Tulsi Gabbard Announces SHOCKING Discovery, Cracker Barrel CAVES & Federal Reserve Gets BIG Shake-Up
August 28, 2025 • 45 mins
Tulsi Gabbard just revealed a big discovery. Jesse Kelly discusses that and what it means for the deep state. This comes amid drama at the Federal Reserve. What will come of it? Will the Supreme Court get involved? Jesse speaks with Josh Hammer and Dave Brat about this. Plus, Tommy Robinson joins Jesse for an exclusive interview on a major story from across the pond.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 8-27-25
Choq: Visit https://choq.com/jessetv for a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life
Beam: Visit https://shopbeam.com/JESSEKELLY and use code JESSEKELLY to get our exclusive discount of up to 40% off.
Pure Talk: Go to https://www.puretalk.com/JESSETV to make the switch
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Let's talk about deep state stuff. Let's celebrate the whistleblowers
being brought back. Josh Hammer's here, Tommy Robbinson's here, Dave
brad is here. We have a huge show coming up
on I'm right now, Okay, Before we get to deep
(00:23):
state things, I just I just want to remember that
we need to pray. I know about that mass shooting today.
We don't do mass shooting television here. It's awful. God
help God to be with those families. This is the
time to come together. It's time to pray. Time to
ignore the gun grabbing communists on the left, pray, come
together and just know there is evil out there. And
(00:47):
as I warned you before, they're going to keep coming
after soft talk targets of any kind. So we need
to harden them. Schools, churches, that this is where the animals,
this is where the demons are going to come and
look for prey. So pray and don't become prey. All right,
All right, Now, let's talk about what's going on in
(01:08):
the government. The Trump administration deserves all the credit in
the world for their attempts so far to clean out
the deep state filth. But don't think for a moment
that it has been cleaned out. Communists have spent decades
burrowing themselves inside of every single branch of the government,
(01:30):
and they're not simply going to walk away now that
Donald Trump is president of the United States. These are
anti American subversives who hold on the power in this country,
and they must be dugout, root and branch. You see FEMA,
Trump's going to overhaul FEMA. Of course, FEMA's freaking out
about it. Super upset. Well, why why are Democrats super upset?
(01:54):
Because they conquered FEMA too. Do I need to remind
you after that hurricane, FEMA were skipping houses. They were
going around finding houses who needed aid, and if you
had a Trump flag, they skipped your house. Deeply evil.
This is the system they've worked very hard to put
into place, and this is why, this is why it's
(02:15):
going to take a long time. I don't even know
if it could be done in four years. Let's hope
we get another four of somebody afterwards, and then another
four after that. It's going to take that kind of
time to root these people out. And if I may
point out, we wouldn't know a lot of these things
if it wasn't for the whistleblowers.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
It appears that I was retaliated against because I forded
information in my superiors and others that questioned the official
narrative of the events of January sixth.
Speaker 1 (02:44):
As a result, I was accused.
Speaker 2 (02:45):
Of promoting conspiratorial views and unreliable information. Because I did this,
the FBI questioned my allegiance to the United States.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
Is a friend, you've ever been to a school board meeting? Yes,
a FBI ever sent youed the parking lot of a
school board meeting, Yes, they have.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
And in the parking lot of.
Speaker 5 (03:02):
A school board meeting where the FBI sent you, you
were taken.
Speaker 3 (03:05):
Down information regarding people's license plates.
Speaker 4 (03:08):
That's correct.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
But the FBI will crush you. This government will crush
you and your family if you try to expose the
truth about things that they are doing that are wrong.
Speaker 4 (03:18):
And we are all examples of that.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
That's the reason we found out just how evil all
the tyranny was inside of our government. And by the way,
I should note credit to Cash Mattel Dan Bongino, those whistleblowers,
those brave whistleblowers, have finally been made whole. That was
an announcement that was put out there. I'm a very
happy man. I hope you are happy as well. But
(03:45):
back to what they're doing inside of the government. Remember,
without those brave whistleblowers, without people coming forward, we'd have
to rely on people like Abby Phillips.
Speaker 6 (03:54):
This idea that this was a weaponized these were all
these different prosecutions, that all these different jurisdictions were not
all directed from one place. There's absolutely no evidence of that.
You guys can tell me what evidence you have of that,
but I've never seen it, and I've never heard anybody.
Speaker 7 (04:09):
Actually, the Obama and Biden administrations didn't politicize the dj
and Okay, who oh, I mean, whom you could? I
mean they were they were better at hiding transparent.
Speaker 6 (04:19):
I'm just saying, if you are making this was directed
by some kind of make puppeteer at the top of
the who is that person?
Speaker 8 (04:27):
So?
Speaker 7 (04:28):
How did the Irish only go after conservative efforts?
Speaker 6 (04:30):
They you're not answering my question. Who is the person?
Who are they?
Speaker 7 (04:35):
I'm talking about the conservatives that Obama and there's no
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
This is a tactic. Who was it? Name the person?
There's no evidence, of course, there's tons and tons and
tons of evidence. Nathan Wade. When they were trying to
throw Donald Trump in prison, Nathan Wade kept visiting the
freaking White House. It's all kinds of evidence. Matthew Graves,
his witch wife was checked in and out of the
White House over and over and over again when he
(05:03):
was chucking as many Trump supporters in prison, it's seemingly possible.
Of course, all the evidence is out there, and they're
all still there. Tulsey Gabbert talked about what she found.
Speaker 9 (05:15):
And you've also found many bags of information. I think
they call them burned bags, and supposed to be burned
and they didn't get burned having to do with how
corrupt the twenty twenty election was. And when will that
all come out?
Speaker 8 (05:31):
Mister President.
Speaker 10 (05:31):
I will be the first to brief you once we
have that information collected. But you're right, it's we are
finding documents literally tucked away in the back of safes
and random offices, in these bags and in other areas,
which again speaks to the intent of those who are
trying to hide the truth from the American people and
trying to cover up the politicization that was led by
(05:55):
people like John Brennan and James Clapper and others that
have caused really immeasurable harm to the American people and
to our country.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
Yea, they're still there, lots and lots of them. We
have a lot of work to do to cut the
tumor out of our government. Again, credit to the Trump
administration for making it happen. Now, let's talk about flag burning,
since that's been in the news. Josh Hammer's going to
(06:24):
join us. Let's find out what the actual law is.
Before we get to that, Let's get to how you feel.
How's your mood. See, as we get older, we don't
get all the things we need in our body, and
we get too much estrogen. It's in our waters. Synthetic
Estrogen's everywhere right now. That's why our testosterone levels are dropping.
(06:47):
That's why we're sad a lot. And we don't have
to live like this. You don't have to feel like
you feel all the time. Let Chock help you whatever
you're looking for in your life, young, old man and woman.
Chok has natural herbal supplements that will make your life better.
They have made my life better. A male vitality stack
(07:09):
from Chok is the best health decision I have ever
made in my life. I will never stop taking one
every single day again. This morning, every day I take
my male vitality stack. I want you to feel like
I feel. Chalk dot com slash JESSETV. We'll be back, Okay.
(07:36):
So we have to talk redistricting, Supreme Corp. To flag burning,
and obviously to get into the legal stuff, you know who,
we always go to my friend Josh Hammer of the
Josh Hammer Show. All right, Josh. Donald Trump famously put
out this executive order about flag burning, and he says
on camera, if you burn a flag, you get a
year in jail. I don't think the president can just
(07:59):
make laws like that or anything, but I don't know,
you know, what's happening.
Speaker 11 (08:05):
So it's very interesting legal question. Actually, so there actually
is a law. There's actually multiple laws, Jesse that Congress
has passed. Is one going back to the nineteen sixties,
nineteen sixty eight, back during the Vietnam War protests can
state all all the flag burnings back then. And then
Congress passed another anti flag burning statue based in nineteen
(08:25):
eighty nine. And that latter statue, which is eighteen US
Code Section seven hundred, does have exactutorily required one year
prison sentenced term. So that is where the one year
is coming from. It's not like he's kind of just
concocting this out of fin are. He's basically issued an
executive order and saying that as bertains to certain types
of flag burning, we are going to actually enforce this
(08:48):
nineteen eighty nine statute. Now, the devil's always in the
details here. So in the executive order, he says, Jesse,
we know the Supreme Court has said that there's a
First Amendment right to engage flag burning, but they didn't
actually talk about when it is used as a means
of inciting violence. You know, various exceptions in well established
First Amendment doctrine. So that is the executive order, taken
(09:11):
at face value, as they're saying, we're going to enforce
this statute as bertains to certain types of exceptions that
the actual underlying Supreme Court cases from thirty five years
ago to not necessarily touch. Now, I actually, personally, Jesse,
you would go actually quite a bit further than this. Actually,
I think that the two Supreme Court is Supreme Court
case in question Texas versus Johnson from nineteen eighty nine.
(09:32):
Then there was a companion case from the next year
US versus Eikman. I think those cases are wrongly decided.
They are both five to four cases.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
There.
Speaker 11 (09:39):
A lot of folks note that Anthony Scalia joined the
majority opinion in both cases. What they don't often note
is that Chief Justice William Ranquist, who was just as
well known a conservative as Scalia, dissented both times.
Speaker 8 (09:49):
There.
Speaker 11 (09:50):
I don't think that you having First Amendments right to
burn the American flag. I don't think you've a first
man right actually to burn anything, because literally burning anything
to pour some gasoline has something aflame. It's not speech,
it's literally not speech. It is conduct, and frankly, it's
actually dangerous conduct because something like fire is involved. And
as conduct as an action, the government has the ability
(10:10):
to regulate it and if it so chooses to actually
criminalize it as well. So that's my actual stance as
it pertains to the overarching first man question there. But
it's important to note that the Executive Order, on its
own terms, actually accepts these two Supreme Court cases. They say,
we're not challenging that there, but we're operating within the
confines there. We're just carving out kind of a First
Amendment exception there, that's what it's trying to do.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
Okay, So, as you said, the devil's in the details.
