Streisand Effect: Ka$h flails with more PR mid-Manhunt | Ep 697 - The Kyle Seraphin Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:10):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends.

(00:37):
Welcome to today's Kyle Serafin show.
And it is Tuesday, December the 16th.
Got to tell you guys I have a dream.
A dream that one day I'm going to wake up or maybe I'll even go
to bed and I'll realize it before I close my eyes.
And our FBI will be either disbanded or deweaponized or set

(00:58):
up in such a way that I won't have to think about it, won't
have to worry about them coming through the door of my house or
screwing with one of my friends who works there 'cause they're
not there anymore. Or I won't see some information
operations slop that's being just plopped on the plate and
the platter of people that I otherwise would get along with.

(01:19):
There's a lot of you out there that have decided to, I think
part ways with the non thinking,instinctive tribal crowd that
just goes whatever whatever trumpet is people say is for me.
There's so many people that justhave that instinct.
And then, and I think that as time goes on and as people kind

(01:40):
of consider it in light of the totality of it, they're like,
they're making me eat this garbage and I don't want it.
I'd like to just be a regular person with an independent mind
that can make up my mind and andnot have to be told what my
opinion is. And I think even though this is
a fantasy world, it could happen.

(02:01):
They're pushing so hard the the mainstream media push the the
Fox News sort of boomer. Don't consider anything.
Everybody on TV only tells you serious stuff.
They're destroying their credibility and they don't
necessarily realize the moment around them.

(02:21):
And the moment has to do with this last five years where
people have been lied to in meaningful ways.
And it has directly affected their livelihood.
It's affected their their freedom, their safety, their
ability to just not be connected.
You know, a lot of us didn't spend all of our time poring

(02:42):
over the news cycle to figure out what was coming up next or
what might happen. But over the period of 2020 and
2021, I think that changed because the whimsical fancies of
people in your state health departments or the insanity of
mainstream media gaslighting that was pushing, you know, new
fake information at you. We had to be aware of it because

(03:06):
you could be on the wrong side of some local ordinance that was
just made-up or some decree by your mayor or your governor
decided that everybody had to wear a mask or that you had to
walk on the right hand side of the aisle and then the left hand
side of even an odd aisle at your supermarket and somebody
might try to drag you out in handcuffs if you weren't paying
attention. So a lot of people who didn't
otherwise want to be connected to this information, they

(03:29):
started, they started paying attention and maybe some people
went back to sleep, but I don't think you could afford to be
asleep. I don't think you can afford to
not be aware or cognizant of the, the information OP that
surrounds all of us. And it comes through public
relations campaigns. It comes through the veil of
legitimate media sources. And I'll, I'll make this

(03:52):
argument to you because I know people look at what I do as far
as the way that we cover things.And I had one person a long time
ago complain. I think this person has probably
since been re educated and recorrected their mind.
But I cover almost exclusively left-leaning sources because if
I want to see the truth about the people that I have high
expectations for that otherwise might be ideologically aligned

(04:12):
with me, I want to know what their critics say.
It's far better to find out whatkind of criticism you have.
I almost exclusively go to negative commentary.
I want to find out what are the negative people say.
If you agree with me, that's great.
I, I appreciate you. There's a lot of you out there.
You leave comments and they're, and they're positive.
Some of you leave comments that are funny.

(04:33):
That's where I'm really, that's what I'm really there for.
But the people that don't agree with me are where I want to
find, I want to find the sticking point because if
everybody agrees, it's like, well, what are we even talking
about? So let's go find the descent.
And dissent is a really criticalpart of what the left would call
our democracy, right? The voices that don't agree with
us. But dissent also tells us where

(04:56):
we might be wrong, where we should re evaluate.
And if we can't critically assess like, oh man, did I have
this correct? Should I look at this position
and see it in a a more full manner, in a more full light?
I think we should. I think if you don't open
yourself up to scrutiny, if you don't open your mind up to
challenging whatever your cognitive biases are, then then

(05:20):
you're screwed. Then you're going to fall for
whatever the information, OP, the slop, the PR campaign, the
psyop, whatever you want to callit, you're going to fall for
that because it's designed for you, the non critical thinker.
If you just say, how would thesepeople lie to me?
And we did an entire program about parasocial relationships.
And I think that's going to comeinto today's program a little
bit. Parasocial relationships are

(05:42):
relationships that are exclusively 1 sided with a
figure in either the media or inthe public sphere that doesn't
even know you exist. And I have some too, I'm sure.
But I kind of know, and I hope you do too, that people in the
public space, whether they be onsocial media or on real media or
whether they be in television orwhether they're just like a like
an actor. Like does Robert De Niro really

(06:04):
love you? You know, maybe a bad example.
Does Ben Stiller really get you?Would Chris Pratt want to hang
out with you? Would he be like that guy that
he he'd really be your buddy if you guys got together?
Like if you have those kind of thoughts, come on now.
You don't even get along with all the people you work with.
You don't even get along with all the people in your family
that know you really well. So these these parasocial

(06:27):
relationships are the things that make you expect that there
is a A1 sided reciprocity between someone that you've
never met and owes you nothing and wouldn't know you if you
walked up and spoke to them. You think that there's some sort
of transactional understanding between the two of you.
And I see it all the time. Today we're going to talk about

(06:47):
Dan Bongino a little bit becausehe popped up on my feed while I
was trying to get my exercise inhere.
I am pedaling on my bike, getting my heart rate up.
And I'm starting to. And I just see like new stories
inbound. Dan Bongino might be leaving his
thing, you know, might be leaving it.
So now I'm seeing this flood of Dan Bongino is my guy.
Like, I trust Dan again. Again, people who've never met

(07:07):
Dan, people who don't know anything about Dan, people who
Dan has never betrayed, people who have never had a promise
made directly to them in an explicit format about a very,
very serious topic. Like, I don't know your safety
and your survival. I've had that conversation with
Dan Bongino. I had a man tell me that my

(07:27):
story would not fall apart because he wouldn't let it,
because that's what he was goingto make as a commitment and I
was going to change my entire life.
If you guys don't know how this works, I sat in the out in the
middle of the desert in New Mexico in my backyard on a house
that I was listening to sell because I didn't have a job at
the FBI anymore and I didn't know what was coming next.
And I had a man tell me that youcan come forward and speak on my

(07:49):
podcast. And I need you and America needs
you and, and this voice is important.
They need to put a face, this face apparently for better, for
worse aging, though it may be Gray hairs, though they creep
into the beard. This face was necessary because
everybody needed to know that there was a human being with

(08:10):
eyes and a mouth and a nose and,and a personality and a voice
behind FBI whistleblowers who are going to members of
Congress. So I took him at his word.
I really did. And that was overtly betrayed.
And I don't, I don't sit and like worry about this kind of
stuff anymore. I just can't.
I, there's too many things that are happening every day, but

(08:31):
it's really clear to me that I'mnot going to forget when
somebody betrays you, if somebody gives you their word
and goes back on it, like you'd be a fool to not keep that in
your back pocket. And remember when this person
says something, it's not worth the paper it's printed on.
It's not worth the airwaves thatit was broadcast across.
So that's, that's my take on this.
And I think it's relevant because again, we're now seeing,
God forbid, Oh, I've never told you that before, have I?

(08:53):
I've never come out and said that this guy was short lived
for that job because he was never a good fit.
I've never told you that he didn't have the qualifications
to be there, right? Of course I did.
I'm being sarcastic here. So we're going to talk about the
potential moving of the MAGA podcasters out of the FBII don't
know what that means next, but Ihave some suspicions.
Couple other stories that are super important, which is that

(09:14):
they've been screwing up in Rhode Island.
It looks really bad. At the very least, it's a bad PR
situation. And so the FBI does what the FBI
does. They've announced that they
foiled A terror plot. Guys, you can set your freaking
watch by this. I'm not even I'm bored of making
predictions that they are going to do this at this point.

(09:36):
But they set a they they foiled A terror plot in Los Angeles.
So we'll get into that. I have the complaint in front of
me, which is it's exactly what you expect if you've been part
of this program. You know, it's the playbook.
We're going to go into the new sort of influence op that's
going on. Because what would make you
think that somebody is not the thing that they're claiming in a
lawsuit other than going out andtalking to a legitimate

(09:58):
influence operation person? The former spokesperson for Mike
Pence and a former spokesperson for DHS and someone who's been
around the Trump administration since the first admin.
This is, of course, Katie Miller, who married Stephen
Miller, who has an awful lot of tie to intelligence, the
intelligence apparatus. She's on Donald Trump's

(10:18):
intelligence Advisory Board. So for a girl that has nothing
to do with anything intelligencerelated, Alexis Wilkins, who's
suing me for $5,000,000, sure has an awful lot of connections
to the intelligence world in theUnited States government,
despite being a country music sensation.
She's dating an intelligence agency head and she's sitting
down with somebody who I legitimately would call like

(10:41):
part of the intelligence community if you're part of
Donald Trump's Advisory Board. So we'll get into that a little
bit too. And then what else do we got?
Mass shootings and what they mean broadly global, etcetera.
There's a there's a push right now, obviously coming from the
the political left to say guns are bad, OK, and we got to get
rid of them. So that's where we're going to
go. And let's start with my friends
over silent. This actually plays in really

(11:01):
well because if you're worried about the sort of the media
narratives and you don't trust big tech or government or
corporate data brokers or anybody else for that matter, if
you just just don't trust people, which is where I sit,
maybe you want to tie up your digital footprint a little bit,
at least when you choose to. Maybe you want to go off grid on
occasion. You can do that with my friends
over at silentitsslnt.com/kyle. That's silent.

(11:21):
No vowels.com slash Kyle. You'll save 15% on qualified
orders. You get free shipping as well on
a lot of them. This is the one that we use
every single day here on the show.
So if you guys have seen this before, I should turn it right
side up. It says silent right down here.
It's really well made. It's got really good magnets and
all you literally do is put yourphone inside of it and away goes
all of the radio frequency. That's the RF communications,

(11:43):
that's cellular and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth and GPS and RFID and
near field communications and all kinds of other things that
your phones are starting to put out there with no signal.
There's no tracking, there's no remote access, there's no bread
crumbs. This is the technology that our
friends over in the special operations world use.
They use it for sensitive site exploitation if they want to
hold on to something and make sure nobody wipes it from
remote. It's also something I use as an
FBI agent, except I used to use like tinfoil and an ammo can.

(12:06):
I really did because there were not good products, at least not
that the the government would buy at that time.
Silent stepped up into that gap.They make stuff in the military
for various different law enforcement agencies and you 2
can buy the same stuff they're using.
It's not the cheapest product because it actually works.
If you want the cheap stuff, go to Chinese Yemen.
Get disappointed when it actually leaks and fails.
I've leaked tested this the sameway we did in the Bureau.

(12:26):
I've driven literally hundreds of miles moving from different
cell phone towers and pinging atdifferent directions and moving
it around inside my cab of my vehicle is a great way to test
these things and and it survivedwith living colors or with the
with the flying colors rather. Did a great job and didn't leak
at all. So that's a big deal.
If you guys want something that works, check it out.
Cut down your digital footprint,get some silence in your life,

(12:47):
go off the grid, join your family for a few minutes.
Put away the psyop and the information OP and just be a
regular person like we used to. Check them out.
Link in the show description silent.com/K YLE.
Today's program begins in more depth right now.

(13:10):
So sometimes my wife gives me a hard time.
She's like, he kind of went longin the beginning, you know, And
I go, yeah, sometimes I do. But I do feel like that's part
of the program. You guys.
First of all, that's just my commentary on what's going on in
the world. And more importantly, I think it
sets up where we're going to go with the program in light
details. I'm going to tell you where
we're going. So that's what the the old rule
was. Tell them what you're going to
tell them, then tell them and then tell them what you told
them at the end. I do a little bit less of that

(13:31):
than because I I assume a littlebit of capability of my
audience. So forgive me that I don't do
the classic media move, which isI'm going to basically spoon
feed you everything. I don't want to do that.
I want to assume that I'm talking to people that have an
intellect, that have a penetrating sort of curiosity.
And some of the stuff is things you're going to have to go and
do on your own. You're going to go look on your
own to find out, is there more to this story?

(13:55):
We only have a few minutes here.I mean, if there's hours of
this. So some of these are going to
peek your fancy and you're goingto want to read more about it.
This story is pretty straightforward, though.
This is coming from the New YorkSun Daniel Edward Rosen is
writing here. And the headline Dan Bongino's
office is empty and his chief ofstaff has moved on.
Ex podcaster may be gone come January 2026, say FBI, the FBI

(14:17):
insiders. All right, well, we've been
talking about this is a real possibility for a while.
And when the staff starts leaving, it's a pretty good
indication the job is about to be refilled by somebody new.
That actually might be the single biggest thing, an empty
office. I don't know when your chief of
staff, Mose takes another job inside the Bureau, it's probably
a good indication we're doing something else.

(14:39):
Can we trust this article? Look at this.
Sometimes I see stuff on the chat off the corner and and I
want to address it. Can we trust it?
Maybe. I think we should be skeptical
at all times. I think we should not let our
confirmation bias fill us in where we say, oh, well, we
assume that this was going to happen.
So now that we hear about it, ofcourse it's happening.

(15:02):
But The Sun has been pretty critical.
There have been other articles as well.
And I will tell you why I think this is actually very likely
because the cooperating evidencefrom both sides pushes it out.
And let's just kind of tease that ahead.
Bongino went on and or gave information to Fox News as well.

(15:23):
And when that happens, here's the here's the Fox News article
for your awareness. OK, let me frame it on the
screen nicely. Deputy Director Dan Bongino to
decide about his future at the Bureau in the coming week.
Sources say that's Fox. That's the official mouthpiece,
I would say, of this particular part of the administration.
So if Fox News is going to run the story and it's not the the
favorite outlets of Dan Bongino or Cash Patel when it comes to

(15:46):
this stuff, it's a pretty good indicator that the story is has
some accuracy and I think it haslegs.
So, as they say, let me read a little bit of it.
The brief and tumultuous tenure of MAGA podcaster turned FBI
Deputy Director Daniel Bongino. We never call him Daniel unless
we're mad at him, right? Like his mom when she was upset
or disappointed. It may be coming to an end soon

(16:08):
with his office largely empty, the chief of staff assuming a
new role in Baltimore, The Sun has learned.
While Mr. Bongino, 51, was in his Washington office on Friday,
he's believed to inform several special agents in charge of the
FB is 56 field offices that he would be soon leaving his role.
His Washington office was empty on Friday evening.

