"...but you can't take the Democrat out of the Man." RFK Jr. testifies to Senate | Ep 646 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:11):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, and

(00:39):
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Friday, it is Septemberthe 5th.
And curiously, but I guess predictably, we are missing
Steve Friend from our usual friendly Friday segment.
Just another reminder that the FBI whistleblowers that were
reinstated are not able to talk anymore.
And so we're not going to hear any more from Steve Friend in

(01:00):
that capacity, at least not in the near future.
And I wanted to do something in his honor.
I want to do something sort of Ato address that, and we're going
to do sort of an homage to SteveFriend as we get started.
For those of you that used to follow him, or maybe you still
follow him, but you're not seeing it anymore, Steve Friend
was really, really good at goingthrough FBI press releases and

(01:20):
pointing out the hypocrisy and the the idiocracy that we live
in where the FBI would claim credit for not their work.
I've got a little bit of that today.
You guys aren't going to be surprised.
And we're also going to kind of explore this idea that you can
take a man out of the Democrat Party, but you really can't take
the Democrat out of that man. And that's going to be coming
from RFK Junior, who went in front of a Senate committee to

(01:43):
talk about vaccines, which is very, very frustrating.
What I did not know and I found out there's a, an overt and
public push on the political left.
Guys like Chris Cuomo are sayingit.
They want to make sure that you understand that the law is our
national religion. Just take that for a second.

(02:03):
Just digest that as you will. The law is our natural religion.
We've seen a little dust up now between a couple of different
senators discussing where do rights come from?
And I think this is a continuation.
Now, here's the fun thing. Those of us that have been in
this sort of battleground space for a little while have been
trying to tell you that people on the political left look at

(02:25):
government as a God. And how does God give you his
rules? How does he tell you what he
expects? He codifies it.
The 10 commandments were the lawin the same way if the law that
is being passed by our Congress as inefficiently as you can
imagine, if that is our nationalreligion, like they're going out

(02:46):
and saying it overtly. It's pretty interesting.
And I don't, I don't hate that people are being honest with us.
Now, before we get into the the fun of it, because I do have
some fun. I've got some exposes.
We're going to expose hypocrisy.We're going to do a little bit
about propaganda, which I can't help.
Let's go ahead and start first with my friends over at Patriot
Protect. Maybe you don't want to get
robodiles, scammers, cyber criminals, I don't know,

(03:09):
hackers, scumbags in general trying to get access to your
information. AT&T had a data breach where
they exposed 184,000,000 login credentials with the username,
passwords, and e-mail addresses unencrypted, left wide open on
the Internet. This is a thing we find
constantly, whether it's our federal government failing,
leaving things wide open, whether it is in fact a private

(03:30):
corporation. Your data is yours, but they
don't treat it like it's theirs,and so they lose it on a regular
basis. And that doesn't matter whether
it's a healthcare provider or a bank or whatever else, people
tend to lose this stuff. If you want to make sure that
your information is protected and that you are less likely to
be susceptible to scams, you cando something about it by
scrubbing your name, your address, your phone number and
more off these data broker websites.

(03:50):
So you are not a likely target. And Patriot Protect does just
that. They also have a thing called
the Blackout service that is scanning the dark web looking
for caches that include your information.
You give them their information,they go out there and they scan
around looking for who's trying to sell your information, and
then you know you've been compromised.
So you can change up the things you need to.
It's a real pain in the butt to change up all your passwords and

(04:10):
get new credit cards and things like that.
But if someone's selling your info, you're going to want to do
something about it. And you can do it with my
friends over at Patriot Protect.It's patriot-protect.com/kyle.
Again, patriotprotect.com/kyle. Don't forget the dash in the
middle. Use the promo code Kyle.
Make sure you populate that. Save yourself 15% on an annual
subscription. It's dollars a month, which
makes it pennies a day or I don't know, a handful of pennies

(04:30):
a day. Go check them out.
Link in the show description andmake sure that you're protecting
yourself. If you don't use this service,
use somebody. But that's the one that we use
here. Mr. and Missus Seraphin.
I think my parents have the samething as well.
So check them out. And we're going to get started
with today's program right now. All right, so as promised, I am

(04:57):
going to give you a little tasteof Steve friend.
Now, we we missed the friend in the Friday mornings, but that
doesn't mean that we have to forget what Steve was great at.
And one thing he did was show you that the FBI claims to be
one thing. And in fact, it is entirely
something else. Now, my argument is that the FBI
claims to be a law enforcement entity and that it actually is
an intelligence agency. That's the Seraphin sort of
proposition, if you will. And I started talking about this

(05:19):
in September, which means we arenow coming up on the three-year
anniversary, a couple weeks awayfrom the three-year anniversary
of my name being a public, you know, public fact.
And that, that the claims I was going to put my name in my face
to it on the Dan Bongino show, which was at the, I think the
24th of September in 2022. I got a chance to go through
some of the old stories and, andto walk through like, how the

(05:41):
hell did I get here with a guy named Doctor Bob Shulman?
I went to his podcast yesterday.I think you'll probably see it
on Monday if you guys are interested in seeing it.
If you want to rehash some of the old stuff.
One thing I did not know is thatI met Doctor Bob, who was a
major donor to Project Veritas and I met him through James
O'Keefe. And we went, I went to his home

(06:02):
under the, the, I guess I went to his home under the
understanding that Doctor Bob wanted to meet me with no
particular information, but James introduced it is that I
have a candidate who I would like to hire and I would like
you to pay his salary. And so I would like you to meet
him. And so it, they set it up.

(06:24):
James set it up such that each person believe that the other
person wanted to meet the other,although neither one of us had
anything in it. And that when we met, I think
Doctor Bob was a great guy and we had a really nice
conversation. And the fun thing is, is that
the the end up loser was James O'Keefe because he had lied to
both parties and then he lost the support of Doctor Bob after
not hiring me because Bob was like, yeah, this guy would be
great done. I'll I'll fund his position.

(06:47):
And then O'Keefe in fact, didn'tactually do that.
So all that is history. But that's kind of the history
that we're walking through rightnow as I'm kind of looking back
coming up on three years anniversary of those.
Anyway, Steve friends proposition has always been that
the FBI steals credit and that they Juke the stats that they
are out there basically claimingcredit for things they didn't
do. And then they're going to
Congress and saying this is whatwe did.
So we're going to do a little look here.
This is Director Cash Patel's official FBI Twitter account.

(07:14):
And I'm showing it to you because I want to handle a
couple things. And it's going to be our first
story of the day as well. John Solomon is the most recent
post. It's a repost by Director
Patel's account. And John Solomon says this is
such a big development, the FBI reportedly stops a mass shooting
before it started and didn't wait until afterwards to say

(07:34):
they had the shooter on its radar.
Signs of a major mindset shift under Director Cash Patel.
Now, that sounds pretty good. But for those of us that pay
attention to these sort of things, we know there's probably
a little bit more to it. And you're going to find out
that there isn't just one second.
I also just want to highlight that doctor.
Director Patel said incredible work that the FBI has stopped a
potential school shooter. After the suspect was released

(07:57):
on bond, we moved quickly to arrest him and secure federal
charges that would keep him detained and our children safe.
Phenomenal action, intelligence,work saved lives.
That's really a dangerous statement, I think, particularly
in our lives. And then of course, he's got
another one celebrating himself.There's a picture of himself in
some cool guy shades. Those are some Gators.
I wear Gators. I look better in my Gators.

(08:18):
I'm just going to say that up front.
And then there's the the allegedshooter.
He's a 25 year old guy who has aYouTube channel.
We'll talk about that in one second as well.
And I just want you to point outthat there's a couple of things
that I've been seeing over and over again.
And this was brought up on our call in show last night.
This concept here, you're seeingit right on the screen.
If you guys can read the small print, it says 28 arrests
involving FBI personnel. That's from 22 hours ago.

(08:41):
This concept that the FBI is involved in the arrest is
prominent and it is upfront and it actually acknowledges that
they didn't execute the arrest. They were involved in it.
For those of you that listened, maybe last night there was a
scenario where one of my colleagues needed an arrest in
order to check off the five required experiences to come off

(09:01):
probation. And he didn't have 5 arrests.
And so the 5th arrest was him sitting in a control room
watching CCTV footage as anotherFBI agent arrested somebody who
was already in Sheriff's Department custody.
So locals had custody, taken himin, done the search, you know,
booked him, put him into a cell and then took them out of the

(09:23):
cell. And our agent went in and cuffed
the guy up again to transport him over into US Marshals
custody, where then he would putinto a federal containment.
And one of my colleagues watchedon a monitor and then booked
that as being involved in the arrest.
That was an arrest experience, watching somebody else do an
arrest of somebody that was already in local custody.

(09:43):
That's how some of these things are juked.
So when you see the words involved in arrest, it should
make the hackles on the back of your neck stand up just a bit.
And once again, there are dozensof examples of it on the
Facebook or in this rather this ex post.
You can keep going down here. Here's another 121 of us
involving FBI personnel, as longas they're there on scene or
part of the operation. Operation.
You're seeing the FBI claim credit.

(10:03):
And that's a big deal because what it shows is a fundamentally
disingenuous sort of operation. And here's what I'm going to
show you. This is the the gentleman that
was arrested gentleman, because we don't know anything about
him. Couple things that I got in that
are problematic #1 Patel says FBI stopped a potential
preschool massacre, unacceptableacts of cowardice.

