FBI declassified: "BURIED LEAD" & the FBI Covered for Clinton Foundation!? | Ep 631

Join the Kyle Seraphin Show LIVE 9:30a ET on Rumble, or on Spotify: https://KyleSeraphinShow.com

Our Sponsors:
https://PatriotCoolers.com/collections/kyle-seraphin (PROMO KYLE for 10%)

https://SLNT.com/KYLE (Save 15% off everyday Faraday bags)

Episode Transcript

(00:37):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends.

(01:05):
Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Thursday. It is August the 14th.
A little bit of a rocky start assometimes happens.
Got ahead of myself. Turn the stream on.
Turn the stream off. Welcome to the program today,
folks. We're going to be talking about
buried lead. I'm not hearing that word being
discussed. I'm not hearing that title being

(01:25):
discussed in the mainstream media.
And I went through and looked atall the websites.
It's not there. I actually think that it might
be one of the most interesting sort of revelations from the
Adam Schiff allegations that gotdropped out there and the the
propaganda that is being spewed by John Solomon, who is still
out there. Now he's going to run another
thing. This feels like throw spaghetti

(01:47):
against the wall and see what sticks.
Hey, Americans, are you, are youmost excited about Adam Schiff?
He's a real bad guy. He was pushing the Russia hoax.
Oh, that doesn't hit you right in the fields.
How about we tell you about Hillary Clinton.
Did you know that the FBI covered for Hillary Clinton?
They were allowing the Clinton Foundation to do a pay for play
scheme in 2018. I'm, I'm, I'm flabbergasted.

(02:15):
I, I don't know, I guess they I guess they just assumed that we
are that dumb. Had someone else let me know
that FBI Barbie was out on Fox last night and talking about all
the things that she knows about,which is very, very little, but
she claims to have worked every kind of case that the FBI has.
That's silly. I've touched a lot of different
types of FBI cases. To say that I work them would be
kind of ridiculous. I've been around them.

(02:38):
I know people who who do that for a living and spend a lot of
time doing it. But to go out there and make the
claim that is someone who never did that kind of work that
you're that you're an expert in everything kind of iffy for
those of you that are watching over on our Rumble channel and
you're looking to find the YouTube channel.
The YouTube issue is, is that wewere unable to connect the first

(03:00):
time and so they connected the second time.
So you may have to go find the new whatever pop up.
It's out there. All right, so let's get into
today's program with all of thissort of buried Lee, which I'm
going to explain to you why that's the code name of the case
that the FBI opened into the Adam Schiff whistleblower
allegations opened. And then based on what I can
tell, closed because it was not something they could

(03:21):
substantiate and it was probablyhearsay and it might have been
covered by the fact that you're talking about a different branch
of government. So let's just go with that.
We're going to talk about those things.
We're also going to talk about feds in DC and federalizing it.
We'll talk about a little bit more only because the mainstream
media cannot get enough of it and they're very excited.
I'm going to show you the probably the single best piece
of evidence that the federal government should not be
involved. Even better than Neil Team 6.

(03:43):
Anyway, we'll do a couple more things like that.
Let's talk about Patriot Coolersfirst.
My friends over at Patriot Coolers, you can reach their
website by going to patriotcoolers.com.
The promo code Kyle will save you 10%.
That's always the case. Sometimes they bump it up a
little bit. Right now it's the regular
attempt. It's the same thing that
military veterans get. If you have a one of those like
verify IDs, you can do it the same way, but you don't have to

(04:06):
give them anything and you don'thave to be a vet to be able to
go out there and support my friends.
They also will support veterans with your purchase.
So a portion of all profits go back and help veterans who are
looking for mobility, help people who are struggling to
move around in their own homes. It's Patriot coolers.com promo
code Kyle. We've got the the 20 oz, the
lovely 20 oz sitting here on thedesk right now.

(04:27):
Screw top snaps down works really well.
You put your coffee in there first thing and then you can
enjoy it throughout the day at the temperature that you left it
at it. Basically, we'll keep it for a
close to I think 12 hours hot and it's hot enough that if you
leave it steaming when you goingto church, when you come back
out, it'll still be steaming. Great folks.
They've been supporting us sinceFebruary of 2023, before any of

(04:48):
you were listening, most of you,and we really appreciate you
guys out there supporting them. Good company, good folks.
Let's get into today's program, see what we can pull out here
from buried lead. We'll try not to bury that lead.

(05:11):
All right. And I'm going to troubleshoot
something in real time here for my folks over on Rumble Rumble.
I'm going to give you guys the link here.
I know you guys are struggling. There's the link to the YouTube
for those of you that are worried about it.
It's right there, very easy. All right, let's lead off with
something that's not bad news. I think it's actually good news.
I think it's the things that should be done.
Not everything that the Trump administration is involved in
frustrates me. And it shouldn't frustrate all

(05:33):
of you as well. I think the people that are
doing the best job are talking about it the least.
And occasionally one of these stories will leak out, as in the
mainstream will actually cover it.
So we get to talk about it a little bit.
Marco Rubio says the United States is in the process of a
terrorist label for the Muslim Brotherhood.
This is a long time in coming for people that have been
working in the CT world and for folks that do sort of security

(05:53):
studies. This is something that's been
pitched at least for about 20 years.
And and this would be a good step forward.
The end of the day, we've got Secretary of State Marco Rubio
announcing on Tuesday of this week that the United States is
in the process of designating the Muslim Brotherhood, a
terrorist organization here in the US.
Why wouldn't you designate the Muslim Brotherhood and care?

(06:13):
I just look at these organizations.
We have a mayor's race in New York City with a psycho, with a
lunatic. This is a guy named Sid
Roseburg. He was talking about this,
talking about the connections and the amount of money that
that mayoral candidate Zoran Mandami is supposedly getting
from the Muslim Brotherhood. Yeah, we've got a real problem.

(06:34):
We've got a non-us citizen or a non-us born 7 years as AUS
citizen, a group of folks that that are really kind of
troubling, put money into placeswhere they probably are really
scary. Now, I think if you listen to
people like George Hill, who's been basically fighting Islamic
terrorism for his entire career,you're talking about you're

(06:58):
talking about a ideology that we've been at war with for a
very long time, and it's certainly been at war with us
for a very long time. I'm not the biggest Marco Rubio
fan, but at the end of the day, the stuff that he's been doing
out there seems like it's getting it done.
And I'm not mad at him for that.He said, yeah, all that's in the
works. And obviously there are three
different branches of the MuslimBrotherhood, so you have to
designate each one of them separately.

(07:20):
You know, we have this formal process for nominating people
and putting them in. And then the State Department,
which he's in charge of, will actually declare them that an
FTOA foreign terrorist organization.
It's the same kind of things that they were doing with some
of these gangs kind of into that.
Like you said it, it's not all losses.
There are people that sort of get what the threat looks like.
And then there's people that don't, there's people that are

(07:41):
pushing whatever the hell this is.
Joe Rogan hosted Anna Paulina Luna couple days ago.
She was in town when I was on with Alex Jones and she asked
him to meet up. I thought that was very funny.
I don't know why I found that funny, but Rep Luna wanted to
meet up with Jones for lunch andhe was unable to do it.
This lady's in Congress and verylikely is the first cocktail

(08:06):
waitress at a strip club to everserve in the August halls of
Congress. I think it actually is
appropriate for the time and place that we're in.
She went on to talk about things.
She's not very bright and peoplethat know her behind the scenes,
I'm not going to name who they are, have told me she's a nice
lady, but she's not very bright.She's she's a dull or dim witted

(08:28):
bulb. So she went on to talk about
aliens because what the hell, Like you're on Joe Rogan, so why
don't you just get high and talkabout crazy stuff.
Here's a little taste of that. This is how serious Marco
Rubio's nominating terrorists asterrorists.
Anna Paulina Luna, staunch MAGA lady, also swimsuit model, also
cocktail waitress at strip club who may or may not have been

(08:49):
involved in some of the activities there.
Here she is talking about interdimensional beings.
I feel like she should have donethis on Alex Jones.
What specifically are you saying?
Like what? What happened?
To, to I guess, break it down insimple terms, is that I think
that some of the tech that exists that whatever these
things have these energy things have energy things.

