November 22, 2024 • 45 mins
(Full Show) Donald Trump just suffered his first big loss since winning the election, as Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his name for consideration to be the next attorney general. Jesse Kelly explains how the system made this happen and how they're not going to stop with just Gaetz. Natalie Winters then joins the show to discuss who may replace Gaetz as Trump's nominee. Also, hear from Marc Morano regarding massive energy news. Plus, Ellen DeGeneres has fled the country. Morgonn McMichael and Alex Clark are here to react.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 11-21-24
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
We react to the big news about Matt Gates. Natalie
Winters is going to join us to also react to
that news. Hollywood stars are actually leaving America. All that
and more coming up on I'm right. Okay, let's talk
(00:24):
about the Gates thing, and the Gates thing being the
fact that Matt Gates came out earlier today and made
an announcement that he's withdrawing his name from being age.
Here's actually specifically what he said. I had excellent meetings
with the senators yesterday. We'll get to that in a moment.
I appreciate their thoughtful feedback and the incredible support of many.
(00:44):
While the momentum was strong, it's clear my confirmation was
unfairly becoming a distraction to the critical work of Trump.
Vance are timed waste YadA, YadA, YadA, and withdrawing my
name blah blah blah blah blah. You got it all,
he bounced out. Okay, So first, let's do this. Ever,
the conversation we've had many times before about how we
(01:08):
have a thousand battles to fight. Saving a country and
losing a country is a process, not an event. A
process not an event. We had a huge election win.
It's wonderful. I'm still so happy. I'm assuming you're still
so happy about it, and that's good, feel good. But
it was one it was a major battle, but it
(01:29):
was one battle. There are a thousand more to come.
This was one of those battles. Donald Trump's preference for
attorney General was Matt Gates. Matt Gates spent the day
yesterday bouncing around the halls of the Senate and look,
I'm sure you already figured this out, but here's how
this works. You go door to door. There are one
(01:51):
hundred senators. You're probably not gonna bother meeting with the Democrats,
so you're gonna have about fifty three doors you need
to knock on, give or take, depending on who's in town.
Go knock on the Republican senator's doors. They would have,
of course, had meetings set up ahead of time. They're
not actually knocking on doors. And you go sit down
and you simply ask are you a yes or a no?
Are you a maybe? Can I convince you do? We
(02:13):
need to go do lunch. And what you're doing is
you're simply counting votes. They spent the day yesterday on
Capitol Hill counting votes. Are we going to do this
or not? And it's obvious from Gates's statement and from
the timing of all this. They walked out, they walked
off of Capitol Hill yesterday, and Matt Gates did not
have the votes. I was told you that he was
(02:34):
going to be a coin flip. I assume most of
the others will be okay, but I knew Matt Gates
was going to be a coin flip. Matt Gates did
not have the votes. That's obviously what happened here. Now
there are details we don't know and probably won't ever know,
but the bottom line is Mat Gates did not have
the votes, and why didn't he have the votes? Well,
that's going to lead us to a little bit of
(02:55):
a larger conversation. We're going to have. Matt Gates didn't
have the votes because of the United States Senate. But
the Republicans control the United States Senate. I don't understand. Well,
that is the point. You see the primaries, the primary
in your red state. I'm not even talking about the
Lisa Murkowskis and the Susan Collins of the world. I'm
(03:17):
not talking about them. I'm talking about our red state
senator problem because we have a big one. We have
states that are blood red. They could elect and will
elect any Republican who wins the primary, and our reddest
states send consistently our worst senators to the United States Senate.
(03:39):
No excuse for it. It's on me. It's on you
if you reside in these red states. I do. I
reside in Texas. To have John Cornyn be a United
States Senator from Texas is unacceptable. I need to do better.
I need to do more. Unacceptable. As soon as we
get as invested and involved in our primary process as
(04:00):
we do when Donald Trump is on the ballot for president,
then these things will stop happening. Now, let's talk about
how intelligence agencies not just work today, but how evil
communist agencies work, how they've always really worked. You see,
the communist knows how to use your values against you.
(04:23):
This is a conversation we've had many times. But because
his only value is the revolution, he doesn't have anything else.
All he cares about is the revolution, burn everything down
towards the country. For him, that is the greater good.
I know it's sick, but for him that's all that matters.
He has no other value system. Beyond that. It gives
him the freedom you don't have. It gives him the
(04:45):
freedom to take your values and use them against you.
And they do this with dirty stuff all the time,
and they always have. Did you know if you watch
this show for any length of time, you do know this.
But did you know the stas see the secret police
in the East Germany, that horrible communist country. Did you
know that they used to plant pornography on people. They
(05:09):
would plant it the agency itself, They would go out,
they put it in your mailbox, put it in your desk,
break into your home, put it by your bed. Why
would you why? I remember the first time I read
something like that, I thought, that's so weird. Why would why?
That's just odd? But it's not when you actually think
about it. Because what happens when your wife goes and
gets the mail, she finds that smut in there. She
(05:33):
comes storming into the house. Now there are cracks in
your home. Now you're having a big argument. Hey, I
saw what you were looking at. What did you do?
There are cracks in your home. It appeals to her emotions,
It attacks her emotions, and it breaks things up. Dirty
things like that appeal to your emotions. They go after
(05:55):
your emotions, my emotions. As soon as you hear underage
this or or paid her for that, immediately, we're all
everybody human nature were all though. That's girls. I hope
that's not trouble. Oh gross, And you see that value
system of yours, which is good. I'm not criticizing your
value system. That value system of yours is used against
you by evil communist agencies all the time. Do you
(06:19):
remember we've talked about this on the show before. Do
you remember Cheryl Atkisson. She's still around, so I hope
you do remember her. A wonderful journalist. And what happened
was she was with I believe CBS at the time,
and she was going after Barack Obama. This is when
Barack Obama was president. She was one of the few
journalists in the country who was willing to really expose
(06:40):
the evil things Barack Obama was doing. And of course,
because Barack Obama is an evil, demonic communist, he sent
the government after Cheryl Atkisson. And do you remember what
Cheryl Atkisson testified the FBI tried to do.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
Remember this, you were it sucks being set up by
the government and surveilled by the government, and sometimes it
takes far too long to be able to clear those
matters up.
Speaker 3 (07:07):
May I say one little reported facet of my case
is one of the federal agents involved in one of
the operations against me said that they intended to plant
child porn in my husband's computer. This is the FBI.
There's been a case that's currently in litigation unrelated in
which an FBI agent has testified that they did that.
(07:28):
They have done that. It was not accomplished in my case.
I guess the curtain was drawn on that facet of
the operation prior to them doing it. But imagine how
you ever get out of that. How they knew we
had a young daughter at home and has allegedly conspired
to do that.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
This is not some Internet wing nut. That's Cheryl Atkinson,
And as she said, it's part of the public record. Now,
these agencies, why would you, why would you plant child
porn on somebody's computer? Why would you do such a thing?
Because they understand the second the second I say the
words child porn, what do you do? Same thing I do?
(08:13):
Oh gosh, well no, no, gross lah. It creates this
emotion inside of you, and that's why they do it
because they know if they can do that, and obviously
this is something they do. These things happen in our
country because it appeals to your emotions. They can use
(08:33):
it to get you to go along with whatever they want,
and they can use it and do use it and
have used it many times to stop people who may
threaten them. So if you have an attorney general and
you're worried that he may clean house, you're worried that
he may expose some level of corruption, either when he's
(08:54):
in Congress or as attorney general, or you simply open
an investigation, grab a flimsy witness here, a flimsy witness there,
doesn't matter that they'll be discredited, it doesn't matter what
is said. The bottom line is a second. You start
an investigation and underage girl paying women. Immediately, people who
don't think they start to cringe, they pull back, and
(09:19):
you've applied that stain to the person you're trying to destroy.
And this is not something that happens in East Germany.
East Germany's gone. This is something that happens now in
the United States of America. Your intelligence agencies, and that
is what the FBI is now. But all of them.
The intelligence agencies of this country use these things with
(09:40):
regularity to destroy the reputations of anybody who may threaten
them in the end. And of course they do it
because well look what happened today. They do it because
it works. Now this goes to a talk we've had before.
How do you that, how can you fight back against
(10:03):
something like that? Well, you stop giving these agencies legitimacy.
You see the problem in the United States Senate. Why
Matt Gates wasn't going to get through the United States
Senate as the United States Senate is still full of
low TGP losers who see FBI and they think, well,
there's an FBI investigation. Clearly it's very very important. Instead
(10:24):
of looking like at the FBI like the cheka, which
is what it actually is, they still look at it
like the great men and women at the FBI. And
as long as you look at them like that, you
have no chance. They will take the trust you give them.
They will take the legitimacy you give them, and they
will form a weapon out of it and they will
attack you with it, and they will succeed just like
(10:44):
they did. Now we're going to get an ag I
bet you'll be good one too, so don't sit and cry.
And I lost a battle. It's okay. We'll fight more,
we'll win more, we'll lose more. But that's what happened here.
And as long as you give these agencies intimacy, they
will keep doing the same thing over and over and
over again. And be careful because maybe right now you're
(11:06):
sitting there saying and I would understand this, but Jesse,
I don't like Matt Gates. I think he's obnoxious. I
think he's a jerk. I don't care for Matt Gates.
I don't want to hang out with them at all.
It's not about Matt Gates. It's about something so much
bigger than Matt Gates. Because today it was Matt Gates. Tomorrow,
maybe they're putting something on your computer. All that may
(11:26):
have made you uncomfortable, but I am right. We have
an incredible show. We'll talk to Natalie winter Is about
what happened today, what she thinks about it before we
do that. I have some incredible news. I've been telling
you about Beam dream powder from Beam, the natural hot
coco that I drink that puts me to sleep and
(11:46):
then I wake up and I feel good. So you
know about Beam already. And what if I told you
what's my flavor? Chocolate cinnamon. I think it's called cinnamon cocoa.
But it's amazing, It's delicious. It's just a couple of
hot chocolate. Beam just sent me some new lavers and
oh gosh, they have brownie batter. They have what is
it but white chocolate peppermint. Oh just trust me. Going
(12:11):
to sleep has never tasted so good. Shotbeam dot com,
Slash Jesse Kelly, go enjoy. We'll be back all right.