(10:23):
And the North Carolina man was charged with making online
threats to massacre dozens of black children.
These are very, very common. The idea that somebody would
step out and say I'm going to dosomething really awful or that
they put it on a YouTube channel, it happens absolutely
every day. It's awful, It's gross.
And they almost never want to dothese things in real life.
And we know that because the FBIusually leads them along to the

(10:44):
point where they actually have areal plot.
And then they can get him with ahate crime, domestic terrorism
charge. Now, some of you guys are
thinking, oh, well, that's the playbook.
That's what you guys have been talking about for a really long
time. And that's exactly correct.
This is the playbook. This is how the FBI does
business. And I'm going to read you a
couple little pieces here. So the FBI director's taking
credit for stopping a potential tragedy and massacre of dozens

(11:05):
of black children. A guy named Zachary Charles
Newell, 25, of Newport, was arrested on Monday and charged
with Interstate threat to kidnapor injure in the criminal
complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia.
That's September 2nd, I need to actually go pull that complaint
and I don't have it and I couldn't pull it before we got
the show started. But what I did read was very
interesting. The FBI worked quickly with our

(11:26):
partners, obviously. Obviously there's going to be
partners involved, FBI involved in arrests right in the
Carteret. I don't know how you pronounce
that. Carteret County to ensure this
individual was taken to custody before he could act.
And So what happened? The local Sheriff's Department,
Carteret County or Carteret County served a search warrant
at a location and Google actually alerted the FBI's end

(11:48):
talk on August the 31st that somebody named commentators hate
me. I had an e-mail address
registered to this guy Newell associated with his phone number
and so on and so forth. They got the address, the IP
address, traces it from Charter Communications and the Sheriff's
Department deputies went and confronted him at his home.
He allegedly admitted to making the comment on YouTube.

(12:09):
The search warrant was then executed.
So they probably held on to him until they got the search
warrant or they already had it in the works.
And then he was charged in statecourt with communicating a
threat of mass violence on educational property, which was
the local charge. And then the guy bonded out with
a state magistrate, which means you're probably talking at least
a full day, but maybe 2 days. Often times you get somebody in
custody, they're there overnight, and then they see the

(12:30):
judge first thing in the morningkind of deal.
You know, possible that you're able to drag him directly in if
they have a quick working state magistrate and then they can
have their initial appearance ortheir arraignment.
And then the Sheriff's Office worked with the FBI to take him
into federal custody on federal charges after he was already in
local custody. So the FBI allegedly saved the
day, but only according to the FBI and only if you don't

(12:51):
actually read the story to read that in fact, the Sheriff's
Department actually arrested him.
Now it'll be really interesting because my real questions go
along like this. Didn't the trans shooter that
was in Minneapolis also have a YouTube channel saying things
about violence that were really,really explicit in a long form
video? This guy made one mention of
something he might do and apparently was in a small

(13:11):
channel and was flagged. Why was he flagged preemptively
and the trans shooter was able to get away with it?
It's because the FBI doesn't actually have a good mechanism
of stopping people unless, and we might find this out soon,
they're actually involved in it and they're setting people up
now. That guy's a perfect subject.

(13:31):
Let me show him back on the screen again.
That guy is the perfect dude that I would have been
surveilling when I was working for the FBI.
This would have been what's called an RMVEA, racially
motivated violent extremist. Somebody who hates black people,
says he's going to do something violent, and then we go follow
him around for days and days anddays until they finally
interview him and he's like, no,I didn't actually mean that.
I just was having a bad day. I just made a Reddit post that

(13:53):
was racist. I just said something on YouTube
because it was a live stream andI popped off.
But this is a major shift, remember?
A major shift in mindset. So says John Solomon, and it
just reminds me every single time we see this stuff.
John Solomon is the dedicated propagandist who worked on
behalf of Donald Trump with CashPatel in what is this June of

(14:14):
2022. This is a, a letter that is
public that you guys can find that has John Solomon's address
or his e-mail address, his phonenumber and so on.
And this is from Donald Trump asking that Cash Patel and John
Solomon specifically be his representatives to access the
presidential records and any information they're in.
So he's naming those two to be able to be his reps.

(14:34):
No shocker that Solomon ends up doing sort of a heavy lifting
and trying to act like the FBI is somehow reformed when in fact
I don't think it is. We do have that little video and
this is the thing I I get the sense that Donald Trump might be
fed up. This is from August 11th.
We played it last night on our call in show.
I had some of you guys do your your analysis on the facial
expressions. I'll let you do the same thing.
Here's Patel making a bunch of claims.

(14:56):
Most of them are inflated and exaggerated and you can tell
that Donald Trump doesn't seem to be buying it.
This is the reason why I think that he got sent out.
And if you noticed on that Facebook or that that X scroll,
not a single thing about the whistleblowers to include guys
like Steve Friend and and Garretta Boyle.
And the reason why is, is because they have not been
reinstated yet. They're just waiting.
They haven't been contacted by the FBI.

(15:18):
They're just waiting. They haven't been paid their
back pay. So they're just waiting and
they're having to be quiet. They're actually following the
terms of the agreement, which says that they essentially are
under the FBI social media policy, meaning they can't post
about things. And their silence was bought for
$0.00 so far. Now, I think that they will
eventually get paid and I hope they do, but I don't want you
guys to think that everything ishunky Dory.

(15:39):
And now it's all good in in in the hood here because my guys
are just sitting around waiting for a phone call from the
Bureau. Anyway, we're coming up.
They have 30 days to comply. And the the deal was signed on
the 26th. So we are now 20 days away from
them being in sort of a default of the position that they
actually started. Let's do a quick little video.
I'm going to be on the screen here.

(15:59):
We may stop it at some point. And here is Cash Patel talking
at a press conference and doing his little sort of these are the
best things we've done. And aren't you a great President
Donald Trump? But you can see what his face
looks like. This year alone, under President
Trump's administration, we've had over 4000 child victims
identified and found that's a 33% increase from the same time
period last year, 33% increase. We've had a seizure 1500kg of

(16:26):
fentanyl this up to this date. That is a 25% increase since the
same time period last year. And just to put it in
perspective, 1500kg of fentanyl is enough to kill 115,000,000
Americans, 115,000,000 Americans.
Cops are getting after it. It's such an awkward line.

(16:47):
Cops are getting after it. As everybody knows, the FBI is
not caught. They're not cops.
And that's why they weren't the guys who arrested this guy who
sounded dangerous. He also sounds super nervous.
You guys think he sounds drunk. I don't think he's drunk.
I think he's nervous. We're going to continue on just
a little bit more. The FBI has arrested 19,000
people this year alone, thanks to President Trump's.

(17:07):
Look at that face, Beth frown. He's like you are just full of
crap. The FBI has not arrested 19,000
people. And by the way, most of those
arrests that they're involved in, involved in but didn't
actually do are almost all immigration arrests.
So we're going to talk about some immigration stuff today.
Obviously we'll talk about vaccines, but look at that face.
I don't know, I almost want to zoom in further on it, but

(17:28):
Donald Trump does just not. I'll give you some more context.
We'll give it a couple more seconds here just to roll, but
watch, he's just administrations.
That's double than where we werethis time last year.
And we have also arrested 1600 people.
Can you guys see that face? If you can't, this is what his
face sounds like. Are you telling the truth?

(17:50):
It's just not good. OK, so let's talk about some of
those arrests and some of the stuff that Cash is out there
bragging about. Because a big thing that was
promised in this administration was that they were going to get
rid of illegal aliens in this country.
And I do think that's the thing that most of us hope for.
We're hopeful that there will beundocumented illegal aliens,

(18:11):
criminal aliens in this country,deported and mass, mass
deportations. That was the thing I think
people cheered on. CNN seems upset about it.
And I'm going to tell you something here is a serious and
real dark problem. Hundreds of undocumented
immigrants were apprehended in amassive ICE raid at the Hyundai
plant in Georgia. Now, the details of this are

(18:34):
really important. I think what you're seeing is
that there was a significant number of different federal
agencies involved. OK?
What you're seeing on the screenis ICE and then ATF because ATF
is always looking for work. I'm sure the FBI was involved
there because I saw some statements about that as well.
And here's the story. Hundreds of undocumented
immigrants were. Of course, they're undocumented.
Immigrants were apprehended during a sweeping immigration

(18:55):
raid at a Georgia manufacturing facility on Thursday, making it
one of the largest ICE raids at a single site in the 22 year
history of the agency. Cheers.
Very good. More of this, please.
We want all of this stuff. About 450 people were
apprehended as several law enforcement agencies descended
on the Meta plant that was in Ella Bell, the nice name about

(19:17):
25 miles West of Savannah, GA. It's the latest example of the
Trump administration's crackdownon immigration.
I think that it's funny because they highlighted that word.
You guys can't see it, but they did the raid salted, halted
construction at the at the plantand they were producing
batteries for electric vehicles.It's been touted by the governor
as the largest economic development site in the state's

(19:37):
history. OK, so 450, we're going to do
some quick math. We're going to we're going to
quickly look over at what CBS has reported.
Also, same thing, 450 detained an ICE raid at this huge Hyundai
plant and just ask yourself if this is one of the biggest
economic development things in the state in the history of the

(19:58):
state and they claim that is a $7.6 billion manufacturing
plant. How many total employees would
you guess were part of this facility?
Very interesting. 1200 people are employed.
They said about 1200 people. This is according to CBS.
They claim that ATF that the HSIFBIDEA ICE.

