August 15, 2025 • 58 mins
In this episode I discuss the Musk vs Trump feud, and how it may ultimately just be a distraction. I then focus on Kash Patel's recent appearance on Joe Rogan. Kash is visibly uncomfortable and does his best to avoid giving any real answers as Joe applies the pleasure regarding the Epstein Files. Russia launches the biggest attack against Ukraine to date, and I address the Cold World War 3 we are in.
Support:
https://buymeacoffee.com/worldablaze
Email: worldablaze@fontesmedia.com
Web: https://www.worldablazepodcast.com/
X: https://x.com/fontesablaze
Threads:https://www.threads.net/@worldablazewithgeorgefontes
FB: https://www.facebook.com/worldablazewithgeorgefontes
Please like, follow, and share the show!!!!
Support:
https://buymeacoffee.com/worldablaze
Email: worldablaze@fontesmedia.com
Web: https://www.worldablazepodcast.com/
X: https://x.com/fontesablaze
Threads:https://www.threads.net/@worldablazewithgeorgefontes
FB: https://www.facebook.com/worldablazewithgeorgefontes
Please like, follow, and share the show!!!!
Support:
https://buymeacoffee.com/worldablaze
Email: worldablaze@fontesmedia.com
Web: https://www.worldablazepodcast.com/
X: https://x.com/fontesablaze
Threads:https://www.threads.net/@worldablazewithgeorgefontes
FB: https://www.facebook.com/worldablazewithgeorgefontes
Please like, follow, and share the show!!!!
Support:
https://buymeacoffee.com/worldablaze
Email: worldablaze@fontesmedia.com
Web: https://www.worldablazepodcast.com/
X: https://x.com/fontesablaze
Threads:https://www.threads.net/@worldablazewithgeorgefontes
FB: https://www.facebook.com/worldablazewithgeorgefontes
Please like, follow, and share the show!!!!
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Take my beney like, can you just.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
Let me in my way? Welcome world to bladies, listeners.
I'm back in action. I took a little bit of
time off, and I very much apologize to everybody who
listens to the show supports the show. Sorry. Look, I
want to make it very clear everybody. I love the
(00:30):
fact that you all listen to me and support me,
but I also need you to know this isn't my
full time job. My other business took my attention. It
was a very busy period, and again I apologize for
not getting this episode out. I know it's been a
few weeks, but I will have to say in my defense,
those last few weeks I was off. There really wasn't
much going on. And here I am ready to go.
(00:51):
I am recording this Saturday, June seventh. It is four
forty five pm here on the West coast of the
United States of America, and I have to tell you
that I'm glad I waited because this past week has
man it made up for it, and there's a lot
to talk about, and I will not be able to
get to all of it, but I'm going to try
to hit some bullet points here, all right. Also, I
(01:16):
want everybody to know that I have been retooling and
working with my brother on the other show that I
co host with him, Random Thoughts with Manuel and George.
Now we have taken that show and we have focused
on video episodes primarily. We are on YouTube, We are
on Rumble, and we are now on pod Nation. So
(01:37):
pod Nation has their own Roku app and we're part
of that community. And so if you have a Roku player,
you could download the pod Nation TV app and you'll
see a picture of a big alien on there. When
you search for it, you'll see a pop up download
that you'll be able to see those Random Thoughts with
Manual and George episodes on the pod Nation TV app
on Roku, and you'll also be able to see other
(02:00):
podcasters that are a part of that community and that network.
So go ahead and give pod Nation some support. If
you have a big TV with Roku, you can go
ahead and use the pod Nation app to watch those episodes.
And as far as World the Blaze is concerned, I
am not going anywhere, and I want to go ahead
and give people an update. Listen, I promise you video
it's coming. I'm not gonna do my solo episodes or
(02:22):
my solo hosted episodes on video, because I just don't
know if it works. I feel more comfortable doing the
solo episodes and audio. Now that being said, I promise
that I'll have more guests, and I do. They are booked,
they're coming up here. Actually this month I will start
recording those episodes. Those episodes, the guest episodes, I plan
(02:43):
on having those moving forward. Those will be released in video.
I feel that the interaction between two people definitely has
to be seen. It allows for better context as you're
able to see people's facial expressions and the reactions, and
those will absolutely be our Rumble YouTube and they will
(03:03):
be on pod Nation. I'll go a heading uploads on
the pod Nation TV app as well. And I have
to say that I have to give everyone who's supported
the show. There's countries that have stepped up and have
been listening to me and their percentages of downloads have
gone up, So thank you very much to the UK
as always, thank you Iceland for supporting and Australia has
(03:28):
you know, they've been increasing their numbers. So Australia, thank
you very much for listening to this show. And of
course we have New Zealand who's always been a strong supporter,
and America is you know, the bulk of where everything
comes from in the USA. But I really have to
tip my hat to those nations out there who continue
to support, not just support, but seem to be growing
in size as far as the audience. So thank you
(03:48):
very much to all of you out there. Special shout
out to the Duchess of New Jersey. Duchess, thank you
very much for all your comments, your interactions, not just
on the show here, not just worldplay, but I have
seen your comments interactions on random Thoughts with Manuel George too,
So thank you very much, Duchess, and thanks to everybody
(04:08):
who has been leaving comments on Spotify. Now I'm going
to say this right now, I don't ask for much.
If you like the show and you support the show,
support me by spreading the word. Let everybody else know
about World of Blaze with George Fonts and by all means,
leave a five star review and whatever damn podcast app
you like to use. And outside of that, if you
(04:30):
have time, sure leave a commoner review and I do
respond to those. Now with that out of the way,
and I'm sure you're all thinking George's been long enough.
Get to the damn episode. I'm getting there, and I'm
just going to pull the band aid off. Let's talk
about Trump versus Elon. What in the hell is going
on here? Listen this on the surface. A lot of
(04:51):
people are reading this on the surface. And I've always
said a lot of people live on the surface of information.
Now these guys are airing their grievances out in public.
Elon's mad at Trump. Trump's mad at Elon. Why is
Elon mad at Trump? Well, it sounds like Elon was
really upset because of all the work he put into DOGE,
(05:12):
everything he did to uncover fraud and waste, all the
recommendations he made, and when it comes to this big,
beautiful bill, Elon is vehemently against it because there's not
enough cuts. A lot of the work that Elon did
isn't even included. A lot of the DOGE cuts aren't
even a part of it. And on the surface, you know,
(05:33):
this bill looks good. You know he look no tax
on tips, more tax cuts, et cetera. But even those
provisions they expire in twenty twenty eight. And we all
know that every sitting president who gives an executive order
or you know, was able to pass things that they
want to. Bill usually gets repealed when the new president
(05:54):
comes in, especially if it's an opposing party. Now, we
can hope that after the Trump administration, after this, after
Trump's last presidential term here is over, we can only
hope that there might be another conservative or honestly, what
I would like to see is a centrist. I want
someone down the middle. You know, I don't want another
far left far right type of situation. I want someone
down the middle. But I would hope that some of
(06:15):
the executive orders and policies that were put into place continue,
absolutely continue, because there are some good things that Trump
has done. There are some questionable things. There are definitely
a lot of things that Trump did that upset a
lot of people. Of course we knew that would happen.
But let's get back to this disagreement between Elon and Trump,
(06:36):
which really comes down to this big, beautiful bill. Now, again,
this looks nice and tasty, It looks delicious. You want
to sink your teeth into it. The damn thing is
wrapped in crispy bacon. But the problem is is that
damn bacon is wrapped around a big chunk of fat,
a big stick of lard. And that's the issue that
(06:57):
Elon has. There's a lot in there that actually may
add to the debt. The other thing that is ridiculous
is the debt ceiling is all proposed to be raised
even more so instead of really addressing the budget and
taking care of the spending, there's gonna be more spending,
and not just spending. We're also gonna raise the debt
(07:18):
ceiling to about five trillion, because you know, the best
way to budget you're spending right, to rain you're spending
in is to make it look like you're not even
hitting your budget limit anyway, right, Like, hey, look, my
budget's five thousand, I'm spending ten thousand. While I know
how to fix that. I'm gonna make the new budget
(07:39):
limit twenty thousand, so now I can spend my ten thousand.
You know what happens they spend the twenty. In fact,
they'll go ahead and spend the fifty and they'll be like, well,
you know what, I know this looks bad, but next year,
next year, our spending limit is now one hundred thousand.
And that's the game the government has been playing for many,
many years. So Elon is upset at Trump. Elon feels used,
(08:00):
Elon feels unappreciated, And this whole thing is being played
up in real time on social media, primarily X and
True social Now, let's get a little more insight into
the bill.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
I have.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
I have a Congressman Chip Roy here of Texas. Here's
a little bit about what he thinks of this bill.
Speaker 4 (08:22):
Now, the big beautiful bill, let's go through it. The
bill is what I would call the good, the bad,
and the ugly, because that's the truth. And I'm not
going to get into personalities and squabbles and back and forth.
The President is right that we need to move a
bill through here with tax cuts and spending restraint so
that he can get the agenda done that he campaigned on.
(08:43):
He's one hundred percent right, and we should do that.
Elon is right that this bill doesn't cut enough. That's
the truth. Two things can be true at the same time.
And the barriers actually achieving the greatness of moving the
big beautiful bill through that would achieve the President's agenda
and achieving what Elon is rightly saying, which is that
(09:05):
we should cut more. The barrier is right here in
this chamber. It's right over there in the Senate. People
unwilling to face their constituents and tell them the truth. Well,
I'm going to try to sit here on the floor
and tell the truth. I had to hold my nose
to vote for this bill two weeks ago, off the
House floor to the Senate. Why it does not cut
enough and it's not even close to cutting enough. My
(09:28):
colleagues say, oh, but Chip, it's the biggest spending decrease
in history. Let's be very clear. It is a reduction
in future increases of about one point six trillion dollars. Yes,
that is the biggest amount ever. But guess what. We
have sizeably more debt and sizeably more spending than ever,
(09:49):
So of course it should be, but it should be more.
One point six trillion dollars in cuts or future reductions
is really about one hundred and sixty billion dollars a
year ten years. That's the truth. The truth is our
whole budget has grown from about three point six trillion
a decade ago to seven point two trillion. Now it's doubled,
(10:13):
and everybody wants to applaud themselves for one hundred and
sixty billion dollars of reductions and increases.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
Well, that doesn't sound like a very good budget. Doesn't
sound like a very good proposal or proposals that are
included in this bill. Seems like increased spending is yet
again the aim of the government and the debt ceiling
is to be kicked down the road and raised once again.
(10:39):
And you know, Triperway is not the only one. Here's
Ran Paul. Here's a little clip of what he thinks.
Speaker 5 (10:45):
Here.
Speaker 6 (10:46):
The House bill is going to add about four trillion
to the debt ceiling. The Senate bill adds five trillion.
There's nothing fiscally conservative about expanding the debt ceiling more
than we've ever done.
Speaker 2 (10:58):
It, right, there is nothing fiscally conservative about expanding or
raising the debts something whatsoever. I mean, if we're adding
about four to five trillion and we're gonna move the
goalpost of the debts thing too about five in fact,
may even be seven, how is that fiscally responsible for
the United States of America. Now, Trump's gonna claim, Look,
we're bringing in a lot of money, regardless, these tariffs
(11:21):
are are bringing in billions, billions, maybe even trillions of dollars.
But is it enough to keep up with the spending,
is it? And now you got a little bit of
insight as to why Elon Musk is pissed off. So
they've been arguing, and I'm gonna go through a couple
this is ridiculous, but we're gonna go through a few
(11:42):
tweets that we're going back and forth between Donald Trump
and Elon Musk. I'm gonna do my best to kind
of keep these in chronological order. They may not be
in exact order, but they're pretty much in order. So
Elon said a lot, and Donald Trump responded on truth
Social with a couple of I don't know what you
call him truths whatever, And here's what he had to say.
(12:03):
Here's here's the first one. Donald says, the easiest way
to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars,
is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts. I was
always surprised that Biden didn't do it. All right, Well,
there's there's shot fired number one. And then Trump goes
on in another truth or post saying Elon was wearing thin.
(12:26):
I asked him to leave. I took away his ev
mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars and nobody
else wanted that he knew for months I was going
to do, and he just went crazy. Well that that
may be Donald President Trump, excuse me, that may be,
but Elon has said many times that he doesn't even
(12:47):
care about the EV mandate. He doesn't even care about
the EV subsidies or the the kickbacks or the cuts whatever.
