February 13, 2025 • 44 mins
Tulsi Gabbard has been CONFIRMED as Director of National Intelligence. Jesse Kelly reacts to this and gets analysis from Breanna Morello. This comes as President Trump continues to free hostages from overseas. Jesse reflects on the differences between Trump and Biden's presidencies on this issue. On the topic of foreign policy, there's new intel out about the Chinese spy balloon that flew over the United States. Hans Mahncke joins Jesse with his reaction. Plus, a discussion about activist judges with Sean Davis of The Federalist.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 2-12-25
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Why does Trump bring hostages home and Joe Biden did not.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
We'll discuss that tonight. Brianna Morella joins us.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
We have so much to talk about, from judicial activism
to the world going crazy.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Are we going to see the end of the war
in Ukraine? All that coming up?
Speaker 1 (00:17):
And I'm right, okay, let's discuss hostages coming home, which
is freaking wonderful, so thrilled to see this happening. Why
are Americans coming home? What's going on right now? First
(00:37):
of all, before we get into that, let's discuss this.
What is the point of becoming a citizen of a nation?
Why ever form nations at all?
Speaker 2 (00:47):
Tribes? Why not?
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Why do we do that? Why don't we all just
go live on our own somewhere. Well, the point is
that you get protection and prosperity coming to get either
to form a nation, a nation that will advocate on
your behalf. You see, being a citizen of a country
(01:09):
is a contract with obligations on both sides. And this
is the difference between the evil communist tyrants in this
country and administrations like the one we have now. The
obligations go both ways. Yes, you as a citizen, me
as citizen I have obligations I feel. I've always felt
(01:30):
a duty to my country. It's part of the reason
I signed up to fight for it to this day.
Part of the reason I do this. I want to
advocate on behalf of my country. I care about it.
I have a duty to it. I would die for
it today. But that's not one way. That doesn't only
go one direction. My country has an obligation to me
(01:51):
as well, and this doesn't This is not just about America.
This should be every citizen of every nation across the globe.
I am a citizen of the United States of America.
That means when I go abroad, whether I'm in Mozambique,
whether I'm in London, Australia, wherever I happen to go,
I am offered some layer of protection by the government
(02:14):
of the United States of America because I'm a citizen
of the United States of America.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
That is how it should be.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
Remember that story from the New Testament.
Speaker 2 (02:24):
We talked about it before. Hopefully you've read it in
your Bible.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
When Paul apostle Paul is getting beaten, he gets arrested,
he's getting beaten, and he says to him, should you
be doing this to a Roman citizen. Remember how they
freaked out? Wow wow, wow, Hey, bring them in a
glass of water. WHOA, I didn't realize what is that?
Speaker 2 (02:42):
That citizenship right there? I'm a citizen.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
You mess with me, you will deal with the fury
of Rome. But here in the United States of America,
that goes away whenever you elect a Democrat.
Speaker 2 (02:55):
See it just does. It goes away.
Speaker 1 (02:59):
Four years of Joe Biden's presidency with Americans held all
over the planet by terrorist groups, by nation states, and
the only time anybody can even remember the Biden administration
lifting a finger to bring one home is when a
black Wnba lesbian got busted and thrown in prison in Russia.
(03:21):
As soon as they thought they could get some cultural
Marxist brownie points out of it, the Biden administration bent
over backwards and released from prison the foremost weapons dealer
on the planet so we could bring the black lesbian
back home and get some cultural Marxist brownie points. But
after that it went back to not a care in
the world. Too bad, so sad, best of luck in
(03:44):
prison over there.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
And then the Trump administration comes in and we'll get
to the ones he just released.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
But it's not as if he's done. Donald Trump constantly
is talking like this.
Speaker 3 (03:59):
As far as I'm concerned, if all of the hostages
aren't returned by Saturday at twelve o'clock, I think it's
an appropriate time. I would say, cancel it, and all
bets are off and let hell break out. I'd say
they ought to be returned by twelve o'clock on Saturday.
And if they're not returned, all of them, not in
(04:20):
drips and drabs, not two and one and three and
four and two Saturday at twelve o'clock, and after that,
I would say, all hell is going to break out.
And I don't think they're going to do it. I
think a lot of them are dead. I think a
lot of the hostages are dead. I think it's a
(04:43):
great it's a great human tragedy.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
What's happened. How people can be that?
Speaker 1 (04:56):
I want you to know something. I know you like
hearing American president talk like that. I like hearing an
American president talk like that. But this is yet another
thing that should not be a partisan issue. You an
American citizen, If God forbid, you are ever abroad and Russia,
Hamas whoever gets their hands on you.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
You should.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
You have every right to expect every single American president
to speak about you exactly like that. That should be
the basic, the base expectation of every single American president.
You were the commander in chief, me the citizen. I
(05:41):
have a duty to the country. I will, I will,
I will fulfill that duty. You have a duty to
me as well. You look out for me, you protect me,
and you let anyone know who would harm a hair
on my head, even though I don't have any left
that all hell will come down on them if.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
They do so. That is part of citisenship.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
And I hate that we don't have it when Democrats
are in office, and I love that we have it now.
And I loved, I loved Mark Fogel, a teacher. Thirty
Russians got their hands on him four years ago, wrongfully
detained in a Russian prison prison. Not exactly a great time.
Donald Trump gets in three weeks later. Boom, Markvogel's on
a plane home. Here he was last night.
Speaker 4 (06:25):
I feel like the luckiest man on earth right now.
And I want you to know that I am not
a hero in this at all. And President Trump, this
is a hero. Thank you all. And I love our country,
(06:46):
and I'm so happy to be back here, and I
wish I could articulate it and better.
Speaker 5 (06:56):
You've done beautifully. And he's got a great mother. And
want to show the mother in a rally, she said,
do you if you win, will you get my son out?
And I promise, she's ninety five years old and we'll
get him out.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
And we get him out. Isn't that wonderful? And why
does Trump get him out? How that happened?
Speaker 1 (07:21):
How did that happen? Well, you know, I'm a father.
Stay with me on this. Maybe you're a father, maybe
you're a mother of it. I'm a father, And to
be honest with you, I don't think I'm a very
good one. But if you ask me, I wouldn't think.
I don't think I'm a very good one. But the
people around me, my wife included, think I'm.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
A great one. Oh, your best dad, best dad. And
you know what I am? I care. I love them.
That's what I am.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
All my failings, all the ways I've gone wrong. If
you just care, that'll get you a very long way
as a father. You might even find yourself raising a
couple of fine young men like I am. Why does
Donald Trump as president. Why is he so successful? We
did this last time too during his four years. Why
is he so successful bringing Americans home when they are
(08:14):
kept abroad?
Speaker 2 (08:16):
He cares, that's it. He cares.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
He doesn't get in and check the poll numbers when
someone puts something in front of his desk. Hey, mister president,
we have a Mark Foegel helped over there in Russia.
It doesn't immediately become political while we have the midterms
coming up?
Speaker 2 (08:33):
Have we pulled tested this?
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Do we know what the Latinos think about? There's none
of that, just genuine care and oftentimes, look, you want
to be a good president, maybe that's all it takes
is caring enough. And Steve Whitcoff us Special Envoy, so
he's not done.
Speaker 6 (08:55):
John, I would say to you that the president's policy
on Americans that are held abroad, we leave nobody behind.
It's very, very similar to the military credo, leave nobody
back on the battlefield. And that's how he feels. And
so I think that you'll see a president who is
extraordinarily proactive in seeking all hostages to be released who
(09:19):
are being held in.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
That's wonderful.
Speaker 1 (09:25):
And you know what's sad is that It's wonderful because
we should always expect every American president the ones we love,
the ones we hate, the ones we vote for, the
ones we don't. Every single American president should conduct themselves
exactly this way when our citizens are held or harmed abroad.
So good for us, Good for Donald Trump. Thank you,
(09:48):
mister President, very much. Please keep continuing to bring them home,
and please keep caring all that may have made you uncomfortable.
But I am right. We have an amazing show for
you right now. Hans Monkey joins us in just a moment.
Before we get to Hans, let's get to the expense
(10:08):
reports you have to do. Are they the freakin worst?
I have a one man show. It's just me, Aubrey.
My wife does the books.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
But it's just me.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
I'm the only one with expenses out there. Flight here,
hotel there, and it's a nightmare. Then when she does expenses,
you know what. I'm in for a day of text messaging.
Speaker 2 (10:28):
Why did this? What category does this go?
Speaker 1 (10:31):
I don't it's awful, Well, it used to be. Now
we have the Ramp Corporate Card. The Ramp Corporate Card.
Does it all for you? Doesn't that sound nice? Does
it all for you categorizes everything you're not chasing down
this receipt that RAMP does.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
It all for you make your life easier.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
How much time would you spend, how much money would
you spend if you didn't have.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
To stress it?
Speaker 1 (10:52):
So for a limited time, listeners of this show can
get two hundred and fifty dollars when you join RAMP.
There's going to ramp dot com slash jesse. That's ramp
dot com slash Jesse cards issued by Sutton Bank member
FDI say terms and conditions apply, We'll be back.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
Okay. So there's more good news out there.
Speaker 1 (11:20):
And this may not tug at your heart strings because
it's not near and dear to us. But the Russia
Ukraine War, whatever you think about that whole thing, it's
been butchery, butchery, and you can't ever trust the casualty numbers.
But when you look at the estimates out there, we're
talking about our losses from World War two, that's the
kind of butchery we've seen. Well, we wake up this
(11:43):
morning and find out Trump had a long phone call
with Putin and the end of that war has begun.
Negotiations have officially begun. Let's get this whole thing stopped.
Stop losing all their blood, stop losing all our treasure.
Joining me now, Hans Monke, author of the book Swift
Voting America. Hans, No matter what, this is a good thing,
(12:04):
and I really question anybody who says it's not.
Speaker 2 (12:08):
This is a great thing.
Speaker 7 (12:10):
The thing that frustrates me about this is that it
didn't happen eight years ago. And of course Trump's hands
were tied with this whole Russia collusion hoax, that whole mess.
He wasn't able to unneach his superpower, his negotiating power,
his leverage, all the stuff in his toolbox. He wasn't
able to do that. And we see that he can.
