Can Trump win the Election?

Today on the Jimmy Barrett Show:

• Jimmy finds the new Blue Bell flavor
• American Thinker's Matt Kane on whether or not Trump will win the election

Episode Transcript

(00:02):
Well, what we need is morecommon sense. Got the youth breaking down
the world's nonsense about how American commonsense. We'll see us through with the
common sense of Houston. I'm justpro common sense for Houston. From Houston
is Talking dot Com. This isthe Jimmy Barrett Show, brought to you

(00:27):
by viewin dot Com. Now here'sJimmy Barrett. All right, Happy Friday,
Welcome to the show, everybody.Thank you for the help yesterday.
By the way, I do appreciatethe fact that you were looking out for
me, trying to get worried tome about where you had found the new
Bluebell Doctor Pepper float flavor. Theycame out yesterday. I was over two

(00:52):
before the show yesterday. I madeanother run after dinner and found it at
an h being near me. It'swhere I should have gone to begin with.
Honestly, um, you know Iwas talking to Sheriff Fryer on ktr
RAH about this earlier this morning,and two things that came up. She
she she bought it. I meanwe talked about it all yesterday morning.

(01:15):
We got ourselves all hot and botheredfor ice cream for Bluebell ice cream in
this new flavor. I personally,I'm not you know, I'm I'm a
vanilla kind of guy, honestly.Or you know, I'm not really into
exotic flavors. Not that Doctor Pepperis exotic, but but you know,
I'm a little more of a puristwhen it comes to ice cream. So
I really didn't excite me. I'mnot a huge Doctor Pepper fan. But

(01:38):
Elizabeth is, so I knew shewould really want it, and so I
told sherif said, yeah, Ifound it at HIB if you want to
find something that's, you know,uniquely Texas. Not that no Bluebell is
uniquely Texas anymore because it's available allacross the country, but but it is
made in Texas. If you wantto meet it in Texas product, you
could almost always find it at HGB, even you can't find it somewhere else.

(02:00):
And I had gone to Oh,by the way, she got a
half gallon. Of course, Idon't know if they had any pints.
They had both pints and half gallons, and I grabbed the half gallon,
and then I thought, so Iput the half gallon back and I took
the pint. For two reasons.Number one is what if by some strange

(02:21):
craziness. Elizabeth didn't end up likingthe Doctor Pepper flavor. I mean,
I can't believe that would happen,But what if they were to happen,
I'd be stuck with a half gallonof ice creams and I'm not gonna eat
and it would be a real waste. So I got her the pint.
Well, the other reason was Ithought, well, if I get her
the half gallon, she'd eat thewhole dog on half gallon if she really
really likes it, So maybe Ishould start with a pint. He's he's

(02:45):
on into it, And of courseshe loved it, and her eyes rolled
into the back of her head.And I'm pretty sure we'll buying some more
of that stuff. It's it's goodstuff. The vanilla. It's like vanilla
with it. It's kind of strangea little bit. It's um, it's
been. It's not the normal vanilla. It's it's more creamy than the normal
vanilla. I'm taking this from Sheriff'sexplanation of it because I haven't. I

(03:07):
haven't tried it yet and I'm kindof trying to watch when I meet,
so I'm probably not gonna try itanytime soon. And it's got this ribbon
of doctor Pepper Sherbert that goes throughit. It's interesting. I mean,
it's not the most appetizing color,because you know the colors like Doctor Pepper,
but yeah, it's it's by allaccounts, everybody who's tried it really

(03:28):
really likes it. But again Iappreciate the help, And again I ended
up finding it at HGBT HB.I'd gone to Kroger first and Sam's a
Walmart second, and I struck outof both places, but I hit paydirt
at HB. Okay, let's talka little bit about jobs. First of
all, congratulations to you if you'regainfully employed, especially if you're gainfully employed

(03:51):
in a white collar job. Whatwe're looking at is we're looking at some
job losses, but not in placeswe're used to getting job losses in previous
recessions. Not that we're necessarily inone right this minute, but in previous
recessions, usually the jobs we loseare the service sector jobs, the fast
food jobs, the minimum wage jobs, the unskilled jobs are the first ones

(04:16):
to go, but not this timearound. The high tech jobs are the
ones that we're losing. The mostof the white collar jobs are the ones
where we're seeing layoffs. It's we'renot seeing layoffs right now in the blue
collars segment, which is kind ofinteresting, kind of different from any other
economy we've had in the past.Mike Road, the Dirty Jobs Guy,

