September 26, 2025 • 46 mins
Jesse Kelly explores the growing terror threats facing the United States. From communist radicalization to sophisticated attacks, Jesse and experts uncovers the risks threatening our way of life. Join Jesse as he highlights the unwavering efforts to protect America’s freedom and security in these challenging times.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV
Choq: Visit https://choq.com/jessetv for a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life
The Fresh Pressed Olive Oil Club: Go to https://FarmFresh246.com & get your first $39 bottle free with no obligation or commitment.
Pure Talk: Go to https://www.puretalk.com/JESSETV and save 50% off your first month.
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
Terrorism. Every single American knows about terrorism. And what do
you think about when you think about terrorism, You think
about Jihanti's Islamic Jihak. You know we live through nine
to eleven the isis years, Iraq, Afghanistan. That you think
about suicide vests and things like that, that's what we think.
We think terrorism me too for sing of pops into
(00:32):
your head. But let's get down to the nitty gritty
of it, because we have an entirely different kind of
terrorism going on right now and it's going to continue
going on. Terrorism is simply, as the name suggests, the
use of terror to pursue political goals or religious goals.
There are people all over the planet who don't have
(00:55):
a respect for human life. And once once you strip
that away from somebody, so it's a human being, any
human being, once they stop being someone created by God,
it's a sacred soul, it's a human being.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
Once they're not that, then why wouldn't you hurt them?
Why wouldn't you kill them, threaten them? Once you strip
that humanity away.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
From people, that's what you do. Now Here in the
United States of America, we have the Democrat Party. They
are communists, they're street animals, are communists. They're street enforcers,
are communists. And here's how it works. It has worked
this way for a while, probably twenty twenty five years
in this country, and it's going to be bad for
(01:39):
the foreseeable future. Elite communists, I'm talking about Democrats in
the media and Democrat politicians. They understand they have a
rabid base willing to hurt people because they're a bunch
of animals and demons, and they give them orders. And
they've been doing this over and over and over and
over and over again. Program them no different than a
(02:01):
jihadi is programmed. You know, die for Allah, Die for Allah,
Die for Allah. Here's a suicide vest programmed over and
over and over and over and over again. Well, Democrats,
they've been calling you nazi, gestapo, white supremacists over and
over and over and over and over again for ten years.
And we roll our eyes and we say that's not true,
(02:22):
and we say I'm not racist, and we say I'm
not hitler, and we tell them it's ridiculous. But they're
not saying that for your sake. They're not talking to
you when they call you a Nazi. They're talking to
the demons that make up the Democrat base. Your liberal
aunt Peggy, if she thinks you're a Nazi, if she
(02:43):
thinks Donald Trump is a Nazi, a Russian agent, but
beyond her right, that's the basic Democrat.
Speaker 2 (02:48):
That's the normal Democrat.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
If you keep going down and down and down, how
many are pilled out of their minds? Remember the polls
we've cited over and over again about how pilled out
and have all already been told they have mental health
issues Democrats are now. Now, let's go to the internet
where terrorist cells meet, not just Gihati terrorist cells, where
(03:11):
these communists terrorst cells meet. They communicate with each other.
They talk about killing people. I want him to die.
We should kill him? Should we kill him? I think
I'll kill him, over and over and over again. And
this has been happening for years. These people have been
programmed to believe they're fighting against Nazis, and Democrats give
them orders, and they interpret those things as orders because
(03:35):
that's what they are, and they march out and they
hurt people. I'm going to play something for you, something
we've played for you many times before on the show.
But I want you to listen very very closely. Jaya
Powell is a congresswoman from Washington State. She's a committed communist,
fairly open about it. But she lays out quite frankly
(03:55):
what the plan is. And you'll notice. You'll notice she's
gonna say strike ready and street ready, and you've heard
these terms. That's not the most important part of what
she's about to say. She talks about risk tolerance. We
have to figure out what our risk tolerance is, and
as things get more dire than we have to have
more risk tolerance. What she's saying, hey, I know, maybe
(04:17):
you don't want to get arrested. I know maybe you're
hesitant to hurt someone or kill someone. But we're fighting
against Nazis now. We don't have time for any more hesitation.
You may have heard this interview and dismissed it. You
may have heard it and thought it was nothing, But
that communist animal on the internet he heard this and
he heard marchin orders.
Speaker 3 (04:38):
We might call this getting strike ready. I think of
it as getting us strike ready or street ready. And
part of that is understanding our own strength, and as
we develop that strength, being able to assess our risk tolerance.
Because we know that risk tolerance increases as the severity
of the situation increases, and as our own understanding what's
(05:00):
happening increases. So overall, the more we understand what's effective,
what the risks are, and who's ready to participate, the
more impact we can.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
You heard what she said, and look I pointed her out.
But in the interest to fairness, they all talk this way.
Chuck Schumer is telling people to reap the whirlwind.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
Joe Biden got up.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
In front of the entire country and told them that
Republicans were a threat to the very foundations of democracy.
Every single talking head on CNN, MSNBC, New York Times,
Washington Post. Ten years of calling you Nazi, Nazi, Nazi.
What has happened is it has created terror cells in
this country, no different than jihadi terror cells. They're in Portland,
(05:46):
They're in New York City, they're all across the United
States of America, oftentimes drugged out, sexually deviant monsters. And
they believe they're in a fight with Nazis. They're in
a war, they believe, and they've already killed and they're
going to kill again. And I'm sorry, I know that's
very hard to hear, but they're going to keep killing people.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
We can win.
Speaker 1 (06:11):
This fight, but we better understand that's what we're dealing
with and why we're dealing with it. And by the way,
before we go to Jerry dunlavy, just know they're not sorry.
I'm talking about elected Democrats. They know what their rhetoric does.
They're not going to tone it down because they want
this to happen. All that may have made you uncomfortable,
(06:32):
but I'm right, we'll go to Jerry next. Increase in
your testosterone in ninety days. That sounds like something you
would hear from the local tea clinic. I know you
have one, there's one in every five feet around here.
(06:53):
But what does that mean? Well, there, you're gonna get
a needle jammed in your arm. Do you think you
should do that? I'm talking about natural herbal supplements clinically
tested twenty percent increase in your t levels in ninety days.
You are going to have so much more energy than
you have now without a needle in your arm. Your
(07:14):
brain is going to work better, your mood is going
to be better. All without a needle in your arm.
Natural herbal supplements a male Vitality stack from Chok will
change your entire life, ladies, you are not forgotten. They
have female vitality stacks for you. Do you want to
be full of pep at the end of the day,
ready to go instead of dragon your butt through the
(07:35):
kitchen chalk dot Com slash Jesse TV.
Speaker 4 (07:46):
Can you understand that it was never my intention to
make light of the murder of a young man?
Speaker 5 (07:53):
I don't.
Speaker 4 (07:57):
I don't think there's anything funny about it. I posted
a message on Instagram and the daves killed, sending love
to his family and asking for compassion, and.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
I meant it.
Speaker 6 (08:06):
I still do.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
Nor was it my intention to blame any specific group
for the actions of what it was obviously a deeply
disturbed individual. That was really the opposite.
Speaker 2 (08:17):
Of the point I was trying to make.
Speaker 4 (08:18):
But I understand that to some that felt either ill
timed or unclear, or maybe both. And for those who
think I did point a finger, I get why you're upset.
If the situation was reversed, there's a good chance I'd
have felt the same way. I have many friends and
family members on the other side who I love and
remain close to, even though we don't agree on politics
(08:40):
at all. I don't think the murderer who shot Charlie
Kirk represents anyone?
Speaker 1 (08:46):
Yeah, that was all a lie. He said what he said.
We all saw it. We all know why did it?
Joining me now? Jerry Dunlavy, chief investigative correspondent for Just
the News, one of the real great.
Speaker 2 (08:58):
Ones out there.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
So, Jerry, I guess we can skip past all the
lying and crocodile tears and get down to why do
you think Jimmy Kimmel blamed it on the right? To
begin with? Did he believe it? Is he one of
the dirt balls who knew he was lying? Where would
he even get this idea?
Speaker 6 (09:16):
Tough to get into someone's head. But what I can
say for sure is that Jimmy Kimmel is likely the
kind of person who was hanging out in the information
space of the left. And as I laid out in
a story that I did with dozens and dozens of
examples of prominent leftists, this was something that a large
(09:41):
number of prominent people on the left either fully believed
or were happy to put pedal to their followers. And
what they were pushing was a baseless conspiracy theory that
the assassin who murdered Charlie Kirk was a right winger,
and not just any right winger, but a follower of
(10:03):
the far right and anti semitic Nick Fuenttes. Now, what
evidence did they have for this?
Speaker 7 (10:09):
None?
Speaker 6 (10:10):
They never did. There was never a shred or of evidence,
and in fact, every piece of evidence from the very
UH day of the shooting and onward was that this
was someone motivated by left wing ideology. We have the
ammunition with inscriptions hey fat, hey fascist catch uh bella
(10:34):
chow a and a purportedly anti fascist uh song written
on some of the ammunition and uh and on and on,
and then of course his him admitting to his family
UH that he had done this because he believed that
Charlie Kirk was hateful, and admitting to his boyfriend, who
(10:59):
believed is that he is transitioning from male to female,
admitting to his boyfriend that he did this because Charlie
Kirk was hateful. Now, of course, there's nothing more hateful
than assassinating someone over their views, And of course Charlie
Kirk was not a particularly hateful guy at all. He
went to college campuses and debated people in good faith.
