DESPERATE FBI Director Digs Deep into... John Bolton's Mustache? | Ep 637 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:11):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends, welcome

(00:39):
to the Kyle Serafin show. Today is Friday.
That makes it a friendly Friday,all right?
And it is August the 22nd, whichmeans my daughter is nearly two
years old, so that's pretty cool.
And we have no time for comforting lies here on this
program. I don't really care if people
feel good about the things that seem quite obvious.

(01:00):
What I feel like is that you should have information, then
you should go out there and act accordingly and you should make
a decision. Last night we had a really good
call if from a first time calleron Our Calling program.
It was quite simple, he said. I listen to a bunch of stuff.
I find out if the person has theknowledge, the experience, has
the ability to accurately assessthe thing that they're talking

(01:20):
about, and then I decide either to adopt it or not, or I decide
to adjust some of the things that I'm thinking about, you
know, like a critically thinkingaudience member.
That is what we hope for here. I don't want any blind
sycophants. I certainly don't want people
who just believe me because I said so.
That's a terrible idea. We're going to present to you
more information today, including things that should
indicate that the current FBI director, what did I name the

(01:41):
programs? Think about desperate, was it
FBI desperate? FBI director digs deep into John
Bolton's mustache out. We went into the archives to try
to figure out if there was a national security case that
could result in a search warrantabout someone that makes us feel
good because we don't like him. That's a terrible thing.
That's exactly what the Biden administration used to do.

(02:02):
That's how Roger Stone ended up with a SWAT team and ACNN crew
outside of his house. So we just had that happen last
night and people are going to celebrate it.
Fantastic. I'm so excited that we have de
weaponized government by someonewho's going to do weaponization.
We're going to debunk a bunch ofstuff if you guys are here to
find out. Unfortunately, we're not going
to have Steve Friend join us because he was reinstated as a

(02:23):
whistle blower. That's what the FBI director
said yesterday, except I got Steve Friend on the line.
So he's going to be joining us because none of that is true
either. Debunking lies left and right
will do that. Right now I want to tell you
about my friends at Under Tack. I don't know if there's a
natural Segway there, but every day you wake up, you should be
wearing underwear. Reminds me of Latin class

(02:43):
Semper, Ubi, sub Ubi. Always wear underwear.
It's the first joke you learn inLatin class.
Folks here in Texas, it's hot, it's gross.
I'm the kind of guy that like, Iwant the right gear on for the
right thing. So if you send me a pair of
overalls, I put it on when I decide to go kill all the bugs.
And one of the key things about wearing overalls in hot, humid,
nasty Texas summer is you also want some like premium cotton or

(03:07):
premium modal comfort sort of undies that are not cotton.
The cotton ones will make you absolutely miserable.
They'll stick to your leg and begross.
So if you guys want to check outmy friends over at Undertech,
you can upgrade your underwear and you can use my name plus the
number 20, it's Kyle 20 will save you 20% sidewide.
They've also got attractive looking lady boxer brief things.

(03:27):
I don't know what you ladies call those things, but they
cover your butt and they don't look like you're, they don't
look like you're shooting a swimsuit ad.
Do you know what I'm talking about?
They've got a great product. It's very comfortable.
I basically put these aside. I'm like one of those guys that
like I want to plan my week so that my favorite underwear is on
the day when I have the worst things going on.
And my favorite underwear right now are the under tack.

(03:48):
I very much prefer the ones thatthey call the Infantry.
The Recon ones are a little bit more like the stuff you wore in
the military. If you guys were in that, where
you had sort of like a spandexy thing.
Check them out, put them on, super comfortable, whether
you're going to be hanging out at home and you're going to just
be wearing underwear because you're retired and you can get
away with that. Or maybe you're a podcast host
and half your day involves sitting around on the couch and

(04:09):
and reading garbage. Or maybe you're working really
hard and you want something likethat, that Recon model where
you're going to be out there sweating and you need something
that's going to dry quickly and keep you keep you comfortable.
They've got an E&E pouch in the back that you can hide an almond
or cash or drugs or whatever it is that you guys hide in your
underwear. I'm not going to judge you.
Check out undertac.com. It's UNDER tac.com.

(04:33):
undertac.com, the promo code Kyle 20.
Save yourself 20% site wide. You guys are going to be
supporting a veteran run charitythat fights human trafficking
and you're going to keep your boys comfortable.
Let's call it that. Let's jump into today's program.
Here we go right now. Do do, do, do, do, do.

(04:59):
OK, so I think I've got that guy, Steve Friend, and some of
you guys know him. And this is the theme, sort of,
that we have for the American radicals.
And here is American radical himself.
Done, done, done. It's Steve Friend.
How you doing, Steve Friend thismorning on a Friday.
Oh, face of the franchise here of the suspendables present and
accounted for. I might not be.
What does that mean? What the heck does that mean?
Dude, face the franchise. I am the Athenian senator of the

(05:22):
suspendables. OK, I might not be actually back
at the Hoover building right now, but like a Phantom Menace
to keep up with our Star Wars reference in the thermal exhaust
port, we are, I think both of usmanifesting ourselves back to
the director suite. They're probably hearing our
voices reverberate off those four walls that they can hear
between the director and the nowCo deputy director.

(05:45):
When you say you think one guy is listening and the other guy
can hear it through the walls, is that probably possible?
I mean, we've been reliably informed that if they wash their
hands, they can hear it. So it's pretty thin walls of the
7th floor there. Maybe that's why they need to
build a new building. You know what, we're going to go
to the tape because I'm not sureif that's true.
I want to I want to audio check that I gave up everything for
this. I mean, you know, my, my wife is

(06:07):
struggling and I'm not a victim.I'm not Jim comedy.
It's fine. I did this and I'm proud I did
it. But if you think we're there for
tea and crumpets, what I mean, cash is there all day.
We share it. Our offices are linked.
He turns on the faucet. I hear it.
He's there at I he gets in like 6 O clock in the morning.
He doesn't. He's not there at six O clock in
the morning because he's at the gym in the in the apartment
building. But he knows that he's there at

(06:28):
6:00 in the morning because someone told him to say that.
And then the water turns on so he can hear it.
I want to know, do you know verymany people that complained
about having to do their job allday?
Is that, is that normal in your world, Steve?
Amongst government workers, probably a little bit more
prolific, but I think for the most part, people sort of expect
that there's a certain set of hours during the day that

(06:49):
they're going to be engaged in that and they just do that.
That's sort of like putting yourpants on and being a grown up.
Oh, it's very exciting. Do you know anybody in America
that does things just for tea and crumpets?
What is that about is that I think it's in keeping with the
theme of like, I hate weakness. That's that's the other point
that he loved to make during that.
I think he was the exact same interview.

(07:09):
He hates weakness and tea and crumpets is associated with
weakness or just being a girl dad.
So I'm not sure about I would drawing that Direct Line of
communication. I don't know what crumpets are
specifically, but I would have like tea and scones with my
little girls, I think. I don't think that would make
anything that wouldn't make me any less of a person.
I feel like at this point you'reprobably doing the egg witches,

(07:30):
so you could be really carnivoreon it, right?
No carbs, I'm eating carbs. I just stopped.
I just stopped worrying about that, Steve.
I just try to do a little bit more cardio than otherwise.
I just I'm back to eating all the things that I want to eat.
Six Mile a day diet, right? That could be it.
Let's start with the very beginning.
Usually we could put kind of thethe main piece at the end.
I want to do the main piece at the beginning.

(07:50):
I want to talk about this desperation move and I'm going
to read some of the stories herebecause all the mainstream media
decided to pick it up and the the FBI director decided to
tweet, you know, FBI agents in the field getting the work done.
This is where they're getting the work done.
For those of you who can see, you're looking at a very nice
middle class house, kind of upper middle class house in
Maryland. This looks like every house that

(08:12):
you'll find in the DC metro areathat's sort of decent.
It's, you know, get the little dormers, which are the the fake
windows that come out of the roof for some reason, or maybe
those are real windows in that little weird house.
And here's the story from ABC News.
Federal agents are searching John Bolton's home.
Sources. Federal agents were seen Friday
morning outside of his residence.
What were they doing? He's the former Trump national

(08:34):
security advisor John Bolton, famous for having a ridiculously
silly mustache and sort of a weird misshapen head.
He's kind of got like an upside down triangle where the top of
his head is wider than his chin by a lot.
And so it doesn't, like, naturally flow down.
And then that mustache sort of sets off and has its own
feelings and ideas and loves war.
You've also got NBC News reporting it that they raided.

(08:56):
Raided the former National security advisors home in
Bethesda, MD. Not a big fan of Bethesda.
I'm not a big fan of Maryland just cuz I don't think it's
America. Steve as part of a this is my
favorite national security investigation in search of
classified records. When did we hear people upset
about that last? That seems to be familiar to me.
I think there was sometime in around the summer of 2022 when

(09:21):
we had an unprecedented raid on a former president's house.
And what's the difference between a routine search and a
raid is whether or not you call cable news ahead of time to
alert them, right. Like that's basically where
we're at at this point. So a picture I've got there, I'm
trying to see where it came from.
I think it came from NB. No, it didn't come from NBC.
It didn't come from ABC. It came from the New York Post,
I think. So there, you know, a lot of

(09:43):
photographers outside of there, it's easy access to the, the DC
Bureau that they have. There's all kinds of, you know,
DC based photographers and so on.
Do you know what this case is about?
Do you do you have a grasp on it?
The reading that I've done on it, it seems like it's going to
be the exact same allegation that was against Donald Trump
and Joe Biden and Mike Pence, who self reported that he was in

(10:03):
possession of classified documents and used them to write
his memoir where he said mean things about the president.
My problem with this is a coupleof points.
Number one, just like a small point.
They're doing this on Friday morning so that they can leave
work early on a friendly Friday or federal Friday.
Oh, yeah, they're, they're already at the Cracker Barrel.
But the Cracker Barrel they might not recognize because of

(10:24):
the redesign that they're just did there.
I got that coming up. Don't worry about that.
We're going to talk about that. Secondly, John Bolton, you might
not like him, but I can't think of anything that he did where he
weaponized a system. He just had access to people who
were in a position to make decisions to send troops off to
die. And that's his perspective.
He's a chicken hawk. He's a neo con.

