Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
So before we get into our medical institutions specifically, I
just wanted to talk to you again about institutional trust, institutions, nations,
how nations remain, because I see something happening globally right now,
in many, many, many places, honestly, many places considered to
be Western civilization.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
I see this happening.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
It's happening here in the United States of America, Canada, UK,
of course, France, Germany.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
I see this happening.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
A very very common thing throughout history is happening. And
this is how it oftentimes goes. A country will be
established somehow somewhere, and then the country will begin to
flourish and grow. People will be happy, prosperous, and over time,
the the institutions on which a nation is built. Remember,
(01:03):
nations are built on their institutions. They are the pillars
that hold your nation up. Your government, your education, your religion,
your entertainment, your various things, those are institutional things that
create a country. Over time, the institutions will become corrupted
as the people check out, get too comfortable, lazy, whatever
(01:25):
word you want to put on it. The institutions will
be infiltrated and conquered by evil corrupt people. And once
the institutions become corrupted by evil people, the institutions will
begin to serve themselves instead of the nation. You know
that the education institution of a country, it actually should
(01:46):
never be to serve the education. It should be to
serve the country. That should be the ultimate goal. The government.
People inside the government shouldn't exist to serve the government,
to better the government, enrich the government, span the government.
The government should exist to well help the country, serve
the country. But once it's conquered by evil, selfish people,
(02:10):
that changes. The institution focuses inward, focuses on itself, and
after that corruption happens, the institution will do terrible things.
It will lie. Evil act after evil act will happen,
and the people themselves will know it. No no matter
(02:31):
what age you're in today we all have cell phones, right,
you can read about it. But no matter what age
you're in, the people will begin to pick up on
the fact that this institution is turning evil selfish, and
then something disastrous happens. The people will begin to separate
from the institution. They will begin to view the institution
as the enemy instead of a necessary pillar holding up society.
(02:56):
And once you get to that point, the end of
that country is in sight. I'm not saying it's happening tomorrow,
but you have to have trust between the people in
their institutions where the country will end. You cannot have
this separation and continue to exist as a country.
Speaker 2 (03:16):
It doesn't work. And I see it happening globally right now.
I know you see it.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Two institutions have already broken the trust. Time after time,
issue after issue, they've broken the trust. And they're all
virtually all of them except for here in America, which
we'll get to in a moment, but virtually all institutions
now are doing what they always do. And it blows
me away because the lesson of history is quite clear.
(03:41):
The institutions, instead of.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
Trying to earn back the trust of.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
The people, open up the books, hold people accountable. Instead,
they double down, triple down on all the evil, selfish things,
thus bringing about the end of the country much faster
than it would have happened otherwise. The United States of America,
our institutions are evil and.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
Corrupt as well. Evil, corrupt, dishonest.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
We don't have to look very far back in history
to see an example of just how evil, corrupt, and
dishonest our institutions are.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
Remember COVID, you really should, in an indoor setting, a
congregous setting, be wearing masks. It's just the appropriate thing
to do to defend, to protect yourself and your family.
Speaker 4 (04:29):
Our data from the CDCs today suggests you know that
vaccinated people.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
Do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Bibermectin is
something more often used to deworm horses.
Speaker 5 (04:41):
If we really do our part, stay at home social distance,
then we can flatten our curve even below those projections.
Speaker 6 (04:49):
But it really depends on all of us.
Speaker 4 (04:51):
I'm making the personal sacrifices not to infect my parents
and my pregnant daughter. I worry about that because then
it gives people the option to say, well, bars and
restaurants are open. Then I can have twenty people over
for Thanksgiving, and so I don't like it to be
any number. I like it to keep it to your
immediate household.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
Obviously, we could just play a montage that lasted the
whole show.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
Those were all lies. Every one of those people was lying, and.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
They knew they were lying, every one of them lying
evil and as they told, lie after lie after lie,
while your life was being destroyed, while you had to
say goodbye to your dying mother on zoom, you couldn't
have a funeral, while your child lost their ability to read.
That trust began to shatter between our medical institution and
this country. And then of course the vaccine, which of
(05:43):
course is not a vaccine at all, it's a therapeutic
of some kind create created by and through Operation Warp Speed.
Operation Warp Speed was terrible, one of the most evil
things this country has ever done. That poisonous shot armed
numerous people who are still out there searching for justice.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
Maybe that's you watching right now. And up until recently
even Trump was still touting.
Speaker 7 (06:08):
It despite COVID, which was very unfortunate situation for the
whole world. We did a great job with it. Never
got the credit for the job we did Operation Warp Speed.
People say, is that one of the greatest achievements ever
in politics or in the military, because it was almost
a military procedure. But everybody, including Putin, said that Operation
(06:34):
Warp Speed, what you did with that, nobody can believe it.
And we did a great job.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
It wasn't great, it was horrible. What was evil? What
was wrong? Now?
Speaker 1 (06:46):
Donald Trump has to own that has not really ever
done so up until recently.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
So what happened with.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
Trump and warp speed, then I'm not excusing him, So
don't think that I am. What happened though, Donald Trump
was lied to by all the people around him. Everyone's
going to die. You're going to have fifty million people dead.
