SELF-LICKING: Our Government ALWAYS defends the Government (NCSWC) | Ep 643 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:11):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast. 2nd Amendment defender and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and

(00:39):
welcome to the Kyle Serpent Show.
Today is Tuesday, it is September the 2nd, and I
appreciate you all being with us.
Thanks to our growing audience over on YouTube.
It's awesome to see you guys perking up and popping in with
us in the mornings and of courseour regular folks over on the
Rumble chat. You guys are great as well.
So thanks so much for being along for this ride.
We had Labor Day weekend and that means it was a long weekend

(01:00):
and that means we were supposed to celebrate a day off for
people who do work. Many of you are in that
category. I hope you got a federal day
off. I spent it with my kiddos in the
outdoors like a lot of people do.
And then I also spent it sort ofsleepless and I've dropped
probably, I don't know, 10 or 11lbs since the last, the end of

(01:23):
the, the, the events of last week, which we're really wild.
I told you it was going to be a big week.
I didn't have any idea that we were going to have any of the
fun stuff that we did. On Friday.
We went, I went down to Houston to go negotiate with the federal
government on a settlement or a potential settlement for a long
term lawsuit that we have. It's multiple years now about

(01:44):
COVID tyranny and sort of COVID malfeasance.
And of course, Spencer Evans wasrecently fired from the FBI and
the reason cited was his overreach and unreasonable
actions that the FBI took as part of the FBI's COVID
enforcement policy. Something that I'm going to be
touching on today, not in the sense of the FBI's policy, but
just more broadly that the government pushed this thing on

(02:06):
us and many of us lost faith in institutions over the last
couple years, and we dramatically did so in 2020 and
2021. You know, what are you going to
do when you find out that your government is lying to you in a
very meaningful way and they're doing so to advance an agenda?
Now, the crazy thing for me was,is that I got to go and see that

(02:28):
the government was not willing to reach a settlement with us.
They were 100 miles apart from what the, the group of
plaintiffs that I work with and the, the DOJ attorneys and we
have a confidentiality agreement.
So we're not going to say anything more than no agreement
was reached. The lawsuit will continue and
that's the status quo. And so I've, I've reached this

(02:49):
conclusion. It's not going to be surprising
to you, but it is a conclusion that I have that it doesn't
matter who, quote, UN quote, runs our government because the
government just runs. And the purpose of the
government is to continue government.
And the purpose of the government is to defend the
actions of government, regardless of who did them and
regardless of what an administration at the top says
was wrong. Remember, you can have the

(03:12):
person, the official who enforced bad policy fired for
that bad policy. But what you can't have is the
government admit that that policy affected people
negatively and that those workers should be made whole.
That was my experience on Friday.
And it's more of exactly what you guys are saying in the chat.
That process is punishment. I'm going to go over not so much

(03:37):
what was alleged in a lawsuit that was dropped last week,
which is a thrilling, exciting thing and probably the reason
why I've lost weight and why I'm, I'm, I'm not sleeping.
And again, you know, I'm not angry.
I'm, I'm like emotionally distressed over it because the
anxiety that comes in from someone coming after you,
particularly when they have access to unlimited resources as
a the top tier of the federal investigative agency.

(04:00):
This is just more continuation of what I've seen for years.
Then I went through this again. You know, I did this initially
when I first went public with Dan Bongino and told my story.
You step out and you just go, I know that I'm about to walk into
a, a complete buzz saw and, and I'm going to do it anyway.
And then you find out that the buzz saw just, you know, you get
reprieves, there's teeth that are missing in the saw, but it

(04:21):
never really stops spinning at you.
And I'm going to give you kind of the timeline on that.
Looks like Director Cash Patel has decided to return to America
from Scotland. No mention in any of his social
media posts about why he was there, what he was doing there,
how that had anything to do withFBI business.
And maybe we'll find out and maybe we won't.
There's also no mention of whistleblowers being celebrated.

(04:41):
I have the alerts on for the social media posts that come out
of the FBI director for obvious reasons.
And what we found out is that hedoesn't seem to celebrate the
return of Gerardo Boyle and Steve Friend and Mike and some
others that have been named on this program.
And isn't that interesting? I'm going to give you the
timeline of why I think that's relevant.
And then I also want to talk about sort of the biggest sort
of gas light there is. The main story that runs across

(05:02):
all of the major news or outletsright now.
All of them, CNNNBCCBSABC, take your pick.
They are all talking about two things that are going to be sort
of a contrast, a bipartisan pushto get release of the Epstein
files. That's where all of this
started, I think in many ways. And then the second thing is, is
that we are going to have a fight over the budget because we

(05:24):
are now in September, which is the last month of the fiscal
year for the federal government.Anybody who works in contracting
knows what I'm talking about. But if you guys are not familiar
with the way that your federal government that you pay for with
your tax dollars operates, allowme to illuminate real quickly.
They end the year at the end of September and October 1st is the
first day of the new fiscal year.

(05:45):
I have no idea why they did that.
They probably set the budget back.
Maybe somebody knows the the history on this.
But allow me to tell you real quickly, your government does
not operate on the same fiscal year as you, most of you, unless
you work for a government sort of subsidized agency.
And so we're going to have that fight again.
And here's my prediction to you right up front, because I'll
always do this. I think we're going to see

(06:06):
continuing resolution, continuing resolution and then
omnibus in some variety. I doubt that that gets done any
differently. And the reason why is because
I've watched history and so haveyou.
And you guys also know that all the things they said they were
going to do, they immediately move on from that because
they're going to give you a shiny new object to chase.
And today's object is called thethe Epstein files.
Before we get into the rest of today's program, that was kind

(06:27):
of the preview and kind of a warm up and coming in bent from
a long weekend, allow me to tellyou about my buddies over at
Patriot Coolers. I brought the 40 oz with me in
the backpack when I went and satwith the judge for mediation.
I bring it with me wherever I go.
It's always full of something. In this case, this one is full
of an iced coffee because it's afreaking 1000° and super muggy
outside. This one is wood grain to match
the, IT was actually meant to match the wood grain interior of

(06:49):
my minivan or my wife's minivan,but it also matches very nicely
with the set of our House of ourstudio here, guys.
Patriot coolers.com is the the website Kyle.
Kyle is the promo code. It's very easy to check it in
there. You get 10% off.
You get the same discount if youwere a veteran.
So you're not getting anything special, but it does allow you
to take advantage of, you know, watching our program and we

(07:10):
appreciate that they've been with us legitimately from the
beginning, going back to February, I want to say of 2023,
before there was an audience, before most of you were even
aware that I was out there doingthis, they were with us and
they've been in our corner and I'm really appreciated.
They are like sort of the most grandfathered in of our
sponsors. So they're built for freedom.
They are built to perform. They are patriotic in nature and
in design and in layout. And they're patriotic in the way

(07:32):
they actually execute the company because they actually
donate a portion of all their proceeds to disabled veterans to
help them with mobility. So if you guys want to support a
great company that also supportsus, that's way to do it.
Whenever you're in the mood for like a corporate gift, you know,
someone house warming something,somebody who has everything and
you're like, what do I get them?You can check out something at
Patriot Coolers and they're going to have something there
that's going to be pretty good. Let's get into today's program.
We've got a ton of stuff I want to cover and I want to try to do

(07:53):
it as focused as we can. All right, let's do it.
One of the biggest challenges that I always face when I start
the program prep in the morning and I have to wait until
morning, or at least I I generally am waiting till

(08:14):
morning before we actually, you know, get the actual show kind
of laid out. One of the biggest challenges is
how do I Orient us to a through line that explains what I see
going on right now. And the easiest way to do it
today was, I found it a short that this guy, Scott McFarland
did. And McFarland is a mainstream

(08:36):
media news guy. He also was really skinny and
doesn't seem to fill out a normal dress shirt.
I'm not sure how skinny he is orwhat causes him to be that
skinny. But you'll notice that his shirt
is like a bag on him. And he has a very polished
delivery. And it's most likely written in
a script. And the odds are is that he does
multiple takes. If anyone's ever tried to do
this kind of stuff where you go do a take, there's always
something you don't like. That's kind of why I like doing

(08:58):
the show live, because I'll stumble over a word every once
in a while, and then that's justpart of the show.
That's how you know that it's being done live.
But mainstream media likes to doscripting.
They like to do this sort of fake feeling, like you're going
to get the real truth from somebody who speaks really
simply. And he just says it just right,
exactly the way you want to sound.
And he has a little bit of a thing to his voice because
that's how he sees it going in away that's going to make it

(09:19):
substantiated to you. Tell me if you don't hear that
these are the stories that CBS is going to be pushing today or
that Scott McFarlane thinks thatCBS is going to be pushing.
He's doing the same thing I do. He's looking at the news
stories, but I feel like the motivation is different.
Maybe you guys can tell by the voice.
Here we go. Hey, it's Scott McFarlane.
Good Tuesday morning. Going to be a really busy day

(09:41):
for everybody tracking the Jeffrey Epstein controversy and
the mess that is all the back and forth over the Jeffrey
Epstein files. It's going to be a bipartisan
push today in the US House on this legislative mechanism that
could force the release of Jeffrey Epstein files,
potentially satisfying this faction of people, including

(10:01):
Trump supporters. I think the administration isn't
doing right by this and not being transparent enough with
what it knows about Jeffrey Epstein.
Meanwhile, a group of Jeffrey Epstein survivors travel to
Washington, DC, and we expect them to make public appearances
later this week to make their arguments.
And some of them have told me they find all of this

(10:21):
triggering, all of this to be a challenge to them and other
survivors of sex abuse across the country.
As Glenn Maxwell gets a new platform and a higher profile
and an interview with the deputyattorney general, and as Jeffrey
Epstein's name continues to circulate in this political
argument that happens as well. We'll see how the Trump

(10:42):
administration responds. But there is going to be this
shot of nitroglycerin to those who want to make the Jeffrey
Epstein files an issue. OK.
And recording. Yeah.
And you'll notice that he's got the, he's got the shirt sleeves
rolled up kind of 3/4 the way that you'd expect maybe a Jim
Jordan type to really let you know that he, he's a hard
working news guy. Even if he can't fill out a a

(11:05):
regular dress shirt, that's normal.
That's what he does. So you hear that they're going
to do the classic Democrat move.They're going to focus in on the
controversy, not because they cared about victims, not because
they had a president who was in for a very long time, for full
years where they could have donesomething about this.
They could have done something under Obama as well.
Turns out there's a a long history here and none of it was

(11:26):
investigated. None of it was honest and none
of it continues to be. But the reason why I actually
found that file and that little clip of what's going on in the
news today, and it is the first story that I will cover just
because I think it tells us a bigger story.
If we could just focus on the Jeffrey Epstein stuff, we don't
have to worry about this bipartisan budget fight, which
is going to result in some massive omnibus where they spend

(11:47):
all of our money and we have no say in it.
The bigger piece there is that Scott did a little piece of the
weekend where he wants to talk about law fair and lawsuits and
politics and how they are inextricable.
And I had that experience on Friday.
Because you can't get somebody to be impartial about something

(12:08):
that wrecked our country, that ripped us apart.
And what that was was a government stepping in and
telling you that you must do something whether you like it or
not. And that's the opposite of what
government supposed to do. Government is meant to protect
you from force and fraud. It is not meant to shove its
ideas of what's good and bad on you and say that you have no

(12:29):
ability to negotiate back. When we talk about the ideas of
weaponized government, we talk about the concept that
government is weaponized. It is that government has an end
goal. What it should not.
It's end goal should be to allowyou to have the most perfect
expression of human freedom and stay out of its way, the way of
the the population, the people who fund it.

