PURGE? Sacrifice the Limb to save the Body... | Ep 628 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:15):
Take a look. Behind the curtain with a real
whistleblower and American patriot, Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome

(00:43):
to the Kyle Seraphin show for Monday.
It is August the 11th and as usual, the weekend sometimes
doesn't feel long enough, does it to this?
This was one of those moments I felt like I was working through
the weekend and I'm going to share with you some of the stuff
that we were working on. A little bit of a heads up for
those of you that are listening early enough in the day at 2:00
PM Central time at 3:00 PM Eastern, we're going to go on

(01:03):
with Alex Jones, share a little bit of information.
It's always fun to go on with Alex.
I was watching something he was talking about meats and
synthetic butter, which I've seen a little push on Bill Gates
food products. And it's like, you know, Alex
Jones is sometimes way out thereon the limb and sometimes he's

(01:23):
just right on the money at this fake food idea.
Seems to be about right. So today we're going to be
talking about the purge. Actually, I'm going to before I
put my phone in the Faraday bag,I think I'm going to read you
guys something. I wasn't sure if I was going to
do this, but I think I am. So let's do that a little quick
preview. Today's podcast, something that

(01:43):
I saved and shared with my friends in the suspendables chat
groups. You guys are now part of the
inside crew quote. I have believed in the metaphor
of God as the all knowing gardener who prunes us and
shapes us. That's something that was put
out on LinkedIn, which is a cesspool by Spencer Evans, the

(02:03):
now terminated former special agent in charge of Las Vegas.
And additionally, he was the deputy assistant director of
human resources during the COVIDtyranny. 100% Covidien.
And then I got this from an FBI agent who actually understands
what's wrong with the FBI. Quote, we have arrived at a

(02:24):
moment when we must remove the limb to save the patient and not
just use a scalpel to take out the rot.
That doesn't mean that the people who run the FBI know
that, and that's problematic. I'm actually starting to see the
pressure campaign go online. We're starting to see some FBI
agents take to Twitter, voice their opinions.

(02:47):
They think they got dirt on me. What they have is the same
perjury that went out to the House Democrats 2 years ago.
So the end of the day, we're going to be talking about the
purge and the terror that existswhen weaponized government comes
from you. They're not wrong.

(03:07):
The Democrats that are crying about this, they're not wrong.
This group of former Intel people that are referring to
themselves as steady state. The steady state is their take
on the deep state. But all they're proving is that
they are a deep state. That the people who look out for
each other, the mutual admiration societies of retired
former special agents and intelligence officials, they are

(03:27):
the problem. Someone asked me, what's the
solution? The solution is start tacking
off the limbs that are rotted. We need less of it because they
are incredibly dangerous to American liberties.
Not the left, not the right Americans, period.
This was never about politics and it never should be about
politics. And unfortunately, although
there are people who are gettingit done right in the Trump

(03:49):
administration, Donald Trump is part of the problem when it
comes to not knowing what the issues are.
And he's proving it with a thingthat we're going to talk about
today, removing the homeless andcrime from Washington, DC.
He doesn't even know what the tools that he has available are,
and he doesn't know how to use them.
And that's not necessarily his fault because he's not a guy
that's run government. But the people that are advising

(04:12):
him are either morons or even worse, they are nefarious and
they want to see things carry onthe way that they have.
I am not OK with that and and I don't think you should be
either. I think it's really dumb and
it's really dangerous. Let's start with the sponsor
read we're going to get in. Today's program got a lot to
cover here, so let's lead off with my friends over at My
Patriot Supply. If you're worried about any of

(04:32):
these things, like it's not a totally unreasonable thing to
do, mypatriotsupply.com/kyle is where you can go and prepare
yourself. It's not just hot in the summer,
it's been historic. There are flash flood warnings
at a 40 year high. It's not slowing down.
Some towns have been underwater,roads have been washed out.
All kinds of things are common in crisis zones.
It's usually the scene of peoplestanding in line and waiting.

(04:53):
They're waiting for bottled water, they wait for food, they
wait for someone to show up and save them.
Do you want that to be you, or do you want to be able to
prepare so you don't have to wait for someone else to take
care of you? What if health takes days?
What if it takes no time at all because it never shows up?
Is the system built to protect you?
I'm going to prove to you today with some of the information
that in fact, it is not. It is run by people who are

(05:15):
looking out for themselves, and you're simply part of the the
currency of the realm. Sometimes our government can
barely handle one emergency, letalone dozens.
Your local governments are no better folks.
Prepare yourself with my PatriotSupply.
That should be for everything. It doesn't matter whether it's
civil unrest or natural disasters or anything else.
mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle Right now they're giving away

(05:35):
four weeks of free emergency food with your purchase of a
three month emergency food kit. That's the deal I have.
So buy three, get four months. That's a pretty solid option.
Again, you're giving yourself 120 days worth of personal
insurance against God knows what's coming your way.
mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle Link in the show description.
My finger is wagging downward towards with the notes.

(05:56):
If you were to Scroll down, you would see that.
All right, check them out. Make sure you guys are prepared
so you're not relying on a very ineffective federal, state or
probably your local government as well.
Let's get into today's program right now.

(06:19):
All right, so we're going to go through sort of a list of
things. Some of them are directly
related. Some of them are things that I
think that we should we should just talk about because they
they talk about a broader problem.
Let's start with #1 this is coming from NBC.
This is actually kind of a localnews story with national
implications. An Afghan interpreter who evaded

(06:40):
death during the war in Afghanistan met a grim fate in
Texas. You're looking at a pretty awful
story here. And again, this goes to how bad
is it? How awful is the situation?
Do we need to do amputations? Do we have the time to be

(07:00):
interested in individual tiny solutions at a scalpel level?
Or is it machete time? An Afghan interpreter.
I'm sorry. Another Afghan immigrant is
accused of stabbing the militaryinterpreter 20 times.
Why was it? Oh, because he was frustrated
with how slow the system was moving, officials say.
So that is your your headline. Let's get into what the actual

(07:20):
story says. The news of Abdul Niyazi's death
arrived by a chilling phone call.
It was March the 26th at the endof Ramadan.
His wife wanted to know whether she should expect her husband, a
former U.S. military interpreterwho lost both legs in a bomb
blast in Afghanistan and became one of Houston's most well known
advocates for the new Afghan migrants.
It was almost time to break the day's fast.

(07:42):
She recalled that they got a phone call from his cell phone.
And the man on the other end of the line said, I'm not your
husband. I killed your husband.
So put yourself in that situation, ladies.
You pick up the phone, your husband's phone number on the
caller ID and someone said I just killed your husband.

(08:03):
The shock of the call and testified when the family
learned that authorities had alleged in bail documents in the
Harris County District Court that an Afghan national who
sought help from Niaz was or Niazi was accused of stabbing
him more than a dozen times because he was frustrated about
the United States illegal immigration or the, I'm sorry,
the refugee immigration situation.

(08:25):
And I told you that these peoplecame in by 100,000 or so.
This is a legacy of the Biden administration.
They flew a bunch of people in on military cargo jets.
They landed them on military bases, and then they just didn't
have a plan. This is a legacy of what
happened because of the failed withdrawal and all of this

(08:45):
stuff. It all kind of goes to the same
root core. You put the wrong people in, you
put a guy like Joe Biden in, or you put whoever the hell was
actually running the show when Joe Biden was there.
They failed in Afghanistan. They betrayed the legacy of what
millions of veterans who fought in the global War on Terror.
They brought in a bunch of the enemy.

(09:08):
And this 34 year old guy decided, oh, you know what?
I'm, I'm really frustrated with the fact that the United States
is not taking care of me. Probably I'm going to go stab
the guy that is my advocate, whowas in fact the kind of person
that we don't mind getting here.I met all kinds on these Afghan
refugee camps when I was workingat Fort Bliss and when I was
working out at Holloman Air Force Base.
There are people that you would not be sad to have as your
neighbor. They were educated, they were

(09:29):
multilingual. They had skills that were
applicable to American businesses.
And then there were people that were shitting on the side of the
road. They would just walk off into
the desert, drop trowel and takea crap as we drove past the
roads on the military base. So you had all kinds.
These were the same people that walked into the showers, didn't
know what running water was, so they just crapped on the floor
or they crapped next to their beds because they basically live

(09:53):
like animals where they were. And so you imported a variety of
people from like urban dwelling,modern skills, human beings who
could integrate into this society and have for all
generations. They found out what was going
on. Or you had people who basically
belonged in caves. The crazy thing is this guy is
out on bail on personal recognizance.

