Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
The Democrat Party is insane and I'm not sure if
it can be fixed. We'll talk about that tonight. Arron
McIntyre is here. Peter Schweizer on just how much of
our country has been sold out to China, all that
changes at the CDC and more coming up. I'm right, okay,
(00:26):
So we need to get something out of the way
first before we dig into the violence in this country.
The Democrat Party, the insanity and all these other things.
But it hurts to say what I'm about to say,
but it's true. We need a Democrat Party, meaning we
need a reformed Democrat Party. We need an opposition party
(00:50):
of some kind that is sane, still loves America. All
these things we need one, and we don't have one.
It's difficult for me to see how the United States
of America can hold together long term as long as
the Democrat Party remains the anti American party. It's just
(01:11):
very difficult to figure out how we could make that work.
When you share a country with thirty forty percent, pick
your number of people who want to burn it down,
it doesn't work. I've used the analogy so many times
before on the show. But if my wife wants to
burn the house down, and I don't want the house
to burn down. I'm probably fighting a losing battle. I
(01:33):
may stop her once, stop her twice. Eventually I got
to go to work or use the bathroom, and she's
in the kitchen light in the matches.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
It's very difficult. We have to have a reformed.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
Sane Democrat party. We have to have it, and it's
not on the horizon right now. Democrats are facing a
voter registration crisis. Even the New York Times is talking
about it. They are at crisis level as a party,
completely unpopular. And what that shows when you're losing the
(02:05):
voter registration war like that, what it shows is you've
lost normal people, normies, not you, not me. We're always
in on this, but normal people think Democrats are weird, icky, mean,
and they're leaving.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
They're leaving in drops.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
The party's broke, completely broke, fifteen million dollars cash on hand.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
The RNC has eighty million dollars cash on hand.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
They are so unpopular they're considering convening a convention years
early to try to get things sorted out, try to
get things fixed. And I don't think that will help them.
I mean, they just had a little mini meeting at
the DNC. And keep in mind, I just want to
(02:50):
stress this again that you and I we are the
frontline of winning elections. We are the activists with the
ones who run for office. We donate with it, but
it's not our votes that win elections. I already know
who I'm voting for in twenty twenty eight, and so
do you. It's the normies. It's the norms they win elections.
They'll vote this way one year and this way one year.
(03:12):
Are not necessarily political. But what do you think normal
people think when they see this.
Speaker 3 (03:20):
Is Lindy somek who is from the Sagana Ojibwe nation,
and she's going to deliver our land acknowledgment today.
Speaker 4 (03:27):
Lindy Boujou, Lindy Samic Nadga Cause amicdotum Uh Sagba and
way and now good morning DNC members, friends and relatives.
Speaker 5 (03:47):
Let's talk about the land for a second. The DNC
acknowledges and honors the Dakota Yata, the Dakota people who
are the original stewards of the lands and waters of Minneapolis.
The Dakota cared for the lands lakes in the Wakatanka,
the Great River, the Mississippi River. For thousands of years
before colonization, this land was not cleaned or traded. It's
(04:10):
a part of a history of broken treaties and promises,
and in many ways we still live in a system
built to suppress indigenous people's cultural and spiritual history.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
Yeah, that's weird.
Speaker 1 (04:28):
It's not only just horrible and suicidal to have as
a country, but it's weird, and they.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Can't bring people in.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
In fact, now probably even worse, the Democrat brand is
pro crime. And Democrats can wind about that all they want,
They can point fingers about that all they want. But
people and even normies have eyes and they can tell
Democrats are the pro crime party. And as soon as
they get a hold of a microphone and say things
like this, it just confirms these beliefs.
Speaker 6 (04:57):
Issues voters care about. Where does Trump go? Migrant crime, carjackings,
the really lurid, awful stuff. That is a crazy, crazy visual.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
Don't take the.
Speaker 6 (05:07):
Bait, because most Americans are more worried about how are
we going to address mental health issues, the visible homelessness
that we see on streets, and how do we deal
with mental health and other issues that drive the sort
of random incidence that scare all of us. That's what
you should.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
Be talking about.
Speaker 6 (05:25):
That's where you should be focused. Don't take the bait
and talking about migrant crime or carjackings or the things
that actually don't matter to that many Americans and then
go to the.
Speaker 2 (05:36):
Car jackings don't matter. Forgot about that and not Yeah,
that's great.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
So that brings me to look, obviously, we're not going
to talk about that terrible shooting yesterday. It was awful,
it's terrible. I don't want to bring you down, but
I did want to. I did want to point something
out on what's happening and why the Democrat Party as
of right now, I do not believe can be fixed,
and in fact, I believe things are going to get
more violent and more dangerous. Here was Minneapolis Mayor Jacob
(06:02):
Fray after all that.
