General Perjury? | Ep 139 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:03):
Take a look behind the curtain with the real whistleblower in
American Patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this programme has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.

(00:24):
Today is Thursday. It's September the 21st and we
are going to be talking Merrick Garland, or as my friends like
to call him, the General. What's up with the General?
I've got a goal for today's show.
I've got a goal going to show you a bunch of clips.
We're going to react to those clips.
We're going to share with you the insight from someone who has
worked under his department. And I have one simple goal.

(00:45):
I have one simple aspiration forthis show.
I am going to attempt to refrainfrom dropping F bombs.
That's that's just it. It's simple.
I wasn't enlisted guy. I worked in law enforcement.
I worked in an ambulance. I worked in a hospital in a in a
high volume ER when we had people coming in and things were
stressed and sometimes you say things.
I'm going to attempt to control my desire to drop F bombs when I

(01:10):
see this guy because he is a snivelling weasel of a human
being and we're going to get into why it is so scary.
That this guy is the attorney general, and it's not because
he's the attorney general. That's not the scariest thing to
me. Not at all.
All right, we're going to get into all of that.
Then we're also going to talk a little bit about what's been
going on in the rest of the country, and then I'm going to
give you guys a little taste. Right now, this week has been

(01:31):
somewhat wild. I was on the Drinking Bros
podcast yesterday, drove down there out of Austin, TX.
So I got to go down and hang outwith some pretty cool guys.
They've got a really cool studiosetup.
It's like a metal building, and they've got multiple sound
stages and they've got all thesecamera set up.
And you get a little bit more ofthe unfiltered version of Kyle
Serafin on The Drinking Bros. They're not exactly ones that
you need to self censor around. So we talked about the FBI and a

(01:54):
bunch of other stuff. So that's going to be airing in
a week. That's going to be on next
Wednesday, one week after yesterday.
And then I'm gonna be on Tim Poole, Culture War and my buddy
Garrity Boys gonna be joining me.
So we're flying out tonight to go to the DC area, which is my
least favourite place in America.
It's the worst place that I knowof.
But we're going to go out and we're going to do that.

(02:15):
And so you guys will see us on yet another venue and you get a
sort of a longer take on GarridoBoyle, I want to play this, this
video. We're going to start off with my
friend Dinesh Dsouza, Dan Bongino and the police state
trailer. We're promoting their movie.
We want you guys to go out and check it out if you're
interested in seeing. Kind of a scary take on America.

(02:36):
They have put together a very compelling piece and I think you
all will appreciate it. So we go and throw that on right
now. You guys can enjoy that and
we'll get back and start doing some clips.
So here is the police state trailer.
We honour you, Father, for all that you've.
Done for us Chief Division, Council on do J have approved a

(03:03):
no knock breach. We want the subject to be on
display. Doing the walk of Shame.
Full visual impact Any questions?
Are we becoming a police state? Government told American
citizens they couldn't go to church on Sunday for the first
time in my life and say to myself.
Am I gonna get a knock at the door?

(03:25):
FBI war come to the door now. The Patriot Act and FISA were
used against Donald Trump. These individuals have
commissioned the biggest propaganda play in U.S. history.
They don't go after the people that rigged the election.
They go after the people that want to find out what the hell
happened. We don't need to have a crime.

(03:47):
What we need is a person to lookat.
And then we go find out what crime you did.
Our focus is shifting. Our main priority as a Bureau is
going to be domestic. Terrorism really paints anybody
who's right of centre. If you're a pro life, pro
family, Catholic, do they defineyou as radical?
These are anti government. We are afraid of a religion,

(04:10):
violent extremists, and they must be dealt with.
We can do anything we want. Pretty, pretty scary stuff.

(04:30):
Pretty scary stuff folks. That is not something that feels
good to watch, but it is going to be insightful.
I think they've got a lot of really great interviews in
there. Julie Kelly, you probably saw
There's Jim Jordan, Cash Patel. Sounds like they may have had
gotten Trump in there. I don't even know yet who they
all got, but Dan Bongino does a pretty good chunk of it and the
the story is compelling. So you can get tickets online at

(04:51):
policestatefilm.net. Police State film.net is where
you can go find them. And they are doing showings all
over the country in private theatres, private theatre,
sellouts, sort of private screenings.
October 25th. And the and October 23rd, 23rd
and 25th. So let's start launching into
this weasel of a human being. Let me just tell you right now

(05:11):
why I think this guy is so scary.
As you watch these clips, I don't want you to think about
him as the attorney general. Those are politicians.
Those are political appointments.
That happens all the time. He was a federal judge and his
job was to be impartial. And you can just tell by the way
he speaks that this guy is a progressive leftist.
He is part of the problem in this country.

(05:33):
Listen to when he says things like, you know, the Justice
Department exists to protect ourdemocracy.
That is code for I don't believein the Constitution because the
Constitution does not lay out a democracy, not in any way, shape
or form. We don't have a democracy in the
United States. We have a constitutional
Republic. There's a reason why we've
covered things like The Federalist Papers here, because

(05:53):
we have a Federal Republic that's supposed to be small.
It is not a democracy. Democracy equals every time you
hear that democracy equals tyranny of the majority. 50% + 1
That's what democracy means and it's really scary.
There's a reason why we don't have it.
It's because the founders saw that human beings are fickle.
Government is bad. The more of it you have, the

(06:13):
more likely it is to oppress you, and therefore you try to
avoid that. You put as many safeguards as
possible between mode democracy.And the people that's what a
Federal Republic is about And Merrick Garland doesn't even
acknowledge this When he speaks he goes straight down the
leftist talking points. He is adopted the role of a
politician because he probably sat there on the bench and did
the exact same thing and of course he's more than happy to

(06:36):
run cover for his parties preferred policies.
So let's not just these videos may have gotten a weird order.
So Ryan's going to play them. I'm going to tell you what's
going on in each one of these. If you watched this thing
yesterday for the five hours, you're probably still doubled
over on a toilet and vomiting because it's pretty awful.
Let's play the first video clip and let's just get right into it
right away. Ryan and.
And start holding our bellies and maybe finding our emesis

(06:58):
bag. Go ahead and roll clip one
search in my town. FBI phone numbers all over the
district please call call that people are truly afraid.
I just want to make sure if you're not aware that you are
and this is a big problem when people are afraid of their own
government and I'll show you some other things we're talking

(07:19):
about justice system. I don't question you probably
not a bad person I don't know you but well I'll tell you you
are in charge of the department and people right now feel you
know I look at Durham report andI called on the fights of
violations of various of millions Americans right.
It's like KGB but when I read Duram Reports we have this you
have a nice you know playbook. First let's have a special

(07:43):
counsel and then you don't have to answer any questions here.
Then let's extend slow work investigation on Hillary Clinton
on Hunter. Ever since a slow walk we were
very quick and Donald Trump but you are very slow walk.
Then by the time you know that investigation ended statue of
limitation expired and all of your agents need to be tested

(08:05):
from Nesia. No one calls anything.
OK. You probably should have as part
of your hiring policy so no one held accountable which was a
egregious what happened you knowin that report when I read about
them I can't believe it happenedin the United States of America.
This is my frustration. I'll be honest with you then
it's very interesting. You know, regardless what it is,

(08:26):
even people in Obama administration rights concerns,
you know, how can President Sonsbe serving on, you know, corrupt
Ukrainian oligarchs. Do you understand that it
actually can undermine the one Ukrainian effort on policy?
I think these concerns were raised above administration
didn't do anything about it. These people are dying right now