(10:13):
It was a $750,000 bail after he stabbed a man to death because
of something that man was not incharge of.
How on earth can this country continue onward?
And so all this talk about redistricting in Texas, I think
this has something to do with it.
The fact that illegal aliens were being counted in the
census, that's a problem. Donald Trump is trying to fix

(10:35):
some of these things with a scalpel and some of these things
with the machete. The right answer might be to
deport all of these people that are waiting on the process.
Sorry, go back to Afghanistan. You're not our problem.
Why? Because you're not American.
And we, we voted for this thing that I kept hearing over and
over again. I don't think it means what we
think it means. We're having this like Inego

(10:56):
Montoya situation, right? I don't think that word means
what you think it means. America first should mean that
Americans come first, that this country comes first.
That's not what we're getting. We're getting like America sort
of the right answer would have been America only like a
completely isolationist answer. Is that great for all the global

(11:18):
people? No, but is it good for Lindsey
Graham? No, it's not.
But is it probably the right answer when it comes down to
like, how do you solve these problems?
You start here, you get your house in order and you don't go
out there and start telling people it's like a if you went
to the the HOA president who wascalling you and citing you
because you're blinds were 3/4 open and they were not allowed
to be open during the hours of 9to 5 or some kind of crazy like

(11:40):
HOA rule. And so that person didn't have
their house in order, had like, stinking dead animals in their
front yard. And then they were out there
sighting you because of the way that your lawn was half an inch
too long or you didn't have yourblinds open properly.
We have to get our own house in order, and we haven't done it.
And more importantly, if you're going to do America, only if
you're going to do America first, don't you think that you

(12:01):
should look at the American federal government and say, hey,
our government is full of corruption.
It is incredibly dangerous to Americans.
So we don't have time to try to figure out whether or not we're
going to vet Afghans who flew inhere.
And we're, like, hanging on to the landing gear.
Do you guys remember the visuals?
They were hanging on to the landing gear of Air Force, you

(12:24):
know, transports and falling offfrom the sky at 2000 feet,
hitting the ground terminal velocity.
Why? Because the people who were
trying to come to the United States didn't even understand
like what a plane was. And then they get mad and they
stab a guy who theoretically, according to everything I can
read here, including the the former Marine Corps platoon

(12:45):
commander who worked with this, this translator, they said he
was a hero. They said he was an absolute
stunt. And the guy who stabbed him,
this 37 year old guy named Mosullah Sahil, 37, he's accused
of first degree murder. So he got a $750,000 bail.
He's out on personal recognizance right now.

(13:06):
Oh, sorry. They actually asked for 750,000.
I'm, I misread that. I, I misunderstood it when I
read the story. They asked for $750,000 bond.
They failed to indict him. And so he's just walking around
free, no payment required. There's no bond at all.
He called and confessed to this crime.
Awesome. And when asked what happened,

(13:28):
the prosecutor said, yeah, we just, we just didn't get it
done. We failed.
OK, How many other ridiculous sort of situations exist in this
country like that, where you're looking and you're thinking, oh,
is the federal government going to come save us?
Is the state government going tocome?
Is the local government going todo their job?
We're this far away, I think, from people getting completely

(13:49):
Western. I think that people in this
country are expecting things we're getting promised.
I saw another sort of tweet fromDan Bongino talking about summer
crime, talking about the the summer heat initiative and how
they're getting rid of murder inin America, that they're
basically solved murder at the FBI, which is insane.
And he said this is not even thebeginning of the beginning.

(14:09):
TuneIn next week. Have we found out what shook Dan
Bongino to his core the other day?
Was it corruption? Is that what we heard?
I guess, I guess so. I guess that's what they said
while I'm talking on the nature of like a foreign focus that
needs to be domestic. I just want to cover this
briefly because I don't have a slide about it and I don't have
a story talking about it actually wasn't a mainstream

(14:31):
news article, but it actually does bother me.
Donald Trump has re endorsed Lindsey Graham.
Lindsey Graham who believes thatthe most important thing in the
United States is not to focus onAmerica only or America first.
He's like still worried about his money coming from Ukraine.
I wish this guy was not who represented you, South Carolina,
but here he is going on, you know, a friendly news

(14:54):
organization, Meet the Press, NBC.
This is the real Republican. This is what real Republicans
look like. Again, if you are a conservative
person, if you're an America only person, you're not a real
Republican. You're a rhino.
That's what you are. You're in name only because you
actually don't believe in the things that your political party

(15:15):
actually puts out. Lindsey Graham is like peak
Republican as far as I can tell.Here he is explaining the real
problems in America. This is what your your tax
dollars should go to. But I have every.
Confidence in the world that thepresident is going to go to meet
Putin from a position of strength, that he's going to
look out for Europe and Ukrainian needs to end this war

(15:36):
honorably, and it's time to end this war honorably.
But how we do it will will be historical and and I'm confident
President Trump will get a good deal for all.
Oh, good. Oh, good.
So President Trump's going to get a good deal for all.
And that's going to be for he's looking out for European needs
and Ukrainian needs because that's really what is that what

(15:57):
you voted for guys? Is that it?
I mean, JD Vance seems to understand this.
I I don't envy that man's job. He's walking out and trying to
to walk through this minefield. He did an interview with Fox, of
course, and and his interview he's like, I think he's actually
telling us the quiet part out loud during this, but he's going
to talk about whether or not shouldn't they pay for their own

(16:17):
weapons? Isn't that the way it's supposed
to work? Your point about weapons, what
we said to the Europeans is, is simply first of all, this is in
your neck of the woods. This is in your back door.
You guys have got to step up andtake a bigger role in this thing
and if you care so much about this conflict.
You should be. Willing to play a more direct
and a more substantial way and funding this war yourself.

(16:38):
I think, I think the president and I certainly think that
America, we're done with the funding of the Ukraine war
business. We want to bring about a
peaceful settlement to this thing.
We want to stop the killing. But Americans I think are sick
of continuing to send their money, their tax dollars to this
particular conflict. But if the Europeans want to
step up and actually buy the weapons from American producers,

(17:00):
we're OK with that, but we're not going to fund it ourselves
anymore. I mean, yeah, I actually agree
with all those things. Again, JD Vance says the things
that people would agree with. The problem is, is that I don't
think that's actually what the policy is.
That doesn't seem like the real story.
Again, I don't think that he represents what the real
Republican Party looks like. He's saying the things that I
want to hear, because that's true.
I do think the Europeans should fund it if they care, and I

(17:20):
don't. And I don't want my money going
there. If they want to buy American
weapons, knock yourself out and then you have the alternative.
You have the Lindsey Graham out there saying the soft sell stuff
and then you have Donald Trump backing Lindsey Graham.
Doesn't that seem problematic? The other thing that does seem
problematic, and it's not related to the either of these
things, it has to do with these clips.

(17:42):
About 50% of the clips that we grabbed, when I look at them,
they're completely fine. The audio and the video are In
Sync, and then when they go intothe broadcast software, they
come out of sync for some reason.
So I'm not doing that on purposeto make you guys feel like crazy
people. We'll try to decode whatever it
is, but there's some sort of bugthat's making that happen.
Here's Lindsey Graham. He was at a fundraising event,
and he got a phone call unexpectedly from Donald Trump.

(18:03):
I'm sure it was totally unexpected that happened while
he was standing on the stage. And here he is able to tout the
support, the 100% support of Donald Trump.
So for all of you people that are out there that say, ah,
Donald Trump, that's 3D chess, yeah, Friends close, enemies
close. None of these things are real.
Donald Trump makes some good decisions which are true.

(18:23):
And I'm going to actually share some today and a bunch of crappy
ones like backing Lindsey Graham.
And here's that phone call. I just want to thank everybody.
And Lindsey, thank you so much. You've been my friend.
I know you had. You're in a big race and I don't
think it's going to be a contest, but I have a feeling
you're going to do very well. You have for a long time.
Thank you very much. And Lindsey Graham, just so you

(18:46):
know, full endorsement. Trump's full endorsement.
He's a great guy. Every time I needed him, every
time I needed him, he was there for me.
I just want to thank everybody. So there you heard it.
Full endorsement. OK, That's not an impersonator.
That's the real deal. Is that what you want?

