June 26, 2025 • 36 mins
What’s the difference between whistleblowers and leakers? The Right is changing how it handles the media. Wrongfooting the media and getting them to play defense.
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
This is a Jesse Kelly Show. It is the Jesse
Kelly Show. Let's have some fun on a Thursday, a
magnificent Thursday. Smile. We are almost at the end of
(00:32):
the week. We are beating up the communists in the media,
and that's a real good time. We're gonna discuss that tonight.
We're gonna discuss dealing with the media, dealing with the lies,
dealing with the communists because this lying that CNN's been
doing actually provides us a great example of how to
deal with these people and how to not deal with
(00:53):
these people. That'll be a good time. We'll talk about
Joe Biden's auto pen because of an ex Biden official
that just gave some testimony about it. We're gonna talk
about how the communist journalist sees himself. We're going to
do emails, the communists are after your kids, all that
and so much more coming up on the world famous
Jesse Kelly Show. And before I forget halfway through next hour,
(01:19):
Ryan Gardusky's gonna join us. You know, Ryan Gradusky. I
don't have any guests, but I love Ryan. He did
a big analysis of the twenty twenty four election. Who voted,
how and why we just had a big report come out.
Ryan is gonna break it down for us. We're gonna
nerd out on some details, and then we'll move on
to other things. All right, And before I forget tomorrow
(01:43):
is ask doctor Jesse Friday. And you need to get
your questions emailed in right now to Jesse at Jesse
kellyshow dot com. All three hours tomorrow belong to you. Now,
you've undoubtedly heard and seen things about CNN and The
(02:03):
New York Times. I don't want to let them off
the hook, but CNN and the New York Times lying
about the Iran strikes line, this was the lie they told.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
So this is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency,
which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm And we do want
to emphasize that the intelligence, of course, is ongoing. The
collection is ongoing, and the assessments as a result of
that intelligence could change. But as of right now, the
DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told
was based on the battle damage assessment that US Central
(02:36):
Command has done following those massive bombings and strikes that
the US carried out inside Iran last weekend. And what
we are told is that based on the assessments of
the damage that these bombs implemented on these nuclear sites
that as of right now, it does not appear that
they ended or obliterated Aron's nuclear program. Instead, they only
(02:59):
set it back by months, according to people.
Speaker 1 (03:03):
Let me ask you something before we get into the
Trump administration and the great way they've handled this and
the backtracking of CNN, and we'll get do all that stuff,
but that's not really the point of all this. That's
just one story. It's one day. We'll forget about this tomorrow.
But let me ask you something. How would you handle
that if you were in office in any way and
(03:24):
the media or a Democrat or any entity was lying
about you. Because this is something we have discussed before
on the show, and we will discuss it until the
day they finally kicked me off the ear. How to
deal with communists, their tactics, and their lives. For the
(03:49):
longest time, the GOP tried to not I actually don't
even want to call it the GOP the right because
it applied to all of us you meet politicians, it
applied to all of us. The right try to deal
with these kinds of blatant lies in the quote nice
(04:11):
way and This is why it's important for all of us,
and why it matters for you. It matters for me
because jerks like me, jerks have an easier time dealing
with communists than nice people do. Let me say that again,
because maybe you are nice, and I'm not telling you
to not be nice at all. It's good. I'm glad
(04:34):
you're nice. Jerks like me have an easier time dealing
with communists than nice people do. Forever, when the media
would tell an outright lie about the Right or the GOP,
(04:54):
they would tell the lie. You know why they told
the lie. They told the lie to hurt the right,
to protect it, defend the communist revolution, and to hurt
the enemies of the communist revolution. They're not media, they're
not journalists. They're communist revolutionaries who've taken the position of
power they have to further the communist revolution. But the
(05:14):
Right didn't want to speak like that, didn't want to
didn't want to sound mean, didn't want to seem mean,
And so you'd get a report like this where I mean,
that person has no idea, no idea, battle damage assessments
or whatever. That person blatantly lied, their source blatantly lied.
We all know why they blatantly lied. They lied because
(05:35):
they believe their role as communist revolutionaries slash journalists is
to stop Donald Trump, to stop any advancement on the right. Therefore,
whatever Donald Trump does, you have to trash it, you
have to make it look bad because that helps the
communist revolution. That's how they see themselves. But forever, forever,
the right didn't want to say that. The right one, Well,
(05:56):
I don't want to see mean dude, you guys are
really biased to or or we got this lameness. How
many times have you heard this lameness or even said
it yourself? Could you imagine if the left did that?
What would they be? Could you imagine what they be
saying if this was a democrat pointing out the hypocrisy?
Is there anything lamer than that? We thought that was effective.
(06:17):
It's it's a way to challenge what they're saying because
you're mad about it. But you're not being too mean.
You're almost you're almost giving them an opportunity to defend themselves. Hey,
you're being mean and biased and this is this is
left leaning and hypocritical, don't you think? And yet they
(06:41):
never reached a handout when you did that? Did they
it never dissuaded them once at all. Accusations of hypocrisy
never seem to hurt their feelings, never seem to change
their tactics. They just kept doing the same same thing,
over and over and over again, lying to hurt you,
(07:01):
lying to help them, lying to hurt you, lying to
help them. No matter what you said as a nice person,
they just kept going. It was exasperating, wasn't it exhausting?
I don't understand. I just pointed out your hypocrisy. Why
haven't you changed? Because he's your enemy. You may not
(07:23):
know it, but he knows it. He thinks about it.
He wakes up every single day and goes to work,
no matter what his job is. Maybe he works at
the FBI, maybe CNN, maybe he's a general, maybe he
works in Hollywood, maybe he's a kindergarten teacher. But he
goes to work every single day with plans to destroy you.
(07:43):
You don't think in those terms. You want to be nice,
and so finding out that someone has declared war on
you is almost too much to take. WHOA, WHOA. So
we tried to be nice. Now I'm going to dump
a heaping helping of credit on Donald Trump, because Donald
(08:05):
Trump is a jerk. I get it. Look I'm a jerk.
I'm not insulting them. It takes a jerk oftentimes to
deal with communists because nice people are trying to be
nice with them, and you cannot be nice to communists.
(08:25):
You just can't. I'm not saying you have to do
them wrong. I'm not saying you have to commit some
mortal sin or something. I'm not saying that at all.
But if you believe you can deal with these people
with the utmost kindness, they will eat you alive. Nice
people get eaten alive by communists. Eaten alive. Jerks are
the most effective anti communists. They are. The GOP has
(08:48):
completely changed how it deals. It's with this kind of reporting.
This man iss there's a lot of credit.
Speaker 3 (08:55):
Like CNN in particular, they're trying to you know, they're
trying to say, well that it was destroyed, but maybe
not that destroyed. You know what they're doing. They're really
hurting great pilots and put their lives in the line.
CNN is scum, and so is MSD and C they're
all and frankly, the networks aren't much better the CNN.
Because I watch it, I have no choice. I gotta
(09:16):
watch that garbage. It's all garbage, it's all fake do is.
