FORGETTING THE MISSION: "What happens when people enter government?!" | Ep 693 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:10):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome

(00:38):
to the Kyle Serpent Show for Wednesday, December the 10th.
Thank you for joining us. If you are over on X and if you
are on YouTube and if you are onRumble, if you're listening
after the fact on any of the audio platforms, consider doing
it on Spotify only because you can do video and audio and there
is a video component to this. And today's palate cleanser will
be coming in more of a video format than others.

(00:58):
You can hear it, but it won't sound the same if you can't see
it because there's some visuals that go along with it.
And I think it's going to be thecase for a lot of the stuff we
do right now. That's the medium.
But most of the stuff you can do, you can just listen.
So those you are listening, makesure that you are considering
leaving us a comment about your thoughts after the fact.
I read most of your comments. Let me suggest to you, although
I do have a public e-mail address and you guys can e-mail

(01:20):
me. It's info@kyleserafin.com.
That's probably not the best place for you to send me your
analysis or questions or thoughts on any particular
episode because I don't know what you're referring to most
the time. And I am getting these more and
more emails people are sending like here's my here's my
thoughts about something. And it's like, I have no
context. Can you just tag it when the
places where you're watching? If you're on Spotify, great
comment section. If you're on YouTube, awesome

(01:41):
comment section. Rumble, same deal.
I scan through those a couple times a week.
There's a ton of them. So you know, there's literally
hundreds of you guys like that are commenting, but I will read
them if you send them to the right bot.
So that's my my request to you And also thank you for being
interested enough to be engaged in what we're talking about here
today. I want to hone in on something
that addresses a question that Iget over and over again.

(02:04):
I don't really know the answer. I don't know that any of us know
the answer, but I have some suspicions about where we might
be able to find the answer. So I'm going to try to point us
towards some some critical thinking and some evidence that
indicates that when people get into government, they forget the
mission. But it's not just a regular
government job and it's certainly not just a leadership

(02:26):
government job. It's not that people get into
the House or the Senate and suddenly they don't know what to
do anymore. It's not that people take over
leadership of a government agency and they just forget what
the heck they're doing. I think that their mission gets
redefined while they're there. And we've seen some real
evidence of this in low level positions, as low as the teacher

(02:47):
of a fifth grade class. And we've seen it in high level
positions all the way up to, let's say, the president of the
United States, who seems to havelost track of what the mission
is. And maybe one of the most
important missions you can do when you're running for office.
You have to highlight the problems.
It's not really fun, but that's what you do.
You say these are the problems. I've identified the problems and

(03:09):
I am the guy with the solutions,and I'm going to bring you those
solutions. And therefore you should vote
for me when you consider that everything about there is a
problem that you face, I know how to fix it.
Let me serve you is a service oriented transaction.

(03:29):
It's like where do I recognize your pain and can I solve your
pain? This is a classic thing we do in
sales. What are your pain points and
how can I alleviate them? What is your problem and how can
I solve it? And can I do it within your
budget? Are you willing to accept the
cost? I even saw it when I was in
emergency medicine. I used to ride an ambulance and
the deal was something like this.

(03:50):
I have a solution to the issue you have.
It's going to be pain medication.
It's going to be finding out what's ailing you.
I'm going to do a a blood pressure reading.
I'm going to put on a 12 lead and I'm going to do an EKG.
I'm going to try to assess what your problem is.
You're telling me a pain. I want to find out what causes
it and then can we do something about it?
Do we have some beta blockers? Do we have some narcotic pain

(04:11):
medication? Do we have something that is
going to leave it? Do we have some Benadryl that's
going to stop the swelling and the itchiness in your throat and
your inability to breathe? Do we have a nebulizer
treatment? Right.
OK. Like, I can go down the whole
list. I can think of every single
thing I used to do in an ambulance, things we used to do
in the FBI, things that I've done in every sales job is can I
assess where you are struggling and do I have a fix for it?

(04:33):
And then more importantly, are you willing to pay for it?
We put Donald Trump into office under the the extensible belief
that he understood that costs were out of control, that
inflation had grown, and that there were several causes. 1 was
really bad policy and increased government regulation.
So we wanted less government, less regulation.
Some people have been doing that.

(04:53):
I think we've been seeing that over at the, the Department of
Energy. I think we've been seeing in
some ways we've been seeing thatover in, in, in the healthcare
industry when we start talking about HHS, some of this is
getting done, some of it is getting altered.
The other pain point was, is that we had a supply and demand
problem. We had a massive demand because

(05:16):
we had a shit load of illegal people here.
I don't mean to say it that way,but I don't know.
I get so emotionally involved inthe idea that millions and
millions, unfathomable amounts of people came into our country
in a very, very, very short window.
And even in my lifetime, the number of people that have come
here illegally and were tolerated and allowed to stay
here and assumed to have standing and being able to take

(05:38):
advantage of our court system tostay here, even though they
jumped the line to get here. No due process whatsoever as
they entered, but all due process and every sort of
fairness applied to them on the way out.
And that's bizarre to me. It's absolutely bizarre that we
would have that. So we looked at that as a demand
problem. Too many people wanted the

(06:00):
things that we have. And so that made a scarcity
issue that didn't mean to exist.So Trump was coming in with a
regulation problem with a demandside, like a supply demand curve
issue, right? And then there was this values
question, like, what the hell isit for?
My buddy Gerardo Boyle sent me abook a long time ago.
The men, the mission and me, andwhen we start talking about the

(06:24):
way that the military looks at missions, which is can we go
achieve this objective, there are two parts to it.
They teach this in every military class and they teach it
even in some of the law enforcement world.
It's task and purpose. Here is what you are going to go
do and here is the reason for which you are doing it.
And if you know what the purposeis, if you know what the purpose

(06:45):
is for the task, then you can redirect that task and you can
adjust it and you can shade it and you can make it fit better
as you move down the line to make sure that you are achieving
the mission for the reason that you're doing it.
The task is only a job. The purpose is the why.
And when you understand the why,then you end up doing the, the,

(07:05):
the how better and the what better.
I think our people get into these government jobs and they
completely forget about the purpose and they focus in on the
daily task. That's my assessment.
I don't know that that's 100% correct and I want you guys to
consider it and then give me your comments on it as you go

(07:26):
along. What is it that goes on where
you see people suddenly think myjob is to defend my job and to
justify what I'm doing and to explain away my failures to you
instead of assessing? Am I accomplishing the task that
was assigned and am I doing it for the purpose?
Am I achieving the purpose for which I was put into this

(07:47):
position? It doesn't matter if you're a
teacher or if you are a principal or if you are a state
administrator or somebody on theCity Council or you're somebody
who's a city manager somewhere. If you work in a position of
public trust as a governmental employee of any side, have you
realized that the entire purposeof what you do there, the reason
is to serve another group of people?

(08:10):
And I think we see, we see people forget that.
And I have a very funny sort of way of assessing that at the
end. I found this like, like
sometimes I think things just come to me because I'm in the
space to receive them. I found something on Instagram,
which is a very amusing look at the Denver airport.
So as we go into the holiday season and people have traveled
for Thanksgiving to go see family, and you're going to be
traveling on your way to go see folks for Christmas, I hope,

(08:34):
hope many of you will. The Denver airport is like,
uniquely bizarre. And I have a strange connection
to it, which I will tell you at the end of the show.
It's got some really weird sort of demonic art and some other
things. So like, I managed to find
something funny to tie all this stuff in.
I think I think it's funny and Ithink it ties it in.
Let's start with the sponsor read the the purpose of these

(08:55):
reads is to have you interested in a product by my friends at
Patriot Coolers. If you're looking for a gift
from somebody who has all the things, maybe they don't have
this brilliant looking 20 oz Tumblr.
Maybe they don't have a custom version of it which you can buy.
We have a link in the show description Patriot coolers.com
and the promo code Kyle will save you 10%.
They are our longest sponsor. They've been with us since the
beginning. If you were looking to support

(09:16):
the show and you're like who really believes in this mission?
Maybe you're new here. Patriot Coolers are great folks
and their their task is to make good coolers and to make things
that are thermal isolation. But one of the purposes they
have is to have a patriotic thing that actually reflects
your values. And so all of their drink Ware
will have things that are little, little catchy things on

(09:37):
there. I'm going to close the lid on
this one. It's got 13 stripes and stars
here there. I'm sorry, 50 stars on the
bottom. There's 13 stripes.
You're just like our flag. And on top of it, one of the
great things they do is they give money back from their
profits. And every year they cut a big
check to help veterans with mobility issues who serve this
country honorably, who did the task and the purpose and got
injured doing so. And they take care of them.

(09:57):
They sent out a check, a good chunk of it.
So you're supporting us, You're saving 10% by using my name,
kyle@checkoutpatriotcoolers.com,using the promo code Kyle.
And then also you're out there doing something good for this
country. They make a great product.
You're never going to see like, oh, like, I really wish I hadn't
bought that. Like every time I get something,
I'm like, man, I could actually use more of these.
I actually probably cannot use more cups.
I think I have something like 10or 12 of these darn things.

(10:19):
And I'm always like swapping them up.
And I'm like, oh, today feels like a Gray day.
It's kind of a kind of a more dignified moment.
And other days will feel more like a wood grain.
And sometimes I carry the red one and it's like, here I am,
it's 40 oz and I need to hydrate.
So anyway, check out the guys atPatriot Coolers.
We're really appreciative of their support.
We're appreciative of your support.
And we're going to dive into today's program, discussing this
task purpose and forgetting the mission.

(10:51):
And so some of you may wonder why this thumbnail?
What's up with the thumbnail? Is it just because you really
like night vision? And the answer is yes, look how
cool that thumbnail is. I actually have a couple
different thumbnails that were built up this.
I could look at people wearing night vision and kit and rifles
all day long. I don't know why that's my
thing. I'm a dude who likes that kind
of stuff. And whoa, wrong button.

(11:14):
I caught you guys off guard. You don't want to do that with
your flashlight when you're doing night vision, and you
don't want to do that with your podcast when you have the thing
queued up for the music. So I really like night vision.
I think it reminds us how narrowthe focus can sometimes get.
I've been taking my daughter. I've done it once now with my
daughter and I've done it a few times on my own.
I put on my bino night vision and it limits my field of view.

(11:37):
And then I walk out into the darkness and I look under nods
and I see what's out there and Isee deer and I see pigs and I
see people walking their dogs and I scare the ever loving shit
out of them. And, and I apologize, but they
don't know what to do because there's like this dude walking
with like, you know, all dark clothes and slung rifle hidden
under a hoodie and and a helmet on.
I look like probably like a complete psycho.

(11:59):
We live in a relatively suburbanarea with some rural outskirts.
So I try to go to the rural part, but it's really easy to
get lost in the, in the the taskpart when I'm when I'm moving
under night vision. And it reminds you it's like
there's a narrow focus. When you start doing the job,
you start getting tasks saturated.

(12:20):
We even have words for it, right?
You get sucked into the work that you're doing and you start
narrowing your focus from the entirety of the problem down to
the narrow scope of what I am completing at this moment.
And so even though I am just like kind of obsessed with night
vision in general, I just think seeing in the dark and being
able to do thermal stuff, that'show when things go bad, those

(12:41):
people have a unnatural advantage.
This is a almost a superpower. It also is a good reminder of
how easily that when you start narrowing your focus to try to
solve a problem, you may actually lose sight of the real
big thing, which is the purpose.OK, so all that is to say, what
do you got for us today? I got a great example and the
great example are schools. They are currently, I think,

(13:04):
maybe the worst thing running when it comes to the government.
Schools are a perfect microcosm for when purpose and tasks are
devolved completely divorced from each other.
They're not connected anymore. And we got to see that in real
time in 2020 and 2021 with the way that the teachers unions who

(13:26):
represent the employees of this thing, this governmental
process, the teachers unions were working against the actual
mission because they didn't wantto go back to school.
The purpose of a school is to educate the youth.
That's what it's for. That's their that's their

(13:46):
overarching mission set. And the reason is, is because
you develop more capable citizens and you, let's be real
honest about the way that our real schools work.
They are keeping kids out of parents hair so that they can go
and have jobs, so we can have, you know, double, double incomes
and so on. But in theory, the real
underlying mission set is that the the school is supposed to

(14:07):
provide information and tools for future citizens to step into
the world and be successful. And they have forgotten that.
And we all sort of know that theteachers unions are representing
the interests of the people who are employed there.
And I remember growing up where everybody was like, teachers
don't get paid enough, like givethem love and all this other
kind of stuff. And it's like, yes, some of that
probably was true for a very long time.