(12:50):
But when we talk about a self licking ice cream cone, which is
the constant analogy used insidethe the Beltway, Washington DC,
it means that the you have something that doesn't have a
real purpose anymore. Its purpose is simply self
sustainability. The government exists to keep
continue keeping the government going.
And when I say that the government will always defend

(13:12):
itself, and I'm talking about big G government, it doesn't
matter what agency we talk about.
Go over to Department of Energy,go to Department of Commerce.
These are almost all executive agencies, Department of Justice,
Department of Homeland Security.They exist to continue what they
do. Again, it is a a task and a
purpose. Divorce.
In theory, the task is what you should do or what you must do,

(13:35):
and the purpose is why. And right now the why is gone.
The why is because that's how we've always done it.
And that's what I do for a living and never a question of
is it right? Is this what we are supposed to
be doing? Is this the actual original
intent? It's not there.
Listen to Scott McFarlane again,by the way, He has the same

(13:56):
exact opening. Hello.
Yeah, I do the same thing. And when I open my show, I guess
we fall into grooves. It's funny to.
I diagnose it in somebody else. Listen to what he has to say
about the Proud Boys. He's talking about the Proud
Boys case. This is Enrique Tario, who we
interviewed here recently, Joe Biggs, who we interviewed
earlier this year. Guys who put $100 million
lawsuit claiming a weaponized government.

(14:17):
Would it shock you to know that our DOJ wants to kick that web,
that lawsuit to the curb? They don't want to deal with it.
They want to substantiate and affirm the previous government's
actions because there's actuallyno difference unless you get rid
of the people that are going to do those things, unless you
actually take the helm and turn the corner.
They never did. And here's Scott McFarlane

(14:38):
explaining to you that they didn't.
Hey, it's Scott McFarlane. Sometimes you just can't
separate the legal issues from the political issues.
Sometimes they are just inextricably intertwined.
And we're seeing that this LaborDay weekend as some of the Trump
administration's attorneys at the US Department of Justice are
taking heat from some factions of Trump supporters over what

(15:00):
they're doing with this lawsuit filed in federal court in
Florida, where a group of January 6th defendants, high
level January 6th defendants areseeking $100 million plus and
punitive damages, alleging they were maliciously prosecuted and
that their 4th Amendment rights were violated, among other
allegations in a civil lawsuit they filed against the federal

(15:22):
government. The Department of Justice has
filed a nearly 30 page motion asking a court to.
Dismiss. Saying first of all, the federal
government enjoys some form of sovereign immunity and that no
case has been made of malicious prosecution, and that these
January 6th defendants haven't exhausted their administrative
remedies before bringing a federal lawsuit.

(15:45):
And that's exactly how it alwaysgoes.
You haven't exhausted your administrative remedies.
I experienced those administrative remedies when I
was working for the FBI. And so I have a very, you know,
similar sense to what these guysare going through.
They went straight to a federal lawsuit, which is the only way
you're going to get it done. And they actually had the belief
that there might be a settlementthere, just like we were led to

(16:07):
believe when it came to the lawsuit about COVID.
Now, COVID predates the January 6th controversy in some ways
because it started, and then in other ways it actually comes
afterwards because they began the January 6th crackdowns on
January 6th of 2021. And then you had the Biden
administration come in and starteliminating people that didn't
want to get on board with them. And isn't that funny?

(16:28):
And isn't it interesting that the DOJ that supposedly under
Donald Trump, the same guy that pardoned all of these people or
commuted their sentences, Joe Big, still without a pardon,
still needs a pardon, is unable to access VA benefits because of
the way that he was commuted andnot pardoned.
Those people are still looking for a way to redress grievances.

(16:50):
And you have to go through a process.
And that process is exactly whatthe punishment looks like.
The process is very specific. It's will you please fill out an
EEOC complaint? Will you please apply to have us
recognized as a whistleblower? Will you go to the Office of
Attorney Recruitment and Management, even though that
doesn't make any sense for them to be the people that decide

(17:10):
what a whistleblower is because they just recruit new people to
DOJ? You have to go to them.
And then you can go to the MeritService Protection Board.
But before you can go to that, you better go and ask us for an
appeal. And that appeal is all you're
able to contest whether or not your name is the person that we
named in the thing that we did. The FBI actually gave me a
hearing. And the hearing was not to hear
any facts unless my name was notKyle Serafin.

(17:32):
But it's a hearing. So you're given administrative
due process. All that does is kick you down
the line. And as much as anything else,
what it does is it exhaust your financial resources.
It exhaust your faith in the system.
It exhaust your ability to look at everything and still be cool,
calm, collected, measured. All they want to do is rattle
you as you keep going on. Then you go to the Merit Service

(17:53):
Protection Board. They argue that they don't
actually have the right venue. They don't have jurisdiction or
standing to be able to recognizeyour case.
And then you end up in the EEOC and they say, you know, we've
done a 65 page study and it basically affirms that the
government looked into themselves and found that they
were not guilty and there's justno evidence of it.
We didn't go look for evidence, by the way, but we didn't find

(18:13):
any evidence that was presented when we didn't go look for it.
So we're unable to substantiate your claims.
And so we're just going to go ahead and say that we wish you
the best. And by the way, you could appeal
that if you want. And we'll look at it again and
do the same thing. And maybe in like 6 to 8 to 10
to 9 years, like some of these whistleblowers reinstated last
week, maybe you will find that somebody gives you back pay.

(18:35):
They've wrecked your reputation.They've wrecked your health.
They've wrecked your your psychological status.
They've wrecked your trust in the federal government of the
systems. They've destroyed all the maybe
you're on a bunch of medicationsnow.
You're probably financially ruined.
But we're going to get back to you on that, OK?
And that's how this all looks. So that's why when I see
Congress returning to face a chaotic funding fight, an

(18:59):
Epstein drama and the crime crackdown, these are the three
stories that are that are leading the news.
There's going to be potentially National Guard troops coming in
to try to shut down what's goingon in Chicago.
The the amount of violence that's been going on for most of
my adult life, which is insane. They're going to talk about
Jeffrey Epstein as though suddenly the left cares about
traffic, children or a pedophileor things like this.

(19:19):
When they had the ability to deal with it, when they had one
of their greatest champions, Bill Clinton, right, and his
wife were national prominent figures, they kept their mouth
shut. And now there's a possibility
that it can wound the Donald Trump administration.
So they're going to go after that.
And then lastly, we're going to basically cover that.
There's going to be eventual continuing resolution because in
30 days, the government will be unfunded and it'll face the

(19:42):
shutdown. And that will be a totally not
predictable, imminent problem. So what are we going to do about
it? Well, we're going to have to
kick the can down the road so wecan evaluate this later.
And why do we have Mike Johnson is the speaker of the House from
the Republican side, even thoughwe have all both houses of
Congress and theoretically we have the White House, all this
stuff is all done. This is a Republican, a
Republican term because this is all show, this is all theater.

(20:05):
And the guy who actually got hisjob campaigning for the job,
saying that we would do single item appropriations for
government agencies, he's nowhere to be found, that guy.
How many of you can remember thefight to unseat Kevin McCarthy?
Someone sent me a picture of Kevin McCarthy today because we
were talking about wealthy people with lots of money who

(20:28):
just happened to live with otherwealthy men in their 40s and
50s. Totally normal thing to do.
What do you give you guys kind of the the progression of what
happened of late? The process is the punishment
and why I have such empathy for the Proud Boys.
And I think they had a New Hope when they got out of prison.
And I don't blame them for it. In fact, I'm I'm glad they did
because God, that'd be rough. And then you kind of see that

(20:51):
it's always a process equals punishment situation.
I'm going to read you some factsfrom our our friend Phil
Kennedy. Kennedy was the emeritus
producer. He is the reason for this
podcast in many ways. He encouraged me to do it.
He suggested to me that I get out there and start talking and
he helped produce the original episodes and gave me the
motivation to go and get a voice.
So this is from his Twitter X feed.

(21:13):
I'm just going to read, He says what you need to know about the
Kyle Cash drama. This is obviously a reference to
Cash Patel and these are the timelines that he sees.
This is obviously not without chatting with me and and some of
the other suspendables. So this is not something that is
going to be foreign to you #1. Cash and Dan didn't plan on
reinstating any whistleblowers. I think that's evidenced by the

(21:34):
fact that they didn't in the same way that the Trump
administration did not go out there and solve the problem for
the Proud Boys, as evidenced by the fact that they had the power
and they didn't. I'll look at Joe Biggs
commutation versus his, his possible pardon.
It would have cost him nothing politically.
Donald Trump, at that point, it would have been out of the news
already. But instead the man is still

(21:55):
suffering. Today I saw a post, he said
something about hearing voices and having some, you know, you
know, obviously mental trauma that is ongoing and he can't get
it addressed because he doesn't have any money and he doesn't
have access to the VA, even though he's a veteran and, and a
Purple Heart recipient and served this country and bled for
this country. So that's pretty tough to deal
with that. That feels like betrayal #2.

(22:16):
Kyle reported on the MAR A Lago raid and the case agent pilot
who was flying Cash Patel aroundon the FBI jet.
You guys know about that? That was August 4th.
I gave pre warning to people inside the Trump administration
political appointee be able to get that to the right folks.
The White House was pissed and it picked Andrew Bailey in an
unprecedented Co deputy directorspot.
You guys know that that was announced probably.