(08:48):
and Americans don't trust this president.
So you I want to ask you one thing.
You know, as you you know, I don't need answer because I know
you're not. I want to, but I think you're
probably good American and you care.
And a lot of these people are soafraid they cover up this stuff,
I think in your department because they're embarrassed that
what we became as a country to say that what our department is

(09:10):
justice became that allows Russians to do propaganda and
Chinese, it allows them to destabilise our country.
That is then. That is dangerous.
She's exactly right. So that's Victoria Spartz.
She is a representative from Indiana, and she's Ukrainian.
As you can tell, if you listen to what she sounds like, she's
Ukrainian. And she's upset, rightly so, The

(09:34):
only thing that made me feel good about listening to that.
And she's got kind of that shrill voice, which is kind of
difficult to listen to. At least Garland had to hear it
in person. He had to have that kind of
hammered home on him. She's talking about how the way
the FBI is behaving reminds her of the KGB.
I've had a long conversation with Sebastian Gorka, who is in

(09:54):
our intro role, and every time Isee his his face, it makes me
smile because he's such a fun guy off off camera.
He's actually pretty fun on camera too, but one of the
things that he and I were discussing.
Was the fact that because the FBI is an intelligence agency?
Right. And the DOJ is in charge of it.
The DOJ under Merrick Garland isin charge of this intelligence

(10:15):
agency, but it's an intelligenceagency that maintains its
capabilities of arrest. And prosecution.
That's what a secret police is. That is exactly what every
single secret police has ever been in every single
totalitarian regime that has existed in the last 150 years.

(10:35):
They have people that are going out there and they're spying,
and we know the FBI is doing that.
And they talked about this. We couldn't find the clip, but
Merrick Garland actually was defending FISA 702.
I'll talk about that in just a second.
And he was defending it because it's an outstanding intelligence
tool. That's what he said.
It's it's where they get the most intelligence, which is
absolutely horrific. I'll tell you why in one second.

(10:57):
So here she is telling us that there is this intelligence
agency, the FBI, that maintains its powers to arrest.
Or as Steve Friend and I have sort of jokingly referred to it
as a trans intelligence agency, a trans intelligence.
Is one that was started off as alaw enforcement agency,
transitioned, transitioned itself to being an intelligence
agency, but it maintained its bulge like some of these dudes

(11:19):
that are out there pretending tobe women.
And they keep the D, right? They keep their pants still
stuffed and they fill up a jock strap.
And the jock strap fill for the FBI is a badge and a gun.
They have the ability to come out there with handcuffs and
lock you up. That should scare the hell out
of all Americans. And the scariest thing for me
was listening. And I was actually yelling at my
steering wheel as I was driving because I was listening to Ryan

(11:40):
Mattis stream yesterday of this particular hearing as I was
driving down to go to the Drinking Bros podcast and I am
screaming at my my windshield because he said FISA 7O2 is the
single largest source of information of intelligence that
we get in the FBI. FISA 702 is a special provision

(12:00):
of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act, which many of you will know was
weaponized against Donald Trump.It was used to spy on his
political campaign and then continued to spy on his
presidency through false hearings and and false
documentation, through lies. This is Peter Struck's legacy.
This is Lisa Page legacy. This is Andy Mccabes legacy.

(12:23):
It turns out the the number two at the FBI and the former acting
director. He was the acting director when
my daughter was born. My second daughter.
OK, so. Here we are with this tool and
and the way that that that FISA works is when you have what's
called a full FISA, this is a FISA warrant.
The FBI gathers an enormous file.

(12:43):
It's called the Woods file. It's every single fact that's
ever been written about this person that you want to use to
justify your position. And you go in front of a a
special court that meets in secret.
It's called the Fisk. They actually go into a Skift
vault. And the Fisk is the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court.And you take this Woods file,
which is a thick binder, and it documents every single thing and

(13:06):
every single fact that you assert has to be backed up with
with the documentation, you'll say I saw Ryan Matta driving
down I-95 towards Richmond. I-95 is an American highway
system that runs North and Southon the East Coast of the United
States. You know, and then you say he
was driving in a a Nissan Altima.
A Nissan Altima is a four door sedan that was produced by the

(13:30):
Nissan automobile company, you know, between these years and
these years. And this is how detailed this
thing has to be. You break down every single fact
and you justify it. And if you don't, the attorneys
over at DOJ and at the FBI, FISAunit will look back and they'll
go, OK, we need more facts here.You need to footnote this thing.
You need to document this. Everything must be documented.
And the reason why is because when you request a FISA.

(13:51):
You're the only person there. It's you and it's not me.
Obviously, it's not a federal agent is doing.
These are actually attorneys from DOJ or FBI that sit in
front of the FISA court. They swear in and they do what's
called ex parte. They are doing it one part only.
It's their part, the government's interest.
And so the government has to present the interest of the
citizen as well. The full facts, they're not
allowed to slant it. And then the judges are supposed

(14:12):
to decide whether or not that person meets the conditions for
a FISA. That is not what 702 is.
And I'm telling you all this because FISA actually is fairly
rigid, even though they've abused it.
So we already know that the the the SHAPE guarded programme is
jacked up. But 702 was way scarier.
I've written up 702 requests in a morning.
It's a couple of paragraphs thatyou proofread a couple times
with your supervisor. FISA 702.

(14:35):
Is unlimited access to your digital information if it
touches an American company. If you have a Yahoo email
account, we can get it. If you have a Gmail, a Hotmail,
If you have Skype, if you're using any non encrypted digital
communications, we can get access to it.
And it's only designed for one group of people.
Foreign actors, People who are acting on behalf of foreign
intelligence services that are based in a foreign nation.

(14:58):
Chinese spy in China. Chinese business person working
with the MSS in China. Russian oligarch who was
recruited by the FSB. These are the people that we can
get. 702 coverage on. But here's The funny thing.
Let's say that person is a business person, and a lot of
them are because they're what they're called, Co opt ease.
A Co op de is someone who works on behalf of a of a state actor,

(15:19):
but is not necessarily an explicit state actor.
When we have Co Op's they do business that is legit and some
that is not legit. And if you happen to be doing
part of the legit business, you are identified the idea that
Merrick Garland was defending this tool for use against
smugglers moving fentanyl over our southern border.
Is absolutely absurd. It is a bastardization.

(15:41):
And he sat there with a with a straight face and defended FISA
702 saying this stuff has to be protected because it is our
number one source of information, including a vital
tool in protecting Americans from illegal fentanyl coming
across the borders. They're using it for criminal
cases, criminal cases that are known as transnational organised
crime talk and usually Western Hemisphere.

(16:02):
So it's called talk W cases. If they're using it that way.
That is explicitly the opposite of what's supposed to be done,
and the only reason why you would be doing it that way is
because you want to identify Americans.
People on this side inside the United States that are using the
the smuggling routes and that's called reverse targeting and it
is against the law. Everything about 702 is abusive
and George Hillis said it and hehad a lot more experience than I

(16:24):
did. But for the two years that I saw
Raw Fiza, I had a major problem with it.
It's one of the reasons why I stopped working
counterintelligence. It made me sick and we were
still doing it and they're defending it and Congress has
the opportunity to defund it. And so far we don't see them
doing that. I want you guys to have that
understanding. We have a very dishonest actor
working inside the the AG's office and moreover he used to
be a federal judge and if that'sthe way he ruled that.