As I said in the open, we lost this battle
and it sucks. The Gate nomination gone. I think we're
(12:35):
gonna get something great anyway, but it sucks to lose
battles that we should win. Why did we lose it?
It's talk to Natalie Winters about that and other things.
Joining me now, co host of the War Room, one
of the great investigative reporters out there on our side,
Natalie Winters. All right, Natalie, I was pulling hard for
Gates to get in there and shake some things up.
(12:57):
Didn't work out. It's not my first loss in politics.
I'll be fine, but it.
Speaker 4 (13:02):
Sucks, of course it does.
Speaker 5 (13:04):
Gates as someone who has gone up against the deep
state and frankly won right. He really, I think rose
to fame with the first impeachment. He stared down all
of those democracy loving crisis actors and just totally obliterated them.
But I think, unlike the Democrats, we are so blessed
to have a very deep bench of people who understand
not just how the DOJ has been weaponized against the
(13:26):
American people in some cases first hand, but more importantly,
how to dismantle it. I think there are wonderful people
like Jeff Clerk, Mark Pailetta, even Andrew Bailey, who I
think embody that same spirit. But make no mistake, I
think the biggest lesson to take away from Gates withdrawing
his nomination is that, you know, the so called resistance
(13:47):
that we're up against is not something that is just
confined to the left side of the political aisle. I
think the establishment wing of the Republican Party makes up,
if not more so, I think at least as much
of a signific can threat to the MAGA Trump agenda
that the four Left does.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
No. I don't disagree. I've been screaming and bashing my
balding head off the desk forever about Republican participation in
primaries in these red states, Natalie, It's embarrassing. Once every
four years, everyone throws on a Maga hat and they
get excited and it's Rallied time and they get involved.
But then Republican primary season in my state of Texas
(14:25):
comes up and Republicans are nowhere to be found, and
we have that human barnacle John Cornyn in the Senate
now forever. We've got to freaking change it. I don't
know how we change it. I feel like maybe it
is changing, but I'm frustrated. I'll be honest.
Speaker 4 (14:38):
Now, it's all.
Speaker 5 (14:39):
About seizing the institutions. And I think though we can
celebrate the overwhelming victory that President Trump had, if we
don't have the ability to effectuate it or actually implement
what's this all for? And I think that while, like
I said, we can celebrate our victory, that same spirit
that allowed us to win in twenty twenty four, really
(14:59):
working hard on election integrity, working hard on candidate and
quality candidates selection. I think we need to not let
our foot off the gas and continue only to accelerate
more on that front. I think too, you know, these
senators who are up for reelection, since right now were
what essentially the maximum amount of time period that you
could be away from primary season. From these forthcoming elections,
(15:21):
we need to not have short term memory loss and
we need to actually drill down in primary these.
Speaker 1 (15:25):
People, no doubt about it. I will be participating wholeheartedly
as I know you of Okay, Chuck Schumer is ramming
judges through as fast as he possibly can. What's going
on here.
Speaker 5 (15:42):
Yeah, So I think it's important to sort of contextualize
this effort to ram federal judges through.
Speaker 4 (15:48):
I think they're up to over two hundred.
Speaker 5 (15:51):
The sort of left wing resistance this time, I think
can be compartmentalized into three distinct categories. One is the
judges that they're working overtime, you know, into the wee
hours of the night, as the Washington Post says, democracy
dies in darkness. The second is the sort of states
rights argument, right all the democratic governors working to undermine
(16:11):
the Trump agenda. And then the third silo is going
to be the left wing NGO that's your ACLU SPLC
activisty all the way to the left of you know,
the Communist Party USA. But right now, since right President
Trump hasn't been sworn in. There in sort of their
first phase of resistance, which is essentially the idea of
quote Trump proofing the government and one of the levers
(16:32):
of power that they're really intent on weaponizing as we speak.
To do that is by ramming through as many judges
as possible. And there's been some controversy over some Republican senators,
particularly Mike Brawn of Indiana even ted Cruz in some
cases not being present for votes. Now, if they were there,
it wouldn't necessarily mean that they wouldn't have been confirmed,
(16:53):
but it would have at least forced Kamala Harris to
cut her Hawaii vacation short. But it's really important in
this you know, what is it fifty nine fifty eight
days that we have until President Trump is sworn in.
Democrats and their establishment Republican counterparts are doing every single
thing that they can. They will not let one second
go to waste to Trump proof this country and block
the America Versus agenda.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Speaking of Trump proofing, we're firing long range well, I'm sorry,
the Ukrainians are firing long range missiles into Russia. We're
now tossing anti personnel minds on the ground. It looks
like they're really trying to Trump proof this financial boondoggle,
the slaughter house going on in Ukraine. It's pretty ugly.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
I mean this, I'm sorry, it's treason. There's no other
way to couch it. Having the Biden regime put Zelensky
in the best possible negotiat negotiation place to be right
when he comes to the table with Putin and Trump.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
That's not helping America. That's helping Ukraine.
Speaker 5 (17:49):
And that's the definition of being a trader to your country.
I think it's also worth noting that sort of secretly
overnight they've been working behind the scenes to forgive half
of a nine billion dollar loan to Ukraine for of
course nebulous you know, foreign aid and military equipment whatever
that may mean. So that's about four point seven billion dollars.
(18:10):
But it shows you, right, they're not displaying this new
policy sort of reversal with wide open arms to the
American people.
Speaker 4 (18:16):
They're doing it secretly.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
They're forced to put out a statement because certain reporters
have sort of you know, leaked it, but they know
this is such an unpopular issue. But I think to
just just last point on this, it's quite interesting. I'm
sure your audience is familiar with the Transition Integrity Project.
It was the sort of far left Soros funded election
interference group that tried to prevent Trump from winning in
twenty twenty and one of the things that they said
(18:38):
President Trump was going to do in his transition period
to just sort of muddy the water and make it
very difficult for a potential president elect Joe Biden, was
to quote spark a foreign adventure or have a sort
of wag the dog type of fair So obviously the
left deals and projection, but I think it just sort
of shows you how they're really trying to muddy the
water and hand President Trump the most complicated geopolitical situation
(19:00):
that they quite possibly could.
Speaker 1 (19:04):
What do you think of these nominees so far, Natalie
or did these potential potential cabinet picks? I love most
of them. Look, you can have orlieve the losers like
Christy Nome in my opinion, but for the most part,
I love them. I've been very, very impressed. Heg Seth
has me doing backflips if I wouldn't throw my back out.
Speaker 4 (19:23):
Yeah, right, heg Seth.
Speaker 5 (19:24):
He's not qualified because he's what not on the board
of Raytheon or Boeing. I mean this idea that you
have to quite trusted experts. Yeah, where have those experts
gotten us the last have you know, many decades.
Speaker 4 (19:35):
In terms of foreign policy?
Speaker 5 (19:36):
I think overall, you know, the obviously top line ones,
the Gabbards, the hag Seth nominations are wonderful. I will
say I think the Rubio nomination is something that I
am particularly concerned about, just because I think in the
kind of global censorship wars, that's something that obviously you
followed quite closely.
Speaker 4 (19:55):
We followed quite closely on War Room.
Speaker 5 (19:57):
So much of that, whether it's USAID or other sort
of NGO type activity, runs straight through State Department. So
you need someone who's willing to stare it down globalists
in the face and of course the shall I say
enemy within domestically and tell them that no, you're not
going to censor the American people. But what you're talking
about is dismantling a multi billion dollar industry and essentially
(20:20):
censorship industrial complex. And I just don't think Rubio has
the spine to stick up to that behemoth that is
probably the deep state epitomized.
Speaker 1 (20:30):
Yeah, I kind of share your concerns on that when
I'm going to table those for now. But I've been
vocal vocally against that one too. What the heck you're
gonna do? Nobody bats a thousand. Let's talk about China
and Donald Trump. This relationship has been contentious. To put
it mildly, China, of course, would prefer Democrats remain in
power forever because they frankly work for China. Now what
(20:51):
changes now?
Speaker 5 (20:52):
Natalie well at President Trump attacked the China issue with
a level of nuance that I think most people don't appreciate,
particularly his ability to sanction foreign influenced groups who are busy,
as we speak, paying off basically everyone in Washington, d C.
In New York to try to effectuate pro China policies
on every level of federal, state, and local government. So
(21:14):
I think that area in particular was something that the
Trump administration was particularly adept on. In their National Security
Council desk tasked with running China affairs, was I think
particularly ahead on that issue and over the target. But
more broadly too, I think it's quite funny right when
they point out certain for example, Tulci Gabbard, they say, oh, well,
(21:35):
you know she's compromised by Russia because she once maybe
put out a tweet that didn't peddle the military industrial
complexes line on Russia. Well, Democrats, if you want to
play the game of people being compromised by foreign countries,
I would suggest you look into someone named Joe Biden
and Hunter Biden, because he'd be disqualified for running for president.
If that's the standard you want a levy against any
(21:55):
presidential nominee or candidate.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
Certainly would you were the best come back anytime? Thank you?
All right, we have so much more and I have
so much more for you. I have your Christmas shopping
already done. Did you know that cell phone? Someone in
your life wants a new cell phone and you don't
have to worry about having to break the bank because
(22:20):
pure Talk is here. You don't need Verizon AT and
T or T Mobile. That person in your life, husband, wife, son, daughter,
why don't you switch them to pure Talk save a fortune,
brand new iPhone, brand new Android, whatever you want. Puretalk
has everything. They're also on the same five G network,
so you're not going to sacrifice coverage. You're not going
(22:42):
to sacrifice service. When you get a hold of people
at pure talk, you will speak to an American who
speaks English, because this company loves this country, led by
a Vietnam veteran. Switch to pure talk, save a fortune,
be patriotic, puretalk dot com slash Jesse TV. We'll be back.
(23:11):
It's crazy how different the two parties are, and how
frankly awful Democrats are. And this is for me. I
criticize Republicans all the time, but as soon as you
get a Democrat president, you just know energy is going
to get more expensive. They get an office and they
attack the energy sector. Remember the Keystone pipeline. Yeah, that
was good to go. And then Biden got elected and
(23:33):
just just gone immediately. And of course they're reporting now
that Trump is going to bring it back, may bring
it back. We'll see what else Trump may do. Joining
me now, Mark Morno, executive editor of Climate Depot dot com. Mark,
are we getting Keystone back? What else are we getting back?
We getting the band back together? Here we are?
