January 21, 2025 • 37 mins
Rejecting the beliefs of the elites. What happened to he January 6th prisoners. The federal government turning their guns on half of America for the last 4 years. Rejecting the beliefs of the elites. Josh Hammer and the legal battles Trump might have to fight. Klaus Schwab doesn’t want you undermining his idea of a collective future fueled by illegal immigration.
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
This is a Jesse Kelly show. It is the Jesse
Kelly Show. Let's have some fun on a Tuesday. And
oh man, I don't know about you. I am enjoying
the new much more focused, much more nasty Donald Trump.
(00:36):
Donald Trump Part two is just my speed. And we
will talk about a lot of that tonight. So you
are a couple themes that are going to be on
the show. We're going to talk about changing the way
things are and why there's so much resistance to that.
You see it globally, you see it in America. I'm
going to talk about the January sixth political protesters being
(01:00):
Josh Hammer is going to join us about a half
hour from now. Trump's trying to end birthright citizenship by order.
Can he do it? We know it's good? Is it
gonna get shot down? We'll talk about that. We have
former FBI Special Agent Steve Friend. He's going to join
me next hour. He has some grave concerns and so
(01:22):
do I about this lag and what they're doing in
the FBI. We'll discuss that mass deportations are here, the
World Economic Forum is back in the news, and can
the communists change their ways? And if not, why not?
All that and so much more is coming up tonight.
(01:43):
I don't even know how we're gonna get to everything
on the world famous Jesse Kelly Show. Before we get
into anything else, what happened to the January sixth political
protesters was one of the most evil things this country
has ever done. It really was. We had that ugly
(02:09):
protest that got a little spicy on January sixth. We add,
we don't even know how many federal law enforcement officers
in the crowd instigating that. We don't know. But whatever
happened on January sixth, after it, Joe Biden's government, his
(02:29):
DOJ saw an opportunity to paint you all of us
as domestic terrorists or either potential domestic terrorists. Remember they
never cared about January sixth. They were never stressed about
it at all. It was all just about turning the
guns of the federal government against you. Always remember this
(02:54):
when it comes to communists. We'll come back to January sixth, specifically,
in a moment communists believe in you using power You
already know this to reward their friends and punish their enemies.
And every single time communists have taken power in a country,
Soviet Union, China, East Germany, Cambodia, do you name it?
(03:15):
Every single time they have taken power Venezuela. Now they
have tried to figure out, and eventually did figure out,
how to use all those guns of the federal law
enforcement or the military. How do we use all those
guns against our domestic enemies. Look at all this power,
(03:36):
Look at what we can do. If we can just
find a way to justify it, then we'll use that
power against our political enemy. Stalin was obviously one of
the first, one of the ones who really wrote the
book on this, and if you know anything about the
history of the Soviet Union, you know we've talked about
this before. He would simply haul people who were either
(04:00):
his political enemies or he thought a potential threat to him.
He would find a way to get his federal law
enforcement arm to get some charges on these people, to
justify sending them to the gulags or lining them up
against the wall and firing a bullet into their head.
(04:20):
He found a way to take the force of government
and turn it against his political enemies. Mao did the
exact same thing Cultural Revolution. You already know about it
because you listened to this show where Mao had developed enemies,
political enemies in his country. His policies had been disastrous,
they had been deadly, and he was finding himself on
(04:43):
the outs with a bunch of people. What did Mao do.
Mao found a way to get the guns inside his country,
turned against his political opponents, and then as soon as
those little monsters got done beating to death all of
ma how political opponents, he of course sent in his
Red Guard and dragged them all out to the countryside,
(05:06):
where they were shot and starved to death. Popa did
the same thing, and American Democrats did the exact same thing,
granted on a much smaller scale in the last four years,
and they did so using January sixth as the justification
for it. None of these people were ever stressed about
(05:26):
January sixth. There was an unarmed protest that got a
little bit out of hand. There was no insurrection, and
Democrats know it. What they know was January sixth because
it provided some bad optics. We don't like seeing riots
when it's our side doing it, and it didn't look great.
They saw an opportunity and they took it, and that
(05:49):
opportunity was, Hey, we had this protest that took place
in Washington, d C. A place where we control every
single lever of power from top to bottom, from the
city to the federal government. Hey what if we just
what if we just went after all these people and
called them terrorists and threw them in federal prison. Many
(06:11):
of them will kill themselves. We had multiple kill themselves
because the federal government took people with no criminal record
and started throwing them in federal prison or threatening them
with federal prison as if they were Osama, as if
they were Osama bin Laden himself and innocent people have
(06:32):
suffered mightily. And Donald Trump, you know, I have been
critical of him in the past. I was very critical
when he first started running for office again that he
had not spoken up about the January sixth political prisoners.
He was really silent on it for a couple of years,
and I was vocally critical about him, of him about
(06:52):
that whole thing. And all the credit in the world
goes to Donald Trump today because Donald Trump sat down
day one and he turned them all free a freaking
wonderful moment. Good job, President Trump.
Speaker 2 (07:06):
So this is January sixth. These are the hostages, approximately
fifteen hundred for a partner full part full partner, honeytation,
full partner. We have about six commutations in there.
Speaker 1 (07:26):
He didn't tiptoe it. He didn't do what a lot
of people were worried about. Myself included. Well, I mean
a case by case basis, if somebody made me uncomfortable, nope,
sit down and turn all of them loose. And he
did it. Credit goes to him. But setting that aside,
every single January sixth er, listening to the sound of
(07:49):
my voice, I just want to say congratulations. I am
sorry your evil government turned against you. I'm sorry for
how evil democrats are. I'm sorry for the loss because
you don't get those four years back. Lots of guys
that won't get their wives back, girlfriends back, boyfriends, husbands back.
(08:13):
We add people whose children turned them into the federal government.
As communists always do, they will find a way to
turn families against each other, family members turning in family members,
evil communists, all of them. And I'm sorry you had
(08:37):
to go through it. I'm sorry you lost four years.
I'm sorry for the family members of those who passed on,
like Matthew Purna, took his own life, couldn't deal with it,
took his own life. His poor sweet mom has to
live with that forever, without her baby boy. So we
will not forget the evils the communists did. But wow,
(08:59):
good job Donald Trump and every single January sixer. I'm
glad you're free. I'm very very glad you're free. You
who know, if you've listened to this show for any
length of time. I have been loudly speaking up for
these people for a long time because I despise when
(09:22):
the powerful come down on the powerless. I hate these
people who did that to them. Matthew Graves, he's already
sailing off into the sunset. Merrick Garland, Lisamonico. These are
the names. Remember, these things didn't just happen to the
January sixth political protesters. Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Lisimonico, Matthew Graves.
(09:46):
The evil communists in this country who did this to
the little guy have names, and punishment must now come.
