Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:12):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Hello my friends, you can't make
(00:43):
it up. The sound was muted.
Today is Monday, it is December the 8th and we are going to have
a very interesting show for you.We're going to cover a whole
bunch of topics. First of all, I booked an
interview with the Co founder ofPatriot Protect.
It's Skip Holtz. And so he's going to be doing a
guest segment with us talking about cybersecurity.
(01:06):
This is something that needs to be done anyway.
So we were talking about that. It actually kind of coincides
nicely because there was a data breach for the folks that run
DoorDash and DoorDash I think isgoing to be a very prominent
thing that you hear about in thenext week or two.
We're also going to talk about my friend, Steve Friend, who was
(01:28):
on a viral podcast we did on Friday, shared out by a member
of Congress. And he got a call right
afterwards, a letter as well, saying that he's fired.
Steve Friend, FBI whistle blower, patriotic, true blue
(01:51):
author, just all around stud. In fact, he called me today
while he was on his run. He's like, yeah, I got another
hour worth of jogging right now.Had two things happen this
weekend, both Friday and then onSunday that are completely and
ridiculously illogical #1 He wasfired from his attorneys.
The attorney said they will no longer represent him, despite
(02:13):
the fact that they highlighted in their letter firing him that
the FBI is in material breach ofthe agreement that the DOJ made
with him over 100 days ago. They still owe him back pay.
They still owe him a clearance. They still owe him a gun and a
badge and a bunch of leave and all kinds of other material
things, health insurance, you name it.
(02:35):
And his attorneys decided to walk away.
It turns out his attorneys are part of the problem and they
have been for quite a while. I have never had them represent
me. And I got into a little bit of a
thing with them. We're going to expose some of
The Dirty laundry of Empower Oversight, the so-called
whistleblower protection firm that basically exists to protect
the deep state from people like Steve Friend from myself.
(02:58):
And they sort of only work in somuch as you're willing to go
along and play ball with the approved narrative.
I'm going to show you who the guys are.
I'm going to tell you why I don't like them.
I've never liked them. I think they are gutless
pussies. And I said that to their faces.
Well, at least I said on the phone.
I actually mentioned that I thought that people like them
should be hung by the neck from the 14th St. bridge and then
(03:22):
waited until their corpses rotted and fell into the Potomac
to be swept out to sea and neverfound again.
Because people like them who go out there and operate ostensibly
as good guys and then do exactlythe opposite and enforce the
status quo are the reason why this country is screwed.
So I have some strong feelings about this.
I also feel pretty strongly about the fact that they tried
(03:42):
to ask me for $25,000 that you, our audience, our Twitter
audience and the people that follow me over on social media
raised in individual 13 + 1000 personal donations to keep
Marcus Allen and Garretta Boyle afloat when those guys had no
income and were indefinitely suspended forever.
(04:03):
And not only did Steve friend get fired from his deep state
attorneys, he also got told, I'mtold by his wife because we
don't talk. That would be that would be
totally inappropriate for a current FBI employee who doesn't
have any of the authorities of an FBI employee.
Yeah, Steve Friend's wife lets me know that Steve was called
(04:25):
back into the office despite having no responsibilities,
despite not having a background check, and despite not actually
having any duties to do as an FBI employee.
He's supposed to get picked up shortly and then sit in the
Daytona RA, which is a satelliteoffice, while his boss hangs out
in Jacksonville and does nothing.
(04:46):
They literally saw the podcast that we did on Friday, got rid
of his attorneys and representation, and then pulled
him into the office to do nothing in a retaliatory act
that is in fact a violation of whistleblower laws.
It's also a material breach ongoing of the agreement that
they have with the OJ. So that's where we're going to
go if you guys want to know. We're also going to talk about
Brian Cole. Sorry, I'm getting a little bit
(05:08):
amped up. Brian Cole Junior of Woodbridge,
VA, a 30 something year old man,autistic or developmentally
delayed or both, who apparently confessed to the pipe bombs on
January the 5th. Here's a problem.
What if he was doing something else?
(05:28):
What if the evidence was so thinthat it actually could never
stand scrutiny, which is why they didn't go to a grand jury?
We're going to show you some of the initial reads that have been
posted out on X and some of the the Internet researchers slash
video weaponize autistic man with a an itch in his brain that
he needed to scratch Armitas who's been working with the
(05:50):
blaze. This story is going to fall
apart. So I have a recipe for crow.
If anybody would like a barbecued crow breast, I
actually have that recipe. We're going to cover that as
well. So we've got a bunch to cover
today on this morning and I think that government narratives
are going to fall apart and thatis just the way it's going to
(06:11):
have to be and we are going to be part of it.
This show is only going to get more contentious.
I'm sure we'll see more things. For whatever it's worth, I
actually put some graphics that came from Armitas that he shared
with me over the weekend. I put it into today's show prep
and then I went to go look at itjust before we went live and it
was gone. It was like completely gone for
the computer and I didn't deleteit.
I have no idea why it went away.I air dropped it to myself again
(06:32):
because I had a backup and then it is now loaded and I I hope, I
hope, in fact, I'm going to double check it right now.
There it is. OK, so the graphic is there.
So we'll get to that. All right, let's first do a
sponsor. What we do here is we talk to
you about things that are important.
We also use your attention span and we weaponize it against you
to sell you things if you are soinclined, if you have the money
and you are so interested in theproduct.
We're always going to be very, very clear that I only am
(06:56):
willing to represent companies that I would spend my own money
on, and one of them is the folksover at Cove Pier.
So let's start with that right now.
I actually never cared about drinking water until I moved
into Texas. My wife has always been the
drinking water kind of kind of person.
She was worried about pesticidesand arsenic and fluoride and
lead and pharmaceuticals and PFAS and all the other kind of
(07:16):
things that get in there. That was not really like a Kyle
Seraphin thing until I moved into the Hill Country of Texas
where our water table has a significant amount of sulfur
that they don't filter. And I couldn't either.
And the water stunk. I didn't like the way it
smelled. So we got ourself a Cove Pure.
We opened up a a deal with them and they've got a great little
system. First of all, it's very easy.
I've got a drip filter and then I've also got the Cove Pure
(07:39):
filter. The kids use the Cove Pure
filter because it's so easy. One, it lets you do hot, cold or
warm beverages. That's pretty fantastic.
If you want to make instant tea or instant coffee, you can do it
right then. If you want something that's
cold, comes right out and it's already been filtered so you're
going to get it and it's alreadychilled in the machine.
It's got size presets so you canhave weird shaped water bottles
and not worry about your kids running overflow or pushing the
(08:00):
button and leaving it running. That makes a big difference for
us. And there's no plumbing
involved. You literally just set it on the
countertop, push a few buttons for about 15 minutes to get it
filtered and flowed and get all the all the water moving where
it needs to do it and get it allflushed out.
And then it's ready to go and it's ready to go for months.
These filters last for a very long time.
Some of them can last for up to 24 months from what I remember
reading. That all works really well for
(08:22):
me. But also, and probably most
importantly, it actually certifies that they, they've
pulled all the junk out of your water, 99.9% of contaminants.
That's going to include those PFAS and pharmaceuticals and
fluorides and leads and arsenicsand so on and so forth.
So if you want a gift for someone or if you want to get
one for yourself, this would be a great time to get it.
They've actually sold out because we're doing such a
successful job talking about their product and they are so
(08:44):
good. In fact, even one of the the
ladies who works for our advertising agency hit me up and
said, hey, I listened to how yousaid you put it out for your
kids. And I went like, oh, I should
get one for my kids too. People are looking into this
thing. They've actually sold out of
their units. That's a pretty good indication
of what quality that they have and more importantly that
there's a demand on these things.
So they've extended their holiday discount.
This is the Black Friday deal. They did $250 off right now.
(09:06):
Cove pure.com slash Kyle Cove pure.com/kyle Cove Pure
pure.com/kyle check that out. That's why we parted up with
them and they're going to do this sale through I think the
end of the month and you won't see shipment until January, but
you guys can lock in the deal because they basically sold out.
They said, hey, let's keep this thing running.
So if you're interested, right now is the time to get it.
(09:28):
This is the better deal that they've had since I started
working with them, and I don't think you'll be disappointed.
That's what we have to say aboutCove Pure.
The link is in the show description.
As usual. You guys can Scroll down
wherever you're listening and find it there.
We're going to get into a contentious show, so maybe you
need a sip of water. Let's start it right now.
(09:54):
All right, And contentious is where I intend to go, and
contentious is where we'll be. Let's start at the very
beginning. This is the letter that was sent
over to my friend Steve Friend. It's the second letter from his
attorneys at Empower Oversight. They represent whistleblowers
and research that you can be find finding them at Empower
with no E for some reason. EMPOWR dot US Dear Steve, On
(10:21):
November 24th, 2025, we had a phone call with you regarding
our advice that you are subject to the FBI social media policies
after you were returned to its payroll sometime before October
10, 2025. As we indicated on that phone
call, we would send you a followup letter outlining the FBI's
(10:42):
policies in detail on November 24th.
So we sent you a letter also clarifying the scope of our
attorney-client relationship with you.
And in that letter we indicated 1.
The dispute with the FBI we helped you over the last several
years has substantially concluded with a settlement
agreement entitling you to back pay even for the period after
your resignation through the settlement date. 2 You seem
(11:04):
unwilling to follow our advice on the matters discussed above.
For everybody's understanding, Steve Friend, frequent guest of
our program, the Friendly Fridayguest star has not received back
pay, nor has the FBI or the DOJ substantially completed the
(11:26):
terms of this agreement. So what I see in this letter is
a set of attorneys, one of whom is a former Grassley staffer and
spent basically his entire career working in Deep State.
If we believe that there is in fact a uniparty, I'm going to
make the allegation and I'm going to say it is my opinion,
lest they decide to come after me litigiously.
But it is my opinion based on all that I've seen that empower
(11:49):
oversight. Who sent this letter to Steve
Friend? He's working with the current
FBI for access or otherwise. And in doing so, what they have
done is they have set themselvesup to violate the duties that
they would have to their client in order to maintain access to
the agency that they may be ableto benefit from in the future.
(12:11):
And it fits everything that I know about these guys.
I'm disgusted that they represent themselves as whistle
blowers and whistle blower attorneys.
Gerardo Boyle is one of their other clients and did not, in
fact, get the back pay yet. He hasn't got his leave balances
yet. He hasn't even gotten the right
health insurance. And he just had a freaking baby.
(12:32):
These guys fell down on the job and they called it victory
simply because they got a press release.
They're no better than Cash Patel.
And in fact, it's my belief they're probably working with
Patel. Bongino, take your pick out of
the front office from the FBI. That's Kyle Seraphin's opinion.
If you don't like it, deal with it.
Your evidence is pretty substantial.
(12:52):
And the other real problem with these guys is early on, I
already got sort of the uncomfortable vibe that they
were not working for the right team when they approached me and
they said, oh, we've noticed that you've raised $600,000 for
the guys that we represent. By the way, those guys are my
friends. They're my former colleagues.
Who the hell are these guys to pop in and act like they somehow
(13:13):
have some say? And they said, listen, here's
what we'd like to do. What we'd like to do is we'd
like to ask one of our attorney friends to write a letter and to
do some research to substantiatethat Garreto Boyle and Marcus
Allen can receive the money thatyou raised for them without any
help from us, without any benefit from any political
figure or anything else. You personally went out and
(13:35):
raised money for these guys and now you're holding on to that
money and we think we can get itto them.
And all we need you to do is agree to pay US $25,000 up to
that amount. We're going to try to get it for
free, but just be aware. Would you be willing to be on
the hook for $25,000 of not yourmoney, Kyle Serafin, of money
that you got from people in fivedollar $10.25 dollar $100
(14:00):
increments? We had over 13,000 individual
people give money to this fund. That's a lot, $25,000 was a huge
chunk of it, and these guys asked me if I would be willing
to cut them a check for 25 grandso that one of their attorney
buddies would write a letter that would substantiate that
(14:21):
these men could in fact receive this money and not be in
violation of FBI policy. That makes me want to puke.
Hence my comment to them that they were part of the problem
and I'd like to see some attorneys hung from the bridges,
which is not a very nice thing to say, but it turns out I'm not
a very nice person. When you look over and see that
somebody who doesn't have a job,who has no money coming in, has
(14:45):
family and little kids, and you're getting a nice
comfortable salary, both the themen that run in power oversight
make about $200,000 a year. You're going to go over and find
the pot of money and see if you can what, get another jet ski
for one of your buddies in Washington, DC?
What is $25,000 of donation money?
How about you put it up pro bonobecause it's the right thing to
(15:06):
do. I spent my time for free and I
don't make that much money. I spent my time for free raising
money for these guys. It was a really big deal.
