going to make this
argument on Bannon. And I want you to consider he's
basically saying that just before Steve Baker dropped out
the quote UN quote blaze bomber story, the FBI had decided they

(57:23):
were going to take a new look atit.
And then they were like, oh, crap, we are screwed because we
are now caught in the fact that the government actually is
involved. And for whatever reason, the FBI
has been covering it up for the entire time that that Patel and
Bongino were in. So here's here's Solomon making
the argument that how they solved the case and he's acting
like, oh, I knew all the things that were going to go all along.

(57:43):
They got the wrong guy, people. I'm real confident of saying
that. I'm going to show you why,
because he's a brownie. You know what a brownie is?
A brownie is a dude who loves MyLittle Pony, and that story just
dropped on the New York Post. We can't get more fun
Christmassy type stuff than the FBI arresting A brony bomber.
Anyway, we'll start with John Solomon and we're going to move
into the story about the the My Little Pony, including some
music. Well, as I mentioned, I think it

(58:06):
was just before Thanksgiving on your show, I thought there would
be an arrest this week. They were zeroing in on a
gentleman whom they arrested this morning in Northern
Virginia. And the way this case was
cracked was about a month or sixweeks ago, von Gino, who was the
lead on it and Patel decided to take the old agents off the case
and put a new team on it. Now, there was a little

(58:26):
resistance, as there always is in the FBI, to any form of
change. But the new team came in, they
applied some new ideas, some newtechnologies, and some of the
evidence that was sitting right in front of them with fresh eyes
was followed. And it was able to be led to
this gentleman who they arresteda little bit ago.
We don't know much about his ideology or his intentions or

(58:47):
his motives yet. And one of the things that FBI
officials stressed with me this morning is that this is really
the beginning. The arrest is the beginning of
trying to understand how this operation was conducted, who's
behind it, whether there are more conspirators or whether
this is a lone wolf. Still all of.
That to be determined, but a really extraordinary effort 5

(59:08):
almost. Awful.
Absolutely awful. I don't know why John Solomon,
who's a print guy and was like an editor and was a writer, why
he thought that he could convey things across in a visual medium
the way that I do. He's got a lisp.
He's not a good articulate communicator.
He says a bunch of things. He has no power or gravity in
his voice. Like all of it, just like just
the mechanics of listening to him are really difficult.

(59:29):
And then the stuff he said was BS.
An arrest is not the beginning of the story unless you're in
like local law enforcement. This is a 5 year operation.
This is a 5 year operation investigating somebody that did
the most terroristic act in the biggest case that the FBI
apparently ever handled, right. Apparently this case was the

(59:50):
linchpin. It was cited in numerous
sentencing documents. The danger that the the pipe
bombs brought about during that day was was referenced over and
over again. By judges who were destroying
the lives of J Sixers. It's not the beginning of
something. Nobody in the FBI arrests
someone and says we feel pretty comfortable that we got our man

(01:00:10):
and we think you're going to be comfortable with it too as we so
figure out what he was all about.
We don't know why he did this thing and we don't really know
that much about him. And and then we use some new
technologies like cell phone pings, which are not a new
technology. It turns out, ladies and
gentlemen, cell phone pings, notnew.
Credit card receipts, not new. License plate reader, also not

(01:00:33):
new. That's what they found it on.
And so they're opening themselves up for this silliness
and this embarrassment. DC pipe bomber suspect Brian
Cole Junior had a secret online life obsessing over My Little
Pony. What?
Yeah, The My Little Pony. Did you know that there's an

(01:00:54):
entire subculture of men who just love My Little Pony and
they're known as brownies? And as I said, I kind of grew up
in an Internet culture. And so I know a little bit of
something about what it looks like.
And I understand that there are men that do this and they're not
generally speaking, a particularly violent group.
There's been some allegations that there's a crossover there.