But this conspiracy theory, I can't emphasize enough how deep
(11:24):
this was on the left on Blue Sky, on Twitter,
you had New York Times, reporters, members of Congress, writers
for The Atlantic, all sorts of people, big names and
big accounts, all pushing this. Some of them I think deceitfully,
and some of them, I think actually believed it because
that is the to use their favorite terminology, that is
(11:46):
the disinformation space that they are steeped in and that
they live in.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
Jerry, I'm glad you brought up the New York Times.
I mean, you can look at headlines from NBC News.
This is the problem with this world to make believe
these people live in. It's not just a couple training
freaks on Reddit in Blue Sky. It's the thought of
even if you think they're biased, these huge news organizations
pedaled the same lies you see in the deepest, darkest corners.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Of the Internet.
Speaker 1 (12:14):
So if you're just a normal Democrat, you believe so
many things that are simply not true.
Speaker 6 (12:23):
Absolutely. I mean it's you know, in one sense, obviously
you blame some people bear responsibility for believing things that
aren't true. But you know, like I said, you had
reporters and editors and contributors for the Atlantic who had
bought into this totally baseless conspiracy theory that Charlie Kirk's
(12:47):
assassin was, you know, a far right groper rather than
what he was, a leftist who wanted to kill Charlie
Kirk because he thought Charlie Kirk was the hateful one.
You had a reporter for writers for the New York
Times who were had convinced themselves that it was so
(13:08):
overwhelmingly obvious that the shooter was right wing that people
on the right were going to stop talking about Charlie
Kirk's assassination. They were saying this, they had conced they
had clearly convinced themselves or somehow wanted to convince their
audiences that it was so obviously true that the shooter
was right wing that people on the right were going
(13:29):
to stop talking about it. Obviously, that hasn't happened, in
part because I don't think people would stop talking about
it whether the shooter was from the right or the left,
because lots of people just care about the truth. But
people haven't stopped talking about it because it's so obvious
that the shooter was motivated by by left wing ideology
(13:49):
and a hatred for Charlie Kirk. But this was a.
I mean, these are big name people from prominent places.
I encourage people to read the article. It's one of
the more thorough things that I've done. And when I
say that there are dozens and dozens of examples, I'm
not exaggerating. And I wasn't like scraping the bottom of
the barrel of the internet trying to find, you know,
(14:10):
random people with no followers. These are prominent people, prominent
left wing influencers and prominent left wing reporters and think
makers that were spreading this conspiracy theory. So what I'm
saying is it's no surprise that it made it all
its way, all the way to Jimmy Kimmel, whether he
was pushing a lie knowingly or just believed it because
(14:36):
the rest of the people that are around him believed it.
You know, it's hard to say, but you know, this
is a conspiracy theory that has taken hold on the left,
and a large number of people on the left are
going to believe this conspiracy theory for a long time.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
Unfortunately, again, I want to remind you that he is
Jerry Dunleavy with just the News, and I actually want
you to go re this article very much because I
talk to you all the time about the world of
make believe these communists live in. If you want to
see the bricks in the mortar and how that world
gets built, go read the article.
Speaker 2 (15:09):
It's fascinating. I dug into it. It's fascinating. It's the
nitty gritty.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Detail of why your kookie liberal and Peggy believes Donald
Trump is a Russian agent. Anyway, Jerry, speaking of the left,
the Biden administration worked very very hard, in fact, everyone
on the left, the media as well, for a very
long time to brand right wingers as domestic terrorists, up
to and including lying about data. You dug into this,
(15:34):
what'd you find?
Speaker 2 (15:37):
Yeah?
Speaker 6 (15:37):
I mean, you know, in the wake of Charlie Kirk's
assassination and with all of the politically motivated violence that's
happening right now, a lot of it from the left,
you would hope that we would have a firm, you know,
data set to get our arms around to figure out
(15:58):
what is going on, what's the accuracy of the threat
picture in the United States, and where are domestic terrorism
threats coming from? And I would want that. I want
to know where the threats are coming from the right.
I want to know where the threats are coming from
the left, but unfortunately, the Biden administration spent four years
muddling that picture deliberately. And one of the ways that
(16:21):
they did it, and I know this for a fact
based on declassified documents that we only now are getting
our hands on, that part of how they distorted the
domestic terrorism threat picture is that without telling us that
they had done this, they inflated the right wing terrorism
(16:42):
domestic terrorism threat by counting thousands I'm telling you more
than a thousand, probably closer to two thousand and maybe
more than two thousand instances of arrests in cases tied
to the capital riot of January, counted those each individually
(17:03):
as an instance of domestic terrorism, and then use that
to say that right wing domestic terrorism threat was on
the rise. But they didn't tell us that they were
doing that. We were six cases, so they weren't out
there saying, look, we're taking every single January sixth case
(17:23):
that we've opened and we're counting it as right wing
domestic terrorism and that's why we're saying that right wing
terrorism is on the rise. No, they just told us
that right wing terrorism was on the rise without telling
us how they had arrived at that conclusion, And when
you dig into it, you actually see that sixty one
(17:44):
percent of the domestic terrorism cases as of February twenty
twenty two we're all directly tied to January sixth, So
sixty one percent of the domestic terrorism cases that the
FBI had opened, we're tied to January sixth. Seventy eight
percent of the domestic terrorism arrests that were made in
(18:05):
twenty twenty one were tied to the Capitol Riot. And
they didn't really tell us though, that they were using
those January sixth numbers to pad the stats on this
domestic terrorism threat problem. And then, of course we saw
what they did with that. They greatly expanded the power
of the federal government to look into so called purported
(18:29):
domestic terrorism. They expanded the powers, of course, like using
a letter from the National School Boards Association which called
upon labeling parents as domestic terrorists, to launch a DOJ
DOJ investigations, and all sorts of other things that the
(18:54):
Biden administration, the Biden DOJ did based on this sort
of original sin of using the Capital Riot to pad
those stats and then label right wing domestic terrorism as
this massive threat. And unfortunately, now after four years of
the Biden administration, when we're seeing serious left wing violence,
(19:18):
of course this year seeing it with the assassination of
Charlie Kirk, attacks on Ice and all of this stuff,
but also seeing it the last four years, the last
eight years, we do not have an accurate and trustworthy
data set to rely upon to determine where these threats
are coming from. So the FBI currently is going to
(19:40):
be back at square one, is going to have to
go back and redo all of this because of the
purposefully muddled threat picture that the Biden DOJ and FBI
and intelligence community put together.
Speaker 1 (19:54):
Jerry, before I let you go there are it's more
than chatter. We're hearing this from the counter Terrorism Center.
Al Qaeda on the rise, plotting things. You wrote the book,
amazing book up about our withdrawal from Afghanistan. Kable, tell
me what you know.
Speaker 6 (20:12):
Well. Al Qaida was never fully defeated in Afghanistan, and
the Taliban never not before nine to eleven, not when
we were threatening to invade, not after we invaded, and
not after twenty years of war, and not after we left.
The Taliban never was willing to give up its alliance
(20:33):
with al Qaeda and to give up protecting al Kaieda.
So al Qaida is still a threat. It does have
training in operational space in Afghanistan under the Taliban. And
what's important to keep in mind about al Qaeda is
it doesn't just operate in Afghanistan. It has very effectively
(20:59):
managed to and reconstitute in many ways. It is a
significant challenge and threat. Iterations of al Qaida are significant
challenge and threat in Africa in places like Yemen. Al
Qaeda's outfit in the Al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula
(21:19):
is potent, and al Qaeda has not given up on
its goal and strategy, which is big grand terrorist attacks
aimed at the West and the United States. Isis K
is a little bit more opportunist as compared to al Qaeda.
(21:41):
Isis K will attack where it can and when it can.
Al Qaeda is a bit more patient and likes the
big spectacular attacks, and it has a safe haven in
Afghanistan under Taliban rule, and it's operational in al Qaeda
and in the Middle East. I think that the threat
(22:04):
is very real, but it was very good to see
Joe Kent and the National counter Terrorism Center and Telsea.
Gabbard highlight this threat because I do think that it's
a serious one. All of us, of course, are talking
about domestic terrorism right now, I think rightly. So there's
(22:25):
obviously some domestic terrorism threat from the right. There's a
huge growing problem of it on the left. But you
don't want to forget about the Islamic and jiahattist terrorism
threat as well around the world and here in the
United States, because it's it's serious. Heid and isis K
(22:47):
are not defeated. We have killed a lot of their
different leaders. We have done a lot of things to
try to tamp down on them, but we lost the
war in Afghanistan. There's no other way to put it.
We retreated, we withdrew in chaos, the Taliban took over,
(23:11):
and Al Qaida is still protected by them. So this
is a challenge that we're going to continue to face.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
Jerry, you are the best, my man, Come back soon.
All right, We're going to talk to a former NYPD
detective next. You know what we have behind our stove
probably the exact same thing you have behind your stove.
Salt pepper, olive oil. It's every kitchen you go into,
(23:41):
salt pepper, olive oil. But here's the problem. We just
grab a bottle of olive oil from the grocery store.
That's all I've ever done forty four It's all I've
ever done for about forty three years of my life.
You go down the grocery aisle when you're out, you
only wait until you're out right because it never goes bad.
Speaker 6 (23:58):
Have you ever thought about that?
