June 11, 2025 • 45 mins
Pete Hegseth testified before a House committee and it didn't go well for Democrats. That as the SecDef warns of a new threat to America. Jesse Kelly has it covered. Jesse also gets an update from on-the-ground in Los Angeles as Julio Rosas joins the show, while Mel K gives more intel on who is funding the protests. Plus, an inside look at the work being done to codify DOGE cuts in Congress.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 6-10-25
Choq: Visit https://choq.com/jessetv for a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life
Beam: Visit https://shopbeam.com/JESSEKELLY and use code JESSEKELLY to get our exclusive discount of up to 40% off.
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Pete haig Seth testified before the House today. We'll touch
on that, but we're going to touch on China. We'll
talk to Julio Rosas about what's going on in Los Angeles,
the big Beautiful Bill, all that more coming up.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
I'm right, okay, So let's talk about China in kind
of a roundabout way.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
You see, first of all, Pete haig Seth spoke on
the House today, spoke at the House at the House,
on the House. He's spoke in front of the House today,
in front of the House of Representatives.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
What's he doing.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
He's the Defense Secretary and he's bouncing around Capitol Hill
asking for money.
Speaker 3 (00:44):
That's how it works.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
When you're head of the FBI, you go to Congress
and beg for money. When your Secretary of Defense, you
have to go to the House and say I need
money for this, I need money for that, I need
money for this. And of course Democrats up and down
the line didn't really want to talk about the defense
of America or the military ships or planes, or they
(01:05):
wanted to talk about the United States military getting involved
in these riots in LA There was a whole lot
of talk like this.
Speaker 4 (01:13):
Mister Secretary We're both from Minnesota. I was in the
Twin Cities during the riots that followed the murder of
George Floyd. Tens of thousands of protesters took to the
streets for days. Governor Walls made the decision to call
up the Minnesota National Guard. At no point did we
need the citizens of Minnesota request that the Marines be deployed.
Speaker 5 (01:34):
Well, congress Woman, thank you for the question. You are right,
we're both originally from Minnesota, which is why I recall
twenty twenty quite well when Governor Walls abandoned a police
precinct and allowed it to be burned to the ground,
and also allowed five days of chaos to occur inside
the streets of Minneapolis.
Speaker 3 (01:56):
What's going on here?
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Why are they upset about the Maris being sent in
Aglar was concerned about how they're sleeping and whatnot.
Speaker 6 (02:05):
Mister Terry, I want to express my severe concern with
the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles without
consultation of the State of California. There have been photographs
that have shown these troops sleeping on the floor and
have not been provided fuel, food, or water by DoD.
How long will this deployment last, and why were we
unprepared to provide them basic necessities such.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
As food and water.
Speaker 5 (02:29):
The commanders and troops on the field are very well prepared,
so there are moments where you may do as best
you can temporarily, but we are ensuring they're housed, fed,
water capabilities in real time from my office, because I
care that much about the California Guard and the Marines
and the men and women who are supporting ourations on
the ground. It's true every day, and that's a disingenuous
(02:52):
attack that misrepresents how much we care about our troops
and what they're doing to defend ice agents. I'm not
going to take the fact that we don't care about
the troops. Nobody cares more about the troops at the
top then this Secretary.
Speaker 6 (03:02):
And the chair in our part with the deployment lasts.
Speaker 5 (03:04):
We stated very publicly that it's sixty days because we
want to ensure that those rioters, looters and thugs on
the other side assaulting our police officers would know that
we're not going anywhere. We're here to maintain the peace
on behalf of law enforcement officers in Los Angeles, which
gavin me some won't do.
Speaker 3 (03:23):
Okay, a couple things.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
First, lying on the ground, sleeping on the ground, not
being provided for it is well, I'll just put it
to you this way. I have mixed emotions about compulsory
military service for a country, very mixed emotions. You know,
a country like Israel. There are many in the world,
but Israel comes to mind right away that forces everybody
(03:48):
to join the military for a certain period of time.
Part of me loves it for a lot of reasons.
Part of me hates it for a lot of reasons.
But the part of me that loves it is questions
like that. Anybody who's ever been in the service has
slept on the ground, on the floor, You've dug a
hole on the ground, and the mud and the jungle.
(04:08):
At one point in time, I was in triple canopy
jungle with my feet, my naked feet on the ground
in a centipede the size of a snake crawled over them.
It's called being in the military. You don't always have
some cozy sheets in a bed. Sometimes you grab some
shut eye right there on the floor. It's no big deal.
Buck up, Buttercup, and anybody who's served knows that that's
(04:32):
one two what are they actually mad about. Are they
mad that they're not getting proper beds? Are they mad
about the length of deployment? Are they mad about any
of these things? No, they're mad about force on force.
They're mad about their force being met with force and
(04:53):
their revolution being stopped. That is their true concern and
is why they get upset when you use force on them.
Because remember what I've always told you about communists. They're
religious zelots and therefore they only understand fear and pain.
(05:14):
They don't have a second language you can use. You're
never going to reason with them. You're not going to
appeal to their morality because they don't share your morality
at all, because they're religious zelots. Think about them like
radical Jihati's fear and pain.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
It's all they understand.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Well, not only do you need to understand that, they
understand that.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
That's what they know. They know.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
They'll riot, they they'll loot, they'll vandalize, they'll kill, they'll
hurt people for as long as they possibly can until
force stops them, until good stops them. They're not concerned
about the Marines sleeping on the ground. They're concerned about
the Marines smashing in the face of some filthy foreigner
(05:57):
street communist who's pillaging Los Angeles right now. That's their
main concern, and that's the only reason any Democrat top
to bottom is questioning the deployment of Marines in Los Angeles.
Deploy the Marines, smash the rioters, and this immediately. Now,
let's move on and talk about something that actually matters
more than what's happening in Los Angeles right now. Pete
(06:21):
Hegseth brought it up today. Let's talk about China.
Speaker 5 (06:25):
I'm also proud to represent and serve our warriors and
their families today as they do every day. They're keeping
America safe, they're defending the homeland. They're standing up in
deterring communist China.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
Standing up in deterring communist China. That wasn't a one off,
That wasn't something he just mentioned in the intro. You
talked about communist China.
Speaker 5 (06:51):
Clear any attempt by communist China to conquer Taiwan by
force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo Pacific
end world.
Speaker 3 (07:00):
There's no reason to sugarcoat it.
Speaker 5 (07:02):
The threat China poses is real and it could be eminent.
Speaker 7 (07:06):
We hope not.
Speaker 1 (07:09):
Now, Trump has talked about China excess, always talking about
China cash. Betel has brought up China, China, China, China.
So here's what can happen to you and me if
we're not aware of what's going on. It's a very
human nature thing. Why is China that big of a deal?
It's a very it's a human nature thing to ask
(07:31):
that question. They're not landing divisions of troops on the shores,
There's not There aren't Chinese submarines off the coast of
California right now. There aren't Chinese fighter jets flying over Alaska.
Speaker 3 (07:45):
What are we worried about? Well, this is.
Speaker 1 (07:47):
Something that America wristles with and will wrestle with. China
is at war with us. But China has a very
Eastern view of war. Eastern in this way. They believe
in fighting a war differently, not just with bombs, not
(08:09):
just with bullets, not just with the normal things. China
fights wars in different ways. It's an Eastern, all encompassing
way to fight a war. We've talked about this before.
Maybe you're aware of this. The Mongols, the Mongolian Empire,
speaking of an Eastern view of war. You talk about
the Mongols and immediately people think of Genghis Khan. If
(08:29):
they know anything more about the Mongols, they're thinking about
a horse army.
Speaker 3 (08:33):
That's essentially what it was.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Horse archers and army, very mobile, very fast on horseback.
They'll swarm you, kill you. They'll think about the Mongols
laying siege to cities and killing everybody. These are all
things the Mongols are famous for. You can argue, and
I actually would argue, it's the greatest army that's ever
walked the face of the planet, unstoppable, wiped out everybody.
But you know what people don't talk about. The Mongols
(09:00):
fought wars in a variety of different ways. It wasn't
just that Genghis Khan would show up outside of your
city on horseback. Genghis Khan's spy, his intelligence service, was
top of the line. He invested unbelievable amounts of time
and money into ensuring his intelligence service was amazing. They
(09:22):
would do things like, well, if he was thinking about
conquering your city, his spies would be in your city
six months a year before his army ever showed up.
They'd be finding out where the political divisions are in
the city. Can they exploit those political divisions, spreading money around,
ensuring that the city wasn't near as cohesive as it.
Speaker 3 (09:42):
Had been before.
Speaker 1 (09:44):
Maybe a little bit of poison in the water supply,
maybe bring in somebody with the plague, intentionally weakening the
city from within. So when the Mongolian hordes showed up
out of the gates, the city wasn't near as strong
and ready as they could have been. That's exactly what
(10:05):
China has been doing and is currently doing to the
United States of America. They are importing fentanyl. They're trafficking
it to the cartels.
Speaker 3 (10:13):
Well, what you.
Speaker 1 (10:14):
Need to make fentanyl. They're giving it to the cartels
on purpose. This is something the Chinese Communist Party is
obviously aware of, and it's something they want to happen.
We now have one hundred thousand Americans a year dying
of overdose. That's done intentionally. That's China weakening us. We
now have a second story over the course of the
last couple weeks of a Chinese person smuggling in pathogens,
(10:37):
deadly pathogens to put it inside of our food supply.
Speaker 3 (10:40):
They'll be interested in our water supply.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
Now. The problem is for norm and norma for average
everyday American.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
You don't even know how to deal with these things.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
These things are random headlines you see on your phone
and then you set them down. But what we do
have to know is we are at war with China.
That is not your call. It's not my call. We
don't get a say when it comes to wars. Only
one side gets a say. China has declared war on us.
They intend to supplant us as the number one country
(11:13):
on the planet, and they are fighting that war not
with bombs and bullets and submarines. They are fighting that
war in a variety of different ways. They're all over
the internet. Did you know that turning one American against another?