(14:29):
And we've seen that eclipse where now the teachers say,
well, my purpose is actually to take home money.
It's the same thing I've seen every other governmental
employee do. What I've seen them do is
believe that the reason that they are there is to get the

(14:49):
paycheck. And if they get the paycheck
without doing the mission, that's OK too, right?
One of the most hated figures coming out of the COVID pandemic
in, in my estimation, was this woman, Randy Weingartner.
She's a high level Union Leader.She makes hundreds of $1000 a
year. And the entire thing that she

(15:10):
was lobbying for served her interests, served the interests
of her constituents, which were the teachers and failed the
students. They assigned danger and and
they were worried about the safety of the people doing the
job allegedly and ignore the children left them alone.

(15:33):
And for those of us that were homeschooling, we were like, of
course, because you're not actually invested in the purpose
end of this. A parent has a massive interest
in seeing their child be successful.
A parent cares every day whetheror not worries every day
essentially serves and they really service minded attitude
they worry about and and they put their comfort second so that

(15:57):
the child can have what's out there first.
My wife tells me everyday that she's exhausted, and I believe
her. And she says it's there's just
so much to do. And I went, well, yeah, but
that's only because you care about achieving the mission for
the sake of the purpose. That is actually good.
If you didn't care, if it was like, I'm going to go check the
box. I got to spend 2 hours with my
kids and then I'm going to go onand do what I want to do.
And I'm going to make sure my house is clean and I'm going to

(16:19):
experiment with baking what she does, whatever else.
If we were going to do that, shecould ignore my kids.
But she doesn't. She spends hours and hours on
it. She cares what their outcomes
are. This is what makes sense.
Teachers. I'm not saying they're not.
That worked very hard. What I'm getting at is the union
system works against the actual mission set.
So here's Randy Weingartner. She's on a whole podcast with

(16:40):
someone named Dasha Burns and she's being asked and she's
lying about it because now we want to revise history as well.
Because we actually know that when you take a position that is
antithetical to the to the mission set, to the purpose, and
everyone sees it, they would allnot support you and they can't
have that. So she's actually left honesty,
and she's trying to say things that happened that we didn't

(17:01):
actually see. There's a lot of examples of
this going on right now. And I see some good and some
bad. So I'm going to play you a
couple of each. Here's the teachers union
situation. I do wonder what you think.
Like, looking back at to that tumultuous period of time, do
you think that teacher unions and Democrats have done enough
self examination in the role they played in pandemic school
closures? Like, were there mistakes made?

(17:24):
Yeah. Of course there were and there
were mistakes made by everyone. There was huge mistakes made by
the Trump administration to not be clear, to not focus on safety
as they were focusing on reopening it.
Reopening became political, not became something that we all
should have prioritized. Really, it's not something that

(17:49):
we all should have prioritized. It was the Trump administration
immediately goes to the blame shift, immediately does the
opposite of what people who are service minded think.
Think about every decent worker you've ever had, anybody that's
ever done a job for the sake they did the job for the reason
it was meant to be done. And they blame themselves when
they fail at doing the job and they are hard on themself.

(18:13):
If you are not your own biggest critic, you can also be your
biggest, you know, promoter. You can find all of your
successes and you can tout them,but if your instinct is
immediately, when someone says, hey there, this thing didn't go
right, If you don't know how to take ownership of that problem
and you immediately find a scapegoat, I got some real

(18:33):
questions for you. Do you understand what the
mission is now? Maybe you improperly my favorite
people. By the way, my wife is one of
these people. She improperly takes on more
blame than is appropriate. You guys know people like this
as well. The opposite is also true.
The people that cannot take any blame, it's never their fault.
I'm closer into that category. I have to work very hard to

(18:56):
constantly be my own biggest critic in certain relationships
on this thing. I will tell you like I'm I blew
it. I pushed the wrong button
earlier and I played you music when I didn't mean to.
I'm I'm like, that means I'm notfocused when those things
happen. It's really important to me, but
find yourself an employee that constantly self praises.

(19:18):
Find yourself almost anybody in the government right now.
I actually had this conversationwith Joe Altman yesterday on his
podcast and I was like, you knowwhat's crazy?
And here here's how I know the members of our government that
are not doing a good job. They're telling everybody what a
good job they're doing. They're Randy Weingartner, Randy
Weingartner, whatever her name is.
I know that they're not doing a good job because they straight

(19:39):
up are spending time briefing instead of achieving.
This is a classic example. This story is bizarre and I
don't know why it came into my feed, but I'm fascinated that it
did. This is the Daily Caller that's
reporting on it. I want to read it to you.
It says rookie. I assume they're saying like
rookie move or maybe it's a rookie teacher.
Teacher accidentally seems to make the best case for why

(20:01):
public schools are failing students.
I'm going to actually say something beyond that and beyond
this headline. I think that a teacher in
Washington state has actually made the case for why public
schools are not a net positive. They're essentially a daycare
and they are not achieving the mission that we hoped they
would. Ain't that a bummer?

(20:23):
Let's read some of the story. I've got a a video presentation
on it as well. And and then I've got some more
thoughts. Washington state school teacher
inadvertently handed conservatives the single
clearest example imaginable of why public education is failing,
according to recently reported allegations.
I want you to consider this in terms of task and purpose.

(20:43):
A non binary school teacher. Let's just start with the red
flag right there. A non binary school teacher.
Now we've already got someone who is identified in the public
as being interested in their sexuality as part of their
public persona. That seems problematic to almost
everybody that deals with children in a place called
Tumwater, WA named MX, which I believe is pronounced mix.

(21:08):
TJ Thornton. It's just a fat, ugly woman.
For anybody who's curious, it's that's what it is.
All right. I think I've actually got a
picture somewhere. See if I have a picture of this
weird looking lady. Yeah, I do.
There it is. So there.
I think the teacher is in the inset picture here.
So for those listening anywhere else, check us out on Spotify.
Check us out on Rumble or YouTube.
You can see this strange pictureof this lady who is going by mix

(21:31):
TJ Thornton allegedly pushed back against a 10 year old boy
does not want to teach a 10 yearold boy in fifth grade because
his father, a school board member named Casey Taylor, who's
pictured as well, voted months earlier to keep girls as a a
protected category for sports. I wanted to keep girls sports

(21:52):
biologically female only according to Alicia Perkins on a
sub stack. And I saw the sub stack out
there. I'm I'm reading the the
reportings on the reporting. So hopefully we they got it
right. So hopefully we're getting it
right as well. Thornton goes by they them
pronouns. I can't tell you why I would
care, but if I were a betting woman, says the author of this
piece, I would assume that she is a progressive white female

(22:13):
because that's the only way the story makes any sense.
And of course, you can look at the inset here and see that is
the case. Actually chubby.
What did my sister used to say? My sister's not very nice.
She's actually one of the affluent liberal females as
well. But she's an awful to say.
But, but my sister used to referto women like this as
unfortunate looking. And this woman is unfortunate

(22:34):
looking and somehow decides to identify as not female, even
though we all look and go, yeah,that's a woman.
It's just a woman who needs to hit the gym a little bit.
And you know, she's teaching 5thgrade kids.
Not a great example. I don't know.
I had a lot of like not fit teachers and I kind of thought
of them that way when I was young.
I was like, look, I can run for 1000 years, I'm 89101215,
whatever, why can't you? And maybe I didn't have as much

(22:58):
compassion, but now I'm almost 44.
I'll be 44 this month. I went out and was talking to my
dad, holding a conversation, andmy heart rate was 175 to 180.
So, you know, just do it. Just take care of your bodies.
You start step one. Start doing 5 push ups a day,
whatever it is. Get yourself to the point where
that's not your reality. She could start now.
It's the hard work. Or she could complain about it

(23:18):
and say that I don't want to have a A student in my class
because I don't agree with his dad's politics.
This is a wild thought. First of all, whoever knew the
politics of their fifth grade teacher?
I'm trying to think of my fifth grade teachers.
I had a PhD in mathematics teaching me math and I can't
remember his name, but he was real weird looking and he had

(23:39):
these goofy glasses and he was super bright and I don't know
what he thought about anything other than math.
He was fascinated by optics and set theory and and mechanics and
dynamic structures. And so he would teach us like a
little bit of engineering, a little bit of physics, and a
little bit of math. And I remember learning set
theory. When I was in fifth grade, I had
an English teacher who I knew had a law degree and he was the

(24:00):
best teacher I've ever had probably on any level.
At 5th grade he was teaching us the Lord of the Rings and
Christian allegory all right, and the world that that token
created. So that was cool.
But I have no idea what his politics were.
He might have been gay, he mightnot have been gay.
I it could have gone either way based on my memory of him.

(24:21):
I don't remember the politics ofany of my teachers before.
Maybe high school that I could probably guess, but I didn't
know what they were then. Why is a fifth grade teacher
with a they them with a mix title trying to kick a 10 year
old out of her class because shethinks dad doesn't like her
social or sexual preferences? Want to go to this little clip
here? This is a Brandy Cruz.

(24:41):
I believe she's talking about this actual problem and how this
is kind of a Ground Zero. This is a classic example of
this woman thinking that her jobis about affirming her existence
and not about achieving the actual mission.
Her task is to educate a 10 yearold and the purpose is so that
the 10 year old walks away with the more knowledge, not that you

(25:04):
feel great about whatever it is that's going on in your, in
your, your kind of chubby face and your, and your bad politics
and your disagreement with somebody's dad.
She, she literally states she's worried about an unsafe
interaction if she ever has to have a parent teacher
conference. That's what's being described
like absolutely bizarre beyond, but I don't think it just says

(25:24):
that public schools are failing for this reason.
I think that it tells you that the purpose and the and the
mission set of schools has now actually become divorced from
what we thought they were. So we're out there thinking
they're one thing and they're actually something else.
This does crazy enough apply to my own experience in government.
Everyone thinks that certain government agencies are meant to
do one thing, whatever that thing is.
And when they don't do that anymore, we got a real problem.

(25:47):
The conservative answer is is just shut them down.
We don't need them. Here's a Brandy Cruz.
I believe it's CR USEI want to give her credit.
It's an undivided podcast. I'm going to play a bit of it,
but not all of it this. Story takes us to the Tumwater
School District. And the Tumwater School District
has really become kind of central to the debate happening
in Washington state over protecting girls sports.

(26:08):
So of course, Francis Stout, who's a now junior, I think, at
Tumwater High School, she was onour show, was one of the first
female athletes in the state to really start to speak out about
having to compete against biological boys.
We had her on the show. Remember, she had to sit out her
final basketball. She chose to sit out her final
basketball game of the year because there was a biological

(26:28):
boy playing on the other team. And so that really thrust this
issue and the Tumwater School district into the national
spotlight. I mean, Francis has now been
very vocal in supporting the twoLet's Go Washington initiatives.
She's been on Fox News, some other national outlets kind of
pleading her case for why, you know, she's hoping that leaders
in our state do the right thing and protect girls sports.

(26:51):
So after Francis came out and told her story, you'll recall
about this time last year, therewas conversation about the
Washington Interscholastic Activities Association
presenting 2 amendments to theirmembers to vote on.
And the amendments would basically keep boys out of girls
sports. One of them would have said only
biological girls can participatein girls sports.

(27:12):
The other one said it would create a third category for, you
know, gender diverse individualsto compete in.
And so for a few months, they were planning on having these
votes, which we thought was great news.
But then the state came out and basically told the WIAA, you're
not taking a vote on that. You're not going to do that.
So the WIAA had votes, but they were just symbolic.

(27:33):
They didn't really mean anything.
So some more sane school boards decided to take symbolic votes
of their own. And one of them, you recall, was
the Tumwater school board. And they voted earlier this year
symbolically that they don't want boys participating in girls
sports. Now, that doesn't mean anything,
right? All right, so we're going to
hold it right there. By the way, she has a really
neat background. So if you look, she's got a, a
bust of Abe Lincoln in the background with a flag.

(27:55):
That's fun. But then I noticed that her,
her, her bookshelf. This is the, the, the neurotic
nature of my brain. I look behind her and I see the
bottom shelf has blue lighting. The next shelf has red lighting,
and then the top is all white items, whether they be small
busts or whether they be books with white covers.
So you've got red, white and blue there, but not in that

(28:16):
order. Anyway, clever.
I like it. I don't know if everybody sees
that. I assume people do.
She's talking about something that is a mainstream position
that when you watch boys and girls interact at a very, very
young age, they're pretty much the same, although boys are
significantly more aggressive and they're a lot more physical.
And last night I'm watching my 4year old poke my 2 year old in
the nose and he's doing the boopgame, but he's so aggressive

(28:39):
because he's a boy and he's twice her age.
He's boop, boop, boop. And then it starts getting to
the point where he wants to see if he can get a real reaction
out of her and he's about to poke her eye out and I have to
smack him in the head. And it doesn't hurt him.
If I smack one of my daughters in the head, they're they're
done. They, they like, if I tap them
on the head, they'll be like sobs crying.
I smack my son in the head and he's like, which is what I want
from a boy. That's what I was like too.