(19:08):
Primary? Thomas Massie, full endorsement.
Lindsey Graham. Lindsey Graham has like a 20, I
think the last time I looked at his liberty score.
He votes with Democrats all the time.
That's what he does. He votes for anything that
spends more money and does the exact opposite of that sort of
America first, America only mentality.
So I don't get it. I don't get it at all.

(19:29):
Again, Donald Trump not a perfect human being.
This is a great argument againstidolatry, which is an ongoing
theme of this program. If you look at somebody, I had
somebody over the weekend that was like, Seraphin, are you with
Donald Trump or against him? It's like, hey, soft brain, I'm
not with anybody. I'm with me.

(19:49):
I'm with my wife and my kids. I'm with things that are right.
When people do things that are right, you are not going to get
me to sign up for like whatever somebody says as my proxy.
There's nobody that I'm willing to cede my agency to and say
I've endorse what this person says 100% of the time.
Why? Because they don't know what I
know and I don't know what they know.
But I guarantee you we don't agree on everything.

(20:11):
Even those of you that get really, really riled up when you
find out, like where Seraphin doesn't say the same things that
I think. I don't ask you to believe what
I think. I'm just telling you what I
believe. But if you believe it, great.
If you don't, you put it in the comments.
And I read those and then we cancome to a decision.
They used to call that thing critical thinking where you hear
different sides of the same story.
And then you try to figure out like, oh, like, what do I think
of that? Which one of those people has

(20:33):
more weight? Which one has more credibility?
Which one of those arguments hasmore gravitas and evidence?
And then I'm going to go with the one that makes the most
sense to me. Do you know what doesn't make
sense? This, this is an NBC story.
Sorry. This is a CBCNN story.
Trump zeroes in on federal takeover of DCII Flub the the
source. Because multiple different

(20:53):
agencies, we've got ACBS and ABCand Fox all covering the same
story. And I'm going to hit all of them
because I think it tells a broader story.
All right. Trump zeroing in on a federal
takeover of Washington DC as FBIpatrols the streets.
So let's just start there. What you're looking at on the
screen is a picture of the Washington Monument.

(21:13):
I've actually seen gangs of youths, AKA young black kids
between the age of like 12 and 18 that are on 4 Wheelers and
dirt bikes ripping up that grassthat is our property as
Americans and it's pretty disgusting and almost nothing
happens to them. DC Metro PD let's them get away
all the time. President Donald Trump is
expected to ramp up efforts to curb crime in the nation's

(21:36):
capital on Monday as he threatens a federal takeover of
Washington, DC, and the city officials largely remain
deferential to him. There's probably a good reason.
If there was ever a city that represented exactly how weak,
stupid and bad the federal government can do things, it is
Washington, DC. And I don't think a federal
takeover is the right answer. There's an argument that you

(21:59):
should probably cede it to Maryland, where they took the
property from in the 1st place. That's fine.
Maryland is not America. Everything north of the Potomac,
not America, as far as I can tell.
Give it away and then leave a small cluster of federal
buildings that are under federaljurisdiction the same way a
military base might be. That might be the right way to
go. But this District?
Nobody. Nobody fathomed that DC would be

(22:21):
a place where people congregated, not when they built
it. Nobody fathomed the amount of
power that the federal government would have.
But let me tell you one thing that I can tell you definitively
with evidence is a terrible idea.
The FBI patrolling the streets of your nation's capital.
Why would that be? How do we know?
Oh, because we did that. And I say we because I was one

(22:42):
of the people that was told to go walk around with a freaking
plate carrier on and FBAFBI markings in June and July and
September of 2020 when they weredoing the BLM riots across the
country. There was this attempt to slow
down certain areas, not all of Washington, DC, by the way.
They totally left open the WhiteHouse North Lawn.

(23:06):
But they already did that. And I'm going to show you what
the result was later. OK.
So Donald Trump has planned to ramp up.
They want 450 officers expected to participate in a surge of
federal law enforcement called for as many as 130 FBI agents to
patrol Washington, DC with DC police as part of an increased

(23:26):
presence patrol. Sorry that they said an
increased federal presence. I'll call it a presence patrol.
Those of you who've been in the military, you know that a
presence patrol is when you walkaround so that the enemy knows
you're there. That's the entire reason for it.
It can be provocative, so you can provoke contact and then you
can go and you can draw them into conflict and then maybe you
can eliminate them. Ed, can it be just to to

(23:48):
suppress them, to walk around and let them see you and then
go, oh, we're going to go operate somewhere else?
There's different reasons for a presence patrol, but those are
the primary ones. The primary part of their job
will be driving around the city running license plates for
stolen vehicles and warrants. Set a search.
A source familiar with the matter to CNN.
It's not your typical FBI agentsand it's not typical for FBI

(24:10):
agents in general to patrol withlocal police departments.
Let's talk about it. I was one of like a dozen people
that I was aware of that had theability to run license plates
from my vehicle. Mostly what happens is FBI
agents who want to run a licenseplate the way that you'd see
like in a computer aided dispatch machine and a laptop
that a, that a local cop would have.

(24:30):
Normally what would happen is they would, they would just type
it in. An FBI agent will call it in
either via radio or cell phone to the radio room at the
Washington field office. And then they would give that
information and then it would take anywhere from, let's say 5
minutes to an hour and a half for that dispatch person to run
the plates and give you the information and send you the
e-mail. And they would usually send it

(24:52):
to you in this ridiculous formatwhere they would send you it.
And then they would send you another e-mail with a password
so that they were disconnected. Even though this is not national
security information, even though local cops can get this
on their their phones or on their tablets like in their car,
FBI agents can't do that. They don't have the tools to get
it. Running NCIC checks was one of
the few things that, like, my team actually went out and did,

(25:13):
and I knew almost nobody in the thousand agents or so that
worked in Washington, DC. They could do that.
So who are they going to get to go run these plates?
And why is having an additional 130 FBI agents rolling around
going to make any bit of difference?
They've already done foot patrols previously.
Donald Trump said that we're going to make our capital safer
and more beautiful than ever before.

(25:33):
The homeless will have to move out immediately.
We'll give you a place to stay, but far from the capital.
Why? Why are we going to give them a
place to stay? This is the same problem that I
had with the person that called in.
We had a caller two weeks ago, Zach called in and told me that
we really need to give money to gender like reassignment
surgeries. Why?
Why do we need that? Why do we need to give any money
for healthcare from the federal system?

(25:55):
I just want you to show me wheredoes it say that in the
Constitution? What makes me responsible for
feeding or or housing the homeless in Washington, DC?
And why doesn't the abundant government that exists there?
Washington, DC is like easily the the worst example.
I'm going to show you a couple other headlines here.

(26:15):
This is CBS and ABC. They're the worst example of
what local governments could look like.
Why? Because they get their money
directly from the federal government and they're
accountable to the federal government.
And there are like 96% Democrat city.
Trump says the homeless should leave DC immediately after
floating a federal takeover of the Capitol.
News flash, it's all federal anyway.
They have to go to Congress to get their funding.
It's the most dysfunctional thing you could figure out.

(26:37):
And then the other people attached stuff to it.
Trump holds a news conference oncrime in DC threatening a
federal takeover. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah. All this stuff is great.
Do you know how great it is? Washington, DC was the employer.
The city of Washington, DC was the employer of a man that I
helped arrest for homicide. And you go, well, that's fine.

(26:58):
Like sometimes people break bad,right?
People could do the wrong thing.They could get involved and kill
another person. This guy's homicide was involved
in dealing fentanyl that actually ended up killing a
college student out in Virginia.So Interstate commerce, drugs
involved, contraband, etcetera. Here's the problem, that guy was
already a convicted murderer. I kid you not.
He had been convicted of second degree murder.

(27:20):
I think he served somewhere between 8 and 12 years.
And then he got out and then he got a freaking job with the city
of Washington, DC The city government hired him.
And so he dealt drugs out of hisfederal building that was owned
by the District of Columbia, twoother drug dealers, and it ended

(27:44):
up killing someone. And so you go, oh, well, that
seems really problematic. But that's just one day to
point, Kyle, this is just one case.
We actually went up the chain and I helped arrest the guy who
was his supplier, and his supplier was also a convicted
murderer who lived in Washington, DC.

