PATEL Claims "Every Single Person" who Weaponized the FBI removed: I found 3 yesterday | Ep 636 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:11):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and

(00:40):
welcome to today's Kyle SeraphinShow.
It is Thursday, it is August the21st, and I appreciate you
joining us. The title of today's program is
a bit salacious and might have caused some Internet failures
early on. Hopefully, we don't have any
interruptions in this live stream and hopefully for those
of you who are listening after the fact, you'll have no

(01:01):
difficulties. Although I am being told that
folks are on various different podcast apps are not able to
download the podcast guys, you can always do that very easily.
I can confirm it quite easily ifyou go and check out Spotify and
the website iskyleserafinshow.com.
That's just a redirect that willtake you to where you need to
go. So while we're talking about it,

(01:22):
the places you can find our podcast, if you're ever looking
for it on the audio and it doesn't show up, rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. You can find me on X at
kyle.seraphinyoutube@kyleseraphinyoutube.comslash at Kyle Seraphin.
You can find us on Locals, whichis Kyle seraphin.com.
If you want to support the program, by all means, come on
over to any of those platforms. Make sure that you're a

(01:43):
follower, A subscriber or whatever the heck they want to
call it. It's different everywhere we go,
unfortunately. And then make sure that you're
liking the videos that we have. Make sure that you're driving
and setting up notifications if you want to see us go live,
because you can join us live with no ads, just the little
ones that we read right here. Those are all opportunities for
you to support the program. And if you want to help me out,
and I'd really appreciate it because right now we are
continuing to grow, maybe not insize in the way that I would

(02:06):
like, but man, we are getting influence.
I just talked to somebody insidethe Bureau this morning who said
I can't go a day or two without hearing somebody mention your
name and nobody knows that I know you.
So that's really fun. I think it's fun for my friends
that are currently working in the FBI and share information
with me. I think it's fun for people who
are in the FBI who are frustrated and need a voice.
And I'm providing that same voice of of accuracy and sort of

(02:28):
push back against where this woke nonsense that's been going
on for about a decade. I'm going to share with you
things from what we like to callthe mutual admiration societies
today. Those are the Society of ex FBI
agents, which is a group of people that basically say we
were FBI agents and therefore you should hire us.
And also, we're going to advocate and give money to our
other friends who are US. And then you've also got the FBI

(02:50):
Agents Association, which I specifically warned Cash Patel,
Don't cozy up to these people. They don't have your best
interest at heart. Their interest is in FBI agents
and maybe also some kind of wokeagenda.
They always saddle up to an FBI director.
And they did the same thing. And now they're writing stern
letters against the firings thathappened.
Anyway, I'm just telling you, we're providing a voice for the

(03:12):
voiceless. So all of you are part of that.
And if you want to help us out, the cheapest and easiest way to
support us, you don't have to buy anything.
You don't have to sign up for any kind of memberships.
All you got to do is share it with a friend.
You can literally send them the link.
Kyle seraphinshow.com. Hey, check out episode number,
whatever, whichever 1 impacts you.
And if it's today's, that's easyas well.
All right, today's program, we're going to get into some new

(03:34):
stuff, some basic news. We're going to talk about
tariffs. We're going to talk about some
of the debriefs that are going on, the ongoing litigation of
Joe Biden's presidency and whether or not he was sane,
sober, coherent, mentally fit for duty.
I don't know why we're still doing this, but we are.
We're going to talk a little bitabout sort of the joke that is
existing in the redistricting fight, which is happening in
Texas and then in California, shocker, you're going to find

(03:55):
out that California has affirmedits own decision.
They're kind of like a classic government agency.
We're also going to go back in time a little bit.
We're going to talk about an FBIhoneypot operation that got
wiped off the map and got scrubbed from conservative
media. You heard about it, then you
heard it debunked. I'm telling you there's more to
that story. There always was, and it
shouldn't have gone away. The the folks inside today's

(04:17):
FBI, the Dan Bongino, Cash Patel, sort of a conglomerate
there, have asked conservative media to play nice with them
because they couldn't confirm they were being misled by folks
inside the Bureau who have a vested interest in hiding, you
know, their secrets. So we're going to do a reveal.
Yesterday, Cash Patel did an interview on Fox and he said
that we removed everybody that has done anything nefarious or

(04:37):
weaponized government inside theFBI.
It took me a couple of hours. I found three more for him
because he's not competent at his job, which led to a very fun
Alex Jones appearance yesterday and probably something that was
very inflammatory. So I'm going to do something I
never do. We're going to do an ad read,
we're going to do a little bit of news and then I'm going to
give you a 5 minute. It's a cut down version of 35

(04:57):
minutes. It's the coherent argument that
I made for Alex Jones because most people read the headlines
or they look at Alex Jones is kind of click bait, which I
absolutely love because it's Alex Jones.
But good Lord, some of the stuffhe says is really wild.
And I want you guys to follow a very simple, short logical
process. And then you ask yourself, is
this true? So in a rare moment, I'm going

(05:18):
to actually give 5 minutes to a previous interview.
But I chopped it in such a way that all the fluff is out of it,
I think. And so you're going to get a
very clean situation from, from Infowars, the, the hit that I
did yesterday. And Alex always tells me to go
chop it up and do whatever I want with it.
I almost never do. So that's going to be something
a little different. We're going to lead off today
with a, a sponsor who I'm a big fan of in so much as we have

(05:39):
their products in our house. They were our insurance policy
during the last election season when I actually started having
quite a bit of anxiety thinking that the the the prior
administration was going to comeafter us.
And so if there was a civil war,I would want to make sure that
we could feed our family. That was a real thought in my
brain. And that's why we went out and
bought the three month emergencyfood kit.
You can get the same thing today.
It is available and they're actually going to add a month on

(05:59):
top of that for free. It's mypatriotsupply.com/kyle.
So we can talk about all the things that are scary.
Historic heat, flash flood warnings because you have extra
dry things, 40 year high for floods.
We're coming into hurricane season in the other folks that
are living near the Gulf or if you're living on the Eastern
seaboard, there could be a crisis in any time zone.
It can happen anywhere in which you always see are crowds

(06:20):
standing in line waiting, hopingfor bottled water, waiting for
food, looking for someone to show up and save them.
And if you don't want to wait for someone to save them, if you
want to be the person that is inthe prepare situation, not the
repair, then what you do is you buy yourself an insurance policy
of emergency food, water filtration, things like that
from My Patriot Supply. Go to mypatriotsupply.com slash
Kyle. Right now you're going to find

(06:42):
out that you're going to get 4 weeks free on top of the 90 day
food kit that you get. You can join millions of
Americans who are prepared with My Patriot Supply.
They're vertically integrated ona lot of the stuff they do
Sonica's good. It's packaged well, it's
stackable, which means you can store it quite easily.
You can tote it quite easily as well.
And like anything else, it's dehydrated, it's in bags and
it'll last for up to 25 years instorage without like a lot of to

(07:04):
do. You just keep it out of direct
sunlight. Claim your four week emergency
food kit today, my patriotssupply.com/kyle.
Check out the link in the show description if you guys want.
Let's get into today's program. We're going to cover a lot of
ground and like I said, kind of a variety of topics, but they're
going to we're going to hit a couple of home ones.
We're going to knock a couple ofthem out of the park today.

(07:32):
And so I alluded to it yesterdaymorning.
I got these yesterday. These are not fresh from today,
but I did want to show them on the screen for those of you that
are watching on the the YouTube,if you're watching on the
rumble, then you can see this. If you're listening on Spotify,
you can activate the video part right now.
And if you're not listening on Spotify and getting the video,
it is your best bet for the audio thing.
I, I was never a Spotify guy. Like Full disclosure, I never
had the Spotify app. I was an an Apple podcast kind

(07:54):
of person. I know there's people that do
iHeartRadio. Someone told me they listen on
Castbox, but the functionality of Spotify is very high.
It doesn't cost you anything, which is nice.
I think you actually skipped theoriginal pre roll ads that roll
out on some of the other advertising platforms because
they don't hit people on their own platform.
It gives me the best metrics. But more importantly, you can
switch between audio and video. So if you're driving and you

(08:15):
hear me say something like this,you can hit the button and it'll
just pop up the video when you're at a stop sign or
somewhere safe. Or you could be like some of the
folks we see out there and you just turn the video on and watch
while you drive so that you can cause wrecks because you're a
bad person. The joke is this is this is what
was sent to me. I'm going to describe it.
On the left side of the screen next to me is the Predator.

(08:36):
It's kind of a stylized version of the Predator.
And he's holding a burnished, polished, stripped down human
skull. And on the other side is also
the Predator, but it's from a different sort of imagination.
And he's holding Boba Fett's helmet with like a spine coming
out of it, which is silly and funny and, you know, kind of a
darkly amusing thing. I guess that's the only way to
describe it. It is kind of the way that it

(08:58):
feels right now. And that's the reason why folks
inside the FBI are starting to hear my names.
I've got buddies that I talked to yesterday who who got phone
calls and they were like, dude, you remember Serafin?
Like, I think he's getting people fired at the FBI.
Yeah. What we're doing is we're trying
to do the job that the director and the deputy came in and said
they were going to do total personnel warfare.

(09:19):
Look, this is not a personal thing.
There is a serious and significant problem that exists
inside that federal agency. It is scary to those of us who
are dealing with it. We're actually going to have
another retired FBI agent, FBI whistleblower.
We just booked an interview. So I don't always go back to the
FBI interview pool, but occasionally we find someone.
I listen to his story on a different podcast and, and Full

(09:40):
disclosure, I rarely have time or interest in listening to
podcast. It's just not my thing in so
much as I'm constantly putting this together.
So I don't go listen to other people's stuff all the time.
But I did listen to one from Judicial Watch and I'm actually
going to appear on their podcastsometime next week or something
like that. And listening to it, this guy,
Bill Taylor described exactly what I've been saying.