(12:32):
Now he did today and we're already seeing the results.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
Hans helped me understand.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
Pretend like I don't know anything about politics in America
and I just showed up yesterday. Why the two totally
different approaches the Biden presidency versus the Trump presidency when
it comes to Ukraine Russia. Why doesn't everybody want the
carnage to end? Why isn't negotiating a piece just kind
of the normal way they talk?
Speaker 2 (13:02):
Why so different? I think there's it's multiicausal.
Speaker 7 (13:06):
So you have a lot of stuff going on with
old Cold War style people where their whole mentality is
Cold War Russians are bad no matter what.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
So you have that, you have the corruption.
Speaker 7 (13:19):
Remember you had these CIA bases in Ukraine that no
one was told about until recently. That was a big secret.
There's a lot of Biden corruption going on in Ukraine.
There was a lot of general corruption going on in Ukraine.
There was a whole us AID thing going on in Ukraine.
So there's a lot of stuff to cover up there
that people just don't want anyone to find out about.
(13:41):
Then there's these kind of geopolitical thinkers who think that
Russia has to be contained and Ukraine is part of
Europe and this and that and so on. So you
have a lot of different kind of people coming together
for different reasons. But unfortunately they all came together under
this sort of globalist umbrella or establishment at least, you know,
whatever you want to call it. And all of those
(14:02):
people coalesced sort of under Biden, and they were all
pulling in the wrong direction.
Speaker 2 (14:07):
And you know, finally that's been corrected.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Okay, Hans, let's switch gears and talk about something that
just it makes my blood pressure go through the roof
the whole Chinese spy balloon thing. For those who may
have forgotten, the United States government under Joe Biden detected
a Chinese spy balloon.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
When it was over Alaska.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
It was then allowed to traverse the entirety of the
United States of America, and they waited until it was
over the freaking Atlantic before they shot it down.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
Hans, talk to me about this, please.
Speaker 7 (14:42):
Yeah, no, it makes my blood boil, just as you.
We've now found out from a still classified report within
the Pentagon. It's a seventy five page report that's been
reported about. The report itself has not come out yet,
but that report is supposed to state, well, what they found.
So after they shot it down in the Atlantic, which
(15:02):
makes things much more difficult because then you have to
send down divers and you know, trying to recover everything.
Eventually they did. That would have been easier if they
just shot it down overland. But okay, so they found
the pieces and now they put them back together, and
now they figured out, oh my goodness, this thing is
full of US parts. So there's parts in there from Iridium,
the satellite phone company. There's parts in there from Texas Instruments,
(15:25):
various other US companies that were basically US technology was
used by China to spy on the US. In a nutshell,
that's what was going on. The other thing that I
found very interesting that hasn't really been reported is that
they found kind of empty compartments within that spy balloon
and they weren't being used at the time, but they
(15:47):
could have been used in an offensive way. So there
was no offensive weaponry or anything like that on the balloon.
It was just spying equipment, but it could have been. So,
you know, otherwise, what are these all these empty compartments for?
So they were talking about maybe you could launch drones, gliders, whatever,
that sort of thing, and that's what these compartments might
have been for. But you know, as it stands, from
(16:10):
what we know now, US technology was used by China
to spy on the US.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Okay, so walk me through that, Hans the possibilities there.
Does that mean Texas Instruments is collaborating with the Chinese
Communist Party or does it mean the Chinese are doing
well the Chicoms have been doing forever, just blatantly ripping
off our technology.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
Yeah, I know, it's the latter.
Speaker 7 (16:34):
So what you can pick this stuff up on eBay,
that is the simple stuff. The more difficult stuff you
have to find other ways of getting. But no, I mean,
there's no suggestion at all that any of these US
companies were collaborating with the Chinese Communist Party or the
Chinese in general.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
But look at what happened with Nvidia recently.
Speaker 7 (16:54):
You know, you had the new Chinese AI and everyone
was sort of reporting about and everyone was saying, oh,
look they did it for so cheap, and they did
it themselves and so on, and then it turns out,
once you look under the hood, that actually they did
it using these Nvidia chips, but they're not allowed to
be sent sold to China.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
So what did they do.
Speaker 7 (17:12):
They went to Singapore and bought I think like fifty
thousand of them or something like that. So it's very
easy for them to source. Even if there are sanctions,
if there are export restrictions and so on, it's very
easy for them to go elsewhere into other markets and
find this stuff.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Let's switch gears to something that's your specialty.
Speaker 2 (17:35):
The Russia hoax.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
We were talking earlier about Ukraine, the Russia hoax. There
are a lot of ties there are, they're not.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Oh massively, very very much.
Speaker 7 (17:44):
So I think first of all, the most important thing
that's always kind of overlooked, especially by legacy media, is
that the Ukraine War did not start in twenty twenty two.
It started in twenty fourteen under Obama. It was just
on a smaller scale, the whole coup situation which Biden
basically green lighted Victoria Neulan, that whole story I'm digressing here,
(18:06):
but that's how it kicked off. They kicked out the
democratically elected government of Ukraine day by day, I mean,
Biden and Neulan replaced them with their own puppets, and
the Russians weren't happy with it, obviously not. And that's
when they took Crimea. That was back in twenty fourteen,
and then you had the civil war breakout in the
eastern parts of Ukraine where you have Russian speaking people
who were not happy with.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
This situation, obviously, right.
Speaker 7 (18:29):
So this has been going on for a very long time,
and President Trump could have resolved this during his first term.
In fact, during that election in twenty sixteen, he kept
saying that he was going to resolve it. But then
with this Russia collusion hoax. They basically tied his hands.
They criminalized any kind of diplomacy with Russia. You remember,
I mean anytime he met the Russian ambassador or something
(18:50):
like that, which is completely innocuous. They had a total
meltdown the media did. When Putin gave a baron Trump
the son a football like a soccer ball, media had
to melt down about that soccer ball being bugged and
being spyware. And it was justly complete hysteria. It was
incredibly bad because it prevented Trump from doing anything about
(19:11):
that situation that was going on already, and then of
course when Biden came in, things only escalated and got worse. Now,
some people say that the Russia hoax was at least
meant in part and I agree to cover up for
everything that had gone on in Ukraine, and I think
that is true. We releast talked about the coup in
(19:32):
twenty fourteen. Ukraine also interfered in the twenty sixteen election
quite openly. You can go back and you know they
had their ambassador writing anti Trump pieces, They had their
prime minister gone Facebook and just go on a huge,
horrible anti Tramp rant. This is all in the run
up to the twenty sixteen election, so there was a
(19:53):
lot to cover up. There was a lot to be
gained by the establishment, by the elites, by all those
kinds of people, by Democrats. In painting Russia as the
bad one in Ukraine has the good one, that was
sort of the overarching idea.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
What a freaking ugly state of affairs, swift boating of America.
That's his book, Hans, Thank you, brother, I appreciate you
very much.
Speaker 2 (20:14):
Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (20:17):
All Right, Polsy's in Polsy Gabbert is officially in What's
that mean?
Speaker 2 (20:24):
Let's talk to Brianna.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
Morello about that and many other things. Before we talked
to her about that. Let me talk to you about
your cell phone company and why.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
It's communist garbage. We have got to stop.
Speaker 1 (20:34):
Funding the companies who hate our guts and work against us.
Speaker 2 (20:38):
We have got to put our money where our morals are.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
And I realize that can be difficult sometimes when you're
going out to buy this, when you're looking for this service,
it's hard to stop, take an extra step, get on
your phone.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
Okay, what causes do they support? It's hard.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
I realized that, but not with pure talking at least
with your mobile service. It's a no brainer on the
same five G network, So you're not sacrificing service.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
You save a fortune.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
They hire Americans, they don't fund things like planned parenthood in.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
Black Lives Matter. Pure Talk that's a no brainer.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
And now with the qualifying plan free phones. I know
that phone of yours has cracks in the screen and stuff.
How about you go get an iPhone fourteen, Samsung Galaxy,
Puretalk dot Com slash JESSETV.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
We'll be back. Paulcy Gabbert is in.
Speaker 1 (21:38):
We officially have the most attractive Director of National Intelligence
in the history of the United States of America.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
That's good, but I'm sure there are other Bennies involved.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
Joining me now to discuss that is Brionna Morello, host
of The Wonderful Brianna Morello Show, which you.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Can see right here on the first on the weekend.
Speaker 1 (21:55):
Okay, Brianna, Besides the fact that she's hot, what should.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
We expect here?
Speaker 8 (22:00):
Oh, that's all I had for you, the fact that
she's hot, Jesse, I didn't have anything else. Now, this
woman is absolutely incredible. First off, I gotta say I
love the fact that Telsea Gabbert was one of the
thousands of Americans who were added to the terror watch list,
the TSA terror watch lists.
Speaker 2 (22:17):
As you guys know, we.
Speaker 8 (22:18):
Spoke about it. I broke it actually exclusive to her.
I called her team to let her know that she
was added to that list. And so now to see
her as the D and I director, I gotta say,
is really really impressive. We've been looking for all the
facts as to how she landed that list, and I'm
sure now we'll finally figure that out. But I'm really excited.
She seems to call out all the right people. She
(22:38):
knows that Faiza was a massive issue. I know, Jesse,
between you and I, we are we hate Fisa. And
she seems to understand that She's not rolling back. All
the reports do say that she's getting a little cushy
with Fiza.
Speaker 2 (22:51):
She's not.
Speaker 8 (22:52):
She still does not like it at all. She understands
that you've been used legally to surveil the American people.
So this is the kind of person you'd want in
a position like this. So I'm excited, and I hope
you are too.
Speaker 1 (23:03):
Oh yeah, no, I'm all kidding aside. I'm very excited
that we have someone who's aware of the corruption, all
the evil stuff that goes on inside of our intelligence
community heading up the intelligence community. That brings me to
this point, though, Brianna, how concerned are we that they're
simply going to silo her?
Speaker 6 (23:22):
Now?
Speaker 2 (23:22):
She is a very.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
Sharp individual on top of our military service and everything else.
But these people live in secrecy. That's frankly their job.