It was super important to me that my friends didn't go hungry
and they wanted, they wanted 25 grand of the money that they had
No, no right to. All right, we're going to
continue on with this letter. Their issue with Steve Friend is
(15:30):
that he's not abiding by the FBIsocial media policy.
Here's the problem. Steve Friend is not an FBI
employee by any stretch of the imagination.
He has no gun. He has no badge.
He has no chain of command. He has no phone.
He has no e-mail address. He has no authorities.
He has no security clearance. He's collected money from them
(15:51):
because they put stuff into his pay into his his bank account,
but he doesn't know what it's for because he has no access to
his leave and earning statementsso he can't see a pay stub.
He has no idea what they're depositing.
He's told me that he's gotten 5 different deposits from the FBI
at every single one of them is acompletely different amount of
money. Why is it a different amount of
(16:11):
money? Why has he gotten 5 different
deposits? When you guys have a paycheck
from the federal government, if you know anything about it, it's
pretty much always the same unless you did some overtime.
And that's not the case for the FB is they don't get overtime.
They get what's called LEAP Law Enforcement Availability pay.
So what the Hell's going on here?
They said that he hasn't been part of the social media policy.
(16:33):
Imagine you work for a company they've hired you on, but they
haven't actually like brought you in the door.
Are you subject to their policies prior to them actually
officially having a date of hire?
He's had interviews, we've put him on the air and he said as
much where they came up and theysaid sort of like conditionally,
if we were to hire you, the following things might happen at
that time. Yeah, this is crazy.
(16:54):
And it's not a coincidence that yesterday afternoon with just a
few minutes notice, they asked the friend to come into the
office to do 0 things. He does not have a security
clearance. He can't work for the FBI and
moreover, as a non security cleared person in FBI space, he
requires a constant escort by FBI policy, at least as long as
I can remember. I'm not an FBI employee anymore
(17:16):
either and I don't know what their policies look like.
But the way that it worked when I was there for all the years
that I was, if you did not work for the Bureau and you did not
have a Bureau background check on file, then somebody had to
babysit you non-stop. So did they really bring Steve
Friend into the office to tie upanother employee full time as
well just to keep him quiet frombeing on my podcast?
I'm going to assert you, I believe, yes.
(17:37):
And for whatever reason, the guys that empower oversight
seemed totally OK with being part of this and that's
disgusting to me. They said we are withdrawing
from any future representation on your behalf.
It might slow or complicate the FBI following through.
However, we indicated that if you would sign a limited
representation agreement, we're willing to continue to represent
you for the limited purposes of advocating on your behalf for
(17:58):
timely implementation of the settlement agreement and back
pay that you're owed. This is not a negotiable thing.
This is what they signed up to do.
This is what they've gone out and fundraised on.
Do you know how many victory e-mail these people put out?
On December the 2nd, 2025, we informed you that we had an all
status call with the Department of Justice and we reiterated, if
(18:19):
you reiterated that if you wanted to continue
representation from us that there would be a limited purpose
that we've discussed. You need to sign an engagement
letter with us that says that wecan represent you only under the
limited scope that we want to rather than signing it.
You sent us a letter saying thatyou appreciate our continued
representation for the purposes of advocating for your timely
(18:39):
implementation of the settlementand back pay, which is exactly
what Steve is. That what they sent to Steve in
the 1st place. However, you did not sign our
limited representation agreementnecessary for our continued
representation. You indicated that although
you'd receive 4 deposits, you didn't have access to your
employee personnel page, the EPP.
You had no means of evaluating what those deposits reflected,
(19:00):
if they were the right salary orinterest payments for the back
pay that you're owed. All this is true.
Steve has no idea what they're paying him for.
Your letter requested that we forward the FB is Office of
General Counsel Communications regarding disciplinary actions
against you for perceived violations of DOJ media contact,
which we did. And then they went on to say
essentially that they're not going to represent Steve Friend.
They fired him as a client. How crazy is this?
(19:25):
We reiterated our previous request.
Please sign this limited agreement to do the thing which
was already the scope of our of our representation to you.
Can you re sign that? We're only going to do what you
said and what we said at the beginning of the outset.
We just need more paperwork. We want to make sure we limit
our scope because we've agreed that we're going to help out
DOJ. Jam up Steve friend.
(19:45):
That's Kyle Serafin's opinion onthis.
Today the FBI sent us the following with the language in
red responding to topics in black that we had raised.
This is what they represented tothe FBI.
This actually is the most funny part of this entire thing.
The FBI has has straight up admitted that they are in
material breach of the. Agreement that the DOJ made with
(20:07):
Steve Friend signed by the deputy attorney general of the
United States of America, the number two over at DOJ, the
person that is able to appoint folks into the FBI and his
attorneys took that as mission complete.
We're done and we're out. Steve Friend, no changes since
last update. He does not have access to the
employee personnel page so he can determine if his leave and
(20:28):
pay are in fact correct. The FBI said as of 12 to 2025,
the employees EPP account was reset.
The employee will receive NFC e-mail with guidance.
Payroll unit was also able to notify employee or will notify
employees our future. So it's not done, not not
(20:49):
complete. It's been reset and we're going
to send you an e-mail and we'll help you set it up in the
future. Not done.
Steve Friend most likely needs step increases and restoration
of leave. As of 11/6 payroll completed all
corrections to personnel action history and restored AL and and
sick leave and as of 12/2/2025 the payroll unit confirm the
employee. I should put this all on the
(21:09):
screen. Confirm the employee is not
missing a WGI. The employee's last WGI happened
on 6/5/2024 for the GS15GS135 pay grade and the next one will
be in May of next year. Well nobody can verify this
(21:30):
stuff. That's the whole point.
He doesn't have access to any ofthe portals, which is what the
whole piece of the pie was. And by the way, they told him
what his balances were, and they're not right.
FBI employees at Steve's grade should be earning 156 leave
hours, annual leave hours per year.
We're talking about multiple years.
I think they said his balance was in the 70s, like 75 hours.
(21:51):
He should have something like 400.
Yeah. This is really personal to me,
guys, because they pulled somebody off my podcast from
Friday and decided to go after this.
He has no health insurance. They want him to go into an FBI
job where people wear badges andguns, where people wear body
armor and he has no freaking health insurance as of 12/2.
(22:11):
The employee submitted the FEHB beneficiary forms so it will be
protest with the effective date going back to September 19,
2022. He's already been paying out of
pocket for this stuff. Are they going to reimburse him
for his old? What is that all about?
Reinstatement of his security clearance?
Oh, that's pending a background investigation and adjudication.
It's not done. All of this stuff is the
(22:35):
requirement under the agreement they have.
How about the the payment of hisback pay as of 12/3?
HRD has reached out to some other group for a status update
and they're awaiting a response.Back pay calculations are
pending for all employees, whichmeans it hasn't been done.
They're in material breach. They were meant to do this in 30
days. They're over 100 days.
They are now what about 70 plus days in arrears?
(22:57):
They're behind. They owe him back pay and
interest. And on 12 for the Jacksonville
management team reached out to Steve friend and spoke with him.
They explained the onboarding process, including bringing him
into the office, getting him assigned a Bureau vehicle,
scheduling him for a firearms qualification.
According to the Jacksonville management, he appeared excited
about returning. Jacksonville is standing by to
facilitate his onboarding when he's approved to FBI space and
(23:19):
that is not real yet. It hasn't happened.
And so they fired him as an as athey fired him as a client
December 5th. And then he got a call yesterday
on December the 7th saying now we need you to come back to the
office to do nothing. This is retaliatory guys.
You know, they're going to come after everybody that's involved
in this stuff. Given this positive outcome,
(23:40):
this is this is Jason Foster, the founder and chair, and
Tristan Levitt, the president. Given this positive outcome
where you didn't get your back pay, you don't have health
insurance yet, you haven't had the proper amount of leave
distributed, you haven't had your security clearance
reinstated, you actually have nojob there at this point.
We now consider our represent our representation with you to
(24:01):
be complete with regard to your reinstatement.
Additionally, we're aware, contrary to our previous advice,
you've once again publicly commented on FBI matters today,
risking further adverse administrative action.
This is where they lift their hand and they show you what's
going on. Steve, you can't talk bad about
the FBI, which is doing bad things and is not in good faith,
opening their their coffers and paying you the things that they
(24:23):
owe you in light of your apparent unwillingness to follow
the free professional advice we've given you.
Oh, now it's free professional advice.
We're even more convinced that our previous expressed inability
to represent you regarding any legal matters other than your
reinstatement is warranted, and we're no longer willing or able
to expend further time or resources representing your
interests or providing counsel moving forward.
(24:43):
If you donate to Empower Oversight, I encourage you to
give Jason Foster a call. If you don't have Jason Foster's
number, go ahead and reach out to meinfo@kyleseraphin.com.
Same story for Tristan Levitt. If you'd like to reach out to
these people and you give money to this group, let me know.
I'll put you in touch. Accordingly, this letter
(25:03):
constitutes notice of termination of representation.
Fired as a client. If DOJ or the FBI communicate
with us further about you, we will notify them that our
representation is concluded and encourage them to contact you
directly. Would you like a copy of your
file? By the way, this was a
privileged communication betweenclient and attorney and the
(25:24):
client raved that privilege to me.
So we have been talking about itright now.
Moreover, Jason Foster, Tristan Levitt, attorneys who are
backing the the work of brave whistleblowers.
How about this? How about we find out whether or
not Washington, DC wants to keepyour bar license in in check
because this seems like a material breach of the agreement
(25:46):
that you had. And firing him as a client so
that you can jump in and and keep things going up on your
wall so that you and and others can feel good about your
associations with Chuck Grassley.
Have you guys ever seen what what Jason Foster did?
There was Jason Foster on the screen.
He's the founder of Empower Oversight, dedicated to
enhancing independent oversight of government and corporate
wrongdoing. Sure he is, as long as you play
(26:08):
ball with the people on the other team.
He was the Chief Investigative Counsel for the Judiciary
Committee in the Senate for almost 8 years.
He was the Senior Investigative Counsel on the Committee for
Finance, U.S. Senate almost six years.
He was the Senior Counsel for the Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs for two years.
This goes back to 2003 and before that he was Senior
(26:30):
Counsel on the Committee on Government Reform, House of
Representatives for six years going back to 1997.
Jason Foster has been swimming around in the swamp for the
entirety of his time. Just saying.
And here's Tristan Levitt. This is his LinkedIn.
He's the president in power. He's a delegate in the West
Virginia House of Delegates. He also worked for the Merit
(26:52):
Service Protection Board, which is functionally useless and has
done nothing for whistleblowers.By his own volition.
US Merit Service Protection Board of 5 1/2 years, 4 1/2
years, rather, sorry, Office of Special Counsel, all of these
guys. And then he was the senior
counsel for Jason, for Chairman Jason Steffitz, which is the OR
Chaffetz, that's the House Committee on Oversight and
(27:15):
Government Reform. Have any of those things ever
functioned or done anything for anybody?
Just say it. I'm going to put the chat up on
the screen. I'm nauseated by this stuff,
guys. These are swamp creatures doing
swamp things, asking whistleblowers for money that
should go to them so they can help out their other swampy
buddies in DC. When I said it, I'm going to
double down on it. Some of these attorneys should
(27:36):
be freaking hung. They should be left to just rot
so that everybody can see their corpses rotting on the bridge
about to fall into the Potomac and realize what an evil, nasty
group of people are swimming around inside of that Beltway.
Nothing stop. It won't stop, apparently.
Nothing we can do about that, I guess.
(28:01):
This retaliation is not going tostop the fact that our our
scumbag helpers are actually just as bad and the only thing
they want you to do is shut up and play nice.
That's what they wanted. Think about the best deal that
they got for anybody. The best deal was Marcus Allen.
(28:21):
They got it quickly, and it's because he kept his mouth shut.
And the best deal was, we're going to reinstate your
clearance as long as you agree to resign from your position and
never work in that job. As far as I know, Marcus Allen
still didn't have a job, testified in front of Congress.
And who do they bring in? Just remember that this was May
of 2023. They brought in Steve Friend,
they brought in Gerardo Boyle, they brought in Marcus Allen.
(28:44):
And where was that one really not very nice voice who could
have been there? And you know, an FBI whistle
blower that exposed things that are still ongoing.
This guy never testified in front of Congress.
You know, they brought instead. Here he is.
Tristan Levitt. They brought Tristan Levitt in
to talk because, you know, he's one of the friendlies.
(29:09):
He's one of the people that willplay nice.
He's one of the guys who's worked inside of our government
in the Merit Service Protection Board.