Speaker 7 (06:04):
Don't just say this is about thoughts and prayers. Right now,
these kids were literally praying. I think the impetus has
to be on all of us as leaders to do
a whole lot more to recognize that we've got more
guns in this country than we have people. I have
heard about a whole lot of hate that's being directed
(06:25):
at our trans community. Anybody who is using this as
using this as an opportunity to villainize our trans community
or any other community out there, has lost their sense
of common humanity.
Speaker 2 (06:46):
Why do they talk like that now? Why? Why?
Speaker 1 (06:52):
Why did I tell you things like this were coming?
And by the way, more things like this are coming.
This is me you remember this back on July ninth.
Right now, there is an escool, an escalation that I
have not seen in my lifetime. The rhetoric will and
is increasing, and therefore the violence will and is increasing.
(07:13):
This is now going to increase from here, organized planned
street violence and the animals who commit this kind of
violence are going to move on from hard targets like
Bortac and they're going to come to your church, They're
going to come to your child's school. They're going to
find soft targets where they can hurt the people they
(07:34):
want to hurt. They're not going to accept failure forever.
This is not to get you to hide or even
be afraid or stay in your home. This is to
let you know to keep your eyes open, carry if
you can, and be ready to protect yourself because organized
street communism in this country is going to increase from here.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
Why did I know that?
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Well, I want you to listen to something else, one
more thing here, and then we'll have a little talk.
Gavin Newsom. Gavin Newsom's running for president. Obviously this is
not a breaking breaking news. Everyone can tell Gavin Newsom's
running for president. And so he's bouncing around doing every interview,
every speech he possibly can. We got all that's that's
stuff we already know. But why does he get on
(08:28):
stage and say things like this.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
Wake up you or lose your country again.
Speaker 3 (08:34):
It's not about Democrats or but it's about.
Speaker 2 (08:37):
All of us.
Speaker 8 (08:38):
You're absolutely convinced.
Speaker 2 (08:40):
I'm absolutely you've seen it.
Speaker 7 (08:43):
He's tried to steal the last election.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
He tried to trying to rig it.
Speaker 1 (08:47):
In plain sight, He's running again in twenty twenty eight.
Gavin Newsom has repeated this over and over and over again.
Donald Trump's not leaving. He's running again in twenty twenty eight.
He's not leaving. I'm getting Trump happ laugh. Why what's
going on there? So let me explain the disaster that
is the Democrat Party and why there's in so much trouble.
(09:09):
Democrats are communists, sorry, they are just is the way
it is. I don't care if that's offensive to you.
They're communists. Communists are herd animals. They move as one.
Whatever direction they're going to, they move as one. And
because the Democrat in your life is a herd animal,
they will say what they're told, do what they're told,
think what they're told. They're a herd animal. They can
(09:31):
be moved in any direction. So if it's beneficial to
these elite communists to give them a symbol to worship
George Floyd, doctor Fauci, they can do that.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
This is a hero, This is a hero memorial Memorial time.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
Look at this hero and immediately you're drone liberal and
Peggy George Floyd, George Floyd like the robot she is.
Then she'll drop him one day and that sens Ukraine.
You understand how it works. But it works the exact
same way. When they create symbols to hate. They take
their herd and they find symbols and hold them up
(10:08):
in front of the herd and say, this is the
source of all your problems, this is.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
Why this is bad.
Speaker 1 (10:14):
And that has been Donald Trump for ten years. We
are at a decade of elite communists in this country
telling street communists that Donald Trump is a Nazi, he
works for Vladimir Putin, He's going to run again. He's
a dictator. He's never going to leave the White House.
Speaker 2 (10:34):
He said that over and over and over again.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
Now, this rhetoric, I'm sure just brushes right off of you.
But for the legions of mentally ill communist street scum
in this country, they hear things like that and they
believe it.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
And did you know, poll after.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
Poll after poll shows Democrats are unhappy with the Democrat Party.
You may be nodding your head and saying, well, yeah,
what hopes of the Democrat Party is insane? But wait,
the devils in the details. They're not mad with the
Democrat Party because the Democrat Party is insane. The leading
reason Democrats are unhappy with their politicians is they don't
(11:12):
fight Trump hard enough. Again, they've made him the Antichrist.
As a result, guys like Gavin Newsom who want to
be president, he has to throw them red meat by
saying the most absurd, insane, not even close to accurate things.
That's what he has to do to become the nominee.
(11:34):
The problem is he gives the speeches because that's what
the street animals want to hear.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
But the street animals.
Speaker 1 (11:40):
Hear the speeches, believe the speeches, and all it takes
is one deranged lunatic to go do something violent. We
are going to see more and more violence from the
left in this country because the rhetoric will increase, mental instability,
demonic possession.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
All these things are increase.
Speaker 1 (12:00):
Seeing more rhetoric, more demonic possession, more pharmaceuticals.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
More violence. Let me again encourage you.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
Check out your child's school for security, check out your
church for security. This was not the last one. All
that may have made you uncomfortable, but I am right.