(29:00):
I actually remember my, my olderbrother.
I've got a, an older half brother, 10 years older.
And he was like, man, I used to watch mom and dad spank you and
you would just tighten every little bone in your body and
tighten up all your little muscles.
And when they smacked you, like you just look like that was
nothing. You know, that's what I kind of
want out of my son. I actually appreciate that they
do interact differently at a certain age like 1, the
aggression level and then when they get big enough then the
testosterone starts happening and you got puberty.

(29:22):
Like who wants to see their highschool age son demolishing high
school age girls? Not me.
Boys versus girls is only fair, like kindergarten and below and
maybe not even then, probably not then.
So they did a symbolic vote and they said something that is
mainstream. This is the the Daily Callers

(29:43):
piece. Again, the job description is
simple. We're talking here about the job
description of being a teacher. Teach reading, writing, math,
science. At no point is it acceptable for
a a teacher to screen students for ideological purity.
Well, we would agree with that generally.
I think a lot of people would upuntil 15 minutes ago.

(30:04):
But if that's where we're at right now, where the mission is
not the same thing, we're not agreeing on the mission.
We don't agree that the institution is meant to do the
same thing. You think you're sending your
kids to a public school, a government school, as we like to
call them here, because you think they're going to learn how
to do certain skills. They're going to learn how to
do, you know, basic thinking, critical thinking skills.
They're going to learn the the, the language of numbers.

(30:28):
They're going to learn how to domath.
So the the language of science is in mathematics often times
they're going to learn the language of our language.
They're going to learn how to doEnglish.
They're going to how to write things.
They're going to know what a prepositional phrase is.
They're going to understand the different participles of a verb.
They should be able to diagram asentence.
I feel like that's what you think you're sending your kids
to learn. And what are they really doing?

(30:48):
They're being occupied and they're being indoctrinated and
that's actually not even that wild for us to think about right
now. This is actually the the point
the Daily Caller makes. This is what happens when
schools become radical left wingeducation camps or re education
camps. They are teaching your kids for
8 hours a day. This is why I homeschool.
I'll put the chat up on the on the screen for a second.
This is why we homeschool in this house because I don't trust

(31:09):
people to take care of my children at all.
Like I'm going to take an unvetted human being that I
would not let in my home to babysit my children and I'm
going to leave my children with them voluntarily.
Well, there must be some sort ofcredentials they have, right?
And teaching credentials are notit.
I remember the people that were in education when I was going

(31:29):
through school. Those people have now been
teaching for 20 years. I graduated College in O four O
5. Should have graduated in O 4,
but I did in O5 whatever did thedid the classic victory lap
because I was a dummy and I tooktoo many classes and too many
things and I wasn't very great at paying attention.
But you know, fine, those students that got all A's in the

(31:51):
stupidest, easiest classes in primary education and secondary
education, they are tenured, they are locked in, and they
were mediocre when they were there.
I mean, I've seen many studies that have shown essentially that
the lowest accepted Gpas into the collegiate system in this
country go into, on average, theeducation departments, and they

(32:14):
come out with the highest Gpas graduated.
So they are treated the most gently.
Maybe they grew up to be the best students.
Does anyone believe that? Because I don't.
All right, I don't know. This school system that we're
talking about in Tumwater, WA, which is a microcosm for a lot
of things, they have a sign on their system that says all are

(32:34):
welcome here and accept the political beliefs of people who
are like me and maybe who are like you and who maybe think
that, you know, boys shouldn't compete with girls and that it
shouldn't matter what's going onwhen it comes to putting them
through the school system. It shouldn't matter what your
dad's political beliefs are. I'm not sure anyone knew what my
dad's political beliefs are. I didn't know what my teachers

(32:55):
were. We did live in a better time.
I lamented this with my friend Joe Altman the other day.
If we could push a button and goback to some of the things,
there's a reason why we all feellike this, this anxiety that's
happening in the system right now.
Part of it is because the, the cost has gone up.
Part of it is because inflation has continued to run since I was
born. The dollar is worth way less now

(33:16):
than when I was born. And so the regardless of the
interest rates, which are there's a story about the
interest rates changing, they may be dropped for the third
time. We've got a really ugly system
developed where we know too muchabout too many people that
doesn't have any value on what we're doing.
And people have forgotten what the actual mission is that they
are trying to accomplish with the goal that they have.
Some people go to a fast food restaurant and the people that

(33:38):
work there don't realize their job is to serve people that walk
in the door. The thing that you make, they
think their job is to push the buttons and to go out there and
run the fryer and maybe like hand something out.
And when you find someone that understands that service is
about serving others, you recognize it right away and you
want to go back there. As someone who waited tables for

(33:58):
literally years, I think I spentfour years waiting tables.
I spent thousands of hours carrying a tray and walking
around and having my feet sore and covered in like freaking
gook. That comes out of the whatever
the gunk is that comes out of the dishwashers.
I'd manage restaurants. It's a very regular thing and
you know that your job is dependent, your income is

(34:19):
dependent on knowing that somebody else's requests and
needs and putting whatever it isthat they are doing their their
purpose is to get a meal and to spend their money.
Maybe the only time they spend money out of their house all
week for all you know. So your job is to make it good.
And how many of us get that experience when we go to a
restaurant? I don't even want to go to a
restaurant anymore. Nobody seems to understand what
the mission is. And I say that as someone who

(34:41):
understood the mission. You come to the bar and you're
by yourself as a bartender. Your job is to chat with the
person. They're there to have a little
bit of community. You start the conversation to
that. I mean, I used to do this all
the time in Kansas. I would start a conversation and
then the people in the bar wouldkind of chime in.
And when I'm doing stuff back behind there and cleaning the
glassware and I'm moving around and I'm getting new kegs for the

(35:01):
beer, guess what? The patrons who came there solo
that are having a drink, they'reenjoying community together
because we started a conversation about music or art
or something that's going on in the town.
The stoplight. That doesn't work.
And what the hell is, you know, Sergeant Bill doing and how come
he keeps pulling people over when they're riding on the
country Rd. or whatever that wasthe my my purpose was can I

(35:23):
provide this thing community, right.
Anyway, we've lost all of this stuff.
And so I've got a kind of a smorgasbord of examples of
people who recognize it. And this might be, this might be
the best sort of example of why we're in a bad spot right now,
because the American, the experience was set up so that

(35:48):
our children would have more opportunity than those before
people left the old world. They came to the United States
and they hoped for opportunity, not success per SE.
They they aspired to a success, but they just wanted the
opportunity to try. And I think we've forgotten
that. I think we've forgotten that
that's what the entire purpose of this organized society is.
I said it to Joe Alban the otherday as well.
And I'm always kind of honed in on old conversations.

(36:10):
I had the task and the purpose. The American thing that we all
agree on, the American dream is,is that we put women and
children first. We prioritize their, their
success. Why?
Because we care about the future.
It's a Christian thing, it's a Western thing.
It's a sense of a linear temporal.
There are other cultures that believe in sort of circular time

(36:30):
and karmic believe. No, in America we say I will
suffer, so the next generation suffers less and so on and so
on. And we aspire to a more perfect
union and a more perfect experience.
And we hope that we are creatinga better place on earth for the
ones who come after us. And we're willing to take on
whatever that ugliness is. We're going to take our family

(36:50):
into a place that's uncomfortable and then we hope
that they come out of it better.When I see videos like this,
which came from ABCI, think it came from Good Morning America,
maybe that's CBS. I see this woman, she's got
twins, which is beautiful, and she's in tears.
First of all, this like instinctto film yourself crying is very
bizarre to me. And you're now commercializing

(37:10):
your babies. But this video of this lady is
heartbreaking because we've forgotten the purpose of what
we're doing. The task is the same, raise your
children. But why is she going to work
with these little things? So today is my last day of
maternity leave and I go back towork tomorrow and I just.

(37:39):
I feel like I haven't. Had enough time with them.
I know I got longer and then a lot of women get with three
months, but it just doesn't. I just don't feel ready.
That had a very high risk pregnancy because they shared a
placenta. They were 5 1/2 weeks premature.

(38:02):
We were in the NICU for several weeks.
So you kind of feel a little robbed of that postpartum
experience and that does not getaccounted into your maternity
leave here. Here's the really important
part. You have new babies.
They need you. You need them.
You're biologically inclined to go and support them.

(38:23):
So what are you doing? Does your job love you?
Does your job? Will it, will it matter in five
years when you have maladjusted children or not adjusted
children at all because you didn't get to spend time with
them? You're going to outsource them
already at 3 freaking months oldwhen they were born prematurely.
You're going to outsource them to a stranger.
This is the lie that's been sold.

(38:44):
The the goal was, is that women could have the freedom.
This is the women's Lib thing. Women could have the freedom to
choose to work or not work. The problem is, is that once you
have children, your body physically changes.
Ladies, some of you know this. My wife was a great example that
she got pregnant. She said, I don't want to work.
I want to take care of this growing baby.

(39:05):
And I was like, yeah, we're going to buy a slightly smaller
house than we would like to have.
We're going to only drive a paidoff car.
I'm not going to have a car. I'm only going to have my work
car because I was, I got a job that had a work car.
We make choices. Did we have all new things?
No, we did not. When we spent money out of our
pocket, it was for like new flooring because we knew we

(39:26):
could sell the house for more. We went and did a renovation in
the basement because we knew it added sweat equity or I did it,
which is what I did a lot of like who changed all the floors
in the house? I did, right.
So we did all of this stuff because the answer was is that
our children were the priority as a parent.
This lady, she's in that that world right now.

(39:46):
Your, your mission is to raise adjusted, successful children
who maybe have a better life than you do if you can do it
right in the American ideal. And people are asking like,
where the hell did that go? I know where it went and so do
you. It went to a place that it got
distracted. It's the same as the teachers
that are interested in doing what they're interested in their

(40:10):
own outcomes, and they've forgotten what the actual
mission said is. It's a guy named David Lynch,
and he's diagnosing one of the problems that the people who got
into government have forgotten because they are surrounded by,
yes, people and maybe they all have a lot of money and maybe
they're doing well. But if you can't see that other
people are making, some of them are, it's their own fault, no

(40:32):
doubt about it. But some of it is that we have
people that have completely divorced themselves from the
actual purpose of why they are there.
The president of the United States, although I have
incredible respect for him and his fight, fight, fight
attitude, he and his kids are completely disconnected from

(40:54):
reality. I keep on hearing him and his
kids talking about how great theeconomy is and how things are so
much better than Biden. Let me ask you this, do you
really feel, do you feel inside this incredible euphoria of how
great things are? I don't.
Maybe that's because I've got 3 adult kids, 2527 and 30 years

(41:17):
old, who although despite makinggood money, can't even think
about going to buy a house, can't even think about going on
vacation, can't even think aboutdoing anything.
In fact, they're debating whether or not they should have
their health insurance. Should they buy health insurance
for next year because they're not sure if they can afford it?
What? What happened to the white

(41:37):
picket fence? What happened to the American
Dream? To imagine being a kid today, a
white kid in America nonetheless, you did all the
things you're supposed to do, and yet you don't see anything.
You don't see the system. You don't see the American
Dream. You've been hearing for the last
three decades that the dreamers are the illegal aliens.

(42:00):
That's really interesting. And there's more to this.
You guys can listen to him. His name is Dennis Michael
Lynch, and he looks like he's a dad in my age bracket.
Generally speaking. Now times get tough.
Nobody's guaranteed easiness. So, you know, suck it up,
buttercup. I, I believe in a, a thing
that's called sitfu. SITFU.