(04:36):
Mike Roe, he has show onFox these days. Mike Rowe here talks
about how the amount of white colorjobs is going down and makes some interesting
observations about some other jobs that weneed to be training more forty years ago.
From my point of view, itstarted when we took shop class out

(04:57):
of high school. And when wedid that, we just unleashed a storm
of unintended consequences. Around the sametime, we started telling kids that the
best path for the most people wasa four year degree. Not just a
good path, but a path thatif you didn't take, you're going to
wind up with some sort of vocationalconsolation prize, that steady drum beat after

(05:18):
forty years, that's what we're seeingright now. We've got over eleven million
open positions, most of which don'trequire a four year degree. We have
one point seven trillion dollars in studentdebt on the books. We're lending money
to kids who will never be ableto pay it back to train them for
a lot of jobs that no longerexist, And we still just have our

(05:39):
thumb on the scale. We're stillsaying these jobs are good, these jobs
are bad. I've been hearing fromfor years that robots are going to wreck
blue collar work. Turns out AIis coming for your white collar job.
It's all backwards. Our population isgetting older and older and older. I
don't think you need to be aneconomist or a rocket scientist to see that
there's going to be a credible opportunityin that area. But that's not a

(06:02):
four year degree world. It's asix figure job that just requires a different
way of thinking. I just readthis book. You would love it.
It's called The Comfort Crisis. Oh. I bought it because you told me
to. Circle gets a square.But you know, I don't know about
morally right or wrong, and Idon't know that it's always wise to paint
with too broad a brush, becausethere really is a La La Land,

(06:24):
you know. I mean, he'sreferring to it as a fictitious place,
but it's it's a real place,and there are plenty of people, I
think who can be productive working fromhome but by and large, if you're
doing the thing you're doing because itmakes you comfortable, you're probably taking some
kind of shortcut, and shortcuts leadto long delays. We know that.

(06:45):
It was my earlier point. Thesethings take a long time to matriculate.
There's going to be a lot ofunintended consequences for not going into the office,
from socialization just to basic collaboration.You lose so much when you're home
alone staring at your screen, nomatter how effective you are. Yeah,
that last part was going to directedat Elon Musk. Elon Musk said,
it is a What did he say? He he said it was immoral not

(07:10):
to go to the office. Basically, he said, he said, you
need to get out of the houseand go to work. You need to
socialize with other people. And he'sright, I mean, he's absolutely right
about that. This this whole ideathat you can spend your entire life working
from home and don't have to socializeor don't have to interact with other people.

(07:30):
That's not that's that is La LaLand. That is not the real
world. Back with Blent Jimmy Barrettshow here on a nine fifty K prec
Well, you know, every nowand again we'll prove on the morning show
that you really can't do justice toa topic in three or four minutes,

(07:54):
and this morning was a perfect exampleof that. We had this, We
had this little um debate going onthis morning based on an article we saw
an American Thinker about Trump and aboutwhether or not Trump can win or can't
win a general election. And thereare two basic camps. I mean,
they're the Trump fans who obviously believein Trump and believe the Trump can do
anything he sets his mind to,and they will support him no matter what.

(08:18):
And then there's the anti Trumpers,who the people who are against Trump
and won't support Trump no matter what. And then you've got the ones that
are in between, although I thinkthere's not that many in between anymore who
haven't formed opinion one way or another. The question is is if Trump gets
the nomination, and he probably willthe way things are right now, if

(08:39):
he gets the nomination, can hewin the general election? Our next guest
thinks so. His name is MattKane at He and he writes for American
Thinker. Although I will say this, Bat, since you and I talked
this morning, Senator John Cornyn who'sabout as squishy as Republicans can get.
In fact, when he ran forreelection, he didn't even he didn't even
claim to be a Republican in thead. Yeah, he he's just as

(09:03):
completely innoculous as you could ever hopeto have. He came out today and
officially said anybody but Trump. That'sinteresting. So and does he mean he'll
support anybody but Trump, or doeshe mean anybody but Trump can win?
I think he means he'll support anybodybut Trump. And that's pretty much that's

