How did Democrats lose men?

Today on the Jimmy Barrett Show:

• Edward Bartlett on why Democrats lost the male vote

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Well, what we need is more common sense, common.

Speaker 2 (00:07):
The common breaking down the world's nonsense about.

Speaker 3 (00:12):
How American common sense will see us through With the
common sense of Houston. I'm just pro common sense for Houston.
From Houston dot Com. This is the Jimmy Barrett Show,
brought to you by viewind dot Com.

Speaker 4 (00:29):
Now here's Jimmy Barrett. So you heard right that Brian
Wilson died. He died yesterday at the age of eighty two.
First of all, makes me feel old knowing that he
was eighty two. Second of all, you know, I guess
it's just part of normal activity, right when you have

(00:51):
when you have people that you grew up listening to
their music and now they're now they're passing away. I mean,
that's that's that's gonna become, becomes more and more common
the older you get. But a lot of great memories
of the Beach Boys. I actually bought. One of the
first records I actually bought is a very very very
very very very young child was Good Vibrations by the
Beach Boys, which, as it turns out, evidently I had

(01:14):
pretty good musical days because as it turns out, that
was the biggest hit that was Their number one most
sold recording was Good Vibrations. A lot of Beach Boys songs,
a lot of good songs. They kind of started off
and they were founded and look all this up of
course of Wikipedia. They were founded in nineteen sixty one
out of Hawthorne, California. Three brothers, three Wilson brothers, plus

(01:40):
Mike Love and l Jardine were the original members of
the Beach Boys. Dennis Wilson, who is the drummer, was
the first Beach Boy to die. I'm trying to remember.
I can't recall what he died from or how he died.
I just know he died young, and so he was
the first member of the band that had to be replaced.

(02:00):
Pet Sounds was their number one album. If you were
to ask the Beatles and other musical groups from the
nineteen sixties, you know what Beach Boys songs or albums
may have influenced them the most. That's the one that
usually comes up because it was really kind of creative.
I mean, when you think about Good Vibrations was nineteen

(02:21):
sixty six. It had a lot of sound effects and
recording techniques that were brand new for the time that
were created by Brian Wilson. I mean, he had a
lot of mental health problems. He was a strange cat,
but he was a musical genius in many different ways.
So anyway, this morning on ktr H, we're doing this

(02:42):
because we had had two stories and there's two questions
of ball.

Speaker 5 (02:45):
Well.

Speaker 4 (02:45):
I'm only mentioned this other question because some of the
listeners what we saw on with not only their favorite
Beach Boys song or Beach Boys moment, but also with
their favorite beverage or in this case more the beverage
you can't live without, which means it's different than your
favorite beverage. Your favorite beverage may be something you don't

(03:05):
drink all the time, but the one that you can't
live without is the one you got to have. Coffee
comes to mind. You know it may not be your
favorite thing to drink, but you rely on the first
thing in the morning to get your caffeine buzz going
or whatever it is. So anyway, that was our question
this morning on KATRH beverage you can't live without? And
favorite Beach Boys moment or favorite Beach Boys song.

Speaker 6 (03:29):
Jimmy best Beach Boys song Sloop John B.

Speaker 2 (03:35):
This is Jack from Connecticut.

Speaker 1 (03:37):
I remember seeing the Beach Boys in concert at Freedom Over,
Texas about thirty years ago.

Speaker 5 (03:42):
Have a good day, guys, Yeah, Scott, Mike knows.

Speaker 1 (03:45):
My brothers and I we played forty one years for
a wedding band for Polish weddings and stuff. But the
first thing did my oldest brother learn when he was
in fifth grade was wipe out man. That was mandatory.
And then we went on from there with the Beach Boys,
the Eagles, Willie Nelson, et cetera, et cetera. But yeah,

(04:07):
the Beach Boys were a big inspiration, especially with.

Speaker 4 (04:12):
Up and we lost them there. But yep, I think
I said this morning on the show wipe Out?

Speaker 2 (04:17):
Isn't that?

