Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:12):
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because thisprogram has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends, and
(00:40):
welcome to today's Kyle Seraphinshow.
And it is Tuesday and it is August the 19th.
We are now 10 days out from an interesting little moment in my
life where I'm going to get to sit down with some DOJ attorneys
and we're going to try to litigate, mediate, come to an
agreement on the lawsuit that wehave.
This is 26 FBI employees are going to be looking down the
(01:02):
barrel of what? What are we going to go forward
and do here? Are we going to take this into
federal court and see what a jury thinks or are we going to
be able to shut it down beforehand?
Interestingly enough, the allegations that are made by me
and my Co plaintiffs in this lawsuit are the same allegations
that Cash Patel, the FBI director, made about the same
(01:22):
guy that we alleged did it. COVID nonsense, COVID Tierney.
Ain't that something? And since we're on the topic of
FBI, just kind of briefly, I'm going to tell you today's
program is going to culminate with a discussion about the big
nugget the Trump administration prides itself on being an
administration of firsts. The first time that you've seen
(01:45):
Fox News host jump into governmental roles, sometimes
good, sometimes bad. We are having another first as
of yesterday afternoon, so standby for fun.
We will get into that. The big nugget also want to talk
about a couple of wins I think that are decent.
We're going to talk about Lee Zeldin, who's doing something
(02:08):
quite interesting regarding diesel regulations, actually
emissions and regulations in general.
This is actually the thing that should be happening.
And generally speaking, if it ishappening and it's good, then
you're not going to hear about it a lot on most of the news.
So we'll talk about that. Going to talk a little bit about
the Zielinski slash Euro boring leaders meeting with Donald
(02:29):
Trump. And I want to kind of touch on
finally, as we wrap up for the end of the day, I want to talk
on maybe the single biggest scary problem that if it's not
solved, along with the FBI beingthe, the, the kinetic mechanism
that our government will use to come after us.
The other thing is, is how do you fix the long term crisis of
our voting system and the Republic being undermined?
(02:51):
And Trump has made a statement about it.
I'm not nearly as optimistic as some people are, but at least
he's acknowledging the problem. And I think that is a certainly
a step in the right direction. So we're going to do all those
things. Before we do, we're going to
remind you that there are infinite numbers of people.
I don't know how many, many people, but a lot of people that
are out there that would love tosteal your data.
We're talking about cyber criminals and hackers.
(03:12):
We're talking about foreign entities.
We're talking about people that are living in Nigeria sitting in
a call bank trying to call you up, pretend to be a company that
you work with. How do they do that?
Well, they have access to all ofyour data.
So once they do, they know who you are and where you live and
how old you are and what jobs you've had and all this kind of
stuff. And one of the easiest things
you can do to take your name outof the pile that these scammers
can come after you with is by signing up for a service like
(03:33):
Patriot Protect. That's what my wife and I use.
It's patriot-protect.com slash Kyle.
Let me just tell you guys right up front, it's a little bit
awkward because you're going to be filling in a lot of
information about yourself. They have to know that you're
the person that they're trying to get removed from these data
broker websites and then they goout there and scrub the web
trying to pull this information out.
It's constantly popping up. So you want this to be a
(03:54):
subscription service that you do.
You can do it one time per year,an annual service.
You just pay for it. It's a couple bucks per month
across the whole year. It's like 6 bucks a month, a
year or something like that. And you use my name Kyle Kyle
for for a 15% discount at checkout.
They're scanning the dark web aswell using their blackout
service, looking to see if somebody's already hacked your
data and already sold it out there.
(04:15):
In which case you can change your logins, your passwords, you
can change the information out there.
You can notify your banks that you might be a victim of a
future scam. You can save your money.
And so it's this is a an ounce of prevention versus the pound
of cure. The pound of cure usually ends
up in the thousands, if not 10s of thousands of dollars.
Don't be a victim. Put on some digital camouflage.
If you're not using Patriot Protect, use a service.
(04:35):
But that's the one that we use here.
We appreciate them being a sponsor of the Kyle Seraphin
Show. And the link is in the show
description right up front, veryeasy to find.
Let's get into today's program and let's go after some big
Nuggets. So yesterday I got to see one of
(04:58):
my best buddies in the world whoI don't see as often anymore.
He is now living in Tennessee and he is facing the
possibility, maybe the probability of a 73 year old
boomer stepping into the governor's seat on the next go
round. As we talked about yesterday,
just not a fan of ladies in their 70s running for governor
(05:19):
anywhere. I don't care who you are, I
don't care how awesome you. I don't care how good you look
for your age. All that is kind of gross.
But we went down and hung out and I hadn't seen him in about
nine months. And so some things have changed
around our house. Two of the the most interesting
things, I guess that were because he's a truck guy and,
and drives a diesel truck and had an RV that they pulled out
(05:40):
to Tennessee and kind of found aplace to live, which is cool.
I also have a diesel truck and it's kind of a nice little
bookend in 2000. I'm trying to remember exactly.
I think in 2009 I bought my first diesel truck.
It was a 1991-F-250 single cab, no air conditioning, roll down
windows, stripped down model. You know, double battery, double
(06:02):
gas tank, long bed, 8 footer, rear wheel drive and and it was
awesome. And it cost me $1700.
I've been kind of a frugal guy most of my life.
And so I had this diesel truck. This was the 7.3 liter Idi
International diesel engine. It was epic.
And I actually loaded my my spare tire up on front of this
(06:22):
this ranch hand grill that was on it.
So it looked like a like a pig nose.
And I actually pushed guys on the base every once in a while.
When the young guys who had a lot more money invested in their
car had no gas and they couldn'tget themselves in, I would just
put that rubber right up to the edge of whatever they had.
And I would just slowly chug, chug, chug, chug, chug, chug,
chug them on to Kirtland Air Force Base, which was always
kind of funny. Now I've got a new a new diesel.
(06:43):
It's a six 6.7 liter and it's very nice and it's very plush.
And my buddy and I were talking about it.
And as we were talking about it,I started realizing we're
looking at all the different features.
And you know, now you have to doa thing called adding def DEF.
That's diesel exhaust fluid. And interestingly enough, that
may be going the way of the past.
There's a clip that I lost, but it was a discussion by Lee
(07:06):
Zeldin, who's the EPA administrator in the Trump
administration, talking about how they were going to
deregulate and basically they weren't going to rollback
regulations to 2008. They were going to delete the
the the EPA from getting involved in a lot of this stuff.
And so who would cover this and the possible climate change
(07:27):
disaster that it might cause except NPR.
So that's where we're going to lead off today.
And what did they said? Their headline, which drew me in
was businesses face, quote UN quote, chaos as the EPA aims to
repeal its authority over climate pollution.
Now, I'm a business. I mean, I I run a business.
It's a me business. It's here I am.
(07:47):
But my business also has this little, little this little
diesel truck that sits outside. It's not that little.
Actually, it's pretty nice. And so I started reading this
and you'll be shocked to find that they were able to to
determine that there are many businesses who have joined some
sort of professional Business Association that are absolutely
incensed by Lee Zeldin doing this totally normal thing, which
(08:09):
would say, you know, the government doesn't really belong
in your business. It doesn't actually need to tell
you how to drive. It doesn't need to to call your
stock pond in the back of your property navigable waterways.
And that is totally unacceptableto CNN.
And so let's listen to him discuss what's going on.
I'm going to read through some of these articles.
Mostly what I'm interested in isthey found people that
(08:30):
theoretically are in quote UN quote business that are begging
for more regulation. Why would that be unless it
benefits the business or it justbenefits their climate Scam The.
Supreme Court made it very clearthat I have to follow the law, I
have to follow the plain language of the law, and I can't
get creative. So when you read through the
2009 endangerment finding, they say that where there's silence
(08:53):
in the law, there's gaps that that I should just be
interpreting that as my own discretion.
The Supreme Court has made it very clear that that is not what
is is a power that I have. This decision is a decision for
Congress to make if they want toamend Section 2O2 of the clean
air, with all due respect. Power.
A power that you have is to rewrite a regulation.
(09:15):
You are taking an action. You could just leave it alone.
The power, No, the power comes from the law.
I don't get to just make up the law just because a predecessor
decided to fill in vague language in the law to do many
mental leaps to try to justify an electric vehicle mandate and
(09:37):
trillions of dollars of regulation to strangulate out of
existence entire sectors of our energy economy.
You were posting earlier a wholebunch of photos of stationary
sources. Well, the Biden administration,
we did do a whole bunch of regulations to try to make, for
example, the coal industry get regulated out of existence.
(09:58):
There are people out there who like wind.
I I come from a state where the governor says that New York is a
substitute for base load power. It's not.
In order to make America the AI capital of the world, in order
to unleash energy dominance, to protect the jobs, to bring down
energy costs, we are not going to regulate out of existence
entire sectors of our economy. And we are not going to
(10:21):
interpret law in whichever vague, creative way allows us to
give ourselves maximum power. The power comes from the law and
from Congress, not from our own creativity.