So he knows how broken the government is.
Oh, does he? When was the last time his
family went without food becauseof it?
When was the last time his family went without a paycheck
because of it? Isn't that interesting?
The way they play this game is that they're holding.
(29:31):
They're looking at both sides cards and the people who have no
money to go out there and hire long term representation.
They just have to trust that their attorneys actually have
their best interest. Meanwhile, the attorneys are
making backdoor deals and setting it up.
Remember when Cash Patel went forward and announced that FBI
whistleblowers have been reinstated?
Hurrah. Who got the credit for it?
(29:53):
Chuck Grassley. Oh, and who did Jason Foster
used to work for? That's right, Chuck Grassley
back when he was like 90,000 years old and not 98,000 years
old. Screw you guys in power
oversight. For some reason you guys care
about what people say on X. I'm bigger than you on X.
(30:14):
I'm going to point out your hypocrisy.
I'm going to be screenshotting this letter every single time
you make a post. I'm going to turn the
notifications on and I'm going to hunt down your stupidity.
I'm going to make sure your donors know that the guys that
you went out there and crusaded for and acted like you were
representing in great faith and you collected money on so you
could pay your your little bloated salaries for your
ineffective representation. What did you do?
(30:38):
Nothing. Did any of you guys get anything
without this podcast continuallyembarrassing the current FBI
director by proving he doesn't know what the hell he's doing?
How many people has Empower Oversight gotten fired from the
FBI for the previous sort of actions?
None. And by the way, not once have
they ever said, hey man, can we help you out with anything?
(30:59):
The only thing they ever offeredto do was get the story of me
and Gerardo Boyle out there to Tucker Carlson and they failed
and they gave it to John Solomonat just the news.
That scumbag that works within the FBI 7th floor, the guy that
gets invited to meetings with the FBI and then goes out and
acts as a mouthpiece on their behalf, am IA little bit pissed
(31:21):
about these guys. You're damn right I am.
Do I think the FBI is now in material violation of their deal
and do I think that they are engaging in public and and and
continued retaliation against FBI whistle blowers?
100% that's not my opinion. You can just look at what
they've done. You can't bring somebody in for
not a real job when they don't even have a background check.
(31:44):
You guys can Fact Check me if you're an FBI employee.
Let me know how many people got hired with no background check
and are brought into the workspace so they can simply be
babysat and kept off social media?
They're going to put Steve Friend in a skiff today I bet.
If I had to gasp, he's sitting there, probably with no phone,
no computer access, twiddling his thumbs, knocking out push
outs every 5 minutes. I'm guessing when Gerardo Boyle
(32:06):
told you that they would crush you, That's what it looks like.
It's long, it has absolutely no limit, and it will go forever.
So with that in mind, let me plug my buddies over at Patriot
Protect for the, for the amusement of it.
I was able to find Kash Patel's personal phone number because he
does not obviously use Patriot Protect.
(32:27):
If you guys want to protect yourself against people like me,
just sitting here in the podcastchair, I found the mom and the
grandmother and others that are associated with the, the alleged
pipe bomber subject. There's a lot of stuff out there
on social media and on the just the, the broader web.
Just be aware, Patriot Protect is a way that you can scrub it.
You'll have a harder time finding stuff on me than you
will on some of these, like elected officials.
(32:48):
Let's see where it goes there. OK, so that being the case, if
you are not trying to be a victim of sniffing and ChatGPT
and data breaches and so on, there are ways that you can
protect yourself signing up withthe with the friends over at
Patriot Protect. We'll get you started.
patriot-protect.com slash Kyle. It's
(33:09):
patriot.dashprotect.com/kyle. Man, I'm having a hard time with
that one Today. The data brokers are publishing
your stuff for free. People can get your home, your
family, your habits, your age, your income, your online
footprint, take your pick. Scammers will use that to
calculate everything about you. Decide whether or not you are a
profitable target. If you don't want to be an easy
(33:29):
low hanging fruit, then you should check out my friends over
there right now. I skip said he was going to
offer something special, so go ahead and check that out at
patriot-protect.com/kyle. I think the name Kyle is the
promo code that works to get youthe deal.
I think he said he's going to work out a better deal.
Normally we do 15% off their annual subscription, which is an
easy thing to do. I think he's got something
(33:50):
better planned for today. So I'm going to actually let him
tell us that in a second here. Let's go ahead and do this
little segment. We we booked this before we knew
that we were going to get into this sort of craziness.
So we'll do that real quick withSkip.
And let's talk about for a little bit online scamming.
And I think you're going to findthat it actually has something
to do with the end of the show when we get into more pipe armor
stuff. All right, so we're going to do
(34:12):
a little guest segment with one of our sponsors, but also brings
information on things that I do not know about, which is tech
stuff. I wish I knew more.
I used to be more of a kind of anerdy guy.
I'm going to welcome Skip Holtz.He is the Co founder of one of
our sponsors, Patriot Protect. And thanks for joining us again,
Skip. Always a pleasure, Kyle, always
a pleasure. Thanks for having me on.
I mean, look, you know, I anytime I come on, it's not like
(34:33):
I bring good news. I mean, that's.
The entirety of this podcast. No, exactly.
If you, if you see, if you see me coming on, you know that
there's something coming. You know, there's, there's
always a lot of things happeningin cybersecurity.
And that's exactly why, you know, we, we, we sponsor the
show because it's very importantwhat we do.
And, and it's unfortunate. I would like to do other things
(34:56):
with my time. I, you know, it'd be great to be
a park Ranger or something like that and you know, be on the
land. But unfortunately, all of these
companies that we rely on or, orare made to rely on are
continuously failing, being breached, being leaked, and it
interacts with our everyday lives.
And, and so, you know, every time I do come on, I, as, as you
(35:17):
know, I don't want this to be some sort of infomercial like I,
I want to educate people on the actual risks and threats that
are kind of going on our everyday world.
And here we are again, with another host of of bad things to
report. So we got a couple good stories
here. This is coming from TechCrunch
primarily one of the industry publications you've kind of
turned me on to. We got three stories.
(35:38):
One of these is going to be kindof relevant to the last podcast
we did where we talked about a guy who was driving around
Washington DC and he was drivingfor DoorDash, apparently.
And so you sent me an article about DoorDash, and I want to
get into what that's all about. Even if you don't use some of
these companies, the odds are asyou end up touching one of the
bigger aggregators. So we'll start with a very
(35:58):
specific example. And can you confirm at this
moment, are you in fact wearing a hoodie in the dark?
Just so that's what people. Think this is a live shot we got
here? Very good.
Perfect. I'm not moving at all.
I keep myself very. Still, yeah, he has a very good
like sort of hacker persona. So he kind of like hides in the
dark here. OK, so the the headline goes
that DoorDash has confirmed a data breach affecting users
(36:19):
phone numbers and physical addresses.
This is kind of you guys, guys, your bread and butter.
Maybe you can explain what the hack was, how it happened, and
then what sort of vulnerability that leaves for people if you
would. Yeah, absolutely.
Yeah. You know, they were actually
pretty tight lipped about the actual nature of how it was
breached here and and the other couple breaches.
We'll we'll explain. But basically they said that
(36:41):
this is something that happened recently and what was exposed
was the the users again, this isso customers of DoorDash names,
e-mail addresses, phone numbers and creepily and of course, this
is the case with DoorDash physical addresses, your home,
where you are. You know, this is and what they
in in their statement, this is where you get into their kind of
(37:04):
like, you know, very published by lawyers sort of explanation
here where they say no sensitiveinformation was accessed by the
unauthorized third party and we have no indication that the data
has been misused for fraud and identity theft at this time.
Right. No.
And it exists at this moment. Can I read the other piece of it
too? They said no Social Security
(37:24):
numbers, government issued IDs, driver's licenses or bank or
payment cards information were stolen as part of the breach
which to admit to. Exactly which wasn't the case
anyway. And we we know intuitively that
we don't give our Social Security numbers to, to
DoorDash, as you know, as why would you need that?
But of course they say that and add it in there.
It's like saying, it's like going to a restaurant and
(37:45):
saying, you know, that that has a steak listed as gluten free.
It's like, yeah, of course it's gluten free.
It's a, it's a cow. Cows turn gluten into cow when
This is why we have beef anyway.But the point is it, it just,
it's again, legal ease and, and them grasping at straws to try
to minimize the the issue. But the issue is very real.
The question is when you put this information out there and,
(38:07):
and, and you know, offer it to acompany that you're trying to
enter into some commercial arrangement with just so you can
get your to, you know, to get your burrito or whatever.
This is the, this is the problemis that scammers now have this
information on the dark web or, or up for sale or aggregated
somewhere in, in some way. And, and it doesn't matter how
(38:28):
it can be used and how it reallyworks is whether the source of
information that a scammer or a cyber criminal or somebody even
worse is looking looking at you for is there casing you?
And really what they're looking for is who is the lowest hanging
fruit. Let's look at the address.
Let's look at if it's a nice house.
Let's look at, you know, the thedemographics of the person to
(38:48):
see if the juice is worth the squeeze.
And then most importantly, they look at, is this person
cybersecure? What is it that, what are the
vulnerabilities and exposures that I can, that I can use?
Can I interpolate their, their passwords?
Can I hack them? Can I get into their e-mail
account? Can I get into their, their bank
details? You know, and, and of course,
(39:11):
they look at low hanging fruit. And so the point of course is of
what we do or anybody should care about is make yourself a, a
higher cost target for them to, for, for them to exploit.
You don't want to when they're going down that list, you don't
want the scammers to look at youand say there's something here.
(39:31):
You want them to just move on and say, ah, it's not worth it.
Let's just, let's just, you know, let's exploit the suckers,
basically. You know, that reminds me of
because it's Christmas and we domovie references when you and I
talk. I was.
Just thinking about that. There's that moment in Home
Alone, the original Home Alone where the, where the creeps are
driving down the really nice St.and they're trying to find out
like which houses have the alarmsystems and which ones don't and
which ones have the automatic lights.
(39:52):
So you're just looking like, what's the deterrent?
And if they know that your automatic lights only turn on at
a one time, they're like, aha, they do it when they're not
here. Automatic lights will deter us.
So the, the idea just, you know,a higher cost target might be a,
you know, protected by ADT or homeowner has gun and bad temper
or whatever it is that makes people not want to come into
your house. Same kind of idea for your
online persona. Exactly.
And So what? When you buy our service, you
(40:14):
turn into young Kevin McAllisterwith mannequins dancing in the
window to make sure that people understand that you can't come
in to this house because it's full.
I like having the same referencethings.
OK, let's do this other one because this one is an
aggregator and I think maybe theOracle breach is a little bit
darker or potentially more wide reaching for some folks.
Says everything you need to knowabout the Oracle data breach.
(40:35):
I don't use Oracle. What do I use that Oracle's
involved in? Or am I related to this and all?
Yeah, great question. So again, you know, Oracle you
know, is a absolutely massive company that does basically, you
know that some of the bread and butters like customer
relationship management software.
I mean they really do a lot of back end.
I think you know, they, they they used or were The Pioneers
(40:57):
or invented, I can't recall Sequel, which is like a a large
data querying protocol. And of course it is made the the
the founder Larry Ellison enormously wealthy and what
happened to them. This is a huge issue is a
Russian based hacking cohort. I mean, I want to call it called
(41:20):
CLOP did a zero day attack. What is a zero day vulnerability
attack? It is when they, of course, you
know, dark groups like this are constantly prodding and testing
for weaknesses. Again, movie reference, I think
I did last time about the Jurassic Park with the
velociraptors trying to find theweak points in the, in the
(41:41):
electric fence to, to get out. They're constantly prodding at
it and seeing where there are vulnerabilities.
And zero day means that the, theowners of the software, in this
case Oracle, did not know that there was this vulnerability.
They had no knowledge of it. They weren't trying to work on
it. And and unfortunately, these
hackers found it. And so this affected the
(42:01):
companies that are to which Oracle is a vendor and a list of
the ones that you might interactwith on a day-to-day basis,
whether that's, you know, you'rea you're a customer or you're
you're you know, you're you're acustomer of a customer of this
sort of thing is Michelin Michelin tires broadcast
Broadcom, an enormous, you know,Internet company, Estee Lauder.
(42:27):
If you're, if you have, if you're buying makeup, Humana.
I've been accused of wearing makeup but it's not true.
Milo Yiannopoulos said. I wear a natural luster.
You. Have I just, I just, yeah, I
just have these cheekbones. Humana healthcare Fruit of the
Loom. You know if your if your
underwear might get hacked. We don't know.
Canon. Canon printers.
(42:49):
This was an interesting 1. University of Phoenix.