So not that I would ever in a million year's
harm an American flag. In fact, we go around the
neighborhood and make sure they're not touching the ground. But
if I so desire, and I light an American flag
on fire in my backyard, am I in trouble? What
does it mean to incite violence? If I what is it?
(10:55):
How do you decide that I'm trying to incite violence?
Speaker 4 (10:59):
Right?
Speaker 11 (11:00):
So it would be up to the local laws. What
the executive Order is essentially saying is that we are
going to allow local governments, state governments to try to
enforce this as they see fit. They're ultimately trying to
get this thing to a jury that would be ultimately
kind of in the eye of the beholder. Does this
actually raise to the threshold of inside of myles? Now,
(11:21):
look in the abstract, you know you're hypothetical just doing
it in your own backyard. I mean, the answer is
obviously not. Now Again, in my personal opinion, Jesse, I
am of the opinion there that this actually should be
criminal behavior, whether or not it actually in size violence
there but given the executive order there no that sort
of conduct almost assuredly would not be covered. Again, the
idea is that it would get to a jury, but
(11:43):
very hard to see how any kind of personal conduct
in one's backyard would actually inside violence. The final thing though,
that I think is very important to note though, on
this executive order Jesse, it's really not just about the law.
The laws is sound. I think that Donald Trump has
made a legally sound decision. But I think what Donald
Trump is actually doing here when it comes to this
executive order is he is yet again putting Democrats in
(12:05):
the un annual position of defending, in this case, literal
flag burning. He's yet again taken one of these wedge
cultural issues, whether it's biological males and women's sports, whether
it's trying to oppose the deportation of a homosnik like
Machaman Khalil or the MS thirteen guy kilmar Abrego Garcia,
he's putting them on the defense of when it comes
to these eighty twenty issues. I mean, he's literally making
(12:26):
them defend flag burnings. He's making Adam Shift all the
usual suspects, you know, defend your quote unquote right to
burn the American flag. So it's politically genius. It does
legally work there, Jesse in my opinion, but I think
that the law is frankly only half the point of this,
of this executive order.
Speaker 1 (12:43):
All right, let's shift gears to California redistricting. I understand
Republicans have filed a petition with the state Supreme Court.
What's happening out there.
Speaker 11 (12:53):
Yeah, so they're basically challenging all the way to the
California's Preme Court. This is not necessarily an issue of
a federal lot. Is pretty well established that states have
culinary power to redistrict as they so choose, subject to
some Voting Rights Act exceptions when it comes to racial
gerry managering. By the way, very interesting court case coming
up this coming term where it seems like the Supreme
(13:13):
Court could finally, once and for all put an end
to a lot of Voting Rights Act of nineteen sixty
five shenanigans when it comes to this notion that you
have a statutory concerts requirements to create these majority minority districts,
these these majority black districts now at Bama, South Carolina.
Very interesting stuff that's going to be at the Supreme
Court this coming term. But as it pertains out in California,
(13:34):
what Gavin Newsman in California Democrats are trying to do
is they're essentially trying to find a too clever by
half workaround around their own State of California independent commission
that has been established when it comes to redistrict there.
And it's a clever loss. So I'm not necessarily sure
it's going to be successful, to be totally honest with you,
just just given the ideological complexion of the California Supreme Court,
(13:57):
they will probably bend or backwards to find some way
of citing with Gavin Newsom in California Democrats, especially when
when cherished precious US House seats are at stake there.
So I'm not particularly optimistic here. But they're basically challenging
it on state law grounds and saying that at least
as a procedural matter, that Gavin Newsom is doing this
too quickly and is not actually abiding by the relevant
law which created this independent commission when it comes to redistricting.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
All Right, The New York Times, which I try to
not read, continues to put out peace after peace after
peace talking about Democrats and what a disastrous electoral college
position they're in. What's happening?
Speaker 11 (14:35):
Yeah, so this, you know, this relays directly to the redistrict.
Speaker 5 (14:37):
Right.
Speaker 11 (14:37):
So, I mean, you know, every ten years we have
a US Census. Every ten years we get new apportionment
in the US Congress. I mean, you know, I mean, Jesse,
just look at the twenty twenty census. You know, the
twenty twenty census basically says all you need to know.
For the very first time in the history of California
as a states, California actually lost seats in the electoral
(14:58):
College in the US House. Literally, it's preble sat Literally,
Gavin Newsom has presided over the California that, for the
first times as California became a state in the eighteen fifties,
has actually lost seats in the Congress and votes in
the electoral College. But it's not just California, California, Illinois,
New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, all the usual blue state suspects.
(15:18):
They're all losing seats. What states are gaining seats, well,
the exact opposite. I mean my state of Florida, You're
a state of Texas, the Carolinas, Georgia, Arizona, Tennessee. All
the usual suspects are gaining seats. And the point of
this New York Times article, which I guess they're trying
to light a fire under their ideological buddies over at
DNC headquarters, the purpose of this article is basically to
(15:39):
say that, you know what, based on the trends that
we see thus far, it's going to continue. The twenty
thirty cents is going to look really really good, I
think for Red States and for Republic in the general.
By the way, it'll look even better. I think if
Donald Trump is able to follow through on his long
sought after promise to try to make sure that illegal
aliens are not counted in the sensus, which they definitely
should not be. There is absolutely no requirement that they be.
(16:00):
It is frankly appalling and abhorrent that they are. That'll
actually probably make it even better for Red States.
Speaker 1 (16:05):
Actually, what's going on with Lisa Cook?
Speaker 11 (16:10):
So Lisa Cook is one of these seven Federal Reserve
governors on the Board of Governors. Donald Trump is, you know,
as only Trump can do. He's trying to become the
first president to successfully fire one of the Federal Reserve's
board of Governors and he's firing her because we have
pretty she has not been indicted or convicted, but we
are able to suss out the publicly available data when
(16:33):
it comes to her interactions with financial institutions. There and
there are deeply credible allegations, highly credible that she has
engaged in mortgage fraud because she actually listed in multiple
residences in Michigan and Georgia, as the case may be,
as her principal place of residence in order to secure
a more favorable bank loan. Now, the problem, among others,
is that the Federal Reserve is literally the regulator of
(16:56):
the financial system. They are the lender of last resort.
That is kind of the definition of what a central
is in a modern economy. So it's a massive crisis
of public legitimacy to have one of these seven governors
on the Board of Governors, who sits there on this
body overseeing the financial institutions, if she herself is defrauding
financial institutions. Now, the relevant statue, the Federal Reserve Act
(17:16):
in nineteen thirteen, says that a governor can only be
removed for cause. So there's this whole debate as to
whether or not this constitutes legitimate cause. You know, what's
your name? Lisa Cook's attorney, Abby Lowell is now saying
that all cause only means indicted or or convicted by
a jury.
Speaker 3 (17:32):
But does it.
Speaker 11 (17:33):
I mean Congress could have said that. Congress literally could
have ridden that if they want that. Their cause seems
to me to be subjective in the eyes of the
beholder there, and this seems to me to be a
pretty good cause someone who was credibly alleged to defraud
financial institutions while sitting on the FED Board of Governors.
But you know, this whole statutory question Jesse about cause
is actually something of a sideshow from the overarching constitutional point,
(17:54):
which is that Donald Trump, as the executive has the
executive power to fire who sits in his executive branch. Now,
Cook's defenders will say that the Federal Reserve is independent,
is unique, it's not really within the executive branch, to
which I say, well, literally, where is it. I mean,
it's either an Article one, the Congress article to the
executive branch, or argle three, the judiciary. I'm pretty sure
it's not the Congress or the judiciary. So positive elimination
(18:16):
right there. So you know, one way or the other, Jesse,
Donald Trump's is gonna win on this.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
Apparently every Democrat in the country committed mortgage from It's
wild Josh, thank you, brother, I appreciate it. I don't
understand why you would do that. I mean, I guess
I guess they all get away with it, or have
gotten away with it. Maybe that's why they all do it.
It's such an obvious crime. Anyway, How did you how'd
you sleep last night? Do you get a good night's
(18:44):
sleep every night? Beam is here for you. Beam is
here to make your life better by making your sleep better.
You can wake up every single morning having knocked out
eight nine hours of good sleep, not getting up to
ten times rolling over good sleep, natural sleep because Beam
(19:05):
is drug free. It's simply a cup of hot chocolate
with all kinds of natural things in it that'll just
put you relaxed and drifting off to sleep. Go get
a bag of dream powder. You'll have one in your
home forever. Shotbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back.
Speaker 5 (19:34):
There are eleven very strong candidates. President Trump knows some
of them, some of them he doesn't. I'm going to
begin talking to them after labor day, and there'll be
some other folks around the White House who also interview them,
and we will present three or four candidates to the President.
(19:54):
The new chair will be someone who is expert on
monetary policy, regulatory policy, and knows how to run a
sprawling institution, which the FED is.
Speaker 1 (20:08):
Okay, Scott Piscent is a very sharp guy. As soon
as I hear the word expert, I tend to cringe
a little bit because of how dumb most of those
people are. But I assume Scott Pissent has someone good
in mind joining me now. Dave Bratt, Senior vice president
of Business Relations at the Great Liberty University. Okay, Dave,
why do we need a new FED chair? What's it
(20:30):
take to be FED chair? Where are we going to
find one of these experts?
Speaker 3 (20:35):
Yeah, the folks. If you want an answer, go read
The Monster at Jekyl Island or whatever, referring to the
beginning of the Federal Reserve and how that institution was
set up in nineteen thirteen, and then The Secrets of
the Temple is a more modern book. But your intuition
was right there. Besant is good, but he's got to
(20:56):
operate within a fixed political swamp environment up there, and
so they're going to get these experts right, and the
economic experts will not allow you to bring up You
know that the FED has no problem with leftist policies
right exploring you know, dimensions of multi colored flags on
their buildings and all this as serious time and energy
(21:17):
spent on this, but they will not diagnose right. And
just so if people don't know, the FED has two mandates.