(16:29):
Well, that would be the case formost feds, if you guys know.
FBI spokesperson didn't return questions from the Sun.
And his departure, which has been rumored in recent weeks,
may have been put into motion. In November, his chief of staff,
a guy named Jimmy Paul, was named the special agent in
charge of the Baltimore field office after he served the role
with Dan Bongino only nine months.

(16:49):
And that is according to his LinkedIn page.
Mr. Paul's, a 17 year veteran ofthe FBI, was the first ever
Indian American to hold that role.
It's kind of funny, according tosocial media posts from the
fraternal organization American Mali.
Malali, I don't even know what this word is.
Malali, Law Enforcement United never even heard of this thing.

(17:11):
But anyway, they found some group of things to talk about it
and there you go. So if his chief of staff has
moved on, there's a good indication that in fact he may
be going. Now.
Bongino has been posting tough talk, protect the homeland,
crush violent crime, all this other nonsense.
Dan Bongino has been in the roleof FBI Deputy Director for nine
months, which for those of you who've ever done like a long
term TDY, many of you have temporarily served in jobs

(17:33):
within your own job for longer than Bongino has been there.
It's regular that people from the FBI spend 18 months at TD YS
temporary duty assignments to the FBI's headquarter building.
Legitimately, there's probably athird of the people in senior
management at the Bureau who could easily say I have done
jobs temporarily for longer thanDan Bongino has spent in that

(17:57):
role. And I do think that's a little
bit embarrassing. And I also don't know why he
thinks that we should trust him.I really don't because as you
just heard, a guy who's been in the FBI for 17 years who stepped
up to be his chief of staff and is now going to be in senior
management in Baltimore. Well, you think he just got into
management when Patel and Bongino showed up?
No, he was in the feeder program.

(18:18):
The way that the, the, the, the org chart works, it's worth
knowing is that people work cases at AGS 13 pay grade, it
doesn't really matter, but 13 isthe number of the tenured agent
after five years, all right. And after five years you can
start working without anybody else looking into you.
And they, you know, they, they give you the full pay for the
job and a 1310. So every pay grade also has

(18:42):
individual steps in it, one through 10 and the 1310 is
considered your most senior caseagent, brick agent, the guy on
the ground, woman on the ground doing the actual casework.
Above that is a 14. The fourteens are the
supervisors, various different steps in there. 15 is a
supervisor, supervisor, second line supervisor, right?
And then you get off that GS scale where you're no longer
making sort of a published pay rate, you move into a different

(19:04):
published pay rate called the Senior Executive Service.
That's the senior management level.
These people we often will talk about on this program being sort
of deep state because they've been there for a while and
they've obviously wanted to advance off the GS scale and
they are no longer connected to anything related to individual
cases. These people are policy.
They are political actors, oftentimes inside the Bureau, like

(19:26):
whatever Bureau politics are. And this is the case for every
agency. I'm talking specifically about
the FBI because it worked there,but every federal agency has
this now. If only somebody had told us
that we shouldn't trust this managerial core.
If only somebody had gone out there, put it on record and said
you cannot have faith in an organization that doesn't clean

(19:46):
up the management. Has someone ever said that do
not trust the FBI and do not trust the Secret Service either,
or any of these government entities until there is a full
change in management. What?
A full change in management, yousay?
How far down would that go? If you asked me, it would go

(20:07):
down to the GF fifteens. Those are the people that are
second level managers. They are the managers of
managers and that's when you start getting into that middle
management BS. Did they do that?
Did they follow the plan that wehad?
And we didn't ask for credit. The guys who lost their jobs in
that agency, who have the most vested interest in surviving and

(20:27):
making sure that it is deweaponized My dream of waking
up one day and not worrying about the FBI, which is a real
dream. It's a pipe dream, I guess.
But I had someone asked me last night while I'm sitting around
the we started a little bonfire in the backyard or not a
bonfire, whatever, you know, like a fire pit fire.
Sitting there with my kiddos, they're roasting marshmallows.
They're wearing their jackets, even though it's not that cold
outside. And we're throwing things into

(20:47):
the the flames. And I get a an e-mail media
request. Mr. Serafin, could you give me a
read on Director Patel's job or kind of an update at the one
year mark coming up on the one year mark of how he's been
doing? And I said Cash Patel and that
actually falls for for Dan Bongino right now had a
generational opportunity. Can any of you think of a time

(21:12):
going back into the archives? Those of you who remember Chris
Ray, you remember Jim Comedy, you remember Bob Mueller, maybe
you remember Louis Free. Maybe you can go back that far.
Maybe you remember all the way back there.
Do you remember a time when you thought there might be a real
big change, like promise change,specifically focused in on

(21:35):
federal law enforcement? It should have happened in the
90s. A 100% it should have happened
after what happened at Waco, after what happened at Ruby
Ridge. And obviously the FBI was not
the the initiating problem there, but had an an awful
effect, went in and made it way worse.
Did you think there might be a big change when we had Bill

(21:56):
Clinton come in? Did you think there'd be a big
change with George Bush? Was it ever like the FBI is a
centerpiece of the problem? I cannot think of a time in my
life when we have heard a drum banging from either side, left
or right. This is a serious threat to the
American people's civil liberties, and we've got to fix
it and we're going to put in a guy who's going to do it.

(22:17):
Hence my advocacy of Cash Patel.It was based on can we fix this
thing? He had a generational
opportunity and it was completely squandered and they
blew it beyond belief. It's the reason why I thought I
did this. This is Dan Bongino speaking to

(22:37):
me. Before I even knew it, someone
had to send me this. And what did he say?
He actually warned you of the same thing that he's been
dealing with every single day and didn't fix.
So he's going to leave as a failure and it is non negotiable
did not fix it. And dropping a terror plot on a
Monday afternoon is not going tobe yet.
They actually it's buried, by the way, on everything with the

(22:58):
exception of Fox News. Everybody buried the story
because it's such crap. I had multiple mainstream
outlets reach out to me and go, have you seen the, the this,
this terror plot thing in Los Angeles?
I go no, but let me just put a guess on it.
It involves A confidential humansource, also known as an
informant, as a set up person. And then it also involves
undercover FBI agents moving theplot along, am I right?

(23:22):
And I got back a message from from one of them.
It said one of the meetings was 40% FBI paid personnel to
further this domestic terrorism plot.
That's how bullshit these thingsare.
Anyway. I believe this guy.
I think a lot of people did. I think some people should be
disillusioned. It should be a gritty like a

(23:43):
like a gritty example that the status quo has its hooks into
the system and you don't get real change.
And you certainly don't get it if you put people in who have
what I would call F you money and they don't even know when to
say F you. This guy disappoints me and
probably should disappoint you too.
This is an agency that has betrayed you and that oath you

(24:06):
took into this man or woman who stepped forward and disclose
this horrific information about the FBI targeting A legitimate
conservative journalist. I applaud you.
But another whistleblowers come forward.
I applaud you as well, Sir, ma'am, from the FBI who came
forward with this data. Folks, we are starting to see

(24:26):
it. People are starting to take
their constitutional oath seriously.
Nope. It was just me both times.
Most of the stuff that Dan talked about and celebrated and
thought were like, this is a turning point.
It wasn't, not at all. It was just a guy who had seen
it from the beginning. My first couple days there, I
went, this is not what I signed up for.

(24:48):
And then I got to the field office and I went, I think what
we're doing is unconstitutional.I don't want to be part of it.
I'd like to go ahead and report this problem.
If no one's going to do anythingabout it, I'm going to find my
way into another job, which I did.
And of course, it ended up that I tried to leave the political
environment of Washington, DC, and I moved out to New Mexico.
Most of you don't even know where Las Cruces is on a map,
but I do. And I moved out there to get

(25:10):
away from it all, to not be involved in in anything
political. There should be the least
political place in America, Las Cruces, NM.
And it turns out that's where I lost my job over politics, COVID
politics, things that some of usare still suffering from, still
worried about. I still have an ongoing lawsuit
about it. And then the other piece of it
was, is that the Biden administration was letting in
Afghans writ large. I thought that was problematic.

(25:33):
It was pretty obvious. We just had that happen.
We just had members of our National Guard shot in the head
while they were in Washington, DC.
How crazy is that? That a story that bothered me in
September of 2021, and I went tomy member of Congress less than
a month later. That story is still ongoing.
Isn't that crazy? And the parents at school board

(25:54):
things, the fact that the FBI had prioritized as a domestic
terror threat for political operations to just cave to the
teachers union and the National Association of School Boards,
that's crazy too. They didn't fix anything.
They never have. And I'm not sure they ever even
tried or they even knew how to because they got rid of the
people who should have been helping them.

(26:14):
What you seen on the screen is obviously the snowy winter of
Rhode Island, where we just had a mass shooting.
And that guy's still on the loose as of this morning.
It's almost 9:00 here, so almost10:00 on the eastern East Coast.
I haven't seen anything saying that they've got him.
So there's an ongoing manhunt for an unknown fat guy who's got
a sweatshirt and a beanie. Yep, it's about that.
Good. I'll show you guys the videos of
that in just a second. I just want to make sure you

(26:36):
understand that's what we're talking about.
And what do they do? Also, not a week ago, they
celebrated an arrest in the pipebomb case.
Or two weeks ago, I guess it's coming up on two weeks now,
which seems absolutely absurd. The New York Times covering this
one. And I actually think this is
pretty wild. As Bongino celebrates an arrest
in the pipe bomb case, others onthe right remain skeptical.

(26:56):
I am one of those peoples quoted.
So is Tom Massey now, for whatever it's worth, I don't
always read things in the New York Times, but I, I think it'd
be, I'd be remiss to, to not share with you because it's
really funny. And also some of the adjectives
and the, the way that they described me, the descriptions
are pretty gold. You guys have been calling me a
nemesis and a boogeyman from some of the other pieces that

(27:20):
we've read. And I'm just going to tell you
the reason why I'm telling you that is because people are
listening to this program, people who have far wider
audiences and, and have much bigger reach than I do.
And it, it's a big responsibility to try to be
honest about stuff and say whereI'm coming from.
But it's also really funny when people call you a scorched earth
critic. So here's the New York Post

(27:41):
story, you guys, I archived it here.
It'll go over on kyleserafin.com.
You guys will find the link. If you want to find it over in
the comments section, you can find it on YouTube.
You can find it on the comments section of Rumble.
Make sure you guys are liking the video while I'm bringing
those things up. And, and then Scroll down and
find the pin comment where you'll be able to read this for
yourself if you're so inclined. I'm going to read a couple
pieces of it. Bongino, the official #2 at the
FBI, he's the Co #2 if we're being whatever the heck that

(28:04):
means. He spent much of Thursday.
This was going back to December 5th, basking in the praise of
his role in catching a man charged with planting 2 pipe
bombs near the Republican and Democratic Party headquarters on
the eve of January the 6th. It was his 51st birthday and the
triumphal announcement the case has been cracked through the
force of will and reexamination of leads neglected by the Biden

(28:25):
era Bureau. Well, I'm trying to make you the
the point that there's only one Bureau and there's only ever
been one Bureau. And that guy told us not to
trust the management unless it'sbeen completely changed.
And we have evidence based on his own chief of staff that they
haven't done it. Do not trust the FBI and do not
trust the Secret Service either or any of these government

(28:46):
entities until there is a full change in management.
All right, fine. Well, he says previously I was
paid in the past. He's talking to Sean Hannity for
my opinions. And it's clear that one day I'll
be back in that space. We expect it'll probably be next
year, probably early next year if we're being honest about it,
he said. There's zero doubt that the
placement of the devices was a setup previously and then now

(29:07):
what? Now we have to do facts.
You think that this FBI and thatFBI and the FBI, as I would say,
is incapable of embarrassing theliving hell out of these guys?
Somebody probably told Cash Patel that we have the subject
in custody when they were going after Charlie Kirk's killer.
Somebody told him that we've gotthe guy, so that somebody from

(29:31):
most likely the FBI briefed the president that they've got the
guy when Donald Trump went out and posted that the other day
and got it wrong. Is there any accountability to
this stuff when you get it wrongover and over again?
Let me just read a little further into this and then I'll

(29:52):
show you that other people are catching on that there's
something of a problem of credibility.
How many times can you tell yourboss the wrong thing, put him
out in public or publicly claimed victory for a non
victory before it comes back andbites you in the ass?
And, and that's an open questionbecause the reason this stuff
continues is because people keeptolerating it because of that
parasocial relationship with Atros Den.

(30:12):
He's my God. Cash is my dude.
How that continues to happen is beyond me, but it does happen,
which is to tell you that you asthe audience listening to this,
you are in a minority. And I don't like to tell people
like, hey, you're kind of exclusive.
Like you're the bet you, you might be the smartest audience
per capita, like because you're sitting here and you're least
critical. I regularly get pushed back and
say, I don't agree with you on this.