We're gonna talk to arn McIntyre about everything going on
in this society. Before we talk to him, let me
talk to you about dream powder from being sleeping is
(12:31):
what I want to talk to you about. A good
night sleep makes your next day and a bad night's
sleep ruins it. Let's be honest. I love coffee as
much as the next man. There's no amount of coffee
in the world that can overcome a bad night of
sleep and have you actually feeling good. He may be
a little jittery, but you're not feeling good. Get some
(12:53):
sleep using natural things. Dream Powder is a cup of
hot chocolate with natural things is in it? Not that
it's going to knock you out for twenty hours and
you wake up feeling groggy, You wake up feeling good
to go.
Speaker 2 (13:07):
A cup of.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Hot chocolate Shopbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back.
Speaker 3 (13:22):
Minnesota ranks the highest per capitable for being a safe
haven for transgender individuals in Minnesota. And can I just say,
we can talk about economic growth and feeding children and
growing the economy and creating jobs simultaneously with talking about
everybody's human rights matters, and we shouldn't beam wide.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
You can do both.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
Joining me now, My friend Arn McIntyre, host and columnist
at The Blaze are in. There aren't very many training people,
and the issue itself is unbelievably unpopular. I mean, it
doesn't take a genius read poll numbers and know that
this is a losing issue for a political party. It's
well known, well established, Yet they can't let it go.
Speaker 2 (14:10):
Can you explain why?
Speaker 9 (14:13):
Yeah, I think it's time for us to drop the
illusion that democracy is somehow responsive to the will of
the American people. Like you said, it's very clear that
on every level this is a massive losing issue for
the left, and yet it's central to their coalition. Even
after Trump won and they were devastated by this huge
sweep that came in, they you know, they got down,
(14:34):
They sat down and said.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
What are we going to do?
Speaker 8 (14:35):
What are we going to change?
Speaker 9 (14:36):
How are we going to change our messaging. Maybe we've
gone too far, Maybe we should put the woke away
and go back to economic populis or something. But they
can't do it. The activists don't let them do it
because this is at core their religion. This is what
defines their movement. The Left needs to invert hierarchies. It
needs to put those that otherwise would be last in society,
(14:58):
would be considered the outc as of society. They have
to put them first in everything, and so it's absolutely
necessary for them to ultimately invert everything that is good
and true and beautiful. They cannot allow children to grow
up under the auspices of their parents following their religion. No,
they need control of these children. They need to brainwash
them from the very beginning. Child mutilation, child sacrifice. This
(15:21):
is the heart of the left in every sense.
Speaker 1 (15:25):
Alarn, did we I mean, I don't want to put
blame on us here, but maybe we deserve some Did
we on the right, meaning the whole general term, on
the right?
Speaker 2 (15:34):
Did we fail in heading this off? It can be
hard to.
Speaker 1 (15:38):
Accept evil for what it is right when you're first
introduced to it. But did we fail and allow ourselves
to get here some way?
Speaker 8 (15:47):
Yeah?
Speaker 9 (15:48):
I think in a lot of ways we are catching
up with technology. This is a constant problem for all
societies in the current age, but very much so for conservatives.
They don't know what's going on. They don't understand the
technological events, they don't really grasp the extent of the
scientific procedure that's being applied, and they just say, well, doctors,
they must know what they're doing. I don't want to
(16:08):
hurt a child. I feel bad, of course, you feel
bad for a child who's confused and possibly suicidal. And
many parents were blackmailed into saying, well, I have to
go along with this, because if I don't go along
with this, I am ultimately facilitating the suicide of my child.
Maybe they'll self harm and it will be my fault.
And what we recognize is that once we caught up
with science, once we really understood what was being done,
(16:30):
none of this was reversible. None of this was interchangeable.
All the things that we were sold that, well, the
child can just walk away from this, everything can kind
of just be swapped back into place. None of this
is true. It's absolutely devastating for the child. It ruins
their life, It makes it impossible often for them to
have children, have decent relationships, often drives them closer to
self harm. But we didn't have that data early on,
(16:52):
and people just wanted to trust the science. They just
wanted to trust the experts. And what we've seen from
COVID and others is actually you can't trust even medical professionals.
They are just as dedicated to this religion as your
average progressive activist.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
Grief Amy Klobuchar said this at their meeting.
Speaker 10 (17:11):
Farmer in New Mexico relied on immigrant workers who are
too afraid to do it anymore. And we have a
message to Donald Trump. Immigrants don't diminish America. They are America.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
Immigrants are America, right, aren't.
Speaker 8 (17:31):
I mean?
Speaker 9 (17:31):
They really just give the game away here, right, We're
not replacing you, We're just making it clear that you're
not an American, and these new people are the Americans
it's not a great replacement. It's more of a great
shuffling around, right. But no, obviously this is the Democrats plan.