He didn't care about that. See, Elon's a guy that
I take for wanting to innovate. Push the envelope really
changed society through technology. Now, I'm not naive to the
fact that he absolutely wants his pat on the back
(13:08):
and he wants to be recognized. But Elon's in a
position that he really doesn't need the money. I mean,
as far as I know, he's still the richest man
in the world as far as I know. And Elon
Musk couldn't help himself, so he shot backers. Here's one
tweet from X that Elon shot back at Trump because
Trump was going off on Elon as well. So Elon
(13:31):
responds one more post and I'm leaking his nudes. And
he then later said that he will apologize profusely as
soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files.
So Elon is now trying to hold the Trump administration
account of Ally was saying, look, you don't like the
(13:52):
dose cuts, whatever, give us the Epstein files. Give us
something that you promised. And so this keeps going on
back and forth with Trump. But here's where things came
to a head. Elon dropped this. He said, time to
drop the really big bomb at Donald Trump. Well at
(14:15):
real Donald Trump, which is his handle on X. So
that real Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That
is the real reason they have not been made public.
Have a nice day, Donald J. Trump. Wow. So Elon
Elon calling out Trump and accusing Trump of being in
(14:35):
the Epstein files and saying that is exactly why the
files haven't been released yet. Well, be'st questionable. Look, yes,
Trump's on the flight logs, but even Epstein's lawyer said
that Donald Trump wasn't on the Epstein list. Yes he
was on the flight logs, he flew in the plane.
And there are pictures, there are legitimate pictures floating around
(14:56):
of a young Donald Trump partying or at least with Epstein.
But these pictures are all very public. They're in very
public places. They might be at fundraisers other galas, and events,
So they're all very public photos with a lot of
other people around in public. Now, with all that being said,
(15:18):
Trump just finally he was done. He's like, look, I
ain't playing this game no more so. In an interview
with NBC, Trump responded and dropped this bumpshaw and I'm
going to just quote a little bit from here. The headline.
Trump says, Elon Musk will face very serious consequences if
he funds Democratic candidates. Okay, pretty much right to the
(15:40):
point straight for the juggular. Now is that legal? Can
the President of the United States really tell him he
can't do this? No, he shouldn't have said that. But
in response, it had an impact because suddenly all those
negative tweets and accusatory tweets of Donald J. Trump being
on the Epstein list and all the other things that
(16:03):
he said about Donaldalie Trump are suddenly overnight erased from
Elon Musk's Twitter account. Can't find them, And the only
way you can find them now is because most people
who reposted or made a comment actually took a screenshot
and they have the picture of the post. But all
this really did happen because I was monitoring this as
(16:26):
was happening in real time, and now here we are
with Donald Trump in another interview on a plane being
asked about the situation, and it seems like everything's suddenly fine,
and a.
Speaker 5 (16:41):
Good way to save money be to cancel some of
Musk's contracts.
Speaker 1 (16:46):
How seriously you considering that? Oh, I'll take a look
at everything. I look at everything. He's got a lot
of money, he gets a lot of subsidy.
Speaker 5 (16:54):
So we'll take a look at that only if it's fair,
Only if it's fair for him and for the country.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
I would certainly think about it. Yet, but it has
to be fair.
Speaker 3 (17:03):
Why don't you consider opening reopening investigations into his companies?
Speaker 1 (17:07):
There are a bunch of investigations.
Speaker 5 (17:08):
You know that they had any, but you know they
had them. I would just let them speak for themselves.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
I had no idea. Excuse me, I have no idea
whether or not they had a good designation.
Speaker 3 (17:18):
What's your view on elon moscasm today?
Speaker 2 (17:21):
I mean, or have you heard from him at all?
Speaker 5 (17:23):
Stally, I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia,
working on around, working on so many that I'm not
thinking about Elin.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
I just wish him well, you know, what happens my contracts.
Do you feel like the US can survive with all
of them?
Speaker 3 (17:38):
Obviously you can trict you a lot when it comes
to the fence and space and that relationship that's been
important through quite some time to join.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
The US can survive without almost anybody. And do you
accept me? Did you have any concerns about his drug
use when he was working for you? I don't want
to come in to understruct us. I don't know.
Speaker 5 (17:57):
I don't know what his status is. An article of
the New York Times. I thought it was Frankly, it
sounded very unfair to me.
Speaker 1 (18:04):
You said earlier today that mister Musk had a problem.
What did you mean by that? Did you misjudge him?
I don't want to talk about problems.
Speaker 5 (18:11):
I think that I think the United States had problems
that if you look at the numbers today, the numbers
were unbelievable, The numbers were incredible. The numbers that came
up today in the stock market went way up. The
country's doing really well almost I think in a very
short period of time you're going to be saying doing
better than it's ever done before. We have hundreds of
(18:32):
plants coming in, plants a lot of jobs are being created.
That's what happened this morning. You saw them jobs, and
the nice part, they're not government jobs. They're jobs of
people coming in and doing other things, including the leisure
hotel and leisures. Because a lot of good things are
happening with our country. We're taking in billions of dollars
(18:53):
of tariff money. The money is pouring in and it
hasn't even started yet. Really relatively, we're going to have
a very successful country very soon.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
And a strong Okay, so far, they're trying to get
a reaction from Trump. They're trying to get him to
say something very negative about Elon, and it's just not happening.
So all of a sudden, Trump is being very civil.
Usually he's very loud, very proud, and will publicly shame
(19:24):
anybody to his benefit, so he doesn't look like the
bad guy. But somehow he chose to be very civil here.
And he look shot across the bow. He warned Elon
and say, look, don't mess around, don't don't go. Don't
go funding Democrats because I'll make it very bad for you.
He sent the message, and now Trump is being civil,
(19:48):
Elon is quiet. Trump's response to so far, is that
of someone who's confident that there is not going to
be an issue moving forward. I'm not really sure what
was said between them, but apparently Trump doesn't seem to
have an issue. I want to keep playing this because
we have a few more minutes on this, but they're
going to ask him a few more questions about the
relationship between he and Elon.
Speaker 3 (20:09):
Gave Elon Musk when he left the White House a
key symbolically to sue the White House to the administration
at large. I think that's what would you like him
to give that back?
Speaker 1 (20:18):
I don't take things back. I gave him a key.
He tried very hard with the TESTA. I haven't done.
Speaker 3 (20:24):
I want's work then, as at this point for them
for the administration, how do you think his doge did
at the end of the day with the savings.
Speaker 5 (20:30):
That oh, I think it helped us a lot. I
think it helped I think, and it's not finished at all.
We are taking we've basically taking it over and we're
doing a job. Many of those people remained with us,
and they're going to remain with us. They're very good. Uh,
It's it's terrific. We saved you know, hundreds of binions
of dollars. It's terrific and it's going further. I mean,
(20:51):
i'd give you the answer actually at the end of
two years, because a lot of it is out into
the future.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
But it was a big saving and a good mindset.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
What are you doing by the Tesla? Are you going
to keep or are you gonna I haven't.
Speaker 5 (21:01):
Brought it there.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
Do you have any plans to contact I hope he
does well with Tesla.
Speaker 7 (21:05):
Do you have any plans to speak with mister Musk?
Speaker 1 (21:07):
This was one of your closest advisors for a while.
Speaker 5 (21:09):
Have any plans somebody made a mistake. A lot of
reporters have been calling me. I didn't call any reporter.
A lot of reporters say asked me the same question. No,
I don't I'm not even thinking about that.
Speaker 3 (21:19):
There apparently were these efforts. This is what I read
to bring you guys, you and Elon back together. So
those those efforts are where are they?
Speaker 6 (21:27):
No?
Speaker 1 (21:27):
There are referens.
Speaker 5 (21:28):
I mean, I've asked about it, but I'm not really
interested in that. I'm really interested in the country and
solving problems, including war problems in very far away lands.
A lot of people being killed. You know, when I left,
we had no problem. We didn't have wars. We defeated
Isis one hundred percent.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Iran was broke.
Speaker 5 (21:46):
There was no Hamas problem, there was no Hezbela problem.
Israel wouldn't have happened. In other words, Russia Ukraine wouldn't
have happened. We had no inflation. And by the way,
we have no inflation now. And if we had a
good FET chairman, you would lower rates. And you know what,
if inflation happened in a year from now or two years,
let him raise rates.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
All right, So so far this is a very different
Trump than we're normally used to. They're asking him, Hey,
are you going to talk to Elon again he was
one of your closest advisors, or are you going to
try to get back together? What's going on? And Trump
just like, hey, I don't even care, No, haven't eve
thought about it. He's literally saying that this issue isn't
worth this time. He's got bigger fish to fry, He's
(22:27):
got a country to worry about. He's not going to
get drawn into some social media squabble and compromise the safety, health,
and growth of the United States of America. And for
the most part, he's not even He's not even like
puffing himself up. So this is very different. I'm not
sure what happened between them with this exchange. I don't
(22:49):
know if Trump's somehow got humbled because he was challenged
by someone who was also very powerful. I mean, he's
not the president. Elon Musk definitely cannot hold a candle
to the government if Trump wanted to to put the
screws to Elon. But at the same time, Trump can
also recognize that Elon's very powerful, has a lot of
connections and can definitely manipulate the media and other companies
(23:11):
and relationships around the world to screw Donald Trump if
you wanted to. I mean, you know, Trump's not a need.
I'm sure he sees that. So I think this is
just the two realizing them Usually this can't go on now.
The other take I have is this whole fucking thing
was theater. This whole thing was a big distraction. They
don't really hate each other. Why do I say that. Well,
(23:33):
while this was going on, a lot of people forgot
about the Epstein files. A lot of people forgot about
what was going on with Polantier or Pallenteer. However, you
pronounced that. There's different ways of saying that. Well, what's
so important about Pallenteer and now what's going on with that?
And the reports that were happening in relation to the
Trump administration are of note and very important. And while
(23:54):
people were digging into that, this squabble between Musk and
Trump happened. Very convenient, Right, who's Palenteer? Well, here's the deal.
I got this from Granite Shares, So granite shares dot com.
They'll usually give you background on companies and what they do.
I'm going to read the company overview and go into
(24:16):
their business segments. So the company overview, Whatalenteer a planeteer does.
They were found in two thousand and three by Peter Teel. Now,
Peter Tiele is a name to recognize and to pay
attention to you because he's a big AI guy. He
is huge on AI and developing AI.
Speaker 4 (24:33):
Now.
Speaker 2 (24:34):
He was one of the founders, along with Nathan Geedding's,
Joe Lonsdale, Stephen Cohen, and Alex Karp. Palenteer originally focused
on helping intelligence agencies. Okay, you hear that they focused
on helping intelligence agencies, particularly the US government detect patterns
and uncover hidden connections in large data sets. Over time,
(24:57):
the company expanded into commercial sectors while maintaining its core
strength in government work. So what's their core offerings. Well,
there's there's two services roughly that are their core offerings.
There's Planeteer Palunteer UH Gotham so Polanteer Gotham. Originally developed
for counter terrorism efforts, this platform is widely used by
(25:20):
government agencies, especially in defense and intelligence. Gotham allows users
to integrate, analyze, and visualize data from disparate sources. It's
designed to help agencies detect patterns and derive actionable insights
from massive amounts of information. This software is a critical
tool for military and intelligence operations. So their other offering,
(25:43):
which is Pallunteer Foundry. This platform targets commercial clients, so
providing data integration and analytics tools for enterprise boundary. Is
highly adaptable and enables organizations to create digital twins, perform
complex simulations, and gain operational insights. It's used across industries
like healthcare, automotive, and finance to optimize workflows and support
(26:04):
decision making. So let's go to their business segments. Because
regardless of what they are for the commercial segment. Most
of the revenue, actually the biggest chunk of their revenue
and their contract is with government, specifically government and defense.
So let's read what they do there. Government contracts remain
(26:25):
Planter's largest revenue stream. The company has established long term
relationships with defense and intelligence agencies in the US and
allied nations. Planter's Gotham platform is the foundation for much
of this work, allowing users to sift through enormous data
says to uncover insights related to national security, counter terrorism,
and again military operations. Planter also supports various defense applications
(26:49):
such as mission planning, logistics optimization, and battlefield management. This
solutions are integral to operations across branches of the US
Department of Defense and other military alliances. So there you
have it. And one of the key technologies that Polanter
uses is AI. Okay, So here's what's been reported in
(27:12):
the news in pretty much you know, everybody doesn't matter
if it's NBCCBSCN N whatever, and I don't even care
if they're left. Look, it's everywhere. These are the accusations
of the relationship and what's going on now. There hasn't
be any hard data or proof, but it is floating,
is floating around out there. Somehow this information got out.