(30:32):
That's fine. You shouldn't, doesn't mean
you're right. I think I'm right, but it
doesn't mean I am. It just means I think I am.
And I'm willing to accept that that there are things that get
wrong regularly. Sometimes I'm accidentally
right. I say the wrong thing and I'm
right. Wouldn't that be weird?
I mean, that happens too. This story about the pipe bomber
is a great microcosm for the failing of this generational

(30:56):
opportunity. Let's read some of this stuff.
The claim that the pipe bombs were part of an inside job is a
crucial element of the debunked but enduring belief among
fervent Trump loyalists that thecapital riot was not what it
appeared to be a violent effort to disrupt the lawful election
of Mr. Biden, but rather a shadowy conspiracy by government

(31:18):
and political operatives to sow chaos and discredit the Trumpist
movement. That right there from The New
York Times is a simple paragraphthat sums up exactly why the
pipe bomber story cannot cannot.Why the establishment, why the
media, why the government, why everybody that's all involved in
this stuff, cannot allow a a former Capitol Police officer,

(31:41):
current CIA employee to be the person.
You got me that paragraph. It's part of the debunked but
enduring belief. It has to remain debunked
because the minute that you showthat Capitol Police officers in
11 minutes and 7 seconds left their car that they were driving
before they were even asked to drive and went out and found a

(32:02):
pipe bomb in under 12 minutes faster than a freaking dog could
find him. And went directly to the spot
the pipe bomber had been at the night before.
Sitting down for 77 seconds in the dark, 1 Bush in all of
Washington, DC, of which there are thousands and thousands of
bushes and then turned around and went directly to the threat
and found the pipe bomb. If that doesn't indicate the

(32:26):
enduring belief among fervent Trump loyalists that the capital
riot was not what it appeared tobe a shadowy conspiracy by
government and political operatives, well, it doesn't
take a ton of them to be fair. And that maybe is where Bongino
and where Patel and maybe some of the other sort of grifty
types. What did the what did my buddy
say yesterday? I think Steve friend said it the
grift of Failure, which was a play on the on the title of

(32:47):
Bongino's book. If you're going to be out there
making the claim that it's this broad government conspiracy,
then you are a cartoon. I'm going to tell you that it
was likely a very narrow governmental conspiracy.
It involves one or two very, very powerful people who have
the ability to pick up a phone and people do stuff.
It involves several government agencies, low level foot

(33:08):
soldiers that have a vested interest in seeing the OP
carried out. What's more likely that a guy
who has has literally nothing todo with politics, has nothing to
do with the government, has nothing to do with the United
States Capitol Police who found the bomb in no time flat, has
nothing to do with Washington, DC as far as we can tell, and

(33:30):
basically doesn't even know what's going on around him?
Is it more likely that that guy predicted in advance that the
election would have, let's just call it, significant questioners
and there would be a controversy?
Is it likely that a guy who lives in mom's basement, who has
the functional ability of, let'ssay, a 16 year old per mom?

(33:51):
I think it's actually probably lower than that.
He kind of responds the way thatmy 4 year old does when I ask my
4 year old a question and he haslike non sequiturs that go along
with it. There's some footage that's
coming out of Brian Cole Junior who's been arrested for the pipe
bomb scenario. Is it more likely that that guy
who completely absolves every governmental agency, Capitol
Police, the FBI, members of Congress, the ATF, and whoever

(34:13):
else, then maybe the CIA if they're in the mop up crew?
It doesn't mean that everybody in the CIA, the thousands of
people that work there. It doesn't mean everybody in the
40,000 people at the FBI or every person in the Capitol
Police 2000 plus people that work there.
It doesn't mean they're all involved.
It just means that someone from each agency in a position of
authority could have abused their authority and that seems
more likely than some random dude.

(34:36):
It seems more likely that a random dude in Woodbridge, VA
who lives with his mom and worksat a bail bond shop and doesn't
know how to drive and does a terrible job like mastermind
building pipe bombs in advance and was buying the stuff in in
2019. Tom Massey on this.
This is why. This is all going to end up
falling apart. They say they have checks and

(34:57):
credit cards, even one of them was a cash purchase.
So I'm not sure how they know this individual made a cash
purchase of bond making materials.
The one inch diameter, 8 inch long pipe, the end caps that go
over that 9 Volt batteries, alligator clips.

(35:19):
They they've literally they say they have evidence that he's
purchased all of those things. By the way, all of those things
are in my basement right now, ofcourse, OK, because I've
purchased all of those things multiple.
Times anybody that does home improvement.
Yeah, if you run the black pipe that is is used for gas lines,

(35:39):
for instance, if you're hooking up a generator or something.
I'm not saying this kid did thatsort of work, but these are
common materials. But they say they've got him
purchasing these things. The thing is he must, he's, he's
a, he must be a national asset at this point because he
predicted the election. If, if the motive is that he was

(36:00):
upset about the election. So he built these bombs and
placed them on J5 so they would go off on J6 and help the the
insurgents take over the capitalso that they could overturn the
election, which seems to be the narrative right now.
He knew two years in advance to start buying this material

(36:20):
because the date on these purchases, almost every
purchase, predates the election.Do you do you see why that's a
really troubling thing? We have to forget everything
that we've known, including the things that these guys have
said. And so the New York Times
covered this in a, in a, a very clean manner.
For those of you who want to discount it because it's the New

(36:42):
York Times. We should be looking at people
that we might disagree with and try to see, does it poke holes
in our narrative, in our own thought processes?
Are they making a, a legitimate point that we should consider?
Here's where it comes down. This is about the 2/3 the way
down the story. The arrest takes place nearly
five years after the bombs were found and defused.
It raises questions about the quality of the investigation

(37:02):
under AG Merrick B Garland and the FBI director at the time,
Christopher A Wray, who, by the way, has not been relaxed.
He has not been arrested. They went after comedy.
Have you noticed that none of the quote UN quote deep state
the, the, the gangster types, the government gangsters that
Patel had, he got John Bolton. That's it.
Is that what you voted for one guy in a year?

(37:22):
They must be working on it. Sure they are, as Mr. Bongino
attempted a tire shredding U-turn.
That is a great phrase, by the way.
Give the writers credit for writing something fun.
A vocal group of activists who are staying the course lashed
out. It was a more modest, if equally
vehement, reprisal of the backlash over the effort by
Trump appointees to quell the fervor over the Epstein

(37:43):
investigation. You guys know where I've been on
that. You know where I've been on this
Consistent. That's the words you're looking
for. Kyle Serafin, a former FBI agent
who conducted surveillance on the pipe bomber case before
leaving the Bureau to become a popular right wing podcaster.
There you go. They actually got me right.
They didn't call me a MAGA guy. And I do love that.
Thank you. New York Times.
He said he did not believe that Mister Cole had planted the

(38:04):
bombs near Capitol Hill. Mr. Serafin, A scorched earth
critic of the current FBI director.
Why is it it's because I'm mad at Cash Patel.
No, it's because I believe that he said he was going to do what
he was going to do. And of course he hasn't.
I'm going to show you more examples of that.
Caspitel has long maintained that law enforcement officers
are implicated in the placement of the pipe bomb.
Quote, I think this whole thing is completely fabricated.

(38:26):
None of it rings true to me. Mr. Seraphin said the FBI has
done this before. The model is Richard Jewell.
Many of you guys know that. Representative Thomas Massie, a
Kentucky Republican, has also long maintained that the pipe
bombing episode was an inside job by D state operatives and
questioned whether the FBI had indeed found the right man.
It goes on. You guys got it.
This is why it's relevant because if you can go set

(38:48):
somebody up, if you can do a complete, what do they call it?
A tire shredding? Is that it?
Tire shredding? U-turn and never have to answer
for what changed your mind and then you get to go back to your
podcast. Then we're done because nobody
is thinking critically. What did you know?
Why did you know it? How did you know this wasn't
going to work out? We've got tearful evidence of

(39:10):
Dan Bongino leaving his podcast nine months ago, which is
shorter than many of you deployed to foreign nations that
get shot at. And he was in tears when he
left. And he'll be so glad to be back.
And it'll be embarrassing for anybody that's serious and looks
at it in any kind of critical way.
We're going to keep going into this and I've got more stuff.

(39:31):
And then of course, we've got all these other stories I want
to keep touching. This is going to be obviously a
little bit longer today. But I think that going through
the complaint of the BS setup, because the first thing the FBI
does whenever something bad happens is they go to domestic
terrorism and they got to go to a playbook case.
Do they have a bunch of these sitting on the books?
Yes, they do. They sure do.
How do you know, Kyle? Because I've been on those
surveillances. They've got a dozen of these

(39:52):
things working all around the country at any given time.
They can bust them up at any time they like and they can just
push it to a moment with that UCor that undercover and then they
write the complaint. So we're going to go through
that too before we do. My friends at Patriot Cooler are
fueling today's rage and maybe the fact that I'm not sleeping
at night and drinking some coffee out of a hot mug.
This is one way to do it. This is the 16 ounce mug.
It is great for a desk, not great to fit into your car's cup

(40:15):
holders. So if you're a cup holder
person, get the 19 oz. It's more, it's taller.
It's probably better if you're driving anyway.
If you're a desk person like I am in the mornings here and I
don't have to go anywhere for commute.
Maybe you work from home. The 16 ounce mug is great, looks
great, feels great. It's got a great size to it.
The handle's good. Patriot coolers.com promo code
Kyle. They are our longest sponsor.
They've been with us since the beginning.

(40:36):
I really do appreciate them. Those guys reach out and they
don't ask for much and all they say is if you're in the market
for a cooler or a Tumblr, if you're thinking like hey is a
Yeti or an igloo or whatever, a Stanley in my in my future,
check them out first. They're a great company.
They give back to veterans. They also support us and you can
save 10% with my name. It's Kyle and that will save you
10% on any of their stuff. You buy 50 bucks or more, which

(40:58):
is basically go out there and you know, buy one for you and
one for a friend, your spouse oryou know, give a gift, something
like that. And then you're going to get
that 10% off and free shipping. So double, double and their big
stuff all will fit into your cupholders.
As you guys are pointing out, the 40 oz, the 30 oz, the 20 oz,
the 19 oz. They all fit into cup holders
nicely because they thought, hey, what if we made sure that
they trimmed down at the bottom and they do.

(41:18):
So Patriot coolers.com promo code.
Kyle, save yourself some money on that.
All right, let's continue on. Let's continue into this is sort
of meta coverage. OK, hold on.
Just before we do couple of different stories up here.
All right, throw that one on. Dan Bongino could potentially
leave in the FBI future. Sources say.
This is coming from the nationalnews desk at Fox San Antonio.

(41:40):
I'm just giving you a sampling of some of the other stuff.
Again, this is the Fox story. Say he's going to make his
decision in a couple of weeks. Well, what's a couple of weeks?
That's next year. We're 2-3 weeks away early next
year. I've been told he's on what they
call terminal leave. For those of you who've been in
the military, you know what I'm talking about.
That's when you burn all the leave that you've accrued and
you get paid so you can technically be on the job even
though you're not at the job anymore.

(42:01):
And when you go on terminal leave, for those of you who have
not served and done a terminal leave, essentially what you're
doing is you cash out all your leave.
And it says I'm working until January, but I'm taking the rest
of year off and I'm not going tobe here.
So I'm physically unavailable for duty and I am not planning
on coming back. But technically I still work
here. That's terminal leave, we've

(42:21):
been told. That's the thing.
There also is some some coveragein this and it's worth reading
and I'm not going to cover it all here, but there's some
coverage of Miranda Devine's 115page report from current and
active and former FBI agents andanalysts and so on who've had
heavily criticized these guys and his push back talking about

(42:42):
how she's deep state divine. So they run a little bit of
cover. Miranda prefers the old guard.
I will tell you definitively that of all the people in the
media that have a big voice and have been Dan Bongino advocates,
have been promoted by Dan Bongino on his podcast and so
on. Miranda Devine is probably one
of the people out there with themost character.
Because it does cost you something to go head to head

(43:04):
against the government official and a loud voice in the
conservative movement. Somebody who has the friendship
of Donald Trump, somebody who's got the backing of Fox News.
As we found it takes a lot to step up and say you're wrong.
And I don't care what it costs me.
I mean, it doesn't cost me nearly as much.
It could cost me my entire platform.
And at the same time, my platform is not that big
compared to these people. But Miranda Devine, she's a best

(43:25):
selling writer. She writes for the New York
Post. And they tend to be down the
middle on some things, as in they're on the left on certain
issues and they're on the right on certain issues.
So they kind of they kind of play that game.
And she went out definitively and said what she said.
And she also is definitively defended.
Steve Friend, right Friend started his public sort of

(43:48):
facing push against the FBI withMiranda Devine.
So she was the benefactor. She was the what's the right
word? She's like the patron of Steve
Friend's whistle blowing to the public, just the way that Dan
Bongino was the was the patron for mine.
And the big difference is, is here in December of 2025,

(44:10):
Miranda Devine still talks to Steve Friend and still has his
back. And Dan Bongino has not spoken
to me since last year when he decided that Julie Kelly, a
bored multi millionaire Democrathousewife who gives significant
money to Hillary and to Biden and to others, that woman must
know more about FBI search warrants and FBI paperwork than

(44:32):
I do. As a former FBI agent, not only
have I been on more search warrants than Julie Kelly, I'm
going to guess that I've been onmore search warrants than Dan
Bongino and I've certainly been on more FBI search warrants.
Even though he's now done SecretService and he's now in the FBI.
How many search warrants has he gone on?
None. Did they have the deadly force
policy when they went and got John Bolton?