I mean, that's an enormous, you know, private educational
provider and imagine that. Yeah, that goes back all the way
if you've, I mean, cause they'vealways been an online
university, so probably all their records are digital.
Exactly. And, and this is something
actually that happened to Columbia University recently
too, is that they were hacked and you know, if you applied
(43:09):
there, your information was leaked.
It's just, again, it's, it's in,in the list goes on here in, in
this particular breach. But the point is, is that the
companies that you interact withon a commercial basis or you
interact with a company on a commercial basis and they
interact with that company and, and your information is
exploited. The point is your information
(43:30):
can be out there. And you know, you asked ask the
question of yourself like, you know, do I have, what am I doing
to protect myself from these scams?
Because, you know, the frauds happen.
And I'm sure everyone that's listening is is nodding along
saying, yes, I know somebody that this happened to.
And the question is, you know, yesterday is the best time to do
something about it. Today is the next best.
(43:52):
Sure, I, I, I always end up withthese things and I'm always kind
of blown away that people tell me they're like, Hey, I've got a
friend and this scam happened tothem and it was like X number of
hundreds of thousands of dollars.
I'm like, whoa, how did that? How did that even take place?
But then, you know, it can happen to anybody on their down
day. It's happened with my own family
where somebody that, you know, reached out and caught you when
you're busy, you're doing something else.
I actually probably got hit witha, with like maybe a
(44:13):
spearfishing thing the other day.
Get an e-mail purports to be from, from X corporation, which
I use every single day. And it was like, Hey, we flagged
you as say, you know, potentially whatever, you have
some language in one of your posts that's inappropriate and
we're going to put an advisory upon your thing which will limit
your visibility. And I'm like, oh, OK, I got to
do a review of that. And I didn't even think that
(44:36):
they stole the logo from X. They had it from some other
thing and it, and they sent it off to my, one of my emails.
Now, luckily the e-mail I have is not connected to the X
account in any way, shape or form.
So it didn't do anything. But it's my publicly available
like facing e-mail that's you look at it and you go doggone
it. Like I almost got scammed there
and I had to send it off to the to the fishing thing that goes.
It looks like this group's what's it called?
Clop CLOP. Or is it a zero it?
(44:58):
Is, well, yeah, it's, it's, it'szero, but yeah.
It's a stylized thing and it says here that they they've
taken up to what, $500 million? This is not small business.
No, that's the point. I mean, these, these are
seasoned people that are, that are that are doing this.
I mean, I imagine that, you know, the, the spearfishing
attempt that you're describing is, is much more small fry or
(45:18):
not. It depends.
You know, you're, you're a publicly facing person.
And so this is it's you, you don't know.
I mean, on the other hand, we get, you know, normal people get
these stuff, these things all the time.
And it's these that's it's even more scary than just getting
kind of like a a normal BS e-mail that doesn't really make
(45:39):
sense. Like when you get that sort of
thing, you know, that there is ahuman person on the other end of
that looking at you as an individual specifically to try
to, you know, again, with this, it's a business.
You know, cyber scamming is a business unlike, you know, you
know, like any other in which they are trying to measure their
(46:00):
input versus output, their ROI, right?
They want it, they want to target those.
They don't want to waste time onsomebody that's not going to be
worth it or and so they they tryto target individuals and
there's a reason that they're targeting you.
They think that they can exploityou.
And so the, you know, again, theimportant thing is having a
infosec team on your, on your, on your side.
(46:23):
For sure. Also the fact that it's
affiliated with the Russians is always interesting to me.
Asisa has identified it looks like per this thing.
And again, you don't even know who you're dealing with.
Mazda was one of the things thatwas listed on their companies
out there. So car companies like the amount
of data we're talking about, people forget you've got if you
got an app, which I do for my Ford truck now you realize it
like everything is connected everywhere.
As much as I despise that and I kind of wish I had one of those
(46:45):
like pre Skynet 90s trucks. Of course I kind of missed it,
but. Just to give me like a 98-S10
pickup with, you know, 5 speed with just the smelliest carpets
and you know, and just that's all you.
Start it and no electronics whatsoever.
I, I used to tell my wife that was the reason why I actually
bought the first truck that I ever bought, which was a
(47:05):
A-901-F-250. And she was like, it's got 2
batteries and two gas tanks and you got to manually flip them.
And why is that? And I'm like, I can start this
truck in fourth gear and I can get five guys to push it and I
can bump it into second and dropit in there with no electricity
whatsoever. And I got extra batteries.
I got extra, you know, diesel like it just goes, it doesn't
hold anybody. It's, you know, it's a single
cab, but it just works. So when everyone else is dead
(47:27):
and they I can't drive, I'll be driving like Sarah Connor
through wherever I got to go. Exactly.
I miss that world. We're not there anymore.
OK, so this is the thing. So some people think I'm dealing
with smaller companies, I only deal with local businesses,
blah, blah, blah. This one was kind of a little
alerting. This is a fintech, which that
sounds like finance and a place called Marquee here at home in
Texas to me. What's the story with Fintech?
(47:49):
Fascinate with marquee I guess. Yeah, fascinating stuff.
So again, this is a, this is a small financial vendor for many
different, I think they, they say on their website 700 plus
banks and credit unions and they, you know, facilitate
banking for a lot of these smaller regional banks and
(48:11):
credit unions. And so, you know, if you say to
yourself like, Hey, I don't do business with Chase or Wells
Fargo or, you know, any of the, any of the large banks because I
wanted to be smaller. I want my money to feel more
secure. I kind of, I like it better.
The reality is, is that for those smaller community banks to
compete and, and still, you know, maintain their relevancy
(48:34):
in an increasingly narrowing world as far as number of firms
go in, in every single industry,they need to use vendors to
allow them to compete at that, at that level.
And so they use vendors like like Marquee and, and there's,
you know, if I'm just reading through a lot of these banks,
you know, Alliance Bank Erie, Federal Credit Union, you know,
(48:56):
Guarantee Bank, Bank of California, there's a huge
amount of just smaller banks that you would just never even
hear of if you didn't do business with.
Them I'm looking at this one, itsays Maine Credit Union or Maine
State Credit Union. I can't imagine there's a ton of
people in Maine to begin with. And you probably think you're
safe and feel other than Maine because you're barely part of
America at this point. But there you are isolated up in
the in the hinterland. And yes, you're still going to
(49:17):
be doing business on the web it seems.
Exactly. And so and so this was another
zero day Attack Attack. So this was they didn't know
that they the, the company didn't know this was a problem.
And as, as of this week, again, this, this came out a couple
days ago, 400,000 people so far confirmed affected by the data
breach. And again, that is with 100%
(49:39):
certainty going to increase, as you know, because the firstly,
they want to minimize the scale when this happens, when you
know, when the news comes out. And secondly, we just know by
the nature of this, it's like, it's not like the hackers are
out there saying, Hey, we just figured out another, you know,
tranche of 400,000 customers that that's not how it works.
And so they're just hoping that this goes away and they can
(50:00):
remain, you know, salient as a vendor.
But the point of this is, is that between the DoorDash thing,
which effects, you know, enormous company that keeps
buying up smaller, you know, food delivery services, between
the Oracle thing, which is just a, a, a behemoth on a scale that
we don't, we can't even like really understand.
And then this, which is to say, you know, a smaller, a smaller
(50:24):
effect. But for those that want to get
away from the, from the larger, from the larger companies to
interact with its, it doesn't doit.
The point is this in our modern world, you know, this isn't the,
the 91-F-250. This is the app controlled new
world. And it, the, the threats are all
(50:44):
all the way out there. It's no matter where you look
that you can't hide from this. So the question is, what do you
do about it? Well, is there is there a
requirement for one companies toreport this stuff?
Is there a requirement for government to report it to
anybody? Just so like, you know, is there
like one of these compliance emails that says go, you may
have been hacked or is that sortof best practices, you know,
what governs all that? So people even know if they're
(51:05):
even getting hit with this stuff.
Sure. Yeah, I mean, you could.
I mean, and this happens too. Because I imagine they don't
want to tell you if they could tell you.
If they can't tell you. If they don't have to tell you,
they probably wouldn't. Exactly.
I mean, you know you they could.OK, I'll give you a good
example. There's a company, I can't
recall what it was, but they tried to try to hide it and you
know, they got, they got nabbed by the FTC, You know, but think
(51:28):
about this. They, like every company is
asking themselves what is the cost for going legit and getting
out in front of it and losing customers and all that stuff
versus the, the potential five year long litigation that we
might get into with the FTC or the DOJ or whatever that might
result in a, in a fine. You know, they, they contract
(51:52):
with large, you know, white hat lawyer law firms to see what the
exposure might be and what the fine might be based off of other
precedent. So the answer is, yeah, they
have to. But will they?
And that what they do is a business case.
They they try to do it. And in the meantime, who's the
victim? You us the people that that have
(52:14):
no choice but to get their burrito, you know, delivered to
them. You're, you're just, you're just
a calculation on whether or not you're going to cost them more
on the coming or going. It also looks like they're
getting people coming and going with the, with these actual
attacks that there's a ransomware.
Almost all these things seem to be ransomware now.
So they're charging to release the systems back to the people
that run them and then they're also selling off the information
(52:34):
that they stole. Am I?
Am I getting that right? That's, that's exactly correct.
That's exactly correct. Because so that's the point is
that, you know, with these ransomware attacks, the business
model for the hacker is to say we're going to, you know,
capture, encrypt and shut down, you know, X amount of your data.
And if you want to have businesscontinuity or get it back,
here's the Bitcoin address and you can give us $700,000 or
(52:57):
whatever and we'll release it ornot or release it, I don't know.
So that's one piece of the business model.
The other one is we're going to capture all this data, see how
we can monetize it. And there's basically nothing
you can do about it because you left this zero day exploitation
available in your software developers or vendors or
whatever. Didn't, you know, didn't patch
it. And that's on you.
(53:18):
So there's, there's a lot of different, again, we really
should think of these as business models.
And then, you know, they have your data, they have your, in
the case of DoorDash, your, yourphysical address, your phone
number and e-mail address. And then Joe Pesci might be
driving by and taking a look at your house and saying, Hey, this
is this is worth it to do a break in.
(53:40):
Or, you know, I think that we can, you know, get this guy's
password to his Chase account orwhatever 'cause he's got a nice
house in the Chicago suburbs. And that's that's how it works.
That was very consistent. The other guy's name, I can't
remember what the actor's name was, but his but his his
character was called Merv Do. You remember that I see his
(54:01):
face. I see his face too.
I could see his head burn too after he got hit with the the
blow torch. Good.
One in the basement. OK, so people want to get
themselves squared away. They want to get that.
I do get way less robocalls thanI used to, which is the easiest
thing that I can see. You guys always talk about that
in your ads, so that makes senseto me too.
And I've got a way more public profile than probably everybody
else. I got what, 400,000 across
(54:21):
different platforms and followers.
And so I'm, I have to imagine I'm making more trouble for
anybody than and I still have a pretty, pretty low instance of
people trying to screw with me. Even the publicly available
emails are are not generally bothered.
So there's something it's. True.
I mean, look, you know, you knowwhen you when you sign up, it
does make a difference. And even when you do get, you do
get a robocall or a scam call orsomething like that.
(54:44):
We call it like like a it's likea blank.
You know, it's getting fired at you, but there's nothing in
there. And it just one last one in the
hunt for Red October, Captain Ramius steers into the into the
torpedo before it can arm and and then it just, you know,
crashes against the hall and nothing happens.
(55:05):
That's what you know, when you sign up for Patriot Protect, you
know, the the service is to makesure that you you get in front
of all this stuff. Take away the ammunition that
the scammers can use to get against you is by, you know,
removing your name, your address, your age, your phone
numbers, your past workplaces, your relatives names, taking all
(55:26):
of that off the Internet. So they're ungooglable to make
sure that when you do get one ofthose robocalls, you know that
they don't have this whole dossier of information against
you because that's, you know, why have it out there.
It's insane that it's that it isout there in any functioning,
you know, legal system, it wouldbe illegal to have to have these
(55:46):
companies. I, I mean, I'm telling you, I
found the, and I was, I've told this to the, to the audience
before, but I found the directorof the secret services private
address, his phone number, his e-mail address, his, his cell
phone. And they were talking about
people, you know, getting swatted and, and government
officials. And I was like, it's really easy
for some of these people. And, and I used to do this for a
living. So I've got a little bit more
(56:06):
skill at finding it, but I, I find I go find people's stuff
very easily. And it's a lot harder to find me
now than it used to be. And whenever I get a threat now,
I get a death threat. It'll always be from like a
place I used to live and I haven't lived for a while.