Speaker 6 (23:52):
I mean, this is going to be a complete yin
yang to what we just went through with Joe Biden,
which was a yin yang from what we went through,
which was a yin yang from what we went through
with Obama. I think the key message here is President
Trump has to get us out of the yin Yang.
I guess you'd call it the whiplash that we literally
(24:13):
deal with every four years.
Speaker 7 (24:14):
And there's some key things he can do. Yes, he can.
Speaker 6 (24:17):
Reverse all of Biden's executive orders. Yes, he can start
allowing permitting and drilling in federal lands in our waters.
But here's the key that he needs to do, and
this has to be day one. He needs to submit
to the United States Senate the Earth Summit Treaty that
was the underlying basis for this entire United Nations Climate Conference,
(24:41):
and submit, I'm sorry, submit the UN Paris Agreement twenty
sixteen to.
Speaker 7 (24:46):
The Senate for verification.
Speaker 6 (24:48):
And this would no doubt go down in flames in
the Senate. Force them, and then that would get us
out of the nineteen ninety two Rio Earth Summit Treaty
which George H. W. Bush, a Republican, got us into.
This is what needs to be done. Otherwise than that
would do is make it incredibly difficult for the next
president to embrace this UN net zero agenda, and of
(25:09):
course all the other tentacles that come for that.
Speaker 7 (25:12):
Maybe I didn't explain it well enough.
Speaker 6 (25:14):
But the bottom line is we have to get out
of the UN Climate process, which we are in by
treaty going back to nineteen ninety two George Bush, and
we need to get out of that, and we need
to get out of it so the next president can't
just do some executive orders and reversals and we're back
in that's where Donald Trump failed last time. That I
think is one of the key things he can do
for American energy.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Okay, so this sounds like something that's possible for him
to do. Have you heard any sniffs out of Trump
Camp that he's it's something he's interested in doing.
Speaker 7 (25:44):
Yes, I think he is now.
Speaker 6 (25:45):
Can remember just let's go back twenty seventeen eighteen, he
had Rick Perry, Energy Secretary, who was like, oh, we
need to stay in the UN Paris Agreement. Yet Rex
Tillerson as Department of State, Oh, we need to stay
in the UN. And Donald Trump himself back if you recall, well,
we're going to renegotiate, get a better deal.
Speaker 7 (26:03):
You know, now, there's no better.
Speaker 6 (26:04):
Deal this Donald Trump, Donald Trump two point zero gets it.
He's not playing that game, and I think he's ready
to do this. This is what all of the climate skeptics,
this is what all of his advisors.
Speaker 7 (26:16):
Are urging him.
Speaker 6 (26:17):
This is going nuclear on this entire since nineteen ninety
two United Nations Summit Climate Treaty process, this would kill
it in the United States. We submitted as a treaty
to the United States from Obama didn't want to submit
the UN Paris Agreement as.
Speaker 7 (26:31):
A treaty anyway.
Speaker 6 (26:32):
That's a key thing that he can do, in addition
to just a whole host of reversals of everything Obama,
Biden did, and Obama did. And I think what we're
going to have here, it's going to take a few years.
I think you're going to see an almost instantaneous effect
on prices because energy is run on futures market, particularly
(26:54):
things like the oil and the gas markets. If there's
a feeling that things are opening up, there's going to
be excitement and there's gonna be a pressure to lower
prices almost immediately.
Speaker 7 (27:05):
So just that idea of.
Speaker 6 (27:06):
The attitude and the agenda of Donald Trump's gonna have
a huge immediate impact.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Yeah, momentum is a powerful thing. Okay, Mark, can Donald
Trump begin getting us back into refining you and I've
had this talk before about how we don't refine very much.
We've eliminated so much of our refining capacity. It's insane
to me that we will dig up oil here and
then ship it somewhere else to get refined and then
ship it back in madness to me, can we reverse that?
Speaker 6 (27:36):
It's hard to reverse because so much of that is regulating,
So much of that is like everything else in America,
everything we outsource. But this doesn't make sense that we outsource.
This is the national security issue, and we have we
produced it energy domestically, Let's refine it domestically.
Speaker 7 (27:52):
He can start a long process toward that.
Speaker 6 (27:54):
And it all comes down to deregulation and stopping this
climate agenda and bringing out obvious things like if we
don't do it here, we're doing it in places that
don't have our highest standards. We're doing it around the world,
and we need to get back to that. That is
one of the key things we need to do. And
I think when when Trump is sworn in on that
first day, there's just going to be such a sea
(28:17):
change of reversals. And I think there's also a sense
this is a key point when it comes to all
of this. This is not Donald Trump twenty sixteen. Meaning
we were just on the cusp of dealing with the
um Paris Agreement net zero. The whole world was all in.
Everyone was excited. Republicans were cowering in fear. You know,
(28:37):
I don't want to be against the environment net zero.
We're all for that zero. We've had eight years since then,
and we see the disaster. We see the European governments
bailing out. The German Coalition just collapse in England. They
had a huge rebellion. The EU elections last summer were
a huge rebuke. They tip they suspended, the grew the
Green New Deal in Europe, all throughout Europe, through the EU.
(28:59):
Now we have Donald Trump coming in. You have Argentina
at this COP twenty nine, someone I just got back
from literally pulling their one hundred and seventy member delegation.
You had the French Foreign Environment Minister not show up
because they were slighted. No major Western leader other than
the UK Prime Minister showed.
Speaker 7 (29:16):
Up at this summit.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
You have.
Speaker 6 (29:19):
Some of the one of the Pacific nations said they're
not coming because nothing happens at these conferences. They're greenwashing
and they're a waste of their time. So Donald Trump
can help push what I call a Clexit climate exit
from this UN process, similar to the way a Brexit
was the England's exit, Britain's exit from the EU.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
Mark. How's azure Benijon? I don't know if I said
that right. I don't even know where it is. It
sounds like it's in South America or something, but it
doesn't sound.
Speaker 6 (29:48):
It's in Western Asia, bordering Russia.
Speaker 7 (29:53):
Russia. It's next to Russia and Iran.
Speaker 6 (29:55):
I was actually tempted when I was there for a
week to cross over the border into Iran and see
how far they were getting on those nuclear weapons. I
wisely chose not to, but I don't know that I
could have got in and out. But Azerbaijan, unlike dubai
last year, which I was just sort of in love with,
I just couldn't believe how beautiful city was. And Azerbaijan
and I was in Baku, the capital. They literally are
(30:17):
an example of a oligarch where the United States has
actually headed. If we were going on the Great Reset,
you had dire poverty, pollution, trash, crumbling infrastructure, and then
juxtaposed against rolls Royce dealerships, Armani Gucci stores, block and block,
city block after city block, this very wealthy Petro state
(30:40):
oil money, and then the rest of there's no thriving
middle class in Azerbaijan. Interestingly enough, their leader is an
authoritarian whose father was the Soviet puppet.
Speaker 7 (30:50):
During the Soviet control of Azerbaijan. So it was that,
you know, an interesting country to hold.
Speaker 6 (30:55):
The UN Climate summon in, because that's basically the UN
Green vision is You're gonna have a few people at
the top doing what they want in private jets and
eating all the meat they want, and everyone else is
going to be in the crumbling infrastructure and the energy rationing.
The conference is still ongoing. It's just about to end.
I think it ends tomorrow.
Speaker 7 (31:13):
I got back a few days ago.
Speaker 6 (31:15):
All I can say is Donald Trump cast a shadow
over the entire conference.
Speaker 7 (31:19):
There was depression world leaders.
Speaker 6 (31:22):
Al Gore was finally forced to show up unannounced.
Speaker 7 (31:25):
He was not scheduled.
Speaker 6 (31:26):
I didn't see Hi anywhere in the schedule, and he
shows up and starts ranting about how climate signs have
been right about everything. The Taliban showed up at this
conference for the first time ever. They're now recognized the
leaders of Afghanistan and they showed up, which means Joe
Biden and Kamala Harris did not need to be there
because the Taliban literally repeat the Biden message there at
(31:47):
this U end. In fact, they've rehabilitated their image. Washington Post, Newsweek,
New York Times. Washington Post at a front page story
about how the Taliban is fighting climate change and now
they're becoming accepted again in play society, in the international
community because they're rehabilitated their image with climate change.
Speaker 1 (32:06):
Yeah, fighting climate change with one abused little girl at
a time. What a wonderful regime that is. Mark, Thank you,
my brother. I appreciate it. All right, do some culture
war stuff, shall we? Speaking of culture war stuff, babies
we have to save them. You know the Preborn's Network
(32:28):
of Clinics. They have these clinics. They set them up
in the highest abortion areas of the country. You know
that they save two hundred lives every day. When you
support preborn if you ever have or you will right now,
you are saving a life. It's not like other places
you give. You save a life. That baby it's about
(32:49):
to die. But mom, if she gets an ultrasound. If
she can hear the heartbeat, she will choose life. She
does almost every time. That's what preborn does. They give
free ultrasounds. Twenty eight dollars is what that ultrasound costs.
Whatever you give to preborn, it's tax deductible twenty eight
million for all I care preborn dot com slash Jesse,
(33:12):
We'll be back.
Speaker 8 (33:22):
It's because you can then misuse words like oppression. There
has been no oppression for the white man in this country.
You'll tell me which white men were dragged out of
their homes. You'll tell me which one of them got
dragged all the way across an ocean and told that
you are gonna go at work, We are gonna seal
(33:43):
your wives, We are gonna rape your wives. That didn't happen.
That is oppression. We didn't ask to be here. We're
not the same migrants did y'all constantly come up against.
We didn't run away from home. We were stolen. So yeah,
we are going to sit here and be offended when
you want to sit here and act like and and
(34:05):
don't let it escape you that it is white man
on this side of the aisle telling us people of
color on this side of the aisle, that y'all are
the ones being oppressed, That y'all are the ones that
are being harmed.
Speaker 1 (34:22):
Sorry, I can't. Well, you have just so many weapons
grade morons in our government. It's amazing. It's amazing the
country is still standing. Joining me now Alex Clark Coast
of Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark. I'm gonna ask her
about that in a second, and Morgan McMichael turning Point
USA contributor. Okay, Alex, first of all, what's apothecary? It
(34:43):
sounds like some kind of hippie stuff. I don't understand.
What is it?