(44:53):
You bet you freaking ass they did.
They have the deadly force policy whenever somebody carries
a gun for the FBI, including. That's something that Dan
Bongino now has to deal with. You think Dan Bongino now knows
the FB is deadly force policy and that it's always an effect?
Just saying, all right, all of that comes to this, it has
nothing to do with the fact thatCash Patel's handing a Tommy

(45:14):
Tommy gun or a Thompson submachine gun and 45ACP to a
dude in Qatar. No, he's eager for the center
stage and they're casting aside caution when they go forward and
make statements. This is another New York Times
article, but I think it's truly relevant simply because what
we've seen is APR based push. We've seen people inside the

(45:36):
Trump administration that are desperate to get spin because
for them the PR release is the accomplishment.
Let me say it a different way. Sometimes you go out and you
achieve a mission and what you did, the results speak for them
self. And sometimes you plan a mission

(45:57):
and announcing that you're goingto do the mission is the result.
The Trump administration has been that way.
We cured cancer. They could put out a press
release and that would be the win.
Not actually curing cancer, by the way.
It would be that they said they cured cancer or they planned to
cure cancer. We've stopped fentanyl from
coming to the United States because we have a piece of paper
that the Chinese are going to wipe their ass with. 10s of

(46:19):
thousands of lives have been saved.
We're heroes. OK bro, that's what we're
dealing with. We're dealing with people who
would rather say and not do. And what do they teach you when
you were a kid? Whoever talks the most eats the
least. If you have a big family, you
know what I'm talking about. I've got, I've got five brothers
and sisters combined. When you talk the most, you're

(46:42):
not doing the work. These guys haven't done the work
to be able to make the claim. So that's what's going on here
with this particular article. A heinous act of violence, a
faceless killer on the loose, a desperate manhunt.
The FBI director with his fingerpoised over the post button for
his social media account. This goes back to the scream
crying that I heard about, whichhappened over Charlie Kirk's

(47:02):
killing. He was scream crying that he
didn't get the pictures that he could tweet.
And I still say tweet on X 'cause it's better than post.
The circumstances collided over the weekend, once again finding
a suspect who opened fired at Brown University in a classroom,
killing two people, injuring nine others.
This has completely gotten lost because the guy is still
wandering around. Cash Patel, the bureau's self

(47:25):
promotional top official. They nailed that as well.
This is New York. This is New York Times.
They're still hitting it right on the on all cylinders here.
His agents have apprehended a person of interest in a hotel
room only to find out, oops, oopsie, grabbed the wrong guy.
Sorry about that. Yeah.
And maybe, and maybe since we had a major screw up on that,

(47:46):
maybe we could do something else.
Could we run some cover and dropa terrorism plot?
Guys, we're saving you from terrorists that we're setting
up. If you've listened to this
program, you know the playbook. The playbook is find someone
who's dumb, says something really ridiculous on social
media, doesn't have enough moneyto complete the plot unless the
feds get involved and subsidizedit.
Then they goad it to completion and then they arrest you before

(48:06):
you do anything dangerous. That's the playbook.
Here it is. The FBI now reports that it's
disrupted a planned New Year's Eve terror attack in Los
Angeles. 4 suspects in custody. The FBI identifying them as
members of a pro Palestine extremist group.
They're suspected of planning coordinated IED attacks
targeting 5 different locations in Los Angeles.

(48:27):
But based on the reporting, now that plot has been foiled.
We will wait for more out of LA or out of Washington, DC.
We're going to wait for more. But we're Fox News and we said
it authoritatively. The FBI has saved you from maybe
people who were in the FBI pushing along a terror plot.
Feds say they foiled a New Year's Eve terror plot in Los

(48:49):
Angeles, Southern California. They announced the arrest of
four people. You're seeing their faces on the
screen. OK, They were organized.
They were sophisticated and extremely violent guys.
Want to bet that any of those things are true?
They wouldn't have gotten, like,a brand new agent right out of
the Academy to this very important terror case, would
they? They wouldn't have gotten a

(49:10):
confidential human source to like get in there and figure out
what's going on from the beginning and then bring in an
FBI undercover to goad it along and then bring this to the
moment of crisis and announce a big tough guy Fox News win when
they're in the middle of screwing up.
What's happening in Rhode Island.
They wouldn't do that, would they?

(49:31):
A plan to attack several Los Angeles area businesses on New
Year's Eve was detailed dangerous and already in motion,
authorities say. Not anybody else.
Four people allegedly tried tiedto an anti government group
gathered last week in the MojaveDesert to make and test several
bombs. But the FBI foiled the terror
plots. They had everything they needed
to make an operational bomb at that location.

(49:51):
We disrupted the terror plot before the buildings were
demolished or innocent people were killed.
That sounds really serious. They must have had some actual
bombs, right? No, they didn't.
Got it. The FBI arrested those in
suspicion of plotting this attack.
And so the United States Attorney went out and gave a
speech and so did so did the FBIassistant director in charge.

(50:15):
You'll know that as an addict. The ADIC of the Los Angeles
field office. Akhil Davis, a diversity hire
that has not been changed. What were we supposed to think
about? We were supposed to say Davis
was around from before, so we should trust the FBI.
Do not trust the FBI, OK? We we're not supposed to trust
the FBI. Got it.
OK. Sorry about that, Dad.
All right. They were all tied to a radical
faction of the Turtle Island Liberation Front called the

(50:38):
Order of the Black Locusts. Oh, it's so good guys that I, I
saw the Turtle Island, the Turtle Island Liberation Front
piece. I saw that earlier.
And when anyone has the word front in it, that's all you need
to know is what a green Beret told me.
That's how you know it's a front.
But this particular faction of the Turtle Island Liberation
Front is called the Order of theBlack Lotus because these people

(51:00):
are super freaking serious. Danger danger operators.
Should we just skip ahead? Should we just skip ahead and
raid the complaint? Because that seems like what we
do here. I think it is.
Here we go. All right.
Audrey. Eileen Carroll AKA Sig Ginanak
and Zachary Page AKAAK, Dante Gatfield AKA Nomad and Tina Lai

(51:27):
AKA Kickwear. These are some very strange
street names and to put them on a very serious document like
this in the Central District of California is quite silly.
If you're missing out on the what's going on the screen, you
guys are missing out on what we do here partially, which is some
visual. So check us out on Spotify.
You may hear a Spotify ad right now.
If you're listening and not watching, Spotify's the way to

(51:50):
go to kyleserifandshow.com real easily and check us out there.
If you're listening on the otherplatforms and it's audio and
video, then yeah, give us a like, let's do it.
OK. Criminal complaint by telephone
or other reliable electronic means.
This was sworn out over phone. I've done this before, it's OK.
The complaint in this case states the following is true.
Best of my knowledge and belief.This is a different pony than
what I've used. Ponies are the FB is templates.

(52:11):
That's what we call them. I don't know why they're called
ponies. I actually don't 18 USC 371
conspiracy, broadly speaking, and then 26 USC 5861 Delta, the
possession of an unregistered destructive device complaint
signature is a female named Carolyn Thompson, an FBI agent.
And what you'll notice that's quite interesting about this is

(52:32):
that name is not redacted like the name on the pipe bomber case
was redacted. Why would that be?
Oh, because normally FBI agents,when they put out things that
are public complaints like this,they don't, in fact, they don't
in fact redact the names. And I'm going to also hold it on
something else. And I've said it here before and
I'm going to say it one more time.
The FBI does not do criminal complaints.
By and large FBI agents that arelistening.

(52:53):
Check my math. How many criminal complaints?
If you're a retired FBI agent listening to this, please put in
the comments how many complaintsyou wrote in your career.
Outside of maybe some of the bank robber cases, which could
get exigent outside of people who worked on Indian
reservations where they sometimes saw this, it is very
uncommon for the FBI to use complaint because complaint

(53:15):
means you didn't take it to a grand jury, which is the FB is
MO. Just be aware that was a change
that happened. What it does is it allows you to
move faster than grand jury, which is not the way the FBI
does it. And in this case, I don't think
there was actually danger there and I think we're going to find
that out since they had an undercover and they had Achs in
there. What I think they needed was a
complaint today because we have APR disaster right now and

(53:40):
therefore we're going to do thiswe're going to read a little bit
more about that. Let me pull this off screen real
quick. I want to I'm going to double
check something shooting time Rhode Island.
We're doing a Fact Check in realreal life right now.
So the shooting didn't come up, of course.

(54:01):
Thanks a lot AI. The shooting took place and
let's see if they swore this thing out if they just had this
ready to go. December 15th it says injured
around 2:00 PM taking in. I'm going to double check if you
guys know in the chat when did the shooting take place at Brown
because I know it didn't take place yesterday.

(54:22):
So give me give me the date if you would in the time this
happened at on December the 13th.
That's why I'm saying this at 4:33 PM they did the swear out.
That would also be interesting to sort of see if this was a
need to win. I probably should have checked
that beforehand. All right, I, Carolyn Thompson,
do sworn declare and state as follows.
I'm a special agent with the JTTF guys.

(54:43):
Joint Terrorism Task Force. What do we say?
They're the brown shirts. They're the ones, right?
The JTTF is always the what do we need?
How can we flex? Political pressure can be
applied because Joint Terrorism Task Force is broad, so they're

(55:06):
holding on to this case. I've been employed as such since
July of 2024. So she started this job in July
of last year, which means I think she's still on probation
right now. I love that the chat is like a
negotiating. If you guys want to find out
when the when the shooting took place, you got to go look it up.

(55:27):
All right, During my career, I've participated in multiple
criminal and national security investigations.
Sure you have, Hun, you just gotthere.
I'm familiar with strategy, tactics, methods, tradecraft and
techniques of criminals, terrorists and their agents.
This is silly. During my employment with the
FBII went to New Age and training at Quantico like
everybody does from July to December of 2024.

(55:50):
These are essentially the same, the same sort of Academy time.
I went in June and I got out in November.
So she's been doing this job forbasically just less than a year
in real life. And, and all I'm saying is they
always get somebody junior on this stuff.
All right. So she goes on to talk about
that's all. Listen, there are really serious

(56:12):
senior agents that have less than one paragraph and it
certainly doesn't take up a whole page and more.
This is kind of a lot. This is kind of a lot for your
minimal experience. Remember the deal when you have
a lot of information, you don't need to say a lot.
You're like, I've been doing this since 09.
That's what you saw in the pipe bomber case.
I've been working terrorist threats.
Anyway, purpose of the affidavit, they identify the
people, they tell you what the charges are.

(56:33):
This is where it gets fun. This is always where it gets fun
for me. The summary of probable cause
this person Carol, that's a that's the last name as a member
of the Turtle Island Liberation Front Tilf November of 2025.
This just went down. This is a brand newish case on
this particular development provided A confidential human

(56:56):
source also known as the CHS, an8 page handwritten document
titled Operation Midnight Sun that described A bombing plot.
So let's be real. Tilf brought in an FBI informant
who is a paid informant that does this as far as we can tell
professionally and got a copy oftheir manifesto and Operation to

(57:18):
do bombings, an 8 page handwritten document AKA
Operation Midnight Sun. Do you know?
Super serial. These people must be another
TILF member. She wrote this with like no
irony or sense of humor. Known as AK, later identified as
Paige, was also present during the meeting when they handed out
their bombing plan to the FBI. Specifically, the plan

(57:42):
contemplated planting back pantswith a backpacks rather with
IEDs or improvised explosive devices to be simultaneously
detonated at 5 locations targeting 2US companies at
midnight on New Year's Eve in the Central District of
California. Now I wonder how many casualties
would happen at midnight at these businesses.

(58:02):
The handwritten plan included that it was going to use IE DS
and complex pipe bombs. Listen guys, whenever you want
to go out there and make a pipe bomb, do not do a weak pipe
bomb. Do not do a simple pipe bomb.
Make sure that you you detail for the FBI that your plan
involves a complex pipe bomb. Included instructions how to
make the bombs and guidance on how to avoid leaving evidence

(58:24):
behind that could be traced backto the Co conspirators.
Well, news flash for you guys, if you buy those things, you're
probably going to get caught. But if you buy them with your
credit card in your own car and you drive around with your own
cell phone, you probably will get away with it for five years.
You guys blew it. You guys got beat up by a
brownie. You got beat by a brownie out in
Washington DC who has nothing todo with the government.

(58:44):
Sure, they planned to take the FBI source discussed with the
source the prospect of testing explosives in the desert
mid-december 2025. Since the initial meeting with
the bomb plot, Carolyn Page recruited other Co conspiracies
in the plot, including Leigh andGarfield Gaffield, and the Co
conspirators then took numerous steps towards executing the bomb

(59:05):
plot. They acquired bomb making
material, traveling to a remote location in the Mojave Desert to
construct and detonate test bombs.
That seems like a good idea actually.
Sounds like a good time in the desert.
The Co conspirators took steps to begin the construction of the
devices. They unloaded bomb making
material from their car, and they began to assemble the
materials on a table, constructing a tent.

(59:26):
This is the first time I've everseen constructive intent aside
to a actual tent. Constructive intent is a tent
over the bomb making materials. Because the sun was bright, they
wiped down the interior of the PVC pipes and began discussing
the grinding precursors for explosive powder.
Here's that thing about explosive powder.
You know what the one thing thatwe were missing from the Brian

(59:48):
Cole case was? Yeah, the explosive powder part
of it. FBI agents intervened.
They found you out in the desertplaying with your fake bomb
materials. They got you good, suckas.
How do you like that? I'm not kidding.
That's literally what happened. They legitimately went out and
found people laying out a bunch of materials and said come
arrest us. We're in the middle of the

(01:00:09):
desert. I think I actually have a
picture of that, so give me a second because I'll put that on
the screen. It actually is quite
entertaining. All right, here we go.
This is the bomb making table. This looks like when Kyle goes
to the range. But I don't do bomb stuff, I do
gun stuff. And it's about the same.
Here it is for you right now. You're missing out on this
visual. So there they are.
Look at that. They were going to do PVC pipe
bombs. It's very complex.

(01:00:31):
They had that. The tent is not doing a great
job shading anything and they were not particularly organized.
I think these people were definitely going to get some DNA
and some hair and some other stuff on there.
Poor things. This does not look like a hyper
sophisticated or complex pipe bomb building situation.
Let's go back to the statement. Statement of probable cause.

(01:00:52):
Based on my review of law enforcement reports,
conversations with other law enforcement agents, and my own
knowledge, I am aware that the the Turtle Island Liberation
Front, or TILF has the followingthing.
They want liberation through decolonization and tribal
sovereignty. These people are freaking
idiots. Let's just call them what they
are. Turtle Island is a is a name

(01:01:13):
used to describe North America by people who are retarded.
That's what they just said Here it is.
Turtle Island is a term used by some Native Americans to
describe the North American Kotlin.
I said it correctly the first time.
And according to open source, they're anti capitalist and anti
government. They're retarded.
These are retarded people and they have a retarded bomb making
set up in the middle of the desert and they brought an FBI

(01:01:36):
informant and undercover so thatthey could get completely
busted. I'm not making this stuff up.
I wish I was. It's far too funny to to do it.
Let's go to UCE, should we find that?
Here's a good part of it. Let's go back over here.
So when you go to these these these documents, what you should
always do is scan for the fun terms.

(01:01:57):
CHS, that was right up front, confidential human source.
That's Part 1 of the playbook. Now we need an undercover.
So let's go to that. It's on page 10 of the
complaint, which is 24 pages long, by the way.
And remember, remember the coal thing, the five year pipe bomb,
the five year pipe bomb in Washington, DC.
That was the most terroristic thing that happened on January
6th, 5th, whatever, right? That was like 8 or 9 pages long.