(20:22):
The Georgia State Police and other agencies were all part of
this. It's in Bryan County, Georgia,
1200 people employed. I want you to just do the math.
450 were arrested, about 450. So let's just use their numbers.
That means more than more than 1/3 of the employees are illegal

(20:43):
aliens. And there's a couple of things
that that could mean. Part 1, Hyundai Corporation is
involved or the Honda, Hyundai Motor Group, let me be specific
about their name, could be involved in mass fraud and they
are not using E-Verify and they are bringing people in knowingly
that are illegal. Now that would be a really,

(21:04):
really wild move for a major carcompany that doesn't need to do
that. They can always raise their
prices. They have some of the cheapest
cars on the market. So here's the real question,
what if all those people are working under stolen Social
Security numbers? The idea that people who live in
the United States illegally are not causing any actual criminal

(21:25):
activity and they are not the so-called worst of the worst
that you always hear about. Why are they going after these
people? They're just hard workers.
They're just trying to get a joband make a living in America.
No, most likely if they are working in a Hyundai plant and a
third of the people working there are there illegally,
particularly if they use E-Verify, which they are
required to do, then it means that they are there fraudulently

(21:47):
and they are stealing somebody'sidentity and they are working
there under some sort of illegalauspices.
And so now you've got a real bigproblem because the narrative
has always been these are hard working people and you're
kicking them out of jobs. We're going to talk about jobs
numbers in this country as well because I had some fun little
digging into history. There's some negative reporting
about what the job, the job growth look like in this nation.

(22:10):
And of course, NBC News was covering it in a very dark
light, but they were very, very complimentary and they were also
willing to make excuses for Joe Biden during his term.
So I, I pulled some historical information there.
All right. So apparently it's a 3000 acre
site. It's West of Savannah.
Homeland Security said that theywere part of an ongoing criminal
investigation into allegations on of unlawful employment
practices and other serious federal crimes.

(22:34):
Interestingly enough, because I always assume that when I hear
the words illegal alien in the manufacturing plant, like our
first guest is that they're probably, they're illegally from
Mexico, from Guatemala, from El Salvador, from Honduras, from
Venezuela, like take your pick somewhere South of the United
States border, but from our hemisphere.
But that's not necessarily the case, as we found out with all
the illegal immigration that wascrossing over that border for

(22:56):
the last four years. So this statement is quite
interesting to me. The South Korean Foreign
Ministry said in a statement that the economic activities of
Korean investment companies and the rights and interests of
Korean citizens must not be unfairly infringed upon during
U.S. law enforcement operations.We're actively responding to
this incident by dispatching theconsul, the Consul General

(23:18):
specifically of the US Embassy in Seoul and we are sending our
consulate general in Atlanta to the site and instructing the
formation of an on site responseteam centered around the local
embassy. We've conveyed our concerns and
our regrets to the US Embassy inKorea.
We've urged them to exercise extreme caution to ensure the
legitimate rights and interests of Korean citizens are not

(23:38):
infringed upon. Now maybe they're sitting there
and and getting involved in the the Korean investment end of it
and they don't want to have anything bad happen because they
put money on the US soil. And I think that's something we
can encourage. We're not mad about that.
But if you got a 30 of workers that are non-us citizens, we got
a real problem there. So now that their vetting
problem, a vetting problem that's, that's not being done
properly. I've been told that E-Verify is
garbage. But the last piece of it is, is

(24:00):
what happens when people are defrauding American citizens of
their identity and they're working under it.
They're working. And that means that they are
going to, let's say you're, you're out of work and someone's
using your Social Security. That means you probably don't
qualify for some benefits that would otherwise be out there.
I mean, they are, they are paying theoretically into your
Social Security. It's a lot of really weird stuff
that happens. And if you've ever had your
identity stolen, it is kind of a, it's kind of a, a hopeless

(24:24):
scenario because how do you stopsomebody from using a number
that was never supposed to be used this way to ID themselves
for legitimate work? I found out somebody was working
for a pizza restaurant in Arizona when I was in my, my 20s
and I was working in another state.
I think I was working at Warner Brothers in California.
I, I did these background checksbecause I was going into the
military and suddenly found thatlike two or three different

(24:45):
people had been or were activelyworking under my Social Security
number in all these different places that I've never been.
You know, like a pizzeria in Phoenix and something out in, in
like Illinois and stuff. So when they get a hold of your
Social Security number and sell it, like, what do you do with
it? And then of course, as you guys
are pointing out in the chat, whose fault is this that all
these people are here in the 1stplace to do it?
And I think we already know the answer.

(25:06):
So that's going to pivot me overto the story about the job
market, because this is obviously a question about jobs
and whether people can get jobs.450 jobs, 1/3 of the jobs at
this massive plant not being held by legal American workers
is kind of a big deal in a smallplace.
And I imagine that this is goingto be extrapolated much more,
much more broadly. First, let's go ahead and just
talk about one of our sponsors, and this one is going to be our

(25:29):
buddies over at My Patriot Supply.
They're here to remind you that September is National
Preparedness Month, not preparedness for identity theft,
but preparedness for any kind ofemergency or disasters that you
might face. So it's a great time to ask
yourself questions like how muchfood do we have on hand for
emergencies? Do we have clean water?
Do we have access to clean water?
If our tap went dry, what would we do if a storm knocked down
the power and we didn't have it for a week or longer?

(25:51):
If you're like me, there's always room for improvement.
That's obviously the case. We could all have more things
and more preparation, but the folks at my Patreon Supply are
making it easier. Right now they're giving away
over $1500 in free emergency food and preparedness gear.
When you go check them out, go to mypatriotsupply.com/kyle
mypatriotsupply.com/kyle. They launched this Emergency
Prep month mega kit and includesa full year of emergency food,

(26:15):
water filtration, a system that can purify at the source, solar
generator backup. I have most of these things in
my house. We have water purification, we
have both passive and active. We've got food, we've got ammo,
we've got things that you guys should be doing.
If you're not setting yourself up for that success, then you
are setting up to have like a real rough time if something
were to happen to you. This is not like scare tactics,
this is Peace of Mind and and personal insurance.

(26:36):
mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle. You guys can actually scan the
QR code. If you're watching it on TV, you
can use that with your phone. Go there, bookmark it, take a
look at what they've got. There are 90 different emergency
preparedness essentials that youcan get involved in and you're
going to get a total of like $1500 free when you buy the huge
kit again, bundle for for bulk and for cost savings.
Definitely check them out. If you are not prepared, we all

(26:58):
could probably do a little bit more.
So all right, let's talk about jobs and job market.
Here we go. The job market is expected to
show weakness. Oh, a jobs report that is going
to come out, that hasn't come out yet.
It's due today. It's due this morning.
But they're already expecting itto be weak.
Now, they were previously wrong on some other stuff.
I think it's interesting. We'll just read their little
story. The federal government's going

(27:19):
to release their data this morning.
And that is unlikely to allay the concerns about a slow down
in the jobs market. Analysts estimate that 75,000
jobs were added in the United States in July, and that would
be a slight improvement from the73,000 that were added in June.
How interesting. And I wonder what percentage of
them were given to illegal aliens.
That seems like it actually really bothers the people that

(27:40):
are reporting in our liberal press. the US economy appears to
have stagnated since July, say analysts with Citibank.
And they noted this week in separate surveys from the
Federal Reserve released on Wednesday, it showed little to
no increase in economic activityor employment over the past
several weeks. Monthly job reports from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics is closely watched by economists to
give a little snapshot on the economy.

(28:01):
This one will be especially scrutinized, particularly by the
leftist media. Now, what they don't do is make
a bunch of excuses like you usedto see under Joe Biden.
And again, we just point out thehypocrisy because it's real.
This is a headline from January of 2022.
After one year in office with Joe Biden, they're looking

(28:23):
confused and now wandering around aimlessly.
They said the Labor Department'sinitial job reports again
estimates in 2021 weren't as reliable as.
Usual. The United States economy added
4.9 million jobs in the 1st 10 months of the year, and then
after the revisions they rose another 6,000,000 and then we
had revisions downward that change that as well.
Again, these numbers don't necessarily mean anything.

(28:46):
These are numbers that are givento you by a government agency,
and most of us don't believe thegovernment is all that great at
doing much of anything. We got some real problems.
You've got some unreliable media.
So you're kind of in this weird spot where you go, well, who do
we trust and what sort of information should we be relying
on? Here's another good one.
This one just came out from CBS.And I found this to be

(29:07):
interesting because they're claiming, you know, if jobs are
going down, maybe it's because those jobs are actually
currently being held by illegal aliens, as we just saw at that
plant. And this story seems to
substantiate at least a piece ofthis.
This is from September 1st. Federal data reveals 1.2
million, 1.2 million drop in federal immigrant workers.

(29:27):
I'm sorry, in immigrant workers under Donald Trump.
No federal, sorry, federal data,immigrant workers.
Let's read it real quickly. As millions of Americans gather
to celebrate Labor Day, federal data shows that Trump's
immigration policies are reshaping the US workforce.
They sort of imply that not for the better, obviously.
The number of immigrant workers in the United States has
declined by 1.2 million. The fun thing is, is that they

(29:47):
are not willing to separate out legal residents of this country.
So that's going to be your greencard workers, your green card
residents, your H1 BS and so on.People that actually have a visa
and and the right to work in this nation, at least as
determined by our state department.
And they're not going to sort that out from illegal aliens
that are here. The labor market shake up comes
as the flow of immigrants in theUnited States has slowed

(30:08):
significantly under Trump, who campaigned on a promise to
deport millions of immigrants who are working here illegally.
Again, this Georgia story gives us a little bit of a taste.
If the biggest project in your state's history has 1/3 of the
people working there that have no right to be in this nation
and have no right to be working at all, you got a real problem.
Because if you're creating economic opportunities and

(30:29):
Americans don't get to take advantage of them, aren't we
working against ourselves? Trump said that he's campaigned
on deporting millions of aliens who are working here illegally.
He said he's focusing the deportations on dangerous
criminals. But most people that are
detained by ICE have no criminalconvictions.
Yeah. So again, criminal convictions,
let's be real clear, you don't have to be convicted of identity
fraud to have committed identityfraud.