And I don't really care. I just go, yeah, have at it,
man. Honestly, Kyle, that absolutely
warms my heart to hear to to know that.
I like getting death threats on places where I don't live that
(56:28):
that's. And let me be clear when I say
it warms my heart to hear that you've gotten a death threat.
What I mean is. I actually kind of think it's
kind of like a sport for me too.And I'm like, I always respond
to them too. I'm like, hey, don't send
anybody you want to get back. Like come on at me.
But also I don't live there. So that's also that's also
helpful. It's it makes me have a little
bit of Peace of Mind with my kiddos because I do have some
(56:48):
little ones. Yes.
All right, so people missed the Black Friday deal, so a little
disappointed, but it's still a relatively inexpensive service
and they can sign up with your thing.
Absolutely. And I'll say this, you know
this, we've, we've been, you know, listeners of, of you have
been hearing us in our name for almost a year now.
And so we wanted to do somethinga little special for for your
(57:10):
folks for those unfortunate folks who have not signed up for
Patriot Protect yet. What we'll do is for this week
we'll make the promo code Kyle count for 50% discount on the
annual plan, which. Is Black Friday, the Black
Friday delayers like I did that on one of those things, they can
catch the second big second run of the Black Friday deal.
Exactly. So I mean, again, this is just
(57:31):
going to be for the folks that that listen to you.
And I want to make sure, again, for everybody that does business
with any of these companies, if,if it's one of these or if it's
going to be a breach that we hear about next week.
And unfortunately, you know, allwe do at Patriot Protect is
listen to this stuff and just shake our heads and say like,
you know, you know, we, we can'tdo anything about that, but we
can arm people, you know, normalAmerican consumers, you know,
(57:55):
with something to do about it. We give you for literally like 5
bucks a month. And actually, if you do the
promo code Kyle this week, it'llbe like the fraction of that or
whatever, a whole infosec team at your disposal.
Just make sure you've got make sure you doing something about
it because I feel bad for those that don't.
It's probably by the end of it about as much as one burrito on
DoorDash. My buddy was telling me it cost
(58:16):
him like 40 or 50 bucks to get aburrito because he didn't meet
the minimum and so that's what it costs on corporate credit.
Card I only hope that he was full of bourbon at the time and
just. Needed that no he was he was
working at infowars. I don't think they, they were
worried about it too much. It was kind of funny.
But yeah, it is a thing. So there you go.
For the cost of a burrito one time on one of these services
that may leak your stuff, you can get that covered for the
year. It it does make a difference as
(58:37):
far as I could tell. So again, I'm a, I'm an N = 1
like anecdotal story, but I appreciate you guys.
I appreciate you jumping on and explaining some of this stuff.
This is definitely not my cup oftea, but nice to know that
everything is always going to bea risk and that we are living
under Skynet. Listen, firstly, it's always a
pleasure to come on, always a pleasure to talk to your folks
and I can with 100% certainty say that next time I'm here,
(58:58):
there's going to be some more bad stuff to talk about.
Outstanding guarantee that's what we like.
Yep. All right, bud.
Skip, thanks for coming on and Ihope you have a hope.
You have a great week. Likewise.
Thank you, Sir. So there you go, folks.
Nothing but bad news as usual, but not a bad deal.
And also, he's a good guy. Skip's funny.
I love, I love that he always has a really good movie
(59:20):
reference for me. And we always have a couple of
them. And so we're going to add a few
more to the repertoire. OK, So what does that have to do
with anything? We had deep state lawyers decide
to screw Steve Friend over the podcast we did about a pipe
bomber. We just talked about data
breaches and things out there, including a DoorDash scenario.
This is the only way my brain weaves it all together.
And then lastly, wasn't the guy who got arrested for the pipe
(59:45):
bomb allegedly working for DoorDash at that time?
This data that they soak up whenthey get these leaks, It's not
just necessarily even what you can see.
I was talking to one of my buddies the other day and he
uses Uber and he was like, I look back and I've got two years
worth of Uber, Uber information.Sounds like DoorDash will give
you access to two years deep worth of orders that you made.
(01:00:08):
I have a plea for you all since I didn't hack DoorDash and I
don't have access to all the DoorDash somebody in Washington
DC. Ordered Chipotle or I don't know
what it is, whatever. Some food.
What what else they had there? Cava.
Maybe Cava, the Mediterranean thing.
Somebody ordered food in Washington, DC on January 5th
(01:00:32):
and received their food between 7:00 and 9:00 PM on January the
5th. And I'm going to bet that
somebody out there in Washington, DC got it from a guy
named Brian Cole Junior, a guy with 60% torso, 40% legs, a guy
who has glasses and has kind of a weird affect and drives a 2017
(01:00:53):
blue Nissan Sentra. You guys want to bet?
You want to bet that the FBI randown the wrong guy, but they
decided to do what they did anyway?
That they decided to silence thefriend, That they decided to
continue pushing forward on a case that likely they already
(01:01:15):
cleared in January, February, orMarch of 2021.
You want to bet on that? Anyone want to take that bet?
Because I don't think you should.
I don't think you should. It's not the only thing that's
going on. This is another sort of instance
of deep state stuff. I just want to cover it because
for everybody saying this FBI isdifferent, people are being held
to account. Are they though?
(01:01:36):
Y'all really. United States federal judge
temporarily blocks the evidence used to dismiss the comedy case.
There's this non-stop ongoing disaster area.
Federal judge temporarily barredprosecutors from using the
evidence seized in from a key figure in the dismissed criminal
case against former FBI directorJim Comedy.
You think the deep state doesn'ttake care of its own?
(01:02:00):
Daniel Rickman Richmond, the lawprofessor former attorney for
comedy, filed a lawsuit in the District Court, District of
Columbia, alleging that prosecutors violated his Fourth
Amendment right by seizing material from his electronic
devices during an investigation in 2019 and 2020 and in granting
a temporary restraining order. On Saturday, District Judge
Colleen Kolar Kotelly wrote thatRichmond is likely to secede on
(01:02:25):
the merits of his claim that thegovernment violated this 4th
Amendment right by retaining thecomplete copy of all records on
his personal computer and searching that image without a
warrant, which is 2 problems. Problem number one is the
ongoing statement that our FBI has absolutely no interest in
(01:02:45):
doing things by the book when itcomes to probable cause.
Their their their regular violation of the 4th Amendment
in the national security sphere bleeds over into the criminal
side. It has to because the same
agents who have the same charterto do the same type of work will
occasionally be able to come up with something.
They work national security and they were able to find something
on a FISA or A7O2, which is likeFISA Lite.
(01:03:09):
And then they just happened to be able to build a criminal case
on you knowing where they went, even though they should have
gone there. Interesting.
This is going to be another one of those things that gets tossed
out. So for all the people like all
The Who are the deep state gangsters that have been
prosecuted under this particularadministration, who Jim Comedy
and Bolton and Letitia James andsome of these things are shut
down. Comedy's going to walk.
(01:03:31):
Is anybody talking about Chris Ray?
Apparently Chris Ray's FBI, if you want to believe that it was
his in the, which I don't, I think it was Paula Bates, but
Chris Ray's FBI was apparently responsible for failing for four
to five years in the pipe bombercase.
That seems truly problematic. Does that not bother you guys as
well? OK, let me encourage you to
(01:03:52):
listen on Spotify. If you're just listening to us
and you don't have chapters, if you don't have video as an
option, why not check us out on Spotify?
And Kyle serifandshow.com is theeasy way to get there.
The reason I say that is becausemaybe you find a topic that's
not interesting to you and you want to jump ahead.
Spotify does AI chapters, which are pretty great and you can get
that is probably the best way toget the recall.
By the way, we are 1000% increased this year since we
(01:04:15):
started using Spotify. If you're not on Spotify, check
us out on Rumble. Check us out on X Check us out
on YouTube. Humble and YouTube are the only
two that are monetized there. So if you care about supporting
us, it doesn't cost you any moreto watch on one of those
platforms. I really appreciate if you did.
And that's the easiest way that you can show us a little bit of
love. We get a little bit of ad
revenue out of those things. We also get ad revenue out of
Spotify and you may hear an ad from them right now.
(01:04:37):
Again, it's Kyle surfandshow.com, very easy to
find us if you want to support what we're doing here and just
thumbing the the eye of this sort of deep state gangster
clowns that are out there, the status quo types.
Follow us on locals. It's Kyle serafin.com.
Otherwise, make sure you have liked this video.
Bump us up in the algorithm, leave us a comment.
Like it on YouTube, like it on Rumble.
(01:04:57):
All of those things push us up. We've got a great chat over on
Rumble, which you guys have probably seen.
That's on the right hand side ofthe screen on the left side,
which I can't integrate because Rumble kind of sucks when it
comes to playing well with others.
You've got our YouTube chat and they're also active and bumping
along and that's been really cool that you guys have started
doing that. We have we have gradually
increased linearly to the point where at some point we just
(01:05:18):
blast off over on YouTube. But for all of you that are the
early adopters, you guys are in the 1st 20,000 subscribers to
this channel. So Congrats on you.
You found the Kyle Seraphin show.
We're really glad you're here and I am not done yet.
We're going to do pipe bomber stuff.
Shall we feel like we should? There's other things going on,
immigration stuff, MTG going outagainst it.
Let's start with this. I went on a couple of podcast.
I think I did redacted, I'm pretty sure.
(01:05:40):
Who else did I do? I did Clint Russell's show
Liberty Lockdown, which is sneaky good.
I, I really like Clint. I've always liked Clint.
We've talked a few times offlineand I think we've done 2
interviews on camera. I'm a big fan of the way that
Clint handles business by the way.
He's a great listener and he didtherapy.
I, I actually owe him probably atherapist Bill from talking to
him on the show that went out onSaturday because I, I must have
(01:06:00):
done 95% of the talking for thatshow and I appreciate him doing
this. Let's talk about why this is
relevant. This map right here is the area
in question. You'll see D Street mid screen
and it goes east and West. OK, 2nd St.
SE on the right hand side, that's going to be the Far East
boundary and that goes North andSouth and in the vicinity of and
(01:06:20):
it's bordered on the north side by C St.
What we are looking at is the complex that includes the DNC
and the RNC. And I think I actually have a
map that may be a little bit easier to see those things
because they're flagged. Let's see what we can do with
this one here. OK, This is the flag area.
All right, so this is where I used to work.
There it is. The FB is Washington field
office. It's over here and you'll see
(01:06:41):
this north-south Road. If you're not, if you're if
you're just listening, I'm pointing at 395, the Interstate
that goes right through the middle of the heart of DC and
right past the National Mall. Over here is the complex for the
Capitol. This is the National Mall area.
You got like the Lincoln Memorial over here and so on.
OK, we're going to zoom in on where these green flags are.
Can you see the green flags You will shoe?
(01:07:03):
Here we go. OK, green flags coming on in.
OK, They're at the bottom of thescreen.
Let's put them right in the middle.
The green flags represent a few key places of interest.
One of them, the Capital South Metro station.
That's where the Capitol Police officers, the CSU teams parked.
It's also where Person of Interest 2 got off and walked
(01:07:27):
around and made a beeline over to this flag.
Oh, freedom, Madam. There you go.
This green flag over here is theRNC.
That's the Republican National Committee.
That is where one of the two pipe bombs was found.
We believe that even though it was the first one found, it was
the second one placed. And the Democratic National
Committee is over here. And I'm just showing you on a
(01:07:48):
broad map here, this is Canal Street, this is New Jersey,
which cuts right through the middle of the map.
That's what I was looking for. And it goes 2nd St. to the
right, 1st St. And then you get over here to
South Capitol Street is going tobe the boundary line next to the
DNC. Remember all those things as we
switch back to this map. Where you are looking closest to
me is going to be South Capitol St.
(01:08:09):
Furthest from me, 2nd St. just below where you can see on this
map is going to be 695, which eventually feeds into 395 and
goes back home for Brian Cole, who I believe based on what his
grandma said and all available evidence thus shown to me was
probably actually just driving and didn't drop the pipe bombs.
I'm saying it to you right now, I don't believe that he was the
guy that dropped the bombs. I think the FBI got the wrong
(01:08:31):
guy and I think they know it. How's that for an assertion?
Is that wild? Share this stream, share it with
your friends. Let's break it down real quick.
These are the critical hours that are going to be of
relevance. At 7:10, according to the
complaint that was filed for hisarrest, Brian Cole Junior's
(01:08:51):
vehicle, a 2017 Nissan Sentra, which they do not describe any
further, but it actually is pretty easy to find.
His Nissan Sentra was seen on a license plate reader with
Virginia plates, and it was captured driving South on 395.