I realized Joe Biden will be free of that, at
least in this life. At least. A Monico is not
free of that. Merritt Garland's not free of that. Matthew
Graves is not free of that. There were no preemptive
(10:09):
pardons issued by old Senile Joe on the way out
the door for the people in the doj Donald Trump
did the right thing. He pardoned these people. Now let
us see if Pam BONDI will do the right thing
and throw communists in prison for their evil deeds. Congratulations
January six ers. Now let's move on and talk about
(10:30):
There's so much wonderful stuff to talk about. We will
dig into that. Now, before we dig into that, let's
talk about your dog. We had a bunch of people
over to the house last night, little neighborhood party. We
actually popped a bottle of Let's Go brand and wine.
Wasn't I didn't partake. I don't really do wine or
(10:51):
that kind of stuff anyway, But we had a bottle
of Let's Go brand and wine, watch the National Championship game.
And guess who was the star of the party. Freaking Fred.
We kept him in the room and everyone protested so
Fred could come out and love on everybody. Big fluffy
idiot that dog is, and everyone loves him and we
love him too. It's a blessing. My mom took him
(11:12):
for a walk today in the neighborhood. Fred takes off
on her. There's a big group of kids. Fred takes
off on her because the kids started calling his name.
They knew Fred, and he ran over there like the
fluffy moran he is and got a bunch of love,
and then he came back. That's why we give Fred Roughgreens.
Every single meal. Roughgreens get sprinkled on Fred's food because
(11:33):
his dog food gives him no nutrition. If we don't
give him rough greens all natural nutritional nutritional supplement, he
never gets food. But because of rough Greens, he doesn't
have digestive problems anymore. His coat looks better. It has
everything your dog needs to live longer. Call him get
a free jumpstart trial bag eight three three three three
(11:55):
my Dog, or go to Roughgreens dot com slash Jesse
We'll be back. Jesse Kelly returns.
Speaker 3 (12:06):
Next.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
It is the Jesse Kelly Show on a Tuesday. And
one of the big executive orders that Trump handed down
already was this executive order that says, hey, the birthright
citizenship stuff, that's going to stop then. Just so you know,
and maybe you're new to all this here in America,
(12:30):
they have misinterpreted the force of fourteenth Amendment for a
very long time, and as a result of that they've
done it on purpose as a result of that. If
you are an illegal and you come into the United
States of America, if you're a woman, you're pregnant, and
you come into this country, you can be the most
illegal of illegals. And you have that baby in America,
(12:53):
that baby is an American citizen the way they interpret
it now, that's completely wrong. Trump said, no, that stops.
Josh Hammer is going to join us in about ten
minutes from now to find out is that executive order
going to hold up? This is Supreme what's the Supreme
Court going to say about it? So that is coming.
(13:14):
But I wanted to get to this email because it's
gonna it's gonna take me along the theme for tonight
historical Oracle. There's obviously a war going on in America
right now. That's why the pardons on both sides of inauguration.
Inauguration Day, it really felt like a prisoner exchange. To me,
what does the oracle see coming next in this war
(13:36):
outside of the communist legal obstructionism, Well, what's happening right now?
It it is an assault on the way things have
been for a very long time in this country and
in Western civilization. And this is what I mean by this.
(14:00):
The longest time, Republicans Democrats, it didn't matter. There were
a bunch of things, so many things that were just
accepted as right good. The way things are, this is
the only way it can be. Any adjustment to these
(14:20):
things is tantamount to being the end of the world.
And this lasted, like I said, the Republican presidencies Democrat presidencies.
And right now, what is happening not just in America.
I should note Canada's seeing this. We're seeing this in
places like Germany, France, other places. What's happening is the
(14:41):
people themselves are starting to rise up and reject it.
And it's not purely a rejection of communism. I want
to be clear about that. It is a rejection of
common held beliefs of the elite who run Western society.
(15:03):
People are sick of what they have done with Western
society and they want something different. Which brings us to
Trump point or Trump two point zero, the second Trump administration.
Why did he get elected by such a wide margin?
Why is he he's not backing off of any of
(15:24):
his campaign rhetoric like presidents always do when they get elected.
If anything, he's ramping it up, and yet the people
are still loving it. Pull after pull out. Their poll
shows he's more popular now than the day he was elected.
People are loving it why because what Trump represents. What
he represents is a rejection of the way things have been,
(15:49):
and people in so many different ways are sick of
the way things have been. A couple different things. Trump
is going to declassify Martin Luther King Junior files, the
JFK fires files, and the RFK assassination files. Now that's
just a small part of this. But stay with me here.
(16:11):
Why were those things classified anyway? The JFK files. Why
maybe you could understand in the immediate after math and whatnot.
But the president of the United States of America was assassinated,
he was shut in the head. The federal government went
(16:31):
out and gathered a bunch of intelligence about who may
be responsible, about the circumstances around it. And after gathering
all of that intelligence, the federal government promptly said, I'm sorry,
you don't get to see America classified when you do
things like that. And then everyone just accepted after accepts
(16:55):
it afterwards, every one of them, every single president, could
have declassified it. I don't care what their name is.
Bill Clinton, Reagan, Trump, the first time Obama, all of
them carter for a new name them. They all could
have declassified it. But the way things have always been
was keep it classified. That's just the way things have
(17:16):
always been. This new version of Trump is a complete
rejection of the way things have always been. And that
is music to your ears for the most part. There'll
be things you don't like. There'll be things I don't like.
That's music to your ears, that's music to my ears.
But understand, the people who have been holding power for
(17:42):
a long long time, they are scared to death of it,
scared to death of it because it means the end
for them. Picture here, here's a good example. Godafi, or
any any leader, any dictator, any king, when the rebellions
(18:06):
get too big and their men can't hold them back
for long enough, Well, it just happened to Basad in Syria.
We'll use Basad. He'd held power forever, wars, rebellions, all
kinds of things forever. Finally, finally he loses. What's that
drive to the airport like when you know you don't
(18:28):
rule anything anymore? Nothing? What's that feeling when you're leaving
your palace and you're going to god knows where to
be a nobody, the feeling you've lost it all. But Alissade,
I don't know why I call him Basade, but shar Alissade.
What's that feeling like? That's what our elites dread. I'll
(18:50):
touch on that smart after we talked to Josh Hammer next.
Feeling a little stocky, follow like and subscribe on social
at Jesse Kelly Show. It is the Jesse Kelly's Show,
and joining me now my friend host of America on Trial. Also,
we wrote a book, Israel and Civilization. My friend Josh
(19:12):
Camer Josh, Donald Trump wants birthright citizenship. Well, he wants
to stop these anchor babies from coming over here, crapping
out a kid and giving them citizenship. Can he do
this by executive order?
Speaker 3 (19:27):
Jesse?