Everyone's going to die. Do you want to be the
president when fifty million people die? They're all going to die,
a lot of death, mass death, mister President. We need
a vaccine now, we could get one ready to go.
(07:14):
We need this done now, fast track this thing. Gigantic
fat hand out to pharmaceutical companies who didn't have to
jump through any more hoops to make sure it was safe.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
And out it goes.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
And now we have pregnancies being terminated by the million.
We won't even go into that little number. Donald Trump
was lied to, bought into the lies, pushed it, and
people die.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
But Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (07:38):
Has really, really solid people around him now that to
his credit, he has brought into the administration doctor J.
Marty McCarey, several others, smart people who know the truth
about this stuff. And Donald Trump is now hearing the
truth and he put out this statement quote. It is
very important that the drug companies justify the success of
(08:00):
their various COVID drugs. Many people think they are a
miracle that saved millions of lives. Others disagree with the
CDC being ripped apart over this question. I want the answer,
and I want it now. They show me great numbers
and results, but don't seem to be showing them to
many others. I want them to show them now to
the CDC and the public and clear up this mess.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
One way or the other.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
I hope Operation Warp Speed was as brilliant as many
say it was.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
If not, we all want to know about it and
why now.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
I know if you are somebody still angry about all
that that that seems like a small thing, and it is,
but it's also not. That is a huge first step.
And I will say this, that's more than is happening
in any other Western country to earn back the trust
(08:58):
of the people in their institutions.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
You can say it's small, Okay, it's small.
Speaker 1 (09:04):
No one's doing that. In Canada they're all doubling down,
tripling down. No one's doing that in Germany and France
and the UK. It's not happening anywhere else in the
Western world. It is slowly happening here. Bad people are
being removed from the government. The Trump administration acknowledging when
(09:24):
mistakes are made and fixing those mistakes. Like this Susan Monarez.
Trump had someone else in mind to head up CDC.
Of course Big Pharma didn't like and because they are
a bunch of evil, poisonous scumpags, so they own a
bunch of United States Senators, including Republicans like Bill Cassidy
of Louisiana, they torpedoed his nomination. Trump went with this
(09:45):
Susan Monarez girl for some reason, because there were red
flags all over the place.
Speaker 8 (09:53):
What can we do to ensure that at Steady State,
not just in response to a pandemic, but at Steady State,
that we haven't open and inclusive and a fully benefiting
clinical trial network, so that we can ensure that it's equitable,
that it's accessible, that that it isn't just skewed towards
a demographic or geographic or a patient population, but we
(10:15):
actually have an inclusive clinical trial network.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
You heard all the buzzwords, she's a dirty communist who
never should have been there. When now she's gone, and
that's a good thing.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Keep in mind where we were.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
I just mentioned we have doctor j and others involved
now with the national health institutions of this country. Keep
in mind where we were. Remember when they tried to
create a new pandemic scare out of this monkey pox thing,
and they brought in this muddy buddy on TV to
tell you about it.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
The confusions exists, the misperceptions.
Speaker 5 (10:50):
Yeah, so I think you know, this virus transmits through
very close skin to skin physical contact, often in the
setting of sexual exposure, but there are other mechanisms for
its transmit suld including if you touch objects at individuals
who've had monkey Pop's touch, or if you have prolonged
exposure to respiratory droplets. With that said, signaling to people
(11:11):
who are in the gay, bisexual, other men who have
sex with men communities, and also transgender people who have
sex with men, that it's really important to have awareness
that that's circulating in the community is really a critical
part of the messaging while not generating, you know, inordinate
concern and really focusing on the infection as linked to
an identity. So it's just an infection, it's not linked
to an identity. It just happens to be in the
(11:32):
social network.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
No, it's linked to one identity.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
It's a gay it's a gay disease that only affects
people who engage in gay activity or the dogs they
couple with. Yeah, you forgot about that story, right, Those
were the people who were in charge of America's health institutions.
Of course, that dude resigned because we're getting rid of
a lot of the bad people in the CDC. Now
(11:57):
he's the shining star on all the morning show trash.
Speaker 5 (12:00):
In the Trump administration, we're seeing the tip of the iceberg.
So right now, I think probably the most prominent demonstration
of that is what Secretary Kennedy did with changing the
childhood's schedule for COVID nineteen, in that we were directed
that only children with underlying conditions would be the ones
(12:21):
that should qualify for vaccination. That's not what the data shows.
I mean, from my vantage point as a doctor who's
taken the hippocratic oath, I only see harm cooming. I
may be wrong, but based on what I'm seeing, based
on what I've heard with the new members of the
Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices or ACIP, they're really moving
in an ideologic direction where they want to see the
(12:42):
undoing of vaccination. They do want to see the undoing
of mRNA vaccination. They have a very specific target on COVID,
but I do fear that they have other things that
they are going to be working on. Hepatitis B vaccine
is on the agenda for the meeting in September. I
predict that what they're going to do is try to
change the birth dose of hepatitis BE vaccine so that
(13:04):
kids don't get it when they're born.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
Yeah, kids shouldn't be getting that when they're born. These
were the people who were in charge of the institutions.