But I think CNN is a gutless group of people
and the people that run it nobody even knows. There's
been sold so many times, but the people that are
run it over to be a shame. MSD and C
again in Brian Roberts, he heads it. He's a disgrace,
he's a weak, pathetic distrait.
Speaker 1 (09:37):
Maybe you don't like that, and I understand that because
maybe you're not a jerk. Maybe you're not. I understand
if that makes you uncomfortable. But we're gonna go over
the media's response to Team Trump's response in just a moment,
and then it'll be pretty revealing when I lay it
(09:57):
out that way, how effective that is, no more how
well I mean, I'm really not sure, Natasha. That seems
like it's kind of a biased way either. Could you
imagine if Democrats didn't then that never worked? That never
you notice that never made them play defense. Donald Trump
and his entire team, which I'll play it all for
(10:18):
you came out and said you're a bunch of evil,
lying scumbags. They're even naming names. You guys are dirtball
creep losers who lie about everything that hurt them so badly.
They've been running rebuttals on television all day long defending themselves.
Let's play some examples on how to deal with these communists.
(10:39):
It's gonna be a great time. I'm in a great
mood before we do that. Maybe my great mood is
due to the fact that my elbow doesn't hurt right now.
Remember I told you I had to go get that's
really gross. Sorry, sorry, I had to go get my
elbow drained that one time, just bothering me, clicking, popping
all the time, that swool, that swell. Then I had
(11:01):
to get it drained. And after I got it drained,
they injected something in it. I wish I hadn't done that.
It was really stupid. Then forever I would just it
would hurt. Then Relief Factor came along every single day,
and I was skeptical at first. I knew Relief Factor
had a great reputation, but I'm always I'm naturally a
skeptical person. I'm taking it every day, every day, every day.
(11:24):
First couple of days, nothing elbow still hurt. Then I
thought maybe it was my imagination started to seem like
it didn't hurt as bad. It didn't hurt as bad,
and the next day didn't hurt as bad. My elbow
doesn't hurt at all. Now, relief Factor is one hundred
percent drug free. Take it every day. The longer you
(11:49):
take it, the better it works. Call one eight hundred
the number four relief or relief Factor dot com. We'll
be back the Jesse Kelly Show on air and online
at Jesse Kellyshow dot com. It is The Jesse Kelly
Show on a magnificent Thursday. Cannot get the smile off
(12:10):
my face watching the Communists play defense. And they're not
playing defense because we were nice because we pointed out
their hypocrisy. They're playing defense because we finally started dealing
with the lying scum bags the way you should deal
with lying scum bags by calling them lying scum bags. CNN,
in an effort to hurt Donald Trump, came out with
(12:33):
the report trying to pour cold water over a news
story that was good for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
This is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency,
which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm and we do want
to emphasize that the intelligence, of course is ongoing. The
collection is ongoing, and the assessments as a result of
that intelligence could change, But as of right now, the
DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told
was based on the battle damage assessment that US Central
(12:58):
Command has done following those massive bombings and strikes that
the US carried out inside Iran last weekend. And what
we are told is that based on the assessments of
the damage that these bombs implemented on these nuclear sites,
that as of right now, it does not appear that
they ended or obliterated Aron's nuclear program. Instead, they only how.
Speaker 1 (13:22):
Did Trump's theme respond like this?
Speaker 4 (13:26):
Nataja Bertrand published an article in Politico from the intelligence agency.
She said that John Ratcliffe was speaking without any evidence
when he said Iran was attempting to undermine President Trump's
presidential campaign. And then we of course found out that
was absolutely true. In fact, the Biden administration declassed an
intel report which said they had high confidence that Iran
(13:48):
had done exactly what Ratcliffe alleged. They did run an
influence campaign to hurt President Trump's candidacy. In fact, we
know the Iranians tried to take President Trump's life. And
so this is a reporter who has been unfortunately used
by people who dislike Donald Trump in this government to
push fake and false narratives. She should be ashamed of
herself and that's not what reporting is.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
How did Trump's theme respond.
Speaker 5 (14:12):
There's a reason the President calls out fake news for
what it is. These pilots, these refuelers, these fighters, these
air defenders. The skill and the courage it took to
go into enemy territory, flying thirty six hours on behalf
of the American people in the world to take out
a nuclear program is beyond what anyone in this audience
can fathom.
Speaker 6 (14:33):
And then the instinct, the instinct of CNN, the instinct
of the New York Times, is to try to find
a way to spin it for their own political reasons,
to try to hurt President Trump or our country. They
don't care what the troops think, they don't care what
the world thinks. They want to spin it to try
to make him look bad based on a leak.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
Of course, we've all.
Speaker 6 (14:54):
Seen plenty of leakers, and what a leakers? Do They
have agendas and what do they do? Do they share
the whole information or just the part that they want
to introduce.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
How did Trump's theme respond.
Speaker 7 (15:06):
Do you have certainty that all the highly enriched uranium
was inside the Four Dome Mountain or some of it?
Because there were satellite photos that showed more than a
dozen trucks there two days in advance. Are you certain
none of that highly enriched uranium was moved?
Speaker 5 (15:21):
Of course, we're watching every single aspect, But Jennifer, you've
been about the worst, the one who misrepresents the most intentionally.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
We didn't get whining about hypocrisy, we didn't get complaints
about bias. We got direct in your face, you by name, you,
your network. You're an evil liar. How effective was it?
Speaker 8 (15:51):
This was CNN today, Despite the emotional spegi and outrage
from the Defense secretary, what he said about the DIA
assessment is what CNN reported for on his issue that
he took about it being preliminary, about it being low confidence.
CNN reported all on all of this. I was looking
(16:13):
back just to make sure that we had it all
throughout the throughout the reporting process.
Speaker 1 (16:19):
Playing defense lying through their teeth again because they are
on the defensive, no longer on offense. Playing defense got
called out for dirty lies, called out for being liars,
called out for being evil, and now instead of being
the aggressors while the gopis you're bias, you're liberal, that's hypocritical.
(16:41):
Instead of the GOP being on the run while the
savages in the communist media chased them down like wild animals,
now the media is on the defense.
Speaker 9 (16:51):
There's so much more reporting to do on this topic.
This this is a very complex matter, even though Trump
tried to make it sound simple on Saturday. It's really
important to note what CNN did not report. CNN did
not report that this mission was a failure.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
Far from it.
Speaker 9 (17:06):
It may it turn out to be a tremendous success.
We just don't know all the facts yet, and neither
does the US government.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
On the defense, there is a lesson here for you
and me. This is not about this one story, like
I said, which we're all going to forget about by tomorrow.
It's not about this one bombing, this one controversy, this
one press conference. It's really not about CNN or Politico
or the New York Times or any of these people.
(17:34):
This is about you in me being shown how to
deal with communists. And you cannot treat them with kid gloves.
You can't baby them, you can't try to morally challenge them,
because they don't share your morality at all. They are
(17:56):
out to get you. They are out to destroy the
things you love the most. They will lie, they will manipulate,
They will do everything in their power to put you
on the wrong foot, to put you on the defensive,
to put you on the run so they can then
chase you down and savage you forever. But just like
(18:18):
almost all evil things, all bullies, all evil people, they
shrivel up like a California raisin the second you dig
in and say, no, dirt ball, let's fight. That is
how you deal with communists. I'll finish up my talk
on this hang ons catch up Jesse kellyshow dot com.