(30:51):
They can identify you. If you fraudulently used
somebody's number on E-Verify and you were able to get a job
that you have no right to have and you shouldn't be working in
our nation, you've done something criminal.
You just haven't been convicted of it.
And I would say that destroying people's financial history, that
their livelihood, their credit records and so on, it's pretty

(31:11):
damaging. Whether that makes you a quote
UN quote dangerous criminal, I don't know, because it just
depends on if you just can't buya home or you can't get into an
apartment because your credit record and your credit score has
been damaged by someone who's using your name illegally, that
seems pretty damaging. If your family can't find
shelter, there's some real damages associated with that.
In any case, the overall number of people in the United States
peaked an estimated 14 million in 2023.

(31:33):
We'll have to remember that was under Joe Biden.
And however, the number of unauthorized immigrants has
likely declined in part due to the increased deportation and
reduced protections under the Trump administration.
That sounds like a good that 14,000,000 sounds low.
We've been hearing between 10 and 20 million most of my life.
I'm sure the number is quite a bit higher.
That's only a number that's estimated by the Pew Research

(31:54):
Center, which tends to lean leftin their projections.
So they're very confident that it's that it's only 14,000,000
and that's the peak. But there's no, there's no
evidence of that. How do you know if somebody is
not here legally if you don't have numbers on it?
And no one's going to admit like, hey, by the way, I'm not
supposed to be here. I've committed a crime.
I'm involved in an active crime right now.
I want to tell you who I am not likely.

(32:15):
This does seem like one of thosethings that is like kind of a
mixed bag. I don't know that it's a win,
but it's nice to be able to focus on it.
And it's nice to see 450 people removed from jobs that they
shouldn't be in. So I don't want to always bag on
people that do a crap job because there are plenty of
those and we could do it all daylong.
I do want to point out that, youknow, our government is an
imperfect system. It does a really nasty and weak
job of a lot of the things it's supposed to do.

(32:37):
They should have never been herein the first place.
And unfortunately, even though they ramp these things up,
you'll notice that ATF, HSI, FBI, all these other federal
agencies were involved. That tells me that they haven't
done the thing that they were supposed to do, which is that
they've been hiring all these these new ICE agents, but they
don't have a way to actually move them down the line and have
them actually do the operations.In theory, we don't need FBI

(33:00):
agents doing immigration enforcement, nor should they
unless they're going after people that happen to also cross
into one of the FB is other things like transnational
organized crime, movement of drugs, guns, blah, blah, blah,
right, complex financial crimes.If they're doing scams, stuff
like that, great. But I don't necessarily want our
FBI investigators doing this thing simply because you've

(33:24):
hired 10,000 or you're going to hire 10,000 new ICE agents, but
you don't have the Academy spaceto do it.
As usual, the government proposes a solution.
It involves spending a bunch of money and then like whether or
not it works is sort of like up for grabs.
So just be aware of that. One of the other things that
I've seen people get really, really excited about this is
sort of a pseudo law enforcementand military thing.
We showed you video the other day of Atda, Trenis Diagua or

(33:47):
whatever the hell they're called.
Venezuelan gang boat being smoked by a drone, some sort of
ISR platform up in the sky doinga thermal scan, catching them in
the open water, dropping some sort of ordnance kaboom.
And people want to go out there and cheerlead it.
But I kind of like I had, I had I think John Burke was saying it
over on social media yesterday, like what do people feel like
from the military? And I was trying to figure out

(34:08):
what it's hard to cheer for people that are doing things
that are gross and destroy America And bringing fentanyl in
is obviously horrible and and drugs in general.
We have a supply side problem. I mean that we have a demand
side problem. Rather the supply is going to
keep coming in because people want that.
But I kind of like the way that Rand Paul had to say, you know,
there's too many people that want to cheerlead actions that

(34:29):
are kind of iffy and questionable.
Let's just assume that it was a legally justifiable move.
My question is, is that really the way that we should be using
our resources? It's the same question.
Should we really be using the FBI, which is supposed to be a
sophisticated organization? Just ask them, should we be
using them to go after somethingas low level as immigration?
So maybe going after the dangerous stuff, one would

(34:49):
think, shouldn't they be waitingto collect the credit from your
local Sheriff's Department for actually keeping you safe
Anyway, Rand Paul kind of talking about world police.
I think this is useful. That cartel boat, which you
know, I as I personally think that's a brilliant deterrent to
this kind of activity. Is is that how you see it?
You know, I guess, you know, it's hard to have any sympathy
for drug dealers, you know, trying to import product into

(35:12):
our country. But at the same time, I guess
you might ask the question, you know, where does it end?
Are we the world's policeman, the international policeman?
Are we going to be blowing people up off the coast all
around the world trying to interdict?
Really, I'm not sure we have thefinances to be the world's
policeman. So on the face of it, sounds
good. Nobody's going to have any kind

(35:32):
of lost love for a bunch of drugs going down in the ocean
and killing some some gang at the same time.
Really, where does it end? And is it really the
constitutional duty of our government to be, you know,
policing international drug trade everywhere around the
world? If, if it's, if it's, I'm going

(35:52):
to cut it there. He's asking the right question.
I think the question should be is what is our government?
What is it supposed to do? I think it's what we explore
here on a regular basis. And what we often find out is
that the government is not doingthe thing that you, the
taxpayer, expects them to do. And they don't represent
themselves honestly. We got a real issue when people
assume that the function of government is to keep you safe.

(36:13):
No, I think their job is to keepother people from getting
involved in your business and allowing you to exercise the
things you're supposed to have, right.
What they really end up doing issort of infringing on those
rights. And you end up in this sort of
this devil's bargain where we are constantly negotiating for
our own freedoms. And the cost of it is just going
to be your privacy or your liberty when you when you give
up the ability to, you know, to basically take responsibility

(36:37):
for your own safety. And, you know, I also like you
guys saw the 90s Harrison Ford movie clear and present danger.
And I was also, you know, probably a teenager when that
stuff came out. And I cheer the the the SF guys
going and taking down, you know,drug cartels in Columbia.
That was kind of the mission setback then, you know, but Jack
Ryan fan, sure. I like, I like Chavez, right?

(37:00):
What was his name? Ding Chavez the the shooter.
Like, we can all cheer for people that are getting rid of
evil locally. At the local level, we get down
to it, like at the minutia. But at a policy level, it gets
kind of dangerous when you starthaving these unfunded,
unfounded, you know, unfounded sort of actions, broadly
speaking. So all that goes to this weird
discussion. And I let off with it because

(37:20):
RFK Junior apparently went out in front of a Senate hearing and
he said some things that made mevery uncomfortable.
And they probably should make you uncomfortable too.
I think yesterday's hearing and I've got the the best piece of
it here. Here, I'll just show you.
I'll tease this up. This is ABC telling us the four
takeaways from RFK Junior's fiery Senate hearing over CDC
turmoil and vaccines. The the take away that I had

(37:44):
listening to a bunch of cuts of this and I didn't sit and list
the entire thing. So maybe I should.
But I, I can't listen to politicians do theater for that
long. Very often.
What I took away is that he's acting in a political way.
He's a smart guy. We probably have a lot of
overlap in values when it comes to protecting children from
things that are dangerous products.

(38:05):
But I also think the danger of hiring Democrats to go represent
you when you're Republican or worse when you're a
conservative, is that they are still Democrats.
And RFK Junior, for better or for worse, you know, in this
narrow scope is probably OK. But his idea for solving
problems leans on government. And that is not the way our

(38:27):
country is really set up, because if you're going to lean
on government to solve problems like violence or something like
that, you end up ceding a lot ofyour agency and you end up
ceding a lot of your liberty. So we'll read the four things
actually. First, let me just say thanks to
the folks at Patriot Coolers because they are awesome.
And we've got we've got to do a little little plug for them.
Patriot Coolers is our longest sponsor here at the Kyle

(38:49):
Seraphin show. It's Patriot coolers.com.
The promo code is Kate Yle. If you guys watch this program,
you'll always notice there is one over my shoulder.
I actually don't get to use thisone even though I like it a lot.
It's got suspendables etched stuff.
If you guys want to have something etched that's custom,
whether it's something that's palatable or not, if it's
conservative minded, they will not cancel you.
They will still make it for you.Or you can just get one of their

(39:11):
great regular products like straight off the catalog.
Easy to do. They're an easy gift.
They're an easy choice if you are are looking to replace
something out there. And they're patriotic in their
their branding and in their values.
They support disabled veterans and they support us, which we
really appreciate. Patriot coolers.com promo code
Kyle, save yourself 10%. Like I said, they've been with
us since February of 2023. So since this podcast was able

(39:32):
to to hold an audience big enough to monetize, they were
the first ones to jump on the bandwagon.
So they've been with us since the beginning, like some of you,
and I'm super grateful for them.And then the other thing is, is
like they're great products. So it's super easy to go out
there and recommend them becauseif you buy them, you always go
like, Oh yeah, I really like this.
I've given them as gifts. I've got a neighbor who's using
one of their, their soft coolersas a, as a lunch box and it

(39:52):
keeps ice for for days and days.They're great if you're doing
outdoor stuff. We're coming to the end of that,
but we're moving into some of the fall seasons where it might
be nice outside. So check out my friends over at
Patriot Coolers. And, and give them a look, if
you're in the market, don't spend money.
You don't need to, obviously, but that's where we're at.
Let's do the four takeaways. I like 4 takeaways.
These are when they like sort oftell you like, oh, we're just
going to sum it all up for you right now.