Speaker 1 (24:00):
Have you ever looked at the date on the olive
oil sitting behind your stove when you buy it? It's old,
months old, sometimes years old. Go to farm Fresh two
four six dot com. Get one bottle. It's free. By
the way, it's free. You pay like a buck to
cover the shipping. Get one bottle.
Speaker 2 (24:21):
What is it?
Speaker 1 (24:22):
It's fresh from a farm.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
It's so much more flavorful.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
You've been eating bland olive oil and had no idea
farm Fresh two four to six dot com.
Speaker 8 (24:40):
Arguably the fastest rising star right now in Democratic politics
is Zura Mandani, who is going to be elected Mayor
of New York City and probably in a landslide as
a sort of talent spot er in the Democratic Party.
What do you think of him and his candidacy and
what do you think of mainline Democratic shyness and agitation
(25:03):
about the prospect that he's gonna win.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
Look, as far as I'm concerned, he's the Democratic nominee
and he should be supported.
Speaker 8 (25:11):
Do you endorse this candidacy?
Speaker 9 (25:13):
I support the Democrat in the race.
Speaker 2 (25:15):
Sure, that's great.
Speaker 1 (25:20):
I hope my beloved New York City is not going
to make the biggest mistake ever. But I fear they're
going to joining me now. Bodid, a host of One
Tough podcast, retired NYPD detective.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Gosh, that's freaking cool. Bo.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Please tell me that New York City is not going
to vote for this monster.
Speaker 7 (25:39):
Let me tell you something. I'm the only one that
put together a pac political action back there, and it's
NYCABM dot com New York City. Anybody but Mondamie. There
is None of the candidates are going after Mondamie. They're
going after each other like jerks instead of focus on
(26:00):
the problem and Mondami Mundammi is the problem. I've been
doing my own homework the other day. What I did
was I hit the streets. First stop was Times Square.
He wants to put mentally ill people in abandoned storefronts,
gives them real good accessibility to the trains, so they
can push people in there and they can beat people
(26:23):
up to mentally ill. Then I made my way up
to Harlem, where we had a grandma that was shot
by a stray bullet by a gang, a bunch of
gangs one hundred and thirteen, and Lennox I did another
video up there. He wants to get rid of the
gang lists as far as the database. He wants to
do everything to destroy our city. Then I went up
(26:44):
to the South Bronx. He wants a freeze on rents.
I remember the nineteen seventies Punk Mandami. I remember when
they got rid of it, they become abandoned buildings. Maybe
that's where you want to go. People are not realized anything.
Speaker 5 (26:59):
Now.
Speaker 7 (26:59):
I'm looking at the fundraising. I'm talking about tens of
millions of dollars being funneled through from out of this country,
including the in country. People like that Fat Big Sorrows
giving all this money. All they're doing, you wonder why
his poll numbers ain't changing. He had one hundred thousand
people on the streets knocking on doors. With all this
(27:21):
money he has, I estimate he had raised more than
fifty million dollars. That's why this punk is going and
nobody's gonna touch him because he's raising all this money.
I heard, you remember I got appointed out the Homeland
Security Council by the President. I heard there was investigations
(27:41):
going on as far as went out of this country
contributions into this campaign. This is a big This is
such an unbelievable thing. What's going on. This is becoming
the wave like what happened in England. They got fifty
towns are'm controlled by social communist son of the guns,
(28:05):
and this is gonna sweep across our country. If this
punk gets elected in New York City, that's how I
really feel about it.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
Well, that's certainly I agree, But why would New York
even with all the money, Why would New York City?
I know New York City's but they suffered from the
Blasio that they they've they've pinned horrible mayors before and
suffered so greatly. How could they ever choose.
Speaker 2 (28:29):
Someone like this?
Speaker 7 (28:32):
Well, the most important thing now, my child, My child
and my daughter are Jewish and my ex wife is
a Russian Jew, so I guess I'm a Jew by marriage.
But here's the deal. How about sixty five percent of
the New York Jewish people voted for this creep. When
he comes out and he says he's anti Semitic, he
(28:54):
doesn't recognize Israel. He doesn't recognize the fact if the
primere of Israel comes to New he wants them locked up.
I tell you what, punk, you're the one that's gonna
get locked up. I got my crawl with this guy.
All he does is smile and follow him, follow hi
where he came from, kept from Uganda, from a rich family.
He couldn't run a damn kool aid s dand now
(29:16):
you want to give him one hundred and fifteen billion
dollar budget. This is a little punk fool who can't
even hold a job. He was a a settlement for
two terms. You never even voted. All he does is
that qtuty smile and you know what they're doing. They're
raping the minds of our of our children on Instagram
ticktoc and they're going to them. Oh, he's gonna give
(29:38):
you free everything. He's gonna give you free buses, he's
gonna give you free rents, he's gonna give you free food.
He's gonna give you food. Dish is a punk that
has to be beat in this election. When are people
gonna wake up? And that's what I do with my
and I implore people support NYC ABM dot com. I
(30:00):
will continue to the last day of the election to
let people realize, what are you doing? Why is it
there no counter attacks from these other candidates against Mondummy? Here?
All they do is attack each other? How bad attacking him?
Speaker 2 (30:16):
Why isn't Cuomo getting more traction? Bo is a guy?
I mean the Cuomo.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Family's royalty in New York governor, this governor that had
is it?
Speaker 2 (30:25):
Is it lingering? Covid anger?
Speaker 1 (30:27):
Why?
Speaker 7 (30:27):
Why?
Speaker 2 (30:28):
Why not Cuomo?
Speaker 7 (30:30):
You know, look, if I have to vote for Como,
I'll vote for Como over Mondummy. I like, I love
Curtis Sliwa, you know, I don't know. People say he
can't win. But here's the deal, what do we vote for.
I'd rather vote for an honest person, which the most
honest out of all of them. Eric Adams is a criminal,
He's a thief. I went through this thing with the
(30:51):
migrant monies. There's all kinds of hundreds of millions of dollars,
no big contract. Nobody wants to talk about it. Eric
Adams is finished and then I told presidents fardening, this
guy there is seven billion dollars of no big contracts
that went to New York City. Why did all his
(31:13):
top lieutenants all in January leave? Remember that shaggy that
guy wasn't me. They all left because when they get
indicted on taking money from the city, the mayor Eric Abas,
you can go, it wasn't me. That's bull craft. He's gone.
Now you got como, and I tell you the honest truth.
His problem is he doesn't know how to be compassion
(31:36):
He doesn't have to do he doesn't know how to
go to the people, say, you know what I screwed
up as governor. I passed his stupid bill reforms. I
let all the cop killers go. I was wrong, But
I love New York City and I love America. I
want to be your mayor and show you my show
you my my contrition of what I did wrong. Please
(31:56):
give me a chance. Because he ain't got it in
I could. When I to punch people out, I just
say to him after I was finished, you know, I'm
sorry you made me break your jaw, but you made
me do it. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
He can't say, bo, what would this mean for the NYPD,
ma'am Donnie becoming mayor.
Speaker 7 (32:19):
Oh well, here's the deal with this. The problem here
is the NYPD is not proactive anymore. They're afraid to
get involved. The other day, when I went up to
Lennox av you one hundred and thirteenth Street with a
film court, when I'm doing these videos about anti Mondonnie,
that gang was on the corner of Lenox Avenue and
(32:39):
one hundred and thirteen. This is the same gang where
shots came out and killed a grandmother, Mamozelle. They a
stray bullet killed her. I walked right into him. They
looked at me like I was nuts. I said, you know,
I'm doing a video here about the killing of this grandma.
Over here. One of the stray bullets came. It came
from a gang fight. I'm not saying you guys are
(33:00):
the gang. Definitely was the gang. Every one of them
stood fast, and they looked at me, and they said
to himself, this guy's gotta be either a psycho path
or he needs to be incocerated. He walks right into
twelve gang members. Their faces all drop a cold stone,
and I know killers. When I see him, I locked
up a lot of them. These were bad guys. I
(33:21):
walked away and I said to myself, I challenged my
own mind. I'm saying, both, why are you walking into
these bad aass gang members ere? And you you know,
at any time, I knew there was at least three
four guns there, and you know this is what it is.
They have open rain. Nobody's going up there. Years ago,
I would have called in the anti crime guys, says,
(33:42):
come on, meet me over here, let's go after this gang.
And I guarantee you we would have taken four guns
out and maybe one of those guns would have been
a murder weapon that would have killed somebody. There's no proactivity.
They get no support for this moron city council liberal thing.
You can't get a guy in the headlock on top
(34:08):
tell me that. So the cops don't want Now if
they get sued, which they get good, get sued, they
could take their home away that they've been putting money
in their pensiones. They lose their job, and you wonder
why cops are not reacting and why they're not doing it.
That poor cop that was shot on Park Avenue and
killed was working overtime because the lousy salary. They started
(34:30):
with below fifty thousand dollars. You couldn't even eat Hamburger.
Speaker 6 (34:35):
Help.
Speaker 7 (34:35):
But these poor cops have to work second third jobs
and then they don't get no support. On top of it.