Are we worrying they're going to keep her? You know, hey,
just Paulicy No, no, no, no, stay over there, We've
got this covered over here.
Speaker 2 (23:37):
Yeah, it sounds like that she's not.
Speaker 8 (23:38):
She understands that she needs to push back on the
intel community. She's very well aware of that. So I
think she's not going to allow them to push her
off the side. She's going to get the work done.
I'm confident in that. And you know, she's ticked off
all the right people, and that's usually clear indicator. When
everyone that you and I both don't like hate her,
that's a clear indicator to me that she's the perfect
(23:59):
person for the role. And then she's not going to
just be quiet and kind of get back into a corner.
So I'm very confident that she's going to correct all
the issues that we talk about all the time.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
It seems like RFK Junior is going to get through tomorrow,
which I'm actually surprised, but I can't believe Paulsy got through.
I can't believe our FK is getting tough, But it
looks like they're getting through.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
What do we expect him to actually do. I realized he's.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
Become an internet meme at this point in time, But
what's actually going to happen?
Speaker 8 (24:27):
Yeah, Well, I mean, I'm hoping he can make America
healthy again. It's outrageous that this country has become so unhealthy,
and I think he understands all of that. He used
to be the left hero until they realize he was
anti anti vax and he was pushing back against big
pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 9 (24:44):
So I think he's going to continue to do that.
Speaker 8 (24:46):
I think he's going to get through, and I think
he's going to continue to push back against all these
companies I have destroyed this country and destroyed our health.
So I'm hopeful that OURFK is going to do just that.
We'll see did he talk a big game over the
last couple of months. We'll find out. But I also
really do hope that he stays true to his word,
because we've got a big issue on our hands. You know,
(25:07):
these pharmastudo companies are intentionally making Americans sick so that
become forever patients. And the clearest indicator of that is food.
Jesse I talk about all the time I lost thirty
pounds from no longer eating processed food to going to
a carnivor only diet. And so many Americans I know
are doing the same and they're having great results, but
for everyone. But it just goes to show that the
food we're taking in is probably poisoning and is killing us.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
So carnivore only. Where do chips follow in there? I
really like chips.
Speaker 8 (25:38):
Sorry to break the news to you. You do ketos,
you understand?
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Loosh?
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Yeah, obviously, very strict, very strict about the whole thing. Okay,
Cash Bartel, God only knows when he's going to get
in there, because Dick Derbin keeps stopping him. Why would
Dick Derban be so concerned about cash Btel?
Speaker 8 (25:55):
Oh, cash Hotel is the major threat. Cashtel understands where
all of the people who need to be purged out
of the federal government are, and so they're trying their
best to play the long game in all of this.
The FBI is afraid of Cash Hotel because he's got
the experience as a prosecutor, and he also understands what
needs to be done to purge these awful communists from
the FBI and the Democrats, for example, have done a
(26:17):
great job here on our Florida offices, our field offices.
They've put Trump haters at the very top of these
field offices, and then they've infiltrated other parts of the department.
So they know that they're on limited time at this point.
So getting rid of cash Hotels what they're hopeful for.
But they don't have anything. Cash Hotel's going to get confirmed.
(26:37):
There's not a single negative thing that you could say
about this guy besides the fact that he wrote a
book about going after the deep state, and that's all
they seem to have. Otherwise they're just sitting here spewing
lies on this man. So I think he's gonna get in.
It's just a matter of when they finally let him
to get in.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
Okay, he gets in, ham Bondi's already in. Do government
people go to prison? I realize we have a bunch
of resignations and firing and things like that.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
But that's not enough. That's not near enough to save
the country.
Speaker 1 (27:06):
If we have four years of resignations where we haven't
saved anything and we're finished, are they going to send
people to prison. I'm talking about government people, not January
sixth Memas.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
Jesse.
Speaker 8 (27:18):
I agree with you. You know you put out a great
tweet the other day about all of this. They need
to go to prison. Pambonni. This is the ultimate test
for Pambonni. I know a lot of people seem to
be very confident in her. I was very lukewarm about
her because I know in Florida she did support red
flag laws, and when it came to other critical cases,
the Zimmerman case, she wasn't very She wasn't very conservative,
(27:39):
we'll say so. I was never really confident in her.
Now I don't have much in the negative to say
about her, but I wasn't very confident, so we'll see.
I mean the fact that we're just firing people at
the FBI who might have leaked about the ice rates
that were happening around the country, might have leaked that
it shouldn't be just firings. These people need to go
to prison. I mean, God forbid, one of these ICE
(28:00):
agents would have been shot in the process of all
of us are attacked because you let these gangs know
that they were coming for them. I mean, people could
have died from this. This is a very serious issue.
So we'll say if she's willing to file charges against
these people, but we need them to be dragged off
to prison. These are evil human beings. They don't believe
the same things you and I believe in. They're communists,
They're nasty human beings, and they they blunk behind prison bars.
(28:24):
Whoever becomes the next president of the United States, let's
say it's not a Republican. If it's a Democrat, we're
just then going to go back to the old way
of doing things. So we need to create fear in
any elected official, anyone who works in governments, that this
will be you if you decide to betray the American people.
Speaker 1 (28:40):
Tell me about New York Democrats, Rihanna, They're all criminals.
Speaker 8 (28:45):
All of them are criminals.
Speaker 2 (28:46):
Jesse.
Speaker 8 (28:47):
I've been covering them for years now, as you know,
I'm a New Yorker recovering a New Yorker, and I
sat here and watched the corruption unravel and there was
little outrage because they have the media on their side.
But there's been plenty of paid play schemes throughout the years,
and we all know that they are gunning for President
Trump and anyone in his administration. So I'm suggesting that
Pambondi launched an investigation into these people and start going
(29:09):
through their books. You know, it was back in I
believe it was twenty eighteen when New York Democrats took
in a million dollar donation for the Hospital Association and
then just days later, Chris Andrew Culma, I should say,
signed off on expanding the funding for Medicaid, which meant
that there was an extra one hundred and forty million
dollars in payouts that were given to anyone who was
(29:30):
filing these Medicaid claims, so the hospitals, nursing homes potentially.
Speaker 9 (29:35):
So that's a crazy.
Speaker 8 (29:36):
Investment, right, You don'ate one million dollars to New York
Democrats and in return you get one hundred and forty
million dollars in additional funding, and that's at the expensive taxpayers,
and just there. Kathy Holchel has also been accused of
several paid to play schemes involving her husband and other
people as well, And it also was with Andrew Cuomo
when he was a governor as well. I mean I
could count out the top of my hand at least
(29:58):
five instances in paid place geas betw those two alone. Now,
if you want to go after people like Letitia James,
let's say Alvin Bragg, they're probably in a lot of
these discussions, and so I would say, let's try to
get people a flip. The person who I'd probably goun
for first is Andrew Cuomo, because we know he's weak,
we know he's angry at Democrats for abandoning him and
throwing him under the bus. So let's launch those investigations.
(30:21):
It's only a couple of years old, so the statue
is not up on those. I mean, the most recent
one I believe happened in twenty nineteen with Andrew Pomo.
So let's start investigating.
Speaker 9 (30:29):
Let's go after these criminals.
Speaker 1 (30:32):
Have no doubt, Brianna, talk soon. Appreciate you, Thank you, Jesse.
Now let's talk about getting a great night's sleep, shall we.
I love to sleep. Dream powder from beam make sure
I sleep every single night. It's a cup of hot
chocolate see. It tastes delicious, but it's got things in it,
(30:58):
natural things, melatonin.
Speaker 2 (30:59):
It's completely lead drug free.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
I sip on a cup of hot chocolate any night.
I need to sleep, and I sleep well. But the
more important thing is I wake up well, meaning I
wake up feeling good.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
Normally, when you take.
Speaker 1 (31:12):
Things to sleep, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
You wake up and feel like garbage.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
No more. Go to shopbeam dot com.
Speaker 1 (31:21):
Slash Jesse Kelly gets you up to forty percent off.
Speaker 2 (31:26):
We'll be back.
Speaker 4 (31:36):
All right.
Speaker 1 (31:36):
You're mad about the judges. I'm mad about the judges.
Every day you wake up, you roll over, you.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
Grab your phone. I know what you do when you
wake up in the morning. You roll over, you grab your.
Speaker 1 (31:44):
Phone and you look, Oh, the judge just stopped another
thing you love and you're frustrated. But how do we
get here? What are these judges doing? Who are these
people joining me now? My friend CEO co founder of
The Wonderful Federalist, Sean Davis. Okay, Sean, these judges. Every
day we wake up, we're losing our mind. They're ruining everything.
(32:04):
How did they even get to these positions? How do
they get this much power. What's going on.
Speaker 10 (32:09):
Yeah, it's a great question, because they don't actually have
the power that they're claiming for themselves. So if you
look at how our judiciary is put together, at the bottom,
you've got federal trial judges, we call them district judges,
and they're given authority over a small geographical region. You'll
have one maybe in East Texas, you'll maybe have one
(32:29):
in West Texas. There's one in upstate New York. They
don't have national power because what our founders did when
they created the judiciary is they created the Supreme Court,
and they said, hey, Congress, you can create inferior courts
below that to help the Supreme Court out because obviously
they're not going to be able to handle every case
around a nation as big as the United States. And
(32:51):
so they created these little district courts and gave them
pretty circumscribe power in that area. And what has actually
happened in say the life last fifteen to twenty years
is these inferior federal judges in federal districts have decided,
you know, we have the power to block anyone in
everyone from doing anything we want or don't want around
(33:13):
the entire nation.
Speaker 9 (33:14):
And it's completely lawless.
Speaker 10 (33:15):
It's contrary to the Constitution, it's contrary to the way
our laws are written, in the way the judiciary was created.
And we're getting pretty close to the point where the rubber's.
Speaker 9 (33:25):
Going to meet the road in this nonsense. It's just
going to have to stop.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
Okay, that's actually what I wanted to talk to you
about next.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
How do we make it stop? Sean? What's the appropriate
way to do this?
Speaker 1 (33:38):
Understanding that we have communist, activist judges that are not
going to tire of this, They're never going to slow down.