(10:45):
He gets lots of war boners, but he didn't take an entire agency
and weaponize it like the Stasi.It just seems to me like he's a
known quantity. He's a known high profile person
who's an enemy of mega. And they're not going to deliver
on comedy or Brennan or Obama orClinton.
So they're going to give you this guy on a ticky tack

(11:05):
documents case and they can say see here we finally have a high
profile arrest. We had to wait 6 to 8 months.
We just crossed crossed that sixmonth threshold this week,
August 20th. So right on schedule.
No one is above the law. FBI agents on mission said Cash
Patel on X because that's how people find out what's going on
in the FBI that work in the FBI.If there's no tweeting, then how

(11:28):
do you know what the leading thinks?
The probe, which is said to involve classified documents,
was first launched years ago, but the Biden administration
decided that it was too political and that it basically
didn't have the substance to carry on.
That's what the New York Post reported this morning.
He hasn't been arrested. He hasn't been charged.
It comes after years of investigation at which has

(11:51):
something to do with the potential criminality of
national security information that was put out in his book.
And I suppose that there's not astatute of limitations issue
because if he's still in possession of that information,
that's not going to be the issue, right?
Assuming he is, this says it wasrelated to an investigation that
began in 2020. That's the end of Trump's first

(12:12):
term, the same year that Donald Trump's Justice Department
launched a criminal inquiry intohis alleged disclosure of
national security secrets in hisbook The Room Where It Happened.
That investigation came after Trump and Co tried to quash the
publication after its inclusion of what they considered to be
national security secrets. They claimed that he broke the
NDA, which was signed as a condition of his employment,

(12:32):
something you and I are both familiar with.
We both signed those and we've signed the read in and the read
out of it. And Biden's administration
thought it was too political. Now, yeah, he is a he's
obviously like a Trump antagonist.
You could see why Biden might beexcited about having that
continue on, you know, give him cover.
But is this really, is this really the bad guy that they're
hoping for? Are we going to just see the Q

(12:53):
tard people that just like, are they just going to be like, you
know, yes, this is this is as the prophecy has stated, the
Internet. God has now delivered us this
Bolton mustache or are we now grasping deeply because anything
forget the friendly Friday thing.
Are we at like anything to be able to just not talk about the
fact that cash Patel's probably about to get replaced?

(13:16):
Well, the Co deputy director wastalking recently about how he
was shocked to his core to uncover which one is the code.
Hold on, which one is the code Deputy director?
They both are currently in position there.
And sort of I, I'm struck by theorg chart which I have reviewed,
unlike current leadership over at the FBI.
So we have one director, 2 deputy directors, and then one

(13:39):
associate deputy director. So that the tree goes back down
to narrow again. It's, it's, you didn't do a good
job of doing the hedge cutting of that one.
All right. Is it is it fair that you share
the same analysis that I do thatthere's no chance you bring in
somebody to help you with your job because you're doing a great
job. I think that that's spot on with
that and particularly because ofthe individual that was brought

(14:01):
in him being in those discussions to take the top of
helm there. That to me speaks very loudly.
And the other thing that you're hearing about in the rumor
intelligence around the current Co deputy director that he is
physically packing up his office.
I mean that that to me says morethan we need to know about where
his future endeavors are going to be, which is probably back

(14:22):
where he should be, where he's got an audience that's waiting
for him. And he's done very well
professionally. And he did share information,
went all the way on that limb years ago about the Russia hoax,
and that propelled him in the stratosphere.
That's your jam. That's your lane.
You can go back to that and be successful.
This just wasn't it. And you were set up to fail from
the beginning because you came in as an outsider and you

(14:43):
weren't given the tools. You weren't given the people
surrounding you that would empower you to make the
necessary decisions to bring about the changes that you would
hope a director would identify that needed to be made.
Just kind of riding those out. And I think that the change is
probably necessary if they have the opportunity to do it.
Maybe we get a second by the apple here to actually fix this
agency. I watched John Rich go out and

(15:04):
and try to run cover again. It all the all the signs tell me
exactly what I think is going tohappen.
And of course, everybody says ifyou call it too early, then
you're the problem. But it's pretty clear John Rich,
who's friends with Dan Bongino, is out talking about how Dan
Bongino, you know, he wasn't there for teeny and crumpets.
He was there giving up his his his easy life for difficulty.
It sounds like he was actually begrudging the thing.

(15:25):
I found out something yesterday when I was interviewing Kurt
Zuzdak on Infowars. And I had not thought of this
before, but whether you like Andy McCabe or not, and I don't
like him, and I don't think you do either, whether you like Paul
Abate, who's the previous deputydirector?
Yes. None of you know who the
previous deputy directors of theFBI were because you didn't care
or work in the FBI, which is howyou know a top tier politician
who's on his way up doesn't go into a number two job that no

(15:47):
one's ever heard of. Again, none of you know what
David Bowditch is up to today, even though he works for Disney.
And you may know only because I've talked about it.
And those are just the depth. I can't remember the deputies
before me before I was in the Bureau.
I have no idea. I really don't.
And two of those, two of those deputy directors of the three I
just named were acting FBI directors for a period of time.
So take that for whatever it's worth.
They were actually at the top. What Kurt Zuzdak pointed out to

(16:10):
me is that the deputy director job of the FBI is like a 15 to
18 hour a day job. It's absolutely effing
miserable. And I, you know, I don't blame
Bongino for not liking, if you took me from the job I do now
and the way that I do it and theflexibility and the freedom I
have to do what I do and put me in that gig, I'd be a, I'd be a
basket case because that's a massive transition.

(16:33):
But more importantly, he's not set up to be successful in that
job. You need someone that knows that
agency. Imagine if you don't know the
background of the thing you're trying to do.
So not only are you learning on the job, like what's the
culture? What are the names?
What is the org chart like? Who are these people?
What's their history? We're going to get into
something here again. Yesterday I, I put the name out
there of Jill and Yard and I want to cover it again.
But it's like you have so much to learn and you're not used to

(16:57):
working that way in that format.Yeah, it's, it's.
And for very little money compared to what he was doing
before. Of course he's miserable.
I don't blame him. That's worth getting into
because this job sort of self selects for the type of person
that is going to enjoy, perhaps at least thrive in the
environment. It's a person who leans in and
really likes having meetings allday long because if they didn't

(17:18):
like it, they would have left headquarters a really long time
ago. And those guys were nothing if
not headquarter animals that were bouncing back and forth,
back and forth just so they could get back there and make
sure that they had all those meetings and reviewing all those
PowerPoints all day long. Like that's something that they
enjoy. Which I mean, I don't, I
wouldn't want that job. I wouldn't wish that job on just
about anybody unless it's a terrible person.

(17:39):
But then again, I'd be empowering them.
So it's we can, we can, we can push this exactly to people's
personal experiences. A lot of you have seen this in
companies you've worked for. If you've worked in the law
enforcement realm or if you've worked in the military, you know
exactly what I'm talking about. You're often not led by the best
person at the job. You're led by the person who
stuck around longest to do things that nobody else wanted

(17:59):
to do. There's a value in that because
that person is most committed. But these are the most also like
institution over constitution types people because they are
dead set on getting that next promotion.
They're dead set on doing what it takes to do that job.
Again, That's the deputy's role.The funniest thing that you
mentioned, I just want to put this one more thing in the org
chart. Doubling up on that position
right now, historically speaking, and you and I may have

(18:21):
both seen the same work chart, but it used to go FBI director,
deputy director, the deputy would run the operational side
of the FBI. So all your criminal cases, your
national security cases, the onethat actually have agents and
then the associate deputy director, which they still have
that position would run the other pieces of it, which are
like the administrative ends, the lab division, the that you
know, the the intake phone calls, the, you know, whatever

(18:42):
sort of a science and technologybranch, like all those other
kind of stuff that's sort of like support.
So they actually used to have sort of a code deputy director.
The code deputy director's job is called the assist or the
associate deputy director. They actually still have it.
That's the funniest thing to me about all this.
It it also self selects for a left of center political
perspective because the people that join the FBI that want to

(19:02):
be the cops that want to lock upbad guys, that the law and order
types, the gun toting types, those tend to be the guys that
are libertarian, conservative and they don't want to leave
those positions because they signed up to do that job.
And they say, hey, who wants to be a manager?
And you're like, no, that's not for me.
I love the job I'm doing. I get paid way more than I
probably probably should for it,and I have no ambition to get
beyond that. It's the people that are jumping

(19:23):
out of their seat, raising theirhand to be a manager so they can
tell other people what to do. Those are the leftists.
And now they've ascended throughthat letter all the way up to
the top rungs of the of the pyramid here.
And that's why there's this collective mindset.
The political shift within the FBI leadership is far left.
Yeah. And, well, this is something
that people always ask, you know, it doesn't matter if
you're on social media or whatever else.

(19:43):
So, like, how do you save it? It's like, it's super simple.
You need to turn the hourglass upside down.
You need to have the people thatare closest and most interested
in the mission doing the management.
They don't want to do it. You got to get reluctant
leadership. So we all, we actually gave that
plan out there to Patel early on.
It's like go out there and find your best GS13, your brick
agents. Go find the best first line
supervisors that wanted to just be in the mix and manage, but

(20:04):
like manage the case agents, notmanage some program nebulously
off at headquarters. Get those people that are
closest to what the American people think the FBI does and
put them in charge. You're not going to do it.
I got an interesting perspectivefrom Kurt.
I want to push this out there and this is also going to lead
us towards something a little bit later.
I'm thinking of a scandalous cover up that I didn't realize
was a cover up until earlier this week.

(20:24):
And then we're going to cover some other news as well 'cause
there's other stuff going on. Let me just play this thing.
This is from Infowars yesterday,folks.
If you missed it, I will put it out over on our local channel.
I'll give you guys the entire interview.
Some of you guys want to see it.It's like a an hour long, but he
dropped a bunch of information. This is one that I had not
considered, which is that Pam Bondi may not be the the
problem, especially when it comes to dealing with the
Epstein case and his perspective.

(20:47):
Kurt is different than us. Kurt is far more left than we
are. Was that fair?
Yes, but he's left in a way thatit doesn't impact his ability to
be in law enforcement, which is probably the the best thing.
It's the left. It's the people that are like
liberal that we thought we were going to work with, which is
like, maybe we don't agree on everything, but we understand
that there are principles that are immutable.
Like maybe you should be fair. Check out Kurt Zusdak state
here. We'll we'll talk more about him

(21:08):
in a SEC. Fortunately, the one person
who's been been outstanding is, is our AG.
I mean, I think Pam, Pam Bondi has really been she has been
been doing the absolute phenomenal job.
And, and when she announced thatEpstein, those Epstein documents
and all they should have fired everybody in the FBI, moved them

(21:28):
off to San to San Juan or Alaskaas soon as that happened because
the FBI, that was intent that had to be intentional.
Let me dig in on that just for, I want to dig on that a second,
because a lot of people, I thinkon the on the MAGA side of the
world are thinking that Pam Bondi is actually the problem.
It sounds like you're suggestingthat it's an FBI problem and
they set her up. Is that what I heard?