(16:45):
Here's the shit out of me. I can't say it any other way.
Sorry. I've been trying not to swear in
this guy. All right, let's do video #2.
Let's see what we got on here. We're going to keep going.
We're going to move forward through this tough folks, and
we're going to see how hot underthe collar this gets.
Let's do video 2, Ryan heard So he would stop looking into
Purisma, where Hunter was on theboard.
Would you agree? All right, let's let the
American people decide. Play the clip.

(17:07):
Play the clip. Remember going over convincing
our team or others to convincingthat that we should be providing
for loan guarantees And I went over I guess the twelve 13th
time to Kiev and and I was goingto supposed to announce that
there was another billion dollarloan guarantee And I had gotten

(17:28):
a commitment from Poroshenko andfrom that they would take action
against the state prosecutor andthey didn't.
So they said they had they walk out the press concept.
No, I said I'm not going to. We're not going to give you the
billion dollars. They said you have no authority,
you're not the president, the president said.
I said call him. I said I'm telling you you're

(17:49):
not getting a billion dollars. I said you're not getting a
billion. I'm going to be leaving here.
And I think it was about six hours.
I looked. I said we even 6 hours if the
prosecutors not fired. You're not getting the money.
Well, son of a bitch. Fire.
And they put in place someone who were solid.
Mr Attorney General, what you just saw there was Joe Biden in

(18:10):
his arrogance and role as the vice President in this country
saying if you don't fire Shopkin, the United States isn't
given the $1 billion loan. Why would Joe Biden say that?
As the vice President, why wouldhe say such a thing?
Was it policy? Was it our policy at the time?
Yes or no, it wasn't. I have documents here.
Interagency Policy Committee dated.

(18:31):
Wouldn't information. Is the gentleman ever gonna let
the time on my time Pipe down, Pipe down?
Shulkin had made. Let's go.
He's made significant reforms. Shokin did.
Matter of fact. John Kerry says he was
impressive. And, you know, within a few
months after Chokin was fired, they appoint A prosecutor that
said we're not going to look in the purisma anymore.

(18:52):
Cancel that. Forget it.
We're not looking in the prisma boom.
Here comes the $1,000,000. Joe Biden threatened the
Ukrainian president and the Prime Minister.
Everybody can see it. The fire shoken or the United
States won't give the billion dollars.
If that is not quid pro quo, Sir, what is?
I will tell you what it is in America.
Agrees with me. It's bribery and it's
impeachable. Are you going to do something

(19:13):
about it? He says no by the way he's like
well that's not what the JusticeDepartment does.
I'm not the I'm not the attorneyfor the president.
But no dude you're corrupt. That's what you are.
You're a person who has decided to side with your party instead
of what your oath says which is disgusting.
Couple things. So that's Troy Neils he's a
congressman from Texas. He I love the pipe down because
Jerry Nadler who has his his pants and his belt around his

(19:36):
nipple line, I think he's got them up there.
He looks like the Penguin. If you guys never seen Jerry
Nadler he's a bizarre looking little human being.
Only only he could have only been elected originally in a pre
Internet Society because otherwise you would have just
showed video of him on a loop. Of him walking and people would
be like, no, I don't think so. I don't think, I don't think
Jerry Nadler is going to represent people in New York.
That's just that's not going to happen.

(19:58):
But instead he keeps getting elected and he just sits there
with his pants up as high as, you know, close to his neckline.
He's like a Steve Urkel. Little weird white, you know,
80,000 year old Steve Urkel. And.
He asked. Michael chafing pants.
It's the belt. It's really the belt at the
nipple line is the real problem for him.
No doubt about that. So, so we've got this.
We've got to shut down. He puts him down and he just

(20:19):
shows him. Look, Victor Chokin should be in
front of Congress. Why is Victor Shoken not their
testifying? That would be nice.
Wouldn't it be nice to hear fromthe prosecutor that was going
after Bergsma that Joe Biden cancelled with his quid pro quo
when he was vice president? Anyone else want to hear that
testimony? Cause I do.
I wanna hear it. I do.
I wanna hear a lady from Ukraineasking a Ukrainian prosecutor
who got fired because of the work of Obama and Joe Biden

(20:42):
explaining what this corruption scheme was that he was involved
in and what he knew, what he knew at the time, what he could
prove and what he got walked outon.
That seems worthwhile. That would be a good hearing.
I tune in for that. I think you guys would too.
I think that a lot of us would wanna hear what that's all
about. He doesn't give him a chance to
answer. The thing is this, when you give
Garrett, when you give Merrick Garland a chance to answer, then
he just sniffles and he's weak and he just, he just waffles

(21:06):
back and forth. You.
They didn't get any value out ofhim, although they did get a lot
of teary sympathetic sounding garbage.
So there's that. Let's go and do the next clip on
here. Some of these things are just,
they're only there because they are punching in the face.
Know not to get a real answer. Play clip #3.
See where we're going with this.Talking about the constitutional
duty of oversight, this should be Thomas Massey, I believe.
You're signing the Constitution.I'm going to cite it.

(21:28):
It's our constitutional duty to do oversight.
Now in that video, that was youranswer to a question to me two
years ago when I said how many agents are assets of the
government were present on January 5th and January 6th and
agitating in the crowd to go into the capital.
And how many went into the capital?
Can you answer that now? I don't know the answer to that
question. Oh, last time, you don't know

(21:50):
how many there were or there were none.
I don't know the answer to either of those questions, if
there were any. I don't know how many.
You don't know whether there areany.
I think you may have just perjured yourself that you don't
know. That there were any you want to
say that again that you don't know that there?
Were any personal knowledge of this matter?
I think what I said the last time you've had two years to

(22:13):
find out, and today, by the way,that was in reference to Ray
EPS. And yesterday you indicted him.
Isn't that a wonderful coincidence?
On a misdemeanour. Meanwhile, you're sending
grandmas to prison. You're putting people away for
20 years for merely filming. Some people weren't even there
yet. You've got the guy on video
who's saying go into the Capitol, he's directing people

(22:34):
to the capital before the speechends.
He's at the site of the first breach.
You've got all the goods on him,10 videos and it's in it.
And it's an indictment for a misdemeanour.
The American public isn't buyingit.
I yield the balance of my time. To Chairman, I answer the
question No, nobody wants to hear your.
Answer. I'm gonna ask you one now.
Let's get away from this. So this is really interesting

(22:55):
stuff. First of all, he's mentioning
the fact that we have an indictment of Ray apps.
So he was indicted for a misdemeanour trespassing charge.
It holds up to 364 days. It's one day short of a year.
That's what a misdemeanour does in the federal system.
And he was indicted for that. Nobody who is serious is going
to look at that and say, oh, that's that's a that's justice
at play. He was either a cooperating
witness or he's a source. And this was his sweetheart

(23:16):
deal. And then he could plea to
something. And then they're going to ask
for some sentence. And the sentence will be
whatever it is. It'll be less than 364 days and
probably it'll just be, you know, House Lester, probation or
something like that. So Ray's being questioned, But
you're telling me that the Attorney General of the United
States on the biggest case that the FBI has ever worked, in

(23:39):
their own words, OK, the biggestthing they've ever done?
Bigger than 911. Bigger than assassination cases
into a president. They're gonna not brief the
attorney general of the number of informants and undercover
agents that were in the crowd, whether or not there were any,
and what that number looked likeand what those exposures and