Speaker 4 (04:17):
Was that the Ventures or or some other group that
did wipe Out? But I think the Beach Boys did
a version of it two, but it's not originally their song,
all right, any others?

Speaker 1 (04:27):
Paul from Splendora favorite Beach Boys song Little Deuce Coop
favorite drink R in R Reserve and coke and.

Speaker 7 (04:36):
What's up Jamie?

Speaker 2 (04:37):
What's that?

Speaker 8 (04:37):
Mike?

Speaker 1 (04:38):
Okay, the Queers did a cover Don't back down. Shut up, Mike,
I know you're giggling, and drink would be memory kabucha.

Speaker 2 (04:50):
You all have great days.

Speaker 9 (04:50):
Stay dry.

Speaker 10 (04:52):
My favorite song from the Beach Boys was when Tim
Allen and his wife on TV Pat Richard's and Pat
sing a song with the Beach Boys. I think it
was a little loose coop. Also my go to beverage
that I can't live without his diet Doctor Pepper. This
is Marty.

Speaker 4 (05:12):
Hey, Marty, I don't remember I remember the Beach Boys
being on Home in Purpidie. Maybe they were. And by
the way, Marty, not to correct you, if it's a
little deuce coop, that little loose coop.

Speaker 2 (05:24):
All right, more calls about the Beach Boys.

Speaker 8 (05:27):
This is Al from Spring. I got to see the
Beach Boys back around nineteen eighty. Man, what a great show.
I'm not going to go out and name my favorite
song because there's just too many of them. But I'll
tell you the one that they probably wish they could
take back is in my room. Never a fan of
that one.

Speaker 6 (05:48):
Have a great day, Sparrow, Will Houston plat drink in
the morning, just Red Bull.

Speaker 5 (05:54):
Can't at function unless I.

Speaker 2 (05:56):
Have them, but red Bull that's hardcore.

Speaker 4 (06:00):
Although I do Red Bull and vodka, I've got I
kind of got into that for a while. Because the
problem with the problem with alcohol is it makes you sleepy,
So the red Bull was kind of counteractive to making
you sleepy. But yeah, I've got a little bit of
high blood pressure that I control through medication, and I'm
thinking red Bull is not the kind of medication that

(06:22):
you want to take for controlling high blood pressure. So yeah, no,
that's probably not a good.

Speaker 10 (06:26):
IDEA favorite Beach Boys song, wouldn't it be nice?

Speaker 2 (06:31):
Favorite beverage Mountain Dew zero, have a great.

Speaker 11 (06:36):
Day, Good morning, Jimmy and Company. One drink I can
be without his coffee. I've been drinking it since four
I'm in my fifties. Two or three cups in the
morning and I'm all set for the rest of the day.
It's working out good benefits. That is, one drink I
can live without. This is landa from Alvin, Texas. I

(07:00):
have a great day to stay dry.

Speaker 4 (07:02):
Few too, Lando, Thanks and thanks for checking in with us. Yeah,
I drink a lot of coffee in the morning, as
you can imagine, you know, because I get up at
two fifteen and we start prepping for Houston's morning news
on KTRH around what time you usually getting about three fifteen,
three twenty until five, and then we're going too late.
So yeah, yeah, we need to get up that early

(07:22):
little coffee in the morning's manatory. I though it's decaf again,
high blood pressure. Can't be drinking all that caffee. All right, Well,
those are good memories. That's good stuff earlier this morning.
Here's something else I'll share from earlier this morning. I
think it's worth sharing with it. We'll do it in
our next segment. Here Anise Parker. Do you know who
Anise Parker is? Do you remember Anease Parker and these

(07:43):
Parkers before my Houston days? She was the mayor of
Houston back around twenty fifteen twenty sixteen. I think twenty
sixteen was when she left the mayor's ship. Twenty seventeen
is when I came to Houston, of course, so I
wasn't there. I guess she's big in the gay She's
a lesbian, big in the gay rights, which at this