So here's a quote from an MSNBC article. The push
(27:35):
has put a key Polanta Air product called Foundry into
at least four federal agencies, including DHS and the Health
and Human Services Department widely Adopting Foundry, which organizes and
analyzes data, paves the way for mister Trump to easily
merge information from different agencies. The government officials said, creating
detailed portraits of Americans based on government data is not
(27:58):
just a pipe dream. The Trump administration has already sought
access to hundreds of data points on citizens and others
through government databases, including their bank account numbers, the amount
of their student debt, their medical claims, and any disability status.
Mister Trump could potentially use such information to advance his
political agenda by policing immigrants and punishing critics. Democratic lawmakers
(28:22):
and critics have said, okay, so there you have it.
Of course, the Democratic lawmakers and critics are going to
obviously be against Trump in any capacity, but we still
have to think about the ramifications of this type of
deal or use of this technology. This can be used
for a digital ID system, for example, collecting data. This
(28:43):
could lead us down the road to how China handles
our citizens. It could lead to data that could be
used for a social credits cored. Now, we don't ever
want to think that the United States of America will
take away freedoms, and we may go down that road.
But let's not forget what happened during COVID. The censors,
the deplatforming, people losing jobs, all those things happen. All
(29:06):
the things we said that wouldn't happen did happen. So
this does raise concern. And another concern that we need
to be aware of is that in this big beautiful bill.
Getting back to that, by the way this all ties in,
there is a provision in which state and local governments
cannot regulate AI for I believe it was a period
(29:28):
of ten years. Very interesting. So you have one of
the biggest proponents of AI being one of the founders
of Plantier, which their technology is all mostly based on
the abilities of integrating the advanced capabilities in algorithms that
AI can offer. And now this doesn't look so, I
(29:51):
don't know, coincidental. Now it looks like it's something out
of a conspiracy novel. Plausible, Right, And then we could
also talk about that with the squabble that was happening
between Elon Musk and Trump, we also kind of forgot
about what was going on with the Epstein list, Right,
So we're getting close. Pam Bondi was saying, Hey, we
(30:13):
got thousands of hours of tape and evidence that we're
going through and that we're going to release. And then
you have Bongino, Dan Bongino, who was a prominent podcaster
and a huge proponent of moving the Republican Party forward
and may have actually contributed to helping Donald J. Trump
get elected. Now, with that being said, he's now the
deputy director of the FBI, and suddenly, after constantly saying
(30:37):
that Epstein didn't kill himself, that there's more behind this,
that this is a conspiracy, that somebody got to him,
now that he's in the FBI, all that is just
thrown out the window. No, nothing happened, he killed himself,
There's no conspiracy, No one got to Epstein. Very very strange.
(30:58):
Makes you wonder if Dan himself wasn't a media plant
to take advantage of new media, and he himself spread
dare I say it conservative or Republican propaganda. Now we
know that he's been, you know, a podcaster or a
radio show host for many many years. And his sudden rise, though,
(31:20):
is what was kind of strange. Now he's gonna say, well,
it's because Rush Limbaugh gave me a shout out and
recommended my show, and since then it blew up. All right,
fair enough, Dan, but you gotta also admit that your
rise was kind of like a switch that was flipped
and then overnight you were a success. And then you
suddenly didn't care about the money or the show. You
(31:40):
wanted to be back in the government, serving in law
enforcement in the FBI. Sorry, Dan, but it is a
head scratcher. And then you have cash Betel. Same thing,
same thing, all the times he said, now there's something
going on here. This doesn't smell right. We need to
get to the bottom of it. And now that he
(32:02):
is the director of the FBI, suddenly tapes don't exist.
Nothing's going on. Hey, I don't know what to tell you.
We're gonna give you everything we have, but there's nothing there. Okay,
So was the elon Donald J. Trump squabble or fight
a distraction kind of seems that way, kind of seems
(32:24):
that way, But you know what, We're gonna move past that.
Speaker 1 (32:26):
Now.
Speaker 2 (32:27):
Let's focus on what's going on with the Epstein List,
the list that was promised on day one of Donald J.
Trump's presidency, which one hundred days in or so. We've
got fuck all. We got nothing, nothing aside from people
side stepping, bird walking their answers, not really given direct answers,
trying to change the subject. But I'm gonna play something
(32:50):
here now. I don't really do this often, Like I'm
gonna play something from Joe Rogan, Joe Rogan's newest episode
of Latest as of you know this episode, I'm recording
a way he had Cash. I got to give Joe credit.
I don't listen to Joe Rogan every day, I really don't.
I know there's some hardcore fans out there, but when
Joe has a certain guest, I'm gonna listen. And I
got to give credit to Joe because he actually pressed
(33:12):
Cash Battel. He pressed him on this Epstein List situation,
and Cash did a good job of not really giving
a direct answer, and at some point he even changed
the subject on Joe, and Joe realized what was going
on now. I didn't hear the entire episode. I got
now seventy five percent in. But what got my attention
(33:35):
was Cash's response at about forty one minutes in or so,
when Joe started pressing him about the Epstein list. What's
interesting is Cash really seems to be I'd hate to
say it lying. He's either lying or he really is
(33:57):
this clueless. And I can't say that Cash is clueless.
He's a pretty smart guy. I want to play some
of this now. I'm going to play it. I may
interject here and there, but you got to hear this interaction.
Here we go.
Speaker 7 (34:09):
I've said it, Dan Bongino said it. We've reviewed all
the information, and the American Republic is going to get
as much as we can release. He killed himself. Do
you think, let's play out the logical conclusion of this.
Do you think that myself, Bongino and others would participate
in hiding information about Epstein's grow test activities, or do
(34:30):
you think we would also participate in not prosecuting people
we had evidence to prosecute people on the problem is
there's been like fifteen years of people coming in and
creating fictions about this that doesn't exist. Where's the videotape
of Anifsteen Island of X, Y and Z committing these frauds?
(34:51):
Why haven't you given it to us? Do you really
think I wouldn't give.
Speaker 6 (34:53):
That to you?
Speaker 2 (34:54):
All right, that's very interesting in the statement he's trying
to make appeal here that look, a guy like me,
in my position, what I do? I stand for justice, truth, light,
the American way. I would never hold this information back.
Of course, I didn't want to prosecute someone who did
(35:15):
these heinous acts. But in the same statement, he said
that there were fifteen years of people spreading lies about
this which weren't lies, were they? I mean, let me
put this into perspective. Cash Epstein has been on the
radar for years. They obviously were looking into Epstein, especially
(35:38):
if they have fifteen years of evidence and investigative reports
on Epstein. So your statement doesn't make any sense in
that if there was the information, don't you think I
would give it to you? Not really, Cash, not really
believe in you here, Because if there's fifteen years of data,
investigative reports, and evidence and there was nothing there, there
(36:04):
was nothing there, then nobody would be talking about Epstein
for those entire fifteen years, and even after he has died,
something doesn't smell right here, Cash or I would continue
to play this because this is where Joe leans into Cash.
Speaker 7 (36:20):
If it existed. I'm working my ass off, along with
the leadership at the Bureau and DJ to get you
what we're allowed to give you. And you're going to
get the video of the cell and you're going to
see for yourself, and we will never be able to
convince everyone.
Speaker 8 (36:35):
Okay, let's get into that. So what did you think
before you got an office? Did you think that Epstein
was smart? No, no suspicion at all of that.
Speaker 7 (36:45):
But I have a different background, right right, So I
was a public defender back in the day. I used
to spend a lot of time in jails and a
lot of time in segregated housing units shoes as we
call them.
Speaker 2 (36:55):
Right, all right, I'm gonna stop it. In the video,
Cash says know and looks away. Kyle looks down, looks away.
He's full of shit. He himself had suspected that there
was foul play here, but suddenly he doesn't believe there is. Suddenly,
same thing with Dan Boon Gino. Suddenly no issue is
nothing going on, right.
Speaker 7 (37:18):
And so, and I've known people that have committed suicide
in these cells, and I know how you get in,
how you get out, who works the system, and so
the way, based on public information at the time that
he ended up put the pictures in him hanging himself,
I was like, man, that guy killed himself. There's just
(37:39):
no way that you could have run an up and
had people go into that cell and not have any
video of it and not have any people come out
and say, hey, yeah, I saw that guy. He shouldn't
have been there, the guard or this guy. There's just
no access points into places like this in the detention
center he was in, which I've been in.
Speaker 8 (37:57):
So correct me if I'm wrong. But what I told,
what I'd read was that the guards were not paying
attention or were sleeping.
Speaker 7 (38:06):
Well, right, yeah, and in short order you'll see it
is that?
Speaker 8 (38:09):
Is that correct?
Speaker 7 (38:11):
Well, it's hard to surmise that from a video, right.
Speaker 2 (38:13):
Like, oh, okay, you can tell Cash is already feeling
the pressure here a direct question because Joe's correct. It
was reported that the guards were asleep, not paying attention,
and later on you're going to hear where Joe brings
up the fact that while was also reported that the
cameras were somehow not working. So the argument that Cash
gives about there's no way they can have this can happen.
(38:35):
There's no entry points it would have been caught on video.
But I do remember Joe remembers, most of America remembers
that we're told the cameras weren't functioning or operating at
the time, So how would you get it on video anyway?
And the messaging that he is saying that look, there's
no ways would have happened in a prison like this,
(39:00):
all right, So murders that are influenced by bribes being
offered to prison guards who are corrupt and want to
make extra cash because they put up with a lot
of bullshit already. Maybe they're not corrupt. Hey, look you
wave ten twenty grand in front of someone's face to
look away, they may consider it. We're human, right, prison
guards are human. They're working their ass off not making enough.
(39:21):
I can see that happening. So Cash is really doing
a good job thus far. But you could also hear
and if you watch the video, if you look at
Joe Rogan's episode with Cash Betel, his latest anyway, you
could see Cash is a bit uncomfortable, and I gotta
say that Cash is a pretty good actor so far,
(39:42):
or I would have continue this a little more.
Speaker 7 (39:44):
Right where they like, you know, and look, do guards
does off on the night shift? Yeah, but no one
can get in to the cell. And if they had
gotten in to the cell, you would see it. But
we were told that the cameras were down. Well I
don't know who said that, but that was that was
in the news. We're giving you all the footage we have.
Speaker 2 (40:05):
Funny right, that nervous laugh. I don't know who said that.
You know, he tends to do that a lot. That's
Cash is tell I've watched other interviews where he was
where he was asked about the Epstein list and the
Epstein files and the suicide itself, and where he also
shrugged it off with a laugh. That's one of his tells.
So just so everybody knows, pay attention to his responses.
(40:27):
And every time he throws that little laugh and he
kind of shirks because he knows he's full of shit
and he's been backed into a corner.
Speaker 8 (40:33):
So why wasn't that released like immediately? Why Why did
this speculation escalate?
Speaker 7 (40:41):
I think you'd have to ask whoever. The Attorney general
back then was Bill Barr.
Speaker 8 (40:46):
Did you ever see do you remember that HBO autopsy show?
Doctor Michael Baden. He's a famous forensic I don't think
as a scientist, and so he's a pathologist and he
reviewed the case and it was his determination that it
was a homicide because of the way his neck was broken.
And what he said was it was indicative of a
(41:08):
ligature strangulation, and it was because of the positioning on
the neck where the marks were that it wasn't indicative
of someone hanging by their weight, which had been higher
on the chin. And there's this specific break of the
bones and the vertebrae that's consistent with someone who has
just strangled to death.
Speaker 7 (41:24):
I haven't seen it. I'll definitely take a look at it,
because that's part of my job. You haven't seen that
the report? No, I haven't looked at that.
Speaker 1 (41:33):
Did you see any.
Speaker 8 (41:35):
Was there any other autopsy done other than the official one?
Speaker 7 (41:40):
Not to my knives, But if there was, you'll get it.
And that's what we're doing.
Speaker 8 (41:43):
See if you find that doctor Michael Badden thing. Do
you remember that show?
Speaker 2 (41:47):
The HBO show? No, pretty cool show.