One is price stability and the other is unemployment. They
probably should not have unemployment because they don't have all
the levers for that. They should just be in charge
of price. So when they're given the second charge of unemployment,
they say, well, we can do DEI and everything else
(21:38):
related under the sun, but they will never look at
major problems we have with the allocation of capital in
our country, like a twenty million person border invasion. I
wish the next FED governor would have to tackle that.
What about the one point five million dead and injured
now in just Ukraine plus a million in Russia and
(21:58):
the impact of all of our defense. Where's the economic analysis?
Speaker 5 (22:02):
Right?
Speaker 3 (22:02):
They have a thousand economists in that building, all getting
paid big bucks. So your intuition is spot on they're
gonna hire experts.
Speaker 12 (22:09):
That are just you know, oh, I'm gonna run a
bunch of regressions and you know, do all these statistics
and whatever, and they're not gonna hit the right target
because they're not aiming at the right target, which is
the welfare of the economy and the American people.
Speaker 3 (22:23):
And they the elites don't care about that.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Dave, How does the Federal Reserve deal with prices when
prices are supposedly set by a market that is free.
Speaker 3 (22:38):
Yeah, no, that that would be nice as well. Right,
So we have, in addition to the Federal Reserve problem,
we got you know, seven trillion dollar government budgets per year,
and we don't use the price system, and we have
monopolies all over the place, like the Magnificent seven, right,
the big seven firms that make up about forty percent
(22:59):
of S and P five hundred seven for you know, Google, Microsoft,
all them. So they're all monopolies. So our price system
is broken. We're not using markets. If you use markets
that favors the small guy, if you if you got
to have cronies up in DC adding lines into the
budget of the government, that favors the lawyers and the bureaucrats,
(23:21):
and so how does the FED can shape interest rates?
Speaker 8 (23:26):
Right?
Speaker 3 (23:26):
By and they and they can do this, right. We
saw under Biden that printed way too much money, easy money,
and we had twenty two percent inflation over the over
those four years. Right, if you add it all up together,
that twenty you lost one fifth of your purchasing power.
And people, people aren't mad. They don't know what that
(23:46):
sentence means. Yet, you didn't only lose one fifth of
your wallet or your income. You lost in just those
four years one fifth of your retirement plan. Right, because
when you take those dollars out there, all worth one
fifth less. And that's just from those four years. And
so the FED has as a as a stated purpose,
(24:10):
our target two percent inflation per year. We'll just do
the math on that. What's fifty years at two percent,
you've lost one hundred percent of your purchasing power over
fifty year period. That's their goal. The American people don't
know any of this because we won't teach them that
in the schools, otherwise there'd be a mini revolution.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
Well, that's all pretty terrible, all right. What's going on
with India? Trump made good on his promise, slapped a
fifty percent tariff on India. He's mad at them for
a variety of things, including buying up all that Russian
cheap oil. But what does that mean for me? I
don't even like Indian food.
Speaker 8 (24:48):
What do I care?
Speaker 3 (24:50):
Well, Trump's doing the right thing on all this. I
was on the Big India Times, right, it's the biggest
media over there in India, with about six Indian panelists
and the Chinese panelists. And we want to be friends
with India, right, they're pro democracy there Western but we
got some problems.
Speaker 8 (25:09):
Right.
Speaker 3 (25:10):
They have tariff and non tariff barriers on us. They
got trade deficits with us. They're subsidizing oil to Russia.
They're being too friendly with China. And I said, you know,
you need to assume you're rightful place on the world stage.
They're a superpower. They got one point four billion people,
they're getting rich. They're powerful, but they have not made
(25:32):
it clear what principles they believe in as a country. Right,
we have a constitution, we protect minority rights, you know
in the James Madison, the factions in law. We have
provided free sea lanes for the past seven years. I said,
we helped win World War two, with our allies and
a bunch of jaws dropped and we've been paying the price,
(25:54):
and so we need them to step up and pay
part of the price for maintaining a stage world order.
So that's why they matter. And then you know, hopefully Trump,
if he can end this Ukraine War, he doesn't reproach Ma,
which means, you know, we're not gonna be buddies with
Russia and Putin, but it'd be better to have China
with a two front problem right Russia to the north
(26:16):
of them and US over the Pacific, and then having
India with us too. So Trump's knocking some heads in
order to get these hard moves accomplished, and they're they're
all necessary, and he's doing the right things, and people
get upset in the short run, but hey, if you
want to be a friend, you got to be a
real friend, not a fake friend.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
What risk do we run of India running to the
arms of China, because that would certainly not be a
good that would not be a good alliance to have.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
Yeah, well they're they're not running there, but they're tiptoeing
right now. They've been meeting and talking and they got
meetings over in China next week and Putin was over
in China?
Speaker 8 (27:00):
Was she?
Speaker 3 (27:01):
I think it was this week and Mody was not,
which is, you know, a little bit promising. But India,
like I was saying, they need to share our long
run strategic principles. They they're being a little too cute, right,
They're just cozying up for short run benefit with anyone
who gives them benefit, while we have to pay the price, right,
(27:23):
And Europe wants to go to war and they want
us to pay the price. The Middle East we have wars.
Now we're down in Where are we We're down in Venezuela.
I think right we got the Mexican cartels. We're getting
serious on that. It's like, hey, guys, you know we're
we're running out of bullets and running out of dollars
(27:44):
and someone else needs to be an adult in the room.
Everybody who's spent free riding and the American people know it,
and they're sick of it.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
They've Trump came out and said something about Chinese students
and money that well, here he was.
Speaker 9 (28:02):
But we're getting along very well with China, and I'm
getting along very well with President she. I think it's
very insulting to say students can't come here because they'll
go out, they'll start building schools and they'll be able
to survive it. But I like that their students come here.
I like that other country students come here, and you
know what would happen if they didn't, Our college system
(28:24):
would go to hell very quickly. You'd have and it
wouldn't be the top colleges. It would be colleges that
struggle on the bottom, and you take out three hundred
thousand or six hundred thousand students out of the system.
I like having and I told this the presidency that
we're honored to have their students here. Now with that,
(28:44):
we check and we're careful and we see who's there,
and Marco wants that we spoke. We're in the same position.
But we have a tremendous college system, the best in
the world. Nobody even to us. That's why China sends
them here.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
Yeah, you can count me out on pretty much all that, Dave.
Fifteen percent of our college students are apparently try comms,
and they only come here to spy and steal things.
In what universe is this?
Speaker 8 (29:08):
Okay?
Speaker 3 (29:10):
No, I agree with you. I think he's probably doing
some strategicy. He knows the base is going to go
hyperplect on him and he'll have to pivot. He's got
to deal with China right now in the short run
of his trade agreement, so he's trying to probably be
friendly in the short run. That's not going to work
for the reasons you just stated. And I usually don't
(29:32):
brag on my own school, but Liberty University is ranked
number one most conservative school in the country, training champions
for Christ in the Hill today the Hill, the big
DC swamp rag up there. That's popular with all the Congress.
So just wanted to put in a good word for
Liberty University.
Speaker 1 (29:50):
You brag on yourself all day long. That's always welcome
on this show, Dave, Dave, appreciate you very much. Come back,
So good man, Maybe I should be the head of
the Federal Reserve. I don't have any idea what what
I would do. I mean, I don't know anything about it.
(30:10):
But how hard can it be?
Speaker 8 (30:12):
Anyway?
Speaker 1 (30:13):
You know, it's easy switching to your cell phone service
to pure talk. That's really easy. Do you understand that?
You just go to puretalk dot com slash jessetv means
ta into it all. We're talking about the patriotic mobile company,
the one who's CEO fought for this country, the company
that will save you be fortune a fortune. What if
(30:36):
your cell phone bill could get cut in half? Would
that help a little extra scratch laying around? When I
switched from T Mobile to pure Talk, clean into my
bill got cut in half? Switch Puretalk dot com slash
Jesse TV.
Speaker 8 (30:53):
We'll be back.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
Well by now. Unless you've been living under a rock,
you've probably seen a picture or the video of a
fourteen year old girl in Scotland with a hatchet and
a knife, fighting off, or at least attempting to scare
off somebody who was after her. Joining me now to
talk about what exactly happened out there? What is going on?
Are these people about to have a revolution? The great
(31:24):
Tommy Robinson, British journalist. Okay, Tommy, would you do me
a favor for those who are unaware of it? Unpack
this story? What happened? Why is she running around with
a hatchet?
Speaker 13 (31:36):
So there's a viral video it shows a young Scottish
child who's clearly says you've attacked children. So she's been
attacked or her sister's been attacked, violently attacked. The allegation
is by these migrant it's a migrant man. Now, just
so people understand, from one end of you, from one
end of Britain to the other, young girls like this
(31:57):
have been kidnapped, tortured and raped and whenever this happens,
they've been made that they've been made the scapegoat. So
even now the media are probably about to try and
spin this, totally spin it. Even though you can hear
the little girl saying you attacked us, Leave us alone, stay.
Speaker 4 (32:14):
Away from us.
Speaker 13 (32:15):
You can hear her clearly talking about a previous physical attack,
which allegedly is to do with the man video in
the young girls. But across Britain children are being targeted,
the police stand by, allow it to happen, facilitate it,
and that little girl now has faced prosecution for.
Speaker 4 (32:32):
Having a weapon. Well the brick.
Speaker 13 (32:34):
This is going on across our country and the media
now are trying to spin it to say there's no
proof that she was attacked. You can clearly hear what
she's saying in the video and it's a sad state
of affairs now that young girls are having to arm
themselves with weapons to defend themselves against migrants who have
been imported into this country.
Speaker 1 (32:54):
Gosh freaking world, did you say she's being prosecuted. What's
happening to him?
Speaker 4 (33:01):
Nothing's happening to him.
Speaker 13 (33:02):
She's being prosecuted now, Just so you know, just last
week at a migrant hotel in Epin, a migrant let
himself into an old lady's house, walked into her house.