They spend time and money doing this. Now, it's not
like you need to do something. You don't need to
(11:33):
run down to the local Chinese restaurant start screaming at
the cook. But we do have to acknowledge as a country,
as a people, that we are already in a cold
war with China. And it's even more complicated because our
economies depend on each other. China needs uspying goods, we
need China making goods. Big, old, ugly situation, but it's
(11:54):
the one we have. All right, Let's go talk to
Julio Rosas about la and deported. Before we talk to Julio,
I want to talk to you about testosterone. There is
another thing that is destroying this country from within. Chinese
divisions are not we don't have testosterone. We have lost
(12:17):
half of our testosterone in just fifty years.
Speaker 3 (12:21):
Do the math on that? What's that look like?
Speaker 1 (12:23):
In another fifty We're not even gonna have babies.
Speaker 3 (12:25):
We won't have enough men to fight a war.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
When a war comes, will be just a big, effeminate
society of losers, a whole country full of James Langford's.
Speaker 3 (12:33):
Is that what you want? Do you want to be
James Langford? Do you want to sound like Lindsey Graham?
Speaker 1 (12:38):
Get a male vitality stack from chalk flowing through your veins, gentlemen,
natural herbal supplements having you feeling like a million bucks.
Speaker 3 (12:48):
Every single day, full of energy.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
Ready to go chalk dot com, slash JESSETV.
Speaker 3 (12:56):
We'll be back.
Speaker 8 (13:05):
You know you've heard reports that there are riots on
the streets of Los Angeles. That is not what's happening
across the city of Los Angeles.
Speaker 5 (13:11):
Coven Houston's right there, was anything like a riot happening
on Friday Saturday, and.
Speaker 7 (13:14):
We just witnessed protester thanking a National guardsman for his
service here in California.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
Lapd By most estimates, had this under control last night.
Speaker 9 (13:26):
No, I don't think the National Guard is needed now.
Speaker 6 (13:29):
Things in La are calm.
Speaker 9 (13:30):
There was a protest that got a little unruly late
at night.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
There have been no violence where anybody that was protesting
hit anybody, shot anybody, anybody.
Speaker 7 (13:43):
Nothing.
Speaker 5 (13:44):
What is just a bunch of people having fun watching
cars burn.
Speaker 7 (13:48):
Most of those demonstrators were very peaceful.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
It's peaceful.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
They're having fun watching cars burn. Let's find out how
true all that stuff is. Joining me now, National Blaze correspondent,
United States Marine and possibly in ice custody. Julio Rojas, Julio,
what's going on in La Are you free right now?
Speaker 10 (14:12):
That's a good one, Deessie.
Speaker 11 (14:13):
I'll give you that one. Yeah. I am.
Speaker 10 (14:16):
I am in Los Angeles, and I have been so
busy with the riots that have been happening. I did
not even realize that that Tom Elliott put that super
cut together, and I was unaware of just how how
much lying is happening right now.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
Between between everybody.
Speaker 10 (14:38):
It's it's it's really ridiculous that despite being lambasted and
just mocks relentlessly five years ago when they pulled that
same mostly peaceful, uh you know, talking point, they're still
doing They're doing it again, and it just shows that
they learned absolutely nothing. And and for me, that's kind
of okay because it gives me job security because most
(14:59):
of Americans will tune out those people and tune into,
you know, people like me or any of my other
friends who are here in Los Angeles covering the riots,
because I mean, yes, there are protests, but they devolved
into riots like what happened yesterday again, So I don't
know what to expect today. We are expecting crowds to
kind of gather back outside the Federal building in downtown
(15:22):
Los Angeles.
Speaker 11 (15:23):
But.
Speaker 3 (15:25):
They're all lying.
Speaker 11 (15:26):
I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 10 (15:27):
I don't know what else to say other than just
just the obvious fact.
Speaker 3 (15:29):
And all you do is just look at the videos.
Speaker 11 (15:33):
Julio.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
This is obviously not your first rodeo when it comes
to dealing with the street animals. So can you give
us a sense because we're not on the ground, all
we have our internet videos and Twitter and what the
news is lying about. Obviously, LA is a very spread
out place. Anyone who's ever been there and knows that
is it certain parts of town? Does it feel like
it's escalating or dying off? You have a much better
(15:57):
feel for this stuff than those of us who aren't
there and don't have you experience that.
Speaker 10 (16:02):
Yeah, it's been centered at the city Hall and the
Federal building uh in in the downtown area by the
one oh one. But last night they they couldn't get
close to they got pushed away by l a p
D after after throwing glass bottles at police. And so
what typically happens, and this is exactly what happened last night,
(16:24):
is you know, writers have a primary target. If they
can't get to their primary target, or they get pushed
away from their primary target, they're still amped up and
they say, well, we're just going to go out and
cause all sorts of mayhem. And so that's what we
saw last night. A couple of blocks away that hadn't
really seen any action in the past few days, we're
now seeing looting at all these different stores. I mean,
(16:46):
the sushi place got looted, Apple a weed store. I
don't I don't. I would hazard I guess that the
local library or bookstore. I think I think those right now.
But yeah, it's it is starting to spread. And that's
kind of unusual. And I say that because usually the timeline,
(17:06):
at least what was happening in twenty twenty was the
worst parts of the riots were were the first three days,
give or take. We're now in day five and we're
just now getting to the just looting random stores stage
because they have the ability to do that, because there's
still not enough resources or personnel needed. Because yeah, you're right,
(17:29):
and this is what I've been telling people is that
even if they can get the downtown area is secured,
Los Angeles and Los Angeles County is huge, and you
know so many people that are very sympathetic to the rioters,
and so you can lock down downtown, but who's to
say won't happen in Santa Monica or you know, Inglewood
or Compton or Koreatown or you know, Burbank or something. Right, So,
(17:52):
I think it's good that President Trump is deploying more
military personnel, but I think it's going to require even
more the fully plant down on the violence. Obviously, people
can still protest, but we're still in the violence stage.
And that's significant because it usually doesn't have enough steam.
Speaker 11 (18:11):
For this Loan.
Speaker 1 (18:14):
Julio, Who is doing what? When it comes to law enforcement?
I mean this in the La LA PD, Obviously they're
going to be involved. We know we have National Guard.
What are they actually doing? Seven hundred marines are coming.
These are infantry marines. So are they planning on putting
these infantry marines in close.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
Contact with these guys?
Speaker 1 (18:36):
Because I have a pretty good idea on how that's
going to go.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
Who is doing what?
Speaker 10 (18:41):
So my understanding is that is that because the active
the yeah, the active duty and the Federalized National Guard,
because they're not being activated under the Insurrection Act, but
instead of different authority they are, they are more limited
in what they're able to do. And so basically the
military personnel are going to be used to protect the
(19:01):
federal UH building, the main one right next to the
City of Hall, because that has been kind of the
epicenter of everything.
Speaker 11 (19:09):
Bye.
Speaker 10 (19:09):
By doing that, that frees up the federal law enforcement
agencies like ICE, like HSI or the Federal Protective Service,
who up until this point have been also helping with
securing in the perimeter because they have to keep in
mind they're still planning on doing onst operations here. With
everything that's going on, I mean, they're still they're having
(19:29):
to uh, they're they're having to contend with what's happening
in the streets with carrying out President Trump's orders. So
by by freeing up ICE agents or HSI agents from
guard duty and they can actually go into enforcement once again,
so that it kind of takes take care, take cares
(19:50):
of two problems at once.
Speaker 11 (19:53):
So I don't know what we'll.
Speaker 10 (19:54):
We'll see where exactly, uh will they will be placed,
and we'll see if if that if the additional personnel
will kind of mellow things out.
Speaker 11 (20:06):
But I mean just.
Speaker 10 (20:08):
Yesterday when when the protesters heard that Okay, it is official,
the Marines are coming, the speaker was saying, oh, are
we going to be afraid of the Marines, and everyone
in the crowd is like no, And so yeah, I
don't know. I think I think because it's President Trump
activating them, it is going to agitate them more. So
(20:30):
we'll we'll see what happens today in the coming days.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
Yeah, I've been in that exact situation before in the
Joff Iraq. It's amazing, amazing how pacified they get when
you fix bayonets. Julio, thank you, my brother. As always,
I appreciate you. Not afraid of the Marines. We'll see
how that works, all right, guys, let me know now.
(20:57):
I know I'm going to sleep like a baby tonight.
Reasons One, the Marines are coming.
Speaker 3 (21:02):
Two. I have Beam.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
I have dream powder from Beam. There are a lot
of things out there you can take to go to sleep,
lots of them. You sell them in a gas station.
Your doctor will writes your prescription. But I know, I
know how many are natural. That's why you wake up
all groggy and miserable. You know that because you're not
taking natural things. I'll take this pill or drink this
(21:26):
and then you wake up in your eyes, have clothes.
Speaker 3 (21:28):
You want to die.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
With dream powder, you sleep like a baby, and you
wake up energized like you didn't take anything because it's
natural melatonin and rachi and all these other things.
Speaker 3 (21:39):
It's a cup of hot chocolate. Have a cup of
hot chocolate before bed and sleep like a baby.
Speaker 1 (21:44):
You want to save a bunch of money, Shopbeam dot com,
slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back Okay, so I know
everybody he's talking about Los Angeles. We've been talking about
Los Angeles. But we do have to focus on some
(22:07):
other things going on. For instance, the what's their what
are they calling it the Big Beautiful Bill, which is
still not at an actual bill yet, Rumor has it
it's really stuck in the Senate and they are deeply divided.
Speaker 3 (22:21):
So what's going on?
Speaker 1 (22:24):
Let's ask Wade joining me now, the United States Marine
Corps veteran Wade Miller, also senior advisor for Center for
Renewing America. Okay, Wade, the Big Beautiful Bill?
Speaker 3 (22:35):
What's to hold up? What's the Washington d C? Give
it to us?
Speaker 12 (22:39):
Well, on the conservative side, you have members you want
deeper cuts on some of the mandatory spinning programs, more
savings on things like Medicaid. There's additional things we can
do to save a lot of money.
Speaker 11 (22:50):
There. On the moderate side, some of.
Speaker 12 (22:52):
Them think that these cuts go too deep and they
don't want to cut as much money, and I just
I don't understand that logic.
Speaker 11 (22:58):
We're thirty seven trillion in debt.