(22:37):
And then I also turned around to#4 Kyle reports that Andrew
Bailey is actually cash and Dan's replacement.
It's very simple to me. I've never heard of anybody
getting a Co managerial spot because you were doing a great
job and the Co manager who got this, the Co manager assigned
usually doesn't get to stick around, mostly because you're
not doing a good job. Maybe you're doing a miserable

(22:57):
job, maybe you don't want to be there in the 1st place.
I think all those things apply to Dan Pongino.
So he's gone. But none of you can name the
last five FBI deputy directors and what they do today outside
of Andy McCabe, who we're going to play in a minute, none of you
can name what they do. You don't know who they are and
you know what they did. And most of you, if you pay
attention to this program, know that Andrew Bailey is a
potential national figure and hewas the number one choice

(23:18):
initially. We made the case and that got a
reaction. In order to save his job number
5, Cash Patel launches a Hail Mary posting about reinstating
10 whistleblowers without consulting the DOJ or the
whistleblowers attorneys. As I told you guys at the time,
there was no deal in writing. And by the way, that 10 included
two that were already on board. So they went after it and had to

(23:38):
figure out another 8. And so they did.
And they were all the eight thatwere represented by Empower
Oversight, the whistleblower attorneys.
They were having issues with DOJand that issue specifically was
Cash Patel that he couldn't cometo the deal.
I announced that they didn't have the deal.
The White House pissed again because he put his foot in it
another time, sends Cash Patel to Scotland for a time out.
This is our this is our analysis.

(23:58):
This is not necessarily factually a claim, but it's our
belief that the White House senthim there to get him out of the
way. And as a result, over the
weekend, last weekend, not this previous Labor Day, but the one
before that, they ended up signing a deal, getting it
together. And the final details were
announced on the 26th. And so through his attorney and

(24:20):
girlfriend Cash Patel, this is direct quote.
He says through his attorney andgirlfriend, Cash sues Kyle for
repeating something previously said by other media
personalities. Again, the deal for the
whistleblowers was on the 26th. The lawsuit drops on the 27th.
I'm made aware of it on the 28th, The 29th, the the DOJ has
no settlement available for me and the others who went through
this process. And there's the take on it.

(24:42):
What do you do with that stuff? Because again, process being
punishment. I have a lot of empathy right
now what those Proud Boys feel. And I'm also looking at our
government and seeing that we'renot in a good place and we
actually have an ongoing disaster area directly across
the pond that we can look at andwe can see where this goes.
It's real clear because the previous administration and the

(25:05):
ones before that, you know, you can have Donald Trump one point
O be a speed bump, but the overwhelming push to derail this
country in the way that we're seeing it, it's just it's just
an acceleration of the previous things that have been going on.
And as I said, we have an example of what it looks like

(25:28):
when you take the brake off whenyou get rid of the the speed
bumps and it's right across the pond.
It's what we separated from. They don't have all of the the
measures of protection that we have.
So I'm going to play you a guy who's British talking about
Britain, and I can't help but seeing the parallels.
We share a culture, we share a national origin.

(25:49):
We share a lot of common law, which goes back 500 years.
We share a revolutionary moment where we separated, but we still
maintain strong allyship with this country.
We've worked with them in the last several wars.
Yes. They actually started off trying
to eliminate our our ongoing nation status.
And then they became reliant on us.
Like many things, we grew back together.

(26:10):
It's like a sibling fight in some ways.
I would say, you know, you can fight with your sibling and draw
blood, but if somebody else tries to come after your
sibling, that's your sibling. I kind of look at the Brits that
way, especially because we now look at them as being sort of
the the older brother, but the little brother.
And that's also kind of a strange dynamic, and they seem
like they're screwed. And here's some people talking

(26:32):
about it. The UK is now one of the
shittest places to live. Taxes are so high they take most
your money from you up to 45% income tax, then on top of that
20% VAT on everything you buy. Then you've got things like
council tax, Rd. tax, stamp duty, the list goes on.
The town centres are rundown shit holes full of crime
stabbings on every corner. The cost of living so high it

(26:52):
costs most people's hourly wage just to buy a coffee and a
sandwich so no one can afford tolive.
Everyone works all day just to pay their bills and barely get
by and pay their high interest mortgage Which which they end up
paying two to three times more for the house than it was
actually bought for. And then once they're finally
finished paying this, they can'teven hand the house down to
their kids when they've worked their whole life and paid their
taxes. They've got to pay almost half
of it in inheritance tax and they want to increase tax

(27:14):
further from here. You get constant fines through
your letterbox for stupid things.
And guess what? If you don't pay these fines,
they'll keep going up and up until the bailiffs will come and
take your car and your house from you if you don't pay it
because you owe nothing and you work your whole life as a slave
for this system. It's almost like you hear that
sort of World Economic Forum mantra.

(27:34):
You'll loan nothing and you'll be happy because you won't know
any better. How many of us are living in a
tax burden that you couldn't fathom or your parents couldn't
have fathomed, or your parents parents certainly couldn't have?
And you think, well, we could just turn it around with a vote.
And then you see stories like this and I don't think you can
turn it around with a vote. This is NBC News, This is a

(27:57):
left-leaning news source. Donald Trump faces a hurdle in
banning mail in voting and that hurdle is his own Republican
Party. This morning, Barry Cunningham
was going back and forth with meabout Q stuff.
I think Q and the Q plus. And Donald Trump, by the way,
tweeted something out or shared on true Social saying, you know,
like nothing can stop what's coming.

(28:17):
I agree. What's coming though, is a
continuing resolution, another continuing resolution and
eventually an omnibus. What's coming is what has always
been coming our way. And in many ways, I don't know
that anything can stop what's coming.
There's really only two possibilities.
Servitude to a government that no longer serves us, or
something that like looks like 1776, which is the kind of thing
that you saw Vivek Ramaswamy andDonald Trump campaigning on in

(28:41):
2024, like a real revolutionary moment.
That was what was being discussed, a national divorce.
And I don't see it trending right now again, because we're
being distracted by all the things that are out there.
But then you read a story like this.
This is the percentage of 2024 general election turn out by
mail. And where is it heaviest?

(29:03):
In the turn out by mail here, itturns out Washington state,
98.5% of the ballots were cast there.
I'm actually going to go over toour to our graphic here so you
guys can see it. I'm going to put the graphic on
the screen. It's interactive.
Oregon 99.3% cast by mail. These are also not the states

(29:27):
where Donald Trump won. The ones with the hash marks are
where he won. Here you go.
How about Vermont 64.7%? Let's go to this one.
Colorado Trump didn't win 91.3%.Now he won in Arizona with 74%
that was mail in, and Utah with 91%.
Those places are pretty safe generally.
California 80.8 are mail in. No win there.

(29:52):
Do you see all these wins? And why is it that the
Republicans are fighting againstthis sort of thing?
This will be the thing that endsus.
I think in many ways we can. We can agree on that.
It will be the thing that takes down the Republic because what
it's done is it's made it more quote UN quote democratic.
It's also taken our vote and putit in a place where we can no
longer see. When you cast your vote, it goes
into an electronic black box. And at the end of the day,

(30:14):
nobody knows what the answer is.The answer is whatever the
computer spits out. And we've been building up an
entire lifetime of trusting computers and technology.
And there are people that are born today that don't remember
an analog history the way that Ido, the way that many of you do.
The average audience member hereremembers at the very minimum,
having an analog childhood. Many of you had early adulthoods

(30:35):
or even most of your adult life in the analog world.
Paper ballots work just fine. And we got results the next day.
Maybe people would be a jury, you know that maybe we were, you
were like a like a politics nerd.
You stayed up all night to find out who won.
I'm going to continue on with that story, but I'm going to 1st
break over to one of our sponsors since it's a logical
time to go ahead and do it and we'll talk about the folks over

(30:56):
at Silent. This is a tool that I brought
with me. I brought that exact backpack
with me when I went to go do ourmediation and I actually brought
this as well because I didn't want any government employees
around my phone when possible. Your phone is a tracking device
just like all this technology. It has things going on that you
can't see and you don't know about.
South government agencies and big tech, corporate data
brokers, cybercriminals, take your pick, are all looking for a

(31:19):
piece of your digital footprint and they don't ask.
They just take it because you'reout there pinging them at a
regular basis with all of the different wireless signals that
are out there. And that's why silent exists.
Their Faraday gear will block all wireless signals.
There's cellular, there's Wi-Fi,there's Bluetooth, there's GPS,
there's RFID, there's NFC. All these signals are constantly
looking for somewhere to send information and share it.

(31:41):
If you have no signal, that means they can't track you.
There's no remote access, there's no bread crumbs.
There's no one following you. That's the way that we do it in
the special operations world. That's the way that you do it in
the counterintelligence world. This is the way the federal law
enforcement tries to protect sources.
You can get your own Faraday products at silent.com/kyle SLN
t.com slash Kyle. As long as you use Kyle at the
end when you're checking out, you'll save 15% on your

(32:03):
qualified orders. They make really good products.
They make intelligently designedstuff, and if you're a
government operation, you need to have US made stuff very
compliant. You can get that done too, and
you'll pay the price that on that.
If you want to choose your priceand you want to buy something
that's sewn overseas with an American company, you can do
that as well. Their stuff is used by the US
military. It's used by various law
enforcement agencies, and they make an outstanding product.

(32:23):
I've tested the other ones that are cheap and they tend to fail.
That's just the way that they work.
They almost all have some sort of a leak in their design or in
the way that they're actually manufactured.
You guys want to get something that works?
Check out this. And it is a really, really smart
thing. There are more pockets in this
than you can think of, and it carries more stuff than you
would imagine. You can literally carry an
entire broadcast suite with you,which I did.
And you can also carry, you know, like clothes for the

(32:44):
entire week. If you're like me and you don't
wear that much clothes, check that out. slnt.com slash Kyle.
I'm going to go back into the story here about banning mail in
voting. My view on vote by mail is that
it should be permissible, says House Majority Leader Brian
Postumus. I think that's how you say his
name. He's in Michigan State.
He's a Republican, and he endorsed Trump.

(33:06):
But I believe currently the way exists specifically in Michigan
is at the highest risk for fraud.
Oh, yeah. What was your first indication?
We lived through a place where we started discrediting some of
these things. But this discrediting happened a
very, very long time ago. I love this.
This is the chair of the VermontRepublican Party.
Donald Trump often does. He sometimes overstates his

(33:27):
case. I don't think anyone supports
complete elimination that would disenfranchise men and women
overseas. And I'm not sure that's his
intention. So if we can do the same thing
that they do on abortion, if we can just try to hone in on the
exceptions to the rule, then we'll just say that the rule in
general is bad. And why is that?
And I think it's because the status quo continues to be
undefeated. You cannot beat it.