Speaker 9 (34:47):
Yeah, well, it kind of is. And apothecary was the
original place in your community that you would go for
natural remedies, and so my podcast we are all about
healing a sick culture. So every guest has their own
unique remedy to do that you know, for physical health,
spiritual health, or mental health. So yeah, it's the original
place you would go before pharmacies and hospitals and big pharma.
(35:08):
You would go to an apothecary. So that's kind of
the story there.
Speaker 1 (35:13):
See, I knew it was hippie stuff with crystals and
stuff like that. I've heard of that stuff. Okay, Morgan,
it doesn't appear that these dirty comedies on the left
have learned any lessons at all from the election. We
don't want to be divided by race. The stuff does
not work anymore. The whole sexist, misogynists, you hate black
people think it doesn't work anymore. But they don't. They
(35:33):
don't learn, They never learned.
Speaker 10 (35:35):
I mean, they have been the ones that have called
us racist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, you name it. We've been
called every name in the book. But this clip I
just think is hilarious because while she's touting about oppression,
she's wearing thousands of dollars.
Speaker 4 (35:48):
Worth of jewelry.
Speaker 10 (35:49):
Her earrings are Chanel and I'd really want to ask
her a question is how have you been oppressed in
the United States of America? Because I really don't think
there is any kind of quote unquote systemic race that
actually is impacting her, especially when America is the Land
of the free, home of the brave, a country with
opportunity that she would not be afforded in any other country.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
Alex, speaking of your show, your podcast, let's talk about
the election and the echo chamber Democrats live in. Kamala
Harris famously was controlled to the max. She wouldn't do interviews.
When she would, it was only a limited amount of time.
You have to edit out this. She won't do. Joe
Rogan she how much do Democrats suffer from just being
the urban elite party? Now there's just a sea of
(36:34):
red across the middle of the country when you look
at the map, and a couple of big blue pockets
on the coasts. That's where they are. Now, that's the
only place they are.
Speaker 9 (36:42):
Yeah, I mean everyone's going to bring up that Kamala
Harris is incapable of having an unfiltered, unedited conversation for
hours and not sounding like a complete imbecile, which is true.
That's why she only did one podcast interview, which was
call Her Daddy, a liberal female audience podcast. But I
think that that was a terrible strategy because it wasn't
(37:04):
going to win her any new voters. And then you
meanwhile had young men who have been trending for Trump
in massive waves for the past year. There was that
recent study that talked to boys graduating high school and
they were overwhelmingly leaning conservatives. So she was ignoring young men,
refusing to go on more mass appeal podcasts because she's
(37:25):
too afraid. And yes, the Democrats all live in an
echo chamber.
Speaker 1 (37:29):
They just keep.
Speaker 9 (37:30):
Having hope and assuming and thinking like, oh, everybody agrees
with us, when it's clearly not the case. She could
have gone on different shows like d'ovonne or Joe Rogan,
which really could have attempted to show her in a
different light to more of a mass appeal audience that
had people both from the left and the right, but
she refused to do it. And then the second biggest
(37:52):
fail of the Kamala Harris campaign, not only the Echo
Chamber podcast and refusing to talk to other people unfiltered
showing her personality, she was also refusing to link.
Speaker 7 (38:01):
Arms with RFK Junior.
Speaker 1 (38:05):
Yeah yeah, it didn't do her any favorites at all. Morgan,
maybe she doesn't have a personality, you know, Alex didn't.
She wasn't wrong with anything. She just said. She never
opened up. She wouldn't go just be raw on a
podcast for three hours. I shouldn't use words like that
when talking about Harris. But she just wouldn't just open up.
But she doesn't have a personality to open up. Maybe
her personality is freaking horrific and that did the only
(38:25):
thing they could do with her.
Speaker 10 (38:27):
I mean, she is just continuing the chain of command
when it comes to control and being a puppet for
the deep state and the DNC. So I'm really not
surprised that she didn't go on all these podcasts. And
I think it was, like Alex said, her number one
failing point with this election, because she could have easily
actually talked about gen Z issues, talked about issues concerning
one in also the Maha movement with Alex has been
(38:50):
a pioneer in the podcast industry when it comes to that,
and I think it lost her so many points. I mean,
you can look across the board, every single county, she
didn't do better than Biden and a county booking compared
to twenty twenty, and even Trump did better when it
came to women. And I just think that she really
failed when it came to talking to her voting base
(39:10):
about things that matter because she campaigned entirely off of
abortion and it ended up failing.
Speaker 1 (39:17):
Alex. She brought up RFK and Maha, and of course
we learned about your hippie podcast trying to get people
healthier with actually a joke. But I do support these things.
I like that the right has gone this route, talking
more about hell, talking more about the crap in our food,
talking more about working out. It's such a weird thing
to hear either one of the political parties addressed these issues.
(39:40):
And honestly, I'm a little surprised it was the Republicans.
Speaker 9 (39:44):
Well, you shouldn't be because of the pandemic. So during
the pandemic you had the majority of Republican parents were
voting in favor totally vaccinate my children.
Speaker 1 (39:55):
I'm all in favor.
Speaker 9 (39:56):
When we mandated the COVID vaccine, you saw those numbers, plumb,
it was nearly one hundred percent, and then it went
all the way down into the twenty percent of people
that would say, yes, I believe vaccine safe and effective.
Speaker 7 (40:07):
It was all because of the lies and.
Speaker 9 (40:09):
The manipulation and the censorship going on from big Pharma
during those four years twenty twenty to twenty twenty four.
So that's a huge indicator that we were in for
some serious change. But you're right, historically it was more
the liberal, crunchy granola people that cared about things like
organic food and GMOs and so that was why it
was such a big deal, in such a huge clincher
(40:30):
on the Trump campaign. When Bobby Kennedy came out on
stage in Arizona in doors, Donald Trump said he was
going to be working with him and voting for him,
and that President Trump promised him a spot in the
administration taking care of health for the American people, and
that gained I believe gained Trump so many more female
voters than anyone was expecting because of what Morgan brought up.
(40:54):
The left was totally banking on abortion, but actually turns
out more moms care about being able to feed their
children and feed them healthy food as opposed to just
killing them.
Speaker 1 (41:04):
Yeah, let's talk about that real quick, Morgan. The female
vote obviously, young single women percentage wise voted for Democrats,
but they did not clean sweep women, as Alex just
pointed out, the way they were expecting to. They obviously
thought they were going to get every woman in the country,
but that didn't happen. I know Republicans have a long
way to go, but are women shifting right at all?
(41:27):
Or have we just completely lost the kookie nutters.
Speaker 10 (41:31):
I think women will eventually start shifting more to the
right and being more conservative as time goes on, and
they continue to see the lies that the feminist movement
has been selling them for years, even encapsulated with the
Maha movement. Look how birth control has impacted women, and
I've seen hundreds of thousands of women starting to ditch
their birth control over the past couple of years. And
even looking at the polling under the age of thirty,
(41:52):
women under the age of thirty, forty percent voted for Trump,
which is a lot more than I think the Democrats
expected them to. Just like Alex said, when you are
looking at feeding your kids, wanting to have children in
the future, wanting a safe economic future so that you
can raise your kids, buy a house, and actually looking
at issues that are concerning the middle and lower class Americans,
(42:12):
it's a no brainer that a candidate like Kamala Harris
isn't actually working in your favor. And it's the more
that we dive into the lies of how the feminist
movement has really trapped women, I think they're going to
start waking up and voting more conservative in the future.
Speaker 9 (42:26):
And can I just piggyback something on what she just said.
President Trump gained fifteen points with women.
Speaker 7 (42:32):
That is huge.
Speaker 9 (42:33):
The GOP has an opportunity here. We just gained millions
of new female voters again, I believe, largely because of
the Maha movement. If we keep courting them and we
you know, it's like we just had a great successful
first date that was the election. We had a great
first date with all of these new female voters. If
the GOP continues to keep promises and Trump keeps promises
(42:53):
on all this health stuff, and we keep moving forward
and we treat them right and we make them feel welcome,
we have the potential to keep them men for twenty
twenty eight and going on forward from that. So I
think the new Republican Party, focusing on a lot of
these very nonpartisan issues in the health space, we are
looking at a very very optimate, favorable future with female voters.
Speaker 1 (43:15):
Yeah, I think so. And as they reject feminism because
women don't want to be ugly. So anyway, Morgan Alex,
thank you so much. I appreciate it. We have light
in the mood. Thanks all right, it is time to
(43:36):
lighten the mood and it is enjoyable. After the other
party takes a beating electorally, watching them try to figure
out why, and watching them fight with each other about
it's your fault, it's your fault. You shouldn't be doing this,
you shouldn't be saying that. And look, this happens to
us too. When we have these huge losses, everyone starts
(43:57):
throwing about at each other. You did this, you did this,
and so Now because we had this big election, when
we get to sit back and bask in the glow
of Democrats going on television throwing poop at each other. Look,
I debated Professor Linckman before I told him his theories
about the keys were absurd. I was right, he was wrong.
(44:18):
I said he'd lose.
Speaker 11 (44:19):
His keys wrong.
Speaker 7 (44:22):
And that's a cheap shot.
Speaker 11 (44:23):
And I won't stand for who wanted, brother, should not.
Speaker 1 (44:26):
Be who want to make you make denial.
Speaker 11 (44:32):
I read your own followers comments and they all trashed you,
every one of them, and supported me. Yeah right with
that personal.
Speaker 1 (44:40):
Come find out again.
Speaker 7 (44:41):
Make whatever point you want it, don't make it.
Speaker 1 (44:44):
You don't know anything.
Speaker 11 (44:45):
Say whatever you want, but I'm not okay, brother, you
got it wrongstrously and stupidly wrong.
Speaker 1 (44:52):
So okay, all right, can I just finish your gun?
Speaker 7 (44:54):
Damn stupid?
Speaker 11 (44:58):
Hey, Alan, you just deserve a tall glass of shut
up juice, So can you just shut up for a second.
I will not sit here and say for personal attacks
for blasphemy against me.
Speaker 7 (45:10):
You don't need to do that. You don't blasphemy against
Jesus Christ.