Her daughter then chased him, and when her daughter chased him,
her daughter now faces prosecution. The migrant has not been arrested,
not been prosecuted. The daughter who chased him out of
(33:24):
the house has faced prosecution for what happened at the
migrant hotel. This little girl is facing criminal prosecution. The
migrant nothing at all, Tommy.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
I see these videos in Scotland and Ireland. I see
these videos and I see the anger arising. Obviously you've
been a part of this, of raising a big part
of this, raising awareness of all this. Are the people?
Are they fed up? And I don't know what that means, right,
I certainly don't want to see anyone get hurt, but
are people fed up? Where is this going?
Speaker 13 (33:59):
This country is bubby like never before. Even I'm not
just exaggerating here. It's brewing on revolution. The public are awake,
the public are furious. The public understand their safety has
been taken. They realize we've been betrayed. We're looking at
our culture disappear. Our towns and cities are changing. The
demographics are changing that quick, that fast. We feel like
(34:20):
foreigners in our own towns and cities. That's what's happened
that quick, that fast. Whilst British people are struggling to
get dentists, appointment, to get doctors, migrants are being brought in,
put in four star hotels. British pensioners cannot afford their heating,
can't pay their bills, whilst migrants are put up in
hotels with free luxury meals. Every single day. Many of
(34:41):
the migrants that have come in. There have been twenty
five sexual assaults on children by migrants in hotels put
up in hotels. Nine British women have been raped by
migrants just in those hotels. Just so you know, ninety
percent of rape cases don't go to court. We've got
nine court cases of migrants who of raped women. How
(35:04):
many British women are being raped and there's not a
day that goes by now where we don't see a
story of a migrant sexually assaulting, attacking, torturing young girls
and British.
Speaker 4 (35:14):
Women in this country.
Speaker 13 (35:16):
And the whole time that's happening, our government wont to
call anyone who opposes it far right racist extremists.
Speaker 4 (35:23):
It doesn't wash anymore.
Speaker 13 (35:24):
Those words and those smears and those labels worked for
twenty years. They paralyzed this entire nation of men and
women who are too scared to speak out. I can
confidently say now that fear, that bubble, it's bursts.
Speaker 4 (35:39):
The British public are awake. You're going to see I
told you Jesse before.
Speaker 13 (35:43):
On the thirteenth of September, we're expecting a million people
to descend from every corner of Britain onto our capital city,
where the British public will send a message to the
world that we are remaining silent no longer. We're watching
the destruction of this country no more. We will not
be silent any longer. That's what's happening. And I'm telling
you the country is bubbling. It's brewing for revolution. It's happening.
(36:07):
Cats out in the bag, they can't put it back in.
People are awake. The more you see videos like this.
What the media we're now try and do and politicians
is spin this. But it doesn't matter. They used to
have the power, they used to have the monopoly. They
don't have any power anymore. I picked this up, send
one tweet. We've reached more than the whole BBC. It
doesn't matter anymore. Their power has gone. We're grateful to
(36:28):
Elon Musk for giving the public back and a space
where we can see what's happening. We can discuss these
topics and conversations. X is the only platform we have
left in this country. If it wasn't for Elon must
buy an X, we'd be in the dark. None of
us would have got this video. They had a sense
of it, they had deplatformed it, and then they'd spun
(36:48):
the whole country with their media narrative.
Speaker 4 (36:51):
It doesn't wash anymore. Britain's awake, Tommy.
Speaker 1 (36:55):
Can you help me understand location when it comes to
where they're putting these people, where these assaults are happening.
And I say this because I'm not physically there is
this isolated to the cities. Are they putting them in
the countryside? Is it? Where is this taking place.
Speaker 13 (37:11):
Well, what used to happen Because I'm from a town
called Glutontown, which is a very rough town thirty miles
north of London. It has a fifty percent Uslim population,
is a very poor town, working class. These are the
sorts of towns all these migrants used to be thrown into.
They used to rape their way through them and it
would be our problem.
Speaker 4 (37:29):
But not anymore.
Speaker 13 (37:31):
Now Hotels in every single corner of Britain are full
up with migrants. So in leafy suburban areas, places that
weren't touched or affected by Islamic immigration, now in those
small little areas they can't let their children walk to school.
They're getting sexually assaulted. So the problem that I used
to talk about, which used to be confined to big
(37:52):
cities like where I'm from, has now spread to every
corner of Britain that there's not a single area that's
not being affected anymore. So now the public have had
a mass awakening because it was all right when it
wasn't in their backyard.
Speaker 4 (38:05):
Well now it's in their backyard.
Speaker 13 (38:07):
It's not confined to one area, it's every corner of Britain,
every town, every city. Hotels are full migrant attacks are
happening in the places that you wouldn't expect them to happen,
where there were no migrants. You might have a totally
a totally English suburban area like Epping, which has now
been flooded with hotels housing two hundred migrants, where young
(38:28):
children are being sexually assaulted on their way to school.
This is happening from one corner of Britain to the other.
There's no hiding it anymore. The public see it, they
feel it. There's I can sense, Jesse, there is a
massive shift in this country in public opinion, something I've
only watched and dreamed about for fifteen years. I've been
banging my head against the wall trying to wake this
(38:50):
country up. And now the country's awake. It's awake, it's ready.
People are listening. As I said, We're going to send
a message to the establishment British there is patriots, young
old women, grandma's children are going to travel from all
over Britain to send a message to our treacherous, tyrannical,
traitorous government. On September thirteenth.
Speaker 1 (39:13):
Tommy, you mentioned earlier that the cops are complicit, that
the cops showed them. That is just that is beyond
belief for a lot of us who have a lot
of respect for law enforcement. Can you help me understand
that dynamic?
Speaker 13 (39:28):
Yeh, so police Officers'll give a couple of examples from
government government studies.
Speaker 4 (39:33):
Now not my opinion.
Speaker 13 (39:35):
Two fathers their thirteen year old daughters were in a
house being raped by a group of Muslim men. The
dads got together they went to the house to get
their daughters back. The police turned up and arrested the dads.
They left the children in the house with Pakistani Muslim
men being raped. Another incident, a young twelve year old
(39:57):
girl was in a derelict house, an abandoned home, five
Muslim men sexually assaulting and rapner. The police turned up.
They arrested the twelve year old girl for drunk and disorderly.
They arrested the twelve year old child for drunk and disorderly.
They did not arrest or prosecute the men. Quite literally,
(40:17):
the invading men have been given free reign from one
end of this country to the other to kidnap, torture
and rape. Now I know to your viewers that sounds
unbelievable that if you want to put a scale on
the power of political correctness. It paralyzed an entire country
like Britain, it paralyzed their police force and government from
(40:39):
one end of the country to the other. They stood
by and in all the government reports in Rotherham, in Telford,
in Rochdale. In Rotherham, one four hundred children were raped.
Rotherham only has a three point seven percent Muslim population.
In Telford, one thousand children were raped, five are dead.
There's only a one point seven percent Muslim popular in
(41:00):
that town in Telford. In Telford they identified two hundred
Muslim rapists in that town alone. There's only a thousand
Muslim men in that town. Twenty percent of the men
were raping our children and murdering them and only eleven
of those men have faced prosecution. Where So when you
see the cases in the UK and the pictures of
(41:20):
the Muslims being charged in each town, it's a handful
where there's the reality is one hundreds and hundreds and
hundreds in every town and city. The Rape Gang Inquiry
just been published now by Rupert Low and Sammy Woodhouse.
Sammy Woodhouse is a survivor of these rape gangs in Rotherham.
They've identified eighty five Islamic communities in towns and cities
(41:42):
across the country which were raping their way through them.
Speaker 4 (41:45):
Eighty five.
Speaker 13 (41:46):
Basically, every single town that has an Islamic community in
Britain has these gangs targeting young English children. And whilst
they were targeting, the police stood by, and they didn't
stood by. They prosecuted the families, They prosecute the english
Men who stood up. They demonized us, they imprisoned us,
they lied to the public about us because they all
(42:07):
had dirty hands. So there is a for your audience
to understand the scale of this problem. And in America,
wake up because if you've got Islamic communities, I guarantee
you it's happening there. And the Democrats, just like our
Labor Party, will be covering it up. And they'll cover
it up because their next vote bank for their politics
is coming from that Islamic community and what means more
(42:29):
to them, just like in England, what meant more to
the Labor Party, the Islamic vote meant more than protect
protecting young English girls, and your Democrat party will be
no different.
Speaker 1 (42:40):
God have mercy. Telling of the final question, are there
any military leaders in Britain who have spoken out against
this current or former.
Speaker 13 (42:53):
And Middleton is a former sas military hero. He is
speaking our next event on the thirteenth of September. He
is speaking strong. He's going to run for mayor of London.
He'll face the same accusations and attacks. But the difference
is where we are now to twenty four months ago,
even twelve months ago. Yes, people are now speaking. People
(43:17):
are now starting to find the courage and as more
people speak up, it becomes more palatable, more acceptable, and
more people are finding coage to speak up. So keep
your eyes on the UK. Big things are brewing. There's
a shift in public opinion. It's not going away.
Speaker 1 (43:35):
Whereise gone, Tommy, blessings to your brother, stay after him.
It's freaking horrific evil and he's right. Democrats are the same,
try as hard as they could to do the same
thing here, and they've been successful in a lot of ways. Evil,
deeply evil, and it's all about power anyway. Late in
(43:57):
the moon next, all right, it's time to lighten the mood.
And here's a different light in the.
Speaker 8 (44:10):
Mood for you. Your voice works, it works now. No longer
is corporate America able to just constantly trash. You, trash
your culture, trash the country without hearing from you. Because
of the power of social media, your voice now works
(44:30):
and we are speaking up.
Speaker 1 (44:31):
We're getting loud, so when they trash things we love,
we speak up. Cracker Barrel got a lot of crap
as they changed their stupid logo, spent something like seven
hundred million dollars to figure out a new logo that sucked,
and everybody got mad at them for it. They just
put out a statement, we thank our guests for sharing
your voices in love for Cracker Barrel. We said we
(44:52):
would listen.
Speaker 4 (44:53):
And we have.