(33:48):
That continues to just do what it does.
Government continues to do the thing that government does.
We want it to remain the same because that it's predictable.
When it's predictable, we can goout there and we can sell
influence and we can go out there and move money around and
we can take yours and we can do what we want with it.
Because you're not paying attention.
And it's really not sexy to talkabout voting systems.
And I, my eyes glaze over too. My buddy Joe is 100% focused on

(34:12):
this all the time. He sends me technical data and
papers and white papers and, andresearch and, and, you know,
algorithmic regressions to try to find curve of best fit for
decay models. And I'm just like, I don't have
the bandwidth. I can understand it technically,
but I don't want to and I don't care.
And I imagine many of you are inthe same boat.
And when they play on that, which they do, then you got

(34:34):
people saying, look, you don't want service members not to be
able to vote to you. I mean, wouldn't that be
terrible? We don't want victims of a child
sex predator. We're a guy who was out there
who was trafficking in teenage girls.
We don't want that guy to get away with it even though he's
already dead, do we? That's why we have to hold the
Epstein files accountable suddenly, even though we didn't
previously. That's why we need to, you know,

(34:55):
make sure that mail in ballotingis there for people who are sick
or old. How about the majority of the
voting population? How about the fact that we can
pretty much assume from all available data, including some
election fraud cases, that people took advantage of the
sick and the elderly who were shut insurance and couldn't make
it to the polling station and had their their sick 90 year old

(35:17):
grandmother who's no longer mentally competent to throw a
ballot in to make sure that she checked the right boxes with her
hand even though it was too weakto hold a pencil or too weak to
hold a pen. So we mailed that thing in.
The government continues to do what the government does always,
and it doesn't fight against itself unless you get people
that are really disruptive. And there's a thing, there's a

(35:38):
couple of people in the Trump administration that seem to be
disruptive. I've mentioned Tulsi Gabbard
before, if you guys have heard me talk about it.
Chris Wright, he's the secretaryof Energy.
He seems to be a disruptor. Lee Zeldin seems to be a
disruptor. There are people inside this
administration that clearly get what the mission is, which is go
stop. The thing that was happening.
The government was not working the way that it was designed.

(35:59):
It wasn't protecting you from force and fraud.
In fact, it was partaking in thefraud.
So if your government is part ofthe fraud, the right way to do
it is to stop said fraud. You might need some tourniquet
measures, but the answer is not more government.
So I tend to disagree with federalizing places like Chicago
or or Washington, DC. If anything else, you may have

(36:20):
to go in and stop it. But what happens when the people
in those areas actually vote forthe thing that they got?
Because that's what we see. I want to play you Chris Wright,
talking about something that I've heard him say before.
And it rings very true to the same story as Lee Zeldin.
Billions, 10s of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars,
numbers that we cannot comprehend our actual use of in

(36:41):
a short period of time. We're kicked out the door to
continue policies and to continue the sort of scam that
goes on on the taxpayer. And they were done so with the
previous administration's ongoing cooperation or maybe
even explicit request. And the people who did this
stuff continue to work there, and they were all OK with it.

(37:03):
Yeah, this is the thing I think that should alarm taxpayers.
Nearly $100 billion of taxpayer money was committed to
businesses all across this country to mostly build bridges
to nowhere in 76 days after President Biden lost the
election and before President Trump was inaugurated, nearly
$100 billion of taxpayer money was committed in just a rush and

(37:27):
a mad dash to get money out the door that.
Is extraordinary. That is extraordinary.
In other words, they had money that they wanted to spend.
They knew that they were, they lost the election, so they just
wanted to just. Get it out and allocate it.
To wherever they wanted, even though I mean, these projects
were, were not necessarily in line with what the American

(37:48):
people wanted. Exactly.
A little over 40 billion was committed in the previous 15
years. The whole history of the loan
office, Lenta Solyndra is a famous example of that.
But a little over 40 billion / 15 years and then 90 billion in
76 days, If that's not damning, I don't know what it is.

(38:09):
So how do you get to that mindset?
How do you get to the idea that we have never cut out this
volume or this speed or, or this, you know, this aggressive
of a push to loan certain money out?
You do it because people are ideologically In Sync with you
and you indoctrinate them when they're young.
I watched this the other day. I'm, I'm sort of in this like,

(38:30):
sort of like sarcastic mood about this.
This child, Greta Thunberg, whatever her name is, she's hard
to watch. She's hard to listen to.
You don't have to cut your hair like Lloyd Christmas from Dumb
and Dumber for people to know that what you're saying is dumb.
But I think she actually believes this and she's
celebrated for it. And there's plenty of dumb
people that think she's right. And then there's the really

(38:50):
dangerous people that pull the strings and manipulate this
attitude. So she thinks she's part of a
global uprising. She thinks that really, you
know, the tide of human destiny and righteousness is behind
them. This is a religious conviction
for people who, generally speaking, don't have any
religion. That's how you start celebrating
God. Vermont, listen to these words

(39:10):
and tell me that you don't root for the sea in the age-old
battle between sailboat and sea,when man takes to the waters and
tries to travel somewhere, apparently she's going to sail
back to Israel again. You know, for all the billions
of dollars we give them, I don't, they owe us something.
Can they not just put the ship out?
I'm just, I don't wish for people's demise, generally

(39:31):
speaking, but I would like it ifshe maybe had some humility and
didn't have a boat anymore. So maybe they could sink the
boat and then rescue her and banher from boats.
But this story is. Also about a global uprising,
about how people are stepping upwhen our governments fail to do
so. For every politician that is

(39:52):
fueling the genocide, further environmental and climate
destruction, and further colonization and fascism, there
will be people escalating the resistance against that.
I'm going to tell you something because what she just said has
the exact same sort of energy asa former Biden official that I

(40:18):
watched. And that Biden official's name
is Admiral, right? Admiral Rachel Levine had to
look off screen to be able to add this onto the thing.
I feel like it's the same energyas this clip.
Hello. I'm Admiral Rachel Levine.
This Black History Month, I'm pleased to partner with OMH in

(40:38):
advancing better health through better understanding for Black
communities. Climate change is having a
disproportionate effect on the physical and mental health of
Black communities. Black Americans are more likely
than white Americans to live in areas and housing that increase
their susceptibility to climate related health issues.
And 65% of Black Americans report feeling anxious about

(41:01):
climate changes impact. Oh, OK.
Well, if they feel anxious aboutclimate impact because they're
black, then we should definitelydo something about it because
we're nice people and nice people do good things for people
that feel anxious. That's what we're all about.
We need to alleviate that. Do they feel potentially anxious
about the insanity that is beingpushed and sort of the crazy

(41:22):
mantra is it, does it bother them that the money that is
being spent by the government inorder to mitigate climate
effects or whatever other nonsense fantasy they're
selling, is it, does it bother them that their grandchildren's
grandchildren will not be able to pay that debt back?
Not even close. And that you're moving towards,
you know, some version of servitude again, ongoing.

(41:42):
This is not a new problem. It's a mindset problem, though.
It's an indoctrination problem that that girl, Greta Tunberg
with the silly haircut and the global uprising against the
fascisms or whatever that has the same energy as this sort of
interesting. I, I don't really watch these,
these jubilee clips that often and we'll get dinged on a, on a

(42:05):
copyright thing, but I, I think it's worth playing this clip
because that girl doesn't have ajob.
She doesn't have a function. She's a person that is a
figurehead, A mouthpiece. She thinks that she's adding
some value into the world. The value is essentially she's
just adding more carbon dioxide as she breathes, which I think
she thinks is a problem. You know, these people don't
actually believe in what they say because they continue to

(42:28):
speak loudly and they fly aroundin private jets and they travel
around. You know, they're on a sailboat
that's powered by a diesel motor.
They're not ideologically consistent.
And here's a great example of what that person grows up to.
If they don't have a huge voice or megaphone, they end up with a
guy who's attempting to look like a Viking.
I think this is a Viking look sitting and talking to a man who

(42:51):
is worth hundreds of millions ofdollars.
Patrick Bette Davis talking to AI guess communist socialist
type guy. And it's not his lack of skill
and maybe not even his work ethic.
It's this attitude, it's this entitled.
You know, I believe that these things should happen and
therefore they should because that's what's righteous.

(43:12):
But I have no willingness to go out there and and look just a
little bit into what it takes todo something.
Have you, some of you have probably been without a job in
your life. Most of you probably have
experienced that and you go well, anything you know, the
best time to get a job is when you have a job.
So wouldn't you want to get a job?
And aren't you willing to acceptwork that is below your station
to go ahead and do that? My buddy Steve Friend, prior to

(43:33):
his settlement with the FBI, wasapplying for overnight security
jobs at gas stations. And he was looking to do like
retail loss prevention hourly atTarget because that's what a man
will do to go out there and feedhis family.
And then there's guys like this.And the answer is like, well,
you know, I have rules, I have standards, and I'm not going to

(43:54):
go work for some evil corporation like yours.
Listen to this entitled attitude.
The answer to this question query, this exchange should have
been, are you interested in working for a job?
I'd be incredibly grateful to have an interview.
I'd love to talk to you about anopportunity and I really
appreciate you considering me. That might be, you know, that's
life changing. It's a blessing and bless you
for offering it. Or you could be like, well, I

(44:14):
really have to look into what you're about and what you do and
like. What are the values of your
company? 477 job interviews turned down.
But I'm still picky. And so this attitude has been
cultivated and it gets cultivated by holding up like
maybe he could be the next grid at Doonberg.
Maybe he could also have a a sailboat.
Maybe he could also roll around and talk about the evils of
capitalism. Essentially, this was supposed

(44:36):
to be like Marxist socialist, communist versus capitalist.
It's not even fun or interestingbecause all the arguments they
have are just garbage and noise.And then I'm going to show you
that this garbage and noise continues on no matter where you
go. You can take it from a podcast
with a bunch of unserious peopleand a guy who's close to a
billion dollars and worth. You can also go and watch it on
the mainstream media. And the people are watching.

(44:57):
We're all cheering on our like, I don't know, avatars in media.
Yeah, that person speaks for me.That's what I would have said if
I was in that situation. That's how I think about it,
too. That's kind of what we're at.
In the meantime, the plot launcher's on and the gas light
continues on your resume. What do you have on your resume
skill set? What do you offer?