They're being removed.
Speaker 2 (13:17):
Now.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
Be grateful that at least some of our institutions are
attempting to bring that trust back, to create that bond again.
Speaker 2 (13:29):
Is it enough?
Speaker 1 (13:29):
No, it's not enough yet. It's more than we've had.
All that may have made you uncomfortable, but I am right.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
What does it mean to feel good? I feel good?
Do you feel good? I don't feel good? The truth
is that we don't feel good.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
In fact, we feel bad way too often because our
levels are off our energy.
Speaker 2 (13:52):
We shouldn't need a.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
Cup of coffee at three in the afternoon. Now, don't
get me wrong, I love my afternoon coffee.
Speaker 2 (14:00):
Shouldn't be a huh. I need this because I'm dragging.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
When you get home from work, are you still full
of pep? Ready to go make dinner, go for a walk,
play with the kids, or are you out of gas?
Try some chalk. It's about to change your life and
make your life better. Try some natural herbal supplements, some chalk,
and you're gonna find out what it means to feel good.
A better mood, better energy, Your mind works better, You'll
(14:26):
be better at home, you'll be better at work. Your
entire life gets better when you allow chalk into it.
Go to chalk dot com slash jessetv. Your life's about
to improve. Well, I do have some bad news. Well
(14:50):
good news and bad news. The good news is Senator
Ron Johnson is here. But the bad news is Congress
is back in sessions. So I'm sure we're about to
get screwed in one way or another. So joining me al,
Senator Ron Johnson from the great state of Wisconsin. Okay, Senator,
before we get into the spending, which I have no
doubt is coming, and we'll be told that we have
to pass it, the world will come to an end.
What's happening at the CDC, because it looks like good
(15:13):
things from my perspective.
Speaker 6 (15:15):
Well, Jesse, I would tend to agree with you. I
don't have knowledge of all the inner workings, but from
my standpoint, I think federal health agencies were corrupted. I
think it's been obvious, certainly since COVID, that the federal
health agencies were captured by big pharma other interests. They
weren't serving the interest of the American public. They were
(15:35):
lying to us. I mean, there's a long list of
lies told during COVID. The injection was going to stay
in our arm. You know again, things we weren't told about,
the biod distribution of of the injection it's an injection,
the covering up of the microtitis signal that we know
now we have documents of that. I think there's gonna
(15:55):
be more information coming out of other signals that they
also hid. So again, these agencies have lost the trust
in the American public because they haven't been trustworthy. And
these are the individuals that push the mandates, They're the
people that covered things up, lied to the American public.
And from my standpoint, I'm happy to see him go.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
Senator.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
It's kind of a general question, but I think the
trust between people and their institutions is just everything for
a country, and then a country will end if that
trust is broken. Do the people who run these institutions,
all of them health I mean, FBI, media, whatever.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
Do they realize that? Does that go into any of their.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
Heads as they tell lie after lie and then cover
up the lie that they just told them, then cover
up for the cover up. Do any of these people
care that that trust is necessary or the country will end?
Speaker 6 (16:51):
You know what I've found again, I'm not of this world.
I'm an a column from Oshcrash, Wisconsin, came here and
never ran for office all of a sudden here in Washington,
and this is a bubble. It's a very thick, well
insulated bubble. And I think that's the part of the problem,
is you have all this government concentrated right here in
this alternate universe. A better idea would literally to be
(17:13):
to set off these agencies into different states so that
the people that first of all serve those agencies come
from different places, not just within the Beltway here. But
I think that's a big problem. I've often said that
we just don't have enough people in Washington, see, not
in the administration, not in congresstant and congressional staff, they
have any experience in which means very little knowledge of
(17:35):
and maybe worse sympathy for the private sector. That they
don't have a clue how hard it is to run
a business and how all the rules of regulation, the
taxes that they impose on businesses just make it that
much more difficult. So it's just a matter of a
simply again no experience in, very little knowledge of, and
maybe worse, no sympthy for. And then throw on top
(17:56):
of that, and we'll talk about this with spending. They've
never even been part of a functioning organization where you
have a mission statement. We had a vision statement where
we set annual goals, where the people that are part
of the organization understand their role they play to accompst
those goals. And again here we are. We don't appropriate
(18:16):
these accounts, not in you know, any kind of rational way.
It's you know, these two thousand plus page on we
of spending bills that nobody has a chance to read.
Somebody writes them somewhere, they slip all kinds of crap
in there, and that's been accepted here, like that's how
the government operates. It's a seven trillion, seven trillion dollars
(18:38):
a year entity, seven trillion dollars, seven thousand billion dollars,
and we don't have our act together where we actually appropriate.
And again, all we're trying to appropriate is about a
quarter of it. Seventy five per cent of is an
automatic pilot, and they set it up that way so
they don't don't have to appropriate it. So the government
just continues to grow, and as government grows, our freedoms received.
(19:00):
So now I'm not a fan of this place at all.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
Senator Okay, I mean you brought it up. We might
as well get into this horrible subject. A spending bill
is coming of some kind. What is coming?