(40:13):
Let me show you before actually let me show you the, the, the
worst of the takeaways. And this is like what happens
when you put, I don't know. I don't know what this is.
I don't want to see Donald Trumpnominated for a Nobel Prize for
science. I just, that seems really cringe
worthy to me. So we'll do that and then we'll
do the four takeaways. Here we go.
This is Bill Cassidy talking about it, not as a senator, but
as a doctor. As if we care.

(40:34):
When you're a politician, you'rea politician.
And I'm approaching this as a doctor, not as a senator.
I am concerned about Children's Health, seniors health, all of
our health. And I applaud you for joining
the president in a call for radical transparency.
Thank you for that. I said yesterday, I believe it,
that President Trump deserves a Nobel Prize for Operation Warp

(40:56):
Speed. If he had been President Obama,
he would have gotten it. But because of Operation Warp
Speed forcing the federal government to come to a vaccine
development within 10 months when others said it couldn't be
done, we saved millions of livesglobally, trillions of dollars.
We reopened the economy. Economy's an incredible
accomplishment. Mr. Secretary, do you agree with
me that the president, that the president deserves a Nobel Prize

(41:19):
for Operation Warp Speed? Yeah, absolutely.
Senator, let me ask you. But you just told Senator
Bennett that the COVID vaccine killed more people than COVID.
Wait, that was a statement. I did not say that.
OK, then let me ask because you also were Senator.
I just want to make clear, I cannot say.

(41:41):
We'll check the record. That's a question of fact.
You also said that you were also, as lead attorney for the
Children's Health Defense, you engaged in multiple lawsuits
attempting to restrict access tothe COVID vaccine.
Again, it surprises me that you think so highly of Operation
Warp Speed when as an attorney you attempted to restrict

(42:02):
access. I'm happy.
I'm happy to explain why I have.I had three minutes and 30
seconds left. All these things, if you've ever
been watching any of these hearings, they're all
theatrical. It's all me getting a sound
bite, me auditioning for whatever my preferred news
coverage is going to be for the night.
So if I'm a Democrat, I'm going to go out there and audition for

(42:22):
CNN or I'm going to audition forMSNBC and hope that they pick me
up so that I can say the thing. They'll play the clip and then
they'll ask me to respond to it.It's the same thing.
The people that are, you know, nominally Republicans, they're
going to go out there and look for that, that Fox News thing.
I'm not really interested in what you said, and I'm not
really interested in what you have to say.
I'm interested in what I have tosay because this is my time to
get a little bit of press coverage and then I can turn

(42:44):
around and I can fundraise on it.
This is the entire game and it'sawful.
There's the four takeaways. I'm going to give them to you
because I had to scroll there. Deep, deep, deep.
This article goes long and it's very detailed about stuff that's
not very detailed. So he defended his CDC shake up
and the firing of the of the director whose name was I think
what, Susan, Susan Morenes. Apparently there was an op-ed

(43:05):
that was published and she repeated that she was partially
fired because she wouldn't prematurely sign off on vaccine
recommendations from their Advisory Council over the CDC.
And and he denied that. And so they said, you know, is
she a liar? It's like you can write anything
you want in an op-ed. So she's lying to the American
people in the Wall Street Journal.
And he said, yes, Sir. So that's funny.
Like, I think that's commusing. At least he's holding some

(43:25):
ground on things. And by the way, you can lie in
an op-ed. You're not supposed to lie
underoath, even though people do, especially our current FBI
director seems to have done that.
All right, so then you've got some other things that can go
on. Cassidy, who you just heard
there. And some of the other
Republicans joined the Democratsand they challenged Kennedy on
vaccines and how great they are.And aren't they the best thing
ever? And isn't Operation Ward Speed
so good? And so you got this sort of

(43:47):
push, this sort of pharma push, and they're very, very upset
about Kennedy canceling $500 million and federally funded
mRNA vaccine funding. So you can imagine the people
that were getting that $500 million were very upset about
it. And I'm sure they made that
clear through their various lobbyists and so on.
One of those is actually highlighted in this particular
clip where you've got Elizabeth Warren very upset.

(44:11):
She's super upset about vaccinesand she's doing the scolding
routine that she does. So here's a fun interaction
where he calls out the amount ofmoney that she received from
lobbies that are pharmaceutical related.
I never promised that I was going to recommend products with
which there is no indication. And I know you've taken $855,000

(44:33):
from pharmaceutical companies, Senator.
I never promised that I was going to recommend products with
which there is no indication. Yeah, but when you.
So she's very outraged and he's obviously, like going to get his
point across. And the two of them are yelling
over the top of each other. And the one thing that I always
notice about these hearings is nobody knows how to tune a
microphone. I don't know why they use the

(44:55):
microphones they do. Those are look like they're
condenser microphones that are picking up everything and they
have massive plosives. You know, those noises is the
worst. I wish they could just clean
their audio up. If we're going to do theater, we
should do better miking. So that would be my
recommendation. If our government wants to get
more credibility, they should probably hire some sound people.
That's the biggest take away that I have is I really don't

(45:16):
like the way that you're miking your audiences.
And maybe teach people not to lean so far in and out.
Anybody who knows about microphone technique, it's
supposed to move with you. You guys will notice me.
I think Tim Poole does it reallyall the time, too.
You're constantly moving the microphone to get it the right
distance. And when they don't mic, well,
then you can't hear what's goingon.
All right. Anyway, senators were pushing
for clarity on COVID vaccine access.
They really, really wanted to know about that because they

(45:38):
want to know about the money. And then of course, the last
thing was he appeared mean NBC covered and said that the GOP
supports vaccines. So that's really good for them.
They were excited to find out that GOP don't voters were
polled. And so they can try to convince
people that other people like you also think that vaccines are
great and to the point of COVID vaccine access, which I don't

(46:02):
know why people are still using them.
In fact, that might be a good question for our chat.
Many of you have family members who decided to get the shot.
Maybe you did too. Maybe you went and got boosters
because you thought it was a value.
I would like to know, maybe we can do this on locals.
You guys can go over to kyleserafin.com.
We'll start a whole post there and I just want some replies to

(46:23):
the thread. You can do it on X as well.
I'd be interested. Feel free to tag me in a post.
What I would like to know is didyou or your family members take
booster shots to the COVID vaccine, and are you still
taking them? And if you are not still taking
them, what made you stop? And when?

(46:45):
That's it. That's the only question because
I don't know who's out there fighting for access to it.
But apparently, Kathy Hochul is going to make sure that
pharmacists are allowed to administer COVID shots.
You don't have to go to a physician.
So they're going to make it as easy as possible.
And I found this to be somewhat amusing just because of that.
We really need to make sure thatpeople have access to the thing

(47:06):
that nobody seems to want. I don't know who's getting these
shots. I don't know why they're getting
these shots. I don't know anybody that wants
to get a shot that they've already admitted doesn't really
work. And because they took them away
from the recommendations for children, you've got senators
that are truly upset and unable to go out there.
And again, this is like this sounds like pharma lobbying, but

(47:28):
I just want you to know her executive order will allow
pharmacist to both prescribe andadminister.
So you don't even have to go to a doctor.
You can get them from a pharmacist, which by the way,
makes most sense. I actually condone the idea that
pharmacist should be able to prescribe things.
They have a doctor in pharmacology or in, you know,
they're, they're doctors, a pharmacy, whatever the heck that
that degree is. They have PhD in that field.

(47:50):
Why they're not able and they have to get a license in that
field to prescribe, to put drugs.
In theory, they should be able to prescribe drugs.
The fact that the American Medical Association doesn't
really go with that, I don't getit.
Pharmacists know more about druginteractions than doctors do
almost always because that's literally the only thing that
they do. They don't deal with the
anything else, just the, the, the chemical interactions in the
body. And having known a couple

(48:10):
pharmacists, they are paid really well to not do any of the
things that they know how to do.And they end up just doing like
most of them don't even do compounding.
They just count out pills or their license allows other
people to count out pills. It's really a weird, a really
weird system that we've created.All right, let's do a little bit
more. Imagine if you wouldn't let
children take COVID shots or if you wouldn't force them to get
COVID shots. This is the debate that's

(48:30):
happening in Florida right now. Removing mandates and removing
mandates is really a big problemfor everybody.
If you're on the left or if you're taking money from
pharmaceutical lobbyists, etcetera.
This critical advisory panel haslost scientific credibility
after years. Colleagues, we spend so much
time not looking at this as Democrats and Republicans, but

(48:51):
it's good science and scientific, you know,
credibility. And now the American Academy of
Pediatrics has warned that the committee is being politicized
at the expense of Children's Health.
American Academy of Pediatrics, you think they're lying to?
I think the American Academy of Pediatrics is gravely

(49:15):
conflicted. They get their biggest
contributors of the four largestvaccine makers.
They run a journal, Pediatrics, which they make a lot of money
on. That is completely dependent on
pharmaceutical companies. So I don't think I wouldn't put
a big stake in what they say that benefits pharmaceutical

(49:35):
interest. Senator, I didn't politicize, he
said. I depoliticize it.
The Congress has been investigating, he said.
Over the country, Mr. Secretary,scientists and doctors are
saying otherwise. Well, all over the country, the
sciences and doctors told us that we had to wear a mask and
then we didn't have to wear a mask.
And then we could be 10 feet away from each other or 6 feet

(49:56):
away from each other. Or maybe if we got a shot, then
we can get closer and hug. But you could only see people
who died through a glass window for a cold or a flu.
And then they categorize people who got shot in the chest is
dying from this disease. You know, like they lied to us.
So we don't believe you. The credibility of the
institutions was the real question, I think.

