Golden Age? Or end of the American Experiment? | Ep 632 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:12):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower and
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, and

(00:40):
welcome to today's Kyle Seraphinshow.
It is Friday, it is August the 15th, and we may be at the end
of things. I guess that's just what's
kicking around in my head at themoment.
I am feeling fairly pessimistic,but not individually and not
about where you live and not about where I live, but I guess
just about America as an experiment.
We've been heard, I've been told, and we've been sort of

(01:01):
pushed that there was going to be this golden age under Trump
2.0. I think realistically that was
unbelievable in the first place,but I've done something I rarely
do. I got up this morning, I had a
little breakfast with my kiddos and I sketched out today's show
on a napkin. So that's pretty classic.
I almost never sketch out any notes about what we're going to
talk about, but I did that for today's discussion with Steve

(01:24):
Friend, so he will be on quite shortly.
Interestingly enough, Steve is the host of a group called The
American Radicals, and that is the podcast name.
It's also the name of the group chat that I share with Steve and
Gerardo Boyle and some others American radicals.
It might be time to be a little bit more radical, at least in
the way that we think about it, which means that we have to
accept something that is very difficult to accept, that it

(01:48):
doesn't always work out and it might be the end of a thing.
It doesn't mean that everything is over.
It just might mean that we are moving on to the next phase of
whatever this this Republic looks like.
And there's a reason why I bought a bunch of my buddies
keep sending me these little, these little graphics and they
say late stage Republic. We have all the evidence around
us to to evaluate and it's thereall the time.

(02:09):
And none of it feels good. It really does not.
So let's talk about that in one second before we do.
Let's pay some bills because we are still in a world where that
is a requirement. And my friends over at Patriot
Protect are worth talking about.If you guys are worried about
scammers, if you're worried about cyber threats, if you're
worried about people trying to get access to your data and your

(02:30):
information, you should be. Because scamming is a real
thing. The folks at Patriot Protect are
the folks that we have contracted in the Seraphin house
to keep an eye on our data on our personal profile on the web.
So that scumbags and weirdos cannot find us so easily.
patriot-protect.com slash Kyle Make sure you're using the name

(02:51):
Kyle. It may not auto populate, but if
you're doing check out you want to make sure you put that in.
You'll save 15% on an annual subscription, it cost you
dollars a month, and it might save you hundreds or thousands
of dollars in one single instance of being scammed all
the time. Criminals and and government
entities and federal agents who are sitting in their cars doing

(03:12):
surveillance are using these data broker websites to find out
who you are, where you live, whoyou're connected to, what family
members you might have. They can either impersonate you
and try to get credit or open upaccounts or steal things in that
way, or they can go after you bycalling you up and having
information that you wouldn't expect a regular person would
have. They'll pretend to be companies
that you work with and then steal your information there.

(03:34):
If you guys want to take your name out of the pile of leads,
the Glengarry leads that they will go and find, you just want
to make yourself just a little bit more of a hard target.
You can do that with digital camouflage and using a Patriot
Protect. Again, patriot-protect.com slash
KYLEI read about a new data breach every single week, and
there's always something out there that you guys should be
just concerned about. You don't have to be worried.

(03:55):
You can take some steps and do some prevention
patriot-protect.com slash Kyle, let's let's get into today's
program all right, I promised you a
friendly Friday and we will do just that.

(04:15):
Let's go ahead and give him sometheme music too, because I've
got a couple of little. I got this little button here
and it says Steve friend on it and I think that it triggers
the. The.
Notification of a Steve friend. There he is, Steve friend.
Good morning. Happy Friday to you.
Good morning, happy friendly Friday the walk up music.
I'm ready to just like line drive one out to left center and

(04:38):
grab 2 back. Do you go to baseball in the
initially? Is that your first thought?
Walk up music makes me think of that.
I'm actually in the mindset now of entry music because I was
informed by my my wife that I have been nominated to become
the PA guy at Pop Warner football because I talk in front
of a microphone. So I'm probably good at that

(04:58):
too. So I need to play the entry
music for the seven-year old andunder football team tomorrow
when they take the field. I'm opting for Enter Sandman
Metallica because that'll get them in the right mindset from a
1991 song. Yeah, we we lean back on
nostalgia heavily. Let me ask you, there was a
little friend that jumped on thecamera before you were there.

(05:20):
There was someone playing your office.
What age bracket was that guy? That guy was 11 and under, so
slightly older. He's doing season #2 tomorrow,
outside linebacker. He's excited to get W.
OK, let me just assure the listening audience that young 11
year old friend is a really handsome little guy.

(05:41):
You you've got some, you've got some good breeding going on in
this friend household. I didn't see like that.
I have. No, they look like a little bit
of both is what they look like. He's just got better hair, I
think. Is that what?
Oh, he got the fresh going back to school haircut, so he got the
hairline cut in there. He's looking let.
Him know it was a sharp looking haircut.
I was like, look at that little guy for a second.

(06:02):
I thought, all right, I actuallyput him on the screen because I
was dancing around and setting up the scene.
So I put him on the screen and and he immediately was like, I
think that guy can see me. Like I thought I was just
creeping. He was listening or watching a
video of Kash Patel, which is something we're going to do in a
second here. I'm going to meditate on a
couple things. So I've got, I've got a thing
sketched out. There's some dystopian imagery

(06:22):
for you. I've got a, I've got a sketch of
something. We have a friend who likes to
say a system is what it does. Can you reflect on that
statement, which you've probablyseen 50 times in the last couple
weeks? I think that it's ultimately the
question, and I'll make another football analogy here, another
sports ball analogy for you. There's a lot of hopium out

(06:43):
there and the presumption is that you got your number one
draft choice and your number twodraft choice at the helm.
And the conclusion that too manypeople are erroneously getting
to is that we have the personnelin that position, ergo we're
going to win the Super Bowl. So I'm making allusion to the
FBI. We got an FBI director, a deputy
director, Patel Bongino. So if you ask the average person

(07:05):
who's not really in this like weare about what is going on that
is good in the system that is the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, they will immediately say, well, we got
cash. We got Dan and you And I would
say, what are they doing? What is that system doing that's
producing the results that we all sort of voted for in the
mandate last year? And we're not getting that

(07:26):
because the system is what it does.
We're not getting the outcomes if you actually have the
patience to look at it or the interest to do it.
One of our buddies also likes tosay something like they're doing
the best they can. I I look at the various
different folks that that sit inthe Trump administration.
Some of them seems to be doing what you'd expect them to do or

(07:46):
what you'd hope they do, which is de weaponize or or at least
attempt to root out corruption that we've we've seen.
And then some of them are doing the best they can and it doesn't
seem to be doing anything at all.
How does that hit you when when you hear those expressions?
It's extremely disappointing because as it was advertised,
we're we're going to make everything great again and look,

(08:09):
you're over promising. You're never going to ever
deliver that. But I, I think that I had the
presupposition that if you're ina position of authority,
particularly if you're in a cabinet level position, you take
over an entire department, the power that flows through you via
directly the President of the United States, you should be
able to make immediate changes. Now, they might not appease and

(08:31):
appeal to every single person, even all the people on your
side. You might not make the changes
that are massive enough, or you might go too aggressive.
You're never going to please everybody.
But for you to sit by and say, well, the system already exists
and I'm just, I'm fighting against it and I can't do
anything. You're the boss.
It comes through you. So you're tantamount to

(08:51):
admitting that you're not relevant, you're not necessary
because the system exists without you.
Which then goes back to like, ifit's on autopilot, then who's
really in control of anything that's operating our system
government right now? Let me throw something that's I
think kind of a dark thought. And this is something that I
have not been able to shake. I watched one of these videos

(09:12):
today. I sent it out to our friends.
And it's a guy with a mustache that I really like.
And he's got like a Rotary dial phone on the wall and it's made
of brick. And I like that too.
And he's watching all these idiots in masks and scrubs in
what appeared to be hospitals dancing because we got this
really, really weird look. And I think you and I
potentially we fixate on this ina way that is not what everyone

(09:36):
does. But I don't think that we're
wrong about it. This this reveal that happened
during the COVID experience thatwe had in America in 2020.
And then again, the response again that after they put in a
new guy 2021, we got to see in the government.
That's why you and I don't work there.
And we have this realization that the person that you were

(09:56):
when your government came down and told you, you got to stay
home. We're going to shut down the
economy. This nebulous idea.
We're going to shut down trade and commerce, but not booze and
not pornography. We're not going to shut down
like large companies like Walmart.
We're just going to shut down you, the individual who has a
job at a small thing. Whatever your small business is

(10:19):
going to go out of business. Your restaurant is done.
Your social norms are out the window.
And people got to realize exactly who they were because
who you were when COVID restrictions rolled out is who
you actually are. That that's the supposition this
guy makes. And I'm unfortunately like in a
full agreement right now. You saw things differently

(10:40):
because where were you during 2020?
In 2020 I was in Iowa and in 2021 to Florida.
Yeah. So a very, very different sort
of look at the country I'm in, New Mexico and Virginia.
So we're on like, like literallykind of opposite ends.
And I went interior and you wentcoastal.
What was what did people do? What was the spectrum of

(11:01):
people's responses during that time?
And I look, I probably get the best view.
Iowa and Florida were relativelythe most two of the most free
states that were out there. But even then, shocked to the
core. I mean, it's crazy that we're
talking about this. I mean, I my wife and I were
watching ATV show on Netflix together right now and there was
a episode that was clearly referencing coronavirus in

(11:24):
there. And I started to get like PTSD
levels of rage when I was watching what was going on
because I even saw those sorts of behaviors where walking down
the one way of grocery aisles and nobody taking a moment to
think that that doesn't make sense at all.
They just immediately complied. I think, you know, I did the

(11:47):
malicious compliance when it came to the testing, whereas you
flat out refuse. It was funny that we basically
were the opposite sides of the exact same coin.
We're like, what can we do? We're all like I tested every
single day just to prove a point.
Yeah, so we, we basically agreedthat what was being asked of us
was absurd, disgusting, ridiculous, unlawful.
And so our response to it was was alternating.