Speaker 2 (19:12):
Is it multiple bills? Is it an omnibus bill?
Speaker 3 (19:15):
Is it?
Speaker 2 (19:16):
What is coming? And how bad is it going to be?
Speaker 6 (19:19):
Probably the best case scenario just be a continuing resolution. Again,
it's an awful way to run government. But if you
have to do a deal with Democrats, they're going to
demand more spending and we can't afford it. Jessey, I
know you know that since January first, this year, I've
been arguing that we must return to a pre pandemic
level of spending. We're not even close. I laid out
(19:41):
options somewhere between five point five and six point five
trillion dollars. We're still spending well over seven trillion.
Speaker 3 (19:47):
You know.
Speaker 6 (19:48):
The one big beautiful bill knocked that down a little bit,
but not by much, not not anywhere near enough. And
so probably the best situation is just continued spending at
this year's level, don't increase it. Do that for a
year after after year.
Speaker 2 (20:02):
It's probably the.
Speaker 6 (20:02):
Best case scenario until literally we have the public demanding
fiscal conservatism. Now, President Trump, you remember, in his address
to Congress, said he wanted to do something in the
near term that hasn't been done in twenty four years,
balance the federal budget. Well, listen, no president in my
(20:23):
lifetime as honored his promises more than President Trump has.
I want to hold him to his word.
Speaker 1 (20:28):
Now.
Speaker 6 (20:28):
I'll do everything I can to help him with that,
line by line, review, program by program review the federal budget.
You know, nothing should be out the table, but that's
what it's gonna take. It's gonna take like forensic accounting
and analysis and information and the public has to be
behind us, because that's a big problem Jesse when you
don't have the public demanding it. But what the public
(20:50):
wants is they want their benefits, right, they want their benefits.
You can cut somebody else benefit, but don't cut my benefit.
And by the way, tax somebody else for my benefit
as well. So that's that's the game. The American public
is basically paying or playing tax somebody else to provide
me my benefit. No, by the way, increase my benefit.
That's that's the state of.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Playing American day.
Speaker 6 (21:12):
Yeah, yeah, driving, driving, driving the airport today, I was
listened to Wisconsin Talk Radio. Three and a half million
riders of the Milwaukee transit system don't pay the bus fair.
That's like eight million bus fairs going unpaid annually.
Speaker 2 (21:32):
That is the level of country.
Speaker 6 (21:34):
Back, of respect for law, the lawlessness that that we're
we're living in today here in America. It's not a pretty.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
Sight speaking of lawlessness. Look, I honestly don't want to
single her out, even though I can't stand her.
Speaker 2 (21:48):
Ihan Omar.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
There's a big story out there today that she makes
one hundred and seventy four thousand dollars a year. Her
net worth is thirty million dollars. We hear about the
stock trading all the time, where members of Congress somehow
beat Warren buff every single year in the stock market.
It's such naked corruption that seems like it should be
such an easy thing to solve.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
What is happening back there.
Speaker 6 (22:09):
Well, again I don't know the specifics of her situation,
but it sounds like she was funneling campaign contributions to
her now husband when he was not her husband. And
they build up a little nestig there. And again I
don't know how else they've built their wealth, but yeah,
I mean something like her it goes from nothing to
six to thirty million dollars in wealth. Again, that's it's
(22:31):
a weird account. It's a weird financial disclosure. They have
these ranges from one to five million, five to twenty
five million, so you can really over exaggerate what member
of Congress is worth. But apparently her minimum is six
million dollars, and I think that ought to be investigator.
Remember when this came before Homeland Security and we had
Amendment Rick got at a great amendment. Well, why don't
(22:52):
we investigate how Nancy Pelosi got all her wealth to
do the same thing with elon Omar anybody else who
just has this outside wealth that they didn't come into
Congress with, but all of a sudden, after serving a
few years, all of a sudden, they're worth millions that
ought to be investigated and, if necessary, prosecuted. We have
laws on the books to prevent this kind of fraud.
Speaker 1 (23:15):
Senator, back to what we were talking about before, you
mentioned three quarters of the spending is automatic. Is there
any way to undo that or is all of it
these third rail of politics stuff where the second you
bring it up, someone's going to say, you're trying to
take away Grandma's Social Security and you lose your next election.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Can we do anything about this spence?
Speaker 6 (23:37):
The thing I continue to point out is if you
leave social Security and Medicare off the table, even Medicaid,
we've got a trillion dollars of other mandatory spending. It
should be discretionary spending. But again, what Congress has done,
because they want to keep spending more money, is they
just deviously transfer what should be discretionary spending appropriated to
(23:58):
other mandatory so it just becomes mandatory. And again it's
out of sight, out of control, so that fast game
they've been playing. But that's why I keep pointing out
there's close to four hundred billion dollars that we're spending
this year that if you take twenty nineteen expenditures plus
them up by inflation population, we're spending four hundred billion
(24:21):
dollars more than that inflated figure from twenty nineteen, and
that excludes Socis Kitty and Medicare.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
God, Senator, thank you so much. I appreciate you. You
know what my cell phone company does when they give back,
because you already know what variazon at and T and
T Mobile. You know what they give back to whatever
the newest COMMI Cause Dejore is out there. Pure Talk
gives back to veterans. It's always about the veterans. CEO
(24:51):
of Pure Talk did two tours in Vietnam and now
he runs this wonderful company that will charge you less
for your cell service. It's on the same tower. And
when Puretalk gives back, it's all about the vets. When
it's Independence Day, they were given out American flags to veterans.