(10:02):
And yet I've never met Bill Taylor before.
I've seen that he has a a presence on Twitter, which is
quite small. And we never crossed paths,
although our time in the Bureau overlap by a number of years.
And all the things that he was saying, you could have heard it
here, you could have heard it here very early on.
It sounded exactly like the stuff that I said in my first
discussion with Dan Bongino going back to September of 2022.

(10:25):
His whistleblower concerns are very often the same ones that I
had, you know, like reverse targeting and, and, and the FBI
abusing domestic terrorism. This is something that that
Steve Friend says, like we're not just making this stuff up.
We're telling you something because we think it's probably

(10:48):
really, really bad and it's really dangerous.
And if it doesn't get fixed, youknow, we're screwed when the
next organization comes in. But we're actually screwed right
now because what it's doing is it's going to go infringe on
somebody's liberties. These guys came in and they had
an opportunity. And so if I have to collect
skulls, metaphorically speaking,in order to make that work, and

(11:08):
that's what we're going to do. And I'm not going to shy away
from it, but it does make me sadbecause there are people that
are actually getting the work done before we get into the work
done, which is going to be, I think Tulsi Gabbard is doing a
really, let me say surprisingly good job only because I just
didn't see it coming from a, from a former Democrat.
She's been really making it sound like she understands the

(11:30):
problem. And then she's attempting to get
that solution against probably the ugliest agency out there, OD
And I. And generally like running the
United States Intelligence community, you know, it's 80% in
opposition to her easily. Let's start with this news from
CBS, which I found kind of funny.
There's four reasons why Donald Trump's tariffs are not causing
the United States inflation to soar.
You guys probably wondered, hey,how come inflation is not sorry,

(11:53):
to be fair, like prices are going up in most places on most
things. And we, like I said, we've lost
an advertiser here because theirsupply chain is out there.
We're going to talk about these four reasons because I think
they're funny. And it's CBS, which means we're
going to find a little bit of a bias inside the story despite
the barrage of new in tariffs that are imposed by the Trump
administration this year on dozens of US trading partners.
I think it's almost everybody. The price of goods and services

(12:15):
across the United States have defied many economists
expectations and remained relatively stable.
Oh, wait. Are you saying that the partisan
expectations of left-leaning economists were not actually
fair and reasonable predictions about that?
Economists caution that that's just because the tariffs have
yet to trigger a renewed bout ofinflation.

(12:36):
There's no guarantee that priceswon't surge later on this year.
So what I just took from that was it hasn't happened yet, but
it still could. You should continue to be
concerned and scared because at any moment, prices will come get
you. You know, inflation is the
weakening of your dollar. It means that your dollar buys
less things that almost always comes from it, like increasing

(12:58):
the money supply. You know, these people, these
people will always make excuses for their bad predictions, and
then they'll also tell you that it's it's coming anyway.
So here we go. Despite doom and gloom,
predictions of inflation and recession has been months since
Liberation Day, and inflation has continued to trend towards
an annualized, annualized rate not seen since President Trump's

(13:19):
first term. While a recent Council of
Economic Advisers analysis foundthat the prices of imported
goods are actually declining to the White House spokesperson.
OK, fine. Let's talk about the four
reasons that they cite here. What you're seeing listed on the
screen. Number one is tariffs aren't as
high as many people expected. Oh, so he did the really, really
bad thing that we were worried about, but that really, really

(13:41):
bad thing wasn't as bad as we thought it would be because
we're drab, you know, dramatic kind of hyper partisan fake
news. It's not so much a reaction to
the tariffs that have been low, but it's that the effective
tariff rates in priests has beenrelatively limited up until at
least June. So that's going to lead us on to

(14:03):
our second thing. The real story also is that
companies stocked up on the things because they knew the
tariffs were coming and they haven't burned through that
previous sort of reserve of products.
There was a big jump in imports from Canada that would later be
tariff before the tariff kicked in.
So they bought them prior to tariffs.
So the supply chain hasn't realized, you know, the tariff
costs. And so those haven't been pushed

(14:24):
onwards. But eventually, experts warn
retailers will exhaust those lower cost goods that were
imported earlier in the year. And that could, could people
remember possibilities lead to higher prices down the road.
So your two reasons so far are they weren't as high as we
thought and people bought stuff early so that they didn't
actually experience it. So you're not doing it.
Reason #3 potentially an excuse,retailers are actually just

(14:47):
eating the cost of additional tariffs for right now, which
means that they can afford to eat the cost and they're trying
to keep business. That might be true.
You know, people don't want to change prices.
For those of you that keep trackof certain things, you'll watch
that like prices won't just go up immediately.
What they'll do is they'll kind of like go up on a stair step.
So they won't be gradually increases by pennies.
They'll go three months, the same price.
And then you come in and try to go buy your favorite coffee

(15:08):
beans and, and they're 28 bucks instead of being 24 bucks and
you go like, oh, it was a $4.00 price.
I know what this normally costs.We know that the cream that we
buy is normally $9, but now it's1165 or whatever it is.
So you'll see that incremental increase.
So they'll eat the cost for a little while and then they'll
try to make it up with a price increase because they don't want
to continually to increase the price.
And then the last one is, is that eventually it will hit us,

(15:30):
but it just hasn't gotten there yet.
So just wait for it. So the bad news is coming.
Apparently, if you listen to ourfriends on the left, that's what
they always tell you. Just kind of interesting because
there were a lot of people that were freaking out about it.
For those of you that were watching Liberation Day, quote
UN quote, Liberation Day when the tariffs kicked in and you
bought into the market, you're probably up if you have an index
fund the way that I do. I'm not a big investor guy.

(15:50):
I don't have some sort of money genius in any way, but my all my
investments are up from that time period and they're actually
up historically from any time period.
So I think we're up maybe 10% onthe air.
So freaking out about an opportunity to buy in to
markets. The only problem is, is that a
lot of Americans, I don't think actually do.
I don't think they have that money to put into the market.

(16:12):
So there's a huge chunk of people that are not going to be
profiting from it. But if you're savvy, if you make
good decisions, this is something I talked about with
Joe Altman the other day, havingFU money, the ability to have FU
money, it's not so much that youhave like so much money that you
don't know what to do with it. It's that you have enough money
that you can say F you if someone comes at you in a bad
way. And the only way you do that is
by living responsibly. You know, I'm not a, a Dave

(16:34):
Ramsey guy per SE Like I, I don't think I've ever sat and
listened to anything Dave Ramseysaid for more than a few
minutes. But the principles of it is if
you don't owe anybody anything, then they can't demand anything
of you. That was my experience working
for the federal government. That's the problem with a lot of
these folks that work in the federal government.
We're actually going to cover that with the FBI agents
association at the end of the show here, which is that those

(16:54):
people, they're one paycheck away from selling you out to
Russia. They don't want to do it.
But they have the same answer that my that my, my boss had,
which happened in November of 2021.
It's like he's like, I agree with you.
You're correct. The things you're saying are
true and right. And, and I just can't afford to

(17:14):
agree with you out loud because I've got a mortgage, an alimony,
I owe money and some of my life decisions basically carry
forward so that my salary, if itgoes away, I'm screwed.
I got no other option. I got two years to retirement,
three years to retirement. By the way, all these themes
tend to go back to some of the things that I said the first
time I came out and spoke. For those of you that have been
like, I, I love this. I, I get this like Kyle Seraphin

(17:36):
is a chaos agent. That's my favorite.
I might actually change that to my bio chaos agent if chaos
agent means I say things that are I believe are true and
there's some significant evidence behind it that I can
back up. But it hurts your feelings.
And the reason I can say that isbecause I'm not beholden to
somebody to pay me a Twitter account or that I'm waiting for

(17:57):
Rumble revenues or things like that.
If you end up saying things thatare true and it hurts people's
feelings and like their responseis to attack not the message
that you have, but to just try to impugn your honor, your
dignity, they want to go after you with an ad hominem.
Somebody said, why do they always try to discredit you?
It happened in the CBS piece we covered yesterday morning.
It said Kyle Serafin speculated truthfully.

(18:18):
It turned out or, or, you know, it turned out to be true.
It's like it's not speculation. If it turned out to be true,
that was just accurate analysis.I'm going to give you some more
of that today. I'm going to give you more
accurate analysis. And the fact is, we could look
at the dollars, we can look at the we can look at the movement,
we can look at the names, we canlook at the the history.
We can just do rational analysison our own.