(01:01:15):
It's kind of that's like the cosplay thing.
You're seeing the the people that go to conventions.
The general brownie is like living at home in his mom's
basement. Might be emotionally challenged,
might be learning disabled, might not be, might just be
someone who's just kind of socially awkward.
People glom onto it. And they're looking at
anthropomorphized horses. Horses, as I like to say with my

(01:01:35):
girls that are really nice and friendly, and they teach
messages about, you know, working together.
Does it make sense that grown men would like this?
Not to me, probably not to you, but they're out there.
They're not, generally speaking,a violent type.
I don't think they build bombs. That's usually not the there's a
pretty big crossover. There's a big gap between the

(01:01:56):
people who are autistic and sortof move towards a childish
fascination with an anthropomorphized, feminine,
horsey figure. And I want to blow up things
over an election that was unfair.
And I started planning it a yearand a half to two years before
it happened. You guys get that?

(01:02:17):
Here's some of the the artwork that Brian Cole was apparently
involved in. Childish teenage man attempting,
accused of attempting to blow upthe DNC and the RNC in
Washington DC on January the 5th, 2021.
Was a highly active My Little Pony fan.
They don't use the word brownie,but I don't know why, because
Brownie's a great word. The Brownie bomber, Brian Cole

(01:02:37):
Junior 30, was obsessed with thetoys marketed at young girls.
I have several of those young girls in my house and they do
like My Little Pony, creating art of plastic pony dolls,
remixes, songs of them and writing fan fiction dedicated to
them. There was no sexual aspect to
his end. For whatever it's worth, that's
what's noted in the story. His works are spread across
various social media accounts and they link to his e-mail

(01:02:59):
address and his phone number. And there's one of them.
One of his pictures is a a pony holding a lightsaber looking
thing and it says I'm not quote UN quote cute.
I'm deadly. OK, there's the mug shot, which
is very unusual because you can see he's got his headphones in
there. That's something you see some
autistic people wear when they need to be able to do sensory

(01:03:19):
deprivation or they're overwhelmed by environment.
I've never seen a mug shot wheresomeone got to keep their
headphones that kind of tacitly acknowledges if this in fact,
the mug shot and and this says it's credited to the Department
of Justice. So if that's his mug shot and
that's the picture they took when they when they went to
process him, what it tells me is, is that they understood that
taking those away from him wouldcause him to meltdown, which

(01:03:42):
means you're dealing with somebody who has a, let's say,
a, an abnormal response to normal stimuli.
How do you spin this? How do you spin this?
That a guy who loved Applejack or Apple Bloom or whatever the
name of the the horsey's name isand Fluttershy, like that's the

(01:04:04):
guy that went out there and built the bombs.
It's childlike stuff. Again, there are some people
that have it towards the sexual fetish, but I, I don't think it
is. This is a this is the kind of
thing I got an article about the, the subculture of bronies,
but it says a man who's part of the My Little Pony subculture
known as a bronie. The community was in 2017 large
enough to hold annual conventions and experts

(01:04:25):
considered followers very sincere in the fandom.
Yeah, they are serious about this stuff.
I mean, like, it's not a seriousthing to me, but they are
serious about it. One of the expressions they use
is welcome to the herd. You can find it in an urban
dictionary. It's a thing.
It's weird, it's abnormal, but it's not violent, not as far as
I can tell, and links to it are very weak when you try to find

(01:04:46):
people that are actually involved in the violence end of
it. None of Cole's post examined by
the New York Post, who's writingthe story, had any notable
sexual connotations. Fan fiction story was authored
by Shoal Coats. It showcases him bringing
together My Little Pony fantasy and horror.
Apple Bloom's eyes snapped open as she sat up in her bed,

(01:05:08):
panting heavily and sweat dripping from a red mane.
The skeletons, the zombified ponies rising up from the
ground, they're decaying bodies and rotted flesh slid from their
bones. He wrote, Allegedly.
She buried her face in a hooves,crying silently at the horrible
images that inhabited her mind. It's a High School graduate.
He's writing fan fiction about ponies with no sexual overtone.

(01:05:29):
Guys, that's the guy that they think was out there doing this
mastermind plot that got away with the Fe, you know, got away
from the FBI for what, almost five years?
Just add strange, they quote Daniel, what's his name here?
Daniel Chadbourn, assistant professor of psychology, who
wrote the book Meet the Bronies,a psychology of adult My Little

(01:05:54):
Pony fandom. The subculture of brownies was
very online and unique and attracted a lot of male fans who
were breaking gender norms, which attracted a lot of
attention. The subculture was generally not
sexual, he noted, adding he isn't surprised that within the
community, some members are in fact troubled.
Someone who's disaffected is often going to look for spaces
to engage in to find a sense of identity and belonging.