Speaker 1 (44:54):
Our new logo is going away and our old timer
will remain. The days of Lase Fair, Oh I'll just
let it go have to be over. You have to
treat these people with aggression, and we did little wins,
celebrate them, see them all.
Speaker 4 (45:15):
M
Let's talk about deep state stuff. Let's celebrate the whistleblowers
being brought back. Josh Hammer's here, Tommy Robbinson's here, Dave
brad is here. We have a huge show coming up
on I'm right now, Okay, Before we get to deep
(00:23):
state things, I just I just want to remember that
we need to pray. I know about that mass shooting today.
We don't do mass shooting television here. It's awful. God
help God to be with those families. This is the
time to come together. It's time to pray. Time to
ignore the gun grabbing communists on the left, pray, come
together and just know there is evil out there. And
(00:47):
as I warned you before, they're going to keep coming
after soft talk targets of any kind. So we need
to harden them. Schools, churches, that this is where the animals,
this is where the demons are going to come and
look for prey. So pray and don't become prey. All right,
All right, Now, let's talk about what's going on in
(01:08):
the government. The Trump administration deserves all the credit in
the world for their attempts so far to clean out
the deep state filth. But don't think for a moment
that it has been cleaned out. Communists have spent decades
burrowing themselves inside of every single branch of the government,
(01:30):
and they're not simply going to walk away now that
Donald Trump is president of the United States. These are
anti American subversives who hold on the power in this country,
and they must be dugout, root and branch. You see FEMA,
Trump's going to overhaul FEMA. Of course, FEMA's freaking out
about it. Super upset. Well, why why are Democrats super upset?
(01:54):
Because they conquered FEMA too. Do I need to remind
you after that hurricane, FEMA were skipping houses. They were
going around finding houses who needed aid, and if you
had a Trump flag, they skipped your house. Deeply evil.
This is the system they've worked very hard to put
into place, and this is why, this is why it's
(02:15):
going to take a long time. I don't even know
if it could be done in four years. Let's hope
we get another four of somebody afterwards, and then another
four after that. It's going to take that kind of
time to root these people out. And if I may
point out, we wouldn't know a lot of these things
if it wasn't for the whistleblowers.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
It appears that I was retaliated against because I forded
information in my superiors and others that questioned the official
narrative of the events of January sixth.
Speaker 1 (02:44):
As a result, I was accused.
Speaker 2 (02:45):
Of promoting conspiratorial views and unreliable information. Because I did this,
the FBI questioned my allegiance to the United States.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
Is a friend, you've ever been to a school board meeting? Yes,
a FBI ever sent youed the parking lot of a
school board meeting, Yes, they have.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
And in the parking lot of.
Speaker 5 (03:02):
A school board meeting where the FBI sent you, you
were taken.
Speaker 3 (03:05):
Down information regarding people's license plates.
Speaker 4 (03:08):
That's correct.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
But the FBI will crush you. This government will crush
you and your family if you try to expose the
truth about things that they are doing that are wrong.
Speaker 4 (03:18):
And we are all examples of that.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
That's the reason we found out just how evil all
the tyranny was inside of our government. And by the way,
I should note credit to Cash Mattel Dan Bongino, those whistleblowers,
those brave whistleblowers, have finally been made whole. That was
an announcement that was put out there. I'm a very
happy man. I hope you are happy as well. But
(03:45):
back to what they're doing inside of the government. Remember,
without those brave whistleblowers, without people coming forward, we'd have
to rely on people like Abby Phillips.
Speaker 6 (03:54):
This idea that this was a weaponized these were all
these different prosecutions, that all these different jurisdictions were not
all directed from one place. There's absolutely no evidence of that.
You guys can tell me what evidence you have of that,
but I've never seen it, and I've never heard anybody.
Speaker 7 (04:09):
Actually, the Obama and Biden administrations didn't politicize the dj
and Okay, who oh, I mean, whom you could? I
mean they were they were better at hiding transparent.
Speaker 6 (04:19):
I'm just saying, if you are making this was directed
by some kind of make puppeteer at the top of
the who is that person?
Speaker 8 (04:27):
So?
Speaker 7 (04:28):
How did the Irish only go after conservative efforts?
Speaker 6 (04:30):
They you're not answering my question. Who is the person?
Who are they?
Speaker 7 (04:35):
I'm talking about the conservatives that Obama and there's no
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
This is a tactic. Who was it? Name the person?
There's no evidence, of course, there's tons and tons and
tons of evidence. Nathan Wade. When they were trying to
throw Donald Trump in prison, Nathan Wade kept visiting the
freaking White House. It's all kinds of evidence. Matthew Graves,
his witch wife was checked in and out of the
White House over and over and over again when he
(05:03):
was chucking as many Trump supporters in prison, it's seemingly possible.
Of course, all the evidence is out there, and they're
all still there. Tulsey Gabbert talked about what she found.
Speaker 9 (05:15):
And you've also found many bags of information. I think
they call them burned bags, and supposed to be burned
and they didn't get burned having to do with how
corrupt the twenty twenty election was. And when will that
all come out?
Speaker 8 (05:31):
Mister President.
Speaker 10 (05:31):
I will be the first to brief you once we
have that information collected. But you're right, it's we are
finding documents literally tucked away in the back of safes
and random offices, in these bags and in other areas,
which again speaks to the intent of those who are
trying to hide the truth from the American people and
trying to cover up the politicization that was led by
(05:55):
people like John Brennan and James Clapper and others that
have caused really immeasurable harm to the American people and
to our country.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
Yea, they're still there, lots and lots of them. We
have a lot of work to do to cut the
tumor out of our government. Again, credit to the Trump
administration for making it happen. Now, let's talk about flag burning,
since that's been in the news. Josh Hammer's going to
(06:24):
join us. Let's find out what the actual law is.
Before we get to that, Let's get to how you feel.
How's your mood. See, as we get older, we don't
get all the things we need in our body, and
we get too much estrogen. It's in our waters. Synthetic
Estrogen's everywhere right now. That's why our testosterone levels are dropping.
(06:47):
That's why we're sad a lot. And we don't have
to live like this. You don't have to feel like
you feel all the time. Let Chock help you whatever
you're looking for in your life, young, old man and woman.
Chok has natural herbal supplements that will make your life better.
They have made my life better. A male vitality stack
(07:09):
from Chok is the best health decision I have ever
made in my life. I will never stop taking one
every single day again. This morning, every day I take
my male vitality stack. I want you to feel like
I feel. Chalk dot com slash JESSETV. We'll be back, Okay.
(07:36):
So we have to talk redistricting, Supreme Corp. To flag burning,
and obviously to get into the legal stuff, you know who,
we always go to my friend Josh Hammer of the
Josh Hammer Show. All right, Josh. Donald Trump famously put
out this executive order about flag burning, and he says
on camera, if you burn a flag, you get a
year in jail. I don't think the president can just
(07:59):
make laws like that or anything, but I don't know,
you know, what's happening.
Speaker 11 (08:05):
So it's very interesting legal question. Actually, so there actually
is a law. There's actually multiple laws, Jesse that Congress
has passed. Is one going back to the nineteen sixties,
nineteen sixty eight, back during the Vietnam War protests can
state all all the flag burnings back then. And then
Congress passed another anti flag burning statue based in nineteen
(08:25):
eighty nine. And that latter statue, which is eighteen US
Code Section seven hundred, does have exactutorily required one year
prison sentenced term. So that is where the one year
is coming from. It's not like he's kind of just
concocting this out of fin are. He's basically issued an
executive order and saying that as bertains to certain types
of flag burning, we are going to actually enforce this
(08:48):
nineteen eighty nine statute. Now, the devil's always in the
details here. So in the executive order, he says, Jesse,
we know the Supreme Court has said that there's a
First Amendment right to engage flag burning, but they didn't
actually talk about when it is used as a means
of inciting violence. You know, various exceptions in well established
First Amendment doctrine. So that is the executive order, taken
(09:11):
at face value, as they're saying, we're going to enforce
this statute as bertains to certain types of exceptions that
the actual underlying Supreme Court cases from thirty five years
ago to not necessarily touch. Now, I actually, personally, Jesse,
you would go actually quite a bit further than this. Actually,
I think that the two Supreme Court is Supreme Court
case in question Texas versus Johnson from nineteen eighty nine.
(09:32):
Then there was a companion case from the next year
US versus Eikman. I think those cases are wrongly decided.
They are both five to four cases.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
There.
Speaker 11 (09:39):
A lot of folks note that Anthony Scalia joined the
majority opinion in both cases. What they don't often note
is that Chief Justice William Ranquist, who was just as
well known a conservative as Scalia, dissented both times.
Speaker 8 (09:49):
There.
Speaker 11 (09:50):
I don't think that you having First Amendments right to
burn the American flag. I don't think you've a first
man right actually to burn anything, because literally burning anything
to pour some gasoline has something aflame. It's not speech,
it's literally not speech. It is conduct, and frankly, it's
actually dangerous conduct because something like fire is involved. And
as conduct as an action, the government has the ability
(10:10):
to regulate it and if it so chooses to actually
criminalize it as well. So that's my actual stance as
it pertains to the overarching first man question there. But
it's important to note that the Executive Order, on its
own terms, actually accepts these two Supreme Court cases. They say,
we're not challenging that there, but we're operating within the
confines there. We're just carving out kind of a First
Amendment exception there, that's what it's trying to do.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
Okay, So, as you said, the devil's in the details.
So not that I would ever in a million year's
harm an American flag. In fact, we go around the
neighborhood and make sure they're not touching the ground. But
if I so desire, and I light an American flag
on fire in my backyard, am I in trouble? What
does it mean to incite violence? If I what is it?
(10:55):
How do you decide that I'm trying to incite violence?
Speaker 4 (10:59):
Right?