(21:48):
Yeah, tell me. What I mean, yes, that's
absolutely. I mean, Pam Bondi's again, the
AG has to believe what the, the FBI is telling her.
If you, if the AG can't believe the information coming out of
the FBI, she is, she's crippled and that and, and, and again,
you don't. And if the FBI gives you a

(22:09):
package of documents, says this what it is, that should be law.
That should be, hey, we're giving, we're making this
statement to the, to the AG. This is all the documents.
The fact there was a truckload of documents somewhere else.
That's I mean that that everyonein the upper echelon should have
been removed at that point in time because that because in the
FBI, the one embarrassment, the one thing that you can never do

(22:31):
in the FBI is embarrass the FBI.That's the rule that's even
that. And that's at the even at the
foundationally with whistleblowers.
Hey, you embarrass the FBI, you can't be here anymore.
But the executives, what they did to to Pam Bondi was was 100%
the FB is fault because in inside the FB is case, they know

(22:52):
every document that's ever been that's ever been obtained.
They can run a report that showsevery document in the Epstein
file. This is a paper.
This is all electronic. So they could have done that and
given it to her, but that obviously didn't happen.
What can you make of that? Because again, I think that we
have been as critical about anybody that needs to be
critical. And it actually did open a new

(23:13):
light. Imagine if you went to United
States Attorney or you went to your AUSA, your prosecutor, and
you said, yeah, this is everything we have for discovery
and you withheld information. Who would know that other than
you? The, the, that's exactly where I
was going in my thinking. Because you do have that ability
in the Sentinel reporting systemthat the FBI has where you can
essentially export your entire case file to it.
It tended for me, I didn't have overly complicated cases.

(23:34):
It was more efficient for me just to pull them all out.
But that is all discoverable. That is part of the process.
You have to turn it all over. And who would know it?
I mean, theoretically your supervisor would have access to
it, but that's not somebody who's digging into the details
very far. And I know of instances in which
agents did not turn over every single thing.
And they created a lot of friction between a United States

(23:56):
attorney's office and that FBI office because that because in
their discretion, they thought that, well, I'm just not going
to turn that information over. Like, that's not your call.
You have to turn all of it over.It's up to the prosecutor's
discretion as to what is germaneand relevant.
And even if they are not going to use it at trial, they still
have to turn it over because it's all about the process.
But if you make that call and you make that federal prosecutor

(24:17):
look bad, there's a chance that you will never, ever be allowed
to bring a case forward to that office ever again because they
just know they can't trust you. Yeah.
And this is one of the major values of having people who
don't think exactly the same waythat you do and having
conversations with them. I constantly learn things from
talking to you because you and Ihave similar values.
But we don't think the same way.I think that's been evident.

(24:37):
And a lot of you'll say things, and I'll be like, I never
thought of that. I have the same experience with
so Kennedy. I have the same experience with
Carol Boyle. Our different lens that we
bring, even with the same values, changes the way that I
often view things. Or you'll remember things that I
didn't. And it's like, yeah, I
understand about discovery and Iknow, but he's right.
You can run out. You can literally run a records
check and find out what does it look like?
How on earth do they not bring that information there?

(24:58):
And what I'd never considered isthe people in New York that had
the ear of the FBI director, they set up the AGI kind of knew
that she didn't know all that stuff.
I mean, that's pretty, that was pretty obvious to us.
The question was why? And I actually put the blame on
her. But at the end of the day, the
people that brought that information over and were
responsible for it being correctare the director and the deputy

(25:21):
director. Another reason why you need to
have someone in the deputy chairthat knows the FBI.
So if someone says, hey, you know, these are all the files
and you go, great. How many files does Sentinel say
we have and how many did you include?
And they go, well, it's, it's, you know, we have 75 documents
here. It's like, well, what did the
report say? It's like, well, this said
18175. So where's the other 1800?

(25:42):
Like get back to work. That's not, we're not turning
that over. They don't even know if you're
in a spot where you don't know how to check the work of your
subordinates, you're set up for failure.
Again, I, I had empathy. I have a lot, actually more
sympathy than most people, that there was no way that Bongino is
going to be successful unless hecalled in people that knew
better. Kurt Suzdak, some FBI guys who
are prior that wanted to see it done right.
He didn't have that. So he was at the discretion of

(26:03):
what happened in New York. And then I've got a story out of
New York that we touched on yesterday on Infowars as well
that I think is truly scandalousand it should have been the
thing that we're talking about instead of talking about
Bolton's mustache. Hold on, I have Bolton's
mustache here. You want to see it, there's
Bolton mustache. Look at that mustache.
It has a clean shaved Athenian center.
It sort of offends my sensibilities.

(26:23):
It's really not. You know, Steve, I must ask you,
would you ever consider to whereyou would look very funny with a
mustache? I think that was the one
objection that I got from the home front, from my children.
They saying, hey, you can never be sheriff because you don't
have a mustache. That's actually true.
No, that's pretty good. OK, let's talk about people that
also shouldn't be there. You know what?
Let's let's take a quick second and let's talk about the folks.

(26:45):
If if you're worried about the way the world's going, maybe
we'll talk about the folks over at My Patriot Supply.
I think that's probably as good as any reason.
Let's go ahead and pop that openhere, folks.
mypatriotsupply.com/kyle. It is the tail end of their buy
three get one free. This is a buy three months and
you'll get the final four weeks of emergency food free.

(27:06):
It's like a $250 value. It'll feed a grown adult with
2000 calories a day for a full day times 30.
That seems really useful. If you guys are worried about
the things that are out there, whether it be power outages like
we had yesterday, we had some like light flooding and we had
some significant rain. All those things can leave you
in a weird spot. You might want something that's

(27:27):
a little bit durable. You might want to have your own
insurance policy against flooding or natural disasters.
Maybe you're living in the hurricane zones and you want
something. The nice thing about the My
Patriot Supply stuff is that it comes in these buckets that are
easily stackable. They fit in your trunk, they can
fit in the bed of your pickup, and they're waterproof and
they're going to keep it out. And as long as you keep it out
of direct sunlight, you can keepit for up to 25 years.
Check him out today by going to mypatriotsupply.com/kyle.

(27:49):
They've got a new deal that's going to be coming up shortly on
the emergency generator and a backup battery, which you guys
will see shortly as well. That's a super cool thing.
I kind of wish I have a battery backup.
We actually got to test the, I think it's called the Grid
Doctor 3300. That's the one I have.
It's their top end solar generator.
I got to test it yesterday because we had a power outage.
We've had a couple power outagesin the last few days.
All of my equipment continue to run.

(28:10):
It immediately went into failover, which means you can
actually set it up as a universal or uninterrupted power
supply. Very cool stuff For my friends
over at My Patriot Supply. There's a link in the show
description. Check them out.
If you guys are looking to make sure that you increase your
survivability in a disaster, mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle.
Let's say who's not going to survive, Steve, You know who's
not going to survive? Probably this guy, this old

(28:32):
turd, this is Lloyd Doggett. He was my congressman for a
little while. I'm not a big fan.
I've been sort of lamenting the K fob WWE fake wrestling thing
that's been going on in Texas and California.
We covered even yesterday about how the the the state houses,
they all ran off so they can break quorum.
And now Gavin Newsom was approved so he can go and
redistrict and all those other. By the way, there are multiple

(28:54):
states that are redistricting orthat have gerrymandered areas
and the most gerrymandered districts are in both Republican
and Democrat. Everybody does it, so all this
has seemed fake, but this is thefirst time that you got my
attention and I'm excited about it.
Long time Texas House Democrat said that he will not seek re
election if re disagreeing efforts hold.
He was born in 1946. He's older than my dad.

(29:16):
He has been in office for 30 years.
He's been in politics for 52 years.
Steve Friend. So if the gerontocracy starts
getting chiseled away because ofthese Texas redistricting
efforts, it's the only thing that will get me excited about
it. But anyway, Lloyd Doggett said
that if they they pass, he's done.
And I thought that was noteworthy today.
What say you? I'm here for that.
Particularly for the guys that are wearing the Ukrainian flag

(29:38):
on their lapels. Dude, look at him, America only.
He's a scumbag. OK.
Announcement from 78 year old Lloyd Doggett, who served in
Congress since 1995. Before that he was on the Texas
Supreme Court. He was also in the Texas House
going back to like 1972 or 1975.72.
I think new congressional lines that the Republicans are

(29:58):
attempting to pass will change the district that he's currently
in, which is a safe district, Texas 37 and it will open it up
and and make it possible to his seat will actually favor
Republicans. So he's going to be mad about
it. Of course.
He represents the southern part of Austin and and big chunks of
Travis County, which is a reliably blue area, currently in
a really red area with a red State House.

(30:21):
And it's, you know, a guy who's been there since before I was
born. I mean, just think about what
he's seen in his political life,right?
I'm going back to 1972. He's been through all these
battles. This guy was around during the
Iranian hostage crisis and he's still calling the shots for the
people in your district. Yeah.
He's also never in his office when I went to go try to deal

(30:42):
with him because I had some veteran issues and absolutely
useless because I'm sure as a a leftist.
This was in 2012. I went out there and we had a
discrimination issue with Texas State government and some things
that he should have had access to and his office was utterly
useful, utterly useless to me. That was kind of fun.
I want to bring up a blast from the past.
Speaking of things that we haven't talked about in forever,

(31:04):
like the Iran, what was it, the Iran hostage crisis?
Is that 444 days? Yes.
How about this guy? Do you know who that guy?
Can you name that person on the screen there?
Steve Friend, It's Abrego Garcia.
Abrego Garcia, Did you know that?
He's back in the news. The Maryland man can't avoid
him. Maryland dad, I heard.
So I've been watching this for acouple days.
There's been a couple of different news outlets that have

(31:25):
popped up over the last few. I think the first one I grabbed
was coming from AP, the AP and ABC News.
And it was that his lawyers are trying to get the smuggling
charges dismissed because going after him represents vindictive
prosecution. They filed a motion that said
they would like to dismiss the charges on selective or

(31:46):
vindictive prosecution of a alleged human smuggler in the
United States because of all thethings that have gone on.
They obviously only went after him because they deported him
and then they needed to win. What say you about that stuff?
I think John Bolton probably needs to get his attorneys
because he's got a stronger caseagainst being vindictively
prosecuted. This guy, he really does pulled
over by state troopers with like12 dudes in a vehicle and it was

(32:10):
pretty clear that he was doing trafficking.
I mean, everybody does that. That's why you always drive to
San Francisco with complete strangers that don't speak
English. You don't know.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, he could be released from detention and
head back to his home in Maryland.
God, you got to love CBS News. His home state of Maryland as
early as Friday. That's today.
He might be released today in the latest moves of the month

(32:31):
long saga that's become a symbolof President Crump's track down
against undocumented immigrants,AKA illegal alien MS13 human
smugglers. Nothing funnier than CBS running
this picture on the lead. That's a picture of him wearing
a bull's hat in Maryland. It's the black bull's hat with
the horns that look exactly likethis.

(32:53):
Because that's what Ms. 13 guys wear.
But remember Maryland dad? A Nashville based federal
Magistrate Judge ordered Abrego Garcia be released from jail two
months ago while he awaited his criminal trial to begin in
January. That order has been delayed.
The request of Abrego Garcia's attorneys, who feared that ICE
would immediately detain him andthen deport him again.