Do you pull the Andrew Jackson and tell them, hey,
try to enforce it and just ignore it. Do you
run to the Supreme Court and say, Clarence Thomas.
Speaker 2 (33:52):
Save us once again? What do you do? How do
we stop this? Because it has to stop? Right?
Speaker 10 (33:57):
I actually think you do a little of all of
that and all of the above strategy. So, federal district courts,
they have limited power within a limited geographical area related
to a limited class of people. So this idea of
doing nationwide injunctions against all parties in all states and
(34:17):
apply to all federal agencies, that's nonsense. So what you
could have is the Trump doj go and say, Okay,
we are going to respect this order within the bounds
of your district related to these particular parties in the case,
not parties around the country. And beyond that, you don't
have the authority to enjoin us from any of the stuff.
(34:39):
So we're going to continue to do that. Meanwhile, I
think you do appeals to the higher circuits. You do
appeals to the courts, because I know Clarence Thomas, Neil
Gorsitch just for two, have written in some of their
descents and some of their concurrences that the nationwide injunctions
have to stop, and so there's already an appetite at
the Supreme Court for that. So I think you do
(34:59):
a little bit of Andrew Jackson at the district trial
court level, knowing that it is a long term strategy.
You're going to have to get the sup Supreme Court involved,
and it's very much in the interest of John Roberts
to nip this in the bud because what you will
have happen over time is courts grab power that they
don't have. You're just going to have executive agencies in
(35:21):
the presidency ignore them entirely and not do this little Carbout.
I've suggested they're just going to start ignoring them entirely,
at which point the whole perceived legitimacy idol that John
Roberts worships in front of that's gone.
Speaker 9 (35:33):
And once that's gone, it's never coming back.
Speaker 1 (35:38):
Sean, I know I'm asking some questions here that no
one knows, including you, So you don't have a crystal ball,
But what's.
Speaker 2 (35:46):
The timeline on that?
Speaker 1 (35:47):
Look like, how do we get this in front of
the Supreme Court? And I know I sound just like
a desperate citizen, but that's exactly what I am. I
want this to stop like five minutes from now. I
realize the law moves slower than that. But can the
Supreme Court? I don't know how this works. I'm not
one of these DC lawyer types. Can the Supreme Court
wake up tomorrow morning and say, okay, everybody got their round,
(36:08):
We're making a ruling here.
Speaker 2 (36:08):
How's this work?
Speaker 10 (36:10):
It probably wouldn't be tomorrow morning, but there are avenues
to get claims before them fairly quickly, Like this isn't
just a random dispute between two people who are mad
at each other and don't like how they were doing
business with each other. You know, that stuff can take
years and years and years. We're dealing with the president
and the presidency itself being impeded. So these are like
major constitutional questions that can really only be settled by
(36:32):
the court. So I think realistically, if they decide to move,
we could be looking at months moderately, probably a year
or two. I think that I know. And that's why
it's important for Trump's doj and the Trump Executive to
not just go along with and say, Okay, well, you know,
you're the court. I guess we've got to you know,
(36:53):
wait and see until the Supreme Court gets involved. There
has to be some strategic ignoring of the non sense
because otherwise you're going to let the courts run the
presidency for the next four years, and that can't be
allowed to happen.
Speaker 2 (37:07):
No, can't be allowed to happen.
Speaker 1 (37:08):
All right, we're gonna shift gears and talk about Ronald
Rowe Secret Service Acting Director's Secret Service, Ronald row He's
gonna walk away, collect that government paycheck and walk away.
Speaker 2 (37:19):
What should we know about mister Roe.
Speaker 10 (37:21):
I want to know why he's not under criminal investigation.
I mean, we saw what happened with the president in Butler,
he was deliberately left completely unsecure. You had a gigantic
soup sandwich of incompetence running.
Speaker 9 (37:36):
The Secret Service at the time.
Speaker 10 (37:38):
You had the lead counter sniper not even going to
visit the entire building, that building that the would be
assassin fired at Trump from the guy running counter sniper
ops for the Secret Service didn't even bother to set
foot on it or.
Speaker 9 (37:51):
Go over there and see the point of view over there.
Speaker 10 (37:54):
And then to top it all off, you had Ronald
Row going before Congress repeatedly and having these like completely emotional, screaming,
shouting meltdowns, and members of Congress who had the audacity
to question how exactly this agency under his charge was
such a disaster. So I'd like to know what exactly
that guy was doing the whole time as director. I
(38:16):
don't think he deserves a pension. I don't think he
deserves to retire. I believe he deserves to be under
the criminal microscope for a very long time because that
moron and his incompetence nearly changed.
Speaker 9 (38:30):
The course of world history forever.
Speaker 10 (38:31):
It very well could have embroiled us in a civil
war or worse, because he just chose you know what.
I don't like Trump, so I guess we're just going
to not protect him.
Speaker 1 (38:41):
Sean, you say in competence, and I'm not arguing with
you at all. But if I'm the type of person
who believes this federal government is evil and criminal, and
I look at things like you just pointed out, the
top counter sniper doesn't go visit the rooftop that's one
hundred and forty eight meters in an elevated position away
from the subject I'm supposed to protect. At some levels, Sean,
(39:05):
in competence doesn't even explain it. Honestly, if you were
to ask me, hook me up to a lot of
detective test I think people inside the government wanted Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (39:15):
Then they try to facilitate it. That's what I believe.
Speaker 10 (39:18):
Oh, I don't disagree with you at all. It's the
frame that I use. I call it strategic incompetence. So
you had a bunch of morons at basically the line
level doing the actual work. The guy who's a lead
counter sniper, I think he'd been in the job for
six years, had no prior military experience, which you know
I don't either. But I'm also not leading a counter
(39:38):
sniper unit. And I think generally, if you're going to
be leading counter sniper operations, maybe you should have been
a sniper at some point in your career, doing that
for a living in hostile combat zones. So I think
the people at the like the actual work level, were incompetent.
I believe the people above them making decisions were malevolent
and malicious, And it's why the Trump detail was denied
(40:00):
for years their request for more security. It's why from
DHS on down, from majorcis on down, they said, no,
you don't need more resources. We're going to give all
those resources to the first lady, you know, fifty miles away,
not the guy who was a former president is going
to be the next president. So I think you had
malevolence and maliciousness at the top, deliberately starving him of resources.
(40:24):
And then I think they knew they had a bunch
of morons below them incapable of doing the job, and
they were just happy to let that run its course.
Speaker 1 (40:34):
All right, let's shift gears on the JFK files to
the JFK files. Sean speaking speaking of this exact subject
we're talking about, I've I'm a cynic, as you know,
you know me, I don't think there's going to be
anything really juicy in there, because look, if powerful people
decided to murder the president of the United States of America,
(40:56):
the truth of all that probably died when Jack Ruby,
life long Jewish mob enforcer, murdered Lee Harvey Oswald. But look,
I don't know. Was it the American Mafia, was it
Meyer Landski? Was it traffic Conte? Was this CIA at
Linda Johnson? I don't know, but I don't I'm not
anticipating a bombshell, are you now.
Speaker 10 (41:17):
I mean it's been sixty what we're sixty two years,
you know, a little over sixty one out from that happening.
I don't imagine that they did what they did but
then left meticulous files sitting around to be viewed later.
So I don't think we're gonna find out that much.
I hope I'm wrong. I also don't trust the people
(41:38):
who've been hiding this stuff, you know, for sixty years,
to just go out because the president said so, and
find all the documents and hand them out to us.
They may just be throwing all those needles and haystacks everywhere.
Speaker 9 (41:51):
But I will say my favorite.
Speaker 10 (41:52):
Conspiracy theory of all time hands down is the idea
that Lee Harvey Oswold killed JFK.
Speaker 9 (41:59):
I think it's hill.
Speaker 2 (42:03):
I actually don't disagree with that at all.
Speaker 1 (42:04):
I think if whatever theory you believe, if you believe
that with everything surrounding it, man, you have some blind
faith that it's amazing. Sean, Thank you, my brother. I
appreciate you as always.
Speaker 9 (42:17):
Thank you, sir. Take care.
Speaker 2 (42:21):
I have some exciting news. Did you know.
Speaker 1 (42:26):
Anti Communist Manifesto is available on paperback?
Speaker 2 (42:29):
Now? Do you know that paperback? Baby?
Speaker 1 (42:33):
Of course it was a hard cover, and of course
it was a national bestseller. Not that I'm in a brag,
but now get the paperback version. Take it on that
plane with you. Take it to the john Go learn
about communism, the history of it. Laugh a little bit
what you can do about it. Jesse kellybook dot com.
Speaker 2 (42:51):
We'll be back all right.
Speaker 1 (43:01):
It is time to lighten the mood. And I love
making fun of CNN, don't you? Don't you have a
good time making fun of CNN? And Anderson Cooper is
one of those types I've always enjoyed mocking because when
I think about Anderson Anderson Cooper, I think about how
he tries to present himself always as a serious journalist,
and in one moment it'll be this serious journalist Stanison Cooper,
(43:21):
and then in the next moment he'll get caught with
these behind the scenes footage of him standing in a
super deep puddle to make it look like the floodwaters
are over as.
Speaker 2 (43:31):
These it's just it's it's a fraud.
Speaker 1 (43:33):
And in the end, it's just kind of a caddy
communist is all he is.
Speaker 2 (43:36):
He kind of lost it on Chris Sinunu last night.
Where's the game?
Speaker 11 (43:41):
You're not going to be satisfied till he shows up
with ten thousand pages.
Speaker 6 (43:47):
He's giving very specific things, but he's not actually giving
any evidence of that.
Speaker 11 (43:52):
It's all going to come because what they also said
was if we have to go to Congress, we'll go
to Congress, right, but show where.
Speaker 6 (43:57):
Some of the details that have come out, like the
you know, fifty nine million dollars spent on luxury hotels,
it's actually not the talking.
Speaker 11 (44:05):
About the femal money that was used for migrants. That was, yeah,
FEMA money for migrants.
Speaker 4 (44:09):
That's okay.
Speaker 1 (44:10):
Now, no I'm not saying it's so I'm not saying
it's okay, don't put word.