(24:00):
liabilities look like. And then we're going to indict
Raabs in a way that indicates hewas one of them from some part
of the government. I don't care if he was DHS or if
he was DOJ. He could have been working for
the Marshalls. He could be working for ATF,
could have been working for for DEA, which is weird.
But they were probably there too.
He could have been working for FBI.
They've said he wasn't. So I believe them on that one
because they there's other places could be working for ICE,

(24:22):
could be working for, for Homeland Security
Investigations. HSI could been working for any
number of other different littleintelligence agencies in there.
Could have been working for DoD asset, right.
He could have been working for aprivate contractor that actually
has a cut out that's getting paid by someone in the
intelligence service. A lot of ways he could have done
this. A lot of them.
And the attorney general says, Idon't know, You saw Thomas
Massey's little smirk there. He said you may have just

(24:45):
perjured yourself. I'm sure he perjured himself
over and over again when I watched that testimony.
There's no way this man's being honest.
And we'll see some other clips that show that as well.
Before we do, I want to say thanks to Catholic vote.
So here they are. catholicvote.org.
Check them out, folks. catholicvote.org.
You can click on the loop at thetop of that.
You can either just read the Loop right there.
You don't have to sign up for. You have to give them your
email. If you don't want to.
You can go see today's loop, which has a lot of good stuff in

(25:08):
it. Talks about the attorney general
pleading ignorance. We're going to talk about how he
understood nothing about how thethe Richmond field office was
going after Catholics in that area in Virginia talked about a
convicted pro lifer speaking outabout how wrong it is going
after the fact. We actually just got a comment
about that in our five star reviews on Apple's.
We got Chuck Schumer, another big favourite of ours, who

(25:29):
decided to cave in to to Tuberville regarding his vote or
lack thereof. They didn't want to vote about
military appointments. We've got the former Biden
official caught in stolen women's clothing.
I'm not even going to cover that.
But this is one of those guys, Sam Brinton, who used to be at
the DOEA, supposedly nuclear engineer who also was interested
in handling men who were dressedas puppies.

(25:50):
He's also a disgraced member of the of this anti Catholic hate
group called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence which is a
pretty awful and disgusting group.
A lot of good things in the looptoday.
And then you can also find that they have an excellent podcast
in and of itself. It's called The Loop Cast.
Check them out. My friends over there, they've
interviewed my father. They interviewed a bunch of
other people. I've been on the last and they

(26:10):
do a really nice commentary. It's it's it's heartening.
They don't put it out all the time.
I think it's like once a month, maybe it's once a week.
I think it's once a month thoughand just do this, this one nice
little podcast, so you guys should check them out.
Let's move a little further on into this hearing.
It just continued to get good. Went from bad to worse.
It was over and over again. It's just it's stupid and it's
bad. It's listening to this clown.

(26:30):
Let's play the next clip on hereand we'll just keep rocking and
rolling. Maybe What would be the impact
on America of defunding the FBI?If funding, the FBI would leave
the United States naked to the. Malign influence of the Chinese
Communist Party to the attacks by Iranians on American citizens

(26:53):
and attempts to assassinate former officials.
To the Russian aggression. To North Korean cyber attacks to
violent crime in the United States, which the FBI helps to
to fight against. To all kinds of espionage.
To domestic violent extremists who have attacked our churches.

(27:19):
Our synagogues, our mosques, andwho have killed individuals out
of racial hatred. I I just, I cannot imagine the
consequences of defunding the FBI.
But they would be catastrophic. Ohk I can me, me, Kyle.
Kyle will answer this question. I would be happy to answer this

(27:40):
question for you guys. Let me tell you what would
happen if we defunded the FBI. What would happen is you would
not see anything change. Nothing.
I would say almost nothing wouldhappen.
What would happen is you might have a couple more people
getting away with some white collar fraud, but those tastes
cases take years and most of us ever recognise it.

(28:01):
The FBI does almost nothing whenit comes to the impact that
happens on your level as an individual American.
And I say that as someone who spent six years there.
And that means that I spent six years of my life getting paid
for something that I think the mission is bogus.
And I found that out in 2020. I found out in 2020 that the
FBI's mission, the most important mission that they
have, which they consider to be national security, it's their

(28:23):
biggest priority. That's why they are an
intelligence agency. It's not it's not what you think
it is because they already gave you the experiment.
What happens if you defund the FBI?
They didn't defund it. They kept paying everybody.
But they stopped doing their jobin 2020.
Stopped outright. Imagine you're a federal
employee who makes $175,000 a year.

(28:43):
Let's say you make 150. Let's just average it out from
the brand newest agent to the oldest agents there.
You're on the frontline. You're working counterterrorism
in Washington, DC. You're working
counterintelligence in Washington, DC, where all of the
embassies are, where all of these consulates are, where
people are going around, where the biggest spy targets are, the
people that are actually in the power, the seats of government

(29:04):
that have all the information that you might want.
There's only two places that happens in a big way, happens in
Washington, DC, and it happens in New York City.
Let's say you're in Washington, DC and that is your job,
protecting the American people from spies and terrorists.
And your management comes in andsays, you know what, you're
really important to us. We love you a lot.

(29:24):
We're so scared of the flu. We're so scared of this COVID,
which kills people that are over65 and none of you are over 65.
But we're so scared of this thing that we are going to make
sure that you are safe and we only want you to work 30 minutes
2 * a week. Your work week has gone from 50

(29:44):
hours required. That's what FBI agents are
required to put in. You're required to build 8 hours
+2. It's called the 8 hours of
standard employment plus two hours of what we call AVP or
availability. Pay 2 hours on top of the normal
8 hour work day. That doesn't include your lunch.
You're supposed to be at the office doing office work or
running around in the field recruiting sources and talking

(30:05):
to people and investigating and getting data.
All that stuff supposed to happen for close to 11 hours a
day. We're gonna go ahead and drop
that and it's going to be one hour per week.
How many of you would like to make 150 grand a year for one
hour a week, one hour work? Does that sound good?
Is that a good deal? Anyone want to sign up for the
FBI and do that job? Because that's what they did for

(30:28):
2020 starting in March. When they did the lockdowns in
DC all the way through parts of 2021, it was ongoing.
When I left the office in April of 2021, they got a full year of
working one hour a week. You know how many terrorist
attacks happened during that time in Washington DC?
Do you have any spies or traders?

(30:48):
Ran off with everything? Probably all the ones that were
already doing it because they get caught very often.
It's just not that much of it. And the ones that do are
actually doing it in a legal way.
There's nothing they can do about it other than report and
know about things. As as my old boss used to say,
well know things and then we'll know more things.
It's like, cool. Is there any kinetic action?
We're not going to arrest anybody.
We just want to know about it. We're going to watch the
American people get robbed blindof all of our technologies and

(31:08):
send it over to China in technology transfer programmes.
Counter proliferation is a complete failure.
So we're going to do that. So one hour a week and 150 grand
a year on average, we're all OK.I didn't see that White House
burn. I didn't see anything else
happen. You know, we did see the biggest
insurrection that's ever happened.
If you go and ask the FBI, you think it was because they had

(31:30):
people working one hour a week, that could have been it.
Maybe January Six was a failure because the FBI wasn't actually
at work. Defund them anyway.
Who cares? Because the biggest failure was
a bunch of guys running in and attacking cops with flagpoles.
So there's that. Flagpoles.
Super dangerous. The most armed populace on the
planet decided to take over their government with a stick of