Speaker 4 (19:28):
Well, first of all, I have to as a lawyer,
I have to say that I love this phraseology of
crapping out a kid. Not exactly how you would see
it in the United State Supreme Court opinion, my friend,
But sorry, Josh, but I love it. Nonetheless. So this
is a longstanding debate when it comes to the Fourteenth
Amendments and I don't want to nerd out too hard
(19:51):
when it comes to the citizenship clause in the Fourteenth Amendment. Basically,
the legal debate comes down to what the phrase quote
subject to the jurisd thereof means. And I'll leave it
at that for now. But the key point I think
for our purposes is that this is this a question
that ninety Supreme Court has never actually decided when it
(20:12):
comes to the children of legal aliens aka anchor babies.
There is a tremendous amount a tremendous amount of disinformation
on this particular topic. So there is an eighteen ninety
eighth US Supreme Court case called Wang Kim Mark. It's
a case involving Chinese immigrants out in California, and there
the court decided that the children of legal aliens, people
(20:36):
who are here on a visa, they are temporary permanent residents,
they have a green card, and so forth their children.
The court ruled in Wang Kim Mark do get Fourteenth
Amendment birthright citizenship. I happen to think even Wang Kim
Mark was actually wrongly decided. There was a robust descent,
which at the time included Justice Harlan, the greatest Justice
(20:56):
of the era who he was. He was a lone
dissenter and the Plusy versus From case just a few
years prior. But in any event, that case, which the
media loves to cite when it comes to the anchor
baby question, it only had to do with the children
of legal, not illegal aliens. And then the Court was
totally silent on this for another eighty four years. It
was any case out of your state of Texas called
(21:18):
Fwiler versus Doe in nineteen eighty two. That was the
next time the Court touched the question of birth right
relationship for illegal aliens, and they didn't actually rule on it.
They basically just dropped a footnote in the middle of
the opinion and said, oh, by the way, WANKI mark
that case from eighty four years ago. We interpreted to
apply to illegal alien children too. But that's not binding.
(21:41):
That's not how it works. That's what lawyers called dick ga.
It's basically just a phrase that's tossed in there. So
the media says, oh, you can't do this. The Constitution
for hip it said, nonsense, total nonsense. This legal question
has never been presented to the United States Supreme Court
in clear, direct fashion I think that Donald Trump is
on totally sound I think it's also fantastic policy. It's
(22:02):
the kind of thing that I've been pushing for for many,
many years. I know a lot of conservatives have been
pushing for it as well. There I'm frankly just just
just astonished that he did at day one. Astonished in
a good way. I mean, this is really this real
guns blazing stuff.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Jesse.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
I had high expectations for this Magna two point zero administration.
But to go in there and try to ban birthright
relationship by executive order day one, honestly, that surpasses even
my already high expectations.
Speaker 1 (22:29):
Okay, again, I'm speaking with Josh Hammer, host of America
on Trial, Josh setting aside the you know, some young
guy case or whatever, that Chinese one is out in California.
Does this go to the Supreme Court again? Now, what
happens from here? Is it already the law? I doubt
that what happens from here detail wise.
Speaker 4 (22:50):
So it definitely it's already being sued. So Blue States,
the ACLU, various you know, pro immigration, open border groups
groups like that, they're already he's doing. So it probably
is just a matter of time until this thing finds
its way to the United States Supreme Court. That's where
things get interesting. I do not think that there are
(23:12):
five current votes to uphold the interpretation of the fourteenth
Amendments that I have just said that I agree with,
namely that the phrase subject to the jurisdiction thereof means
that you have to be here at a bare minimum
legally in order to get birth right did in ship.
I am skeptical that there are five votes that I
wish I were wrong, Jesse. I hope to be wrong
(23:32):
on this. But if I'm just trying to be an
objective kind of predictor, if I'm trying to prognosticate where
the current votes on the court come down, there I
see Clarence Thomas, I see Sam Alido, and then I
see question marks on basically everyone else. So let's just
play this out a little further. Let's say that I'm correct,
and at the Supreme Court when this thing gets litigated,
there ultimately rules against the Trump administration rules incorrectly, but
(23:56):
rules against them nonetheless. That would present dal tre Tru
with an opportunity to pull what I like to refer
to as an Abraham Lincoln. So famously, there was the
dred Scott case, probably the single worst case in US
Supreme Court history, from the late eighteen fifties. Chief Justice
Roger Tawni famously ruled that black people are not citizens
(24:17):
and can never be citizens. It was a horrific opinion,
wrong morally, wrong legally, and so forth. Abraham Lincoln, when
he was president, basically stuck two middle fingers to the
United States Supreme Court. He said that he would not
apply that ruling as it pertains to anyone else other
than the slave in question, dred Scott, And sure enough
he did ignore it. He actually issued passports to free
(24:40):
blacks in the Western territories of the United States in
direct defiance of dred Scott. So, if I were advising
Donald Trump what to do if the Supreme Court ruled
against him, here would be to basically say, you know what,
I appreciate your opinion, but when it comes to my administration,
to my executive branch, I get to interpret the Constitution
for my I am not bound by your rulings for
(25:02):
anyone other than the plaintiffs in this particular lawsuit. I
hope he does that, Jesse. If it comes to that,
it will be a fantastic moment to take a true
link Lincoln esque constitutional stand. I don't know if he
would do it. I'm frankly I'm hoping he doesn't come
to that. So I would love for the court to
rule the right way. But that's potentially where we're heading here.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
Okay, So finally, his legal team. I'm not talking about
his personal life lawyers or you know, Elena Hobbar. Are
these types his legal team, the ones who are going
to be digging into this stuff. Do you like them?
Do you trust them? I don't know these people. That's
your area.
Speaker 4 (25:39):
So he has he has an excellent, excellent slitter General
of the United States coming on right now. Andrew Bailey
looks like it is coming on. Actually, sorry, I get that. No,
it is Andrew Billy. Andrew Bailly is coming in here
as a Switzer General of the United States. He is
just truly, truly fantastic, actual Jesse Sorry, I'm pretting myself
(26:00):
in real time. Bailey is not the splitzer generally United States.
It's actually a former slicter General of MISERI I'm getting
my Missouri the lawyers confused there, I knew, I knew
that did in summer ups. But in any event, he
has a fantastic splitter General of the United States coming
in here. Look, when it comes to Donald Trump's actual
top notch lawyers, he has fantastic legal talents around him. Now.
(26:20):
It's true that he has a knack in the past
where picking some lawyers who maybe are are better suited
towards being on camera a little bit as opposed to
being in the courtroom. But when it comes to actual
courtroom attorneys, he's done very well for himself overall there,
and he's going to He's going to be in good hands.
He said that, you know, oral advocates can only do
so much when it comes to the court room. It
really does come to says, I expect that most justice
(26:44):
on the court probably again I hope I'm wrong here,
but I would anticipate that most I'm probably just going
to default to the way that most courts have interpreted
this provision for the past thirty forty fifty years there.
But I hope I'm wrong, because that's an incorrect interpretation
in my opinion.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
Okay, Josh Hammer, you are the man, my friend. Thank
you so much. I appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (27:05):
Always a play A guest.