(12:10):
I was absolutely not. And you were like, I'm going to
show you how you you did what? Like the reductio ad absurdum
type thing where I'm going to make this so ridiculous that
nobody could say otherwise. But I, I clearly remember a
staff meeting in a government space where allegedly we're all
adults, we're all grown-ups. We've all been vetting of having
an IQ that is probably in the triple digits, having integrity

(12:32):
and bravery. And we sat there and we said,
well, you know, on high back in the Ivory City, somebody told us
that in this room, which they don't have the ability to watch
us in, we all have to sit at distancing and wearing masks.
And they all did it. I'm looking around the room, not
wearing a mask, thinking like, how are we the same people?

(12:56):
How is this? We're all grown-ups, we're all
adults, we're all allegedly in charge of ourselves.
And yet it was just so much easier for you to go along.
And I was the problem in that room.
It was very clear that I was creating static for everyone who
just wanted to follow orders. And that to me was one of the
biggest like watershed moments of you were pushed for a

(13:19):
decision for your chip. So, I mean, and really, it's
relatively small. Like, would it have hurt or
killed me to wear a paper mask on my face for 45 minutes in
this staff meeting? No.
But what it represented was thatyou just don't have the courage
for all that you're alleging to have stood for and the what
you're probably telling your family that I will stand in the

(13:41):
gap to protect the country and defend the Constitution.
And it's all fake. You're completely exposed as
just someone who wanted a paycheck and the ability to go
to a social party and brag abouthow you're a government agent
and you're really interesting. But when you were put for that
decision, he just immediately folded like a cardboard box in a

(14:02):
rainstorm, as my dad would say. So they just fired a guy named
Spencer Evans who was the personthat did the compliance for the
FB is version of COVID. Everybody knows a Spencer Evans.
Everybody knows that there was an HR person, there was somebody
in your company, there was somebody in your governmental
structure. There was somebody in your
community. There was somebody in your HOA.
There was somebody in your touchFootball League that told your

(14:22):
kids that they couldn't do something, that told you that
you couldn't come to work, that told you you must comply with
certain things. And every single one of them was
hypocritical because they all had glaring hypocrisies in their
policies alone. I was reminded of this, which is
really fun. I actually wrote this in
December of 2021. Steve, I'm going to go back and
read it real quickly to you. One of the things that the
Bureau does and we've we've really called out as a problem

(14:44):
is that the FBI has a thing called task force officers.
And that's why the FBI is not just an FBI problem.
The FBI is a federal problem forall of us because these people
have the ability to project intoyour state and your local
government and they manipulate funding and money and right,
Like that's what a task force is.
So Safe Streets is one, right? There's task force on child sex

(15:04):
trafficking. I'm I'm thinking joint terrorism
task force. Are there any other like really
big ones that are out there? The reservation probably has a
task force. I mean, we didn't have one and
they were endeavoring to stand it up, which is kind of a racist
one because it's not safe streets, it's Safe Trails Task
Force because apparently they don't have roads on the
reservation, according. I think they should have called
it iron teepee, but OK. So yeah, they should have just
leaned into it. Let me just explain something

(15:26):
that was really, really wild during that time and I forgot
about it until last night duringour call in show.
This is a quote from my e-mail to Spencer Evans at that time,
by the way, he's been removed because of his over egregious
unreasonable behavior related toCOVID, which is very interesting
for our lawsuits coming up. Quote the FBI has also doggone

(15:46):
it, of course, I just kicked it off one second here.
The FBI has also yet to discuss how task force officers can
share a space with our employeesand are yet not subject to
testing or other theatrical performances of subservience.
Those are Kyle's words. At the time, you can tell I was
really feeling it. If employees like me are
presenting such an undue burden that we cannot be accommodated
for our religious beliefs, obviously our state and local

(16:09):
partners present the same quote UN quote danger to workplace
safety as discussed in your written response, I'll be filing
an EO complaint. The Safer Federal Workforce Task
Force, that's an amazing thing in and of itself, had written
guidance, blah blah, blah, blah blah.
The Bureau decided to follow allthat guidance in piece meal
fashion. We all experienced that.
It didn't make sense, right then.

(16:29):
They immediately went to things that were completely illogical
and yet we were just supposed totake them at their word, even
though we could see that there was glaring hypocrisies and
errors in the policy and they couldn't explain it, nor did
they try. And you were villainized.
I was pointing out some very obvious things like hey, that
local deputy who's on this task force, he's being told to adhere

(16:51):
to the policy for his agency andhis agency is not requiring him
to put an experimental gene juice in his arm.
But he's a OK. But I work in the cubicle
immediately next to him. But because my payroll, my pay
stub comes from the Department of Agriculture for the Uncle Sam
and I'm an FBI employee, I am required to do it.

(17:11):
And if I don't, then I am put onthis purge list.
I have to self identify myself for you to take under
consideration of whether or not my presence in the office is
hindering our overall operationsor if a reasonable accommodation
can be met. Meanwhile, we'll never get back
to you on this because we've already got your name, so we'll
try to find some transient reason to run you off.

(17:33):
Interestingly enough, they just decided to get rid of that list,
but it took law fair, it took fighting and it took a what now
we're in August, August in the Trump administration for them to
agree to a settlement, all of which hourly bills are going to
people who are fighting it that are actually federal government
employees. I want you to listen to this
because this is kind of interesting.
This is Brett Weinstein who I occasionally go to.
He's talking to Piers Morgan, who I'm not a big fan of is an

(17:54):
anti gun like fat BLOB Brit thatthe Pines on American stuff.
But you've got this totally sensible discussion that AI
would say high school biology, but we should probably round up
and say college level undergraduate biology student.
Even one class should actually realize, or if you ever watched
House MD and anybody who watchedHouse MD knows that the number

(18:18):
one likely thing is they're always going to do with the
differential diagnosis. It's always possibly autoimmune
disorders. It.
Could always be lupus. So autoimmune disorders are,
broadly speaking, when the body attacks itself as foreign,
whenever it identifies parts of me as not me.

(18:38):
You have this internal conflict,a civil war, if you will, which
I think is going to be relevant later.
And so that's the argument That was my concern right away with
just the biology behind it. Here he is saying this now in
2025, like it's like it might besomewhat novel to people, but
those of us who were paying attention could see that as well
as the other kind of glaring hypocrisies and policy.
Now I have to say that independently, I've had a a

(18:59):
very, very top experienced oncologist in the UK, in London,
one of the best in the country, who's expressed exactly.
The same concerns to me for a long period of time about the
mRNA vaccine. So they weren't all mRNA, but
the ones that were. He's been very concerned about
that. What what do you feel about that

(19:20):
particular issue? Unfortunately, the mRNA
platform, though it is brilliantin its conception, is fatally
flawed. And although there are arguably
applications where it might be useful, something like the
treatment of a deadly cancer, itis not appropriate to vaccinate

(19:44):
against a relatively mundane disease like COVID.
The reason that it isn't is thatthe platform itself carries
hazards at its core that at the moment we have no technological
fix for. So the myocarditis and

(20:05):
pericarditis that showed up as aresult of COVID vaccinations.
Are inherent to the platform, not to the messenger RNA that
was delivered inside these shots.
It would, in my opinion, be almost certain to show up
irrespective of what foreign protein was encoded by the

(20:26):
vaccine in question. And it would be no service to
the public if we were to allow vaccines that have this flaw to
be deployed only to discover years later that people had been
injured and died because of them.
Oh, right. I'm going to turn your body into

(20:49):
a into a manufacturing facility of something that your body
thinks is not part of your body,and then your body is going to
manifest that in random cells around itself, and then your
body is going to attack those things.
Sounds fine. Let's just roll with that.
Outside of the context and even the science of the mRNA vaccine
for coronavirus, this is a problem that is rampant,

(21:12):
particularly it within your government.
And there's nothing to indicate to me that the marriage between
Big Pharma and the government isn't completely, at this point,
whole entirely. The Venn diagram is a circle.
The example that I like to lean on is the how.
If you want to promote inside anorganization like the FBI, the
best way to do that is to inventa solution and then look for a

(21:32):
problem to apply it to. So the mRNA invention is a
solution. We just need to find the problem
to apply it to. And if this isn't the
appropriate way to do it, but that doesn't matter, it's just
such a beautiful solution. We have to push it.
We have to jam that square peg into this round hole.
Very much like some sort of entry level supervisor in the

(21:55):
FBI who invents some sort of initiative or comes up with a
really cool acronym. It briefs so well on PowerPoint
and then uses it to promote and then the initiative never is
effective or launched at all. Steve, it's so elegant, though.
How could we just leave this on the field?
How could we not give it a shot?I'm going to show you why I
think it went forward. And I have something else in

(22:15):
here that I've jotted down on mylittle my little sheet of paper
which upset or it's a napkin, really.
I wrote, men tolerate injustice because the consequences of
resisting that injustice is killing a part of themselves
that they fear will never grow back.
And that's the thinking man's problem.
The thinking man looks out thereand says if we don't agree to

(22:39):
the social contract, if we don'tgo along with what's going on,
if we say that our government isso flawed that it's probably
irredeemable, if we say things like that, if we're no longer
willing to participate in this sort of illusion, then there's a
real problem. Because we are going to give up
the comfort of Amazon Prime Video.
We're going to give up the comfort of being able to go to a
Costco and do those things. And then there's these people.