(50:17):
I think Senator Kennedy honed inon it.
And the, and the little clip we played yesterday.
The credibility of the institution is the question.
The American Pediatric Association doesn't tell me how
I'm going to handle my kids. But let's get to the root of the
issue, which is that if you don't mandate things, then it
won't be part of the law. And if it's not part of the law,

(50:38):
then how are we going to get youto follow our religion that says
that you must do exactly what wesay and you must be complicit
and you cannot have your own thoughts outside of our broader
institution. And here is, I guess he's
swinging back left now, again, he's pretended to be on the
right for a little bit or he pretended to be reasonable.
But this is Chris Cuomo kind of revealing what the Chris Cuomo
that we remember, the guy who hid in the basement in the

(50:58):
Hamptons or whatever the heck, he was hiding out and popped out
after shivering and shaking eventhough he was out like doing
stuff. This is one of the COVID actors
who moved that kind of scam forward, telling us that law is
the religion of our nation. And that was news to me because
I actually thought that we were not a country with a national
religion. You can't just say the the

(51:19):
parent is the cornerstone. Yeah.
For in terms of what happens with my kid, yeah, that's my
call. That's your call.
Is daddy for your brood. That's not what we're talking
about. The cornerstone here is the law
in the society. Our national religion is the law
and the reason that it. Evolved.
Where it is now? You can argue too many vaccines.
How many vaccines? Look at it again.
Show us the data again, Fine, but you are not the last word,

(51:44):
OK? The authority having
jurisdiction is the last word about what it takes to go to a
public school. You can home school.
But these recommendations evolvebecause you don't get to decide
whether my kids get sick or not.Only your kids.
OK, now he's got Benny Johnson on there.
I don't know that Benny Johnson is the best guy to debate this

(52:05):
dude who is very sort of boisterous and New York like,
but let's just take his argumentfor whatever it's worth.
Before we do the argument, let'stake a quick breather for
Spotify to do the Spotify ads. There you go.
OK, here is the argument that heessentially is making.
First of all, he's saying that religion of this nation, the

(52:26):
national religion is the law in the United States.
That's crazy. That's truly, truly wild.
And that scares the crap out of me because our law is very, very
imperfect. So to worship at the altar of an
imperfect God is scary. But the second thing he's trying
to say is, and he's, he's talking about whether or not we
need to mandate vaccines across the board.
You must have one in order to come into this institution that

(52:47):
you fund with your dollars. You're going to compel my tax
dollars from property taxes or sales taxes or whatever else to
fund an institution. And then the only way that I can
go and participate in that institution is if I do something
that only should affect me. The concept of a vaccine, that
something will be able to vaccinate and therefore protect

(53:08):
you in advance. Prophylactic protection for a
disease would mean that you're exposed to it and then you
develop antibodies and then you are safe from that vaccine or
from that, from that, that pathogen, whatever it is.
It doesn't mean that you can't contract it and it doesn't mean
that you can't spread it. So if you have your children who
are quote UN quote, unvaccinatedfrom whatever this thing is, and

(53:29):
you introduce them into an area where everyone else
theoretically is vaccinated, then maybe they end up with
polio or measles when the other kids are safe.
That's the claim. What does that have to do with
anyone except the parents choiceto do something?
They should be able to accept risk and that's what we're
talking about. Whether or not you can legislate
my ability to accept risk for myown offspring, of which I am the

(53:51):
sole person responsible for. And that's crazy.
Imagine the argument and this isthe one that the memes used to
do if you guys recall during theCOVID nonsense.
If I don't wear deodorant, then your deodorant won't work.
Now in the case of the deodorantsituation, it might be that I
now smell like body odor and youdon't.

(54:11):
And you don't want to be around people who have body odor.
But you can't stop that, can you?
And it doesn't injure you, you just don't like it.
Now imagine that you're totally protected from something.
So it's it's odorless and it's tasteless and it's only going to
affect me negatively if I'm around you.
Under what circumstances would you have the right to legislate

(54:32):
the things that go into my body if it has nothing to do with
you? This is not even as good as the
libertarian argument, which is sort of like that, that, you
know, you're right. Stop where my freedoms are like
we have this this boundary between US and my freedoms can
continue to grow. And I'm completely unchecked
until I run into a place where Iinhibit somebody else's
freedoms. I'm not even going to be able to
touch your freedom because you are going to be injected and

(54:53):
theoretically safe. And this argument was made ad
nauseam over and over again throughout this COVID chaos.
What I never heard was someone make the argument that this is
our religion. And so maybe that's why we have
this this clip that we played yesterday and I'm going to play
it again. If we're going to have the
debate about where do rights come from, what is the purpose
of this nation? And do we have a national
religion that is somehow hingingon what is it?

(55:15):
It's hinging on on you telling me what to do, that we have to
worship the law. I know people that do worship
the law, but I don't think they should.
It's a very, very weak and imperfect God, full of garbage,
full of contradictions within itself, as usual.
That's why we have to have judges.
Here's Tim Kaine again versus Senator Ted Cruz.

(55:36):
Two more senators talking about sort of the nature of our
rights. I actually have a Bishop to
respond to this. I went to the clergy since
they're talking about the whether or not our rights come
from God. And I think that's a good answer
to it. The notion that rights don't
come from laws and don't come from the government, but come
from the creator, that's what the Iranian government believes.
So the statement that our rightsdo not come from our laws or our

(56:00):
governments is extremely troubling.
So Senator Kaine said in this hearing that he founded a
radical and dangerous notion that you would say our rights
came from God and not from government.
I I've just walked into the hearing.
As he was saying that, I almost fell out of my chair because

(56:24):
that radical and dangerous notion in his words is literally
the founding principle upon which the United States of
America was created. And if you do not believe me,
and you made reference to this Mr. Barnes, then you can believe
perhaps the most prominent Virginian to ever serve Thomas

(56:48):
Jefferson who wrote in the Declaration of Independence.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal and that they are endowed by their Creator.
It seems really straightforward folks, if you're following right
now, if you're watching at the moment, make sure you're

(57:09):
subscribed to the channel on YouTube.
We appreciate that. If you guys are on rumble, we
have a Little Mix up with with Chris Crumble the the Chris
Pavlovich, who is the the owner of the CEO of rumble.
He was the founder of it and we're seeing problems and he
said that it's just in your head.
So if you're having issues over on Rumble, join us over on
YouTube. We'd appreciate that.
You can follow us on X. You can follow us on locals.
It's Kyle seraphin.com. Make sure you like the video.

(57:30):
We found out that the likes and this is the studio.
It's a one man show. So if you see glitches or
problems on my end, I will tell you when they are because it's
just me doing it. But what we did find out is that
likes on Rumble drive us on to the leaderboard.
And we just happen to have a hugely disproportionate number
of likes per views because you guys are so tuned into it and
because I must ask for it. So if you want to continue to

(57:50):
push yourself on the leaderboardand prove that their numbers are
junk, you guys can keep doing that over there.
I'm going to show you kind of the, the, the, the, the response
to this from a Catholic Bishop. I'm a Catholic guy.
You guys don't have to take his theology.
But what you can do is you can say that obviously when you make
reference to the founding documents that resulted in the
American experience that we're in currently right now, we can

(58:12):
say that the rights come from the creator.
And that is not some sort of heretical argument.
And it certainly doesn't violateanything even in our laws.
And we don't actually worship the law in this country.
That's not our national religion.
Hey, everybody, it's Bishop Baron.
I just feel obligated to speak out against something that I
came across today and I just found it so outrageous and
really so dangerous to our democracy.

(58:35):
It was Senator Tim Kaine at AI think it was a Senate
confirmation hearing and he was actively contesting the view
that our rights come from God and not from the government.
And he said, it's very dangerousif you claim that our rights
don't come from laws and from government.
Well, what struck me was he's a senator from Virginia.

(58:56):
Virginia was a state of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison,
both of whom took it as fundamental to our democracy
that our rights don't come from the government, they come from
God. So we know the familiar words of
Jefferson, right, that we are created equal, created by God.
We're endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights.

(59:19):
Among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
You see, so basic to Jefferson was the fact that rights come
first. They're not invented by the
government. Rather, government exists.
And remember, this language fromthe prologue of the Declaration
to secure these rights doesn't invent them, doesn't ground

(59:39):
them. It secures them.
It recognized them as objectively coming from God.
And then its whole purpose is tosecure them, to serve them.
I think too, of that familiar word from Jefferson.
Inalienable. These rights are inalienable
now. Why?
Because they come not from the government, but from God.

(59:59):
If the government creates our rights, it can take them away.
This is what I want to see from clergy so much.
I want to see this. And so I'm going to keep an eye
on this particular Bishop. I want them to be involved.
Your clergy, if you are a Protestant, if you're a
Catholic, if you're Orthodox. I need to see our clergy get

(01:00:19):
involved in this discussion because it is obviously a
position now being pushed. And I'm seeing it from multiple
angles, whether it be from politicians or whether I'm
seeing it from folks that are inthe news media.
If you're going to tell me that the religion of America is our
law, we are going to have a realbig problem on our hands and
they're going to push this to a moment of crisis.
We've already seen them favor one side and they do favor that

(01:00:41):
position. But to say it explicitly means
that the churches need to be involved.
I need to hear it from the pulpit.
I need to see it on social media, from the people that have
authority, that have the respectof those in their congregations.
It is time to be involved politically.
Unfortunately, there is no way that you can separate this
discussion. And what did he say about

(01:01:03):
inalienable? Because that's also really
interesting. Yesterday we talked about the
the idea that a right is an entitlement.
Absent a duty, you have an ability to do something, but the
only way that you keep it is that you actually are able to
defend it. That's the reason why, first, we
have the freedom of speech and religion and press and the right
to assemble and petition for redress of grievances.