Speaker 12 (23:00):
You know, the moderate right now kind of fashions itself
as the Reaganist Reaganism wing.
Speaker 11 (23:06):
Of the party. But they're neither socially conservative or fiscally conservative.
They're kind of the worst of both of those ranks.
Speaker 12 (23:13):
So their job is just to perpetually throw a wrench
in the gears here. And we need to get this
bill done. It's got one point six trillion and mandatory savings.
Hopefully the Senate can go deeper and broader with that
and lock in longer mandatory savings, and then we, of course,
on the back end, have we can get after a
discretionary and happy to talk about that in a minute.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Yeah, Wade, we hear terms like well, I just use
the term deeply divided, and we keep reading articles saying
they're deeply divided. But how divide it are we? Are
we a senator away? Are we ten senators away?
Speaker 11 (23:47):
What do you know?
Speaker 12 (23:49):
Well, so the White House and HFC and others are
in conversations with their comrades in the Senate, and HFC
just sent over a ten page memo I think line
outlining all of the various options that they would have
at their disposal to get additional cuts, and didn't demand
all of it, just said, you know, pick and choose.
Here's some things that they're on the table. But you have,
(24:09):
you know, a handful of Republican senators that just don't
really want to do any of this. You know, they
want tax cuts maybe, but they don't actually want to
solve the spending crisis. And you know, at the same time,
they don't want to talk about social issues. So at
a certain point you have to ask what point is
it and having them if they're not there at least
on fiscal conservative.
Speaker 3 (24:29):
Votes, yeah, no doubt.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
Okay, well, Russ vote is somebody I respect immensely. I'm
sure you do as well. Russ said this, That's what
he said.
Speaker 10 (24:39):
If HR one fails, if whatever comes back from the
Senate fails to get to the desk of the President
and signed in the law, what happens at the end
of this year.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
I think we'll have a recession.
Speaker 13 (24:49):
I think we will be economic storm clouds will be
very dark. I think we'll have a sixty percent tax
increase in the American people. And just to if I
could answer Craftsman lawyers question or statement, the notion that
this bill, I mean, we've been actually criticized unfairly on
the Reconciliation Bill for the fact that it is all
(25:12):
mandatory savers. We're using the same model that Bill Clinton
signed into law, and we think it will have incredible
impact on not just these programs, but giving people dignity
of work. And we're not going to be ashamed by that,
but we do need to explain ourselves to those that
are being impacted by the watchdogs in this town.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Wade, I have actually talked to people I trust the
economically who kind of echo what Russ said. There not
necessarily people even pitching for the bill, but people saying
we've gotten so hooked on all this government spending. Getting
off of it needs to be more of a weaning
than a snap all at once.
Speaker 11 (25:51):
What do you know, Well, yes and no.
Speaker 12 (25:55):
So our situation is fairly dire from a fiscal perspective.
Speaker 11 (25:59):
We need to be a great on this.
Speaker 12 (26:00):
But you know, the political reality in DC is that
people who know that this bill needs to get done
for the reasons that Russ mentioned, they're trying to navigate
how much can we get done while still getting it
done because at the end of the day, you know,
we can demand two point five three trillion in cuts,
but then we end up with zero because the moderates
will vote against it, and no one has argued that
(26:23):
the Reconciliation bill by itself is our answer to the
national debt. We're going to have to take many steps
to get there. I think one point six trillion and
mandatory savers over a ten year period is a huge
step in the right direction. As a reminder, everyone touts
the Gingriish welfare reforms of the nineties. I think Russ
mentioned it in terms of what Bill Clinton signed into
(26:44):
law in real terms compared to today's dollars, that was
about eight hundred billion in cuts. This bill has one
point six billion in cuts. So it is a huge
step in the right direction by itself. It's not going
to solve the debt limit of the debt crisis. It's
not going to solve our defest. We do need additional
steps after this, but we need to figure out what
is the most we can get and still get the
(27:06):
votes to get a pass and then get this thing done.
Speaker 3 (27:11):
Waite, what's a pocket recision.
Speaker 12 (27:14):
I'm glad you asked, so you know right now reconciliation
process is dealing with mandatory spending, and a lot of
people have asked, why aren't we doing doze cuts on
the reconciliation package. And the reason is is that reconciliation
can't get at discretionary spending. It will be deemed as
extraneous in the Senate and be stripped out through the
Bird Rule process. So an alternative to this to get
(27:38):
at the discretionary spending side is a recision. Now, a
regular recision is a message sent to Congress by the
President where he says I want to cut the spending,
and normally the president can then withhold funding for forty
five days. In that period, Congress has the opportunity to
approve it or to reject it or only approve some
(28:00):
of it. And after that forty five day withholding period,
whatever is not cut is you can't do a recisions
package on don't you're unable to cut that spending. So
there's some risk in putting forward to recision package because
if a few moderate Republicans block it, then we lose
our ability to rescind those funds this year. So we've
put forward what we are calling a pocket recision strategy.
(28:22):
So remember I mentioned that as soon as the president
summits this package, the president has forty five days to
withhold funding. So if you submit this package, after roughly
August eighteenth. That timeframe, the president can withhold funding into March,
sorry into October. And the reason that matters is once
(28:43):
you're past September thirtieth, the budget authority to spend those
funds lapses. So if you do a pocket recision after
roughly August eighteenth, no matter what Congress does, no matter
how many Senators remembers, the House, the moderates, the squishy
swamp dwellers, no matter what they think about it, they
can't stop it. So it's an easy way for the
(29:04):
White House to bank hundreds of billions of dollars and
cuts and fiscal year twenty five and send that back
to the American people and not add it to the
balance sheets of our debt.
Speaker 11 (29:16):
In other words, it's how we get our dose cuts.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
Do you get the impression that Trump White House would
back something like that? Are they on that Trump can
be all over the map on spending.
Speaker 12 (29:28):
Well, unlike the last you know, Biden administration and the
last Trump administration, there are not a lot of leaks
coming out of this White House, so I can't confirm
one hundred percent. However, I will say that I know
that Russ knows about this. Russ has talked about it
on CNN. He said the word pocket decision on CNN.
Mark Paoletto, one of the lawyers over Owenbe, wrote a
memo in this in twenty twenty one. So I suspect,
(29:50):
given how much I know, that Russ and Mark and
others want to get this money and cut it so
that we don't spend it and fuel the woken weaponized
deep space state that's being targeted against American people, I
can only assume by reading the tea leaves that this
is their preferred strategy as well, or else we would
have probably seen more Recisions packages already. So I think
(30:10):
that they're looking at everything that's going on in Congress
and they're putting out one relatively small Recisions package as
a test to say, here you go, Congress, can you
get this done? If not, then I suspect after that
you won't see any more Recisions packages until roughly August,
or if you do, it'll be very small packages that
are less risky and more likely to pass.
Speaker 11 (30:33):
Wade.
Speaker 1 (30:34):
Who are these squishes in the Senate who're blocking this
on our side?
Speaker 12 (30:38):
I mean, they're the ones we all, They're the ones
that are always in the way. It's the Susan Collins,
the Lisa Murkowski, the Mitch McConnell's that for whatever reason,
they always find a reason not to support even the
easiest fiscally conservative arguments. I get it, they're in you know,
either they're in swing states or they're just moderate Republicans.
(30:59):
But again, these are the same people that will go
out in their town halls and they'll say that they're
socially moderate so that they don't have to answer on
abortion and marriage. But they'll assure they're Republican voters by saying,
but we're fiscally conservative, and here we go, here's fiscally
conservative things that.
Speaker 11 (31:14):
They could be doing.
Speaker 12 (31:15):
And yet you know, the Don Bacons of the world
and the others, they're out there touting Reaganism and saying
that they're going to vote against these cuts. And I
just don't know how you square the peg of saying,
you know, we're thirty seven trillion in debt, but we
have to fund nine billion in four and aid going
to all of these NGOs that hate America and are
aligned against us and have been propping up the censorship
(31:35):
industrial complex. It's a little bit of insanity and you know,
enough is enough. We need to get these decisions done.
Speaker 3 (31:43):
We do waite go back soon, Brother Seveer five.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
All right, mel Kay has thoughts on all this stuff thanxt.
Speaker 8 (32:01):
Obviously, this is a moment where we have to be
on the streets all over the country to protest what's
happening to our immigrant community, but more broadly, to protest
what's happening to our democracy. This is the most corrupt
administration in the history of the country, and we are
going to rise to this moment by being out there
on the streets.
Speaker 1 (32:21):
Again, as we've talked about many times, two different divisions
to communism.
Speaker 3 (32:25):
Always have been, always will be. There are the.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
Street communists and the elite communists, and they work together
all the time. The elites go on television. We got
to be street ready, got to glad they are in
these streets, and all the animals and drugged out trainees
and foreigners and super freaks we have in this country
heed the call and they all put down their cats
and their marijuana and they run to the streets to
(32:48):
go hurt police officers. Joining me now, mel K, host
of the Melk Show. Mel it's all so predictable. What
is not is the GOP apparently appears ready to hit back.
Speaker 7 (33:01):
Ah, well, we hope so.
Speaker 14 (33:02):
I mean, the real truth is we have to really
look at this as the bigger picture, which is why
is this happening?
Speaker 7 (33:08):
We are in a color revolution in America? What is
the issue? What is going on?
Speaker 14 (33:12):
Frankly, I believe that they are trying to protect their
global financial system and would appreciate if Donald Trump would
stop trying to reignite the American economy and prosperity so
that we walk down the path of technocracy. And these
useful idiots that nothing's new with this. This is the
color revolution playbook they've played out over and over. We've
(33:33):
been in one since twenty sixteen, and they have to
go kinetic now or they completely lose. And the sad
part is what's really being lost is our future, our children,
and our sovereignty. And we need to stand up now
more than ever because the truth about post World War
II America is that we have not been sovereign basically
since nineteen thirteen. And the people that are funding this
(33:56):
world war right now, which this is part of it,
really are nervous that their entire model is falling apart.
Speaker 7 (34:03):
They need World War III. Why not kick it off
in America.