Speaker 8 (41:49):
So this guy, doctor Michael Baden, he had a long
career of catching murderers, you know, exhooming bodies, finding trace
amounts of poisons, different kinds of things.
Speaker 2 (41:59):
It was a crazy show, like all these wild ways.
Speaker 7 (42:01):
I love watching shows, and I spent a lot of
time on plans.
Speaker 8 (42:03):
Yeah, it was an old show. It was a show
like from the early two thousands, I believe. But this
guy was like, you know, it's very well respected forensic
scientists who would analyze these bodies, and it was his
determination that he was murdered.
Speaker 7 (42:19):
Yeah, And my job, going back to the core of
what I've been doing since I stood rushing it was
to get it is to get everybody the information.
Speaker 8 (42:29):
When did you get here? Epstein's autopsy points to homicide
pathologists hired by brother claims. New York City Medical Examiner
strongly disputed the claim that the evidence from the autopsy
suggests his triangulation. So let's go to by the way,
this is the New York Times and they never lie
the private pathologist, doctor Michael Baden, said the morning TV
(42:50):
show Fox and Friends. Mister Epstein experienced a number of injuries,
among them a broken bone in his neck, that are
extremely unusual in suicidal hangings and could occur much more
commonly in homicidal strangulation. I think the evidence points to
homicide rather than suicides, sid doctor Baden, who observed the
autopsy done by city officials. Doctor Baden, a former New
York City medical examination and a Fox News contributor, said
(43:12):
I have not seen in fifty years where that occurred
in suicidal hanging.
Speaker 3 (43:16):
Case.
Speaker 8 (43:18):
Findings by doctor Baden were strongly disputed by the city's
chief medical examiner, doctor Barbara Sampson, who previously ruled at
mister Epstein's death in August tenth in the Metropolitan Correctional
Center was a suicide. I stand firmly behn our determination
of the cause and manner of death in this case,
doctor Sampson said in the interview on Wednesday. She added,
in general, fractures of the hyoid bone and cartilage can
(43:40):
be seen in suicides and homicides. The hyoid bone is
near the Adams apple. Doctor Samson also dismissed doctor Badden's
contention that the circumstances around mister Epstein's death suggested other
people may have been involved. She said her office had
done a complete investigation taken into consideration information gathered by
law enforcement in the making the determination.
Speaker 7 (44:01):
So this is a perfect example of going back to
my public defender in prosecutor days. This is what we
call a war of experts.
Speaker 2 (44:10):
Okay, all right, So now Cash is trying to flip
the script here because he knows he's backed into a corner.
He knows that there's more to the story. And now
this is a war of experts, right, And he's going
to go on and say, Hey, when I was a lawyer,
I would do this when I defended people like sometimes
the defense some pretty bad guys, and you know, you
(44:31):
want to find an expert who's on your side, who's
going to say what's going to work for your defense. Sure,
except for the fact that this forensic scientist is forensic pathologist,
went out of their way to examine this, to look
at this case without getting paid, no incentive, to give
(44:53):
his two cents on this matter, and say, look, this
is not conducive. This does not like line up with
a suicide. This isn't very common like that. This doesn't
make any sense. Look, Cash is full of shit. Bongino
is full of shit. There is something that is either
(45:15):
scaring them or their allegiance to Trump. And I'm not
even saying or accusing Trump of being involved in this
whole Epstein fiasco, but someone close to Trump maybe and
someone is absolutely being protected or may have nothing to
do with Trump. It could have to do with another agency,
(45:38):
someone involved with another agency that can easily wipe out
Cash's family and get to Bongino and his family. We
don't know. This is hypothetical. This is hypothetical, but this
also is very interesting because Cash was also recently swatted.
How peculiar. And if you don't know what swatting is,
(46:01):
this is where somebody, some of anonymous person will call
in some crazy thing going on at a house, like, oh,
there's a gunfight, there's something going on, and the police
will respond with a swat team and this go to
your house with guns out, ready to go. And someone
swatted Cash. Someone got to Cash. I'm sorry, none of
this smells right. None of this lines up. A lot
(46:23):
of what Cash and bon Gina say are very contradictory
to what Pam Bondi has been saying to the press.
None of this makes sense. None of it. Look America,
I mean hell, the world needs accountability. When it comes
to this Epstein case, we need accountability, we need closure,
(46:45):
We need people to be prosecuted, we need them to
go to jail. And I've said this before, I do
not care if certain people that we don't want to
be involved are involved. I say if they are, If
they are involved in pedophilia, you know they're going around
having sex with underage girls and boys, and they're a
(47:06):
part of this whole Epstein party, this whole Epstein fiasco.
Let them burn, Let the government burn, if the governments
behind it, I don't care. It's time for us to
reset and move forward and really live as a very
very proper moral society. We got to stop reinforcing and
(47:31):
coddling and patent people on the back for being minor attracted,
for just brushing these things under the rug, or even
being scared of being held hostage by some power. Look,
I hate to say it, but yeah, we're all going
to die at some point. Are you going to die
on your feet defending justice, truth, the American way, and
freedom or you're just going to be a coward, take
(47:51):
the money and run. You're not doing anything for the
American people. If you're going to be that guy, if
you're going to be that guy. You're not doing anything
for the American people. And I know it's a tough spot.
Look at they threaten your family, that's one thing. To
threaten you, that's another. I get it, I get it.
But someone has to step up, someone has to put
their foot down and not be afraid to prosecute every
(48:14):
single fucking person that was involved with this whole Epstein
fiasco period. All right, all right, all right, get off
my soapbox. Look, we had the discussion. I hope that
people are brought to justice, and I wish Cash would
(48:34):
stay vigilant and somehow pull his head out of his
ass and really go after this Epstein case the way
he said he was going to before he became the
director of the FBI. Now, in other news geopolitics across
the globe, Russia is escalating their attacks against Ukraine. Now,
(49:00):
this just happened. So this is why I brought this
up today. As of this recording, June seventh, twenty to
twenty five, Russia launched one of the largest attacks yet
against Ukraine. So this is what's been reported. Apparently, Russia
launched one of the largest air attacks against the Ukraine.
(49:20):
There were four hundred seven suicide drones, thirty eight cruise
missiles and six ballistic missiles that hit the Ukrainian cities.
So far, it's been reported that three people died of
seen other reports that seven to ten people died, there
were you know, twenty to thirty injuries. Here's a report
from the AP that came out just you know, a
(49:43):
few hours ago. Russian attacks on eastern Ukrainian city of
Kharkiv killed four, wound more than two dozen Kiev, Ukraine.
Russian attacks targeted the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv killed
at least four people and wounded more than two dozen
others on Saturday. Now again, there's other reports that are
(50:04):
coming out for saying that there was more than four
people killed. But I'm just gonna read what I got
here from the AP. The first wave of the Ukrainian
second largest city was a large Russian drone and missile
attack in the early hours. It killed at least three
people and wounded twenty one others, according to local officials.
In the afternoon, Russia dropped aerial bombs on the city
(50:25):
center to the at least one person, wounding five more Karkibbs.
I'm sorry, I'm probably mispronounced that, but karkibvs mayor said.
The warring sides also accused each other of trying to
sabotage a planned prisoner exchange nearly a week after Kiev
embarrassed to Kremlin with a surprising drone attack on military
airfields deep inside Russia. Now again this is a piece
(50:50):
that we have to pay attention to because Ukraine retaliated
against Russia. They launched a deep attack days ago. By
the way, against Russia got one of their power grids
or one of their major towers that helped supply power.
They bombed and took out a supply train. So the
Ukrainians launched an attack. Now people are saying, why would
(51:13):
the Ukrainians do this? What are they thinking they did?
They they wouldn't do this if they had didn't have
the backing or approval from the US or someone else.
There's also others that said, you know, there's no way
that the Ukraine would do this and jeopardize the relationship
with the US. One of those people was PbD. I
believe uh, you know, Patrick Pick, David, Sorry man, you
(51:35):
got some bad takes. Listen, Ukraine's gonna do what they
want to do. They're protecting their country and their sovereignty. Yes,
there was a minerals deal in place. Yes the US
is involved financially, and yes that they are now going
to be or they I don't know what I'm saying.
They we because I am in the USA, We're going
to be tied to the hip with Ukraine. But nothing
has happened yet in terms of putting people there to
(51:57):
start mining and processing those minerals. Okay, now we have
to do something. This whole thing is getting out of hand.
Russia is now taking the gloves off. They have never
launched an attack this big. This is them flex and saying, look,
you want to fuck around, you're gonna find out. Russia
can wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth. Literally,
they can do this. We all know it. I am
(52:21):
labeling this Russia Ukraine situation as kind of I may
be off on this, you may not agree, but it
feels like the Cold World War three. Why do I
say that? Because every nation has an interest of either
self protection or an interest in what's going on due
to their relationships with Ukraine and the surrounding territories and
(52:42):
countries around the Ukraine and Russia. You see, we can't
dismiss the fact also that while we don't want to
believe this is not a cold World War three, which
may very well become a very hot World War three.
That well, our allies are Ukrainian allies and big air quotes.
(53:03):
By the way, the UK has done nothing yet. France
has done nothing yet. Poland has done nothing yet. Poland's
at there ready though you can't fuck around Poland. I mean,
they're ready to go. But everything's been posturing. Everything's been words,
everything's been donations, money, supplies, whatever, but none of them
has stepped up. Now the Ukraine here Starmer claimed, we're
(53:25):
gonna step up our readiness, our military redness, and we're
ready to go. Sure, you guys keep talking, but nothing's happening.
This war has been going on for quite some time.
It's not gonna be long before Russia is knocking on
your door just for the sake of retaliation. You guys
talk big and do nothing. That being said, I'm also
gonna hold President Trump accountable. I know he was not
(53:46):
wanting to get into an actual war. Nobody wants to
go to a real, hot, contested World War three. But
the reality is someone's gonna have to put their foot down. Period.
In this war, China is involved, but nobody's talking about it.
There has been Chinese troops caught scene killed in this
(54:09):
war siding with Russia. There have been North Korean troops
caught killed seen in this war supporting Russia. Iran has
sent drones and technologies to Russia in support of this war.
So we got this alliance between Russia, Iran, China, and
(54:31):
North Korea who are all very actively engaged in this conflict.
Yet those who claim that they stand up for freedom
and justice and are looking out for Ukraine have done
nothing nothing. Why because they don't really want to be
held a task. They don't really want to kill their
own citizens, their own military personnel. I mean understandable, nobody
(54:52):
wants to go to war, but when is somebody going
to actually step up, reach into their fucking trousers, pull
their gigan aganic balls out and slap him on fucking
Putin's face. Putin's going to keep doing this, He's not
going to stop. He doesn't care about peace. He's not
going to do anything to appease the Western Alliance. He
(55:14):
gives no fucks Russia wants Ukraine. He's made it very clear.
And after that, he's gone for Poland. He's going for
all the old USSR territories because that's what he said
he wanted to achieve. And Putin's getting older, man, he's
getting older, and this is his legacy. This is just
him testing the waters. At any given moment, Russia can
(55:35):
decimate the Ukraine. And I know, I hear all these
the analysts saying while Russia doesn't have the infrastructure, they
don't have the logistics, they don't have that. You know what,
fuck all that. You know what, Russia has a huge artillery.
They could just rain hell fire from the sky on
Ukraine all day and take him out. And Ukraine has
(55:57):
no real aerial defense outside of what ever we may
donate to them, period, full stop. We got to stop
fooling ourselves into thinking how strong Ukraine is. Ukraine is sneaky,
Ukraine is smart. They've launched some attacks that Russia wasn't
prepared for. They got caught off guard how Russia was
attacked deep into their own territory. I gotta tip my
(56:18):
hat to Ukraine for doing that. Great good for you,
but you poke the bear. And now Russia said fuck it,
here you go. You know what, The rest of world
is doing absolutely nothing, absolutely nothing. This needs to end.
Trump needs to do something period. This is goot to stop.
(56:40):
The United States of America, who stands up for freedom, democracy, justice,
needs to step up because the rest of the world
isn't gonna do dick. They're gonna do fuck all until
America steps up. And that's always been the way it is.
That has always been the way it is. Europe is
not gonna save you. Ukraine, stop entering to them. U
(57:01):
K't give us no fucks about you. Franz ain't gonna
do shit across to busy trying to look like a
man was being slapped by his wife. Nothing's gonna happen.