They've announced it over and over and over again. They
hate the existing population of the United States because those
(17:51):
people still yearn for the traditions and heritage and history
of our people. They recognize that we are barriers to
their power because we believe in things like family and faith.
We believe that there are certain rights that have been
bestowed on us by God through our tradition, and that
we need to hold to them. New immigrants they don't
have this problem. You don't have to worry about free
(18:12):
speech with a lot of these guys. You don't have
to worry about the idea of individualism or the ability
to carry a fire them they don't believe in any
of that stuff. And if you bring enough of them
in and they get to vote, then guess what. America
doesn't believe in it either, because you've replaced the Americans
that actually care and will stand against it. So, yeah,
when she says, well, you're just not Americans, it turns
out immigrants are Americans. Well, she's just telling you exactly
(18:33):
what she believes.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
But this is another political loser, right, Aaron, I know
you remember. I remember all the polls leading up to
the election, Donald Trump talked about immigration endlessly because it
was pretty much number one or number two on every
Americans list for things they cared about.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
Isn't being the open borders party a loser?
Speaker 9 (18:53):
Well, not if you get to replace enough of the voters,
not if you bring in enough new people to share
in your vote. Remember, yes, these people can't vote immediately
in theory, though there are questions about that as well.
But all of their children will have birthright citizenship, and
they're all kind of banking on the fact that eventually
we're going to get an amnesty plan. Let's not forget that
the Republicans started to try to pass an amnesty plan
the minute Ice got funded to actually do deportations. So
(19:16):
it's not some ridiculous idea that you just bring in
twenty thirty million people that sit around for a few
years until the political pressure builds, pass the amnesty plan,
and boom, you win every election going forward. Yeah, you
might have lost a few in the interim because it's
not popular, but you're setting yourself up for generational success.
Speaker 8 (19:34):
Now.
Speaker 9 (19:34):
The interesting thing is I've been listening to left wing
media and they've been saying, this might have been a
mistake on our part. They're admitting the strategy like they're
full out admitting that, Yes, we were looking at the demographics,
we were making sure they trended a certain way. We
were sure we were just going to automatically win these elections.
But it turns out that some of the Hispanic immigrants
we bring in they actually want to be in America, like,
(19:54):
they actually like America as it is, and they started
voting for Trump when they were not supposed to. They're
supposed to be our loyal voter.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
Now.
Speaker 9 (20:00):
I don't think that the GOP should ultimately count on
the based minority vote to get out there and change things.
But it is funny that this ultimately seemed to backfire
on some level of the Democrats. But they can't change
the rhetoric. They've been doing it for decades and decades.
Where do they go from here?
Speaker 2 (20:16):
Well, where do they go from here?
Speaker 1 (20:18):
Because they want the White House back in twenty twenty eight,
but in order to win the Democrat primary, everyone sees
Gavin us somem Pritzker, all these other losers out there
taking stances that are going to be losers in places
like Michigan or Pennsylvania. How does the party come back
from what appears to be a death spiral.
Speaker 9 (20:39):
That does seem to be a big problem for them,
And it's a question that they are most certainly asking themselves.
Remember when they spent twenty million dollars to send that
giant woman around to figure out how to talk to
men and get them to vote for the party again.
I mean, I mean, these people are absolutely desperate and
the links are going to are insane, and they can't
even take their own advice. After spending months talking about
(21:01):
how they need their own Joe Rogan, they need the
podcast bros. They got to win men back. They basically
just came to the conclusion, actually, no, men suck and
they just need to learn to vote first. Anyway, that
was actually like the conclusion they came to. Now, I
will say this, I think that there are two issues
that can allow them to recover. One is war. If
they can get a real anti war movement going, and
(21:23):
they're trying to do it around Israel and Palestine right now,
that is fuel for the fire. They feel morally righteous
when they're doing that. They and to be fair, I
don't want the United States involved in this, and so
there's a lot of sympathy for some people saying ultimately,
we just don't want to be involved in foreign wars anymore.
And if Trump has walked away from that in some
way and the Democrats can embrace that, then they're stealing
a core issue from Trump. So they shouldn't. The Trump
(21:44):
administer issues should not make that easy. The second thing
is economics. Ultimately, we are still in a scenario where
we are getting inflation, not as much as we used to,
but we are still having a serious cost of living issue.
And if the Republicans don't solve it, if they don't
address it, if they just say, hey, young people up
and figure it out, they're going to face a backlash
because they were promised, the people of America were promised
(22:05):
that caring about how much it cost to have eggs
or how much it cost to buy a home was
something that the Republicans now were making central to who
they were. They were going to be raising families, making
sure that we had a society where people can have
children and live a decent life on hopefully maybe one day,
one income. Instead of forcing every mother into the workforce.