(23:03):
So let's have a little bit of a light hearted moment.
Apparently if you go to Times Square, your IQ is divided in
half or really, really dumb people go to Times Square or a
lot of Americans are so far below what you and I would
consider to be average that theyprobably, you know, probably
can't afford like a $400.00 emergency in their life.

(23:23):
And they think that a self driving car means that they
should take a nap in the back seat until it runs off the road.
Or, or any other number of like really wild ideas like, hey, do
you want to get into a taxi cab with no driver?
That sounds awesome. Let's see if I can trust some
algorithm and some gremlins in amagic box that are going to
drive me around. These are the people that sign
up for that. These are the early adopters of
like Waymo. Taxis are better than having a
car is. This shaped with four sides

(23:43):
called. I don't know.
I haven't had. I haven't done something with
shape since like 5th grade, 5th grade shapes.
Yeah, if you had a guess. I think I don't know, like I
don't, I don't, I know what likewhat shapes have four sides, but
I don't know the name for it. Yes.
Can you name three countries? Besides the USA, Alabama.

(24:08):
That's one, New Mexico 2 and Connecticut three.
OK, if you don't know how this guy works, he goes out on the
street, he asks questions and nomatter what people says, he says
yes or that's right. Got it.
So that's the shtick. Just so you don't don't think
he's a crazy person. I mean, he's he's dealing with

(24:30):
retards. It's too easy for you.
What is 1/4 + 2 Dimes 1? Quarter plus, how much money is
that? A $0.65?
Is it $0.65? Yes.
Do you know who the 1st president of the USA was?
George Floyd. I mean, his name is George

(24:51):
though. I just don't know the last.
Washington How many inches are in 2 feet?
I don't know. Around how many inches?
If you have to guess, five, yes.If you're walking north and then
all of a sudden you turn right, what direction are you facing?
So if I'm going say that. Again, real quick, you're

(25:13):
walking north and then you just make a hard right.
What direction are you facing? 90° to the right.
This S No, it's not Southwest. Yes.
So that's where we're at, right?Yeah, I'm like, if you're going

(25:33):
north and you turn right, you'redefinitely just going parallel
to the Earth because N is up, right?
Correct. Yeah, whatever you say, he's
going to say yes. So that's how in trouble we are.
And this is where it might go. This is a APOV video I saw.
And I'm, I'm trying to have fun with this because this is a
really dark topic. This is ChatGPT being used in
2050. Those people have now grown up

(25:55):
and they are now the senior leadership in some sort of
marketing corporation and they're about to have a meeting.
And Steve, I'm going to leave you on the screen so you can
react to this one as well. Feel free to not be silent if
you have to be. Hey ChatGPT, my Co worker just
knocked on the door what should I do?
Well, let's keep it simple. Go ahead and open the door.
It's the easiest way to see whatthey need and keep things
rolling. OK, lest anyone not understand,

(26:18):
because you're just listening ifyou're not watching, there is a
guy wearing a, a Gray sweatshirt, looks very
comfortable. And he is sitting at a desk in
like a classic conference room with glass windows.
There's a door. There's a pretty young female
employee that's coming in. She's in her 30s.
So these people are both like intheir 30s or 40s and they're
having this conversation at a conference room table.

(26:38):
They're both holding their phones up to their face, like
the kind of people that you see talking on their their speaker
phones and you can't stand them.You hate them all the time, yes.
Yes, so Steve hates both of these people just by the look of
them. This still is enough for Steve
to hate both of these people andhope they don't.
There's no way This is 2050, by the way, This is 2026.
This is right. This is actually next year.

(26:59):
This is not nearly 25 years in the future.
This is 20, four months in the future.
I touch everything, my boss justdidn't say hi.
What do I do? If you feel like it, just go
ahead and say hi anyway. Hi, she just said hi to me.
What should I say? Back just go ahead and say hey
how are you bad keeps things friendly and shows you're open
to a little chat. How are you?
He just said how are you? What should I reply with?

(27:21):
You can just keep it nice and easy and say something like I'm
doing well thanks for asking, how about you?
It's always a solid and friendlyway to keep the combo going.
Oh, I'm doing fine. How are you?
She just asked me how I'm doing.How am I doing?
Hey ChatGPT, my Co worker just knocked on the door what should
I do? Well, let's keep that's not that

(27:43):
far off. No, no, 25 years.
No, I think you probably nailed it. 25 months, maybe 25 weeks.
We're at that level because you don't have to do anything other
than spend 25 seconds on a social media platform and you
see people just asking AI questions because that's where
we are at right now. People just like to outsource

(28:05):
their thinking. And I look a couple thoughts on
the intelligence level. And this is one of the most
depressing realizations I've come to.
And I've I've cited it before, the IQ bell curve, which would
mean that the top of the bell curve represents the most amount
of people. The average person that's 100,
72 was what Forrest Gump was at.So only marginally more

(28:29):
intelligent than the character of Forrest Gump is where most
people are now. If you're on the right side of
that bell curve, you and you are, if you're a member of the
Kyle Seraphin Show audience because you're consuming
information that is vastly more intellectually requiring your
attention than somebody who's onthe left side of the bell curve,
you will fall into the trap of believing, well, you know, I'm

(28:50):
just a regular person. I'm, I'm humble.
I'm not overly proud. I'm not a government worker.
I'm just regular at average. You're not, you're not.
The average person is just doesn't have the intellectual
horsepower that you're at. And the average person is going
to just say, well, it's a computer, so it's probably
smart. It'll tell me exactly what to
do. And that's where we will be
probably sometime around mid 2026.

(29:11):
Yeah, that was the the silliest thing about Idiocracy.
That was supposed to be a couple100 years in the future.
It could have been a couple hundred months in the future
very easily, and it would have been much more accurate since
you're talking about AI and the computer must be smart.
It's not that people are asking about wisdom or things that are
knowledgeable that are out therethat the AI has access to.
But I went ahead and did what does Socrates say about tyranny?
We're going to do some of that. And then also, what did

(29:32):
Aristotle say? These are just quick little
blurb. You could literally just blurb
that in there. Hey, what did some of the
ancient philosophers have to sayabout tyranny?
That's when it's awesome becausebecause you could have learned
that information and have it at your fingertips as opposed to
saying like, what should I respond when they say, hi, how
are you? More importantly for me, this is
stuff that I've read, but it's 25 years in the past for me.

(29:54):
It's not something that I deal with on a daily basis.
Like I deal with my son, who this is a total aside, but my
son who when I take him pee in the middle of the night, 'cause
he's I wake him up at like 10:00and I take him over there.
He reminds me of you. Tell me, is it an alligator or a
crocodile that you always see with its front legs just kind of
drifting in the in kind of like space?
You know, they always see them like floating at like 45° angle

(30:16):
in the water. Yes, the lower alligators are
crocodiles. Which ones?
I believe that's alligator. I think it's alligators too.
How do you know the difference between an alligator and a
crocodile? The V versus EU man, the V
shaped. No, no, no, no.
That's not true, is it? Yes, I've gone to Gatorland
multiple times and that's been explained to me.
I'm pretty sure that an alligator is one that you will

(30:39):
see later and that a crocodile is one that you'll see after a
while. All right.
Anyway, But my son, like, I'll pick him up and I, I hook him
underneath his arms and he just like, like, that's the things
that I'm focused on. I'm not focused on.
Like, hey, like, what did Aristotle say about tyranny?
And so here you have is like thequick thing.
And I've read this stuff kind ofbefore.
It's worth remembering that there is a real problem.
Aristotle himself summarized thethree headings that you should

(31:01):
you should figure out the way that tyrants operate.
A tyrant should humiliate his subjects?
Check. Create mistrust amongst them?
Check, check. And be aware that they are
incapable of actions against him.
Sort of this learned helplessness.

(31:21):
Socrates appears to say very similar things in the Republic.
He said that a a tyrant or tyranny sows the seeds of
tyranny by generating drones desire for a champion.
How often do we talk about idolatry and people really
bristle at that? Perhaps we should refer to it as
people really desperately looking for a champion.
Who's your champion? Is it Victor Davis Hanson?

(31:42):
Is that who speaks for you? Is it Joel Saladin because
you're really interested in organic farming or in
sustainable farms and growth? Is it Dan Bongino because he
really knows how the deep state works and he's going to go stop
them even though he hasn't been in government in 14 years and he
was AGS 14 at the end of his term?
I mean, who's going to who's going to be your champion?
Is it Donald Trump, a man who isnearly 80 years old and worth

(32:04):
billions of dollars? Like, is he more relatable than
most billionaires? I think so.
And I'm not not just saying, andI don't think you're arguing
that you should discount anything that those people say.
You should take that information, but then also not
outsource your autonomy and yourdecision making to say like, you
know, he's got my proxy, whatever he says, Ergo is right.
But you know, this also goes back to like we've known about

(32:26):
this forever. You're referencing Socrates and
Aristotle and Plato. Let's just go back to the origin
of our country, which we have this pesky dusky document
because people are addicted to comfort.
All right? And there's a very.
The first president, George Floyd.
Yeah, George, St. George Floyd.
But you know this, I've talked about this before on the

(32:46):
American Radicals podcast. There's this one line of that
pesky document or declaration where they talk about how
people, or even then the, the people that came across on the,
oh, you, your mom would say the Nina, the Pinter and the Santa
Maria, the Pilgrims, and then engaged in the Trail of Tears
right after that. And then eventually we had
slavery in a civil war and Barack Obama.
That's American history, especially if you're in Times

(33:07):
Square. But the the one line is.
By the way, that was perfect. That was perfect.
We should just chop that. So there you go, Steve Brent
does American history for you. Accordingly, all experience has
shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils
are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the
forms to which they are accustomed.
We are addicted to comfort and have been for 250 years of this

(33:30):
country. That is, that is the thing,
right? That is the that is the exact
thing that I'm making the argument that men will tolerate
any number of tyrannical and unjust policies because the
consequences of resistance involve killing a part of
themselves that they may never be able to get back.
And all of that took me to this thing.
I mentioned Joel Saladin the other day.