(33:15):
That's. So we're living in this clown
world. I think I actually have a video
of how stupid this is. I found these, I found this.
I may have to pull it up real quick.
I, I found this video of this dude who decided to just like
jump in and help out complete strangers and offer his services
as an attorney. It's like here, here, this guy

(33:35):
is going to be your lawyer if you want him to.
Steve, watch this. We'll turn the volume down.
But he's going to go out there. He's going to cross a busy
highway, almost get smoked to talk to people in English who
don't speak English. That's a really smart thing that
that truck was hauling OK. I'm a lawyer, I can talk to
them. I'm a lawyer, I can talk to

(33:56):
them. That's my favorite thing that
I've like. That's why I had to pull this
clip down. So this dude crossed the
highway, which people who are just listening heard like like a
semi goes by. Dude walks up to like 6
immigration enforcement guys with three or four dudes in
handcuffs that are against the guardrail and they're doing
whatever their process is to take him into custody or they've

(34:16):
got him in custody and they're going to take him.
This guy decided to just inject himself.
This is in Bellefont, Pennsylvania.
All right, we'll roll a little bit more.
I'll get your commentator. Just hold your hand up if you
want to add something on top of this.
Oh, I'm a lawyer, but I'm their lawyer now, so I'm going to have
a conversation. You guys have representation?
Stay back. You guys have representation.

(34:39):
Do you want a lawyer? I'm not in danger standing here
any more than you are. Do you guys want a lawyer?
I don't care. Do you guys want a lawyer?
No, you want a lawyer. You want a lawyer.
OK, You're. Going to be an immigration
lawyer help you speak Spanish. What do you think of that I mean

(35:00):
he had to bust out the contract of retention him for him as an
attorney there right to make sure that they can but they
probably couldn't read it since they don't speak English and
they had no idea what he was offering the services wide.
The best is is that the immigration guy just goes he
goes dude, he goes if if you want to be an immigration lawyer
you should speak Spanish that's solid.
How much you want to bet that that guy, well, if he even is an

(35:22):
attorney, is not a criminal defense attorney.
He's just an actor. I bet he has zero experience
with immigration too. But he is a guy who's willing to
walk across the highway and say that he is their lawyer because
he saw them first. And and he knows the law like
the back of his hand where he can just walk up on a criminal
scene and start making demands of the officers.
They're not like, and when all the danger is gone where it's

(35:45):
somewhere that's a slightly moresafe location where we're going
to attempt to do any sort of like interrogation there.
But dude, he held his phone up. He's like, he's, you know, you,
you ever tried to film anything with your phone?
And you look down, you realize like you're walking on stuff or
you like look down at the stuff you're walking on and you
realize that your phone drifted and your kids no longer in the
shot. This guy's got mostly the stuff
in the shot. He's walking across a busy

(36:06):
highway. And then my favorite is that
this lady stepped up because this lady's going to solve the
problem. Excuse me.
Excuse me, Sir. Here we go.
Let's finish it up. I mean, I can't speak a little
Spanish, Not now. You guys make sure you don't

(36:27):
want an attorney right now. You sure?
Bro, I totally abla, Abla, I'm telling you doesn't even know
the word. What is it?
Abogado is that is that attorney?
I don't know. I speak American.
I speak American too. I just think it's really funny.

(36:48):
These guys, they're great. Again, Kilmora breakout Garcia
is about to be free and and aliens are getting rounded up
and that's by the way, that's not a good ratio.
You've got 6 to maybe 3. We were hearing inside the the
FBISERO sort of assist that the that federal agents are
basically like snatching these up and they're all dog piling on
it. So every agency gets to claim

(37:09):
the same stats. So DE as out there Marshall
services out there. The funny thing is, is that
people on the left, they're like, oh, Trump people are super
sad because, you know, Trump's doing the wrong thing.
It's like, no, no, no, they wantmore.
You misunderstood. We're mad because they're not
doing as much as they said, not that, because they're doing too
much of it and they're arrestingthese idiots.
The statistic that I saw was that there was apprehending

(37:30):
about 30,000 legals per month, and that's an arrest.
That's not a deportation. They're saying, well, we're
getting backed up because we're only deporting 18,000 of them.
So every month 12,000 of them are not getting deported.
So we're running out of space. Well, I go back to the original
#30,000 per month means about a 1000 a day, which would mean
365,000 a year, which you extrapolate over 4 years, which

(37:53):
means we're under one and a halfmillion arrests, not even
deportations. Yes, you got to have to do a lot
better to make the voters happy again.
It's this funny little reason why I feel like this is the only
time when it makes perfect senseto continue to push down on, on
the the Trump administration in various places.
And if we can add any media pressure, if we can add any

(38:13):
social media pressure, you ask for what you want because the
other side is like advocating onbehalf of this Maryland dad
whose home state is Maryland, Despite that his home country is
not in the United States, He will dig his heel into the
ground to defend his homeland ofMaryland.
It's so silly. I've got a neck bearded cowboy

(38:34):
who likes to make fun of people in Utah and thinks that people
in Utah talk like people in Alabama.
I'm going to play that in another second here, but I'm
going to get you a prediction. Is this guy going free today
based on what you know of the case, which is enough?
And do you think that ICE swoopshim up and send him out of the
country again for around 2? Steve friend prediction moment?
No, here we are in Trump season 5, right?

(38:57):
So I'm going to say yes, he getsreleased and ICE is there to
meet him because we have to havea news cycle that'll drive
everything across the weekend into Monday.
So yes, that's what I'm going for.
OK, I'll take that. I'm not mad about it.
We're going to do a quick video of a dude who is going to tell
you that Donald Trump supportersare super sad because they're

(39:18):
losing money from the federal government.
Remember that the danger is is you can agree with what people
on the left say, but have completely different motives.
I think this guy misses the point.
I'm going to see if you come up with the same thing and we're
going to work our way through. There's also a very, very funny
story that impugns the characterof Donald Trump, which I think
is also sort of part of this thing.

(39:39):
Leftist said that good moral character is not necessary for
illegal aliens. This Republican town is finding
out the hard way. St.
George, UT, voted overwhelminglyfor Trump, not once but twice,
likely believing his agenda would bring fewer regulations,
less woke spending, and more real infrastructure investment.
But instead, their city just lost almost $88 million in

(40:00):
federal funding for a critical transportation project, all
thanks to a GOP law that Trump proudly signed.
The money was supposed to help reconnect neighborhoods divided
by the increasingly congested I-15.
The highway cuts right through the city, creating daily traffic
and safety concerns. But that funding vanished after
Republicans targeted a Biden eragrant program because it

(40:20):
included goals like improving equity, walkability and access
in historically underserved areas.
Even local Republican officials are calling the loss
heartbreaking. The project wasn't about having
any type of ideology. It was about fixing roads,
building bridges and improving the daily life of their
residents. But of course, in their rush to
cancel anything with the word equity in it, Republicans in St.

(40:42):
George, UT, ended up cutting infrastructure improvements in
their own community. And of course, those Republicans
will say we didn't know it affect us.
We thought it affect everybody else.
And the craziest part is we tried to warn them but they're
too big of idiots to even understand unless it affects
them directly and. Can you translate what that
Wisco cowboy had to say there? The neck bearded dude who?

(41:05):
So his argument is that you voted against your own best
interests, which is what the communists always say, because
you opposed infrastructure investment in infrastructure,
which is stealing your money viataxation or just printing more
of it or borrowing more money sothat they can just build a
thing. And then your representative
come back to your district with all that pork, right?

(41:27):
This is how we're going to stir the economy.
Rice, taking money from others and giving it to others, which
would mean from each according to his ability, to each
according to his means, that's communism.
And because you voted against communism, ha ha, ha, ha.
And plus, you know, you should have voted for a bridge because
of equity, which is DEI, which is, again, cultural Marxism,

(41:49):
which puts immutable characteristics ahead of merit,
which which means by definition,that you, whatever you're making
or producing or offering that will suffer.
And again, that's communism. So that's a win for Utah.
And I think they would probably double down on that and say,
what other projects can we cancel here that we don't need?
Have you ever met anybody from Utah?

(42:10):
I have. Do they ever sound like this?
Do they sound just like this when they talk?
Not unless they're military and they were born in Mississippi.
Or if you're from the South likeus, we like to leave out
syllables. That's how you know somebody's
authentically from the South that you know, you're from
Sissippi or you're, you hail from Lana, Georgia.

(42:33):
It's too hot out for all those syllables.
I don't know where that guy cameup with the with the accent or
why he thought like, you know, obviously these are performative
things. And this is unfortunate, the
world we live in where people are going to perform again, I
agree of leaving that that thingout.
I'm like, yeah, yeah, yeah. That is a problem that they cut
that. That's because they only cut
that. We needed more of the cutting

(42:54):
because I don't need people putting our money back.
By the way, can you just define just for my help?
It's a small town in Utah. What is a critical
transportation product project? What is a critical
transportation project? And how many people do you know
that voted for like federal infrastructure that we're also
in the MAGA camp? It's there's a word game, right?
So the, the critical project would be like a footbridge that

(43:18):
probably goes over this highway so you don't have to run across
it. Like that attorney that was
concerned about the Pennsylvaniaillegal aliens.
That's exactly what it was. It was an $88 million footbridge
over a highway that like you probably could buy everybody a
flipping car in the neighborhoodthat couldn't get across the
highway. That's probably the odds.
We find a guess, but we need to have that bridge so that the

(43:40):
congressman could put his name on that and say that it was a
memorial bridge for him as opposed to actually just
refunding the money that the government stole from you.
We're not taking it to begin with.
Are you saying that you think that it's possible that the
people who would be building thebridge would also be campaign
donors of said congressman that would put his name on that
bridge? Because that's what I feel like.
And they would also be hiring the likes of the people that

(44:01):
were on the roadside there in Pennsylvania.
Yeah, that checks. They would be hiring the
illegals to come and do it. OK You ready for something
That's really funny? Our chat is already talking
about how this is all fake and gay.
This is really good. NBC, which is home to.
I went and did a look on the theMSNBC host.
I think this is actually an MSNBC story, MSN.
Now, they might be changing their name, but it's not there

(44:23):
yet. It's still saying MSNBC on my
screen. Three of their hosts are quote,
UN quote, openly gay, whatever openly gay means.
And two of them are the first black openly gay people to be on
television. And they are unwatchable.
One of them is Jason Capehart, Ithink his name is, and the other
one is some other person that I don't care about.
None of them are important. And then last one is Rachel
Maddow, who may or may not be a dude.

(44:45):
The Trump administration is worrisome.
They have a new focus on a group's moral character or good
moral character. This is the best little sub
headline here. Steve Trump couldn't pass any
legitimate test of moral character, but we're supposed to
accept his administration as thearbiter of who's good enough to
become a citizen? I feel like that's kind of what

(45:06):
the job of the person who sets up the State Department is.
Aren't don't you get to make thepolicies including whatever like
in America, put a guy in there, a three time divorce guy or
whatever, two time divorce guy. And that's why the president
doesn't have to get through a background check.
You're considered vetted by the American people.
Do we have like a religious testin this country?