(18:44):
It is the Jesse Kelly Show on a wonderful, wonderful Thursday,
reminding you that tomorrow is an Ask doctor Jesse Friday.
All three hours belong to you. Ask me anything doesn't
even have to be political. Whatever you eat, mail in
to Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com. The questions are
(19:05):
already coming in hot and heavy, and in fact, I'm
gonna get to some emails that just to clear out
some room, if you will, before tomorrow, I'm gonna get
to that in a few I just want to play you.
I just want to do this chronologically one more time
to kind of sum up my point here. When Donald
Trump got a political win, remember that's what this was about.
(19:26):
For the American communists. They were looking at Donald Trump
dropping bombs on I RAM, They looked at the poll numbers,
saw the public liked it. They saw a political win
for Donald Trump. Because they're communist revolutionaries, they tried the
best they could to pour cold water all over that win.
(19:47):
That's why the initial report, and I'm gonna let it play,
was this.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
So this is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency,
which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm and we do want
to emphasize that the intelligence, of course, is ongoing. The
collection is ongoing, and the assessments as a result of
that intelligence could change. But as of right now, the
DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told
was based on the battle damage assessment that US Central
(20:11):
Command has done following those massive bombings and strikes that
the US carried out inside Iran last weekend. And what
we are told is that based on the assessments of
the damage that these bombs implemented on these nuclear sites
that as of right now, it does not appear that
they ended or obliterated Around's nuclear program. Instead, they only
(20:34):
set it back by months, according to people who were
briefed on the assessment.
Speaker 1 (20:39):
So why was their initial report that and then after
a couple of days they even got a New York
Times article backing them up a couple of days later.
They're scrambling doing this despite.
Speaker 8 (20:52):
The emotional speech and outrage from the Defense secretary.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
What he said about the.
Speaker 8 (20:58):
DIA assessment is what CNN reported on his issue that
he took about it being preliminary, about it being low confidence,
CNN reported on all of on all of this, I
was looking back just to make sure that we had
it all throughout the throughout the reporting process, CNN had
reported that it is preliminary and of course can be updated,
(21:21):
including these two parts. It is still early, we reported
in our initial report for the US to have a
comprehensive picture of the impact of the strikes. None of
the sources described how the DA assessment compares the views of.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
What would put the media on the defense. Wasn't being nice,
wasn't pointing out hypocrisy, It was being a jersey.
Speaker 3 (21:45):
The fake New is like CNN in particular, they're trying
to you know, they're trying to say, well, I agree
that it was destroyed, but maybe not that destroyed. You
know what they're doing. They're really hurting great pilots that
put their lives in the line. CNN is scum and
so is MSDNC. They're all and frankly, the networks aren't
much better the CNN because I watch it, I have
(22:06):
no choice. I gotta watch that garbage. It's all garbage,
it's all fake is. But I think CNN is a
gutless group of people, and the people that run it nobody.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
What's the lesson in this for you, for me, for
all of us. I'll tell you what. I actually have
to go to a neighborhood gathering tonight. I'm not gonna
call it a party because there's a purpose to it,
but it's a neighborhood gathering tonight. And there aren't many
in my neighborhood. But there are some communists. They're all
(22:42):
over social media, Donald Trump, Sandler, Ah, that's the ones
who will walk into the neighborhood gathering tonight and everybody
will start rolling their eyes and do the whole brother
thing underneath their breath, and they'll come storming up to
a whole group of people who weren't even talking about that,
(23:02):
and they'll start screaming about who knows what whatever the
latest talking points are they're fed on CNN, MSNBC. The
liberal aunt Peggy in your life will do this too.
Maybe they did it to you today at work, Maybe
they'll do it this weekend at a party, at a
sports game, at whatever this will happen in your life.
(23:23):
Don't roll your eyes and walk away. Don't sit there
and be silent and then complain about it later after
you're gone with your spouse, and you don't have to scream,
and actually you don't have to name call. You don't
have to go quite as far as Trump does. But
correct them firmly, immediately, correct the lies firmly and immediately,
(23:46):
and don't back off. Don't worry when they start getting
loud about I figures you'd like a Nazi, because they
will do that. They'll raise the volume of their voice
to get everybody looking in an effort to make you uncomfortable.
They don't care about that. They're too high on antidepressants.
They're trying to make you uncomfortable, trying to shout you down,
(24:06):
trying these things. And you know why they do that.
You know why that's a tried and true tactic for them,
because it's worked on the right forever. They know you
want to be nice, They know you just want the
party to go well. They know you want to be polite,
and so they'll try to make you uncomfortable. Don't worry
about the people looking they look bad, you don't look bad.
Don't raise your voice. You don't have to call names,
(24:28):
but don't let them off the hook either. Be firm,
call it out. Watch that communist shrivel up and drift away.
We have for far too long allowed these people to
use our niceness. What your niceness, I'm not, but to
use our niceness against us, our desire to live in peace,
(24:53):
our desire to be seen as nice. Well, I don't
want to be mean no more. If you try to
deal with them and that way, you will fail. Think
about it like a like a rabbit dog. Think about
it like a rabbit dog who keeps coming into your yard,
attacking your dog, eating your chickens if you have them,
(25:15):
maybe trying to bite your kids, trying to bite you
a rabid dog out of control. What are you going
to do? What's an effective way to stop it? Going
inside and lock the doors? Just go inside and hide.
Let the dog run rough shot over your yard, over
your dog, over your chickens. No, if you really want
to stop that rabid dog, you're going to have to
(25:37):
find an effective way, an aggressive way of dealing with it.
You have to meet that aggression with your own aggression.
You can sit inside and whine about the hypocrisy of it,
or you can go outside in a forceful manner and
deal with it. Deal with communists, don't let them get
away with it. I actually have a little bit more
(25:58):
on that in the moment, but I want to do
some emails first. Hey, Jesse, can you please explain how
a whistle blower or leaker works? If they come forward
with information, how do we really know it's true? For
that matter, since the press doesn't have to tell who
the source is, how do we know they even got information?
Couldn't the fake news people just make up the narrative
they want and say it was a leaker. Okay, so
(26:18):
we're dealing with different things here, so let me break
this down separate ways. Whistle blower a whistle blower has rules,
has a process they have to follow. You can't just
let's say you work at the Pentagon and you want
to trash Trump and make Trump look bad. There's a
lot of those people still at the Pentagon. And you
(26:39):
want to go to CNN, you want to go to
anywhere and leak classified information, Well you're not allowed to
do that unless you follow a very specific process that
will make you a whistle blower, and that if you
follow the process, if you follow the rules, I'll put
it to you that way. There are rules. I'm not
(27:00):
going to break it down. It's too nerdy that there
are rules. And if you follow the rules, you have
to do a B and C. If you follow the rules,
then you get, or you're supposed to get. You're supposed
to get whistle blower protections. Hey, this guy came forward
with damaging information. He did a B and C. Therefore
he has whistleblower protections. And those whistleblower protections are supposed
(27:24):
to I keep stressing that because I think about the
FBI whistleblowers. But those whistleblower protections are supposed to protect
good people from nasty retaliation when they come forward with
damaging information against a powerful entity. To be a quote
whistle blower, you don't just get to assign that label
(27:46):
to yourself. You have to do certain things to achieve that.