Veterans you nominated here, have an American flag. They're getting
(25:11):
veterans back on their feet. Medical care debt getting veterans
the help they need and the help they deserve. That's
what my cell phone company does while charging me half
of what I was paying at T Mobile. Go to
puretalk dot com, slash jessetv and make the switch today.
It's time switch to pure talk. Let's talk about Democrat
(25:41):
violence as more rhetoric continues to increase from their side.
First of all, understand that you you don't commit acts
of violence all the time, and you don't wish violence
on other people all the time only because you have
something morally against it.
Speaker 2 (26:02):
Me too.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
It's not that I'm a completely non violent person, I
admit that. But even our political opponents. You know, if
we woke up tomorrow and saw that Joe Biden died,
I wouldn't cheer, wouldn't be happy. I'm not gonna cry,
I'm not gonna sob I don't care for him, but
that wouldn't that wouldn't make me happy.
Speaker 2 (26:21):
I wouldn't go online and it said woo dead.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
Yes, this wouldn't occur to me. But that is because I,
you and I we have a different value system than
communists do, and the enemies of communists throughout history. This
is not unique to America have always struggled to fully
(26:46):
understand that to a communist, violence is a necessary part
of the revolution.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
It is a necessary part of the revolution. It is
so necessary.
Speaker 9 (26:59):
He will encourage it, sometimes, really really subtly encourage it.
Sometimes he'll flat out tell people go commit acts of violence.
But to him, because he has nothing morally against it,
violence is just second nature.
Speaker 1 (27:16):
And don't think for a moment I'm only talking about
Democrat politicians, you know, elite communists, or I'm only talking
about Antifa or BLM or street communist types.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
This goes for well. According to Poling.
Speaker 1 (27:32):
The majority of Democrat voters in this country are comfortable
with violence. Do I need to remind you of the
poll during COVID that showed the percentage of Democrats that
believe that you should be arrested and thrown into a
camp if you didn't mask up, didn't take the vaccine.
The percentage of Democrats that thought your children should be
(27:54):
taken away from you, It wasn't ten percent.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
These are normal people.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Those are acts of violence to them. Force violence, that's
what you do. You get power, you get the ability
to use violence, and you use it. Maybe the violence
comes in the form of a drained street animal. Maybe
you've controlled you've taken control of some government agency, local
(28:21):
police force, national police force, whatever it is.
Speaker 2 (28:25):
When you have the power to physically.
Speaker 1 (28:28):
Hurt people in some way, the communist uses that power,
always has, always will And this is what I continue
warning us about. On the right, they believe now because
they don't control the government right now, because the Trump
administration is making some really solid steps, they believe violence
(28:49):
is more necessary now than it has been before, and
they are spreading that around and we're seeing more violence.
Speaker 6 (28:56):
Now.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
Remember James call me former.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
Head of the FBI, eighty six forty seven, what essentially
amounts to a subtle death threat, a subtle encouragement for
somebody to harm Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (29:09):
He knew exactly what it meant.
Speaker 1 (29:11):
This is not some street animal, some drugged out loser
on tiktoking Trump it. That's the former head of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation. Now, let's talk about what happened
over Labor Day weekend. Trump disappeared for a couple of days.
I don't know what he was doing, didn't matter, but
online on the internet, some weird rumor started that he
(29:34):
was dead.
Speaker 2 (29:35):
Very bizarre, that he was dead.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
It actually led to a pretty funny exchange between Trump
and Peter Doocy here it.
Speaker 10 (29:43):
Was completely different, but about a big viral social media
trend over the weekend.
Speaker 2 (29:49):
How did you find out over the weekend that you
were dead?
Speaker 10 (29:53):
You see that now people didn't see you for a
couple of days. One point three million user engagements as
of Saturday morning about you worked in mines?
Speaker 6 (30:02):
Really?
Speaker 11 (30:03):
You know, I have heard it's sort of crazy. But
last week I did numerous news conferences, all successful, they
went very well, like this is going very well, and
then I didn't do any for two days, and they
said there must be something wrong with him.
Speaker 6 (30:18):
Biden wouldn't do him for months.
Speaker 11 (30:19):
You wouldn't see him, and nobody ever said there was
ever anything wrong with him, and we know he wasn't
the greatest of shame.
Speaker 2 (30:28):
Pretty funny. But let's talk about Tim Walls.
Speaker 1 (30:34):
Look, we could go a lot of different places with this,
but let's talk about what Tim Walls said. Tim Walls
is the governor of Minnesota. We have fifty states, he's
the governor of one of them. Stood up in front
of a bunch of Democrats as that Trump's dead rumor
was flying here's what he said.