(08:06):
point in time I don't really care about, you know,
that's fine. All I really care about is how are
you going to run the county and how would you
be different than Lena Hildago. She's running for Harris County Judge,
which is interesting because that tells me one of the
two things. Either Lena Hildago's already decides she's not going

(08:27):
to run and therefore you've got a lot of Democrats
who are lining up to take her place, or even
if she is going to run, everybody thinks she's vulnerable
and can be primaried, so they're getting ready to get
rid of her because they don't think that she can
get reelected. Whatever the case is. We had a niece
Parker on this morning, and I'll share that interviewed with
interview with you coming up next yere on AM nine

(08:49):
fifty KHPRC and the Jimmy Barrett Show. So over on

(09:10):
our morning show, Houston's Morning News on KATRH, we had
an East Parker on, former mayor of the City of Houston.
Minunderstanding from what I was told is that she was
term limited, which is why she hadn't run for mayor
when I was here, I was lucky enough to get
her in time for Sylvester Turner. Look at me. I

(09:31):
was here in time, Fred Emmett. So I do have
a point of reference to how Harris County was being
run before Lena Hildago, and the difference is day and night. Now,
a niece Parker is a progressive. She's very liberal. She
probably is going to and I think you'll see in

(09:53):
this interview she's certainly for right now running towards the middle,
although she probably is more middle ground, certainly more middle
ground than Lena Hildago is. But she's she's not the
least bit conservative. I mean, we need to make that clear.
But I will give her credit. She was willing to
come on our show this morning. Lena Hildago's not been
on our program. She knows better. And I think a

(10:15):
niece Parker probably thought that I was going to be
combative in bombastic and you know, try to try to
have a gotcha moment, and I could tell she was
very nervous. So you know, it's early. She's not the
Harris County Democrat candidate for judge at this point, so

(10:35):
there's plenty of time to talk to her about her
politics and how her politics might influence her decisions if
she were elected judge. For now, this this is a
getting to know each other, how are you different than
Lena Hildago kind of an interview, So we shared that
this morning. Let's share it again with former Houston mayor,

(10:55):
A niece Parker a candidate for Harris County Judge too,
So our time we welcome an East Parker Democrat candidate
for Harris County Judge. Former Houston mayor may recall, during
her tenure the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance was a big
deal for her. That was one of her pet projects.
What would she bring to the table if she were
to be elected Harris County Judge. Well, let's ask her.

(11:17):
First of all, Anie, welcome to the program. Nice to
meet you.

Speaker 6 (11:21):
Thank you.

Speaker 5 (11:22):
It's nice to meet you as well.

Speaker 4 (11:24):
First of all, let's start with the decision. We haven't
heard anything from Lena Hildago yet about whether she intends
to run or not to run. I'm wondering if maybe
you think she doesn't intend to run, and that's one
of the reasons why you're running.

Speaker 9 (11:40):
I have no idea whether she's going to run or not.
I made my own decisions. I mean, obviously, as a candidate,
I hope that she doesn't. But I think that's one
of the.

Speaker 5 (11:55):
One of the issues.

Speaker 9 (11:55):
There ought to be certainty, and if you want a job,
you ought to stand up and say you want the job,
say it publicly, end privately.

Speaker 5 (12:02):
And standing your record.

Speaker 4 (12:04):
Well, it's a stressful job. At least it's very stressful
to her over the course of the last few years.
Maybe maybe they'll has something to do with their decision.
You've been to the world of politics, You've been out
for a while. Get why jump back in?

Speaker 2 (12:15):
Are you? Are you looking for trouble?

Speaker 5 (12:20):
You know, three months of retirement. It probably allowed.

Speaker 9 (12:24):
Me to consider Misshif, But no, I actually contemplated. I
left the I left my office's mayor at the end
of twenty fifteen and went working in nonprofit sector. And
I intended to run for county judge in twenty eighteen.
Adam it was not going to run for re election

(12:44):
and had already started putting a campaign together, and Ed
changed his mind.