Speaker 1 (45:14):
You lose her. I'm gonna pull that out the next
time the wife is mad at me about something and
she's yelling at me and said, that's blasphemy anyway. I
see them all, h
We react to the big news about Matt Gates. Natalie
Winters is going to join us to also react to
that news. Hollywood stars are actually leaving America. All that
and more coming up on I'm right. Okay, let's talk
(00:24):
about the Gates thing, and the Gates thing being the
fact that Matt Gates came out earlier today and made
an announcement that he's withdrawing his name from being age.
Here's actually specifically what he said. I had excellent meetings
with the senators yesterday. We'll get to that in a moment.
I appreciate their thoughtful feedback and the incredible support of many.
(00:44):
While the momentum was strong, it's clear my confirmation was
unfairly becoming a distraction to the critical work of Trump.
Vance are timed waste YadA, YadA, YadA, and withdrawing my
name blah blah blah blah blah. You got it all,
he bounced out. Okay, So first, let's do this. Ever,
the conversation we've had many times before about how we
(01:08):
have a thousand battles to fight. Saving a country and
losing a country is a process, not an event. A
process not an event. We had a huge election win.
It's wonderful. I'm still so happy. I'm assuming you're still
so happy about it, and that's good, feel good. But
it was one it was a major battle, but it
(01:29):
was one battle. There are a thousand more to come.
This was one of those battles. Donald Trump's preference for
attorney General was Matt Gates. Matt Gates spent the day
yesterday bouncing around the halls of the Senate and look,
I'm sure you already figured this out, but here's how
this works. You go door to door. There are one
(01:51):
hundred senators. You're probably not gonna bother meeting with the Democrats,
so you're gonna have about fifty three doors you need
to knock on, give or take, depending on who's in town.
Go knock on the Republican senator's doors. They would have,
of course, had meetings set up ahead of time. They're
not actually knocking on doors. And you go sit down
and you simply ask are you a yes or a no?
Are you a maybe? Can I convince you do? We
(02:13):
need to go do lunch. And what you're doing is
you're simply counting votes. They spent the day yesterday on
Capitol Hill counting votes. Are we going to do this
or not? And it's obvious from Gates's statement and from
the timing of all this. They walked out, they walked
off of Capitol Hill yesterday, and Matt Gates did not
have the votes. I was told you that he was
(02:34):
going to be a coin flip. I assume most of
the others will be okay, but I knew Matt Gates
was going to be a coin flip. Matt Gates did
not have the votes. That's obviously what happened here. Now
there are details we don't know and probably won't ever know,
but the bottom line is Mat Gates did not have
the votes, and why didn't he have the votes? Well,
that's going to lead us to a little bit of
(02:55):
a larger conversation. We're going to have. Matt Gates didn't
have the votes because of the United States Senate. But
the Republicans control the United States Senate. I don't understand. Well,
that is the point. You see the primaries, the primary
in your red state. I'm not even talking about the
Lisa Murkowskis and the Susan Collins of the world. I'm
(03:17):
not talking about them. I'm talking about our red state
senator problem because we have a big one. We have
states that are blood red. They could elect and will
elect any Republican who wins the primary, and our reddest
states send consistently our worst senators to the United States Senate.
(03:39):
No excuse for it. It's on me. It's on you
if you reside in these red states. I do. I
reside in Texas. To have John Cornyn be a United
States Senator from Texas is unacceptable. I need to do better.
I need to do more. Unacceptable. As soon as we
get as invested and involved in our primary process as
(04:00):
we do when Donald Trump is on the ballot for president,
then these things will stop happening. Now, let's talk about
how intelligence agencies not just work today, but how evil
communist agencies work, how they've always really worked. You see,
the communist knows how to use your values against you.
(04:23):
This is a conversation we've had many times. But because
his only value is the revolution, he doesn't have anything else.
All he cares about is the revolution, burn everything down
towards the country. For him, that is the greater good.
I know it's sick, but for him that's all that matters.
He has no other value system. Beyond that. It gives
him the freedom you don't have. It gives him the
(04:45):
freedom to take your values and use them against you.
And they do this with dirty stuff all the time,
and they always have. Did you know if you watch
this show for any length of time, you do know this.
But did you know the stas see the secret police
in the East Germany, that horrible communist country. Did you
know that they used to plant pornography on people. They
(05:09):
would plant it the agency itself, They would go out,
they put it in your mailbox, put it in your desk,
break into your home, put it by your bed. Why
would you why? I remember the first time I read
something like that, I thought, that's so weird. Why would why?
That's just odd? But it's not when you actually think
about it. Because what happens when your wife goes and
gets the mail, she finds that smut in there. She
(05:33):
comes storming into the house. Now there are cracks in
your home. Now you're having a big argument. Hey, I
saw what you were looking at. What did you do?
There are cracks in your home. It appeals to her emotions,
It attacks her emotions, and it breaks things up. Dirty
things like that appeal to your emotions. They go after
(05:55):
your emotions, my emotions. As soon as you hear underage
this or or paid her for that, immediately, we're all
everybody human nature were all though. That's girls. I hope
that's not trouble. Oh gross, And you see that value
system of yours, which is good. I'm not criticizing your
value system. That value system of yours is used against
you by evil communist agencies all the time. Do you
(06:19):
remember we've talked about this on the show before. Do
you remember Cheryl Atkisson. She's still around, so I hope
you do remember her. A wonderful journalist. And what happened
was she was with I believe CBS at the time,
and she was going after Barack Obama. This is when
Barack Obama was president. She was one of the few
journalists in the country who was willing to really expose
(06:40):
the evil things Barack Obama was doing. And of course,
because Barack Obama is an evil, demonic communist, he sent
the government after Cheryl Atkisson. And do you remember what
Cheryl Atkisson testified the FBI tried to do.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
Remember this, you were it sucks being set up by
the government and surveilled by the government, and sometimes it
takes far too long to be able to clear those
matters up.
Speaker 3 (07:07):
May I say one little reported facet of my case
is one of the federal agents involved in one of
the operations against me said that they intended to plant
child porn in my husband's computer. This is the FBI.
There's been a case that's currently in litigation unrelated in
which an FBI agent has testified that they did that.
(07:28):
They have done that. It was not accomplished in my case.
I guess the curtain was drawn on that facet of
the operation prior to them doing it. But imagine how
you ever get out of that. How they knew we
had a young daughter at home and has allegedly conspired
to do that.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
This is not some Internet wing nut. That's Cheryl Atkinson,
And as she said, it's part of the public record. Now,
these agencies, why would you, why would you plant child
porn on somebody's computer? Why would you do such a thing?
Because they understand the second the second I say the
words child porn, what do you do? Same thing I do?
(08:13):
Oh gosh, well no, no, gross lah. It creates this
emotion inside of you, and that's why they do it
because they know if they can do that, and obviously
this is something they do. These things happen in our
country because it appeals to your emotions. They can use
(08:33):
it to get you to go along with whatever they want,
and they can use it and do use it and
have used it many times to stop people who may
threaten them. So if you have an attorney general and
you're worried that he may clean house, you're worried that
he may expose some level of corruption, either when he's
(08:54):
in Congress or as attorney general, or you simply open
an investigation, grab a flimsy witness here, a flimsy witness there,
doesn't matter that they'll be discredited, it doesn't matter what
is said. The bottom line is a second. You start
an investigation and underage girl paying women. Immediately, people who
don't think they start to cringe, they pull back, and
(09:19):
you've applied that stain to the person you're trying to destroy.
And this is not something that happens in East Germany.
East Germany's gone. This is something that happens now in
the United States of America. Your intelligence agencies, and that
is what the FBI is now. But all of them.
The intelligence agencies of this country use these things with
(09:40):
regularity to destroy the reputations of anybody who may threaten
them in the end. And of course they do it
because well look what happened today. They do it because
it works. Now this goes to a talk we've had before.
How do you that, how can you fight back against
(10:03):
something like that? Well, you stop giving these agencies legitimacy.
You see the problem in the United States Senate. Why
Matt Gates wasn't going to get through the United States
Senate as the United States Senate is still full of
low TGP losers who see FBI and they think, well,
there's an FBI investigation. Clearly it's very very important. Instead
(10:24):
of looking like at the FBI like the cheka, which
is what it actually is, they still look at it
like the great men and women at the FBI. And
as long as you look at them like that, you
have no chance. They will take the trust you give them.
They will take the legitimacy you give them, and they
will form a weapon out of it and they will
attack you with it, and they will succeed just like
(10:44):
they did. Now we're going to get an ag I
bet you'll be good one too, so don't sit and cry.
And I lost a battle. It's okay. We'll fight more,
we'll win more, we'll lose more. But that's what happened here.
And as long as you give these agencies intimacy, they
will keep doing the same thing over and over and
over again. And be careful because maybe right now you're
(11:06):
sitting there saying and I would understand this, but Jesse,
I don't like Matt Gates. I think he's obnoxious. I
think he's a jerk. I don't care for Matt Gates.
I don't want to hang out with them at all.
It's not about Matt Gates. It's about something so much
bigger than Matt Gates. Because today it was Matt Gates. Tomorrow,
maybe they're putting something on your computer. All that may
(11:26):
have made you uncomfortable, but I am right. We have
an incredible show. We'll talk to Natalie winter Is about
what happened today, what she thinks about it before we
do that. I have some incredible news. I've been telling
you about Beam dream powder from Beam, the natural hot
coco that I drink that puts me to sleep and
(11:46):
then I wake up and I feel good. So you
know about Beam already. And what if I told you
what's my flavor? Chocolate cinnamon. I think it's called cinnamon cocoa.
But it's amazing, It's delicious. It's just a couple of
hot chocolate. Beam just sent me some new lavers and
oh gosh, they have brownie batter. They have what is
it but white chocolate peppermint. Oh just trust me. Going
(12:11):
to sleep has never tasted so good. Shotbeam dot com,
Slash Jesse Kelly, go enjoy. We'll be back all right.
As I said in the open, we lost this battle
and it sucks. The Gate nomination gone. I think we're
(12:35):
gonna get something great anyway, but it sucks to lose
battles that we should win. Why did we lose it?
It's talk to Natalie Winters about that and other things.
Joining me now, co host of the War Room, one
of the great investigative reporters out there on our side,
Natalie Winters. All right, Natalie, I was pulling hard for
Gates to get in there and shake some things up.
(12:57):
Didn't work out. It's not my first loss in politics.
I'll be fine, but it.
Speaker 4 (13:02):
Sucks, of course it does.