Speaker 12 (30:50):
You get up in the morning and you doom scroll
through things. And although I will say this, the last
few days, you woke.
Speaker 13 (30:57):
Up thinking there might be news, just saying, just saying,
there will be news sometime, just so you know there
will be news.
Speaker 2 (31:09):
We know what he's saying. There.
Speaker 1 (31:11):
You woke up hoping that Donald Trump was dead, and hey,
he is going to die at some point in time.
The governor of Minnesota, it's so open now with Democrat voters,
street communists, elite communists, and in fact, mister producer, I
want you to play that video one more time for me.
In this time instead of listening to Tim Walls, because
(31:33):
Tim Wallas is a quack, I got that. I want
you to listen as the governor of Minnesota wishes death
on the President of the United States openly behind a microphone.
I want you to listen to how the crowd responds
when he does it.
Speaker 2 (31:48):
Go ahead.
Speaker 12 (31:48):
You get up in the morning and you doom scroll
through things. And although I will say this, the last
few days, you woke up thinking.
Speaker 13 (31:55):
There might be news, just saying saying, there will be
news sometime, just so you know there will be news.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
Ha haa gosh, that's so funny. Let's hope a violent people.
Speaker 1 (32:16):
You have to remember you're dealing with people who view
violence differently than you view violence. Remember Ryan Ralph, the
guy who was waiting to shoot Donald Trump on the
golf course. Ryan Ralph. Crazies like that. They hear that
kind of rhetoric and they act on it. Remember the
(32:37):
guy who flew from California to murder Brett Kavanaugh. He
heard people like Chuck Schumer threatening the justices with reaping
the whirlwind, and you just ignore that as a standard
Democrats speech. But the street animals who are okay with
political violence don't view it that way. They view it
as marching orders. Senator Marshall Blackburn see just had a
(33:01):
twenty two year old woman charged with threatening to kill her.
They believe, even the average ones, they believe violence is
a necessary means to an end. They have been so deluded,
so poisoned, their minds, so poisoned to believe that the
(33:21):
world is coming to an end. If Donald Trump remains in.
Speaker 14 (33:24):
Power, if Republicans get power, this is the end of
all humanity. These are Nazis, These are this all this
apocalyptic language. Time after time after time, after time has
convinced the average Democrat that now, well, I have no
choice but to commit acts of violence. And when they're
little street animals, when their little pets commit acts of violence,
(33:48):
the elite communists then run to cover for them as
best they can. That Tranne shooter we just had in Minneapolis,
that horrible freaking shooting little Catholic kids, NBC is shoot.
Speaker 9 (34:01):
A public apology for misgendering the tranny a public apology.
Speaker 1 (34:10):
And do keep in mind, speaking of that, what have
we talked about? Why why do democrats want your guns?
Speaker 2 (34:17):
It is? Are they naive?
Speaker 3 (34:19):
You know?
Speaker 1 (34:20):
Because whenever, whenever they bring up gun confiscation, we will,
because we don't understand what we're dealing with, we'll hold
up some facts and we'll say, well, actually, if you
look at that the gun, the highest gun law states
they're the most violent. We try to point out logic
and facts, and we wonder, why doesn't that ever work?
Speaker 2 (34:36):
Why does it?
Speaker 1 (34:37):
Why doesn't that work? Those are facts? Well, stop being naive.
They don't care about crime, they don't care about mass shootings.
They are very very okay with violence. What they truly
truly care about is that they can't hurt all of us,
that they can't do to us what they see other
(34:58):
evil countries doing to their citizens. Remember what Australia did
during COVID. We saw testimony after testimony of it. Australia
built concentration camps and took unvaccinated people and threw them
in them. The free western civilization country of Australia sent
government goons door to door to apprehend people and throw
(35:21):
them in a concentration camp.
Speaker 2 (35:23):
What kind of gun laws does Tim Walls want?
Speaker 15 (35:26):
When they had a school shooting in Scotland or they
had an incident in Australia, they simply made changes.
Speaker 6 (35:31):
They are just as free as we are.
Speaker 15 (35:33):
They still have gun ownership requirements, but they have made
sure that they don't have these, and since they did
those things, they don't have them. We are an outlier
amongst nations in terms of what happens to our children.
And I refuse to think that that's okay.
Speaker 6 (35:46):
It's simply not.
Speaker 1 (35:50):
Oh, he's not worried about the children. He is, however,
very very very worried about you and your ability to
defend yourself. Just remember, there are violent people among us.
We call them democrats. All that may have made you uncomfortable,
but I am right. All right, Well, there's a government
(36:26):
funding deadline coming. No, I promise, hold on, hold on,
I promise it's actually September third, and you're watching a
new show on I'm right, this is not a repeat.
Speaker 2 (36:36):
We haven't screwed it up.
Speaker 1 (36:38):
There's a government funding deadline coming, and nobody in the
GOP is on the same page, and blah blah blah
blah blah. We all know exactly how it's going to go.
They'll run it right up to the deadline, forcing everybody
to sign some gigantic pile of craft until we're all
bankrupt in our dollar isn't worth two Nichols joining me
now the great Congressman Chip Roy now candidate or Texas
(37:00):
Attorney General. Well, Chip, did I get any of that wrong?