Speaker 1 (34:08):
Mel make that connection for me. People see Mexican flags
in LA. You're talking about the global financial system. Take
your time merge those worlds.
Speaker 14 (34:17):
Okay, So what we need to understand is that post
World War Two we were lied to about basically everything,
particularly the CIA, what it does and who it protects.
I frankly believe that it protects the global financial system,
which includes the NGOs. There was a act passed in
nineteen forty six that made the NGOs and all of
the un tentacles and the Rockefeller Brothers Ford Foundation, all
(34:41):
these foundations sovereign immune foundations. Basically, not only do they
not pay taxes, but they are not even subject to
the rule of law, investigation, or anything else. Once Doge
started cutting into USAID and looking at the money around
the world that funds these color revolutions and these revolutionaries,
they had to go into overdrive. And frankly, I believe
(35:03):
this was long planned if Trump got back in. They
were talking about it back in April, the law Fair
Crew right on MSNBC saying they were planning for this
if Trump won. And here we are, this is Election
Integrity Project. People These are the Trump haids, and they
are using the useful idiots that they brought into this
country to fight a battle to destroy America from within
(35:24):
so that they can walk us straight into the Agenda
twenty thirty technocracy that they have sunk trillions of dollars into.
At the end of the day, this is another play
for a global war to have the bankers recalibrate and
go into another phase after another world war of reconstruction
that will just loot America of everything we have left
(35:45):
and give us the final coup de gras. And that
is basically what the open border was about. As far
as I'm concerned, this was all about the national sovereignty
of the United States, and particularly the Constitution and the
Bill of Rights being a problem for the global financial
system that is being built around us, and frankly is
ready for takeoff as soon as America gives up and surrenders.
Speaker 7 (36:07):
Order out of chaos is the way they work, and
right now.
Speaker 14 (36:09):
They are causing as much chaos as possible so that
the American people say, just make it stop.
Speaker 7 (36:14):
Whatever we need to do.
Speaker 14 (36:15):
Though they launched maybe a global public infrastructure without us
even realizing that what they are doing is ending our sovereignty,
and that is what this battle is about.
Speaker 7 (36:25):
Sovereignty and trillions of dollars at stake.
Speaker 1 (36:29):
Karen Bass is Los Angeles' mayor, of course, and well
she's been all over the television here she.
Speaker 9 (36:35):
Was, we need to stop the raids. Should not be
happening in our city. It is not warranted, and it
does the only thing it does is contribute to chaos.
This was chaos that was started at Washington, DC. You
have a situation like we did in the last Trump
administration where kids were afraid to go to school because
(36:58):
they weren't sure their parents would be there, where people
were afraid to go to work, and you just think
about the disruption in families. You might have a father
that's going into a warehouse or a plant. You might
have a mother who is serving as a childcare worker
on the other side of town, either in somebody's home
or not. You disrupt the entire ecosystem, You impact our
(37:20):
overall economy. If people are afraid to go to work.
This is a city of immigrants. If they're afraid to
go to work, you were going to hit our economy
in a way that is completely unnecessary. This is a
problem that started on Friday morning when the raids happened.
Speaker 7 (37:37):
This did not need to take place.
Speaker 14 (37:42):
We were about an international criminal organization and money laundering
connected to the cartel. Second of all, Karen Basspert, we
used to have a rule in America that communists and
socialists could not run for office. It was antithetical to
the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Thus they could
not take an actual oath of office in America. And
yet this woman slid through. She has been a lifelong communist.
(38:03):
Not to mention, she worked for National Endowment for Democracy
during color revolutions in.
Speaker 7 (38:07):
Libya and elsewhere.
Speaker 14 (38:09):
She has always been somebody who has been an agitator inside.
Speaker 7 (38:12):
And it's not a surprise that she was elected.
Speaker 14 (38:14):
In the fully captured and communists infused California. But she
is a long term and very very experienced Color revolutionary
and that is exactly what she's kicking off in LA.
Unfortunately for the people of Los Angeles, she is not
going to protect them. Neither is Gavin Newsome, because they're
both owned by the international money laundering cartel that runs everything.
Speaker 7 (38:39):
Above this country.
Speaker 14 (38:40):
We have a group of people that will destroy America
from within because They are not loyal to this nation.
They are only loyal to the financial backers that fund
all these NGOs, and she has been a part of
that for decades.
Speaker 1 (38:54):
Well, what do you say to people who say this
is all just bad for the Democrat Party, This is
going to lose them.
Speaker 3 (39:00):
Trump looks better pull.
Speaker 1 (39:01):
Numbers and going through the roof Democrats look bad.
Speaker 3 (39:04):
What do you say to those people, I.
Speaker 7 (39:06):
Say, this has nothing to do with Donald Trump.
Speaker 14 (39:08):
This has to do with the United States of America,
our sovereignty, our constitution, our Bill of Rights, and our future.
Donald Trump is there for a few years. The problem
in America is the American people. The American people do
not know their history. They have been lied to since
World War Two about everything from the UN to endless wars,
to the looting of our money through the IRS and
(39:28):
the FED straight to international organizations that fund every war.
Our children cannot go in and fight again for Europe.
We fought a war in seventeen seventy six, and yet
twice we have been dragged into Europe. The EU has
never changed. They still want to control the world through
Brussels and the United States. Dismantling ourselves from this international
(39:49):
banking situation, the international money laundering, the war endless wars
is the most dangerous thing in the world for these
totalitarians that want to basically create a world government with
a global public infrastructure, with the Bank of International Settlements,
which is an opaque bank that needs to be looked into.
Speaker 7 (40:07):
And frankly, we need to get a real.
Speaker 14 (40:10):
History of America out there to the people to realize
how much they've been looted and lied to.
Speaker 7 (40:15):
And this is the.
Speaker 14 (40:16):
Last stand the international banking cartel that runs all the
wars and is running this entire operation with the NGOs
that are protected immune, don't have any aspect of law
and order within their rulings.
Speaker 7 (40:28):
They don't want to lose power.
Speaker 14 (40:30):
And frankly, this is a small group of elites using
these people that they funneled into here. We have many
things we can do, but if we let our constitution
be a picture on the wall instead of something we
use to fight back, then it's our fault. The people
of the United States of America cannot sit by because
their lives aren't ruined and they're not in upheaval and
we're not having active kinetic war and think that it's
(40:50):
going to go away. It has to be the American
people locally taking back their governments locally using the Constitution
in the Bill of Rights, or we are not going
to have one.
Speaker 3 (41:00):
Tell me about this book, Americans, Anonymous Well.
Speaker 14 (41:04):
I wrote this book because I believe that our country
purposefully is addicted to conflict and chaos by the what
I call the international banking cartel, but also the global
public private partnership that treats America like they're the parent company,
and three hundred and fifty million of us are just
allowed to live here.
Speaker 7 (41:20):
And the facts are we need to have an intervention
in America.
Speaker 14 (41:22):
We need to get real truth about our history, particularly
the CIA, the banking institutions, everything that happened after World
War II.
Speaker 7 (41:30):
We have been looted and lied to.
Speaker 14 (41:32):
We have funded all these wars, all this regime change,
and it is the American people that need to take
control back. We are acting as if everything is outside
of our control because decades of mind control and manipulation
to make us think we have no choice. It is
the American people that can save the world from this
tyranny that is capturing every ounce of the planet, and
(41:54):
we need.
Speaker 7 (41:54):
To really go through it.
Speaker 14 (41:55):
So I go through the Constitution, the Bill of Rights,
the Declaration of Independence, which I think is very relevant
right now because although we had fought the crown back
in the day when we wrote the Declaration of Independence,
right now it's an international banking cartel and the tentacles
of the un Chantham House, the Council Foreign Relations, the
Rockefeller NGOs, all of these groups are functioning above our government.
(42:17):
Our elected officials are captured, our banking institutions are not
working for us, and right now they are also trying
to save themselves while destroying the Constitution. The fundamental transformation
that Barack Obama promised was the end of national sovereignty,
because that was always the goal. So if the American
people do not know our real history and about the
Frankfurt School infiltrating our education system, the Nazis that came
(42:40):
through Argentina and to all of our institutions, the Communists
that were taken out of Germany and put into all
different places in America, not to mention Operation paper Clip,
then they have no idea that we were infiltrated long ago,
and JFK tried to warn us, as did Eisenhower, as
did McKinley, as did Donald Trump, and frankly, Donald Trump
is hated because there are trillions of dollars at stake
(43:02):
if America remains America and America needs to be sovereign.
And when it comes to what's happening with technocracy and technology,
it is the American people that must say the Constitution
and Bill of rights have to still.
Speaker 7 (43:13):
Be front and center.
Speaker 14 (43:13):
Whether you want to join the global public infrastructure or
have palanteer track and trade surveillance US. We can't allow
a Patriot Act two point zero technocracy to happen and
let the Constitution and Bill of rights go by the wayside.
We have to demand its first front and center before
any of the surveillance tech because let's be honest, if
somebody gets in there again, you think they're not going
(43:35):
to weaponize that against every single one of us that
have spoken out against this, they will, and they are
already planning it twenty twenty six. If the American people
do not mobilize now for the twenty twenty six midterms,
they are going to slide right back in there, and
before you know it, it'll be worse than it's ever been.
Speaker 7 (43:51):
Because that is the goal.
Speaker 14 (43:52):
The end of national sovereignty of all nation states, most
importantly the United States.
Speaker 1 (43:59):
Well shades you as always all right, right in the mood. Next,
all right, it is time to lighten the mood. And
it's got to be exhausting being a Democrat in modern America.
(44:22):
It used to be they were just a different party.
But now when you're a Democrat in the country, you
have this completely unrelated group that's part of your constituency. Constituency,
but then there's this unrelated group that they have no
nothing in common. You've got to pander to the climate comedies,
and you've got to pander to all the illegals, and
of course you have the gay mob and you have
(44:43):
to pander them. And then there's the fake black civil
rights mob. Kil Whitey, you gotta pay, you gotta do
all this endless amounts of pandering, and it just looks exhausting,
and then you end up humiliating yourself. Andrew Cuomo is
running to be mayor of New York City, and man,
this is the crappy have to do.
Speaker 11 (45:01):
The City of New York.