OK, and I'm going to show you what his car looks like because
(01:09:13):
that's the kind of guy I am. Allow me to reframe this thing
real quick. This was taken from Google
Earth. This is publicly available.
I'm going to let's see if we cancut out a little bit of the
address stuff. There we go.
Stand by, folks. I'm just trying not to reveal
anything that doesn't need to berevealed.
Not that you couldn't find his address very easily, but here it
is. This is Google Earth parked out
in front of his neighbor's house.
If you're looking at Brian's house to the right and then the
(01:09:34):
first open parking spot on the circle there in this little
cul-de-sac, that's his Nissan Sentra.
It's a 2017 with factory wheels and it is going to be relevant
because somebody knows that theyhad a DoorDash delivery that
came to them with that car. That's my belief and I'm betting
that it could be proved. OK, here's why it's relevant.
(01:09:57):
Here's the time frame 710. Apparently he's driving South on
this road, which we are going tozoom out on.
Here we go here. Let's go 710.
He's driving South here and he took the exit to get onto this S
Capitol St. SW, OK, which would take him
into this general vicinity. That's where he drove by and
(01:10:19):
that's it. That's what they have for his
car as far as they've told us sofar.
My bet is this. This is Kyle Seraphin
speculation. Extraordinary.
I think that the FBI grabbed allthe 186 phones that pinged in
the area in 2021. I think they ran them all down
(01:10:40):
like they said they did. Some were exempted. 51 of them
were exempted for being law enforcement.
No clear why 30 plus were actually flagged for interviews
and a bunch of them had some follow-ups.
Like 90 of them had some follow-ups.
And then I think they identifiedBrian Cole as a guy who was
generally in the area, and then they went and they alibied him
(01:11:00):
and found out that he was not the guy.
This is my strong belief that Mister Cole was not, in fact,
implicated during that time. OK, here's some really
interesting stuff from Armitas. Armitas is the Internet
researcher slash video editor analyst who spent more time in
(01:11:24):
the CCTV footage room than anybody that I can be aware of.
He's he's downloaded all the videos.
He knows where all the cameras are.
And I reached out to him on Friday after the arrest of Brian
Cole. And I wanted to explain to him
something about pings. And I'm going to explain it to
you as well. This is worth clipping for, for
those of you that want to clip this and use this for historical
understanding of what the hell we're talking about.
(01:11:46):
The FBI. Let me put the let me put the
search warrant up here on here as well.
Not the search warrant, sorry. The the complaint.
Let's go to where they talk about this is the complaint that
was filed. Let me show you at the top of
the screen so you know what I'm talking about, OK.
The affidavit in support of criminal complaint.
This is the one that was used togo after Brian Cole and the
arrest. They give you the background of
the pipe bombs. We're just doing a quick recap
(01:12:07):
here. They talk about identified on
surveillance footage. They identified a subject, but
not Brian Cole definitively, certainly not by what they've
put in this criminal complaint. This is not the entirety of it.
Couple things. Interesting identification of
Brian Cole Junior. Let me tell you what they think
is important. He's 30 years old.
He lives in Woodbrook, Virginia.That means he's in the local
area. He's 5 foot 6, which means he
fits their height estimate just barely.
(01:12:28):
And he wears corrective glasses as though that were important.
Why was that important? Because the pipe bomber is seen
cleaning glasses on the video footage.
He lives in a single family house and he works in the office
of bail bondsman. By all understanding of this
guy, it sounds like he is a a person who has low
functionality. But brilliantly enough, and let
(01:12:49):
me say this very, very clearly as well, it sounds like his
family has taken care of him despite the fact that in in many
situations, he would not be ableto thrive, that he probably
wouldn't be able to hold down a job and he likely would not be
able to find gainful employment.And he would be either on the
street or like a ward of the state.
But this family, despite being left-leaning from everything I
can tell to include the fact that here, let me show you how
(01:13:10):
left-leaning they are. Here's the grandma.
Her name is Loretta Cole. She's been quoted in multiple
places. I found her on Facebook easy
enough. There is Brian Junior, as they
call him with his grandmother. OK, the only pictures that she
has, in fact, the only real thatshe shows on her Facebook
account is with this person. And that is the first openly
transgender state delegate to the Virginia House in Virginia.
(01:13:35):
That is a wildly left-leaning thing.
And this woman is there in support of this left-leaning
Danica Noam dude who is a man dressed up like a lady.
So I think they are clearly on the hard left, but I mean the
way that I can find commonality with many people on the left,
they care about their family just like I care about my
(01:13:55):
family, just like you care aboutyour family.
They are pro-life in that way. And rather than leave Brian Cole
Junior, a man who has apparentlyeither an autistic like nature,
maybe it's undiagnosed, but has a serious inability to process
regular things, they didn't justleave him to the state or kick
him out on the street and have him live somewhere.
(01:14:15):
He lives in his mom's basement and he's taken care of by people
who love him and he has a job that gives him purpose.
And apparently he also was working for DoorDash delivering
food, which is a nominal thing. Can you follow the GPS
coordinates? Can you drive to the place?
Can you take the bag and hand itto the person?
You don't have to collect any money.
Can you do those things? Great, you now have purpose.
You're not a ward of the state. You're not wandering around
(01:14:36):
homeless on drugs, getting to fights with bombs and things
like that. And there are plenty of people
in Washington, DC that have that.
So God bless them for taking care of this guy and for keeping
their son in a mom's basement. My dad and I had this
conversation the other day. He's like, that used to be a
relatively common phenomenon. If you had someone that failed
to launch, that just didn't havethe ability to survive on the
(01:14:56):
own, on their own, parents wouldwould take care of that, that,
you know, part of their nest. They would hold on to the
person. They wouldn't kick them out into
the world and say it's your business, good luck.
They would make sure that this person got fed and clothed and
had purpose and love and went tochurch with them and so on.
That was a real thing. For those of you that have
special needs kids, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
(01:15:17):
You may have them through their entire adulthood.
God bless you for taking care ofthem.
Regardless of this woman's politics, which I probably don't
agree with, I do absolutely stand behind the instinct to
take care of your offspring and your lineage, so good on them.
OK, they point out that he livesin the basement.
(01:15:38):
Why is that relevant? Because they also basically
leave it there. He worked for a bail bondsman.
But they didn't say that he did need 1099 work and we're told by
the grandma he did. That seems very relevant.
That seems like a potential alibi to me.
I would have want to run that down and I'm confident the FBI
probably did. That's going to be my belief.
Then they go out and lay out a bunch of things that he bought.
(01:15:58):
What they don't say is that these are the only things that
were bought on those days and I want to highlight that as well.
He bought pipes that were one inch by 8 inch.
I have some in my in my garage. In fact, what I'm going to do
for those of you that are that are regular watchers and you
know that I kind of have like things behind me on the wall.
If you've never watched the show, you're missing out.
But we have a really cool littlebackground here.
I'm going to actually put some random pieces of 1 inch pipe and
(01:16:19):
some end caps that I happened tofind yesterday when I was
looking for some connectors and some hooks.
I just have them in my stuff. I apparently have a pipe bomb
and waiting. I definitely have 14 gauge black
and red wires. I certainly have connectors to 9
volts if I need to. Multiple different connectors
for various different types of items.
Apparently I've all of got I've got all the stuff I need.
I've even got carbide bits that would be able to drill through
(01:16:40):
galvanized steel. Does this guy have a drill
press? Those were really clean and neat
holes for those of you who saw the pictures.
Anyway, I'm going to put some random pipe behind me just for
the hell of it because I used toalways use it for who knows
what. Go back to this, that document
here. What they didn't say, but they
kind of allude to is that he went out and just bought like 1
inch by 8 inch galvanized pipe of a particular marking.
But they didn't say whether he was buying other things that
(01:17:01):
made sense. Did he buy some floor flanges to
go along with it, along with theend caps?
Did he buy some connectors or some joint works or some 90°
angles? Did he buy some elbows?
What else did he buy when he wasbuying this stuff?
Was there a reason? Was it gas line?
Was it water line? Was it some sort of project he
was running where he just wantedto run and do a mousetrap?
Was it something where he was going to put marbles down it
like my kids might? I don't know.
Neither do you. We don't actually have the
(01:17:22):
details. And they leave that out on
purpose. Because if they only were, if he
was only going to a store and buying exclusively pipe bomb
making materials, I can pretty much guarantee you that would
have been part of the affidavit because it makes it a lot
stronger if somebody goes and purposely buys only bomb making
stuff. But did he buy other stuff too?
That seems like it should be relevant.
Then we're going to get down to the pings, and I want to blow
(01:17:44):
your minds with some pink stuff.Maybe you don't know anything
about pings. So let's talk about it.
The FBI obtained historical cellsite records.
Let's just hone in on this. They are associated with cell
towers in the immediate vicinityof the RNC and the DNC for the
relevant time period of January the 5th.
Let's go to our infographic. Here we go.
The towers that they identified,they have multiple towers and
(01:18:07):
each of them are represented by the lines that you see on the
screen that are colored 1202. I feel like there is a 2, maybe
there isn't. O2 is blue, it's dark blue.
It's hard to see. So one is right in the middle of
the screen and then above it that that's at like 395 above it
is going to be two and three. And they point roughly one
points downward South and the other one basically paced goes
(01:18:29):
east. And then you've got #4 which is
over on the east side, but it points out to the West.
And then five kind of turns around a little bit and it goes
far. It's farthest one on the east,
but it points kind of like northand West.
OK. So four and five are both kind
of West pointing things. What they say is, is they they
grab a sector that is roughly 120°, that's 1/3 of a circle.
(01:18:52):
And the way that it works when you have historical cell phone
pings is that whatever data you have, that's what you get.
There's really two ways that pings work.
And I wanted to explain that forpeople who don't know.
In law enforcement, you can get a warrant that will give you
what's called precision pings. That's actually a misnomer.
They're not that precise a lot of times.
And so we can actively ping the cell phone you have, unless it
(01:19:12):
happens to be in a Faraday bag like mine is right now.
If they were to have a ping, I've gotten pings on my phone,
then they can actually indicate like, hey, right now I want to
ping the phone and see where it is.
Where is Seraphin? Oh, he's on a Wi-Fi network in
his house. Got it.
Where is Seraphin? Oh, he's hitting this tower and
it's a Verizon tower or it's an AT&T tower or whatever.
(01:19:35):
So you can ping it actively. The problem is, is the more you
ping it, obviously the more thatyou're giving data back.
And that means you can burn out the battery.
So you don't want to have it like constantly pinging in real
time. You're just hitting him to do
spot checks on where the person is.
Where is this phone hanging out right now?
That's active pinging. Historical pings are something
completely different. And by the way, active pings are
regularly garbage. In Washington DC, we would have
(01:19:55):
pings on phones where we were supposed to go do surveillance
and our accuracy degree of uncertainty was 10,000 meters.
10 kilometers, 5 miles square would be where it could be
anywhere in there. What pings are really good for
showing you is where someone is not.
It doesn't always show you wheresomeone is.
(01:20:15):
I can show you that someone is probably or their phone is
probably in in Maryland and not in southern, you know, Virginia.
That's pretty good, but is it going to show me specifically
what building or what street? Not necessarily.
So that's worth knowing when youstart dealing with historical
pings. We're talking about something
all together differently. That's wherever the phone
(01:20:36):
interacted with. Fill in the blank tower, and it
could be anywhere in that cone of uncertainty and there's no
one there actively pinging it. So you're just looking at
whatever incidental contact the phone had with various towers.
And sometimes it's great. In rural areas, it could be
pretty good, especially if a couple overlapping towers.
In urban areas, it tends to be garbage.
That's just my experience with it, having searched for people
using this technology. Now we go back to the Armitas
(01:20:59):
bit, and this is going to be fascinating to some of you.
Look at what we have here. Position #1 in the middle, dead
center of the screen is where the pipe bomber was at the time
that they indicate for ping number one and the hit on tower
#1 which is outside of the area that tower #1 covers.
(01:21:19):
Now, maybe there's some bleed over because occasionally you
get a little bit wider or a little bit narrower than the
tower is supposed to have, but that seems kind of problematic
#2 shows very deep into the coneand on far off to the right #3
looks like the ping is actually almost outside as well.
This is what what we're looking at in the middle here is the
pipe bomber route and then the towers are all outside of the
(01:21:42):
route to greater or lesser degrees.
This is not a precision move. Look at tower #4 and ping #4
right on the edge. So they're actually banking more
on the air ratio of being outside the 120° then being
inside. OR more probably they ran this
lead to ground in early 2021. And there's probably a file in
(01:22:04):
the FBI Sentinel that says that this guy was ruled out for
variously good reasons and they didn't pursue him any further.
And today's FBI decided we need somebody.