Because I tell you, I feel like I've seen this
movie before.
Speaker 16 (37:07):
Well, do you mean to tell me that every September
we're not getting a different script from the producers here
in Hollywood for ugly people, as they say about Washington, DC. Look,
here's the thing, here's the good news. Right now that
we are eight months plus into the president's administration, we
moved through and got the CR done in March. Now,
(37:29):
most of us don't love crs. Hey, guys, do your job,
get in appropriations bills passed. I'm one of those. I
think we should do our job. But remember that the
problem with the appropriations process, the spending process. We have
to go through the Senate, and Democrats in the Senate
are crazy. So you got you got to get seven
votes from Democrats in the Senate to move something through.
(37:50):
So that's why we ended up with a CR in March.
A lot of conservatives who don't like what we call
continuing resolution to keep funding government at the previous levels.
They don't love those things. But let's remember that we
have the Trump administration in charge of all of the
policies and the execution of those policies in the administration,
in the various agencies. Why am I giving all this
background because it is my considered judgment that we're going
(38:14):
to need to get comfortable with continuing resolutions being our friend.
We do our job in the House, we pass bills
that cut spending. We're doing that, not as fast as
I would like, not as much as I would like,
but we are moving bills that reduce spending. In the end,
the Senate's going to say no to that.
Speaker 6 (38:30):
For the most part.
Speaker 16 (38:31):
We might be able to force their hand on one
or two of them, but probably not so. Ultimately, if
we end up with a continuing resolution, for physical hawks
like you and me, that's actually kind of a win
because if we can hold spending at basically the twenty
four spending levels, then we're holding it flat and we're
actually cutting it back in terms of inflation. So we'll
(38:53):
see what happens in September. I would ultimately support a
continuing resolution at current levels because, honestly, Jesse, if we
passed a ten year continuing resolution and never came back
to Washington, that would probably be a good thing, right
because we were just will spending flat for ten years
when we can grow out of it. So we'll see
what happens in September. A lot of work to be done,
(39:13):
and we had a lot of debates seven next couple
of weeks.
Speaker 1 (39:17):
Jimp, as you have told us before, because it seems
to happen a lot. You've mentioned the Senate puts a
stop on these things. I don't understand. We supposedly have
control of the Senate.
Speaker 2 (39:27):
Why does the Senate stop any reduction in spending.
Speaker 1 (39:31):
I understand those dorks in the Senate are not going
to cut as much as I want cut.
Speaker 2 (39:34):
I'm not an unrealistic person. We can't cut anything.
Speaker 16 (39:40):
Well, we have two problems. We have Republicans who pretend
to be Republican and who will spend money and fight
us at every turn. We had to navigate those Republicans
when we were moving the bill that's the reconciliation bill
that became the big beautiful bill, right, So we had
to navigate Republicans that wanted.
Speaker 2 (39:55):
To spend more.
Speaker 16 (39:56):
We held that in chat Democrats they want to fight
us at every turn. So to get seven Democrats to
get to the threshold of sixty under the current Senate rules,
you've got to convince Democrats to go on. And they
have no interest in working with us. They want to
say that Scott is falling, they were taking away benefits
from old people and women and all the creative horribles
that they want to put forward, rather than working with
(40:18):
us to actually deliver something that's physically responsible. So that's
what we have to work with. I mean, look, I
gotta be honest. We ought to be pushing the Senate
on why it's adhering to the sixty vote threshold rather
than forcing them to have actual filibusters to stop the progress.
So those are things we got to talk through. But
right now we can't get something through the Senate without
(40:38):
them getting the sixty votes.
Speaker 1 (40:42):
Are we going to get a decent member of Congress
when you leave and go become Attorney General or is
it going to be some nerd that we're going to
I'm gonna have to savage on this show all the time.
Speaker 16 (40:52):
Well, first of all, I need to go earn the votes.
I need to go earn the votes of the people
of Texas to be the Attorney Chinnal. I hope I
will do that as a former prosecutor and the former
Persussistant Attorney General, and frankly someone who I think has
demonstrated a commitment to conservatism and the rule of law
and securing the border and going after corporate cronyism and
Chinese communist lands were like today introducing a bill of
band stock trading. I think I've earned, hopefully the trust
(41:13):
of the people of Texas. But and if I do,
and I'm moving on, hopefully the people of Texas twenty
one will send somebody really solid but look, it's up
to them. Someone's got to go earn it. Okay, you
can't buy it, you can't come in from on high.
You got to go earn it and talk to the people.
And look, the odds are never great because the members
of Congress, statistically speaking, have not been that good. But
(41:35):
I do trust the people of Texas twenty one. They're
a good, solid group of people, and hopefully we'll find
somebody solid to send up there.
Speaker 2 (41:43):
Tell me about this stock trading thing. I know you're
on this.
Speaker 1 (41:46):
I know Tim Burchett's on this, that the decent people
are on this.
Speaker 2 (41:50):
It's amazing to me. This is something that can't get done.