(09:12):
Yeah. Well, they call them
interdimensional beings. I think that they can actually
operate through the time spaces that we currently have.
And that's not something that I came up with on my own.
That's based on stuff that we'veseen, that's based on
information that we've been told.
And then also too, I think that there's this historical aspect
of, you know, this gets into thedeeper theories and concepts of

(09:37):
religion and, and I think the history that we currently know
and, and that kind of spins off into another topic of, you know,
you have the modern day Bible, you have this aspect of Bibles
that are books of the Bible thathave been removed that explain
and kind of touch on these topics.
And I think that we're in a timeand age where you have such a
vast amount of information that we have access to via social

(10:00):
media, via your cell phone, via the Internet.
And so it's really changing the way that we understand, you
know, the origins of life and, and the spiritual reality that
we know. When you say interdimensional
beings that they know that theseare interdimensional beings, how
do they know that? That so based on testimony would

(10:20):
be based on witnesses that have come forward.
But what I can tell you. The witnesses just were told
that they were. No, no, that they, that they've
seen things and what I can tell you without getting into
classified conversations is thatthere have been incidences that
I believe where very credible people have reported that there

(10:43):
have been movement outside of time and space.
OK, the reason that Americans are having such a problem with
identifying the such as the the maps in the Iraq this every bit
about this is like Miss South Carolina, can you tell us what

(11:05):
we you would do to make Americans more educated about
the globe? And she would tell you that
Americans don't have good accessto maps such as the I believe
that people have said historic. What the shit did we just listen
to? I listen to this stuff and I
just go, that Lady votes on yourtaxes. that Lady votes on

(11:27):
whether or not we would have a military action. that Lady
represents 10s of thousands of sentient human beings in the
halls of Congress. She is 1 of 435.
Thank God. How many of them think like
that, talk like that, are unableto string together an articulate
thought. Those were a lot of words that
was every bit as dumb as listening to some of the libs

(11:49):
that are out there making ridiculous statements about
white supremacy or gender ideology.
It was just that was that was nonsense.
What and what did you expect? There was this bar in in in
Norman, OK, when I was going to school, when I was going to
college and, and it's and the girls would walk around and they

(12:09):
were all beautiful. They were all beautiful
waitresses. And the T-shirt that they had
said hired for looks. And then the the fact that this
service was like, OK, it was totally excusable because you
realize they weren't hired for competency.
They were hired for looks. I feel like that's what we just
got right there. And the reason why I don't mind

(12:30):
sort of pointing out how dimwitted and terrible some of
the Republicans aren't because they're just as bad.
I watched Jim Jordan this morning.
He's outraged about some of the stuff we're going to talk about.
Oh, Can you believe it? The Hillary Clinton scandal.
Oh, dude, what are you going to do about it?
Nothing. You're not even in the right
branch of government to do something about it.
These people act like they're involved in investigations, but

(12:55):
they're not investigators. And their charges like from one
little tiny line. And that's what they want to
spend all their time doing instead of doing the thing they
should be doing, which is creating line item bills to fund
our government. You know the reason why Mike
Johnson was in again, there's competent people, there's
incompetent people. They're on both sides.
I assume that this lady also washired for looks.
This is Margaret, whatever the hell her name is on on CBS,

(13:18):
demonstrating a complete failureto understand what happened.
And then I also really get a kick out of smart people that
don't do it in a mean way. But that's sort of laugh that
they have to talk to children. Sometimes.
You just have to instruct peopleand bring them along.
Rogan does it in the nicest way possible, like he makes anybody
not look like a complete fool byasking the question that's going

(13:38):
to get to something you can actually talk about
articulately. And he gets there with them.
And so he did that. So God bless him for being a
nice man. Howard Ludnik, who's the
commerce secretary, doesn't seemto feel like he has to do that,
but he's also not mean about it.This is a Face the Nation head
where they're talking about tariffs and a lady trying to do
a gotcha. And then suddenly you realize,
like, oh, maybe they actually dohave to put 10% tariffs on the

(13:59):
entire globe, including places where people don't live.
You thought you knew what you were talking about, but you
should have just asked one person what the idea was before
you tried to do a gotcha on liveTV.
The president stand in the Rose Garden holding up that chart
that you helped make that that wasn't actually tariffs, that
was actually confusing to investors because it was some
kind of other formula. And the countries themselves

(14:20):
seemed kind of random, like why are the Herd and McDonald
Islands, which don't export to the United States and are quite
literally inhabited by Penguins?Why do they face a 10% tariffs?
Did you use AI to generate this?No, no, the idea.
Look, the idea is. Why are they on the list?

(14:41):
Left. Off.
Because the idea what happens isif you leave anything off the
list, the countries that try to basically arbitrage America, go
through those countries to us, any country.
Like we had tariffs. The president put tariffs on
China right in 2018. And then what China started
doing is they started going through other countries to

(15:03):
America. They just built through other
countries through America. And so the president knows that
he's tired of it, and he's goingto fix that.
So basically, he said, look, I can't let any part of the world
be a place where China or other countries can ship through them.
So he ended those loopholes, these ridiculous loopholes.

(15:24):
And now what he's trying to say is I'm going to fix the trade
deficit of the United States of America.
It's a national security issue. We need to make medicine.
We need to make semiconductors. We need to make ships.
We need to have steel and aluminum.
Come on. We need the greatness of America
to actually be built in America.And he's tired of getting ripped
off by the rest of the world. But but, but, but I want to just

(15:47):
interject my thoughts because I have my own thoughts and my
thoughts are gotchas. Can you let me gotcha.
You're saying things that make perfect sense.
That does make perfect sense. There's a loophole problem.
Yeah. OK, fine.
This is, you know, when you haveglobal nations that have the
ability to to transact globally,they go and they Co-op small
areas. Maybe they buy it, maybe they,
they set up a trade deal. OK, cool.

(16:08):
That makes perfect sense. She wants to get in there so bad
because none of this stuff is about being honest and none of
it's about being truthful and none of it's about actually
conveying information. An honest operator would say, I
noticed that you guys had some pretty illogical or, you know,
had some countries in there thatI didn't understand.
Could you tell me why we have a 10% tariff on this country?
And then you would say it, but instead what you made is you
made the commerce secretary laugh about it to you because

(16:30):
you don't know what's going on. You know, it's it's theatrical.
I keep telling you guys, this islike, this is like wrestling.
There's always some people in the wrestling world that are set
up to fail because they're dumb.And then there's the the sort of
like the villains that are goingto also win.
Here's a villain that's sort of winning.
This is the thing that we're that that the suspendable crew

(16:52):
that the former FBI guys that are that are upset about the way
the Trump administration has been operating.
We're most worried about someonelike Gavin Newsom getting in and
coming up there next because they're not fixing the problems
that exist. And we're seeing this sort of
like theatrical nonsense. And I'm going to play the end of
it where we're going to go afterAdam Schiff.
We're going to re adjudicate Adam Schiff from 2017.

(17:13):
We're going to re adjudicate like 2018 Hillary Clinton
nonsense. That is not going to result in
anything. It doesn't fix the problem.
We're not going to fix the infrastructure.
We're going to put federal agents on the street of DC.
We're going to redistrict Texas,and then we're going to start an
arms race where all the leftist states are going to do the same
darn thing. These are not fixing the real

(17:35):
problem, which if you guys recall, the issue happened in
2020. Did someone fix the voting
systems? Have we removed computers and
the black box where you drop your little ballot in and then
nobody knows what happens? And the paper ballot problem,
Have we fixed that? No, we're just going to
redistrict and we're going to get the FBI to hunt people down
and we're going to get the the Texas Rangers to go get people

(17:56):
in Illinois. And we're going to do this big
show of it. And Patel's on our side.
And Ken Paxton's going to send out the Rangers to go round up
the Democrats. We're going to take five seats.
OK, fine. Then they'll do the same thing.
Here's CNN talking to Karen Bass, who's a communist.
We'll tell you why. She's not serious either.
She's excited about it. Of course she is.
Communists are excited about seizing power.
That's what they do. And you're just giving them a

(18:16):
great reason, too. So are we really solving
problems or are we just, are we just breaking even?
And it looks like we're doing something.
Here's state's governor, Democrat Gavin Newsom announced
that there's going to be a news conference tomorrow with other
legislators seemingly to layout California's redistricting plans
in response to Republican leaders in Texas doing the same.