Speaker 15 (45:02):
We are the capital of diversity. One hundred and eighty
languages spoken in our school system, one native, different languages,
people from all across the world. That makes us stronger,
not weaker.
Speaker 1 (45:19):
And ah yes, under Navy languages makes us stronger.
Speaker 3 (45:27):
I see them
Pete haig Seth testified before the House today. We'll touch
on that, but we're going to touch on China. We'll
talk to Julio Rosas about what's going on in Los Angeles,
the big Beautiful Bill, all that more coming up.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
I'm right, okay, So let's talk about China in kind
of a roundabout way.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
You see, first of all, Pete haig Seth spoke on
the House today, spoke at the House at the House,
on the House. He's spoke in front of the House today,
in front of the House of Representatives.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
What's he doing.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
He's the Defense Secretary and he's bouncing around Capitol Hill
asking for money.
Speaker 3 (00:44):
That's how it works.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
When you're head of the FBI, you go to Congress
and beg for money. When your Secretary of Defense, you
have to go to the House and say I need
money for this, I need money for that, I need
money for this. And of course Democrats up and down
the line didn't really want to talk about the defense
of America or the military ships or planes, or they
(01:05):
wanted to talk about the United States military getting involved
in these riots in LA There was a whole lot
of talk like this.
Speaker 4 (01:13):
Mister Secretary We're both from Minnesota. I was in the
Twin Cities during the riots that followed the murder of
George Floyd. Tens of thousands of protesters took to the
streets for days. Governor Walls made the decision to call
up the Minnesota National Guard. At no point did we
need the citizens of Minnesota request that the Marines be deployed.
Speaker 5 (01:34):
Well, congress Woman, thank you for the question. You are right,
we're both originally from Minnesota, which is why I recall
twenty twenty quite well when Governor Walls abandoned a police
precinct and allowed it to be burned to the ground,
and also allowed five days of chaos to occur inside
the streets of Minneapolis.
Speaker 3 (01:56):
What's going on here?
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Why are they upset about the Maris being sent in
Aglar was concerned about how they're sleeping and whatnot.
Speaker 6 (02:05):
Mister Terry, I want to express my severe concern with
the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles without
consultation of the State of California. There have been photographs
that have shown these troops sleeping on the floor and
have not been provided fuel, food, or water by DoD.
How long will this deployment last, and why were we
unprepared to provide them basic necessities such.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
As food and water.
Speaker 5 (02:29):
The commanders and troops on the field are very well prepared,
so there are moments where you may do as best
you can temporarily, but we are ensuring they're housed, fed,
water capabilities in real time from my office, because I
care that much about the California Guard and the Marines
and the men and women who are supporting ourations on
the ground. It's true every day, and that's a disingenuous
(02:52):
attack that misrepresents how much we care about our troops
and what they're doing to defend ice agents. I'm not
going to take the fact that we don't care about
the troops. Nobody cares more about the troops at the
top then this Secretary.
Speaker 6 (03:02):
And the chair in our part with the deployment lasts.
Speaker 5 (03:04):
We stated very publicly that it's sixty days because we
want to ensure that those rioters, looters and thugs on
the other side assaulting our police officers would know that
we're not going anywhere. We're here to maintain the peace
on behalf of law enforcement officers in Los Angeles, which
gavin me some won't do.
Speaker 3 (03:23):
Okay, a couple things.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
First, lying on the ground, sleeping on the ground, not
being provided for it is well, I'll just put it
to you this way. I have mixed emotions about compulsory
military service for a country, very mixed emotions. You know,
a country like Israel. There are many in the world,
but Israel comes to mind right away that forces everybody
(03:48):
to join the military for a certain period of time.
Part of me loves it for a lot of reasons.
Part of me hates it for a lot of reasons.
But the part of me that loves it is questions
like that. Anybody who's ever been in the service has
slept on the ground, on the floor, You've dug a
hole on the ground, and the mud and the jungle.
(04:08):
At one point in time, I was in triple canopy
jungle with my feet, my naked feet on the ground
in a centipede the size of a snake crawled over them.
It's called being in the military. You don't always have
some cozy sheets in a bed. Sometimes you grab some
shut eye right there on the floor. It's no big deal.
Buck up, Buttercup, and anybody who's served knows that that's
(04:32):
one two what are they actually mad about. Are they
mad that they're not getting proper beds? Are they mad
about the length of deployment? Are they mad about any
of these things? No, they're mad about force on force.
They're mad about their force being met with force and
(04:53):
their revolution being stopped. That is their true concern and
is why they get upset when you use force on them.
Because remember what I've always told you about communists. They're
religious zelots and therefore they only understand fear and pain.
(05:14):
They don't have a second language you can use. You're
never going to reason with them. You're not going to
appeal to their morality because they don't share your morality
at all, because they're religious zelots. Think about them like
radical Jihati's fear and pain.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
It's all they understand.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Well, not only do you need to understand that, they
understand that.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
That's what they know. They know.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
They'll riot, they they'll loot, they'll vandalize, they'll kill, they'll
hurt people for as long as they possibly can until
force stops them, until good stops them. They're not concerned
about the Marines sleeping on the ground. They're concerned about
the Marines smashing in the face of some filthy foreigner
(05:57):
street communist who's pillaging Los Angeles right now. That's their
main concern, and that's the only reason any Democrat top
to bottom is questioning the deployment of Marines in Los Angeles.
Deploy the Marines, smash the rioters, and this immediately. Now,
let's move on and talk about something that actually matters
more than what's happening in Los Angeles right now. Pete
(06:21):
Hegseth brought it up today. Let's talk about China.
Speaker 5 (06:25):
I'm also proud to represent and serve our warriors and
their families today as they do every day. They're keeping
America safe, they're defending the homeland. They're standing up in
deterring communist China.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
Standing up in deterring communist China. That wasn't a one off,
That wasn't something he just mentioned in the intro. You
talked about communist China.
Speaker 5 (06:51):
Clear any attempt by communist China to conquer Taiwan by
force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo Pacific
end world.
Speaker 3 (07:00):
There's no reason to sugarcoat it.
Speaker 5 (07:02):
The threat China poses is real and it could be eminent.
Speaker 7 (07:06):
We hope not.
Speaker 1 (07:09):
Now, Trump has talked about China excess, always talking about
China cash. Betel has brought up China, China, China, China.
So here's what can happen to you and me if
we're not aware of what's going on. It's a very
human nature thing. Why is China that big of a deal?
It's a very it's a human nature thing to ask
(07:31):
that question. They're not landing divisions of troops on the shores,
There's not There aren't Chinese submarines off the coast of
California right now. There aren't Chinese fighter jets flying over Alaska.
Speaker 3 (07:45):
What are we worried about? Well, this is.
Speaker 1 (07:47):
Something that America wristles with and will wrestle with. China
is at war with us. But China has a very
Eastern view of war. Eastern in this way. They believe
in fighting a war differently, not just with bombs, not
(08:09):
just with bullets, not just with the normal things. China
fights wars in different ways. It's an Eastern, all encompassing
way to fight a war. We've talked about this before.
Maybe you're aware of this. The Mongols, the Mongolian Empire,
speaking of an Eastern view of war. You talk about
the Mongols and immediately people think of Genghis Khan. If
(08:29):
they know anything more about the Mongols, they're thinking about
a horse army.
Speaker 3 (08:33):
That's essentially what it was.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Horse archers and army, very mobile, very fast on horseback.
They'll swarm you, kill you. They'll think about the Mongols
laying siege to cities and killing everybody. These are all
things the Mongols are famous for. You can argue, and
I actually would argue, it's the greatest army that's ever
walked the face of the planet, unstoppable, wiped out everybody.
But you know what people don't talk about. The Mongols
(09:00):
fought wars in a variety of different ways. It wasn't
just that Genghis Khan would show up outside of your
city on horseback. Genghis Khan's spy, his intelligence service, was
top of the line. He invested unbelievable amounts of time
and money into ensuring his intelligence service was amazing. They
(09:22):
would do things like, well, if he was thinking about
conquering your city, his spies would be in your city
six months a year before his army ever showed up.
They'd be finding out where the political divisions are in
the city. Can they exploit those political divisions, spreading money around,
ensuring that the city wasn't near as cohesive as it.
Speaker 3 (09:42):
Had been before.
Speaker 1 (09:44):
Maybe a little bit of poison in the water supply,
maybe bring in somebody with the plague, intentionally weakening the
city from within. So when the Mongolian hordes showed up
out of the gates, the city wasn't near as strong
and ready as they could have been. That's exactly what
(10:05):
China has been doing and is currently doing to the
United States of America. They are importing fentanyl. They're trafficking
it to the cartels.
Speaker 3 (10:13):
Well, what you.
Speaker 1 (10:14):
Need to make fentanyl. They're giving it to the cartels
on purpose. This is something the Chinese Communist Party is
obviously aware of, and it's something they want to happen.
We now have one hundred thousand Americans a year dying
of overdose. That's done intentionally. That's China weakening us. We
now have a second story over the course of the
last couple weeks of a Chinese person smuggling in pathogens,
(10:37):
deadly pathogens to put it inside of our food supply.
Speaker 3 (10:40):
They'll be interested in our water supply.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
Now. The problem is for norm and norma for average
everyday American.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
You don't even know how to deal with these things.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
These things are random headlines you see on your phone
and then you set them down. But what we do
have to know is we are at war with China.
That is not your call. It's not my call. We
don't get a say when it comes to wars. Only
one side gets a say. China has declared war on us.
They intend to supplant us as the number one country
(11:13):
on the planet, and they are fighting that war not
with bombs and bullets and submarines. They are fighting that
war in a variety of different ways. They're all over
the internet. Did you know that turning one American against another?
They spend time and money doing this. Now, it's not
like you need to do something. You don't need to
(11:33):
run down to the local Chinese restaurant start screaming at
the cook. But we do have to acknowledge as a country,
as a people, that we are already in a cold
war with China. And it's even more complicated because our
economies depend on each other. China needs uspying goods, we
need China making goods. Big, old, ugly situation, but it's
(11:54):
the one we have. All right, Let's go talk to
Julio Rosas about la and deported. Before we talk to Julio,
I want to talk to you about testosterone. There is
another thing that is destroying this country from within. Chinese
divisions are not we don't have testosterone. We have lost
(12:17):
half of our testosterone in just fifty years.