(42:24):
This was my diagnosis for a lot of guys when I was in the
military. Many of you guys in the military
know what I'm talking about. Sitfu one, one glass is enough.
I'll suck at the F up because nobody cares, right?
Work harder, fine. But systemically, we have people
that have stepped in and said, Iunderstand your pain points, I
understand your problems, and I'm going to go out there and do

(42:45):
something to try to fix it. And so we believe them
sometimes. And some people believe this
one. This is Donald Trump, this is
CBS News. He's starting to try on this
idea. He started with this and when he
was campaigning. And you can't lie to people who
are experiencing something that is very different.
Donald Trump says he's quote UN quote crushing inflation in his

(43:06):
speech in Pennsylvania. And the GOP is facing an
affordability concern. Well, they're facing an
affordability concern. That is not their making.
It's not Donald Trump's creation.
It's not even Joe Biden's creation.
This system has been unstable, as we've said, for probably a
115 years. And yet if you're going to make
promises, you're going to come in and say that the I understand

(43:28):
the problem and my purpose is toserve, then you don't need to be
served. You don't need to have your ego
served. I'm doing such a great job.
It's like we got a lot of work to do.
I don't have time for this stuff.
This is as you guys are saying in the chat, in the chat talk is
cheap. This talk is cheap after weeks
of decrying a focus on affordability.
Calling it a democratic hoax doesn't feel like a hoax to
people that are living. It doesn't feel like a hoax if

(43:49):
anybody's looking to go buy a house.
I'm in my 40s and I'm looking athouses going holy crap if you
had told me that that's how mucha house cost when I was growing
up I would have crapped myself. It's wild.
The most expensive house in my neighborhood when I was growing
up in a in a city of a town of you know 2530 thousand is like a
regular house now in many suburban neighborhoods.

(44:12):
Cost wise it just shows you thatour dollar is worthless.
It doesn't say anything else about the housing.
He spent much of his 90 minute speech in a rally style,
promoting and defending his economic record.
You know what they say about politics.
If you're explaining you're losing and he's losing on this
one. But there are areas where he is
winning. That's the sad thing.
He had a couple of missions, he had a couple of of purposes and

(44:34):
it seems like they've gotten away or a couple of tasks
rather, they've gotten away fromthe Y.
And so they're focused in on a little bit of like, what was
the, what was the thing we did? And can we see these numbers?
I had someone tell me, oh, there's been like 1.4 million
self deportations in this country.
That's the scarcity side of the,the equation. 1.4 million.
Those are going to be the most motivated people.
You think more people are going to deport themselves next year

(44:54):
than this year? Absolutely not, because the
people whose mission it is to try to actually point out, hey,
we're a government, Our job is to defend our citizens.
Our purpose, the mission set that exists for this legislature
is to write laws and to appropriately delegate funding
to accomplish the goals of the American people and the taxpayer

(45:15):
and by the way, the citizens whoactually vote.
And we got guys like this. This guy's the district just
below me. This is Greg Caesar.
He's honed in on All IN on the story of an illegal alien who's
been here illegally. I'll tell you her story in a
second. Let's listen to his sympathetic
framing of it. This guy's lost the mission, and
he's one of the 435 that gets tovote.

(45:36):
His voice counts thousands of times more powerfully than yours
does. As a member of the United States
Congress, I've seen the Trump administration do horrible
things to immigrant families andwith ICE, but I've never seen
them do this. What the Trump administration
just did was deport a 19 year old college student who I

(45:58):
represent here in Austin. A judge said it was totally
wrong. They sent her in shackles to
Honduras anyways. And then what they did next,
I've never seen them do. Which is when that college
student Annie Lopez Villosa spoke out about her
mistreatment, the Trump administration sent an unmarked
van to her parents house with armed ICE officers in it and

(46:20):
chased her her father into his house.
Thankfully they are still OK. But we need Annie back, and we
need the Trump administration tostop threatening.
Her parents and her family. For her, just using her First
Amendment rights, this should send a chill down all of our
spines. This isn't just an immigrant
rights issue. Every person in this country

(46:40):
should be able to speak out, usetheir First Amendment rights,
and not have the Trump administration or the federal
government send law enforcement to threaten you or threaten your
family because you spoke out. About something Now, I thought
there there might be something weird about this story because
they deported her, right? Like, I mean, you know, she's
not here anymore. She went to Honduras and she's

(47:02):
using her First Amendment rights.
Well, what rights are those? And, and who said she has them?
Just curious. You can say anything you want.
Honduras as far as I'm concerned, but I'm a little bit
concerned about that one. So we're going to get into that
in just one second here. Just a little reminder, we have
some friends over at Shield if you guys actually want to defend
some of your rights. And we'll be talking about
Second Amendment in a bit. Shield Arms is one of the
companies that I own multiple firearms from and I carry their

(47:24):
magazines every day in my clocks.
If you're looking for an everyday carry, if you want to
increase the capabilities of your small Glock pistols,
they're actually coming out withnew magazines very soon that
will actually increase your standard Glock and some of the
others as well. They make base plates.
They make AR pattern rifles thatare folding that are amazing,
and I have two of those. shieldarms.com, the promo code
Kyle. They should have everything

(47:44):
working over there. If you don't, hit me up on the
e-mail. Shieldarms.com promo code Kyle.
Easy thing to check out there. And while we're sitting here
taking a quick break, Rumble, you guys can hit the like.
We are, I think #30 something onthe leaderboard the other day,
we actually beat my friend Viva.So give us a like, it actually
matters. It pumps us up on there.
Whether anybody cares or not over there, I don't know, but
give us a like on Rumble. Give us a like on YouTube.

(48:06):
You guys are outstanding at doing that.
So I very much appreciate the new audience we've been seeing
on YouTube. Continue to share it with
somebody, subscribe to the channel Notify if you want to
join us for the live show where the chat is going, because
that's always pretty cool. And then lastly, if you're
listening on Spotify or if you're listening anywhere else,
you should be listening on Spotify.
We don't make more money from it.
We just think that it's a betteruser experience.
I do, Kyle serafinshow.com will get you there.

(48:27):
There's a link in the show description wherever you're
listening. You can join us and support us
on locals at kyleserafin.com. It's always my name.
You guys can check it out. And the upside of that is you
can be part of our call in program.
I just had someone say in a comment on YouTube, which make
sure there it is, someone said on YouTube, you're the first
program that I've ever subscribed to.
I've never felt inclined to. And I appreciate the support.

(48:48):
And that means you can interact with us.
And we do it on the call in showon Thursdays, which happened at
8:00 PM Eastern. That's 7:00 PM my time.
We take phone calls, whatever itis you guys want to talk about.
We can talk about task and purpose.
We can talk about pipe bombers, we can talk about conspiracies,
whatever you're into. And it's your show.
So that's what we do for the subscribers.
In a lot of ways, you guys are just supporting what we're doing
here and making sure we're insulated so I don't have to

(49:09):
take anybody else's opinions andI don't take any money for
opinions anyway. I cancel people if I'll cancel
the sponsor, if they tell me what I can and can't say, I will
just be done with that. That's easy and we'll figure it
out, which is what we've done sofar.
It's a slow and organic growth. OK, let me go back to this guy,
Greg Caesar. The story seems like we're
missing something, doesn't it? He he represents her and she's a

(49:33):
college student and so I'm like,well, do you actually represent
her? This is coming from Fox San
Antonio, Austin, TX is the byline new questions emerging
about a 48 hour detention and then deportation of a 19 year
old student from Austin. Well, interesting.
Why is she from Austin if she got deported?
She was trying to surprise her family for Thanksgiving.
The case of Annie, which is A&Y Lucia Lopez Baoza, raises

(50:00):
serious concerns about that due process.
There it is. Due process.
No due process coming here, but we want to process before you
can make me leave calling for answers in the federal
government. She grew up in Austin.
She was attending Boston College.
It's a top tier university in Massachusetts.
Oh, Babson College, I don't knowwhat the hell that is.
I'm not sure it is a top tier college.
Somebody tell me if Babson is a good school.
She was deported to Honduras, where she's from.

(50:22):
Apparently, members of Congress are pushing for her return.
The only thing she did wrong waswanting to have a loving
daughter and surprise her parents over the Thanksgiving
visit. Well, what is the purpose of a
congressman but to represent thecitizens who elect him?
And maybe that's what the citizens of Austin and western
San Antonio really want. Maybe, or maybe not.

(50:43):
He says that she was in Boston Logan Airport.
She was. She was detained by federal
immigration officials, put into shackles, sent to a detention
center center where she slept onthe floor.
She's 19. She'll survive 48 hours later,
she was sent to Honduras, where she remains.
And then you start wondering like, well, what's going on
here? So what does DHS say about this,
right? That's, of course, buried.
You got to go 3. You've seen how far down we

(51:04):
scrolled. The immigration attorney said
that there are circumstances where the government should slow
down. But the congressman also
acknowledged that she had a removal order in place for her
since 2016. That was like 9 years ago.
So for almost a decade she's hada removal order.
But this violates the spirit of the United States Constitution.

(51:26):
Isn't it fun? These people have forgotten what
their job is. You're a legislator.
You're meant to represent citizens.
How interesting. It violates the spirit of the
Constitution. Not the actual Constitution, not
the words of the Constitution, not the actual federal law.
But we feel problematic about this thing because it's the
spirit that we've just made-up here with our with our feelings.
When CBS Austin reached out to Homeland Security, they said the

(51:48):
following thing. This illegal alien entered the
country in 2014, and an immigration judge ordered her
removed from this country in 2015, ten years ago.
She's illegally stayed in this country ever since.
So she's been taking advantage of the things that do not belong
to her because we've actually forgotten what the system is
designed to do. Once again, this is a school

(52:12):
problem, right? She was at school age, so she
was collecting education that didn't belong to her.
And they've acted like, well, the purpose of this thing.
Isn't it funny when the left hasa left-leaning sympathetic
figure like a illegal alien who came here and wants to consume
our educational products? Well, then the purpose of the
school is to provide opportunityand education and to give them

(52:36):
the understanding to go out there to be successful in our
country, even though they don't belong here.
But if a dad thinks that boys shouldn't be in girls sports,
then we can't have that because I might have a political
disagreement with the daddy. This is what happens.
They're disconnected. What happens when you start
removing people? Does it benefit Americans?
That's a good question. Does it help out Americans?

(52:58):
Here's a guy that I found on a video the other day.
He's a 27 year old contractor inLouisiana and he said life's
never been better since you've been shutting down.
The people that aren't allowed to work here, that are having
that are taking advantage of us and they're doing so in a way
that breaks all of our immigration laws and breaks our
our employment laws. Figure when you fix the scarcity
side you actually make it betterfor people that are young that

(53:18):
might want to be able to buy that house the guy was talking
about. So we've had ICE and DHS down in
Louisiana for about a week now and as a business owner, I've
been running my own constructioncompany since I was 18 years
old. I'm 27 now.
We do paint and roof and drywall, tile, ceramics, trim,
molding, you know, carpentry, flooring, concrete, a little bit
of everything I'm seeing first hand.

(53:41):
Just the shockwave them boys aresending across the state.
No immigrants want to go to work.
None of them want to even ride in a truck like mine with a
ladder rack on it. And it is so amazing.
I've got more calls in the last week than I've gotten in the
last three months. I got 20 calls in one day.

(54:03):
GC scrambling to try and finish projects halfway through.
These guys not showing up to work, starting projects,
landlords, you know how a landlord always has, you know,
their go to guy they they call boys ain't showing up to do
nothing. And and this just shows you how
bad the problem is down here in Louisiana.

(54:26):
I mean, we got a population in our whole state that's like the
size of LA County, genuinely in our whole state, and they have
filled this place like no other.And I've got to see through the
presidencies. We had our little heyday with
Trump's first go round, $0.99 a gallon gas.
Even with the immigrants here, shit was still amazing.

(54:47):
They weren't pushing like they are right now.
Joe Biden got into office. He really fucked my industry bad
bad to the point to where the only people that are lining
their pockets are the GCS that are hiring these guys because
it's the only way. I mean shit you send in a
proposal all all you know my last name is a Flores.
Let me let me start there beforepeople start calling me racist.

(55:11):
I'm just speaking the truth. You send a proposal in and you
have one that's like half the price of that. 90% of the time
they going to go with that cheap1 and that's how it's been down
here in Louisiana. It's just everybody competing to
get the bottom dollar, I'm talking.
It, it's not even just the, the bottom dollar part of it.
It's, it's what the quality looks like, right?