Speaker 1 (41:53):
Even the savages who are part of the Democrat party base,
some of them want this to get done. It's horrible
that members of Congress are allowed to insider trade with
knowledge they have that we don't.
Speaker 2 (42:02):
It's against the law. How is this? How is this
not already passed?
Speaker 16 (42:06):
Yeah, it should have been passed a long time ago.
I will say this is a weird situation or strange bedfellows.
I introduced legislation five years ago with a Democrat who's
currently running for governor in Virginia. We disagree on most things,
but she and I, Abigail Spamberger, we agreed on this.
We're sitting down, we had a beer, we're talking through it,
and said yeah, let's go do this. So we were
(42:26):
the first We led, and we said, hey, this is
a big issue. We had three, four or five other
colleagues who had different bills. So we now have merged
all those bills together into one bipartisan consensus bill. When
I say bipartisan, Jesse, I mean this is me stating
on the same stage with Promila, Jayapaul, with Alexandria Cassio Cortes,
(42:47):
with other of the four far Love members of Congress,
and conservatives like Scott Perry, Tim Burchett from Tennessee. You know,
we've got a great Unapolina, Luna, We've got a great group,
and I think we're going to force the hand. Now, look,
the arguments we get on the floor are pretty ridiculous.
Members of Congress will come forward and say, well, our
salary is not good enough, so we need to be
(43:07):
able to trade stocks to be able to pay for
kids college or do whatever, to which I say, we
can have a debate about congressional salaries. Right, They've been
frozen for fifteen years. That's up the people decide, and
we got to decide what to do. But to say
that you're going to day trade, day trade, like engage
in stock trading on the very subject matters you're entrusted
(43:29):
to objectively go vote on on behalf of your constituents.
If you want to trade stocks on a daily basis,
then get out of Congress. There's three hundred and thirty
million Americans, we're four hundred and thirty five. You don't
want to be in Congress, then go home. That's fine, right.
So I'm not sympathetic or moved by that. And I
will tell you one last point. Those of us who
(43:49):
are vocal about it, we're owning it. We're saying we
should ban it, and it's a ninety ten issue. My colleagues,
you don't like it. I promise you they're not saying
that very loudly because they know there can stituents won't
agree with it.
Speaker 2 (44:03):
Chip.
Speaker 1 (44:03):
What's the status of the Freedom Caucus. It's been a
pleasure watching it grow over the years, and just something
that is now a headache for GOP leadership, which I love.
Is it still growing? Is it still strong? Is it
getting watered down as happens over time.
Speaker 16 (44:20):
Actually, I think it's never been as strong as it
is right now. And I say that with all due
respect to my very good friends Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan,
those who founded And remember I was on Capitol Hill
as Ted Cruz's chief of staff when the Freedom Caucus
did not exist, but we were meeting with what would
become the Freedom Carcuss and then the Freedom Caucus got created.
About the time I left working for Ted, I was
(44:42):
back in Texas. I was actually working in the AG's
office as the first Assistant Attorney General. And then the
Freedom Carcass was founded and it started to have an impact. Well,
then I get there in twenty nineteen, I joined, some
other great folks join it, and we've had I think,
a very outsized impact in shaping the direction of policy
to drive a shrink government shrinks bang now, not as
(45:03):
much as you want or I want, but forcing everybody
to deal with these difficult issues. It's as strong as
it's umber band. Now I'm leaving to go home to
Texas to hopefully be Attorney General if I earned that right.
Ralph Norman is going to South Carolina running for Governor,
Andy Bidge running for governor of Arizona, and Byron Donalds
is running for governor of Florida. Two or three others
that we might lose, but we've got new people coming in.
(45:25):
We have some young folks in there that have been
a part of the fights. Let me give you two examples.
Andrew Clyde and josh Urkeen joined with me and Ralph
Norman and the Budget Committee and we voted now the
big beautiful bill in the face of all of the
arrows and all of the heat coming at us because
it wasn't doing enough on the green new scam subsidies,
and we weren't sure it was going to deliver on
the Medicaid restriction of productions that we thought were so important.
(45:48):
So we fought and we held the line, and then
we got some real changes in the right direction. Those
are some younger guys and guys that aren't leaving. There's
some good folks the Freedom Caucus, but we got to
grow his ranks. We need good people to run, you know,
we need solid conservative Freedom Caucus warriors to join and
come up here and join the fight.
Speaker 1 (46:08):
Thank you, Chip, appreciate you as always, man, all right,
it's time to lighten the mood. And the flyovers get me.
Military flyers. Flyovers have always gotten me. I guess I'm
(46:32):
just the ugliest of ugly Americans when I'm at a
football game and it happens.
Speaker 2 (46:36):
They get me.
Speaker 1 (46:37):
They did one for us when we were in Kuwait
getting ready to go into Iraq. It's one of the
coolest freaking things ever. And Trump met with the polls
today and honored Polish leader and honored a fallen Polish fighter.
And the formation you're going to see overhead, don't worry.
They didn't screw it up. It's called the Missing Man formation.
(46:59):
It's what you do when you're honoring a fallen hero.
(47:19):
Pretty cool, I'll see you don't know.