Speaker 1 (27:07):
Well, that was my clarification. Josh and I had not
actually talked about that before he came on, So I
found out when you found out. So this ending birthright citizenship,
the anchor baby problem, the fact that these illegals they
know they just have to hop over the border, have
a baby and it's an American citizen, which is a ridiculous,
(27:29):
insane policy, not at all what the fourteenth Amendment was about.
But where does it go from here? Trump wants it
to stop, brave thing to do, appreciate each trying. It
goes to the Supreme Court. Josh hammer one man's opinion.
But Josh is pretty friggin smart. Josh says he doesn't
think the Supreme Court is going to rule our way,
(27:50):
and then Josh thinks Trump should defy the court. Now,
Trump one point zero would not have taken step Trump
two point zero. Just mike this. Donald Trump sure looks
so far like the kind of guy who might just
do it, and I hope he does. All right, back
(28:11):
to what we were talking about, the changing of the
way things are. Next the Jesse Kelly Show. It is
The Jesse Kelly Show on a Tuesday. Remember, if you want,
you can email the show Jesse at jesse kellyshow dot com.
You can leave us a voicemail eight seven seven three
(28:33):
seven seven four three seven three. Back to what we
were talking about? What is it? What is Trump? Two
point zho? And why is the system? Why are the
globalist communists, whatever way you want to put it, why
are they so mortified by it? Because what it is
(28:53):
is a rejection of them. It's a rejection of the
way things have been for the longest time, and for
these people it represents a real threat to the power
they hold. I brought up I brought up a Cadafi
and Bashah Alassade of Syria. But Chris brought up a
good one during the break Napoleon. Right, These guys who
(29:19):
rise to the mountaintop, kings and monarchs or whatever they
may be, and they hold onto power for so long.
Now I can't relate to this. You can't relate to this.
But think about this. Do the best you can to
put yourself in their shoes. Imagine having a palace, several
of them, servants, a fleet of cars, private jets, stakes
(29:39):
you rule everything, you are a ruler. And then imagine
the phone call comes one day we can't hold the
rebels back any longer. You're going to have to escape now.
Your power is gone forever. No more palaces, no more jets,
no more pools, no more cavia A, no more nothing.
(30:03):
I don't expect you to feel sorry for any of
these people, But what does that feel like? If you're
a Napoleon, You're you're essentially the emperor. You find yourself
eating cold soup on a miserable island one day. What
does it feel like to have risen to the top
(30:23):
and then have it all come crashing down? The globalists,
that's what they see happening in front of them right now,
a rejection of them, and they're terrified, and that's what
makes them so dangerous. I'm gonna play something for you.
The World Economic Forum has not gone away. That evil
communist organization run by Klau Schwap has not gone away
(30:45):
at all. Klau Schwab just gave a speech. Think this
was yesterday. Listen to what he had to say.
Speaker 3 (30:52):
Yah for the next generation fase.
Speaker 1 (30:56):
Chris, stop laughing at his voice. It's immature when you
laugh at his voice.
Speaker 3 (30:59):
Create care for the next generation fails. We risk depending
into self serving and short sighted behaviors. That undermine collective
progress and lead to profound societal and political shifts. To
counter the erosion of hope and confidence in our future,
(31:25):
we must go beyond reacting just to crisis. We must
focus proactively shaping the future in strategic, innovative, and constructive
ways despite the intense short term pressures and problems which
(31:48):
we all feel. You like the island, My grandmother had
an island.
Speaker 1 (31:54):
Chris, that's enough. That's enough. That's not what cloud should
That's enough, Chris. Way, did you hear what he said?
It was only like forty five seconds. I'm gonna play
it for you again. I want you to listen to
it again. I might stop it a couple of times.
He sees what's happening out there as a rejection of
(32:15):
him and his globalist elite friends, this Prime Minister and
this senator and this president and this CEO. He sees
it happening. He knows it's happening.
Speaker 3 (32:28):
Care for the next generation, fase we risk depending into
self serving and short sighted behaviors. Said undermine collective poggers.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
That undermine collective progress. These short sighted behaviors. What are
these short sighted behaviors? What you want to you want
to deport a bunch of illegals. We have a big
collective thing we're progressing on now. We're trying to fill
Western civilization up with barbarians, and you're stressing about a
(33:05):
couple of rapes. Get serian. That's the kind of thing
and lead.
Speaker 3 (33:09):
To profound societal and political shifts. To count to the
erosion of hope and confidence in our future. We must
go beyond the reacting just to crisis. We must focus
more actively shaping the future in strategic, innovative, and constructive ways.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
People are losing their trust in us. That's essentially what
he just said. They're losing their trust in US, and
so we have to stop just reacting to a crisis.
Think about COVID. That was the system reacting to a crisis,
the system finding a way to seize more power and money.
He said, we have to be more active now. The
(33:59):
elites feel it. The people who have been running Western
civilization for decades, probably for as long as you've been alive.
They are feeling a profound rejection of them, their power
and authority. And in large part that's what Trump represents,
(34:22):
a completely new way of thinking, a different way of
doing things, that's not traditionally Republican. It's not traditionally Democrat.
It's totally different. And this is not a big Trump
suck up session, which you know I don't do. He's different.
I'm looking right here. Trump says he's thinking of imposing
twenty five percent tariffs on Canada in Mexico in February.
(34:44):
Tell me the last American president who even considered slapping
what is essentially a gigantic fine on our two neighbors
if they don't adjust how they've done things. You would
never see that from a Democrat. You would never see
that from a Republican, not in your lifetime. Donald Trump
comes in there, he's talking about he's talking about buying green.
Speaker 3 (35:09):
Greenland is a wonderful place.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
We need it for international security, and I'm sure that
Denmark will come along. I think it's costing them a
lot of money to maintain it, to keep it. The
people of Greenland are not happy with Denmark, you know,
I think they're happy with us. We had representatives, my
son and representatives one up there two weeks ago, and
(35:31):
they like us.
Speaker 3 (35:33):
So we'll see what happens.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
But Greenland is necessary, not for us, it's necessary for
international security. You have Russian boats all over the place,
you have China boats all over the place, warships, and
they can't maintain it.
Speaker 1 (35:46):
Who talks like that? What you're seeing is a rejection
of the system, and the system knows it. Tell you what.
I'm going to continue along those lines because the system
doesn't know how to react to this. Before I get
to that, I want to talk to you about pure Talk.
I want to talk to you about switching your cell
phone service, and I'm want to tell you how easy
it is. I know you've heard me tell you about
(36:07):
pure Talk many times before. I know you already know
right now. When you sign up for a qualifying plan
forty five bucks a month, you get a free Samsung
Galaxy phone. You know all those things. You know how
patriotic pure talk is. Do you know how easy it
is to switch? When I tell you to down dial
pound two five zero and say, Jesse Kelly, maybe you
(36:28):
think you're in the in store for a long, miserable process.