The US needs to get involved. Trump, mister President, Let's
figure this out. Let's get something done. This has to end.
(57:25):
Enough of that angry rant. Listen, everybody, thanks so much
for listening to me. And by the way, please like, subscribe,
share the show, give me a five star rating, leave
a comment in a review, and always have a great day.
Days content.
Speaker 6 (57:45):
Feel intention Devil Redemption understands Onetime.
Speaker 1 (58:01):
Do Do Do Do.
Speaker 6 (58:05):
Do Do Do
Speaker 2 (58:10):
Do
Take my beney like, can you just.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
Let me in my way? Welcome world to bladies, listeners.
I'm back in action. I took a little bit of
time off, and I very much apologize to everybody who
listens to the show supports the show. Sorry. Look, I
want to make it very clear everybody. I love the
(00:30):
fact that you all listen to me and support me,
but I also need you to know this isn't my
full time job. My other business took my attention. It
was a very busy period, and again I apologize for
not getting this episode out. I know it's been a
few weeks, but I will have to say in my defense,
those last few weeks I was off. There really wasn't
much going on. And here I am ready to go.
(00:51):
I am recording this Saturday, June seventh. It is four
forty five pm here on the West coast of the
United States of America, and I have to tell you
that I'm glad I waited because this past week has
man it made up for it, and there's a lot
to talk about, and I will not be able to
get to all of it, but I'm going to try
to hit some bullet points here, all right. Also, I
(01:16):
want everybody to know that I have been retooling and
working with my brother on the other show that I
co host with him, Random Thoughts with Manuel and George.
Now we have taken that show and we have focused
on video episodes primarily. We are on YouTube, We are
on Rumble, and we are now on pod Nation. So
(01:37):
pod Nation has their own Roku app and we're part
of that community. And so if you have a Roku player,
you could download the pod Nation TV app and you'll
see a picture of a big alien on there. When
you search for it, you'll see a pop up download
that you'll be able to see those Random Thoughts with
Manual and George episodes on the pod Nation TV app
on Roku, and you'll also be able to see other
(02:00):
podcasters that are a part of that community and that network.
So go ahead and give pod Nation some support. If
you have a big TV with Roku, you can go
ahead and use the pod Nation app to watch those episodes.
And as far as World the Blaze is concerned, I
am not going anywhere, and I want to go ahead
and give people an update. Listen, I promise you video
it's coming. I'm not gonna do my solo episodes or
(02:22):
my solo hosted episodes on video, because I just don't
know if it works. I feel more comfortable doing the
solo episodes and audio. Now that being said, I promise
that I'll have more guests, and I do. They are booked,
they're coming up here. Actually this month I will start
recording those episodes. Those episodes, the guest episodes, I plan
(02:43):
on having those moving forward. Those will be released in video.
I feel that the interaction between two people definitely has
to be seen. It allows for better context as you're
able to see people's facial expressions and the reactions, and
those will absolutely be our Rumble YouTube and they will
(03:03):
be on pod Nation. I'll go a heading uploads on
the pod Nation TV app as well. And I have
to say that I have to give everyone who's supported
the show. There's countries that have stepped up and have
been listening to me and their percentages of downloads have
gone up, So thank you very much to the UK
as always, thank you Iceland for supporting and Australia has
(03:28):
you know, they've been increasing their numbers. So Australia, thank
you very much for listening to this show. And of
course we have New Zealand who's always been a strong supporter,
and America is you know, the bulk of where everything
comes from in the USA. But I really have to
tip my hat to those nations out there who continue
to support, not just support, but seem to be growing
in size as far as the audience. So thank you
(03:48):
very much to all of you out there. Special shout
out to the Duchess of New Jersey. Duchess, thank you
very much for all your comments, your interactions, not just
on the show here, not just worldplay, but I have
seen your comments interactions on random Thoughts with Manuel George too,
So thank you very much, Duchess, and thanks to everybody
(04:08):
who has been leaving comments on Spotify. Now I'm going
to say this right now, I don't ask for much.
If you like the show and you support the show,
support me by spreading the word. Let everybody else know
about World of Blaze with George Fonts and by all means,
leave a five star review and whatever damn podcast app
you like to use. And outside of that, if you
(04:30):
have time, sure leave a commoner review and I do
respond to those. Now with that out of the way,
and I'm sure you're all thinking George's been long enough.
Get to the damn episode. I'm getting there, and I'm
just going to pull the band aid off. Let's talk
about Trump versus Elon. What in the hell is going
on here? Listen this on the surface. A lot of
(04:51):
people are reading this on the surface. And I've always
said a lot of people live on the surface of information.
Now these guys are airing their grievances out in public.
Elon's mad at Trump. Trump's mad at Elon. Why is
Elon mad at Trump? Well, it sounds like Elon was
really upset because of all the work he put into DOGE,
(05:12):
everything he did to uncover fraud and waste, all the
recommendations he made, and when it comes to this big,
beautiful bill, Elon is vehemently against it because there's not
enough cuts. A lot of the work that Elon did
isn't even included. A lot of the DOGE cuts aren't
even a part of it. And on the surface, you know,
(05:33):
this bill looks good. You know he look no tax
on tips, more tax cuts, et cetera. But even those
provisions they expire in twenty twenty eight. And we all
know that every sitting president who gives an executive order
or you know, was able to pass things that they
want to. Bill usually gets repealed when the new president
(05:54):
comes in, especially if it's an opposing party. Now, we
can hope that after the Trump administration, after this, after
Trump's last presidential term here is over, we can only
hope that there might be another conservative or honestly, what
I would like to see is a centrist. I want
someone down the middle. You know, I don't want another
far left far right type of situation. I want someone
down the middle. But I would hope that some of
(06:15):
the executive orders and policies that were put into place continue,
absolutely continue, because there are some good things that Trump
has done. There are some questionable things. There are definitely
a lot of things that Trump did that upset a
lot of people. Of course we knew that would happen.
But let's get back to this disagreement between Elon and Trump,
(06:36):
which really comes down to this big, beautiful bill. Now, again,
this looks nice and tasty, It looks delicious. You want
to sink your teeth into it. The damn thing is
wrapped in crispy bacon. But the problem is is that
damn bacon is wrapped around a big chunk of fat,
a big stick of lard. And that's the issue that
(06:57):
Elon has. There's a lot in there that actually may
add to the debt. The other thing that is ridiculous
is the debt ceiling is all proposed to be raised
even more so instead of really addressing the budget and
taking care of the spending, there's gonna be more spending,
and not just spending. We're also gonna raise the debt
(07:18):
ceiling to about five trillion, because you know, the best
way to budget you're spending right, to rain you're spending
in is to make it look like you're not even
hitting your budget limit anyway, right, Like, hey, look, my
budget's five thousand, I'm spending ten thousand. While I know
how to fix that. I'm gonna make the new budget
(07:39):
limit twenty thousand, so now I can spend my ten thousand.
You know what happens they spend the twenty. In fact,
they'll go ahead and spend the fifty and they'll be like, well,
you know what, I know this looks bad, but next year,
next year, our spending limit is now one hundred thousand.
And that's the game the government has been playing for many,
many years. So Elon is upset at Trump. Elon feels used,
(08:00):
Elon feels unappreciated, And this whole thing is being played
up in real time on social media, primarily X and
True social Now, let's get a little more insight into
the bill.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
I have.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
I have a Congressman Chip Roy here of Texas. Here's
a little bit about what he thinks of this bill.
Speaker 4 (08:22):
Now, the big beautiful bill, let's go through it. The
bill is what I would call the good, the bad,
and the ugly, because that's the truth. And I'm not
going to get into personalities and squabbles and back and forth.
The President is right that we need to move a
bill through here with tax cuts and spending restraint so
that he can get the agenda done that he campaigned on.
(08:43):
He's one hundred percent right, and we should do that.
Elon is right that this bill doesn't cut enough. That's
the truth. Two things can be true at the same time.
And the barriers actually achieving the greatness of moving the
big beautiful bill through that would achieve the President's agenda
and achieving what Elon is rightly saying, which is that
(09:05):
we should cut more. The barrier is right here in
this chamber. It's right over there in the Senate. People
unwilling to face their constituents and tell them the truth. Well,
I'm going to try to sit here on the floor
and tell the truth. I had to hold my nose
to vote for this bill two weeks ago, off the
House floor to the Senate. Why it does not cut
enough and it's not even close to cutting enough. My
(09:28):
colleagues say, oh, but Chip, it's the biggest spending decrease
in history. Let's be very clear. It is a reduction
in future increases of about one point six trillion dollars. Yes,
that is the biggest amount ever. But guess what. We
have sizeably more debt and sizeably more spending than ever,
(09:49):
So of course it should be, but it should be more.
One point six trillion dollars in cuts or future reductions
is really about one hundred and sixty billion dollars a
year ten years. That's the truth. The truth is our
whole budget has grown from about three point six trillion
a decade ago to seven point two trillion. Now it's doubled,
(10:13):
and everybody wants to applaud themselves for one hundred and
sixty billion dollars of reductions and increases.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
Well, that doesn't sound like a very good budget. Doesn't
sound like a very good proposal or proposals that are
included in this bill. Seems like increased spending is yet
again the aim of the government and the debt ceiling
is to be kicked down the road and raised once again.
(10:39):
And you know, Triperway is not the only one. Here's
Ran Paul. Here's a little clip of what he thinks.
Speaker 5 (10:45):
Here.
Speaker 6 (10:46):
The House bill is going to add about four trillion
to the debt ceiling. The Senate bill adds five trillion.
There's nothing fiscally conservative about expanding the debt ceiling more
than we've ever done.
Speaker 2 (10:58):
It, right, there is nothing fiscally conservative about expanding or
raising the debts something whatsoever. I mean, if we're adding
about four to five trillion and we're gonna move the
goalpost of the debts thing too about five in fact,
may even be seven, how is that fiscally responsible for
the United States of America. Now, Trump's gonna claim, Look,
we're bringing in a lot of money, regardless, these tariffs
(11:21):
are are bringing in billions, billions, maybe even trillions of dollars.
But is it enough to keep up with the spending,
is it? And now you got a little bit of
insight as to why Elon Musk is pissed off. So
they've been arguing, and I'm gonna go through a couple
this is ridiculous, but we're gonna go through a few
(11:42):
tweets that we're going back and forth between Donald Trump
and Elon Musk. I'm gonna do my best to kind
of keep these in chronological order. They may not be
in exact order, but they're pretty much in order. So
Elon said a lot, and Donald Trump responded on truth
Social with a couple of I don't know what you
call him truths whatever, And here's what he had to say.
(12:03):
Here's here's the first one. Donald says, the easiest way
to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars,
is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts. I was
always surprised that Biden didn't do it. All right, Well,
there's there's shot fired number one. And then Trump goes
on in another truth or post saying Elon was wearing thin.
(12:26):
I asked him to leave. I took away his ev
mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars and nobody
else wanted that he knew for months I was going
to do, and he just went crazy. Well that that
may be Donald President Trump, excuse me, that may be,
but Elon has said many times that he doesn't even
(12:47):
care about the EV mandate. He doesn't even care about
the EV subsidies or the the kickbacks or the cuts whatever.
He didn't care about that. See, Elon's a guy that
I take for wanting to innovate. Push the envelope really
changed society through technology. Now, I'm not naive to the
fact that he absolutely wants his pat on the back
(13:08):
and he wants to be recognized. But Elon's in a
position that he really doesn't need the money. I mean,
as far as I know, he's still the richest man
in the world as far as I know. And Elon
Musk couldn't help himself, so he shot backers. Here's one
tweet from X that Elon shot back at Trump because
Trump was going off on Elon as well. So Elon
(13:31):
responds one more post and I'm leaking his nudes. And
he then later said that he will apologize profusely as
soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files.
So Elon is now trying to hold the Trump administration
account of Ally was saying, look, you don't like the
(13:52):
dose cuts, whatever, give us the Epstein files. Give us
something that you promised. And so this keeps going on
back and forth with Trump. But here's where things came
to a head. Elon dropped this. He said, time to
drop the really big bomb at Donald Trump. Well at
(14:15):
real Donald Trump, which is his handle on X. So
that real Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That
is the real reason they have not been made public.
Have a nice day, Donald J. Trump. Wow. So Elon
Elon calling out Trump and accusing Trump of being in
(14:35):
the Epstein files and saying that is exactly why the
files haven't been released yet. Well, be'st questionable. Look, yes,
Trump's on the flight logs, but even Epstein's lawyer said
that Donald Trump wasn't on the Epstein list. Yes he
was on the flight logs, he flew in the plane.