(18:37):
Do you support this gerrymandering?
Tit for tat? Texas creates five more
Republican seats. California creates five more
Democratic seats. Absolutely.
And, and Jake, it's not really atip of attack.
We're trying to save our democracy.
And what this administration is doing is trying to dismantle our

(18:58):
democracy. And So what the governor is
doing is fighting for the entirecountry as well as California
because we're on the edge. As mentioned earlier, I was
sitting on the floor of the House of Representatives on
January 6th. I know this playbook and this is
what they're about. And so.
Yes, we have to fight to protectour democracy and if they're
going to become. Out and try to destroy it.

(19:19):
Then we have to fight to protectit and this is one way to do
that. Oh good, we're going to fight
and fix democracy. And a January 6th reference for
your bingo card. So you guys get a couple of
extra little points right there.Great stuff.
What's going on in Los Angeles right now?
Turns out the feds are doing something.
This is a local news story, eventhough it's a federal case.

(19:42):
This is what's happening in thislady's city that she is the
mayor of. In theory, she would be the
person that could tell the highest law enforcement officers
at the local level to go and crack down on this.
But suspiciously, this has to bea federal thing.
This is the same lady that wantsto get feds out of Los Angeles,
right? And she's still, she's got to
protect democracy. How about the teenage girls that
are being sex trafficked? Is that a problem?

(20:02):
Prosecutors say the gang recruited girls as young as 14
years old, many of them runawaysor kids from the foster care
system. Federal officials say those
victims were regularly raped anddrugged, all while being forced
to prostitution. The alleged ringleader, a 25
year old woman named Amaya Olmsted, who goes by Lady Duck.
Prosecutors say she and her Co defendants acted as pimps, using

(20:25):
social media to recruit vulnerable teens and young
adults and controlling them through violence, drugs and
intimidation. According to the indictment,
victims who disobeyed were assaulted, humiliated, they were
denied food or drugs and in somecases branded with tattoos of
their traffickers street names. I heard her just say denied food

(20:47):
or drugs. Did you guys get that too?
That's a weird thing to say. In great news coming out of Los
Angeles, there have been arrestsmade in the burglary of Brad
Pitt's Los Angeles home. It was burglarized and therefore
it was a high priority because his name is Brad Pitt.
Detectives in Los Angeles have arrested four members of a
burglary crew linked to local burglaries.
So this is where the priority set is also protecting

(21:10):
democracy. These burglaries happened in
June. Generally speaking, if you don't
catch somebody in a few days, it's not going to happen.
But that's not the case. Your name, it's Brad Pitt, and
you happen to be a Hollywood donor and you're someone who
might have like, you know, a nice picture like that and
people know your name. Los Angeles Police Department
sources told ABC News that it appears the crew members were
targeting wealthy areas of Los Angeles.

(21:30):
We can't have that. But they weren't specifically
targeting Brad Pitt. Lucky for them, the crew was
apprehended in connection with another burglary, and the case
is set to be presented to the District Attorney for charging
decisions, who will promptly drop the charges and do nothing
and then release them so they can go back to doing the work of
democracy. I'm being sarcastic because I
don't know any other way to do it.
All you got to do is look up any, any local news in any

(21:53):
leftist city. I think I actually had a video
clip yesterday of this guy saying, you know, joke's on you
Republicans. You want to go fix Washington
DC, but almost all of the highest murder rate cities are
in red states, like 9 out of 10 of them are.
And then you look at what the list is and you're like, yeah,
And they all have Democrat mayors in common.

(22:14):
They have this one thing in common that people do crappy
things where they think they canget away with it, where there's
bad culture, where there's no where there's no accountability
unless you rob Brad Pitt's houseand they're going to get you.
This one's good, too. I found this in Philly,
actually. This reminded me of what the
feds could be doing with their time instead of what they are
doing. This ended up being, it looks

(22:34):
like a state police investigation and maybe even a
local police thing because the the feds don't want to get
involved with it. But millions of dollars were
stolen in a a string of armored car heist.
I recall specifically that therewas a squad that just did bank
robberies and armored car robberies in Washington DC out
of the Washington field office. So this is what the FBI would
do. And they weren't that great at
it like they had. I think these guys got away with

(22:55):
like a dozen armored car heist and I don't remember them ever
getting caught the first time they pulled off like 280 grand
or $250,000 out of a, out of a, a Brinks truck.
They waited until the guy was running around doing his cash
pickups and then they hit him same way that these guys are.
You run and you hit the truck while the guy is on the way back
in with a bag of cash. And so he's sort of distracted
and it's only two of them. And you know, four guys jumping

(23:17):
out of the back of a, of a, a, you know, Corolla with AR
fifteens. And then they, they hand over
the money and then they drive off.
Then they hit a bunch of these trucks.
They got like either greedy or drugged up.
And so they were hitting these trucks and stealing empty bags
because they were taking the bags before the guys even got
them filled up. But in Pennsylvania, we're
talking about more than a half, $1,000,000 in one armored car

(23:37):
robbery this week connected to astring of heist in the
Philadelphia area. Oh, Philadelphia.
That's a nice place to go. Some of you guys have seen some
of the videos of that running around where there's basically
like zombies hanging out. So you can go and you can do
fentanyl or you can go. I see your Brinks truck robbed.
It isn't clear if the robbery onTuesday in the suburb of
Philadelphia is linked to the others.
They're out there just doing thebest they can.
You know, this is part of a joint investigation.

(23:58):
This is what you would expect your feds to do.
Look at people who are organized, taking things that
don't belong to them and more importantly, using guns to do
it. Instead, we got a press
announcement out of Washington DC, which was like overnight.
I'm actually going to read this to you because it's very funny.
You guys ready for this Cash Patel overnight in Washington
DC, the FBI and our partners read that as our partners did

(24:20):
this. Our partners equals like anybody
that's in law enforcement that'sout there because with the FBI,
everybody's, our partner made 45arrests and of those 45 arrests,
29 of them were immigration related.
That's how good they did. So what ICE did this, you had 29

(24:41):
arrests that the FBI is going totake credit for in a venue that
they don't actually normally work.
And then sixteen were tied to the violent crime surge.
This is that Operation Summer Heat they're doing and they
seized 3 firearms in DC Charges include assault on a federal
officer, which means they were out at night and so they got
into a fight because these guys are not cops.
Possession of child sexual abusematerial.
Those are always righteous cases, but those happen every

(25:02):
single week in especially in theFB is Washington field office.
I know that illegal firearms, I hate that term.
Drug trafficking, standard stuff, fugit apprehensions that
sometimes is not a bad thing anda Subway sandwich assault.
I don't know if he's making a joke or not, but your DCFBI is
going to make them safe again. Let me just tell you how safe
Washington DC is. In 2023, a 17 year old gang

(25:26):
member carjacked an FBI agent ofher vehicle and she was armed at
the time and she was on duty in the middle of broad daylight and
she lost her vehicle. This is the the New York Post
reporting it. We do have a crime problem in
this country and, and, and the fact of the matter is, is that
when you do and you let the right teams do the right thing.

(25:48):
Telling the FBI to let good copsbe cops, which is what our
current FBI director keeps saying is dumb.
Trying to re adjudicate the Russiagate stuff or like the
Hillary Clinton scandal of wherethey were doing pay to play with
the Clinton Foundation. Do I want them held accountable?
Of course we all should. Should we act like that's an
acceptable substitute for actually doing the daily job of

(26:08):
this? And again, this is easy proof.
A 17 year old with no training, with no upgraded situational
awareness, like no tactical knowledge, has probably spent
more time and done more carjackings than that FBI agent
has even done. Like door knocks because they're
scared to go knock at the door and ask people questions.