Well that seems pretty logical that the the EPA shouldn't be
making their own laws and yet they did.
And so I will link over on calserafin.com if you guys want
(10:43):
to be able to read it. The 2009 I'll read you the name
of the study which came from theEPA.
The endangerment and cause or contribute findings for
greenhouse gases under section 2O2 alpha of the Clean Air Act
is dated. It's dated December 7th of 2009,
so it's super important. In the first year of the Obama
administration, this was part ofthe Climate Change Division,
(11:05):
Office of Atmospheric Programs, US Environmental Protection
Agency in Washington, DC. You guys can look at that study
if you guys are so curious into it.
But essentially what they did isthe thing that the government
often does. It justified its existence and
its ability to step into the wading pool and regulate
something that that is not explicitly called out in the law
(11:27):
itself in the Clean Air Act. In the same way that when they
were talking about waterways andthe reason that they're able to
go after all of your your standing bodies of water on your
own property and why the EPA believes that they have
administrative capabilities there is simply because they
said they did, because they werelike, well, we define what a
navigable waterway is. We put it out for public comment
and nobody knew about it. And so now we've defined it.
(11:48):
And now that is something that has force of law.
This is the enemy, I think of a free society.
This is the enemy. This is what the quote UN quote
deep state. This is what you're what you're
your bureaucratic entities do, folks.
The Administrative Procedures Act 1946, it goes back to that
where where Congress said we could be really granular and
(12:10):
specific about what we do. We could outline very clearly
what we mean by everything. And they actually try to do
that. In general, if you've ever let
read a law, there's always hyperlinks within them because
it defines something, you know, with another statute or there's
another little subsection that tells you what the actual
federal definition is. And when it's insufficient or
there's vagaries in there, it leaves all this sort of play.
(12:32):
And after 1946, what they said is the executive agencies get to
go out and do it. So this is the real sort of this
is the ongoing crisis that exists with our government is
that it wants to insert itself in.
Nobody's ever gotten a promotionin government for making their
governmental agency smaller. Lee Zeldin is one of the few
people right now who's actually who's divesting from powers.
(12:54):
You're not seeing it over at DOJ, which I wish you would,
saying, hey, you know, we don't belong in the Intel business.
There's already agencies that dothat.
There's like 17 of them. We could, we could have 16, we
could have 12. We could have three of them and
that'd be fine. They don't do that.
Nobody ever gets promoted or gets praised in government for
shrinking the size of government.
Now the upside is, is about whatlast year, I think it was either
(13:16):
last year or the year before we had this Chevron deference
removed. The Supreme Court went out there
and said, you know, we used to say that Ty goes to the
government, that the default position is the government is
the expert. And so they are going to be
correct. And when they come up against
some private citizen, they win unless the private citizen can
overwhelmingly prove that they are correct in the face of this
(13:37):
expert who we take at face valueuntil you prove otherwise.
They've actually removed that. So Chevron was a big rollback,
and that was a 1984 court decision.
So for the last, what, 30 something years?
Is it 30 or is it 40 years, 40 years?
We've been dealing with this sort of tyrannical
administrative state where the EPA can define something, say
(13:59):
it, and then they just do it andthere's no fight back.
And so finally you're seeing a little bit of a of a rollback on
this and it's kind of interesting, as you guys pointed
out in the chat, yes, I live in Texas.
Yes, I can do a death delete formy diesel.
Interestingly enough, the picture that you're actually
seeing on the screen, and I don't know why they chose this,
but this is NP Rs picture for this particular story.
It's just a, a big rig exhaust pipe sticking up into a cloud,
(14:22):
like there's really nothing to it.
But it was pictured in Austin, TX, so just down the street from
me, which is kind of funny. I'm going to read you some of
the story. I'm going to read you some of
the quotations I believe are relevant from these folks.
This might be one of the bigger wins that you can have.
And again, it's not going to geta ton of play and I want to give
fair coverage where I can. There's something else to to add
into it too, which is that personal sense of liberty that
(14:45):
you can make your own decisions,right?
That is something that you wouldthink that liberals would sign
on to. Remember they're not liberal
anymore. That's why we use the term
leftist here. Liberals in theory would say
sort of like live and let live. And you know, what you're doing
doesn't necessarily affect me. So if you want to smoke weed in
your house and listen to jazz, as long as it doesn't sneak in
through the barrier of my home and I don't have to listen to
(15:06):
it, then I don't really care what you're doing.
That's more libertarian. That's those are probably the
real liberals at this point are libertarians.
We only have leftist on the other side.
They want to control you and they want to give you their
values, their morality, and thenthey want to do it through
litigious nature and force you to follow it, which is why, you
know, I'm sure they're appalled at the idea of death.
Delete the, the article that I, I or the, the, the clip that I
(15:30):
heard Lee Zeldin give on a different interview was
essentially that he wasn't rolling it back because, you
know, they, they didn't have anyauthority to have it, although
they don't, which is what he just said on CNN.
They don't have the authority toenforce any of this stuff.
He also said that the, the studyis basically that it's junk and
doesn't work. And we on all these things have
been a lie that they've been trying to like, do you know,
climate change mitigation? So that's interesting that that
(15:52):
very much upsets this NPR group.The Trump administration plans
to undo lawmark findings that climate pollution threatens
public health and welfare and itposes significant risk for
corporate America. Suddenly, NPR.
This is an NPR article. Really, really cares how
businesses are going to do. Sure they do.
The Environmental Protection Agency had an endangerment
(16:15):
finding. Again, I'll link that over on
the on the local site for you guys that want to read it.
For those of you that are nerdy enough to go through and read a
government finding. It served as the legal basis for
federal climate regulations under the Clean Air Act since
2009. Again, a radical transformation
from any previous thing and not explicitly laid out in the law.
The finding concludes that the accumulation of greenhouse gases
(16:37):
such as carbon dioxide in the atmosphere endangers people's
health and the well beings of communities.
Remember, without carbon dioxidewe all die.
That's it. Everything dies.
All plant life ends. But it's a pollutant not defined
by statute, defined by feelings From this endangerment finding,
(16:57):
it goes on. Reaching that determination was
a prerequisite set so they couldhave now limits on pollution,
including sort of the carbon footprint.
All of that stuff flows out of these findings.
Getting rid of this authority would lead to the repeal of all
greenhouse gas standards at the federal level, according to the
EPA, amounting to, it says, one of the largest deregulatory
actions in American history. Here's the fun part.
(17:20):
Companies have long complained that the government's effort to
rein in heat trapping pollution are impractical because they
are. A lot of businesses want the EPA
to be in charge of setting national standards of some kind,
according to proponents and legal experts.
And so who did they found? They found a lady.
It's a lady. Her name is Lisa Jacobson, and
she is the president of the Business Council for Sustainable
(17:41):
Energy, whose members include major electricity producers and
and the trade group for the national, the natural gas
industry. No names given, no specific
cited. Not likely to be major players
in that space because you can imagine people who try to pump
gas or pull crude oil out of theground or do industrial
(18:03):
processes are not begging for the government to come in and
tighten down on them. Unless you believe that Lisa
Jacobs said is in fact an accurate representation of
businesses in America, which I don't.
She said, quote, I look at what the administration wants to
accomplish with regards to our national security and winning
the AI race. They have nothing to do with
this. We want to have expansive energy
(18:24):
production. We have that opportunity and we
can do that affordably and we can do that while we're managing
air pollution and greenhouse gasemissions.
What does that mean? Nothing.
It sounds good, though. I mean, that sounds like a
person that really cares and knows things, doesn't it?
Don't you feel like Lisa Jacobson is really interested in
the climate and the planet and growing energy and AI or
(18:47):
something? I don't know, she said.
I would like to focus more on that then on changes to these
regulatory policies, which will cause disruptions in planning
and moving forward with projectsthat we need today.
Then they found an environmentallawyer who was able to speak
about it and he had some negative thoughts.
And then they went to the American Petroleum Institute.
The API is a legitimate oil and gas trade group, so we can hear
(19:11):
them. They said that it continues to
support a federal role in regulating greenhouse gas
emissions. Unclear when they said that or
why they said that or what the context was, or more
importantly, what was the question that led to that
answer. If you guys don't know, whenever
you start doing these these media interviews, I always
record them now because I want to know that my comment is taken
(19:32):
in context. The last time that I was cited
in a newspaper article, just forwhatever, just your awareness, I
did about a 28 minute interview of which I spoke for about 24
minutes of that interview, maybeslightly more.
That's a good interview by the way, that you ask a question and
you let the person just talk. They resulted the resulting sort
(19:55):
of product that came out of thatquoted one sentence that I said
over almost 30 minutes. So you don't always know if the
context is true or fair or accurate.