(31:52):
wood, you know, and like one guyhad a revolver, A5 shot
revolver. That's pretty scary stuff.
I've got more than that on my desk right here in an ornamental
fashion. So when you start thinking about
that, when you start thinking, hey, does it make sense to
defund the FBI? We've already had the
experiment. The experiment has been checked
out and all you got to do is look back and decide are you

(32:12):
comfortable with what happened and the amount of safety that
you experienced in 2020 when theFBI didn't come to work.
That's it. Nobody knew.
I'm telling you right now, I wasin there.
They did an evaluation. This is worth talking about.
They did an evaluation of the counterintelligence cases in the
Washington field office. I think I've said this before.
It shocks some people, but I might as well say on my show
too, they, they did an evaluation.
There are like over 100 agents there and they have an average

(32:34):
of probably 12 cases. So 1200, maybe 1500 total
counterintelligence cases. This covers all the big threat
countries, North Korea, Israel'son there.
They have the the Chinese. They have the Russians.
They have what's called global, which is like the Cubans and
stuff like that. All the mixed bag Iranians and
so on, all the different counterintelligence
investigations that are going on.
All the different companies, countries that want to harm the

(32:54):
United States and they took all these cases somewhere between
1000 and 1500 eyeless, average it out, say 12112 hundred cases.
They did an evaluation of it andthey decided which cases were so
important they needed daily updates on.
Do you know how many cases that was?
I just want you to think of a number, number between one and
1200. How many cases were required

(33:16):
daily updates because they were so sensitive and so important to
the American people that they needed to be checked into on
every single day by counterintelligence agents in
the Washington field office? The biggest hub for that?
It was two. There were two of them.
They sat down with management. Every single agent briefed their
cases to their supervisor, supervisors to their supervisor,

(33:37):
their supervisors to the SEC andthe addict.
And all those guys came down andthey decided there were two, not
200, by the way, 212. That's how many cases needed
daily updates. If that shocks you, then you
know exactly why defunding the FBI wouldn't be a big deal.
There's a reason why Steve and Iargue for this, why we have,
we've advocated that position. It's because who cares 2 two

(34:00):
more thefts will happen. There are a bunch of thefts that
are happening. We just don't know about them.
And the ones that we do know, there's two of them in the 1200
that we have in a basket. A lot of that is what we would
call make work in the military. It's what we would call make
work. When you are in law enforcement,
it's work for its own sake. In grade school, they call it
busy work. When you get grown up, you call
it make work. Where they make you work simply

(34:21):
because they have to make you work because they have to show
you're doing something so important.
Two cases. Disgusting.
Let's play another clip here. Let's see if we can get to our
turning our stomach. I'm trying to give us a little
bit of space. I'm getting this bill out of my
system as we go. Play another clip for me, Ryan.
Do you know about the money thatmoved through Rob Walker shell
companies? Yes or no?
As I've said repeatedly, I have left Matt.

(34:44):
These matters to Mr Weiss. I've not included, I've not
interfered, I've not tried to find out what he knows in the
other way on purpose. Because everybody knows this
stuff happening. And you know what?
People don't pay bribes to not get something in return, right?
Which have resulted in the convictions of a Harvard
professor, of someone at Monsanto.

(35:05):
So we were working against the Chinese.
They paid the Bidens. And now?
Now you're sitting here telling me that North Korea is the big
threat. I gotta get there.
It goes. Hunter Biden is a great artist,
you guys know that. He's been getting a bunch of
money. They've been moving it in.
It doesn't matter whether he's selling art or they're moving
into shell companies And MerrickGarland, I mean, he just doesn't

(35:25):
know. He doesn't know.
It's not his fault. He's just the attorney general.
He's just the highest law enforcement person in the land.
He's just the only guy that should be getting briefed on
this stuff. We'll keep.
We'll keep playing some of theseclips.
We'll keep moving through them because at some point we're
going to see him get emotional about this.
We actually have a clip that I just called Merrick Garland is
crying. So you guys will see that.
But you know whenever you say, hey, do you know anything?

(35:45):
The answer is no. I don't know anything.
Why would I know something? I'm just the attorney general.
I don't know things about what'sgoing on similar to the to the
Chris Ray move. Look I have oversight of the FBI
have oversight but they bubble wrap me.
They don't tell me you think Lisa Monaco should be up there.
Maybe. I'd love to see Lisa Monaco get
grilled like this. I think she'd be much more
combative. They get a real sense of what
the Justice Department's out when you put the Pitbull out

(36:06):
there. The person who's actually
advocating on behalf of this deep state.
So totally worth it. I understand some of you guys
are seeing glitches on there. That's probably a rumble thing
that is not us thing. Our stream is clean so we're
sorry that that is the case. While you're sitting there
though as you as you like, what you're hearing is you guys are
enjoying this. Please feel free to share it on
your social media because we share it on ours.
And then on top of it give me a like if you would scroll on down
to where that thumbs up is make sure it turns green.

(36:27):
We appreciate you guys doing that on rumble.
It does move us up a little bit and gives people an
understanding of what they're seeing.
Puts us into the live rankings as we are giving this to you
live. Let's let's play another clip
Let's move forward. Matt, He's obviously doing
yeoman's work there. We do appreciate a Matt Gates,
the Florida man himself, giving it to the attorney general.
And it turns out only the Republicans are interested in
oversight on this committee. Everybody else on the Democrat

(36:47):
side, they're just covering for him.
I actually heard Sheila Jackson Lee do a really good one, but I
didn't want to play the clip because it made me puke in my
mouth a little bit. And when you do that, then I
have to swallow it. You guys have to watch it.
That's not a good thing to see. Let's do another clip of Merrick
Garland saying things that don'tmatter in five hours of kabuki
theatre that we had yesterday. You got it, Kyle.
And if anybody's having glitching issues, if you guys
just close the app or close yourbrowser and reopen it again, a

(37:10):
lot of times it'll fix it. Over here on Rumble, Attorney
General through the chair, I askyou, do you agree that
traditional Catholics are violent extremists and have no
idea what you're what the traditional means here, let me
just go to church. May I answer your question?
Yes. Idea that someone with my family
background. With discriminate against any

(37:32):
religion is so outrageous, it's so absurd.
Your attorney general, it was your FBI that did this.
It was your FBI that was sending.
And we have the memos, we have the emails, We're sending
undercover agents into Catholic churches.
FBI have said we were appalled, have said that we were appalled

(37:54):
by that memo. So then you agree that they're
not extremists Were appalled by that memo?
In general I think that are theyextremist or not?
Attorney General thing in that memo is, are they extremist or
not? I'm asking you a simple
question. Say no if you think that was
wrong. Things are not extremists, No.
Oh, my God. He almost cried.
And he almost cried. Guys, you see how upset he was,

(38:16):
what you didn't see. And we didn't play this because
it's nauseating. He did an opening statement
where he decided to touch back, and he had exactly that face.
You know, he gets on to the alligator tears or the crocodile
tears right away. He gets right there.
He started this off with his opening statement, and his
opening statement harkened back to how much he owed this
country. He owed his country so much
because his grandmother came to the United States from Belarus,

(38:39):
and she was one of five childrenper his opening statement.
I don't know this to be true, but I'm sure it is.
And he said that she was one of five children and her and two
others made it to the United States.
Two were killed in the Holocaustand he was weepy.
Now don't get me wrong, the Holocaust is awful and the idea
that we had a governmental organisation anywhere that went
out there to eliminate a systematically eliminate and

(39:01):
genocide a people is horrific. But he's talking about people
that he never met. He's talking about people that
he never knew and he's going to get weepy eyed and crying.
He's a grown man in what, his 60s?
I don't know how. Maybe you can look up and see
how old Garland is for me. Ryan, you got a guy there who is

(39:21):
getting weepy and teary eyed about something that happened so
long ago that he may not have even been born.
No, he wasn't born. Was he?
Because he. Because his grandparents.
It's like, it's the stupidest thing I've ever seen.
It's just playing on emotions. And it's fake because this guy
is fake. He's a fake.
He's a fraud and you can see it.He got weepy about the Katy 6.