(55:32):
How many of us would rather buy a house that's older that was
built by people who actually cared about building the thing
instead of slapping it together?And then when you start seeing
some of the new construction, I mean, I do it all the time when
I, I, I've moved into a bunch ofdifferent rentals in the last
couple years and something that blows my mind.
I mean, it blows my mind. I, I, I, I struggle to
understand it. They'll have studs that aren't
16 inches on center and you're going, who the hell built this

(55:55):
thing? What the hell kind of non
standard wall is this? How am I going to find where
everything belongs? And then you go see some of
these housing inspection videos and guys will go out there and
they'll find a half million dollar house or a $700,000
house. They'll go out to California.
They'll go look at it and you go, Oh my God, how is this roof
even going to stay on? They're framed like garbage.
They're not square. The walls bow because nobody

(56:18):
cares, because God, it's way nicer than what they have down
in Mexico or Honduras or El Salvador or whatever the hell
these guys are used to slapping up garbage structures.
And then you go stand in a housethat was built like right around
the turn of the century. Last century my buddy had a
house that I think was built in 19 O 5 or 1912 or something like
that in Montana where it's freaking cold and things are

(56:38):
rough and the wind occasionally comes through and rips the roofs
off the entire town's houses. And I walked on that guy's
floor. I'm telling you this like I
still think about this today because I have not experienced
that in another house with the exception of a million plus
dollar house that I saw in Tennessee that I walked through,
where I walked on the floor, knowing that there was a
basement underneath. The entirety underneath it was

(57:00):
like empty, right? There was a void and there was
no squeak. Not a single place in the floor
made a noise. Not a single place on the stairs
made a noise going downstairs. It's doable.
We used to do it and they did itwith less technology, with less
transportation, with less skilled, you know, measuring and

(57:20):
they still did it with rough hewn lumber and better nominal,
you know, measurements because people gave a damn about what
they did. They were they were proud of
what their work was. I assessed that and you guys
tell me if there's something else that was going on there.
And maybe the inspectors actually cared.
And maybe people like when they bought a home, they were like,
someone's going to live in this instead of saying someone's
going to stay in this for a little while and they're going

(57:40):
to move on. We don't, we don't see
craftsmanship and pride. And I don't know if that kid is
a great builder or not. All I know is that he said that
the people that have been bidding down his industry,
they've screwed it up. So what is the purpose of the
immigration system if not to bring in labor that we had, you
know, that add value to us? What is the purpose of the
government if not to defend our borders so that the citizens can

(58:03):
benefit by keeping things outside and allowing things in
that are of value? It's like the cell wall in your
in your body, It doesn't let everything in.
It's like your skin, your skin doesn't let all things in.
It lets in the things that it's supposed to and it kicks out the
stuff that it's supposed to. If, if it doesn't work, you die.
If you're, if you're outside barrier to the world doesn't
work, you die in every system. That's why they're selectively

(58:26):
permeable. And Trump was out there touting
that and for for good reason. I think his, his illegal
immigration policy and having less people come in illegally is
good objectively and he's touting that good.
The problem is you haven't solved all the problems when it
comes to the, to the, the cost. So touting a win, you should
always try to do a, an over deliver and under promise.

(58:47):
And the Trump administration is literally the worst at that.
They may be the worst thing they've ever seen.
Here's one of the other things that I've seen them working on,
which I think is quite interesting.
Having a friend that just had a baby saying that no more than no
less than four doctors came and tried to push the hepatitis B
vaccine on them. And there's confusion over the
CD CS panel. This is this is NBC News
reporting. So take this with a grain of
salt that it is confusion over CD CS panel.

(59:09):
Hepatitis B guidance could disrupt the care for babies.
Well, again, now we care about babies.
We want to send moms into the workforce.
We're we're negotiating whether or not the state is going to
mandate maternity leave. How about we talk about whether
or not mom should be working in the first place?
Not because we forced them to, but because their biological

(59:30):
instinct. Once they have a baby, meet any
nursing mother. People find me the nursing
mother. That's like, I can't wait to
just leave my baby behind and godo something else.
Find me that Larson. I will show you a a sociopath
that is not a good person. Women are wired to take care of
their young. That's how the species survives.
We're worried about disrupting care for babies.

(59:51):
Doctors and hospitals and publichealth departments are
scrambling to ensure proper carefor pregnant women.
Suddenly they know they're womenagain, by the way, and their
babies following a controversialvote that the CDC had.
It's controversial because it reversed decades of standard
medical practice giving newbornshepatitis B vaccines.
A lot of people have chosen not to for a reason.

(01:00:13):
Maybe because you burned out allyour credibility in 2020 and 21
and you told us things that nobody believed.
So we don't really necessarily just take you at your word
anymore. Last Friday, the CD CS vaccine
panel advised that only babies born to women who test positive
for hepatitis B should get the first dose within 24 hours of
delivery. That seems reasonable.
You mean only the people that are at risk should get the thing

(01:00:35):
that stops the risk? Huh?
Crazy. And by the way, they still get a
choice. You still get a choice.
As a parent, this is your decision, even though there will
be significant pressure by thesedoctors as as my friend just
shared with me, that was his experience non-stop.
It's like, no thanks, we're good.
Imagine if somebody did that at a restaurant.
Hey, can I get you a drink? And you're like, no thanks, I

(01:00:55):
don't drink. And they're like, hey, can we
can we get you an alcoholic beverage?
Would you like a Margarita? Would you like a beer?
And you're like, no thanks, I'm good.
And then they come back and they're like, listen, one of the
things we do here is we have a special on margaritas and we
also have a special on shots andbeer.
Would you like a shot of beer orMargarita?
And you're like, homie, I just told you, no, I don't drink.
I don't want that. Thank you.
And they're like, have you ever considered the benefits of
alcohol while having a social conversation with somebody next

(01:01:16):
to you? And you're like, are we having a
crazy talk right now? Why are you trying to do this?
If somebody tried to sell you something that you said no
thanks to, you look around and you go, I'm not sure that you're
actually serving me. Maybe you've forgotten what the
mission is. Perhaps doctor, your job is to
advise, to share, and then I getto make as best I can, informed

(01:01:38):
consent. I also accept the
responsibilities of what that means.
Maybe that's a bad thing for me,maybe it ends up awful, so be
it. But it's my choice.
I don't need 4 go rounds, maybe 2.
Maybe you get to ask me and thenyou get to say, hey, but did you
consider this? Yes, I did.
Thank you so much for your time.Goodbye.

(01:01:58):
Don't come back to the table here trying to sell me booze
again. Don't come back to my hospital
bed while this woman is sitting here holding on to this brand
new precious little creature. You're going to try and tell
him, hey, we got to do this. Blows my mind.
That's not service oriented. What are you serving is the real
question. That's where it starts getting
questioned and that's why so many of us are concerned about
it. We're like, there's an awful lot
of money in this. Interesting.

(01:02:20):
The government is involved in it.
That's a terrible solution. Interesting.
So is it really about whether ornot it's good for the baby or is
it about whether it's good or not for the Pharmaceutical
industry, which I continue to hear, It's a worthwhile
question. I think we can ask those
questions logically. And then we just do it in the
veil of what is the mission of the people that are in front of
me. How many times do we believe

(01:02:40):
that the professional is representing my best interests?
And can they even, or are they also shading the financial
concerns that they have, the financial concerns of their
benefactors, whether it be a hospital system or whether it be
the the insurance company that pays them or whatever else,
their billing department? What is it?
Why are you pushing so hard? And in fact, if you're anything

(01:03:01):
like me, the harder you push on something that I am initially
kind of like a little bit shaky on, you're just solidifying
where I need to be. My buddy and I talked about this
the other day. Someone came and told him, you
don't have to do the right thing.
You could just not do anything at all.
You could just be quiet. And it, it, it, it, it
infuriated him. He was like, I can't not do the
right thing that I know is rightbecause then I wouldn't be me.

(01:03:23):
And I said, maybe that was God giving you the shove in the
right direction because if someone who didn't matter gave
it to you, it wouldn't have any impact on you.
But someone you cared about cameand give you some advice that
you knew was bad and you were incensed and you were hardened
in the right path. Maybe that was it.
OK, I'm for it. Anyway.
I find it very interesting that some of these systems, these,

(01:03:44):
again, this is kind of what people were hoping under the
Trump administration, that we'd at least remove the pressure
part so that the mission became more obvious.
And if the mission of Health andHuman Services is to benefit
human beings that live in this country, good.
Let's only be focused on those things.
Let's not make recommendations that don't actually bear.
And they should have all scrutiny on them.
I don't think that's crazy. Another one that's going on

(01:04:05):
right now is the Fed divided, divided, Fed.
They're having a Supreme Court case right now on whether or not
we can actually have these people removed.
God forbid whether the executiveis actually in charge of these
quote UN quote independent agencies.
You can't have an independent government agency.
They cannot exist. They depend on one of three
branches. We only have three.
This seems like childish level intelligence, but then again,

(01:04:28):
our school system has started failing people.
They can't even tell you what the three branches of government
are, let let alone what the purposes of those things are.
All executive function, Article 2, Section 1, it's all there.
That's the president's thing andeverything that works underneath
him. They all answer to one guy.
Sometimes it's not a guy we like.

(01:04:48):
Sometimes it's this guy, where is he?
Sometimes it's this guy we don'tlike it.
My dad used to say it's all about can you look your child in
the eye and say it's going to beOK?
That's we worked so damn hard todo during my administration.
In those four years, we created 16,000,000 new jobs,

(01:05:09):
unemployment job. No, you didn't.
You just had jobs come back fromthe things that all had to be
artificially stopped because people made really bad
government policy. But here's what's crazy about
Joe Biden. He actually knows because he is
an old school politician. For as frail mentally as he is
and as quiet and as whispery as he is, Joe Biden actually knows

(01:05:32):
that the way that you sell things to regular people and
it's a decent sales job is that you actually point out what is
the mission? The mission is, can you sit down
and look at your kid in the eye and say, we did everything we
can to make sure that your future is better?
That's a really American thing. So give the man credit for at
least knowing they used to at least lie to you, that they

(01:05:52):
understood the mission, that thepurpose was to be able to look
them in the eye and say the things that I did further the
agenda that I said it would and it would make things better for
you. And that was that was the
entirety of what was going on. Now, did he do that?
No, of course not. That's why he's standing in
front of the LGBTQ Plus Victory Institute, which is complete
bullshit. It's completely nonsense.
It's antithetical to what he said.

(01:06:13):
But he did have a better understanding of what was going
on. And they don't even pretend
anymore, is my understanding about it.
Divided Fed sets to announce an interest rate decision.
That's coming up. The problem is, is remember,
Donald Trump said they were going to try to get this
inflation thing under control. The best way that you do it is
you just ramp up the cost of money.
But they can't do it right now because they have multiple

(01:06:33):
different problems. the Fed is doing two things at once.
It's it's stuck in a bind. This is what it says.
They have to balance the mandateto keep inflation under control
and to maximize employment. And they're using interest rates
to do it. The other problem is they've got
bonds that are not being held and so they are accountable to
the people that handle these interest rates.
So these interest rates can't go, they can't go too low, can't

(01:06:55):
go too high. So you're screwed because
they're not independent. They're only pretend
independent, which is why the Board of Governors for the
Federal Reserve has presidents to put them in right.
It's a it's a fake idea. It's 115 year experiment 100 and
whatever it is 12 year experiment that should end.
You guys are saying end the Fed in the chat.

(01:07:16):
Of course we need to end the, the the income tax as well.
We should not have the federal government be the thing that it
is. And that would be really painful
right up front. And if you understood the
mission and the mandate that Donald Trump got, which was come
in and break some eggs, man, go in there and make a mess, you're
going to piss off your own base by doing it because they're
going to lose things that they like.
But the mission is more important.

(01:07:41):
You would think if you're on mission, you're driving towards
an end goal and bad things happened during that time.
Anybody who's been in the military knows what I'm talking
about. If you've been on a search
warrant, people get injured, right?
I've got a buddy who has a permanent knee problem will
never be the same because the mission was subdue dangerous guy

(01:08:03):
doing bad things. So that's that's the first
priority. And sometimes you sacrifice
yourself a little bit in it. You know what the mission is not
this. We talked about it yesterday a
little bit. This is Neil Team 6.
This is the kneelers that workedfor my federal agency.
They forgot the mission. They were doing something that
shouldn't have been in their mission set.

(01:08:24):
Their job is intelligence right now and they're pretending that
they can do crowd control. But there they were and they
decided the best way to make people feel good about what
we're doing is drop a knee in big smiles and wearing our
stupid masks because George Floyd.
These are people that are divorced from the mission.
There's nothing in the FBI mission that goes anything near
that. Give political statement while
on duty wearing FBI placard doesn't exist.

(01:08:45):
Not a thing. And they got fired.
Also a mistake because it was a way better way of handling this
five years later. But we've got an agency that
doesn't do serious things. I'm going to play you something
that I think is actually kind ofwild.
This guy makes a connection. Which man he might be right.
This is a dude. I think it's called Daddy twin
or something like that. He's over on XI saw this.