So again, we kind of do this caveat mtor.
I'll I'll end with this thought from from NPR's coverage all the
way at the bottom. It says the Trump administration
(20:15):
said this spring that it was could reconsidering the
endangerment finding as a reportas a result of a sweeping
initiative to rollback environmental regulations.
At the time, Lee Zeldin said thegoal was to quote, drive a
dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion.
And quote, I very much like the idea of ending the climate
(20:37):
change religion and putting a dagger in the heart is as good
as any analogy. It is climate paganism.
It is one of the sacraments, if you will, of the broader
religion of leftism, this secular idea that that all good
things come from the government and they sort of like also deify
(20:57):
this Gaia Earth figure and all that's kind of gross.
And all of it is not Christian and all of it isn't really
compatible with the majority of what Americans think.
But if you go to the hard left, that's where it sits.
Government gives us all the goodthings.
It tells us what's good and bad.It defines what's a sin and what
is not a sin. If it's, you know, if it's legal
(21:18):
and we think it's bad, then we make it illegal so that we can
actually have sort of our morality codified for us.
And Zeldin's talking about solving this problem.
Some of the most mundane and dull things, like nobody's
really excited about EPA policy,if I'm being honest.
It's not sexy or fun, but it is the thing that is going to come
in and disrupt your existence. It's going to disrupt your
(21:41):
business. It's going to be the person that
comes in and does an environmental study and says
that you can't build on your ownproperty, you know, EPA
regulations outside of the actual law, which is what he's
saying is if it's not set in law, we're not going to do it.
And remember, the CNN lady asks,well, why don't you just leave
it alone? Because it's already there.
That's going to be a broader problem because they would love
(22:02):
that. They're like, look, I know Joe
Biden brought a bunch of people into this country illegally, but
why don't you just leave them alone?
They're already here. I mean, why would you try to fix
the damage? Why wouldn't you just allow it
to continue? That does seem to be kind of a
leftist argument. Like leave us alone.
But they're always doing what progressing?
There's a reason why the term progressive is more accurate
(22:25):
than liberal at this point. Because progressives are
stepping forward and pushing their agenda.
Even when their agenda disagreeswith another part of their
agenda, they'll still March it forward illogically because
progress is the key progress. Put an air quotes here.
All right, here's Lee Zeldin talking about greenhouse gases.
This is from the Ruthless podcast.
This looks like it would be a pretty good listen as well.
I may put this on my list. If you were asked congressional
(22:47):
Democrats to describe what it is, the left would say that it
means that carbon dioxide is a pollutant.
Carbon dioxide is an endangerment to put to human
health. They might say methane is a
pollutant. Methane is an endangerment to
human health, and that's an oversimplified, I would say
inaccurate way to describe it. What's the significance?
How big is the endangerment finding?
(23:09):
Well, repealing it will be the largest deregulatory action in
the history of America, too. It's so.
Right. So I don't know why they threw
the the music, the hip hop on the end of it, but that's worth
knowing that you're doing massive deregulation by getting
rid of a government finding thatis not law, but has force of
law. So all this stuff stems out of
(23:31):
some good moves that happened from the Supreme Court.
And yeah, let's give credit where it's due.
If you'd had a Hillary Clinton in office starting in 2017, we
wouldn't have the people that are in the Supreme Court for
better, for worse. They are imperfect.
But I can pretty much guess thata Hillary Clinton Supreme Court
would have been atrocious, horrific and disgusting.
So the Supreme Court doesn't always go the way that we would
(23:53):
hope, but getting rid of the Chevron difference was a really
big deal. And seeing some of the fruits of
that did take a long time, especially with repealing some
sort of like goofy regulatory thing.
All right, I also want to tell you guys real quickly before we
move forward, Speaking of methane production and CO2
production, what do they really hate so much?
(24:13):
They hate cows for some reason. If they hated cows as much as
they say they did, maybe they would eat cows, right?
I don't know. That's a weird segue.
Mad Hat jerky.com slash Kyle is the jerky choice of the Seraphin
household. If you guys are interested in
getting a really high quality snack, you want to buy something
that you're going to feel good about eating.
You can get USDA Prime beef there.
It's keto friendly, many of themcarnivore friendly.
(24:35):
Depending on how aggressive you are on the carnivore thing, you
can get it with just minimal stuff on there.
Carbohydrates to a minimum, maximizing your protein.
Give things to your kids, get things to your grandkids.
Get rid of cow farts and methane, which is so dangerous,
by eating the cows. Maybe that just encourages them
to grow more cows. It's Matt with two TS Hat with
1tjerky.com. Matt hat jerky.com slash Kyle.
(24:58):
You're supporting an American business, young guy.
He's under 20 and he's employingpeople in America.
He's making money and he's making a product that you trade
your dollars for and then you get something that you can
enjoy. It's healthy, it's enjoyable.
It has a very nice texture to it.
It's not like eating boot leather, which I'm not a huge
fan of. It's like a tender product that
you get in there. Doesn't last forever, but it
does last you for a while. So put it on your desk and
(25:20):
whenever you're thinking like, hey man, I really need a snack.
I could go eat some chips and crackers, some jarbage, like
whatever, something give me a little pick me up.
No, get yourself some Mad Hat jerky, get yourself some beef
and just eating meat, you talk. My my friend Tracy Beans also
falls as she's has this attitude.
Meat heels. Turns out some of you guys know,
actually my attorney who represented me with the O'Keefe
(25:42):
deposition is a big meat guy. Dropped like 50% of his body
weight because he was a chunky guy and now he's super lean.
He looks way healthier. So some of you guys know getting
some of this garbage out of yourdiet will help.
All right, I want to continue onwith things.
What have you just left everybody alone?
Could you just do that? That's what Democrats apparently
want. Leave them alone.
Don't bother these poor people. They're just trying to get by
(26:05):
with their crappy lives. Let's read the story real
quickly here. This apparently caused some
outrage. The DC delivery driver
detention. That's a really good little
alliterative phrase there, isn'tit?
DC delivery driver detention sparks concern and fear among
some in community. Well, that's saying an awful
lot. Without saying much, a series of
(26:25):
videos showed federal agents conducting operations in
Washington, DC. It sparked an immigrant concern.
The Trump administration continues its federal takeover.
We can do two things at once. If we're being logical and
reasonable stuff, we can look forward and say that a federal
takeover of Washington, DC is not ideal because the federal
takeover of anything is not ideal.
EPA is your good example. They got in and they wanted to
(26:48):
make everything safe in the air,and they ended up regulating
like a natural byproduct that each of you breathe out every
time you do something, right? CO2 is a process.
It is part of normal human respiration.
It's also the thing that your plants and your food has to have
in order to go and conduct photosynthesis.
So it's just part of the cycle. And more in the air means
(27:11):
warmer. Far more people die from cold
than hot. We've done this before, right?
We've played this game. OK, so government getting
involved almost always is wrong.Nobody planned on having people
living in Washington, DC the waythat they do, and nobody planned
on having the people who live inWashington, DC live in the way
that they do. A lot of that territory was
(27:33):
seated from Maryland. That's fine.
It's a federal district. There's obviously a place for a
federal district. It should actually include the
federal buildings and the federal spaces like the National
Mall and some of the museums andsome of the different sort of
like federal buildings that allow you to come in and, and
work there. But the rest of Washington, DC,
this is Kyle Seraphin's opinion.I'm just sharing it with you.
(27:53):
I think it's reasonable, having worked there for five years.
Those people should be able to be represented in Congress.
They always complain about that.Have you have you ever seen it's
actually their license plates? This is taxation without
representation. They're bitching about a thing
that they voluntarily got involved in.
I got a reporter who works for NBC that I talked to sometimes
and he was like, you know, Washington, DC is like, totally
(28:13):
safe. And I'm like, bro, I can take
you to a place where they would kill you.
You specifically, like a white, soft male.
They would eat your soul. I used to work in those
neighborhoods every single morning.
It was a regular thing. You can smell when you're going
into those neighborhoods in Washington, DC.
Take it from me, you don't have to.
It smells like desperation and diarrhea in the river.
(28:36):
When you drive over the Anacostia, You're like, I used
to get on the radio sometimes. And I would say, like, I love
the smell of DC in the morning, you know?
And I just give the guys a hard time because it'd be 5 in the
morning and we're going to go sit and watch drug dealers and
open air drug markets and women who are abusing their children
because they're child pornographers.
Yeah, women doing that, that kind of stuff.
It's awful. And then they put up this, this
(28:57):
victimized thing. Oh, there's no, we shouldn't
have taxation without representation.
You chose to live there. You moved to a place that
doesn't have a congressional representative.
I don't think that place should exist.
I think it should flow back to Maryland, which is what it ought
to be anyway. Maryland kind of sucks anyway.