(28:05):
His supplier had been convicted of first degree murder.
Do you understand how absurd this is?
You've hired murderers to work in your government and then
you're shocked that by giving them a job and you thought that
like giving them a job and you know, a little bit of like a a
solid reputation, they get to wear a dress shirt to work.
This guy that we arrested the second degree murderer, he wore

(28:26):
a dress shirt every single day, slacks, nice belt, clean shoes.
He had a home that was nice. He had a Mercedes, probably
because he was selling drugs. He had a really nice motorcycle,
which caught us off guard because we didn't know about the
motorcycle. And the day that we went to go
arrest him, he actually came zipping out of the out of the
garage on like this orange motorcycle.
And everyone was like, wait, shit.
Well, who was that? Like, is there a motorcycle in

(28:46):
play? Nobody had run the NCIC.
Why? Because FBI agents don't have
that, and the case agents didn'thave the ability to run all of
his known vehicles. It wasn't something that we knew
was coming. Ended up following in.
Yeah, we got him without incident.
Then we got his buddy, two murderers taken off the street
for a murder. Again, shocking.
Working for the District of Columbia, the rod is very, very

(29:06):
deep. I don't think the federal
takeover that is going to be theright answer.
I think ceded to Maryland. Let them figure out what the
hell is wrong with them. That's the only way you're going
to get it right. I'm going to after we're going
to take a quick break and then I'm going to come back and I'm
going to let you know how I knowthis is a bad idea.
Not just the evidence that they don't have the tools or that
they're not trained. We actually tried this before,
and I'm going to show you that that problem and the problems

(29:29):
that came from it, they weren't corrected, not even a little
bit. They're still existing.
And the people who actually created that problem, not only
do they still work for the FBI, they've all been promoted.
And so that goes to the point about this purge that you're
hearing the leftist media talk about.
Before we do, let's talk about ways you can protect yourself,
not just from your your companies that you're working
with, but the federal governmentalso just had another massive

(29:51):
data breach. We're going to talk about that
little bit later on this week. AT&T had a data breach,
184,000,000 login credentials. Yeah, 184,000,000, complete with
usernames, passwords, e-mail addresses left unencrypted, wide
in the open. If you happen to use the same
password or usernames on multiple sites, you're exposed
on that kind of stuff. This data circulating around the
dark webs. Scammers can shop for their next

(30:11):
victim. These are not old logins.
These are like current bank accounts, e-mail providers,
health healthcare portals, government services.
Everybody leaves themselves openat some point in time.
Our government's probably one ofthe worst.
So then criminals don't even need to hack anymore.
They just log on with your information.
They can buy this data. If you want to take your name
out of the pile and keep somebody who's actually looking

(30:32):
out for you and making sure thatyour name is actually not out
there being sold, check out my friends at Patriot Protect.
It's patriot-protect.com/kyle. When you go and do the fill out,
make sure you use my name at checkout.
You'll save 15% on an annual subscription.
It's dollars per month. That makes it down to pennies
per day. And the the big thing is this,

(30:52):
you want this sort of Oz of prevention instead of having to
pay for a pound of cure. People get scammed all the time
for small amounts and big amounts.
The small amounts are usually inthe thousands.
The big amounts are in the 10's and hundreds of thousands.
If you have significant resources, you can protect it
for very cheap and it's worth doing. patriot-protect.com slash
Kyle. Keep your name, your address,
your phone number. Out of those things I'm going to

(31:12):
show you. I was able to find the address
of an FBI agent who's a senior executive.
It took me just a few minutes. I use one of the data search
websites that these people actually scrub, so check them
out. Link in the show description.
Worth your time. Let's go ahead and talk about
this failure, shall we? This is the failure.
Some of you are not able to see the link, are not able to see

(31:33):
this presentation. So let me describe it to you.
It's a black and white photograph.
There's a man in a suit with hisback to us and around the corner
of a room with sort of like AU shaped table.
Remember this was mid COVID. This is on June the 4th of 2020.
You see a series of people wearing khaki pants and body
armor mostly with their hands intheir pockets, guns on their
belt, FBI badges and placards ontheir chest and their belt

(31:57):
lines. All their faces are redacted.
This is a photograph that was released by the Oversight
Project. My friend Mike Howell put this
out on on X about a year ago, and these are all the members of
the so-called Neil Team 6. Neil Team 6 was the group of
agents that knelt for BLM, ostensibly because they were

(32:18):
going to de escalate a criminal action where they were told Neil
or there was going to be violence.
The crowd that was in Washington, DC that was looking
to get a political statement outof the federal agency got
exactly what they wanted withouta threat of violence.
You can look at the background comms which were between people
like Larissa Knapp, who since retired, Jennifer Moore, who

(32:38):
helped get rid of me since retired Stacey Moy and others.
These were all the people that were in charge of the wait for
it, the Washington Field office.And this is one of the taskings
that Stephen Jensen was requiredto do, unmask this photograph.
Now, I used to work in the Washington Field office, so I
know a little bit about how it works.

(32:58):
What I can tell you is, is that there is an official
photographer, I think there's actually three of them.
They had an intern, a guy that had retired from National
Geographics, and a woman named Jennifer who was about 6 feet
tall and about 300 lbs. And all of them, we were the
official archivist of that fieldoffice.
They would show up at major events.
They would go out there for publicity stunts.
And most likely that's who took this black and white photograph,

(33:19):
which commemorates Chris Ray talking and hugging and
consoling the Neil team, six members who were patrolling
Washington, DC, and took a knee as they were concerned that the
crowd might get violent despite no evidence of violence.
The internal comms, which have been released and are heavily
redacted, show exactly what I'm saying.
The FBI conclusively determined that there was no actual

(33:42):
imminent threat to these people,and yet they took a knee anyway.
Why do they take a knee? Because that's not what the FBI
is designed to do. They're not actually able to do
this Quote. What the Bureau asked those
agents to do is go out on foot patrol, something they were
never trained to do. I can confirm I was never
trained for foot patrol. They were asked to be police

(34:04):
officers today. Former FBI official, in no way
were they making a political statement.
I disagree with that part. They were not qualified to do
what they did. But that's what happens when you
hire not cops and then ask them to do the job of cops.
You know the thing that Cash Patel keeps saying about the
FBI? Let good cops be cops.

(34:25):
It results in this picture, men and women, primarily women,
though, on one knee with their hands in front of them, wearing
body armor that says FBI genuflecting to a leftist
political cause. So you think about that because

(34:49):
Trump is setting up for that optic.
That's what's going to happen. That's what happens when you put
them out there. You're not going to stop a
violent crime in Washington, DC.You're not going to immediately
get rid of the homeless people with these FBI agents.
Look at them and in front and center, what you see is a woman
named Sarah Linden. Now Sarah was a supervisor at
that time. She was a special supervisory

(35:09):
special agent at GS14. She was promoted not long after
to ASAC, which is AGS 15 position.
And that's a pretty senior job in the FBI.
It's the top of the of the GS pay scale.
She went on to become an SES. Her she was the acting special
agent in charge of the criminal division even though she didn't
have that experience. And then you see this headline
from the Washington Examiner which came out in February, You

(35:31):
know, right when the Trump administration was in there and
the folks that were running it, guys like Brian Driscoll were
the number one at the FBI. Cash Patel was in the process of
being sworn in. FBI puts BLM take the knee agent
in charge of the Russian counterintelligence program.
You cannot make this stuff up. This story was written by a guy
named Jonathan Schindler. It happened about a week before

(35:53):
Cash Patel was actually confirmed.
Reforming the FBI is one of the most pressing national security
priorities for the second Trump administration.
No evidence of that, by the way.They put the wrong guys in,
unfortunately. And just how the FBI's root and
branch reform is urgently required has been revealed with
troubling news from Bureau headquarters.
Donald Trump is promising to clean the FBI of its woke
misadventures. It's woke business continues as

(36:13):
usual. Intelligence community sources
with direct knowledge tell me that a senior agent who knelt on
duty during the 2020 Black LivesMatter protest in Washington, DC
was promoted to the one of the FB is most prized jobs placed in
charge of Russian counterintelligence at the
National Security Branch. There she is, all 100 and extra

(36:35):
50 lbs of her Sarah Linden wearing a mask doing the
Covidien thing. There's multiple people in
there. Amy Oakes is sitting right there
in the back. She was promoted.
She used to sit next to me over on the in the skiff when I
worked Chinese CI. There's another woman that was
sent off to a league at position.
She was able to go hang out in Australia.
That was super nice. And of the people in that

(36:56):
photograph, as far as I can tell, I've named four of them to
the FBI, two people in the FBI that were looking for them and
they were able to uncover 6 of them and they've had six months,
six of them to include my 4:00. So they found two people.
Why is it? That's because Stephen Jensen
was in that job and he didn't make it a priority.