Now you're asking more about the leaker here and how
all this works. We'll talk about that in just a moment.
Before we talk about that, let me talk to you
up keeping your dog alive and I need to do
this your cat alive. I know, I know you may
(28:09):
be a cat person. I can't relate to you, but
I know you may be a cat person. And I
know when I talk about rough Greens, cat people can
get jealous. That's just naturally how they are. They email.
I wish you would do something for cats too. There
is miwgreens as well. I want to stress this a
(28:30):
nutritional supplement for your cat. You sprinkle it on your
cat's food. Yes, even your picky cat that's annoying. Your
cat will love it and your cat will live longer.
Your dog will live longer with rough Greens. Give the
pet that makes your life better, real actual nutrition. Okay,
(28:51):
you want to try a free jumpstart trial bag of it.
Call them eight three three three three my dog or
Roughgreens Dot com slash Jesse, We'll be back get the
Cure for Rhinos eight days with the Jesse Kelly Show.
It is The Jesse Kelly Show. Reminding you if you
(29:14):
miss any part of the show, you can download the
whole thing on iHeart, Spotify iTunes. If you are a
detail nerd, a numbers nerd, you'd like breakdowns of demographics
of the country and how they how they vote and
which which direction they're going. I have a treat for you.
Halfway through next hour. Ryan Gurdusky is going to join us.
(29:37):
If you listen a lot, you know Ryan. Ryan is
one of these detail nerd guys and Pew research that
they did. They do the research, they come out with
this huge research paper I think it's every four years,
maybe every two years, describing demographics in the country and
how they voted and men, women and old John black By.
(29:59):
I've got that all the more details than you can imagine.
Ryan loves this crap. I would never read that. It
was way too long and complicated, but Ryan broke it
all down. If you want to know demographically how the
country voted in twenty twenty four in different ways that
different demographics, I will tell you this. There are going
to be things that Ryan tells you that are going
(30:22):
to surprise you. They surprised me, and I'm difficult to surprise.
Things might be looking up for us. You're going to
want to hear this about halfway through next hour. Okay,
back to the email. The lady was asking whistleblowers versus
leakers versus so I already talked about whistleblowers and how
they have protections leakers. This is how it works in Washington, DC.
(30:46):
And let's talk specifically about people who leak to the CNN,
to CNN or New York Times or something like that.
Have you seen have you heard? You probably have if
you listen to the show. The searches for leakers like
they're already searching for the guy who leaked this story.
But this is not the first time it has happened.
They have looked for and found leakers in the Pentagon,
(31:09):
in various places. Why is the Trump administration doing that?
Because here is how it works. We have a government,
as you already know, that is filled with communists. It's
not that it used to be. It is north of
ninety percent of federal employees vote Democrat, more than ninety percent.
(31:30):
You may think, well, we're in charge of everything. We
have the House and the Senate, and we have the presidency.
They'll put it this way, Republicans are the cherry on
top of the cupcake that has a lot of icing.
All the icing is Democrat. All the cake of the
cupcake is the Democrat. The cherry may be Republican, but
(31:54):
the vast quantity of the cupcake is Democrat. That's what
we have right now. It'll take years and years and
years to fix this problem, but we have a government
full of communists. And as you know, as we've discussed
many times before, no matter what his role is, no
matter the importance of his role, no matter what uniform
he puts on, the communist is a communist first. Whatever
(32:17):
else he does is secondary. He believes whatever he does
is simply a tool to be used for the revolution.
That's how over ninety percent of our federal employees view themselves.
And what happens is the media. As you know the media,
there are a bunch of dirty communists as well. They
get sources, and the sources are sometimes dishonest themselves. So
(32:43):
let's make it about the Pentagon source, probably some captain,
maybe even a colonel, possibly even a general who hates
Donald Trump, thinks Donald Trump's evil and a communist wearing
a uniform. He knows somebody at CNN in an effort
to make Donald Trump look bad. He will get with
(33:03):
a reporter at CNN who views things the exact same
way he does. So they go out for drinks at
some place in the Washington, DC area, a couple of
beers and tells her, hey, you know, rumor has it.
I saw a report today that said those nuclear facilities
weren't actually destroyed. You didn't hear it for me, but
(33:24):
I saw a report today. Now that's not a whistleblower,
that's a leaker, and that's that's probably illegal depending on
the story. Now, that definitely would be illegal because that's
classified information. That's illegal. The media, you know, they're all
in this together. The source wants to hurt Donald Trump.
(33:46):
The media wants to hurt Donald Trump. They then can
grab that information and they can accurately and honestly say
when they go on television. Sources inside the Pentagon have
told me they're they're not lying when they say that. Now,
what they don't explain to you is that source inside
of the Pentagon is a Trump hating animal, and that
(34:08):
source inside of the Pentagon illegally leaked you information, and
that source inside of the Pentagon is doing everything in
his or her power to hurt Donald Trump. Every day.
They don't inform you of any of that stuff. They
don't inform you that the source only gave you partial information. No,
the media wants to be able to honestly run to
(34:28):
the TV camera, run to the podcast microphone, and say,
sources inside the FBI have told me Donald Trump murders puppies.
They're not lying. That's what makes it so insidious. They
found a source who would tell them that, who would
confirm the report they already wanted to run with. It
was already ready to be printed inside the New York Times.
(34:49):
All you needed to bring it to print was to
tell your editor, Hey, don't worry, mister editor, I've got
a source inside of the FBI and he confirmed that
Donald Trump murders puppies. From there, Remember, the system works together.
The media works with Democrats, they worked with Hollywood, they
work with the FBI. They all work together. From there,
(35:09):
they universally, with one voice, will elevate something that is
an outright lie, and they'll all repeat the outright lie.
And there's two things that used to happen. What used
to happen was, as we already explained, the GOP would
shrivel up in that moment moment, call it biased and
just kind of allow them to run away with the narrative.
And something else that used to happen was the normy American,
(35:33):
not you. You always knew these people were liars, But
the normi American would here, Well, I mean, I know
c on End's bias, but the New York Times is
saying it too, and I saw this guy say it too,
and Politico said it too. Normi American will see the
same story repeated by three four different entities and naturally
(35:54):
just assume it's human nature. Well, if everyone's saying the
same thing, even if they're biased, at least it has
to be partially true. That's how it used to be.
Now a GOP doesn't take it anymore. Now they call
evil liars evil liars, and that is getting more and
more widespread on the right. And as that is getting
(36:17):
more and more widespread on the right, normi American is
hearing it, He's reading it. On social media. Donald Trump
is tweeting about it. And now, when CNN says something,
Norman American says, AH, probably lying. I want to I
want to actually point this out. There's a couple specific
examples courtesy of Jake Tamper. We'll play those for you
(36:42):
next
This is a Jesse Kelly Show. It is the Jesse
Kelly Show. Let's have some fun on a Thursday, a
magnificent Thursday. Smile. We are almost at the end of
(00:32):
the week. We are beating up the communists in the media,
and that's a real good time. We're gonna discuss that tonight.