I'm not a huge fan of Maryland, but most of DC blends right into
(29:18):
Maryland. And when you go over the state
line, you're like, you don't know because it looks the same,
the same demographic of people, the same sort of like building
style. There's no like this like
change. There's no cultural difference
between most of Washington, DC and then what happens in the
nice Maryland and the crappie Maryland.
They both flow directly into Washington, DC.
So give it to them super easy. We can agree that the answer is
(29:44):
that this or that the the solution is bad.
I don't think federalizing Washington, DC is good, but we
would agree for very different reasons.
I think just let the crappy areabe part of a crappy state.
The libs, the leftists are upsetbecause you're really hurting
the feelings of these poor immigrants that are just trying
to make a living illegally in this country in felony violation
(30:06):
of Title 8, You know, and so is the company that's employing
them, Washington, DC resident Tyler De Sue.
He woke up tired and craving a breakfast on Saturday morning.
So he did what many people in this situation would do.
First of all, if your choice. If your choice because you woke
up on Saturday and you were tired and you were craving
(30:27):
breakfast was not to make effingbreakfast.
That's why I don't want to hear people complain about their
finances. So many people make awful.
I've never once 0 times as Kyle Seraphin or Kyle Seraphin family
and I'm guessing my parents haveprobably never done it either.
Have never once used Uber eats ever.
I can't fathom the idea of some unknown stranger or illegal
(30:49):
alien driving around with my food and bringing it to me when
I sure as hell can go do it myself.
We used to have delivery services right?
Like pizza delivery and then there were businesses that were
take out only. If you want the takeout you got
to unseat your happy ass and go get it.
The fact that you're willing to pay more.
Like I remember one of the guys at Infowars was telling me they
(31:10):
spent 50 bucks on like a burritoqueso and and like two other
little things plus tip right. They paid 2 three times what it
cost to have some random scumbagwho might be in this country
illegally bringing you your food.
What the Hell's wrong with you? People did what many people
would do in this situation. It just tells you this is NBC
News writing about it. Someone called Didi Martinez
(31:31):
when the driver took longer thanusual.
Jesus checked the app and noticed something seemed wrong.
This is a great story. The delivery driver's GPS
location had stopped short of his address.
He went out to look for him, he went to look for his food that
he ordered that didn't show up. I stepped onto the street and I
looked down and I see lights in the direction, like police
lights in the direction of wheremy driver was.
(31:53):
He said in an interview he was my driver by himself and like 9
different officers all wearing different uniforms.
Most of them had face coverings on.
This actually is not ideal when you deal with federal agents.
They don't have uniforms, so they jump out wearing blue jeans
and hoodies and T-shirts and freaking wife beaters.
And they wear yoga, tactical yoga pants.
(32:13):
If they're chicks that like, youknow, grab their buttocks and
whatever, like all of that. Not great.
So the Suez went to go investigate.
And the driver, whose name appeared on the food app as
CDSIDI, was being questioned first about his vehicle
registration, then about his immigration status.
And then they said, you're goingto come with us today in a
(32:33):
recorded interview or video thatthis guy did.
Can you tell me in Arabic, please?
Said CD, the illegal alien who did not believe, who did not
belong in our country. And so we have that video and we
have people that are chastising the federal agents for getting
this out. Now listen, this is right on the
heels of an Indian guy who got aan illegal commercial driver's
(32:55):
license in California, drove it into Florida, did an illegal
U-turn because he doesn't understand American laws and
should not be driving a big semitruck and decapitated and killed
three people that are legal residents of my country.
So when you bring people into this country that are not
supposed to be here and then they work in violation of Title
7 illegally, which is a felony and is the and the hiring of
(33:16):
that person is a felony. We got a real problem.
And then you have where leftist actually shine.
They're going to apologize because they want their goober
eats. They just want to be delivered
that breakfast burrito, whateverthe hell it was, because that's
more important. God forbid then like, I don't
know, a family that gets T bonedby this a hole who's driving
around in a SUV that he has no business having and he doesn't
(33:38):
speak English and he can't have a communication.
They're out there crying. Please, like use Google
Translate. Here's the video of what that
look like. He doesn't understand what
you're saying. Bro just use Google Translate on
your phone. It takes 2 seconds.
This is some bullshit. This is ridiculous.
You're. Going to have access better
(34:01):
things to do to harass Uber subscribers.
Minding his business, trying to make a living.
It's. Nine of his business illegally
in our country, not speaking English, you don't have driving
on our roads. And then she's going to talk him
in English. Listen to those cicadas.
Can you hear that? You can request a lawyer, Sir.
You don't have to say anything. You can't understand English,
(34:21):
Sir. Yeah, they said his tax is
invalid, but now they're saying that it was a mistake.
Now they're taking. Right.
So what they said was is that hewas driving illegally with a
vehicle that wasn't properly registered that normal people
have to deal with and he's just trying to make a living even
though he doesn't belong here and he's not from here and he
shouldn't be here and he can't speak our language.
(34:43):
Imagine going to, I honest to God, I, every time I do this,
I'm just like, imagine if I wentto Germany and I didn't speak
German and then I just started working there and then I got
arrested because I was not supposed to be there and I was
working illegally and I couldn'tunderstand German.
I didn't know what any of the street signs said and none of it
made sense to me. And I couldn't figure out what
the thing even said on the car. And then like, would people come
to my aid and be like, leave himalone?
(35:04):
He's just trying to work in our country and make money.
It's such a, it's such a suicidal impulse that, that that
suicidal empathy that you're going to feel sorry for this guy
who just as easily could have turned around and taken you out.
And it looks like he might be inthis little, like stupid moped
scooter. So he'd probably only take
himself out. But honestly, if he even damaged
my diesel truck by driving around like that, I'd be pissed.
(35:27):
Like, get the hell off my roads.Get out of my house.
What are you doing? All right, Speaking of
foreigners that I'm not a big fan of you like that.
We'll do this in just one second.
Let's take a quick few second break for the folks over on
Spotify. There's going to be a canned ad
here. We appreciate you guys listening
through them or skipping them. Whatever you do, here's the
break. And there it is.
I just want to give the warningsbecause it allows people not to
be caught off guard by that. Let's talk about other
(35:48):
foreigners that I'm not a big fan of.
This guy might be my least favorite foreigner.
He was allowed to come here legally because he had a visa,
I'm sure travel visa. What do we need to know about
Monday's Trump Zelensky meeting at the White House?
Well, what we need to know is that CVS covered it.
So let's do some takeaways here.Trump hosted both Vladimir
(36:08):
Vladimir Lewinsky and European leaders at the White House, an
event that was called a very good step, an early step towards
possibly resolving the war in Ukraine.
I heard a bunch of MAGA Homer cheerleader types yesterday.
I jumped into some social media spaces and discussions and the
claim was Trump is so awesome that he's skipping A ceasefire
and he's going straight to peace.
How amazing. Maybe that's true awesome.
(36:29):
I just like Trump needs to stop over promising and under
delivering. That would be great.
And penis playing president of Ukraine is gross.
It's all gross. He shows up and he got praised.
You can see him on the screen right now.
He's wearing a black dress shirtbuttoned all the way up to the
top. Then he's wearing a black weird
(36:52):
Eurotrash suit jacket thing thathas pockets in the front.
Doesn't look like a suit to me. And that's all buttoned all the
way up to the top. So he looks like a freaking
fool, which means he got praisedleft and right.
The leaders showed unity with Solinsky and European allies.
They stressed the need for security guarantees and an
eventual peace deal. Why?
Why do there need to be securityguarantees?
(37:12):
What happened to America first? Seriously, I just keep, I keep
fixating on this. Can anyone please tell me like
in a comment below or in a comment on the on the the audio
stream, Can one of you please tell me what America first meant
to you? That I don't get it?
I have this picture of what it means, and that's not it.
Security guarantees for a country that's not us.
(37:36):
What is America First about thatwe must, we must have some role
in it. So I don't understand it.
Will one of you please help me understand?
Or maybe you just tell me that No, no, we, we're on the same
page here. Please help me understand what
America First meant when you voted for it.
Listen, I'm all about it. America First is rolling back
EPA regulations and telling me that the stupid fluid that I put
(38:00):
in that makes my diesel less efficient and has extra weight
and takes, you know, injects garbage.
And it's one more fail point. What what Zeldin was saying on
those things. By the way, I'm going to break
away from one second because I remembered it.
Zeldin essentially said that thethe death fluid insertion and
all that, it made vehicles slightly more whatever, less
(38:20):
admitting for a little period oftime, but it also caused higher
turnover and that you had like more deep vehicles retired.
So their net carbon footprint was higher because they didn't
last as long. Meanwhile, you can still go find
like a 96, you know, 7.3 liter super.
What do they call it? The supercharged diesels,
whatever they were, the Idi, theinternational, you can go find
those still. You can still find a 91-F-250
(38:42):
diesel. Like I had that 7.3 liter
diesel. They're still out there running.