(01:01:24):
And the way that you quash that is by saying, yeah, you have
those rights, but you also have no duty to exercise them.
And by the way, you have no ability to defend them.
So if they are inalienable, thenthere must be some additional
pieces to those rights. Again, they pre exist.
They should not be taken away. But to tell you a radical
position that I hold and I want you to consider it.

(01:01:47):
There is a current discussion right now about whether or not
the DOJ should get involved because of the transgender
shooting that happened in in Minnesota.
We always see a backlash and reaction and it's always a great
opportunity to try to take guns from someone.
I don't think this is 3D chess. I think Pam Bondi doesn't
understand what guns are about, why they exist, why people have

(01:02:08):
them, what that right is. We do have Harmeet Dillon over
at the Civil Rights division of the of the DOJ saying the right
things and and defending gun rights.
That's fine, that's good. But the DO JS got real problems.
It's reactionary. It's doing certain things that
very, very obviously look political and they're getting
embarrassed in felony cases because they're bringing them in
the District of DC. This is yet another story Did a

(01:02:28):
judge rips the DOJ for causing embarrassment to the government
brings another case that it dismissed.
I found this quite interesting because this is going to go back
to our discussion of rights in one second.
But this was a another dismissaland the judge is Zia Farooq.
I think that's the name. It's FARUQUI.
So unfortunately we have these like non an unfamiliar American

(01:02:50):
names, but he's a he's a, a District Judge that I've seen in
DC that's been handling a bunch of stuff.
And he did a bunch of J6 case aswell.
And so I thought, well, he's throwing out this case.
It was he reasonable? Was he fair in his discussions
of January Sixers? And so I, I just typed in his
name in January 6th case thrown out.
And he also was very upset with the government bringing the
massive J6 case. At least he went on record and

(01:03:10):
said this, this is in in March of 2022.
He said if you were going to charge the largest case ever, if
they don't have the resources todo it, then they ought not to do
that. It feels like the government has
bitten off more than it can chewhere.
So he is critical of government overreach.
It seems like that's somewhat consistent.
I get that he's probably hard onthe left and that he wasn't
necessarily fair to people that were being treated, but at least

(01:03:30):
he was noting the problem. When the government goes out and
acts like an activist, that is abig issue because if the
government's going to go out and, and destroy these quote, UN
quote, rights that we have in the Bill of Rights, that you
have this right to a fair trial,that you have a right to due
process, that you have a right to face your accusers and so on
and so forth. The government is not supposed
to go out there and do searches that they're supposed to give
you all the exculpatory evidence, all the things that
we've, you know, built around this quote UN quote, religion

(01:03:52):
of, of our law, which is very imperfect and it's administered
by men, obviously. Then I start getting really
concerned because we've seen people on the political left
have no problem running right through what we would consider
to be rights. So the, the sort of radical take
that I have is that a transgender person has the same
right to a gun as you do, and sodoes a felon, by the way, after

(01:04:16):
you've been convicted. The, the way that we need to
operate our society should be quite clear.
If you are safe enough to exist in society with the rest of us,
then all of the things that exist in the, in the scope of
rights should be yours. You should be able to vote.
You should be able to own a firearm.
You should be able to be able tomove freely.
And if not, if you were on some sort of like tether, then you're

(01:04:39):
not really a free citizen. And why are you out of prison in
the 1st place? Why are you out of a mental
institution? If we need to be able to control
you and restrict things that areGod-given, inalienable rights,
then what are you doing free because you're a threat to the
rest of society? So it's an ideologically
consistent position that you will not see most people on the
on the Republican side take. Pam Bondi was out there saying,

(01:05:01):
you know, maybe our DOJ will go and try to restrict gun rights
for trans people. Now, it's going to be
interesting because what you're going to find out is that you're
going to actually set up the people on the political left
that are desperate to defend trans people and they're going
to say, no, trans people also need to have gun rights.
Now, we're in a really weird world.
But if you want to have the ideologically consistent place,
it has to be real simple. If you are allowed to walk

(01:05:24):
around free, then you are a freeperson.
A free person has certain inalienable rights.
And those things are guaranteed under the Bill of Rights.
And that's going to be your life, liberty, your pursuit of
happiness, your ability to speakright.
You cannot be restricted in those things.
And I don't think that they should be restricted outside of
due process. And I think that once you've
gone through, if we call it rehabilitation, we're setting

(01:05:45):
people up for failure. And let me also say this, there
are a few people in the world that need a gun more than
someone who was a felon who got out of prison and is now like
looking over their shoulder because they probably have more
enemies than you do in your lifeand you can have a gun.
Their bad choices should either result in them not being free
because they're unsafe or it should result in them being free

(01:06:07):
citizens. And the reason is you can't
actually legislate people to do things that are moral.
Here is Governor Lugen. She's from New Mexico.
She was my governor for a littleperiod of time.
She also is a like a gun grabberand she was accused of grabbing
a man's genitals. So she's a genital and gun
grabber. That's kind of interesting.
Here she is talking about a gun restriction that was going on.
And I was following this as we became public.

(01:06:28):
I think this was in 2023. I got involved with some folks
in New Mexico. The results of restricting your
freedoms are predictable. The people who don't follow the
law are going to continue to do it, which is the argument that
we all make. Let's be consistent about the
argument. Here's Governor Lugen saying
things that are funny and predictable a few weeks later.
Kind of like Segway here. So, effective immediately, no

(01:06:48):
person other than a law enforcement officer shall
possess A firearm, either openlyor concealed in Albuquerque in
Bernalillo County. Really.
Think that criminals are going to hear this message and not
carry a gun in Albuquerque on the streets?
For 30 days, no. One week later, since the week I

(01:07:13):
declared an emergency, we've seen 296 shots fired in
Albuquerque. In Berlin County.
Violent crime moved through the city that resulted in a gun
injury, 2 car hijackings and a kidnapping with suspects not yet
in custody. Great success.

(01:07:36):
How do you, how do you, how do you make that proclamation and
then go out and say, oh, and by the way, I don't predict that
it's going to help and it didn'thelp.
And criminals did criminal things.
That's crazy and wild. So the fact that that person
went out there with a straight face and told you things that
are so ridiculous, like they arecompletely divorced from the
previous reality that they livedin.
They don't even have to address it, right?

(01:07:58):
And that continues to be the position that we see on the
political left. They are not ideologically
consistent. I'm going to show you another
little thing about a woman whosename is Rana Farhar.
She's a global economic analyst,and she is a writer.
And she starts talking about fascism and the way that
businesses worked in the 1930s. What's funny is none of these
people see the irony in the way that everybody jumped in line

(01:08:19):
and complied with the government.
I don't know that they know whatthe word fascism means, but we
cannot be historically ignorant and we also should be
ideologically consistent. If you have beliefs, the beliefs
are that you cannot legislate people to do the right thing.
We can only assign punishment. We cannot go out there and do
pre crime. That's not possible.
We can only find people that have done it, and then we can do

(01:08:39):
enough harsh penalties and lock people up so they're out of the
population if they're dangerous and they don't get to come back
in if they are. And if they're not dangerous,
then they get to be released. You're never going to be able to
stop people from doing the thingthat's in the human heart.
That's the understanding. That's why not only do the
rights come from God, but also we have this, this original sin.
If you're a Christian that you believe in that man has a

(01:09:00):
propensity to do harm to others,to himself, to those around him,
to society, and so on. Listen to this woman making the
argument that nobody did anything to stop Adolf Hitler in
the 30s and 40s and that's why we're really worried about
businesses today. She completely ignores the fact
that during the COVID insanity and during her probably

(01:09:20):
preferred President Joe Biden, the government made mandates on
private businesses through OSHA and others and leaned heavily on
using the force of government toget private buy in.
And they all did. Because businesses do what's
good for business, and it's not good to get on the wrong side of
the government. This is why it's actually kind
of hard to find an attorney thatwants to go out right now.

(01:09:42):
We've got a couple of calls intovarious people who might
represent me in the case of CashPatel's girlfriend, who wants to
sue me over something. Because nobody wants to get on
the wrong side of the FBI director.
That should not be. Our government should not be
allowed to be doing things like this.
And if they're afraid of gettingon the wrong side of a man, that
tells me that they know that they'll do the wrong thing with
the power they have. This woman sort of admits it

(01:10:03):
without even understanding how funny the irony is.
And we'll go into the quick definition of fascism, and then
we'll go into a last thing because I'll show you what it
looks like. If you don't have the ability to
defend yourself, if you don't have inalienable rights, then
your job is to just roll over and die.
This is exactly what happened inthe 30s and 40s.
And one thing that I am. Very, very concerned about as
someone that covers business. You look back at history,

(01:10:25):
business was silent in the 30s and 40s.
Business was, didn't speak out in Europe, often, didn't speak
out in the US against fascism, against the breaking of the rule
of law. And they came to regret it.
And I see a lot of parallels today.
I I just don't know what fascismis, which is when the government
makes certain incentives and leans aggressively on and

(01:10:47):
controls what private industry does and basically rewards those
that comply. You know, kind of like what we
saw under Joe Biden's administration when they made
these OSHA mandates over COVID. So all this stuff for me goes
back to the same localized original scent.
Yeah. Does it go back to 1913?
For sure. Does it go back to 19 O eight?
I think it does. I think that being completely
undermine, like our entire foundation of the Republic has

(01:11:09):
been undermined to the point where it's not the thing that we
found it. But it's amazing to me that
these people don't even see the parallels.
They immediately want to go to Hitler because it's Donald Trump
and he's doing tariffs and tariffs are bad and tariffs are
like fascism. Meanwhile, they have absolutely
no problem when the same thing happened on the other end.
And the result of it, if you actually just comply non-stop