You've got watch strokes, watching this, this, watching that. Then
you got a da break that that bigger Manhattan. All
he's looking is to take the cops down. You know what,
the criminals become the good guys and the cops are
the bad guys. And you know what we see in
across the country with what's going on with Ice. And
(34:58):
I'm involved with Homeland Security. I was appointed by the
President on the Homeland Security Advisory Council. And these poor
ICE guys are out there trying to get these criminal
illegals off our streets and they're getting beat up, to
getting spat on, their families are getting terrorized. Man, this
country's going wrong. We gotta straighten out. And I think
New York City's gotta be the water. We gotta take
(35:19):
this guy down, Mondamie. If we lose New York City,
I promise you this will be a blanket effect. And
next they're gonna run AOC will run for president of
the United States and what she could possibly win. And
then you know what's gonna happen. They'll take the Congress,
and you know what's gonna happen, they'll try to indict
by President Trump. They'll probably try to indict me too.
(35:41):
But this is where we're going. We gotta stop it.
Speaker 2 (35:46):
Bo.
Speaker 1 (35:47):
Thank you, brother, I appreciate you. All Right, we have
more next. I love my cell phone company.
Speaker 2 (36:01):
You know what I like. Here's what I like.
Speaker 1 (36:03):
I like never having to worry that a company I
patronize is going to take my money and use it
against me, because it's a concern everywhere.
Speaker 2 (36:11):
You know that.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
Right when you go buy a new car, you know
you're gonna have an LGBTQ AD the next day and
you're gonna think.
Speaker 2 (36:17):
Wow, I paid for that ad.
Speaker 1 (36:18):
You know, you know what's coming in this crappy corporate
environment we have. I never have to check on Puretalk.
I never have to pull up their social media. Oh
I hope it's not Pride Month for them. Pere Talk
cares about America. They hire Americans. Their CEO did two
tours in Vietnam. They charge you way less for your
cell phone service. You can keep your phone, you can
(36:39):
keep your number. And more importantly, you can patronize a
business that loves this country. When they give back, they
get veterans back on their feet, they give out American
flags at Independence Day. My kind of company puretalk dot
com slash jessetv go switch today. When we talk about terrorism,
(37:07):
we think about, you know, bombs and suicide vests and
planes flying into buildings, and of course all that stuff
is absolutely dreadful. But what we don't think about is
the quiet things, the quiet, slow, subversive things. They're just
as damaging, in many cases more damaging. Joining me now,
Stephen W. Moser, author of the book, I certainly hope
(37:27):
you've read it by now, The Devil and Communist China. Stephen,
please help me understand because when people say terrorism, they
may think Antifa or a bunch of Jihatis. But it
will take a long time for me to get to
someone who talks about China.
Speaker 2 (37:42):
Why would I talk about China?
Speaker 5 (37:44):
Oh, I think we got to start with China because
China behind all kinds of terrorist attacks on the United States,
both directly and through surrogates. You want to talk about Antifa,
the riots back in twenty twenty, the Houston Chinese counsulate
was encouraging people to join the rioters and actually bringing
in undercover agents from China under diplomatic cover to help
(38:08):
to help provoke those demonstrations. Uh, that's that's terrorism. We
now know Antifa is going to be a terrorist organization,
is a terrorist organization and is going to be tracked
as sage.
Speaker 2 (38:19):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (38:19):
Let's talk about Fentanel. Fentanel is you know, chemical terrorism
against the American population, and the labs wouldn't exist without
the precursors that.
Speaker 9 (38:29):
Come from China.
Speaker 5 (38:30):
The cartels in northern Mexico wouldn't be able to fund
their activities without help from China's banks in laundering the money.
And it's not just Mexico, of course. The biggest ventanyl
lab in North America is located up in British Columbia,
which also has a large population of communist Chinese. Communist
Chinese being very active in our northern border country of Canada.
(38:55):
And who can forget the COVID biological warfare which came
from the Wuhan lab in China. And you know, everywhere
you look you see the black hand of the Chinese
Communist Party. I mean, you see it. You see it
in the in the uh the global warming scam, where
China is funding radical environmental groups. You see it in
the solar panel and and wind farm scam, where China
(39:19):
is funding environmental groups that demand solar panels and h
and windmills, all of which are made in China. Meanwhile,
China is uh the biggest polluter on the planet if
you if you consider all of the particulate matter that's
released into the air by China's coal burning power plants.
So everywhere you look, uh, you know, China is meddling.
(39:42):
You know, we're Swiss cheese, yes see. I mean We're
an open society, and China is burrowing into every possible
nook in granny bar society to cause unrest, dissension, and
what they would like to do, like what they would
like to see is is quite frankly civil war in
the United States, because that would greatly weaken us and
(40:02):
enable them to pursue their plans for global domination without opposition.
Speaker 9 (40:07):
We can't allow that to happen.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
Stephen Trump came out recently and said on camera that
he wants once all these hundreds of thousands of Chinese
students to keep coming here. But Trump is no idiot,
especially when it comes to China. He knows what they're doing,
he knows why they're doing it. So please connect these
thoughts for me, because that can't make sense of it.
Speaker 5 (40:28):
Yeah, I'm I'm a little concerned that we're not hammering
China harder at this point in time. We should be
because because China's in increasingly desperate straits. Right, We've taken
away a large part of the export sector of the
economy from them. They've got no domestic consumption. Their birth
rate is down there, averaging one child per couple. You know,
(40:51):
over a woman's reproductive lifetime. The population of China by
the end of the century will be large, will be
smaller than that of the United States of America because China,
the Chinese Communist Party, has killed off China's future, killed
off the China dreat We ought to be encouraging China's collapse,
and instead a word from the White House is that
(41:11):
we're interested in arranging a kind of soft landing for
the Chinese economy. So we don't want to hit him
too hard on terraces. We don't want to press him
too hard in other areas because we don't want the
chaos and catastrophe that would result from a total collapse. Well,
that's exactly what I want. I want a total collapse
of the Chinese Communist Party. I want different factions to
(41:33):
begin openly fighting against each other. I want a warlord
situation in China, which is what followed the fall of
the Manchu dynasty back in nineteen eleven. I want China
broken up into provincial sized pieces, where possibly in the interstices,
freedom can grow and the Chinese people can enjoy more
were human dignity and respect for their human rights.
Speaker 9 (41:55):
That's what I want.
Speaker 5 (41:56):
I want to encourage the collapse of China, because the
collapse of China will be good not just for the
Chinese people, but for the world at large.
Speaker 1 (42:05):
Stephen, how secure We've talked about this before, about the
Xijinping and not necessarily having as much of a hold
on power as seemed to think, kind of on shaky ground.
Speaker 2 (42:16):
What do we think about this situation?
Speaker 5 (42:19):
Well, I think people need to understand that the largest
political organization on the planet, which is to say, the
Chinese Communist Party with ninety five million members, is not
a unified whole. It is a giant mafia with different factions,
with different mafia families dating back to the Law March,
and the people who rub shoulders with the late chairman
(42:40):
Mau zertome. Those families, those elite families and their sons
and daughters and grandsons and granddaughters control large swaths of
the country of China and large parts of the economy.
And Hijinping has made enemies everywhere. He has attacked all
of the other leading families, the families of the former presidents,
(43:02):
the families of the former Communist Party leaders. And so
I think that opposition to Siji King is building up,
especially as he gets older, and that factional fighting could
break out in open attempts on his life would seem
to have happened once or twice in the last couple
of years, and unrest in more remote provinces like Guangdong.
(43:23):
We ought to encourage that. You know, he's now the
mafia downs you know are called the one, the leading,
the leading mafioso is called the Cabo des duty copies right,
the chief of all the chiefs. Well, he's now a
chief of many chiefs who hate him and would like
to see him removed.
Speaker 9 (43:43):
Think of the movie The Godfather. That's what's going to
happen in China.
Speaker 1 (43:49):
What's the military situation like? And I asked this because
if you're going to topple a dictator, you better have
some guns on your side to do so. That they're
generals involved in all this.
Speaker 5 (44:00):
Well, it's very interesting that xijing Ping has removed more
generals that he has promoted in the last few years
than any previous Communist dictator, going back to Eugene Talo
removed none and John Summin who removed none. So, in
other words, some of the same people that he pinned
four stars on a few years ago, he has now cashiered,
(44:24):
he has now arrested, they have now disappeared, some have
been killed. So what is that all about. Is that
a movement by Sijing Ping to stamp out unrest in
the branks of the People's Liberation Army and take out generals.
Speaker 9 (44:38):
Who are conspiring against him?
Speaker 5 (44:40):
Or is there a movement within the People's Liberation Army,
perhaps led by the vice chairman of the Central Military
Commission who turned his back on Chijing Ping at the
last meeting of the Communist Party turned his back on
the leader of China, removing she's allies within the military.
We're all watching to see what happens now. But clearly
(45:01):
there's a lot of a lot of division in the
People's Liberation Army. And remember the last breakdown of order
in China, the fall of the Manchu dynasty began when
the military garrison commander in the central city of wu
Han rebelled against the Manchu leadership in Beijing, and then
the country fall apart, fell apart into twenty years of warlordism.
(45:25):
That could happen in China.
Speaker 1 (45:30):
That'll be interesting to watch. Not that I'm rooting for
it or anything like that. Stephen, thank you so much, sir.
I appreciate you very much. We have final thoughts next.
(45:55):
It's not easy to hear a lot of this when
we talk about terror cells, people eyeing the prospects of
more of this coming. I know you're not celebrating, and
it's not one of these things you watch and you
stand up and cheer at the end.
Speaker 2 (46:08):
I understand that.
Speaker 1 (46:09):
But we have to understand where we are and why
we are where we.