(45:17):
Transportation expertise, logistics expertise.
You consider yourself a hard worker?
I mean, I feel like 80 hours a week, that's a hard worker.
How about we do this? How about I interview and I give
you a job? Would you move to Fort
Lauderdale? How's Florida?
Why not? Would you move to Fort Lauder?
Why not? How about you and I document
this? After this, you come, I do an
interview with you and I give you a job and let's see what you

(45:39):
do 90 days later. OK, let me and I'll, I'll look
up your company and all that kind of stuff and I'll see it.
But you see what just happened regardless, Mike, watch what you
just did. Sure.
You just said you apply to 477 companies.
Who's not gone back to you? A business owner who's hiring
aggressively just made an offer to you.
You said you're willing to move.Then you said I'll look at it.

(46:00):
You became selective. I didn't say I look at it.
If you'd let me finish my sentence, I want to hear it.
I would like to look into your company to see exactly what you
guys do. You would like to because I
don't know what you guys do. So as far as I'm concerned, I
may be wasting my time going if you guys are a finance company,
if you guys are a bank or something like that.
I don't have the certifications.I don't have the degrees.

(46:20):
I'm going to go ahead and just self defeat right here because I
don't know what you guys do and I don't think that you know
enough about what you do to be able to interview me properly
and find out whether or not there's a position for me.
So I'm going to go ahead and prevet that.
That's failure. That's nonsense.
Isn't that amazing? Isn't it amazing to have that
attitude? You know, what skills do you
have? I'm a really hard worker.
I can do anything you ask me to do and I need a living, I need a

(46:43):
job. And I'd, I'd love for you to
look at my resume and see if there's something that fits into
your corporation. And I'm really grateful that
you'd be willing to consider it.I mean, that's not what I
expected coming here. How about that?
How about that? How about a little bit less
entitled? Or the world owes me something
because I have a stupid haircut and I try to dress like a goofy
Viking and I have transportationskills and logistics expertise.

(47:06):
I assume he has nunchuck skills too, right?
And hacking skills. Like he's like Napoleon
Dynamite, but he's grown up. And there's a bunch of these
people and they're out there making decisions and their vote
counts as much as yours. Why?
Why is that? Here's another guy that's doing
a great gaslight. I assume that that's with those
kind of messages and those kind of voters and that kind of like

(47:27):
whatever guilt weakness because that guy was still dressed and
fed. He wasn't exactly skinny and he
wasn't, I mean, he's fatter thanScott McFarland, who's barely
filling out a shirt. Scott McFarland gets paid well.
So what's going on there? And then you start seeing some
of this weird gaslight stuff. And I, I cannot help but think
that people that have that losing attitude also must fall

(47:49):
for this sort of propaganda message.
Here's the because it feels good, right?
It feels good to be in the virtuous category.
Here's the mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson.
And the discussion is whether ornot the National Guard should
come in and take care of the violence problem, which we're
going to talk about in one second here.
That's one of the major stories of the day.
JB Pritzker and Mayor Johnson are going to push back against

(48:10):
Donald Trump to what? The benefit of their of their
constituents, of the people thatlive there.
People buy that. You tell me if you can believe
this guy. Hey, what's up Chicago?
It's your mayor Brandon Johnson.We're here for the annual bike
to drive on a beautiful day thisLabor Day weekend.
Just want to send a message to the rest of the world.
This is not a hell hole. We're building the safest, most

(48:31):
affordable big city in America and we're doing it together.
Let's get it. Hey, what's?
Yeah, yeah, let's get it. This is safe.
It's not a hellhole. You know what?
When you want to go on on a TikTok program or if you want to
go out there and put some messaging out into the universe
and let people know that your city is not a hellhole.
And that's something you have todo when when you say something
like this is a vibrant city. We have all kinds of whelping

(48:52):
opportunities. Businesses are welcome here.
We'd love to see you, you know, consider Chicago for the move.
When you want to relocate your company, If you're thinking
about bringing people in, why don't you come over check it
out? No, your your sales pitch is
Chicago. It's not a hell hole.
That's a hell of a sales pitch. Why would he have to say that?
Here's hey Jackass again. Can't help it.
Like every time I see someone from Chicago try to make a

(49:14):
claim. Up to this point this year, as
of this morning, the total number of homicides in the city
of Chicago, which is a city of roughly 2 million people, is 293
with 245 of them were shot to death.
We've actually got an increase on the the rate of murder
previously was in the every 20 something hours.

(49:35):
It's now under 20 hours, on average, 19 hours and 58
minutes. Every 19 hours and 58 minutes,
more than one per day somebody is killed.
On average in Chicago there are more homicides than there have
been days this year. And August was great.
They had a total reduction monthon month to 43.

(49:58):
So again, it's like close to what, almost 1 1/2 homicides per
day. That's pretty shocking.
And if you look at the week prior that he was involved in,
homicides were up 63% in the week that he recorded that
video. So that's pretty amazing.
And if you guys have never seen this, you know, you know exactly
where he's at in Chicago. He's in one of these

(50:19):
neighborhoods that has 0 homicides.
That's why he feels really good.That's why it's not a hellhole.
There's plenty of places you cango in Chicago where you are
statistically very safe. And here they are.
They're all like this light bluecolor.
And you can see the ones where it's very low with a
intermittent homicide, you know,over the last year.
And they're this sort of blue color.
And then you start getting to the red areas where you can go
and probably be killed in a muchmore high likelihood, let's say.

(50:42):
So it's neighborhood based, of course.
And I'm sure the people that live in Chicago that have nice
properties are like, yeah, yeah,it's awesome here.
We love it, my favorite. And then they go, but hey, do
you want to go to the South Side?
Do you want to go hang out in that Austin neighborhood that I
always see? No, no, I don't go there.
That's how you get killed. Oh, I got it.
That's how you end up with guys like this.
Dude is an inherited billionaire.

(51:06):
He is the mayor of Illinois or he's the the governor of
Illinois, rather. JB Pritzker says sending troops
to Chicago would be an invasion.Now we have to use strong words.
We need to pit us and them together best we can.
An invasion by Donald Trump and the administration, not a
temporary safety measure becauseyou have record homicides as a

(51:27):
city and have for a very long time.
And in theory, when you look at some of the old historical
discussions of the United States, they were always mention
a few cities. You guys, I don't know if you
know this, but guys like Oscar Wilde would talk about it.
They would say things like, you know, New York would be 1
reference and then you'd have Chicago, the Great American
city, San Francisco and, and, and Los Angeles would all be

(51:49):
recognized. Those are the ones that they
would see when they were lookingfrom Europe to the United
States. Chicago was one of those primary
cities that would be utterly American, the Great American
city because it's in the Midwestand it's a hub for commerce.
And there was all kinds of, you know, commodities trading going
on there. And they had art and they had
music and they had culture and access because they had the
water. And now people call it Chiraq.

(52:13):
Talk about the number of homicides there.
And it's inextricable in my mindthat there are places you could
go in Chicago and know that you're probably not going to
come back. And especially, you know, like
guys like me are not going to have that problem.
Turns out it's all the people that they're out there that have
this sort of captive victim mentality.
They're going to try to get on there.
It's going to be young black menwho killed other young black

(52:34):
men. That's who's going to die.
And they rely on that vote so heavily.
The only way. Governor JB Pritzker told CBS
News the Trump administration has not communicated with the
state reported a plan to put military forces in Chicago,
calling the idea an invasion. They've already done this in Los
Angeles. They've already had some
litigation about this stuff. We already found out that there
are there are ways that this canbe done legally, at least

(52:54):
according to the courts. Of course, they'll re litigate
it. They've asked about a possible
military deployment to America'sthird largest city.
And he said it's clear that in secret they're planning to do
this. It's an invasion with U.S.
troops. If in fact they do that.
And do people buy it? I guess they do.
I mean, they must. That's what they're selling.

(53:14):
Again, headlines of the day three thinks a chaotic funding
fight, which is to say we're going to have to have a
continuing resolution. Epstein drama.
If we could just point it out. That's what's been the mess over
a DOJ that gets them distracted and then this sort of crime and
crackdown, which is apparently mostly DHS and our National
Guard, it's less DOJ. It's not about prosecutions,

(53:36):
right? It's about stopping the blood
flow and stopping the blood. And what is the left?
Also interested in this other thing that DHS has going on.
This blew my mind. We're still talking about Kilmar
Abrego Garcia, the most famous illegal alien and El Salvadorian
gang member allegedly in this country in maybe in history.
And what they're worried about is he's now in the middle of 3

(53:57):
simultaneous court battles trying to stay in the United
States for what purpose? You know when the White House
tells you that that you have no right to stay here.
There's no future where you get to stay here.
Why is this family not picked upand gone to El Salvador and then
just voluntarily self deport while they have the ability?
And who's paying for all these court battles?
He's become an international symbol of Donald Trump's mass

(54:18):
deportation campaign, which I think is probably too small.
And he was wrongfully deported to El Salvador.
They love that part. Brought back to the United
States only to face new charges and deportation.
And in many ways, his process isthe punishment, too.
Because there's probably an easier way to do it than
stringing it out like that. You don't have to play that
game. I got John Brennan in a clip

(54:39):
here with MSNBC and they're going to and they're talking
about weaponization, all right. And he is not wrong.
If they're going to use the means of government to smear and
attack people who who fit into the categories of folks we don't
like, If they're not going to use the justice system to do the
thing that we used to think was going to happen, which was

(55:00):
justice, right? Justice is prosecute the guy,
put him wherever you need to go out there and bring your court
case. Why he's still in the United
States is beyond me. The fact that we are able to do
law fare for this guy and fight tooth and nail for some illegal
alien that no one like, no one thinks that he's an American
citizen and that he came to the United States legally.