We're gonna discuss dealing with the media, dealing with the lies,
dealing with the communists because this lying that CNN's been
doing actually provides us a great example of how to
deal with these people and how to not deal with
(00:53):
these people. That'll be a good time. We'll talk about
Joe Biden's auto pen because of an ex Biden official
that just gave some testimony about it. We're gonna talk
about how the communist journalist sees himself. We're going to
do emails, the communists are after your kids, all that
and so much more coming up on the world famous
Jesse Kelly Show. And before I forget halfway through next hour,
(01:19):
Ryan Gardusky's gonna join us. You know, Ryan Gradusky. I
don't have any guests, but I love Ryan. He did
a big analysis of the twenty twenty four election. Who voted,
how and why we just had a big report come out.
Ryan is gonna break it down for us. We're gonna
nerd out on some details, and then we'll move on
to other things. All right, And before I forget tomorrow
(01:43):
is ask doctor Jesse Friday. And you need to get
your questions emailed in right now to Jesse at Jesse
kellyshow dot com. All three hours tomorrow belong to you. Now,
you've undoubtedly heard and seen things about CNN and The
(02:03):
New York Times. I don't want to let them off
the hook, but CNN and the New York Times lying
about the Iran strikes line, this was the lie they told.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
So this is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency,
which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm And we do want
to emphasize that the intelligence, of course, is ongoing. The
collection is ongoing, and the assessments as a result of
that intelligence could change. But as of right now, the
DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told
was based on the battle damage assessment that US Central
(02:36):
Command has done following those massive bombings and strikes that
the US carried out inside Iran last weekend. And what
we are told is that based on the assessments of
the damage that these bombs implemented on these nuclear sites
that as of right now, it does not appear that
they ended or obliterated Aron's nuclear program. Instead, they only
(02:59):
set it back by months, according to people.
Speaker 1 (03:03):
Let me ask you something before we get into the
Trump administration and the great way they've handled this and
the backtracking of CNN, and we'll get do all that stuff,
but that's not really the point of all this. That's
just one story. It's one day. We'll forget about this tomorrow.
But let me ask you something. How would you handle
that if you were in office in any way and
(03:24):
the media or a Democrat or any entity was lying
about you. Because this is something we have discussed before
on the show, and we will discuss it until the
day they finally kicked me off the ear. How to
deal with communists, their tactics, and their lives. For the
(03:49):
longest time, the GOP tried to not I actually don't
even want to call it the GOP the right because
it applied to all of us you meet politicians, it
applied to all of us. The right try to deal
with these kinds of blatant lies in the quote nice
(04:11):
way and This is why it's important for all of us,
and why it matters for you. It matters for me
because jerks like me, jerks have an easier time dealing
with communists than nice people do. Let me say that again,
because maybe you are nice, and I'm not telling you
to not be nice at all. It's good. I'm glad
(04:34):
you're nice. Jerks like me have an easier time dealing
with communists than nice people do. Forever, when the media
would tell an outright lie about the Right or the GOP,
(04:54):
they would tell the lie. You know why they told
the lie. They told the lie to hurt the right,
to protect it, defend the communist revolution, and to hurt
the enemies of the communist revolution. They're not media, they're
not journalists. They're communist revolutionaries who've taken the position of
power they have to further the communist revolution. But the
(05:14):
Right didn't want to speak like that, didn't want to
didn't want to sound mean, didn't want to seem mean,
And so you'd get a report like this where I mean,
that person has no idea, no idea, battle damage assessments
or whatever. That person blatantly lied, their source blatantly lied.
We all know why they blatantly lied. They lied because
(05:35):
they believe their role as communist revolutionaries slash journalists is
to stop Donald Trump, to stop any advancement on the right. Therefore,
whatever Donald Trump does, you have to trash it, you
have to make it look bad because that helps the
communist revolution. That's how they see themselves. But forever, forever,
the right didn't want to say that. The right one, Well,
(05:56):
I don't want to see mean dude, you guys are
really biased to or or we got this lameness. How
many times have you heard this lameness or even said
it yourself? Could you imagine if the left did that?
What would they be? Could you imagine what they be
saying if this was a democrat pointing out the hypocrisy?
Is there anything lamer than that? We thought that was effective.
(06:17):
It's it's a way to challenge what they're saying because
you're mad about it. But you're not being too mean.
You're almost you're almost giving them an opportunity to defend themselves. Hey,
you're being mean and biased and this is this is
left leaning and hypocritical, don't you think? And yet they
(06:41):
never reached a handout when you did that? Did they
it never dissuaded them once at all. Accusations of hypocrisy
never seem to hurt their feelings, never seem to change
their tactics. They just kept doing the same same thing,
over and over and over again, lying to hurt you,
(07:01):
lying to help them, lying to hurt you, lying to
help them. No matter what you said as a nice person,
they just kept going. It was exasperating, wasn't it exhausting?
I don't understand. I just pointed out your hypocrisy. Why
haven't you changed? Because he's your enemy. You may not
(07:23):
know it, but he knows it. He thinks about it.
He wakes up every single day and goes to work,
no matter what his job is. Maybe he works at
the FBI, maybe CNN, maybe he's a general, maybe he
works in Hollywood, maybe he's a kindergarten teacher. But he
goes to work every single day with plans to destroy you.
(07:43):
You don't think in those terms. You want to be nice,
and so finding out that someone has declared war on
you is almost too much to take. WHOA, WHOA. So
we tried to be nice. Now I'm going to dump
a heaping helping of credit on Donald Trump, because Donald
(08:05):
Trump is a jerk. I get it. Look I'm a jerk.
I'm not insulting them. It takes a jerk oftentimes to
deal with communists because nice people are trying to be
nice with them, and you cannot be nice to communists.
(08:25):
You just can't. I'm not saying you have to do
them wrong. I'm not saying you have to commit some
mortal sin or something. I'm not saying that at all.
But if you believe you can deal with these people
with the utmost kindness, they will eat you alive. Nice
people get eaten alive by communists. Eaten alive. Jerks are
the most effective anti communists. They are. The GOP has
(08:48):
completely changed how it deals. It's with this kind of reporting.
This man iss there's a lot of credit.
Speaker 3 (08:55):
Like CNN in particular, they're trying to you know, they're
trying to say, well that it was destroyed, but maybe
not that destroyed. You know what they're doing. They're really
hurting great pilots and put their lives in the line.
CNN is scum, and so is MSD and C they're
all and frankly, the networks aren't much better the CNN.
Because I watch it, I have no choice. I gotta
(09:16):
watch that garbage. It's all garbage, it's all fake do is.
But I think CNN is a gutless group of people
and the people that run it nobody even knows. There's
been sold so many times, but the people that are
run it over to be a shame. MSD and C
again in Brian Roberts, he heads it. He's a disgrace,
he's a weak, pathetic distrait.