(26:29):
It was my favorite thing to do to go knock on, you know, knock
on the public's door and ask about stuff.
When we would do the the regularsummer crime blitz, the surge
about asking about murders that were unsolved in Washington, DC,
of which there are always dozens, dozens and dozens of
them. Super easy to do.
And then you get like really funny stories out of it where
you ask a guy, hey man, do you? There was a guy that was
murdered here a couple weeks agoand he was shot right outside of

(26:51):
your front door. It was 48 feet away from where
your freaking door handle is. And the gab would be like, hey,
man, like, I don't even know anybody in this building.
I just moved here 10 years ago and you're like 1010 years ago.
That shows you how broken our society is, doesn't it?
It was fun and people were terrified.
They're like all tactical and bladed out and trying to get to
the corners of the door. You just knock on the door.

(27:13):
And then you just wait till someone answers the door at
11:00 in the morning. And they're almost always
shirtless or in their underwear or wearing some kind of robe in
some filthy apartment. And you ask the questions, you
know, like cops have to do everysingle day.
And then you see the way the feds do it.
And the feds do it something like this.
Here's a real fuck. He has a.
Badge. He has his name on his chest.

(27:37):
That's. A real fuck no, he's not a real
cop. So that's not very nice.

(28:09):
Those people were jeering the federal agents that were
standing in the street. There were real cops there.
So people knew the legitimacy ofit.
But you got a bunch of like white people that are out there
crying about, oh, this is DC, like leave us alone, leave them
alone, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
I mean, the answer is he's actually not a real cop.
You're a federal agent. You means you're not a cop.
You don't have regular law enforcement authorities.
I used to try to explain this tomy buddies.
They were like, dude, it's kind of scary living next to one of

(28:32):
the feds. And I'm like, yeah, I can't pull
you over. I I don't have that authority
set. What you're seeing on the screen
right now next to me is a, a takeover of the National Mall.
This is the thing that Donald Trump was talking about.
This is a real legit problem. It doesn't always happen in the
National Mall. But what you're seeing is a
bunch of teenagers and young 20slike out there on dirt bikes,
which are essentially motorcycles on quads because

(28:53):
they don't have to get a licenseto buy them from a dealership.
And they're out there rolling around on these damn things and
they were tearing up federal properties.
And they do the same thing on the DC streets where they're not
allowed to drive and you don't see anybody arrest them.
You know who can't arrest them? Federal agents can't arrest
them. There is no probable cause for
them to go and and do some sort of federal Nexus there.
So are we getting federal agentscross deputized under the DC

(29:15):
Metro sort of home charter? Is that happening?
Because that's not something I've heard articulated.
And maybe that would make a little bit of a difference.
But instead what you're going todo is you going to put all these
agents in like really bad spots and they're going to be either
taking a knee or getting carjacked or the other dumb
things out there. There's a real issue in
Washington, DC with crime. But the answer is not like some
of the stupidity that you keep hearing.
And the craziest thing is maybe crazy.

(29:37):
It's just for me, CNN seems to be the most sane voice or at
least bringing on the most sane voices to talk about it.
I'm going to play you a couple of back to backs.
It turns out the legal analysts that have to live in Washington,
DC have all had a friend who wasa victim of some garbage like
this. And by the way, these people are
all armed or these kids are, a huge chunk of them will come
out. They'll go and mob, you know,
take somebody's entire bankroll if they find somebody that's at

(29:59):
a laundry mat. I had an FBI agent actually tell
me. I'll take it off the screen for
a second. I had an agent that I worked
with tell me that she was sitting at lunch, looked across
the street and watched like a gang of 20 guys go beat the crap
out of a 16 or 17 year old Filipino kid who was doing his
laundry. And she was like, yeah, I was
like, what did you do? And she was like, what could I
do? I was like, well, yeah, that

(30:22):
seems problematic. Like you didn't yell at them or
say something. And she was like, no, it was
just me. So you're going to put these
people, these these federal agents in a position they don't
even have a legal authority to operate?
And, and again, surging resources is not the dumbest
thing in the world. Leave it to CNN to actually be
the voice of sanity and all this.
Go figure. So I, I've worked extensively
with police and I don't have a problem tactically with what

(30:43):
Donald Trump is doing here. He, he doesn't have to be the
most dangerous place on earth. Something can be improving, but
still really bad. If your house is on fire and
then a third of the fire goes out, it's less bad, but it could
still be an emergency. I work in DC.
It is dangerous there. You cannot deny that.
And a common police tactic is tosurge resources.

(31:05):
I've been part, we call them task forces.
They're applauded across the board, across the political
board. I've done it in New Jersey, I've
done it in New York. You take the FBI, you team them
up with the Newark PD, what haveyou.
You make a visible presence. Now, is some of it for
appearance and show? Yes.
Because what it does is A, it assures people, it gives people
a bit of confidence and security, and B, it deters

(31:28):
people from committing crimes. So it's not going to hurt.
And this is a situation that needs to be improved.
I don't see why there's A and I also reject the January 6th
look, I've been 100% unambiguouscritic of everything Donald
Trump did on January 6th. I believe he should have been
charged criminally. I believe the pardons were a
disgrace. But why does that mean he can't
do anything now to enforce the law to promote public safety?

(31:50):
I think it raises questions about sure, he's a hypocrite,
fine, he's a hypocrite. But this is all political
theatre. None of this is kind of
fundamentally in terms of crime problem.
Indeed. Would you rather, whoa, it is
political theater, but so is that, So is all of this.
And of course, they brought up January 6th.
Yeah. I mean, you can't make it up.
You know what's funny about whenyou team up the FBI or any other

(32:12):
federal agency with the local PDS, do you know what the
purpose of it is? Bigger investigations, more
complex investigations, more long term investigations into
like organized crime. They don't go out and like March
around an FBI vests on the streets of Newark.
As he was just said, that's not a thing.
Nobody does that. That's not what safe streets
task forces are about. Of course, there are federal

(32:33):
task forces for almost everything you can think of,
whether it be child sex trafficking, whether it be
drugs, whether it be, you know, Interstate commerce stuff
they're trying to do. There's all kinds of ways you
can team up. There's obviously the terrorism
task force, which is the the biggest, you know, money, money
tosser around to to all these agencies.
What happens is, is that the FBIjust agrees to pay for overtime

(32:55):
for a bunch of more senior either cops, investigators,
detective, etcetera. And the upside is that the FBI
gets to steal those investigations and Co claim what
we call statistical accomplishments.
That's the trade off. It is theatrical 100%.
But they're not wrong. Like DC still sucks.
What's funny is is that the answer still continues to be

(33:17):
take it away. This is the actual conservative
answer. Take it away from an area that
has no voice or representation and give it to a state like you
took DC and you made it from Maryland.
Give the parts where people liveback to Maryland so these people
can vote. Everybody crying about, oh, DC

(33:38):
should have a vote. No taxation without
representation. That's, that's what they put on
their license plate. People.
For those who have never visitedour nation's capital and seen
the absurdity and the stupidity that exists there, you have
abject poverty like some of the most poor people in the country.
You have some really incredibly wealthy people there, as you can
imagine, and then they're all crying about not being able to
vote. OK, fine, you can get a vote.

(33:59):
But you cannot be a state because you're not a state,
because you're defined as such in the Constitution to not be a
state. Give them back to Maryland.
Let Maryland handle this. It's always the case that if you
divest back down to a lower level of government, you'll
probably find a better solution.Is it still going to be crappy?
Of course. Maryland has horrible places to
live. Baltimore, not awesome, the

(34:22):
South side of DC like Suitland and all this kind of stuff.
They're not nice. That's fine.
Make it their problem. And then at least they get a
vote on it. And maybe those people go like,
you know what? I'm sick of living in squalor.
I don't want to deal with this. Here is the here's the governor
of Maryland, who is by the way, far more articulate than the Fox
News House and making points that we just don't.
He's he's very proud of the National Guard, but the National

(34:44):
Guard has a purpose. I, I tend to agree like 30 days
and then you got to find a real solution.
The real solution is not long term national federal government
control of that area instead of home rule.
I'm just curious why you've beenso critical of the
administration trying to solve this problem.
Is it the process that you don'tlike?
Because it looks like they're doing the same thing that you're

(35:06):
doing, which is surging resources to the city.
It's, it's because I, you know, I'm, I'm proud to be the 63rd
governor of the state of Maryland and I'm honored to be
the commander in chief of the Maryland National Guard.
I, I stand with the remarkable men and women who have raised
their hand, these citizen soldiers who frankly, are