And there are pictures, there are legitimate pictures floating around
(14:56):
of a young Donald Trump partying or at least with Epstein.
But these pictures are all very public. They're in very
public places. They might be at fundraisers other galas, and events,
So they're all very public photos with a lot of
other people around in public. Now, with all that being said,
(15:18):
Trump just finally he was done. He's like, look, I
ain't playing this game no more so. In an interview
with NBC, Trump responded and dropped this bumpshaw and I'm
going to just quote a little bit from here. The headline.
Trump says, Elon Musk will face very serious consequences if
he funds Democratic candidates. Okay, pretty much right to the
(15:40):
point straight for the juggular. Now is that legal? Can
the President of the United States really tell him he
can't do this? No, he shouldn't have said that. But
in response, it had an impact because suddenly all those
negative tweets and accusatory tweets of Donald J. Trump being
on the Epstein list and all the other things that
(16:03):
he said about Donaldalie Trump are suddenly overnight erased from
Elon Musk's Twitter account. Can't find them, And the only
way you can find them now is because most people
who reposted or made a comment actually took a screenshot
and they have the picture of the post. But all
this really did happen because I was monitoring this as
(16:26):
was happening in real time, and now here we are
with Donald Trump in another interview on a plane being
asked about the situation, and it seems like everything's suddenly fine,
and a.
Speaker 5 (16:41):
Good way to save money be to cancel some of
Musk's contracts.
Speaker 1 (16:46):
How seriously you considering that? Oh, I'll take a look
at everything. I look at everything. He's got a lot
of money, he gets a lot of subsidy.
Speaker 5 (16:54):
So we'll take a look at that only if it's fair,
Only if it's fair for him and for the country.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
I would certainly think about it. Yet, but it has
to be fair.
Speaker 3 (17:03):
Why don't you consider opening reopening investigations into his companies?
Speaker 1 (17:07):
There are a bunch of investigations.
Speaker 5 (17:08):
You know that they had any, but you know they
had them. I would just let them speak for themselves.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
I had no idea. Excuse me, I have no idea
whether or not they had a good designation.
Speaker 3 (17:18):
What's your view on elon moscasm today?
Speaker 2 (17:21):
I mean, or have you heard from him at all?
Speaker 5 (17:23):
Stally, I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia,
working on around, working on so many that I'm not
thinking about Elin.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
I just wish him well, you know, what happens my contracts.
Do you feel like the US can survive with all
of them?
Speaker 3 (17:38):
Obviously you can trict you a lot when it comes
to the fence and space and that relationship that's been
important through quite some time to join.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
The US can survive without almost anybody. And do you
accept me? Did you have any concerns about his drug
use when he was working for you? I don't want
to come in to understruct us. I don't know.
Speaker 5 (17:57):
I don't know what his status is. An article of
the New York Times. I thought it was Frankly, it
sounded very unfair to me.
Speaker 1 (18:04):
You said earlier today that mister Musk had a problem.
What did you mean by that? Did you misjudge him?
I don't want to talk about problems.
Speaker 5 (18:11):
I think that I think the United States had problems
that if you look at the numbers today, the numbers
were unbelievable, The numbers were incredible. The numbers that came
up today in the stock market went way up. The
country's doing really well almost I think in a very
short period of time you're going to be saying doing
better than it's ever done before. We have hundreds of
(18:32):
plants coming in, plants a lot of jobs are being created.
That's what happened this morning. You saw them jobs, and
the nice part, they're not government jobs. They're jobs of
people coming in and doing other things, including the leisure
hotel and leisures. Because a lot of good things are
happening with our country. We're taking in billions of dollars
(18:53):
of tariff money. The money is pouring in and it
hasn't even started yet. Really relatively, we're going to have
a very successful country very soon.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
And a strong Okay, so far, they're trying to get
a reaction from Trump. They're trying to get him to
say something very negative about Elon, and it's just not happening.
So all of a sudden, Trump is being very civil.
Usually he's very loud, very proud, and will publicly shame
(19:24):
anybody to his benefit, so he doesn't look like the
bad guy. But somehow he chose to be very civil here.
And he look shot across the bow. He warned Elon
and say, look, don't mess around, don't don't go. Don't
go funding Democrats because I'll make it very bad for you.
He sent the message, and now Trump is being civil,
(19:48):
Elon is quiet. Trump's response to so far, is that
of someone who's confident that there is not going to
be an issue moving forward. I'm not really sure what
was said between them, but apparently Trump doesn't seem to
have an issue. I want to keep playing this because
we have a few more minutes on this, but they're
going to ask him a few more questions about the
relationship between he and Elon.
Speaker 3 (20:09):
Gave Elon Musk when he left the White House a
key symbolically to sue the White House to the administration
at large. I think that's what would you like him
to give that back?
Speaker 1 (20:18):
I don't take things back. I gave him a key.
He tried very hard with the TESTA. I haven't done.
Speaker 3 (20:24):
I want's work then, as at this point for them
for the administration, how do you think his doge did
at the end of the day with the savings.
Speaker 5 (20:30):
That oh, I think it helped us a lot. I
think it helped I think, and it's not finished at all.
We are taking we've basically taking it over and we're
doing a job. Many of those people remained with us,
and they're going to remain with us. They're very good. Uh,
It's it's terrific. We saved you know, hundreds of binions
of dollars. It's terrific and it's going further. I mean,
(20:51):
i'd give you the answer actually at the end of
two years, because a lot of it is out into
the future.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
But it was a big saving and a good mindset.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
What are you doing by the Tesla? Are you going
to keep or are you gonna I haven't.
Speaker 5 (21:01):
Brought it there.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
Do you have any plans to contact I hope he
does well with Tesla.
Speaker 7 (21:05):
Do you have any plans to speak with mister Musk?
Speaker 1 (21:07):
This was one of your closest advisors for a while.
Speaker 5 (21:09):
Have any plans somebody made a mistake. A lot of
reporters have been calling me. I didn't call any reporter.
A lot of reporters say asked me the same question. No,
I don't I'm not even thinking about that.
Speaker 3 (21:19):
There apparently were these efforts. This is what I read
to bring you guys, you and Elon back together. So
those those efforts are where are they?
Speaker 6 (21:27):
No?
Speaker 1 (21:27):
There are referens.
Speaker 5 (21:28):
I mean, I've asked about it, but I'm not really
interested in that. I'm really interested in the country and
solving problems, including war problems in very far away lands.
A lot of people being killed. You know, when I left,
we had no problem. We didn't have wars. We defeated
Isis one hundred percent.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Iran was broke.
Speaker 5 (21:46):
There was no Hamas problem, there was no Hezbela problem.
Israel wouldn't have happened. In other words, Russia Ukraine wouldn't
have happened. We had no inflation. And by the way,
we have no inflation now. And if we had a
good FET chairman, you would lower rates. And you know what,
if inflation happened in a year from now or two years,
let him raise rates.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
All right, So so far this is a very different
Trump than we're normally used to. They're asking him, Hey,
are you going to talk to Elon again he was
one of your closest advisors, or are you going to
try to get back together? What's going on? And Trump
just like, hey, I don't even care, No, haven't eve
thought about it. He's literally saying that this issue isn't
worth this time. He's got bigger fish to fry, He's
(22:27):
got a country to worry about. He's not going to
get drawn into some social media squabble and compromise the safety, health,
and growth of the United States of America. And for
the most part, he's not even He's not even like
puffing himself up. So this is very different. I'm not
sure what happened between them with this exchange. I don't
(22:49):
know if Trump's somehow got humbled because he was challenged
by someone who was also very powerful. I mean, he's
not the president. Elon Musk definitely cannot hold a candle
to the government if Trump wanted to to put the
screws to Elon. But at the same time, Trump can
also recognize that Elon's very powerful, has a lot of
connections and can definitely manipulate the media and other companies
(23:11):
and relationships around the world to screw Donald Trump if
you wanted to. I mean, you know, Trump's not a need.
I'm sure he sees that. So I think this is
just the two realizing them Usually this can't go on now.
The other take I have is this whole fucking thing
was theater. This whole thing was a big distraction. They
don't really hate each other. Why do I say that. Well,
(23:33):
while this was going on, a lot of people forgot
about the Epstein files. A lot of people forgot about
what was going on with Polantier or Pallenteer. However, you
pronounced that. There's different ways of saying that. Well, what's
so important about Pallenteer and now what's going on with that?
And the reports that were happening in relation to the
Trump administration are of note and very important. And while
(23:54):
people were digging into that, this squabble between Musk and
Trump happened. Very convenient, Right, who's Palenteer? Well, here's the deal.
I got this from Granite Shares, So granite shares dot com.
They'll usually give you background on companies and what they do.
I'm going to read the company overview and go into
(24:16):
their business segments. So the company overview, Whatalenteer a planeteer does.
They were found in two thousand and three by Peter Teel. Now,
Peter Tiele is a name to recognize and to pay
attention to you because he's a big AI guy. He
is huge on AI and developing AI.
Speaker 4 (24:33):
Now.
Speaker 2 (24:34):
He was one of the founders, along with Nathan Geedding's,
Joe Lonsdale, Stephen Cohen, and Alex Karp. Palenteer originally focused
on helping intelligence agencies. Okay, you hear that they focused
on helping intelligence agencies, particularly the US government detect patterns
and uncover hidden connections in large data sets. Over time,
(24:57):
the company expanded into commercial sectors while maintaining its core
strength in government work. So what's their core offerings. Well,
there's there's two services roughly that are their core offerings.
There's Planeteer Palunteer UH Gotham so Polanteer Gotham. Originally developed
for counter terrorism efforts, this platform is widely used by
(25:20):
government agencies, especially in defense and intelligence. Gotham allows users
to integrate, analyze, and visualize data from disparate sources. It's
designed to help agencies detect patterns and derive actionable insights
from massive amounts of information. This software is a critical
tool for military and intelligence operations. So their other offering,
(25:43):
which is Pallunteer Foundry. This platform targets commercial clients, so
providing data integration and analytics tools for enterprise boundary. Is
highly adaptable and enables organizations to create digital twins, perform
complex simulations, and gain operational insights. It's used across industries
like healthcare, automotive, and finance to optimize workflows and support
(26:04):
decision making. So let's go to their business segments. Because
regardless of what they are for the commercial segment. Most
of the revenue, actually the biggest chunk of their revenue
and their contract is with government, specifically government and defense.
So let's read what they do there. Government contracts remain
(26:25):
Planter's largest revenue stream. The company has established long term
relationships with defense and intelligence agencies in the US and
allied nations. Planter's Gotham platform is the foundation for much
of this work, allowing users to sift through enormous data
says to uncover insights related to national security, counter terrorism,
and again military operations. Planter also supports various defense applications
(26:49):
such as mission planning, logistics optimization, and battlefield management. This
solutions are integral to operations across branches of the US
Department of Defense and other military alliances. So there you
have it. And one of the key technologies that Polanter
uses is AI. Okay, So here's what's been reported in
(27:12):
the news in pretty much you know, everybody doesn't matter
if it's NBCCBSCN N whatever, and I don't even care
if they're left. Look, it's everywhere. These are the accusations
of the relationship and what's going on now. There hasn't
be any hard data or proof, but it is floating,
is floating around out there. Somehow this information got out.
So here's a quote from an MSNBC article. The push
(27:35):
has put a key Polanta Air product called Foundry into
at least four federal agencies, including DHS and the Health
and Human Services Department widely Adopting Foundry, which organizes and
analyzes data, paves the way for mister Trump to easily
merge information from different agencies. The government officials said, creating
detailed portraits of Americans based on government data is not
(27:58):
just a pipe dream. The Trump administration has already sought
access to hundreds of data points on citizens and others
through government databases, including their bank account numbers, the amount
of their student debt, their medical claims, and any disability status.
Mister Trump could potentially use such information to advance his
political agenda by policing immigrants and punishing critics. Democratic lawmakers
(28:22):
and critics have said, okay, so there you have it.
Of course, the Democratic lawmakers and critics are going to
obviously be against Trump in any capacity, but we still
have to think about the ramifications of this type of
deal or use of this technology. This can be used
for a digital ID system, for example, collecting data. This
(28:43):
could lead us down the road to how China handles
our citizens. It could lead to data that could be
used for a social credits cored. Now, we don't ever
want to think that the United States of America will
take away freedoms, and we may go down that road.