Speaker 2 (46:13):
Are, and we can come out of this. You can
defeat these insurgencies.
Speaker 7 (46:18):
You can.
Speaker 1 (46:19):
It's going to take focus. It's going to take time,
and there are going to be casualties. Sucks, but it's
where we are. We'll stay on it. Talk to you again.
Terrorism. Every single American knows about terrorism. And what do
you think about when you think about terrorism, You think
about Jihanti's Islamic Jihak. You know we live through nine
to eleven the isis years, Iraq, Afghanistan. That you think
about suicide vests and things like that, that's what we think.
We think terrorism me too for sing of pops into
(00:32):
your head. But let's get down to the nitty gritty
of it, because we have an entirely different kind of
terrorism going on right now and it's going to continue
going on. Terrorism is simply, as the name suggests, the
use of terror to pursue political goals or religious goals.
There are people all over the planet who don't have
(00:55):
a respect for human life. And once once you strip
that away from somebody, so it's a human being, any
human being, once they stop being someone created by God,
it's a sacred soul, it's a human being.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
Once they're not that, then why wouldn't you hurt them?
Why wouldn't you kill them, threaten them? Once you strip
that humanity away.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
From people, that's what you do. Now Here in the
United States of America, we have the Democrat Party. They
are communists, they're street animals, are communists. They're street enforcers,
are communists. And here's how it works. It has worked
this way for a while, probably twenty twenty five years
in this country, and it's going to be bad for
(01:39):
the foreseeable future. Elite communists, I'm talking about Democrats in
the media and Democrat politicians. They understand they have a
rabid base willing to hurt people because they're a bunch
of animals and demons, and they give them orders. And
they've been doing this over and over and over and
over and over again. Program them no different than a
(02:01):
jihadi is programmed. You know, die for Allah, Die for Allah,
Die for Allah. Here's a suicide vest programmed over and
over and over and over and over again. Well, Democrats,
they've been calling you nazi, gestapo, white supremacists over and
over and over and over and over again for ten years.
And we roll our eyes and we say that's not true,
(02:22):
and we say I'm not racist, and we say I'm
not hitler, and we tell them it's ridiculous. But they're
not saying that for your sake. They're not talking to
you when they call you a Nazi. They're talking to
the demons that make up the Democrat base. Your liberal
aunt Peggy, if she thinks you're a Nazi, if she
(02:43):
thinks Donald Trump is a Nazi, a Russian agent, but
beyond her right, that's the basic Democrat.
Speaker 2 (02:48):
That's the normal Democrat.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
If you keep going down and down and down, how
many are pilled out of their minds? Remember the polls
we've cited over and over again about how pilled out
and have all already been told they have mental health
issues Democrats are now. Now, let's go to the internet
where terrorist cells meet, not just Gihati terrorist cells, where
(03:11):
these communists terrorst cells meet. They communicate with each other.
They talk about killing people. I want him to die.
We should kill him? Should we kill him? I think
I'll kill him, over and over and over again. And
this has been happening for years. These people have been
programmed to believe they're fighting against Nazis, and Democrats give
them orders, and they interpret those things as orders because
(03:35):
that's what they are, and they march out and they
hurt people. I'm going to play something for you, something
we've played for you many times before on the show.
But I want you to listen very very closely. Jaya
Powell is a congresswoman from Washington State. She's a committed communist,
fairly open about it. But she lays out quite frankly
(03:55):
what the plan is. And you'll notice. You'll notice she's
gonna say strike ready and street ready, and you've heard
these terms. That's not the most important part of what
she's about to say. She talks about risk tolerance. We
have to figure out what our risk tolerance is, and
as things get more dire than we have to have
more risk tolerance. What she's saying, hey, I know, maybe
(04:17):
you don't want to get arrested. I know maybe you're
hesitant to hurt someone or kill someone. But we're fighting
against Nazis now. We don't have time for any more hesitation.
You may have heard this interview and dismissed it. You
may have heard it and thought it was nothing, But
that communist animal on the internet he heard this and
he heard marchin orders.
Speaker 3 (04:38):
We might call this getting strike ready. I think of
it as getting us strike ready or street ready. And
part of that is understanding our own strength, and as
we develop that strength, being able to assess our risk tolerance.
Because we know that risk tolerance increases as the severity
of the situation increases, and as our own understanding what's
(05:00):
happening increases. So overall, the more we understand what's effective,
what the risks are, and who's ready to participate, the
more impact we can.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
You heard what she said, and look I pointed her out.
But in the interest to fairness, they all talk this way.
Chuck Schumer is telling people to reap the whirlwind.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
Joe Biden got up.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
In front of the entire country and told them that
Republicans were a threat to the very foundations of democracy.
Every single talking head on CNN, MSNBC, New York Times,
Washington Post. Ten years of calling you Nazi, Nazi, Nazi.
What has happened is it has created terror cells in
this country, no different than jihadi terror cells. They're in Portland,
(05:46):
They're in New York City, they're all across the United
States of America, oftentimes drugged out, sexually deviant monsters. And
they believe they're in a fight with Nazis. They're in
a war, they believe, and they've already killed and they're
going to kill again. And I'm sorry, I know that's
very hard to hear, but they're going to keep killing people.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
We can win.
Speaker 1 (06:11):
This fight, but we better understand that's what we're dealing
with and why we're dealing with it. And by the way,
before we go to Jerry dunlavy, just know they're not sorry.
I'm talking about elected Democrats. They know what their rhetoric does.
They're not going to tone it down because they want
this to happen. All that may have made you uncomfortable,
(06:32):
but I'm right, we'll go to Jerry next. Increase in
your testosterone in ninety days. That sounds like something you
would hear from the local tea clinic. I know you
have one, there's one in every five feet around here.
(06:53):
But what does that mean? Well, there, you're gonna get
a needle jammed in your arm. Do you think you
should do that? I'm talking about natural herbal supplements clinically
tested twenty percent increase in your t levels in ninety days.
You are going to have so much more energy than
you have now without a needle in your arm. Your
(07:14):
brain is going to work better, your mood is going
to be better. All without a needle in your arm.
Natural herbal supplements a male Vitality stack from Chok will
change your entire life, ladies, you are not forgotten. They
have female vitality stacks for you. Do you want to
be full of pep at the end of the day,
ready to go instead of dragon your butt through the
(07:35):
kitchen chalk dot Com slash Jesse TV.
Speaker 4 (07:46):
Can you understand that it was never my intention to
make light of the murder of a young man?
Speaker 5 (07:53):
I don't.
Speaker 4 (07:57):
I don't think there's anything funny about it. I posted
a message on Instagram and the daves killed, sending love
to his family and asking for compassion, and.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
I meant it.
Speaker 6 (08:06):
I still do.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
Nor was it my intention to blame any specific group
for the actions of what it was obviously a deeply
disturbed individual. That was really the opposite.
Speaker 2 (08:17):
Of the point I was trying to make.
Speaker 4 (08:18):
But I understand that to some that felt either ill
timed or unclear, or maybe both. And for those who
think I did point a finger, I get why you're upset.
If the situation was reversed, there's a good chance I'd
have felt the same way. I have many friends and
family members on the other side who I love and
remain close to, even though we don't agree on politics
(08:40):
at all. I don't think the murderer who shot Charlie
Kirk represents anyone?
Speaker 1 (08:46):
Yeah, that was all a lie. He said what he said.
We all saw it. We all know why did it?
Joining me now? Jerry Dunlavy, chief investigative correspondent for Just
the News, one of the real great.
Speaker 2 (08:58):
Ones out there.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
So, Jerry, I guess we can skip past all the
lying and crocodile tears and get down to why do
you think Jimmy Kimmel blamed it on the right? To
begin with? Did he believe it? Is he one of
the dirt balls who knew he was lying? Where would
he even get this idea?
Speaker 6 (09:16):
Tough to get into someone's head. But what I can
say for sure is that Jimmy Kimmel is likely the
kind of person who was hanging out in the information
space of the left. And as I laid out in
a story that I did with dozens and dozens of
examples of prominent leftists, this was something that a large
(09:41):
number of prominent people on the left either fully believed
or were happy to put pedal to their followers. And
what they were pushing was a baseless conspiracy theory that
the assassin who murdered Charlie Kirk was a right winger,
and not just any right winger, but a follower of
(10:03):
the far right and anti semitic Nick Fuenttes. Now, what
evidence did they have for this?
Speaker 7 (10:09):
None?
Speaker 6 (10:10):
They never did. There was never a shred or of evidence,
and in fact, every piece of evidence from the very
UH day of the shooting and onward was that this
was someone motivated by left wing ideology. We have the
ammunition with inscriptions hey fat, hey fascist catch uh bella
(10:34):
chow a and a purportedly anti fascist uh song written
on some of the ammunition and uh and on and on,
and then of course his him admitting to his family
UH that he had done this because he believed that
Charlie Kirk was hateful, and admitting to his boyfriend, who
(10:59):
believed is that he is transitioning from male to female,
admitting to his boyfriend that he did this because Charlie
Kirk was hateful. Now, of course, there's nothing more hateful
than assassinating someone over their views, And of course Charlie
Kirk was not a particularly hateful guy at all. He
went to college campuses and debated people in good faith.