(18:40):
If we ask the right questions, we're going to come to the most
likely answers. So that's not like that's not
magic, that's not prognostication.
It's kind of like what you expect people to be able to do
as grown-ups, that they can leanon life experience and if they
have the right amount of data, then they can turn around and
have a pretty accurate assessment forecast of what's

(19:01):
coming next. It's like I'm watching there's
some Rd. signs and if the road signs tell me that there's going
to be a bend in the road next and it's going to, you know, 7°
incline, so engage your, your, your engine brake on your
diesel, then that's probably what you should do.
But if you can't read those things, then you're screwed.
I'm reading some of them stuff because I have access to
information, but all of you can read unless you're driving a

(19:23):
commercial truck, right? Did this happen?
The story is actually atrocious.I think it's one of the legacies
of the of the previous administration bringing in
1,000,000 and millions of peoplein this country, screwing us
over. And in this totally illogical
way. They thought they could bring in
all these people that didn't assimilate, didn't speak
English, didn't share our values, that we would somehow be

(19:45):
able to absorb them, pay them, clothe them, house them, and not
drive costs through the roof forall the people that were here
before. And then the worst part of it
is, is that some people actuallyare going to end up losing their
lives because you've actually introduced a previously
unforeseen danger. I'm reminded of the story of
Carlos Wolf. My buddy Phil Kennedy brought it

(20:06):
up the other day. He was one of the first FBI
agents that I heard was killed while I was working for the
Bureau, and he was killed just before Christmas.
And he was killed helping someone doing something that you
would want a good decent human being and a, and a civil servant
to actually engage in, you know,like have a, a service mindset.
He pulled over on the side of the road to try to change a tire

(20:27):
and he got hit by a drunk illegal alien.
That is something that could happen to anybody.
But if you're drunk and you're in my country illegally, you
shouldn't be there in the 1st place to be able to kill
citizens that are that are part of my community.
Ron DeSantis is now dealing withthis sort of situation.
He went on Jesse Waters show last night to talk about the

(20:49):
illegal Indian immigrant that got a commercial driver's
license. That's some of the biggest
responsibility you can have in our country.
You guys listen to this show a lot.
You know that truckers are some of my favorite people.
The reason is because they bringus all the stuff that we have.
I think it's critical and not all of them clearly, but many
truckers have the ability to be the most educated and well
informed and widely informed human beings in our society

(21:12):
because while they are doing their job, they can also consume
books on tape and podcasts and news and analysis and all kinds
of interesting things. And I find out regularly that
people who drive a truck for a living, especially long haul,
they know things that regular people should maybe know but
have no idea about because they've never had the time to
put 8 or 10 or 12 hours a day into their ears of information.

(21:33):
Maybe at 2X, maybe they're consuming 24 hours worth of
information in a single drive shift.
So that's pretty cool. It's cool if they can speak
English and they can read the signs and they do the job well
as well as listen and absorb that information.
It's not cool if they make illegal U turns because they
can't read for official use onlyand they don't know how to
signal and they turn from the wrong lane, cut across traffic

(21:54):
and decapitate people that are supposed to be alive today
because they shouldn't have beenkilled by someone who wasn't
even supposed to be in this country in the first place.
This is the Santas talking aboutthat.
Fornia, we had an issue where you had an illegal alien truck
driver that got a commercial drivers license in the state of
California employed by a California company.

(22:14):
Kill three people in Florida. This guy didn't even speak
English. We're bringing him up on
charges. He's going to face a lot.
And I can announce, Jesse, that I said initially the company
needs to be held accountable. And we've been working with the
federal government and they are pulling that company's license
to do business because you cannot employ somebody who

(22:35):
cannot read the road signs. That seems like a complete no
brainer to anybody. It's like, hey, can you operate
in this country by being able tounderstand what our signs mean?
Oh, no, you can't. Well, you can maybe Dr. Moped
and you can maybe drive an SUV. But should you be driving
something that has 18 wheels andand is measured in tons and

(22:55):
you're the heaviest, biggest, most dangerous thing on the
road? So simple, the answer should be
no. That makes me think about this
story here, which is about a former Biden aide.
You guys remember this guy, his name was Ian Sam's.
He looks like a human glow worm.He's basically like this little
worm shaped head with these little round glasses and he's
bald and then he's like the skinny little body, but he's
kind of awkwardly shaped. And he's going to go and testify

(23:18):
about Joe Biden and what the cover up of Biden's mental
decline looks like. This is ACNN report.
Another senior aide, former President Joe Biden, set to
testify. All of this stuff looks like
political theater to me, but it is a good reminder of like why
we have this stuff going on. And there's endless examples of
what was going wrong. When I was on yesterday with the

(23:39):
with Joe Altman, I went on to his, I think they're calling it
Untamed now, Untamed Nation. I went on his podcast and we
were talking about the March assessment, which is the thing
that you use to triage a critical trauma patient in the
field. So that's my background as a
paramedic. And the March assessment is very
simple. It's massive hemorrhage, it's
airway, it's respirations, it's circulation.

(24:01):
And then it's like hypothermia, head trauma, and you sort of
like work through the things. The key for the March
assessment, which is a triage protocol for emergency medics,
is that it is the order of operations that you must treat
problems because it is the orderof things that will kill you in
the order in which they will kill you.
The fastest way to die in the field, if you're not, you know,
immediately having wounds that are not compatible with life,

(24:23):
like if you lose your head or whatever, you take a traumatic
bullet wound or it stops your heart, then you could bleed out.
And so that's a fixable problem in the field, or at least it
could be delayed. We can do a tourniquet, we could
do a direct pressure bandage so you stop the bleed.
The second thing is you need to have a coherent and comp pedent
airway, which means there's no holes in it.
So it actually holds the air. And then the next thing is the
air has to actually move in and out and it has to actually go at

(24:45):
the cellular level and you have to have respiration.
So as you work through that acronym, you realize the things
that will kill you in the order they will kill you.
Our country needs to do that too.
This sort of like bread and circus, this theatrical
presentation where the House Oversight Committee brings in a
human glow worm and a suit. And then ask some questions
like, when did you know that your president was a complete
moron? And they'd be like, oh, like, he

(25:06):
was never a moron because nobodywants to incriminate themself.
Or maybe they take the 5th and say that they can't really say.
Or executive privilege because Iwork for this guy.
Does that solve any of the actual problems?
No, it's sternly written letters, it's hearings.
That is the outcome for these people.
They want to make it look like they're doing something.
If they were doing something, they would be addressing the

(25:26):
critical wounds to this country.And I tried to come up with what
they look like. And, and President Trump to his
benefit, we talked, we talked about it yesterday, has actually
mentioned, I think the single most critical deadly wound, the
massive hemorrhage, if you will,of the of the US system.
It's elections. So we need an acronym of how do

(25:47):
you face down the issues facing America and in what order will
they kill this current iterationof the Republic and move us into
whatever the next thing is? I think we're in a late stage of
this Republic anyway. I think everybody can see that
we've built up the scaffolding and we have financial problems
and we've actually eroded the original sort of foundational
doctrine. So we have more democracy and

(26:07):
less Republic and all that stuff.
I think really bad and I can talk about that ad nauseam, but
at the end of the day, if we don't have elections that
actually put the people that represent the people that are
living in this country and U.S. citizens specifically, if you
don't have that happening, it's over.
There's nothing left. What else you going to do?
So elections feels like that's the the massive hemorrhage

(26:28):
piece. And then the other one was kind
of like borders, which actually lined up very quickly with
airway. Again, a Peyton Airway means
there's a proper barrier betweeninside and outside of your body.
Borders equals the proper barrier between your country and
another country. You can't have things coming in
that don't belong in like that truck driver.
You can't have things going out.Who opened the borders?
You know, this guy's boss. We can remember that imported a

(26:50):
bunch of people in 100,000 Afghan refugees.
We're starting to see problems with them.
What the hell are they doing here?
They don't share our values. They don't want to assimilate.
They don't have any language skills.
They don't bring any. They don't add anything to us.
It's like, hey, you can breathe,but you're breathing in a room
that's completely full of nitrogen.
It's like you're going to die. Yeah, we need things that are

(27:10):
actually going to be valuable and actually going to add some
value. So let it be clear that I think
we need an acronym that says this is the order of operation.
And then we need to actually demand that of our politicians
and less of this theatrical thing where we're going to go
find out like whether or not this guy knew.
And it was, he was also part of Kamala Harris's campaign.

(27:30):
And we've had the White House physician who came in and took
the 5th, which is crazy because he thought he might actually
perjure himself or he might actually endanger himself when
it comes to saying things that would self incriminate.
You've got people saying, I don't recall any of this stuff.
A lot of these sort of like angles they play with.
There's some significant wounds that were inflicted in the last,

(27:55):
let's call it 10 years, but in the last four years we got to
see it and many of you guys werepart of that as well.
I'll just cover the story. I was going to put it towards
the end, but I, I think I'll actually do it real quick.
Now, how about this one? Some of you are going to be
really, really upset and I don'tmean to upset you, but there is
a copay for the new COVID shots coming out this fall that also
reminds me of the legacy of Joe Biden, the free COVID shots that

(28:16):
we all got to pay for. I just read another story
yesterday and it's from one of these accounts that constantly
reminds us that in 2021, some lady steps forward and says, I'm
a doctor and I treat cancer patients and I as an oncologist
think it's only responsible thatI get the COVID shots and I'm
pregnant and I would never want to endanger my baby.

(28:37):
And then you hear it like 1415 weeks later, miscarriage,
tragedy, lost child, all the devastation that comes along
with it. We've seen that like over and
over again. There's there's so many people
in my orbit that actually experienced that friends and
friends of friends where you're like, I can't prove that that
happened, that they were related, but damn it, it sure

(28:59):
looks like it. It sure looks awful.
And now you're finding out like this is a, this is an NBC story.
They're very upset about this. Some fall COVID shops may come
with co-pays or they won't be covered at all.
Why would that be? Because the new COVID vaccine
recommendation expected from theCDC could affect what the
insurers are willing to pay for.That kind of tells you something
really screwy about our government that they can make

(29:20):
recommendations and then the thing that you're paying into
doesn't actually decide it. Like how many of you want to be
covering that at all? I had questions previously on
this program and, and I get themin DMS and stuff.
People like talk about not having healthcare.
It's like, look, all you need todo is be able to afford what it
costs and be able to negotiate the cost.
If you're paying money to a company for coverage and that

(29:42):
coverage turns out to be more expensive on an annual basis
than you spend on healthcare, which is their business model,
then you're making somebody elsewealthy when you could have
invested that money yourself andjust held onto it.
Now there's a possibility of like a catastrophic injury,
right? And so you can actually mitigate
against that. You can put it medical payments
into your car insurance payments.