(37:17):
So I'm going to go on Alex Jonestoday and we're going to share
some information. It's going to be fun.
I'm going to share Phil Kennedy's thread right now,
which was a hypothetical idea that the FBI agents who were
involved in this have 72 hours to turn themselves in to self
identify to management that theywere involved in that, and then
just figure out what happens next.
They can give their reasons. They can maybe have a, a, a, a

(37:40):
justification for it, but that should be investigated and you
should know who they were and why.
And here's The funny thing. There was a black woman who was
out there, female agent who was kind of sassy.
As I recall. She didn't kneel.
So you've got the one female black person that's out there
that didn't take an E for BLM and everybody else who did.
Why was that? Why did they all get promoted?

(38:02):
The shenanigans are still afoot out there.
That's what I'm trying to tell you.
And so when you hear these, these articles that say that
there's a purge happening at theFBI, it's not enough.
Again, Spencer Evans went out and I read that his quote to
start the show off, we're looking for God as a gardener
and he's pruning us. No, we need God with a machete

(38:25):
and he needs to be chopping backthe jungle growth.
This is the Fox News story that came out.
Ex government officials pen letter blasting cash.
Patel's FBI purge. The steady state group occurred,
accuses Pash, Patel and Bongino of dismantling FBI independence.
By the way, I have another name for you today.
I have two. One of them looks like they've
been handled. The other one still needs to be,

(38:46):
and there's a bunch more. This is just a taste.
I'm only going to be able to give you guys taste of this.
But what I'm giving you evidenceis that across the FBI, the same
people who were problematic in 2020, the same people who
allowed the nonsense to happen in 2016, that allowed the the
intelligence community to launder Hillary Clinton talking

(39:06):
points into the mainstream discussion with legitimacy
coming from Intel sources, Thosesame people still work there.
A group of former FBI intelligence, diplomatic and
national security officials released a letter blasting FBI
Director Cash Patel, Deputy Director Dan Bongino for firing
several Bureau agents, saying they were targeted for not being
loyal to President Trump. It's not enough.

(39:27):
I'm on the other side of this. We agree, but not for the same
reasons. They're calling it a purge.
I already saw what the purge look like.
They identified every single person who said no to the mRNA
vaccines because of the way thatthey were developed, because of
their religious beliefs. Do you know who enforced that?
Spencer Evans. He was promoted.
He was held on to. He was reportedly fired before

(39:49):
Cash Patel got in. And then he was redeemed and
allowed to stay for another six or seven months.
And now God is a gardener. He says the group has dubbed
himself the steady state. And they claim that agents like
Brian Driscoll, Michael Feinberg, Walter Gardena were
fired as part of a campaign to dismantle the FB is long
standing independence, which they call.
They said they're setting up a tool of political loyalty.

(40:09):
News flash. This is what the tool for
political loyalty looks like, A bunch of agents standing around
with their hands over their junk, talking to Chris Ray
because some lady named Larissa Knapp said that they were doing
the right thing, even though there was no evidence that they
were doing the right thing because she didn't investigate
it. And that this whale of a human
being took a knee and now is in charge of Russian

(40:30):
counterintelligence. These guys have no idea what
they're doing. And they made a martyr out of
this guy. They blew it.
I got another word from another agent that's out there in the
Western states, and he said the worst thing they could have done
was get rid of Brian Driscoll. Now, maybe Brian Driscoll needed
to be somewhere in a lower division, but he got set up and
the problem is, is they had already turned him into a folk

(40:53):
hero of the resistance. Whether or not Driscoll wanted
to be a hero of the resistance, by all accounts, Driscoll is a
good guy. The guy you're looking at on the
screen. Brian Driscoll was the number
one at the FBI and he wasn't even supposed to be.
He was accidentally put into theacting director role.
I know people that worked with this guy for decades, literally
like 20 years, people that knew him from HRT, people that knew

(41:15):
him from New York. And by all accounts, not only
was he a really good case agent and a great teammate, he
actually did what he's supposed to do.
Imagine if people had told Spencer Evans, hey, you got to
file fire, Kyle Seraphim becausehe refuses to put on a mask and
he won't do a nasal swab every 72 hours.
Which by the way, about about a month after that happened, a

(41:35):
federal court also agreed with my position that it was
completely unlawful and it shouldn't be done.
So I was 30 days too soon. As always.
Imagine if, if if Spencer Evans did what Brian Driscoll said,
which is that like, look, dude, you can maybe get rid of this
guy for something he did, but you have to go through the
process. And the process is you have to
investigate him. You have to make allegations,
you have to substantiate the allegations.

(41:56):
He's a military veteran. So you have to like give him the
opportunity to appeal it throughthe MSPV.
And by the way, nobody said thatthe pilot who also was the case
agent on Mar a Lago needed to befired.
He just shouldn't be flying the director's jet and rubbing
shoulders with the current FBI director when he was one of the
lead people who investigated thecurrent president.
That seems problematic. So this guy stepped up and he

(42:17):
just was like, no, you can't do that.
That's not what the system is designed to do.
Everything that the suspendablesrecommended, by the way, every
single thing that we recommendedto Cash and Dan was so that you
would not have this problem. Brian Driscoll is going to sue
and win against the FBI for themremoving him inappropriately.
What they did is going to be found unlawful.
I can just tell you right now it's just going to be a real

(42:37):
pain in the ass and it's going to take four years, maybe more.
It's going to be the same story with Spencer Evans most likely.
He also is going to get a chanceto do it.
What they should have done is assign him to a post in Guam and
told him that he's never going to come back stateside and he's
never going to get promoted. They put him in to the lowest
level position for his pay gradeand put him where his job is to
investigate federal crimes in his living room.

(42:58):
Show up every day until you until you retire because he
could retire at any time. You make people retire because
they didn't commit crimes. They're just not people that
should be doing that job becausethey've they've been found
unworthy of that work. And and Driscoll, by all
accounts I've taken, I don't want to claim that scalp.
I think I accidentally get it, but only because he did the
thing that you'd expect that real management, that real

(43:20):
leadership would do. You'd say no, you've asked me to
do something illegal, unlawful against policy.
Imagine somebody telling GerardoBoyle's former boss when they
said hey, you need to transfer this guy to a unit and then
we're going to cancel him mid transfer.
And imagine if there was a boss that had a pair of balls that
just said absolutely not, this man just had a baby.
That's against policy to transfer him in the 1st place.

(43:42):
We're not going to do that. I won't do it.
And then got fired for it. That person would be a hero.
The people in the FBI are looking at Brian Driscoll as a
hero and, and they're not wrong about him doing the right thing.
So Cash and Dan have now set up a resistance and they have
actually given themselves some martyrs who are actually the
right human beings. So he's he's 100% correct on

(44:04):
being looked at the right way. He didn't create those challenge
coins of himself sitting at the Resolute desk.
Alex Jones and I covered this last week.
He didn't create that legend. They did.
What would the Driz do? And all the stuff.
The fact the matter is if you'rea good person, people build a
cult of personality around it. The FBI is very short on decent
leadership and they just blew it.
So now you've created this real problem, and I don't like it.