(09:26):
an establishment talking point. You're hearingit a little bit. That's basically right
from the looks of Paul Ryan justa couple of months ago. That's something
a lot of them say. Youknow, I don't know what it is
exactly. In my opinion, it'sthat they've tried for so long to do
certain things and come across as thesuccessful Republican politicians, and all of a
sudden, you know Trump, whowas obviously he was a well known billionaire,

(09:48):
real estate muggle and you know TVpersonality at the time of his entering
politics. But he basically comes inoff the street in their field and just
it sort of does make them lookawful that he did a good job.
Set enough, they're bitter. Idefinitely see him as a threat as well,
because one of the other key thingsabout establishment people that have been in
government for so long is that youcan follow the money, and a lot

(10:11):
of them nobody else can say thatthey haven't taken money from somebody that sort
of influences their decision making. Where'sTrump. That's just the nature of a
multi billionaire coming into politics. Youcan't bribe a person who's worth billions of
dollars with a couple thousands of dollarshere and there. So I definitely think
there's more than anything a personal disdainfor Trump that the establishment types as opposed

(10:35):
to them really believing that he can'twin. There's no way they believe that
in my right right. In fact, I think they're they're scared to death
that he can win. And partof the problem is that they're every bit
a big part of the swamp,as many of those Democrats are, and
I think that's what they're fearful of. They're fearful of him destroying their income
stream, their permanent income stream.Well, absolutely, and that it's actually

(10:58):
referred through as the uniparty a lotof people in government in Washington. They
might have a Democrat or a Republicannext to their name, but they're really
pulling the same rope. They've beenin trench there for so long, and
they're really out for themselves. Andyou know, it was interesting his first
term he was against the swamp andit was kind of more a lot of

(11:22):
talking points that he exposed that,you know, they don't really stand up
for the people and all these things. But now when you're seeing as he's
left off, just how deep itreally was maybe years ago people that were
sort of in the middle, which, by the way, I don't really
believe there's much of a middle now. You just mentioned it right before I
came on, that there's very fewpeople who are still unsure about who they're
voting for. But what it's shownin the last couple of years is that

(11:45):
it really wasn't this fringe you knowof deep state swamp. What does that
mean? You're starting to see allthe ways that our agencies, intel agencies,
our Justice Department, it really isjust another branch of It's not even
the Democrat Party, it's the uniparty. There's so many Republicans that have been
there for so long too, thatabsolutely aid in letting our agencies. You're

(12:07):
seeing it right now with some Durhamreport. You're seeing it with some of
the connections the Biden administration had withforeign business dealings. They absolutely protect and
cover establishment types of politicians who havejust been lyning their own pockets for years,
and that's what they're mostly afraid of. In a second Trump term,
it's not just going to be likeit was in his first term. If
he gets in, it is nowout and the open for everybody to see

(12:30):
that. They absolutely allow the weaponizationof their departments to target any of their
political opponents, anybody who thinks differentlyof them, anybody who challenges them.
That's what they're most fearful of rightnow. As you take a look at
the people out there, the availablevoters out there, you know, we
know who the Trump supporters are.We know who the Mago crowd is,
although the leftist under level best totry to make sure that the Mago crowd

(12:54):
is painted as the white supremacist,a type of the races, the type
of individual that is extreme, etc. Etc. Etc. So we know
that crowd exists. We know there'smoderate Republicans I don't know do they vote
for anybody but Joe Biden or arethey capable of voting for Biden because they
just hate Trump that much. Andas we said in the beginning, there's

(13:16):
not that many people in the middle. But I do remember from the last
election, Matt, that what wewere dealing with here, especially with suburban
women. That was the big downfallfor President Trump with suburban women. They
don't like his style. They neverhave liked his style. But I'm just
wondering how we finally had a pointin this country. Were issues Trump style?

(13:39):
Well, if you look at arecent polling. Again I'm very skeptical
of polling overall, it's not theend all bull, but he's actually doing
better amongst women recently than he iswith men. One or more recent polls
showed he had something like seventy twoamongst women in the groups that are pulling
sixty eight percent amongst men the lastelection. If you look, you could
really dive into the demographics. Youknow, people do that. You talked

(14:00):
about a lot about the Hispanic votein a certain areas, especially down in
Florida, But you can't argue withthe fact that he went from sixty two
million votes to seventy four million votesand some so regardless of where that vote
is coming from, nobody has evergained twelve million votes from one election to
the next. That set the record. Trump always says, as he set
the record for more votes than anysitting president ever. He also set the