(55:22):
So how do you, how are we still fighting about that?
And in the meantime, a lot of people have a strong belief that
our government went after us as just regular tax paying
citizens. How is it that we have to deal
with them like destroying reputations, refusing to make
things good when they've alreadyshown that the thing that we've

(55:44):
said was bad was bad? In the case of my lawsuit that's
against the FBI, we said that Spencer Evans did things that
were over aggressive about COVID.
And then the FBI under the current administration said,
yeah, we agree, that's why we'regoing to fire him.
And then we said, do you want tosettle with us?
And they said, no, you had the same situation for the Proud
Boys. We think that there was an over
aggressive and and a targeted prosecution against us that was

(56:07):
unjust. And Donald Trump said, I agree,
many of you will be pardoned, that the rest of you are let out
of prison for commutation. You don't have to serve the rest
of your sentences. And then they said, do you want
to pay us for the pain and suffering that we went through?
And they went no. Do you think that that's going
directly to the ear of Donald Trump or do you think that's
being handled by mid level bureaucrats that are still
carrying out processes punishment and we are going to

(56:29):
simply use the tools we have to destroy the people who stand
against us. Even the people that I don't
like are supposed to get due process folks, including John
Brennan, who has never been indicted for a crime, having
been investigated and had grand jury subpoenas pull all of my
records. This is a very sobering
experience because I used to have a security clearance not

(56:50):
long before that, and the minuteI didn't, they come after you.
I can imagine this is probably areal scary moment for him, too.
And I actually have a little bitof sympathy for it.
And I think you're foolish if you don't too, because it's not
about what side of the politics are, it's whether or not you're
convenient to the machine. Look at this, if we can't
convict someone, we would name them and shame them.
And that seems to be largely what's guiding them here.
No, that seems to be the intention, which is to damage

(57:12):
individuals. You can damage them
reputationally, you can damage them financially,
professionally, and so on. And so by putting out these
investigations or making these referrals or whatever, it does a
lot of damage already, even if it never goes to trial or
doesn't go to a conviction or whatever.
And that's the intent. And unfortunately, Donald Trump,
who, you know, president of the United States, has tremendous
authority and and ability to usethe instruments of government

(57:37):
governance. When I was watching that cabinet
meeting this week, it was actually nauseating that all
these individuals who were fawning over him but are so
willing to be manipulated and beexploited by him.
OK, But then let's also be really fair.
That was the same thing that theprevious administration did as
well. If that's where we're at in
human history, we're screwed. The country is screwed.
It's not what we sign up for. I'm going to give you an example

(57:59):
of that. I always play the both sides
here. I'm not trying to be in the
middle. What I'm saying is I don't like
any of these people. OK, yes, I don't like people
fawning all over the president. I don't like people fawning all
over Joe Biden. Remember he was able to do a 360
back slam and then do cartwheelsand 100 push ups before anybody
else could even get out of theirchair.
Like he was an amazing super stud, basically like Superman in

(58:23):
a feeble, like 8 year old man's body who couldn't even stay on
his bicycle when it was standingstill.
By the way, being on a bicycle standing still is the hardest
thing to do. Let's be real generous about
that too. Here's Abby Phillips from CNN
and she's arguing that, you know, the stuff that we're
seeing today going after John Bolton and his mustache, that's
not right. People are like, are you
serious? What's funny is, is that

(58:43):
everybody wants to make the argument, no, you guys are the
bad guys. You guys are the bad guys.
If you point the fingers both ways and I'm sitting in the
middle going like, no, all of you are the worst.
You've been the worst for a longtime.
And we're just distracted. We're we're we're quibbling over
pennies when the real system waslike subverted from what it was
supposed to do probably 100 years ago.

(59:03):
Let's do this. Here's Abby Phillips just making
noise. There is no evidence that what
that there, that there was some top down order of political
retribution in either the Obama or the Biden administrations.
You can either you can. I'm, I'm going to, I'll, I'll
concede to you that. They made-up like the Russian

(59:24):
hoax, and they use information to go after Donald Trump to try
to undermine his entire presidency, and they all sign.
Their names. Are you going to give me a
second to talk or no, No, but like you can't listen.
It happened. Listen, it happened.
The Russia, The Russia hoax. First of all, a Was Donald Trump
prosecuted? They did it to.
And was he wasn't? He was.
Impeached was. He OK, so he.

(59:46):
That's a big deal. It's called overthrowing all the
people. First of all, first of all, he
was impeached over his handling of Ukraine.
He was not impeached over the Russia investigation.
Perfectly good phone calls, by the way, because.
The second, the second thing is,let me just read to you a list
of people that that Donald Trumpand his top cabinet secretaries

(01:00:08):
have said are going to be the subject of investigations.
And as long as we can get you quibbling over that, we can
gaslight you though the previousadministration, Obama didn't do
any of that and Biden didn't do that.
I'm telling you they did. And I'm telling you that we're
they're still doing the same thing.
And why would that be? It's because the same people
that said yes to everything continued to say yes.
How did they know they were going to have men there?

(01:00:31):
They did something called a COVID vaccine mandate.
That's one of the strongest mechanisms to find out what was
going on. It's the reason that I have a
lawsuit. We interviewed Bill Taylor over
the weekend. You guys may have seen that.
I recommend you check out our interview.
If you missed it, put it on yourlist of things to check out.
There's a Part 2 coming up. And a lot of his ongoing

(01:00:51):
commentary is incredibly biting against the FBI.
But I think it applies across the spectrum of all of
government. And the reason and the and the
salience of the argument is very, very clear to me.
There are a lot of people that said I had to get the shot in
order to keep my job, and I watched Tracy Beans get beat up
on social media about it as well.

(01:01:12):
She's obviously a friend of the program.
She's been a stalwart person. I think her principles are very
aligned with the way that I say things as well.
What's crazy is every single person who got that shot in the
FBI had to sign a form that saidthey did so willingly and
without coercion. And so they lied one way or
another. Either they were being coerced
and they claimed they weren't, or they were not being coerced.

(01:01:37):
They did it voluntarily. One of the first interviews I
did was with a guy named Dan Bongino.
You guys remember that? And the first thing that I
remember taking away from that, that I was very proud of.
What I said is I am not mad at people who thought they did the
right thing. I'm always mad about people who
knew it was wrong at the time inreal time and chose to do
something different. They knew it was bogus.

(01:02:01):
They knew it was fake. They knew they shouldn't follow
it. They knew it was an unlawful
order and they chose to act otherwise for convenience, for
money, for status, for pension. It doesn't make a difference
what the reason was if the if the reason wasn't.
I believe that this is the rightway to do.
It's hard to get really really mad at the people that are so
twisted that they thought what the Nazis did was right.

(01:02:25):
The person that you should be most furious with is your
neighbor that had 0 principles that agreed with you and still
decided to turn you in. And I worked with those people.
I worked with a boss who was a coward and found that out in his
late 40s that his principles were worth like 150 grand a
year. He said, I have a mortgage, I
have alimony, and I have to pay those.

(01:02:47):
And so even though I agree with you, I'm not going to do
anything about it. Even though I swore an oath to
do the right thing and to exposethings that were wrong, I'm
going to go ahead and just push this stuff out.
Is that not insane? There were a lot of people that
were complicit in that one an awful lot, and it looks
something like this. We do have some breaking news.

(01:03:12):
Drug maker Pfizer just announcing the results of its
vaccine trial for adolescents. It says it's coronavirus shot
was 100% effective at preventinginfection sickness among 12 to
15 year olds. This could be a major game
changer for reopening schools across America.
So joining us now is Doctor Chris Pernell.
She's a public health physician and fellow at the American

(01:03:34):
College of Preventative Medicine.
Doctor Pernell, great to see you. 100% effective is that I
mean, I would John and I haven'theard numbers like that.
Is that unusual to find that efficacy rate, find that
efficacy rate? Well, that's even higher than
what we were reported when we had 95% efficacy in adults.
Look, we know these mRNA vaccines are a game changer.

(01:03:57):
The technology is different. The technology is very
promising. I mean, it's 100%.
I mean, I mean, you know, it does not get any better. 100%,
Yeah, that's even better than 95%.
Do you know that? What numbers mean?
Numbers mean if they're bigger, it's better.
In this case. Well, amazing, amazing things.

(01:04:18):
No questions, no skepticism. Hey, is there any examples in
history of 100% effectiveness inanything medical?
Oh, no, there's not. What happens if you apply a
tourniquet to an artery? Is there 100% chance that person
won't bleed out? Oh, there's not.
It reduces their bleed outs by 98%.
What's the 2%? Failure to apply it properly,
additional bleeds, whatever. No 100% effectiveness.

(01:04:42):
Total nonsense. And you know what's crazy?
When I heard those, because I remember hearing that in real
time, just like all of you did, I was like, Oh my God, I've seen
this before. I've seen this movie.
I've seen that movie, and so have you probably.
The story came out on CNN. This is one of their lead
stories. Today, Trump raises fresh
questions about COVID-19 vaccines that he said ripped

(01:05:03):
apart the CDC. There's this big controversy
because they're trying to like, refix, rejigger the CDC for
institutional credibility, and it's gone.
And they're fighting over whether they should get Hep B
vaccines to babies, right? Hep B vaccines to babies.
Hep B is a sexually transmitted disease, and women are tested
for Hep B when they're pregnant as a general course.

(01:05:27):
So why are we forcing it on babies?
Unclear. We got to do it, though.
Have to, we must to be able to protect the babies or maybe to
protect something else. When I see that kind of stuff
going on, when I see that a guy who's left, it was this Doctor
Daskalaki. Do you remember him?
He was like the guy with like the satanic tattoos and he's a
very prominent monkey pox dude. He was the czar of the monkey

(01:05:49):
pox thing for the Biden administration, all that stuff.
So you talk about people that are like seeing the mission.
How do we fix it? We need to restore credibility.
We need to be able to look at our institutions and not
immediately distrust them the way that we currently do.
But I'm telling you that 100% thing, you know how I knew it
was BS because we've had messaging and Hollywood telling

(01:06:12):
us this for a really, really long time.
If anybody tells you they have the answer, you know, you got
something that's a lie. There's a Bad Religion song
about this. You guys have never heard the
song, The answer. Check it out.
It's really good. I'm a punk rock fan by by sort
of growing up, that was my that was my favorite and I loved Bad
Religion because these guys always seemed like sit right in
the middle and poke shots at everybody.

(01:06:32):
I kind of have that same mentality.
This is how I knew 100% effectiveness was was nonsense.
Thanks, Dave. Thanks for nothing, Eddie.
Thank you, guys. That's not all we're following.
Here's Karen at the health desk.The world of medicine has seen
its share of miracle cures, fromthe polio vaccine to heart
transplants. But all past achievements may
pale in comparison to the work of Doctor Alice Crippen.