These are things that Republicans need to carry on, carry
(22:27):
through on, because if they don't, that leaves two holes.
I think that the Democrats could bind around, but right
now they're certainly scattered to the winds.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
Arn As always thank you, boss, and I want to
thank Pure Talk for an amazing, amazing mobile service.
Speaker 2 (22:46):
I like my cell phone company. Have you ever said
those words? Are you proud of your cell phone company?
My cell phone company? They're patriots. They hire Americans.
Speaker 1 (22:58):
I'm so tired of dealing with people who don't speak
English on the phone. Some call center in Bangladesh where
you have to try to click and pop your way
through a phone call drives me up the wall.
Speaker 2 (23:09):
Pure Talk's so patriotic.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
Their customer service Americans right here at home. Pleasant CEO
is a veteran. They take care of veterans. Verizon AT
and T and TMIL will take care of black lives matter.
Where do you think your money should go. You can
keep your phone, keep your phone number, or get a
new one. It's easy to switch. Puretalk dot com slash
(23:35):
jessetv is where you go.
Speaker 2 (23:37):
We'll be back.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
There's so much wrong with the Democrat Party. It would
take us forever to try to unpack it. How did
it happen? How did they get here? We should probably
bring in the great Miranda Divine, host of Pod Force
one to discuss these things. Miranda, you wrote a wonderful
column about Minnesota and how they're just nutballs up.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
There in Minnesota.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
Can you explain why so many of our problems come
from there?
Speaker 2 (24:17):
Yeah?
Speaker 11 (24:18):
Well, certainly, I mean yesterday is an example of the
sort of disorder and disordered thinking, disordered society that Walter
wall Democrats, especially these far left radicals like tamp On,
Tim Waltz, like Jacob Fray, remember the mayor during the
twenty twenty riots who just abandoned the Third Precinct to
(24:41):
the mob as a sort of a ritual sacrifice. And
then they've got Keith Ellison the attorney general. They have
the the lieutenant governor of the state is this woman
Penny Flanagan, who showed up in twenty twenty three at
a press conference that Waltz was announcing that he was
(25:02):
turning Minnesota into a transgender you know, state, like a
special place, a sanctuary state for transgender rights and to
allow what they call gender affirming care for minors, and
that's basically chemical and surgical castration of children, removing young
(25:25):
girls breasts, pumping them full of puberty blockers and other
terrible cross sex hormones. This is all a kind of
a rite of passage for Democrats. For these radical democrats,
it's an article of faith. It is a religion for them,
and they're all at it there. And so you know,
(25:47):
it's part of the brainwashing that has happened to families
and their children during puberty, especially when every child is
a little confused. And also you have to understand there's
a high preponderance of autistic children who think themselves transgender,
(26:08):
and it's the ultimate cruelty to them to trick them
like this. And so we have this sort of terrible
combination of the lawlessness and the sort of defunding police
attitudes that stemmed from Minneapolis after the George Floyd riots
five years ago, where all these same Democrats were in charge.
(26:31):
Tim Wolls, remember let the National Guard didn't call them
out for about a day day too late. His wife,
Gwen Wals, very weird woman. She said that she opened
the windows of the Governor's mansion so she could stick
her head out and smell the fumes of the burning
tires as the city was burning down around them, and
(26:52):
the governor was doing nothing about it because she felt
that was the only way she could really fully appreciate
the moment. Very sick people, So it's no wonder. I mean,
they foster and panda to this sort of mental illness
that is a fad, this transgender fad, and encourage parents
(27:12):
to think that this is going to be the solution
to their children's problems. The mother of this killer, this
demonic nut job, she took him when he was a
minor to the court in Minnesota, to Minnesota District Court
to have his name changed illegally, And the reason given
(27:33):
on the form was on the court order was that
he was a boy who wanted to be known as
a woman, as a girl, wanted to change sex, change
gender to a girl, so he wanted this new name
to acknowledge that, and his mother went along with it.
So it's all a disordered kind of society that democrats
(27:55):
have ushered into Minnesota, and I think it's a warning
for the rest of the country that this is what
they want for all of us. They're not impressive people,
but they thrive they see political capital in disorder on
the streets, whether it's crime on the streets, and the
citizens brightened and undermining the police as they have. I mean,
(28:19):
Liz Colin, who you might remember was a journalist, one
of the few, or actually probably the only one, actually
spoke out in twenty twenty. She says that the numbers
of police in Minneapolis have gone down from nine hundred
odd on the street before George Floyd to about three
hundred and fifty.
Speaker 12 (28:38):
Now.
Speaker 11 (28:39):
It's impossible for those police to keep up with all
the shootings that are going on. There were four shootings
in twenty four hours before this tragedy hit the Anunciation
Catholic School.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
God Have Mercy, Maranda.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
You mentioned that it's an article of faith, and you're
so right about that. What I can't figure out is,
I mean, as horrible as these people may be, they
still can read pull numbers. Normal people think they're a
bunch of weird, vicious freaks, and they seem to be
doubling down on that everywhere, not backing off, doubling down
(29:16):
every place they can. Can you explain that?