Speaker 5 (13:04):
Gates as someone who has gone up against the deep
state and frankly won right. He really, I think rose
to fame with the first impeachment. He stared down all
of those democracy loving crisis actors and just totally obliterated them.
But I think, unlike the Democrats, we are so blessed
to have a very deep bench of people who understand
not just how the DOJ has been weaponized against the
(13:26):
American people in some cases first hand, but more importantly,
how to dismantle it. I think there are wonderful people
like Jeff Clerk, Mark Pailetta, even Andrew Bailey, who I
think embody that same spirit. But make no mistake, I
think the biggest lesson to take away from Gates withdrawing
his nomination is that, you know, the so called resistance
(13:47):
that we're up against is not something that is just
confined to the left side of the political aisle. I
think the establishment wing of the Republican Party makes up,
if not more so, I think at least as much
of a signific can threat to the MAGA Trump agenda
that the four Left does.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
No. I don't disagree. I've been screaming and bashing my
balding head off the desk forever about Republican participation in
primaries in these red states, Natalie, It's embarrassing. Once every
four years, everyone throws on a Maga hat and they
get excited and it's Rallied time and they get involved.
But then Republican primary season in my state of Texas
(14:25):
comes up and Republicans are nowhere to be found, and
we have that human barnacle John Cornyn in the Senate
now forever. We've got to freaking change it. I don't
know how we change it. I feel like maybe it
is changing, but I'm frustrated. I'll be honest.
Speaker 4 (14:38):
Now, it's all.
Speaker 5 (14:39):
About seizing the institutions. And I think though we can
celebrate the overwhelming victory that President Trump had, if we
don't have the ability to effectuate it or actually implement
what's this all for? And I think that while, like
I said, we can celebrate our victory, that same spirit
that allowed us to win in twenty twenty four, really
(14:59):
working hard on election integrity, working hard on candidate and
quality candidates selection. I think we need to not let
our foot off the gas and continue only to accelerate
more on that front. I think too, you know, these
senators who are up for reelection, since right now were
what essentially the maximum amount of time period that you
could be away from primary season. From these forthcoming elections,
(15:21):
we need to not have short term memory loss and
we need to actually drill down in primary these.
Speaker 1 (15:25):
People, no doubt about it. I will be participating wholeheartedly
as I know you of Okay, Chuck Schumer is ramming
judges through as fast as he possibly can. What's going
on here.
Speaker 5 (15:42):
Yeah, So I think it's important to sort of contextualize
this effort to ram federal judges through.
Speaker 4 (15:48):
I think they're up to over two hundred.
Speaker 5 (15:51):
The sort of left wing resistance this time, I think
can be compartmentalized into three distinct categories. One is the
judges that they're working overtime, you know, into the wee
hours of the night, as the Washington Post says, democracy
dies in darkness. The second is the sort of states
rights argument, right all the democratic governors working to undermine
(16:11):
the Trump agenda. And then the third silo is going
to be the left wing NGO that's your ACLU SPLC
activisty all the way to the left of you know,
the Communist Party USA. But right now, since right President
Trump hasn't been sworn in. There in sort of their
first phase of resistance, which is essentially the idea of
quote Trump proofing the government and one of the levers
(16:32):
of power that they're really intent on weaponizing as we speak.
To do that is by ramming through as many judges
as possible. And there's been some controversy over some Republican senators,
particularly Mike Brawn of Indiana even ted Cruz in some
cases not being present for votes. Now, if they were there,
it wouldn't necessarily mean that they wouldn't have been confirmed,
(16:53):
but it would have at least forced Kamala Harris to
cut her Hawaii vacation short. But it's really important in
this you know, what is it fifty nine fifty eight
days that we have until President Trump is sworn in.
Democrats and their establishment Republican counterparts are doing every single
thing that they can. They will not let one second
go to waste to Trump proof this country and block
the America Versus agenda.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Speaking of Trump proofing, we're firing long range well, I'm sorry,
the Ukrainians are firing long range missiles into Russia. We're
now tossing anti personnel minds on the ground. It looks
like they're really trying to Trump proof this financial boondoggle,
the slaughter house going on in Ukraine. It's pretty ugly.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
I mean this, I'm sorry, it's treason. There's no other
way to couch it. Having the Biden regime put Zelensky
in the best possible negotiat negotiation place to be right
when he comes to the table with Putin and Trump.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
That's not helping America. That's helping Ukraine.
Speaker 5 (17:49):
And that's the definition of being a trader to your country.
I think it's also worth noting that sort of secretly
overnight they've been working behind the scenes to forgive half
of a nine billion dollar loan to Ukraine for of
course nebulous you know, foreign aid and military equipment whatever
that may mean. So that's about four point seven billion dollars.
(18:10):
But it shows you, right, they're not displaying this new
policy sort of reversal with wide open arms to the
American people.
Speaker 4 (18:16):
They're doing it secretly.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
They're forced to put out a statement because certain reporters
have sort of you know, leaked it, but they know
this is such an unpopular issue. But I think to
just just last point on this, it's quite interesting. I'm
sure your audience is familiar with the Transition Integrity Project.
It was the sort of far left Soros funded election
interference group that tried to prevent Trump from winning in
twenty twenty and one of the things that they said
(18:38):
President Trump was going to do in his transition period
to just sort of muddy the water and make it
very difficult for a potential president elect Joe Biden, was
to quote spark a foreign adventure or have a sort
of wag the dog type of fair So obviously the
left deals and projection, but I think it just sort
of shows you how they're really trying to muddy the
water and hand President Trump the most complicated geopolitical situation
(19:00):
that they quite possibly could.
Speaker 1 (19:04):
What do you think of these nominees so far, Natalie
or did these potential potential cabinet picks? I love most
of them. Look, you can have orlieve the losers like
Christy Nome in my opinion, but for the most part,
I love them. I've been very, very impressed. Heg Seth
has me doing backflips if I wouldn't throw my back out.
Speaker 4 (19:23):
Yeah, right, heg Seth.
Speaker 5 (19:24):
He's not qualified because he's what not on the board
of Raytheon or Boeing. I mean this idea that you
have to quite trusted experts. Yeah, where have those experts
gotten us the last have you know, many decades.
Speaker 4 (19:35):
In terms of foreign policy?
Speaker 5 (19:36):
I think overall, you know, the obviously top line ones,
the Gabbards, the hag Seth nominations are wonderful. I will
say I think the Rubio nomination is something that I
am particularly concerned about, just because I think in the
kind of global censorship wars, that's something that obviously you
followed quite closely.
Speaker 4 (19:55):
We followed quite closely on War Room.
Speaker 5 (19:57):
So much of that, whether it's USAID or other sort
of NGO type activity, runs straight through State Department. So
you need someone who's willing to stare it down globalists
in the face and of course the shall I say
enemy within domestically and tell them that no, you're not
going to censor the American people. But what you're talking
about is dismantling a multi billion dollar industry and essentially
(20:20):
censorship industrial complex. And I just don't think Rubio has
the spine to stick up to that behemoth that is
probably the deep state epitomized.
Speaker 1 (20:30):
Yeah, I kind of share your concerns on that when
I'm going to table those for now. But I've been
vocal vocally against that one too. What the heck you're
gonna do? Nobody bats a thousand. Let's talk about China
and Donald Trump. This relationship has been contentious. To put
it mildly, China, of course, would prefer Democrats remain in
power forever because they frankly work for China. Now what
(20:51):
changes now?
Speaker 5 (20:52):
Natalie well at President Trump attacked the China issue with
a level of nuance that I think most people don't appreciate,
particularly his ability to sanction foreign influenced groups who are busy,
as we speak, paying off basically everyone in Washington, d C.
In New York to try to effectuate pro China policies
on every level of federal, state, and local government. So
(21:14):
I think that area in particular was something that the
Trump administration was particularly adept on. In their National Security
Council desk tasked with running China affairs, was I think
particularly ahead on that issue and over the target. But
more broadly too, I think it's quite funny right when
they point out certain for example, Tulci Gabbard, they say, oh, well,
(21:35):
you know she's compromised by Russia because she once maybe
put out a tweet that didn't peddle the military industrial
complexes line on Russia. Well, Democrats, if you want to
play the game of people being compromised by foreign countries,
I would suggest you look into someone named Joe Biden
and Hunter Biden, because he'd be disqualified for running for president.
If that's the standard you want a levy against any
(21:55):
presidential nominee or candidate.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
Certainly would you were the best come back anytime? Thank you?
All right, we have so much more and I have
so much more for you. I have your Christmas shopping
already done. Did you know that cell phone? Someone in
your life wants a new cell phone and you don't
have to worry about having to break the bank because
(22:20):
pure Talk is here. You don't need Verizon AT and
T or T Mobile. That person in your life, husband, wife, son, daughter,
why don't you switch them to pure Talk save a fortune,
brand new iPhone, brand new Android, whatever you want. Puretalk
has everything. They're also on the same five G network,
so you're not going to sacrifice coverage. You're not going
(22:42):
to sacrifice service. When you get a hold of people
at pure talk, you will speak to an American who
speaks English, because this company loves this country, led by
a Vietnam veteran. Switch to pure talk, save a fortune,
be patriotic, puretalk dot com slash Jesse TV. We'll be back.
(23:11):
It's crazy how different the two parties are, and how
frankly awful Democrats are. And this is for me. I
criticize Republicans all the time, but as soon as you
get a Democrat president, you just know energy is going
to get more expensive. They get an office and they
attack the energy sector. Remember the Keystone pipeline. Yeah, that
was good to go. And then Biden got elected and
(23:33):
just just gone immediately. And of course they're reporting now
that Trump is going to bring it back, may bring
it back. We'll see what else Trump may do. Joining
me now, Mark Morno, executive editor of Climate Depot dot com. Mark,
are we getting Keystone back? What else are we getting back?
We getting the band back together? Here we are?
Speaker 6 (23:52):
I mean, this is going to be a complete yin
yang to what we just went through with Joe Biden,
which was a yin yang from what we went through,
which was a yin yang from what we went through
with Obama. I think the key message here is President
Trump has to get us out of the yin Yang.
I guess you'd call it the whiplash that we literally
(24:13):
deal with every four years.
Speaker 7 (24:14):
And there's some key things he can do. Yes, he can.
Speaker 6 (24:17):
Reverse all of Biden's executive orders. Yes, he can start
allowing permitting and drilling in federal lands in our waters.