But you could try and find one of those 6 liters and a bunch of
them are all already gone. They've moved on to the new
series and you won't find them. In any case, this is what the
mainstream was really excited about.
This is an NBC story suited and full of praise.
Ukraine and allies woo Trump away from Putin.
(39:03):
Can we just take a moment about how flipping dishonest that is?
And so I'm actually on Trump's side on this one because he had
a statement that he doesn't wantto talk to our, our media.
And I don't blame him. Suited and full of praise.
Ukraine and allies woo Trump away from Putin because Trump
was already in the clutches of Putin.
(39:23):
Trump who said, come to Alaska, come hang out on a military
base. Let me go fly this like BB2
bomber over the top of your head.
Come walk by my, my F30 Fives ormy F20.
You know, the, the, the, what are they F 24 Raptors or
whatever? Come check out our cool ass
planes. See like all of our military
dominance jump in my super cool beast vehicle that we're driving
around in. Right.
That was that was Trump who was wooed by Putin who came to
(39:47):
America. But Vladimir Zelensky is wearing
a suit and his penis is not exposed nor is there a piano
insight. So they were able to woo Trump
away. For Europe's leaders, the White
House meeting was about optics as much as substance, a chance
to undo any ground. Vladimir Putin.
May have gained with Trump in Russia.
They had to bring him back from the brink where he was going to
(40:08):
celebrate the story of Vladimir Putin as the good guy.
You know, I just agree. I just agree with Trump on this
one. This is it.
He's just like, yeah, they suck.My media is dishonest.
That's all we ask for is fairness with the media.
Thank you all very much. We appreciate it.
Thank you very much. He's going to have some off mic
(40:39):
talking here in one second, so we're going to let the the
chattering go on listen to. Him all the time, but he loves
it. He loves it then he does it
always. I never want to speak with my
friend. He's a very good player.
Golfer, you mean? I know he went to golf, but he
(40:59):
says you. You got people going.
I never want to speak with my press because they're dishonest.
These people are dishonest. Yeah.
Good job. The New York Post got a little,
like off camera audio. That's fun.
It's true suit and full of praise.
Let me read you one rather greatline here.
This is the second paragraph. This is the top of the story
from NBC News. While the Kremlin publicly
smarted, a sense of relief sweptthrough Ukraine and across
(41:23):
Europe after the summit Monday with President Donald Trump.
Zelensky hailed it as a truly significant step towards ending
the war. I I You can't hate these people
nearly enough every single time that you think you hate them the
right amount, then there's more.There's just more to it.
They're gross. That's gross.
(41:43):
The the Kremlin publicly smartedanyway, so at least we can see
where their bias is. Again, all of this stuff ends up
being like political theater. Remember yesterday we covered
the story. Texas Democrats who fled the
state began to, I'm sorry, who fled the state to block the GOP
registry. They started coming home.
Here's another one of these great stories.
This is also actually kind of a local story for us in kind of a
(42:05):
weird way. I just want to show you this,
like how silly you have to believe in an alternate reality.
Here's the alternate reality. Democratic Texas lawmaker.
This comes from CNN. By the way, the most trusted
name in news. This comes from CNN.
Democratic Texas lawmaker spendsthe night on the State House
floor after refusing GOP demand for law enforcement escort Texas
(42:30):
Democrat Nicole Collier. I think it's Collier.
Collier spending the night on the Texas House floor in protest
after fusing a Republican demandto be placed under watch.
So she's not going to, she's notgoing to go out there and have
the the law enforcement officials in the end, like, by
(42:51):
the way, that's theatrical too. Let's be realistic, she doesn't
want to have a law enforcement escort to make sure they don't
skip the state again because they did it once and they broke
quorum, which as far as I can tell, I don't know whether it's
a violation of like state law orwhether it was just a, a
violation of their, the, the conditions of their job.
It seems like it's a state law violation they previously
skipped out on to so they could avoid quorum in the special
(43:13):
session and they faced civil arrest warrants.
So it's not a criminal offense. It's a civil arrest.
And then they're like, we're going to do our theater.
You guys did theater. You ran to Illinois to go hang
out in in a gerrymandered state.Now we are going to do theater
too. And we're going to make the
police watch you when you go home so you don't skip out to
Illinois again now that you're back.
(43:36):
And she's the hero. Look at her.
Look at her being heroic. She slept on the floor for
democracy and for principal because she's so good.
I feel bad, honestly, for the law enforcement folks.
That's who I feel bad for most. I feel bad for the people that
got suckered into being part of that theatrical nonsense.
It makes me sad because I don't believe any of this stuff.
(43:58):
It's all fake. What was the overlapping graph
we used to have? Was the the fake and gay
everything kind of like overlapsthat it's happening at the state
level. It happens at the federal level.
We see it non-stop. Yeah, here's the final sort of
conclusion on the Zielinski, which, hold on, let me see it
again. What was it suited and full of
praise? How about people who surprise
(44:21):
you that are actually doing a pretty decent job?
Seems like Marco Rubio does a pretty good job.
What I don't like is the like the 180 turn.
He's gone from being Trump is, you know, the devil to Trump is,
you know, sycophantic. I'm not real crazy about that,
but he is saying honest and realthings, which is what you'd
expect in sort of a ceasefire and or peace agreement.
Both sides are going to have to make concessions.
Oh, you mean like there's going to be a compromise?
(44:42):
That seems highly reasonable. How dare you say highly
reasonable things? Let's do that.
Here we go. Marco Rubio sitting on the
couch, this couch thing where they bring in all this, the
cabinet secretaries and they allsit there where there's foreign
leaders and they do these press gaggles.
They're super weird and awkward,but this is the world we live
in. Again, that's also theatrical.
Here's Marco Rubio saying honestthings, and I don't think he's
wrong. I wish this fit into what I
(45:03):
consider to be America First. It's not bad.
It's just not America First, right?
You guys are saying it in the chat right now.
America First means you take care of our country before
anybody else's. Or you could promise ending the
Ukraine war on day one. Point to one thing, of all the
leaders in the world today, no leader is working harder to
prevent wars or ending them thanPresident Trump is right now.
(45:25):
We're trying. That's why we're talking to
Iran. That's why we're engaged with
Ukraine and Russia. It's the desire to prevent these
wars from breaking out and the end, the ones that exist
already. And, and again, I, I just think
it's tremendous for our country to be led by president who
desires to bring peace and establish peace and protect
peace. So it's hard work.
Yeah, Generally, yeah. OK, Peace is good.
(45:49):
Peace is not the wrong answer for the world.
I don't think that's the focus of what America First means,
though. I mean, it doesn't mean it to
me. Again, maybe that's what it
means to you. Maybe America First means peace
to all and to all good night. But it seems like we got some
problems. By the way, my palate cleanse
today is going to explain everything.
If you guys have been worried about money, if you've been
(46:09):
worried about finances, if you've been worried about the
way the economy runs, if you've been worried about buying a
house, if you've been worried about World Peace, if you've
been worried about emissions or the way that your business is
regulated, all of those things are answered in today's palate
cleanse. You're going to be shocked, but
we actually found I found the clip, the answer, all of it.
(46:30):
So before we do, let's finish ona sort of the reason why we're
able to be critical and we should be critical of the of the
folks that we elected. I'm one of you.
I also voted for this guy. The reason why we could be
critical of quote UN quote, our side is because the other side
is in disarray. They're completely nuts and
(46:52):
they're very upset about like, Idon't know, statistics and
history and anything honest. Here's Mary Karen Bass, she's
really mad about that. That illegal alien got arrested
because crimes being investigated are resulting in
black and brown people. It always goes down to race.
This group is still stuck in that same 2009 findings of
(47:13):
climate problems. They can't get past like race.
And America is like, OK, look, we gave you guys a reprieve.
We went back to the 1970s for a little while.
You're batshit crazy. The things you're saying are
nuts. They don't resonate with any
normal people. So keep running that you're
going to continue only to be in charge in places like
California, New York. I'm very concerned about that.
(47:34):
And not only that, I'm concernedabout the way he is rolling that
out in Washington, DC, which is essentially calling.
Essentially going after young black and brown youth in
Washington, DC, imposing A curfew, saying that if they
violate the curfew, the parents could be charged $500, saying
that the kids could be detained and arrested.
We've tried those policies before.
(47:56):
They do not work. And it's my understanding that
crime was going down in Washington, DC.
So what is the purpose of this? Yeah, the purpose of it is
obviously to just arrest and harass black and brown people.
There was this this podcast thatwent out the Jubilee podcast.
I got a couple clips of this lady sitting in my in my little
hopper. This is one that I think is
relevant today. Remember, statistics are racist.
(48:17):
The fact that black and brown people historically get arrested
by doing St. crime, particularlyin Washington, DC.