(01:02:19):
This one is 24 pages. And all they did, they didn't
even get their bombs made. They just had all their stuff on
the table. They got arrested for having
this. It's like a messy chemical
picnic. All right.
The Co conspirators meet on December the 7th to further
discuss the bombing plot and their intent to conduct future
attacks on federal officials. Paragraph 17 based on the

(01:02:42):
information from the confidential human source and
FBI personnel, including an FBI undercover employee at UCE who
was present during the meeting. I know the following on or about
the early morning of December the 7th, 2025, the CHS and the
UCE. So that's two of the Carol page
and another male. So two of the five.

(01:03:03):
I should do that better. So UCECHS both on the FB is
payroll Carol Page male known asNomad.
That means 40% of this meeting was FBI people.
You guys see this? This is what I'm trying to get
the people on the left to see. I'm looking for the CBS, I'm
looking for the ABC. I'm looking for the CNN types.

(01:03:24):
I'm looking for the NBCI Want you guys to recognize that when
people talk about the Whitmer setup and it was a setup, it is
what the FBI does. It doesn't matter if you work
for the Intercept, you work for Fox News.
Let's admit the FBI sets up dimwitted fools who think that
the United States or North America is called Turtle Island
and want to put the word TILF somewhere in their their

(01:03:44):
handwritten bomb plan. These people are dummies and
they need a job at Burger King. They don't need to be arrested
for this. They should be straightened out
and and this is not a threat to America.
I don't care how serious you think it is, it doesn't deserve
a Fox News headline. They've interrupted a very
serious plot of a couple of retards playing with PVC pipes.

(01:04:07):
And also the FBI was like 40% ofthe meetings.
I'm just telling you how stupid these things read when you look
at them. They all have the same stuff.
They all have the same elements,and I've been training this
audience to see it and that's why most of you guys know
exactly what it is. When you see these terror plots,
you're like, oh God, here we go.Playbook.
There it is. This is the playbook.
Carol stated that she had quote UN quote, the plan.
I kid you not, they have the words in air quotes.

(01:04:29):
The plan. There it is, the plan.
She stated she had the plan and she handed the plan to Garfield.
4 sheets of paper with writing on the front and back of each
page. So 8 total pages front and back
I guess. And Gaffield and the UCE.
This is the undercover FBI employee.
Read it. That's an FBI agent.

(01:04:49):
You gave the plan to an FBI agent, you dip shits.
The UCE later told law enforcement.
Because the FBI recognizing thatthey're not law enforcement.
That's kind of funny that the papers contain detailed
instructions on how to constructblack powder pipe bombs,
something conspicuously missing from the actual pipe bomb case
that went on in Washington, DC. I'll just keep reiterating how

(01:05:10):
funny this is that we're going to have two pipe bomb cases
back-to-back and this one is actually more realistic and and
more more common that you'd havethe FBI involved and a
confidential human source. Following their review of the
plans, Carroll asked whether or not some comrades would be
honest. Team, are you with me, brothers?
You can imagine him saying. He responded that he would talk
to them. And as discussed further, he

(01:05:30):
added that the Black Locust Signal chat group.
Oh, there's a Signal chat. Of course there's guys.
Who's in your group chat? Is it a fed?
Is it an FBI agent? I've got FBI agents in my signal
chat. I got Gerardo Boyle.
I tell him he's gay every day because of it.
Steve Fred no longer no longer that.
All right. Which Co conspirators refused to

(01:05:52):
discuss the logistics for testing the explosive devices in
the desert, among other things? And then they took the
handwritten document back stating it was the only copy of
the plan. Air quotes, but she would make
more copies if the undercover FBI agent wanted to be a part of
it. These people are all like this.

(01:06:13):
This is what this stuff is. If you guys don't know, this is
the real threat to America. The FBI sets up a Signal chat.
They get actual retards, people who make terrible decisions and
name themselves the Black Lotus because they think they're super
serious. Oh, my God.
There's another part on here that's really funny, too.
I've read, I've scanned all thisstuff.
I ran this. My heart rate was like 165 beats

(01:06:33):
a minute while I was sitting on my bike reading this.
It's super funny. Part D here.
Paige told the attendees in the meeting that they were doing
things as cleanly as possible and that it was 100,000% that
the FBI would be on to them. Confirmed.
Yeah. You told the FBI agent in your
group that there was a 100,000% chance the FBI would be on to
them. How do you not laugh when you're

(01:06:56):
doing this stuff as an as an undercover that actually I that
I would love to know what that training is.
I know they make undercovers train like they have to drink
alcohol and they have to like goand remember things while
they're under the influence of alcohol.
They they push them all these different ways.
They do this fun training for for FBIUCES.
But I have to figure that part of it is if someone just sits
there and does stand up comedy and tells you like absolutely

(01:07:18):
like hilariously ridiculous things.
And you, you know, somebody comes out and they've got a
freaking like a, like a, a penishanging off their forehead like
a dildo or something. And you're supposed to look at
them and not laugh In a really serious scenario, 100,000%
chance that the FBI would be on to them.
Guys, clown world. Absolute clown world.

(01:07:41):
It goes on for another 12 pages of this.
I'm not going to read all of it.I just want you to know how
super serious it is that the feds have interrupted this New
Year's Eve bombing plot that totally would have happened if
not for the freaking 65 IQ people who put out this chemical
picnic out in the middle of the desert and got caught.
Look, I didn't even realize it. Look, on the screen, there's a,

(01:08:02):
there's a, what are the green tea?
There's a, there's an Arizona $0.99 green tea.
They don't even sell them for $0.99 anymore, do they?
You know what I'm talking about the extra tall tea can.
It's sitting on this crappy cardtable.
These aren't even nice tables. My table that I set up to go to
the range is way nice is it looks like they have sunscreen
and maybe some soap and maybe some cleaning solvents.

(01:08:24):
Unbelievable. I'm sorry, I'm just, I'm I'm
completely blown away with how dumb this is as usual.
But it tells us the problem whenyou create this ridiculous
scenario where you post things inaccurately when you're
thirsty, as Steve Friend said for social media wins, then you
go out and you bust goofballs like this.

(01:08:46):
It's wild. It's absolutely wild that they
would think that this would fly for Americans.
Maybe that tells us more about us than it does about them.
I'm also seeing another Intel spin op going on right now.
Remember, we've talked about John Solomon before.
I don't like John Solomon. John Solomon is a snake.
John Solomon lied to me specifically.
He said he was going to take thestory and it was really

(01:09:07):
important to us as well. Same way Dan Bongino did, by the
way. Really important story to me
personally. The story that I went to Project
Veritas in May of 2022 and Gerardo Boyle got kicked out of
the FBI for it. John Solomon was going to get it
into the hands of Tucker Carlson, then he was going to
get into the hands of CBS Nightly News for three minutes.
Then he came back and told me after they'd already gone

(01:09:28):
everywhere with it, they'd takenthe footage and they released it
to people that they were going to do a Sean Hannity hit.
Of which I have 0 interest in talking to Sean Hannity about
anything. I don't give a shit what Sean
Hannity has to say. John Solomon is a liar.
That's my experience. He also has direct access to the
7th floor. He also is a propaganda
mouthpiece on behalf of the Trump administration, but really

(01:09:48):
specifically like Cash Patel andwhat he needs.
So here's real America's voice bringing on a former FBI unit
chief, who by all accounts, his name is Bassem Youssef.
I think he's an honorable guy. I don't know anything about him
really. But the reading that I did,
there's nothing that I have is aproblem with what he was or what
he did. But he hasn't been in the FBI in
20 years. And so they're bringing up the,
the, the story that the FBI covered up the Clinton Russia

(01:10:12):
Foundation stuff or the Clinton,sorry, the Clinton Foundation
donation scandal, which I think the FBI did, by the way.
I think that's probably very clear.
Statute of limitations has expired.
Nothing will happen there. There is no justice in this
world on that one. But what's really wild about
this clip is Solomon's point, I think to the low IQ people that

(01:10:33):
are going to feed whatever slop comes out of a real America's
Voice or a Fox News. What I think is going on there
is they're trying to point out the difference between this FBI
and that FBI, despite the fact that we know there's no
difference. So they always go back there and
they they, they hedge on it. They're like, oh, the evil FBI
management did this and they didthat and they did these things

(01:10:54):
and I saw these things and it's been criminal.
And so and so it's like, OK, fine.
The same people still work there, buddy.
Well, you can't make a, there's no distinction.
And if you've been out of the FBI for 20 years, how in the
hell do you even know what goes on there?
The people that you know have all retired.
So now the people that you know are like retired people who know
people that are still there. You're now two sources at least

(01:11:15):
away and you haven't vetted them.
But anyway, nothing against thisguy for his story.
But to trot out someone with 20 years in the in the rearview
mirror going out and trying to act like, you know, some
differential you're trying to actually point out this is the
the OP that there has been a massive change there.
We know there hasn't because whoin the deep state that they were
crying about, and I'm using their words, deep state

(01:11:36):
government gangsters. Who of them have been arrested?
Who of them have cases pending? Are the Clintons going to go
Nope, Obama's Nope? How about Clapper, how about
Brennan, how about Chris Ray? Did any of these people even
break the law? And the answer you're going to
find out, I think, is no, they didn't.

(01:11:57):
They did things they were allowed to do with the power
that they had. And that has been the entire
point of this podcast since the beginning.
The entire point is the agency is allowed to operate in this
way. It does operate in this way.
There is no law that will restrict it.
So you either get rid of the agency or you neuter it.
And nobody in Congress seems interested in doing that.
And that's where the suspendables have come in.

(01:12:18):
I'm not anti Dan Cash or anybodyelse.
I'm anti government authority that is unchecked.
I am anti unaccountable bureaucracy that goes on and
does whatever the hell it thinksis the best answer.
And you can't tell me there's a difference just because you
changed a couple of guys in the management without doing what
Dan Bongino said. Do not trust the FBI and do not
trust the Secret Service either,or any of these government

(01:12:40):
entities until there is a full change in management.
Not at all. As a matter of fact, that when I
heard the news that took me backto as far as 2009, 2010 with
several events that took place where you could, where you could
see obviously that FBI at the highest levels.

(01:13:03):
You know, assistant directors, even the director himself.
Not just stonewalling, but actually throwing a wrench in
the works to make sure that the investigation doesn't come to
fruition. And I, I will be happy to
discuss several of those examples with you.
What I think is going on here that we are beginning to find

(01:13:25):
out the public is beginning to realize is that the FBI was not
politicized just during comedy'sregime or or during the Biden
administration, but it started, I believe, as far back as the
then director Mueller and, and how this actually came to be.

(01:13:51):
Yeah. Yeah, yeah, we get it.
It's been politicized for a really long time.
A generational opportunity presented itself.
And what did Patel do? What did the current FBI
director do? He did one thing.
He screwed it up. He went to to do some holster
sniffing and he started worshipping the tactical program
in HRT. He went out there and believed

(01:14:11):
that he was a politically appointed Prince.
And so he's a new celebrity and he flies around on a on a jet.
And day one said, I didn't have the business acumen to, to get
millions. So what did I do?
Oh, I went out and became the FBI director so I can get a jet.
That's going to keep coming backto haunt him because he said it
and it was a terrible look. And he was saying in front of
people who have private jets that know that he doesn't have

(01:14:33):
the money to do that, but he really wanted it.
He was covetous of it. We've had interviews of people
who said, yeah, I knew him when he was a student.
I knew him back in the day and all he wanted to do was like
play hockey and be famous and get a lot of money.
So when I tell you that he's a holster sniffer, that he's a
wannabe, that he's a that he's amake a wish director, that's
what we're dealing with here. And he squandered something that

(01:14:54):
was so important, and then he decided to go, oh, crap, we're
looking terrible. We're looking ridiculous.
How do we fix this? Let's go fire a gay guy in Los
Angeles who got a pride flag from his boss and had it on the
wall and then went to Quantico. Let's fire that guy.
That's not political. Did you give him a warning and
say, hey, man, you can't have that flag up anymore?
New regime, new rules. We think that's political

(01:15:15):
statements. Nope.
You fired him and you're going to lose.
You're going to lose in court inthe Ninth, in the Ninth Circuit.
You're going to lose in DC. You fired a bunch of people for
kneeling five years ago, which they never should have done and
they shouldn't be in position ofmanagement.
But that's not how you get rid of people in the FBI.
You move them to somewhere, you make them the commander of the
broom closet. They took all the management and
they promoted all the assholes that were doing the same stuff

(01:15:36):
that they were doing previously.And you fired a guy because they
wanted to, to try to shore up the management and the and the
awareness of the public had about your jet after you went
out there and did date night in a $60 million aircraft, you
freaking clown. You took an incredible
opportunity and you stole it from us.
If people go well, it's personal.

(01:15:56):
Yeah, it's really personal to me.
It's super personal because you've taken a government agency
that I am going to fight againstfor the next 40 years of my life
at least. If I'm still breathing and
they're still an FBI and they'restill doing this stuff, then I
still have a problem with it. It doesn't go away whether I
have a podcast, whether I'm justa guy digging A ditch and
thinking about doing mean thingsto them.
I despise what they represent right now, which is

(01:16:17):
politicization. And you're hearing that it goes
back to Mueller. It goes back way before that.
What do you think? What do you think Hoover did?
He set up a political blackmail rig.
Whether it was for good or bad or stability of the country or
better, he meant well or whatever, it doesn't matter.
They have authorities and they have capabilities that they
ought not have, and they have completely shirked the
responsibility of maintaining the Bill of Rights.

(01:16:38):
Specifically, how about that 4thAmendment that we shred because
of things like FISA? Crazy to me, absolutely crazy.
And by the way, the locals who actually have to play by the
rules and the state police who have to play by the rules,
they're catching wind of it. And they're like, you know what,
screw you. I don't like it.
Do you know how bad it's gotten?It's gotten bad enough that this
little 32nd clip kept me awake last night.