(01:06:15):
The toy company Hasbro, which makes My Little Pony did not
immediately respond to requests for like, what the hell would
they have to say about it? Here's the here's a talk and I
think this is done by Chad. I'll put this in the in the in
the links for the show. If you guys want to read it,
it's worth doing. He wrote an entire book on it.
New Mexico Highland professor will give a November 14th talk

(01:06:37):
on his research and the book surrounding the brony culture,
the mostly online culture, about75 to 80% males.
If you don't know, there is a female subculture that actually
fits into this subculture. They're called Pega Sisters.
Yeah, that's a thing people know.
Just saying they can sometimes attend conferences, they get
together and they'll wear outfits and so on.

(01:06:59):
Bronycon, what a mess. What an absolute freaking
disaster. What an unmitigated silly thing
for them to find them self involved in these guys because
how did they not know? Saying that this is the
beginning, it's not good, and they're showing over and over
again that they know less and less about what's going on.
I'm going to give you 2 video clips.
This one's Julie Kelly talking on Bannon, talking about the,

(01:07:21):
the, the prosecutor that was chosen who went after Enrique
Tario was involved in Mike Flynn.
We talked about that yesterday alittle bit.
Here's Julie Kelly. What I keep seeing is the MAGA
people, the ones who are like doing the, the trademark MAGA,
not that who take the words at its face, but the people that do
MAGA trademark MAGATM. They make an awful lot of

(01:07:42):
excuses for these guys who were supposed to be studs that knew
what was going on and understoodthe problems and we're going to
come in and clean it all up and they were after it.
Why are we, why do we have to make so many excuses for people
that are doing a good job? These courts about the trials of
the J6 people and President Trump and, and, and Peter
Navarro and Steve Bennett and a host of Tom Barrack and a host

(01:08:05):
of others. So you know this better than
anybody because you were essentially an eyewitness to
this. Now, you have also been since
Darren Beatty's in the government and Raheem's doing
other stuff right now. You're really one of our lead
watchdogs, if not the lead on this whole thing with the pipe
bomb. And you informed me last night

(01:08:26):
and I can't believe it because my, my head's still blown up
from when you told me that the FBI agents in the lead attorney,
the prosecutor on this case withthe pipe bomber is one of the
worst prosecutors, one of the worst demons that were out there
prosecuting the J6, the J6 folks.

(01:08:49):
How could that possibly? Julie, you must have gotten this
one wrong. Your, your, your track records
100%. But on this one, Julie Kelly
must be wrong. This can't possibly be true, can
it, ma'am? As I tell my husband all the
time, of course I'm right. Yes, I'm right.
I'm never wrong. Never, unfortunately.
I wish that this was not true. And I guess my only thought here

(01:09:16):
is that the new leadership at the DOJ and FBI are not aware of
who this individual is. Jocelyn Valentin, who was the
lead prosecutor, she led the team of government lawyers, DOJ
lawyers who went after the ProudBoys.
I and I covered that trial, right?

(01:09:36):
I covered that in 2023. She is among the worst of the
worst. When I was asked to help submit
names of J6 prosecutors who should be fired, she was towards
the top. Of the list, so I have no idea.
Julie, Julie Julie, Julie, JulieHang on, hang on.

(01:09:56):
She treated the the Proud Boys got a totally fair trial.
Blah blah, OK, so they're going to be sarcastic, and she's being
a little bit sarcastic, saying I'm never wrong.
I actually think she probably believes that.
That is a woefully ridiculous take from this woman.
Why do we have to make excuses? Oh, they probably just didn't
know. That may be true, but that seems

(01:10:17):
like grounds for removal. If you're that incompetent and
you're not able to actually articulate, like what's going
on, how about a slightly more sensible take?
People give Infowars a hard timefor being Infowars, but having
Viva on is significantly more competent.
Let's say commentary. Now here he is discussing what