Speaker 5 (12:49):
He announced that he was going.

Speaker 8 (12:52):
To run again.

Speaker 5 (12:52):
And I, you know, Ed and I have working relationship.
I don't know if you know.

Speaker 9 (12:57):
We actually teach a class together at right And I said, I.

Speaker 5 (13:02):
How did You're doing a fine job. I will wait.

Speaker 9 (13:04):
And that is the year that Lena he died, took
him out.

Speaker 2 (13:08):
Well, as you know this, and I just say, as
you know, I went off and I could see to
do this.

Speaker 4 (13:14):
Yeah, big difference between the way ed Emmett ran Harris
County and the way Lena Hildago is sort of kind
of trying to run Harris County. One of the great criticisms,
of course, is that she spends a lot of time
on social programs and doesn't seem to really spend that
much time preparing for things like hurricanes. I guess the
first question I would really have it if you were
elected Harris County judge in these how would you be

(13:35):
different than Lena Hildago.

Speaker 9 (13:39):
So I understand the job of Harris County judge. It
is not the same as a job of mayor. And
one of the primary differences is as mayor you can
make law past ordinances, but county government he is a
creature of the state, and you and.

Speaker 5 (14:00):
Force state laws.

Speaker 9 (14:01):
But the primary responsibilities public safety, public health, floodwater management,
roads and bridges.

Speaker 11 (14:08):
Uh.

Speaker 9 (14:08):
And then there's some other smaller aspects of county government,
and for the county judge is the biggest thing is
emergency management. If you look at my first priority in
my first term as mayor of Houston, it was infrastructure,
the drainage the litigation that just completed, UH, that was

(14:29):
my drainage view that I that I passed because I
thought we needed to put more money into floodwater management here.

Speaker 5 (14:37):
In Harris County. UH.

Speaker 2 (14:44):
I agreed with the.

Speaker 9 (14:45):
Engineers who sued the City of Houston it was being
it was being diverted.

Speaker 5 (14:48):
I also launched the major initiative to.

Speaker 9 (14:52):
Overhaul the water and sewer lines in the City of Houston.

Speaker 5 (14:56):
Still needs to be done.

Speaker 9 (14:57):
So that infrastructure was my highest priority when I came in.
But I also came in in the middle of the
Great Recession in two thousand and eight two thousand and nine,
So most of what I did in my first term
as mayor was slash budgets, laid off more than seven
hundred city employees. So I know how to make tough

(15:19):
decisions and I know what the priorities are. I know,
you guys on the on the right life to talk
about the hero word.

Speaker 4 (15:29):
We're a little conservative. We're a little conservative, but we
do like hearing a message about it. Yeah, we do
like hearing a message. We do like hearing a message
about infrastructure in public safety because that's what we also
believe is the job of the judge, and we don't
believe that job is being done by our current judge,
so we would like to see a judge in there
who do the job. We've also been very supportive, by

(15:51):
the way, just you know a mayor John Whipmyer because
he's he's a Democrat who seems to understand that.

Speaker 9 (15:58):
You know, we have we worked on the same we
have worked on the same issues.

Speaker 5 (16:04):
Now. I did disagree with John.

Speaker 9 (16:07):
In his effort at the state to pull money out
of the tall roads.

Speaker 5 (16:12):
To shift over to the City of Houston.

Speaker 9 (16:17):
I don't think toll road money should be spent on
anything but roads, frankly and management of the toll roads.
But generally I think John's doing a good job.

Speaker 4 (16:28):
Well, listen, I want to thank you for your time
this morning. We appreciate you calling in and hope to
talk again here pretty soon.

Speaker 2 (16:34):
Thank you.