But this conspiracy theory, I can't emphasize enough how deep
(11:24):
this was on the left on Blue Sky, on Twitter,
you had New York Times, reporters, members of Congress, writers
for The Atlantic, all sorts of people, big names and
big accounts, all pushing this. Some of them I think deceitfully,
and some of them, I think actually believed it because
that is the to use their favorite terminology, that is
(11:46):
the disinformation space that they are steeped in and that
they live in.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
Jerry, I'm glad you brought up the New York Times.
I mean, you can look at headlines from NBC News.
This is the problem with this world to make believe
these people live in. It's not just a couple training
freaks on Reddit in Blue Sky. It's the thought of
even if you think they're biased, these huge news organizations
pedaled the same lies you see in the deepest, darkest corners.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Of the Internet.
Speaker 1 (12:14):
So if you're just a normal Democrat, you believe so
many things that are simply not true.
Speaker 6 (12:23):
Absolutely. I mean it's you know, in one sense, obviously
you blame some people bear responsibility for believing things that
aren't true. But you know, like I said, you had
reporters and editors and contributors for the Atlantic who had
bought into this totally baseless conspiracy theory that Charlie Kirk's
(12:47):
assassin was, you know, a far right groper rather than
what he was, a leftist who wanted to kill Charlie
Kirk because he thought Charlie Kirk was the hateful one.
You had a reporter for writers for the New York
Times who were had convinced themselves that it was so
(13:08):
overwhelmingly obvious that the shooter was right wing that people
on the right were going to stop talking about Charlie
Kirk's assassination. They were saying this, they had conced they
had clearly convinced themselves or somehow wanted to convince their
audiences that it was so obviously true that the shooter
was right wing that people on the right were going
(13:29):
to stop talking about it. Obviously, that hasn't happened, in
part because I don't think people would stop talking about
it whether the shooter was from the right or the left,
because lots of people just care about the truth. But
people haven't stopped talking about it because it's so obvious
that the shooter was motivated by by left wing ideology
(13:49):
and a hatred for Charlie Kirk. But this was a.
I mean, these are big name people from prominent places.
I encourage people to read the article. It's one of
the more thorough things that I've done. And when I
say that there are dozens and dozens of examples, I'm
not exaggerating. And I wasn't like scraping the bottom of
the barrel of the internet trying to find, you know,
(14:10):
random people with no followers. These are prominent people, prominent
left wing influencers and prominent left wing reporters and think
makers that were spreading this conspiracy theory. So what I'm
saying is it's no surprise that it made it all
its way, all the way to Jimmy Kimmel, whether he
was pushing a lie knowingly or just believed it because
(14:36):
the rest of the people that are around him believed it.
You know, it's hard to say, but you know, this
is a conspiracy theory that has taken hold on the left,
and a large number of people on the left are
going to believe this conspiracy theory for a long time.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
Unfortunately, again, I want to remind you that he is
Jerry Dunleavy with just the News, and I actually want
you to go re this article very much because I
talk to you all the time about the world of
make believe these communists live in. If you want to
see the bricks in the mortar and how that world
gets built, go read the article.
Speaker 2 (15:09):
It's fascinating. I dug into it. It's fascinating. It's the
nitty gritty.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Detail of why your kookie liberal and Peggy believes Donald
Trump is a Russian agent. Anyway, Jerry, speaking of the left,
the Biden administration worked very very hard, in fact, everyone
on the left, the media as well, for a very
long time to brand right wingers as domestic terrorists, up
to and including lying about data. You dug into this,
(15:34):
what'd you find?
Speaker 2 (15:37):
Yeah?
Speaker 6 (15:37):
I mean, you know, in the wake of Charlie Kirk's
assassination and with all of the politically motivated violence that's
happening right now, a lot of it from the left,
you would hope that we would have a firm, you know,
data set to get our arms around to figure out
(15:58):
what is going on, what's the accuracy of the threat
picture in the United States, and where are domestic terrorism
threats coming from? And I would want that. I want
to know where the threats are coming from the right.
I want to know where the threats are coming from
the left, but unfortunately, the Biden administration spent four years
muddling that picture deliberately. And one of the ways that
(16:21):
they did it, and I know this for a fact
based on declassified documents that we only now are getting
our hands on, that part of how they distorted the
domestic terrorism threat picture is that without telling us that
they had done this, they inflated the right wing terrorism
(16:42):
domestic terrorism threat by counting thousands I'm telling you more
than a thousand, probably closer to two thousand and maybe
more than two thousand instances of arrests in cases tied
to the capital riot of January, counted those each individually
(17:03):
as an instance of domestic terrorism, and then use that
to say that right wing domestic terrorism threat was on
the rise. But they didn't tell us that they were
doing that. We were six cases, so they weren't out
there saying, look, we're taking every single January sixth case
(17:23):
that we've opened and we're counting it as right wing
domestic terrorism and that's why we're saying that right wing
terrorism is on the rise. No, they just told us
that right wing terrorism was on the rise without telling
us how they had arrived at that conclusion, And when
you dig into it, you actually see that sixty one
(17:44):
percent of the domestic terrorism cases as of February twenty
twenty two we're all directly tied to January sixth, So
sixty one percent of the domestic terrorism cases that the
FBI had opened, we're tied to January sixth. Seventy eight
percent of the domestic terrorism arrests that were made in
(18:05):
twenty twenty one were tied to the Capitol Riot. And
they didn't really tell us though, that they were using
those January sixth numbers to pad the stats on this
domestic terrorism threat problem. And then, of course we saw
what they did with that. They greatly expanded the power
of the federal government to look into so called purported
(18:29):
domestic terrorism. They expanded the powers, of course, like using
a letter from the National School Boards Association which called
upon labeling parents as domestic terrorists, to launch a DOJ
DOJ investigations, and all sorts of other things that the
(18:54):
Biden administration, the Biden DOJ did based on this sort
of original sin of using the Capital Riot to pad
those stats and then label right wing domestic terrorism as
this massive threat. And unfortunately, now after four years of
the Biden administration, when we're seeing serious left wing violence,
(19:18):
of course this year seeing it with the assassination of
Charlie Kirk, attacks on Ice and all of this stuff,
but also seeing it the last four years, the last
eight years, we do not have an accurate and trustworthy
data set to rely upon to determine where these threats
are coming from. So the FBI currently is going to
(19:40):
be back at square one, is going to have to
go back and redo all of this because of the
purposefully muddled threat picture that the Biden DOJ and FBI
and intelligence community put together.
Speaker 1 (19:54):
Jerry, before I let you go there are it's more
than chatter. We're hearing this from the counter Terrorism Center.
Al Qaeda on the rise, plotting things. You wrote the book,
amazing book up about our withdrawal from Afghanistan. Kable, tell
me what you know.
Speaker 6 (20:12):
Well. Al Qaida was never fully defeated in Afghanistan, and
the Taliban never not before nine to eleven, not when
we were threatening to invade, not after we invaded, and
not after twenty years of war, and not after we left.
The Taliban never was willing to give up its alliance
(20:33):
with al Qaeda and to give up protecting al Kaieda.
So al Qaida is still a threat. It does have
training in operational space in Afghanistan under the Taliban. And
what's important to keep in mind about al Qaeda is
it doesn't just operate in Afghanistan. It has very effectively
(20:59):
managed to and reconstitute in many ways. It is a
significant challenge and threat. Iterations of al Qaida are significant
challenge and threat in Africa in places like Yemen. Al
Qaeda's outfit in the Al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula
(21:19):
is potent, and al Qaeda has not given up on
its goal and strategy, which is big grand terrorist attacks
aimed at the West and the United States. Isis K
is a little bit more opportunist as compared to al Qaeda.
(21:41):
Isis K will attack where it can and when it can.
Al Qaeda is a bit more patient and likes the
big spectacular attacks, and it has a safe haven in
Afghanistan under Taliban rule, and it's operational in al Qaeda
and in the Middle East. I think that the threat
(22:04):
is very real, but it was very good to see
Joe Kent and the National counter Terrorism Center and Telsea.
Gabbard highlight this threat because I do think that it's
a serious one. All of us, of course, are talking
about domestic terrorism right now, I think rightly. So there's
(22:25):
obviously some domestic terrorism threat from the right. There's a
huge growing problem of it on the left. But you
don't want to forget about the Islamic and jiahattist terrorism
threat as well around the world and here in the
United States, because it's it's serious. Heid and isis K
(22:47):
are not defeated. We have killed a lot of their
different leaders. We have done a lot of things to
try to tamp down on them, but we lost the
war in Afghanistan. There's no other way to put it.
We retreated, we withdrew in chaos, the Taliban took over,
(23:11):
and Al Qaida is still protected by them. So this
is a challenge that we're going to continue to face.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
Jerry, you are the best, my man, Come back soon.
All right, We're going to talk to a former NYPD
detective next. You know what we have behind our stove
probably the exact same thing you have behind your stove.
Salt pepper, olive oil. It's every kitchen you go into,
(23:41):
salt pepper, olive oil. But here's the problem. We just
grab a bottle of olive oil from the grocery store.
That's all I've ever done forty four It's all I've
ever done for about forty three years of my life.
You go down the grocery aisle when you're out, you
only wait until you're out right because it never goes bad.
Speaker 6 (23:58):
Have you ever thought about that?
Speaker 1 (24:00):
Have you ever looked at the date on the olive
oil sitting behind your stove when you buy it? It's old,
months old, sometimes years old. Go to farm Fresh two
four six dot com. Get one bottle. It's free. By
the way, it's free. You pay like a buck to
cover the shipping. Get one bottle.