Speaker 1 (09:37):
Maybe you don't like that, and I understand that because
maybe you're not a jerk. Maybe you're not. I understand
if that makes you uncomfortable. But we're gonna go over
the media's response to Team Trump's response in just a moment,
and then it'll be pretty revealing when I lay it
(09:57):
out that way, how effective that is, no more how
well I mean, I'm really not sure, Natasha. That seems
like it's kind of a biased way either. Could you
imagine if Democrats didn't then that never worked? That never
you notice that never made them play defense. Donald Trump
and his entire team, which I'll play it all for
(10:18):
you came out and said you're a bunch of evil,
lying scumbags. They're even naming names. You guys are dirtball
creep losers who lie about everything that hurt them so badly.
They've been running rebuttals on television all day long defending themselves.
Let's play some examples on how to deal with these communists.
(10:39):
It's gonna be a great time. I'm in a great
mood before we do that. Maybe my great mood is
due to the fact that my elbow doesn't hurt right now.
Remember I told you I had to go get that's
really gross. Sorry, sorry, I had to go get my
elbow drained that one time, just bothering me, clicking, popping
all the time, that swool, that swell. Then I had
(11:01):
to get it drained. And after I got it drained,
they injected something in it. I wish I hadn't done that.
It was really stupid. Then forever I would just it
would hurt. Then Relief Factor came along every single day,
and I was skeptical at first. I knew Relief Factor
had a great reputation, but I'm always I'm naturally a
skeptical person. I'm taking it every day, every day, every day.
(11:24):
First couple of days, nothing elbow still hurt. Then I
thought maybe it was my imagination started to seem like
it didn't hurt as bad. It didn't hurt as bad,
and the next day didn't hurt as bad. My elbow
doesn't hurt at all. Now, relief Factor is one hundred
percent drug free. Take it every day. The longer you
(11:49):
take it, the better it works. Call one eight hundred
the number four relief or relief Factor dot com. We'll
be back the Jesse Kelly Show on air and online
at Jesse Kellyshow dot com. It is The Jesse Kelly
Show on a magnificent Thursday. Cannot get the smile off
(12:10):
my face watching the Communists play defense. And they're not
playing defense because we were nice because we pointed out
their hypocrisy. They're playing defense because we finally started dealing
with the lying scum bags the way you should deal
with lying scum bags by calling them lying scum bags. CNN,
in an effort to hurt Donald Trump, came out with
(12:33):
the report trying to pour cold water over a news
story that was good for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
This is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency,
which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm and we do want
to emphasize that the intelligence, of course is ongoing. The
collection is ongoing, and the assessments as a result of
that intelligence could change, But as of right now, the
DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told
was based on the battle damage assessment that US Central
(12:58):
Command has done following those massive bombings and strikes that
the US carried out inside Iran last weekend. And what
we are told is that based on the assessments of
the damage that these bombs implemented on these nuclear sites,
that as of right now, it does not appear that
they ended or obliterated Aron's nuclear program. Instead, they only how.
Speaker 1 (13:22):
Did Trump's theme respond like this?
Speaker 4 (13:26):
Nataja Bertrand published an article in Politico from the intelligence agency.
She said that John Ratcliffe was speaking without any evidence
when he said Iran was attempting to undermine President Trump's
presidential campaign. And then we of course found out that
was absolutely true. In fact, the Biden administration declassed an
intel report which said they had high confidence that Iran
(13:48):
had done exactly what Ratcliffe alleged. They did run an
influence campaign to hurt President Trump's candidacy. In fact, we
know the Iranians tried to take President Trump's life. And
so this is a reporter who has been unfortunately used
by people who dislike Donald Trump in this government to
push fake and false narratives. She should be ashamed of
herself and that's not what reporting is.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
How did Trump's theme respond.
Speaker 5 (14:12):
There's a reason the President calls out fake news for
what it is. These pilots, these refuelers, these fighters, these
air defenders. The skill and the courage it took to
go into enemy territory, flying thirty six hours on behalf
of the American people in the world to take out
a nuclear program is beyond what anyone in this audience
can fathom.
Speaker 6 (14:33):
And then the instinct, the instinct of CNN, the instinct
of the New York Times, is to try to find
a way to spin it for their own political reasons,
to try to hurt President Trump or our country. They
don't care what the troops think, they don't care what
the world thinks. They want to spin it to try
to make him look bad based on a leak.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
Of course, we've all.
Speaker 6 (14:54):
Seen plenty of leakers, and what a leakers? Do They
have agendas and what do they do? Do they share
the whole information or just the part that they want
to introduce.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
How did Trump's theme respond.
Speaker 7 (15:06):
Do you have certainty that all the highly enriched uranium
was inside the Four Dome Mountain or some of it?
Because there were satellite photos that showed more than a
dozen trucks there two days in advance. Are you certain
none of that highly enriched uranium was moved?
Speaker 5 (15:21):
Of course, we're watching every single aspect, But Jennifer, you've
been about the worst, the one who misrepresents the most intentionally.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
We didn't get whining about hypocrisy, we didn't get complaints
about bias. We got direct in your face, you by name, you,
your network. You're an evil liar. How effective was it?
Speaker 8 (15:51):
This was CNN today, Despite the emotional spegi and outrage
from the Defense secretary, what he said about the DIA
assessment is what CNN reported for on his issue that
he took about it being preliminary, about it being low confidence.
CNN reported all on all of this. I was looking
(16:13):
back just to make sure that we had it all
throughout the throughout the reporting process.
Speaker 1 (16:19):
Playing defense lying through their teeth again because they are
on the defensive, no longer on offense. Playing defense got
called out for dirty lies, called out for being liars,
called out for being evil, and now instead of being
the aggressors while the gopis you're bias, you're liberal, that's hypocritical.
(16:41):
Instead of the GOP being on the run while the
savages in the communist media chased them down like wild animals,
now the media is on the defense.
Speaker 9 (16:51):
There's so much more reporting to do on this topic.
This this is a very complex matter, even though Trump
tried to make it sound simple on Saturday. It's really
important to note what CNN did not report. CNN did
not report that this mission was a failure.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
Far from it.
Speaker 9 (17:06):
It may it turn out to be a tremendous success.
We just don't know all the facts yet, and neither
does the US government.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
On the defense, there is a lesson here for you
and me. This is not about this one story, like
I said, which we're all going to forget about by tomorrow.
It's not about this one bombing, this one controversy, this
one press conference. It's really not about CNN or Politico
or the New York Times or any of these people.
(17:34):
This is about you in me being shown how to
deal with communists. And you cannot treat them with kid gloves.
You can't baby them, you can't try to morally challenge them,
because they don't share your morality at all. They are
(17:56):
out to get you. They are out to destroy the
things you love the most. They will lie, they will manipulate,
They will do everything in their power to put you
on the wrong foot, to put you on the defensive,
to put you on the run so they can then
chase you down and savage you forever. But just like
(18:18):
almost all evil things, all bullies, all evil people, they
shrivel up like a California raisin the second you dig
in and say, no, dirt ball, let's fight. That is
how you deal with communists. I'll finish up my talk
on this hang ons catch up Jesse kellyshow dot com.
(18:44):
It is the Jesse Kelly Show on a wonderful, wonderful Thursday,
reminding you that tomorrow is an Ask doctor Jesse Friday.