Speaker 11 (11:00):
So it would be up to the local laws. What
the executive Order is essentially saying is that we are
going to allow local governments, state governments to try to
enforce this as they see fit. They're ultimately trying to
get this thing to a jury that would be ultimately
kind of in the eye of the beholder. Does this
actually raise to the threshold of inside of myles? Now,
(11:21):
look in the abstract, you know you're hypothetical just doing
it in your own backyard. I mean, the answer is
obviously not. Now Again, in my personal opinion, Jesse, I
am of the opinion there that this actually should be
criminal behavior, whether or not it actually in size violence
there but given the executive order there no that sort
of conduct almost assuredly would not be covered. Again, the
idea is that it would get to a jury, but
(11:43):
very hard to see how any kind of personal conduct
in one's backyard would actually inside violence. The final thing though,
that I think is very important to note though, on
this executive order Jesse, it's really not just about the law.
The laws is sound. I think that Donald Trump has
made a legally sound decision. But I think what Donald
Trump is actually doing here when it comes to this
executive order is he is yet again putting Democrats in
(12:05):
the un annual position of defending, in this case, literal
flag burning. He's yet again taken one of these wedge
cultural issues, whether it's biological males and women's sports, whether
it's trying to oppose the deportation of a homosnik like
Machaman Khalil or the MS thirteen guy kilmar Abrego Garcia,
he's putting them on the defense of when it comes
to these eighty twenty issues. I mean, he's literally making
(12:26):
them defend flag burnings. He's making Adam Shift all the
usual suspects, you know, defend your quote unquote right to
burn the American flag. So it's politically genius. It does
legally work there, Jesse in my opinion, but I think
that the law is frankly only half the point of this,
of this executive order.
Speaker 1 (12:43):
All right, let's shift gears to California redistricting. I understand
Republicans have filed a petition with the state Supreme Court.
What's happening out there.
Speaker 11 (12:53):
Yeah, so they're basically challenging all the way to the
California's Preme Court. This is not necessarily an issue of
a federal lot. Is pretty well established that states have
culinary power to redistrict as they so choose, subject to
some Voting Rights Act exceptions when it comes to racial
gerry managering. By the way, very interesting court case coming
up this coming term where it seems like the Supreme
(13:13):
Court could finally, once and for all put an end
to a lot of Voting Rights Act of nineteen sixty
five shenanigans when it comes to this notion that you
have a statutory concerts requirements to create these majority minority districts,
these these majority black districts now at Bama, South Carolina.
Very interesting stuff that's going to be at the Supreme
Court this coming term. But as it pertains out in California,
(13:34):
what Gavin Newsman in California Democrats are trying to do
is they're essentially trying to find a too clever by
half workaround around their own State of California independent commission
that has been established when it comes to redistrict there.
And it's a clever loss. So I'm not necessarily sure
it's going to be successful, to be totally honest with you,
just just given the ideological complexion of the California Supreme Court,
(13:57):
they will probably bend or backwards to find some way
of citing with Gavin Newsom in California Democrats, especially when
when cherished precious US House seats are at stake there.
So I'm not particularly optimistic here. But they're basically challenging
it on state law grounds and saying that at least
as a procedural matter, that Gavin Newsom is doing this
too quickly and is not actually abiding by the relevant
law which created this independent commission when it comes to redistricting.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
All Right, The New York Times, which I try to
not read, continues to put out peace after peace after
peace talking about Democrats and what a disastrous electoral college
position they're in. What's happening?
Speaker 11 (14:35):
Yeah, so this, you know, this relays directly to the redistrict.
Speaker 5 (14:37):
Right.
Speaker 11 (14:37):
So, I mean, you know, every ten years we have
a US Census. Every ten years we get new apportionment
in the US Congress. I mean, you know, I mean, Jesse,
just look at the twenty twenty census. You know, the
twenty twenty census basically says all you need to know.
For the very first time in the history of California
as a states, California actually lost seats in the electoral
(14:58):
College in the US House. Literally, it's preble sat Literally,
Gavin Newsom has presided over the California that, for the
first times as California became a state in the eighteen fifties,
has actually lost seats in the Congress and votes in
the electoral College. But it's not just California, California, Illinois,
New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, all the usual blue state suspects.
(15:18):
They're all losing seats. What states are gaining seats, well,
the exact opposite. I mean my state of Florida, You're
a state of Texas, the Carolinas, Georgia, Arizona, Tennessee. All
the usual suspects are gaining seats. And the point of
this New York Times article, which I guess they're trying
to light a fire under their ideological buddies over at
DNC headquarters, the purpose of this article is basically to
(15:39):
say that, you know what, based on the trends that
we see thus far, it's going to continue. The twenty
thirty cents is going to look really really good, I
think for Red States and for Republic in the general.
By the way, it'll look even better. I think if
Donald Trump is able to follow through on his long
sought after promise to try to make sure that illegal
aliens are not counted in the sensus, which they definitely
should not be. There is absolutely no requirement that they be.
(16:00):
It is frankly appalling and abhorrent that they are. That'll
actually probably make it even better for Red States.
Speaker 1 (16:05):
Actually, what's going on with Lisa Cook?
Speaker 11 (16:10):
So Lisa Cook is one of these seven Federal Reserve
governors on the Board of Governors. Donald Trump is, you know,
as only Trump can do. He's trying to become the
first president to successfully fire one of the Federal Reserve's
board of Governors and he's firing her because we have
pretty she has not been indicted or convicted, but we
are able to suss out the publicly available data when
(16:33):
it comes to her interactions with financial institutions. There and
there are deeply credible allegations, highly credible that she has
engaged in mortgage fraud because she actually listed in multiple
residences in Michigan and Georgia, as the case may be,
as her principal place of residence in order to secure
a more favorable bank loan. Now, the problem, among others,
is that the Federal Reserve is literally the regulator of
(16:56):
the financial system. They are the lender of last resort.
That is kind of the definition of what a central
is in a modern economy. So it's a massive crisis
of public legitimacy to have one of these seven governors
on the Board of Governors, who sits there on this
body overseeing the financial institutions, if she herself is defrauding
financial institutions. Now, the relevant statue, the Federal Reserve Act
(17:16):
in nineteen thirteen, says that a governor can only be
removed for cause. So there's this whole debate as to
whether or not this constitutes legitimate cause. You know, what's
your name? Lisa Cook's attorney, Abby Lowell is now saying
that all cause only means indicted or or convicted by
a jury.
Speaker 3 (17:32):
But does it.
Speaker 11 (17:33):
I mean Congress could have said that. Congress literally could
have ridden that if they want that. Their cause seems
to me to be subjective in the eyes of the
beholder there, and this seems to me to be a
pretty good cause someone who was credibly alleged to defraud
financial institutions while sitting on the FED Board of Governors.
But you know, this whole statutory question Jesse about cause
is actually something of a sideshow from the overarching constitutional point,
(17:54):
which is that Donald Trump, as the executive has the
executive power to fire who sits in his executive branch. Now,
Cook's defenders will say that the Federal Reserve is independent,
is unique, it's not really within the executive branch, to
which I say, well, literally, where is it. I mean,
it's either an Article one, the Congress article to the
executive branch, or argle three, the judiciary. I'm pretty sure
it's not the Congress or the judiciary. So positive elimination
(18:16):
right there. So you know, one way or the other, Jesse,
Donald Trump's is gonna win on this.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
Apparently every Democrat in the country committed mortgage from It's
wild Josh, thank you, brother, I appreciate it. I don't
understand why you would do that. I mean, I guess
I guess they all get away with it, or have
gotten away with it. Maybe that's why they all do it.
It's such an obvious crime. Anyway, How did you how'd
you sleep last night? Do you get a good night's
(18:44):
sleep every night? Beam is here for you. Beam is
here to make your life better by making your sleep better.
You can wake up every single morning having knocked out
eight nine hours of good sleep, not getting up to
ten times rolling over good sleep, natural sleep because Beam
(19:05):
is drug free. It's simply a cup of hot chocolate
with all kinds of natural things in it that'll just
put you relaxed and drifting off to sleep. Go get
a bag of dream powder. You'll have one in your
home forever. Shotbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back.
Speaker 5 (19:34):
There are eleven very strong candidates. President Trump knows some
of them, some of them he doesn't. I'm going to
begin talking to them after labor day, and there'll be
some other folks around the White House who also interview them,
and we will present three or four candidates to the President.
(19:54):
The new chair will be someone who is expert on
monetary policy, regulatory policy, and knows how to run a
sprawling institution, which the FED is.
Speaker 1 (20:08):
Okay, Scott Piscent is a very sharp guy. As soon
as I hear the word expert, I tend to cringe
a little bit because of how dumb most of those
people are. But I assume Scott Pissent has someone good
in mind joining me now. Dave Bratt, Senior vice president
of Business Relations at the Great Liberty University. Okay, Dave,
why do we need a new FED chair? What's it
(20:30):
take to be FED chair? Where are we going to
find one of these experts?
Speaker 3 (20:35):
Yeah, the folks. If you want an answer, go read
The Monster at Jekyl Island or whatever, referring to the
beginning of the Federal Reserve and how that institution was
set up in nineteen thirteen, and then The Secrets of
the Temple is a more modern book. But your intuition
was right there. Besant is good, but he's got to
(20:56):
operate within a fixed political swamp environment up there, and
so they're going to get these experts right, and the
economic experts will not allow you to bring up You
know that the FED has no problem with leftist policies
right exploring you know, dimensions of multi colored flags on
their buildings and all this as serious time and energy
(21:17):
spent on this, but they will not diagnose right. And
just so if people don't know, the FED has two mandates.
One is price stability and the other is unemployment. They
probably should not have unemployment because they don't have all
the levers for that. They should just be in charge
of price. So when they're given the second charge of unemployment,
they say, well, we can do DEI and everything else
(21:38):
related under the sun, but they will never look at
major problems we have with the allocation of capital in
our country, like a twenty million person border invasion. I
wish the next FED governor would have to tackle that.
What about the one point five million dead and injured
now in just Ukraine plus a million in Russia and
(21:58):
the impact of all of our defense. Where's the economic analysis?
Speaker 5 (22:02):
Right?
Speaker 3 (22:02):
They have a thousand economists in that building, all getting
paid big bucks. So your intuition is spot on they're
gonna hire experts.