Speaker 4 (16:34):
Niece Sure Democratic candidate for Harris County judge a niece Parker. Yeah,
she seemed nervous to me, and you know, maybe for
one thing, she's been out of politics for the last
I guess the better part ten years, right, eight nine years,
So maybe she's a little rusty, or maybe she thought

(16:57):
that I was going to be more confrontational that I was,
or trying to like I said, trying to get her
in a gotcha moment, which would of course not my intention.
It was just a meet and greet this time. But anyway,
we'll see. You know, obviously I would prefer a Republican.
I would prefer an Alexandra Meeler. That we talked to
her also this morning on our morning show. It doesn't

(17:18):
appear that she's going to run again, So somebody else
is going to be running for that position. Now who
that somebody else turns out to be remains to be seen.
We'll have to see what happens. But you know, clearly,
no matter who ends up in that position, it would appear,
at least on paper, that we're going to be far.
I mean, how could we be any worse off than

(17:39):
we are with Lena Hildago. Whoever goes in that job
next has to be an improvement, I would hope. All right,
quick little break back with morning moment Jimmy Baird Show.
You're a thinking of nine fifty KHPRC. All right, Democrats

(18:08):
are still trying to figure out how they lost men.
Hang on a second, what do you mean they haven't
figured out how they lost the men? You mean they have?
That's just crazy. To me, everything they did, seemingly there
for a while was anti male. When you are trying
to devasculize males, that's generally not a good thing. Men
are going to be men. Men understand there's a difference

(18:29):
between men and women. Men understand that the progressive left
has been attacking them for a number of years. They've
had enough of it. What's not to understand. Join us
to talk about is Edward Bartlett, the founder of Save
Stop Abusive and Violent Environments. It's a five OHO one
C organization working to assure do process, fairness and equal opportunities,
especially for men. Edward, welcome to the show. I'm sure

(18:53):
you have more to say than what I just said
about what democrats problems are with men, but the ones
I listened are pretty obvious, aren't they.

Speaker 6 (19:01):
Well, actually, you summarized it very nicely. Democrats have been dismissing, degrading,
and saying nasty things about men really as long as
I can remember, which goes back, you know, at least
a few years. So the reason, of course, is that

(19:23):
the feminist ideology has infiltrated the DNA of the Democratic Party,
and so what democrats are saying is very much reflection
of feminist ideology.

Speaker 4 (19:39):
All right, but that's not a winning formula for them,
or at least it's not a winning formula anymore because
men have had enough.

Speaker 6 (19:47):
Men have had enough, and it really didn't become obvious
until November the fifth, when there is an extraordinary teaching.
We don't see political realignments like what happened in November
very often. It was maybe, you know, maybe the fifth
time in American history that there was such a huge realignment.

(20:10):
Think of the landslide victory of Ronald Reagan, the number
of years ago. That's the magnitude of the change that
happened in November. So the reality is that men are
clean and exiting the Democratic Party. Four point five million

(20:30):
men changed their vote from twenty twenty to that twenty
twenty four.

Speaker 4 (20:38):
You know, what's very interesting to me too, is the
percentage the point decline of white male's four point decline,
black mail's eight point decline twice as many Latinos a
twelve point decline, Asians a six point decline. Now, it
could be said, at the risk of making a generalization,
it could be said that black mails, and in particular
Latino males, may be a little bit more macho these

(20:59):
days in your average white male. Do you think that's
why they saw erosion in bigger numbers?

Speaker 6 (21:06):
You know, I've thought about that same question, and I
have to admit I'm a little bit I don't know
the answer to that. Actually, I do speak Spanish. I
do have a number of friends male Hispanic men who
are friends. But I have to say I really haven't
figured out this particular question. But bottom line is, the

(21:27):
Democrats suffered historic losses in November, right.

Speaker 4 (21:35):
But the thing that's strange to me is they somehow
feel the need to spend millions of dollars to try
to figure out what went wrong when it seems like
the answer to what we're wrong should be painfully obvious
even to them.

Speaker 2 (21:49):
Well, you're right.

Speaker 6 (21:50):
Just keep in mind that ideology, by definition is not rational.
We're talking about neo Marxist ideology that you know, is
driving principle, believes that there really is such a thing
as patriarchy, really believes that men are out to oppress
women any way they can. And when that's your founding principle,

(22:15):
when that's sort of the idea that drives your whole worldview,
you know, it's really hard to find anything that's logical.

