Episode 6 of the Telcom Corner Cafe Podcast covering Inspection 06-30-2023

Episode 6 of the Telcom Corner Café Podcast discusses Inspection.

Inspection remains both a hot topic and a very controversial topic in our industry. What are you cleaning, what materials are you using to achieve the desired effect, what’s your definition of acceptable verses the lead tech, project manager or the expectations of the customer that you are doing the work for, and surprisingly there is both a very significantly different view and expectations, as well as very little commonality between people, regarding the parameters of what’s acceptable or what’s unacceptable.

Let’s begin with, what are you inspecting? Are you inspecting multimode connectors or single mode connectors. Why is this even a question? There are 3 widely unknown, or not even considered practices that are at the center of inconsistencies regarding inspection practices, expectations and results desired.

#1. What you use to clean with, will have a significant effect on what see, how clean it actually is, what will or will not be left behind, and the effects that it will or will not have on the network.

For instance, isopropyl alcohol is no longer recommended to clean connector end-faces with due to the potential for residue that it could leave behind, which if happens will cause highly reflective (for more on reflectivity, cleaning materials and connectors, check put episodes 3, 4 and 5 of this podcast)                                            

#2. Scope power. I have been a part of, have walked by, and been within ear shots of many discussions and heated debates that this is a non-issue. Unfortunately, that is 100% incorrect. Scope power matters a lot. Why, because to much magnification allows the inspecting individual to see to much. That must sound odd to have heard me say see too much, wouldn’t one want to see everything, kind of. I am going to use an equally odd comparison to significantly move the needle on this particular topic.

If you have ever heard the term overkill, you have just successfully connected why too much magnification is not good, and why one does not want to see everything or to much. It’s over the top, or if preferred excessive, unneeded, unnecessary and will cause far more problems than it will ever prevent or solve.

What do I mean by this. Drifting all the way back to the 80’s for a moment, the reason that 200x or lower magnification scopes were specified for multimode connector inspection, was the determination from years of research by Bell Labs that is was the maximum amount of magnification necessary to adequately inspect the end-face of multimode connectors base on inspection criteria, meaning is it a good or bad polish, where is the damage located? What kind of damage is there and risks or impacts that is poses or could cause.

There cannot be any damage in the core or in the inner cladding region right next to the core, as it may spread into the core due coupling and decoupling of the connectors involved.

Scratches, pits, and over-polishing have long been considered non-issues in multimode connector inspection, because multimode systems remain to date unconcerned about and unaffected by reflectivity issues (which was a big discussion in episodes 3, 4 & 5) Therefore, magnification greater than 200 X significantly enhances the potential for obsessiveness, that quickly creates problem’s because one goes to far, too fast, and before they realize it, a problem that was not going to be an issue previously, is now indeed a problem, whereas if it had been left alone, it would not have caused any network impacts.

However, this is not the case in the single mode environment. It’s an entirely different process when working with single mode. Instead of having the benefit of looking at core sizes of 62.5um or 50 um that are either 40% or 50% of the entire 125um surface of the glass within the ferrule end-face of the connector one is inspecting, in single mode o