Speaker 12 (22:09):
That are just you know, oh, I'm gonna run a
bunch of regressions and you know, do all these statistics
and whatever, and they're not gonna hit the right target
because they're not aiming at the right target, which is
the welfare of the economy and the American people.
Speaker 3 (22:23):
And they the elites don't care about that.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Dave, How does the Federal Reserve deal with prices when
prices are supposedly set by a market that is free.
Speaker 3 (22:38):
Yeah, no, that that would be nice as well. Right,
So we have, in addition to the Federal Reserve problem,
we got you know, seven trillion dollar government budgets per year,
and we don't use the price system, and we have
monopolies all over the place, like the Magnificent seven, right,
the big seven firms that make up about forty percent
(22:59):
of S and P five hundred seven for you know, Google, Microsoft,
all them. So they're all monopolies. So our price system
is broken. We're not using markets. If you use markets
that favors the small guy, if you if you got
to have cronies up in DC adding lines into the
budget of the government, that favors the lawyers and the bureaucrats,
(23:21):
and so how does the FED can shape interest rates?
Speaker 8 (23:26):
Right?
Speaker 3 (23:26):
By and they and they can do this, right. We
saw under Biden that printed way too much money, easy money,
and we had twenty two percent inflation over the over
those four years. Right, if you add it all up together,
that twenty you lost one fifth of your purchasing power.
And people, people aren't mad. They don't know what that
(23:46):
sentence means. Yet, you didn't only lose one fifth of
your wallet or your income. You lost in just those
four years one fifth of your retirement plan. Right, because
when you take those dollars out there, all worth one
fifth less. And that's just from those four years. And
so the FED has as a as a stated purpose,
(24:10):
our target two percent inflation per year. We'll just do
the math on that. What's fifty years at two percent,
you've lost one hundred percent of your purchasing power over
fifty year period. That's their goal. The American people don't
know any of this because we won't teach them that
in the schools, otherwise there'd be a mini revolution.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
Well, that's all pretty terrible, all right. What's going on
with India? Trump made good on his promise, slapped a
fifty percent tariff on India. He's mad at them for
a variety of things, including buying up all that Russian
cheap oil. But what does that mean for me? I
don't even like Indian food.
Speaker 8 (24:48):
What do I care?
Speaker 3 (24:50):
Well, Trump's doing the right thing on all this. I
was on the Big India Times, right, it's the biggest
media over there in India, with about six Indian panelists
and the Chinese panelists. And we want to be friends
with India, right, they're pro democracy there Western but we
got some problems.
Speaker 8 (25:09):
Right.
Speaker 3 (25:10):
They have tariff and non tariff barriers on us. They
got trade deficits with us. They're subsidizing oil to Russia.
They're being too friendly with China. And I said, you know,
you need to assume you're rightful place on the world stage.
They're a superpower. They got one point four billion people,
they're getting rich. They're powerful, but they have not made
(25:32):
it clear what principles they believe in as a country. Right,
we have a constitution, we protect minority rights, you know
in the James Madison, the factions in law. We have
provided free sea lanes for the past seven years. I said,
we helped win World War two, with our allies and
a bunch of jaws dropped and we've been paying the price,
(25:54):
and so we need them to step up and pay
part of the price for maintaining a stage world order.
So that's why they matter. And then you know, hopefully Trump,
if he can end this Ukraine War, he doesn't reproach Ma,
which means, you know, we're not gonna be buddies with
Russia and Putin, but it'd be better to have China
with a two front problem right Russia to the north
(26:16):
of them and US over the Pacific, and then having
India with us too. So Trump's knocking some heads in
order to get these hard moves accomplished, and they're they're
all necessary, and he's doing the right things, and people
get upset in the short run, but hey, if you
want to be a friend, you got to be a
real friend, not a fake friend.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
What risk do we run of India running to the
arms of China, because that would certainly not be a
good that would not be a good alliance to have.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
Yeah, well they're they're not running there, but they're tiptoeing
right now. They've been meeting and talking and they got
meetings over in China next week and Putin was over
in China?
Speaker 8 (27:00):
Was she?
Speaker 3 (27:01):
I think it was this week and Mody was not,
which is, you know, a little bit promising. But India,
like I was saying, they need to share our long
run strategic principles. They they're being a little too cute, right,
They're just cozying up for short run benefit with anyone
who gives them benefit, while we have to pay the price, right,
(27:23):
And Europe wants to go to war and they want
us to pay the price. The Middle East we have wars.
Now we're down in Where are we We're down in Venezuela.
I think right we got the Mexican cartels. We're getting
serious on that. It's like, hey, guys, you know we're
we're running out of bullets and running out of dollars
(27:44):
and someone else needs to be an adult in the room.
Everybody who's spent free riding and the American people know it,
and they're sick of it.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
They've Trump came out and said something about Chinese students
and money that well, here he was.
Speaker 9 (28:02):
But we're getting along very well with China, and I'm
getting along very well with President she. I think it's
very insulting to say students can't come here because they'll
go out, they'll start building schools and they'll be able
to survive it. But I like that their students come here.
I like that other country students come here, and you
know what would happen if they didn't, Our college system
(28:24):
would go to hell very quickly. You'd have and it
wouldn't be the top colleges. It would be colleges that
struggle on the bottom, and you take out three hundred
thousand or six hundred thousand students out of the system.
I like having and I told this the presidency that
we're honored to have their students here. Now with that,
(28:44):
we check and we're careful and we see who's there,
and Marco wants that we spoke. We're in the same position.
But we have a tremendous college system, the best in
the world. Nobody even to us. That's why China sends
them here.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
Yeah, you can count me out on pretty much all that, Dave.
Fifteen percent of our college students are apparently try comms,
and they only come here to spy and steal things.
In what universe is this?
Speaker 8 (29:08):
Okay?
Speaker 3 (29:10):
No, I agree with you. I think he's probably doing
some strategicy. He knows the base is going to go
hyperplect on him and he'll have to pivot. He's got
to deal with China right now in the short run
of his trade agreement, so he's trying to probably be
friendly in the short run. That's not going to work
for the reasons you just stated. And I usually don't
(29:32):
brag on my own school, but Liberty University is ranked
number one most conservative school in the country, training champions
for Christ in the Hill today the Hill, the big
DC swamp rag up there. That's popular with all the Congress.
So just wanted to put in a good word for
Liberty University.
Speaker 1 (29:50):
You brag on yourself all day long. That's always welcome
on this show, Dave, Dave, appreciate you very much. Come back,
So good man, Maybe I should be the head of
the Federal Reserve. I don't have any idea what what
I would do. I mean, I don't know anything about it.
(30:10):
But how hard can it be?
Speaker 8 (30:12):
Anyway?
Speaker 1 (30:13):
You know, it's easy switching to your cell phone service
to pure talk. That's really easy. Do you understand that?
You just go to puretalk dot com slash jessetv means
ta into it all. We're talking about the patriotic mobile company,
the one who's CEO fought for this country, the company
that will save you be fortune a fortune. What if
(30:36):
your cell phone bill could get cut in half? Would
that help a little extra scratch laying around? When I
switched from T Mobile to pure Talk, clean into my
bill got cut in half? Switch Puretalk dot com slash
Jesse TV.
Speaker 8 (30:53):
We'll be back.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
Well by now. Unless you've been living under a rock,
you've probably seen a picture or the video of a
fourteen year old girl in Scotland with a hatchet and
a knife, fighting off, or at least attempting to scare
off somebody who was after her. Joining me now to
talk about what exactly happened out there? What is going on?
Are these people about to have a revolution? The great
(31:24):
Tommy Robinson, British journalist. Okay, Tommy, would you do me
a favor for those who are unaware of it? Unpack
this story? What happened? Why is she running around with
a hatchet?
Speaker 13 (31:36):
So there's a viral video it shows a young Scottish
child who's clearly says you've attacked children. So she's been
attacked or her sister's been attacked, violently attacked. The allegation
is by these migrant it's a migrant man. Now, just
so people understand, from one end of you, from one
end of Britain to the other, young girls like this
(31:57):
have been kidnapped, tortured and raped and whenever this happens,
they've been made that they've been made the scapegoat. So
even now the media are probably about to try and
spin this, totally spin it. Even though you can hear
the little girl saying you attacked us, Leave us alone, stay.
Speaker 4 (32:14):
Away from us.
Speaker 13 (32:15):
You can hear her clearly talking about a previous physical attack,
which allegedly is to do with the man video in
the young girls. But across Britain children are being targeted,
the police stand by, allow it to happen, facilitate it,
and that little girl now has faced prosecution for.
Speaker 4 (32:32):
Having a weapon. Well the brick.
Speaker 13 (32:34):
This is going on across our country and the media
now are trying to spin it to say there's no
proof that she was attacked. You can clearly hear what
she's saying in the video and it's a sad state
of affairs now that young girls are having to arm
themselves with weapons to defend themselves against migrants who have
been imported into this country.
Speaker 1 (32:54):
Gosh freaking world, did you say she's being prosecuted. What's
happening to him?
Speaker 4 (33:01):
Nothing's happening to him.
Speaker 13 (33:02):
She's being prosecuted now, Just so you know, just last
week at a migrant hotel in Epin, a migrant let
himself into an old lady's house, walked into her house.
Her daughter then chased him, and when her daughter chased him,
her daughter now faces prosecution. The migrant has not been arrested,
not been prosecuted. The daughter who chased him out of
(33:24):
the house has faced prosecution for what happened at the
migrant hotel. This little girl is facing criminal prosecution. The
migrant nothing at all, Tommy.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
I see these videos in Scotland and Ireland. I see
these videos and I see the anger arising. Obviously you've
been a part of this, of raising a big part
of this, raising awareness of all this. Are the people?
Are they fed up? And I don't know what that means, right,
I certainly don't want to see anyone get hurt, but
are people fed up? Where is this going?