(30:02):
You can put that into your home insurance.
There's some things on there forinjuries and falls and stuff
like that. If that's the most dangerous
thing, If you're relatively young and you don't have health
conditions and you want to like ward off against trauma, great.
But if you're looking for managed care because you have
long term disabilities or diseases or, you know, lots of
prescriptions, all this other kind of stuff, then yeah, maybe

(30:22):
you need to be paying a health insurance company.
But what you should try to do istry to eliminate some of those
conditions. What are you doing outside of
taking a pill? And so this all goes to personal
responsibility. This all goes to the FUI have FU
health, I guess is what I would call it, because I haven't been
to a doctor in years. I have no idea.
I had my buddy who who's a physician.
He was like, what are your bloodnumbers look like when you went

(30:43):
on the car? The carnivore diet.
I'm like, I don't know, like what am I going to do with it?
Nothing. So I don't know.
I just go on how I feel. I feel fine.
I fell over the other day and I'm fine.
I have a bruise on my butt, but I'm OK.
I'm not injured. I'm 43 and I don't take any
medicines every day. That used to be really normal.
That used to be like the standard for this country.

(31:04):
And now the standard is if you're my age and you're a
military veteran, you go to the VA, they're confused and they
have to define to you what they mean when they say what meds do
you take every day? What medications and what
pre-existing conditions do you have?
I'm like none that I'm aware of.I have allergies.
I have less of that even. I don't even take, I don't even
take allergy pills very often. So if you can encourage that

(31:24):
longer, then you can save money longer and you're less in these
problems. You have to worry less about
inflation because when inflationhits, you're like, that's OK.
I'm insulated against that. It sucks.
Nobody wants things to be costing more, but, and that's
something. So those of you that are really
excited about the fall COVID shots, I'm sorry that the copay
may come along with it or you may have to pay for them all out
of your pocket. I wonder what they cost.

(31:45):
If anybody gets a COVID shot in this audience, And I am not
judging you. I don't care if you do or not.
It's whatever you want. Please let me know what it costs
to pay out of pocket if there's no coverage whatsoever, because
I'm not going to find that in the mainstream.
I promise you that I will not. But I want to know.
So let's let's maybe do that before we get further on.
How about another thing you can sort of insulate yourself

(32:06):
against? This is the other disease in our
society. Ubiquitous technical
surveillance, I think would be the way we would call it.
That's what they called it when I worked in the FBI.
It's something I ward off with this little bag.
I've got a couple of them and I've got some other products as
well, including a full backpack that's waterproof.
Your phone is a tracking device.Government agencies and big tech
and corporate data brokers and cyber criminals and other

(32:27):
scumbags, they all want a piece of your digital footprint.
Everybody wants a piece of your money or they want a piece of
where you've been and what you're up to so they can sell it
and make more money and they don't have to ask.
They just take it because it's in the terms of service.
So you can also ward off againstthat.
You can use those cell phones because they're very convenient,
but you can also hide your stuffwith Silent.
It's SLNT. That's the website
slnt.com/kyle. Use promo code Kyle.

(32:49):
Kyle at checkout. You'll save 15%, which will come
out to a significant amount of money.
He'll save you like 50 bucks on one of their backpacks.
Are they cheapest? No.
Are they really well made and thought out?
They really are. They've got some cool buckles
that I've never even seen beforeand I'm a gear guy.
Magnetic stuff that snaps together.
They've got these sort of fast tech clips that are unlike
others. I think all the stuff they make
is very thoughtful. It is well laid out and it's a

(33:10):
good product. Now, that means you're going to
pay a little, a lot of money forit, including the one like you
see on the screen right now, theeveryday E3 backpack, huge fan
of it, has two different Faradaysleeves in it.
But when you drop your stuff in there, your Faraday products
going to block all the wireless signals, which is sick.
It's cellular and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth and and GPS and RFID
and NFC, near field communication, all the things

(33:30):
that can go out there and be used to steal your data or track
you. And that's a lot of things.
And there's more as well. No tracking, no signal means you
don't have to take the battery out.
You don't have to turn it off. This is what special operations
and counterintelligence investigators use to block
signals and try to keep their sources safe.
You guys can have the same technology at your house, same
stuff the United States Air Force is using.
If you want a very compliant version of it because you're in

(33:51):
a either a military unit or you're in a government contract,
you can do that as well. Super cool people.
The founders of bro. He was on the screen a second
ago. Slnt.com slash Kyle silent.com
slash Kyle. Save 15% link in the show
description below. And yeah, go silent.
Get yourself invisible to the outside world.

(34:11):
There's a lot of, like, scumbagsout there that are trying to
figure out what you're up to. How about this scumbag?
Should we do this real quick? Gavin Newsom, you guys are going
to be shocked. This is the redistricting sort
of like backlash. They were doing the
redistricting situation in Texas.
And then we had this whole theatrical presentation where a
bunch of Democrats decided to break quorum and they ran off to
Washington, DC. Oh, that's like the second time

(34:31):
because this time they actually ran off to Illinois, right.
And so Gavin Newsom, who clearlyis trying to position himself as
a leader in this sort of broken,jacked up underwater Democrat
party, decided he was going to also he's going to be a thought
leader. He was like, well, if they can
do it, we're going to do it. And here in California, we're
going to we're going to take thelargest population.
I don't know if it's still the case today in 2025, but

(34:52):
historically over the last like 15 or 20 years, California has
been blue but has had the most number of Republican voters
anywhere. They just have more Democrat
voters because they have a huge population.
And so you're, you're Democrats massively or just, you know,
outnumber in the right areas the, the, the Republicans, but
you still got a bunch of sort ofsquishy Republicans out of

(35:14):
California historically. And so he wants to go ahead and
disenfranchise those people because we don't care about
fairness. What we care about is winning.
You know, you got to give it to people on the left.
California decided they are not going to stop Gavin Newsom with
his redistricting plans. They decided that it was
constitutional according to the California Constitution or
whatever, if they even look at that sort of thing, Says the
Supreme Court is not going to prevent Democrats from moving

(35:36):
forward with a Thursdays plan toredraw congressional districts.
Republicans in the Golden State have asked the state's High
Court to step in and temporarilyblock these redistricting
efforts, saying that Democrats are racing to put the plan
forward on the ballot this year.And they've skirted a rule
requiring state lawmakers to wait at least 30 days before
passing newly introduced legislations.
But don't worry about the rules.We saw this during COVID, didn't
we? We have an emergency on our

(35:58):
hands. We have an emergency that Texas
is trying to do something, so weneed to do it, too.
We have to answer. And it is our job as Democrats
to just get it done. In a ruling late Wednesday, This
was last night, court declined to act, riding that Republican
state lawmakers who had filed the suit had failed to meet
their burden for establishing a basis for relief at this time.

(36:20):
It's the classic you don't have standing situation.
The thing that you think might happen hasn't happened yet.
And so therefore we will not intervene until that thing
happens. And by the time it does happen,
you'll already be irrevocably damaged and there'll be no way
to make it right. But that's the point in the 1st
place. Thanks for the theater
California. We really appreciate it.
In different theater. You've got Texas, which has a

(36:43):
GOP friendly map that was just passing the Texas House after
all that nonsense. The only thing I really took
away from this article, which iscoming from ABC, is that Texas
has a cartoonishly large gavel. Are they all that big?
I feel like I've seen Nancy, Nancy Pelosi's gavel and it's
like normal sized wooden hammer.That thing is like a like a
cartoon sledgehammer. You guys seen that on the

(37:05):
screen? What you are seeing is the the
what do. You call it the Texas.
House Speaker, his name is Dustin Burrows, he's out of
Lubbock and they are overseeing the debate for these redrawn
congressional maps that are going to be supposedly favoring
Republicans. I guess we'll see how it goes
because people still have a choice when they get to go vote.
It has the potential of flipping5 districts read by merging a

(37:26):
Democratic seat in Houston and in Austin and in Dallas, Fort
Worth, into areas to form newly Republican leaning seats, at
least by their polling, and making two of the RGV Rio Grande
Valley districts that are currently held by Democrats more
competitive to Republicans. So the people that might be
dealing with this are Democrats.Al Green, who is that world
class guy that we see walking around with a cane and looking

(37:48):
like a CRO Magdon. Mark Vessey, who I don't know
very well, Julie Johnson, Greg Caesar.
And then my former Rep Lloyd Doggett, who I am not a big fan
of and really never have been, but his office used to be down
the street from me. So that's what's going to
happen. We've got them passing that on
to the state Senate. They had some sort of back and
forth and then I guess if it goes through, we'll find out
whether all of this theater actually results in new maps and
there's probably a decent chancethat it does at this point.