(33:52):
He's sitting at the Heritage Foundation discussing something.
I want you to think not just about what he's saying.
Actually do that in one second. Let me, let me, let me plug my
friends at Patriot Coolers, which I'm sipping on over here.
Then we're going to do somethingwhere I want you to focus on the
words that he's saying and by what he's saying, what it
actually admits about the current system.
Because that to me was actually the worst part of it.

(34:12):
Before we do, how about this? If you guys want to engage in
some voluntary commerce and if you want to buy something that
has value, intrinsic value in somuch as the utility is always
there, It's Patriot coolers, these folks.
We used them the other day because it was 105° when we went
to Costco. And I take all of our little
Costco shopping, which is meat and frozen fruits and whatever
else and dairy stuff. And we just take it, We lift it.
We put it right in the back of our 50 quart Patriot cooler,

(34:33):
which lives in the back of my minivan.
We do live in this world, so some of these things are really
helpful. This is another one.
This is a 20 oz coffee mug. It's spill proof in so much as
it has a great lid that works. You screw it on, boom.
It keeps your coffee hot for a very long time, including the
fact that I opened up the coffeepot at about 6:00 AM.
It's now nine O 5 my time and the coffee's still good.

(34:54):
If you guys want to do it, checkout Patriot coolers.com promo
code Kyle saves you 10%. That's how you give us credit.
It's also how you save some money.
Use my name at checkout, Kyle, 10% off anything you buy there.
And if you guys are interested in one of the engraved cups or
one of the things that has a logo, you can get your own
engraved cup. You can actually make your own
logo. You can put your own stuff on
there. You can have all kinds of
tyrannical or wild ideas. You can get yourself kicked

(35:15):
right out of your job if you like.
Like who you are during COVID iswho you really are, retard.
You can put that on a cup. They would print it out for you.
They don't care. Or you can go to the Kyle
Seraphin show collection, which is going to be listed in the
show description and looks good.OK, so let's do the the Joel
piece here. I want you to think about it.
What is he saying? What are the underlying
assumptions of what he's also saying?

(35:36):
Ready. Boom.
How do we unstick farmers? We give a food Emancipation
Proclamation so that farmers cansell to their neighbors without
asking the government's permission.
I The thousands and thousands ofwannabe entrepreneurial small

(35:59):
farmers who are ready to access their neighbors with chicken
pot, pie, charcuterie, raw milk,name it Kiefer butter.
But they can't because it takes a half, $1,000,000 licensing
compliance process with 10 bureaucrats hanging over their
shoulders. That's the answer to urban food
deserts. It's the answer to everything.

(36:20):
Doesn't take a dime of taxpayer money, Doesn't take a government
agency. It only unleashes liberty and
freedom in the food system. We have an enslaved food system
that is shackled by a plethora of government agencies and
bureaucracies keeping neighbors from being able to do business
with each other. You shouldn't have to ask the

(36:42):
government's permission to sell a bowl of tomato soup to your
neighbor. That should not require a
government position. The successional issue right now
with, you know, aging farmers are aging out, young people
coming in. The way that you bring young
people in is creating entrepreneurial opportunities

(37:02):
that they are creating. All we need is to unleash the
power of entrepreneurial practitioners around the country
to access their neighborhoods with food, and we will
accomplish what Bernie Sanders is running around asking to stop
the oligarchy. Stop the oligarchy.
How do you stood it down? You have to give food
emancipation. What is the underlying

(37:23):
supposition? If you're going to have a food
Emancipation Proclamation, wheredo you, where do you go to with
that? That we are already enslaved.
This is why Steve Friend and I are really good together, folks,
because I don't need to brief him on how these things work.
That word immediately conjures up January 1st, 1863, the
Emancipation Proclamation given by President Lincoln at the

(37:43):
time, and it was to free people who were.
Already enslaved, already in bondage.
I mean, his solution is the government should issue an
emancipation because the people are already enslaved by the
government and you shouldn't have to ask permission.
So don't just do what you want. Like, there is an actual element

(38:04):
of freedom here. Freedom is not just like the
ability to, I don't know, cut off your breasts or or twigging
berries or put a tattoo on your forehead.
Like freedom is actually to do what you ought to do, and that
is engage in commerce with your neighbors because that's how the
world works. It's the other side of the coin,

(38:25):
right? So freedom, and then the other
side is responsibility to actually use that freedom, to
not let the government encroach upon it, to not end up doing an
8% or an 8.25% sales tax on fireworks to celebrate the
overthrow of a 2% consumption tax on tea.
And make sure that you got the permission slip from the
government in order to have the area to fire off the fireworks.

(38:47):
I I wrote this down and it makesme sad because I think it's
actually true and I don't mean it permanently.
What I mean is whatever this phase is, it's over.
This phase is over. I wrote down America's already
dead. But admitting that is both
terrible and terrifying. You can't do it because if you
do then you're an anti government, anti authority,
violent extremist per our own government.
Either that or you're not sufficiently loyal to the

(39:08):
current administration, which isback and based and MAGA.
You're just not MAGA. That's right.
I've had this overwhelming desire to like buy a 50 Cal,
which was the same thing I was feeling in 2024.
And it's like, what is a what's a 50 Cal for?
It's a government armor. That's what it's for.
That's why you buy it. You buy it because you're
thinking maybe I need to stop government tyranny in its

(39:32):
tracks. And I may have to like, here's
here's what I was telling my wife.
It's probably like an $8000 investment, maybe more,
especially the way I do it, it'sprobably like a $12,000
investment because I'm going to have optics on it.
I'm going to have a sweet optic,and I'm going to have a can for
it. So you're right.
So like that's what's happening.If I turn around and spend money
on a 10 or $12,000 rifle system so that I can stop a piece of

(39:52):
government armored vehicular transportation, I would far
rather have that rifle system than $10,000 in my bank account
on the time when I need it. But right up until that point,
I'd rather have $10,000 in my bank then just then carry around
like a 26 LB freaking rifle system.

(40:14):
But we're at that point where we're thinking about that
problem again, if we're paying attention.
And part of it is because although we're back baby, and
we're based and this is all there.
Like this is the other thing I wrote down Orwell's quote.
In an empire of lies, the truth is treason.
If you recognize this too soon, you're part of the problem.
You're also out $12,000 when youprobably could have been using
it for an investment, which would have been cool.

(40:35):
And maybe if you could hedge it just right, you can wait long
enough. All of this stuff stemmed from
watching a couple of other things.
The FBI director decided to go on Hannity again, maybe because
his boss was also on Hannity. So the AG and the FBI director,
unlike any any administration inhistory, who decided to give the
American people unprecedented access to bullshit and

(40:57):
propaganda. So I'm super excited about that.
And I want to play you what Cashhas to say.
And I'm going to leave you on the screen.
And all I want you to do is put your hand up when you want me to
stop. When you hear something that
needs commentary, and I imagine you're going to need something
that needs that hears commentary, like almost right
away. That's my guess to you.
OK. I want you to listen critically
for the things that he's saying,folks.
Steve and I are almost of one mind when it comes to this kind

(41:19):
of stuff. We use different words to say
the same kind of stuff. Here's FBI director Cash Patel
on TikTok. People are about to go to jail.
Sean Hannity, who's been advertising that for a decade.
Let's just get it. Well, Sean, what we're doing is
building a case for the Americanpublic under the Truth and
Transparency and Accountability Initiative.
And what I mean by that is AG Bondi brilliantly highlighted

(41:42):
our partners, Director Ratcliffeat the CIA and Director Gabbard
over at the DNI. We are working with them because
the documents that would facilitate an investigation of
this magnitude don't just rest at the FBI and DOJ.
They're throughout the intelligence community and we,
the Russiagate guys like Johnny Ratcliffe and myself who
investigated this, like the guyswho investigated this.

(42:06):
No, I look, I understand that hehas a gun and badge now, so he
might really think that his job is to investigate things.
But that's not your job. That's not why you took the
post. That's not what we voted for in
November. That's not what we lobbied so
hard for and put our reputationsout there so that you would get
the position that you assured usyou would do.

(42:27):
And that was to correct this agency, bring it to heel de
weaponize it. But instead you're just re
adjudicating the only claim to fame that you have within mega
world to cover up the fact that you haven't done a damn thing as
it comes to reforming the agency.
OK, we're 2028 seconds. Then I want you to hear the
first thing he said one more time and see if you pick up on

(42:47):
it. I've listened to this a few
times. So I got a cheat code.
Let me go to the beginning of itreal quick.
Short little version ready. Expose this.
Our. Well, Sean, what we're doing is
building a case for the Americanpublic under the Truth and
Transparency and Accountability Initiative.
And what? What are we saying here?
We're we're. Building a system truth and
transparency, whatever fun acronym that he has and here's.

(43:11):
Here's what I heard, and I want you to Fact Check me on this.
I don't think he's going to prosecute a single person.
And I've said that pretty much since the beginning.
He just said what we are doing is building a case for the
American public using truth and transparency initiatives,
reconciliation effort. We are going to give you guys

(43:31):
the information so that you can convict these people in the
court of your minds and not in the court of law.
Because if we were doing a real investigation, you'd find out
when the handcuffs went on. That's what I heard you tell me,
if that makes sense. It does track because never in
my life did I ever leak illegally to the Washington Post
to announce that we were doing aprobe into election crimes.