Speaker 13 (33:59):
This country is bubby like never before. Even I'm not
just exaggerating here. It's brewing on revolution. The public are awake,
the public are furious. The public understand their safety has
been taken. They realize we've been betrayed. We're looking at
our culture disappear. Our towns and cities are changing. The
demographics are changing that quick, that fast. We feel like
(34:20):
foreigners in our own towns and cities. That's what's happened
that quick, that fast. Whilst British people are struggling to
get dentists, appointment, to get doctors, migrants are being brought in,
put in four star hotels. British pensioners cannot afford their heating,
can't pay their bills, whilst migrants are put up in
hotels with free luxury meals. Every single day. Many of
(34:41):
the migrants that have come in. There have been twenty
five sexual assaults on children by migrants in hotels put
up in hotels. Nine British women have been raped by
migrants just in those hotels. Just so you know, ninety
percent of rape cases don't go to court. We've got
nine court cases of migrants who of raped women. How
(35:04):
many British women are being raped and there's not a
day that goes by now where we don't see a
story of a migrant sexually assaulting, attacking, torturing young girls
and British.
Speaker 4 (35:14):
Women in this country.
Speaker 13 (35:16):
And the whole time that's happening, our government wont to
call anyone who opposes it far right racist extremists.
Speaker 4 (35:23):
It doesn't wash anymore.
Speaker 13 (35:24):
Those words and those smears and those labels worked for
twenty years. They paralyzed this entire nation of men and
women who are too scared to speak out. I can
confidently say now that fear, that bubble, it's bursts.
Speaker 4 (35:39):
The British public are awake. You're going to see I
told you Jesse before.
Speaker 13 (35:43):
On the thirteenth of September, we're expecting a million people
to descend from every corner of Britain onto our capital city,
where the British public will send a message to the
world that we are remaining silent no longer. We're watching
the destruction of this country no more. We will not
be silent any longer. That's what's happening. And I'm telling
you the country is bubbling. It's brewing for revolution. It's happening.
(36:07):
Cats out in the bag, they can't put it back in.
People are awake. The more you see videos like this.
What the media we're now try and do and politicians
is spin this. But it doesn't matter. They used to
have the power, they used to have the monopoly. They
don't have any power anymore. I picked this up, send
one tweet. We've reached more than the whole BBC. It
doesn't matter anymore. Their power has gone. We're grateful to
(36:28):
Elon Musk for giving the public back and a space
where we can see what's happening. We can discuss these
topics and conversations. X is the only platform we have
left in this country. If it wasn't for Elon must
buy an X, we'd be in the dark. None of
us would have got this video. They had a sense
of it, they had deplatformed it, and then they'd spun
(36:48):
the whole country with their media narrative.
Speaker 4 (36:51):
It doesn't wash anymore. Britain's awake, Tommy.
Speaker 1 (36:55):
Can you help me understand location when it comes to
where they're putting these people, where these assaults are happening.
And I say this because I'm not physically there is
this isolated to the cities. Are they putting them in
the countryside? Is it? Where is this taking place.
Speaker 13 (37:11):
Well, what used to happen Because I'm from a town
called Glutontown, which is a very rough town thirty miles
north of London. It has a fifty percent Uslim population,
is a very poor town, working class. These are the
sorts of towns all these migrants used to be thrown into.
They used to rape their way through them and it
would be our problem.
Speaker 4 (37:29):
But not anymore.
Speaker 13 (37:31):
Now Hotels in every single corner of Britain are full
up with migrants. So in leafy suburban areas, places that
weren't touched or affected by Islamic immigration, now in those
small little areas they can't let their children walk to school.
They're getting sexually assaulted. So the problem that I used
to talk about, which used to be confined to big
(37:52):
cities like where I'm from, has now spread to every
corner of Britain that there's not a single area that's
not being affected anymore. So now the public have had
a mass awakening because it was all right when it
wasn't in their backyard.
Speaker 4 (38:05):
Well now it's in their backyard.
Speaker 13 (38:07):
It's not confined to one area, it's every corner of Britain,
every town, every city. Hotels are full migrant attacks are
happening in the places that you wouldn't expect them to happen,
where there were no migrants. You might have a totally
a totally English suburban area like Epping, which has now
been flooded with hotels housing two hundred migrants, where young
(38:28):
children are being sexually assaulted on their way to school.
This is happening from one corner of Britain to the other.
There's no hiding it anymore. The public see it, they
feel it. There's I can sense, Jesse, there is a
massive shift in this country in public opinion, something I've
only watched and dreamed about for fifteen years. I've been
banging my head against the wall trying to wake this
(38:50):
country up. And now the country's awake. It's awake, it's ready.
People are listening. As I said, We're going to send
a message to the establishment British there is patriots, young
old women, grandma's children are going to travel from all
over Britain to send a message to our treacherous, tyrannical,
traitorous government. On September thirteenth.
Speaker 1 (39:13):
Tommy, you mentioned earlier that the cops are complicit, that
the cops showed them. That is just that is beyond
belief for a lot of us who have a lot
of respect for law enforcement. Can you help me understand
that dynamic?
Speaker 13 (39:28):
Yeh, so police Officers'll give a couple of examples from
government government studies.
Speaker 4 (39:33):
Now not my opinion.
Speaker 13 (39:35):
Two fathers their thirteen year old daughters were in a
house being raped by a group of Muslim men. The
dads got together they went to the house to get
their daughters back. The police turned up and arrested the dads.
They left the children in the house with Pakistani Muslim
men being raped. Another incident, a young twelve year old
(39:57):
girl was in a derelict house, an abandoned home, five
Muslim men sexually assaulting and rapner. The police turned up.
They arrested the twelve year old girl for drunk and disorderly.
They arrested the twelve year old child for drunk and disorderly.
They did not arrest or prosecute the men. Quite literally,
(40:17):
the invading men have been given free reign from one
end of this country to the other to kidnap, torture
and rape. Now I know to your viewers that sounds
unbelievable that if you want to put a scale on
the power of political correctness. It paralyzed an entire country
like Britain, it paralyzed their police force and government from
(40:39):
one end of the country to the other. They stood
by and in all the government reports in Rotherham, in Telford,
in Rochdale. In Rotherham, one four hundred children were raped.
Rotherham only has a three point seven percent Muslim population.
In Telford, one thousand children were raped, five are dead.
There's only a one point seven percent Muslim popular in
(41:00):
that town in Telford. In Telford they identified two hundred
Muslim rapists in that town alone. There's only a thousand
Muslim men in that town. Twenty percent of the men
were raping our children and murdering them and only eleven
of those men have faced prosecution. Where So when you
see the cases in the UK and the pictures of
(41:20):
the Muslims being charged in each town, it's a handful
where there's the reality is one hundreds and hundreds and
hundreds in every town and city. The Rape Gang Inquiry
just been published now by Rupert Low and Sammy Woodhouse.
Sammy Woodhouse is a survivor of these rape gangs in Rotherham.
They've identified eighty five Islamic communities in towns and cities
(41:42):
across the country which were raping their way through them.
Speaker 4 (41:45):
Eighty five.
Speaker 13 (41:46):
Basically, every single town that has an Islamic community in
Britain has these gangs targeting young English children. And whilst
they were targeting, the police stood by, and they didn't
stood by. They prosecuted the families, They prosecute the english
Men who stood up. They demonized us, they imprisoned us,
they lied to the public about us because they all
(42:07):
had dirty hands. So there is a for your audience
to understand the scale of this problem. And in America,
wake up because if you've got Islamic communities, I guarantee
you it's happening there. And the Democrats, just like our
Labor Party, will be covering it up. And they'll cover
it up because their next vote bank for their politics
is coming from that Islamic community and what means more
(42:29):
to them, just like in England, what meant more to
the Labor Party, the Islamic vote meant more than protect
protecting young English girls, and your Democrat party will be
no different.
Speaker 1 (42:40):
God have mercy. Telling of the final question, are there
any military leaders in Britain who have spoken out against
this current or former.
Speaker 13 (42:53):
And Middleton is a former sas military hero. He is
speaking our next event on the thirteenth of September. He
is speaking strong. He's going to run for mayor of London.
He'll face the same accusations and attacks. But the difference
is where we are now to twenty four months ago,
even twelve months ago. Yes, people are now speaking. People
(43:17):
are now starting to find the courage and as more
people speak up, it becomes more palatable, more acceptable, and
more people are finding coage to speak up. So keep
your eyes on the UK. Big things are brewing. There's
a shift in public opinion. It's not going away.
Speaker 1 (43:35):
Whereise gone, Tommy, blessings to your brother, stay after him.
It's freaking horrific evil and he's right. Democrats are the same,
try as hard as they could to do the same
thing here, and they've been successful in a lot of ways. Evil,
deeply evil, and it's all about power anyway. Late in
(43:57):
the moon next, all right, it's time to lighten the mood.
And here's a different light in the.
Speaker 8 (44:10):
Mood for you. Your voice works, it works now. No longer
is corporate America able to just constantly trash. You, trash
your culture, trash the country without hearing from you. Because
of the power of social media, your voice now works
(44:30):
and we are speaking up.
Speaker 1 (44:31):
We're getting loud, so when they trash things we love,
we speak up. Cracker Barrel got a lot of crap
as they changed their stupid logo, spent something like seven
hundred million dollars to figure out a new logo that sucked,
and everybody got mad at them for it. They just
put out a statement, we thank our guests for sharing
your voices in love for Cracker Barrel. We said we
(44:52):
would listen.
Speaker 4 (44:53):
And we have.
Speaker 1 (44:54):
Our new logo is going away and our old timer
will remain. The days of Lase Fair, Oh I'll just
let it go have to be over. You have to
treat these people with aggression, and we did little wins,
celebrate them, see them all.
Speaker 4 (45:15):
M
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Law & Order: Criminal Justice System - Season 1 & Season 2
Season Two Out Now! Law & Order: Criminal Justice System tells the real stories behind the landmark cases that have shaped how the most dangerous and influential criminals in America are prosecuted. In its second season, the series tackles the threat of terrorism in the United States. From the rise of extremist political groups in the 60s to domestic lone wolves in the modern day, we explore how organizations like the FBI and Joint Terrorism Take Force have evolved to fight back against a multitude of terrorist threats.