(14:22):
record for any candidate ever before him, Barack Obama, who was not a
sitting president obviously before he took office, he had sixty nine million votes in
two and eight, and that wasa rock star candidate. Democrats loved him.
Is the perfect storm for them.And he didn't just hit seventy million
votes, He had seventy five millionvotes essentially. So when people like to
focus on suburban women, right suburbanwomen. To me, that's also sort

(14:46):
of one of those other scripted,planted talking points that you hear on the
news so often. It doesn't matterwhere the vote comes from. I think
Trump style for every person that itturns off, it gains more than that,
because clearly he unlocked a section ofvoters in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania,
Georgia, and Arizona. No Republicanwas able to unlock since Ronald Reagan.

(15:09):
So whatever his style is, Idon't think it turns off more people
than it brings in. That That'show I view it. Yeah, you
know, speaking of a polling data, I guess there's a poll out amongst
independents that would seem to indicate andof course this is being The poll was
done, as I understand it,by a think tank sponsored by De Santis
supporters, so they have their ownacts to grind and all this. But

(15:33):
the poll would seem to indicate thatthe only person who can beat Biden in
these states Michigan, Wisconsin, andin some of these other purple states,
these battleground states, is going tobe Roun de Santis and Trump can't do
it. Do you buy any ofthat? I don't, I absolutely don't.
I hate to laugh, but ifyou look at it, he already

(15:54):
did it once when nobody else haddone it since the nineteen eighties, and
now all of a sudden, we'resupposed to believe, according to this poll
of these people pushing it, thatsomebody who has significantly less support than President
Trump does right now again, Imet you. I'm skeptical of polling,
but when consistent polling from many differentpolling group shows that he's down sixty to

(16:14):
twenty fifty five to twenty one.That tells me that clearly that the candidate
in the fifties and sixties, howcould he have less of a chance than
the candidate in the twenties and highteams. So the other thing with President
Trump is he's already delivered results forthose people. And even though they say,
which you know, that's a differenttopic. They say he lost those
states in twenty twenty, his votenumbers still increased in all of those swing

(16:37):
states. So I'm not sure howthey expect people to believe that all of
a sudden, Ron De Santis isgoing to do more for those people than
President Trump, and they're going tovote for Dasantis, who's an unproven commodity
who has all these ties to theBush era Republicans that those people never came
out to vote for. Now they'regonna jump ship and support him after President
Trump already delivered so many for themover four years and they desperately need that

(17:02):
again after the two plus years underBiden. There's just really zero truth to
that. I think they try toplant certain narratives to discourage people from voting
for Trump, but I think atthis point people see right through that,
which is a very good thing.Desantist obviously trails Trump by by quite a
bit. Are you surprised by themargin, Lady trails By. I mean,
he's a pretty popular governor. It'sinteresting because it's also very early.

(17:26):
I believe he's gonna announce next week. Am I surprised? You know?
I'm not. And the reason Isay that is because most Americans now polling,
not just Republicans, but Americans,most believe that there is something wrong
with the previous elections. And whenyou consider that, that means that most
Americans believe President Trump should be inoffice currently. So I'm not surprised that

(17:47):
he's so popular. I know,typically early in a primary, or at
any point a primary, a candidatedoesn't have sixty percent support across the board
when he's not an incumbent. Forexample, in twenty sixteen, I believe
President Well, he wasn't yet,but then candidate Trump he didn't even hit
fifty percent. He won the nominationwith forty five. So in other times,
sure, it'd be very surprising tosee a primary candidate already at sixty

(18:11):
percent. But when you consider thecircumstances that he's already been a president.
He really did great in the secondtime, and since he's left office things
had only gotten significantly worse in allareas. It's not surprising that people desperately
want him to be back in office. And on the flip side, something
I mentioned in my article is goinginto an election, the News wants you

(18:33):
to think everything revolves around Trump.There are some people whoever's left that's considered
moderate, they do weigh both sidesof the aisle. And President Biden right
now, he has a historic unpopularitywithin his own party. Nope, and
anytimes you've looked I mentioned this tomy article President Ford, President Carter,
even President Bush forty one, toan extent, when you face a significant

(18:56):
primary challenge, they never in reelection. It's a fact across the board.
Anyone who faces significant primary challenge neverprevails, which is what makes twenty
twenty so anomalous as well. Andright now already some polls already have RFK
Junior tied with Biden in a potentialprimary matchup. It's very early, but