(01:09:07):
He's ranting about two things ready.
This is this is a wild rant. He's comparing the fact that
those who are in the podcast space, those people who are in
the commentary space, the Tim Pools, the Candace Owens, the
Dave Rubens, the ladder with Crowder's whatever.
There is a a divide right now happening.
Many of you have seen it. I've called it the, you know,
the MAGA moment where the peoplethat were behind the Donald

(01:09:30):
Trump mission who want to see him successful and have
different sort of platforms on it.
They're in this conflict. I guess we're in the in the
conflict as well. I just want him to do more and
more of it, lot more of it. I don't think he went nearly far
enough. Donald Trump is like way too
squishy and in the middle for me.
Hard right? Get them all out.
If things get crazy and expensive for a little while, so

(01:09:51):
be it. All right, This guy draws the
parallel because he actually sees that the people who had
very specific and critically important safety oriented
missions failed. He ties this online beef, this
podcasty personality disagreements, Candace Owen, Tim

(01:10:15):
Poole, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, all these people.
And he locks it in on the failure of certain people in the
Trump administration to do the thing they said.
And though people have basicallygone two different ways with it,
some people are like, hey, we need to hold you accountable.
This is what you failed. This is where you go.
This is what we need you to do. Stop arresting autistic bronies,
dude. Get the real people.

(01:10:36):
Expose government fraud. That's what you came in to do.
That's what you talked about before.
Now we need you to go do that thing.
That was your mission. That's why you are there.
Don't forget it. Don't get caught up in the task
of running the agency because the purpose of why you are there
is to solve the problem with that agency more broadly.
And then other people were just like I told you, two people.

(01:10:58):
People went two different ways after COVID.
One of the things they did was they said, I don't trust the
government. I don't trust the healthcare
industry. I don't trust public health.
I don't trust law enforcement. I don't trust the media and so I
am going to make up my mind scrupulously and I will
constantly and and critically evolve in my thought processes
with skepticism and evidence based assessments.

(01:11:22):
That is a very small minority. Thank you for listening if
you're one of those people. I try to be that thing.
I can't say I'm perfect at it, but that's my aspiration.
And then there's the other side.And they said everybody lied to
me, so screw it. I'm just going to believe
anything I want them is going tosay things they have no bearing

(01:11:42):
in reality and I'm going to say,and I'm going to assign duties
to other people to deal with my bullshit, however bullshit it
is, that you must now address mycrazy because I've been dealing
with crazy from government and from law enforcement and from
public health and from media institutions and, take your
pick, educational groups. Yep, they've been lying.
Now I get to lie and now you have to come and address my

(01:12:05):
lies. That's a hell of a position.
And if you have enough followersand I'm about to show you a
Candace Owens clip, which I think is kind of funny, and then
this guy actually hones in on it.
I'm not making comment one way or another.
I don't believe what Candace Owens says.
I think she's nuts, but it's only because she keeps saying
things. And when people ask her what is
the conclusive proof, her proof is nobody has come in and
debunked the thing that I said out of whole cloth that has no

(01:12:27):
evidence. She said things that she
believes. I'm going to tell you something
I believe. I believe that ADC jury will
acquit Brian Cole Junior based on the evidence that I have on
my computer right now that I cannot share with you.
Why can you not share it? Because it's not mine.
It was shared with me and I went, holy crap, got it.
Brian Cole Junior, autistic brony black guy,
disproportionate, living in Woodbridge, VA, arrested by the

(01:12:50):
FBI, no connection to government.
That guy's not it. How do I know it?
Because he was doing something else at that time, not my story.
I'm also pretty honorable at this stuff.
People from different news agencies always talk to me back
and forth. I don't share their stories when
it's not my story, that's not what I do.
So I think these people know that he's not it.
And you will see the evidence. I'm not like holding the

(01:13:12):
evidence back from you. It's just not mine to share.
So when the story comes out, then I'll tell you, aha, see,
I'm telling you it's coming. All right.
I wish I could share with you. I wish people move faster.
I don't go slowly. I go really quickly, as you guys
can imagine. I talk quickly.
I think quickly and I act quickly and I'm generally, I
feel pretty good about what I'vesaid and done.
That's kind of how it works, mostly.

(01:13:34):
And then you got this gal and she just says, well, stuff.
And I don't know how you prove that a unnamed source in the
French government is coming after you, but that's what she
said. So here's the Russell Brand
thing. We're going to play it
yesterday. And I and I decided against it.
I want to show you this and I'm going to show you what this guy

(01:13:54):
says, which is he blames this controversy and this sort of
kind of spiral on people who failed to stay on mission and
it's left people just adrift. It's kind of a hell of a
connection. But I don't think he's
necessarily wrong. And I want I want your opinion
on it as well. Here's Russell Brand asking for
the proof. Listen for the proof she gets.
Where is the corroboration? What are we seeing that's

(01:14:17):
indefatigable? What are we seeing in the case
of were Israel involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk?
Is there some connection to Israel?
Do you think the neighborhood ofIsrael is, is fundamental in
even issues as seemingly diffuseand only really connected
through you, you know, and you've been the person that's

(01:14:38):
reported on them as Brigitte Macron's true identity and
Charlie Kirk's murder. Do you think these things are
connected? Yes, I think it's all connected
and I think in many ways we already live in this sort of one
world government system. Maybe it's two world, but with
in terms of the West, don't think there's any difference in
the governments. And that's kind of the point
that we're making and maybe why the Charlie Ker case is so
crucial because it's showing us that, wait, what is the divide

(01:15:00):
here between America and Israel and France?
Right. I just told people that somebody
in the French government alertedme to an assassination attempt.
Shouldn't that require a commentfrom the president?
Of the United. States.
The president has been forced tomake a statement about that.
He received that information. Wouldn't you think it's the most

(01:15:21):
viral, it was the most viral global story for three days.
And the White House has chosen not to comment.
What does that signal to the population?
That it's OK for France to be involved in assassination
attempts, that they're at least if he thought that I was
completely making it up and I gave him the evidence that was
made-up, he would be required tocome out and say we are looking
at that situation and that there's there's nothing here.

(01:15:42):
There's no evidence of that. You're doing none of that.
And that should alarm people. That should very, very much
alarm people. Why?
Why would that alarm people? You've made this wild claim that
somebody from the French government is going to come kill
you with Israeli trained snipersfrom the French Foreign Legion.

(01:16:02):
From what I understand and what I was able to gather, I can only
listen to so much of that stuff.You said something that requires
tremendous amounts of evidence to to substantiate.
Why would the president of the United States have any duty or
responsibility to respond to youever?
Why? I say things all the time.

(01:16:22):
I say things that I know are true.
I'm like, hey, you guys are failing.
You're not reforming the FBI. They're going to come kill us.
That's actually true. You know how I know?
Because they've killed other people before.
Super easy. I can show you evidence there.
That's what I'm talking about. You guys use the word receipts
because certain influence type people love the word receipt.
Oh, bring the receipts. The receipts are things that
you've already paid for, right? That's the, that's the list of

(01:16:43):
things that you've bought. I'm talking about evidence.
I'm talking about you are tryingto substantiate a case.
You've made claims now, but giveit evidence.
That's what rhetoric does. Rhetoric is I have said, here's
my argument. My argument is the French
government is trying to kill me and here is my evidence that
they're trying to kill me. It's an e-mail from this person
in a position to know. Now we have to access and decide

(01:17:04):
whether this person have access.Do they have the placement to
actually make this assessment? Can they say this thing with any
confidence? Do we believe it?
Why would the president of the United States have any bearing
in that whatsoever? I'm just asking.
That's a real question because if you don't bring, he said,
what is the evidence? That's what that's literally
what Russell Brett said. He said, what is the what is the

(01:17:25):
cooperating evidence? And the answer was the president
didn't address my claims. Thus they must be all in on it.
These are these are what are known as sort of, I call them
Internet neonostics or somethingto this effect if secret
knowledge, right? And they have these, these these

(01:17:47):
non debunk able claims because the claim is not something that
you have the ability to debunk because you've made something
and you haven't proved it. We can assess your evidence and
say, well, OK, that's good evidence.
That's bad evidence. We don't think that's very
strong. We don't think a gait analysis
from this particular company is as good as gait analysis from
this particular company. We think that gait analysis
lacking some additional sort of substantiation is not, is not

(01:18:09):
valid and it's not going to be enough to be conclusive.
So there's possibility, but not probability, but like just
saying something. When I tell you that I have a
death threat, sometimes I'll show you the death threat
because it's a death threat. Doesn't matter.
I don't think anybody owes me anything because it's like I got
an e-mail from some rando. Maybe it was a real people,
maybe it was not real people. I don't know.

(01:18:30):
I don't really care. My response to people that give
death threats to me is the same.And by the way, for whatever
it's worth, for a woman who apparently is facing death
threats from the French government, which is a pretty
substantial organization and a pretty capable one, even though
we kind of make fun of the French, Wouldn't you be living
in like isolation and living like you're actually going to be
killed at any moment, settling afear?

(01:18:52):
There are people who are worriedabout being killed.
Have you ever met them? I have.
Have you met people that even think they're in in danger of
being killed because of mental illness 'cause they used to come
into the FB is office and talk to us and we'd be like, whoa,
bro, 0 evidence of what you're saying.
None whatsoever. No experiential evidence, no
anecdotal evidence, no hard tangible evidence.

(01:19:12):
We don't believe what you're saying is true.
But at least they acted like there was a possibility that
somebody might kill them at any moment.
They really did. They did weird stuff, even if it
was illogical and it wasn't eveneffective.
They tried it said you cryptic notes.
I get them in my e-mail all the time.
Right now. People look, tell me a secure
channel that I can talk to you. Kyle's like, I'm not I'm not in
a position to do anything to help you.

(01:19:33):
Whether or not what you're saying is even possibly
substantiated. It's it's bizarre.
So this led to this Tim Poole sort of like freak out.
And this guy explains this freakout and he thinks, and I don't
know that he's wrong. And this is maybe the the
culmination of this sort of discussion here that because the
people that that a lot of members of the media had faith

(01:19:55):
in had personal relationships with a Cash Patel, with a Dan
Bongino, people knew Pam Bondi, people had political connections
to them because that was going on.
Because these people went in with so much hope that they were
going to go in and solve the problems that we all saw.
And they're not doing it. And they're presenting us, an
autistic brony black guy, as thesolution to a likely government

(01:20:16):
involved cover up that they themselves spoke about for
years. There's this major break and
trust. And so some people are furious
about that and they continue to cover it really aggressively and
it's causing split. And some people have just gone
off the deep end and they just said, hey, if we're living in
la, la land where anybody can say anything and do anything
they want, there's no accountability.
Screw it. Then there's this sort of wild

(01:20:36):
thing. So this is a guy reflecting on
Tim Poole. I've set this up a long time,
but it's because it's a really weird clip.
And he swears and he and he calls her the C word, which is
not very pleasant. And I think he's genuinely
pissed off. Having met Tim Poole what like
maybe a half dozen times and spent hours with him.
I think he's really, I don't think this is acting.
I think he's furious because I think his family, I think he

(01:20:56):
actually does perceive real threats to himself.
I've been to his compound and they act as though there's
actual threats. They they carry themselves like
they have real threats, having been swatted a bunch of times
and some other stuff. All right, that's the set up.
Here's this guy. So by now everybody's seen this
temple crash out, right? Completely goes bonker on
Candace, calls her the C word. Candace Owens is a fucking evil

(01:21:19):
scumbag. She is a degenerate cunt.
She is burning everything down and she's gloating and smiling
while she does it. And you know what you fucking
told me? She has no security.
She doesn't fucking deal with the shit we have to deal with.
She's a piece of shit. She's absolutely crashes out on
her. And everybody's going like,

(01:21:39):
what's going on with this guy? Is he on medication?
What's going on? But to the bigger point, look at
all of the right flipping on theGOP right now, right?
Absolutely saying we're not voting.
We're, you know, not having it, right?
Look at how popular Nick Fuentesis getting.
He he, his podcast on Spotify went to #1 and just what like a

(01:22:02):
week Impossible. They pulled him off of there.
That's how popular he is. Yesterday on Piers Morgan,
absolutely toasted. Pierce tell you this, coming
into the coming into the midterms, if you're not America
first or America only, you're going to get your ass handed to
you. Watch what happens.

(01:22:22):
This movement isn't going away and it ain't going anywhere.
And all of the conservative content creators are just
absolutely dividing part in waysthat ain't going to be good for
the party. And, you know, absolutely not.
And what can we blame? Akash Batal?
Pam Bondi? Dan Bongino?
Not one arrest. Not one arrest for foul cheek,

(01:22:44):
Nothing. No accountability.
That's what's to blame. Don't look around and be like, I
wonder what did it? That's exactly what did it.
He's talking about another tier of people having a loss of faith
in institutions. People had an opportunity to be
able to see institutions redeemed.
That's what we thought was goingon there.
And then you got stories like this from Ken Klippenstein.