(35:27):
trained to fight and win our nation's wars.
The people who in times of emergency and in times of
crisis, that I have the unique authority and the unique ability
to mobilize them. And where I have done so as the
governor of the state of Maryland, whether it is historic
floods that we've seen in Western Maryland or whether it's
the fact that I still currently right now have men and women who

(35:47):
are deployed overseas doing operations.
This is something that I take very seriously, particularly as
someone who's worn the uniform, particularly as someone who's
had to say goodbye to my family.Particularly as someone who has
had to trust the judgment of thecommander in chief, knowing that
the decision that they made was one that had not just the best
interest of the national security in mind, but the best

(36:09):
interest of me and my family. And so all I'm saying is this is
if we want to have a serious conversation about violent
crime, we can have a serious conversation about violent
crime. And I would love to be able to
share the multitude of things that we are doing in the state
of Maryland where we, I would love to hear what the things
you're doing in Maryland. Maryland sucks.
Maryland's not America to me. I avoided going to Maryland

(36:30):
unless I was going there for work.
I never would spend any time there.
I have no interest in it. If you live in Maryland, what
are you doing? Like The funny thing is just
that like Southern Maryland is kind of like rural and farmy.
I remember going to like a strawberry picking thing with my
kids down there. And then you go to Baltimore and
it looks like the zombie apocalypse happened and the
human beings lost. Like we're in a post zombie
apocalypse world. It looks like it, it looks like

(36:53):
like Beirut videos that I saw from the from the 80s.
It's crazy. And by the way, that answer that
that had nothing to do with the question.
That's my favorite thing to do in politics.
When you have someone who's like, pretty skilled and
articulate and smarter than the person they're talking to
question, it's like, aren't theydoing the same thing in DC that
you've been doing? And it's like, like, I'm really
proud of the National Guard. And when I served, there was
great things. And national security is super

(37:13):
important. And these people had to say
goodbye to their families. And it's like, what does that
have to do with the problem of crime in your state, which is
unbelievably bad in certain areas.
You have one of the worst citiesin America in Baltimore.
No answer. But what's that guy's name?
Lawrence Jones or something. He doesn't always strike me as
being particularly bright. So he asked this question.

(37:35):
He did the best he could. He's not nearly as good as the
CBS host who tries to butt in and shut it down, I guess.
I guess shut your mouth and let the guy speak.
But the guy spoke articulately about something that had nothing
to do with it. Kind of Anna Paulina Luna vibes,
except he's smarter and more articulate and more
sophisticated. He's a little bit slicker.
He probably has an opportunity to go somewhere else with it.
All right, we're going to go further on with this and then
we're going to get into all thislike Adam Schiff thing, which I,

(37:56):
I actually have the, the three O2 sitting on my desk or the, the
multiple 3O2's that were addressed.
And I'm going to actually read some of them just verbatim
because I want you guys to understand how silly this is.
I'm also going to show you the Hillary Clinton bit that I told
you that is now being circulated.
So we'll give you the kind of tease on that stuff too.
But before we do, let's just break over and say thanks to the
folks at silent. I use it everyday.
I use your products everyday andyou guys probably should think

(38:18):
about it too. If you don't have an opportunity
to do this, invest in it. Get one that works.
Your phone is a tracking device.It can be used against you.
Anybody went to January 6th knows that if you were a pipe
bomber on January 6th, you know you can get away with it because
you're safe. But government agencies and big
tech, corporate data brokers, cyber criminals, anybody else
that might want a piece of your digital footprint, we'll just
take it. The information is available

(38:38):
through apps and other things. If you want to shut them all
down, the only way to do it is to block all incoming and
outgoing wireless signals that include cellular, Wi-Fi,
Bluetooth, GPSRFID, near field communication, you name it.
If it's coming out of your phone, it's used to track you.
You can shut them all down with silentproductsslnt.com.
Slash Kyle is the website. It's the same kind of technology

(38:58):
that special operations teams use.
They're blocking this stuff. People in the in the national
security realm are doing this for sources and for methods to
be able to be able to move it. If you want to operate in China,
it's a minimum requirement for people that are working in these
things. Yeah.
Are you using the same sort of threat environment?
Probably not, but it's not a particularly expensive tool to
have. You buy it and you can forget
about it. We have one sitting on the desk
right here, which is where my phone goes every single day.

(39:20):
The upside of silent is also youget to control whether or not
people can even see that you called or that they called.
It doesn't even go. It goes directly to voicemail,
shuts down your phone completely.
You're not going to get text messages.
You're not going to be interrupted.
It actually makes kind of like adigital silence.
It's nice. A cone of silence.
Slnt.com slash Kyle drop your phone in the silent everyday
sleeve. Get off the grid.
Make yourself invisible to the outside world when you choose to

(39:42):
good folks, big fan and and I, you know, you guys, I'm a gear
guy. So I'm running that every
everyday backpack, that E3 everyday backpack.
And I think it's really, really well laid out, which is not the
case for every backpack that I've used.
A lot of them. I I get them and I'm like, why
did they build this? Not so with the silent folks.
OK, so let me let me continue with the promised stuff.
Here we have a articulate answer.

(40:03):
How about how about MSNBC comingin from the top ropes with
Sanity as well? Right.
Fox doing a bad job, CNN doing adecent job, Morning Joe and
MSNBC actually honing in on the issue in DC, which I think is
reasonable. And I live in Washington.
This is personal for me. Many people are frustrated with
crime that we see particularly committed by juveniles in the in

(40:28):
the city of Washington. People are frustrated, Willie,
that they when they go to CVS tobuy deodorant that they have to
get it from behind locked plexiglass, right?
But the response here and you know, let me say this, right,
This is not these are not just random antidotes.
What we see in Washington Post polling, among others, is that

(40:49):
roughly half of DC residents, mostly half of DC reps, view
this as a serious problem or an extremely serious problem.
I like, it's either a serious oran extremely serious problem.
Again, if an FBI agent is getting carjacked in broad
daylight, you got a problem in your city.
Did it go down? Yes.
The the story is is they're likea like crime's been reduced.

(41:12):
Yeah, because it's spiked. It's spiked in 2023, and it
slightly went down in 2024. They had something like 500
carjackings in 2022. Then they had almost 1000 in
2023. Then they had like 500 again in
2024. And they're like, see, we
reduced crime by 50% against a high watermark.
It's still flood levels, right? And again, CNN, this is a

(41:34):
Republican talking about this. In this case, this guy Brad Todd
is calling it out. It's like, can we just be honest
that there is a problem that again, but that doesn't mean
that the Trump solution is the correct one and we're using the
wrong tool. All of this feels like I'm just
going to say it. All of this feels like anything
to distract from from agency losses.

(41:55):
What have they not been able to capitalize on?
We have no J6 pipe bomber. We don't have Epstein files.
Whether you like it or not, we don't have them.
And they, they advertised it, not me.
We don't have the story about the White House cocaine, right?
We don't have anybody in the Biden crime family who was
hawked on for for years and years about all the illicit
activity they did. We've also been told that their

(42:16):
pardons are not legit because they were signed by an auto pen
and there's an ongoing investigation.
Who's being held accountable forthat?
This stuff doesn't actually takethat long if you're trying to
figure it out. Unless you realize that you
don't have the authority to do any of this stuff.
In which case the message and the announcement of the problem
is their actual solution. In the same way a Jim Jordan

(42:37):
sending a sternly worded letter.The hearing was the outcome.
It's not that it's an investigation into something.
No, we did the press release. That's what happens when you
have a PRAPR type government, when you have APR type
administration, and it does speak to the number of people
that are in media that are part of Donald Trump's
administration. They actually think that saying

(42:58):
it is the win. I'm on the opposite side of the
coin. I'll go to sleep, show me the
indictment, show me the arrest, and then let me know what the
sentencing is after you got a plea deal or a conviction.
Does not minimize the facts. I mean, Washington had 498
carjackings last year. That's way too many.
There were 190 different killings last year in

(43:20):
Washington. Our crime and murders are 6
times what New York is. Washington is not near safe
enough. The DC police union supports
what's happening here. The federal government does have
an obligation to help keep the Federal Capital safe.
And I don't think we ought to distract ourselves with with
what's really at stake here, andthat is DC is not safe enough
and the president's trying to. Make it.
I agree DC is not safe. With them, great.