Speaker 3 (12:21):
Do the math on that? What's that look like?
Speaker 1 (12:23):
In another fifty We're not even gonna have babies.
Speaker 3 (12:25):
We won't have enough men to fight a war.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
When a war comes, will be just a big, effeminate
society of losers, a whole country full of James Langford's.
Speaker 3 (12:33):
Is that what you want? Do you want to be
James Langford? Do you want to sound like Lindsey Graham?
Speaker 1 (12:38):
Get a male vitality stack from chalk flowing through your veins, gentlemen,
natural herbal supplements having you feeling like a million bucks.
Speaker 3 (12:48):
Every single day, full of energy.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
Ready to go chalk dot com, slash JESSETV.
Speaker 3 (12:56):
We'll be back.
Speaker 8 (13:05):
You know you've heard reports that there are riots on
the streets of Los Angeles. That is not what's happening
across the city of Los Angeles.
Speaker 5 (13:11):
Coven Houston's right there, was anything like a riot happening
on Friday Saturday, and.
Speaker 7 (13:14):
We just witnessed protester thanking a National guardsman for his
service here in California.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
Lapd By most estimates, had this under control last night.
Speaker 9 (13:26):
No, I don't think the National Guard is needed now.
Speaker 6 (13:29):
Things in La are calm.
Speaker 9 (13:30):
There was a protest that got a little unruly late
at night.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
There have been no violence where anybody that was protesting
hit anybody, shot anybody, anybody.
Speaker 7 (13:43):
Nothing.
Speaker 5 (13:44):
What is just a bunch of people having fun watching
cars burn.
Speaker 7 (13:48):
Most of those demonstrators were very peaceful.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
It's peaceful.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
They're having fun watching cars burn. Let's find out how
true all that stuff is. Joining me now, National Blaze correspondent,
United States Marine and possibly in ice custody. Julio Rojas, Julio,
what's going on in La Are you free right now?
Speaker 10 (14:12):
That's a good one, Deessie.
Speaker 11 (14:13):
I'll give you that one. Yeah. I am.
Speaker 10 (14:16):
I am in Los Angeles, and I have been so
busy with the riots that have been happening. I did
not even realize that that Tom Elliott put that super
cut together, and I was unaware of just how how
much lying is happening right now.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
Between between everybody.
Speaker 10 (14:38):
It's it's it's really ridiculous that despite being lambasted and
just mocks relentlessly five years ago when they pulled that
same mostly peaceful, uh you know, talking point, they're still
doing They're doing it again, and it just shows that
they learned absolutely nothing. And and for me, that's kind
of okay because it gives me job security because most
(14:59):
of Americans will tune out those people and tune into,
you know, people like me or any of my other
friends who are here in Los Angeles covering the riots,
because I mean, yes, there are protests, but they devolved
into riots like what happened yesterday again, So I don't
know what to expect today. We are expecting crowds to
kind of gather back outside the Federal building in downtown
(15:22):
Los Angeles.
Speaker 11 (15:23):
But.
Speaker 3 (15:25):
They're all lying.
Speaker 11 (15:26):
I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 10 (15:27):
I don't know what else to say other than just
just the obvious fact.
Speaker 3 (15:29):
And all you do is just look at the videos.
Speaker 11 (15:33):
Julio.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
This is obviously not your first rodeo when it comes
to dealing with the street animals. So can you give
us a sense because we're not on the ground, all
we have our internet videos and Twitter and what the
news is lying about. Obviously, LA is a very spread
out place. Anyone who's ever been there and knows that
is it certain parts of town? Does it feel like
it's escalating or dying off? You have a much better
(15:57):
feel for this stuff than those of us who aren't
there and don't have you experience that.
Speaker 10 (16:02):
Yeah, it's been centered at the city Hall and the
Federal building uh in in the downtown area by the
one oh one. But last night they they couldn't get
close to they got pushed away by l a p
D after after throwing glass bottles at police. And so
what typically happens, and this is exactly what happened last night,
(16:24):
is you know, writers have a primary target. If they
can't get to their primary target, or they get pushed
away from their primary target, they're still amped up and
they say, well, we're just going to go out and
cause all sorts of mayhem. And so that's what we
saw last night. A couple of blocks away that hadn't
really seen any action in the past few days, we're
now seeing looting at all these different stores. I mean,
(16:46):
the sushi place got looted, Apple a weed store. I
don't I don't. I would hazard I guess that the
local library or bookstore. I think I think those right now.
But yeah, it's it is starting to spread. And that's
kind of unusual. And I say that because usually the timeline,
(17:06):
at least what was happening in twenty twenty was the
worst parts of the riots were were the first three days,
give or take. We're now in day five and we're
just now getting to the just looting random stores stage
because they have the ability to do that, because there's
still not enough resources or personnel needed. Because yeah, you're right,
(17:29):
and this is what I've been telling people is that
even if they can get the downtown area is secured,
Los Angeles and Los Angeles County is huge, and you
know so many people that are very sympathetic to the rioters,
and so you can lock down downtown, but who's to
say won't happen in Santa Monica or you know, Inglewood
or Compton or Koreatown or you know, Burbank or something. Right, So,
(17:52):
I think it's good that President Trump is deploying more
military personnel, but I think it's going to require even
more the fully plant down on the violence. Obviously, people
can still protest, but we're still in the violence stage.
And that's significant because it usually doesn't have enough steam.
Speaker 11 (18:11):
For this Loan.
Speaker 1 (18:14):
Julio, Who is doing what? When it comes to law enforcement?
I mean this in the La LA PD, Obviously they're
going to be involved. We know we have National Guard.
What are they actually doing? Seven hundred marines are coming.
These are infantry marines. So are they planning on putting
these infantry marines in close.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
Contact with these guys?
Speaker 1 (18:36):
Because I have a pretty good idea on how that's
going to go.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
Who is doing what?
Speaker 10 (18:41):
So my understanding is that is that because the active
the yeah, the active duty and the Federalized National Guard,
because they're not being activated under the Insurrection Act, but
instead of different authority they are, they are more limited
in what they're able to do. And so basically the
military personnel are going to be used to protect the
(19:01):
federal UH building, the main one right next to the
City of Hall, because that has been kind of the
epicenter of everything.
Speaker 11 (19:09):
Bye.
Speaker 10 (19:09):
By doing that, that frees up the federal law enforcement
agencies like ICE, like HSI or the Federal Protective Service,
who up until this point have been also helping with
securing in the perimeter because they have to keep in
mind they're still planning on doing onst operations here. With
everything that's going on, I mean, they're still they're having
(19:29):
to uh, they're they're having to contend with what's happening
in the streets with carrying out President Trump's orders. So
by by freeing up ICE agents or HSI agents from
guard duty and they can actually go into enforcement once again,
so that it kind of takes take care, take cares
(19:50):
of two problems at once.
Speaker 11 (19:53):
So I don't know what we'll.
Speaker 10 (19:54):
We'll see where exactly, uh will they will be placed,
and we'll see if if that if the additional personnel
will kind of mellow things out.
Speaker 11 (20:06):
But I mean just.
Speaker 10 (20:08):
Yesterday when when the protesters heard that Okay, it is official,
the Marines are coming, the speaker was saying, oh, are
we going to be afraid of the Marines, and everyone
in the crowd is like no, And so yeah, I
don't know. I think I think because it's President Trump
activating them, it is going to agitate them more. So
(20:30):
we'll we'll see what happens today in the coming days.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
Yeah, I've been in that exact situation before in the
Joff Iraq. It's amazing, amazing how pacified they get when
you fix bayonets. Julio, thank you, my brother. As always,
I appreciate you. Not afraid of the Marines. We'll see
how that works, all right, guys, let me know now.
(20:57):
I know I'm going to sleep like a baby tonight.
Reasons One, the Marines are coming.
Speaker 3 (21:02):
Two. I have Beam.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
I have dream powder from Beam. There are a lot
of things out there you can take to go to sleep,
lots of them. You sell them in a gas station.
Your doctor will writes your prescription. But I know, I
know how many are natural. That's why you wake up
all groggy and miserable. You know that because you're not
taking natural things. I'll take this pill or drink this
(21:26):
and then you wake up in your eyes, have clothes.
Speaker 3 (21:28):
You want to die.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
With dream powder, you sleep like a baby, and you
wake up energized like you didn't take anything because it's
natural melatonin and rachi and all these other things.
Speaker 3 (21:39):
It's a cup of hot chocolate. Have a cup of
hot chocolate before bed and sleep like a baby.
Speaker 1 (21:44):
You want to save a bunch of money, Shopbeam dot com,
slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back Okay, so I know
everybody he's talking about Los Angeles. We've been talking about
Los Angeles. But we do have to focus on some
(22:07):
other things going on. For instance, the what's their what
are they calling it the Big Beautiful Bill, which is
still not at an actual bill yet, Rumor has it
it's really stuck in the Senate and they are deeply divided.
Speaker 3 (22:21):
So what's going on?
Speaker 1 (22:24):
Let's ask Wade joining me now, the United States Marine
Corps veteran Wade Miller, also senior advisor for Center for
Renewing America. Okay, Wade, the Big Beautiful Bill?
Speaker 3 (22:35):
What's to hold up? What's the Washington d C? Give
it to us?
Speaker 12 (22:39):
Well, on the conservative side, you have members you want
deeper cuts on some of the mandatory spinning programs, more
savings on things like Medicaid. There's additional things we can
do to save a lot of money.
Speaker 11 (22:50):
There. On the moderate side, some of.
Speaker 12 (22:52):
Them think that these cuts go too deep and they
don't want to cut as much money, and I just
I don't understand that logic.
Speaker 11 (22:58):
We're thirty seven trillion in debt.
Speaker 12 (23:00):
You know, the moderate right now kind of fashions itself
as the Reaganist Reaganism wing.
Speaker 11 (23:06):
Of the party. But they're neither socially conservative or fiscally conservative.
They're kind of the worst of both of those ranks.