It's ten minutes on the phone, ten minutes on the phone,
and you're switched. Or keep your phone, keep your number,
switch to pure Talk. You don't sacrifice coverage. It's easy
it's fast. In a free phone, dial pound two five
(36:54):
zero and say Jesse Kelly pound two five zero, say
jess see Kelly, we'll be back.
This is a Jesse Kelly show. It is the Jesse
Kelly Show. Let's have some fun on a Tuesday. And
oh man, I don't know about you. I am enjoying
the new much more focused, much more nasty Donald Trump.
(00:36):
Donald Trump Part two is just my speed. And we
will talk about a lot of that tonight. So you
are a couple themes that are going to be on
the show. We're going to talk about changing the way
things are and why there's so much resistance to that.
You see it globally, you see it in America. I'm
going to talk about the January sixth political protesters being
(01:00):
Josh Hammer is going to join us about a half
hour from now. Trump's trying to end birthright citizenship by order.
Can he do it? We know it's good? Is it
gonna get shot down? We'll talk about that. We have
former FBI Special Agent Steve Friend. He's going to join
me next hour. He has some grave concerns and so
(01:22):
do I about this lag and what they're doing in
the FBI. We'll discuss that mass deportations are here, the
World Economic Forum is back in the news, and can
the communists change their ways? And if not, why not?
All that and so much more is coming up tonight.
(01:43):
I don't even know how we're gonna get to everything
on the world famous Jesse Kelly Show. Before we get
into anything else, what happened to the January sixth political
protesters was one of the most evil things this country
has ever done. It really was. We had that ugly
(02:09):
protest that got a little spicy on January sixth. We add,
we don't even know how many federal law enforcement officers
in the crowd instigating that. We don't know. But whatever
happened on January sixth, after it, Joe Biden's government, his
(02:29):
DOJ saw an opportunity to paint you all of us
as domestic terrorists or either potential domestic terrorists. Remember they
never cared about January sixth. They were never stressed about
it at all. It was all just about turning the
guns of the federal government against you. Always remember this
(02:54):
when it comes to communists. We'll come back to January sixth, specifically,
in a moment communists believe in you using power You
already know this to reward their friends and punish their enemies.
And every single time communists have taken power in a country,
Soviet Union, China, East Germany, Cambodia, do you name it?
(03:15):
Every single time they have taken power Venezuela. Now they
have tried to figure out, and eventually did figure out,
how to use all those guns of the federal law
enforcement or the military. How do we use all those
guns against our domestic enemies. Look at all this power,
(03:36):
Look at what we can do. If we can just
find a way to justify it, then we'll use that
power against our political enemy. Stalin was obviously one of
the first, one of the ones who really wrote the
book on this, and if you know anything about the
history of the Soviet Union, you know we've talked about
this before. He would simply haul people who were either
(04:00):
his political enemies or he thought a potential threat to him.
He would find a way to get his federal law
enforcement arm to get some charges on these people, to
justify sending them to the gulags or lining them up
against the wall and firing a bullet into their head.
(04:20):
He found a way to take the force of government
and turn it against his political enemies. Mao did the
exact same thing Cultural Revolution. You already know about it
because you listened to this show where Mao had developed enemies,
political enemies in his country. His policies had been disastrous,
they had been deadly, and he was finding himself on
(04:43):
the outs with a bunch of people. What did Mao do.
Mao found a way to get the guns inside his country,
turned against his political opponents, and then as soon as
those little monsters got done beating to death all of
ma how political opponents, he of course sent in his
Red Guard and dragged them all out to the countryside,
(05:06):
where they were shot and starved to death. Popa did
the same thing, and American Democrats did the exact same thing,
granted on a much smaller scale in the last four years,
and they did so using January sixth as the justification
for it. None of these people were ever stressed about
(05:26):
January sixth. There was an unarmed protest that got a
little bit out of hand. There was no insurrection, and
Democrats know it. What they know was January sixth because
it provided some bad optics. We don't like seeing riots
when it's our side doing it, and it didn't look great.
They saw an opportunity and they took it, and that
(05:49):
opportunity was, Hey, we had this protest that took place
in Washington, d C. A place where we control every
single lever of power from top to bottom, from the
city to the federal government. Hey what if we just
what if we just went after all these people and
called them terrorists and threw them in federal prison. Many
(06:11):
of them will kill themselves. We had multiple kill themselves
because the federal government took people with no criminal record
and started throwing them in federal prison or threatening them
with federal prison as if they were Osama, as if
they were Osama bin Laden himself and innocent people have
(06:32):
suffered mightily. And Donald Trump, you know, I have been
critical of him in the past. I was very critical
when he first started running for office again that he
had not spoken up about the January sixth political prisoners.
He was really silent on it for a couple of years,
and I was vocally critical about him, of him about
(06:52):
that whole thing. And all the credit in the world
goes to Donald Trump today because Donald Trump sat down
day one and he turned them all free a freaking
wonderful moment. Good job, President Trump.
Speaker 2 (07:06):
So this is January sixth. These are the hostages, approximately
fifteen hundred for a partner full part full partner, honeytation,
full partner. We have about six commutations in there.
Speaker 1 (07:26):
He didn't tiptoe it. He didn't do what a lot
of people were worried about. Myself included. Well, I mean
a case by case basis, if somebody made me uncomfortable, nope,
sit down and turn all of them loose. And he
did it. Credit goes to him. But setting that aside,
every single January sixth er, listening to the sound of
(07:49):
my voice, I just want to say congratulations. I am
sorry your evil government turned against you. I'm sorry for
how evil democrats are. I'm sorry for the loss because
you don't get those four years back. Lots of guys
that won't get their wives back, girlfriends back, boyfriends, husbands back.
(08:13):
We add people whose children turned them into the federal government.
As communists always do, they will find a way to
turn families against each other, family members turning in family members,
evil communists, all of them. And I'm sorry you had
(08:37):
to go through it. I'm sorry you lost four years.
I'm sorry for the family members of those who passed on,
like Matthew Purna, took his own life, couldn't deal with it,
took his own life. His poor sweet mom has to
live with that forever, without her baby boy. So we
will not forget the evils the communists did. But wow,
(08:59):
good job Donald Trump and every single January sixer. I'm
glad you're free. I'm very very glad you're free. You
who know, if you've listened to this show for any
length of time. I have been loudly speaking up for
these people for a long time because I despise when
(09:22):
the powerful come down on the powerless. I hate these
people who did that to them. Matthew Graves, he's already
sailing off into the sunset. Merrick Garland, Lisamonico. These are
the names. Remember, these things didn't just happen to the
January sixth political protesters. Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Lisimonico, Matthew Graves.
(09:46):
The evil communists in this country who did this to
the little guy have names, and punishment must now come.