(44:25):
I don't like it any more than any of you would.
There's a real issue when our law enforcement is weaponized.
It's the thing that I've been campaigning against.
And so people like those on the left and I are going to say the
same things. We're going to be talking about
the same problems. Why is the FBI not actually
doing the job that we actually should be re adjudicating from

(44:47):
2020? You know, like a stolen election
that was like front and center. We're not fixing that.
It seems like the only person who's doing it is Tulsi Gabbard.
I had a request from one of you guys, one of my listeners that
said, if you're going to play canned ads, can you please give
us an opportunity to know that it's coming?
So for those of you that are listening to Spotify, if you're
listening to Apple iHeartRadio, if you're listening audio only

(45:09):
or if you're listening over on Spotify, you may now hear one of
the canned ads that comes in from our monetization program.
Appreciate that. We'll come back right from that.
And then here we are with this. Let me play you Tulsi Gabbard,
who's actually seems to be one of the few people in the Trump
administration on the sort of Intel side that's actually
locked in to the issue. JD Vance seems to get it too.

(45:31):
So let these people be the the, the mouthpieces.
Let this be the way that the, the, the party goes for the next
18 months and not the Lindsey Graham end of it.
I pray that that's the case. Here She is on the Benny Show
talking about what actually makes sense.
And I don't know if this is going to be synced up or out of
sync, unfortunately. I made a comment at a cabinet
secretary meeting that has stuckwith our audience and they

(45:51):
really love an update on it. And it's about the 2020
election. And you were talking about the
security of that election. And you were telling President
Trump that there has been evidence that has been uncovered
in of, of, well, potential breaches.
I, I, I'm not exactly certain, but I'd love a follow up on
this. Here's the moment right here.

(46:11):
And perhaps do you have any updates on the 2020 election or
anything that you found a director?
The the point that I was making there in the cabinet meeting was
early discovery that I had seen from a whistleblower who came

(46:33):
forward who was working under SISA at that time, which is
responsible for critical and infrastructure and trying to
protect against cyber vulnerabilities, critical
infrastructure, including of course the integrity of our
election systems. And what was interesting was
seeing how this whistleblower brought forward information that

(46:54):
SISA at that time that the federal government was aware of,
of vulnerabilities in our election machines, but they
chose not to disclose that information to the American
people or to the the administration at that time.
OK, So what vulnerabilities werethese?
Again, remember the entire problem about Dominion?

(47:16):
One of my buddies, Joe Altman, constantly harps on this.
This is his single biggest issue.
He says if you don't fix the election problem, it doesn't
matter what else you do in the short term because you're not
going to be able to win elections.
Somebody else is going to be controlling that.
This was a was a discussion thathappened.
How many of us have forgotten this?
This is from December of 2020. This is just after the election
in November of 2020. It doesn't sound like this has

(47:39):
been addressed. This seems like this would be
critical stuff. It's actually far more important
than Epstein files, which may ormay not have anything salacious
at all, like the actual mechanism and infrastructure.
That's the problem again. The rot is so big that you can't
come in with a scalpel and try to fix little problems.
Oh, can we find one case agent who's wrong?
No. How about all the people that
refused to do investigations into this question?

(48:03):
Voting systems are by design meant to be used as closed
systems that are not networked, meaning they they are not
connected to the Internet. There is no Internet
connectivity at all. They are not designed to be
connected to the outside world through either an Internet
connection or any other externalconnectivity device.

(48:23):
Dominion have any way to remotely access any of the
information on any of the equipment or have remote access
within the machines themselves. No.
Does anybody have access? To the best of your knowledge,
no Voting systems are. By design, they're meant to be

(48:44):
secure. They're not supposed to be
accessible from the outside. That's been proven over and over
again, including in hearings like in front of our federal
government. Why are they not fixing that?
Shouldn't that be like a front and center question?
It turns out that and using the federal government, again, an
infrastructure question when youuse the federal government to
get a political outcome, which is terrifying.

(49:07):
Isn't that the number one? And why is Tulsi Gabbard the
only one involved in this? Why do we hear Dan Bongino and
Cash Patel out there touting like, we arrested 1000
terrorists, like you arrested a gang member and you've redefined
them to be terrorists. You're juking the terrorist
stats. The same problem that Steve
Friend called out. You might as well be saying
we're arresting domestic terrorists.
They're just J Sixers and grandmas.
It's the same thing the Biden administration did.

(49:28):
It's a different focus. Our team is involved, so we're
supposed to cheer for it. But you're not doing the like
the work. You'll notice that they'll
always tell you what they did and they won't compare it
against the previous year. Like, oh, we got all these child
sex traffickers. We got 270 of them.
OK, well, how many did you get last year at by August?
Oh, it's the same amount or more.
Why don't you show growth that you've turned and made this a

(49:49):
focus? Why don't you explain to the
American people that it's becomea priority and that you've
tiered it as a tiered national threat?
I don't think they have. And there's no evidence that
anyone's told me that they have.Here's JD Vance saying what the
real problem was. And what you don't see is fixing
that. What you see is we got rid of
one of the case agents who locked up Peter Navarro.
Like, that's great. That's a scalpel.

(50:10):
What's needed is a cleaver or a machete to start lopping off
limbs. If you want to save the body, we
need a significant amputation far enough up that it doesn't
spread, and that means you're going to have to cut back really
aggressively. As my friend told me this
morning, I. Absolutely Want to see
indictments, Maria. Look, of course, you got to have
the law follow the facts here. You don't just indict people to

(50:32):
indict people. You indict people because they
broke the law. But if you look at what Tulsi
and Cash Patel have revealed in the last couple of weeks, I
don't know how anybody can look at that and say that there
wasn't aggressive violations of the law.
What they basically did did is they defrauded the American
people in order to take Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign

(50:52):
talking points and turn them into intelligence by defrauding
the American people, defrauding the intelligence agencies, lying
about what the Intel said. They would take something that
that that that supported the Hillary Clinton campaign talking
point and they would overemphasize it and exaggerate
it. They took anything that actually
contradicted that narrative and they buried it deep.

(51:14):
And through that, they actually launched Hillary Clinton's
presidential campaign talking points through the American
intelligence services. That's a violation of the
people's trust. That's a violation of what our
intelligence services should be doing.
And I absolutely think they broke the law.
And you're going to see a lot ofpeople get indicted for that.
Here's the thing that we should really bother the American
people. What do you want our

(51:35):
intelligence community to be doing?
I want them to be catching bad guys.
I want them to be making sure that terrorists aren't going to
kill innocent American civilians.
I don't want them laundering Hillary Clinton's campaign
talking points into the Americanmedia and giving them this air
of legitimacy. It is sick and it's disgusting.
It hurt the intelligence community, it hurt the American

(51:56):
people, and it hurt the first Trump administration.
We've got to have consequences for it or we're just going to
see the same play repeated againand after again.
OK, Yeah, no, that's sort of true.
I'd actually don't want the intelligence service going after
bad guys. Why is that?
Because Intel is inherently, by its very nature, it's
intelligence. So it's political.

(52:17):
It has an opinion, and the people who gather it have like,
an editorial bias the same way that you guys might pick your
news service. And the Intel people are people
like Spencer Evans. This is what he wrote yesterday
or the day before. When I started the week, I
didn't know that Friday would bemy last day in the FBI.
This morning I'm filled with gratitude for a 21 year career

(52:37):
that was beyond anything I couldhave ever dreamed of.
From serving coast to coast in New Haven, in San Diego and
Jacksonville, in Oklahoma City and Las Vegas divisions with two
FBI headquarters tours in the middle, I'm taking a quiet
moment to reflect on the incredible people I've had the
privilege to work for and among.I've long believed in the
metaphor of God as an all knowing gardener who prunes us

(52:58):
and shapes us from time to time because he knows what he wants
us to become. That's really gross.
Sorry. That's the, that's one of the
grossest things that I've ever read.
Who are the kind of people that love that?
How about Tanya here? She's the, she's a national
security executive, one of thosepeople that was part of the

(53:19):
laundering operation. She wrote Spencer.
It was an honor to serve with you, Spencer.
Thank you for all you've done for the FBI and the country.
Notice the FBI comes before the country because these people
have loyalty to institution before Constitution.
On Friday, I dropped the name ofthe executive Special assistant
to FBI Director Chris Wray and the section chief for the

(53:41):
Director's Operations and Security sections from July 23rd
to February 2025. Again, the same time that Sarah
Linda got promoted out and movedinto a new job.
For about a year and a half, this woman was the special
assistant. A special assistant is like the
closest person, confidant, advisor, sometimes mistress, not

(54:01):
in this case that I'm aware of, but often times a mistress of
some senior executive. And usually what you do is you
get a male senior executive thatflies around on the director's
jet sometimes or take special travel, always brings the
special assistant and then they end up getting 2 rooms, but only
using one. That's a very common thing in
the FBI by the way, sexual malfeasance things that used to
get your your clearance pulled. This woman that I brought you up

(54:22):
was a woman that was called Vanessa Tibbetts.
There she is special assistant in charge of the FB is national
security and cyber. She's in strategic management in
the New York field office. So she's in the most powerful
FBI field office as a special agent in charge.
She's the number two person, thenumber one for national security

(54:44):
and cyber. And that interesting.
Who is this lady? Can we find anything about her?
And she's really hard to find information on.
But it turns out that she also went to Nigeria with Chris Ray
2024, found a photograph there. She is right there.
She's circled in the picture. She's 2.
She's 2 rows back or one row back in the middle.