Speaker 2 (24:21):
What is it?
Speaker 1 (24:22):
It's fresh from a farm.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
It's so much more flavorful.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
You've been eating bland olive oil and had no idea
farm Fresh two four to six dot com.
Speaker 8 (24:40):
Arguably the fastest rising star right now in Democratic politics
is Zura Mandani, who is going to be elected Mayor
of New York City and probably in a landslide as
a sort of talent spot er in the Democratic Party.
What do you think of him and his candidacy and
what do you think of mainline Democratic shyness and agitation
(25:03):
about the prospect that he's gonna win.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
Look, as far as I'm concerned, he's the Democratic nominee
and he should be supported.
Speaker 8 (25:11):
Do you endorse this candidacy?
Speaker 9 (25:13):
I support the Democrat in the race.
Speaker 2 (25:15):
Sure, that's great.
Speaker 1 (25:20):
I hope my beloved New York City is not going
to make the biggest mistake ever. But I fear they're
going to joining me now. Bodid, a host of One
Tough podcast, retired NYPD detective.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Gosh, that's freaking cool. Bo.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Please tell me that New York City is not going
to vote for this monster.
Speaker 7 (25:39):
Let me tell you something. I'm the only one that
put together a pac political action back there, and it's
NYCABM dot com New York City. Anybody but Mondamie. There
is None of the candidates are going after Mondamie. They're
going after each other like jerks instead of focus on
(26:00):
the problem and Mondami Mundammi is the problem. I've been
doing my own homework the other day. What I did
was I hit the streets. First stop was Times Square.
He wants to put mentally ill people in abandoned storefronts,
gives them real good accessibility to the trains, so they
can push people in there and they can beat people
(26:23):
up to mentally ill. Then I made my way up
to Harlem, where we had a grandma that was shot
by a stray bullet by a gang, a bunch of
gangs one hundred and thirteen, and Lennox I did another
video up there. He wants to get rid of the
gang lists as far as the database. He wants to
do everything to destroy our city. Then I went up
(26:44):
to the South Bronx. He wants a freeze on rents.
I remember the nineteen seventies Punk Mandami. I remember when
they got rid of it, they become abandoned buildings. Maybe
that's where you want to go. People are not realized anything.
Speaker 5 (26:59):
Now.
Speaker 7 (26:59):
I'm looking at the fundraising. I'm talking about tens of
millions of dollars being funneled through from out of this country,
including the in country. People like that Fat Big Sorrows
giving all this money. All they're doing, you wonder why
his poll numbers ain't changing. He had one hundred thousand
people on the streets knocking on doors. With all this
(27:21):
money he has, I estimate he had raised more than
fifty million dollars. That's why this punk is going and
nobody's gonna touch him because he's raising all this money.
I heard, you remember I got appointed out the Homeland
Security Council by the President. I heard there was investigations
(27:41):
going on as far as went out of this country
contributions into this campaign. This is a big This is
such an unbelievable thing. What's going on. This is becoming
the wave like what happened in England. They got fifty
towns are'm controlled by social communist son of the guns,
(28:05):
and this is gonna sweep across our country. If this
punk gets elected in New York City, that's how I
really feel about it.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
Well, that's certainly I agree, But why would New York
even with all the money, Why would New York City?
I know New York City's but they suffered from the
Blasio that they they've they've pinned horrible mayors before and
suffered so greatly. How could they ever choose.
Speaker 2 (28:29):
Someone like this?
Speaker 7 (28:32):
Well, the most important thing now, my child, My child
and my daughter are Jewish and my ex wife is
a Russian Jew, so I guess I'm a Jew by marriage.
But here's the deal. How about sixty five percent of
the New York Jewish people voted for this creep. When
he comes out and he says he's anti Semitic, he
(28:54):
doesn't recognize Israel. He doesn't recognize the fact if the
primere of Israel comes to New he wants them locked up.
I tell you what, punk, you're the one that's gonna
get locked up. I got my crawl with this guy.
All he does is smile and follow him, follow hi
where he came from, kept from Uganda, from a rich family.
He couldn't run a damn kool aid s dand now
(29:16):
you want to give him one hundred and fifteen billion
dollar budget. This is a little punk fool who can't
even hold a job. He was a a settlement for
two terms. You never even voted. All he does is
that qtuty smile and you know what they're doing. They're
raping the minds of our of our children on Instagram
ticktoc and they're going to them. Oh, he's gonna give
(29:38):
you free everything. He's gonna give you free buses, he's
gonna give you free rents, he's gonna give you free food.
He's gonna give you food. Dish is a punk that
has to be beat in this election. When are people
gonna wake up? And that's what I do with my
and I implore people support NYC ABM dot com. I
(30:00):
will continue to the last day of the election to
let people realize, what are you doing? Why is it
there no counter attacks from these other candidates against Mondummy? Here?
All they do is attack each other? How bad attacking him?
Speaker 2 (30:16):
Why isn't Cuomo getting more traction? Bo is a guy?
I mean the Cuomo.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Family's royalty in New York governor, this governor that had
is it?
Speaker 2 (30:25):
Is it lingering? Covid anger?
Speaker 1 (30:27):
Why?
Speaker 7 (30:27):
Why?
Speaker 2 (30:28):
Why not Cuomo?
Speaker 7 (30:30):
You know, look, if I have to vote for Como,
I'll vote for Como over Mondummy. I like, I love
Curtis Sliwa, you know, I don't know. People say he
can't win. But here's the deal, what do we vote for.
I'd rather vote for an honest person, which the most
honest out of all of them. Eric Adams is a criminal,
He's a thief. I went through this thing with the
(30:51):
migrant monies. There's all kinds of hundreds of millions of dollars,
no big contract. Nobody wants to talk about it. Eric
Adams is finished and then I told presidents fardening, this
guy there is seven billion dollars of no big contracts
that went to New York City. Why did all his
(31:13):
top lieutenants all in January leave? Remember that shaggy that
guy wasn't me. They all left because when they get
indicted on taking money from the city, the mayor Eric Abas,
you can go, it wasn't me. That's bull craft. He's gone.
Now you got como, and I tell you the honest truth.
His problem is he doesn't know how to be compassion
(31:36):
He doesn't have to do he doesn't know how to
go to the people, say, you know what I screwed
up as governor. I passed his stupid bill reforms. I
let all the cop killers go. I was wrong, But
I love New York City and I love America. I
want to be your mayor and show you my show
you my my contrition of what I did wrong. Please
(31:56):
give me a chance. Because he ain't got it in
I could. When I to punch people out, I just
say to him after I was finished, you know, I'm
sorry you made me break your jaw, but you made
me do it. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
He can't say, bo, what would this mean for the NYPD,
ma'am Donnie becoming mayor.
Speaker 7 (32:19):
Oh well, here's the deal with this. The problem here
is the NYPD is not proactive anymore. They're afraid to
get involved. The other day, when I went up to
Lennox av you one hundred and thirteenth Street with a
film court, when I'm doing these videos about anti Mondonnie,
that gang was on the corner of Lenox Avenue and
(32:39):
one hundred and thirteen. This is the same gang where
shots came out and killed a grandmother, Mamozelle. They a
stray bullet killed her. I walked right into him. They
looked at me like I was nuts. I said, you know,
I'm doing a video here about the killing of this grandma.
Over here. One of the stray bullets came. It came
from a gang fight. I'm not saying you guys are
(33:00):
the gang. Definitely was the gang. Every one of them
stood fast, and they looked at me, and they said
to himself, this guy's gotta be either a psycho path
or he needs to be incocerated. He walks right into
twelve gang members. Their faces all drop a cold stone,
and I know killers. When I see him, I locked
up a lot of them. These were bad guys. I
(33:21):
walked away and I said to myself, I challenged my
own mind. I'm saying, both, why are you walking into
these bad aass gang members ere? And you you know,
at any time, I knew there was at least three
four guns there, and you know this is what it is.
They have open rain. Nobody's going up there. Years ago,
I would have called in the anti crime guys, says,
(33:42):
come on, meet me over here, let's go after this gang.
And I guarantee you we would have taken four guns
out and maybe one of those guns would have been
a murder weapon that would have killed somebody. There's no proactivity.
They get no support for this moron city council liberal thing.
You can't get a guy in the headlock on top
(34:08):
tell me that. So the cops don't want Now if
they get sued, which they get good, get sued, they
could take their home away that they've been putting money
in their pensiones. They lose their job, and you wonder
why cops are not reacting and why they're not doing it.
That poor cop that was shot on Park Avenue and
killed was working overtime because the lousy salary. They started
(34:30):
with below fifty thousand dollars. You couldn't even eat Hamburger.
Speaker 6 (34:35):
Help.
Speaker 7 (34:35):
But these poor cops have to work second third jobs
and then they don't get no support. On top of it.
You've got watch strokes, watching this, this, watching that. Then
you got a da break that that bigger Manhattan. All
he's looking is to take the cops down. You know what,
the criminals become the good guys and the cops are
the bad guys. And you know what we see in
across the country with what's going on with Ice. And
(34:58):
I'm involved with Homeland Security. I was appointed by the
President on the Homeland Security Advisory Council. And these poor
ICE guys are out there trying to get these criminal
illegals off our streets and they're getting beat up, to
getting spat on, their families are getting terrorized. Man, this
country's going wrong. We gotta straighten out. And I think
New York City's gotta be the water. We gotta take
(35:19):
this guy down, Mondamie. If we lose New York City,
I promise you this will be a blanket effect. And
next they're gonna run AOC will run for president of
the United States and what she could possibly win. And
then you know what's gonna happen. They'll take the Congress,
and you know what's gonna happen, they'll try to indict
by President Trump. They'll probably try to indict me too.