Speaker 11 (29:21):
I mean, I can't really other than I think that
this is a party that's very dangerous. You know, it's
a wounded animal and it's spiraling out of control. It's
in a death spiral, and so it's at its most
dangerous now. And the hard left radicals, the Marxists have
taken over. The cowards who were the establishment Democrats either
(29:44):
caved in people like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and
Joe Biden, who should have really saved the party from
these people. They just bent over, and then the sense
of the ones left and they became independents or Republicans.
We had this very mournful story in the New York
Times last week saying that you know, for the first
(30:04):
time in history, Republicans are outnumbering or out registering as voters,
Democrats in among young people and so and all over,
I mean across the board, they're out registering them. So
there's no interest in belonging to with the Democratic Party.
It's bizarre and weird and fringe, and also goes against
(30:28):
every tenet of common sense that we all have, like,
for instance, that more cops on the street will make
you safer. And we had the Chicago mayor, Brandon Johnson
quizzed about that by mourning Joe none other than lefty
mourning Joe or anti Trumper mourning Joe on NBC the
other day, and he could not. I think he was
(30:49):
asked four times, you know, would five thousand more cops
solve Chicago's terrible homicide and crime problem? And he refused
to answer. He knows that's the true truth. But unfortunately
the crazies that have taken hold of the party are
just philosophically anti police. So instead of taxpayer money going
(31:10):
to proper police, it's going to social workers and so
called violence interrupters, which is just another grift for the
Democrats and their hangers on, and it does nothing to
stop violent criminals or drug crazed people, or all the
problems mentally ill people, all the problems that are turning
our cities into just dystopian nightmares, and that contribute to
(31:35):
what happened yesterday when this deranged, demonic individual open fire
on innocent children praying in mass.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
You sat down changing the subject a little bit with
Senator Chuck Grassley.
Speaker 2 (31:52):
Here's a little bit of it.
Speaker 12 (31:54):
All that stuff makes Watergate. See, Watergate was kind of
a cover up from the outside. You and I have
been talking during this podcast about a cover up within
government m a big difference. So I'm chairman of this
(32:15):
Judiciary Committee doing my oversight work. I want to make
sure that the public knows how Trump was mistreated. And
I don't care whether anybody ever goes to jail over
it or not.
Speaker 2 (32:27):
I hope they.
Speaker 12 (32:28):
If they're prosecuted and they're guilty, they go to jail.
But right now, I just want to make sure that
the world knows how Trump's been treated since he every
the very minute he came down the elevator.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
Randon, did you get the sense from Senator Grassley that
it's really, really, really bad the corruption that's been going
on inside the government.
Speaker 11 (32:51):
Absolutely. And look, he's a wonderful man, you know, in
his nineties from Iowa corn farmer, and he he's dedicated
his life to oversight and to protections for whistleblowers and
really that you know, he's the definition of public service.
And I mean he has such a great grasp on history,
(33:13):
having lived through so much of it. And you know,
there when he talks about Watergate being a drop in
the ocean compared to Russiagate, his spot on and I
think we owe him a debt of gratitude for his
investigations over the years, for his dogged determination, for his
sort of independence. He doesn't care really what his fellow
(33:36):
senators think of him, and they've done all sorts of things.
When he was doing to Biden investigation, remember he got
ambushed with a bogus, a bogus FBI defensive briefing.
Speaker 2 (33:48):
It wasn't real.
Speaker 11 (33:49):
It was set up by the Democrats, And in fact,
he and Senator Johnson just said, you know, if we
read about this in the Washington Post tomorrow, we'll know
that you are acting improperly. And sure enough, the story
was leaked to the Washington Post to discredit their Hunter
Biden investigation. And the sad thing is they continued on,
(34:11):
but there were Republicans on their committees who were swayed
by these lies because they saw them in the Washington
Post and they believed everything they saw in the Post
or the New York Times. So they just refused to
comply with certain requests that these chairmen were making of
their fellow Republicans in these committees, and of course the
(34:31):
Democrats refused to go along. So there were subpoenas that
were never made, and the investigation was somewhat stymied. Which
was of course the aim of Nancy Pelosi and Adam
Schiff and the rest of them who were trying to
put a spoke in the wheels of Johnson and Grassley.
In the end, their report was incredible and incredibly prescient,
(34:54):
and they got a lot of those sas reports, so
suspicious activity reports from the banks. They managed to get
them and put them out in the public, and that
was the beginning of us understanding. This is before the laptop.