Speaker 12 (23:13):
So their job is just to perpetually throw a wrench
in the gears here. And we need to get this
bill done. It's got one point six trillion and mandatory savings.
Hopefully the Senate can go deeper and broader with that
and lock in longer mandatory savings, and then we, of course,
on the back end, have we can get after a
discretionary and happy to talk about that in a minute.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Yeah, Wade, we hear terms like well, I just use
the term deeply divided, and we keep reading articles saying
they're deeply divided. But how divide it are we? Are
we a senator away? Are we ten senators away?
Speaker 11 (23:47):
What do you know?
Speaker 12 (23:49):
Well, so the White House and HFC and others are
in conversations with their comrades in the Senate, and HFC
just sent over a ten page memo I think line
outlining all of the various options that they would have
at their disposal to get additional cuts, and didn't demand
all of it, just said, you know, pick and choose.
Here's some things that they're on the table. But you have,
(24:09):
you know, a handful of Republican senators that just don't
really want to do any of this. You know, they
want tax cuts maybe, but they don't actually want to
solve the spending crisis. And you know, at the same time,
they don't want to talk about social issues. So at
a certain point you have to ask what point is
it and having them if they're not there at least
on fiscal conservative.
Speaker 3 (24:29):
Votes, yeah, no doubt.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
Okay, well, Russ vote is somebody I respect immensely. I'm
sure you do as well. Russ said this, That's what
he said.
Speaker 10 (24:39):
If HR one fails, if whatever comes back from the
Senate fails to get to the desk of the President
and signed in the law, what happens at the end
of this year.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
I think we'll have a recession.
Speaker 13 (24:49):
I think we will be economic storm clouds will be
very dark. I think we'll have a sixty percent tax
increase in the American people. And just to if I
could answer Craftsman lawyers question or statement, the notion that
this bill, I mean, we've been actually criticized unfairly on
the Reconciliation Bill for the fact that it is all
(25:12):
mandatory savers. We're using the same model that Bill Clinton
signed into law, and we think it will have incredible
impact on not just these programs, but giving people dignity
of work. And we're not going to be ashamed by that,
but we do need to explain ourselves to those that
are being impacted by the watchdogs in this town.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Wade, I have actually talked to people I trust the
economically who kind of echo what Russ said. There not
necessarily people even pitching for the bill, but people saying
we've gotten so hooked on all this government spending. Getting
off of it needs to be more of a weaning
than a snap all at once.
Speaker 11 (25:51):
What do you know, Well, yes and no.
Speaker 12 (25:55):
So our situation is fairly dire from a fiscal perspective.
Speaker 11 (25:59):
We need to be a great on this.
Speaker 12 (26:00):
But you know, the political reality in DC is that
people who know that this bill needs to get done
for the reasons that Russ mentioned, they're trying to navigate
how much can we get done while still getting it
done because at the end of the day, you know,
we can demand two point five three trillion in cuts,
but then we end up with zero because the moderates
will vote against it, and no one has argued that
(26:23):
the Reconciliation bill by itself is our answer to the
national debt. We're going to have to take many steps
to get there. I think one point six trillion and
mandatory savers over a ten year period is a huge
step in the right direction. As a reminder, everyone touts
the Gingriish welfare reforms of the nineties. I think Russ
mentioned it in terms of what Bill Clinton signed into
(26:44):
law in real terms compared to today's dollars, that was
about eight hundred billion in cuts. This bill has one
point six billion in cuts. So it is a huge
step in the right direction by itself. It's not going
to solve the debt limit of the debt crisis. It's
not going to solve our defest. We do need additional
steps after this, but we need to figure out what
is the most we can get and still get the
(27:06):
votes to get a pass and then get this thing done.
Speaker 3 (27:11):
Waite, what's a pocket recision.
Speaker 12 (27:14):
I'm glad you asked, so you know right now reconciliation
process is dealing with mandatory spending, and a lot of
people have asked, why aren't we doing doze cuts on
the reconciliation package. And the reason is is that reconciliation
can't get at discretionary spending. It will be deemed as
extraneous in the Senate and be stripped out through the
Bird Rule process. So an alternative to this to get
(27:38):
at the discretionary spending side is a recision. Now, a
regular recision is a message sent to Congress by the
President where he says I want to cut the spending,
and normally the president can then withhold funding for forty
five days. In that period, Congress has the opportunity to
approve it or to reject it or only approve some
(28:00):
of it. And after that forty five day withholding period,
whatever is not cut is you can't do a recisions
package on don't you're unable to cut that spending. So
there's some risk in putting forward to recision package because
if a few moderate Republicans block it, then we lose
our ability to rescind those funds this year. So we've
put forward what we are calling a pocket recision strategy.
(28:22):
So remember I mentioned that as soon as the president
summits this package, the president has forty five days to
withhold funding. So if you submit this package, after roughly
August eighteenth. That timeframe, the president can withhold funding into March,
sorry into October. And the reason that matters is once
(28:43):
you're past September thirtieth, the budget authority to spend those
funds lapses. So if you do a pocket recision after
roughly August eighteenth, no matter what Congress does, no matter
how many Senators remembers, the House, the moderates, the squishy
swamp dwellers, no matter what they think about it, they
can't stop it. So it's an easy way for the
(29:04):
White House to bank hundreds of billions of dollars and
cuts and fiscal year twenty five and send that back
to the American people and not add it to the
balance sheets of our debt.
Speaker 11 (29:16):
In other words, it's how we get our dose cuts.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
Do you get the impression that Trump White House would
back something like that? Are they on that Trump can
be all over the map on spending.
Speaker 12 (29:28):
Well, unlike the last you know, Biden administration and the
last Trump administration, there are not a lot of leaks
coming out of this White House, so I can't confirm
one hundred percent. However, I will say that I know
that Russ knows about this. Russ has talked about it
on CNN. He said the word pocket decision on CNN.
Mark Paoletto, one of the lawyers over Owenbe, wrote a
memo in this in twenty twenty one. So I suspect,
(29:50):
given how much I know, that Russ and Mark and
others want to get this money and cut it so
that we don't spend it and fuel the woken weaponized
deep space state that's being targeted against American people, I
can only assume by reading the tea leaves that this
is their preferred strategy as well, or else we would
have probably seen more Recisions packages already. So I think
(30:10):
that they're looking at everything that's going on in Congress
and they're putting out one relatively small Recisions package as
a test to say, here you go, Congress, can you
get this done? If not, then I suspect after that
you won't see any more Recisions packages until roughly August,
or if you do, it'll be very small packages that
are less risky and more likely to pass.
Speaker 11 (30:33):
Wade.
Speaker 1 (30:34):
Who are these squishes in the Senate who're blocking this
on our side?
Speaker 12 (30:38):
I mean, they're the ones we all, They're the ones
that are always in the way. It's the Susan Collins,
the Lisa Murkowski, the Mitch McConnell's that for whatever reason,
they always find a reason not to support even the
easiest fiscally conservative arguments. I get it, they're in you know,
either they're in swing states or they're just moderate Republicans.
(30:59):
But again, these are the same people that will go
out in their town halls and they'll say that they're
socially moderate so that they don't have to answer on
abortion and marriage. But they'll assure they're Republican voters by saying,
but we're fiscally conservative, and here we go, here's fiscally
conservative things that.
Speaker 11 (31:14):
They could be doing.
Speaker 12 (31:15):
And yet you know, the Don Bacons of the world
and the others, they're out there touting Reaganism and saying
that they're going to vote against these cuts. And I
just don't know how you square the peg of saying,
you know, we're thirty seven trillion in debt, but we
have to fund nine billion in four and aid going
to all of these NGOs that hate America and are
aligned against us and have been propping up the censorship
(31:35):
industrial complex. It's a little bit of insanity and you know,
enough is enough. We need to get these decisions done.
Speaker 3 (31:43):
We do waite go back soon, Brother Seveer five.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
All right, mel Kay has thoughts on all this stuff thanxt.
Speaker 8 (32:01):
Obviously, this is a moment where we have to be
on the streets all over the country to protest what's
happening to our immigrant community, but more broadly, to protest
what's happening to our democracy. This is the most corrupt
administration in the history of the country, and we are
going to rise to this moment by being out there
on the streets.
Speaker 1 (32:21):
Again, as we've talked about many times, two different divisions
to communism.
Speaker 3 (32:25):
Always have been, always will be. There are the.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
Street communists and the elite communists, and they work together
all the time. The elites go on television. We got
to be street ready, got to glad they are in
these streets, and all the animals and drugged out trainees
and foreigners and super freaks we have in this country
heed the call and they all put down their cats
and their marijuana and they run to the streets to
(32:48):
go hurt police officers. Joining me now, mel K, host
of the Melk Show. Mel it's all so predictable. What
is not is the GOP apparently appears ready to hit back.
Speaker 7 (33:01):
Ah, well, we hope so.
Speaker 14 (33:02):
I mean, the real truth is we have to really
look at this as the bigger picture, which is why
is this happening?
Speaker 7 (33:08):
We are in a color revolution in America? What is
the issue? What is going on?
Speaker 14 (33:12):
Frankly, I believe that they are trying to protect their
global financial system and would appreciate if Donald Trump would
stop trying to reignite the American economy and prosperity so
that we walk down the path of technocracy. And these
useful idiots that nothing's new with this. This is the
color revolution playbook they've played out over and over. We've
(33:33):
been in one since twenty sixteen, and they have to
go kinetic now or they completely lose. And the sad
part is what's really being lost is our future, our children,
and our sovereignty. And we need to stand up now
more than ever because the truth about post World War
II America is that we have not been sovereign basically
since nineteen thirteen. And the people that are funding this
(33:56):
world war right now, which this is part of it,
really are nervous that their entire model is falling apart.
Speaker 7 (34:03):
They need World War III. Why not kick it off
in America.
Speaker 1 (34:08):
Mel make that connection for me. People see Mexican flags
in LA. You're talking about the global financial system. Take
your time merge those worlds.
Speaker 14 (34:17):
Okay, So what we need to understand is that post
World War Two we were lied to about basically everything,
particularly the CIA, what it does and who it protects.