How do you know that, Kyle? Oh, I used to work criminal law
enforcement in Washington, DC. The vast majority of the people,
if it wasn't a white collar crime, if it was like
transactional drugs, if it was involved in human trafficking,
if it was involved in theft or violence or robbery, if it was
(48:38):
involved in carjackings, if it was involved in going after
armored cars or banks, Oregon, like anything that like would
result in sort of human suffering.
Almost all the, the pornography,the child pornography, all of
the, the underage girl brothels,like they were all run by black
people in DC. That's just like what the, the
population set is that's doing the crime.
(48:59):
The white people are working forthe government, They're doing
legalized crime probably. And then there's the the black
people that are doing the illegal crimes.
So that's how statistics work. I'm going to play this.
We're going to get to the big nugget, I promise you.
But there's just like there's only probably about 8 or 10
minutes worth of analysis on that tops.
So we don't need to sit there and belabor it.
I kind of want to look at the bigger picture and then we'll
zoom in. Here's a lady explaining that.
(49:20):
Basically, if you understand statistics, if you can do math
and you are a racist. So shame on many of you out
there who understand basic like statistics, one O one level
college statistics or Advanced Placement high school
statistics. You can give everyone here like
a $50,000, especially people that are in the streets who are
committing violent crimes consistently a $50,000 check.
It's not going to fix anything. It's not going to increase the
(49:41):
median household income the next10 years by 10% of 20%.
For example, we have the ChineseExclusion Act of 1882.
We prevented Chinese people fromgetting citizenship and even
entering the country. We discriminate against them and
basically put them under apartheid even here in the
United States. Yet they have the highest median
household income. How is that possible?
How come they don't complain andfeel entitled consistently to
beg for reparations and beg for this when they are killing each
(50:03):
other 90% of the time, which is the rate that black people kill
each other according to the FBI?Oh, young Matt.
Yet white people are the oppressors.
I'm not sure where your education came from, but they
lied to you. Stats don't lie though.
Statistics lie all the time, so let's start there.
Particularly when the statisticsare coming from the sources that
gain from the statistics being shown a different way.
(50:25):
So if you're going to start yourargument on stats don't lie,
you've already lost the argument.
They lie. They lie all the time. 1
Comparing Chinese people who areimmigrants that made a choice to
come to the United States and comparing the continued effort
of black people to ground themselves in a nation that
continues to make impediments for them to show and live and
(50:46):
exist in their true citizenship is a false equivalency.
I don't believe that happens at all.
What? What?
No one here is in, Are you? Acting right now.
Do you really? I'm telling.
The truth, There's no, there's no systemic racism that I've
experienced here in America. What system is racist?
I think the only racism we've actually seen recently, systemic
racism. What we've seen is the
application of systemic racism against white people.
The University of Western Washington, for example, has
(51:07):
been trying to segregate dormitories using black only
dormitories because black peoplefeel safer amongst each other,
but they're more likely to kill each other than white people
ever, ever to kill them. That's just the truth.
You have King Vaughn rapping about killing other black men.
Why should I think that the white man is the oppressor when
black men are more likely to kill me?
God, this is scary. You need to think about me as
(51:28):
your Mama. Do not talk to me in that
fashion. I may go back and finish that
because there's a couple more seconds on that.
How awful is that? She's like, are you acting right
now while she's wearing a flippin cartoon jacket And like,
she looks like an action figure from some sort of like, retarded
90s, you know, woke nonsense. What is that she's doing?
(51:50):
She's doing in living color as ahuman, like she's a one person
human color act. And then you got this kid who's
like, oh, I'm just going to share with you facts.
Here's a real problem. And so she's like, let me just
appeal to authority. Let me assume that you don't
know who your mother is. So I'm going to pretend to be
that person. It's awful.
She's a awful rotten human beingby the way.
She gets owned by everybody. Everybody is smarter than this
(52:11):
woman. She says words articulately and
knows nothing kind of Karen Bassstyle.
That's the stuff that we see. Again, this why you have a lot
of room right now to demand everything of your government.
There's no excuse for people that are conservative and for
people that are generally speaking right leaning not to
pressure their own group becauseall the hits coming from the
outside can only lead to better outcomes because the left side
(52:33):
of the coin, it's radically disorganized.
As we covered yesterday, CNN is out there polling and saying
historical lows for Democrat party, 30% underwater when it
comes to polling on their their favorability rating.
They just don't have a lead candidate.
They don't have a leader of the party.
They don't know who's who. They're so confused.
All right, let me listen to thisdipshit for one more.
Sorry I can't help it. So let's check that now.
(52:55):
OK, so on the basic level, we have to understand the systemic
racism is grounded in the realities that black people have
not been considered an equal human being in this country
since its onset. So there's simply no way to make
the argument that there isn't systemic racism.
And we have seen in very clear ways the system operate in or in
an organically racist way. Do not cut me off.
(53:18):
Right, I'm cutting her off. So just remember the the
statistic, the systemic reality of the institutional racism has
been begun since the onset of this country's founding, which
is never once recognized. 0 facts laid out.
No, no historical ordinances, noreferences to anything other
than her feelings, which are that black people need
(53:39):
reparations. That was the argument of that
entire program, by the way. So that's why you got lots of
room. You got unlimited room to
operate. That's why we need to have real
discussions from really articulate people that ignore
that sort of noise. I just want you to know that
it's out there. People are talking about that.
That's the churn. That's the laser pointer for the
left. They're like, look, we're going
to own this kid. He's talking about statistics.
(54:00):
He's a, he's a black guy. He's a Uncle Tom because he said
that black people kill black people.
Fact Check. True.
That's what happens, by the way.White people kill white people,
Fact Check. That's true too.
People who look like you, peoplewho live like you, people who
live around you are the most likely to engage in crime
against you. The overlap of other racial
groups is disproportionate when you talk about black over into
(54:20):
white, Hispanic, Asian, whatever.
But it's still not the majority of crime that any group
experiences. They mostly experience crime
from their own racial group and or their own socio economic
group. That's just because that's who
we're around. That's what that reminds me of
that the, the movie 7. You remember who?
How do we covet? How do we begin to covet?
That wasn't 7, was it? No, that was Hannibal Lecter
(54:41):
teaching us from Silence of the Lambs.
I actually have that over on thewall.
Look, boom, Silence of the Lambson the wall.
How do we begin to covet? It's the things we see every
day. And what do you see every day?
The people that look like you, that live like you and so on.
All right, let's do a big nugget.
Can we do a big nugget? Hold on, do I have a?
Big nugget. There's the big nugget.
Big nugget. All right, let's this just
(55:01):
happened yesterday. Let's get some analysis.
Let's get some analysis because for the first time in American
history, we are now experiencinga American state.
Missouri's attorney general is stepping down from a state
elected office, the highest law enforcement office in the state
of Missouri, to become the Co deputy director of the FBI.
(55:24):
The 1st in the history of the FBI.
Never have there been two deputydirectors.
Why would that be? Why do we need a code deputy
director? Maybe because the current deputy
director dispatched Dan. What do?
What do? My buddies called him Deputy
dispatch. He's struggling, man.
He's having a hard time. Do you want evidence?
(55:44):
I'll give you evidence. I gave up everything for this.
I mean, you know, my my wife is struggling and I'm not a victim.
I'm not Jim Comedy. It's fine.
I did this and I'm proud I did it.
But if you think we're there fortea and crumpets, well, I mean,
cash is there all day. We share it.
Our offices are linked. He turns on the faucet.
I hear it. He's there at he gets in like
(56:05):
6:00 in the morning. He doesn't leave till 7:00 at
night. You know, I'm in there at 7:30
in the morning. I, you know, he uses the gym.
I work out in my apartment, but I stare at these four walls all
day in DC, you know, by myself. Divorced from my wife, not
divorced, but I mean separated. Divorced.
And it's hard. I mean, you know, we love each
other and it's hard to be a part, but you're doing some
great work. But you're doing you're really
(56:27):
good. We're Fox News and our job is to
to fluff it up. Here's the deal.
For those of you who actually know about giving up everything
for something, can we can we have a little honest discussion
about that and why that why thatlittle line was so offensive?
How about all of you that were in the military?
Any of you ever give up everything, like maybe the birth
of your first child because you were serving our government, you
were trying to protect American interests, whether or not it was
(56:48):
justified? Maybe you have a different
thought about what that looked like at the like today.
But you showed up in good faith.You were told go over and do
something. So you did.
And you went somewhere where youdidn't get to see your family.
You missed a wedding anniversary, you missed a
birthday of a spouse. Some of you lost marriages over
this stuff. Anybody ever go over there and
lose like a body part or a functionality or maybe you were
never the same because the things that you saw that were
(57:10):
that were just atrocious and you, you couldn't fathom them
existing in the America where that Lady with a stupid color
jacket lived. Do you ever give up everything?