We're talking about back in twenty nineteen, before we got
the laptop, that they already had laid out the groundwork
(35:16):
for us and the guideposts so that we understood what
we were looking at when we were investigating the basically
corrupt activities of Joe Biden and his family, the influence
pedaling around the world, and Chuck Grasley did a lot
of that at the beginning.
Speaker 1 (35:35):
Pod Force one is her podcast, Miranda, thank you, I
appreciate it. How corrupt is our government as it pertains
the China, How bat is our government? How dirty are
the Clintons. Peter Schweitzer is going to join us in
a moment and discuss such things. I'm going to discuss
something with you first I'm going to discuss America's crisis
(35:59):
of a few of them, but testosterone is it might
be the biggest one. And if you wouldn't ask ten
people on the street, no, none of them would say testosterone.
But we have lost You want to hear an eye
popping number. Fifty percent of our testosterone in fifty years
half gone because of all the estrogens in the water
and stuff like that. Now, it doesn't matter what happens
(36:22):
with the debt, the border, taxes, elections. If we lose
all our testosterone, America goes away period goodbye.
Speaker 2 (36:30):
Chalk is out here to change that. Naturally. You want
to feel years younger, your mind working better, better mood.
Speaker 1 (36:41):
Get some natural herbal supplements from Chalk. I take a
male Vitality stack every single day.
Speaker 2 (36:47):
I have for years, and I will until the day
I die.
Speaker 1 (36:51):
You want to save some money, Chalk dot com slash jessetv.
You'll save you some money. You're about sixty to ninety
days away from feeling better than you have in years.
Speaker 2 (37:03):
We'll be back.
Speaker 13 (37:14):
Last month, the Department of Defense was made aware of
an Obama Biden era legacy program called Digital Escorts.
Speaker 2 (37:22):
For nearly a.
Speaker 13 (37:23):
Decade, Microsoft has used Chinese coders remotely supervised by US
contractors to support sensitive DoD cloud systems. Program was designed
to comply with contracting rules, but it exposed the Department
to unacceptable risk. I mean, if you're thinking America first
and common sense, this doesn't.
Speaker 8 (37:43):
Pass either of those tests.
Speaker 13 (37:45):
So I initiated an immediate review of this vulnerability, and
I want to report our initial findings. So the use
of Chinese nationals to service Department of Defense cloud environments,
it's over.
Speaker 1 (37:59):
I'm glad it's all. How in the world did that
ever begin? Joining me now, Peter Schweitzer, author of the
book Blood Money, President of the Government Accountability Institute. Peter
in what universe did our number one geopolitical ally gain
access to our DoD cloud?
Speaker 14 (38:19):
Great question, Jesse, Always good to be on with you. Look,
I think what happened here was that we hired contractors.
It was probably some of the big tech companies, you know, Microsoft, Google,
et cetera. And they do a lot of contract work
in China, and they're all very cozy with China.
Speaker 8 (38:34):
They rely on Beijing.
Speaker 14 (38:36):
To give them access to the Chinese market, and they're
willing to look the other way when it comes to
certain security issues. So it's not surprising to me that
the contractors that would do this. What to me is
stunning is the fact that the DoD officials, the Obama
and Biden era officials, actually authorize this and supervised it
(38:56):
and had no problem with it. That's the part that's
really shocking to me.
Speaker 1 (39:01):
Peter, I don't know what we're if what we're dealing
with is incompetence or malice, but maybe you have some
more insight in that, because you're right, that's what blew
me away.
Speaker 2 (39:10):
It wasn't that this was happening.
Speaker 1 (39:12):
It's that these administrations knew what was happening and just
kind of shoulder shrug the whole thing. And everyone knows
about Joe Biden's families, connections to China and whatnot.
Speaker 2 (39:23):
What are we dealing with here? Malice?
Speaker 14 (39:26):
I think we're probably dealing with both. I think we're
dealing with some incompetence. Look, there are people we all
know in the government who really aren't up to snuff.
They couldn't work in the private sector. But I also
do think there are individuals who are sympathetic to China.
Doesn't necessarily mean they're communists, but they feel like, hey,
China is a partner. They use that kind of language.
We can work with them, we can do things. They're
(39:48):
not a threat, they are not an adversary. They are
essentially a friendly company that's kind of competitive, so they.
Speaker 8 (39:56):
Don't view it as a security threat. I think if.
Speaker 14 (39:58):
Recent history demonstrates it's anything Jesse, it's that we need
to view everything that China does in the context of
espionage and in terms of a national security threat to
the United States, because that's how they operate, and that's
the mindset that the CCP has towards the United States.
Speaker 1 (40:16):
Think about them in the terms of espionage, which makes
this little video clip that's been making a rounds pretty revealing.