(38:10):
All right, that's kind of the the piece of it.
I also wanted to play sort of the people that are getting it
done, the sort of de weaponized version of it.
We played a little clip, I thinkyesterday, but I want to play it
one more time. Tulsi Gabbard talking about the
problem. What I want you to reflect on
with the problem of the federal,the bigger the federal picture
and the ongoing premise of this program is that elections,

(38:33):
borders, I think those are definitely like, those are
definitely immediate kills. And as you work down the line,
somewhere in the acronym, the intelligence community needs to
fit into our acronym and the fact that we have an
unaccountable unelected bureaucracy that does
investigations for purposes thatthey lay out and they self
congratulate themselves. They say we saw a threat and we

(38:55):
mitigated said threat, and we didn't even have to follow the
Constitution to do it because we're using tools that are
outside of a constitutional scope, which should not exist.
We're going to use things like violations of the 1st Amendment.
And violations of the 4th Amendment is the same stuff.
I just told the CBS reporter theother day.
The FBI is part of a broader community of people that are
interested in intelligence, but they don't do nothing with the

(39:18):
intelligence. They make actionable actions.
And Tulsi Gabbard is now the director of national
intelligence, and she is tellingus that she's seen these things.
The danger is if she's telling us it is probably not
prosecutable. This goes to that Billy Madison
moment where he he and Chris Farley, it's, it's Adam Sandler
and and Chris Farley and Chris Farley's the bus driver in Billy

(39:39):
Madison, right. And he goes, he goes, Oh yeah.
You know, we're that Veronica Vaughn.
Like we used to get it on or whatever.
And he was like, no, you didn't.And he was like, but you know,
like, you can imagine how cool it would be if we did.
That's kind of what we've been hearing.
If you've got the the ODNI, the Office of Director of National
Intelligence is sharing the information about all the bad

(40:00):
things that have done. I hope she's correcting them.
It sounds like she might. We got an announcement on that
as well. But Tulsi telling you that she's
working on de weaponizing means that you're not going to likely
see criminal prosecutions again if you had the case, you drop
the indictments. If you don't have the case, then
you make the narrative case to the American people.
This is the analysis. It's the same analysis and why I

(40:20):
think Cash Patel is on his way out at the FBI, which I told
people yesterday on this program, I told Alex Jones, and
I'm going to play you a 5 minuteclip that I think makes a very
tight argument. Why?
It's simple analysis. You guys can agree or not agree,
but you have to at least take inwhat I'm saying and then debunk
the facts part of it. In this case, if you had the
indictments, which is historically a thing, then you

(40:41):
would get them. If you had the fact patterns
that would result in probable cause to arrest, then I think
they would go and do that. There is a huge public appetite
to see accountability, at least on the political right, which is
who they're playing to that base.
People that are on social media,people that watch Fox News,
people that watch sort of the Con Inc, if you will, podcast
networks. They would do what those people

(41:02):
want. You don't need to float out an
idea and make sure that it's OK.If people on the left were going
to riot, they're going to riot for whatever they're going to
riot for anyway. So you don't need to float that.
You don't have to tease it out there.
Tulsi Gabbard talking about the hoax again.
If she's talking about it, it tells me no indictments pending.
If you go to OD. Ni.gov people who say, well,

(41:26):
Tulsi, this is just your view oryour interpretation.
No, it's all in hundreds of pages of documents that I've
declassified and released that show point by point exactly what
happened through this timeline that showed this very dangerous
thing that occurred in the creation of Russia Gate, the
creation of this manufactured intelligence assessment that

(41:49):
essentially had the intent of undermining the voices and votes
of the American people who elected Donald Trump.
They were not happy with the outcome of that election.
And so they created this politicized, weaponized piece of
fake intelligence that, as you mentioned, then went on to serve
as a foundation for everything that came after the multiple

(42:09):
investigations, the years long Mueller investigation. 2
Congressional impeachments, investigations in the raid at
Mar a Lago, the list goes on andon.
Ultimately, the real crime here was against the American people
because this action singularly undermined the integrity of our
Democratic Republic. What to speak of the fact that

(42:30):
some of those folks in those 37 individuals that we revoked
directed the revocation of security clearances from today
by under the direction of President Trump.
They aided and abetted in this action this seditious conspiracy
that that undermined our democracy, undermined our
Republic, and broke that sacred trust that every one of these

(42:54):
professionals is supposed to have from the American people.
Remember. E elections thing, number one,
yeah, it totally needs to be done.
Do we think that it's actually an indictable offense?
I don't think so, because I've seen what national security
investigations look like and I've seen what those what those
prosecutions look like. They immediately.

(43:17):
Hold on to they gather up and they make you get a special
attorney who's read in and has asecurity clearance and they
declassify them at, you know, only at the end when they know
that they're going to have to goto trial, when they're not going
to get a plea. Because at the end of the day,
they don't want to actually do that.
They don't want to declassify all the information.
The intelligence agencies don't,the prosecutors don't.
It's a tool. It costs more.

(43:38):
The process is part of the punishment by needing a special
national security lawyer who hasa clearance that cost you more
money. And then again, the end of the
day, they don't want to give that information up because it
sets bad precedent if you are declassifying it preemptively
and not bringing charges right away.
This is my analysis. It tells me they don't have it.
So the best thing that you can do on top of that is maybe go

(43:59):
out there and maybe you can go and just start dismantling this
weapon. And I think that's good.
Again, intelligence agencies is in my acronym somewhere.
I would like to figure out what it is.
This is what you do. You go and you take it apart.
This is an ABC story. They don't seem very happy about
it. Tulsi Gabbard announced plans to
reorganize her agency. Cut the staff by half.

(44:20):
There's one more thing she doesn't know.
I'm going to let her say what she's doing.
And then I'm going to add some things which I've shared on
social media. And I do hope that it gets
broader. I have a volunteer who's willing
to help her do it too. Let's go ahead and play what she
said. This was on Jesse Waters last
night. So this is Part 2 of that
argument. Fast forward to where we are.
Today, OD and I is more than doubled in size.
It is bloated with bureaucracy. It is rife with politicization,

(44:44):
weaponization, the very thing that it was created to try to
prevent and get after. And unfortunately, it has failed
to meet its mandate. And so this launch today of ODNI
2 Point O, as you said, we will save taxpayers more than $700
million every year, cutting the organization by over 40% and

(45:05):
making sure that those who are working at the office of the
Director of National Intelligence are aggressively
getting after our core mission, which is really ensuring the
safety, security and freedom of the American people.
The one thing that I'm not sure.That she knows is that all of
the intelligence analysts at theplaces that we're still trying

(45:27):
to deal with and we're not seeing success in specifically
the FBI, but sort of that DOJ cadre, they all.
Belong to OD and I. They all answer at least in the
job description, at least in thethe like their their mission set
is actually assigned by OD and I.
And so if we were doing it properly and cash Patel doesn't
want to do it, but they can, They get paid by the FBI, but

(45:48):
they work for the priorities of OD and I and the Director of
National Intelligence AKA Tulsi Gabbard.
So she could. Fix that right away.
And a friend of our show and very technically minded
individual, a solution oriented guy, George Hill, he said he'd
be willing to go work for free to help pull those Intel
analysts, the intelligence component out of national law

(46:08):
enforcement so that we could actually have a law enforcement
agency just do law enforcement. And that would defang one of the
most scary things that exists, which is that you have this
unconstitutional authority to tolook into things.
And I don't care if you're doingit outside the United States.
Let the CIA do the CIA thing. If the NSA is looking at foreign
individuals, great. If they're able to like capture
things because they use domesticcapabilities to find bad guys

(46:30):
that are outside the US, fine. It should not be in the hands of
law enforcement. You shouldn't give people who
have a badge and a gun and the ability to come and put cuffs on
you a warrantless search into your emails and into your into
your private communications. It's a violation of the 4th
Amendment just on the way that anormal person would read it.
So I don't care what the courts have to say.
If you go look back at the original document and normal

(46:51):
people read it, you would see that what they do today through
FISA, through seven O 2 FISA, through incidental collection,
through reverse targeting, through all the other sort of
capabilities that we've given tokeep us safe those.
Things could be removed. What you won't find,
unfortunately, is a group of people that work in those jobs

(47:12):
interested in your personal safety and security and they
don't give a shit about your civil liberties.
How do you know that, Kyle? Because what I remember.
When I got there at the FBI is that they said that our number
one responsibility was rigorous,rigorous obedience to the
Constitution. Let me read you this excerpt

(47:34):
from a sternly worded letter by the FBI Agents Association,
which is a group of leftists that quote, UN quote, represent
FBI agents and not even that many, it turns out.
I'm going to read you the first paragraph and you tell me where
you see a problem. It's in the 1st freaking
sentence. This is what's her name?
Nicole Barra, I think, she says.I am the president.

(47:57):
Of the FBI Agents Association, FBI AA, which represents more
than 14,000 active and retired FBI special agents.
All right, Well, there are about14,000 active special agents in
the FBI right now, so they don'teven represent all the people in
the FBI, and they have some retired members as well.
So that's all silly. Our mission is to safeguard the

(48:18):
careers. I'm just going to take a full
stop right there. Allow me to lean back for a
second. Our mission is to safeguard the
careers, welfare and integrity. I don't even know what that part
means of rank and file special agents so they can effectively
protect the American people. Who told you that you had the
ability? Forget like the mandate.

(48:38):
Who told you that you ever had the ability to enact this
mission? And why would we care?
Would a group that is only interested in safeguarding the
careers and welfare of the public servants?
Isn't that kind of what you're supposed to do?
You're supposed to step up and say service before self
Fidelity, braggory, integrity. I'm going to follow what the
Constitution says, even to the detriment of my career.

(48:59):
No, we actually saw this mentality play out in real time.
The FBI decided that what was good for the FBI was good for
the FBI, and that's what we're willing to do.
And that means getting rid of people that didn't want to get
COVID shots. It means going after Trump
supporters because that's where the money was.
It means. Declaring domestic.
Terrorists of people that were involved in a street fight that
had nothing to do with race, because that's where our funding

(49:22):
comes from. And what's good for the FBI is
good for us, which means we can,quote UN quote, protect the
American people. But first we're going to take
care of our careers and our welfare and some sort of
nebulous concept of integrity which is non realistic.
It's not good. When that's what your move is
and all these people are very upset about Kyle Seraphin.