(01:23:06):
FB OS making a list of American extremists.
Leaked memo says are you on Trump's naughty list?
He pushed this out on December 6th on his sub stack.
Good sub stack. Follow if you guys are
interested. Independent journalism.
I don't agree with everything hesaid, but he's a reasonable guy.
We've spoken and and I think he probably leans more left to me.
I like to follow people that I think are reasonable on the left
or left of center because it keeps me honest and it keeps

(01:23:27):
it's like, OK, fine, we can findcommon ground.
I actually agreed to speak to toScott McFarlane.
Do you guys remember Scott McFarlane?
Hi, it's Thursday morning and it's Scott McFarlane.
I'm doing this breathy radio void.
That guy with a really thin wrists.
I didn't want to talk to him. And one of his buddies reached
out to me from CBS and was like,hey, man, we talked to Steve
just to to Scott. And I was like, I don't want to.

(01:23:47):
I kind of don't like that he can't even fit into a regular
men's dress shirt. And I don't like the way he
talks. And I feel like he's kind of
oily, so I don't want to. And he was like, I think he
should. And I went, all right, whatever,
I'll talk to him. We'll talk.
We'll talk to Scott. Screw it.
Like, we should have conversations with people and,
and find out like, do you say things that are that are

(01:24:08):
reasonable? He apparently is having some
doubts about the story that Bongino and Patel pushed out.
And Bondi was part of it. When it comes to the the pipe
bomber case, and I'm not going to do every show on it the way
that I've seen Candace Owens, every single damn show she does
is about Charlie Kirk's assassination.
She's just going to mine the death of a friend for everything
that it's worth. That's horrible.
How about the real story here? People thought there was a

(01:24:29):
possibility that it gets fixed, and it didn't.
It's not better. Attorney General Pam Bondi is
ordering the FBI to compile a list of groups or entities
engaging in acts that may constitute domestic terrorism,
according to a Justice Department memo that is
exclusively published here. This is national security
presidential Memorandum 7. Ken has been on this like, like

(01:24:50):
white on rice. He loves this story and it's a
really good one. The target is those expressing,
quote, opposition to law and immigration enforcement, extreme
views in favor of mass migrationand open borders, adherence to
radical gender ideology and antiAmericanism, anti capitalism and
anti Christianity. Well, those sound great right up
until you realize you're going to turn over powers, whether it
be at the midterm or the next president election or maybe it's

(01:25:12):
another president election in the future.
At some point somebody else is going to be in charge.
You don't get to say what the what the positions are that are
good and bad in America. We don't get to do that.
You're supposed to leave it open.
The key for what America actually survives under is when
you actually do it the right way.
And what that should look like is you actually protect the

(01:25:32):
Christian Western majority and you allow for and createspace
for the whatever minority. They don't get beaten up, they
don't get taken out. It'll get rounded up by the
government, but we don't like promote them.
That's kind of the, the, the goal.
I do not want to see any side ofthe aisle deciding what anti

(01:25:55):
Americanism is or whether or notthere's an anti Christian or an
anti Muslim or any of the other.I don't, I don't like hate
crimes at all. I think all these things lead
open interpretation where you end up with the same problems we
had with the Biden administration where they said,
oh, you're an anti government, anti authority, violent
extremist, which is the same stuff that our that our founding
fathers believed in. They believe in all this stuff.
This is a flip on agave. You guys are on it.

(01:26:15):
Look at this. I see this in our chat.
Oh, it's agave in reverse. Exactly.
The 266 Oscar cases, these were the domestic terrorism cases
with no criminal predicate that went after January Sixers, that
same thing is going to be flipped on its head and come at
the other side. And so we're just going to do
tit for tat and smack the, the, the, the ping pong ball back and
forth. Well, the only people that pay
for it is us. The goal was not to come in and

(01:26:38):
make them a, a, a, a pro, whatever the heck Donald Trump
has been pushing on these people.
The goal is to get rid of weaponized government so that
everybody can have more liberty.And then you let the market
decide what the good ideas are. I actually like what Harmony
Dillon saying here. Again, I won't show you that
it's all bad. I don't actually believe that.

(01:26:58):
I think that we live in a world of Gray, but there's a lot of
people that are let down by the really, really dangerous thing,
which is our Justice Department is not doing the one thing that
we hoped it would do. And it's because you put some of
the squishy in there. And Pam Bondi is a little
squishy. If she's signing off on this
from Harmony Dillon, great. I'm going to play you a clip
from Harmony Dillon. She's talking from her office.
I kind of dig that chair. Actually.
I cropped the video a little bittight.

(01:27:18):
She's talking about a Second Amendment push from the Justice
Department. It's about damn time.
Let's get rid of the National Firearms Act.
Let's try to go and figure out ways to undercut the Hughes
Amendment. Let's figure out how we make
sure that we understand that there are certain things that
are unconstitutional that are currently in federal law because
we can read the Second Amendmentas plain text.
Let's do that. That would be nice.
Not a second class, right, Is what she says in this clip.

(01:27:39):
OK. And I want you guys to do me a
favor, which I don't always ask for.
My buddy's name is Steven Stambalea.
He's an attorney that's helped me.
But more importantly, he's a gunattorney that knows about guns.
He's a gun guy's gun attorney. And he really pushes and I think
he needs to work for Harmony Dylan in this space.
If he's willing, they should reach out to him proactively and

(01:28:00):
offer him a job. He is a stud that does things
for free. He's been on our program.
You guys can go back and find the clips.
He literally says, how are you going to bankrupt my clients
when I'm going to represent themfor nothing?
Because he does regularly. He's represented me for nothing.
He's representing me right now in a case that is not quite
public yet, but it will be in a maybe 5 days, maybe, maybe next
week. We'll let you know about it.

(01:28:20):
He's representing me cost me nothing because he knows it's
the right thing to do and he thinks it's amusing to push back
against the government. So his his handle is at Stambo
like Rambo but with STSTA MB O the #2A Stambo to a follow him
on X. Like recommend him to Harmeet
Dhillon. Here she is talking about the

(01:28:40):
Second Amendment not being a right that we should, you know,
give a back seat to. Agreed.
But also all of them should be like this.
Hi, I'm Harmeet Dhillon, the Assistant Attorney General for
Civil Rights, with an important update about our work here in
the department. This month the Civil Rights
Division has started a Second Amendment section and I'm really
excited about this. For the first time, the DOJ

(01:29:02):
Civil Rights Division and the DOJ at large will be protecting
and advancing our citizens rightto bear arms as part of our
civil rights work. As Attorney General Pam Bondi
has said, the Second Amendment is not a second class right and
I couldn't agree more with my boss.
The Second Amendment was ratified in 1791 as part of the

(01:29:24):
Bill of Rights and yet it has received less attention from the
Supreme Court than some of our other important civil rights.
However, recently the court has really stepped up and made clear
that states cannot interfere with the right of law abiding
citizens to carry commonly used firearms.
So far, the DOJ Civil Rights Division has sued Los Angeles

(01:29:45):
for unreasonable multi year delays in granting concealed
carry permits. We've supported a couple of
cases in different courts through our amicus briefs with
the Solicitor General's Office. I personally argued the Barnett
case in Illinois in the 7th Circuit, and we did another case
in Hawaii challenging that states unreasonable

(01:30:09):
restrictions. Some of the things we're seeing
and that is going to be the focus of our work around the
country includes multi $1000 costs for citizens to apply for
concealed carry permits. Other jurisdictions are having
unreasonably long delays. Other jurisdictions are
outlawing guns that should be protected by the 2nd Amendment

(01:30:31):
under the recent Supreme Court precedents.
Now, everyone here knows that common sense teaches us that a
criminal is less likely to attack a house that is guarded
by a armed citizen. Secondly, the right to bear arms
equalizes the ability of those of us, women, people with

(01:30:53):
disabilities, and others who might otherwise be more
vulnerable to be able to protectourselves.
And this is important. And I don't mean to detract from
law enforcement. They have a very important role
as well. But the Second Amendment was
passed and, as The Federalist Papers and other founding
documents make clear, to allow citizens the individual right to

(01:31:14):
bear arms for lawful purposes. All right, all of those things
are great. The 9th and the 10th Amendment
are things that everybody shouldread and understand that the
Constitution doesn't lay out allof the the rights that you have
and anything that is not specifically given to the
federal government means that they are left to the citizens
and to the states. Not in that order.
Go read the 9th and the 10th amendment.

(01:31:36):
Make it part of something you understand.
They should be the ones you lovethe most.
Forget the 1st amendment and theSecond Amendment.
They're already pretty well established.
People get it. If you guys want to find Stambo,
you can go to my Twitter page. I just put it up on the screen
here so you guys can see it. There's the post with Harmony
Dillon. You guys can watch that video in
its entirety. It's about 3 minutes long.
It's not a bad watch. It's a little bit slow.

(01:31:56):
People are wondering why she's not sitting behind a desk.
I don't know, maybe she really likes her leggings.
She's got nice boots on or something, whatever.
But Stambo needs to have a job working for this group.
If they're going to create a newsection for DOJ that's going to
be about civil rights and handling the Second Amendment,
then let's treat it like we meanit.
Let's put a guy in. You guys can also listen to the
episode we did with him, which has been a long time.
Should do another one, but it's called the machine gun lawyer

(01:32:17):
and he went out and represented people owning legally and
authorized machine guns bought under a trust in this century in
in the 2000s, which is wild. If you guys know anything about
the the way the Hughes amendmentworked and the 1986 sort of
banned from any future machine guns being made.
He's was the guy that represented the two people that
ever made machine guns for private use that were not 1986

(01:32:40):
Hughes Act compliant. And I think he would have won if
he went longer. It just turns out one of the
guys ended up becoming a federalagent and he ended up becoming a
friend of mine at the Academy. So that's pretty wild.
It's been a strange little journey that we've had here.
All right, last little bit here.Let's talk about the this thing
here. Let me just very clearly state
because I'm not letting this thing go, I just took a day away
from it because I think every day we should take a little bit

(01:33:01):
of a moment to reflect. I spent 8 plus hours, maybe more
between podcast prep and actually doing interviews
yesterday on the pipe bomb story.
The story is ridiculous. I will do another recap at the
end of the week at the minimum if nothing else breaks on it.
I'm telling you that I have seenevidence so far that is going to
basically show you that he couldnot have done it the very

(01:33:24):
minimum. Brian Cole Junior has a
brilliant and capable exculpatory evidence chain right
now. And it involves timelines and it
involves location and and it involves like, I don't even

(01:33:44):
think that he, I don't even think you can do a gate analysis
and put him in the place. I think if we get a picture of
him walking, it's going to clearly point out that he was
not the guy he confessed in a four hour, in a four hour
interview. And I want to point out
something about this that many of you guys may have seen, may
have understood, but perhaps youdon't understand the
significance of. I'm going to try to pull up the

(01:34:07):
picture of him. Confess the the DOJ mug shot,
right? The DOJ mug shot has Mr. Cole
wearing headphones. I want you to consider how many
mug shots you've ever seen wheresomebody is wearing headphones
around their neck. When would that happen?

(01:34:28):
Does it ever happen? In my experience, it does not.
So what I think happened during that interview, and I can't find
the picture, so screw it, we'll just put this back on the phone.
I think they went to go take those earphones off him and he
probably lost it the way that some people who are autistic do
when you start changing environment and they're
uncomfortable. And the agents decided one of

(01:34:52):
two things could happen. We can take this off, which is
policy. We can pull the headphones and
we can take all of his personal items and the shoelaces and
everything else like that. We can sit him down here in the
handcuffs so we could do the theinterview, or we can leave them
on and not have him lose his mind because it's going to cause

(01:35:12):
significant agitation in our subject and we're looking for a
compliant subject. If you know anything about
autistic people, if you've ever met somebody who has
sensitivities to audio, it can be crippling for them.
And even changing things that they don't like changed can be a
real big problem. So even the safety net of having
them around his neck and, and knowing that they're available

(01:35:34):
to him if he needs them, it tells you an awful lot about it.
I think that even just from the evidence that's available for
everybody, as you just do basic analysis as a person who's lived
in the world, you're not buying this.
And that's why people like ScottMcFarlane from CBS and that's
why people who, you know, I saidit to Alex Jones the other day
and he was like, it's 100% they're compromised.