(19:18):
just those paramelers alone really show thatanyone who's saying Trump can't win a general
election, or anyone except Trump tobe Biden there, it's not. I
don't think that they're you know,I'm kind of like the word stupid,
but I think it's intentionally skewed tokind of force an out of it,
as opposed to them actually believing it. All Right, Mankin, before I
let you go, do you thinkthat Biden actually is the nominee or do

(19:41):
you think it ultimately for whatever reason, is somebody else? Very interesting question.
I'd say yes, as launce hishealth allows him too, because it's
not really about him anyway. Clearlyhe's you know, he's not he's not
doing well physically. You know,it looks like he's you know, he
can't really hold a sentence too well. He's seems kind of lost all the
time. He's not running anything anyway, right, he's not running anything anyway.

(20:03):
Well, absolutely so, if he'snot in charge and he's just allowing
himself to be the frontman, Idon't know why they would prefer anybody else
to be, you know, keepgoing up there saying a couple lines,
stumbling through them looking lost, andthen have someone behind the scenes. I
don't know why they prefer anybody elseanyway. So if they have it their
way, absolutely that way they cancontinue doing what they're doing behind the scenes.

(20:29):
If anybody's guess whether he ken I'msure they will absolutely try that if
he's physically capable. So if Idid guess right now, I'd say yes,
he will be, but I alsowouldn't be shocked if something happens before
then. All Right, man Kane, Hey, thank you so much for
joining me this afternoon. I appreciateit. Take care of we'll talk again
soon, I hope. Yeah,you too. Thank you for having me
apprecia having me back on my pleasureMatt Kane, he writes for American Thinker

(20:52):
back with more than a moment JimmyBurchell on a Friday. Here a name
nine fifty k p RC. AllRight, just about time to start the
weekend. But before we do,here, let's bring up to date on

(21:14):
the FBI whistleblower segment. Yesterday,we had three FBI whistleblowers testifying in front
of Congress. There's only one namethat I really got or I can remember
easily, and it's because it's avery easy to remember name. The FBI
agent's name is Marcus Allen, youknow, like the football player Marcus Allen.

(21:37):
So just to show you how Democratswere trying to work against these whistleblowers.
One of the Democrats asking questions ofMarcus Allen started to ask him about
a tweet from Marcus Allen whatever youknow, zero nine, eight, four
to seven, whatever, whatever itwas, and he looked up at her

(21:57):
and said, that's not me.Well, well, let me just ask
you. No, that's not me. In other words, she wanted to
ask a question about a tweet.It was a tweet about Nancy Pelosi that
he didn't write, because that's nothim, that's some other Marcus Allen.

(22:18):
So she's trying to ask him aboutthis, and he's going, that's not
me. Why are you asking aboutthat? That's not me? And she
insists on reading the question and gethim to either agree or disagree with the
premise of the tweet that was nothis. That's kind of how desperate things
are getting, is the Democrats tryto fight back. I mean, they
know the FBI is working for themthese days. They know the CIA is

(22:41):
working for them, they know theDepartment of Justice is working for them,
so they're trying to prop them upanyway they can. Anyway. Here is
a little montage of some of thetestimony from the FBI whistleblowers, with some
reaction on the five from Jesse Waters. Working as an FBI special agent was
my dream job. I was ablowing was a political and in the spirit

(23:02):
of upholding my oath. Nonetheless,the FBI cynically elected to close ranks and
attacked the messenger. My family andI have been surviving on early withdrawals from
our retirement accounts while the FBI hasignored my request for approval to obtain outside
employment. I never Swarrenolf to theFBI. I swarren oflf to the Constitution.
Do you believe that the FBI ispurposefully hostile to you for that reason,

(23:22):
to keep agents from speaking up?Yes, yes, that question.
Yes. The primary allegation was thatthere was a cash incentive program with the
FBI. So the more investigations afield office opens up, the more cash
bonuses are given to the head ofthe field office. So that's why you're
seeing this flurry of investigations, aflurry of arrests. That's why so many

(23:48):
January sixth prosecutions, so many parentsare being investigated. Catholics are now being
investigated, and it explains why anybodywho even to DC on January sixth,
was investigated. They were investigated formoney, but they were investigated and Bank
of America handed over to the FBIevery single transaction that was made by people