I realized Joe Biden will be free of that, at
least in this life. At least. A Monico is not
free of that. Merritt Garland's not free of that. Matthew
Graves is not free of that. There were no preemptive
(10:09):
pardons issued by old Senile Joe on the way out
the door for the people in the doj Donald Trump
did the right thing. He pardoned these people. Now let
us see if Pam BONDI will do the right thing
and throw communists in prison for their evil deeds. Congratulations
January six ers. Now let's move on and talk about
(10:30):
There's so much wonderful stuff to talk about. We will
dig into that. Now, before we dig into that, let's
talk about your dog. We had a bunch of people
over to the house last night, little neighborhood party. We
actually popped a bottle of Let's Go brand and wine.
Wasn't I didn't partake. I don't really do wine or
(10:51):
that kind of stuff anyway, But we had a bottle
of Let's Go brand and wine, watch the National Championship game.
And guess who was the star of the party. Freaking Fred.
We kept him in the room and everyone protested so
Fred could come out and love on everybody. Big fluffy
idiot that dog is, and everyone loves him and we
love him too. It's a blessing. My mom took him
(11:12):
for a walk today in the neighborhood. Fred takes off
on her. There's a big group of kids. Fred takes
off on her because the kids started calling his name.
They knew Fred, and he ran over there like the
fluffy moran he is and got a bunch of love,
and then he came back. That's why we give Fred Roughgreens.
Every single meal. Roughgreens get sprinkled on Fred's food because
(11:33):
his dog food gives him no nutrition. If we don't
give him rough greens all natural nutritional nutritional supplement, he
never gets food. But because of rough Greens, he doesn't
have digestive problems anymore. His coat looks better. It has
everything your dog needs to live longer. Call him get
a free jumpstart trial bag eight three three three three
(11:55):
my Dog, or go to Roughgreens dot com slash Jesse
We'll be back. Jesse Kelly returns.
Speaker 3 (12:06):
Next.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
It is the Jesse Kelly Show on a Tuesday. And
one of the big executive orders that Trump handed down
already was this executive order that says, hey, the birthright
citizenship stuff, that's going to stop then. Just so you know,
and maybe you're new to all this here in America,
(12:30):
they have misinterpreted the force of fourteenth Amendment for a
very long time, and as a result of that they've
done it on purpose as a result of that. If
you are an illegal and you come into the United
States of America, if you're a woman, you're pregnant, and
you come into this country, you can be the most
illegal of illegals. And you have that baby in America,
(12:53):
that baby is an American citizen the way they interpret
it now, that's completely wrong. Trump said, no, that stops.
Josh Hammer is going to join us in about ten
minutes from now to find out is that executive order
going to hold up? This is Supreme what's the Supreme
Court going to say about it? So that is coming.
(13:14):
But I wanted to get to this email because it's
gonna it's gonna take me along the theme for tonight
historical Oracle. There's obviously a war going on in America
right now. That's why the pardons on both sides of inauguration.
Inauguration Day, it really felt like a prisoner exchange. To me,
what does the oracle see coming next in this war
(13:36):
outside of the communist legal obstructionism, Well, what's happening right now?
It it is an assault on the way things have
been for a very long time in this country and
in Western civilization. And this is what I mean by this.
(14:00):
The longest time, Republicans Democrats, it didn't matter. There were
a bunch of things, so many things that were just
accepted as right good. The way things are, this is
the only way it can be. Any adjustment to these
(14:20):
things is tantamount to being the end of the world.
And this lasted, like I said, the Republican presidencies Democrat presidencies.
And right now, what is happening not just in America.
I should note Canada's seeing this. We're seeing this in
places like Germany, France, other places. What's happening is the
(14:41):
people themselves are starting to rise up and reject it.
And it's not purely a rejection of communism. I want
to be clear about that. It is a rejection of
common held beliefs of the elite who run Western society.
(15:03):
People are sick of what they have done with Western
society and they want something different. Which brings us to
Trump point or Trump two point zero, the second Trump administration.
Why did he get elected by such a wide margin?
Why is he he's not backing off of any of
(15:24):
his campaign rhetoric like presidents always do when they get elected.
If anything, he's ramping it up, and yet the people
are still loving it. Pull after pull out. Their poll
shows he's more popular now than the day he was elected.
People are loving it why because what Trump represents. What
he represents is a rejection of the way things have been,
(15:49):
and people in so many different ways are sick of
the way things have been. A couple different things. Trump
is going to declassify Martin Luther King Junior files, the
JFK fires files, and the RFK assassination files. Now that's
just a small part of this. But stay with me here.
(16:11):
Why were those things classified anyway? The JFK files. Why
maybe you could understand in the immediate after math and whatnot.
But the president of the United States of America was assassinated,
he was shut in the head. The federal government went
(16:31):
out and gathered a bunch of intelligence about who may
be responsible, about the circumstances around it. And after gathering
all of that intelligence, the federal government promptly said, I'm sorry,
you don't get to see America classified when you do
things like that. And then everyone just accepted after accepts
(16:55):
it afterwards, every one of them, every single president, could
have declassified it. I don't care what their name is.
Bill Clinton, Reagan, Trump, the first time Obama, all of
them carter for a new name them. They all could
have declassified it. But the way things have always been
was keep it classified. That's just the way things have
(17:16):
always been. This new version of Trump is a complete
rejection of the way things have always been. And that
is music to your ears for the most part. There'll
be things you don't like. There'll be things I don't like.
That's music to your ears, that's music to my ears.
But understand, the people who have been holding power for
(17:42):
a long long time, they are scared to death of it,
scared to death of it because it means the end
for them. Picture here, here's a good example. Godafi, or
any any leader, any dictator, any king, when the rebellions
(18:06):
get too big and their men can't hold them back
for long enough, Well, it just happened to Basad in Syria.
We'll use Basad. He'd held power forever, wars, rebellions, all
kinds of things forever. Finally, finally he loses. What's that
drive to the airport like when you know you don't
(18:28):
rule anything anymore? Nothing? What's that feeling when you're leaving
your palace and you're going to god knows where to
be a nobody, the feeling you've lost it all. But Alissade,
I don't know why I call him Basade, but shar Alissade.
What's that feeling like? That's what our elites dread. I'll
(18:50):
touch on that smart after we talked to Josh Hammer next.
Feeling a little stocky, follow like and subscribe on social
at Jesse Kelly Show. It is the Jesse Kelly's Show,
and joining me now my friend host of America on Trial. Also,
we wrote a book, Israel and Civilization. My friend Josh
(19:12):
Camer Josh, Donald Trump wants birthright citizenship. Well, he wants
to stop these anchor babies from coming over here, crapping
out a kid and giving them citizenship. Can he do
this by executive order?
Speaker 3 (19:27):
Jesse?
Speaker 4 (19:28):
Well, first of all, I have to as a lawyer,
I have to say that I love this phraseology of
crapping out a kid. Not exactly how you would see
it in the United State Supreme Court opinion, my friend,
But sorry, Josh, but I love it. Nonetheless. So this
is a longstanding debate when it comes to the Fourteenth
Amendments and I don't want to nerd out too hard
(19:51):
when it comes to the citizenship clause in the Fourteenth Amendment. Basically,
the legal debate comes down to what the phrase quote
subject to the jurisd thereof means. And I'll leave it
at that for now. But the key point I think
for our purposes is that this is this a question
that ninety Supreme Court has never actually decided when it
(20:12):
comes to the children of legal aliens aka anchor babies.