Speaker 4 (22:27):
Well, and I think maybe even a bigger mistake that
they made. Is one thing to have a philosophy, is
another thing to not know how to play to your audience.
And we saw it over and over again in the
election with Kamala Harris. In fact, former President Obama was
one of the ones who came out and basically chastised
men for not being more supportive of Kamala Harris. In

(22:47):
other words, you understand that they're not supporting her, but
you think it's because she's a woman, and you don't
bother to think of this as above your own really
about your own party philosophy in how you treat men
versus women.

Speaker 6 (23:04):
Well, yes, and actually it was more than Barack Obama
that made these consparaging remarks. Tim Waltz himself once accused
Republicans and neither Higgs exact words, of being quote racist
and misogynistic. That's pretty strong language to stereotypes your opponent. So, uh,

(23:25):
Tim Waltz has used that term. Even Michelle Obama has
used the term of misogynistic on repeated occasions. So yeah,
there's a lot of a lot of bad.

Speaker 2 (23:38):
Vibes here, you know, I think too.

Speaker 4 (23:41):
And I think that the part of this as well
is that I think for a certain period of time,
men were kind of bullied to a certain extent. They
were kind of bullied from the standpoint of of being
told that you're you're chauvinistic, or your misogynistic, you're you're racist,
and that that kept people quiet. And then finally they

(24:02):
got tired of hearing it. They got tired of hearing
that accusation, and they decided that they needed to do
something about it, and that expressed itself. I think in
the election.

Speaker 6 (24:15):
I think you're exactly right, Jimmy, that that I think
we have reached a turning point. Men have sort of
been willing to accept the criticisms without pushing back. That's
changed Men are Men are sick and tired of being
you know, ridiculed and described as misogynistic and non and on.

(24:38):
So yeah, I think we are in a different world
than we were even twelve months ago.

Speaker 4 (24:44):
Well, you know, the last thing I want to do
is to help the Democrats figure this out. So what
do you think. Do you think they're finally figuring it out,
or they will figure it out and they'll make a change,
or do you think the ideology is just too entrenched.

Speaker 6 (24:59):
I think the ideology is very entrenched. We already have
evidence of feminists democratic feminists pushing back from any attempt
to try to address these twelve areas of male disparity.
My prediction is that the Democrats will remain in the

(25:20):
political wilderness at least for the next three to four years.

Speaker 4 (25:27):
Okay, I want to ask you to while you have you,
and by the way, again, we're talking with Edward Bartlett,
the founder of Safe Stop Abusive and Violent Environments, is
a five oh one c three organization working to assure
due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men. We're going
to get into that a little bit here in just
a second, but I wonder if you can make some
analogies between what we saw with Democrats losing mail voters

(25:50):
to what we see going on right now in Los
Angeles and these other cities where we're seeing these protests
which are obviously funded by socialists communist organists. It's amazing
how easy it is to recruit some people to be anarchists.
Take me in the mindset if if you can't of
somebody who's who can be recruited to participate in these

(26:13):
types of activities based on ideology.

Speaker 6 (26:19):
Well, I have an admission to tell you, Jimmy, I
am the former liberal myself. I did vote for Bill
Clinton the way back. Of course, I'm no longer a liberal.
But I think I can kind of see both sides
of the story. But the reality is Democrats have lost
their grip on reality. There is a huge disconnect between

(26:44):
the Democratic rhetoric and the and the reality. And the
example of the La riot is a perfect example, with
people saying, oh, well, these are just rallied, they were
mostly peaceful. Well that's just bizarre, untrue. So yeah, I
think that's part of the disease democrats are dealing with.

Speaker 4 (27:07):
Well, and I guess there's no cure for that one either,
is there, Well.

Speaker 6 (27:14):
At least not in the short term. Again, I think
it's going to be three or four years that the
Democrats come to their senses, or it may timp to
get worse. I honestly, I don't know how things will
turn out.