(01:06:56):
Thank you so much for joining usthis morning.
So, Doctor Crippen, give it to me in a nutshell.
Well, the premise is quite simple.
Take something designed by nature and reprogram it to make
it work for the body rather thanagainst it.
You're talking about a virus. Indeed, yes, in this case the
measles virus, which has been engineered at a genetic level to

(01:07:19):
be helpful rather than harmful. And I, I find the best way to
describe it is if you can, if you can imagine your body as a
highway and you picture the virus as a very fast car being
driven by a very bad man, imagine the damage to that car
could cause. Then if you replace that man
with a cop, the picture changes.And that's essentially what

(01:07:42):
we've done. How many people have you treated
so far? Well, we've had 10,000 and 9
clinical trials in humans so far.
And how many are cancer free? 10,000 and 9.
So you have actually cured cancer.
Yes, yes, yes, we have. Yeah, yeah, That ominous sound

(01:08:02):
you heard afterwards is because we were just about to launch
into the zombie apocalypse. That's from I Am Legend.
It's a Will Smith movie about the last man who had a just a
rare immunity and didn't die. 10,000 and nine.
We had all of them cured and then we didn't worry about the
long term effects. Anyway, I've seen that movie, 2
of you I've already seen when you have 100% effectiveness and

(01:08:23):
I don't believe you. Neither does anyone else.
Comedians were talking about it.This is Jimmy Dore talking about
what happens when you tell the truth too soon.
It is one of the biggest things that you can find yourself on
the wrong side of. And I think it's a common
expression. I think it's something we have
probably many of us share in this in the audience and sitting
here at this desk. Let's laugh about it for a

(01:08:45):
second. I don't have many friends after
COVID, right? I tell the truth about COVID.
And yeah, you want to you want to experience social distancing,
tell people the truth about TonyFauci.
They'll stay away from you. And I'm not saying that the
COVID-19 vaccine doesn't work. All I'm saying is everybody I

(01:09:11):
know who got the COVID-19 vaccine then got COVID.
Is that how vaccines work now? Could you imagine if we all got
the polio vaccine and in the same year we all got polio?

(01:09:32):
I'd be like, hey, I don't think that polio vaccine works.
Why do you say that, Jim? I got fucking polio.
I don't have, right? Isn't that kind of what we saw?
Isn't that kind of how that wentdown?

(01:09:52):
It's, it's really hard to squarethose things.
It's hard for anybody to look atwhat happened and then just
accept the premise as it was. We all heard it was 100%
effective. A government lied to us straight
up. Like there's no question in my
mind that that was a lie. So that's why you have problems
at the CDC. That's why you're going to have
to have problems with the CDC. And you know what, for his part,

(01:10:13):
Donald Trump is actually saying the right thing for I don't know
if you've got messaging help or what, but you know, he was
always touting Operation War St.He was the best.
It was the greatest thing. Here's his his post that
happened over the weekend. He said, I want them to show the
data now he's talking about them.
Show now to the CDC and the public and clear this mess one
way or another. I'd hope Operation Warp Speed
was as brilliant as many say it was.
If not, we all want to know about it and why.

(01:10:36):
And that's the first public comment he's made about this.
It's really critical. Why?
Is it because some people understand the mission?
And it seems like RFK is one of those guys.
That was Jimmy Dore, a comedian talking about social distancing
and how what happens if you say the truth too soon.
Here's the health secretary speaking to a comedian and
getting the laugh line with the same exact line, except he's

(01:10:56):
being dead serious. So again, some people seem to
understand the mission. It just doesn't seem like
there's enough of them in the places that we need it because
the government continues to do the thing that the government
does. And why is there even any
resistance to this if theoretically Trump is in
charge? If the Trump administration took
over and the mission that was actually campaigned upon is the
thing that people took into heart, is that what was being

(01:11:17):
executed? I don't think so.
There's still independent revolts happening at every
single agency. It doesn't matter where they're
at. Here's HHS secretary talking
about it. There's 25% of Americans who
believe that they know somebody who was killed by a COVID
vaccine, killed, killed 25% of Americans. 52% of Americans

(01:11:38):
believe that the vaccines are causing injuries, including
death, 52%. So if you look at the clinical
trial studies, the actual studies that were done that were
released of the Pfizer vaccine, Moderna has not released it.
If you look at the Pfizer vaccine, there was there were

(01:11:58):
22,000 people in the Placebit group, 22,000 people who got the
actual vaccine and the the people who got the vaccine had a
23% higher death rate from all causes but.
That could not be the disease itself.
Well, because we know that if itis and the vaccine doesn't work,

(01:12:22):
well, it's early. Well, no, no, that's not that's
of course that's true. It's just a simple argument.
All you got to do is follow it. Either it works or it doesn't
work. If there's 23% more that die
that got the shot, that turns out to be really problematic for
your your claim of success. And we're all focused in on that

(01:12:43):
because that's what happened five years ago when a lot of
people woke up and said, hey, I don't think the system is
actually doing the thing that wethought it was going to do.
Our government doesn't prevent us from forcing fraud.
They're not following through onpromises.
Yeah, we know politicians lie. That's our our default position.
But why do we accept that? Why are they allowed to?
Why do we have to fund it? Well, it turns out we have to
fund it because if you don't paythat money to continue the thing

(01:13:05):
on that you may not agree with, then you are done.
That didn't used to happen. That's relatively new in the
American experiment. Well, it's called halfway in.
So we're quibbling over whether or not the government can force
you to inject yourself with something or whether or not they
can take things from you with orwithout your permission, and
that they can coerce you into something.

(01:13:26):
Meanwhile, the means of that coercion were established over
100 years ago. So this is a guy.
He goes by the elder millennial.I'm going to borrow his sort of
summary. It's a 3 minute long video.
I'm not going to play the entirety of it.
I'm going to give you the, the, the upfront kind of piece of it.
We'll put it over it on the, on the cow serafin.com for you guys
to reference as a succinct argument that I've made multiple
times that the 16th and the 17thand even the 19th amendment were

(01:13:49):
all things that subverted the Republic as it was designed.
And we're discussing now whetheror not we should have mail in
ballots, when in reality, we should discuss whether or not
our government can compel money out of our pocket at the federal
level. We already lost that battle.
So we're fighting. We're fighting for like, the
scraps again. We're the ones who are now

(01:14:10):
irritated with an 8 1/2% tax on fireworks, celebrating a war
that was fought over a 2% consumption tax on tea.
And so I can't get away from that.
Anyway, this is the argument. You guys know that 1913 was the
year we actually lost control ofour country, right?
Oh, and just for historical context, World War One started
in 1914. I mean, look, I'm sure that was

(01:14:33):
a coincidence, but let me just tell you all the things that
were created in 1913. First, the Federal Reserve,
which is neither federal nor hasany reserves.
It's basically a private bank that just controls all of our
money. Second thing created in 1913 was
the IRS, and I'm sure it's just a coincidence that it was
created the exact same year thata private bank took over all of

(01:14:54):
our money. Yeah, I'm sure it's a
coincidence that that was the year they started taxing you.
Like you work, they print, and then you pay them back with
interest. Yeah, that makes sense.
The next thing created was the Rockefeller Foundation.
Yeah. And let's be real, that was all
about philanthropy. It's not like they took control
of medicine, education, science and basically the health of the

(01:15:17):
world. I mean, let's be real, all they
were doing was donating money. Yeah.
It's not like they were buying control of everything.
Oh, and that worked out so well,right?
Because people are healthier andmore self-sufficient than ever,
right? Oh, yeah.
Also in 1913 was the American Cancer Society.
I mean, that sounds like a good thing, right?
That can't possibly be bad. Except it was completely funded
by extremely wealthy people. But even though it was a

(01:15:39):
charity, they never really gave to anyone.
No, they just took their money and invested in pharmaceutical
drugs. Oh, and chemo.
Yeah. Instead of taking that money and
investing in companies that weretrying to find a cure, No, we'll
just invest in companies that use chemicals from the military
that were later banned. There's far more to it, but
that's the gist of the argument.We're sitting here arguing, as

(01:16:00):
one of you just said, about whether or not, you know, the
the carpet is the right color orwhether we want to replace the
drapes. And meanwhile, there's holes in
the roof and it's on fire. So this country is constantly
being distracted. And we're going to see more
distractions about. It's going to be about Chicago
and whether we should put the National Guard there.
And like, no, but we shouldn't have the situation that Chicago
has created. We shouldn't have the money
that's going there. New York is trying to figure out

(01:16:21):
how do they figure out a budget shortfall.
I actually have that clip too. I might as well play it.
This is Curtis Lee. Well, he's running for mayor of
New York where they're talking about putting a legitimate
communist in a socialist who wants to have state-run
industry, which we've already seen what that looks like.
And you had PBD arguing with a communist and why that doesn't
work. And they're talking about budget

(01:16:43):
shortfalls because the assumption is the government's
just going to spend that money. And the same reason that we're
going to talk about how do we fund the federal government.
We have 30 days to pass something.
But in reality, the question should be why do we fund it at
all and why do we fund any of these things?
We've seen enormous examples of fraud, whether it be mail in
ballot fraud or whether it be the fact they were taking our
money and sending it overseas and then turning around and

(01:17:04):
getting it right back. Where they're talking about
we're we're backing vaccines that claimed 100% effectiveness
while people were still getting it in their clinical data and
they were dying from all 'cause mortality.
I'm sure it was just that like there's a lot going on here
where we are just being constantly distracted by the
stupidest, smallest pieces of it.

(01:17:24):
We don't ever get to the root cause, which is like, is this
government meant to function this way?
Was it ever designed to functionthis way?
And I'm going to give you the spoiler.
Like the answer is no. And how do I know that?
Because I can read the amendments to the Constitution
when it was all subverted and I can see when it was.
I've got a video of a guy claiming to be a 1900.
I'm sorry, he's claiming to be a2001 liberal, which is kind of

(01:17:46):
my argument. Donald Trump is a 1990s liberal.
Meanwhile, the answer is like going back to like a 1880s
Republican if you want to be anything.
That's why I'm not a Republican.I can't be.
It doesn't hold my values. Anyway, here's Slee well making
the argument that like, why are we talking about how to fix a
budget shortfall when the answershould be stop spending money?
Why do we always have to? Keep increasing tax.

(01:18:07):
Well, we want to because we've. We've lost 140 billion, so how
are you going to increase it without raising taxes?
Let me explain. If you cut the city budget, you
won't need as many taxes. Department of Education, 41
billion. That's 1/3 of the total city
budget. What do we get in return for
that? 100,000 less students in the
population, 1/3 who are truants every day. 2/3 of the children

(01:18:30):
in 4th grade cannot read, write or do math at grade level.
And does this help the teachers in the classroom with the
students top heavy? You got deputy chancellors, 1350
department heads. I've asked principals and
assistant principals who hire their staff.
Did you ever meet any of these deputy chancellors or department
heads? Never saw them before in my life
in my school. What are we paying them?