I frankly believe that it protects the global financial system,
which includes the NGOs. There was a act passed in
nineteen forty six that made the NGOs and all of
the un tentacles and the Rockefeller Brothers Ford Foundation, all
(34:41):
these foundations sovereign immune foundations. Basically, not only do they
not pay taxes, but they are not even subject to
the rule of law, investigation, or anything else. Once Doge
started cutting into USAID and looking at the money around
the world that funds these color revolutions and these revolutionaries,
they had to go into overdrive. And frankly, I believe
(35:03):
this was long planned if Trump got back in. They
were talking about it back in April, the law Fair
Crew right on MSNBC saying they were planning for this
if Trump won. And here we are, this is Election
Integrity Project. People These are the Trump haids, and they
are using the useful idiots that they brought into this
country to fight a battle to destroy America from within
(35:24):
so that they can walk us straight into the Agenda
twenty thirty technocracy that they have sunk trillions of dollars into.
At the end of the day, this is another play
for a global war to have the bankers recalibrate and
go into another phase after another world war of reconstruction
that will just loot America of everything we have left
(35:45):
and give us the final coup de gras. And that
is basically what the open border was about. As far
as I'm concerned, this was all about the national sovereignty
of the United States, and particularly the Constitution and the
Bill of Rights being a problem for the global financial
system that is being built around us, and frankly is
ready for takeoff as soon as America gives up and surrenders.
Speaker 7 (36:07):
Order out of chaos is the way they work, and
right now.
Speaker 14 (36:09):
They are causing as much chaos as possible so that
the American people say, just make it stop.
Speaker 7 (36:14):
Whatever we need to do.
Speaker 14 (36:15):
Though they launched maybe a global public infrastructure without us
even realizing that what they are doing is ending our sovereignty,
and that is what this battle is about.
Speaker 7 (36:25):
Sovereignty and trillions of dollars at stake.
Speaker 1 (36:29):
Karen Bass is Los Angeles' mayor, of course, and well
she's been all over the television here she.
Speaker 9 (36:35):
Was, we need to stop the raids. Should not be
happening in our city. It is not warranted, and it
does the only thing it does is contribute to chaos.
This was chaos that was started at Washington, DC. You
have a situation like we did in the last Trump
administration where kids were afraid to go to school because
(36:58):
they weren't sure their parents would be there, where people
were afraid to go to work, and you just think
about the disruption in families. You might have a father
that's going into a warehouse or a plant. You might
have a mother who is serving as a childcare worker
on the other side of town, either in somebody's home
or not. You disrupt the entire ecosystem, You impact our
(37:20):
overall economy. If people are afraid to go to work.
This is a city of immigrants. If they're afraid to
go to work, you were going to hit our economy
in a way that is completely unnecessary. This is a
problem that started on Friday morning when the raids happened.
Speaker 7 (37:37):
This did not need to take place.
Speaker 14 (37:42):
We were about an international criminal organization and money laundering
connected to the cartel. Second of all, Karen Basspert, we
used to have a rule in America that communists and
socialists could not run for office. It was antithetical to
the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Thus they could
not take an actual oath of office in America. And
yet this woman slid through. She has been a lifelong communist.
(38:03):
Not to mention, she worked for National Endowment for Democracy
during color revolutions in.
Speaker 7 (38:07):
Libya and elsewhere.
Speaker 14 (38:09):
She has always been somebody who has been an agitator inside.
Speaker 7 (38:12):
And it's not a surprise that she was elected.
Speaker 14 (38:14):
In the fully captured and communists infused California. But she
is a long term and very very experienced Color revolutionary
and that is exactly what she's kicking off in LA.
Unfortunately for the people of Los Angeles, she is not
going to protect them. Neither is Gavin Newsome, because they're
both owned by the international money laundering cartel that runs everything.
Speaker 7 (38:39):
Above this country.
Speaker 14 (38:40):
We have a group of people that will destroy America
from within because They are not loyal to this nation.
They are only loyal to the financial backers that fund
all these NGOs, and she has been a part of
that for decades.
Speaker 1 (38:54):
Well, what do you say to people who say this
is all just bad for the Democrat Party, This is
going to lose them.
Speaker 3 (39:00):
Trump looks better pull.
Speaker 1 (39:01):
Numbers and going through the roof Democrats look bad.
Speaker 3 (39:04):
What do you say to those people, I.
Speaker 7 (39:06):
Say, this has nothing to do with Donald Trump.
Speaker 14 (39:08):
This has to do with the United States of America,
our sovereignty, our constitution, our Bill of Rights, and our future.
Donald Trump is there for a few years. The problem
in America is the American people. The American people do
not know their history. They have been lied to since
World War Two about everything from the UN to endless wars,
to the looting of our money through the IRS and
(39:28):
the FED straight to international organizations that fund every war.
Our children cannot go in and fight again for Europe.
We fought a war in seventeen seventy six, and yet
twice we have been dragged into Europe. The EU has
never changed. They still want to control the world through
Brussels and the United States. Dismantling ourselves from this international
(39:49):
banking situation, the international money laundering, the war endless wars
is the most dangerous thing in the world for these
totalitarians that want to basically create a world government with
a global public infrastructure, with the Bank of International Settlements,
which is an opaque bank that needs to be looked into.
Speaker 7 (40:07):
And frankly, we need to get a real.
Speaker 14 (40:10):
History of America out there to the people to realize
how much they've been looted and lied to.
Speaker 7 (40:15):
And this is the.
Speaker 14 (40:16):
Last stand the international banking cartel that runs all the
wars and is running this entire operation with the NGOs
that are protected immune, don't have any aspect of law
and order within their rulings.
Speaker 7 (40:28):
They don't want to lose power.
Speaker 14 (40:30):
And frankly, this is a small group of elites using
these people that they funneled into here. We have many
things we can do, but if we let our constitution
be a picture on the wall instead of something we
use to fight back, then it's our fault. The people
of the United States of America cannot sit by because
their lives aren't ruined and they're not in upheaval and
we're not having active kinetic war and think that it's
(40:50):
going to go away. It has to be the American
people locally taking back their governments locally using the Constitution
in the Bill of Rights, or we are not going
to have one.
Speaker 3 (41:00):
Tell me about this book, Americans, Anonymous Well.
Speaker 14 (41:04):
I wrote this book because I believe that our country
purposefully is addicted to conflict and chaos by the what
I call the international banking cartel, but also the global
public private partnership that treats America like they're the parent company,
and three hundred and fifty million of us are just
allowed to live here.
Speaker 7 (41:20):
And the facts are we need to have an intervention
in America.
Speaker 14 (41:22):
We need to get real truth about our history, particularly
the CIA, the banking institutions, everything that happened after World
War II.
Speaker 7 (41:30):
We have been looted and lied to.
Speaker 14 (41:32):
We have funded all these wars, all this regime change,
and it is the American people that need to take
control back. We are acting as if everything is outside
of our control because decades of mind control and manipulation
to make us think we have no choice. It is
the American people that can save the world from this
tyranny that is capturing every ounce of the planet, and
(41:54):
we need.
Speaker 7 (41:54):
To really go through it.
Speaker 14 (41:55):
So I go through the Constitution, the Bill of Rights,
the Declaration of Independence, which I think is very relevant
right now because although we had fought the crown back
in the day when we wrote the Declaration of Independence,
right now it's an international banking cartel and the tentacles
of the un Chantham House, the Council Foreign Relations, the
Rockefeller NGOs, all of these groups are functioning above our government.
(42:17):
Our elected officials are captured, our banking institutions are not
working for us, and right now they are also trying
to save themselves while destroying the Constitution. The fundamental transformation
that Barack Obama promised was the end of national sovereignty,
because that was always the goal. So if the American
people do not know our real history and about the
Frankfurt School infiltrating our education system, the Nazis that came
(42:40):
through Argentina and to all of our institutions, the Communists
that were taken out of Germany and put into all
different places in America, not to mention Operation paper Clip,
then they have no idea that we were infiltrated long ago,
and JFK tried to warn us, as did Eisenhower, as
did McKinley, as did Donald Trump, and frankly, Donald Trump
is hated because there are trillions of dollars at stake
(43:02):
if America remains America and America needs to be sovereign.
And when it comes to what's happening with technocracy and technology,
it is the American people that must say the Constitution
and Bill of rights have to still.
Speaker 7 (43:13):
Be front and center.
Speaker 14 (43:13):
Whether you want to join the global public infrastructure or
have palanteer track and trade surveillance US. We can't allow
a Patriot Act two point zero technocracy to happen and
let the Constitution and Bill of rights go by the wayside.
We have to demand its first front and center before
any of the surveillance tech because let's be honest, if
somebody gets in there again, you think they're not going
(43:35):
to weaponize that against every single one of us that
have spoken out against this, they will, and they are
already planning it twenty twenty six. If the American people
do not mobilize now for the twenty twenty six midterms,
they are going to slide right back in there, and
before you know it, it'll be worse than it's ever been.
Speaker 7 (43:51):
Because that is the goal.
Speaker 14 (43:52):
The end of national sovereignty of all nation states, most
importantly the United States.
Speaker 1 (43:59):
Well shades you as always all right, right in the mood. Next,
all right, it is time to lighten the mood. And
it's got to be exhausting being a Democrat in modern America.
(44:22):
It used to be they were just a different party.
But now when you're a Democrat in the country, you
have this completely unrelated group that's part of your constituency. Constituency,
but then there's this unrelated group that they have no
nothing in common. You've got to pander to the climate comedies,
and you've got to pander to all the illegals, and
of course you have the gay mob and you have
(44:43):
to pander them. And then there's the fake black civil
rights mob. Kil Whitey, you gotta pay, you gotta do
all this endless amounts of pandering, and it just looks exhausting,
and then you end up humiliating yourself. Andrew Cuomo is
running to be mayor of New York City, and man,
this is the crappy have to do.
Speaker 11 (45:01):
The City of New York.
Speaker 15 (45:02):
We are the capital of diversity. One hundred and eighty
languages spoken in our school system, one native, different languages,
people from all across the world. That makes us stronger,
not weaker.
Speaker 1 (45:19):
And ah yes, under Navy languages makes us stronger.
Speaker 3 (45:27):
I see them
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.