(01:17:01):
I've been sued by one of the people in this clip using the
attorneys of another person in this clip for talking about the
things that these idiots are talking about.
And we're going to get into thispart of the info OP here, which
is really, really wild to me. And probably, I don't know,
maybe my attorneys won't like this, but this is legitimate
wild news. A Jewish woman who's gone out

(01:17:25):
and represented herself as like the quintessential Jewish
mother, and she's defending Jewish people and Jewish
children on Piers Morgan and others.
This is Katie Miller. This is the wife of the number 2
for policy in the Trump White House.
OK, this is Katie Miller. Stephen Miller's wife has a
bullshit White House podcast where they pretend like you go

(01:17:46):
sit on her couch in her house. I, I, I, I'm assuming this is on
the set. If this is their house, then
they don't live in this part of the house.
Because if you have children andyou live in your house that
looks like this, that means thatyou have a lot of people coming
in to clean it up all the time. I don't believe it.
We have a $5,000,000 lawsuit that we've asked the judge to
dismiss for being frivolous, andthis woman is going to go on and
joke about it. They're going to talk about this

(01:18:07):
stuff so anybody can talk about this nonsense.
And if you want to tell me that you're not an information op and
you're not involved in intelligence, it's really
interesting that you're sitting next to a lady who used to be a
spokesperson. I'm going to read her resume
real quick. Actually, I'm going to put on
the screen before we go there. This is Katie Miller's resume on
Legend Storm, which is a pretty legitimate place.
She was born in 91. Her maiden name was Katie Rose

(01:18:29):
Waldman. She was in the original Trump
administration. She's got an MPA from George
Washington University. That's swampy.
She went to Florida State, so I'm sure she was a standout
student when she was younger. Just saying.
I'm not, I don't think still whatever.
There's probably smart people atFlorida State.
I shouldn't do that. I shouldn't do that.
I should do better about that. I went to Oklahoma.
Who knows, in 2014. Let's see, she's 10 years

(01:18:51):
younger than I am. Is that right?
She's 10 years younger than me. So in 14 I was that like right
when she graduated college, thisis right out of college.
She was a press assistant for the National Republican
Senatorial Committee. Sorry, I was doing math in real
time. I shouldn't do that on the on
the podcast. And then Representative Paul

(01:19:12):
Cook. Oh, that actually started in
November of 2023. She was an intern then.
She was the press secretary for Steve Gaines Montana.
Sorry, Steve Daines, my bad. November from 2017 to February
19, she was a deputy press secretary at Homeland Security,
then moved into Martha Mcsally, Republican Arizona

(01:19:34):
communications director. This is swampy as shit.
People then went to press secretary for Vice President of
the United States, Mike Pence. OK.
And from there became the communications director for Vice
President Mike Pence until January of 2021.
And then we have a break. Maybe this was when she was
having kids. I don't know what the break was.

(01:19:56):
Pathway. She was a principal at a public
affairs firm, then got into the doge thing and was a
spokesperson for Elon Musk's Doge department, which is known
now defunct. And since February of 2025,
she's been a member on the Advisory Board of the
President's Intelligence Advisory Board.
All of that stuff suggests to meintelligence.
You're getting briefings, you'regetting readings, you're

(01:20:16):
probably getting a clearance. She's a paid propagandist.
And that's a legitimate job, andyou can make an honest living at
it if you're a dishonest person.I think she's a paid
propagandist on the president's intelligence Advisory Board.
And she's going to sit across the table from a current law
enforcement Intel agency chief and his country music sensation

(01:20:41):
girlfriend just and we're going to talk about intelligence
stuff. And also, where's the ring?
This is so astroturfed and so fake that nobody sees this and
likes it. I had more liked engagements by
a factor of 200% than she did. And she had five times or six

(01:21:01):
times the views that I have. Why?
Because everybody knows this is slop.
This is the same slop Fox News is feeding you when they go a
terror plot was disrupted. And now let's talk about this
fake celebrity who's in charge of the the FBI and this like,
astroturfs chick who came out ofnowhere.
People said that Kyle Seraphin came out of nowhere.
No, I came out of a guy named Dan Bongino begging me to come

(01:21:23):
forward and speak on his podcast.
So the American people had a name for it and a face and a
voice and a personality. By the way, I'm a little
prickly. I'm a prickly personality.
I don't shave my beard and I don't really care.
I don't care what you think about what I have to say.
If you, you know, engage me in apolite way, then we'll have a
polite discussion. If you're a jerk, then you're a

(01:21:43):
jerk. I don't care.
It doesn't matter to me. Like your opinion is irrelevant.
This woman is desperate to hitchher wagon.
Listen to the way they even explain it to her.
She is Cash Patel's girlfriend and she thinks that's going to
make her what? Something in the country music
world? She quit being a press secretary
to be the next Katie Miller so that she could be the FBI
director's girlfriend and run around and sing the national

(01:22:05):
anthem for a living at Turning Point events.
I don't know where this goes down anyway.
This this trailer, I might have to live stream this with
reactions and I'm I'm serious about that.
It's supposed to be tonight. We are so excited to be joined
by Cash and his beautiful girlfriend Alexis.
So I just want to clarify, you're not Jewish.
I'm not. You are not from Israel, no.

(01:22:26):
So how did we get to, are you a Mossad agent?
You know, that's a great question.
Where's her ring? Just to clarify, how often has
he travelled to see you since January 20th?
Has there been one moment where you're like, you can't make this
up? There has been one moment where
you say you can't make this up, and this is the moment.
The Katie Miller podcast moment is the moment when you say you

(01:22:49):
cannot make this up. You cannot.
Do you think you have to be a Jew to be in the Mossad?
False. You think you have to be from
Israel or go to Israel to Hump like work on behalf of an
intelligence agency that's in another country?
False. We covered that extensively
here. The CIA doesn't go to the Sudan
and say, can we find an Americanwho's a Christian to go and
represent us there? No, they go find someone who's

(01:23:10):
Sudanese. They will like work on our
behalf. You think they go into
Afghanistan and they go, we can only recruit Americans to work
in Afghanistan? Like, no, they go find a
freaking Afghan. Are you are, are these people
retarded? And they, they feed the slop out
and people go like, oh, this is amazing.
Yeah, yeah, it's so good. It's so tasty.
I just, I wonder where the ring is.
Guys, did you see the body language?
I'm going to play it one more time because it's that gross.
I want you to key in with your eyes.

(01:23:31):
If you're listening, you need tocome to Spotify.
If you're only listening only, you're missing out on an
opportunity to see something. You can also check us out on
YouTube and on Rumble, the video.
You can watch us on X as well. So tell you what, I'll, I'll
shamelessly plug myself here. Check us out on the video
platforms. One of them, Spotify, Rumble X
or YouTube, those are all options.
Locals too I guess you can use any of those.
Make sure you're subscribed to the channel.

(01:23:52):
Make sure you guys have notifiedyourself when we go live.
If you want to give us a like one way or another, we'd
appreciate that. I have seen criminal defense
attorneys sitting next to legit scumbags and they sit closer
than the girlfriend of Cash Patel and Cash Patel sit on this
couch. Tell me I'm wrong.
People tell me I'm wrong about this.

(01:24:14):
You will find people who hate each other like a a man and wife
in divorce court will sit closerthan this couple is sitting and
apparently they're in love and talking about a ring.
Check my math. We are so excited to be joined
by Cash and his beautiful girlfriend Alexis.
Right there. No time you're crossed away
from. Him.
You are not from Israel. Can you say something so I can

(01:24:37):
do? It's so tense in here.
It's so tense. How awkward this is?
Did she move to Washington, DC to be near him?
No. Is there any likelihood that
we're going to see a ring? No.
You know how I know? Because he's 4546 years old.
So he's got 25 years of not putting a ring on somebody's
finger. You think she would say yes?

(01:25:00):
Me neither. Why would she?
Yuck. All right.
And then all of that happens on the background of we're worried
about whether or not like they're doing that while there
is an ongoing manhunt and the people in Rhode Island are are
looking at the FBI and saying we're surrounded by clowns.
So that's what I'm going to do for a little bit now.

(01:25:20):
I'm going to cover down on the the actual shooting story there
a little bit and some of the news coverage.
This one is great. This tells you no one trusts
this FBI or that FBI or the FBI because locals have started
hating them and now they can just be overt about it.
Watch this. Last night I had never seeing a
local jurisdiction essentially throw the FBI under the bus, not

(01:25:40):
just saying we're in charge, butsaying look, that lead that led
us to the person of interest whoended up not being the person of
interest essentially was run by the FBI.
They said so explicitly. Yikes.
So the FBI had a bad tip, We arrested the wrong guy, we
detained him for 12 hours, and we smeared the name of an
American veteran who worked in the in the Army.

(01:26:02):
Oops. Did they go on and double down
on that? They sure did.
Here's the attorney general saying people are getting out
over their skis not knowing whatthey're talking about.
This is CNN. And out front now the Rhode
Island Attorney General, Peter Narona and Attorney General, I
appreciate your time and thank you very much.
I'm sorry that we're talking in these circumstances, but
obviously this manhunt now reaching a, it appears an
intensity intense stage. I mean, new videos, I'll show

(01:26:25):
them again now that have just come out from police.
The FBI has also released imagesand they are pointing at this
person saying that they are looking for an individual about
5 foot eight that has a quote UNquote, stocky build.
Is there anything more you can tell us about this individual?
You know, not right now, Aaron. You know we are working hard.

(01:26:45):
I just left the command post over Providence PD before coming
here and there are a lot of detectives, the province Police
Department, working with federalagents, state police, our
prosecutors to pull every threadhere to see how quickly and
hopefully very quickly we can get this person identified,
detained, questioned if possible.

(01:27:07):
But certainly he is our primary person of interest right now.
And look, sometimes. These.
Kinds of investigations. I've been a state or federal
prosecutor now for nearly 30 years.
Investigations like this, you know, you don't have an image of
the person right after a shooting.
It takes time to build the kind of evidence picture you need to

(01:27:28):
identify somebody and get them into custody.
And that's what's happening now.But I'm confident we're going to
get there. So, so and you also though using
the primary person of interest right now to describe this
individual if I'm making sure I'm just repeating you what you
just said there, OK. Are you confident then at this
point that at least with the information you have now, which
I presume Attorney General is based on maybe more than the

(01:27:51):
videos, that other information you may have that lead you to
believe that you think this is the person responsible for the
shooting? Yeah, look, yes, is is the short
answer. I can't share the other evidence
we have, but we're releasing this evidence because the public
can play a role here in helping us identify someone if they know
them. At the same time, we're
analyzing, you know, as you mentioned in your reporting,

(01:28:13):
there's a there are, we know what kind of firearm was used.
We're analyzing that ballistic evidence and evidence associated
with it. So, you know, eventually we'll
put together the kind of evidence we need to charge
someone. In this case, we believe that
this person is a significant person of interest, possibly
more than that, so we want to identify him and and detain him

(01:28:35):
very quickly if we can. So now if you guys were, if you
guys weren't paying attention, there's just that there's a fat
guy with a sweatshirt and A and a beanie.
So if you know any fat guys thatare 5/8 with a sweatshirt and a
beanie, kind of a potbelly that also have no face because
there's a mask on it. Because the the retarded nature
of this country allows people towalk around with their face

(01:28:56):
completely covered because of a,a disease problem that let's say
was legitimate. It certainly isn't anymore.
And that's what's up. That's, that's what's going on.
That's where we're at. We are now at the place where
some chubby dude is wandering around and he's apparently the
person of interest. And I will show you some of
these videos. Here you go.
One of four. It's a guy wandering with his

(01:29:19):
hands behind his back. You know who does that?
A lot of people who have their. You got a belly or maybe he's
got like body armor or somethinghidden underneath there, like a
bag. Unclear, but he's got a like, a
sweatshirt on. Or maybe it's like a bearskin
hoodie or something. Looks like a hoodie.
Yeah. There you go.
OK, So do you know anybody with a hoodie that's chubby?
There he is. Look that that's a really good

(01:29:39):
picture of him. That's him walking, probably
wondering like, hey, do you knowanybody who walks across the
street against the signal? So he's a jaywalking chubby guy
in a hoodie. And then there's this picture,
which is super useful. It's a chubby ninja.
He does seem to have normal proportions though, So these are
about normal proportions for feet and legs, so that's
helpful. But he's wearing this mask

(01:30:01):
thing, which makes basically no identification possible.
And so that's really good. And then here's another picture
of him. He's got a nose.
You guys know anybody with a nose?
It's covered by a black mask, but he's just got a nose.
So there's that. Then we got the ring camera.
Ring cam's really good. Also shows him walking, so we
know he's ambulatory. These are essentially really

(01:30:23):
critical things that we now are aware of.
Amazing. Thanks, FBI.
That's what we got now. Now to the to the credit of the
attorney general, what did he say?
We know more than you. We know more stuff.
So we're not going to tell you everything.
That's what you'd expect. Tomorrow.
I think we're going to try to get George, George Hill on
because he was involved in the manhunt for someone in this area

(01:30:46):
with the same field office the FBI has, which is the FB is
Boston field office. And he was involved in the
manhunt for the pipe, for the the bombers, for the Boston
Marathon. So I think that'll be
interesting. What could be going on?
What is not going on? What do you think?
I'd like to hear an assessment. My assessment is, is that this
is not very good footage and that the current folks that are

(01:31:07):
in the Bureau are getting completely slacked right now in
the PR space, which is where Cash and Dan choose to do
business. Here's another little funny
commentary. This is also CNN.
This is John Miller, who's a retired guy out of the NYPD and
I think he was a commissioner for a little while.
And so he's tapping his sources,whatever sources he's got at the
FBI, I'm sure he has some here he is talking about.

(01:31:28):
We don't know what the evidence was, but they arrested the wrong
guy and then they let him go. At 12 hours is a long time to be
in detention. Anybody who's ever been in the
military that ever did like a like APOW camp, if you went to
serious school, 12 hours can is slow when you're locked up.
What I am told by my sources is that they ran those tests, and I
don't know whether that includedDNA and Ballistics, but whatever

(01:31:49):
tests they were able to run comparing what they found in
that search to what they found at the scene were not matches.
So we go from an individual who was considered a person of
interest, the subject of search warrants both at his home in
Wisconsin and his hotel here, toa person who served his country

(01:32:10):
honorably in the US Army in in an elite unit in Washington, DC,
who is being released and must be given his presumption of
innocence as we go forward. Yeah.
And, and to your point, John, picking up on some of that, as,
as you noted, when when he was pressed, they were asked
specifically about some of that information.