But let's not forget what happened during COVID. The censors,
the deplatforming, people losing jobs, all those things happen. All
(29:06):
the things we said that wouldn't happen did happen. So
this does raise concern. And another concern that we need
to be aware of is that in this big beautiful bill.
Getting back to that, by the way this all ties in,
there is a provision in which state and local governments
cannot regulate AI for I believe it was a period
(29:28):
of ten years. Very interesting. So you have one of
the biggest proponents of AI being one of the founders
of Plantier, which their technology is all mostly based on
the abilities of integrating the advanced capabilities in algorithms that
AI can offer. And now this doesn't look so, I
(29:51):
don't know, coincidental. Now it looks like it's something out
of a conspiracy novel. Plausible, Right, And then we could
also talk about that with the squabble that was happening
between Elon Musk and Trump, we also kind of forgot
about what was going on with the Epstein list, Right,
So we're getting close. Pam Bondi was saying, Hey, we
(30:13):
got thousands of hours of tape and evidence that we're
going through and that we're going to release. And then
you have Bongino, Dan Bongino, who was a prominent podcaster
and a huge proponent of moving the Republican Party forward
and may have actually contributed to helping Donald J. Trump
get elected. Now, with that being said, he's now the
deputy director of the FBI, and suddenly, after constantly saying
(30:37):
that Epstein didn't kill himself, that there's more behind this,
that this is a conspiracy, that somebody got to him,
now that he's in the FBI, all that is just
thrown out the window. No, nothing happened, he killed himself,
There's no conspiracy, No one got to Epstein. Very very strange.
(30:58):
Makes you wonder if Dan himself wasn't a media plant
to take advantage of new media, and he himself spread
dare I say it conservative or Republican propaganda. Now we
know that he's been, you know, a podcaster or a
radio show host for many many years. And his sudden rise, though,
(31:20):
is what was kind of strange. Now he's gonna say, well,
it's because Rush Limbaugh gave me a shout out and
recommended my show, and since then it blew up. All right,
fair enough, Dan, but you gotta also admit that your
rise was kind of like a switch that was flipped
and then overnight you were a success. And then you
suddenly didn't care about the money or the show. You
(31:40):
wanted to be back in the government, serving in law
enforcement in the FBI. Sorry, Dan, but it is a
head scratcher. And then you have cash Betel. Same thing,
same thing, all the times he said, now there's something
going on here. This doesn't smell right. We need to
get to the bottom of it. And now that he
(32:02):
is the director of the FBI, suddenly tapes don't exist.
Nothing's going on. Hey, I don't know what to tell you.
We're gonna give you everything we have, but there's nothing there. Okay,
So was the elon Donald J. Trump squabble or fight
a distraction kind of seems that way, kind of seems
(32:24):
that way, But you know what, We're gonna move past that.
Speaker 1 (32:26):
Now.
Speaker 2 (32:27):
Let's focus on what's going on with the Epstein List,
the list that was promised on day one of Donald J.
Trump's presidency, which one hundred days in or so. We've
got fuck all. We got nothing, nothing aside from people
side stepping, bird walking their answers, not really given direct answers,
trying to change the subject. But I'm gonna play something
(32:50):
here now. I don't really do this often, Like I'm
gonna play something from Joe Rogan, Joe Rogan's newest episode
of Latest as of you know this episode, I'm recording
a way he had Cash. I got to give Joe credit.
I don't listen to Joe Rogan every day, I really don't.
I know there's some hardcore fans out there, but when
Joe has a certain guest, I'm gonna listen. And I
got to give credit to Joe because he actually pressed
(33:12):
Cash Battel. He pressed him on this Epstein List situation,
and Cash did a good job of not really giving
a direct answer, and at some point he even changed
the subject on Joe, and Joe realized what was going
on now. I didn't hear the entire episode. I got
now seventy five percent in. But what got my attention
(33:35):
was Cash's response at about forty one minutes in or so,
when Joe started pressing him about the Epstein list. What's
interesting is Cash really seems to be I'd hate to
say it lying. He's either lying or he really is
(33:57):
this clueless. And I can't say that Cash is clueless.
He's a pretty smart guy. I want to play some
of this now. I'm going to play it. I may
interject here and there, but you got to hear this interaction.
Here we go.
Speaker 7 (34:09):
I've said it, Dan Bongino said it. We've reviewed all
the information, and the American Republic is going to get
as much as we can release. He killed himself. Do
you think, let's play out the logical conclusion of this.
Do you think that myself, Bongino and others would participate
in hiding information about Epstein's grow test activities, or do
(34:30):
you think we would also participate in not prosecuting people
we had evidence to prosecute people on the problem is
there's been like fifteen years of people coming in and
creating fictions about this that doesn't exist. Where's the videotape
of Anifsteen Island of X, Y and Z committing these frauds?
(34:51):
Why haven't you given it to us? Do you really
think I wouldn't give.
Speaker 6 (34:53):
That to you?
Speaker 2 (34:54):
All right, that's very interesting in the statement he's trying
to make appeal here that look, a guy like me,
in my position, what I do? I stand for justice, truth, light,
the American way. I would never hold this information back.
Of course, I didn't want to prosecute someone who did
(35:15):
these heinous acts. But in the same statement, he said
that there were fifteen years of people spreading lies about
this which weren't lies, were they? I mean, let me
put this into perspective. Cash Epstein has been on the
radar for years. They obviously were looking into Epstein, especially
(35:38):
if they have fifteen years of evidence and investigative reports
on Epstein. So your statement doesn't make any sense in
that if there was the information, don't you think I
would give it to you? Not really, Cash, not really
believe in you here, Because if there's fifteen years of data,
investigative reports, and evidence and there was nothing there, there
(36:04):
was nothing there, then nobody would be talking about Epstein
for those entire fifteen years, and even after he has died,
something doesn't smell right here, Cash or I would continue
to play this because this is where Joe leans into Cash.
Speaker 7 (36:20):
If it existed. I'm working my ass off, along with
the leadership at the Bureau and DJ to get you
what we're allowed to give you. And you're going to
get the video of the cell and you're going to
see for yourself, and we will never be able to
convince everyone.
Speaker 8 (36:35):
Okay, let's get into that. So what did you think
before you got an office? Did you think that Epstein
was smart? No, no suspicion at all of that.
Speaker 7 (36:45):
But I have a different background, right right, So I
was a public defender back in the day. I used
to spend a lot of time in jails and a
lot of time in segregated housing units shoes as we
call them.
Speaker 2 (36:55):
Right, all right, I'm gonna stop it. In the video,
Cash says know and looks away. Kyle looks down, looks away.
He's full of shit. He himself had suspected that there
was foul play here, but suddenly he doesn't believe there is. Suddenly,
same thing with Dan Boon Gino. Suddenly no issue is
nothing going on, right.
Speaker 7 (37:18):
And so, and I've known people that have committed suicide
in these cells, and I know how you get in,
how you get out, who works the system, and so
the way, based on public information at the time that
he ended up put the pictures in him hanging himself,
I was like, man, that guy killed himself. There's just
(37:39):
no way that you could have run an up and
had people go into that cell and not have any
video of it and not have any people come out
and say, hey, yeah, I saw that guy. He shouldn't
have been there, the guard or this guy. There's just
no access points into places like this in the detention
center he was in, which I've been in.
Speaker 8 (37:57):
So correct me if I'm wrong. But what I told,
what I'd read was that the guards were not paying
attention or were sleeping.
Speaker 7 (38:06):
Well, right, yeah, and in short order you'll see it
is that?
Speaker 8 (38:09):
Is that correct?
Speaker 7 (38:11):
Well, it's hard to surmise that from a video, right.
Speaker 2 (38:13):
Like, oh, okay, you can tell Cash is already feeling
the pressure here a direct question because Joe's correct. It
was reported that the guards were asleep, not paying attention,
and later on you're going to hear where Joe brings
up the fact that while was also reported that the
cameras were somehow not working. So the argument that Cash
gives about there's no way they can have this can happen.
(38:35):
There's no entry points it would have been caught on video.
But I do remember Joe remembers, most of America remembers
that we're told the cameras weren't functioning or operating at
the time, So how would you get it on video anyway?
And the messaging that he is saying that look, there's
no ways would have happened in a prison like this,
(39:00):
all right, So murders that are influenced by bribes being
offered to prison guards who are corrupt and want to
make extra cash because they put up with a lot
of bullshit already. Maybe they're not corrupt. Hey, look you
wave ten twenty grand in front of someone's face to
look away, they may consider it. We're human, right, prison
guards are human. They're working their ass off not making enough.
(39:21):
I can see that happening. So Cash is really doing
a good job thus far. But you could also hear
and if you watch the video, if you look at
Joe Rogan's episode with Cash Betel, his latest anyway, you
could see Cash is a bit uncomfortable, and I gotta
say that Cash is a pretty good actor so far,
(39:42):
or I would have continue this a little more.
Speaker 7 (39:44):
Right where they like, you know, and look, do guards
does off on the night shift? Yeah, but no one
can get in to the cell. And if they had
gotten in to the cell, you would see it. But
we were told that the cameras were down. Well I
don't know who said that, but that was that was
in the news. We're giving you all the footage we have.
Speaker 2 (40:05):
Funny right, that nervous laugh. I don't know who said that.
You know, he tends to do that a lot. That's
Cash is tell I've watched other interviews where he was
where he was asked about the Epstein list and the
Epstein files and the suicide itself, and where he also
shrugged it off with a laugh. That's one of his tells.
So just so everybody knows, pay attention to his responses.
(40:27):
And every time he throws that little laugh and he
kind of shirks because he knows he's full of shit
and he's been backed into a corner.
Speaker 8 (40:33):
So why wasn't that released like immediately? Why Why did
this speculation escalate?
Speaker 7 (40:41):
I think you'd have to ask whoever. The Attorney general
back then was Bill Barr.
Speaker 8 (40:46):
Did you ever see do you remember that HBO autopsy show?
Doctor Michael Baden. He's a famous forensic I don't think
as a scientist, and so he's a pathologist and he
reviewed the case and it was his determination that it
was a homicide because of the way his neck was broken.
And what he said was it was indicative of a
(41:08):
ligature strangulation, and it was because of the positioning on
the neck where the marks were that it wasn't indicative
of someone hanging by their weight, which had been higher
on the chin. And there's this specific break of the
bones and the vertebrae that's consistent with someone who has
just strangled to death.
Speaker 7 (41:24):
I haven't seen it. I'll definitely take a look at it,
because that's part of my job. You haven't seen that
the report? No, I haven't looked at that.
Speaker 1 (41:33):
Did you see any.
Speaker 8 (41:35):
Was there any other autopsy done other than the official one?
Speaker 7 (41:40):
Not to my knives, But if there was, you'll get it.
And that's what we're doing.
Speaker 8 (41:43):
See if you find that doctor Michael Badden thing. Do
you remember that show?
Speaker 2 (41:47):
The HBO show? No, pretty cool show.
Speaker 8 (41:49):
So this guy, doctor Michael Baden, he had a long
career of catching murderers, you know, exhooming bodies, finding trace
amounts of poisons, different kinds of things.
Speaker 2 (41:59):
It was a crazy show, like all these wild ways.
Speaker 7 (42:01):
I love watching shows, and I spent a lot of
time on plans.
Speaker 8 (42:03):
Yeah, it was an old show. It was a show
like from the early two thousands, I believe. But this
guy was like, you know, it's very well respected forensic
scientists who would analyze these bodies, and it was his
determination that he was murdered.
Speaker 7 (42:19):
Yeah, And my job, going back to the core of
what I've been doing since I stood rushing it was
to get it is to get everybody the information.
Speaker 8 (42:29):
When did you get here? Epstein's autopsy points to homicide
pathologists hired by brother claims. New York City Medical Examiner
strongly disputed the claim that the evidence from the autopsy
suggests his triangulation. So let's go to by the way,
this is the New York Times and they never lie
the private pathologist, doctor Michael Baden, said the morning TV
(42:50):
show Fox and Friends. Mister Epstein experienced a number of injuries,
among them a broken bone in his neck, that are
extremely unusual in suicidal hangings and could occur much more
commonly in homicidal strangulation. I think the evidence points to
homicide rather than suicides, sid doctor Baden, who observed the
autopsy done by city officials. Doctor Baden, a former New
York City medical examination and a Fox News contributor, said
(43:12):
I have not seen in fifty years where that occurred
in suicidal hanging.