(55:06):
And she lives in like a 625 square foot apartment in Park
Slope, Brooklyn. She's another one of these
people that never married. She's married to the FBI.
That is her husband. It's the most awful situation
possible. My buddy said that's the face
you see when your clearance has been revoked.
It's been revoked by someone like that.

(55:27):
There you have it. So we'll talk about her on Alex
Jones today. I'm just telling you, the goal
has been how do we make these people go away and stop doing
it? You can't do it gently.
Anybody that worked for Ray or comedy that was promoted into
senior management by Ray or comedy should be gone.
It has to happen. We've claimed some scalps.

(55:50):
We're going to keep doing them here.
It's very obvious to me that certain people inside the Bureau
are paying attention because after I named her on the
podcast, within 24 hours, by Saturday morning she had already
deleted the LinkedIn account that showed her background right
here. We already grabbed it, Hun.
It's already out on the Internet, so feel free to share
it. You can go find it in my

(56:10):
timeline. This is who's up next.
This person was part of Chris Ray's strategy team.
If you got promoted, you cannot exist anymore because all of
these people that worked in national security, they're all
compromised at this point. Again, even if they're not,
we're going to lose some decent people.
Unfortunately, he lost Brian Driscoll.
Like I said, probably a decent guy, People that I respect,

(56:31):
think he was a good person, was a good agent, was a good
teammate, and he did the thing that you're supposed to do, be a
good manager, stand up for your employee.
You're going to lose some of that when you cut off an entire
limb. We need to cut some limbs.
We need to cut anything involvedin national security because
these people are using tools that are incredibly dangerous.
And even the left understands that this is not acceptable.

(56:54):
This is a former Trump administration.
He was a former chief of staff. I think he was at Homeland.
This guy's name, Miles Taylor, He end up writing a tell all
book. He's saying the correct thing.
Even if we don't agree on politics, you cannot weaponize
our government, the infrastructure part of it, and
come after American citizens unfairly.
You can't do it. Look, I am reasonably confident

(57:17):
I did not commit treason againstthe United States of America,
the country that I've served my entire career.
But that's not really what they want to do.
Whether it's going, you know, against me or Attorney General
James or Adam Schiff, they want to go shine a light on these
people in their lives and followthem as long as possible to find
the traffic infraction that theycan Lord over them to make their

(57:40):
lives very, very difficult. And make no mistake, this is not
for show. We're in the only the early
parts of this administration. The president is under enormous
pressure from the MAGA base to put these people in handcuffs.
It's why for years he's talked about locking them up.
They now want to see it. And I'm telling you, they are
going to find it. One of these newscasts, you were
going to come on on a Saturday and you and I both know this

(58:03):
Ally. And we're going to be reporting
sort of breathlessly that one ofthese people on this list has
been put in handcuffs, has been picked up and is in detention.
We are going to cross that Rubicon during the Trump
presidency. It brings me no joy to forecast
that. But that's how open eyed we need
to be about this. News flash, homie Miles, they
already did that. That Rubicon was crossed in

(58:24):
August of 2022 when the FBI executed a search warrant at the
former and now current president's home, Right?
We heard that they rifled through the first lady's, the
current first lady's underwear drawer.
That doesn't matter whether that's true or not, because they
were in a position to do it. You'd think that the people who

(58:45):
understood how flippant dangerous that was, and I'm
going to count guys like Cash Patel and Dan Bongino in it
because they were part of a movie that I helped script, that
I helped show the action, choreographed all the scenes
that involved FBI people along with Steve Friend, we were out
there making sure that it was asreal as possible so that people
understood the warning. When you weaponize government,

(59:06):
everybody loses eventually because all this political back
and forth, you're going to hammer that that that tennis
ball back to the other side of the court and what are they
going to do with it? They're going to spike it on you
the same way. So hearing them cry about that
is crazy. And the allegations now are that
usually what I would call projection, the people on the
left are crying about the idea that Trump might use the same

(59:28):
tools that they had already used, like it's somehow a novel
plan to steal an election. Again, These are the things that
need to be done. The FBI should be used to
investigate election fraud, findout who was involved in it, pull
all the records, and actually use some of those incredible,
like, computer capabilities to do a real deep dive on what
happened in 2020 so that we can have some awareness.

(59:50):
You have to fix the root problem.
Going after a comedy or a Clapper or a Brennan like that
sounds cool. It's not going to happen.
The statute is already expired. I don't think they're going to
be able to prove a conspiracy. I don't think they can get a
decent version of a grand jury that's going to go out there and
go after him. This man says otherwise.
By the way, this is, this is thethe argument that if someone

(01:00:12):
comes after you with a grand jury that you're basically
screwed. Like, you know, it would be
almost true, except that it's not.
It's scary. It's not great.
How do you know Kyle? Oh, because of the grand jury's
subpoenaed a lot of my social media and my my Google account.
This is the discussion that MSNBC is having.
Again, too little, too late. We're now batting back and

(01:00:32):
forth. We need to chop this capability
off, not like get rid of some people that were offending our
sensibilities previously. There is nothing scarier for a
citizen to get a subpoena or find out that they're being
investigated by a federal criminal grand jury.
It's terrifying, and here's why.Grand jury investigations sweep

(01:00:53):
broadly. They gather terabytes of
information and they're very efficient at going through it.
And the problem there for peopleis that they may be
investigating issue #1 and then stumble across never before
known issue #2 when going through all those documents.
That is why if somebody is the subject, the target of a grand

(01:01:14):
jury investigation, that is not a good sign.
So given that the federal government has such tremendous
power to investigate, Letitia James should be very concerned,
not that she necessarily did anything wrong, but because that
kind of scrutiny of financial records, of business records,
everything going back probably years, might yield something

(01:01:38):
that the government finds interesting.
Yeah, that's true. It does say something that
Gerardo Boyle and I were never indicted.
I think the thing that came after us for was actually
overturned by the Supreme Court.They wanted to go after an 18
USC 1512 charge from everything I heard.
And that's why zeroing in and putting your energies with the
FBI looking at like street levelcrime in Washington DC.

(01:01:59):
Are you shitting me? The Dems are already talking
about election fraud and theft. I played you this the other day.
I'm going to give you 2 different little little
snippets. One of them is from Hakeem
Jeffries saying the thing that Ithink is the quiet part out
loud, what they what they think will happen.
And then the second one is what I heard over the weekend.
This what is what needs to be fixed, the voting systems.

(01:02:23):
The integrity of the election isfar more important than like
whether or not there's homeless people on the streets of DC,
which there have been for a longtime.
DC already sucks. Fix the rot like the rot cause.
Go ahead and cut off the ugly limb that needs to be that needs
to be amputated. Stop trying to scalpel like 1
little crappy American city. You argued that Texas
Republicans, in your words, at the urging of President Donald

(01:02:44):
Trump, were trying to rig elections by allowing
politicians to choose their own voters through this
redistricting proposal. What do you say to the argument
that Democrats would be guilty of the same charge if they
gerrymandered in so-called blue states, Democratic LED states?
What Democrats would be doing inresponse is to make sure that

(01:03:06):
there is one fair national map so that the people of this
country will have the opportunity to make a decision
in November of next year in deciding who should actually
serve in the majority in the United States House of
Representatives. We think that Republicans are
scared to death that they are onthe brink of losing the House of

(01:03:28):
Representatives. Republicans are trying to rig
the congressional maps because they don't want to have this
fight on the merits. Got it.
OK, so Republicans are going to steal the election.
Is that just a one guy saying this or is this starting to go
more broadly out to the broader podcast sphere so that people on
the left are now primed to thinkthe same thing?