(43:42):
Actually, we had. To minimize the facts, I mean.
DC is not safe. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
OK, here's how I know this is not going to go anywhere.
If Donald Trump was actually in a daily struggle to get DOJ on
his side, to try to correct the problems in federal law
enforcement and make sure that they were not weaponized against
him and his family again or you and my family again, like we
don't want our families targeted, then he wouldn't say

(44:06):
that he hopes Pam Bondi is goingto bring something forward.
He would say conclusively that we have something in the works
because they would have briefed him on what that thing is.
The fact is, they've gone out and done announcements with
Tulsi Gabbard, who's at DNI. That's not an investigative
agency. They may do intelligence.
They may learn things and uncover information, but they do
not have criminal prosecution authority.

(44:26):
Why do we not hear Pam Bondi going out and telling us, yeah,
Adam Schiff's going to go to jail and we're in the middle of
it right now. And I've been forthcoming.
They don't do that. They're just like slowly giving
you this garbage. Here's Donald Trump saying
exactly the same sort of thing. He's actually talking about the
context of now he's got an opportunity to work against
Russia properly because for years he was plagued with this

(44:47):
Russia, Russia nonsense. I've got some some reminders of
that. And that's exactly what they're
doing with this Adam Schiff bit.They're just reminding us that a
bunch of bad things happened. But if you're on the right and
you've been paying attention even a little bit, you already
know that you know that we had an election problem in 2020 and
that there were credible accusations of fraud.
Whether or not you believe they happen or not is irrelevant.

(45:09):
They weren't properly investigated by the people who
could do it. And we know that because DOJ
told us that. We also know that it seemed like
Hillary Clinton got away with some really wild stuff under Jim
Comedy. So it wouldn't surprise you
didn't learn that that that theycovered for him.
We had questions about the Clinton Foundation going all the
way back to Haiti. How come nobody's talked about
it? Because it's too late.
So when you start dancing aroundand you answer you answer

(45:31):
questions like I I really hope Pam Bondi, I'm putting my hope
in her to do the right thing TuneIn next week folks, where we
try to sell you something else with them.
Great. Actually, we had the rush I had
to go through the Russia Russia hoax and it was actually it's it
was a strain on the relationship.
I actually would told them I said, you know, they got this

(45:51):
phony investigation going on. Russia, Russia, Russia, totally
phony, created by Adam Schiff, Shifty Schiff and Hillary
Clinton and the whole group of them.
And it made it very dangerous for our country because I was
unable to really deal with Russia the way we should have
been. And we're looking at Pam because
I hope something's going to be done about it.
These people put our country at great danger.

(46:13):
And Adam Schiff, it was all made-up.
It was a hoax. The Mueller report came out.
They all hated me. They had eighteen Trump haters
and they said I did nothing wrong.
They were they couldn't, they couldn't believe they couldn't
find anything after years of investigation was all a hoax,
was a hoax created by the Democrats, but in particular

(46:33):
Schiff and Crooked Hillary, the whole group.
And now we've learned all the stuff that's come out over the
last two months is incredible through intelligence and
hopefully something's going to happen whether these are people
that put our our country in danger.
So he said all the stuff that's come out through intelligence in

(46:54):
the last two months. Has there been anything that is
revealed to you in the last two months or in the last two weeks,
let's say, that changes your mind about what happened
previously? Is there anything that is unlike
or are these guys just going back to the well of the thing
that they know that they did? Cash Patel's fame came out of
what Russiagate Dan Bongino wrote a book about it.
All these guys basically are going like, you know, what's a

(47:14):
winner? Go back and beat that drum.
Things were very unfair in 2016,20/17/2018.
And the FBI was very, very bad. OK, They're focused in on Jim
comedy. What I haven't heard until this
morning from Jim Jordan. Nobody's bringing up Chris Ray.
You know that guy that Donald Trump appointed to go be in
charge of the FBI who did not fix this?

(47:36):
Look, Schiff is a liar, no doubtabout it.
Like he is a good liar when it comes to the fact that he seems
like he's probably sociopathic in the way that he looks people
dead in the eye and says things.But you'll notice you can't just
say things that are false and let those stand.
Sometimes you got to over enunciate watch, watch Adam
Schiff re say something or add to it.
He's not adding any context. All he's trying to do is sort of

(47:57):
like add more things so that oneof those things might be semi
true. This was him doing the Tucker
Carlson interview where he was asked to just explicitly state
something and he has to add a little bit more to it.
And then of course, his answer is, is that I can't tell you
because it's classified. I'm going to I'm going to read
some of the stuff from this buried lead case because I think
it's worth looking at on the Intel committee.
Let me just ask you one final question.
Can you look right into the camera and say I know for a fact

(48:19):
the government of Vladimir Putinwas behind the hacks of John
Podesta's? Absolutely.
The government of Vladimir Putinwas behind the hacks of our
institution and the dump of of. John Podesta's e-mail.
Not only in the of John Podesta's e-mail, but also in.
Europe, all you have right now is a circumstantial case.
Actually, no, Chuck I I can tellyou that the case is more than
that. And I can't go into the

(48:40):
particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence
now. So again, I think.
So you have seen direct evidenceof collusion.
I don't want to go into specifics.
And also, collusion is not a federal crime.
Let's take one second here. We're going to do the Spotify
ads, so they'll go up. So you guys have been warned.
There they are. All right.

(49:02):
Now I'm going to read to you some Adam Schiff stuff because
the FBI did declassify this. Here's the bit that is most
important. This is a what's called an EC or
an electronic communication, andit's kind of telling in so much
as what it does and what it doesn't say.
It's dated from October 18th of 2017 and the title of the EC.

(49:26):
So this is known as a serial. That's just anything you file to
your case. This serial is a call with FBI
special agent Blank, blank. So they bleeped it out.
It's coming from the Washington Field office.
It was approved by an acting supervisor at the time, so not
the full time supervisor. And then it says case ID number,
which would be a Washington field case.
It would say something there that's also redacted and it's

(49:47):
called buried lead. That's the name of the case.
Buried lead. This makes it an intelligence
case as far as I can guess. I don't think this is likely a
criminal case and the reason is because it has a classified and
the classification of the name of the case is not listed.
It's a sensitive investigative matter, which means they're
talking about somebody involved in in politics.

(50:08):
So you get what's called a SIM. Same thing they did for Project
Veritas, same thing they do for various academics and members of
the clergy. The victim agency is not being
listed, but there's a three letter it looks like agency that
would be the quote UN quote victim that was exposed and then
buried lead would be the name ofthe case.
This is a code name case. That doesn't make it like super

(50:28):
special, but the fact that we have someone that is
declassified a code name case and the code name is actually
declassified tells me this case is done.
It's over. It's it's been wrapped up and
what you see in these declassified 3 O twos, which
again, they're going back to October of 2017.
They're essentially irrelevant at this point.

(50:48):
They've gone through, and I've seen other people do analysis
and say, well, look what it says.
What this says is you've got hearsay evidence.
They did a couple of different interviews and those interviews
took place in 20/17/2019 and then again a follow up in 2023,
which basically just summarizes the things that were said in
2017 and 2019. It appears that they're all from
the same source. They all appear to be sort of

(51:10):
circumstantial hearsay evidence.No direct evidence is listed, no
documents recovered, no attachments are included like
the source submitted the following things, which is a
phone call recording or an e-mail that says this.
They're just saying things that happened and the odds are is
that the end conclusion is in fact what the what the FBI
concluded. They couldn't investigate this,

(51:30):
whether for good or for bad. The FBI did not go to the
congressional liaison personnel with the information because he
believes that they too are embedded with the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Staff and cannot
trust him to do the right thing.Rather, he approached the
contact at the Blanks Office of Inspector General, who advised
him the situation, said they'd be willing to discuss it later.
This is essentially the outcome of it.