(43:52):
Or in my case, like we're doing an investigation into an
allegation of violence, violent crime happening on an Indian
Reservation or Child Exploitation matters.
But this has been handed out, leaked out or, you know, gone
through proper channels to mediato create a narrative, which is
what they're interested in. And they've already softened the
ground. We had it a couple weeks ago
where the the Trey Gowdy's of the world were going out there

(44:14):
saying, you know, getting indicted and arrested.
Like, that's one form of accountability.
But there are other things too. And we could publicly shame them
and maybe have a congressional hearing where Jim Jordan can get
up there or James Comer can havea viral moment.
And then that'll really scratch your belly and you'll feel
really good about it. Meanwhile, our guys were

(44:34):
theoretically in a position to take corrective action, which is
what we wanted. Like, it sucks.
It really sucks that Barack Obama's not going to go to
prison. But this is not your Mama show.
This is your daddy show. He ain't going to prison.
None of these people are going to prison.
But we have the ability to actually do things like get rid
of the FBI. Like, why would I ever trust the

(44:57):
FBI to investigate Barack Obama?The FBI has been shown it.
Can't even investigate itself for the things that it did
wrong, and when it does, it doesn't even go make people
whole that were already part of the things that it already
admitted it did wrong. Let me just articulate this to
the to the audience that's listening.
There is a woman named Nicole Parker who we call FBI Barbie.
And I know the world is out of whack because Fox News hired FBI

(45:20):
Barbie to be their commentator on the FBI in a world where
Steve Friend exists and is employable.
Let me just leave it at that. Let me continue on with this.
Here's some more Fox News nonsense.
They're only good for me to pokefun at at how incompetent and
how much of A like a propaganda mouthpiece they.
Are and we the Russiagate guys like Johnny Ratcliffe and myself
who investigated this and exposed this?
Are. Trying to expose documentation

(45:42):
that we've known existed for years.
At. The same time we're finding new
material. So the best approach is to
release this information with them and also go to our our
colleagues in Congress who have an oversight function on the
judiciary committees and oversight committees and demand
from us information and documentation that we can
publicize things like the DurhamAnnex.

(46:03):
Wait, wait. Makes sense.
For that for me, because now you've heard what I think is
going on here. He he wants to go to Congress
and tell them to demand things of him as opposed to just
turning them over. That's retarded, which we've
known have existed this entire time but were classified for
political reasons. We are educating the American

(46:26):
public as we build through this transparency initiative and
where the investigation goes. I can assure you of this.
We will Max accountability for the American public.
We delivered before when we ran the Russiagate investigation.
I now happen to be President Trump's choice for FBI director,
and I'm honored to lead that charge with our great partners
and Johnny Ratcliffe and our great attorney general and the

(46:47):
prosecutors they have over therewho are just as committed to
justice as everyone should be blindly.
So we are going to de weaponize the FBI and get its credibility
back to the American people by delivering the accountability
they need, by showing them what we're doing every step of the
way. That has never been done.
Before, here's the. That does nothing to de

(47:10):
weaponize the FBI. Whatever those words sounded
really good and democracy is things that I like or
transparency are things that I like.
Steve, friend Executive Order 13526 covered earlier this week,
gives the people who are delegated to run agencies like
the FBI director unilateral authority over FBI materials to

(47:30):
declassify those materials. Just like the CIA director can
declassify things for the CIA and the DNI can declassify
things that belong of the DNI ifyou are the originating
authority of that particular classification. 13526 signed
under Obama December 29th 2009 allows them to do this.
This isn't new. This is 16 years old. 15 years

(47:52):
old at this point. Unreal.
The the argument that he's making on national television is
that we're going to turn over documents and that will result
in de weaponizing a police force.
Because no one's ever showed people what it looks like behind
the scenes except the people that have been showing people
what it looks like behind the scenes and then getting their
jobs cancelled. We're going to keep moving

(48:13):
forward with it. But you're keep listening with
this critical ear because there's more of this.
Beauty of it, Sean, you don't have to trust me or trust you.
That's. All everything you recited the
summer you just gave is years ofexcavating documents that these
deep state actors held and buried and documented their own
corruption because they were arrogant enough to think no one
would ever find it. That Donald Trump would never

(48:34):
become president and appoint a cabinet that would go in and
investigate this matter thoroughly.
And when you start connecting todots, here's what I learned,
Sean, when I why is why is he feeling that he has to connect
dots as the FBI director? He's connecting the dots for
you, 'cause that's what that's how you deweaponize.
And the Russian investigation? As bad as the crime is the

(48:58):
corruption cover up from senior government officials who are
sworn to uphold their duties andaccountability for the American
public. They are the ones that violated
that trust the most internally and need to be held accountable.
So the people you've listed and the names you're calling out
aren't surprises. Their names are on those
documents. Those documents are public.
The Fisa's public. The three O twos are public.

(49:20):
The Strock page texts are public.
Documents are being released weekly by Johnny Ratcliffe and
Tony Ratcliffe making it public.The burn bag information is
coming out. The Durham annex is coming out.
The classified appendix is coming out.
The American people are going tosee and hear the names
themselves, and they can touch and feel it.
As far as what my investigators are going to do, these guys are
the best in the business, and we've assembled a team of

(49:42):
accountability and we're going to deliver for the American
people like never before, because that's what the American
people elected Donald Trump to do.
This is utter charade. This is embarrassing, He.
He could have said that in four sentences.
I'm fairly confident he just filled the classifying
documents. You can read them for yourself.
We're not going to arrest anybody.

(50:02):
We're doing a great job as best we can, but we don't have the
tools to do it, so now you can just read it.
If you wanted to have be accountable for the bad actors
here instead of doing. And that's why this will never
happen, because they're interested in just the salacious
names. They want to say Brennan,
Clapper, comedy and Obama and the Clintons because, and that
makes people feel really good. I want to know the names of the
people who drafted those documents.

(50:23):
I want to know the names of the prosecutors who said we're not
doing anything with this. I want to know the names of the
individuals who handed this to the director of the FBI who
created the opportunity cost forhim to go down the rabbit hole
here of investigating and looking up burn bags because he
apparently he still thinks the FBI uses typewriters.
And, and what he could be doing was reforming the entire agency.

(50:45):
And then for him to sit there onnational television and argue
that by turning this documents over, you'll just have to take
my word for it. But you should just totally
trust me, bro. I'm going to take the exact same
agency that did all these thingsthat I'm alleging and we're
going to now use it. It's our Bureau now.
And we're going to fix these problems.
We're going to hold people accountable when the actual
gettable thing here is this agency showed itself to be

(51:08):
willing to influence political outcomes at presidential level,
to persecute people not just in high positions but like around
the country. And we have an appetite now for
change that should result in, theoretically, the entire thing
being flushed down the toilet. But, you know, it's Betty
Crocker, Esquire. So it's our FBI now.

(51:31):
So it's totally a force for good.
Because never, ever will we everhave a president again who comes
from the left of center. We're going to take a a quick
break for the the ads from Spotify.
So thanks for listening to those.
You've had a warning, Steve. We're going to go back and I'm
going to play you. Who's going to go to jail?
Are you ready? Because that question is being

(51:52):
asked. And who better than the guy who
dominated a huge chunk of the police state movie?
Instead of people who have actually worked inside the
government, like you or me or Garretta Boyle or George Hill,
we got Peter Schweitzer, who wrote a book about the Clintons,
because why not? Are we any closer to anybody
going to jail? Is it relates to the Clintons?
And of course, I always predicate this.

(52:14):
I'm not a lawyer, But what I would say is part of the
challenge with those financial crimes is the issue of statute
of limitations. But when it.
Comes to the cover up, I think you have some real, real
possibilities there from a criminal standpoint.
I think it's great that Congressman Commerce Committee

(52:35):
subpoenaed the Clintons. They're going to be coming in
Underoath to be asked about. I think a wide variety of
questions. Do you think they actually are
going? Do you think they actually go?
I, I think, I think Clinton is Bill Clinton is going to claim
executive privilege, which he really can't because this all

(52:57):
happened after the president. That will be tied to the courts.
I think Hillary Clinton will probably have to show up.
I think she has more, you know, constitutional responsibilities
to do that than Bill Clinton does as the next president.
And I think she's probably goingto get more of what we've got in
testimony in the past, which putthis on hold for a second.

(53:17):
The question, is anybody really going to jail?
The caveat, I'm not actually an attorney.
Let me tell you about people that I think are doing a great
job. Now, James Comer is going to put
people underoath and they're going to have to come and
testify. The follow up question after the
first question was not answered.But are they really going to
show up to testify? Well, I think some of them will,
but not all of them. Even though I was excited about
Bill Clinton coming. He probably won't be there, but

(53:38):
he might show up. And then, you know, he could
claim something and we're going to just go ahead and adjudicate.
We'll just muddy up this water awhole bunch.
Steve. He's yet to answer the question.
Just wait, because he's going totell you.
I'm gonna tell you because I don't recall.
I don't remember pleading the 5th.
What difference does it make? Oh wait, he didn't tell you.
No one's going to jail so. We're going to get the James
Comer or the Jim Jordan hearing,which is what people really

(54:02):
want. I mean, they don't really want
to see a kind of they just want to like see that viral moment.
They want to have that 32nd clipand then have the comers and the
Jordans of the world go on Sean Hannity tonight and say we're
digging to get to the bottom of it.
And at the end, in two years, they'll write a strongly worded
letter. And then in the case of James
Comber, he'll hire a ghost writer to take the information
that belongs to the American people that he used hundreds of

(54:23):
millions of dollars of our taxpayer dollars to accumulate
and have the ghost writer write a book for him.
And then you can buy the book and find out just how much
digging he actually did. In order to sow the seeds of
tyranny, you must generate the drone's desire for a champion,
using it as a structural divide between the rich and the poor.