(01:32:30):
He said, look, it could be fingerprints, it could be
ballistic, it could be DNAI won't say.
But there was also a specific question as to whether there
were weapons found at the scene and whether they led to a person
of interest. That is also a question that
they would not answer. The attorney general said.
I'm not going to say John. So what, that's what they do.
They don't tell you everything because they're trying to keep
the case clean. That's what normally happens in

(01:32:51):
normal murder investigations. By the way, guys, this is a
local crime until proven otherwise.
So the FBI is they're just sort of getting in the way they're
doing. They should be offering
resources. Instead, they try to get out
there and, and, and act like they were a part of it.
Of course, they're tweeting about everything, which makes
them look even more ridiculous and you know, nothing for
nothing. The Fox News crowds, the the
Megyn Kelly types, they've all gotten out there.
Megyn Kelly did some bit about it where she speculated about

(01:33:13):
things she doesn't know. For those of you that were
trying to tag me on her show, she doesn't know what she's
talking about. Megyn Kelly has not done this
criminal investigation. She's talking about.
Oh, like what does cast mean andwhat does it not mean?
You know what it looks like to me?
It looks like the FBI is making these guys look like fools so
they can kick them the hell out because there is a a relatively
reasonable contingent of people inside the Bureau.
This is obviously the political management, but there's a group

(01:33:35):
of people that just want to do their work and they want to have
more competent people. They had a generational
opportunity to fix the FBI and they didn't do it.
So maybe we could go and get theguy who's the host of In Pursuit
and America's Most Wanted, who knows nothing about the case,
and talk to Jesse Waters, who knows nothing about the case.
This is the slop. Let Spoon feed you things.

(01:33:57):
It could be targeted. I have no information.
I have no information at all. I'm just going to make up stuff
on television. Do you guys know how much of
what you see on TV is complete crap?
It's people that talk articulately, look decent, have
the ability to go into a studio and fill words, and then they're
going to sell you pocket catheters.
Here's Fox News waiting to sell you either a pocket catheter, a
gold IRA, or a reverse mortgage so you can lose your house.

(01:34:20):
You know, it does seem like a targeted attack to me.
I'm not sure sure if the target was the person or the university
itself. Just to, to, to draw fear, maybe
even cancel the exams. We know this is a time where
these finals are happening. Maybe this is a student that
didn't want to take their finalsand took this horrible approach
to to preventing that. This individual did walk around

(01:34:42):
campus and while there should becameras everywhere, miraculously
they avoided almost all of them.So perhaps they knew exactly
where those cameras were, where they could get in and around and
get into that building. We know the building was
unlocked, but those classrooms did require badges.
There's badge readers at the entrance of those classrooms.
I imagine if he'd keyed into oneof those rooms, perhaps that

(01:35:04):
badge reader would collect that data.
And if they're not looking at that information, you know, like
I said, there's been so many blunders in this investigation
so far. I don't really know anything
about the investigation seems targeted.
Seems like they could have targeted a person or maybe the
university, or it could have been a student who didn't want
to do exams. And it seems like they should
have gone to badge readers. These are things that I just
speculated in my basement. And then I step up on the Fox

(01:35:25):
News and say, shit, I don't evenknow.
I have no information. The cameras, it seems like they
should have had cameras, but they didn't have cameras.
So you can imagine all the things that I'm imagining over
there. Jesse Watters, now, do you
imagine these as well? And Jesse goes, yeah, yeah.
I also wonder, was it a targetedattack?
Did they target this or did theytarget that?
Or could it be a target? Or could it just be a
disgruntled student? It's a fat guy.

(01:35:47):
It's a fat guy who's 5 foot eight.
He doesn't look like a student to me, at least not at most
universities. But maybe he is.
We don't know anything. What we know is what they put
out. And what they put out is slop.
And what Fox News did with it isadditional slop.
There he is. Look, that's the guy or not the
guy. That's a person of interest.
No clear answer. The answer is, is they're doing
the investigation and you guys aren't entitled to it.
And unfortunately, we've got theFBI on scene, which has not made

(01:36:09):
anybody feel better. Here is some folks from my
former agency, from the ERT wearing these Ray jackets they
require them to wear now. I never ever wore my Ray jacket
outside of the Academy. I want you guys to understand
this. I never wore an FBI Ray jacket
outside the Academy. Not once.
I cannot. I have it in my, I have it in a
box in my closet right now and Ipulled it out the other day

(01:36:30):
looking for batteries and I was like, oh, I still have this
thing. It still has like creases on it
from coming out of the package. I wore it at Quantico and that
was it. Here they are kicking snow.
The FBI Evidence Response team for platoon do their job here on
the corner right next to the engineering.
It's like a hyper technical search I.
See those found their bags? They asked when they put the
evidence in. So there they go, kicking.

(01:36:54):
They got ladies kicking snow, ifyou're wondering.
Yeah, those are women agents and, and maybe some various
different people that volunteered for ERT so they
could have a field trip and they're kicking the snow.
It's very technical search, kicking snow around.
They definitely don't have any. They don't have like a tool for
this. They didn't want to go out there
and like, try to melt the snow. Nothing, they're just going to

(01:37:16):
stand there and kick it with their boots, like weirdly and
keep their hands in their in their Air Force gloves with your
pockets. OK, let's do another one because
that's also fun. So here's some FBI agents and
analysts and they have gathered up there from the evidence
response team. If you're missing the video
here, there are some agents thatare walking across the street.
This is a technical term. We call that a gaggle fuck.

(01:37:37):
And so they are gaggling across the street and they're going to
stand there and they're going tosay over here is the bushes.
Oh, here's some other ones and they're going to do a targeted
walk into the snow, but not on the whole snow.
Let's fan out, Let's not fan out.
Let's just look disorganized andkind of aimlessly mander around.
I had Sam Shumate say something he said amazing.
The FB is evidence search teams use the same tactics that the

(01:38:02):
Army uses when they drop something like sensitive items
on a drop zone after a parachute.
OP Yeah, they do. You basically just get everybody
in a area and then they sort of aimlessly wander around until
somebody says, Yahtzee, that's what you're seeing right here.
This is not a grid search. This is not like a scientific
thing. They're not trying to get rid of
the snow. And what's crazy is they
actually have people that are hyper competent that do this
stuff for a living. And then you got whatever this

(01:38:23):
is. I don't know what this is, but
it looks ridiculous to everybodyon the outside is seeing it.
They go, oh, is this what our tax dollars pay for?
Yeah, it turns out it might be. So there's one of them and I
think I've got one more of it and I will show that as well,
just for funsies. So you guys?
Can see who is gathered there aspart of the investigation.
And John, at times we've seen them with actual Rakes combing

(01:38:46):
through some of the snow coveredground there, some of the
shrubs. Some of the trees.
They're obviously looking in very specific areas again, this.
They're looking in areas like grass, they're looking in areas
like where they're literally turning over leaves.
No leaves left unturned. They're doing the scene from
Spaceballs right now, people. They might as well just be doing

(01:39:09):
a comb in the desert, looking for pieces of of the the
princess's ship that fell down. I don't want to make fun of it,
but like, at the same time, actual Rakes.
Yeah. What are they looking for?
They're probably looking for spent brass.
They're looking for things that may have fallen out.
Maybe they have something that'sgoing on from video, but at the
end of the day, it doesn't look organized.

(01:39:30):
I've been on search warrants anddrug dealers house that look
more organized that are more dedicated than that.
Usually what you do is you do you hit the house, you clear it,
you make sure it's safe and thenyou lock it out and then you go,
OK, here's what's going to happen next.
Three of you go to the backyard,do a grid search, you know, pick
the quadrants and walk through them.
Fine. You go in and label all the
rooms alpha through Zulu and then you're going to go in and
I'm assign you guys to rooms to go search.
And let's follow on. Let's go logically through the

(01:39:52):
rooms start from left to right, you start clockwise or
counterclockwise. You work your way around or you
can just kick freaking snow around on a college campus.
With actual Rakes, she said incredulously.
Why does it? Why does nobody trust it?
And while we got this going on and the law and order types are
watching the slop of cash Patel's girlfriend, not sitting

(01:40:12):
close to him on a couch, and they're going out and talking
about how she's she's totally not an asset for something done
by a person who's a legitimate information operation.
Katie Miller does information OPS.
That's what communications, That's what PR is.
That's what a press secretary is.
They're spokespeople. That's an information op.
That's what it is. We give you information.
Doesn't mean it's disinformationor Mal or mis, just means

(01:40:34):
information that we want you to have.
And so what's the left doing right now?
They're coming for guns again, as usual.
But it's going to continue to ring very true because what we
don't have is like actual progress being made in any
meaningful way. And we don't look like we have
serious people on the other sidethat are trying to go out there
and saying, look, we've got bad operators that have access to

(01:40:55):
what firearms because we live inAmerica and they're doing bad
things. Where were the cops?
Why did the cops not show up on time for this active shooter who
had time to go run around? This wasn't like a hit and run.
This wasn't a drive by. And they find Dr. Bys all the
time. This was at a college campus
that had security cameras. And they've got video of this
guy pacing around and nobody hada gun.
That seems like a bigger problem.
Not enough guns anyway. Or you could go to Chris Murphy,

(01:41:17):
who's in Connecticut, and he's going to tell you that the
problem are obviously your personal ownership and your
exercising of your American liberties.
So we got to stop it. This is about, and we've talked
about this much more than gun violence.
It is gun violence, but the lawscould be stronger.
But they're stronger than other places in Rhode Island.
Well, but the laws do make a difference.

(01:41:39):
I mean, if you look at states like Connecticut, Rhode Island,
Massachusetts, California that have stronger laws, we have gun
violence rates, murder rates, mass shooting rates that are two
to three to four times lower than states that have loose gun
laws. And many of the weapons that are
used in our states for gun crimes come to our states from
those states that have an ability for criminals and people

(01:42:01):
with serious mental illness to buy weapons.
So what we know is that strongerlaws do work.
And since we passed that bill in2022, the first bill in 30 years
that strengthens the nation's gun laws, gun violence rates and
mass shooting rates have come down in this country.
But this is not shocking becauseover the last year, President
Trump has been engaged in a dizzying campaign to increase

(01:42:23):
violence in this country. He is restoring gun rights to
felons and people who have lost their ability to buy guns.
He eliminated the White House Office of Gun Violence
Protection And he is stopped funding mental health grants and
community anti gun violence grants that Republicans and
Democrats supported in that 2022bill.

(01:42:44):
So he has been engaged in a pretty deliberate campaign to
try to make violence more likelyin this country.
Where's that violence happened? It seems like a really racist
thing to say there. Chris Murphy, the whitest guy in
the whitest state that I'm awareof.
There's probably whiter states, but doggone it, you know that
gun control is pretty inherentlyracist.
It actually pretty aggressively favors those who can't afford to

(01:43:07):
do things like deal with your regulations or handle your
waiting background checks or payfor additional, you know, state
background checks on top of this.
And that additional regulation causes things to cost more.
And he doesn't want people to have their felon their their
rights restored as as prior felons.
Well, now you guys know the difference.

(01:43:27):
This is where I sit. I actually agree with that
policy. I think it's great.
I think the Trump administrationshould be giving felons back
their right to carry guns. Who needs a gun more than
somebody who served their time and came out into the world and
now has former felon friends maybe and lives in a place of
danger. If you either, either you're a
citizen and you've, you've left your your, your time behind in
prison and you are now a productive member of society, or

(01:43:47):
at least we act you. We ask you to be or you're not.
Can we start treating people whoserved their time and quote UN
quote, paid their debt to society?
Can we treat them like they actually paid it?
Or do we have to just continue like, well, there's always a
residual cost. You can't vote and you can't own
a gun. That seems really racist to me.
Why do I say racist? Oh, because a lot, a lot of the

(01:44:10):
offenders that we're talking about, they're black.
I thought that was the big thingthat the Democrats were
interested in. There's a lot of black people
who've served time in prison. Maybe they made a mistake when
they were younger. Maybe it was a really bad
mistake. So either they're safe enough to
be in this world or they're not.And I say that having met guys
who are like, you know, had a felony conviction.
And then they were doing really important stuff in our

(01:44:31):
community, driving a trash truckbefore I joined the Bureau.
My, my trash guy who was super nice.
I can't think of his name anymore, but I made his kid like
AI made his kid a box. He was doing like box steps and
stuff and he was doing lifts. So I did it in my wood shop and,
and he had a felony conviction and the only job he could get
was was pulling trash, which wasa vital service and he was

(01:44:52):
awesome at it. He would run up if I forgot my
trash, he'd go up to my side yard and pull the trash out and
empty it. Super nice, paid his debt.
Could we give that guy a break? He got fired for something like
being a proactive trash guy. He got fired for it and I called
up the company and I, I screamedat him for it.
I was like, how dare you take the best trash guy that I've
ever had. I don't care if he's got a
felony on his record. We have principles.

(01:45:15):
That's what we should be anyway.The the left doesn't What they
have is they have goals, they have operations, They have the
the idea that they're going to advance their cause no matter
what. And some of those operations are
coming to fruition right now andwe're seeing them right now and
they're these young, whatever they are.
This kid looks like we'll talk about Dan Bongino being in the
FBI for like shorter time than my friends had temporary duty.

(01:45:35):
I'm fairly confident I have T-shirts that are older than
this kid. I'm pretty sure I do actually.
I'm I'm actually 100% sure I've got T-shirts from when I was a
little kid and my kids wear themNow.
This kid who looks like a child to me and maybe he's in his 20s
is going to go and talk about gun violence and he's going to
sign the blame where it really belongs.
Not on the fat guy with a hoodiewho went out and shot people.
Not on people who take a gun anddo things that are illegal with

(01:45:57):
them and commit a crime which are already illegal.
Nope. The problem is the gun lobby.
These things are tired, but theyalways get a new breath of air.
They go and they blow in air into the stupid bag every single
time there's one of these shootings.
So the best thing that can happen is round up the shooter,
find out the ideology and let's hone in on what the actual
person did. But in the absence of a a real
subject to go in and dig into, the media spins on its own

(01:46:19):
talking points. Maybe it was a targeted attack,
or maybe they didn't want to take their exams.
Maybe there was a maybe there was a hot air balloon.
Maybe it was an alien who was masquerading as an elephant that
actually wore a man suit. I don't like.
Maybe it was an Edgar suit, men in black style.
And then you have this kid. This is crazy stuff because this
guy got on MSNBC. What does he have to say?