(51:51):
They went out there and this is the unclassified piece that was
put at the bottom of a 2017 meeting.
This is from the first meeting they did.
This was in in August, August 2nd of 2017.
There has been some dissent among congressional members with
regards to the Russia issue. Representative Jim Himes was
asked about Adam Schiff. They basically decided at the
end of this time that there was probably nothing they could do

(52:13):
about it because the members of Congress were involved in what
they consider to be speech and debate.
You're talking about a differentbranch of government where they
don't have unilateral authority to go after it.
So now you're going to be doing nothing.
So why are we going back to the hole?
Well, it didn't actually hit theway they hoped it would, so they
went out there and they've triedit out.
Another thing, and that other thing is even more silly.

(52:37):
It looks like this feds receivedwhistleblower evidence in 2017
alleging Clinton Foundation wrongdoing.
Oh, my goodness. More on that in one second.
OK, more on the Clinton Foundation nonsense in a second.
First, let's do just the news. This is the same guy that you're
seeing. This is John Solomon.
Tonight we're going to tell you about the other Clinton

(52:57):
investigation, one that was running in three separate FBI
offices, New York, Washington and Little Rock.
It was a predicated criminal investigation that was examining
whether Hillary Clinton ran a pay to play scheme that
delivered favors from her purchase Secretary of State
while foreigners and others paidlarge sums of money to her

(53:19):
Family Foundation, the Clinton Foundation run by Bill Clinton
and their daughter, eventually Chelsea Clinton.
Three separate, three separate bureaus, offices of the FBI
believe they had predicated evidence to pursue that.
Every time they tried to move the ball down the road in the
shadows of the 2016 election, they got shut down.

(53:39):
I mean, they got shut down at the highest levels of their
agency. Andrew McCabe, the deputy
director, a man who potentially had a conflict of interest with
Hillary Clinton. He, his wife, got money from
Hillary Clinton's former campaign chair to run for a
Virginia State Senate. And by the way, McCabe attended
the meeting where that assistance was solicited.
He eventually was conflicted out, but not before he gave the

(54:02):
order to his agents that you won't investigate or do anything
on this unless I approve it. OK.
Well, he had the executive authority.
To do that. Why?
Because he worked for the FBI. And where does that authority
come from? It gets delegated down from the
president of the United States. Now, there's some real problems
with the way that the left looksat executive authority and the
way they look at the FBI in particular.

(54:23):
They think it's supposed to be the stand alone agency.
That's nonsense. But we're talking about Don John
Solomon here, who I showed you yesterday from this June 19th,
2022 memo to the National Archives.
He is a like a specific propaganda outlet that has been
chosen, hand chosen by Donald Trump.
And by the way, the other personon this list is Kash Patel.
So these people are doing complete propaganda jobs on you.

(54:46):
I'm going to go back to this little funny story here because
I wanted you to see this headline.
Feds received whistleblower evidence in 2017 alleging
Clinton Foundation wrongdoing. Do you want to know when that
story was written? It was in 2018.
Under Donald Trump. 'S first administration.
That's how dumb this is. None of this is new.
None of this is like is is groundbreaking or bombshell type

(55:07):
material. This is re adjudicating old
garbage because they can't get like the the the narrative to
move forward on something else. And obviously at the end of the
day, they want to get a win. They want APR win and this is
their attempt to get it. So last night was that that that
broadcast of, of John Solomon. And I don't know why John
Solomon thinks that he should beon television in any way, shape
or form. He's terrible.

(55:28):
He's absolutely like he stutters, he has a lisp.
He's not physically pleasant to look at.
He might know a bunch of stuff, but he is such a, a crap way of,
of, of pushing it forward. So they choose this like sloppy
looking guy who speaks inarticulately about something
that we all knew. And he even wrote an article
about it, and he actually did significant coverage of it seven

(55:52):
years ago when a house. Subcommittee Chairman.
Gavels in next week to convene an unprecedented investigative
hearing into the Clinton Foundation. 2 questions will
linger as preeminent Is the Clinton family charity really
international do Gooding, or is it a place that suffers from
corruption and illegalities, as conservatives allege?

(56:13):
It's all been out there. Guys, this is not new.
Stuff. I'm not telling you that we
don't have a corrupt organization or agency like we
clearly do and people like Andy McCabe were significantly
problematic, but the time for a lot.
Of this stuff has already passed.
And to act like we're going to get it done and then you hear
Donald Trump in his own words saying I'm putting I I hope and
bondies hope is not a solution, folks.

(56:35):
It's just as bad as cope. It doesn't work.
We know that they. Lied, we know that they.
Fabricated this stuff. We know that they went out there
and like like they floated credibility that wasn't real.
Here's a really good. Taste.
This is actually an 11 minute. Video clip which I might
actually throw up on the on the Locals channel.
If you guys are interested in seeing like an 11 minute time

(56:56):
capsule, watch this where they're pumping up Andy McCabe
and Frank Figlucy. There's some stuff that he left
out of this, which is also seriously critical by the way,
all of these documents that we're seeing that are
declassified. Here's the big question.
You ready? There's Adam Schiff.
OK, there's the story. Buried lead.
Here's the real buried lead. You know what a buried lead is?

(57:17):
That's when they, when they takethe most important nugget, the
biggest nugget of the, of the ofa broadcast and they hide it
somewhere deep in the story. So you're like, Oh my God, like
they bury the lead. They didn't want you to either
know about it or they didn't realize that that was the most
crazy part of it. The the biggest piece of this is
do you believe? For one. 2nd that the current

(57:37):
FBI director who's been there for a few months has any idea
how to dig this stuff up out of Sentinel.
The FB is databases. When we're getting credible
reporting that he's out partyingall night and that his security
detail has to wake him up to go to work, do you think that he's
out there digging the stuff up and saying, Oh my God, there was
an entire classified case that was into Adam Schiff that was

(57:58):
hearsay and it was closed. By the way, what they didn't
declassify was the closing EC that wrapped up this whole case
and said why they weren't going to go anywhere with it.
That's Part 1. The second biggest piece of this
is who gave him that. Because I'm telling you.
Cash Patel is not sitting at hisdesk and researching stuff in
Sentinel. He's got people doing that.
Who are those people? Are they the same people that

(58:20):
I've been telling them are problematic?
The senior executives inside theFBI who have nothing more than
to either discredit these guys or are trying to save the FB is
reputation left and right because that's their seriously
fundamental goal. How do we make the FBI look good
again? Well, we'll just play ball with
this guy, or we'll tell him no abunch of times until he does
something stupid and he discredits himself like we

(58:41):
talked about yesterday. I have no doubt that.
Cash Patel is bent over. Backwards and he's going to have
to do whatever the Democrats sayif he wants to stick around.
Let's say Donald Trump leaves inin 2028.
Until you get, let's see, it turns over to Democrats.
You think Cash Patel thinks he'sgoing to stick around?
Are they going to keep him on? Absolutely not.
It's not going to happen. Who's feeding?

(59:04):
Him these files and what is their agenda, do you think
There's a bunch of really patriotic senior executive
service people that just love tosee FBI exposed?
Nope, not even close. Here's the time capsule going
back to some of the original scumbags, thank frankly.
Bluesy, right, Mr. Botox, Andy McCabe, this is an All Star

(59:25):
panel of propaganda. It's just as bad as John
Solomon. They're just more articulate.
We just heard from former actingFBI Director Andrew McCabe,
Matthew Miller, former chief spokesman of the Department of
Justice, Frank Figliuzzi, formerassistant director for
counterintelligence at the FBI. Just sort of relevant there,
former US Attorney Joyce Vance and Chuck Rosenberg, a former US
attorney who worked on the Staffs of both Robert Mueller

(59:46):
and James Comedy at the FBI. All MSNBC contributors, all my
mentors and advisors in this pursuit.
Your thoughts? We had some new news today.
And it's somewhat nuanced, but it's really important.
And that is between your conversation with Andy and ours
in the green room with Andy, we've learned something.
We've learned. I love it.
When that happened, he didn't. He didn't.

(01:00:08):
Open a separate. Case on the president.
He added the president to the already predicated, already long
existing case on Russia meddlingwith the campaign.
Why is that important? In that case was a full
counterintelligence investigation.
What does that mean? You have specific and
articulable facts that someone is or may be an agent of a

(01:00:28):
foreign power. He felt he had enough to add
Trump's name to that existing case.
That's big news. All right.
We're going to go back to that for a second.
It's big news, but he didn't really add the part that's most
important. And I'm going to add another
piece of context as well. It's big news that you added the
president's name, but do you know one of the reasons that you
can add somebody to a case like that?