Speaker 15 (40:23):
Look, we're getting along very well with China, and I'm
getting along very well with President Chy. I think it's
very insulting to say students can't come here, because they'll
go out and they'll start building schools and they'll be
able to survive it. But I like that the students
come here. I like that other country students come here,
and you know what would happen if they didn't. Our
(40:44):
college system would go to hell very quickly. You'd have
and it wouldn't be the top colleges. It would be
colleges that struggle on the bottom, and you take out
three hundred thousand or six hundred thousand students out of
the system. I like having and I told this to
Presidency that we're honored to have this students here. Now,
(41:05):
with that, we check and we're careful and we see
who's there, and Marco wants that we spoke. We're in
the same position. But we have a tremendous college system,
the best in the world. Nobody even to us. That's
why China sends them here.
Speaker 1 (41:18):
Six hundred thousand Chinese spies, and we're okay with that.
Speaker 14 (41:22):
Yeah, I mean the number right now is roughly three
hundred thousand, so six hundred thousand would mean doubling it.
Speaker 8 (41:28):
No, I think this is a huge mistake.
Speaker 14 (41:30):
I don't know if this is some kind of negotiation
on the part of Trump. I mean sometimes he kind
of throws things out there as part of a negotiating ploy.
But if this is the goal, I think it's a terrible,
terrible idea because here's what we know. We know that
the Chinese students that come here, they're not studying sociology
and comparative literature.
Speaker 8 (41:49):
They're here to study the hard sciences.
Speaker 14 (41:52):
They only are allowed to come here if they and
their families are screened as being loyal to the CCP.
Speaker 8 (41:58):
If there's anything question in your.
Speaker 14 (42:00):
Background and your family's background, they are not going to
allow you to come to study in the United States.
Speaker 8 (42:05):
We also know that they control these students.
Speaker 14 (42:08):
They're all required to use a Chinese app to check
in that is monitored by the Ministry of State Security,
and that the state has a leverage over their family
members back in China. So even if these students wouldn't
want to do something to help the CCP, they have
to because there is leverage that they have. And the
final thing to look at, Jesse is just all the
(42:30):
other things beyond espionage that's going on. We know that
Chinese students have been used to organize protests on college
campuses to advance the CCP. We know that a lot
of the money laundering in the fentanyl trade that takes
place is being carried out by Chinese students in the
United States on visas. They are taking suitcases full of
cash and taking the Chinese state owned banks in the
(42:52):
United States to launder that money. So This is a
national security threat. This is not like some kids spending
junior year abroad in Italy studying renaissance art. This is
something very, very different, and it is an absolute national
security threat.
Speaker 1 (43:08):
Peter real quickly, I've only got about a minute left here.
How corrupt are the Clintons and are they ever going
to go down?
Speaker 14 (43:16):
I think the Clintons are enormously corrupt. They were the
ones that first perfected what I call globalized corruption, which
is they're not just you know, involving corrupt acts in
the United States.
Speaker 8 (43:26):
They've set up a.
Speaker 14 (43:27):
System whereby foreign governments and oligarchs would pay them tens
of millions of dollars.
Speaker 8 (43:32):
So they're hugely corrupt. Whether they go down or not,
I don't know. I'm not a lawyer.
Speaker 14 (43:36):
The statute of limitations has run on some of these crimes,
but I do know that if there is a conspiracy charge,
as long as that conspiracy is carried through in a
criminal behavior, that that statute of limitations can be extended.
So maybe the prosecutors that doj can look at that,
because I do think the Clintons engage in a lot
of criminal conduct in the way that they made money
(43:59):
person only and for their foundation when Hillary was Secretary
of State.
Speaker 2 (44:04):
Yea freaking dirty Clintons. Peter, thank you, my friend.
Speaker 1 (44:08):
I appreciate you as always. It's wild how much of
our government corruption. It's not that government was ever cleaned,
but it's wild how much of our government corruption that
we know today ties back to the Clintons. Remember the Clintons.
The Clintons were famously dirty in Arkansas. This is well
known by people who lived in Arkansas. That's the system
(44:29):
they came up in. Everyone knew the Clintons were dirty,
and they just took that crime network they had put
it in the government. Then communists like Obama Biden have
continued to use it to this stage. Just a filthy,
filthy stain on this country, the freaking Clintons. Anyway, lighten
the mood next. All right, it's time to lighten the mood.
(44:56):
And uh, maybe my favorite thing in the world is
evil communists in.
Speaker 2 (44:59):
The government getting fired now. Susan Monterez, she was the
CDC chief that Trump just hired. It was a month
ago and there.
Speaker 1 (45:08):
Were rumors flying that she was a big Pharma stooge.
Speaker 2 (45:12):
She's gone canned immediately. That's a good thing. Celebrate. Wish
she hadn't been hired to begin with, but whatever, she's
gone now.
Speaker 1 (45:20):
Also, that weird monkey Poks dude, the gay dude with
the devil pentagram and stuff like that tattooed on himself,
he quit too.
Speaker 2 (45:29):
So we're winning. We'll take it. See them all