(45:26):
Are you allowed to have a religious test for any office?
I don't think we're allowed to have that.
That being said, unless you're willing to get up there in front
of the TV cameras and talk abouthow, you know, we need to have
more women in the workplace or we need to provide funding to
Ukraine or need to come all across the board energy policy,
That sounds kind of like a religious test to me.

(45:49):
There actually is the religion. Yeah.
And I think you're right. It's just you have to have a,
you have to worship the God Vermont.
I've taken this on because one of one of the commenters that
I've seen out there has used that term, and I very much like
it. Leftist, they have a secular
religion. It is without God.
The God is government. But calling it a God verment is
my favorite now. Yeah, you have to do that.
So you could, you could pledge your loyalty to that.
That's how you would sign off onan $88 million foot bridge that

(46:11):
nobody's going to walk on. You ever just notice how packed
the foot bridges are around you?Let her go.
As somebody who frequents the foot bridges early in the
morning, you do. The sun becomes melting and
notices that it just has early morning fishermen and homeless
people don't think that they necessitates an $88 million
investment. What about investing in a new,

(46:35):
less racist Cracker Barrel? I think that might be a on par
with New Coke or Bud Light putting Dylan Mulvaney on a can
because Cracker Barrel doesn't have a problem.
Have you ever tried to get into one on a Saturday morning?
Well, they lost $100 million with this brilliant idea.

(46:57):
So they do have a problem now. OK, so this is the current or
this was the current logo. They are now, somebody referred
to it as gentrifying the CrackerBarrel, which I think is very,
very funny. So that's the logo.
And allow me, this is the new logo.
All right? That is that is the upgrade.

(47:17):
The upgrade is from an old man with a Cracker Barrel and the
word Cracker Barrel Old Country store.
That's not going to fly. What we're going to do is we're
going to renovate it and make itnew tacky.
And the actual name of this logois called the more like us
Cracker Barrel logo. I actually pulled the, the like

(47:37):
the, the, the, the, the file. And the file is more like us is
what it's called. And then they've lost $100
million in stock value by addingthis new logo because leftists
are really smart and they're thebest at business.
I'm surprised they haven't done the whole like, hey, you can't
say cracker, that's our word. You can put if you, if it's you

(47:57):
have a great relationship with awhite person, you can call them
your cracker. But if you give that hard R,
there's a cracker. That's hard word.
All right, so Cracker Barrel shed almost $100 million worth
of market value. So none of that's in real.
Anyway, that's just not going tostop the lines on on Sunday
morning after church. The new design eliminates a long
standing drawing of an overall clad man leaning against the

(48:20):
barrel in favor of a cleaner logo featuring just the chain's
name. They lost 7.2% of their total
value, shedding $94,000,000. So nearly $100 million.
The stop dipped to a low yesterday, representing almost
it says representing a loss of almost 2 billion in
capitalization. And the slide appeared to halt.

(48:43):
Wall Street was the one that recommended the logo redesigned.
And then also I wonder if they shorted it.
They were like, hey, let's just let's hit these dummies.
Who's invest, who's who's money,who's IRA or like 4 O 1K is
locked up in crackle barrel stock.
Anybody who's buying the trinkets when they walk in, like
those are the people that are heavily invested in Cracker
Barrel or buying the $600.00 rocking rocking chairs out

(49:05):
front. I mean, according to the
company's website, Steve the oldman and the barrel in the old
logo represent an old country store experience where folks
would gather around and share stories.
That is not my experience of going to Cracker Barrel.
What I experienced are sticky floors, mediocre, like, ugly
plated food and like, bland white dumpling, whatever they

(49:27):
are. That my buddy was like, you got
to have the dumplings. And I tried them.
And I was like, I cannot believethat you told me to come here.
I went there actually when I wasat Quantico with one of my
classmates. He's so excited to take me
there. He's a Asian guy, actually, of
all things. And he was like, yeah, we got to
get the dumplings. And I was like, I've never done
that. I'm kind of like a pancakes guy.
But whatever, I'll try what you just said.
And I ate it. And I was so disappointed that

(49:47):
he was excited because then I could no longer respect him.
He dragged me to a Cracker Barrel to basically lower my
opinion of him. Anyway, they're doing it to
themselves now. And the the patrons, I mean, for
the most part, kind of indicate to me that we have a obesity
epidemic in the country. Let's be real clear about one
thing, too. I cannot fathom why there's a

(50:08):
Cracker Barrel in America when there's an option to go to a
Waffle House in almost everywhere that there's a
Cracker Barrel. There's a Cracker Barrel at just
about every single exit on a major Interstate in this country
is a prolific, prolific franchise.
Well, there is a there's a Waffle House at every single
stop sign in parts of Mississippi.

(50:28):
And I think that it's vastly superior.
I'm just really disappointed. But let's.
Let's go. We're between staff and patrons.
Yeah. And every single stop sign
we're. We're an old timey Cracker
Barrel logo. I want to know exactly what I'm
getting into there. I want to know about.
Apparently that guy's name is known as Uncle Uncle Herschel,
and his logo will still remain in front and center on the

(50:51):
restaurant's branding and on themenu.
But they're going to change the look.
They they tried to make it look like more farmhouse chic or
something. There's just nothing about the
food that says that to me. And somewhere Aunt Jemima is
weeping. Somewhere somebody spent more
money on something that's not going to move the needle and
apparently made their stock value tank.

(51:11):
So there's that. I want to give you one more kind
of silly thing out there becauseI think it's really fun.
And also, anytime we get a chance to talk about your
favorite boomer thirst trap in the Trump administration, we
should do that. So here's your girl.
You want to read that headline? Judge rules Alligator.
Alcatraz can stay open for now, but no further detainees or
construction are allowed. I think there's been an update

(51:33):
to this. Is there OK?
Within 60 days, the facility must remove all generators, gas,
sewage and other waste and wastereceptacles, which calls into
question how the hell it would operate.
You got Ron DeSantis. Ron DeSantis is kind of, is it
always that he's an awkward standard or is he just an
awkward standard in this picture?
You know, I he's an athlete. I mean, I knew he was like a

(51:53):
college baseball player. So I think it might just be the
footwear he wears those boots, but might not to give him a
little couple extra inches. He does look like he's leaning
forward a little bit awkwardly, doesn't he?
I don't have a default anything against Ron DeSantis.
I just thought I saw this picture and it made me laugh.
You've got Christy Gnome with bare shoulders wearing like a
like a tank top and yoga pants that are grabbing her butt and

(52:16):
you get the white MAGA hat goingtoo.
She does. And then you got Trump just
chilling. Trump always just feels like you
just dropped him in there and he's just like sort of observing
the world and it's happening around him.
And then whenever they ask him, then he engages and he just does
whatever Trump does. So, you know, he actually is the
most, like, most natural lookingkind of standing there guy
whenever I feel like he's got just like the Hulk Hogan I Am a

(52:39):
real American song going in his head while people just drone on
around him. He's waiting for Sir.
We need a decision. All right, I'm on it.
Yeah, I could actually see that.I could see him just sitting
there listening. And in the background of his
head, he's like, I am a real American.
And everyone else is talking about like this chain link seems
like it's probably a little bit much.
What are we going to do when allthe sewage and the generators
are out and they're like, Sir? And he was like, yeah, we're

(53:01):
going to authorize it. We're just going to do it.
We don't care what the federal judge says.
A federal judge in Miami ruled that the alligator Alcatraz A
contested immigration. Again, this goes back to this
thing. It's like nobody who's sad about
this. Why?
Why are we shutting down something that's detaining
people to get them out? These are the same people that
cried about kids in cages even though it was happening
otherwise. The filing was done under the

(53:23):
National Environmental Policy Act and the violations they're
in. Did you say there was an update,
you think? Because this is from this
morning, from what I can tell. So, yeah, the, the update this
morning was this one. So I the old one was that they
wanted to pause. And now she's basically that
this judge is communist as saying that you can still stay
open, but you have to remove allthe abilities for you to
function as a detention facility.

(53:44):
And it's based off of environmental concerns.
And, and it's been brought forward by leftist environmental
groups and Native American tribes that are worried about to
preserving the wetlands there because apparently the presence
of this small detention facilityis endangering billions of
dollars in preservation efforts on their behalf.
And, and what what is being preserved?

(54:05):
Maybe a wetlands that are full of both constrictors that people
let out there pythons. This is just proof that the left
always uses whatever it can because it's outcome driven.
They don't care about the environment.
They don't care about the way that lands in Florida.
Are you kidding me? Like that's Vietnam to them.
They don't. It's the same thing.
Like none of these people care about moral character.

(54:26):
They just care about Donald Trump.
Like, at the end of the day, Donald Trump lives more like
what leftists say than what actual leftists often do.
I looked at, I looked at the people that I'm like, who's
someone that I really don't likeover at MSNBC, How about Joy
Reid? Joy Reid's been married for like
20 something years. She's got three kids, same
husband. She lives more conservatively
when it comes to like her socialhistory than Donald Trump, who's

(54:47):
been married three times as kidsfrom the different marriages and
so on. And yet they're going to call
out good moral character, not because they believe that Donald
Trump's a bad guy or that they have a problem with divorce or
anything else like that. They just, you know, they just
don't like Donald Trump. So whatever is going to get the
outcome, that's exactly it. We're going to go and use this
this wetlands protection that has something to do because
it'll get us our illegal immigration move.

(55:09):
That's why they're progressives and that's why they win stuff
too. This is the phenomenon they
don't want. You do as I say, not as I do.
The liberal elitists live, by and large, for the most part, a
very conservative lifestyle. Married, solid foundation, home,
having dinner with the kids. I mean, they're of course

(55:29):
propagandizing their kids and filling them up into their ears
with how they need to cut off their genitals 'cause we have to
impress our friends at Sunday brunch because we're not going
to church. But for the most part, the
lifestyle is rather conservative.
And then you contrast that with people that purport to be on our
side, and it's a lot of unwed moms that are content creators
that are talking about how the trad life is something that all
women should embrace and don't hate the messaging.