Speaker 2 (44:13):
So would you stop that?
Speaker 11 (44:14):
Would you stop that process?
Speaker 2 (44:16):
Don't be the portray I'm What I'm saying is the
every now and then the mask slips. See them all
Why does Trump bring hostages home and Joe Biden did not.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
We'll discuss that tonight. Brianna Morella joins us.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
We have so much to talk about, from judicial activism
to the world going crazy.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Are we going to see the end of the war
in Ukraine? All that coming up?
Speaker 1 (00:17):
And I'm right, okay, let's discuss hostages coming home, which
is freaking wonderful, so thrilled to see this happening. Why
are Americans coming home? What's going on right now? First
(00:37):
of all, before we get into that, let's discuss this.
What is the point of becoming a citizen of a nation?
Why ever form nations at all?
Speaker 2 (00:47):
Tribes? Why not?
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Why do we do that? Why don't we all just
go live on our own somewhere. Well, the point is
that you get protection and prosperity coming to get either
to form a nation, a nation that will advocate on
your behalf. You see, being a citizen of a country
(01:09):
is a contract with obligations on both sides. And this
is the difference between the evil communist tyrants in this
country and administrations like the one we have now. The
obligations go both ways. Yes, you as a citizen, me
as citizen I have obligations I feel. I've always felt
(01:30):
a duty to my country. It's part of the reason
I signed up to fight for it to this day.
Part of the reason I do this. I want to
advocate on behalf of my country. I care about it.
I have a duty to it. I would die for
it today. But that's not one way. That doesn't only
go one direction. My country has an obligation to me
(01:51):
as well, and this doesn't This is not just about America.
This should be every citizen of every nation across the globe.
I am a citizen of the United States of America.
That means when I go abroad, whether I'm in Mozambique,
whether I'm in London, Australia, wherever I happen to go,
I am offered some layer of protection by the government
(02:14):
of the United States of America because I'm a citizen
of the United States of America.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
That is how it should be.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
Remember that story from the New Testament.
Speaker 2 (02:24):
We talked about it before. Hopefully you've read it in
your Bible.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
When Paul apostle Paul is getting beaten, he gets arrested,
he's getting beaten, and he says to him, should you
be doing this to a Roman citizen. Remember how they
freaked out? Wow wow, wow, Hey, bring them in a
glass of water. WHOA, I didn't realize what is that?
Speaker 2 (02:42):
That citizenship right there? I'm a citizen.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
You mess with me, you will deal with the fury
of Rome. But here in the United States of America,
that goes away whenever you elect a Democrat.
Speaker 2 (02:55):
See it just does. It goes away.
Speaker 1 (02:59):
Four years of Joe Biden's presidency with Americans held all
over the planet by terrorist groups, by nation states, and
the only time anybody can even remember the Biden administration
lifting a finger to bring one home is when a
black Wnba lesbian got busted and thrown in prison in Russia.
(03:21):
As soon as they thought they could get some cultural
Marxist brownie points out of it, the Biden administration bent
over backwards and released from prison the foremost weapons dealer
on the planet so we could bring the black lesbian
back home and get some cultural Marxist brownie points. But
after that it went back to not a care in
the world. Too bad, so sad, best of luck in
(03:44):
prison over there.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
And then the Trump administration comes in and we'll get
to the ones he just released.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
But it's not as if he's done. Donald Trump constantly
is talking like this.
Speaker 3 (03:59):
As far as I'm concerned, if all of the hostages
aren't returned by Saturday at twelve o'clock, I think it's
an appropriate time. I would say, cancel it, and all
bets are off and let hell break out. I'd say
they ought to be returned by twelve o'clock on Saturday.
And if they're not returned, all of them, not in
(04:20):
drips and drabs, not two and one and three and
four and two Saturday at twelve o'clock, and after that,
I would say, all hell is going to break out.
And I don't think they're going to do it. I
think a lot of them are dead. I think a
lot of the hostages are dead. I think it's a
(04:43):
great it's a great human tragedy.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
What's happened. How people can be that?
Speaker 1 (04:56):
I want you to know something. I know you like
hearing American president talk like that. I like hearing an
American president talk like that. But this is yet another
thing that should not be a partisan issue. You an
American citizen, If God forbid, you are ever abroad and Russia,
Hamas whoever gets their hands on you.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
You should.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
You have every right to expect every single American president
to speak about you exactly like that. That should be
the basic, the base expectation of every single American president.
You were the commander in chief, me the citizen. I
(05:41):
have a duty to the country. I will, I will,
I will fulfill that duty. You have a duty to
me as well. You look out for me, you protect me,
and you let anyone know who would harm a hair
on my head, even though I don't have any left
that all hell will come down on them if.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
They do so. That is part of citisenship.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
And I hate that we don't have it when Democrats
are in office, and I love that we have it now.
And I loved, I loved Mark Fogel, a teacher. Thirty
Russians got their hands on him four years ago, wrongfully
detained in a Russian prison prison. Not exactly a great time.
Donald Trump gets in three weeks later. Boom, Markvogel's on
a plane home. Here he was last night.
Speaker 4 (06:25):
I feel like the luckiest man on earth right now.
And I want you to know that I am not
a hero in this at all. And President Trump, this
is a hero. Thank you all. And I love our country,
(06:46):
and I'm so happy to be back here, and I
wish I could articulate it and better.
Speaker 5 (06:56):
You've done beautifully. And he's got a great mother. And
want to show the mother in a rally, she said,
do you if you win, will you get my son out?
And I promise, she's ninety five years old and we'll
get him out.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
And we get him out. Isn't that wonderful? And why
does Trump get him out? How that happened?
Speaker 1 (07:21):
How did that happen? Well, you know, I'm a father.
Stay with me on this. Maybe you're a father, maybe
you're a mother of it. I'm a father, And to
be honest with you, I don't think I'm a very
good one. But if you ask me, I wouldn't think.
I don't think I'm a very good one. But the
people around me, my wife included, think I'm.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
A great one. Oh, your best dad, best dad. And
you know what I am? I care. I love them.
That's what I am.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
All my failings, all the ways I've gone wrong. If
you just care, that'll get you a very long way
as a father. You might even find yourself raising a
couple of fine young men like I am. Why does
Donald Trump as president. Why is he so successful? We
did this last time too during his four years. Why
is he so successful bringing Americans home when they are
(08:14):
kept abroad?
Speaker 2 (08:16):
He cares, that's it. He cares.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
He doesn't get in and check the poll numbers when
someone puts something in front of his desk. Hey, mister president,
we have a Mark Foegel helped over there in Russia.
It doesn't immediately become political while we have the midterms
coming up?
Speaker 2 (08:33):
Have we pulled tested this?
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Do we know what the Latinos think about? There's none
of that, just genuine care and oftentimes, look, you want
to be a good president, maybe that's all it takes
is caring enough. And Steve Whitcoff us Special Envoy, so
he's not done.
Speaker 6 (08:55):
John, I would say to you that the president's policy
on Americans that are held abroad, we leave nobody behind.
It's very, very similar to the military credo, leave nobody
back on the battlefield. And that's how he feels. And
so I think that you'll see a president who is
extraordinarily proactive in seeking all hostages to be released who
(09:19):
are being held in.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
That's wonderful.
Speaker 1 (09:25):
And you know what's sad is that It's wonderful because
we should always expect every American president the ones we love,
the ones we hate, the ones we vote for, the
ones we don't. Every single American president should conduct themselves
exactly this way when our citizens are held or harmed abroad.
So good for us, Good for Donald Trump. Thank you,
(09:48):
mister President, very much. Please keep continuing to bring them home,
and please keep caring all that may have made you uncomfortable.
But I am right. We have an amazing show for
you right now. Hans Monkey joins us in just a moment.
Before we get to Hans, let's get to the expense
(10:08):
reports you have to do. Are they the freakin worst?
I have a one man show. It's just me, Aubrey.
My wife does the books.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
But it's just me.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
I'm the only one with expenses out there. Flight here,
hotel there, and it's a nightmare. Then when she does expenses,
you know what. I'm in for a day of text messaging.
Speaker 2 (10:28):
Why did this? What category does this go?
Speaker 1 (10:31):
I don't it's awful, Well, it used to be. Now
we have the Ramp Corporate Card. The Ramp Corporate Card.
Does it all for you? Doesn't that sound nice? Does
it all for you categorizes everything you're not chasing down
this receipt that RAMP does.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
It all for you make your life easier.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
How much time would you spend, how much money would
you spend if you didn't have.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
To stress it?
Speaker 1 (10:52):
So for a limited time, listeners of this show can
get two hundred and fifty dollars when you join RAMP.
There's going to ramp dot com slash jesse. That's ramp
dot com slash Jesse cards issued by Sutton Bank member
FDI say terms and conditions apply, We'll be back.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
Okay. So there's more good news out there.
Speaker 1 (11:20):
And this may not tug at your heart strings because
it's not near and dear to us. But the Russia
Ukraine War, whatever you think about that whole thing, it's
been butchery, butchery, and you can't ever trust the casualty numbers.
But when you look at the estimates out there, we're
talking about our losses from World War two, that's the
kind of butchery we've seen. Well, we wake up this
(11:43):
morning and find out Trump had a long phone call
with Putin and the end of that war has begun.
Negotiations have officially begun. Let's get this whole thing stopped.
Stop losing all their blood, stop losing all our treasure.
Joining me now, Hans Monke, author of the book Swift
Voting America. Hans, No matter what, this is a good thing,
(12:04):
and I really question anybody who says it's not.
Speaker 2 (12:08):
This is a great thing.
Speaker 7 (12:10):
The thing that frustrates me about this is that it
didn't happen eight years ago. And of course Trump's hands
were tied with this whole Russia collusion hoax, that whole mess.
He wasn't able to unneach his superpower, his negotiating power,
his leverage, all the stuff in his toolbox. He wasn't
able to do that. And we see that he can.
(12:32):
Now he did today and we're already seeing the results.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
Hans helped me understand.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
Pretend like I don't know anything about politics in America
and I just showed up yesterday. Why the two totally
different approaches the Biden presidency versus the Trump presidency when
it comes to Ukraine Russia. Why doesn't everybody want the
carnage to end? Why isn't negotiating a piece just kind
of the normal way they talk?