Speaker 4 (27:29):
Well, if they don't come to their senses in the
next three to forty years, then they're going to have
But here's what's likely to happen. If they're going to
stay in the path or on until the midterm elections,
and they are going to get beat in historical numbers
as a result of that, and then then the wake
up call will happen because the one thing that they
do respond to is a loss of power. I think

(27:50):
a loss of power can he is the only thing
that maybe could trump ideology.

Speaker 2 (27:54):
What do you think?

Speaker 6 (27:57):
Well, I guess I'm a little bit cynical and having
sort of you know, I'll just give you an example.
This is the statement from Ross Rochetto. He's the guy
who organized white dudes for Harris. He himself said, and
I'm quoting from him, quote, know, the Democratic Party really

(28:19):
does not like or respect men. That is pretty strong stuff. Yea,
it is so again, you know, they.

Speaker 2 (28:28):
Are in the wilderness.

Speaker 6 (28:29):
It's going to be a while. Some would say the
Democratic Party is is falling apart.

Speaker 2 (28:35):
I don't know. Well, like I said, the time, time
will tell us. Walnut, Yes, yeah, all right.

Speaker 4 (28:43):
Quickly, let me ask you to Uh Edward about about
your organization. What is it specifically you folks do as Save?
What's what's the mission of Save?

Speaker 2 (28:53):
Well?

Speaker 6 (28:54):
Save's mission is to publicize and support equal rights and
fairness for men. It turns out that men are lagging
in twelve areas lagging behind women. I'm talking about lifespan,
I'm talking about enrollment and higher education. I'm talking about

(29:14):
shared parenting after divorce. The list goes on and on
and on. It's a little bit depressing, I'll be honest
with you. So we are trying to publicize the fact
that there is no such thing as patriarchy. If men
who really need help, that's a great point. So if
our listeners would like to check out your website and

(29:36):
find out more about what you folks do, how do
they find you? Yeah, this url is save services dot org,
saveservices dot org and we have lots and lots of
information there.

Speaker 4 (29:50):
All right, Edward Bartlett, thanks for joining us today. I
appreciate it. My pleasures you make shape, are you too?
Edward Bartlett, the founder of Say Back with More in
a moment Jimmy Bird Show here on name of nine
fifty KPRC. So let's wrap up today with talking a

(30:18):
little bit about who is behind And we kind of
brought it up a little bit in our interview with
Edward Bartlett, but you know, the ideology, who's behind the
ideology and more importantly, who's pulling the strings and especially
the purse strings of the people who are participating in
these riots in Los Angeles and the protest thing is

(30:39):
going to go on all around the country tomorrow down
not tomorrow, Tomorrow's Friday, on Saturday, including right here in Houston.
Who's responsible for this? I saw Senator Josh Hawley on Fox.
He got asked that question. He knows that there's perse
strings behind it, but if he knows who's responsible for it,
he's not saying.

Speaker 7 (30:59):
About as authentic as AstroTurf. They are bought and paid
for flash mobs, and I want to know who's doing
the buying and the paying. That's why today I've launched
an investigation. I've sent multiple investigative demands today to various
groups out on social media claiming they are paying for this,
they are organizing it, they are financing it. We've all
seen the videos of vans driving up handing out gas

(31:22):
masks right before somebody blows up a car. It's time
we found out where's the money coming from, Who's really
behind this. I think the American people deserve.

Speaker 12 (31:30):
Answers when they're saying, don't believe what you see on
TV and there's no violence at all. Doesn't that kind
of remind you of the Biden cover up?

Speaker 2 (31:39):
Oh, one hundred percent, it's the same thing.

Speaker 7 (31:41):
Don't believe you're lying eyes. Meanwhile, they're out there blowing
up cars on the one oh one, they're assaulting cops,
they're rushing federal buildings, they're burning down shops. It's all
on television. I mean, we can see it with our
own eyes. I'm just glad Trump isn't letting the city burn.
I mean, Gavin Newsom would allow his state to burn
for the second time in the year. The first part
is somebody is paying for all of this, and they're

(32:03):
trying to spread it, Jesse, just like you reported, they're
trying to spread it across the country, to Chicago, to
Saint Louis, to Seattle, New York, everywhere. We got to
figure out who.