(55:51):
But again, you're not really embodying that.
Actually, there's a there's a podcast that just popped up with
Ashley Sinclair, who I've met one time and seemed like an OK
person. But you know, obviously this was
pre pre Elon baby Mama moment might have been at that like
right time when she was actuallyinvolved in that.
And and she's made a a podcast that's called bad Decisions,
which is essentially like she talks about her decisions that

(56:12):
why you shouldn't do what she did, which is points for
accountability. Yeah, kind of funny, kind of not
terrible. Let me do one thing real quick
here, folks. If you are listening on the
audio podcast, you may hear a breakaway for an ad.
I'm just giving you the heads upwarning as we do so there it is.
OK, Steve, I want to pivot to myour last story here.
I played this clip yesterday. I want you to listen to it.
And then we're going to go dig into kind of the the other thing

(56:33):
that I thought was really revealing that Kurt Zuzdak,
again, different people think different things, remind me of
different fact patterns that I had forgotten about.
Here's Kash Patel talking about how they removed all the
weaponization. By the way, this was like a 24
hours before they decided to go after John Bolton's mustache and
do something that is really weaponized looking as far as I
can tell. This is kind of gross, feels

(56:54):
really desperate. Here's Cash Patel doing that.
You came in, you're you're therenow the leader.
But have the old leaders who assigned this and directed this
operation, have they been dismissed from the FBI?
Every single person that has been found to have weaponized or
participate in that process has been removed from leadership

(57:14):
positions. And we, if we, if and when we
find any others that are involved in this, as you know,
this is 37,000 person agency, weare going to take swift action
just like we have. And just look at the record of
the people that have been dismissed for their actions and
what they're saying when they get out there about how they
personally opined about the weaponization of this place,

(57:35):
just like one of Peter Strock's friends did recently this past
week. That's how we know we're finding
the right folks. And we're going to keep doing
it. It's not done yet, but we're
going to stay on it. All right, Right.
And then right afterwards, I went out there and showed them
that there's this woman named Jill Enyard who's still working
for the FBI. She was involved in this thing.
What I didn't realize, Do you remember this headline from
Carrie Pickett five months ago? I do.
I do because I've been talking about that since the last five

(57:57):
months. OK.
Cash Patel disputes whistleblower revelations about
FBI honeypot agents spying on the Trump campaign.
All right, so for folks to understand, yesterday I, I
queried the person who brought forward that whistle blower
disclosure, which was Kurt Zusdak.
I, I queried him on Infowars. If you guys are listening and
you want to find it over on, youcan find it on Infowars.

(58:17):
You can find it at Real Alex Jones and all that kind of
stuff, but you can also find it on Locals later on today.
I'll put it up. It'll be at kyleseraphin.com.
You can watch the interview I did with Kurt, what I thought
was being disputed. I thought Patel was saying that
there was in fact no honeypot operation.
No, he's doing the same thing hedid in that interview, right?

(58:38):
They play with these words. And This is why I think these
guys are cooked. And This is why I think you've
got something going on with thisBolton thing where it's all
about misdirection. If you were really serious about
going after the bad actors, you wouldn't be looking externally,
You wouldn't be going after the Russia gate villains that are
gone, that have like passed the the statue of limitation.
And you certainly wouldn't be dealing with the people who,

(58:58):
like, had the official capacity.There was a release yesterday
saying like, oh, the FBI author,you know, the FBI director
leaked classified material. The FBI director also has the
ability to declassify material. So you have no idea whether or
not he, if he authorized it, then he did, period.
And I don't think you can go after him for an official act.
What Cash Patel had a problem with, and these are people who
still work in the FBI, is he didn't like the characterization

(59:21):
as the word honeypot because honeypot is a colloquial term,
so there's no real definition ofwhat it means.
But the idea that you'd have a Pretty Woman infiltrate as an
undercover, that's what we generally would call a honeypot,
kind of like what his girlfrienddoes.
This is the language game. And we've talked about it
before. But like, look, the interview
that he just did, he was asked, did you remove those people?

(59:43):
But the implication being, did you fire them?
And he said that they were removed from leadership, which I
don't hate. That's something that Kurt
Suzdak has recommended. Not true anybody.
Smart move. But he's giving that answer.
It's very lawyerly. They gave the same lawyerly
answer when they were asked, were there undercovers at
January 6th? And the FBI responded there were
no undercover employees at January 6th because you.

(01:00:06):
CE undercover employees, a very specific designation, but most
people when you say where they're undercovers are
presuming did you have plain clothes agents present there in
the crowd? And it will be dumb not to at a
major gathering, but they give avery specific response to the
Inspector General. He's giving a very specific
response here. Honeypot is something that he
took umbrage with that characterization of it, but they

(01:00:28):
just didn't ask. Did you send a quasi hot chick
to infiltrate the Trump campaignso that they she could dig up
dirt, which is what the whistleblower allegation was and
is accurate about, right? Again, they scrubbed this from
the from the website folks. This is gone from The Washington
Times new whistleblower disclosure identify agents
assigned to infiltrate Trump campaign.

(01:00:49):
And then you've got this one here where he disputes and I
didn't realize it until Kurt pointed out it was a terminology
thing. It wasn't the fact that it
didn't happen. This woman, Jill Enyart, who is
not removed from leadership, from what I can tell, she's
friends with the special agent in charge of the New York field
office. And all of this actually goes to
a truly scandalous thing. I'm going to read this real
quickly. Mr. Patel took to social media
to dispute that the female agentwas not a honeypot.

(01:01:12):
A honeypot is an underconder operative who feigns sexual or
romantic interest to obtain information from a target.
It's not necessarily that it's that that the possibility exists
because the person actually presents like an attraction.
You don't have to actually feignanything.
And the FBI has no problem usingthese.
By the way, if you follow TrevorAronson and the the Alphabet

(01:01:33):
Boys thing that happened in in Denver, they sent a woman who
had huge boobs, like cartoonishly huge boobs, as a
detective. She was brought into the JTTF
and she was went into a BLM protest and then her back story,
or her legend as they call it, was that she was a recovering
hooker. And then dude would meet with
her and call these young 19 yearold dudes in a room like hey,

(01:01:54):
want to buy illegal guns, but they're not thinking with the
head that is at the top. At that point.
It's the one that's three feet underneath.
Right? But she totally wasn't a
honeypot. Like she's a undercover
operative, like doing totally legit things.
The fact is this woman was apparently at a fairly high
level in the CI program. She was either an assistant
section chief or a section chief, which is a truly
problematic thing. And Cash Patel takes umbrage

(01:02:15):
with the word honeypot, not anything else.
He's had his own little honeypotissue that's been going on of
late. So we're just going to
acknowledge it real publicly. He's got a girlfriend that's
half his age who apparently is both a country music singer, a
political commentator on Rumble,a friend now of John Rich
through Bongino, who also owns abig chunk of Rumble.

(01:02:37):
And she's also a former Mossad agent in what is like the
equivalent of their their NSA. But I'm sure that's totally
because, like she's really looking for like a cross eyed,
you know, kind of thickish built, super cool bro who's
almost 50 years old, who's Indian in America.
Like, it has nothing to do with the fact that we're really close
to the Trump administration. Anyway, I'm sure that that's

(01:02:57):
totally just like love. That's what real love looks
like. That's why Cash Patel's in his
40s and lives with a man in, in,in Las Vegas full time, totally
regular, no big deal. I'm, I'm just saying it's
interesting that he decided to go and take Umbridge with this.
And I'm going to tell you why I think it's so wild, Steve,
because it actually goes to the thing that that was stated
earlier. And it, it ties into the Epstein
situation, the New York field office and the New York Mafia,

(01:03:21):
which I will have you explained in your terms in a second
because I'm sure you've experienced it differently.
The New York Mafia in the FBI got Cash Patel's ear almost
immediately supplanted our recommendation for a good deputy
director to his detriment, I think, and then started
whispering sweet nothings like that chick is not a honey pot,
you need to do these things and managed to basically discredit

(01:03:43):
him by punching out a bunch of fake information that made Bondi
look terrible. And I think actually is going to
bring down the deputy director time of Dan Bongino.
I think that the Epstein rolloutdiscredited him basically in a
way that he's no longer able to recover.
That's my take on it. And it's all from the same crew
of people that we heard are all gone yesterday from Patel on on

(01:04:06):
Fox News. What do you think about the New
York mafia? Do you want to break it down for
people so we have this real clear idea of who is actually
running? I've been always kind of people
always like who's really runningthe FBI maybe.
I think it's the now I'm starting to lean towards this.
So go ahead if you would. There's different factions, I
guess you could characterize them in within the FBI.
And you always kind of hear the rumbling.
The New York Mafia is one I've heard the Mormon Mafia being

(01:04:29):
another one. Oh yeah, the HRT mafia.
And it's basically people who are on a certain career track.
They have the same sort of the swimming in the same pool with
the same characters as they're all progressing in their
careers. They all kind of take care of
each other. They pull themselves along the
lines as if you're gaining in your career and you're trying to
progress and climb the next ladder, It behooves you to have

(01:04:50):
what's called a rabbi, right? Somebody who is at the next
level up that pulls you along. You kind of are able to provide
the ability for them to brag about what you're doing and
they're able to like, watch out for you and mentor you, for lack
of a better term, to bring you along in your career.
One step, next step, next step. And these different factions are
represented within the FBI and they're kind of vying for

(01:05:10):
control because the New York people are not really playing
with the HRT people who might not be playing with the Mormon
people. They're all vying to get to
those very top spots. And there's a limited number of
seats at that table when you getto the very tippy top of the
pyramid of the structure. So they are rivals.
Isn't it funny that people have have previous to quote UN quote,
our team getting involved? They refer to the FBI in the way

(01:05:33):
that it's structured, in the waythat it actually operates
internally and externally like organized crime that or
religious organizations, the College of Cardinals around
James Comedy, the rabbis, the Mormon mafia.
It's really strange because all of these things are perfect
analogy. So they they overlay almost
perfectly on there. But it also involves a faith in
a thing called the FBI. Yesterday we got told by by,

(01:05:54):
well, I guess it was a couple weeks ago, Jimmy Gags, who's a
retired like sort of like sainted FBI guy.
He was at various different newsorganizations and he was talking
on these different cable outlets, including Fox.
And he's a former HRT guy. And he's thought of well, and
he's has gone reasonable, but he's also not reasonable of late
when I see it. And he was like, I would much
rather have the respect of my former colleagues than anything

(01:06:17):
else. And it's like, no, your former
colleagues are dirtbags, man. A lot of these people are pieces
of shit. And they have done really,
really awful things, like they somebody agreed to go out there
and go after John Bolton after it was already deemed too
political and like, maybe it's alawful order and maybe you got
a, a search warrant. But so was the one at Mar a
Lago, which now Cash Patel has claimed there was no, there was
no predicate for it's like, dude, one way or another, it was

(01:06:39):
a lawful search. It was a terrible decision.
It was a completely destructive thing to our country to go out
and execute it. But like, no one is saying you
didn't have the vestiges of legitimacy because a court did
sign off on it. Even if that court guy is, you
know, Bruce Reinhardt and he's compromised, he still signed it.
And so under our system, it's still a legal warrant, just like
going after Bolton. Just terrible.