Speaker 3 (43:16):
Case.
Speaker 8 (43:18):
Findings by doctor Baden were strongly disputed by the city's
chief medical examiner, doctor Barbara Sampson, who previously ruled at
mister Epstein's death in August tenth in the Metropolitan Correctional
Center was a suicide. I stand firmly behn our determination
of the cause and manner of death in this case,
doctor Sampson said in the interview on Wednesday. She added,
in general, fractures of the hyoid bone and cartilage can
(43:40):
be seen in suicides and homicides. The hyoid bone is
near the Adams apple. Doctor Samson also dismissed doctor Badden's
contention that the circumstances around mister Epstein's death suggested other
people may have been involved. She said her office had
done a complete investigation taken into consideration information gathered by
law enforcement in the making the determination.
Speaker 7 (44:01):
So this is a perfect example of going back to
my public defender in prosecutor days. This is what we
call a war of experts.
Speaker 2 (44:10):
Okay, all right, So now Cash is trying to flip
the script here because he knows he's backed into a corner.
He knows that there's more to the story. And now
this is a war of experts, right, And he's going
to go on and say, Hey, when I was a lawyer,
I would do this when I defended people like sometimes
the defense some pretty bad guys, and you know, you
(44:31):
want to find an expert who's on your side, who's
going to say what's going to work for your defense. Sure,
except for the fact that this forensic scientist is forensic pathologist,
went out of their way to examine this, to look
at this case without getting paid, no incentive, to give
(44:53):
his two cents on this matter, and say, look, this
is not conducive. This does not like line up with
a suicide. This isn't very common like that. This doesn't
make any sense. Look, Cash is full of shit. Bongino
is full of shit. There is something that is either
(45:15):
scaring them or their allegiance to Trump. And I'm not
even saying or accusing Trump of being involved in this
whole Epstein fiasco, but someone close to Trump maybe and
someone is absolutely being protected or may have nothing to
do with Trump. It could have to do with another agency,
(45:38):
someone involved with another agency that can easily wipe out
Cash's family and get to Bongino and his family. We
don't know. This is hypothetical. This is hypothetical, but this
also is very interesting because Cash was also recently swatted.
How peculiar. And if you don't know what swatting is,
(46:01):
this is where somebody, some of anonymous person will call
in some crazy thing going on at a house, like, oh,
there's a gunfight, there's something going on, and the police
will respond with a swat team and this go to
your house with guns out, ready to go. And someone
swatted Cash. Someone got to Cash. I'm sorry, none of
this smells right. None of this lines up. A lot
(46:23):
of what Cash and bon Gina say are very contradictory
to what Pam Bondi has been saying to the press.
None of this makes sense. None of it. Look America,
I mean hell, the world needs accountability. When it comes
to this Epstein case, we need accountability, we need closure,
(46:45):
We need people to be prosecuted, we need them to
go to jail. And I've said this before, I do
not care if certain people that we don't want to
be involved are involved. I say if they are, If
they are involved in pedophilia, you know they're going around
having sex with underage girls and boys, and they're a
(47:06):
part of this whole Epstein party, this whole Epstein fiasco.
Let them burn, Let the government burn, if the governments
behind it, I don't care. It's time for us to
reset and move forward and really live as a very
very proper moral society. We got to stop reinforcing and
(47:31):
coddling and patent people on the back for being minor attracted,
for just brushing these things under the rug, or even
being scared of being held hostage by some power. Look,
I hate to say it, but yeah, we're all going
to die at some point. Are you going to die
on your feet defending justice, truth, the American way, and
freedom or you're just going to be a coward, take
(47:51):
the money and run. You're not doing anything for the
American people. If you're going to be that guy, if
you're going to be that guy. You're not doing anything
for the American people. And I know it's a tough spot.
Look at they threaten your family, that's one thing. To
threaten you, that's another. I get it, I get it.
But someone has to step up, someone has to put
their foot down and not be afraid to prosecute every
(48:14):
single fucking person that was involved with this whole Epstein
fiasco period. All right, all right, all right, get off
my soapbox. Look, we had the discussion. I hope that
people are brought to justice, and I wish Cash would
(48:34):
stay vigilant and somehow pull his head out of his
ass and really go after this Epstein case the way
he said he was going to before he became the
director of the FBI. Now, in other news geopolitics across
the globe, Russia is escalating their attacks against Ukraine. Now,
(49:00):
this just happened. So this is why I brought this
up today. As of this recording, June seventh, twenty to
twenty five, Russia launched one of the largest attacks yet
against Ukraine. So this is what's been reported. Apparently, Russia
launched one of the largest air attacks against the Ukraine.
(49:20):
There were four hundred seven suicide drones, thirty eight cruise
missiles and six ballistic missiles that hit the Ukrainian cities.
So far, it's been reported that three people died of
seen other reports that seven to ten people died, there
were you know, twenty to thirty injuries. Here's a report
from the AP that came out just you know, a
(49:43):
few hours ago. Russian attacks on eastern Ukrainian city of
Kharkiv killed four, wound more than two dozen Kiev, Ukraine.
Russian attacks targeted the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv killed
at least four people and wounded more than two dozen
others on Saturday. Now again, there's other reports that are
(50:04):
coming out for saying that there was more than four
people killed. But I'm just gonna read what I got
here from the AP. The first wave of the Ukrainian
second largest city was a large Russian drone and missile
attack in the early hours. It killed at least three
people and wounded twenty one others, according to local officials.
In the afternoon, Russia dropped aerial bombs on the city
(50:25):
center to the at least one person, wounding five more Karkibbs.
I'm sorry, I'm probably mispronounced that, but karkibvs mayor said.
The warring sides also accused each other of trying to
sabotage a planned prisoner exchange nearly a week after Kiev
embarrassed to Kremlin with a surprising drone attack on military
airfields deep inside Russia. Now again this is a piece
(50:50):
that we have to pay attention to because Ukraine retaliated
against Russia. They launched a deep attack days ago. By
the way, against Russia got one of their power grids
or one of their major towers that helped supply power.
They bombed and took out a supply train. So the
Ukrainians launched an attack. Now people are saying, why would
(51:13):
the Ukrainians do this? What are they thinking they did?
They they wouldn't do this if they had didn't have
the backing or approval from the US or someone else.
There's also others that said, you know, there's no way
that the Ukraine would do this and jeopardize the relationship
with the US. One of those people was PbD. I
believe uh, you know, Patrick Pick, David, Sorry man, you
(51:35):
got some bad takes. Listen, Ukraine's gonna do what they
want to do. They're protecting their country and their sovereignty. Yes,
there was a minerals deal in place. Yes the US
is involved financially, and yes that they are now going
to be or they I don't know what I'm saying.
They we because I am in the USA, We're going
to be tied to the hip with Ukraine. But nothing
has happened yet in terms of putting people there to
(51:57):
start mining and processing those minerals. Okay, now we have
to do something. This whole thing is getting out of hand.
Russia is now taking the gloves off. They have never
launched an attack this big. This is them flex and saying, look,
you want to fuck around, you're gonna find out. Russia
can wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth. Literally,
they can do this. We all know it. I am
(52:21):
labeling this Russia Ukraine situation as kind of I may
be off on this, you may not agree, but it
feels like the Cold World War three. Why do I
say that? Because every nation has an interest of either
self protection or an interest in what's going on due
to their relationships with Ukraine and the surrounding territories and
(52:42):
countries around the Ukraine and Russia. You see, we can't
dismiss the fact also that while we don't want to
believe this is not a cold World War three, which
may very well become a very hot World War three.
That well, our allies are Ukrainian allies and big air quotes.
(53:03):
By the way, the UK has done nothing yet. France
has done nothing yet. Poland has done nothing yet. Poland's
at there ready though you can't fuck around Poland. I mean,
they're ready to go. But everything's been posturing. Everything's been words,
everything's been donations, money, supplies, whatever, but none of them
has stepped up. Now the Ukraine here Starmer claimed, we're
(53:25):
gonna step up our readiness, our military redness, and we're
ready to go. Sure, you guys keep talking, but nothing's happening.
This war has been going on for quite some time.
It's not gonna be long before Russia is knocking on
your door just for the sake of retaliation. You guys
talk big and do nothing. That being said, I'm also
gonna hold President Trump accountable. I know he was not
(53:46):
wanting to get into an actual war. Nobody wants to
go to a real, hot, contested World War three. But
the reality is someone's gonna have to put their foot down. Period.
In this war, China is involved, but nobody's talking about it.
There has been Chinese troops caught scene killed in this
(54:09):
war siding with Russia. There have been North Korean troops
caught killed seen in this war supporting Russia. Iran has
sent drones and technologies to Russia in support of this war.
So we got this alliance between Russia, Iran, China, and
(54:31):
North Korea who are all very actively engaged in this conflict.
Yet those who claim that they stand up for freedom
and justice and are looking out for Ukraine have done
nothing nothing. Why because they don't really want to be
held a task. They don't really want to kill their
own citizens, their own military personnel. I mean understandable, nobody
(54:52):
wants to go to war, but when is somebody going
to actually step up, reach into their fucking trousers, pull
their gigan aganic balls out and slap him on fucking
Putin's face. Putin's going to keep doing this, He's not
going to stop. He doesn't care about peace. He's not
going to do anything to appease the Western Alliance. He
(55:14):
gives no fucks Russia wants Ukraine. He's made it very clear.
And after that, he's gone for Poland. He's going for
all the old USSR territories because that's what he said
he wanted to achieve. And Putin's getting older, man, he's
getting older, and this is his legacy. This is just
him testing the waters. At any given moment, Russia can
(55:35):
decimate the Ukraine. And I know, I hear all these
the analysts saying while Russia doesn't have the infrastructure, they
don't have the logistics, they don't have that. You know what,
fuck all that. You know what, Russia has a huge artillery.
They could just rain hell fire from the sky on
Ukraine all day and take him out. And Ukraine has
(55:57):
no real aerial defense outside of what ever we may
donate to them, period, full stop. We got to stop
fooling ourselves into thinking how strong Ukraine is. Ukraine is sneaky,
Ukraine is smart. They've launched some attacks that Russia wasn't
prepared for. They got caught off guard how Russia was
attacked deep into their own territory. I gotta tip my
(56:18):
hat to Ukraine for doing that. Great good for you,
but you poke the bear. And now Russia said fuck it,
here you go. You know what, The rest of world
is doing absolutely nothing, absolutely nothing. This needs to end.
Trump needs to do something period. This is goot to stop.
(56:40):
The United States of America, who stands up for freedom, democracy, justice,
needs to step up because the rest of the world
isn't gonna do dick. They're gonna do fuck all until
America steps up. And that's always been the way it is.
That has always been the way it is. Europe is
not gonna save you. Ukraine, stop entering to them. U
(57:01):
K't give us no fucks about you. Franz ain't gonna
do shit across to busy trying to look like a
man was being slapped by his wife. Nothing's gonna happen.
The US needs to get involved. Trump, mister President, Let's
figure this out. Let's get something done. This has to end.
(57:25):
Enough of that angry rant. Listen, everybody, thanks so much
for listening to me. And by the way, please like, subscribe,
share the show, give me a five star rating, leave
a comment in a review, and always have a great day.
Days content.
Speaker 6 (57:45):
Feel intention Devil Redemption understands Onetime.
Speaker 1 (58:01):
Do Do Do Do.
Speaker 6 (58:05):
Do Do Do
Speaker 2 (58:10):
Do
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Cardiac Cowboys
The heart was always off-limits to surgeons. Cutting into it spelled instant death for the patient. That is, until a ragtag group of doctors scattered across the Midwest and Texas decided to throw out the rule book. Working in makeshift laboratories and home garages, using medical devices made from scavenged machine parts and beer tubes, these men and women invented the field of open heart surgery. Odds are, someone you know is alive because of them. So why has history left them behind? Presented by Chris Pine, CARDIAC COWBOYS tells the gripping true story behind the birth of heart surgery, and the young, Greatest Generation doctors who made it happen. For years, they competed and feuded, racing to be the first, the best, and the most prolific. Some appeared on the cover of Time Magazine, operated on kings and advised presidents. Others ended up disgraced, penniless, and convicted of felonies. Together, they ignited a revolution in medicine, and changed the world.