(54:44):
And in this case, it might be the information rich and the
information poor. I'm just saying this is not new.
It's not new to create this thischampion scenario.
This champion was James. It's Comer.
He's going to be he's he's he's got us.
He's got our back. By the way, cash wasn't done
with that. So let's I got more cash stuff
too. I just wanted to tell you, like

(55:05):
the people who know, who are friends with Cash, who are
friends with Dan Bongino, who helped make the movie with
Dinesh D'souza, that you and I were part of the thing that we
were really worried about 'causewe actually thought that like, a
police state is a real possibility.
They're actually out there just trying to sell their next book
about the police state. And here's more cash.
Here's the beauty of it, Sean. You don't have to trust me or
trust you. That's all.

(55:27):
Everything you recited the summer you just gave is years of
excavating documents that these deep state actors held and
buried and documented their own corruption because they were
arrogant enough to think no one would ever find it that.
And that nobody would ever listen to their own words and
actually know how ridiculous what they said is.
The bingo card, you know, we talked about democracy and

(55:48):
transparency, the January 6th and deep state.
Just throw out the red meat terminology.
And then the the boomers that are watching you on Fox News
while they're waiting on Nikki Parker to come up and give her
commentary some point in the future are going to be very
happy and very excited. They cannot wait for that
congressional hearing. Well I'm sure we will have great

(56:09):
viral 32nd clips that then Sean can play the following evening.
I know that we're in trouble when when MSNBC is agreeing with
Donald Trump. That's actually kind of funny.
You know, you can't talk about aunit party without actually
believing that it's a unit party, that that everybody has
the same instincts. At some point in time.
They kind of have to agree on one solid set of facts, which is
that people who live in Washington, DC, whether they

(56:30):
want to agree to it or not, are actually like living in a really
unsafe city. So I've got some pretty funny
stuff. Here's Joe Scarborough making
sense. That's not normal.
That's how I know we're upside down right now.
Joe Scarborough is saying thingsthat are more obviously true
than Glenn Beck and Peter Schweitzer, who was on that clip
from the Glenn Beck show. The answer to this, this, this
problem for Democrats is not, oh, everything's OK.

(56:51):
There's nothing to see here. Move along.
Move along. Oh, Washington has dropped 24%
or whatever in crime data. Well, let me give you some other
numbers. The Washington Post took a poll
at late April, early May, 91% ofWashington residents say crime

(57:12):
is a problem, 91 percent, 51% itis an extremely serious problem.
And and John Heilemann, we've had people before put this in
racial terms. And this is what I I must say,

(57:32):
this is one thing that I think Democrats have gotten so wrong
about crime. It's a racial term thing.
If only I had a clip about someone that immediately made it
about racial terms because they listen to the mainstream news.
You ready for this? Send it.
Here we go. Check this guy out.
Do you think DC is dangerous? No, DC is not dangerous.

(57:53):
Why would you feel like it's dangerous?
I'm gonna ask you a question. Because it's actually the fourth
most dangerous city in the country based on homicide rates.
That's actually. I know that's absolutely right.
But do y'all feel like it's dangerous because it's black
people? No.
OK, why would why would it be because of a skin?
Color. Oh, that's why I'm asking,
that's why I ask that question. But I don't feel like DC is
dangerous. What?

(58:14):
What part is specific is dangerous for y'all?
The homicides and the carjackings.
Yeah, I agree with the the carjacking and and everything
about that nature I agree with for sure.
But homicides, That's everywhere.
So do you agree with Trump's action to take over the city
with federal troops to make it peaceful?
No, I absolutely do not agree with that.
Why not? For me, I don't feel like the

(58:37):
protection will like it's the same far as in the city itself.
Just like you have Navy troops taking over, what you got to
think about the Metropolitan, the training is different.
Military is different than police.
Police work for the people. The military do too.
Yeah, they they protect us, but the they're they're focused on
combat. There's no combat.

(58:57):
Needed in the streets, Steve, can you can you help me
understand what was being discussed there?
Because I'm not that capable. Objection.
It's devastating in my case. Yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure.
I mean, I agree with you, but the homicides, that's
everywhere. Is it?
Is there homicides in your house?
No, I'm not. I don't think we've had any
reporting of homicides in the friend household and, you know,

(59:17):
ever. But OK, just checking.
I'm of two minds actually on this one.
Obviously, the opening to that where the guy gets completely
overwhelmed by the fact that there are evidence that his city
he lives in is extremely dangerous and there might be a
drop from last year. Well, if last year they had
record numbers, then you can't count that there's a drop back
to the standard normal level. Like that doesn't indicate that

(59:39):
there's significant progress. If it continues to be really
bad. Like it's like being the
skinniest kid at fat camp. At that point, you're still at
fat camp, there's a problem. But on the flip side of that
coin, they make the point that the military doesn't have the
same training for law enforcement.
They don't have the same connection to the community.
Those are all reasonable concerns to bring forward.
And then and lastly, I'll say like, I don't give a crap about

(01:00:01):
Washington. DCI don't.
I don't care. I think that the actual smart
move would be for the president of the United States to say this
is ceded territory to the communists.
You can choke on it. I'm moving to Mar a Lago and I
can be president there and you all can just choke on this.
And see how it goes for you. Like that to me is where I'm at.

(01:00:23):
I live in Daytona Beach, FL. I don't give a crap about
Washington DCI don't care who the mayor of New York City is.
I don't care what the Los Angeles mayor says.
The only reason that these are news stories is because the
people in news media, it's important to them because they
live there. So I'm happy just to content to
to watch it burn and laugh. Well, nobody cares what you
think, Steve. Pam Bondi said They're going to

(01:00:45):
fix all the bad cities that you just named, and she almost named
them all. Exactly.
So here you go. OK, let's focus and dial in.
So DC sanctuary city, LA sanctuary city, San Francisco
sanctuary city, New York City, sanctuary city, California
sanctuary state. What does this mean in, in, in

(01:01:06):
reality, for all of these locations, municipalities,
states, moving forward, they must comply.
Yesterday, I sent out 33 lettersto mayors around this country.
I think 3 or 4 of them were in California alone.
Not surprising. I sent out letters to all of
these mayors and to the governors saying you must

(01:01:27):
comply. We want to know what you're
doing to comply with our federalgovernment.
So we're going to see. I'll let you know how they
respond. They have 5 days to respond to
me. What do you, Steve, why does she
talk like that? You must comply.
And I sent out five letters to these people.
And that's how I think television sounds.

(01:01:49):
Does she talk like that normally?
Like she's out of breath, Like she's in the middle of someone,
like, I don't know, jogging? Is she jogging while she's doing
this? Is there a treadmill underneath
her so she can get her foot steps in for the day or what's
happening? She makes Nikki Parker look like
a great communicator. She makes Nikki Parker look like
Barack Obama. It's amazing.
But this is the difference between the system people and
the outcome people. The Republicans, they're system

(01:02:12):
people. They're the ones that say like
we're going to send a letter andwe're going to demand that you
comply and you send us a response.
We'll go back and forth. This is this is the
whistleblower, the Chuck Grassy's of the world that
pushed through the system that say like, hey, we can't just
snap and restore Garrett A Boyleto the payroll after 1054 days.
We can't just do that because there's no protocols in the

(01:02:32):
system that say that we can't just reinstate Garrett and then
immediately give him a medical retirement because the
regulations don't state it that way.
So it ain't no fun when the rabbits got the gun.
When they get back in charge, they'll just do whatever they
want. Hey, they do whatever they want
because they're outcome people. They just told you that.
The attorney general, United States said I sent 33 letters to
these sanctuary cities and states.

(01:02:54):
You know why? Because they said you have laws
about immigration and we don't give a crap.
We're doing what we want. We're about outcomes.
That's why you had to send your letters.
They did what they wanted to do.When are you going to
acknowledge the asymmetrical civil war that we're involved
in? Right now that is thankfully
cold. So far hasn't gone kinetic, but
one side wants to just follow the rules and the other side

(01:03:16):
plays demolition Derby and doesn't give a crap.
And that is an asymmetrical battle that you are setting
yourselves up to lose because you haven't embraced the fight.
Yeah, but these are our guide. Do not fall in love with Paula.
Politicians fall in love with what?
Folks in the chat fall in love with what outcomes come.

(01:03:36):
Steve Friends. Somebody knows about this.
Somebody knows your secret sauce, bro.
They know how to get it done. They got those DUI arrest
warrants executed and they went after the Subway Sandwich
bandit. The Subway.
He was the he was the notorious infamous DC sandwich hurler, and
they got him after his first sandwich hurl.
Did did he take the place of Jared from Subway as being the
worst representative of Subway or or is it going to be He's the

(01:03:59):
one? He took his sandwich and he.
Yeah, I. Mean.
Juicy Smollett was slightly worse, yes.
So for those who don't know, a man who worked for the Justice
Department, a guy named Sean Dunn, decided to hurl a sandwich
after a prolonged verbal confrontation with law
enforcement in the streets of DC.
And then Pam Bondi went on on X to announce his arrest.