We're going to give Dan Bongino something and we're going to run
it down right now. You guys want to see what that
looked like because they seem like they came up out of nowhere
from a historical file. I think the FBI had this guy in
(01:22:25):
their back pocket because he wasnever a good choice.
They're going to try to play it on you and that's why they said
they're comfortable with their subjects and they're still
gathering more material, which is complete nonsense as I broke
with Steve Friend on Friday. Nobody gets arrested and then we
sort of think it might be the guy and we're pretty comfortable
with it. You better have a freaking slam
dunk when you go do a federal arrest warrant.
(01:22:45):
This is not like 1/2 ass game. There's a reason why there's an
over 90% conviction rate. This is Dan Bongino talking
about how when he got the message it was nothing new.
Except it sounds like it was something new.
He said it on Hannity that they just did good old fashioned
police work on the old data set and this one says they had
something new. Well, which one was it to
solving the case? Dan, you want to take that?
(01:23:08):
Yeah. Sure, I was smiling at you
because I certainly remember themoment.
Darren remembers it too. He said, are you sitting down?
Call me on the phone? I said, oh boy, why is this bad
news? And he said, I think we got them
what exactly that tip was. I'm going to have to pass on
(01:23:30):
that for right now while we're still there's.
Obviously, we're in the prologueof a long book.
This is just the beginning. This is not the end of the
investigation, as you all well know, having reported on these
for a long time. There's interviews to be
conducted. The search warrant processing
scene is not even done. So we're at the early stages.
So that's the only reason I hesitate to tell you what the
exact tip was, but yeah. OK, so it was a new tip, is what
(01:23:54):
he said. A new tip, are they going to get
their story straight? Here's Kash Patel.
He did a victory lap. He said, we want to praise all
the people that work at the Washington field office.
These are the same people, by the way, that coordinated the
efforts against the J Sixers. Interestingly enough, the same
prosecutor that's going to go after Brian Cole Junior is the
same one that went after EnriqueTario and had a role in Michael
Flynn's prosecution. So those people still work
(01:24:14):
there. When I say that the state always
wins, it doesn't matter whether they're coming after Steve
Friend or Kyle Seraphin or they're coming after some
unknown guy who just happens to live in his mom's basement in
Woodbridge, VA, where they're doing the right thing and
keeping him out of trouble and they're giving him function and
purpose. And the FBI probably cleared
him. If I had to say it, I feel
pretty confident saying the Bureau blew it.
(01:24:34):
And by the way, I'm not alone. If you're in the FBI listening
to this right now, you think thesame thing.
That's why you're listening. How many of you have thought
that and said it to your colleagues?
This guy looks like a passkey. This looks like a fall guy.
This looks like bullshit. Was probably more likely what
you said because nobody believeswhat these guys are saying.
Here's Bongino. Remember, he just said I was the
(01:24:55):
guy who quarterbacked the effort.
Bongino owns this arrest. Cash Patel went out and and
praised it and took credit for it and wanted to tell everybody
what a great job they did and how they did something that no
one else did. He also gets to own it.
Pam Bondi was part of the circlejerk in that little press
conference. She gets a bit of it and so does
Judge Jeanine. So we've got them all there.
(01:25:15):
Now, you're not going to care about it, but so does the a Dick
of the Washington Field office and so does the ASACAC that was
in charge of the squad. Those are all people that you're
not going to necessarily be thatinterested in.
But they also should own a pieceof this.
This should be a career ender. This is what I think happens
when you do Richard Jewell. And here before I go to the clip
of Dan Bongino telling you something different than what he
just said at the press conference, allow me to say
this. Richard Jewell found a pipe bomb
(01:25:40):
and then was accused of placing the pipe bomb.
They ruined his life and he diedin his 40s from the stress of
them destroying his life when hewas in fact a hero in that
scenario. There's a big difference between
what goes on with Brian Cole Junior and what happened with
Richard Jewell. And the difference is we have
social media, we have all of youout there and we are completely
(01:26:01):
independent from any media organization.
We don't have to run the narrative.
And I'm not going to, and neither are my friends who are
researching this, who work for an independent media
organization that have been properly reporting on the pipe
bomb scenario for a while. You're not going to get a chance
to just not have anybody ask youquestions because I can see the
inconsistencies in the same day from these guys.
(01:26:24):
Remember, I'm not going to tell you what the tip was.
Well, what was the tip? Sean Hannity wants to know too,
is you did not find any new evidence.
It was all there had been there for the longest period of time.
The only difference between you and Director Ray and and the
Biden DOJ is they did not prioritize it.
Why? And, and I know it wasn't easy
(01:26:46):
to solve, but you did it in eight months.
Yeah, John, I don't know. I don't know what the hell this
prior leadership team was doing outside of, you know, targeting
political opponents, weaponizingthe FBI, destroying its
reputation, embarrassing agents that are doing really good work
out there, catching terrorists, CCP spies and everyone else.
(01:27:07):
It's almost like they were intentionally trying to decimate
faith and institutions. It's it's it's horrifying.
I don't know what they were doing.
I can tell you what happened though, when we got there, the
director and I, my first meeting, my first meeting, I, I
swore in and I kid you not, probably 15 minutes later and
the people who are in the meeting know, I said when I get
(01:27:28):
in there, I want a full brief onthis pipe bomber case on day
one. And I looked at the case agent
after getting a full brief of what they done and they had done
some pretty extensive amount of work.
They had chased down I think thousands of leads, 6000 plus
interviews have been conducted, hundreds of tips and it still
was relatively stale the case. And I grabbed the case agent on
(01:27:51):
the on the way out and I said, you're going to get me this guy,
you're going to track this guy down and you're going to find
him. You're going to get me this guy.
I want him. Yeah, so they gave him somebody
on Dan Bongino's birthday, as I'm getting reports from people
in the security detail that they're packing his house up and
moving him down to Florida so hecan go out on a win.
They showed this B roll footage at that time, Pharmatas, who's
(01:28:13):
responsible for that? That graphic that we showed you
of the towers where they do not align very perfectly with the
pings. In fact, I think they are
relying on the margin of error. Also had an interesting insight
on this video clip. If you're just listening, you
need to go to Spotify so you cankick in.
Otherwise rumble and YouTube areyour options.
And our time stamp is roughly one hour and 28 minutes in.
I'm just looking over at my at my recording clock here.
(01:28:36):
OK, there is the pipe bomber taking off glasses, it seems,
and cleaning them and then leaving them on as somebody
walks their dog next to them, keeps an arm up and then pulls
the glasses again after the person is out of watch, you
know, watching distance. Now, the assumption has always
been that these would be prescription glasses, but
(01:28:56):
Armitas made an interesting, let's say, observation.
And I want to make sure I have this thing on loop right now.
So stand by one second, folks. Let's loop it.
There we go, the story is like this.
This is Armitas belief based on human behavior.
If you are wearing glasses that allow you to see better.
As someone who used to wear prescription glasses before my
(01:29:17):
eye surgeries, I know about this.
When you can't see, when you have fogged up lenses, it's
awful. It is absolutely atrocious.
So you might take them off and clean them on your sweatshirt or
your hoodie and then you put them back on.
Let's say you cleaned them, but it wasn't good enough and it was
a smudge. And your whole goal of wearing
those glasses is to see better, right?
And if somebody's walking up on you, you might take them off
(01:29:38):
again and clean them again. Because it doesn't matter,
because the glass's purpose is not concealment.
The glass's purpose is actually enhancing your vision.
So you could clean them. See, you didn't do a good job,
take them off, clean them again.He does something different.
This bomber, whoever it is, maybe her, takes the glasses
off, cleans them, see someone coming, puts them back on, waits
till the person leaves, then takes them off and cleans them.
(01:29:58):
And Armitas's observation, whichI do not have any major holes
in, is that the glasses then seem to indicate that they were
there for deception and concealment, not for better
view. If you had sunglasses meant to
conceal your appearance and theywere fogged up, their primary
goal is not helping you see. In fact, they do the opposite of
that. They actually just conceal your
(01:30:18):
face. So whether you can see out of
them or not see out of them, your goal would be to make sure
that your eyes are blocked out so people can't see you.
Isn't that right? Check the logic on this
prescription. Glasses that are not darkened
are meant to enhance your vision.
Sunglasses that are worn at night are meant to conceal your
(01:30:41):
person. And wouldn't that be interesting
because we know that there was blurring that was done by the
FBI, as highlighted by Dan Bongino of all things, that they
actually blurred that out. And if they were sunglasses at
the time, that could make it real easy.
They definitely are lenses. The question is, is what sort of
lenses are they, prescription orotherwise?
(01:31:01):
And I think this is an interesting human observation in
so much as this is a series of human observations.
And what we don't have in the probable cause statement that
the FBI put out, which is very specific, they do not say that
they see this man getting out ofhis vehicle, dressed as such,
going on the route and then going back to the vehicle.
So what are the odds that this guy is running a DoorDash as the
(01:31:25):
grandma says that he was out there doing his side hustle?
And this is the report that cameout on Friday after the hearing,
DC pipe bomb suspect Brian Cole Junior appears in court for the
first time weeping with female kin and they cry out, we love
you. Not you're a terrorist, not
we're done with you. The scruffy Red Cross loving
(01:31:47):
suspect accused of planting homemade pipe bombs outside the
DNC in the RNC ahead of the January 6th Capitol riot
shuffled into the courtroom brief hearing on Friday while
female Ken wept and cried out tohim.
We love you. Bryan Cole Junior, 30, who is
allegedly copped to the crime tothe investigators was hauled
(01:32:09):
into the DC federal courtroom for the first time since his
arrest Thursday to officially hear the charges against him.
And he faces raps from transporting explosive device
across state line with intent toinjure, kill or damage property
to malicious destruction by means of explosive material.
Those are the two charges that 18 USC 844 India and Delta
family members. Six of them showed up.
(01:32:30):
They declined to comment at the end of the roughly 10 minute
hearing. Two women in the group cried out
from the courtroom gallery in tears.
I've been in that courtroom, I've been in that gallery.
They said we love you Brian, we're always here for you.
He showed up with a scruffy mustache wearing a khaki
jumpsuit from the jail. He only spoke to the Magistrate
Judge who asked him standard questions, including his
understanding of his rights and his highest level of education
(01:32:53):
that he completed, which was high school.
OK, this is a judge who handled J6 Ryder cases.
There's this indication that theguy's lawyer is already trying
to put Cole underneath a a J6 pardon based on the the wording
in the executive order that Donald Trump put out.
And apparently he's already confessed to it.
(01:33:18):
Here's the victory lap right there.
We see it. He faces up to 10 years in jail
for the first count, 20 years for the second count if
convicted. It's going to be very
interesting to see who is it andwhat kind of deal might he get.
Imagine if they gave him time served or probation only and let
him go with nothing and a guiltyplea so they could close this
thing out. Buddy of mine reached out and
(01:33:40):
said that was his concern. We have a dishonest operation
going on right now run by peoplewho are so desperate and
thirsty. They need to see somebody take
the fall and they pick somebody.And my guess is that there's
probably a file in the FB is computer system that showed the
reason why they didn't pursue this guy any further because
this is basic police work. This is basic FBI investigative
work. This is not that hard.
(01:34:03):
A bunch of historical pings which were identified in the
area. We're already told they
identified all the phones. And then you just run them down
and then you do the interviews. So why didn't they go and get
him in January, February, March?The the idea is, is because what
it didn't fit the narrative. Sorry, I don't buy it.
I don't doesn't make any sense, especially because it doesn't
(01:34:24):
explain why a Capitol Police officer counter surveillance
team was able to find the pipe bombs in 11 minute and seven
seconds from the time they got out of their vehicle.
Right. We're going to go back to this
again. The person that dropped these
bombs disappeared off camera fora solid 8 minutes on foot,
somehow appeared out of nowhere with no vehicle and no easy
(01:34:45):
place to to pinpoint where they started.
Because vehicles are a really great sort of a target of
opportunity to be able to trace.You think the FBI doesn't have
all of those 8 minutes? They should.
If they don't, why don't they? Why did they not share them?
734 pops up on camera, walks around, goes up 1st St. there.
Sorry, that's not 1st St. What is that one?
Let me look real quick. Rolls up the street on Jersey,
(01:35:09):
New Jersey and rolls along to D St.
SE cuts out to the West, goes down, drops the bombs, returns
as came. Disappears for a few minutes in
the vicinity of Folger Park and then rolls up past Saint Peter's
Church on Capitol Hill on 2nd St.
(01:35:29):
SE and then rolls over to the Capitol Hill Club.
Place the, the palm behind the the, the little dumpster that
we're familiar with and then disappears at 8:18.