(39:42):
He's 86 years old. So, yeah, so, like, holy cow,
he's actually older than Biden and he holds it together way
better. That's worth noting, right?
They wanted to put him on the Supreme Court, No.
Is that right, man? I'm gonna.
Have to look up saying over here.
Yeah, check again. Keep looking on that.
That's crazy. If he's 86 years old, he's
actually holding it together. No wonder his voice sounds like
it's falling apart. He's been using it for 100

(40:02):
years, 100 years of using that voice.
And he's got to the point where keeping.
I'm just, I'm just disgusted by seeing him cry about it.
It's so bizarre. He got crying about it.
Like I said, they're crocodile tears.
It's just trying to get sympathy.
And these guys had no problem approving this stuff.
I'm sure he didn't know that they were going after Catholic
specifically, but he's been enforcing the FACE Act in one
way, which is going after pro life protesters and that's his

(40:25):
DOJ. The priority of his DOJ that's
got marched out to the field office of the FBI.
So the investigations are being done.
And on the other hand, here's the other hand of it.
How many people from James Revenge have been arrested for
burning down 7171 have? No, he's 71.
Yeah, he's yeah, he's 71. He was born in 1950, two 1952.
He's still not a young man. And he's got, you know, he's got

(40:48):
7 decades of life experience. He's going to get weepy over
someone that, like he's never met.
It's just bizarre. It's totally bizarre to me.
End of the day, he's not enforcing things equally.
He's going to be teary eyed about one thing and not the
other. I mean, the guy doesn't care.
It's just it's an act and he's not a good actor and we can see
it. Let's play another clip.
It's just gross to see this kindof stuff.
And it's gross for him to try toduck out of the criticism that

(41:09):
he's getting legitimate criticism about something that
yours truly exposed. And in some of the work that
we've been doing here. So over and over again, there's
multiple times that they've had Chris Ray and Merrick Garland on
the stand and they are talking about things that I personally
have exposed, whether it be the Catholics, whether it be going
after parents at school boards, which we have that clip coming
up as well. All this stuff got done because

(41:31):
people like me and Steve friend stepped up and said no, you
know, you guys are liars, you guys are scum and we are going
to expose it and then they just hide behind mealy mouth words
and fake tears. It's disgusting to me.
It's the reason why I'm I'm holding back from from the
swearing part of it because it'sjust it's such a betrayal of
what what the agencies could be.Let's play the next clip.
I guess I'm just wondering, Mr Attorney General, has anyone at

(41:54):
the department told President? Biden to knock it off with
Hunter. I mean, you guys are.
Charging Hunter Biden on some crimes, Investigating him on on
others. You've got the president
bringing Hunter Biden around state dinners.
Has anyone told him to knock it off?
Our job in the Justice Department is to pursue our
cases without reference to what's happening in the outside

(42:17):
world. Just yes or no.
Have you done that? Knowing that I know of has
spoken to the White House about the Hunter Biden case, wondering
this, OK, I got it. I got it.
So Hunter Biden is selling art to pay for his $15,000 a month
rent in Malibu. How can you guarantee that the

(42:38):
people buying that aren't aren'tdoing so to gain favour with the
president? Job of the Justice Department is
to investigate criminal allegations.
You have investigating this. I mean, someone who bought
Hunter Biden's art ended up witha prestigious appointment to a
federal position. Doesn't it look weird that he's

(42:59):
making he's become this immediate success in the art
world Is his dad as president ofthe United States.
Isn't that odd? I'm not going to comment about
any, not going to comment, not going to investigate, Hunter
Biden associate Devon Archer told us that Hunter sold the
appearance of access to then Vice President Biden.
Are you confident he has stoppeddoing that?

(43:19):
I'm sorry, I didn't understand the question.
Hunter Biden Associate Devon Archer told us that Hunter sold
the appearance of access to thenVice President Biden.
Are you confident he has stopped?
I'm going to say again that all these matters are within the
purview of Mr Weiss. I have not interfered with them
and I do not. Do not intend to interfere with

(43:40):
it. That's good right there.
So look at this. You got Matt Gates again holding
his feet to the fire, and the man said that nobody from his
office and no one he knows has ever communicated with the White
House about this stuff. Is there any chance that a
reasonable human being in the American public believes that
that's true? Do any of you think that man
didn't just lie right there witha plain face?

(44:02):
He's the attorney general. He works directly for the
president. The president's son is under
investigation. And you think that there's never
been a conversation about that? Is that even possible?
Is that even remotely possible? No freaking way.
I had a point of order thrown out to me in the chat.
I have not mentioned Gerardo Boyles outstanding contributions
to exposing the wrongdoing. Let me just say very

(44:25):
specifically, Garrido Boyle brought forward the concrete
evidence of the allegations thatI brought forward.
I said that the Attorney Generalhad previously indicated he was
not going to use counterterrorism resources,
Patriot Act tools on parents at school board meetings, and I
produced the memo to say that that was my allegation of
perjury. Garrett came forward and showed

(44:46):
that in fact that was happening and showed all the
investigations to Congress. He brought them the names of the
people that were being investigated and the case files
that were going on. These are unclassified case
files in the oversight of that committee, weaponization and and
the judiciary and share them so that they knew what was
happening. So Garrett Boyle also

(45:06):
acknowledged, sorry buddy, I sawyou in the chat there that you
should normally say a point of order.
That's how we do it when we do these hearings.
A point of order has been stipulated.
The point of order has been acquiesced to in this case.
Look, what's weirder than a man saying that?
He doesn't. He doesn't have any knowledge of
what's going on with his boss. Can you believe that, Ryan?
Does that make any sense to you?Does it make sense that that

(45:28):
your boss tells you? Hey, man, sorry, my kids being
investigated, Can you check intothat?
He goes like, oh, he's like, I don't wanna think about that.
I've never heard anything about it.
There's another guy doing that thing.
He works for me, too. You believe it?
And can Congress subpoena his phone records to see if there's
any communication between him and the White House?
They don't give him over. They don't give it over.
There's a couple of parts in this, and we didn't show the

(45:49):
actual clip of it, and it's worth noting.
But like, they asked him some questions and he's like, I'm not
going to get into the the deliberations that go on inside
the department of like, your department is being asked for
information by you. Like you're the one who supposed
to give it. And their job is oversight on
process, on procedure, on actions.
And he won't talk about the deliberative process of how they

(46:10):
decided that. David Weiss was the one who was
supposed to be the special counsel.
If you guys know the special counsel statute actually says
it's supposed to be someone outside of government.
It's not supposed to be. The guy who's doing the
investigation now gets more authorities.
You kidding me? What kind of craziness are we
dealing with? Think about it.
And they keep pulling in swamp creatures for this stuff.
They keep doing it. They bring on swamp creature
after swamp creature. It's just the same thing over

(46:33):
and over again. It's like the department has
found no what is it? We always say this.
The government has investigated the government found no
wrongdoing by the government in the case that the government
been accused of. Yuck, gross.
This wouldn't fly anywhere else If this was a, like a police
officer being investigated by it.
And like, imagine if a cop shot somebody and then investigated
himself and found out now I didn't actually shoot him.