(01:46:40):
What does he know about what guns does he own?
I just want to know what guns doyou own there?
I think his name is Cam. Let's let's throw this on there.
This will make you guys pissed off.
That's OK. The gun lobby is constantly
shifting the blame from themselves to the individuals
who perpetrate the violence. This is why I was vocally
opposed to the shooter from my high school getting the death.

(01:47:00):
Penalty. It was not because I think he is
a good man, it is because we blame individuals and not the
systems in place that allow these things to happen.
But the shooting at my high school was not solely due to 1
human being. This was a person who had had
several. Reports with law.
Enforcement saying that he had expressed violent intentions and

(01:47:21):
he was still able to legally purchase an assault rifle at 19
years old. So you're saying the culpability
goes beyond him? I don't focus on the evil of
human beings, I focus on evil insystems.
And if we do not address the systems that lead to this
violence, we are never going to be able to solve it.
Killing the mass shooter from a high school, first of all, I

(01:47:41):
don't think the state should have that power.
Second of all, that is not goingto fix the problem.
And we love to blame it all on the individual and not the
things in place that allow them to exist.
But. That is an absolutely incredible
little segment from the grown-ups that are nodding along

(01:48:02):
to this fucking child. Excuse my language, but that
this guy is a child and he says I don't focus on the evil in
people, I focus on the evil in systems.
The gun lobby's are trying to take the blame away from
themselves and put it on the individual who actually did the
bad act. Whoa.
That is a truly leftist, insane position that holds no water to

(01:48:26):
serious people. You just said the system is to
blame for the guy shooting people.
You put the blame on people thatown inanimate objects and you
took it away. Use the system that allows
people to own the inanimate objects.
I want to just tell this guy I have weapons and capabilities
for violence in this podcast that probably exceed his own,

(01:48:47):
and they are just things here that are just part of my set.
Look on my shoulder right now, right over there.
That's a Smith and Wesson 686-2 in 357 magnum with a think it's
a six inch barrel and the original stocks that would be
known as a combat police officers weapon.

(01:49:07):
In the 80s. This was something that a lot of
bike bike cops used to carry. It's a beautiful gun.
It is an awesome trigger. Look over on the right side.
That's a Glock 43 XMOS got a Holosun optic on it.
It's got a Shield Arms magazine,well, and a Shields Arms base
plate on the mag that holds 17 rounds with a threaded barrel

(01:49:28):
capable of taking a suppressor, of which I have several right
over the shoulder over here. You can't see it off camera, but
I got a gun belt here. It's a Texas gun belt.
It's got cartridge loops and there's a 44 mag in there from
the 70s single Action Army made by Interstate Arms.
It's called the Virginia Dragoon, and I've got 44 mag and

(01:49:51):
44 special. I've got more rounds and
capabilities in this room, not to mention the freaking Tomahawk
and the and the World War 2 bayonet up there.
We've got more weapon systems inthis office than I imagine this
kid has ever even touched with his soft, effeminate little
hands. And his answer is, the system is
where the evil lives, not in theheart of men.

(01:50:12):
On MSNBC, not along like. Oh yeah, that makes sense.
Yeah. The systems are the things that
are evil and in the same the same sort of vein at the same.
Moment you've got people. Like Chris Murphy out there
decrying that they are giving gun rights back to felons.
Why? The felons are just people and.

(01:50:34):
Apparently they're people who. Have served their debt and now
they're in there. They're now, they're back in
society. There's a really dangerous guy
running for Senate right now. And this is another MSNB fate
and they love this guy. This guy is James Talarico, I
think is how you say his name. James Talarico is running
against Jasmine Crockett for Senate.
None of them should have any chance at all of winning.
He's like, he's like a beta O'Rourke that's a little bit

(01:50:56):
less cringy and he's more dangerous because of it.
But state Rep Democrat James Talarico has the following kind
of things to say. He's also got a problem with
thoughts and prayers. They always couch themselves
just they couch themselves in the way that reasonable people
talk, saying the most unreasonable, wild shit you've
ever heard in your life. And in this particular clip,

(01:51:17):
what you're going to see is thisis the tool that I would
actually say the devil is very good at using, attempting to use
scripture, playing on Christian empathy, trying to act like the
thing that that I want is like you and what I think is a higher
order, except everything that I do leads to death, murder,
destruction, and like, you know,mass destruction of your, of
your, of your, of your culture and of your country.

(01:51:41):
This is how people vote for socialism.
This is how people vote. For what the communists did.
'Cause it sounds super nice. Everybody should get a fair
chance and we should take real action.
This is this is the danger we'rein at this moment.
I think that these people are going to have like a real space
to operate. I frankly am tired of the
thoughts and prayers rhetoric from our leaders here in Texas

(01:52:04):
and in our nation's capital. I believe in the power of
prayer. I believe I'm going to also hone
in he believes in the power of prayer.
But when someone says but in a statement like this where
they're making a political, you know, argument, I would like you
to consider that everything before the but can be thrown
away because it's been discarded.

(01:52:27):
If prayer changes lives, I believe prayer changes the
world. But there.
Is something. Profoundly lives.
I believe prayer changes the world.
But there is something. Profoundly cynical.
About asking God to solve a problem that we're not willing
to solve ourselves. Assuming that you can solve, you

(01:52:49):
can solve. The nature of the evil in men's
heart is a wildly prideful statement.
And this is where having a faithbackground that's real and you
understand that if you are in fact a Christian.
You know that at the end of. The day the most perfect man to
walk the earth still suffered atthe hands of violent people.
And that was all by design. And that the most perfect man in

(01:53:10):
the world loses and the people that went to prepare his way
lost their heads. I've been reflecting a lot on
John the Baptist of late. I feel like the the time that.
We're living in right now. More of us feel akin to this the
experience of. John the Baptist, when you're
crying your voice in the desert.And the end result of that is

(01:53:31):
that they cut your head off because it's inappropriate.
I hope I don't have my head cut off, but my wife worries about
that kind of thing on a regular basis.
That's why I'm armed to the teeth.
I'm going to continue on with this, but I want you to reflect
on the fact that he is, he's masquerading, putting on
compassion and this sort of Christian empathy, and he's
doing it for the exact opposite reason.
He's saying things that are so prideful that you could not ever

(01:53:53):
seriously take this guy if he was going to go out there and
try to make this argument. It's real simple.
It's like you think that you canchange the evil or the darkness
in the hearts of men. Tell me more, Satan.
God moves and works through US. God has no other hands but our
hands. We prayed and God sent moms from

(01:54:14):
both political parties to advocate in the halls of power
for gun safety. We prayed and God sent lawmakers
with common sense gun safety proposals like universal
background checks, red flag lawsclosing the gun show loophole.
As you know, Rev Scripture reminds us that faith without

(01:54:34):
works is dead, and that's prettyfunny.
Faith without works is dead was one of the big arguments.
Between the Protestant and the and the.
Catholic Church, just so you guys know, if you guys don't
know the historical origin there, that's a very funny
argument to be making because I'm sure that he tries to like
appeal to an evangelical base because he sounds and he looks
like a slimy evangelical kind ofcon man.

(01:54:55):
He looks like a mega, like a mega church preacher, and he's
sitting there with the slimiest person of all.
Rev. All right, I'm going to finish this out.
There's a few more seconds. So the time for thoughts and
prayers is over. It's.
Time for us to act. Yeah, bro, the action is is take

(01:55:15):
responsibility for yourself in this world that was the snakiest
of snake oils. Just so we're on the same page.
I don't think that's that's Reverend Al Sharpton.
That's on the screen for those of you who can't hear or you
can't. Yeah, because you're not
watching. You can't see who he's talking
to. He's talking to the skeleton
that used to be the Reverend Al Sharpton that's sitting there.
It's basically skin stretched over it like he's taking over

(01:55:36):
the the Nancy Pelosi skin demon.Sort of a look where they can no
longer maintain the the chassis really wild.
So that's the danger of the timethat we're in right now, as far
as I can tell. We're in a time.
When all this stuff could come to really bite us in the butt
because you need to get people something to churn on and

(01:55:56):
they're going to turn on something.
So they're going to turn on the anti gun message, which is
nonsense and antithetical. To American liberty.
And by the way, it's None. Of your damn business doesn't
matter if you believe in it or don't believe in it, nobody
cares. It doesn't matter because you
don't get a vote on that. That's what the constitution
says for anybody who cares aboutit.
And they don't right up until the point when they actually try
to act like the constitution matters.
These people always act like some rights are second class.

(01:56:16):
And here's how I know it doesn'tmatter.
This happened in Australia. These are bolt action straight
pole rifles and shotguns. So you can have all the tough
gun laws in the world, you can have a buy back, you can have
your government say that you can't have them.
Guess what? People will do evil things.
They'll either go out and they'll where's my I've got a
good picture, I know I have it 123 where's the picture?
They'll go build a freaking pipebomb with FBI agents in the

(01:56:37):
desert, or they'll go and they'll shoot people with
straight pole rifles. Dang, those are semi automatic
and they're still super functional.
They still kill Yeah, time to reload.

(01:57:05):
Still good. It turns out, almost every
weapon system. That you can think of whether
it's the. Stuff that's sitting behind.
Me. These used to be considered
combat. Arms this, this Smith and Wesson
back here, this 357 that was considered a combat handgun.
That 44 mag that I've got up there was a backup gun for guys
in the cavalry. It's designed after the Dragoons

(01:57:26):
guns, right? Single action or single, single
shot and bolt action rifles. Yeah.
They've all been used in warfarevery effectively to end a lot of
lives. So at the end of the day, you
can't make the argument that either there's like some guns
that are good guns and some gunsthat are bad guns.
Either we don't get to have thembecause we're not entitled to
and we live in a society where that's not a thing, or we live

(01:57:47):
in a free society and there's risks.
And right now we're seeing people like they have all the
ammunition they want to go push it out there.
And we're not seeing anything that pushes back saying we're
effective, we have the ability to solve these problems.
And yes, it's awful, but if. There was an armed.
Security guard or if there was aKyle Seraphin sitting in that,

(01:58:08):
in that that room, then maybe people don't get shot.
I'm going to show you last the footage of some of these kids
that were sitting there as the police came in and pulled them
out. They're doing that the run,
hide, fight thing. Run, hide, fight is the last
thing. Wouldn't it be nice if you had
some veterans that said I'm willing to sacrifice my life so
the people around me can live because some of us already made
that decision. A lot of us have.

(01:58:28):
Some of you have some of you have friends who have done it
for you and you're walking around carrying that burden and
you know that you may have to pay it forward one day, right?
That's the reason why you chooseto be a, a, a carrier.
That's why you go out there. And you said I am a man.
My job is to sacrifice. My life, for myself, my
community, my family, whatever needs to be done, I'll do it.
Or you could just hide like this.

(01:58:49):
There are cops banging on the door.
There's. Students filming each other
because their instinct is to film.
And not do things that are sensible.
OK, cops are going to come in and.
They're going to take the room. Yeah, and this looks super

(01:59:11):
dangerous for the cops coming in.
They must assume that nothing bad has happened to get your
hands. Hands, hands, hands.
Hands, hands. Just keep your hands up for us.
Obviously there's something going on.
We're here to help you. Just.
Listen to what we have to say. OK?
All right. Breathe.
Anybody hurt? No.
All right. Just listen to our commands.
We will get you out of here safely.
Is this? Is this the groove?

(01:59:32):
Is this? Have the bath.
You're full. We'll grab it now quickly.
So there you go. I mean, this is what that's the
alternative. How do they not find the the
actual? Guy in all this stuff, I don't
know the answer, but I know thatpeople don't trust the the
agency that are doing it. I know the locals are upset.

(01:59:52):
About it and I know that. The guy that's out there so
thirsty for wins that he's goingto go out and do a freaking
podcast with his girlfriend sitting on a couch.
That ain't it. That's not what people voted
for, so you're going to lose allof it.
That's the time that we're in right now.
And again, it's dangerous for liberty.
It's dangerous for people who actually.
Care. So let's.
Shut it down right there. I'll just remind you guys, you
can watch the program over at kyleseraphinshow.com.

(02:00:15):
kyleseraphinshow.com. That's the Spotify link.
Give it a try. Everybody who likes it or
everybody who tries it likes it.Or as my friend used to say when
I was younger, everybody who tries it says, oh, that is so
nice. This is the locals.
You can find us and you can support us at kyleseraphin.com.
Some neat stuff coming out there.
I got I need to go to the range and do some shooting.
So we're going to do that and show you guys a little bit of
it. If you want to join the program,
you want to join the the Army over there on the YouTube that

(02:00:37):
it continues to grow. Give us a like make sure you're
subscribed. I continue to see this thing
grow every single day. So share it with a friend.
If you're a YouTube and you likethat.
We're there, we're growing. We're not being squished.
It's totally organic, though. It's a it's a very slow and
methodical curve, but I am appreciative for all of you that
are watching on there and sharing it around with the
friends and a whole new audienceis opened up to us since rumble
seems pretty restricted. God bless all of you guys.

(02:01:00):
All of you have a fun pal show cleanse later.
But this is this is a long enough show at this moment.
So go protect yourselves, protect your family, give
everybody love a hug. Let them know what matters
right? And then stop eating the slop if
you can recognize the slop first.
You know it smells bad, so just.Stop eating it.

(02:01:20):
God bless you. Talk to you soon.
Thanks for listening to the KyleSerafin Show, streamed live
weekdays on rubble.com. Slash Kyle Serafin.
Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.

All Episodes

Streisand Effect: Ka$h flails with more PR mid-Manhunt | Ep 697

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

The Bobby Bones Show

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Streisand Effect: Ka$h flails with more PR mid-Manhunt | Ep 697