(49:42):
If you guys don't know, that's what this is stemming from the
the the skulls that we started with the predator sort of
analogy. That's where it comes from.
Let me show you. This is a Newsweek article.
You guys want to see what it waslike publicly talked about.
This was from where's this Newsweek article from?
I cut the date off it one secondhere.
It comes from July 8th of this year and it's written by someone
called Nick Moore Dewonkey, Is that right?

(50:03):
Morda Wan neck, Morda Wanic. I like that name.
All right, so Nick Morda Wanic writes Kyle Serif.
And a former FBI agent and federal whistleblower predicts
that the Bureau will have a major shake up in the coming
year, in part due to how Cash Patel and Deputy director Dan
Bongino have dealt with the investigation into the
convicted, late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
In part, what did I say at the time?
I think Dan Bongino's gone by the end of the year on Alex

(50:26):
Jones's show on Monday. So that happened in the
beginning of July. I actually said it to him in
March. So you guys know and we set it
off air. I said I think that was true
before. I think it also means Patel
doesn't make it past the midterms if they want to switch
somebody over. I think it could actually be
sooner than that. And so I'm going to give you
guys the take. This is a 5 minute video clip.
It is longer than normal, but since it's mostly my voice, I
feel like it's appropriate for this podcast.

(50:47):
This is something you guys should look.
I want your analysis back on what I'm asking and the, and
the, the information that we're laying out.
If you don't think it's true, then you should have reasons.
Not Kyle Seraphim's a chaos agent or I don't like his voice
or that guy has always been a Dick and he doesn't like Dan
Bongino. Those aren't reasons.
Listen to the the logical argument and then feel free to
disagree with me because if I thinking is off, I would like to

(51:07):
correct it, but I don't see it being otherwise.
And by the way, this is flying around the FBI right now 'cause
FBI agents who I've never heard of are calling up friends of
mine saying if you heard this like CAS Patel's on his way out.
I think the logical and the and the safe money is on that.
All right before we play the video, which I'm going to do in
like 5 seconds Spotify ad break you guys will get it right now
it's. About 53 minutes.

(51:29):
There we go. OK.
So video number six, this is Alex Jones and I yesterday.
By the way, never to be outdone,Alex Jones is Mr. Hype.
So you guys will laugh about this because breaking exclusive.
Breaking exclusive. Breaking exclusive.
Breaking exclusive Breaking exclusive.

(51:50):
Missouri. AG Andrew Bailey being brought
in for the future replacement ofFBI Director Cash Patel.
So Kyle Server, you got the floor.
Start over. You've got a guy who was in the.
Running to be the director of the FBI prior to Cash Patel
being named and nominated by Donald Trump.

(52:11):
That's Part 1. You've got a guy that is
currently the attorney general of a American state.
He's the top law enforcement official and he was elected as
such. And he's been doing good work,
as you said. He's also standing in a job as
AG where his predecessor became AUS senator.
So that AG job launched his predecessor into national

(52:33):
federal office. Do we think that a man like
Andrew Bailey is going to step into the number 2 shared
position at the FBI? That's never been done.
I think the first argument that makes that really easy, there's
no way there's an overlap period.
Then we're going to slowly see Dan Bongino disappear.
I'm not even sure if there's even going to be an overlap, but
it's going to at least be the optics of, you know, we've got

(52:55):
this under control. We don't need to.
We need one. If you have a job and your boss
brings in another guy to do the job with you, does it mean that
you're doing an awesome job? Are you really fulfilling the
mission set if we need a second person to do your job?
The answer is no. And now you're going to double
up on the deputy director job. That makes zero sense to
anybody. And like I said, there's no way

(53:17):
a guy leaves the top office in Missouri as an elected official
to become a political appointee.That's not congressionally
approved. So that's Part 1.
The second argument is the reason Dan Bongino is
unsuccessful as a deputy director is because he doesn't
know the FBI. And that's not his fault.
He just didn't work for the FBI.So you wouldn't expect him to
know the FBI. He doesn't know who's been
stabbing who in the back, who avoided Office of Professional

(53:39):
Responsibility investigations, who hitched their wagons to
which managers and how those things have progressed.
He doesn't know who's hiding from from responsibility over
the last four years. He doesn't know where they've
been and who they know and what they do and what sort of
conspiratorial things have been going on.
So, you know, the FBI is a of fraternity.
If you show up day one and thinkyou're going to clean it out,
but nobody wants to talk to you or tell you the secrets, you're

(54:01):
not going to be successful. In that same argument.
And this is the biggest argumentwhy I think Bailey is actually
going to end up taking over the FBI.
You're not going to have Andrew Bailey step in as a prosecutor,
as a former AG and go into a jobwhere Bongino has been
unsuccessful by not knowing the FBI.
And then you got Andrew Bailey and he also doesn't know the
FBI. So the job of the FBI director

(54:23):
is very clear. It's to give oversight, to give
vision, to give direction, and to sort of like layout.
These are the policies and procedures I'd like to see
executed. The job of the deputy is to go
execute those policies and procedures.
If you don't know how to turn the screws on the people that
work in your agency, you cannot be successful.
Bongino was already in that scenario.
I'm empathetic to the fact that if you don't know the FBI, it's

(54:47):
unrealistic to think you'd come in and fix it.
But that same problem holds truefor Andrew Bailey.
So then you have to look at the Trump administration and say,
are they absolutely crazy? Are they going to do 2 things
the wrong way and think they're going to get a different result?
You know, that's the definition or Einstein's definition of
insanity. You keep doing the same thing
and expect a different result. You cannot put in a non FBI
person in the deputy role and think you're going to get

(55:07):
something different. So the analysis goes, one guy's
not doing his job well, you've now added the second guy.
That's a soft, slinking exit. He's going to disappear.
And like I said, I told you it'dbe before Christmas, that he
would be, you know, back in the podcast chair at the beginning
of next year. It might even be sooner.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was predicted to me 6.
Months ago, like a month in, that both would be gone.

(55:28):
And even CBS News, which is a scary thing because you know,
the deep state has a long memory.
It gives you all the credit and goes over the timeline that
you've been calling all of this you.
Haven't made a prediction. Yet that hasn't come true yet.
So it plus it all makes sense. So he's logical, but Cash
Patel's gone. So that looks like a good sign.

(55:49):
And then I ask you, I mean, I know who he is.
I'm falling as close as you, butAndrew Bailey looks like he's
pretty smart. That's one of the toughest guys
going after corruption and the deep stage, so put put a fine
point. On that, because Andrew Bailey,
does he have to be the best prosecutor?
No, because you're the attorney general, you don't go try cases.
That's not your job. What you have to be is the most
savvy person and the most principal person for the

(56:11):
argument that's being made by some of the MAGA folks right now
is that, well, they need a good prosecutor as the number 2 at
the FBI. You can't articulate that and
also be a sensible person because the FBI doesn't
prosecute cases. These are our priorities.
These are the things we're goingto put our resources into.
These are the programs we're going to get rid of.
This is the personnel I want handling this stuff.
So if you're going to move somebody who's clearly savvy and
as you said, Ken Paxton, Andrew Bailey, probably the two of the

(56:34):
of the of the, you know, 50 attorney generals that have
prominence and specifically prominence to people on the
political right. You're looking at a guy that's
smart, that's savvy, that's got the right background, military
experience and all that kind of thing, and you're going to have
him jump into what, like a number two job?
I don't see it happening. So saying that Cash Patel is
very likely out is where the smart money is right now.
And I actually think it's Annette good.

(56:55):
It might give us another opportunity.
Us being like people who want tosee accountability for the
federal government, another chance to touch that animal that
is the FBI and reassert authority.
Real simple stuff. Yeah, I love it.
I watched our chat while you guys are watching that that
little clip and the the number one thought was that people like
the blazer. Should I wear a blazer in the

(57:18):
morning and that would that makeyou guys happy?
I could do that. I put that in your comments
below. Does Kyle Servin need to be
wearing a blazer to be able to speak authoritatively on things?
I could do it. It wouldn't be terrible.
I've got enough Blazers to swap through you.
You. I just, I don't see any weather
way around this stuff. OK, I don't see how you can and
figure this out. And, and if you guys have a

(57:39):
different argument, then please make it.
But I'm already hearing this is fun.
I'll tell this right now. I've had now 2 separate sources
tell me this morning Bongino waspacking up his office.
So Part 1 of my supposition thatthe code deputy directorship is
not real. I don't know when they're going
to announce that he's gone, but my guess is he probably doesn't
even show up to work anymore. And would you they're bringing

(57:59):
somebody in, you're there replacing you.
Like how humiliating you went ineight years of big talk, found
out that you didn't have the chops to do the thing because
they put you in a position to fail.
I can diplomatically say that very truly, he was not set up to
be successful. They probably thought he was,
but they should have asked somebody who knew a little bit
about the FBI, and they're not hopefully going to make the same
stupid decision. You don't put another person in

(58:21):
to fail the same way. It's not a great idea.
And I don't think Bailey is dumb.
And that's the real problem. Do you think Bailey's going to
go in there and be a nobody? Can any of you name the last
four deputy directors of the FBIand where they've gone?
I mean, I can, but I worked for the FBI, so I actually worked
for some of these guys. Can you other than Andy McCabe
maybe because he went on and nowhe's a, a commentator and kind

(58:42):
of a a bookworm looking nerd standing there doing leftist
commentary at NBC and MSNBC. Can any of you name them?
Because I doubt it. Most of you don't know who Paul
Bate was, even though he was thevillain for the last little
while. Most of you probably don't know
David Bowditch, right? And then, like I said, maybe you
know Andy McCabe. So you got Dan Bocchino.