(46:55):
Was nothing wrong, There'd be riots in the streets.
Oh, wait, we already did that. We've had riots in the streets
even when that shooting was justified.
We've had riots in the streets. And the American people just
roll over and take this stuff. That's why I'm telling you, if
you're not buying things like ammunition and getting yourself
order, you got to get your fitness right.
You got to get your head right because George Hill and I have
said it, and I keep hearing it from different people.

(47:15):
Doesn't matter whether it's on Dan Bongino show or somewhere
else. When we talk, the people that
are listening and have their earto the ground about what's
happening in this country, theremay not be a 2024 election and
there's definitely going to be some violence in this country.
It may be why, you know, widespread.
It might be very narrow scope. It might be just in some urban
areas. Get yourself a plan.
Figure it out. Figure out what your plan is
because it's getting ugly and these guys are lying to your

(47:37):
face. They got no problem doing it.
Let's play the next clip forward.
We'll just keep moving forward on this stuff.
I guess I'm just wondering Mr Attorney General clip knowing
that I know. Sorry.
Spoken to the White House about the Hunter Biden case.
Wondering there there is no I got you could just hear him.
You could hear him. Lying has spoken to the White
House about the Hunter Biden case.
Wondering there. OK, I got no one that I know of

(47:59):
has spoken to the White House about the Hunter Biden case.
Wondering OK, I got one that I know of has spoken to them.
Roof of the man lying straight to our face.
I told Ryan just played a bunch of times until it made me sick.
That's how many times I can handle it.
No one in my office has ever spoken to.
The white is like, dude, come on, that's not even a good.

(48:21):
Year Garland impersonations are on point.
Are they talking about the wholeshow?
I'd have to do this. I'd have to be like no one in my
office because he's just crying all the time.
He's crying at an age where like, I don't know, go.
You guys hear the intro that my show has and the outro.
That's my father. My dad is older than Merrick
Garland. Not by a lot.
By enough, though. And he talks like a grown man.
He speaks and he doesn't have like, a frog hanging out in his

(48:43):
throat waiting to cry at all times.
I don't get it. It's not an age thing.
It's just a weakness thing. The guy's a frail weak person
and he's been stomped on and andjust he just allows this to
happen. He's getting stomped on by a
woman who's in her 50s. Lisa Monaco.
Gross. So gross.
Alright, let's play another clip.
Let's just keep moving forward on this stuff, see if we can get
to the point where we. Don't.
Are you aware that directory a couple months ago and sworn

(49:05):
testimony implicated you in a sweeping abuse of power?
I doubt he would characterise whatever you, whatever he said
in that way. Well, he testified about the
school board memo that you issued on October 4th of 2021,
in which you mobilised federal law enforcement powers against
American parents. Now, of course, you didn't put

(49:27):
it quite like that. Instead, you found a pretext,
which is stated right here in the first line of the memo.
In recent months, there has beena disturbing spike in
harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against
school administrators, board members, teachers and staff.
What was your basis for making that?
Time, I will say again, as I've testified numerous times in

(49:49):
response to exactly the same question, that I saw numerous
reports in the Press of violenceand threats.
You saw reports in the press, and so you decided to.
Instigate a nationwide 1% initiative, if I may be
permitted to answer the question.
Reports in the media of violenceand threats of violence against

(50:10):
school personnel of all kinds, the FBI director.
We received a letter from the National Association of School
Boards reporting yes. That letter contained anecdotes.
It didn't contain data of an increase.
Did you? Yes or no.
Consult with the FBI director before issuing the memo.
I don't believe I spoke with theFBI director, No.
Why not? Why wouldn't you consult with

(50:32):
the FBI? Director, because the purpose of
the memo, as is very clear from the memo, is to ask the FBI to
assess the situation, to hold meetings and to determine
whether this attorney General, you started with a conclusion
that there was an increase in threats.
Now, if you had bothered to consult with the FBI director,
here's what he would have said. This is from his sworn testimony

(50:52):
that he was not aware of any such evidence.
So my question to you, Sir, sitting here today is can you
substantiate your claim that there was an increase?
Of course, there will always be criminal, sporadic criminal
activity in all quarters of society.
But your claim was there was an increase.
Can you substantiate that sitting here today?
That by the reports in the Pressof violence and threats of
violence and by the letter sent by representatives of 1000.

(51:16):
No, you're giving us anecdotes. I'm asking you that data.
You also said in your memo, thisis really, really good
questioning. So I had to look it up.
This is Kevin Kyle. He's a representative from
California. And what I'm seeing is that he
went to Yale Law School. He was a loyal Marymount student
in 2009, which means I think he was there when my brother was
there. He also went to Harvard.
So smart guy, clearly asking a very poignant questions.

(51:39):
And he's getting down to the root of the matter, which is
that this. You launched a nationwide
inquiry into parents at school board meetings.
You you launched a series of requirements and had people like
Steve friends sitting in the parking lot taking down licence
plates of parents that attended school board meetings simply
because of anecdotes by a lobbyist group that represents a
sort of corrupt interest. This is a the National

(52:02):
Association of school Boards which was lobbying the White
House to call parents domestic terrorists and he didn't consult
with whether or not there was any statistical backing and he
he correctly points out you tookanecdotes from a political
Action Group and then you did their bidding.
You want to know what weaponization looks like in
America. It looks like a a advocacy group
that is that is required to lobby on behalf of their

(52:24):
interest and and their their membership.
They have direct access to the White House and the attorney
general and it results in actions by a a subservient and
politically active FBI. That's what weaponization is.
That's what we've been arguing since the beginning.
That's what got me thrown out ofthe FBI in October of 2021.
I brought this forward in October 21, and by November 23rd

(52:47):
I was told do not come back intothe office.
And it was it was a twofold thing.
Number one was I said I was going to swap my nose for COVID
every 72 hours because that seemed like political
subservience. And I don't do theatre.
People ask me, hey, how come younot testing for COD?
Well, I'm not an actor, so I'm not going to pretend to do
something that makes sense. I'm a paramedic with a top
secret clearance and I know whenI'm sick and when I'm not sick

(53:08):
and I'm not going to test for disease I have no symptoms of.
That's absurd. For those of you that took tests
that often get your noses checked by by an ENT pretty
regularly, you got exposed to ethylene oxide at a very high
level that has never been testedbefore in human beings on a
mucosal membrane. That was immediately a problem
to me. It's something I brought up with
Steven Stamboli when we had our first conversation in October.
Like, hey, this is scary stuff. Why would they ask you to do

(53:29):
this? It's not good.
And the second thing is, I got kicked out of the office because
I brought forward this memo to Congress and it went forward.
And what was it? It was the IT was a political
action wing asking for somethingvery specific.
And they got it. Imagine writing a letter to the
Attorney General with, like, your personal feelings, and then
them launching a nationwide policy.
It's crazy. It's fully crazy.
It makes zero sense whatsoever. It's really scary to me that

(53:54):
this is going on. Do we have any more clips on
there or was that the last one there?
Right. I think that was our last clip
of. Gas the last one, folks.
We're dealing more if you want them.
Yeah, I know we've got it. We could do this all day.
Here's the crazy thing. He did five hours of testimony.
He said zero things that mattered.
Nothing was true. We had a basically defensive
covering. We had people like Swalwell,
Eric Swalwell from California that were attacking Jim Jordan.