All three hours belong to you. Ask me anything doesn't
even have to be political. Whatever you eat, mail in
to Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com. The questions are
(19:05):
already coming in hot and heavy, and in fact, I'm
gonna get to some emails that just to clear out
some room, if you will, before tomorrow, I'm gonna get
to that in a few I just want to play you.
I just want to do this chronologically one more time
to kind of sum up my point here. When Donald
Trump got a political win, remember that's what this was about.
(19:26):
For the American communists. They were looking at Donald Trump
dropping bombs on I RAM, They looked at the poll numbers,
saw the public liked it. They saw a political win
for Donald Trump. Because they're communist revolutionaries, they tried the
best they could to pour cold water all over that win.
(19:47):
That's why the initial report, and I'm gonna let it play,
was this.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
So this is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency,
which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm and we do want
to emphasize that the intelligence, of course, is ongoing. The
collection is ongoing, and the assessments as a result of
that intelligence could change. But as of right now, the
DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told
was based on the battle damage assessment that US Central
(20:11):
Command has done following those massive bombings and strikes that
the US carried out inside Iran last weekend. And what
we are told is that based on the assessments of
the damage that these bombs implemented on these nuclear sites
that as of right now, it does not appear that
they ended or obliterated Around's nuclear program. Instead, they only
(20:34):
set it back by months, according to people who were
briefed on the assessment.
Speaker 1 (20:39):
So why was their initial report that and then after
a couple of days they even got a New York
Times article backing them up a couple of days later.
They're scrambling doing this despite.
Speaker 8 (20:52):
The emotional speech and outrage from the Defense secretary.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
What he said about the.
Speaker 8 (20:58):
DIA assessment is what CNN reported on his issue that
he took about it being preliminary, about it being low confidence,
CNN reported on all of on all of this, I
was looking back just to make sure that we had
it all throughout the throughout the reporting process, CNN had
reported that it is preliminary and of course can be updated,
(21:21):
including these two parts. It is still early, we reported
in our initial report for the US to have a
comprehensive picture of the impact of the strikes. None of
the sources described how the DA assessment compares the views of.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
What would put the media on the defense. Wasn't being nice,
wasn't pointing out hypocrisy, It was being a jersey.
Speaker 3 (21:45):
The fake New is like CNN in particular, they're trying
to you know, they're trying to say, well, I agree
that it was destroyed, but maybe not that destroyed. You
know what they're doing. They're really hurting great pilots that
put their lives in the line. CNN is scum and
so is MSDNC. They're all and frankly, the networks aren't
much better the CNN because I watch it, I have
(22:06):
no choice. I gotta watch that garbage. It's all garbage,
it's all fake is. But I think CNN is a
gutless group of people, and the people that run it nobody.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
What's the lesson in this for you, for me, for
all of us. I'll tell you what. I actually have
to go to a neighborhood gathering tonight. I'm not gonna
call it a party because there's a purpose to it,
but it's a neighborhood gathering tonight. And there aren't many
in my neighborhood. But there are some communists. They're all
(22:42):
over social media, Donald Trump, Sandler, Ah, that's the ones
who will walk into the neighborhood gathering tonight and everybody
will start rolling their eyes and do the whole brother
thing underneath their breath, and they'll come storming up to
a whole group of people who weren't even talking about that,
(23:02):
and they'll start screaming about who knows what whatever the
latest talking points are they're fed on CNN, MSNBC. The
liberal aunt Peggy in your life will do this too.
Maybe they did it to you today at work, Maybe
they'll do it this weekend at a party, at a
sports game, at whatever this will happen in your life.
(23:23):
Don't roll your eyes and walk away. Don't sit there
and be silent and then complain about it later after
you're gone with your spouse, and you don't have to scream,
and actually you don't have to name call. You don't
have to go quite as far as Trump does. But
correct them firmly, immediately, correct the lies firmly and immediately,
(23:46):
and don't back off. Don't worry when they start getting
loud about I figures you'd like a Nazi, because they
will do that. They'll raise the volume of their voice
to get everybody looking in an effort to make you uncomfortable.
They don't care about that. They're too high on antidepressants.
They're trying to make you uncomfortable, trying to shout you down,
(24:06):
trying these things. And you know why they do that.
You know why that's a tried and true tactic for them,
because it's worked on the right forever. They know you
want to be nice, They know you just want the
party to go well. They know you want to be polite,
and so they'll try to make you uncomfortable. Don't worry
about the people looking they look bad, you don't look bad.
Don't raise your voice. You don't have to call names,
(24:28):
but don't let them off the hook either. Be firm,
call it out. Watch that communist shrivel up and drift away.
We have for far too long allowed these people to
use our niceness. What your niceness, I'm not, but to
use our niceness against us, our desire to live in peace,
(24:53):
our desire to be seen as nice. Well, I don't
want to be mean no more. If you try to
deal with them and that way, you will fail. Think
about it like a like a rabbit dog. Think about
it like a rabbit dog who keeps coming into your yard,
attacking your dog, eating your chickens if you have them,
(25:15):
maybe trying to bite your kids, trying to bite you
a rabid dog out of control. What are you going
to do? What's an effective way to stop it? Going
inside and lock the doors? Just go inside and hide.
Let the dog run rough shot over your yard, over
your dog, over your chickens. No, if you really want
to stop that rabid dog, you're going to have to
(25:37):
find an effective way, an aggressive way of dealing with it.
You have to meet that aggression with your own aggression.
You can sit inside and whine about the hypocrisy of it,
or you can go outside in a forceful manner and
deal with it. Deal with communists, don't let them get
away with it. I actually have a little bit more
(25:58):
on that in the moment, but I want to do
some emails first. Hey, Jesse, can you please explain how
a whistle blower or leaker works? If they come forward
with information, how do we really know it's true? For
that matter, since the press doesn't have to tell who
the source is, how do we know they even got information?
Couldn't the fake news people just make up the narrative
they want and say it was a leaker. Okay, so
(26:18):
we're dealing with different things here, so let me break
this down separate ways. Whistle blower a whistle blower has rules,
has a process they have to follow. You can't just
let's say you work at the Pentagon and you want
to trash Trump and make Trump look bad. There's a
lot of those people still at the Pentagon. And you
(26:39):
want to go to CNN, you want to go to
anywhere and leak classified information, Well you're not allowed to
do that unless you follow a very specific process that
will make you a whistle blower, and that if you
follow the process, if you follow the rules, I'll put
it to you that way. There are rules. I'm not
(27:00):
going to break it down. It's too nerdy that there
are rules. And if you follow the rules, you have
to do a B and C. If you follow the rules,
then you get, or you're supposed to get. You're supposed
to get whistle blower protections. Hey, this guy came forward
with damaging information. He did a B and C. Therefore
he has whistleblower protections. And those whistleblower protections are supposed
(27:24):
to I keep stressing that because I think about the
FBI whistleblowers. But those whistleblower protections are supposed to protect
good people from nasty retaliation when they come forward with
damaging information against a powerful entity. To be a quote
whistle blower, you don't just get to assign that label
(27:46):
to yourself. You have to do certain things to achieve that.