(59:02):
He's was a name beforehand. But if you put in a no name,
people wouldn't know who he was.He wouldn't be constantly
referenced. He was held up.
He's like this guy. He's like, he talked about it
and now he's going to go do it, but he can't because he doesn't
know we've been lying to him. So I promise you guys that we
got three names. One of them is Vanessa Tibbett.
So I don't want to, like, overplay it, but we told you
about her. She was a special assistant to
Chris Wray. You know, the real last guy that

(59:24):
Trump put in that office. If you want to make the argument
of an Achilles heel, it exists for Donald Trump.
In the DOJ, he's had bad picks there and in the FBI, he's had
bad picks there. He's had two.
And both of them are ineffective.
Very clearly, the guy who flies around, wears AT shirt, hangs
out with the operators, puts this thing out.
This was something that was released by Cash Patel

(59:44):
yesterday. This is really embarrassing too.
FBI top 10 most fugitive, you know, most wanted fugitives.
Cindy Rodriguez Singh captured. We got her.
We got her in. July The.
FBI put her on the list. Remember I told you that the Top
10 Most Wanted Fugitive list is a FBIPR tool?
It was created to make you look like you're doing some great

(01:00:06):
work. Cindy Rodriguez Singh.
Was put on the top 10 most wanted under the the belief that
she was fleeing or had already fled to India.
And so she was put on there for AU FAP, an unlawful flight to
avoid prosecution. It was a capital murder charge,
which means it's a state charge for homicide.
And then the unlawful flight to avoid prosecution means that

(01:00:27):
she's fled the area. The funny thing is that she
didn't flee the area. She was actually caught in
Texas. She's from Dallas, but they
thought she was in India. OK, so she was put on in July
and she was arrested this week. It's August.
I'll do the math real quick. In my head, it's like June,
July, August. Oh, like a month later.

(01:00:48):
You think they didn't know whereshe was?
Or they didn't have a pretty good idea where they were?
This is how it works. This is what propaganda looks
like, folks. You take somebody that you know
you're going to catch eventually, you put them on the
list most wanted, and then you catch them a little while later
after everybody forgot they're on the list.
Except the Internet's forever soI could find it super easy.
So she was there. So this is fake.
This is not like this is what I voted for.
How about this also, which showsyou a captured FBI director?

(01:01:11):
Do you guys remember Lavoie Finicum?
He was at the standoff of the wildlife preserve with the
Bundys. This goes.
Back to I think 20. 16 in January, it was winter and he
was shot and he was shot by Oregon State Police.
And as I understand it, 'cause I'm not an expert on that thing
and I definitely didn't get likedeep into the weeds on it, but
apparently he basically drove upto a roadblock and then got out.

(01:01:33):
And there was some sort of problematic issue where he like
made a furtive gesture, which isa way to get shot.
Or he reached into his jacket and he had a con or something
like that. But he was shot by, I think
Oregon State Police, but he alsohad some shots that were fired
by a hostage rescue team. And there's all kinds of weird
stuff that happened with this thing.
And I like I said, the details of it are not 100% in my, my
memory, but folks that were paying attention to it.

(01:01:55):
I have a friend who was in the room when this award was handed
out. FBI Director Cash Patel gave out
a bravery medal for the agents involved in shooting a guy when
there was like 10 of them and they are Tier 1 operators and
he's 1. Like, you know, senior citizen,
local yokel who had like a handgun and the claim that's
being made in the award ceremonywas that he rammed the vehicle

(01:02:17):
of the federal agents, pinned a federal agent underneath it, and
they had to shoot him to be ableto like put him down.
And so therefore, it was justifiable.
There's a lot of questions aboutthat because there's actually
video footage of this. And I think there's drone
surveillance and some of the drone surveillance sees like
some real weird stuff. As I recall, the story was, is
that HRT guys were seen scrambling looking for brass
because no brass was found. There was an allegation that he

(01:02:37):
perjured himself, one of the shooting agents who was given
this award. And so they were standing there
getting this proud medal for bravery 10 years after the fact,
whitewashing that a dude who wasshot.
And maybe it was justifiable homicide, but you don't lie
about your shot when you're an FBI agent.
And you sure as shit shouldn't be doing that if you're a
hostage rescue guy. Those guys are supposed to be
the best at what they do. But remember what they did

(01:03:00):
right? Away.
The first thing that Cash Patel did is he got involved in that
office. He immediately went down to the
hostage rescue selection. He immediately started watching
all the cool guy bro stuff. Allegedly, he has a locker.
At the Hostage Rescue Team's. Facilities with all of his
personal weapons. He's got his own kit and shit in
there in case he wants to like tack up and be a cool guy and
jump in the helicopter. I mean how freaking
embarrassing. That's not what an FBI director

(01:03:22):
does. So at least in an Andrew Bailey,
I hope that he would wear a suitand do the job of FBI director
instead of whatever this like make a Wish Foundation nonsense.
It is. Remember CAS Patel told you
right after the Epstein stuff? Conspiracy theories aren't just
just aren't true and they never have been.
This was not specifically about Epstein, but this was about
Epstein. It's been an honor to serve

(01:03:42):
President Donald Trump and I'll continue to do so for as long as
he calls on me. That might not be that much
longer, folks. And as I said, I'm going to give
you a couple of names. One of them is Jill Enyart.
She was the alleged honeypot that went after the Trump
administration. She still works for the FBI.
Kash Patel immediately ran coverfor her as well.
And isn't that something now? Why did he run cover for her?

(01:04:03):
What I found, and this took somedoing folks, because it took
yesterday, this is in some Chineseium like website copy
system. New FBI whistleblower
disclosures identify agent assigned to infiltrate Donald
Trump's campaign in 2015. A new whistleblower disclosure
identified agent Jill Enyart as one of the investigators
assigned to infiltrate Donald Trump's presidential campaign as

(01:04:24):
early as 2015 as part of the offthe books operation launched by
then FBI Director James Comedy. You guys remember this.
You're like, holy crap, there were two honeypot operations.
I've got the specifics of what that looks like.
I know what that whistleblower disclosure was about.
And Jill Enyart still works for the FBI and senior management.
She apparently was either the section chief or the assistant
section chief. So that would be the level that

(01:04:45):
we saw Steve Jensen or just below it, the number two there
in a counterintelligence group that was doing this operation.
And she apparently went over with some nominally backstop,
which means they didn't have allthe paperwork filled out
properly, got an off the books operation to go out there and
approach the campaign and then did the same thing in London.
There's all kinds of details that are very specific from
people that were in a position to know about it.

(01:05:05):
And cash immediately poo pooed it to the point where The
Washington Times, who originallypublished this with Carrie
Pickett, pulled the article. If you go look for it now, if
you go find their true social post, it links to nothing.
Four O 4 not found, but the internet's forever.
And there's an ongoing lawsuit. About this because this
whistleblower disclosure which went forward early on as as cash

(01:05:28):
walked in, it immediately resulted in a lawsuit from the
from the from the attorneys thatare representing the
whistleblowers that brought thisforward because it was claimed
that it was garbage. That seems problematic.
It also. Means that your FBI director and
Deputy director are leaning on right leaning media to pull
stories, including this one. And who are they listening to?

(01:05:48):
They're listening to guess what?Vanessa Tibbetts, who's a really
good friend of Jill Enyard. Because female agents who came
up together in senior managementtend to know each other.
As far as I know, Jill actually lives in New York.
She might actually be one of thesenior administrators in the FB
is office there. I can't tell if she's in Los
Angeles or New York, but the open sources that I see shows
her name as being a 48 year old female agent living in New York

(01:06:11):
City. OK.
So now you have two. They were involved.
In the counterintelligence. Operation into who?
George Papadopoulos, Remember this guy?
He said he thought it goes back to 2015.
It sounds like at least it went back to 2016, but maybe earlier.
TIBBITS, Vanessa Tibbetts, again, the special assistant for

(01:06:32):
Chris Wray for strategy and operations.
I've got all of her information.And by the way, this would take
nothing to find out who these people are.
All you'd have to do is go look for anybody that was promoted in
the last, let's say, 12 months at the FBI, pull the 950 fours,
which is their internal and sometimes classified resume.
And all you got to do is do a keyword search for things like

(01:06:53):
Trump, Mar a Lago, counterintelligence, Plasmic,
echo. There's like a dozen search
terms you could do. You could pull out every single
person that was involved in that.
You should also grab all the special assistance to all the
senior people that you fired. And those people should also be
on the hook. They should all be interviewed
and they should probably never be in a senior position again.
But instead we've got Cash Patelgaslighting us and saying that
they've got this all handled. It took me about 3 hours

(01:07:16):
yesterday to come up with three names.
I'll give you the last one afterthis.
Here's Kash Patel saying we handled it because he's just
fluff and bullshit. You came in, you're you're there
now the leader. But have the old leaders who
assigned this and directed this operation, have they been
dismissed from the FBI? Every single person.

(01:07:36):
That has been found to have weaponized or participate in
that process has been removed from leadership positions.
And we if we if and when we findany others that are involved in
this, as you know, this is 37,000 person agency, we are
going to take swift action just like we have.
And just look at the record of the people that have been
dismissed for their actions and what they're saying when they
get out there about how they personally opined about the

(01:08:00):
weaponization of this place. Just like one of Peter Strock's
friends did recently this past week.
That's how we know we're findingthe right folks.
And we're, yeah, that's how we know we're finding the right.
Folks, we don't really have evidence of it, but when they go
give media hits, then we know doofus.
I found three of them yesterday.By the way, we just got an
update. This is breaking news.
Cash Patel just announced that your Washington field office in

(01:08:22):
Washington, DC has done the following things.
They've done 6 illegal gun seizures last night and seven
drug seizures. And they have charges for theft,
assault with a deadly weapon, drug offenses, assault on an
officer. They love that.
And unlawful entry. So trespassing, That's what your
FBI is doing, are they? Cleaning out the rot, no.
They're going on Fox News sayingthey cleaned out the rot when

(01:08:42):
I'm easily able to find out thatthat's not the case.
And how about the third name? Because I told you I'd give you
3. Here's the third name.
It's really simple. The guy's name is Brian Hefner.
He was the boss at the National Tactical Operations Center.
That was the intake Center for all of the January 6th bullshit,
which was like people calling insaying my neighbor is a racist.
I don't like him. I think he likes Donald Trump.
You should go knock on his door about January 6th.