(01:10:39):
the possibilities are. None of them are good, by the
way. If what they're saying is true
and no one believes it, it's a problem.
If what they're saying, if they believe it but it turns out not
to be true, it's a problem. When you say, like, you know,
maybe the Trump administration didn't know who this person was.
Maybe Jeanine Pirro didn't know who this person was.
They know now. And so if they don't do anything
now, that's a problem. If they didn't know, that's a

(01:10:59):
problem. If they did know, it's a
problem. And some people are going to
raise the argument, you know, they need Bulldogs who are going
to go in there and really get that conviction.
If you're getting that conviction through, I won't say
Brady violation, it might not bethe right term, but through
violating the rules of procedurethat you don't result in hiding
exculpatory evidence that results in an injustice that

(01:11:21):
requires A pardon. If that's the type of bulldog
prosecutor you need, you're screwing justice as well.
And so there's no good reason for why this woman still had a
job, how she ended up on this case.
If they didn't know it's a problem, If they didn't know
it's a problem and that's where we should leave it because
that's the issue. The issue is it's a freaking
problem if they're putting thesepeople in and the problem is, is

(01:11:43):
that it's predictably problematic.
If you were, if you were thinking that you're going to go
back to the old case file and find someone that was cleared
and your assumption that they'reclear wasn't good.
You read the evidence and you'relike, oh, Brian Cole wasn't the
guy because following, you know,these following things, if you
read the case file and you're like, OK, he had pings.

(01:12:05):
He was in the area. They had some uncertainty.
And then what did they do? They did a follow up interview.
Oh, they found out that he was on the move at that time and he
didn't actually fit inside the parameters when they did more
precise ping mapping. And then you went out there and
then you have Dan Bongino smiling like a goofball and it's
his birthday and you're going togo get that guy for me.
You think that's what it took? Was that really what it took?
It just took Dan Bongino pullingthe case agent side saying

(01:12:28):
you're going to get this guy. It's going to happen.
And the guy's like, OK, fine. Like I'll serve you up some slop
here. You want this?
Run with this. Destroy your credibility.
I might have seen some things, folks.
This is probably like the the most salacious part of all this.
I might have seen some things that lead me to believe that
they have the wrong guy. I'm not just like, I'm not just
saying this for no reason. It's not my story to share yet,

(01:12:52):
but you guys know that we've shared some things before,
before it happened. Let me tell you, I've already
seen some things and it is it isenough for me to make.
I could take it to ADC jury and you can't convict this guy.
Let me say that real clearly. Actually, that's really true.
You could take the things that Ihave seen already that I
actually already have and we could show it to ADC jury and

(01:13:17):
they will acquit this guy based on reasonable doubt.
Doesn't mean that he could have done it, sure, but no DC jury is
going to convict him. An autistic black brony who has
a stumbling gait who wears Crocsbut suddenly also has like
expensive sneaker head sneakers and walks around looking like a
stud athletically moving around through Washington DC despite

(01:13:39):
the fact that per the FB is own claims, he's been there like
never. He's been there once per year.
He's made one purchase per year in Washington DC.
Who are you going to put your money on?
People that don't know? Just saying that's it's
embarrassing. And the best little bit was

(01:14:00):
Donald Trump calling it essentially a Democrat hoax, but
it's not clear what he's callinga Democrat hoax.
This is from yesterday. Not a huge fan of Lindell TV.
I'm actually not a fan of Cara Casanova as a person.
She and I had some tips. I think she's really lazy as a
as a reporter. That's been my personal
experience dealing with her numerous times.
We did this long. OK, let me justify that.
We did a long interview, like 45minutes long about something.

(01:14:21):
And it might even be about this case.
Back in the day. She was very interested on the
J6 stuff. And at the end of it, she said,
can you just write up what you told me and give it to me in
notes? And I was like, no.
And she was like, can you just, you know, like write what we
talked about? No, you're a freaking reporter.
You could have recorded the conversation or take a note
yourself. What the shit are you talking
about? I got to do your job.