There is a tremendous amount a tremendous amount of disinformation
on this particular topic. So there is an eighteen ninety
eighth US Supreme Court case called Wang Kim Mark. It's
a case involving Chinese immigrants out in California, and there
the court decided that the children of legal aliens, people
(20:36):
who are here on a visa, they are temporary permanent residents,
they have a green card, and so forth their children.
The court ruled in Wang Kim Mark do get Fourteenth
Amendment birthright citizenship. I happen to think even Wang Kim
Mark was actually wrongly decided. There was a robust descent,
which at the time included Justice Harlan, the greatest Justice
(20:56):
of the era who he was. He was a lone
dissenter and the Plusy versus From case just a few
years prior. But in any event, that case, which the
media loves to cite when it comes to the anchor
baby question, it only had to do with the children
of legal, not illegal aliens. And then the Court was
totally silent on this for another eighty four years. It
was any case out of your state of Texas called
(21:18):
Fwiler versus Doe in nineteen eighty two. That was the
next time the Court touched the question of birth right
relationship for illegal aliens, and they didn't actually rule on it.
They basically just dropped a footnote in the middle of
the opinion and said, oh, by the way, WANKI mark
that case from eighty four years ago. We interpreted to
apply to illegal alien children too. But that's not binding.
(21:41):
That's not how it works. That's what lawyers called dick ga.
It's basically just a phrase that's tossed in there. So
the media says, oh, you can't do this. The Constitution
for hip it said, nonsense, total nonsense. This legal question
has never been presented to the United States Supreme Court
in clear, direct fashion I think that Donald Trump is
on totally sound I think it's also fantastic policy. It's
(22:02):
the kind of thing that I've been pushing for for many,
many years. I know a lot of conservatives have been
pushing for it as well. There I'm frankly just just
just astonished that he did at day one. Astonished in
a good way. I mean, this is really this real
guns blazing stuff.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Jesse.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
I had high expectations for this Magna two point zero administration.
But to go in there and try to ban birthright
relationship by executive order day one, honestly, that surpasses even
my already high expectations.
Speaker 1 (22:29):
Okay, again, I'm speaking with Josh Hammer, host of America
on Trial, Josh setting aside the you know, some young
guy case or whatever, that Chinese one is out in California.
Does this go to the Supreme Court again? Now, what
happens from here? Is it already the law? I doubt
that what happens from here detail wise.
Speaker 4 (22:50):
So it definitely it's already being sued. So Blue States,
the ACLU, various you know, pro immigration, open border groups
groups like that, they're already he's doing. So it probably
is just a matter of time until this thing finds
its way to the United States Supreme Court. That's where
things get interesting. I do not think that there are
(23:12):
five current votes to uphold the interpretation of the fourteenth
Amendments that I have just said that I agree with,
namely that the phrase subject to the jurisdiction thereof means
that you have to be here at a bare minimum
legally in order to get birth right did in ship.
I am skeptical that there are five votes that I
wish I were wrong, Jesse. I hope to be wrong
(23:32):
on this. But if I'm just trying to be an
objective kind of predictor, if I'm trying to prognosticate where
the current votes on the court come down, there I
see Clarence Thomas, I see Sam Alido, and then I
see question marks on basically everyone else. So let's just
play this out a little further. Let's say that I'm correct,
and at the Supreme Court when this thing gets litigated,
there ultimately rules against the Trump administration rules incorrectly, but
(23:56):
rules against them nonetheless. That would present dal tre Tru
with an opportunity to pull what I like to refer
to as an Abraham Lincoln. So famously, there was the
dred Scott case, probably the single worst case in US
Supreme Court history, from the late eighteen fifties. Chief Justice
Roger Tawni famously ruled that black people are not citizens
(24:17):
and can never be citizens. It was a horrific opinion,
wrong morally, wrong legally, and so forth. Abraham Lincoln, when
he was president, basically stuck two middle fingers to the
United States Supreme Court. He said that he would not
apply that ruling as it pertains to anyone else other
than the slave in question, dred Scott, And sure enough
he did ignore it. He actually issued passports to free
(24:40):
blacks in the Western territories of the United States in
direct defiance of dred Scott. So, if I were advising
Donald Trump what to do if the Supreme Court ruled
against him, here would be to basically say, you know what,
I appreciate your opinion, but when it comes to my administration,
to my executive branch, I get to interpret the Constitution
for my I am not bound by your rulings for
(25:02):
anyone other than the plaintiffs in this particular lawsuit. I
hope he does that, Jesse. If it comes to that,
it will be a fantastic moment to take a true
link Lincoln esque constitutional stand. I don't know if he
would do it. I'm frankly I'm hoping he doesn't come
to that. So I would love for the court to
rule the right way. But that's potentially where we're heading here.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
Okay, So finally, his legal team. I'm not talking about
his personal life lawyers or you know, Elena Hobbar. Are
these types his legal team, the ones who are going
to be digging into this stuff. Do you like them?
Do you trust them? I don't know these people. That's
your area.
Speaker 4 (25:39):
So he has he has an excellent, excellent slitter General
of the United States coming on right now. Andrew Bailey
looks like it is coming on. Actually, sorry, I get that. No,
it is Andrew Billy. Andrew Bailly is coming in here
as a Switzer General of the United States. He is
just truly, truly fantastic, actual Jesse Sorry, I'm pretting myself
(26:00):
in real time. Bailey is not the splitzer generally United States.
It's actually a former slicter General of MISERI I'm getting
my Missouri the lawyers confused there, I knew, I knew
that did in summer ups. But in any event, he
has a fantastic splitter General of the United States coming
in here. Look, when it comes to Donald Trump's actual
top notch lawyers, he has fantastic legal talents around him. Now.
(26:20):
It's true that he has a knack in the past
where picking some lawyers who maybe are are better suited
towards being on camera a little bit as opposed to
being in the courtroom. But when it comes to actual
courtroom attorneys, he's done very well for himself overall there,
and he's going to He's going to be in good hands.
He said that, you know, oral advocates can only do
so much when it comes to the court room. It
really does come to says, I expect that most justice
(26:44):
on the court probably again I hope I'm wrong here,
but I would anticipate that most I'm probably just going
to default to the way that most courts have interpreted
this provision for the past thirty forty fifty years there.
But I hope I'm wrong, because that's an incorrect interpretation
in my opinion.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
Okay, Josh Hammer, you are the man, my friend. Thank
you so much. I appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (27:05):
Always a play A guest.
Speaker 1 (27:07):
Well, that was my clarification. Josh and I had not
actually talked about that before he came on, So I
found out when you found out. So this ending birthright citizenship,
the anchor baby problem, the fact that these illegals they
know they just have to hop over the border, have
a baby and it's an American citizen, which is a ridiculous,
(27:29):
insane policy, not at all what the fourteenth Amendment was about.