(35:41):
But this is where we're going. We gotta stop it.
Speaker 2 (35:46):
Bo.
Speaker 1 (35:47):
Thank you, brother, I appreciate you. All Right, we have
more next. I love my cell phone company.
Speaker 2 (36:01):
You know what I like. Here's what I like.
Speaker 1 (36:03):
I like never having to worry that a company I
patronize is going to take my money and use it
against me, because it's a concern everywhere.
Speaker 2 (36:11):
You know that.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
Right when you go buy a new car, you know
you're gonna have an LGBTQ AD the next day and
you're gonna think.
Speaker 2 (36:17):
Wow, I paid for that ad.
Speaker 1 (36:18):
You know, you know what's coming in this crappy corporate
environment we have. I never have to check on Puretalk.
I never have to pull up their social media. Oh
I hope it's not Pride Month for them. Pere Talk
cares about America. They hire Americans. Their CEO did two
tours in Vietnam. They charge you way less for your
cell phone service. You can keep your phone, you can
(36:39):
keep your number. And more importantly, you can patronize a
business that loves this country. When they give back, they
get veterans back on their feet, they give out American
flags at Independence Day. My kind of company puretalk dot
com slash jessetv go switch today. When we talk about terrorism,
(37:07):
we think about, you know, bombs and suicide vests and
planes flying into buildings, and of course all that stuff
is absolutely dreadful. But what we don't think about is
the quiet things, the quiet, slow, subversive things. They're just
as damaging, in many cases more damaging. Joining me now,
Stephen W. Moser, author of the book, I certainly hope
(37:27):
you've read it by now, The Devil and Communist China. Stephen,
please help me understand because when people say terrorism, they
may think Antifa or a bunch of Jihatis. But it
will take a long time for me to get to
someone who talks about China.
Speaker 2 (37:42):
Why would I talk about China?
Speaker 5 (37:44):
Oh, I think we got to start with China because
China behind all kinds of terrorist attacks on the United States,
both directly and through surrogates. You want to talk about Antifa,
the riots back in twenty twenty, the Houston Chinese counsulate
was encouraging people to join the rioters and actually bringing
in undercover agents from China under diplomatic cover to help
(38:08):
to help provoke those demonstrations. Uh, that's that's terrorism. We
now know Antifa is going to be a terrorist organization,
is a terrorist organization and is going to be tracked
as sage.
Speaker 2 (38:19):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (38:19):
Let's talk about Fentanel. Fentanel is you know, chemical terrorism
against the American population, and the labs wouldn't exist without
the precursors that.
Speaker 9 (38:29):
Come from China.
Speaker 5 (38:30):
The cartels in northern Mexico wouldn't be able to fund
their activities without help from China's banks in laundering the money.
And it's not just Mexico, of course. The biggest ventanyl
lab in North America is located up in British Columbia,
which also has a large population of communist Chinese. Communist
Chinese being very active in our northern border country of Canada.
(38:55):
And who can forget the COVID biological warfare which came
from the Wuhan lab in China. And you know, everywhere
you look you see the black hand of the Chinese
Communist Party. I mean, you see it. You see it
in the in the uh the global warming scam, where
China is funding radical environmental groups. You see it in
the solar panel and and wind farm scam, where China
(39:19):
is funding environmental groups that demand solar panels and h
and windmills, all of which are made in China. Meanwhile,
China is uh the biggest polluter on the planet if
you if you consider all of the particulate matter that's
released into the air by China's coal burning power plants.
So everywhere you look, uh, you know, China is meddling.
(39:42):
You know, we're Swiss cheese, yes see. I mean We're
an open society, and China is burrowing into every possible
nook in granny bar society to cause unrest, dissension, and
what they would like to do, like what they would
like to see is is quite frankly civil war in
the United States, because that would greatly weaken us and
(40:02):
enable them to pursue their plans for global domination without opposition.
Speaker 9 (40:07):
We can't allow that to happen.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
Stephen Trump came out recently and said on camera that
he wants once all these hundreds of thousands of Chinese
students to keep coming here. But Trump is no idiot,
especially when it comes to China. He knows what they're doing,
he knows why they're doing it. So please connect these
thoughts for me, because that can't make sense of it.
Speaker 5 (40:28):
Yeah, I'm I'm a little concerned that we're not hammering
China harder at this point in time. We should be
because because China's in increasingly desperate straits. Right, We've taken
away a large part of the export sector of the
economy from them. They've got no domestic consumption. Their birth
rate is down there, averaging one child per couple. You know,
(40:51):
over a woman's reproductive lifetime. The population of China by
the end of the century will be large, will be
smaller than that of the United States of America because China,
the Chinese Communist Party, has killed off China's future, killed
off the China dreat We ought to be encouraging China's collapse,
and instead a word from the White House is that
(41:11):
we're interested in arranging a kind of soft landing for
the Chinese economy. So we don't want to hit him
too hard on terraces. We don't want to press him
too hard in other areas because we don't want the
chaos and catastrophe that would result from a total collapse. Well,
that's exactly what I want. I want a total collapse
of the Chinese Communist Party. I want different factions to
(41:33):
begin openly fighting against each other. I want a warlord
situation in China, which is what followed the fall of
the Manchu dynasty back in nineteen eleven. I want China
broken up into provincial sized pieces, where possibly in the interstices,
freedom can grow and the Chinese people can enjoy more
were human dignity and respect for their human rights.
Speaker 9 (41:55):
That's what I want.
Speaker 5 (41:56):
I want to encourage the collapse of China, because the
collapse of China will be good not just for the
Chinese people, but for the world at large.
Speaker 1 (42:05):
Stephen, how secure We've talked about this before, about the
Xijinping and not necessarily having as much of a hold
on power as seemed to think, kind of on shaky ground.
Speaker 2 (42:16):
What do we think about this situation?
Speaker 5 (42:19):
Well, I think people need to understand that the largest
political organization on the planet, which is to say, the
Chinese Communist Party with ninety five million members, is not
a unified whole. It is a giant mafia with different factions,
with different mafia families dating back to the Law March,
and the people who rub shoulders with the late chairman
(42:40):
Mau zertome. Those families, those elite families and their sons
and daughters and grandsons and granddaughters control large swaths of
the country of China and large parts of the economy.
And Hijinping has made enemies everywhere. He has attacked all
of the other leading families, the families of the former presidents,
(43:02):
the families of the former Communist Party leaders. And so
I think that opposition to Siji King is building up,
especially as he gets older, and that factional fighting could
break out in open attempts on his life would seem
to have happened once or twice in the last couple
of years, and unrest in more remote provinces like Guangdong.
(43:23):
We ought to encourage that. You know, he's now the
mafia downs you know are called the one, the leading,
the leading mafioso is called the Cabo des duty copies right,
the chief of all the chiefs. Well, he's now a
chief of many chiefs who hate him and would like
to see him removed.
Speaker 9 (43:43):
Think of the movie The Godfather. That's what's going to
happen in China.
Speaker 1 (43:49):
What's the military situation like? And I asked this because
if you're going to topple a dictator, you better have
some guns on your side to do so. That they're
generals involved in all this.
Speaker 5 (44:00):
Well, it's very interesting that xijing Ping has removed more
generals that he has promoted in the last few years
than any previous Communist dictator, going back to Eugene Talo
removed none and John Summin who removed none. So, in
other words, some of the same people that he pinned
four stars on a few years ago, he has now cashiered,
(44:24):
he has now arrested, they have now disappeared, some have
been killed. So what is that all about. Is that
a movement by Sijing Ping to stamp out unrest in
the branks of the People's Liberation Army and take out generals.
Speaker 9 (44:38):
Who are conspiring against him?
Speaker 5 (44:40):
Or is there a movement within the People's Liberation Army,
perhaps led by the vice chairman of the Central Military
Commission who turned his back on Chijing Ping at the
last meeting of the Communist Party turned his back on
the leader of China, removing she's allies within the military.
We're all watching to see what happens now. But clearly
(45:01):
there's a lot of a lot of division in the
People's Liberation Army. And remember the last breakdown of order
in China, the fall of the Manchu dynasty began when
the military garrison commander in the central city of wu
Han rebelled against the Manchu leadership in Beijing, and then
the country fall apart, fell apart into twenty years of warlordism.
(45:25):
That could happen in China.
Speaker 1 (45:30):
That'll be interesting to watch. Not that I'm rooting for
it or anything like that. Stephen, thank you so much, sir.
I appreciate you very much. We have final thoughts next.
(45:55):
It's not easy to hear a lot of this when
we talk about terror cells, people eyeing the prospects of
more of this coming. I know you're not celebrating, and
it's not one of these things you watch and you
stand up and cheer at the end.
Speaker 2 (46:08):
I understand that.
Speaker 1 (46:09):
But we have to understand where we are and why
we are where we.
Speaker 2 (46:13):
Are, and we can come out of this. You can
defeat these insurgencies.
Speaker 7 (46:18):
You can.
Speaker 1 (46:19):
It's going to take focus. It's going to take time,
and there are going to be casualties. Sucks, but it's
where we are. We'll stay on it. Talk to you again.
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.