(01:14:41):
So anyway, I, I think she's lazyAnd, and that was the end of it.
Like you don't get to waste 45 minutes of my time where I give
you my information and, and you know, my analysis on something
and whatever I know and then askme to write it up myself when
you're a freaking paid reporter.So anyway, I think that's lazy.
And I thought it was really, really disgusting.
This is a bad question. Like so many people don't know

(01:15:01):
how to do. They go and they monologue a
question to the president of theUnited States.
How about an actual open-ended question?
Sir, what's your take on the pipe bomb case that just went
out? You got like one second to get
it through. Anyway, She does a crappy
question. Trump says it's more of a
statement. Thank you for your statement.
It's a Democrat hoax. I don't know what to make of
this. I don't think he's buying it.
And by the way, I've heard some folks in DC say the White House

(01:15:24):
is not buying the story, and I don't think the brownie thing
makes it any better. We'll.
Entertain I'm Kara from glint LTV Kara Cashnow, but I'm not
faking it. Just so you know, and
everybody's talking about the pipe bomber over the weekend,
the suspect that was taken into custody.
I reported on Biden's kangaroo court for four years and I this
is an important question to me. Everyone knows that J 6 was a

(01:15:44):
fed direction to set you and your supporters up.
So my question is, what's your gut instinct about the new pipe
bomber suspect taken into custody?
Does your instinct tell you thathe acted alone?
And also Mr. President, how do you feel about the lead
prosecutor on the pipe bomber case?
Jocelyn Balancing is the same prosecutor that allegedly acts
the J6 or to lie to frame you for J6 when you did nothing

(01:16:06):
wrong? What are your thoughts?
Well, thank you. I really appreciate that
question. It's sort of a statement that I
appreciate. It very much Jocelyn is being
looked at. They all have to be looked at.
What they're doing is so bad. This was a whole Democrat hoax.
The whole thing was a Democrat hoax, and it's all being looked
at. I appreciate that.
I. Don't even know what that means.

(01:16:28):
Why was it not looked at beforehand?
Again, this is the same argument.
This is the reason why some of the stuff that I've done on
social media has been so successful, pointing out the
flaws and the weakness in this FBI.
But I guess it goes broader to the DOJ end of it.
That's not been my focus. You don't know who works for
you. It took you nine months, 11
months to get rid of people who did something five years ago and

(01:16:48):
you did in the dumbest way possible.
And now you're dealing with a lawsuit, Same story.
You're putting on prosecutors who did the bad things, the
people at the front line that were doing the thing that was
atrocious. What did you expect?
How did you hire people that couldn't tell you who are the
people that are problematic? How did you let people that were
in the agency that did all the bad things that you were
claiming they did for years comein and then just say like, well,

(01:17:10):
now we've turned over a new leaf.
It's the meme, it's the Seraphinshow meme reform, but with the
same guys, you cannot do that. And that's what we keep pointing
out here. So I have a funny footage
because I can't be this serious for this long and it is a really
like this is a deadly serious topic to the point where people
will go to prison for life or bekilled over it.
That's how that's how serious this is to me.

(01:17:32):
Allow me to show you what I think the meeting looked like
before they did the the interview of Brian Cole.
So I think he got some FBI agents together.
They got together at the conference table and they were
like, how do we make this autistic, socially awkward, My
Little Pony loving guy? How do we make him feel

(01:17:53):
comfortable so that he can confess to us?
And I think it looks something like this.
As they come in, we treat it just like one of us, OK?
That's one of us. One of us.
We. Accept that, one of us.
They're all brownies, right? They must all be brownies.
They had to tell them like, yeah, you know, I also like

(01:18:14):
Apple Bloom or Apple Jack, whatever.
We're all brownies here. How else?
How else did that get done? And why did anyone think that
was OK? Again, the mug shot shows him
with the headphones on. This is not like he's about to
go do a DJ party. He's in a federal detention.
He's being interviewed by federal agents for the most

(01:18:35):
terroristic thing done on January 5th.
On January 6th and still nobody can explain to me what the
Capitol Police were doing on that day.
How the hell did they find the bomb and then give up?
What is his connection to Capitol police who clearly had
way more knowledge than necessary?
Even if it was just ABS trainingexercise.
Even if there's some jacked up terrible fake excuse, I'm not