No more camera surveillance. I really hope the FBI doesn't
have like something else that they're trying to not tell us
because what they're telling us is super thin and what they've
been telling us for five years is super thin.
(01:35:52):
And if their historical pings are the entirety of it, they
don't have video footage of him getting out of a vehicle, a blue
Nissan Sentra. Do they have footage of this
vehicle where he gets out of it and is carrying the backpack,
wearing the shoes and the hood? Because that's a lot closer to
something we can believe. It doesn't prove that he was the
one driving it. And a cell phone ping is not
(01:36:13):
something we can drone strike. It just means that somebody's
phone was somewhere. People hand phones off all the
time, especially when they're trying to do criminal activity.
But we're supposed to believe that the Super spy spent five
years evading the FBI, spaced out his purchases for two years
prior, even before the election ever took place, And somehow
he's a Trump supporter despite the fact that his grandma is a
rabid left wing politics fan andsupports the first transgender
(01:36:39):
dude woman dressed up in the Virginia State delegate's house.
And somehow this guy's a big Trumper and he lives in his
mom's basement as a big Trumper,while mom and grandma are like
politics of the other side And whose dad was represented by
Benjamin Crump. That's what they want to sell
us. Just tell me if you're buying
that. I'm just saying, put in the
comments. Tell me why you buy it.
If you think that we're going todiscover something is totally
(01:37:02):
amiss later on, you can let me know that too, because this,
this ain't it. These are the towers.
One more time, now that you've seen it again, that little area
where it says #1 in the middle of the screen, that tiny little
square area is where The Walkinghappened for the pipe bomber.
(01:37:24):
And those large V shaped open arms with different colors are
where the towers are picking things up.
And anything in that sector could be the right thing.
This is not a slam dunk for pings a couple of purchases that
almost everybody that I know that's a regular dude has in
their in their garage. And many of you have let me know
(01:37:45):
as well. That doesn't do it.
And when Steve friend and I punched a bunch of holes in this
and showed how ridiculous it was.
And Tom Massie, congressman who's been doing the
investigation on this, who's been working, you know, sitting
down and talking to The Blaze about some of the the
shenanigans that he thinks that the FBI is involved in and the
fact that it should involve the United States Capitol Police in
some way, shape or form or another, which this guy doesn't
(01:38:07):
seem to have any connection to. Tom Massey shares our podcast.
And the FBI calls Steve back in despite not having a job for
him. And his attorneys said that
they're no longer willing to represent him.
That's how deep this kind of stuff goes.
Do I think that these are unconnected random incidents?
Absolutely not. And neither do you, if you're
(01:38:28):
being honest, because that's crazy.
Why would this law firm with Chuck Grassley staffers and
people who have worked in the federal government and and
completely rely on access to people who have power to be able
to get donor dollars to be able to pay their full time salaries.
How do those people, how do theysuddenly decide that they're not
going to work with Steve Friend anymore?
(01:38:49):
Who's been the most effective ofthe people that they they worked
with? He's been the loudest.
He's been the most aggressive along with me.
We're the guys that laid on the barbed wire so the other guys
could get their jobs back. By the way, other than Gerardo
Boyle, who has still also not gotten his back pay, who still
also doesn't have the proper leave balance, the other guys
that were on that list, they arealso not being made whole.
(01:39:11):
I'm going to leave their names out of it for right now out of
respect for their sort of like quietness is keeping them a
little bit safer. But the FBI has not fulfilled
the agreement with the 10 whistleblowers that they were
meant to and they want them to shut up.
And God forbid Steve Friend who is clearly not an employee based
on having none of the actual things that make you an
employee. And most importantly for the
(01:39:32):
FBIA, background check is a required qualifications.
It's the reason why I don't workat the Bureau.
It's the reason why I knew I wasfired from the minute they
pulled it. It's like, OK, well I don't have
a background check. I can't do any work anymore.
I can no longer come and do my duty.
I don't work for you anymore. The fact that you're not paying
me is another piece of it. To start paying him when they
can't even say that they should be paying him because they don't
(01:39:52):
actually have the background check done yet, is in and of
itself incriminating. And calling him into work to do
nothing is retaliatory. And I expect that they'll be
some legal process along with that.
If not, there should be. And if you're a congressperson
who's listening to this or your staffer who's listening to this,
guys, your job is to protect whistleblowers, period.
(01:40:13):
They're allowed to come to you. If you ever want to see things,
you better make sure that you set a better example than what
you've been doing. And I'll give you one last
example of how I know they're not and this is going to be
really bad. One of the reasons that many
people know me is because of this thing that they called the
Catholic memo, which was a it was a a document that was
(01:40:36):
produced in the FB is intelligence sphere, which
essentially claimed that radicaltraditionalist Catholics, a term
that they made-up citing the Southern Poverty Law Center,
were potentially white supremacists because they like
the Latin Mass. I'm paraphrasing a bit.
It's one of the things you guys know about me.
Check this out. Tell me the deep state does not
win Local FBI special agent in charge appointed new state
(01:41:00):
public safety secretary and there he is Stanley medor.
Governor elect Abigail Spanberger has appointed the
current. He's not the current.
He's retired the former. They got this wrong.
Actually, that's funnier. Special agent charge of the
Richmond Field office. Stanley Medor as the
commonwealth's next secretary ofpublic safety and Homeland
(01:41:21):
Security. He was the guy that should have
been the buck stops with me in Richmond, VA, where the memo was
drafted that went out there where the intelligence product
was was drafted and signed off on under his leadership, his
management. This is the guy who should have
taken the credit the fall, but he was standing behind Cash
Patel early on. Why was it?
Why did they put this guy who Patel probably didn't even
(01:41:42):
realize who he was standing behind him while, well, Patel
saying let good cops be cops Andnow he's going to be the top
person for public safety and Homeland Security under the new
former CIA Abigail Spanberger when she takes over as governor
of Virginia. You guys go with that.
(01:42:03):
You tell me that the deep state doesn't always win.
He's had a long career in publicsafety, starting as a special
agent with the Alcohol and Beverage Control Authority
starting in 1997. Amazing.
He was promoted to a supervisoryspecial agent at FBI
headquarters in 2013, and he spent a bunch of time doing
(01:42:24):
that. And then he moved out to the the
resident agency in North Carolina.
He got named top cop by a National Association of police
organizations, became the ASAC of the Philly field office in
2019-2020. He was the chief of staff to the
FBI deputy director. I'm just going to try to figure
(01:42:46):
this one out. If he was the chief of staff to
the FBI deputy director in 20-20, that would have been,
what did I tell you earlier was in charge, who was in charge of
the FBI? Not Chris Ray, Paula Bate, Paula
Bate, ABLMABLM sympathizer, 100%.
We're going to go get all the A holes that were involved in
January 6th. That guy.
And in 2021 he was put in Richmond and in 2023 they signed
(01:43:11):
off on this memo. The rest is history.
I exposed it. What's the cost?
Nothing. He just got named top, top
public safety and Homeland Security secretary for Virginia.
So good luck, Virginia. That's what you guys are dealing
with. Meanwhile, one of your citizens
right there is likely a person who has already been cleared by
(01:43:34):
the FBI but was arrested for something.
We didn't have a lot of Cliff today.
I don't feel like we need them. I think we're telling you
exactly what you need to know. I'm pretty troubled by this.
I'm not going to let it go. I don't intend to.
I'm sure I'm going to be doing more news.
It's about it this week. If you guys didn't watch the
interview with the timeline, thebreakdown, check it out.
I did it with with Viva Frame. I did it with, I did it with
(01:44:01):
Clayton Morris over at REDACTED and Natalie and I also did it
with Clint Russell on Liberty Lockdown.
Over the last couple days. It's been a busy weekend for me
because of that. We've been out there running it
down. So this is not over.
I'm pretty confident we're goingto find out that the FBI lied of
it. The only question I have is
what's going to happen then? What do we do when you find out
(01:44:21):
that your FBI, your FBI, this FBI, the new FBI, or whatever
the hell they're calling it was 100% complicit in setting
somebody up simply to be able toget any connection possible away
from the US government. Sam.
All right, follow us over on Spotify, Kyle seraphinshow.com.
(01:44:43):
Like us on the channels, if you're watching Rumble, YouTube,
if you're watching on X, consider going to one of our
monetized spot podcasts, video locations.
We'd appreciate that. We just don't get any credit for
you to for X. So you know, it's a good
platform for a lot of things. It's just not great for video
for us. If you want to help us out, you
can also go over to locals. It's Kyle serafin.com.
And if you want to make sure you're going to the best
listening experience because youwant to be able to switch
(01:45:04):
between maybe audio and video, Kyle serafinshow.com, go to
Spotify. That's where we have it.
Follow us over there. We've had a massive increase on
there. We were one of the top 1% of all
video podcasts and we had a hugegrowth, like 1000% growth over
there in the last year because we've started going hosting on
that end of the day, leave us a comment, Subscribe to the
channels where you can. Let's breakthrough the 20,000
(01:45:25):
mark. That's our next sort of like
thing over on YouTube and like it so you can boost us in the
algo. We're very appreciative.
I got something that's kind of like uplifting and positive.
This is one of my favorite dudeson YouTube.
I've been watching him for literally years.
I was an FBI agent and I was like, if I need to teach
somebody how to carry a gun for the first time, I send them to
the Warrior Poet Society and John Lowell.
(01:45:46):
John Level talking here about marriage, which is not something
that has to do with guns per SE,but it does have to do with
asserting force in the world. Think you guys will appreciate
his take on marriage? This is how I also sort of see
things. It comes from a very benevolent
but also sort of dictatorial statue, which I think is a
Christian perspective. Enjoy this.
A little different than what we talked about today.
(01:46:07):
Just something to kind of cleanse your palate.
My wife is not in charge in my house.
I am, and she is my helper. And I'm not her helper.
She doesn't wear the pants I do now because I adore my wife.
I want to model the sacrificial leadership of Jesus.
Jesus, recognizing that all authority in heaven and earth
had been given to me, stood up, took out his outer robe, tied it
around his waist, knelt down in,washed his disciples feet.
(01:46:29):
That's what the biblical accountis recognizing He had all
authority, He got down and washed feet.
I am in authority over my wife. It's not a 5050.
The buck stops with me. I am the head.
Because of that, I'm going to use my leadership to take
wonderful care of my wife, boys,my sons, this is our woman.
We're going to take care of her.She doesn't open doors, we open
it for her. Our job, my job as a man is to
(01:46:51):
make sure my life is harder thanhers.
I want my life harder than hers.I make money.
I'm going to spend more on her than me.
I'm going to lift her up. I'm going to serve her.
I'm built stronger so that I canuse my strength for my bride.
I'm going to exalt her. I'm going to do something better
than 5050 or equal. I'm going to lift her up.
I'm going to treat her not as anequal.
(01:47:13):
I'm going to treat her as more important.
And I'm going to steer our marriage as well.
I'm going to set the culture forour home.
And I need her to give me her valuable insight.
And sometimes we're going to disagree and I'm going to go
with what she thinks. And sometimes I'm going to go
with what I think, but I'm goingto use her as my helper, as my
second self on mission for the Lord, because I desperately,
desperately need the counsel of my wife.
(01:47:33):
And I honor her, you know? If that hits for you guys, hits
for me too. I like it.
It's a, it's a reminder that there was a way that things got
done and we're not doing those. But what we do know is that for
many, many, many years, as long as men were doing that, we kind
of kept the lies of the of our government at Bay.
We really did, because at least we could control what was
(01:47:54):
happening in our own household in a meaningful way for
ourselves and our offspring, forour spouses.
We kept the evil outside. I think it's come in.
I think they've been lying to usfor a very long time.
And now they're lying even to the point where it disrupts some
of these family units in the ways that they're meant to run.
With my perspective, you could disagree with me.
Put it in the comments. I appreciate all of you guys who
(01:48:15):
look forward to a very interesting week where we are
going to thumb in the eye of thegovernment authorities that I
think are lying to us. And I don't say that for clicks
and I don't say it because it's fun and I don't say it because
it actually brings me any sort of joy or pleasure.
It actually does the opposite. It is exhausting.
I wake up every single day going, good God, what are they
going to screw with today? And how are my kids going to go
(01:48:35):
out there in the world and experience the America that I
grew up in in some degree of bliss?
My kids already know that the government lies, they already
know the names of the people that are lying in our
government. And that sucks because I've got
a 7 year old and an 8 year old that are more versed on politics
that many adults who actually pull the lever and get the vote.
Ain't that something? All right, see you guys again
tomorrow. Support our sponsors like the
(01:48:58):
video audios for now. God bless you.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSeraphin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter,
Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.