(01:35:55):
Like it's over, You know, like he calls it out, right?
Lastly, allow me to put this outthere one more time because this
is one of the wildest things that you will hear as long as
you're tuned to it. I did it earlier.
I think I played it on Monday. I'm going to play it for you one
more time. I played it for Alex Jones's
audience yesterday. So if you guys already heard
this, bear with me because it's worth hearing it again.
The deputy director of the FBI said two things.

(01:36:15):
I'm now paid for my for facts and not opinions, which means he
is now discounting everything hesaid before.
That's crazy to me. I don't know how you even get
there. And the more important thing he
says is as a law enforcement professional who cares about
facts and not opinions. His words, not mine.
He's only interested in being paid for facts.
He feels pretty comfortable thatthey got the right guy.

(01:36:37):
He's pretty comfortable that they got their subject.
For those of you that were in law enforcement and many people
who are in law enforcement that are current or former, you guys
have done this job. And you know, how many arrests
have you done when someone said did you get the right guy?
You say I'm pretty comfortable Igot the right guy and then you
get to sleep at night. Just just atrocious.

(01:37:00):
This is not how the FBI works. This is a 5 year investigation
and you think you might have gotthe right guy and you think the
public is going to be OK with it.
The public is not on Gino the the explaining deputy director.
Again, if you're explaining, you're losing you guys put this
in your head so that you know that when this comes out, I'm
not just doing crazy stuff here and telling you something for
clicks. You're going to realize that

(01:37:21):
they're already giving you all the clues you need to be able to
assess that they don't have perfect confidence in what
they're doing because because this guy doesn't line up, not to
any thinking person, certainly not someone who did a podcast
talking about all the the inaccuracies that happened in
this case up until this point. You know, I don't know if you
remember this, This is before you became the deputy FBI
director. You you put a post on X right

(01:37:43):
after this happened and you saidthere's a massive cover up
because the person that planted those pipe bombs, they don't
want you to know who it is because it's either a connected
anti Trump insider or an inside job.
You said that, you know, long before you even thought of as
deputy FBI director. Yeah.

(01:38:05):
That's why I said to you this investigations just begun.
We are pretty comfortable. We have our guy.
I think this again, legal process starts to surface and
information, facts start to comeout by the public's going to be
very comfortable with the investigation that was conducted
under Director Patel and his leadership.
And he's been great on this. He's been great on this.

(01:38:26):
And he's just shaking his head as he's saying it.
And you guys just read that bodylanguage.
Is that the way the Dan Bongino talks about stuff?
Does he just tell you? I think you're going to feel
really great about how this comes out.
This investigation is five yearsold, but it's just begun and
we're on chapter 1 of chapter 20of this book.
That goes for a long time. And you guys, you notice my head

(01:38:49):
shaking. I don't believe it either.
And I'm I'm actually just telling you that you're going to
feel pretty comfortable when we do this thing.
There's all these little micro expressions where people
discredit themselves with their own body, whether that's what's
happening here or not, unclear. But his words are damning.
They are damning because we havehis old words.

(01:39:09):
And I'm not going to do Bongino versus Bongino for you today.
I'm just going to tell you, Director Patel has been amazing
on this with all of his patches on his jacket.
Nobody ever wore an FBIJTTF or FBI Ray jacket before Patel got
in there. He actually mandated this stuff.
I don't know if you guys know this.
It's super embarrassing because that's not how they, I mean, you

(01:39:30):
change the Bureau culture, but not in a good way.
I have an OGFBI Ray jacket. I should put it up in the
background. I have an OG 1970s made in
America plastic nylon issued long before I was ever in the
FBI jacket that I found in the closet one time.
And I'm like, that thing is freaking great.
This is like the freaking thing that you thought you were going
to get issued. Then you get these like high

(01:39:52):
speed 511 like lame things that you see the director wearing
right now and they think looks cool.
And I'm like, that's not what I signed up for.
Mine's in mint condition too. You want to know why?
It was made in the 80s. You know why it's in mint
condition? Because nobody ever wore them in
the FBI. For God's sake, you freaking
fools. Let me do one last thing again.
I'm going to point it out to youguys because I did it the other
day and I understand that this doesn't hit perfectly.

(01:40:13):
I did AI, if I do say so myself.I did a really good job of
explaining this on Infowars yesterday.
These are not the FBI's renderings.
This is somebody else's rendering.
This is a video analyst rendering of the cell phone
towers and the ping data that the FBI relies on to put Brian
Cole Junior in the area of the pipe bomber on January 5th

(01:40:36):
between 7:34 and and 8:18 PM. That's a very specific timeline.
OK, It's 50 minutes, give or take 48 minutes.
Maybe look at the map. If you're listening, you're
missing out. You can't see it.
So Rumble, YouTube, Spotify, take your pick.
Right in the middle of the screen, you see that orange set

(01:40:58):
of handles, those orange arms. There is an acute angle that is
about 120° and it says 3 on it. Right next to it is a 2 and that
opens out to the right. Across the way from it is a four
with yellow arms and it faces out to the left, which is out to
the West. Then you've got the one and it
faces down to the it's called SE, and then you've got the five
and it opens up to the northwest.

(01:41:18):
You guys tracking? Those are the towers.
Those are the angles. There's 120 degrees.
So the acute part of the angle, that's the smaller part of the
angle, is pointing the directionof the sector that the pings of
that cell phone tower will pick up in.
And then you zoom in and you seethat cluster in the middle,
which is the map near Folger Park where the pipe bomber was

(01:41:40):
actually walking at the time. OK, 1234.
They're not connected to arms ofa triangle.
They are part of the pipe bombers.
Route 1 is up by the DNC, 2 is alittle bit South of the DNC, 3
is en route leaving and heading over to the RNC, and four is
roughly in the vicinity of the RNC.
Just so we're all on the same page, ping #4IS outside the

(01:42:02):
sector of tower #4 Ping number one is outside the sector of
tower #1 Ping number 2 is inside, ping #3 is outside.
So of the four pings that we aretalking about on the screen
right now, three of the four of them are either on the margins
or actually pretty well outside.And what's more likely that we
can find Brian Cole on the map moving around during those Times

(01:42:25):
Now that we know where he was with the cell phone ping and we
know where that look in those inthose different little tower
areas. Are you guys checking how we're
going to find out and prove this?
And yeah, apparently he was doing DoorDash that he's doing
DoorDash. You think somebody doesn't have
a record of that? I want, I want to get somebody
from DoorDash to tell us that's what I'm working on.
They don't owe me anything, by the way, just like Candace Owens

(01:42:46):
doesn't get owed a phone call from the president.
But I would. I have tried.
And I'm going to continue to reach out to their media
relations. DoorDash could clear a guy and
show that he was doing work because if he delivered a
burrito to somebody at 819 whilethe pipe bomber just disappears
from from being on foot droppingoff pipe bombs and somebody
says, Oh yeah, a blue 2017 Nissan Sentra with factory

(01:43:08):
wheels popped up and gave me my burrito.
And by the way, they're nowhere near this grid.
And there's somewhere way up there, you know, north of the
Capitol. It's over.
He can only physically be in thearea that he was in.
And all your circumstantial evidence of buying things that
are in my garage won't won't save the FB is case on this.
And I'm telling you that evidence already exists in a way

(01:43:31):
that I know ADC jury, because they're going to be sympathetic.
The DC jury will already acquit him based on what we have.
And there's more of it out there.
So we're going to keep building it up.
And I expect people to keep doing the work and the people
who are, you know, behind the scenes making this thing happen.
Yeah, I know that the companies don't want to get involved.
I'm seeing you guys say this in the screen on the chat.

(01:43:51):
DoorDash probably doesn't want to get involved.
Yeah, they probably don't want their reputation on there.
Wouldn't it be better to know that they didn't hire a pipe, a
pipe bomber? Wouldn't you, as DoorDash, want
to say we didn't have a pipe bomber working for us.
In fact, we just had a guy that was just doing his best and we
gave opportunities for autistic guys that may not have other
opportunities to make money. Wouldn't that be better?
Makes sense to me. All right, I told you guys I had

(01:44:13):
a palate cleanse. That's funny and actually ties
these together. Let me do a quick little plug
for our friends over at Go to Spotify.
I keep saying it to you guys, why?
It's really a good user experience.
Nobody has gone back and said, Seraphin, you've steered me
wrong. Nobody tells me that they hate
the products we buy, as far as Ican tell, and nobody tells me
that you have steered them wrongon Spotify.
Kyle seraphinshow.com link in the show description.
Go to go to add Spotify to your follows.

(01:44:33):
Join us there. We've had a massive year on
there. It's been awesome.
If you're watching elsewhere, YouTube X Rumble, like what
we're doing, subscribe to the channel there if you have not
already and share it with a friend.
It's the single biggest way thatyou can support us for free.
It cost you $0.00. Send the show, maybe you send
last Friday show with Steve friend.
Maybe show the Monday show talking about firing C friend.
Maybe you send yesterday's talking about bronies.

(01:44:54):
We got some pretty good tractionon those over on YouTube as
well. Same thing on Rumble.
We're on the leaderboard every week now.
Send it to a friend. I think we punch way above our
weight for what it is. It's just the dude sitting here.
Here I am changing out in this one little room, bringing you
what I can and I think it's accurate.
And you know some of the things I have more questions about.
This is one of the questions. Can we just laugh about mission?

(01:45:15):
Can we laugh about being off mission?
Can we laugh about the divorcingof task and purpose?
I think we can. This is a visual palate cleanse.
Enjoy. A man being tasked with
designing the Denver airport. And if you know anything about
the Denver airport, you guys will know what I'm talking
about. Let's do it.
Why would you agree to design another fucking airport?

(01:45:37):
Whatever did 1. You got this.
How hard could this be? OK, so if Denver is here, how
about we put the airport over here in fucking Kansas or
something? I don't know.
I should take a look at this mood board the developers sent.
All right, what is what is this?What the fuck?

(01:46:00):
OK, I think I understand. The exterior of the airport will
look like teepees and the interior will look like the
construction of a highway. Travelers can access one of
three terminals via this convenient monorail system, and
once they exit, I guess they canbegin their 2 1/2 mile death
March to their gate. You can have this cool carousel
at baggage claim for ski and snowboard equipment, and that'll

(01:46:23):
be the perfect place for the gargoyles.
Finally, let's welcome travelersto the airport with a symbol of
safety and tranquility to calm their nerves.
Perfect. This is perfect.
This is perfect. So if you guys don't know about

(01:46:44):
the Denver airport, first of all, it's basically demonic the
way that they drew it and the way that they came up with it.
And so he's doing this spoof on the mood board with gargoyles
and danger and weird stuff. And then they have this huge,
massive blue horse with glowing red eyes.
The glowing red eyes are meant to like I guess ward off planes
from smashing into the blue horse that's at the top of it.

(01:47:05):
And the craziest thing and my weird little connection to that
story with right, it hits me so hard.
I used to walk around the campusat the University of Oklahoma at
night and a miniaturized versionof that horse, which was still
like 2 times the size of a real horse was on our campus over at
the campus Art Museum. And I don't know what the hell
the connection was from University of Oklahoma and
Denver. And maybe one of you guys does,
you can put it in the comments below.

(01:47:25):
But I used to walk by that freaking horse, which looks like
a blue demon horse that's all glowing and crazy.
And it's like, you know, it's got like high gloss resin and
these crazy ass blue red eyes that look absolutely demonic.
And so anyway, this is a classicexample of like, hey, we're
going to build an airport, but let's also do weird demonic art

(01:47:46):
and let's let me get convenient for the travelers, except for
the freaking three mile walks we're going to do and we're
going to make it look like a construction site inside and all
the other stuff. I love the way that guy's mind
work is basically the same levelof like sarcasm and and sort of
like dark humor that I have. Yes, Blue Lucifer, I think was
the name of the horse. All right, so that's that's a
great example of and and they'reall over the place.

(01:48:08):
It's like the reason why we say the catch phrase of this
program, and I'll say it one more time for those of you who
are new. It's my belief that government
is the worst solution to every problem, including when it is in
fact the only solution to said problem.
It's still the worst. It sucks we don't like
government here. Notice on the list?
All right, that's it for today'sshow.

(01:48:29):
Support the sponsors. Make sure you're looking at the
links below, like subscribe, share, do the thing.
Leave me a comment whether you agree or disagree.
I'm cool with it either way. Thanks so much.
Look forward to seeing you guys tomorrow.
God bless. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.

All Episodes

FORGETTING THE MISSION: "What happens when people enter government?!" | Ep 693

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

The Bobby Bones Show

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}FORGETTING THE MISSION: "What happens when people enter government?!" | Ep 693