(01:03:50):
Remember what it resulted in thelast time?
It resulted in a January 6th anda bunch of people having no
faith in the government. Listen, if you promise MAGA
people that you're going to locka bunch of people up, as JD
Vance said he would like to see happen, but sort of like soft
pedals, that it's not going to happen.
It's coming from Tulsi Gabbard, not from Cash Patel, right?
So that's the soft sell and the other side believes that the

(01:04:11):
election is stolen. All you're doing is you're
setting up this Civil War era. This is what we talked about
with with George Hill and and Steve Friend the other day.
When people's expectations are not manifested or realized,
you're going to have something really, really dangerous.
And now you're going to set the precedent of putting FBI agents
out in the street. Does anyone see this going well?

(01:04:32):
We've already seen what that look like in 2020.
So I want everyone to pay attention to this next thing
really, really carefully. Donald Trump is doing this not
because he thinks he can pull itoff.
Like, even logistically, pullingoff another census between now
and 2026 would be nearly impossible.
Pulling it off and then having areapportionment, pulling it off,

(01:04:56):
and then every state having to do redistricting.
Because if you take away seats or add seats, you have to
redistrict the whole state, right?
Like, none of that is going to happen.
None of it would be legal, and none of it's even possible.
So ask yourself, what is Donald Trump up to?
This is what he's up to. He is laying the groundwork to
try to steal the 2026 elections.Why is the Department of Justice

(01:05:18):
collecting individual voter dataon every American?
Why are they going to all 50 states?
Why is the criminal division of the Department of Justice going
to all 50 states? To try to get the voter files so
they know where you live, what your Social Security number is,
whether you're a registered Democrat or Republican, what
elections you have voted in. Why are they collecting all of
that information? Why is he now saying we need

(01:05:40):
this massive census and and reapportionment?
Why does he tie it to 2024? I'll tell you why.
Because when Republicans lose in2026, he wants to be able to
say, you see, we lost because wewere cheated.
We lost because the census was raped.
We lost because people who are not eligible to vote voted.

(01:06:02):
We lost. And there are all these
irregularities. So everyone needs to be paying
attention to this YouTube channel, hopefully the Democracy
Dog and YouTube channel as well,because Brian and I cover this
stuff and hopefully help you connect why what Donald Trump is
doing around the census actuallyties to what the Department of
Justice is doing around voter lists.
Got it. OK, yeah, Yeah.

(01:06:23):
Let me tell you what the Department of Justice has
historically done with voter lists and what the FBI did to
investigate the so-called election fraud that happened in
2020. The alleged election fraud.
Nothing. Nothing.
They actually made a priority for four years under Joe Biden
while they were importing 100,000 Afghan refugees who
turned out to stab people that are trying to help them.
When they were doing that, what they said was is we're only

(01:06:43):
interested in voter suppression because Democrats are the only
ones who get to decide what happens.
Free and fair elections should be a priority for everyone and
if you are in the vast minority,you should not want to win
elections and then have to deal with a pissed off, very well
armed, highly trained, G wad, veteran capable opposition force

(01:07:07):
in this country. That's how everybody gets
destroyed. We're getting set up for
something really dumb, which is why those of us that are paying
attention are preparing again, and it doesn't seem like they're
paying attention to this. They're trying to piece meal the
solution with these little nits and little bites around the
edges. Machete, not scalpel.

(01:07:29):
That time has passed. Sorry, that's where we're at,
right? That's today's program.
That's what I have to say about that.
If you want to see more of it, you can join me on Alex Jones
with the Infowars. That will be happening at 3:00
PM Eastern Time. It's 2 here in Texas.
I'm going to drive down his studio to go hang out with him
because the experience is alwaysa little bit more.
Make sure you guys are supporting our channel by
subscribing to it over on YouTube and on Rumble on X.

(01:07:49):
You can be a subscriber as well.If you guys want to be a paid
subscriber on locals, that's awesome.
It's Kyle seraphin.com. I'll give you all the articles
that I referenced today as well.Some of these photographs
that'll be out there. If you guys want to have a like,
we appreciate that. If you want to get notified when
we go live, you can skip all theads other than what I read,
which is about two or three, never more than that.
You can get all that stuff by going and watching us live at
0930 Eastern Time and that is 8:30 here in Central Texas,

(01:08:13):
America. I do have a palate cleanse for
you today. I think we should laugh about
something. The other day you guys beat me
up about this idea that fat people are not related to the
number of calories they eat. It turns out that it's been
fairly conclusively proven that the laws of thermodynamics, they
do apply to you, hormones be damned.
If you take in less, you will lose weight.

(01:08:34):
If you do less than you consume by moving around, it turns out
that's just the way that the the, the laws of matter have to
function, and it's really not negotiable.
So for all those who wrote me after the fact, and many of you
did, and some of you guys actually sent me books, and I
appreciate the books, but I don't have any time to read
things about how your hormones are actually going to dictate it
no matter what you eat. No, there was a thing that this
professor did called the Twinkieexperiment.

(01:08:56):
I'm going to play a little sort of snippy thing about this.
If you ate nothing but 1000 calories of Donuts and you
walked around in a regular American Life day, you would
burn more than 1000 calories. And then you, sorry, not pounds
calories. If you ate 1000 calories with a
Donuts every single day, you'd lose weight.
You'd probably be eventually unhealthy, but not even
immediately. It turns out a lot of your
metrics would actually go into abetter way.
Here's your palate cleanse. Basically said if you ate 1000

(01:09:18):
calories a day of just Donuts you will get fat.
And I reply to the comment I'm like, I disagree.
It's purely thermodynamics. You know someone did that but
with Twinkies to prove a point. And wait wasn't the only thing
they lost. This is Mark Hobb, the professor
of human nutrition at Kansas State University.
And for 10 weeks, he wanted to do an experiment, eating what he
called the Twinkie Diet, or a diet made-up of exclusively

(01:09:40):
Twinkies, Oreos, Doritos, and a few their snacks to see if he
could still lose weight. Following the number one rule
for weight loss, eating fewer calories than you burned, he
found that he burned about 2600 calories per day.
And even though it was junk food, he made sure to eat only
1800 calories per day. And after 10 weeks of doing
this, he lost 27 lbs and his body fat dropped from 33% down

(01:10:02):
to 24%. But that's not really
surprising. What comes next is not only did
his weight drop, his bad cholesterol also dropped by 20%
and his good cholesterol went upby 20 percent, his triglycerides
lowered by almost half, and his blood pressure fell from being
in stage 1 hypertension down to a normal healthy level.
Listen to what I'm about to say.Calories matter, but they are

(01:10:23):
not the only thing that matters.No one is telling you to eat
like this. All this is showing is that you
don't have to be perfect to be healthy.
Having some unhealthy foods in amostly healthy diet isn't a bad
thing, and it doesn't make you unhealthy.
All right, so there you have it folks.
Look, this has been done. You can go back and type in
Twinkie Diet anywhere you like. If you want to do it on YouTube,
you can see some news coverage of it.

(01:10:43):
If you type it into Google, you'll get some articles that
were written about it at the time.
Calories in, calories out. That's really the simple measure
of it. It doesn't have the total metric
for health. No, what it says is that you can
eat some junk and still be OK. Or you could be a savage and
just do total meat like my buddySteven Stambolia and you'll lose
like, you know, £100 because that's how it works.
The quality of calories matter, but at the end of the day, the
quantity is very important. If you want to write to the

(01:11:05):
show, you can always do that at 9073, 3 W, State Highway 29,
Suite 110, Box 5 O 9, Liberty Hill, TX 78642.
That's for those you want to send me a postcard or a letter
that disagrees with this conclusion, which has been out
there for a long time. Anyway, it's available to you if
you guys are so inclined. I appreciate all the people that
wanted to connect with us, whether it's online or offline.
I hope you guys have a fantasticday and God bless you.

(01:11:26):
I look forward to making this week interesting.
I think we're going to start offwith 1 already.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSeraphin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter,
Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.

All Episodes

PURGE? Sacrifice the Limb to save the Body... | Ep 628

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}PURGE? Sacrifice the Limb to save the Body... | Ep 628