But where does it go from here? Trump wants it
to stop, brave thing to do, appreciate each trying. It
goes to the Supreme Court. Josh hammer one man's opinion.
But Josh is pretty friggin smart. Josh says he doesn't
think the Supreme Court is going to rule our way,
(27:50):
and then Josh thinks Trump should defy the court. Now,
Trump one point zero would not have taken step Trump
two point zero. Just mike this. Donald Trump sure looks
so far like the kind of guy who might just
do it, and I hope he does. All right, back
(28:11):
to what we were talking about, the changing of the
way things are. Next the Jesse Kelly Show. It is
The Jesse Kelly Show on a Tuesday. Remember, if you want,
you can email the show Jesse at jesse kellyshow dot com.
You can leave us a voicemail eight seven seven three
(28:33):
seven seven four three seven three. Back to what we
were talking about? What is it? What is Trump? Two
point zho? And why is the system? Why are the
globalist communists, whatever way you want to put it, why
are they so mortified by it? Because what it is
(28:53):
is a rejection of them. It's a rejection of the
way things have been for the longest time, and for
these people it represents a real threat to the power
they hold. I brought up I brought up a Cadafi
and Bashah Alassade of Syria. But Chris brought up a
good one during the break Napoleon. Right, These guys who
(29:19):
rise to the mountaintop, kings and monarchs or whatever they
may be, and they hold onto power for so long.
Now I can't relate to this. You can't relate to this.
But think about this. Do the best you can to
put yourself in their shoes. Imagine having a palace, several
of them, servants, a fleet of cars, private jets, stakes
(29:39):
you rule everything, you are a ruler. And then imagine
the phone call comes one day we can't hold the
rebels back any longer. You're going to have to escape now.
Your power is gone forever. No more palaces, no more jets,
no more pools, no more cavia A, no more nothing.
(30:03):
I don't expect you to feel sorry for any of
these people, But what does that feel like? If you're
a Napoleon, You're you're essentially the emperor. You find yourself
eating cold soup on a miserable island one day. What
does it feel like to have risen to the top
(30:23):
and then have it all come crashing down? The globalists,
that's what they see happening in front of them right now,
a rejection of them, and they're terrified, and that's what
makes them so dangerous. I'm gonna play something for you.
The World Economic Forum has not gone away. That evil
communist organization run by Klau Schwap has not gone away
(30:45):
at all. Klau Schwab just gave a speech. Think this
was yesterday. Listen to what he had to say.
Speaker 3 (30:52):
Yah for the next generation fase.
Speaker 1 (30:56):
Chris, stop laughing at his voice. It's immature when you
laugh at his voice.
Speaker 3 (30:59):
Create care for the next generation fails. We risk depending
into self serving and short sighted behaviors. That undermine collective
progress and lead to profound societal and political shifts. To
counter the erosion of hope and confidence in our future,
(31:25):
we must go beyond reacting just to crisis. We must
focus proactively shaping the future in strategic, innovative, and constructive
ways despite the intense short term pressures and problems which
(31:48):
we all feel. You like the island, My grandmother had
an island.
Speaker 1 (31:54):
Chris, that's enough. That's enough. That's not what cloud should
That's enough, Chris. Way, did you hear what he said?
It was only like forty five seconds. I'm gonna play
it for you again. I want you to listen to
it again. I might stop it a couple of times.
He sees what's happening out there as a rejection of
(32:15):
him and his globalist elite friends, this Prime Minister and
this senator and this president and this CEO. He sees
it happening. He knows it's happening.
Speaker 3 (32:28):
Care for the next generation, fase we risk depending into
self serving and short sighted behaviors. Said undermine collective poggers.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
That undermine collective progress. These short sighted behaviors. What are
these short sighted behaviors? What you want to you want
to deport a bunch of illegals. We have a big
collective thing we're progressing on now. We're trying to fill
Western civilization up with barbarians, and you're stressing about a
(33:05):
couple of rapes. Get serian. That's the kind of thing
and lead.
Speaker 3 (33:09):
To profound societal and political shifts. To count to the
erosion of hope and confidence in our future. We must
go beyond the reacting just to crisis. We must focus
more actively shaping the future in strategic, innovative, and constructive ways.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
People are losing their trust in us. That's essentially what
he just said. They're losing their trust in US, and
so we have to stop just reacting to a crisis.
Think about COVID. That was the system reacting to a crisis,
the system finding a way to seize more power and money.
He said, we have to be more active now. The
(33:59):
elites feel it. The people who have been running Western
civilization for decades, probably for as long as you've been alive.
They are feeling a profound rejection of them, their power
and authority. And in large part that's what Trump represents,
(34:22):
a completely new way of thinking, a different way of
doing things, that's not traditionally Republican. It's not traditionally Democrat.
It's totally different. And this is not a big Trump
suck up session, which you know I don't do. He's different.
I'm looking right here. Trump says he's thinking of imposing
twenty five percent tariffs on Canada in Mexico in February.
(34:44):
Tell me the last American president who even considered slapping
what is essentially a gigantic fine on our two neighbors
if they don't adjust how they've done things. You would
never see that from a Democrat. You would never see
that from a Republican, not in your lifetime. Donald Trump
comes in there, he's talking about he's talking about buying green.
Speaker 3 (35:09):
Greenland is a wonderful place.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
We need it for international security, and I'm sure that
Denmark will come along. I think it's costing them a
lot of money to maintain it, to keep it. The
people of Greenland are not happy with Denmark, you know,
I think they're happy with us. We had representatives, my
son and representatives one up there two weeks ago, and
(35:31):
they like us.
Speaker 3 (35:33):
So we'll see what happens.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
But Greenland is necessary, not for us, it's necessary for
international security. You have Russian boats all over the place,
you have China boats all over the place, warships, and
they can't maintain it.
Speaker 1 (35:46):
Who talks like that? What you're seeing is a rejection
of the system, and the system knows it. Tell you what.
I'm going to continue along those lines because the system
doesn't know how to react to this. Before I get
to that, I want to talk to you about pure Talk.
I want to talk to you about switching your cell
phone service, and I'm want to tell you how easy
it is. I know you've heard me tell you about
(36:07):
pure Talk many times before. I know you already know
right now. When you sign up for a qualifying plan
forty five bucks a month, you get a free Samsung
Galaxy phone. You know all those things. You know how
patriotic pure talk is. Do you know how easy it
is to switch? When I tell you to down dial
pound two five zero and say, Jesse Kelly, maybe you
(36:28):
think you're in the in store for a long, miserable process.
It's ten minutes on the phone, ten minutes on the phone,
and you're switched. Or keep your phone, keep your number,
switch to pure Talk. You don't sacrifice coverage. It's easy
it's fast. In a free phone, dial pound two five
(36:54):
zero and say Jesse Kelly pound two five zero, say
jess see Kelly, we'll be back.
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.