Speaker 2 (13:02):
Why so different? I think there's it's multiicausal.
Speaker 7 (13:06):
So you have a lot of stuff going on with
old Cold War style people where their whole mentality is
Cold War Russians are bad no matter what.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
So you have that, you have the corruption.
Speaker 7 (13:19):
Remember you had these CIA bases in Ukraine that no
one was told about until recently. That was a big secret.
There's a lot of Biden corruption going on in Ukraine.
There was a lot of general corruption going on in Ukraine.
There was a whole us AID thing going on in Ukraine.
So there's a lot of stuff to cover up there
that people just don't want anyone to find out about.
(13:41):
Then there's these kind of geopolitical thinkers who think that
Russia has to be contained and Ukraine is part of
Europe and this and that and so on. So you
have a lot of different kind of people coming together
for different reasons. But unfortunately they all came together under
this sort of globalist umbrella or establishment at least, you know,
whatever you want to call it. And all of those
(14:02):
people coalesced sort of under Biden, and they were all
pulling in the wrong direction.
Speaker 2 (14:07):
And you know, finally that's been corrected.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Okay, Hans, let's switch gears and talk about something that
just it makes my blood pressure go through the roof
the whole Chinese spy balloon thing. For those who may
have forgotten, the United States government under Joe Biden detected
a Chinese spy balloon.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
When it was over Alaska.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
It was then allowed to traverse the entirety of the
United States of America, and they waited until it was
over the freaking Atlantic before they shot it down.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
Hans, talk to me about this, please.
Speaker 7 (14:42):
Yeah, no, it makes my blood boil, just as you.
We've now found out from a still classified report within
the Pentagon. It's a seventy five page report that's been
reported about. The report itself has not come out yet,
but that report is supposed to state, well, what they found.
So after they shot it down in the Atlantic, which
(15:02):
makes things much more difficult because then you have to
send down divers and you know, trying to recover everything.
Eventually they did. That would have been easier if they
just shot it down overland. But okay, so they found
the pieces and now they put them back together, and
now they figured out, oh my goodness, this thing is
full of US parts. So there's parts in there from Iridium,
the satellite phone company. There's parts in there from Texas Instruments,
(15:25):
various other US companies that were basically US technology was
used by China to spy on the US. In a nutshell,
that's what was going on. The other thing that I
found very interesting that hasn't really been reported is that
they found kind of empty compartments within that spy balloon
and they weren't being used at the time, but they
(15:47):
could have been used in an offensive way. So there
was no offensive weaponry or anything like that on the balloon.
It was just spying equipment, but it could have been. So,
you know, otherwise, what are these all these empty compartments for?
So they were talking about maybe you could launch drones, gliders, whatever,
that sort of thing, and that's what these compartments might
have been for. But you know, as it stands, from
(16:10):
what we know now, US technology was used by China
to spy on the US.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Okay, so walk me through that, Hans the possibilities there.
Does that mean Texas Instruments is collaborating with the Chinese
Communist Party or does it mean the Chinese are doing
well the Chicoms have been doing forever, just blatantly ripping
off our technology.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
Yeah, I know, it's the latter.
Speaker 7 (16:34):
So what you can pick this stuff up on eBay,
that is the simple stuff. The more difficult stuff you
have to find other ways of getting. But no, I mean,
there's no suggestion at all that any of these US
companies were collaborating with the Chinese Communist Party or the
Chinese in general.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
But look at what happened with Nvidia recently.
Speaker 7 (16:54):
You know, you had the new Chinese AI and everyone
was sort of reporting about and everyone was saying, oh,
look they did it for so cheap, and they did
it themselves and so on, and then it turns out,
once you look under the hood, that actually they did
it using these Nvidia chips, but they're not allowed to
be sent sold to China.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
So what did they do.
Speaker 7 (17:12):
They went to Singapore and bought I think like fifty
thousand of them or something like that. So it's very
easy for them to source. Even if there are sanctions,
if there are export restrictions and so on, it's very
easy for them to go elsewhere into other markets and
find this stuff.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Let's switch gears to something that's your specialty.
Speaker 2 (17:35):
The Russia hoax.
Speaker 1 (17:36):
We were talking earlier about Ukraine, the Russia hoax. There
are a lot of ties there are, they're not.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Oh massively, very very much.
Speaker 7 (17:44):
So I think first of all, the most important thing
that's always kind of overlooked, especially by legacy media, is
that the Ukraine War did not start in twenty twenty two.
It started in twenty fourteen under Obama. It was just
on a smaller scale, the whole coup situation which Biden
basically green lighted Victoria Neulan, that whole story I'm digressing here,
(18:06):
but that's how it kicked off. They kicked out the
democratically elected government of Ukraine day by day, I mean,
Biden and Neulan replaced them with their own puppets, and
the Russians weren't happy with it, obviously not. And that's
when they took Crimea. That was back in twenty fourteen,
and then you had the civil war breakout in the
eastern parts of Ukraine where you have Russian speaking people
who were not happy with.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
This situation, obviously, right.
Speaker 7 (18:29):
So this has been going on for a very long time,
and President Trump could have resolved this during his first term.
In fact, during that election in twenty sixteen, he kept
saying that he was going to resolve it. But then
with this Russia collusion hoax. They basically tied his hands.
They criminalized any kind of diplomacy with Russia. You remember,
I mean anytime he met the Russian ambassador or something
(18:50):
like that, which is completely innocuous. They had a total
meltdown the media did. When Putin gave a baron Trump
the son a football like a soccer ball, media had
to melt down about that soccer ball being bugged and
being spyware. And it was justly complete hysteria. It was
incredibly bad because it prevented Trump from doing anything about
(19:11):
that situation that was going on already, and then of
course when Biden came in, things only escalated and got worse. Now,
some people say that the Russia hoax was at least
meant in part and I agree to cover up for
everything that had gone on in Ukraine, and I think
that is true. We releast talked about the coup in
(19:32):
twenty fourteen. Ukraine also interfered in the twenty sixteen election
quite openly. You can go back and you know they
had their ambassador writing anti Trump pieces, They had their
prime minister gone Facebook and just go on a huge,
horrible anti Tramp rant. This is all in the run
up to the twenty sixteen election, so there was a
(19:53):
lot to cover up. There was a lot to be
gained by the establishment, by the elites, by all those
kinds of people, by Democrats. In painting Russia as the
bad one in Ukraine has the good one, that was
sort of the overarching idea.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
What a freaking ugly state of affairs, swift boating of America.
That's his book, Hans, Thank you, brother, I appreciate you
very much.
Speaker 2 (20:14):
Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (20:17):
All Right, Polsy's in Polsy Gabbert is officially in What's
that mean?
Speaker 2 (20:24):
Let's talk to Brianna.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
Morello about that and many other things. Before we talked
to her about that. Let me talk to you about
your cell phone company and why.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
It's communist garbage. We have got to stop.
Speaker 1 (20:34):
Funding the companies who hate our guts and work against us.
Speaker 2 (20:38):
We have got to put our money where our morals are.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
And I realize that can be difficult sometimes when you're
going out to buy this, when you're looking for this service,
it's hard to stop, take an extra step, get on
your phone.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
Okay, what causes do they support? It's hard.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
I realized that, but not with pure talking at least
with your mobile service. It's a no brainer on the
same five G network, So you're not sacrificing service.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
You save a fortune.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
They hire Americans, they don't fund things like planned parenthood in.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
Black Lives Matter. Pure Talk that's a no brainer.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
And now with the qualifying plan free phones. I know
that phone of yours has cracks in the screen and stuff.
How about you go get an iPhone fourteen, Samsung Galaxy,
Puretalk dot Com slash JESSETV.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
We'll be back. Paulcy Gabbert is in.
Speaker 1 (21:38):
We officially have the most attractive Director of National Intelligence
in the history of the United States of America.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
That's good, but I'm sure there are other Bennies involved.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
Joining me now to discuss that is Brionna Morello, host
of The Wonderful Brianna Morello Show, which you.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Can see right here on the first on the weekend.
Speaker 1 (21:55):
Okay, Brianna, Besides the fact that she's hot, what should.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
We expect here?
Speaker 8 (22:00):
Oh, that's all I had for you, the fact that
she's hot, Jesse, I didn't have anything else. Now, this
woman is absolutely incredible. First off, I gotta say I
love the fact that Telsea Gabbert was one of the
thousands of Americans who were added to the terror watch list,
the TSA terror watch lists.
Speaker 2 (22:17):
As you guys know, we.
Speaker 8 (22:18):
Spoke about it. I broke it actually exclusive to her.
I called her team to let her know that she
was added to that list. And so now to see
her as the D and I director, I gotta say,
is really really impressive. We've been looking for all the
facts as to how she landed that list, and I'm
sure now we'll finally figure that out. But I'm really excited.
She seems to call out all the right people. She
(22:38):
knows that Faiza was a massive issue. I know, Jesse,
between you and I, we are we hate Fisa. And
she seems to understand that She's not rolling back. All
the reports do say that she's getting a little cushy
with Fiza.
Speaker 2 (22:51):
She's not.
Speaker 8 (22:52):
She still does not like it at all. She understands
that you've been used legally to surveil the American people.
So this is the kind of person you'd want in
a position like this. So I'm excited, and I hope
you are too.
Speaker 1 (23:03):
Oh yeah, no, I'm all kidding aside. I'm very excited
that we have someone who's aware of the corruption, all
the evil stuff that goes on inside of our intelligence
community heading up the intelligence community. That brings me to
this point, though, Brianna, how concerned are we that they're
simply going to silo her?
Speaker 6 (23:22):
Now?
Speaker 2 (23:22):
She is a very.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
Sharp individual on top of our military service and everything else.
But these people live in secrecy. That's frankly their job.
Are we worrying they're going to keep her? You know, hey,
just Paulicy No, no, no, no, stay over there, We've
got this covered over here.
Speaker 2 (23:37):
Yeah, it sounds like that she's not.