(01:09:04):
And I got thousands of those leads in front of me and there
were hundreds of thousands of them that came to the FBI guy,
the guy who was at N talk. Apparently this is an allegation
by a whistleblower, which I'm. Going to go ahead and call this
a. Protected disclosure that we're
making. So members of Congress listen
up, people who are interested inthe Trump administration and the
OIG, listen up. A policy violation occurred

(01:09:25):
where this guy, Brian Hefner, Hefner was able to deactivate
all of the the sources. Remember we were going to hear
about the 26 sources that the FBI had in on January 6th.
Yeah, Where are they? Apparently they were all
deactivated in the system that we used to classify them.
It's called DD is the computer system that's outside of the
main record keeping system wherewe keep classified sources or we

(01:09:48):
keep them so they're protected for human intelligence.
And this guy apparently helped deactivate all the 26 sources.
There may have been more, but the 26 that we know of that were
in the the reports that came out, I think it was Durham's
report. And then they gave them a
different route to connect to the FBI.
So you've been deactivated, but you can continue to report to us
using NTALK, the National Tactical Operations Section, the

(01:10:09):
1800 FBI tip line call in and whether they were given a
special code to be able to give in so that their information
would be routed. They are still available to the
FBI and they can still give information in.
So they were deactivated as sources.
So they're not on the books anymore, but they're still
there. Here's the crazy thing.
What? Happens then is that tip comes
in through the hotline through that that that phone number and

(01:10:30):
then they route it through a system called E Guardian and E
guardian immediately routes to the field offices.
So you type it up in E Guardian and then your field agents get
it. Does it ever look like it's
going to go to the FBI director's thing?
No, it's going to go to a special agent who's like a
supervisor at the field office and they're going to hand it off
to one of their people to go do the investigation from some tips
that are coming in from J6 sources, the people that were

(01:10:51):
invading the patriot groups and so on, who were all tasked at
that time and being paid. The only question we have right
now, because I don't have the resources to follow down on it,
were they getting paid in some under the table way right now?
Has that gone on since January 6th?
But we know that they were deactivated prior to Donald
Trump coming in. So you haven't got all the guys
and you want to know where that guy is now 'cause he left and
talk? Brian Hefner is now.

(01:11:13):
The assistant section chief of the new section that is set up
for executive protection. They have so many security
details in the FBI. It is essentially the sire size
of a field office. They have the attorney general
Dan Bondi's detail, they have Cash Patel's detail.
That's like 60 agents right there.
They have Dan Bongino's detail. That's like another 20 from what
we're told. So you now have 80 plus agents,

(01:11:35):
plus the supervisors for the ships and so on.
You have like almost, you have an entire investigative field
office. The the Omaha field office
covers multiple States and they have 80 investigative agents.
They have that much tied up in executive resource protection.
And the assistant section chief of that.
Section that they've created forsurveillance for for executive
protection is Brian Hoffner. So just like you found that the

(01:11:58):
pilot who was on the Mar A Lago case or the pilot who was doing
the investigations of the DonaldTrump for the classified
documents was flying the plane around Cash Patel, the dude who
runs the security details for Cash Patel and Pam Bondi and Dan
Bongino also was in on this stuff.
Is your head understanding how bad these guys are at their job?
They have no freaking idea who works around them.

(01:12:19):
And that's the point that I madewith Alex Jones.
If you don't know the people in your agency and nobody tells you
who they are, you're screwed. You need someone who can get
access to this information. And by the way, I know who those
people are, it's not Kyle Seraphin.
I don't want that job. I hate DCI, want nothing to do
with the federal government. Again, I said it this morning, I
hate the government and I don't want to work for them.
I think they're the worst. I was been proven correct

(01:12:41):
because they got rid of me when I was there because I said
things that I thought were accurate.
I started whistle blowing in 2017 folks about things that
were obviously illegal to me at the time.
And I just escalated and escalated.
And the more I talked about it, eventually I went to a member of
Congress right when the COVID stuff was happening.
And that's why I don't have a job there anymore.
I am. Mean and my.
Opinions are not nice and I don't care what happens in that

(01:13:02):
agency. And none of those people have a
right to their job. Those people are interested.
In the same thing that the FBI Agents Association is, which by
the way, I quit paying into thatat some point.
And because they wanted to to back this thing called the Going
Dark initiative. They wanted people from the FBI
Agents Association to fund lobbying so that we could get a
back door into all the end to end encrypted apps use have.

(01:13:23):
And I said no, they call it lawful access.
I don't want anything to do withit.
I said I use end to end encrypted apps and I don't want
the government reading it. At one point I am going to be a
citizen again and not someone working for the FBI, and I still
want my rights intact as a citizen.
And they called and argued with me for an hour.
The president of the FBI Agents Association at the time, he
argued with me for an hour and he seemed like a decent guy,

(01:13:44):
but. There's sycophants to
government. Power.
They believe in the government. I don't.
I believe in God-given rights and what it says in our
Constitution because I thought that's what we were about.
And my mission is not to safeguard the careers, welfare,
or integrity of rank and file FBI agents.
So some of them get tossed out. Tough shit, seriously sorry that
you lost your job. You can probably find another
one. Ask Gerardo Boyle, he's got some

(01:14:06):
hot leads on jobs. He hasn't had a job in almost
1100 days. Ask Steve friend, he's got some
hot jobs. He got hired by a think tank
that has people in Donald Trump's administration right now
and can't find another job because they blackballed him
from anything that has to do with what he does.
Anyway, put your comments below.Let me know what you guys think.
Oh, by the way, here's Jill Enyart she received from the the

(01:14:28):
other mutual admiration Society.There's one that's called the
FBI Agents Association. The other one's called the
Society of ex FBI Agents or sockEx FBI.
They gave Jill Enyart. She was the the honeypot,
alleged honeypot. They gave her the William H
Webster Award in 2011. It involves a $5000 gift for her
service outside of the Bureau. She was so awesome.
She was definitely like, not on the track of people who do what

(01:14:49):
the FBI asked of them. So there you go.
There's the receipts, as they say, right?
Remember. All this comes down to the thing
that Tulsi. Gabbard's talking about they
stole an election. That's part E.
That's the number one sort of thing that's going to kill us if
we can't actually pick the people we want in our elections.
We got to fix it, but I don't think they're going to do it
through prosecutions. You better Ridge ourselves of

(01:15:10):
the people that were part of it though, that's for damn sure.
They shouldn't at least have a job at the very minimum.
There you go. That's today's program, y'all.
What do you think of that? Drop some knowledge on you, drop
some information, make sure thatyou're following us.
I appreciate that you guys do many of you follow over on X
slightly less follow over on Rumble, a growing number on
YouTube. All of you guys are great.
If you guys want to find it financially support what we're

(01:15:30):
doing, a lot of the stuff that Ido, I do it because I think it's
the right thing. There's no money involved in it.
There's no, there's no like clicks.
We don't make enough money off Xor even be worth it.
But if you guys want to support us over on locals, I highly
appreciate that and you guys cando so by going to
kyleseraphin.com. Otherwise, follow us and
subscribe on the various channels you can, you can do it
on rumbleitsrumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
You can do it on X at Kyle Seraphin YouTube as well.

(01:15:50):
Locals is kyleseraphin.com. You guys get the trend and then
Kyle Seraphin show. There's a link in the show
description. Boop.
Send that out to your friends and let them know maybe this is
the episode that really impacts you and you want them to see it.
We need to be able to make sure that people understand that it's
not about how you feel about theinformation.
It's like, is the analysis solid?

(01:16:11):
Can you poke holes in it? And if you can guess what, we
have a comment section and I read a ton of them.
Please put them out there. I look forward to hearing what
you guys have to say. That's it for me today.
That's all that I can gain to you.
I hope that was a value. I actually have something kind
of funny as well. Let's do something.
Do you guys want to hear about the government telling you how
to not worry about this stuff? What about aliens, Kyle?
How can we never talk about aliens?
This is what I think about aliens.

(01:16:34):
Aliens are real. What, are you going to set age
limits on Congress? You're all way too fucking old.
Where's all the money you're sending to Ukraine going?
You're clearly laundering it. Show us Epstein's client list.
Aliens are real. Yeah.
Nobody fucking cares. Shit, don't get distracted, you

(01:16:54):
all keep. Your head on the ball, keep your
eye on the ball. Don't follow the laser pointer.
We appreciate all of you. God bless you.
Look forward to seeing you againtomorrow.
If you're watching on Rumble, we'll send you over to the
American Radicals Podcast and we'll see you tomorrow for
Friendly Friday. Thanks.
For listening to the Kyle. Seraphin Show streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle

(01:17:17):
Seraphin.

All Episodes

PATEL Claims "Every Single Person" who Weaponized the FBI removed: I found 3 yesterday | Ep 636

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}PATEL Claims "Every Single Person" who Weaponized the FBI removed: I found 3 yesterday | Ep 636