Did you ever give up anything? How about you gave up this thing
where you used to make millions of dollars, now you still make
millions of dollars, but it's inyour wife's name and you live in
a $20,000 a month apartment witha really nice gym and you go to
(57:31):
work in a job that pays you 1/4 of $1,000,000 a year that you
chose to go into. What about that?
Because that's where deputy today ends at all right?
Why are we getting a code deputydirector of the FBI?
Let me give you it real simply. Some of you do not know this,
but Bailey, hold on. I think I've got a, an article
here. OK, Andrew Bailey was one of the
(57:53):
top contenders, maybe the top 2 contenders between him and Cash
in being named FBI director backin December, January, whenever
they were making that decision. Now in no small part due to me
and the other FBI guys that are former FBI guys, we ran a very
aggressive PR campaign asking for Cash Patel to be put in.
Why would you do that, especially considering my my
(58:14):
recent criticism? Well, I had the belief that Cash
actually understood the problem because he was asking people who
did understand the problem what it was.
We had a belief that he was going to go in there and make
changes, not jump in and get really excited about having a
private jet and immediately likesell out the principles that we
had. I don't think that Dan Bongino
sold out anything. I think Dan Bongino got snowed
by an organization that professionally snows people,
(58:37):
rolls them, bubble wraps them. It doesn't matter what you call
it. So what we're seeing right now
is a soft landing for Dan Bongino to leave the FBI.
As I predicted previously, I told you he'd be out by the end
of the year, probably before Christmas.
Maybe now, based on what I'm seeing, he might be out in the
next like 30 days, you know, 60 days.
Whatever it is that makes peopleforget about the fact that they
have two deputy directors, whichhas never been done.
(58:58):
The fact that we have a deputy director who has a Frippin A20
man security detail despite carrying his own badge and gun,
which is silly. They're going to phase him out.
So he's going to go back to his old life within the year, within
the end of this year. 2025 S started and finished in this
year. But I think the bigger play is
we showed you that Cash Patel doesn't know what's going on in
(59:21):
his own agency. He just gave out an award to an
HRT guy who was credibly accusedof shooting in an unauthorized
law enforcement fashion was found like with a hung jury that
wasn't able to convict him. And they just gave him an award
for valor for shooting at a guy in a truck.
This is the, the Bundy, the, youknow, the Wilderness Center
takeover situation. Cash has been totally rolled up
(59:43):
by HRT. We have credible reports that
Cash Patel, the FBI director, isstoring his personally owned
guns, firearms. I got no problem with having
them. He's storing them with HRT in
their locker. HRT is the hostage rescue team
that's on Quantico, Virginia. They've been taking him out in
the hot in the, the helicopter. They've been showing him the
selections. They've been taking him out
there. He did a hype video trying to
recruit these guys, throwing flashbangs and doing cool guy
(01:00:05):
shit. So you've got a guy that
basically bought 100% into the image of being the FBI director
without actually doing any of the work that we said.
And I think one of the final straws had to have been when
Donald Trump heard from a memberof his administration through me
that the guy who who was runningthe case resulting in his wife's
underwear drawer getting flippedover and rifled through by
(01:00:27):
federal agents was now flying the plane of the FBI director.
And the FBI director didn't evenknow it.
If you don't know who the peopleare in your own agency as the
director, are you even doing that job?
And we know that they don't knowwhat's happening around them
because they told us. They went on Fox.
And I'm going to show you. This is my evidence that these
guys are getting fed whatever itis that the FBI wants them to
(01:00:50):
know, see or do. When you watch this clip, I want
you to think one question in your head.
Who is putting this stuff on your desk?
And did you ask for it? Because that's not what I hear.
To that too, because what the director saying is right.
You got to remember, we come in in the morning.
There's a portfolio of 100 level10 items.
If it's a level 9, which is a pretty big freaking deal,
(01:01:12):
someone else fixed it. The only thing that gets to my
desk or his is a level 10. That's the entire day.
Look at his schedule. Any given day.
I'll show you the palm card I have.
It is filled from 7:30 to he leaves seven at night, 6:30 at
night. It it's filled all day.
We just can't focus on one thing.
You want New York to go boom, DCto go boom?
(01:01:33):
You want an OC organization to go hack into some cyber network
and crack all the Fox News's holdings?
We're dealing with all that stuff, too.
Everything's a priority. Everything's a priority.
This is one of many things we did.
It's not an excuse, it's just reality.
That's an excuse. That's what that's called.
What you're looking at. There is someone who believes
what the people told him. Did he ask for all those
(01:01:54):
meetings all day long? No.
Do we know from folks inside theBureau that he's miserable doing
those meetings and he doesn't like them?
Yeah, he's the number two in theFBI who called that meeting.
Why are you there? Well, you're told because if you
don't show up to the meeting andlisten, then something's going
to go boom. But do you think that the deputy
director of the FBI, which is a managerial position, has
(01:02:16):
anything to do with whether or not a case agent is doing their
job in the field 13 levels belowin the bureaucratic system?
No, they don't. So all they're doing is they're
keeping you run around and chasing.
And they've been doing it to Danvery effectively.
Dan and and Andrew Bailey will have the same problem.
Neither one of them are Bureau insiders.
But here's what I think the playis.
So I'm going to share this real quickly.
(01:02:37):
Dan needs a soft out. He's going to quote UN quote,
cross train in the Army. And my buddy was saying they
call it side saddling. There's a lot of different names
for it. Training your replacement,
right? You bring somebody in, you get
them up to speed with what you're doing.
I hope that Bailey is able to immediately hire real Steve
friend. We won't have him on friendly
Fridays anymore. That would be fine with me.
He needs Steve as a special governmental employee to come in
(01:02:59):
and be a bullshit filter for himbecause all of this stuff level
10s all over your desk. New York's going to go boom with
a deputy director doesn't sit there, fail.
That's a failure, Dan back wherehe belongs.
Dan's not capable of doing that job.
Neither is Andrew Bailey, by theway.
He doesn't know the FBI from theinside.
It takes a lot of work to do that.
It takes decades. I don't have that experience.
I spent six years in the FBI andfive of them in Washington, DC.
(01:03:21):
I'm not the guy for that job. Dan is definitely not the guy
for that job. Talking about in front of a
microphone is not the same as being able to go in and know
what the nuts and bolts are of the organization.
So let's be very fair about that.
I think he's miserable. I hope he goes back to his wife.
I hope he gets laid. I hope that his life is better.
I hope that he goes back to partying and coming in on his
podcast on Mondays and telling you how he got drunk over the
weekend. That'd be great.
Dan needs to leave for Dan, but also for America.
(01:03:44):
Andrew Bailey needs to learn a little bit about the FBI, the
culture, see what the rot is. And then Cash Patel needs to go.
And I think that's what we're seeing here.
Now, I, I can't give you 100%, but I would say that I am
moderately confident that Cash Patel's days are numbered
because he screwed up and he screwed up in a big way and
we're not done exposing the screw ups.
He doesn't know who it is that works inside the FBI.
(01:04:05):
He doesn't know who's there. And I'm constantly going to
embarrass these people by pointing out who it is.
There's a reason why I'm being told that they listen to this
show to find out who the problems are so they can try to
go fix it before it gets too bigon the national news.
And our national news is just Twitter.
It's not even that much. It's like 3 million people saw a
story. Boom.
The person that needs to come inis a retired someone who is not
(01:04:26):
a conservative, not a leftist, but a constitutionalist who
understands what the FBI is, whyit's wrong right now and how to
do it right. I made a recommendation of that
guy. You guys can go watch a couple
interviews with him. I brought him on the podcast.
His name's Kurt Suzdak. Is he the best option?
Maybe not. He is an option.
He understands the problem, and he also understands that the FBI
(01:04:47):
is malleable. And you can make it suck or you
can make it great. And the FBI is constantly
screwing up and constantly able to come back to center and not
suck for a little while. They need to take their lumps.
They need to correct the problems.
They need to get out of the Intel business.
They need to get rid of these bad actors, many of whom are
still there. You need to get rid of the
special assistants and the people that were doing Chris
Ray's biddings that were stashedall around the FBI.
(01:05:11):
You need to make sure they all go away.
And it would help if you had somebody who was a prior
whistleblower, who prior said noand went up against head to
(01:05:32):
That's the way you should do it.That's what they should have
done in the 1st place. And by the way, Kurt Zuzdak was
in Washington, DC when Donald Trump was inaugurated because
Cash Patel asked him to go be down there.
He was waiting on standby and then he got ghosted.
And then he drove up and froze his ass off because his his old
Jeep didn't work. And he told me he went back up
to Connecticut and he's just sitting around and now he's just
(01:05:54):
watching this chaos play out. We're watching chaos because
these guys chose to engage in hubris.
Bongino said yes when he should have said no.
If they'd asked Dan Bongino to step into the Secret Service, it
probably would have been too biga job, but that would have been
fine. He could have at least gone to
an agency that he knows the language, the culture, the way
that it works, the org chart, the structure, the types of lies
(01:06:15):
that people sell. He's still got people that would
be friendly to him in that agency.