Now you're asking more about the leaker here and how
all this works. We'll talk about that in just a moment.
Before we talk about that, let me talk to you
up keeping your dog alive and I need to do
this your cat alive. I know, I know you may
(28:09):
be a cat person. I can't relate to you, but
I know you may be a cat person. And I
know when I talk about rough Greens, cat people can
get jealous. That's just naturally how they are. They email.
I wish you would do something for cats too. There
is miwgreens as well. I want to stress this a
(28:30):
nutritional supplement for your cat. You sprinkle it on your
cat's food. Yes, even your picky cat that's annoying. Your
cat will love it and your cat will live longer.
Your dog will live longer with rough Greens. Give the
pet that makes your life better, real actual nutrition. Okay,
(28:51):
you want to try a free jumpstart trial bag of it.
Call them eight three three three three my dog or
Roughgreens Dot com slash Jesse, We'll be back get the
Cure for Rhinos eight days with the Jesse Kelly Show.
It is The Jesse Kelly Show. Reminding you if you
(29:14):
miss any part of the show, you can download the
whole thing on iHeart, Spotify iTunes. If you are a
detail nerd, a numbers nerd, you'd like breakdowns of demographics
of the country and how they how they vote and
which which direction they're going. I have a treat for you.
Halfway through next hour. Ryan Gurdusky is going to join us.
(29:37):
If you listen a lot, you know Ryan. Ryan is
one of these detail nerd guys and Pew research that
they did. They do the research, they come out with
this huge research paper I think it's every four years,
maybe every two years, describing demographics in the country and
how they voted and men, women and old John black By.
(29:59):
I've got that all the more details than you can imagine.
Ryan loves this crap. I would never read that. It
was way too long and complicated, but Ryan broke it
all down. If you want to know demographically how the
country voted in twenty twenty four in different ways that
different demographics, I will tell you this. There are going
to be things that Ryan tells you that are going
(30:22):
to surprise you. They surprised me, and I'm difficult to surprise.
Things might be looking up for us. You're going to
want to hear this about halfway through next hour. Okay,
back to the email. The lady was asking whistleblowers versus
leakers versus so I already talked about whistleblowers and how
they have protections leakers. This is how it works in Washington, DC.
(30:46):
And let's talk specifically about people who leak to the CNN,
to CNN or New York Times or something like that.
Have you seen have you heard? You probably have if
you listen to the show. The searches for leakers like
they're already searching for the guy who leaked this story.
But this is not the first time it has happened.
They have looked for and found leakers in the Pentagon,
(31:09):
in various places. Why is the Trump administration doing that?
Because here is how it works. We have a government,
as you already know, that is filled with communists. It's
not that it used to be. It is north of
ninety percent of federal employees vote Democrat, more than ninety percent.
(31:30):
You may think, well, we're in charge of everything. We
have the House and the Senate, and we have the presidency.
They'll put it this way, Republicans are the cherry on
top of the cupcake that has a lot of icing.
All the icing is Democrat. All the cake of the
cupcake is the Democrat. The cherry may be Republican, but
(31:54):
the vast quantity of the cupcake is Democrat. That's what
we have right now. It'll take years and years and
years to fix this problem, but we have a government
full of communists. And as you know, as we've discussed
many times before, no matter what his role is, no
matter the importance of his role, no matter what uniform
he puts on, the communist is a communist first. Whatever
(32:17):
else he does is secondary. He believes whatever he does
is simply a tool to be used for the revolution.
That's how over ninety percent of our federal employees view themselves.
And what happens is the media. As you know the media,
there are a bunch of dirty communists as well. They
get sources, and the sources are sometimes dishonest themselves. So
(32:43):
let's make it about the Pentagon source, probably some captain,
maybe even a colonel, possibly even a general who hates
Donald Trump, thinks Donald Trump's evil and a communist wearing
a uniform. He knows somebody at CNN in an effort
to make Donald Trump look bad. He will get with
(33:03):
a reporter at CNN who views things the exact same
way he does. So they go out for drinks at
some place in the Washington, DC area, a couple of
beers and tells her, hey, you know, rumor has it.
I saw a report today that said those nuclear facilities
weren't actually destroyed. You didn't hear it for me, but
(33:24):
I saw a report today. Now that's not a whistleblower,
that's a leaker, and that's that's probably illegal depending on
the story. Now, that definitely would be illegal because that's
classified information. That's illegal. The media, you know, they're all
in this together. The source wants to hurt Donald Trump.
(33:46):
The media wants to hurt Donald Trump. They then can
grab that information and they can accurately and honestly say
when they go on television. Sources inside the Pentagon have
told me they're they're not lying when they say that. Now,
what they don't explain to you is that source inside
of the Pentagon is a Trump hating animal, and that
(34:08):
source inside of the Pentagon illegally leaked you information, and
that source inside of the Pentagon is doing everything in
his or her power to hurt Donald Trump. Every day.
They don't inform you of any of that stuff. They
don't inform you that the source only gave you partial information. No,
the media wants to be able to honestly run to
(34:28):
the TV camera, run to the podcast microphone, and say,
sources inside the FBI have told me Donald Trump murders puppies.
They're not lying. That's what makes it so insidious. They
found a source who would tell them that, who would
confirm the report they already wanted to run with. It
was already ready to be printed inside the New York Times.
(34:49):
All you needed to bring it to print was to
tell your editor, Hey, don't worry, mister editor, I've got
a source inside of the FBI and he confirmed that
Donald Trump murders puppies. From there, Remember, the system works together.
The media works with Democrats, they worked with Hollywood, they
work with the FBI. They all work together. From there,
(35:09):
they universally, with one voice, will elevate something that is
an outright lie, and they'll all repeat the outright lie.
And there's two things that used to happen. What used
to happen was, as we already explained, the GOP would
shrivel up in that moment moment, call it biased and
just kind of allow them to run away with the narrative.
And something else that used to happen was the normy American,
(35:33):
not you. You always knew these people were liars, But
the normi American would here, Well, I mean, I know
c on End's bias, but the New York Times is
saying it too, and I saw this guy say it too,
and Politico said it too. Normi American will see the
same story repeated by three four different entities and naturally
(35:54):
just assume it's human nature. Well, if everyone's saying the
same thing, even if they're biased, at least it has
to be partially true. That's how it used to be.
Now a GOP doesn't take it anymore. Now they call
evil liars evil liars, and that is getting more and
more widespread on the right. And as that is getting
(36:17):
more and more widespread on the right, normi American is
hearing it, He's reading it. On social media. Donald Trump
is tweeting about it. And now, when CNN says something,
Norman American says, AH, probably lying. I want to I
want to actually point this out. There's a couple specific
examples courtesy of Jake Tamper. We'll play those for you
(36:42):
next
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Cold Case Files: Miami
Joyce Sapp, 76; Bryan Herrera, 16; and Laurance Webb, 32—three Miami residents whose lives were stolen in brutal, unsolved homicides. Cold Case Files: Miami follows award‑winning radio host and City of Miami Police reserve officer Enrique Santos as he partners with the department’s Cold Case Homicide Unit, determined family members, and the advocates who spend their lives fighting for justice for the victims who can no longer fight for themselves.