(01:18:52):
Tracy friend, Boo, whatever you want to call her of Eric Adams,
no show job at the Department ofEducation for 2 1/2.
The the problem is, is people act like that's not what the
system was designed to do and expecting a different result
would be insane. It's the reason why the Proud
Boys don't have a settlement. It's a reason why my group of
FBI employees that are plaintiffs against the

(01:19:13):
government, we don't have a settlement offer either.
It's a reason they're fighting it tooth and nail and they would
love to see it dismissed, even though theoretically the people
at the top agree with us. If we had a conversation, I
imagine with the Pam Bondi, we're like, hey, look, we were
done wrong. Isn't that what you ran on?
They'd go, yeah, for sure. Does it ever get there?
Absolutely not. Because we've accepted this
middle position. This is what the middle position

(01:19:35):
looks like. I'm wrapping up here, but this
is the middle position. We're going to do even more this
week talking about more of this,this ability to push complete
nonsense and make you believe that it's necessary for your
life. And it keeps you away from the
original argument, which is whether or not you're healthy or
not, whether or not your body functions the way it's supposed
to, whether or not your government is doing the thing

(01:19:56):
that it was designed to do. They've they're arguing about
whether it's efficient about something it was never supposed
to do. Being a 2001 liberal who
identifies as a Republican rightnow is actually not maybe even
the symptom. It is probably the root of the
problem because they don't even know what the problem is.
They can't even look into the spiritual battle that's
underneath it. I'm a 2001 liberal.

(01:20:16):
That's just Republican now, which I think in this town makes
me a Nazi. You know, like it's the same
thing. I'm pro gay and that's not good
enough. You have to be pro trans and pro
all this new thing. But if a girl was to like a
truck in baseball instead of us in 2001, we go, that's a Tom
board now. We would go, well, she has to
cut off her and she must be trapped in that body.
It's an attack on the gay community, in my opinion.

(01:20:37):
You're. Sterilizing them, you're
compromising their brain development or bone development
fact that we're getting past that so.
Easily. I'm afraid it's far more
nefarious than that. What is a safe space?
They say it's a safe space, but really it's just the way that
they can get you alone and indoctrinate.
My God. They'll say, oh, you know, you
don't have to ask your parents. They wouldn't get it.
They're old. Don't ask your older brothers
and sisters. We'll give you a safe place

(01:20:58):
where we can give you Marxist nonsense.
Not safe. It's not safe from you.
You're a grown up and I'm a little kid and you're trying to
confuse me. There's a lot.
I see a Direct Line between why that person saying that and
seeing that problem is problematic.
And that's how you end up with aGreta Thunberg and that's how
you end up with whatever Ragnarok guy with the freaking
Viking haircut telling a guy who's worth 500 + 1,000,000

(01:21:20):
dollars. Like, you know, I'll look into
what your company's about, all being just directed at the wrong
stuff. We're going to have arguments
about things like that are already accomplished.
Like how do you know social doesn't work?
Oh, because they tried it and didn't work.
Well, that wasn't real socialism.
I kid you not. That was actually brought out in
that debate. I've watched about a dozen of
the little interactions back andforth between PBD and these

(01:21:40):
so-called communists, some of them who are very articulate.
They don't know anything. They're really articulate.
So that's kind of where we're atright now with these things.
And meanwhile, that 100 plus year plan, it's all working.
You're all distracted about the things you're supposed to be
distracted about. And then you see stuff from like
Whitney Webb, who I don't necessarily always agree with,
but on stuff like this, there's way too much sense here because

(01:22:03):
this is a slow March where all of the evil plots, they all end
up converging. If everybody comes from a place
of evil, from from subverting the brilliant experiment that
this country was started on and they've been slowly chipping
away at all the foundations, youend up with one kind of ring to

(01:22:23):
rule them. All right.
All the rings in, in Tolkien, they were all different vices
that were all different plots and plans.
They all had different kingdoms that they were all holding on
to. And you end up with something
like this, where it's like, whatif we could just unite all these
these evil tribes together into one complete engagement of
subservience? There's a coordinated global
policy push for digital IDs as the new form of government

(01:22:46):
issued identification credentials.
And they're essentially all based on your biometric data,
which can be your fingerprints, your your face, your the IRS of
your eyeball. And the idea is essentially to
collect all of that data and have it housed or have it tied
directly to your digital ID. So your physical ID will be

(01:23:07):
mapped to the digital ID. Digital IDs are not really a
separate project from CBDC's andthis new digital financial
system. And you in documentation and
also documentation from the Bankof International Settlements,
they very overtly state that CBDC's and digital ID's are
meant to go together. And without digital ID's, the
CBDC digital finance system cannot exist.

(01:23:29):
One of the reasons it can't exist without that is because of
the KYC functionality built intothis digital financial system.
They have the know your customerprotocols, they have to know who
you are. And so they want to have your
call it tied to a digital ID andhave that digital ID be mapped
to your physical ID through the biometric data collection.
So there's different efforts to make digital IDs either as NFTS,

(01:23:51):
non fungible tokens. There's also the efforts of Sam
Altman of Open AI and his World Coin project, whereby you scan
your IRS, you give them your, your, the biometric credentials
of your eyeball, they give you aunique identifier, a digital ID,
and it's inherently tied to a digital wallet.
That is the same model the UN isusing.
They've already implemented it for refugees getting food

(01:24:13):
assistance from the World Food Food Program.
It's called building blocks. It's on blockchain.
It involves refugees scanning their irises in order to buy
food or receive their rations. They have to check out of a
grocery store style place in therefugee camp and they they check
out biometrically with a an eyeball scan and then the amount

(01:24:36):
of food they have the the monetary value of that is
subtracted from their digital wallet connected to their
digital ID and their iris. So ID 2020, The UN and other
stakeholders in this particular sphere often argue that the
reason this is necessary is because of what they called the
identity gap. And the identity gap is the

(01:24:59):
claim that the lack of digital ID is preventing people, mainly
the world's poor, from accessingessential services.
Whether it's banking, whether it's education, whether it's
healthcare, they claim the only way for these people to be able
to access these services is to onboard them to these identity
schemes. Perfect.

(01:25:19):
That's it. If we just knew more about you,
if we just had more power to solve the problem and knew what
your problems were, then we'd bebetter at solving it.
And we give that as examples because we've already solved all
the other people who are Miserables problems too.
We have such a a great track record of fixing the problem.
That's why we now have a what coming up on $40 trillion debt
as United States debt continues to grow.

(01:25:41):
And when I was in high school, it wasn't even 10.
We have more than four times thedebt of my childhood in my
lifetime and it took 200 and what, almost 250 years to get
there and then it took 20 years to quadruple.
Let you know real simple, but focus in on that.

(01:26:04):
Don't focus in on the things that were getting us there and
all those things that know your customer thing.
By the way, how many of you remember a time when you used to
be able to cash a check and you didn't have to show an ID, you
just had to know if the check was good?
Go watch. If you guys want to have a funny
story and you want to go touch up historical FBI case because
it's out there, go watch this, the movie Catch Me if you can or
read the book The story of FrankAbagnail and his great scams.

(01:26:27):
None of those things could be done today.
Not one of them. Did that benefit you, the person
or did it benefit the banking industries?
What my take is, is that it benefited the banking industry.
Theoretically it benefits you because there's less scams.
You can't be, you know, you don't have as many people out
there, but that's what happens when you have a very low trust
society, which is where we're moving towards.

(01:26:47):
And the lower the trust, which they have done through all kinds
of scams and lies and frauds andand gaslighting.
We have no trust. Guess what that means we need to
have more control. If you have in high trust
societies, you need very low levels of governmental control.
When you have low trust societies, you require
governmental control. That's the difference between
being urban and rural. And so we're in this divide,

(01:27:09):
this national divorce, where some of us want to still live in
high trust societies and keep our doors unlocked and be able
to say hi to our neighbors and pop in and turn off their alarm
or make sure that their oven is not and they could call us and
the doors already unlocked. We have a key to it.
And some of us want to live in apartments where we don't know
the person that lives next door to us.
And those things are not really compatible societies.
They're not the same society. We've moved closer to that urban

(01:27:29):
version, even in the rural areas.
And I don't think it's by, I don't think it's by accident.
That's where I'm going to end ittoday.
I've got more stuff to cover on about SSR is I want to talk
about some things about statins and so on.
You know, there's more, more andmore data that basically just
shows all of these things are all individual plots moving
towards the same thing, which iswe're just going to tell you
causation is correlation or correlation is causation.

(01:27:49):
We're going to make arguments toyou that are going to subvert
your trust. And the first version of it is
we're going to get all your money.
And the second version is you'regoing to not believe in any
institutions no matter what theyare, and you'll be screwed.
Guys. There's going to be a Spotify ad
right here towards the end. So I appreciate you listening
through the end of it. And I'm also going to encourage
you. There's a Spotify ad encourage
you sign up for the channel. So many of you guys have joined

(01:28:11):
up over on locals. I really appreciate that.
We've seen a huge boon over there.
If you want to financially support the program and what
we're doing over here, it's Kyleseraphin.com, kyleseraphin.com.
You can be a free member. Just be part of the community.
That's also cool. If you want to jump in, I think
it's 50 bucks a month for the year.
You get it early access to all of our interviews.
You get the call in show where you can call in and tell me what
you think on Thursday nights andI like that as well.
And then lastly, you're, you're supporting what we're doing and

(01:28:31):
staying independent because nobody else keeps us going.
If you guys want to be part of that again, Kyle seraphin.com,
you can also go to rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
You can follow us on X at Kyle Serifin or you can do the
YouTube thing, which is Kyle, what is it.youtube.com slash at
Kyle Serifin. There's an at sign in there.
Watch us on Spotify, iHeartRadio, whatever else.
If you guys want to do that, we appreciate that is to all those
things are great and make sure you like the video.

(01:28:53):
Make sure you leave us a five star review.
If you're listening on those places, subscribe, share it,
etcetera, etcetera. Send a friend the link Kyle
serifinshow.com push it out there.
We're going to be sane. We're going to continue to be
sober about this. This is not, there's no time for
pom poms right now, especially when quote UN quote, our team is
in the driver's seat and they'renot hitting it for us.
All right, Hopefully you guys got a little taste of comedy.

(01:29:14):
So that'll be the pal cleanse ofthe day and we'll go get you
some fun stuff for later on. I hope you have a fantastic
Tuesday. For those of you that are mid
work week or if you're just getting started, God bless you.
I look forward to seeing you throughout the rest this week.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSeraphin show streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle

(01:29:36):
Seraphin.

All Episodes

SELF-LICKING: Our Government ALWAYS defends the Government (NCSWC) | Ep 643

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}SELF-LICKING: Our Government ALWAYS defends the Government (NCSWC) | Ep 643