Speaker 8 (23:38):
She understands that she needs to push back on the
intel community. She's very well aware of that. So I
think she's not going to allow them to push her
off the side. She's going to get the work done.
I'm confident in that. And you know, she's ticked off
all the right people, and that's usually clear indicator. When
everyone that you and I both don't like hate her,
that's a clear indicator to me that she's the perfect
(23:59):
person for the role. And then she's not going to
just be quiet and kind of get back into a corner.
So I'm very confident that she's going to correct all
the issues that we talk about all the time.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
It seems like RFK Junior is going to get through tomorrow,
which I'm actually surprised, but I can't believe Paulsy got through.
I can't believe our FK is getting tough, But it
looks like they're getting through.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
What do we expect him to actually do. I realized he's.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
Become an internet meme at this point in time, But
what's actually going to happen?
Speaker 8 (24:27):
Yeah, Well, I mean, I'm hoping he can make America
healthy again. It's outrageous that this country has become so unhealthy,
and I think he understands all of that. He used
to be the left hero until they realize he was
anti anti vax and he was pushing back against big
pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 9 (24:44):
So I think he's going to continue to do that.
Speaker 8 (24:46):
I think he's going to get through, and I think
he's going to continue to push back against all these
companies I have destroyed this country and destroyed our health.
So I'm hopeful that OURFK is going to do just that.
We'll see did he talk a big game over the
last couple of months. We'll find out. But I also
really do hope that he stays true to his word,
because we've got a big issue on our hands. You know,
(25:07):
these pharmastudo companies are intentionally making Americans sick so that
become forever patients. And the clearest indicator of that is food.
Jesse I talk about all the time I lost thirty
pounds from no longer eating processed food to going to
a carnivor only diet. And so many Americans I know
are doing the same and they're having great results, but
for everyone. But it just goes to show that the
food we're taking in is probably poisoning and is killing us.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
So carnivore only. Where do chips follow in there? I
really like chips.
Speaker 8 (25:38):
Sorry to break the news to you. You do ketos,
you understand?
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Loosh?
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Yeah, obviously, very strict, very strict about the whole thing. Okay,
Cash Bartel, God only knows when he's going to get
in there, because Dick Derbin keeps stopping him. Why would
Dick Derban be so concerned about cash Btel?
Speaker 8 (25:55):
Oh, cash Hotel is the major threat. Cashtel understands where
all of the people who need to be purged out
of the federal government are, and so they're trying their
best to play the long game in all of this.
The FBI is afraid of Cash Hotel because he's got
the experience as a prosecutor, and he also understands what
needs to be done to purge these awful communists from
the FBI and the Democrats, for example, have done a
(26:17):
great job here on our Florida offices, our field offices.
They've put Trump haters at the very top of these
field offices, and then they've infiltrated other parts of the department.
So they know that they're on limited time at this point.
So getting rid of cash Hotels what they're hopeful for.
But they don't have anything. Cash Hotel's going to get confirmed.
(26:37):
There's not a single negative thing that you could say
about this guy besides the fact that he wrote a
book about going after the deep state, and that's all
they seem to have. Otherwise they're just sitting here spewing
lies on this man. So I think he's gonna get in.
It's just a matter of when they finally let him
to get in.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
Okay, he gets in, ham Bondi's already in. Do government
people go to prison? I realize we have a bunch
of resignations and firing and things like that.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
But that's not enough. That's not near enough to save
the country.
Speaker 1 (27:06):
If we have four years of resignations where we haven't
saved anything and we're finished, are they going to send
people to prison. I'm talking about government people, not January
sixth Memas.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
Jesse.
Speaker 8 (27:18):
I agree with you. You know you put out a great
tweet the other day about all of this. They need
to go to prison. Pambonni. This is the ultimate test
for Pambonni. I know a lot of people seem to
be very confident in her. I was very lukewarm about
her because I know in Florida she did support red
flag laws, and when it came to other critical cases,
the Zimmerman case, she wasn't very She wasn't very conservative,
(27:39):
we'll say so. I was never really confident in her.
Now I don't have much in the negative to say
about her, but I wasn't very confident, so we'll see.
I mean the fact that we're just firing people at
the FBI who might have leaked about the ice rates
that were happening around the country, might have leaked that
it shouldn't be just firings. These people need to go
to prison. I mean, God forbid, one of these ICE
(28:00):
agents would have been shot in the process of all
of us are attacked because you let these gangs know
that they were coming for them. I mean, people could
have died from this. This is a very serious issue.
So we'll say if she's willing to file charges against
these people, but we need them to be dragged off
to prison. These are evil human beings. They don't believe
the same things you and I believe in. They're communists,
They're nasty human beings, and they they blunk behind prison bars.
(28:24):
Whoever becomes the next president of the United States, let's
say it's not a Republican. If it's a Democrat, we're
just then going to go back to the old way
of doing things. So we need to create fear in
any elected official, anyone who works in governments, that this
will be you if you decide to betray the American people.
Speaker 1 (28:40):
Tell me about New York Democrats, Rihanna, They're all criminals.
Speaker 8 (28:45):
All of them are criminals.
Speaker 2 (28:46):
Jesse.
Speaker 8 (28:47):
I've been covering them for years now, as you know,
I'm a New Yorker recovering a New Yorker, and I
sat here and watched the corruption unravel and there was
little outrage because they have the media on their side.
But there's been plenty of paid play schemes throughout the years,
and we all know that they are gunning for President
Trump and anyone in his administration. So I'm suggesting that
Pambondi launched an investigation into these people and start going
(29:09):
through their books. You know, it was back in I
believe it was twenty eighteen when New York Democrats took
in a million dollar donation for the Hospital Association and
then just days later, Chris Andrew Culma, I should say,
signed off on expanding the funding for Medicaid, which meant
that there was an extra one hundred and forty million
dollars in payouts that were given to anyone who was
(29:30):
filing these Medicaid claims, so the hospitals, nursing homes potentially.
Speaker 9 (29:35):
So that's a crazy.
Speaker 8 (29:36):
Investment, right, You don'ate one million dollars to New York
Democrats and in return you get one hundred and forty
million dollars in additional funding, and that's at the expensive taxpayers,
and just there. Kathy Holchel has also been accused of
several paid to play schemes involving her husband and other
people as well, And it also was with Andrew Cuomo
when he was a governor as well. I mean I
could count out the top of my hand at least
(29:58):
five instances in paid place geas betw those two alone. Now,
if you want to go after people like Letitia James,
let's say Alvin Bragg, they're probably in a lot of
these discussions, and so I would say, let's try to
get people a flip. The person who I'd probably goun
for first is Andrew Cuomo, because we know he's weak,
we know he's angry at Democrats for abandoning him and
throwing him under the bus. So let's launch those investigations.
(30:21):
It's only a couple of years old, so the statue
is not up on those. I mean, the most recent
one I believe happened in twenty nineteen with Andrew Pomo.
So let's start investigating.
Speaker 9 (30:29):
Let's go after these criminals.
Speaker 1 (30:32):
Have no doubt, Brianna, talk soon. Appreciate you, Thank you, Jesse.
Now let's talk about getting a great night's sleep, shall we.
I love to sleep. Dream powder from beam make sure
I sleep every single night. It's a cup of hot
chocolate see. It tastes delicious, but it's got things in it,
(30:58):
natural things, melatonin.
Speaker 2 (30:59):
It's completely lead drug free.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
I sip on a cup of hot chocolate any night.
I need to sleep, and I sleep well. But the
more important thing is I wake up well, meaning I
wake up feeling good.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
Normally, when you take.
Speaker 1 (31:12):
Things to sleep, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
You wake up and feel like garbage.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
No more. Go to shopbeam dot com.
Speaker 1 (31:21):
Slash Jesse Kelly gets you up to forty percent off.
Speaker 2 (31:26):
We'll be back.
Speaker 4 (31:36):
All right.
Speaker 1 (31:36):
You're mad about the judges. I'm mad about the judges.
Every day you wake up, you roll over, you.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
Grab your phone. I know what you do when you
wake up in the morning. You roll over, you grab your.
Speaker 1 (31:44):
Phone and you look, Oh, the judge just stopped another
thing you love and you're frustrated. But how do we
get here? What are these judges doing? Who are these
people joining me now? My friend CEO co founder of
The Wonderful Federalist, Sean Davis. Okay, Sean, these judges. Every
day we wake up, we're losing our mind. They're ruining everything.
(32:04):
How did they even get to these positions? How do
they get this much power. What's going on.
Speaker 10 (32:09):
Yeah, it's a great question, because they don't actually have
the power that they're claiming for themselves. So if you
look at how our judiciary is put together, at the bottom,
you've got federal trial judges, we call them district judges,
and they're given authority over a small geographical region. You'll
have one maybe in East Texas, you'll maybe have one
(32:29):
in West Texas. There's one in upstate New York. They
don't have national power because what our founders did when
they created the judiciary is they created the Supreme Court,
and they said, hey, Congress, you can create inferior courts
below that to help the Supreme Court out because obviously
they're not going to be able to handle every case
around a nation as big as the United States. And
(32:51):
so they created these little district courts and gave them
pretty circumscribe power in that area. And what has actually
happened in say the life last fifteen to twenty years
is these inferior federal judges in federal districts have decided,
you know, we have the power to block anyone in
everyone from doing anything we want or don't want around
(33:13):
the entire nation.
Speaker 9 (33:14):
And it's completely lawless.
Speaker 10 (33:15):
It's contrary to the Constitution, it's contrary to the way
our laws are written, in the way the judiciary was created.
And we're getting pretty close to the point where the rubber's.
Speaker 9 (33:25):
Going to meet the road in this nonsense. It's just
going to have to stop.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
Okay, that's actually what I wanted to talk to you
about next.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
How do we make it stop? Sean? What's the appropriate
way to do this?
Speaker 1 (33:38):
Understanding that we have communist, activist judges that are not
going to tire of this, They're never going to slow down.
Do you pull the Andrew Jackson and tell them, hey,
try to enforce it and just ignore it. Do you
run to the Supreme Court and say, Clarence Thomas.
Speaker 2 (33:52):
Save us once again? What do you do? How do
we stop this? Because it has to stop? Right?