(01:04:20):
Because if you throw a stone at a windshield of a federal
vehicle or if you throw a sandwich at the plate carrier,
that's probably either at least at Level 3 plates, if not level
4 plates, you know, for ballistic protection.
If you throw that against a federal law enforcement officer,
you're going to find yourself out of a job and facing felony
charges. But if you drop a pipe bomb in
the city of Washington, DC, or if you like ride around on a on

(01:04:42):
a dirt bike and shoot somebody in the face, you're probably
going to be fine. Donald Trump says libs got to
change. So this is what our guy is
saying again, if you want to, ifyou want to get the drones
excited, give them a desire for a champion.
Here's what our champion looks like kind of walking through his
discussion about how libs got tochange.
His numbers aren't even as good as is Joe Scarborough.
For some reason, half of the people here, maybe all of the

(01:05:03):
people here, most of you live inDC, you are petrified to go out
and you're liberal. And if you're liberal, you're
going to have to change your Democrats.
You're going to have to change your way.
So we will have crime under control very shortly in DC.
But their record numbers and sadly what I guess the mayor
did, but whoever it was, they asked the numbers to be fudged

(01:05:26):
so that it would show less crimethan the fact.
The fact is it's worse than it'sever been.
And we will have it just like wedid at the border where with
borders are totally in great shape right now.
The best ever record setting shape.
We'll have the crime situation solved in DC very soon.
So it's it's basically done. Yeah, I mean, we we solved crime

(01:05:48):
entirely, except when we let theelite pedophile rapist go free
six weeks ago. Well, the good news is the
opposition, if you believe in opposition, which I actually
don't, Like I said, I think thatthe experiment, at this phase of
the experiment, whatever this phase is, it's over.
We now need emancipation just tobe able to grow food and sell to

(01:06:08):
our neighbors. My wife and I had this
conversation the other day. She's like, you bought a really
ridiculous amount of pesticide spraying gear.
And I went, yeah, that's like, that's how I solve a problem.
Like you got ants, You might be able to solve it with $6 worth
of traps from HEB, but that's not how Kyle Serafin solves
problems. I'm buying a 70PSI sprayer.
I'm buying all of the deadly chemicals, right?

(01:06:29):
I'm going out there and getting piles of like Ant destroyer
powder to put on top of the Ant mound and I'm going to go spray
the whole thing. And at this point I might as
well make a damn business out ofit.
Like all I need to do is start shipping in a certain amount of
ortho and I should be able to godo home defense sprays for
people and and charge. But I can set up a Ant killer
better battle belt that you can now sell.
I don't need a belt. I've got a backpack.

(01:06:50):
I've got a backpack spray system.
Dude, I'm not even playing around.
I have a back. I'll send you pictures.
I have a backpack sprayer systemthat holds all of my extra
equipment in it and then also itholds 16 liters worth of death.
To to bust it must look like a Ghostbuster.
It looks exactly like a Ghostbuster, including you can
actually stash it back there with the spray nozzle and it's
an adjustable length. OK, all of that being the case,

(01:07:11):
I cannot go out there and go start a business of spraying
people's pests without some sortof licensing.
I'm sure there's some sort of like permits I got to go pull,
there's some kind of a business license, I got to register with
the state, blah, blah, blah, blah.
I'm not going to do all that crap.
So I can either be like the bootleg Ant killer.
I have to ask permission of my state and my local government if
I want to go just help out my neighbors by going and killing

(01:07:31):
all their stuff and taking a couple bucks for my time.
So that's how I know we're screwed.
Again, I don't mind the fact that we have such turds that are
running it because the other side looks like this.
That's why I need to push these people and I I don't think we
can fix them. I just think we should just let
people know that the we need to switch from opium to copium and
then from copium to step down isto reality.
Or you could just live in Jasmine Crockett's world, which

(01:07:51):
is my favorite. I have to play this because I
have it. It is funny because when people
think about black women, they think about our strength.
They think about how, you know, usually we're juggling so much
and we're doing so much and we're still going to school and
we're doing all the things. And part of it is unfair because
at the end of the day, we are still butt humans, but because

(01:08:14):
she's a butt human. I guess allegedly.
She's a butt. Human.
I mean, it is apparently unique to having darker melanin levels
of your skin to be managing things like kids and households
and work and going to school. That would be news to Madam
Friend. I had to look it up but appear

(01:08:37):
apparently Jasmine Crockett has children.
Who would agree with that? I didn't, I didn't know that she
had kids. I, it's very difficult to find
out good information on some of these people.
That doesn't sound right. The picture that I'm seeing
doesn't even look like Jasmine Crockett per SE.
But I just, I just wanted to sayI find it fascinating because

(01:08:57):
when people are looking out there and going like, what you
know, what do we know about these people like Jasmine
Crockett, like black women in general?
We just think, yeah, Black women, they're they're known for
their hard work ethic. I know black women in the
government for taking jobs that they have no business having
because it's a federal jobs program.
And that's a Democrat thing. And this lady just kind of laid

(01:09:19):
it out for me. Like, look, sometimes people
make a good what we're going to do black lady versus black lady
on this. Let's get cancelled.
Here we go ready, Steve. Democrats are delusional.
Boom, really. I mean, they, they, you said in
five seconds it took me 45. They they delusional.
The LDR hypocrisy is caught up with the Democratic Party and

(01:09:41):
they don't know how to deal withit for everything.
And and I don't agree with President Trump for about 99.9%
because I'm holding out that 1% that him and I are going to
agree on something. I want it to happen.
God knows. I thought he would really like
here. I think he would, too.
I think he would, too. The Donald.
OK, go on, call the sister. We can talk it out.

(01:10:03):
This is the thing Democrats holdright there for a second.
She's about to lay out the hypocrisy problem, which exists
on the left for sure. But if you're being honest and
you're a person who thinks that we have a unit party issue and
that these are both, you know, different wings of the same bat,

(01:10:23):
see if she's going to lay out the exact same thing, I want you
to try to give me the Republicananalogy she's about to get,
which by the way, her answer is really good People hate
hypocrites. And it's just really caught up
by when you talk about the the cultural swing and all of that,
people realize, let me give an example, As much as Democrats
decry President Donald J Trump on democracy, now, I wish

(01:10:43):
Democrats really did about democracy.
I wish they did. But let me tell you what they
did in 2024. They propped up President Biden.
They propped up Biden nomics, even though the majority of the
people were saying we can't afford stuff.
They did not have a real primary.
Then you got President Obama andGeorge Clooney pushes President

(01:11:05):
Biden out of the race along withRepresentative Nancy Pelosi.
That, that, that that gang, theytook his hand in his arm.
And then you don't. You don't.
And then you try to not try in certain states, you kick off the
ballot Democrats, people like Congressman Dean Phillips, who
is the only actively elected dimwho had the courage to run.

(01:11:29):
You mess with Marianne Williamson, you mess with people
like Doctor Cornell West, et cetera, et cetera.
Democrats did that, not Republicans.
So it's just examples of I thinkpeople are over the hypocrisy.
And because in the United Statesof America we only got two
parties, which I think is insaneto ask 300 / 300 million people
to pick from the 2, the pigeon keeps switching back and forth

(01:11:50):
to both of them because I believe most people in this
country don't really have a home.
What do you think about that? I think I agree with it and I'm
actually kind of surprised because she did with the thing
that the Republicans always liketo do and talk about the
hypocrisy and the communists don't care about it.
Doesn't hurt their feelings likeit hurts your feelings,
Republican. But she did lean on the

(01:12:12):
democracy, which is the code word she says.
She actually defined what it is to be democratic.
And the fact that that word doesn't mean what they say it
means. It just means things we like,
well, because we're interested in outcomes, not in actually
following what democracy entails.
And that is that there's a majority rule everybody gets to
say and then whoever gets the 50% + 1 gets to say.

(01:12:35):
But similarly to the Republican equivalent to that, it's we
demand transparency. We're not, we're not going to be
transparent about what you wanted.
I mean, you wanted to find out things like, you know, who were
the clients that Epstein was trafficking children to?
You know, who planted the January 6th pipe bomb?
Why has that person not been found and what, what sort of

(01:12:57):
weird government stuff was goingon?
Remember, Cash went on, went on with Maria Bartiromo and said
that we're going to unveil like all the people that were
involved in the in, in sort of the CHS world.
We're not talking about FBI agents, Steve.
We're talking about confidentialhuman sources.
They're going to reveal what wasgoing on there.
Look. And we're being promised now
transparency about Russian collusion narratives from the

(01:13:18):
2016 election. That transparency is going to be
comedy and Brennan and Clapper, the names you already know, as
opposed to who were doing the interviews, who in the DOJ was
pushing these things forward andis still in these positions of
power. We're not going to get that
transparency because then that will lead you to the ultimate

(01:13:39):
question of like, hey, you guys know who these people are.
Those names are not blocked out for the additions of that you're
reading and you continue to allow them to operate.
Well, damn. We should probably just get rid
of that whole FBI, but then theywouldn't have their positions of
power. Wait, what was that?
They wouldn't have what? They wouldn't have their

(01:14:00):
positions of power. Morris gave up a big nugget.
You can't be giving up those bigNuggets, Steve.
Yeah. It's like, it's our FBI now,
It's our DOJ now, it's our DHS now, it's our government now,
with no evidence that's the case, as you found out that the
people who work in the sort of like rank and file version of
the DOJ are sandwich throwing assholes that live in

(01:14:21):
Washington, DC, effeminate homosexual men, from what I
could tell, who want to throw a sandwich at a federal officer
who's wearing a freaking plate carrier.
And then you prove that he's thebad guy by arresting him.
What are the That guy gets a really good job in a law firm
like today. That or a think tank.
What? Are the odds that they drop that
that they they filed a criminal complaint to go after him and

(01:14:42):
that ADC grand jury refuses to give an indictment for it and
that guy is back out doing something else like by the end
of the week? 100% there's no chance they're
going to prosecute that as far as I can tell.
And and and look, not for nothing, I'm not defending
assaulting federal officers, butif I got hit in the chest with a
Subway sandwich, like they'd have to hold me up from laughing
so hard that. So you've done you've done AFO

(01:15:05):
situations. We had one where a guy got into
a tussle with like some guy at at the border.
So Border Patrol deals with a lot of Afos and the FBI does the
investigation. So you get called out there and
you're like, all right, man, what's what's the situation
here? And they're like, yeah, like I
was taking this illegal in. And so I grabbed this this alien
and and I was wrestling and he tried to get to the ground.
And so I ended up on the scuffled around and he rolled
over on my and then I ended up on top.