(01:00:52):
You guys ready look at this. I'm going to show you in this
three O 2 from Adam Schiff, the Adam Schiff investigation, the
buried lead. It says right there.
Victim. Organization, OK, victim agency,
we're talking about adding. A name to a.
Case and getting full authorities to investigate

(01:01:16):
because they're a victim and that is one of the tricks that
you can use in counterintelligence.
And Frank Figliuzzi knows that you can say like they found in
the Durham report that the Donald Trump administration was
targeted by Russia. And you can choose to do one of
two things. You can pursue them and say,
hey, we think that they're actually going to be compromised

(01:01:37):
and we're going to go after them.
Or you can do the thing that would be like more credible and
reputable. And you would say, I think that
we should give them a defensive briefing.
Remember what Durham said? There's a couple things that
were really, really, really critical in the Durham.
The Durham report that came out,which is not being referenced as
much right now #1 the only way the FBI is going to be fixed is

(01:01:59):
not by policy. And it's not by some change that
is done at the exact level. It's going to be by people
actually agreeing to do the right thing because it's the
right thing to do. They're going to uphold their
oath in the spirit of it, not inthe letter of some policy.
That's Part 1. And the second thing, the Part 2
of that is they gave. Different treatment to
different. Campaigns.

(01:02:19):
This has all been adjudicated. This has all been shared.
They gave Hillary Clinton defensive briefings.
They investigated Donald Trump. We already know that.
And when you're when? You're potentially a.
Victim. You can still get your name
added to the case, which is exactly what Frank is talking
about here. He's just not saying that we can
investigate you as a potential victim, as a target of foreign

(01:02:40):
meddling. And that shouldn't actually be
OK because the guy was actually the president.
Now you're going to hear him basically try to assert that
there is some sort of independent executive authority
that they are vested with, like the FBI doesn't operate under
the charter and under the authority of the United States
president. Explain what that let him do,
adding Trump to a full investigation.

(01:03:02):
Well, if you want to talk theoretically in.
Concept you have your full panoply of investigative
techniques available to you at the point you add someone to a
full investigation. That could even have include
included going to FISA court andasking to wiretap the president.
We know he didn't. Suddenly Rod Rosenstein doesn't
sound that so. For offering to wear a wire
indeed, not the other thing. That Matt and I were talking
about in the green room and, andMatt can elaborate, is this is a

(01:03:24):
masterful chess move by McCabe because because he's playing
chess at the highest level. When you add Trump to that case
and if someone were to try to close it and maybe even that
someone is Rod Rosenstein, he'd have to say I I'm closing a case
involving the president. And you've added obstruction to
this existing case because we'veconfirmed with Andy in the green

(01:03:47):
room that the obstruction case was not separate either.
He added that to the existing CIcase.
So anyone trying to close that is closing an obstruction case
on the president, are you? And where did the authorities?
Come to do any of. These investigations, they come
from the president, None of these.
Guys seem to acknowledge that. This is the hubris that needs to

(01:04:11):
be fixed. This is the actual problem that
exists with inside our federal law enforcement.
These people, This is why they're called deep State, think
that they actually possess powers that are intrinsic to
their office and that are not byvirtue of the position granted
to them by the executive branch,specifically the president who
is elected every 4 to 8 years. They just summed it.

(01:04:34):
Up and you can see how excited. He was about it because they're
going to investigate the president, the highest level of
chess being played breathlessly reporting this stuff if your.
Boss is being targeted. By an outside organization that
is antithetical to the aims of what your boss has said he is

(01:04:54):
interested in doing. It is your job, is it not?
To go bring it forward. To be like, hey, or is it your
job to go out there, investigatehim and then try to expose him
to the shareholders? Nobody else would stand for this
and Trump. Has not gotten rid of these
people. They still exist in the Bureau.
There are people that love Frankie Figs in the Bureau,
guaranteed. There are people that think Andy

(01:05:15):
McCabe did the right thing and those same people lionized Brian
Driscoll after he got fired lastweek.
And guess what? They don't like Cash Patel today
and they didn't like him before and they're not going to go
along with what he's saying. And if they can make him look
like a fool and they can go out there and hand him some old
closed investigation without giving him the closing EC, that
shows that basically we didn't have any authority to
investigate this and this thing got shut down.

(01:05:36):
There was no evidence that we can either gain that would
substantiate a federal case against these people.
There's nothing that's going to happen.
And then you got Donald Trump out there tweeting things that
are also like TuneIn next week because Donald Trump said it's
clear, there's clear evidence. This is not evidence.
This is a FBI agent documenting an interaction with someone who
looks like a hip pocket source because they couldn't actually

(01:05:59):
sign them up in Delta. They couldn't sign them up in
the FB is confidential human source system because the person
worked for a member of Congress and there's some real specific
rules about what you can and can't do with another branch of
government. You know, because they have a
certain amount of authority the same way the president is
supposed to have. The problem goes back to the
same thing that I keep telling you guys.
Do you have an executive agency that doesn't think that it

(01:06:21):
actually answers to the damn executive.
And the executive right now is Donald Trump.
And if he doesn't understand that this is an existential
threat not just to his family, but to American liberties, to
yours and mine and all the people on the left as well, they
don't get it. And the reason why is because
they are armed and they can comein your house and take your life
and they can take your liberty, period.
That's where I'm going to wrap it up today.

(01:06:42):
We had some issues with YouTube.If you guys are watching after
the fact, I just restreamed it to to YouTube.
So we'll just we'll just turn around and put it back out
again. We'll we'll give you an
opportunity to watch it over there too.
If that's your your preference. Make sure you're supporting our
channel and all the places that you can do so you can subscribe
to the channels like rumble. You can do it on on YouTube, You
can do it on X. You can join us over on locals
at kyleseraphin.com. If you guys want to be a paid
member. We just made an interesting

(01:07:03):
investment yesterday in a flamethrower.
So we'll have some members only flamethrower videos, maybe of
killing ants, maybe of just shooting into the pond behind my
eyes, I don't know. We'll figure out some place we
can shoot a flamethrower if you guys want to part of that and
Get Me Out of the doghouse because I told my wife I bought
it and she was like, what the hell are you doing?
Why are you buying a flamethrower?
I don't know. I just feel like, you know,
America, that's why. And so that's going to be the
topic of our palate cleanse today.

(01:07:24):
So I hope you guys appreciate this.
Just a little bit of a a light hearted look on how did this
country get started? It got started with people who
weren't going to say, you can tell us what to do.
They said if you try to do something that we don't like,
then we're going to end you. Here's a comedian talking about
liberals going to reservations. They actually do live on
reservations. They're called Baltimore,
they're called Philadelphia, they're called Washington, DC,

(01:07:46):
New York City. And I think the Liberals that
fight. Against the guns.
Like I hear you and I think yourargument is so logical, but it's
futile. Like you got to stop.
Like I know you think you're right, but you're going to lose
your argument because I don't know if you realize this.
Liberals, you're fighting with agroup of people that have guns.

(01:08:11):
Yeah, Yeah, you can hear them yeehawing right now.
Yeah. Yeah.
Like when you keep arguing, I'm like, you need to stop arguing
and read some history because I don't think you understand how
this country was founded. A bunch of.
People came here with. Guns killed.
The people that didn't have guns.

(01:08:34):
Stole their country and then wrote a constitution that said
I'm keeping my fucking guns now you can keep up your fight and
I'll come visit you someday on your reservation and.
Be like, hey, we going to the Liberal casino?

(01:08:54):
Tonight. He's not wrong.
I'll see you guys at the casino.I'll be at the blackjack table.
It's the only one where the oddsare decent.
God bless you. Look forward to seeing you again
tomorrow. We'll get some of this
straightened out. And if you guys are listening
over on Spotify or on iHeartRadio or on Apple and
you're having issues with that, please leave a comment on any of

(01:09:15):
the channels or hit me up on XI.Love hearing from people who are
seeing platform issues, which seems like they are sort of
ubiquitous right now. All right, we'll see you all for
a friendly Friday tomorrow morning.
Thanks for listening. To the Kyle Serafin show.
Streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle

(01:09:36):
Serafin.