Speaker 10 (33:57):
I actually think you do a little of all of
that and all of the above strategy. So, federal district courts,
they have limited power within a limited geographical area related
to a limited class of people. So this idea of
doing nationwide injunctions against all parties in all states and
(34:17):
apply to all federal agencies, that's nonsense. So what you
could have is the Trump doj go and say, Okay,
we are going to respect this order within the bounds
of your district related to these particular parties in the case,
not parties around the country. And beyond that, you don't
have the authority to enjoin us from any of the stuff.
(34:39):
So we're going to continue to do that. Meanwhile, I
think you do appeals to the higher circuits. You do
appeals to the courts, because I know Clarence Thomas, Neil
Gorsitch just for two, have written in some of their
descents and some of their concurrences that the nationwide injunctions
have to stop, and so there's already an appetite at
the Supreme Court for that. So I think you do
(34:59):
a little bit of Andrew Jackson at the district trial
court level, knowing that it is a long term strategy.
You're going to have to get the sup Supreme Court involved,
and it's very much in the interest of John Roberts
to nip this in the bud because what you will
have happen over time is courts grab power that they
don't have. You're just going to have executive agencies in
(35:21):
the presidency ignore them entirely and not do this little Carbout.
I've suggested they're just going to start ignoring them entirely,
at which point the whole perceived legitimacy idol that John
Roberts worships in front of that's gone.
Speaker 9 (35:33):
And once that's gone, it's never coming back.
Speaker 1 (35:38):
Sean, I know I'm asking some questions here that no
one knows, including you, So you don't have a crystal ball,
But what's.
Speaker 2 (35:46):
The timeline on that?
Speaker 1 (35:47):
Look like, how do we get this in front of
the Supreme Court? And I know I sound just like
a desperate citizen, but that's exactly what I am. I
want this to stop like five minutes from now. I
realize the law moves slower than that. But can the
Supreme Court? I don't know how this works. I'm not
one of these DC lawyer types. Can the Supreme Court
wake up tomorrow morning and say, okay, everybody got their round,
(36:08):
We're making a ruling here.
Speaker 2 (36:08):
How's this work?
Speaker 10 (36:10):
It probably wouldn't be tomorrow morning, but there are avenues
to get claims before them fairly quickly, Like this isn't
just a random dispute between two people who are mad
at each other and don't like how they were doing
business with each other. You know, that stuff can take
years and years and years. We're dealing with the president
and the presidency itself being impeded. So these are like
major constitutional questions that can really only be settled by
(36:32):
the court. So I think realistically, if they decide to move,
we could be looking at months moderately, probably a year
or two. I think that I know. And that's why
it's important for Trump's doj and the Trump Executive to
not just go along with and say, Okay, well, you know,
you're the court. I guess we've got to you know,
(36:53):
wait and see until the Supreme Court gets involved. There
has to be some strategic ignoring of the non sense
because otherwise you're going to let the courts run the
presidency for the next four years, and that can't be
allowed to happen.
Speaker 2 (37:07):
No, can't be allowed to happen.
Speaker 1 (37:08):
All right, we're gonna shift gears and talk about Ronald
Rowe Secret Service Acting Director's Secret Service, Ronald row He's
gonna walk away, collect that government paycheck and walk away.
Speaker 2 (37:19):
What should we know about mister Roe.
Speaker 10 (37:21):
I want to know why he's not under criminal investigation.
I mean, we saw what happened with the president in Butler,
he was deliberately left completely unsecure. You had a gigantic
soup sandwich of incompetence running.
Speaker 9 (37:36):
The Secret Service at the time.
Speaker 10 (37:38):
You had the lead counter sniper not even going to
visit the entire building, that building that the would be
assassin fired at Trump from the guy running counter sniper
ops for the Secret Service didn't even bother to set
foot on it or.
Speaker 9 (37:51):
Go over there and see the point of view over there.
Speaker 10 (37:54):
And then to top it all off, you had Ronald
Row going before Congress repeatedly and having these like completely emotional, screaming,
shouting meltdowns, and members of Congress who had the audacity
to question how exactly this agency under his charge was
such a disaster. So I'd like to know what exactly
that guy was doing the whole time as director. I
(38:16):
don't think he deserves a pension. I don't think he
deserves to retire. I believe he deserves to be under
the criminal microscope for a very long time because that
moron and his incompetence nearly changed.
Speaker 9 (38:30):
The course of world history forever.
Speaker 10 (38:31):
It very well could have embroiled us in a civil
war or worse, because he just chose you know what.
I don't like Trump, so I guess we're just going
to not protect him.
Speaker 1 (38:41):
Sean, you say in competence, and I'm not arguing with
you at all. But if I'm the type of person
who believes this federal government is evil and criminal, and
I look at things like you just pointed out, the
top counter sniper doesn't go visit the rooftop that's one
hundred and forty eight meters in an elevated position away
from the subject I'm supposed to protect. At some levels, Sean,
(39:05):
in competence doesn't even explain it. Honestly, if you were
to ask me, hook me up to a lot of
detective test I think people inside the government wanted Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (39:15):
Then they try to facilitate it. That's what I believe.
Speaker 10 (39:18):
Oh, I don't disagree with you at all. It's the
frame that I use. I call it strategic incompetence. So
you had a bunch of morons at basically the line
level doing the actual work. The guy who's a lead
counter sniper, I think he'd been in the job for
six years, had no prior military experience, which you know
I don't either. But I'm also not leading a counter
(39:38):
sniper unit. And I think generally, if you're going to
be leading counter sniper operations, maybe you should have been
a sniper at some point in your career, doing that
for a living in hostile combat zones. So I think
the people at the like the actual work level, were incompetent.
I believe the people above them making decisions were malevolent
and malicious, And it's why the Trump detail was denied
(40:00):
for years their request for more security. It's why from
DHS on down, from majorcis on down, they said, no,
you don't need more resources. We're going to give all
those resources to the first lady, you know, fifty miles away,
not the guy who was a former president is going
to be the next president. So I think you had
malevolence and maliciousness at the top, deliberately starving him of resources.
(40:24):
And then I think they knew they had a bunch
of morons below them incapable of doing the job, and
they were just happy to let that run its course.
Speaker 1 (40:34):
All right, let's shift gears on the JFK files to
the JFK files. Sean speaking speaking of this exact subject
we're talking about, I've I'm a cynic, as you know,
you know me, I don't think there's going to be
anything really juicy in there, because look, if powerful people
decided to murder the president of the United States of America,
(40:56):
the truth of all that probably died when Jack Ruby,
life long Jewish mob enforcer, murdered Lee Harvey Oswald. But look,
I don't know. Was it the American Mafia, was it
Meyer Landski? Was it traffic Conte? Was this CIA at
Linda Johnson? I don't know, but I don't I'm not
anticipating a bombshell, are you now.
Speaker 10 (41:17):
I mean it's been sixty what we're sixty two years,
you know, a little over sixty one out from that happening.
I don't imagine that they did what they did but
then left meticulous files sitting around to be viewed later.
So I don't think we're gonna find out that much.
I hope I'm wrong. I also don't trust the people
(41:38):
who've been hiding this stuff, you know, for sixty years,
to just go out because the president said so, and
find all the documents and hand them out to us.
They may just be throwing all those needles and haystacks everywhere.
Speaker 9 (41:51):
But I will say my favorite.
Speaker 10 (41:52):
Conspiracy theory of all time hands down is the idea
that Lee Harvey Oswold killed JFK.
Speaker 9 (41:59):
I think it's hill.
Speaker 2 (42:03):
I actually don't disagree with that at all.
Speaker 1 (42:04):
I think if whatever theory you believe, if you believe
that with everything surrounding it, man, you have some blind
faith that it's amazing. Sean, Thank you, my brother. I
appreciate you as always.
Speaker 9 (42:17):
Thank you, sir. Take care.
Speaker 2 (42:21):
I have some exciting news. Did you know.
Speaker 1 (42:26):
Anti Communist Manifesto is available on paperback?
Speaker 2 (42:29):
Now? Do you know that paperback? Baby?
Speaker 1 (42:33):
Of course it was a hard cover, and of course
it was a national bestseller. Not that I'm in a brag,
but now get the paperback version. Take it on that
plane with you. Take it to the john Go learn
about communism, the history of it. Laugh a little bit
what you can do about it. Jesse kellybook dot com.
Speaker 2 (42:51):
We'll be back all right.
Speaker 1 (43:01):
It is time to lighten the mood. And I love
making fun of CNN, don't you? Don't you have a
good time making fun of CNN? And Anderson Cooper is
one of those types I've always enjoyed mocking because when
I think about Anderson Anderson Cooper, I think about how
he tries to present himself always as a serious journalist,
and in one moment it'll be this serious journalist Stanison Cooper,
(43:21):
and then in the next moment he'll get caught with
these behind the scenes footage of him standing in a
super deep puddle to make it look like the floodwaters
are over as.
Speaker 2 (43:31):
These it's just it's it's a fraud.
Speaker 1 (43:33):
And in the end, it's just kind of a caddy
communist is all he is.
Speaker 2 (43:36):
He kind of lost it on Chris Sinunu last night.
Where's the game?
Speaker 11 (43:41):
You're not going to be satisfied till he shows up
with ten thousand pages.
Speaker 6 (43:47):
He's giving very specific things, but he's not actually giving
any evidence of that.
Speaker 11 (43:52):
It's all going to come because what they also said
was if we have to go to Congress, we'll go
to Congress, right, but show where.
Speaker 6 (43:57):
Some of the details that have come out, like the
you know, fifty nine million dollars spent on luxury hotels,
it's actually not the talking.
Speaker 11 (44:05):
About the femal money that was used for migrants. That was, yeah,
FEMA money for migrants.
Speaker 4 (44:09):
That's okay.
Speaker 1 (44:10):
Now, no I'm not saying it's so I'm not saying
it's okay, don't put word.
Speaker 2 (44:13):
So would you stop that?
Speaker 11 (44:14):
Would you stop that process?
Speaker 2 (44:16):
Don't be the portray I'm What I'm saying is the
every now and then the mask slips. See them all
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.