(54:14):
None of the Democrats care aboutdoing oversight.
They care about doing defence onbehalf of their political
Pitbull and their pitbulls name is the Department of Justice and
the Pitbull has teeth. And those teeth are called the
FBI. That's the metaphor.
The DOJ is happy to go out thereand be the the bite and the bark
of the Democratic Party. And the FBI is willing to be the
teeth that sink in. It grabs it, and then the DOJ

(54:36):
chops them up and swallows them down and puts men that weren't
even in the city in gaol for 22 years like you heard in our
interview of Enrico Tario. It's so gross.
I play the swall well, quick, real quick.
Alright, if I play it, he's he'sgross too.
But do it. Alright, go ahead.
And Mr Attorney General, you areserious.
They are not. He's got a countdown in front of
him. Guys.

(54:56):
They are not on a laptop 500 and496 days.
They are not. Yeah, he's fair and they're not.
He's got a countdown timer of how long it's been since Jim
Jordan answered a subpoena from his own committee.
So, yeah. Is that hypocritical?
Yeah, it is. Actually, it is.
Let's just call it what it is. You should answer the subpoena
if you're going to tell people that they're in contempt.
I don't know what they were asking for.

(55:16):
I don't really care anymore. I remembered at some point, and
it just doesn't matter. There's just no honesty.
This is Kabuki theatre. What's going to be the end
result? Is Merrick Garland going to be
accused of perjury? No.
Should he be? Yes.
Is Victor Shoken going to come in and testify for the American
people? No.
Should He? Seems like it.
We've given all that money to Ukraine.
I'm pretty sure we can afford a flight back from Ukraine here,
so we could have him talk about what's going on.

(55:36):
That might be good. I'd love to have the people that
bought Hunter Biden's art. How about the political
appointee that got a nice job inthe Biden administration?
How about put him on the stand? Hey, man, what do you like most
about Hunter Biden's artwork? How did Hunter Biden go from
zero to making, you know, enoughto pay off a $15,000 a month
rent on the beach in California?How did that happen?

(55:57):
So talented was because all the crack that he was smoking that
he says, his creative brain. I know people that smoke crack.
I've met them. That's what happens when you're
when you're a paramedic and you're an FBI agent.
You actually meet people that smoke crack.
Most of them aren't earning, like, you know, six figures on a
piece of art that they did. Usually what they're doing is
they're like writing pictures onthe on a bathroom wall and then
they're smoking whatever they can find and they're doing other

(56:20):
things that we can't talk about on the show because this is too
family friendly. Just saying they don't.
They don't get along the way that Hunter Biden has.
You might be the most successfulcrackhead in American history.
There's probably like one or twoothers.
There was a mayor in Canada thatmight be up on there.
His last name was Ford. I can't remember his first name
now. And there was a.
And then Marion Barry, the mayorof DC, might be the two most,
the three most successful men weshould have.

(56:41):
Like a crackhead T shirt, like smoke crack, ruled the world.
Something like that. Alright, that's that's going to
do it for today. I think we're going to wrap it
up here. We're going to say thanks before
we leave to our friends over at Patriot Coolers.
You know, Patriot Coolers. We're showing their day coolers
today. I've got the backpack.
It's fantastic. It's really, really useful if
you want a thermal barrier between anything you're
carrying. You can keep your lunch hot or

(57:01):
cold. You can keep things from
melting. If you live in the Texas heat,
it's still almost 100 degrees outside for me.
So we've been using this to movethings around for the kids when
we're going places, keep their water bottles in there.
It's got little handy pouches actually.
It's got so many pouches that you can lose things in there and
not find them. I've lost granola bars and went
looking and found them like weeks later.
Great stuff. Check out their their, their day
coolers. These are great things for
moving lunch around and if you want to be a guy who's got a

(57:23):
room for some of your non required cooling you got to kick
your out your work stuff in. You can even fit like a tablet
in that open pocket. Pretty good stuff.
Check that out. Easy access promo code Kyle 10%
off. Kyle gets you 10% off. 10% off
with promo code Kyle. Should we say it one more time,
Kyle 10% off at patriotcoolers.com?
They are our friends. They're great people out of

(57:43):
Houston, TX. Check them out.
I think you guys can appreciate all that.
Let's do a a big thank you to all of you.
We've crossed over the barrier of 13,000 viewers.
So we have over 13,000 of you that have subscribed to the
channel. You guys can always follow the
channel. That's the way Rumble calls it.
That's a follower is if you are watching the channel and you get
notifications, if you want to subscribe to the channel,
there's 25 or so of you that want to put 5 bucks a month in

(58:05):
front of it. So, you know, a cup of coffee at
Starbucks with 2000 calories with the sugar or you can watch
the Kyle, Sarah and show that you're supporting us.
We do appreciate that. We're not saying you should.
We're just saying if you want to, you can click the little
button that says subscribe. And we really do appreciate it.
Make sure you hit the like button and make sure that my
buddy Eric Jason over there in the chat is not having a
conniption fit. He's already put a rumble rant

(58:25):
on it. He's out there supporting our
channel everyday. Really appreciate him doing the
moderation in the chat. A great dude and all of you.
We're really thankful for you. We're just shy of that 700 mark
on the Apple reviews. I think we're four way You guys
came through with another six orseven of them since the last
show, so thanks so much for giving those.
If you want to leave us a 5 starreview, this show notes will
give you the click through you can wrap right through there.

(58:46):
I have heard that Apple is skipping and doing weird things
on the app. I tried to find that out
yesterday. I didn't have that experience,
but it doesn't mean you guys arenot.
We are looking for a new stream host, so we might be moving off
Pod Bean and moving to somethinglike Spotify.
It might be more financially sound for us, but it also might
give us a better product to you.So that's what our real goal is.
If you're listening to the audioshow and you have issues, leave
me a 5 star review telling me that there is a problem and we

(59:09):
will work on that for you. You can always leave the comment
in the rumble chat as well. Today's five star review comes
from Sweet Sherry. What a nice name.
Sweet Sherry and this is a shortand sweet one as well.
Just says thank you five stars. So refreshing to hear an honest
voice. Keep up the good work.
We will do it. We will indeed Sherry.
We'll keep up the good work because we're just funded for
you. All the people that are

(59:30):
advertising with us, we pick them by hand.
I've had to turn away sponsors that don't make sense to me and
nobody's telling us what we can or can't say.
So we just bring it to you. The way we think about it, it's
the way I think it. That's the way I'm setting it
today. I kept the swearing to a
minimum, so I hope that worked out for you guys at work.
Really do appreciate all of you.Follow Ryan Matta at Ryan Matta
Media ma TA. You can find him on WFTV at 2:00
PM On LFA TV he streams on rumble.

(59:52):
And by all means, make sure you bookmark this.
We will see you guys again. Tomorrow is going to be friendly
Friday. It's gonna be Steve Friend doing
it solo. I am flying to the DC area so
look forward to a solo friendly Friday.
I told him he could take the keys to the boat.
I'm going to be riding on somebody's got because we're
going to do temples show kind ofa weird time.
But I hope you guys do enjoy that.
See him tomorrow for friendly Friday.

(01:00:13):
Thanks for listening to The KyleSerafin Show streamed live
Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter and True Social at Kyle Serafin.

All Episodes

General Perjury? | Ep 139

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}General Perjury? | Ep 139