The FBI is dead set and was deadset against going after this
guy. They were never going to let him
be successful. And that's why he's got 100
level 10 things on his desk. And God forbid he say no, Dan
just hasn't been there long enough to know that they do that
to you for years. They push the red button, they
(01:06:36):
act like it's all over. And if something, if something
that you do is not what they want, then you're going to be
the one responsible for the next911.
That's just how it works. And someday he'll realize that
that wasn't the case. And my hope is, is that Andrew
Bailey goes in there and realizes that and then edges out
the current director. And then they bring in a real
deputy, someone from the Bureau who wants to see it reformed,
(01:06:56):
who wants to see it work properly.
If we can't get rid of it and wecan't, then that's the only
answer that's going to make any sense.
That's the big nugget for you guys.
What does it look? Like.
That's the big nugget. I got to turn the volume up on
that. I think in any case, it's sad
because what you saw was a guy who basically gave in to his
pride. I'm sure he's absolutely
miserable and he doesn't know how to do the thing he's doing.
(01:07:17):
And he was too proud to say I can't be that guy.
I don't know who asked Dan to dothis, by the way.
That seems to be the the generalconsensus inside the
administration. Like no one knows how Dan
Bongino got that job. Why you would choose a former
Secret Service guy who's been out of government for 13 or 14
years to step into a government agency he's never worked in, let
alone run. That's a terrible decision.
Everything about it is bad. But that's the one thing that we
(01:07:39):
can all kind of agree on with Trump's issue.
He often times chooses people poorly, he does personnel
problems that nobody seems to understand from the outside and
it looks so obvious for those ofus looking in.
Remember it was his Achilles heel in 1.0.
It was the thing that probably brought him down in the 1.0 he
(01:07:59):
had set. He had what sessions?
You had Bill Barr, you had comedy there in the 1st place,
you got rid of him and you endedup with Ray.
You're not hearing anybody cry about arresting Ray, are you?
Why? He's the most recent guy.
He's the one that's inside the statue of limitations.
He's the one that prolonged the theoretical conspiracy that we
(01:08:21):
hear people talking about. Remember the thing that shocked
Dan Bongino to his core? What was that?
What was that nonsense? Because I never heard about it
again? Remember the wave of
transparency we were going to get of what happened on January
6th? Where the hell is that?
Where's the pipe bomber? None of these guys know how to
go out there and make a demand and then make it happen and let
them know either you do the job or you're going to be removed
for insubordination. That needed to happen right
(01:08:43):
away, but they came in and touched it soft, and now they're
getting handled. It's the same problem that law
enforcement officers will face. Anybody who's been in law
enforcement knows what I'm talking about.
You touch a subject soft, you give them like an idea that they
are going to be victorious in a conflict with you.
Physical or intellectual, doesn't really matter.
You show that you don't have thetenacity to do what needs to be
(01:09:04):
done. And then they run that
interaction from then on out. And that's how you end up
telling someone, put the gun down, put the gun down, put the
gun down, put the gun down, put the gun down, put it down, man,
pump, put the gun down. And then you get stabbed because
you didn't come in there hard and just be like, if you don't
put the gun down, I'm going to kill you.
OK? You've asked him.
Then you tell him, gun down. The third thing is you make him,
you make him put the gun down byshooting him because that's what
(01:09:25):
has to happen. Whatever.
And it shouldn't be a gun, by the way.
It should be a knife, whatever how long and short is.
If you don't touch something right away with a firm grip and
let them know that you are now taking the reins.
You've all done this with a dog.Probably go to a dog and be
gentle with it and then try to like take control.
You ever see women do that in the park?
It's really embarrassing. You don't control the dog is
wagging you. It runs you.
(01:09:46):
Because it assessed you as weak.The FBI assessed both of these
men as weak. One of them was easily played.
Here's a jet. Here's a slushy machine.
Take your bottles of booze. Fly out to Las Vegas.
Sleep in party. Have a great time.
We're happy to be here. We're here for you.
Put your guns in our locker. Come and hang out with us.
Here's a badge. Here's a freaking gun.
Here's some cool guy shirts. Here's like some freaking some
operator clothes. You're one of us like you're
(01:10:08):
you're in man. Cash always wanted to be one of
the cool kids. Dan wanted to do a good job by
bad, but he just doesn't know how to do it.
It's not his fault. He's not, he's just not
qualified for that job. Neither am I Neither are you, by
the way, people who are listening to this for the most
part, if you think you're the right deputy because you have
the years of experience and and the time in there in the FBI.
If you were like AGS 14, maybe AGS 15 and you got you got run
(01:10:33):
out of that agency for doing theright thing.
Somebody asked you to do something illegal and more or
unethical and you said no and that was the end of your career.
Like you're the right guy maybe.OK, let me know if somebody else
wants to take that job. I'll float that name up there to
somebody. I don't know if they're
listening, but hopefully we see Andrew Bailey step in.
So that's the that's the like the next six months, I think.
And we, I don't know how fast itgoes, but we'll see it happens
(01:10:54):
soon. All right, I told you I would
play you everything and I would explain all the things and all
the problems and I will do that for you very shortly.
Can I tell you guys that we haveAPO box?
Some of you guys, I don't know. I have a clock on that.
We don't need a clock, that's for our call and show.
If you guys ever want to send something to the show.
Sometimes you guys want to send me like postcards or a letter or
maybe you're afraid of the FBI reading your emails or
something. You can send me to the PO Box
which is 9073 W State Highway 29, Suite 110, Box 5 O 9,
(01:11:18):
Liberty Hill, TX 78642. If you didn't see that, go to
spotifykyleseraphinshow.com. Very easy to do it.
Make sure you guys are liking the program.
Make sure you're sharing it withyour friends.
Especially that last long analysis.
If you think that's not common for people to hear, let's do a,
let's do a breakdown to all the things, all the things broken
down and understood. Here it is.
South Park gives it to us. This is what you've been missing
(01:11:39):
out on in the economy. And so why is our economy
failing us? Because the government kept
interest rates too low for too long.
The government took our economy for granted and now we are all
here paying the price. How long will we sit and watch
our economy fall? And so I say to you, do not
listen to the Wall Street brokers, for they are the ones
(01:12:01):
who put us in this situation, fat cats with corporate greed.
They are the ones who knowingly drove us down this pathway of.
You they must have gone somewhere.
The answer is obvious, my friends.
It is the Jews, covetous Jews who have taken all our money and
hold it for themselves, hidden all the cash in some secret Jew
cave that they built, probably back in the early 60s.
(01:12:22):
It is the Jews my. Friend casting all different
kinds of blame from person to person.
But the fault lies in all of you.
You who bought that $300,000 house when you only had 20,000
to put down. You who bought that third car,
even the only two people in yourhome drive.
It is time to stop pointing fingers.
The finger pointing gets us nowhere, Steve.
(01:12:45):
We have mocked our economy and now the economy has cast its
vengeance upon us all. He's right.
This is the first guy that actually makes sense.
Yeah, it is an angry and unforgiving economy.
To repent, we must stop frivolous spending.
Instead of paying for cable, letus watch clouds.
Instead of buying clothes, wear but sheets from thine beds.
(01:13:08):
Cut spending to only the bare essentials, Water and bread and
margaritas. Yay.
That's it. You guys heard it.
You're down to water and bread and margaritas.
You saw Ryan Maddow make a little guest appearance there
talking about the covetous Jews hiding all the money in the Jew
(01:13:29):
cave. South Park is so good.
Everybody's retarded. That's what that's what that's
what I took away from that, thatclip.
And people are willing to listento anybody that says things in a
clean, clear, articulate voice. Whether or not they make any bit
of sense is irrelevant because they sounded so confident,
didn't they? Yes, they did.
They were saying my opinion and their voice.
(01:13:50):
And that's what I want to hear. That's what we try not to do
here. So many of you will hear not
your opinion out of not your voice.
And if that challenges you, OK, that's what we're here about.
Thanks for listening to it. Please share it with a friend if
you have not. Find somebody who sort of like
generally agrees with you but doesn't agree on everything and
just be like, hey, you want to be challenged every once in a
while instead of just hearing your own thoughts like
regurgitated and burped back at you.
(01:14:11):
Yeah. Check out the Kyle Seraphin
show. Kyle seraphinshow.com will take
you right to Spotify easy and and fun.
Thanks for being with me today. I'm going to send you guys that
are listening over on Rumble to the American Radicals podcast.
I'll encourage you over on X Check out at Amradpod for my
friends over there. And this week is just getting
started. So let's see what happens on
this weird Wednesday coming up. Have a great Tuesday.
Whatever's left of it. God bless you.
(01:14:33):
See you soon. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter,Truth Social and Instagram at
Kyle Seraphin.