(01:11:30):
with the government, eventually the government tells you that if
someone comes in to kill you, you should hide and hope they
don't get you. And this is a a guy.
He's the I think a police chief or a regional chief in York,
which apparently is part of Canadia.
The snow Mexicans. This is a snow Mexican position.
This is not what Americans do nor is it what we should do.
This is a warning for those of you that live in this country.
In the unlikely event that you find yourself the victim of a

(01:11:51):
home invasion, we are urging citizens not to take matters
into their own hands. While we don't want homeowners
to feel power powerless, we urgeyou to call 911 and do
everything you can to keep yourself and loved ones safe
until police arrive and be the best witness possible.
This could mean locking yourselfin a room away from the
perpetrators, hiding, fleeing the home, but don't engage

(01:12:14):
unless absolutely necessary. But as it stands, we know the
best defense for most people is to comply.
As you've just heard a number ofsafety recommendations.
In the unlikely event that you find yourself the victim of a
home invasion, we are urging citizens not to take matters

(01:12:36):
into their own hands. I wanted to play that one more
time for you. Don't take matters into your own
hands. Just let other people decide.
Give up your agency, surrender it, and then pray for mercy from
some rando person that broke into your home and has already
shown a propensity for not complying with the law.
It's the same argument that was made by Governor Lucian.
We're going to take the guns away and the people who abide by

(01:12:57):
the law are going to abide by it, and the people who don't,
don't. What a weird, weird moment.
Amy Coney Barrett is running around promoting a book saying
that this country is not in a constitutional crisis.
This is a head story from NBC and I agree with her.
We are not in a crisis because that would mean that we have an
acute problem. We do not have an acute problem.
We have a chronic problem. We have a chronic problem of
people not understanding history, not understanding where

(01:13:19):
this Republic came from, not understanding what civics are,
not understanding how the law works or what is designed to do.
And certainly they seem to not understand that when countries
fall away from God and they start declaring that law is
their religion. Historically, you can look at
biblical text and find that countries that fall away from
their core beliefs tend to have significant problems.

(01:13:39):
And it would be no shock to findout that we have crazy
corruption and it's just becausepeople don't even know their own
history. I assume that's what was the
problem for the for the ancient Israelites as they were walking
around. Maybe they had forgotten that
when they screwed up, it actually went really, really
badly for them and our nation. The further away it gets from
the original principles and the understanding and principles
that are God based, you end up having some serious issues.

(01:14:00):
We're getting there. Somebody asked me yesterday,
like, where do you see this going?
I see this going into whatever the 4th or 5th iteration of
America is, and it won't look like today's.
I hope that it's not particularly violent for too
long, but I do think it won't begood.
The proper answer to someone breaking into your home and
deciding that they are going to take your things and that they
are not going to ask permission.If they're not going to beg you,
they're not going to appeal to your humanity.

(01:14:21):
They're going to use force against you for most people in
America, because most people that are gun owners now are
owning either a 9mm handgun or they own a an AR pattern rifle.
The right answer is most likely three to five rounds of 9mm
right in the center of the of mass.
That's the right answer. Just put it right in the middle

(01:14:42):
of mass and make them stop. And if you're a better shot,
maybe you're putting 55 grain to77 grain, you know, bonded
copper and lead into the tea boxand shut them down.
Because you can't come into my house and take my things.
This is where my family lives. These are my kids stuff.
You don't even get rights to take my kids stuffed animals.
You come into this home, I assume you're willing to do
violence because you've already entered a place that you know

(01:15:03):
you don't belong. So why are you on the street in
the 1st place? I'm just going to say I, I'll
have to let God judge me on thatone because I'm going to defend
the people that I'm responsible for.
I think you should too. The government's not tasked with
doing it. They do a very, very imperfect
job. They do a pretty awful job
actually at the end of the day. And now I'm going to have a
discussion in our our chat aboutwhether or not we should have

(01:15:24):
shotguns or handguns or rifles. The right answer, the right gun
for you is the gun that you havewhen you need it.
So make those decisions, whatever that looks like.
If you live in a place where they won't let you do it,
consider why do you live in a place where you have inalienable
rights that have been alienated by your state and then go
somewhere else. I'm going to keep telling you
guys, I don't understand people that live in places where you

(01:15:44):
cannot defend your own life and your own property and your own
freedom and your own offspring. No one else is going to do it
for you. I've been in the the mechanisms
of government. I've cleaned up people from
shootings as a paramedic and I have responded to things as a
investigator. Law enforcement comes after the
fact. That's their job.
They're not supposed to stop active crimes, even though they
act like they do. They say serve and protect what

(01:16:07):
they really ought to do. What their real job is, is to
investigate and enforce laws that have been broken.
And that's hard for most people to understand.
So don't give up your agency, protect yourself.
That's the end of today's program.
I do have something fun for you,so I will remind you one more
time. Check us out over on locals.
A lot of you guys have been doing that and it's really,
really inspiring. I appreciate you.
You can follow me on X at Kyle Serafin and you can give us on
YouTube. It's Kyle.

(01:16:27):
It's what is it.youtube.com slash at Kyle Serafin.
If you've never tried Spotify and you're used to listening on
another app, consider using Spotify.
I just had a couple of converts yesterday.
It's Kyle serifandshow.com. It'll take you right there.
You can do the website, but being able to listen with the
lock screen on apparently is a big feature that you can use and
I like it and it doesn't cost you anything extra.
You don't have to be a premium member.

(01:16:48):
The second thing is, is that youcan flip between audio and
video. So when I say look at Trump's
face in today's episode, you canpush switch to video.
It'll pop up the video, stream it for a short time, you can go
back to audio. Maybe you want to do it when
you're at a stoplight if you're driving in your commute or
something. Having that ability to switch
back and forth, it's really neatand I don't know anyone else
that's doing that functionality.YouTube has an imperfect version
of it. Spotify is really where it's at

(01:17:08):
for that. And I didn't ever use Spotify
until I started hosting there, so I also didn't know.
But I'm going to make the pitch for them and I appreciate them.
They host us for free. For whatever it's worth.
If you're listening after the fact, Spotify does video and
audio both cost you nothing. You don't have to pay to be a
member of it. It's like it's a free app as
well. So check them out if you have
not already. And they have all the same
stuff. There it is.
All right, ladies and gentlemen,let's do a palate cleanse.
We're going to the weekend. You guys remember when things

(01:17:30):
used to be like more sensible and we could just see what the
hell was going on? We didn't have gender confusion
ideology, so does Jim Breuer. This guy was in one of my
favorite movies as a dumb kid and and here it is.
This is like the guy from Half Baked.
When I grew up in the 80s, you knew what was going on here.
I'll tell you right now, I'll watch your reaction.
Every generation is programmed and then they try to deprogram

(01:17:52):
years later. I grew up here, everyone knew a
gender just by the earring they had and what ear it was in.
I'm a knucklehead, but I was a real knucklehead back there.
I'll tell you exactly what it had on, OK.
I had a dangling cross earring. Left ear, left ear.

(01:18:19):
That was the left. Yeah.
I know who you are. I see.
I see the holes still in there. And that was to let gay people
know. Look, you can look, but you
can't touch. Left side means I'm really into

(01:18:41):
chicks with my dangling earring.The cross means I'm a little
religious. Just say.
And then if you were gay, you put it in your right ear to let
everyone know, hey man, I'm gay.Which threw me off like, Oh my
God, Larry's gay. How did you not know?

(01:19:04):
He's a good football player? I didn't know he could play
kickball and we gay. I trust him.
I didn't know. And if you had an earring in
both ears, you're like, whoa, I don't know what earring to.
There's more to it, but yeah, life used to be a little bit
more simple. I don't think people are abiding
by those rules anymore. I see earrings all over the

(01:19:24):
place, I see tattoos, I see nosepiercings, I see face piercings
and and tattoos that I can't understand.
I don't get it anymore. So maybe I'm just like an old
fogey, but I, I do understand what Jim Brewer's talking about.
It used to be better. All right, I hope you guys have
a good weekend. I hope you guys have a a nice
one. We're also got a pretty big
interview. I dropped three hours of of more
conversation with retired Supervisory Special Agent Bill

(01:19:46):
Taylor, including some evidence that you guys are going to want
to hear that FBI senior executives involved themselves
in perjury, committed perjury onthe stand.
We cannot have law enforcement that doesn't follow the rules.
And I think you're going to findthat the same information that
I've been sharing with you is something that someone I didn't
know while we worked in the Bureau.

(01:20:06):
It's the same thing that he saw.All you got to do is find
yourself on the wrong side of things.
And you get to experience what Gerardo Boyle did, you get to
experience with Steve Friend or Marcus Allen or myself or
anybody else. You get kicked out of the
fraternity. And, and I think Bill Taylor's
voice is sane and sober and he'sexactly the same thing that you
thought an FBI agent would soundlike reasonable, understands

(01:20:27):
that he's not always going to bean agent and understands that
the government is limited in itsscope and it's supposed to be
involved in fair process. And that wasn't the case.
So that's what we got coming up on this Sunday.
And if you're over on locals, you'll get it on Saturday.
It's already uploaded. So look forward to seeing you
guys for that as well. God bless you have a fantastic
and a safe weekend. And I'll see you guys on the
other side. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle

(01:20:50):
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.

All Episodes

"...but you can't take the Democrat out of the Man." RFK Jr. testifies to Senate | Ep 646

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Breakfast Club

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}"...but you can't take the Democrat out of the Man." RFK Jr. testifies to Senate | Ep 646