But here's the key that he needs to do, and
this has to be day one. He needs to submit
to the United States Senate the Earth Summit Treaty that
was the underlying basis for this entire United Nations Climate Conference,
(24:41):
and submit, I'm sorry, submit the UN Paris Agreement twenty
sixteen to.
Speaker 7 (24:46):
The Senate for verification.
Speaker 6 (24:48):
And this would no doubt go down in flames in
the Senate. Force them, and then that would get us
out of the nineteen ninety two Rio Earth Summit Treaty
which George H. W. Bush, a Republican, got us into.
This is what needs to be done. Otherwise than that
would do is make it incredibly difficult for the next
president to embrace this UN net zero agenda, and of
(25:09):
course all the other tentacles that come for that.
Speaker 7 (25:12):
Maybe I didn't explain it well enough.
Speaker 6 (25:14):
But the bottom line is we have to get out
of the UN Climate process, which we are in by
treaty going back to nineteen ninety two George Bush, and
we need to get out of that, and we need
to get out of it so the next president can't
just do some executive orders and reversals and we're back
in that's where Donald Trump failed last time. That I
think is one of the key things he can do
for American energy.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Okay, so this sounds like something that's possible for him
to do. Have you heard any sniffs out of Trump
Camp that he's it's something he's interested in doing.
Speaker 7 (25:44):
Yes, I think he is now.
Speaker 6 (25:45):
Can remember just let's go back twenty seventeen eighteen, he
had Rick Perry, Energy Secretary, who was like, oh, we
need to stay in the UN Paris Agreement. Yet Rex
Tillerson as Department of State, Oh, we need to stay
in the UN. And Donald Trump himself back if you recall, well,
we're going to renegotiate, get a better deal.
Speaker 7 (26:03):
You know, now, there's no better.
Speaker 6 (26:04):
Deal this Donald Trump, Donald Trump two point zero gets it.
He's not playing that game, and I think he's ready
to do this. This is what all of the climate skeptics,
this is what all of his advisors.
Speaker 7 (26:16):
Are urging him.
Speaker 6 (26:17):
This is going nuclear on this entire since nineteen ninety
two United Nations Summit Climate Treaty process, this would kill
it in the United States. We submitted as a treaty
to the United States from Obama didn't want to submit
the UN Paris Agreement as.
Speaker 7 (26:31):
A treaty anyway.
Speaker 6 (26:32):
That's a key thing that he can do, in addition
to just a whole host of reversals of everything Obama,
Biden did, and Obama did. And I think what we're
going to have here, it's going to take a few years.
I think you're going to see an almost instantaneous effect
on prices because energy is run on futures market, particularly
(26:54):
things like the oil and the gas markets. If there's
a feeling that things are opening up, there's going to
be excitement and there's gonna be a pressure to lower
prices almost immediately.
Speaker 7 (27:05):
So just that idea of.
Speaker 6 (27:06):
The attitude and the agenda of Donald Trump's gonna have
a huge immediate impact.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Yeah, momentum is a powerful thing. Okay, Mark, can Donald
Trump begin getting us back into refining you and I've
had this talk before about how we don't refine very much.
We've eliminated so much of our refining capacity. It's insane
to me that we will dig up oil here and
then ship it somewhere else to get refined and then
ship it back in madness to me, can we reverse that?
Speaker 6 (27:36):
It's hard to reverse because so much of that is regulating,
So much of that is like everything else in America,
everything we outsource. But this doesn't make sense that we outsource.
This is the national security issue, and we have we
produced it energy domestically, Let's refine it domestically.
Speaker 7 (27:52):
He can start a long process toward that.
Speaker 6 (27:54):
And it all comes down to deregulation and stopping this
climate agenda and bringing out obvious things like if we
don't do it here, we're doing it in places that
don't have our highest standards. We're doing it around the world,
and we need to get back to that. That is
one of the key things we need to do. And
I think when when Trump is sworn in on that
first day, there's just going to be such a sea
(28:17):
change of reversals. And I think there's also a sense
this is a key point when it comes to all
of this. This is not Donald Trump twenty sixteen. Meaning
we were just on the cusp of dealing with the
um Paris Agreement net zero. The whole world was all in.
Everyone was excited. Republicans were cowering in fear. You know,
(28:37):
I don't want to be against the environment net zero.
We're all for that zero. We've had eight years since then,
and we see the disaster. We see the European governments
bailing out. The German Coalition just collapse in England. They
had a huge rebellion. The EU elections last summer were
a huge rebuke. They tip they suspended, the grew the
Green New Deal in Europe, all throughout Europe, through the EU.
(28:59):
Now we have Donald Trump coming in. You have Argentina
at this COP twenty nine, someone I just got back
from literally pulling their one hundred and seventy member delegation.
You had the French Foreign Environment Minister not show up
because they were slighted. No major Western leader other than
the UK Prime Minister showed.
Speaker 7 (29:16):
Up at this summit.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
You have.
Speaker 6 (29:19):
Some of the one of the Pacific nations said they're
not coming because nothing happens at these conferences. They're greenwashing
and they're a waste of their time. So Donald Trump
can help push what I call a Clexit climate exit
from this UN process, similar to the way a Brexit
was the England's exit, Britain's exit from the EU.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
Mark. How's azure Benijon? I don't know if I said
that right. I don't even know where it is. It
sounds like it's in South America or something, but it
doesn't sound.
Speaker 6 (29:48):
It's in Western Asia, bordering Russia.
Speaker 7 (29:53):
Russia. It's next to Russia and Iran.
Speaker 6 (29:55):
I was actually tempted when I was there for a
week to cross over the border into Iran and see
how far they were getting on those nuclear weapons. I
wisely chose not to, but I don't know that I
could have got in and out. But Azerbaijan, unlike dubai
last year, which I was just sort of in love with,
I just couldn't believe how beautiful city was. And Azerbaijan
and I was in Baku, the capital. They literally are
(30:17):
an example of a oligarch where the United States has
actually headed. If we were going on the Great Reset,
you had dire poverty, pollution, trash, crumbling infrastructure, and then
juxtaposed against rolls Royce dealerships, Armani Gucci stores, block and block,
city block after city block, this very wealthy Petro state
(30:40):
oil money, and then the rest of there's no thriving
middle class in Azerbaijan. Interestingly enough, their leader is an
authoritarian whose father was the Soviet puppet.
Speaker 7 (30:50):
During the Soviet control of Azerbaijan. So it was that,
you know, an interesting country to hold.
Speaker 6 (30:55):
The UN Climate summon in, because that's basically the UN
Green vision is You're gonna have a few people at
the top doing what they want in private jets and
eating all the meat they want, and everyone else is
going to be in the crumbling infrastructure and the energy rationing.
The conference is still ongoing. It's just about to end.
I think it ends tomorrow.
Speaker 7 (31:13):
I got back a few days ago.
Speaker 6 (31:15):
All I can say is Donald Trump cast a shadow
over the entire conference.
Speaker 7 (31:19):
There was depression world leaders.
Speaker 6 (31:22):
Al Gore was finally forced to show up unannounced.
Speaker 7 (31:25):
He was not scheduled.
Speaker 6 (31:26):
I didn't see Hi anywhere in the schedule, and he
shows up and starts ranting about how climate signs have
been right about everything. The Taliban showed up at this
conference for the first time ever. They're now recognized the
leaders of Afghanistan and they showed up, which means Joe
Biden and Kamala Harris did not need to be there
because the Taliban literally repeat the Biden message there at
(31:47):
this U end. In fact, they've rehabilitated their image. Washington Post, Newsweek,
New York Times. Washington Post at a front page story
about how the Taliban is fighting climate change and now
they're becoming accepted again in play society, in the international
community because they're rehabilitated their image with climate change.
Speaker 1 (32:06):
Yeah, fighting climate change with one abused little girl at
a time. What a wonderful regime that is. Mark, Thank you,
my brother. I appreciate it. All right, do some culture
war stuff, shall we? Speaking of culture war stuff, babies
we have to save them. You know the Preborn's Network
(32:28):
of Clinics. They have these clinics. They set them up
in the highest abortion areas of the country. You know
that they save two hundred lives every day. When you
support preborn if you ever have or you will right now,
you are saving a life. It's not like other places
you give. You save a life. That baby it's about
(32:49):
to die. But mom, if she gets an ultrasound. If
she can hear the heartbeat, she will choose life. She
does almost every time. That's what preborn does. They give
free ultrasounds. Twenty eight dollars is what that ultrasound costs.
Whatever you give to preborn, it's tax deductible twenty eight
million for all I care preborn dot com slash Jesse,
(33:12):
We'll be back.
Speaker 8 (33:22):
It's because you can then misuse words like oppression. There
has been no oppression for the white man in this country.
You'll tell me which white men were dragged out of
their homes. You'll tell me which one of them got
dragged all the way across an ocean and told that
you are gonna go at work, We are gonna seal
(33:43):
your wives, We are gonna rape your wives. That didn't happen.
That is oppression. We didn't ask to be here. We're
not the same migrants did y'all constantly come up against.
We didn't run away from home. We were stolen. So yeah,
we are going to sit here and be offended when
you want to sit here and act like and and
(34:05):
don't let it escape you that it is white man
on this side of the aisle telling us people of
color on this side of the aisle, that y'all are
the ones being oppressed, That y'all are the ones that
are being harmed.
Speaker 1 (34:22):
Sorry, I can't. Well, you have just so many weapons
grade morons in our government. It's amazing. It's amazing the
country is still standing. Joining me now Alex Clark Coast
of Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark. I'm gonna ask her
about that in a second, and Morgan McMichael turning Point
USA contributor. Okay, Alex, first of all, what's apothecary? It
(34:43):
sounds like some kind of hippie stuff. I don't understand.
What is it?
Speaker 9 (34:47):
Yeah, well, it kind of is. And apothecary was the
original place in your community that you would go for
natural remedies, and so my podcast we are all about
healing a sick culture. So every guest has their own
unique remedy to do that you know, for physical health,
spiritual health, or mental health. So yeah, it's the original
place you would go before pharmacies and hospitals and big pharma.
(35:08):
You would go to an apothecary. So that's kind of
the story there.