(01:07:00):
The the court might have signed off on a warrant after an agent
didn't provide all the necessarydocuments to the federal
prosecutor at that point. So the due process was denied to
that person. And like, as a personal aside, I
don't really care if Andy McCabeor Peter Strzok or Lisa Page
respects me. And they are my former
colleagues. That's right.
Yeah, I could care less. It's it's kind of wild that the

(01:07:21):
all of this stuff keeps coming down that these people, they
they basically cite that the institution is the goal.
And and since people were wondering why the hell you're
here, I just want to read this tweet also because apparently
Cash Patel legislates and and runs the FBI by a tweet.
He defends honeypots who were clearly operating in honeypot
capacities. He also makes agreements with
people. And so people are very, very

(01:07:42):
curious. I think they may TuneIn just for
this breaking this came out yesterday.
Breaking exclusive. I want to do the Alex Jones
piece. There.
You do it. Well, breaking exclusive.
Yeah, our agreements have been reached with 10 FBI
whistleblowers and their councils to include a
combination of back pay, security clearances and
reinstatement. We greatly appreciate real
Donald Trump and his commitment to transparency and

(01:08:03):
accountability. Thank you to Chuck Grassley for
working with us to make this happen.
Steve, I have this strange instinct that Cash Patel found
out that he's not going to be the FBI director, maybe like
starting in January or somethinglike that, whenever the turnover
happens and that Andrew Bailey'sgoing to be taking over.
That he might have learned it byaccidentally listening to the
Kyle Seraphin show. And then maybe later on, Alex
Jones, what do you what do you got with that?
How's that make? I mean, I think you have a track

(01:08:25):
record of I guess projecting or as you go, as you characterize
speculating about things, but speculating right to be true.
And at this point, I, I think you've called enough things
correctly that you might actually hold the power to speak
things into existence. But you did present a very
logical, well thought out prognostication.

(01:08:49):
And I mean, remains to be seen if that does happen.
But I think that the pieces are all moving in that direction.
And we've been reliably informedthat, yes, that there are people
within the director's suite within the 7th floor of the FBI
that are paying attention to what the Kyle Seraphin show is
putting out there on not just the podcast, but on your social
media account. Which is a weird position to be
in, in the multiverse that wherewe find ourselves now, where

(01:09:11):
you're sitting there in a non restrictive waistband and not a
blazer, I might add. It doesn't seem to have quite
the authority that you have on Infowars.
Yeah, bring the authority for info policy at the premier law
enforcement agency is a thing that you're doing.
I guess let's just ask the question because 10 FBI
whistleblowers have been. A deal has been reached.
So tell us about your deal, Steve.

(01:09:32):
I'm going to give you the whole camera.
Tell me about what your deal looks like and how excited you
are about whatever it is that you got.
I'm holding the deal here in my hands.
Hold them up. People get excited about your
hands. So that's pretty.
They do exist, but they're not holding a deal.
I know that that Garrett and I were doing the American Radicals
podcast yesterday when this tweet started to circulate.

(01:09:53):
Hold on, Hold on, hold on. What are you?
What are you this one? I love that music.
It's really good. Yeah.
All right, go ahead. I got your music.
I got your theme musics, Steve. That's what I want to bring for
you. OK.
You're doing the American Radicals and you guys were going
over your deal out loud. No, no, I'm completely not
tracking on this one at all. And I got lots of questions from

(01:10:17):
media about it. And I said, this is news to me.
It was news to the attorneys. It was news to the Department of
Justice. It was news to Senator
Grassley's office. But I mean, look, the FBI
director is within his executiveauthority to do it.
But we don't know who the 10 are, and neither do any of the
whistleblower attorneys out there because there are no

(01:10:38):
deals. So here's what happened.
I'm going to tell people in no uncertain terms.
I'll put it back up on the screen.
Kash Patel, I believe this is OK, full speculation time,
Welcome to the program. If you guys are new here, this
is where I just tell you what I think is going on.
And the only facts that I have are what we've been observing
and what's been going out there for the last little bit.
I think that it's pretty clear that Andrew Bailey will become

(01:11:00):
the FBI director inside of maybenext six months, maybe the next
eight months, something like that.
At some reasonable pound of time, they will remove Cash
Patel. I think it's very clear to me
that Dan Bongino was already done.
That's why John Rich is out there defending him and trying
to make sure that his audience stays intact.
That's why people have been out there the whole time for the
last few months trying to defendhim after the Epstein debacle.
I think he's freaking miserable.I think that I gave up

(01:11:22):
everything for this, OK, He gaveup everything for it.
He's been making a martyr of himself.
When I found that people who arein the hero business just go do
hero stuff. People who are in the
complaining about how a life tough their life is are in the
image business. And Dan Bongino is in the image
business right now. He's trying to regain it.
So whatever that's all going on,I think Dan's gone.
I think Cash is gone soon enough.

(01:11:42):
I called that out a couple of days ago and I think Cash shit
the bed. I think he freaked the hell out
and realized that his tenure andhis smiling celebration of
Andrew Bailey becoming the Co deputy director was actually him
smiling and and like congratulating his own
replacement, whether he realizedit or not.
And I think he's got enough hubris and he's got enough cool
jets and like cool guy clothes that he doesn't even realize

(01:12:04):
that he was getting booted out. And he actually like hand shook
his own replacement. That's Kyle's take.
After that, you guys got some acknowledgement from DOJ saying
that there was going to be a deal offered.
And the deal is what we've referred to as the Marcus deal,
which is that Marcus Allen, you get your back pay, you get a
security clearance, but piss offand you can't work here anymore.
And that's actually not necessarily disagreeable.

(01:12:25):
I, I, I personally don't want you guys to go back to the FBI
because I hate the FBI. Then I think Patel saw Infowars,
heard about what Kyle Serafin issaying about it.
Realize the unbelievably clear logic that the, the top tier
talent out of Missouri is not coming in to become the number
2. When Cash Patel's own PR people
were calling us before he was nominated and saying, you know,

(01:12:47):
Andrew Bailey is the stiffest competition to Cash Patel being
FBI director. You got those calls, right?
I did. I did.
They even, they even had some oppo research on it.
Another guy from Michigan. But it seemed like the leader in
the clubhouse at the time. Yeah, there was Mike Rogers, who
was a former FBI guy. But the real leader was going to
be this Bailey, which kind of came out of nowhere.
And then they had oppo research on him, things that they might
be able to kind of target and things that might make him a

(01:13:09):
weaker candidate. And I know some of those things.
And so do you. And so then cash goes, oh, crap,
I'm going to get replaced. So out of nowhere, he decides to
exercise this like 28 Code of Federal regulations power where
the FBI director can unilaterally instate things like
whistleblowers. The the code is Phil Kennedy
cited on Twitter again in July. He cited it.

(01:13:29):
And here's the really crazy part.
Cash decided to announce the win, which by the way is 100% in
line with how his PR team works and how Erica Knight, who's his
PR lady works. When she asked me, oh, what do
we do about this Epstein thing, I was like, you should create a
task force, You should put all the people, sequester them, put
them in Pocatello, ID I don't give a shit.
Like put them in Wyoming, let them do work, exempt them from
virtual Academy, put them 100% on that, show them you're

(01:13:51):
serious, whatever. And then you guys can say, hey,
we have a task force working on it and they'll do what they get.
And she drafted a press release in under an hour and sent me the
press release. And I'm like, you haven't got a
task force, you haven't got a team, you haven't done any of
that stuff. You can't re release a press
release when you haven't done the thing.
Patel put this piece out, I believe, and we have 10
whistleblowers. Now he's got to go find 10

(01:14:11):
whistleblowers because he doesn't have the ink on any of
it. And when everybody wants to know
well, which whistleblowers doesn't include, nobody serious
thinks that it doesn't include Garrett Boyle and Steve Friend,
nobody. That's why you got calls from
the New York Times and NBC and everybody else.
Can I throw in one more factor that might have been pushing in
the direction that you that yourprediction is, is correct.

(01:14:32):
And and that is the Donald Trumpjunior clip, which we keep
recirculating where he acknowledged like 6 or seven
months ago, like in real time, the the whistleblowers are
getting reinstated. And I need to correct the record
on this. I do.
Apparently that video found its way to the chief of staff of the
President United States, Susie Wiles.
And she kind of came to the collision like, what the hell,

(01:14:53):
Why haven't you done this yet and was now pushing.
So there might be extra forces coming from 1600 Pennsylvania
Ave. on that and happy to see it.
And if, if nothing else, if thisis completely correct or
incorrect, it doesn't matter to me.
If the current FBI director useshis executive authority to
reinstate a Garrido Boyle, then I'm in favor of it.

(01:15:15):
I need to find this clip, Steve friend.
I have it hidden somewhere. It might be in I I want this and
I want to be able to find it easily.
And it's not, of course, occurring to me.
Who was he referencing in that clip?
Do we think Don Junior, like he says something to somebody off
camera? But like my question has always
been like, who was he referring to?

(01:15:37):
Where the hell did that come from and why did he think it was
if it made any sense in real time?
Donald Trump junior looks like 15° off camera and says it's
confirmed. It's confirmed.
I want to know who's behind the camera very much like I want to
know who's putting the 100 level10 things on the Co deputy
director. I got you.
Look at this. I got you.

(01:15:58):
Check this out. You ready?
Will the FBI whistleblowers havean opportunity to get their jobs
back in the department? God bless.
Yes. I would hope that's the case.
Again, I'm outside of the administration.
I think these are things that are really important.
We're confirming that's the case.
Yes, the whistleblower certainlyOK, We're confirming it in our

(01:16:19):
lives. So that congratulations Well
done. Whoever is off camera there is
running things within our government.
We need to investigate who that person is.
We're confirming. Yes, yes.
Congratulations. Congratulations to you, Steve,
just like I'm gonna congratulateyou on this thing.
How many major, how many major news outlets reached out to you
yesterday? I think more personnel within

(01:16:41):
news that I have developed relationships with, they reached
out to me personally, right? But Reuters reached out to me
professionally and at the point where I didn't know anything
and, and it just was honest withthem, like, I don't know, this
is news to me. And they were sort of taken
aback. But like, wait, what do you mean
you don't know? I was like, I have no idea.
I have no information. I'm sorry.
Let me name to you New York Sun,New York Times, New York Post,

(01:17:05):
CBSNBC, Gateway Pundit, and thena few Blaze and a few others
that are like friendlies. Yes, that's that's the number of
news outlets asked me about thisdeal.
So cash, now you're in a problem.
I'm going to just speak directlyto the FBI director because that
seems like the right thing to do.
Director Patel, you're in kind of a crisis right now because
you've named that there's going to be a deal with 10

(01:17:26):
whistleblowers. You now need to give them what
they want because you need 10 ofthem and they need to include
Steve Friend and they need to include Gerardo Boyle.
If you want to maintain the credibility of that BS tweet
that you put out where you made a deal without having the deal.
Nobody goes out there and announces it because they need
it. And you need this for the PR
win. So it's very clear to me that
you need to go ahead and capitulate to whatever it is
that makes Steve happy. You need to capitulate what

(01:17:47):
makes Gerardo Boyle happy. You probably should give Steve.
You should probably give Phil Kennedy the ADIC job since you
just opened it up by firing Steve Jensen.
He'd be really good at Washington Field Office.
You need to go out there and make this right.
And then you can go out there and have the win.
And when you do, we're going to celebrate it.
We're going to tell everybody what a great job you did by
following through on your word. But the problem is, is you've
already showed what your cards are and your cards are that you