(01:18:57):
buying it. So in honor of the the herd and
and welcoming people into the brownie herd, we're going to do
a special edition of FB is and you'll notice if you're missing
on the visual. This is a great time to come to
Spotify. We'll play Spotify clip right
real quick, a little Spotify ad.If you are not watching on
Spotify Rumble YouTube X, you'regoing to miss the FB is that I

(01:19:22):
added for this special edition of FB is.
I will play the song one more time.
I it's super catchy. This is maybe my favorite song
right now. This is welcome to the herd
version. FB is.
Yeah, welcome to All right, I'm not going to play

(01:21:14):
the whole song, but I do love that song.
It seriously is probably my favorite jam right now, except
maybe the one that we're going to end with because seriously,
I, I, I don't know how these guys got walk themselves into
this rake trap. They don't have enough
information on this guy and we're going to prove it.
So anyway, stay tuned for that. It's not my story, but I've seen

(01:21:35):
it pretty confident. Brian Cole's not going to do it.
I am going to be going on Infowars later on today.
Alex Jones threatened slash, begged slash, guilt, shame me
and told me that I was ghosting him.
I was not ghosting him. I was celebrating my daughter's
7th birthday over the weekend. So I didn't go and talk about
this over there, but I've been meaning to go over and chat with
Alex about it. So we'll do that.
And I'm going to be on Joe Altman's program later on today.

(01:21:56):
So if you're listening later on in the day, you can also check
me out on Untamed, formerly the Conservative Daily.
What else we doing? We got a couple other things
coming up. Anyway, we're going to it's
going to be a busy week. It continues to be a biggie
week, busy week, and I made somecontact with the mother of Brian
Cole yesterday and I'm hopeful that her son's attorney will

(01:22:17):
talk to me as well. I'm injecting myself into this
thing because I don't want to see an innocent man regardless
of their political ideology. I don't want to see the wrong
people go to jail simply becausethese guys are screw ups and I
think that's fair. Follow us, support the channel.
We really appreciate all of you guys.
Like the videos, wherever you'reat, if you're watching, you can
see the static in the backgroundrumble.

(01:22:39):
Give us a like we are 35th on the on the leaderboard
yesterday. We're in the top 50 even though
we are probably the smallest show on there in the Top 40 X.
We appreciate you guys on monetized, but whatever, watch
it over there. If you want to join us on
YouTube or on Rumble, that's where we make money on it.
You can join us on locals. If you want to support us, you
can subscribe over on locals. You can subscribe on X.
You can subscribe on YouTube andall these places.
Anyway, check us out on the places you can and I'll just say

(01:23:02):
thank you so much for letting medo this thing.
Somebody pointed out that Nick Fuentes doesn't have a real job
because he sits behind a microphone and talks.
And I was like, neither do I. Like I know this is I know this
is not a real job for real people.
I have had a lot of real jobs inmy life.
I think that's why this is fun and interesting to me.
But I recognize that this is notwhat regular people do ever.

(01:23:24):
And the odds that I could sit here in front of an audience and
have people care what I have to say about it and the fact that
I've got some experience that's that's interesting for other
people to hear commentary on, including about freaking
brownies. Should I put the should I put
the put it up here including freaking bronies that is.
That is illogical at every leveland it makes no sense that it
would be the case that I could be a sit here talking about

(01:23:46):
freaking bronies. I have something that I found my
son was singing this last night.We, some of you on the Internet,
in addition to being bronies andliking My Little Pony as dudes,
do really weird things with yourtime.
And I found another one of them which I just think is inherently
funny and it's super catchy and it was in my head before we
started. So unfortunately, we're going to

(01:24:07):
kick the FB is song out of your head and end with a palate
cleanse here, which is somethingabout Dan Bongino.
I don't know why someone sent methis, but when you guys do send
me stuff that sticks in my head,I make sure that all of you
suffer with me. God bless you have a fantastic
day. This will be the last thing you
hear and we are out. I want to be at the RNC.

(01:24:28):
I want to see Bongino.

(01:25:16):
Thanks for listening to the KyleSerafin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.

All Episodes

BRONY BOMBER?! FBI's Pipe Bomber subject revealed to be part of "the Herd" | Ep 692

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}BRONY BOMBER?! FBI's Pipe Bomber subject revealed to be part of "the Herd" | Ep 692