Speaker 1 (35:13):
See, I knew it was hippie stuff with crystals and
stuff like that. I've heard of that stuff. Okay, Morgan,
it doesn't appear that these dirty comedies on the left
have learned any lessons at all from the election. We
don't want to be divided by race. The stuff does
not work anymore. The whole sexist, misogynists, you hate black
people think it doesn't work anymore. But they don't. They
(35:33):
don't learn, They never learned.
Speaker 10 (35:35):
I mean, they have been the ones that have called
us racist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, you name it. We've been
called every name in the book. But this clip I
just think is hilarious because while she's touting about oppression,
she's wearing thousands of dollars.
Speaker 4 (35:48):
Worth of jewelry.
Speaker 10 (35:49):
Her earrings are Chanel and I'd really want to ask
her a question is how have you been oppressed in
the United States of America? Because I really don't think
there is any kind of quote unquote systemic race that
actually is impacting her, especially when America is the Land
of the free, home of the brave, a country with
opportunity that she would not be afforded in any other country.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
Alex, speaking of your show, your podcast, let's talk about
the election and the echo chamber Democrats live in. Kamala
Harris famously was controlled to the max. She wouldn't do interviews.
When she would, it was only a limited amount of time.
You have to edit out this. She won't do. Joe
Rogan she how much do Democrats suffer from just being
the urban elite party? Now there's just a sea of
(36:34):
red across the middle of the country when you look
at the map, and a couple of big blue pockets
on the coasts. That's where they are. Now, that's the
only place they are.
Speaker 9 (36:42):
Yeah, I mean everyone's going to bring up that Kamala
Harris is incapable of having an unfiltered, unedited conversation for
hours and not sounding like a complete imbecile, which is true.
That's why she only did one podcast interview, which was
call Her Daddy, a liberal female audience podcast. But I
think that that was a terrible strategy because it wasn't
(37:04):
going to win her any new voters. And then you
meanwhile had young men who have been trending for Trump
in massive waves for the past year. There was that
recent study that talked to boys graduating high school and
they were overwhelmingly leaning conservatives. So she was ignoring young men,
refusing to go on more mass appeal podcasts because she's
(37:25):
too afraid. And yes, the Democrats all live in an
echo chamber.
Speaker 1 (37:29):
They just keep.
Speaker 9 (37:30):
Having hope and assuming and thinking like, oh, everybody agrees
with us, when it's clearly not the case. She could
have gone on different shows like d'ovonne or Joe Rogan,
which really could have attempted to show her in a
different light to more of a mass appeal audience that
had people both from the left and the right, but
she refused to do it. And then the second biggest
(37:52):
fail of the Kamala Harris campaign, not only the Echo
Chamber podcast and refusing to talk to other people unfiltered
showing her personality, she was also refusing to link.
Speaker 7 (38:01):
Arms with RFK Junior.
Speaker 1 (38:05):
Yeah yeah, it didn't do her any favorites at all. Morgan,
maybe she doesn't have a personality, you know, Alex didn't.
She wasn't wrong with anything. She just said. She never
opened up. She wouldn't go just be raw on a
podcast for three hours. I shouldn't use words like that
when talking about Harris. But she just wouldn't just open up.
But she doesn't have a personality to open up. Maybe
her personality is freaking horrific and that did the only
(38:25):
thing they could do with her.
Speaker 10 (38:27):
I mean, she is just continuing the chain of command
when it comes to control and being a puppet for
the deep state and the DNC. So I'm really not
surprised that she didn't go on all these podcasts. And
I think it was, like Alex said, her number one
failing point with this election, because she could have easily
actually talked about gen Z issues, talked about issues concerning
one in also the Maha movement with Alex has been
(38:50):
a pioneer in the podcast industry when it comes to that,
and I think it lost her so many points. I mean,
you can look across the board, every single county, she
didn't do better than Biden and a county booking compared
to twenty twenty, and even Trump did better when it
came to women. And I just think that she really
failed when it came to talking to her voting base
(39:10):
about things that matter because she campaigned entirely off of
abortion and it ended up failing.
Speaker 1 (39:17):
Alex. She brought up RFK and Maha, and of course
we learned about your hippie podcast trying to get people
healthier with actually a joke. But I do support these things.
I like that the right has gone this route, talking
more about hell, talking more about the crap in our food,
talking more about working out. It's such a weird thing
to hear either one of the political parties addressed these issues.
(39:40):
And honestly, I'm a little surprised it was the Republicans.
Speaker 9 (39:44):
Well, you shouldn't be because of the pandemic. So during
the pandemic you had the majority of Republican parents were
voting in favor totally vaccinate my children.
Speaker 1 (39:55):
I'm all in favor.
Speaker 9 (39:56):
When we mandated the COVID vaccine, you saw those numbers, plumb,
it was nearly one hundred percent, and then it went
all the way down into the twenty percent of people
that would say, yes, I believe vaccine safe and effective.
Speaker 7 (40:07):
It was all because of the lies and.
Speaker 9 (40:09):
The manipulation and the censorship going on from big Pharma
during those four years twenty twenty to twenty twenty four.
So that's a huge indicator that we were in for
some serious change. But you're right, historically it was more
the liberal, crunchy granola people that cared about things like
organic food and GMOs and so that was why it
was such a big deal, in such a huge clincher
(40:30):
on the Trump campaign. When Bobby Kennedy came out on
stage in Arizona in doors, Donald Trump said he was
going to be working with him and voting for him,
and that President Trump promised him a spot in the
administration taking care of health for the American people, and
that gained I believe gained Trump so many more female
voters than anyone was expecting because of what Morgan brought up.
(40:54):
The left was totally banking on abortion, but actually turns
out more moms care about being able to feed their
children and feed them healthy food as opposed to just
killing them.
Speaker 1 (41:04):
Yeah, let's talk about that real quick, Morgan. The female
vote obviously, young single women percentage wise voted for Democrats,
but they did not clean sweep women, as Alex just
pointed out, the way they were expecting to. They obviously
thought they were going to get every woman in the country,
but that didn't happen. I know Republicans have a long
way to go, but are women shifting right at all?
(41:27):
Or have we just completely lost the kookie nutters.
Speaker 10 (41:31):
I think women will eventually start shifting more to the
right and being more conservative as time goes on, and
they continue to see the lies that the feminist movement
has been selling them for years, even encapsulated with the
Maha movement. Look how birth control has impacted women, and
I've seen hundreds of thousands of women starting to ditch
their birth control over the past couple of years. And
even looking at the polling under the age of thirty,
(41:52):
women under the age of thirty, forty percent voted for Trump,
which is a lot more than I think the Democrats
expected them to. Just like Alex said, when you are
looking at feeding your kids, wanting to have children in
the future, wanting a safe economic future so that you
can raise your kids, buy a house, and actually looking
at issues that are concerning the middle and lower class Americans,
(42:12):
it's a no brainer that a candidate like Kamala Harris
isn't actually working in your favor. And it's the more
that we dive into the lies of how the feminist
movement has really trapped women, I think they're going to
start waking up and voting more conservative in the future.
Speaker 9 (42:26):
And can I just piggyback something on what she just said.
President Trump gained fifteen points with women.
Speaker 7 (42:32):
That is huge.
Speaker 9 (42:33):
The GOP has an opportunity here. We just gained millions
of new female voters again, I believe, largely because of
the Maha movement. If we keep courting them and we
you know, it's like we just had a great successful
first date that was the election. We had a great
first date with all of these new female voters. If
the GOP continues to keep promises and Trump keeps promises
(42:53):
on all this health stuff, and we keep moving forward
and we treat them right and we make them feel welcome,
we have the potential to keep them men for twenty
twenty eight and going on forward from that. So I
think the new Republican Party, focusing on a lot of
these very nonpartisan issues in the health space, we are
looking at a very very optimate, favorable future with female voters.
Speaker 1 (43:15):
Yeah, I think so. And as they reject feminism because
women don't want to be ugly. So anyway, Morgan Alex,
thank you so much. I appreciate it. We have light
in the mood. Thanks all right, it is time to
(43:36):
lighten the mood and it is enjoyable. After the other
party takes a beating electorally, watching them try to figure
out why, and watching them fight with each other about
it's your fault, it's your fault. You shouldn't be doing this,
you shouldn't be saying that. And look, this happens to
us too. When we have these huge losses, everyone starts
(43:57):
throwing about at each other. You did this, you did this,
and so Now because we had this big election, when
we get to sit back and bask in the glow
of Democrats going on television throwing poop at each other. Look,
I debated Professor Linckman before I told him his theories
about the keys were absurd. I was right, he was wrong.
(44:18):
I said he'd lose.
Speaker 11 (44:19):
His keys wrong.
Speaker 7 (44:22):
And that's a cheap shot.
Speaker 11 (44:23):
And I won't stand for who wanted, brother, should not.
Speaker 1 (44:26):
Be who want to make you make denial.
Speaker 11 (44:32):
I read your own followers comments and they all trashed you,
every one of them, and supported me. Yeah right with
that personal.
Speaker 1 (44:40):
Come find out again.
Speaker 7 (44:41):
Make whatever point you want it, don't make it.
Speaker 1 (44:44):
You don't know anything.
Speaker 11 (44:45):
Say whatever you want, but I'm not okay, brother, you
got it wrongstrously and stupidly wrong.
Speaker 1 (44:52):
So okay, all right, can I just finish your gun?
Speaker 7 (44:54):
Damn stupid?
Speaker 11 (44:58):
Hey, Alan, you just deserve a tall glass of shut
up juice, So can you just shut up for a second.
I will not sit here and say for personal attacks
for blasphemy against me.
Speaker 7 (45:10):
You don't need to do that. You don't blasphemy against
Jesus Christ.
Speaker 1 (45:14):
You lose her. I'm gonna pull that out the next
time the wife is mad at me about something and
she's yelling at me and said, that's blasphemy anyway. I
see them all, h
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Boysober
Have you ever wondered what life might be like if you stopped worrying about being wanted, and focused on understanding what you actually want? That was the question Hope Woodard asked herself after a string of situationships inspired her to take a break from sex and dating. She went "boysober," a personal concept that sparked a global movement among women looking to prioritize themselves over men. Now, Hope is looking to expand the ways we explore our relationship to relationships. Taking a bold, unfiltered look into modern love, romance, and self-discovery, Boysober will dive into messy stories about dating, sex, love, friendship, and breaking generational patterns—all with humor, vulnerability, and a fresh perspective.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com