(24:15):
that flew into DC for January sixNot only that, the FBI was taking
officers off child porn cases and makingthem hang out in the parking lots of
parent teacher conferences and write down theirlicense plates. They made the Betsy Ross
flag or a bumper sticker that saidto a terror symbol. So now you

(24:40):
understand why the FBI says white supremacyis the number one threat in the country
because it's a predominantly white country.And you could make money, a fortune
investigating everything a flag wave or asmall business owner, a Trump supporter,
a parent, anybody that can beconsidered white. You can open up an

(25:03):
investigation and get paid for that,okay, But you could also open up
investigations on people on the left ifthe idea here is just to get paid.
But that's not what they're doing.They're just doing people on the right.
Now. Jesse got a little bitinto the symbolism there and the whole
um white supremacy thing and spying onparents. Here's here's a more specific segment

(25:27):
on that. Here is a whistleblowerwho whose job it was to spy on
parents at school board meetings, eventhough he was going to school board meetings
himself as a concerned parent. Imaginethe irony of that. And also,
but it begins with this. Itbegins with some of the symbols that the
FBI has been telling it's it's umit's agents are white supremacist symbols or or

(25:53):
possible, uh, you know,possible, possible, you know, tip
offs that you're dealing with somebody whocould be a terrorist. It starts with
that and then segues into spying onparents. Take a listen to the whistle
blower. So which Americans were beingtargeted now? August twenty twenty two,

(26:15):
a media organization attained a copy ofa document which whistle blowers subsequently authenticated to
the committee that is styled the FBI'sDomestic Terrorism Symbols Guide on Militia Violent Extremists.
Mister, why are you generally familiarwith that guide? Yes? And
that guide identified certain things that madepeople more likely to be deemed a threat

(26:37):
or terrorists, didn't it? Yes? And when one of those things,
just the number two and the letterA next to each other. Yes,
it was. And in your experienceas a law enforcement official, does putting
the word two and the letter twoand a next to each other makes someone
more likely to be violent or lawbreaking? No? And if someone signified the

(26:57):
right that they support the right tobear arms, was that also something in
the symbol guide? Yes? Andhow about this one really got me?
The Betsy Ross flag was the BetsyRoss flag and the Terrorism Symbol Guide it
was? And what about the BetsyRoss flag makes someone more likely to be

(27:18):
a violent extremist? I wish therewas a reasonable explanation for that question.
There isn't, And people blew thewhistle and said, this stuff is crazy.
Americans are being targeted, mister friend. You ever been to a school
board meeting? Yes? FBI eversent you to the parking lot of a
school board meeting? Yes, theyhave. And in the parking lot of
a school board meeting where the FBIsent you, you were taken down information

(27:41):
regarding people's license plates. That's correct. Now, when the first time you'd
been to a school board meeting?Was it? No? I went on
my own as a private titisan asa parent. Yes, and so there
you were. It must have beenquite an interesting perspective there. You were
taken down the information of people parentsattending school board meetings on behesse of the
FBI, and you had been oneof those parents at a school board meeting.

(28:03):
How did that feel? Well,after I attended, privately, my
colleagues tease me that they were probablygoing to start investigating me. You used
to go after the worst of theworst, didn't you. Yes, I
believe so you went after people wholooked at child porn, yes, people
who were sexually exploiting children, yes, And then you were in the parking

(28:23):
lot of a school board meeting,taken down the information of parents. What
happened to the cases that you wereworking to protect our communities from the worst
predators that exist. I was toldthey were not to be resourced, and
then after I was suspended, theywere handed off to local law enforcement.
They go. So that's what's happeningwith the FBI. You know, they're

(28:48):
spying on parents, writing down licenseplate numbers at school board meetings instead of
pursuing child predators. Is that willbe gone in the FBI, because that's
what We've gone right down from theFBI. So when they talk about starting
over with the FBI, I thinkthat's a pretty good example of why they

(29:08):
need to consider doing that. Allright, Hey, I'm ready to start
the weekend. I'm gonna go out. I'm gonna go ouat and give you
some more of that Doctor Pepper floatice cream and uh, you know,
a couple of premium glasses of wineand and and and start my weekend.
I hope you have a great weekend. I'll see a Monday morning, bright
and early five AM with shaff Fryerover on News Radio seven forty KTRH.

(29:30):
We're back here Monday at four onAM nine fifty KPRC.