(01:18:08):
need 10 whistleblowers and they need to include people that
people have heard of because every major news publication
knows exactly what that should mean.
And if you go out there with some BS EE O complaints that no
one's ever heard of from 10 years ago, not going to fly.
You probably should make a deal with Robin Grizz too.
She's been out there for a very long time.
She was she was attacked by the previous administration.
So if you want to go fix this, you got to go fix what McCabe

(01:18:30):
did. You got to fix what these these
clowns Joe did under comedy and under Ray.
That's your move. And you only have a little bit
of time to do it because pretty soon Andrew Bailey's going to go
in and I'll D him him and tell him exactly the same thing.
You guys got an opportunity to do the right thing.
What you're proving by that, that that post, and let me just
say this real clearly, the audience, what Cash Patel proved
by the tweet that is below me. Agreements have been reached

(01:18:51):
with 10 FBI whistleblowers is that it was always unilaterally
within the authority of the FBI director to step up and do this.
If he had the balls. And he's telling you here August
21st yesterday after six months in office that he never did have
the balls until right now. And the only reason he has the
balls is because he found out he's probably losing his job to
Andrew Bailey. That is about as much as I can

(01:19:13):
sum that thing up. You want to add anything to it
in a diplomatic way that doesn'truin your deal, Steve?
Well, again, I don't have the deal in hand here.
Like you can see it's not there.That's your deal with your empty
hands. I think you've made a strong
case for the Andrew Bailey ascension.
You've made a strong case again.I'll go back to the executive

(01:19:33):
authority that the director and the code deputy director of the
FBI have had at their fingertipsfor all this time.
And the guys came from the outside, and this was the risk
we took. I mean, an outside person for
director, I think makes sense. Traditionally being outside the
box and bringing in an outsider for the Co deputy director was
sort of an atypical wait route to go.
And there was the danger here. They didn't know the mechanisms,

(01:19:56):
they didn't know the authority. And as a result of that, the
people that were there sort of bubble wrap them and distracted
them from exercising that authority.
And this is in regard to reinstating whistleblowers.
It's in regard to doing away with things like the
intelligence collection program and the integrated program
management quota system and all the like, the things that we've
tried to identify over the last couple of years.

(01:20:16):
So perhaps now the the cow is out of the barn on this element,
maybe we'll see similar energetic executive authority
exercised on the other structural changes that would
not just benefit guys like Garrett O Boyle, but the
American people as a total, yeah, having decent people in
there and showing that doing theright thing doesn't result in
your entire life being destroyed.

(01:20:37):
By the way, I'm going to add another person to that list too.
So Director Patel, you also needto fix the situation with Zach
Stoffstall. You need to put Zach back in.
He made a constitutional non political decision to back up
the Bill of Rights. And if the FBI is not going to
back up employees and especiallysupervisors who step up in the
gap, you're, you're, you're screwed up.
And you're probably going to have to go back and hire all
those five guys whose scalps I took last week, especially Brian

(01:21:00):
Driscoll, because he also did what FBI people are supposed to
do, which is say when it's not legal for you to fire people,
you can't fire people. This, this sort of significant
stupidity, which was pressured because you listened to the
wrong people. And then you got pushed into a
corner by the people who have always tried to do the one
thing. All I want to do is see
accountability. I want to see bad people not in
power in the FBI. I don't care if they get a

(01:21:21):
paycheck from the FBI. And neither do you and neither
do the American people at the end of the day.
But you shouldn't have Vanessa Tibbetts, who's in New York.
You shouldn't have Jill Enyart, who was part of the honeypot
operation. They should not be in management
positions. You shouldn't have Brian Hefner,
who we talked about yesterday. You shouldn't go from being in
charge of talk, hiding the CHS'sthat were all involved in the J6
cases and then go be the assistant section chief in

(01:21:43):
charge, the protective details for Pam Bondi and Dan Bongino
and Cash Patel. You shouldn't be able to profit
from doing evil things or from operating outside of the scope
of what Americans expect this agency to do.
So there it is. Accountability means people who
did bad things don't get rewarded.
It's super simple. Stop listening to New York.
Do what you can in the time thatyou have left.

(01:22:04):
And I'm happy to share the same things with Andrew Bailey.
And by the way, Bailey should pick Kurt Suzdak to help him be
a deputy, so at least he has some damn institutional
knowledge of what goes on so he has a better chance of being
successful. That's Serafin's rant of the
day. How?
How do you feel about all that, Steve?
I vow. I vow that I mean.
And look, if you do the right things here, you might actually
get get to keep your job. If in fact the plan is that

(01:22:26):
Andrew Bailey is going to ascendto become the director and it
hasn't happened yet. You can always make the
necessary tweaks and adjustmentsthat we've been arguing for that
will not just make 10 whistleblowers whole.
But if you stop the secret police that the people saw for
the last, particularly during the Biden administration, when
we saw the FBI going after people for very obviously First

(01:22:49):
Amendment protected activity because it was politically
inconvenient for them and characterizing them as
terrorists because they were small government people.
If you actually course correct on that and you exercise the
authority that you do have, do afull audit of all
counterterrorism cases for the FBI.
As long as we're going to talk about transparency, How about
all the open counterterrorism cases that we have right now and
expose how there are people currently who are being groomed

(01:23:12):
rooms or being targeted for an entrapment and then hold the
people that did that accountable.
Like those are the sorts of changes that I've been arguing
for. You've been arguing for
Garrett's been arguing for Phil,George Hill, all of us.
If you do that. Well, hey, now, we got an
energetic director of the FBI and he might be worthy of
keeping that post for the next 9years.
We shall see. We shall indeed.

(01:23:34):
And I'm going to have Bill Taylor join me for the next
Sunday. Sit down.
Not this weekend, but for next weekend.
We actually just set up the interview this week and we're
going to do a talk about exactlythe things Guy I've never met
before, guy I've never spoken tobefore.
And then I go out there and listen to his story on a
podcast. And it's the same allegations
that you and I both made in different ways.
Things about weaponization, of the process, about juking the
stats, about abusing the counterterrorism program to go

(01:23:55):
after people simply because it pays better for the budget.
All these things are problematic.
We can't have it in a in a weaponized government and it
can't be the MAGA weaponization version because it's going to
turn over that weapon at some point in time.
Whenever that is. It's going to be pointed right
back at us. Steve friend, what do you got
coming up on the American Radicals podcast for the
weekend? Should I put the music in the
background while you're talking?As always, it's great music.

(01:24:17):
So we'll join us tomorrow on rumble.com/amradpod, 10:30
Eastern Time. We're doing our traditional
Saturday grab bag. We're talking about some stuff
like how there's fifty differentside effects of common
medications out there, so perhaps you shouldn't be like
injecting things into your arm. Also, how the World Economic
Forum has new leadership and shocker, it's another globalist.

(01:24:38):
And we've got radioactive food getting recalled at Walmart.
So just situational awareness. So hey, guys, Appreciate it as
always. Have a great weekend.
We'll see you back for next Friday.
Yeah, Don't eat those, those radiated shrimp.
Thanks, Steve, for joining me today.
I appreciate you. You're good, man.
And I look forward to hearing what that deal is when the
director calls you up later today.
Bye. Bye.

(01:24:59):
There's his hands, people. They love it.
If you guys don't know, there was a rumor that Steve friend
had no hands. If you're new to the program, he
does clearly have hands. They're just not on camera.
I don't know why that is either,and neither do you.
It's just the way that it works.Folks, we appreciate you
watching and I appreciate you either subscribing, notifying
yourself, liking these videos when you're out there.
If you're listening and you wantto do a comment, I have found

(01:25:21):
even though I never use Spotify prior to to hosting with them,
they do have a really, really clean app.
You can find us on Spotify at kyleseraphinshow.com.
It'll take you right there. You don't even have to download
it. You can do the audio and the
video and you can leave a comment as we go.
So check them out. Otherwise, follow us on Rumble,
follow us on YouTube, follow us on X, you subscribe over on
locals if you want to financially support what we're

(01:25:42):
up to here and we definitely appreciate all of you.
I hope you have a fantastic weekend.
I feel like I owe you guys a pallet cleanse because that was
a little bit intense. Let's see what we got for a
pallet cleanse. You guys know this guy Andrew
Schultz, he's got some interesting ideas about illegal
aliens and so on. Let's play that.
Let's go that on the way out thedoor and something about the
Egyptian. I'm learning about Egypt.

(01:26:03):
A bunch of fucking liars in Egypt.
I just want to point that out. Liars, all of them.
Fucking liars. I'm supposed to believe 4000
years ago you guys built the pyramids, right?
And then for the next 4000 years, you built.
Jack shit. Not happening.
Not happening. You built the greatest thing
ever created by human beings 4000 years ago and then for the

(01:26:25):
next 4000 years the best thing that you can create is cotton
sheets. Fuck you, Egypt.
I'm not a stupid person. I'm not going to believe some
bullshit lie like that. OK, I do some more research.
Turns out they didn't even buildtheir own pyramids.
Do you know who they say built the pyramids?
Who? Who do they say that?
They say that the Jews built thepyramids.

(01:26:46):
Look, I think they got the contract.
I don't know. I don't know if they put all the
blocks on top of each other, Youknow, I think they hired some
Mexicans. You're Mexican?
Yeah. You guys probably did it.
You know that's for real. That's why, that's why people
are always like, the aliens built the pyramids.

(01:27:06):
It's like, yes, illegal aliens built the pyramids.
It's the wrong aliens. You know?
You want to know some fucked up shit though.
Are there pyramids in Mexico? Beautiful pyramids, right?
Gorgeous pyramids in Mexico. Nobody questions who built
those. There is no hour long History

(01:27:30):
Channel special. Who built the pyramids and
Mexicans, motherfucker, that's who built there was a
quinceanera. They needed a tent.
You know that that shit up by Saturday?
Speaking of, it's almost Saturday.
If you guys don't know who that comedian is, his name is Andrew
Schultz. That he might be the most
talented stand up in America right now.
He's absolutely hysterical. He's fantastic.

(01:27:52):
If you guys are not following him, you should.
If you see one of his shows comeby your way and you don't have
like little kids like I do and you have a chance to go out and
watch him, I would 100% recommend it.
His shows look like an absolute hysterical riot.
That guy has got unbelievable talent.
He also does the podcast too, but I think stand up is it's
pretty special. And all of that was awesome.
So anyway, the aliens did build the pyramids, but I love that
it's illegal aliens. Hope you have a fantastic

(01:28:12):
weekend. Illegal aliens as well.
Whatever, it's the weekend. Let's just be friendly about it.
God bless all of you. Thanks for being part of our
program. Look forward to seeing you again
on Monday. Take care of yourselves.
We'll see you in a couple days. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.

All Episodes

DESPERATE FBI Director Digs Deep into... John Bolton's Mustache? | Ep 637

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}DESPERATE FBI Director Digs Deep into... John Bolton's Mustache? | Ep 637