(01:15:26):
And then I I coughed him and you're like, OK, did you have
any injuries? And they're like, well, he broke
my sunglasses and you're like, what?
And he's like, yeah, my Oakleys,they're broken right here on the
nose piece. And I'm like, how did that
happen? He was like, I was like, you
know, pressed up against his back, whatever.
And then he like moved around and then like, it broke my
sunglasses. Is there?

(01:15:46):
Did you have to go to the hospital at all?
No, no, But they can't glue backtogether anymore.
And you're like, look, dude, I'll write it up.
And I'm willing to take it to anAUSA because I'm a team player.
I'll take it out there. I'll go take a little bit of a
credibility hit and I'll be like, yeah, we had a Border
Patrol agent and his sunglasses broke while he was taking this
guy to custody. What's that e-mail look like
coming back at you? Sometimes you get on the phone

(01:16:07):
even. That's the best.
I wouldn't put it in an e-mail. Yeah, let's be honest.
I would call a personal cell phone of it.
You're calling the personal cellphone to the duty AUSA and
you're going to get the I got a guy, he was the duty AUSA in New
Mexico for an AFO, and he was onthe treadmill when I picked it
up. I heard GGGGGGI go, are you OK?
And he's like, yeah, I was like,what are you doing?
He's like, I'm working out what's up, man.
And I'm more. Than Pam Bondi, yeah, I've got

(01:16:29):
And he's still more coherent. Yeah, he was.
And so I'm like, I got a AFO, can I brief it to you?
And he was like, sure. So I briefed it and he was he
was like, yeah, verbal decline. Do you need it in writing?
They don't want to put it in writing either.
Look, I'm. Going to document it by an by a
three by an EC, I'm going to putan EC and that just says that we
did a conversation verbal decline.
You good with that? Yes, remember calling a federal

(01:16:51):
prosecutor for a stabbing in theeyeball with a grilling fork and
he said how stabbed was he? It's incredibly important.
How stabbed was he Steve? Was it a loss of permanent?
Did he permanently lose the eye?Permanent vision loss declined.
That would usually fly in most places.
Unless you live in a violent place.

(01:17:12):
We're screwed anyway. I, I don't mean to be too
flippant about it, but like a lot of the stuff goes there.
Let me just give you the last little thought here as we end,
because it's not just coming foryour food and it's not just
coming for your sense of justice, which I think is a big
problem, though. There's these like explicit and
implicit taxes on just being alive.
Listen to this lady explain whathappened to her freaking power

(01:17:33):
bill. Tell me we haven't all been
there because this is all outside of our control.
So I just got my first power bill under the new rules in
which I pay for AI to plug in toour power grid.
Now PSE&G did absolutely warn methat this would happen.
I mean, no, they didn't tell us that we're we're funding AI

(01:17:54):
because why should AI pay for itself when we can do it for
them? Is my bill more than double the
highest I've ever paid for any of the hottest years on record?
Yeah, yeah. I used to pay something like
22235. It's $660, Northern New Jersey,
standard usage. I mean, I use lights.

(01:18:14):
I have a fan going. If you look at the usage levels
on my bill, it's on par with what I did last year and the
year before it. It's nothing greater or less
than, but it went from like $235to 666 dollars $666.39.
Are you asking if like, I've decided to let the neighborhood
tap into my power? No.
Did did my our company decide tolet AI tap into our grid?

(01:18:42):
Yeah. And as as pissed as I am about
my bill, I think I'm making thispost to document the moment
where I go extreme cheapskate. You know, when somebody finds me
climbing in a dumpster. A hark back to this moment.
That's it. That's all I really got.
This is just me documenting a moment in time where I
collectively. Lose my shit.
They have that video where parents like just put a power

(01:19:04):
cord next to an indoor bicycle and they convince their kids in
order to keep the TV going they have to like cycle to tire
themselves out for nap. Time.
Do you think a? Bicycle like that actually
exists where I could just power things in my house.
I've I've literally looked up today whether or not wind
turbines are legal in my neighborhood.
She she goes down a rabbit hole of all the options that she

(01:19:25):
might be able to do to to not have a $660 power bill.
My buddy in California told me his bill was over $800 and they
have the same kind of problems. That's what Alpha Warrior has
talked about, too. Yep.
Yeah, that's right. So that Lady was in New Jersey,
alpha's in California. That goes back to maybe your
point about you don't care aboutNew York and Washington.

(01:19:47):
Is it your own fault if you livein these places?
To a certain element, but also Ithink with the AI centers that
are going up all across the country that are just consuming
so much energy. They're gathering data on you
and then expecting you to pay for it because the electricity
bills are going to necessarily skyrocket.
There's not an unlimited amount of energy and power, and we have

(01:20:07):
not built up the infrastructure enough.
So they are sucking those resources down.
Ergo, they're limiting supply. And economics would demand that
a smaller supply would cause prices to go.
Up for the people who are being collected on, so again, we're
funding our own demise in that regard.
Kind of like paying for a federal government that destroys
your liberty by being tyrannical, but gives you sort

(01:20:28):
of the credibility that they aregoing to give you all the
documents that they had from like 8 or 10 years ago in this
transparency exercise. Except the closing ECS where
they said there isn't a there there.
Yeah, that's the last little piece of it, is that somebody
closed those investigations and they said why?
And Cash is not publishing thosefor some reason.
Steve, that's as much black Pilling as I can do for the day.
Why don't you tell people what you got coming up for tomorrow

(01:20:48):
on the American Radicals podcast?
They'll give you the screen. Well, thank you for that and
George, everybody to join us on rumble.com/M Rad Pod, the
American Radicals podcast, 10:30Eastern Time.
We're doing our Saturday grab bag.
GOB actual he returned, so it'llbe his first Saturday grab bag.
We're to talk about the Chinese Communist Party might be using
in vitro fertilization in order to run a Trojan horse scheme in

(01:21:11):
America. And then also vaping is a
problem as well as RFK is one ofthe few bright spots within the
current administration is standing in the gap against
vaccine. So it'll be all across the
board. Looking forward to it.
Join us tomorrow, 10:30 Eastern Time rumble.com am rad pod.
Have a great weekend guys. Thanks, buddy.
Love you. Talk to you soon here about

(01:21:32):
this, folks. Have have this little laugh,
folks, because we can still havedate night, right?
Hey, I'm just going to lay down with the kids for a couple
minutes. OK.
Good night. No, Pour me a glass of wine.
David Salon. OK.
I was thinking we can watch a movie.
Sure. Or play a board game.
I'll see you tomorrow. I'm just going to lay down for a
couple minutes. Then it's party time.
Hey, we had a good day. I'll just be two minutes.

(01:21:54):
Dinner was nice. Why are you like this?
I'll see you. I'll see you in 2 minutes.
Hope you ready for a rager. Hope you ready for a rager.
Rager, Annie. Come on, can't sleep like that.
You won't be able to walk tomorrow.
You got my wine? Here comes the party train.
Hey, I'm just gonna lay down thekids for a couple minutes.

(01:22:16):
That's how it starts. You guys know how it ends.
Yeah, you know, date night sometimes it's just having a
great day, folks. Thanks for supporting the
program. If you guys can go ahead and
subscribe over at Rumble, do it at at X.
You could do it on YouTube or you can follow us on locals,
which is Kyle seraphin.com. We'll cheat code you in to
supporting the podcast. You could do it either as a free
member or a paid member of our society and see some of the fun

(01:22:36):
stuff we do behind the scenes. Because we are dealing with a
fallen society. I decided to buy a flamethrower.
So they'll be some flamethrower videos pending.
I'm fairly confident of that. Like share, subscribe, make sure
you guys see we're a one man show here.
It's just one guy trying to do as best he can to try to bring
you some information and make sure that we are not too high up
on the opium so that when it allcrashes down around us, we are
not devastated. We're just pragmatic.

(01:22:58):
And then we go and start fillingup the tank on our
flamethrowers. That may be a real thing, not
just for Ant mounts, but like wemight be fighting all of this
stuff in the near future. And I think the only thing
that's holding us back is reallyadmitting that it's not working.
It's not. I think Steve and I have showed
you a little bit of that today. All right, God bless all of you.
Hope you have a great weekend. In spite of that locally, it's

(01:23:18):
probably really great where you live.
The odds are pretty decent. Like Steve said, there's some
catastrophic things happening all around this country and yet
your neighborhood is still not on fire and your neighbors will
still say hi to you when you go get the mail.
So go do that. Go say hi to your neighbors.
This was the advice we gave you early on in the the craziness
that was going on in 2024 with the the election season and
Trump getting shot at and all this other crazy stuff.

(01:23:38):
Guess what? It still works today.
Go build your local Society of people who are on the same page
as and that starts by knocking on doors or saying hi or sharing
a cup of coffee out on the porchand so on.
God bless you. See you guys again after a long
weekend and have a good rest of your Friday.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSeraphin Show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.

(01:24:01):
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Seraphin.

All Episodes

Golden Age? Or end of the American Experiment? | Ep 632

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Golden Age? Or end of the American Experiment? | Ep 632