Speaker 2 (32:12):
Is behind this.

Speaker 7 (32:14):
And by the way, why is the Democrat Party now
basically an extended mental ward?

Speaker 2 (32:18):
I mean, what has happened to these people? They're nuts?

Speaker 8 (32:22):
You know.

Speaker 12 (32:22):
You notice that CNN never even interviews anybody at the riot.

Speaker 2 (32:26):
We have clips of them, and you can.

Speaker 12 (32:28):
See why Shennan doesn't want to talk to them. Because
they look insane. Your colleagues in the Senate do they
support these people?

Speaker 9 (32:35):
Do they think this.

Speaker 12 (32:36):
Is good politically for the Democrat Party.

Speaker 7 (32:40):
Well, that's what they're acting like. I mean, they're out
there saying all peaceful protests. It's all peaceful. And by
the way, this is Donald Trump's fault. I'm like, really,
Donald Trump's fault. Gee, I missed it when Donald Trump
went and blew up a car on Highway one oh one.
I didn't see him when he was assaulting cops. What
I saw was a bunch of lunatics who are waiving
the Mexican flag and other flags while they.

Speaker 2 (32:58):
Burned our own.

Speaker 7 (32:59):
And by the way, way, Jesse, we ought to penalize
people who burn the American flag while they're committing a crime.
If you do that, you ought to have your prison
sentence doubled. It's time to get serious with these people.
It's a law and order time in America. No more
of this nonsense.

Speaker 4 (33:13):
Yeah, well, maybe that's part of their plan, right. Do
you think they want to get President Trump to go
all martial law, call an insurrection. I still think that
maybe part of what their plan is. These people are
not stupid. They may be ideal. They may be ideological,
ideologically retarded, but they're not stupid. There's a method to

(33:35):
whatever it is they're trying to do.

Speaker 2 (33:37):
Now.

Speaker 4 (33:37):
The one thing I will say about Senator Hawley that
I don't quite understand here is I don't believe for
a minute that he doesn't know who some of the
players are here. You know, he makes it sound like
he needs to do an investigation to find out who's
funding this stuff. I think they already know. In fact,
I heard Florida Representative Anna Pauline a Luna. She had
no problem identifying who's who's spending the money in Los Angeles.

Speaker 2 (33:58):
Listen to this.

Speaker 13 (33:59):
It's actually being funded by a billionaire by the name
of Neville Singham. He's actually funding a group called the
Party for Socialism and Liberation, which if you look online,
they are a communist organization. What they're doing is they
are using Hispanic Americans the way that BLM used black
Americans during these whites and frankly the way that Code Pink,
which is also funded by the CCP, is using Palestinians.

(34:20):
So what they're trying to do is they're using this
to usher in Marxism. But it's important to note that
actually when you find and you follow the money trail,
mister Singham is actually largely funded by the Communist Chinese Party.
So House Oversight has issued and we'll be sending a
letter this Friday with all my members of Oversight calling
mister Singham to testify before Congress. If he does not appear,
it does not provide documents. Who will then be held

(34:41):
a contemptive Congress and he will be prosecuted by the
Department of Justice. We are not playing. This is a
different administration. We have the Department of Justice, and if
you interfere with American politics and are a foreign agent,
you will be held accountable. I can tell you that
there is significant financial money trails. All you have to
do is follow the money. Remember so Nevill's Seingham is
actually financing the LA Rights, but the there's also other
groups coming in, but they have different ideological perspectives, some

(35:04):
backed by Soros that are globalists, and then obviously the
Marxist organizations. But remember this is a color revolution, right,
They're using these immigrants as a guys for their real
objective and goal here, and frankly, it's nothing different than
what happened in the Summer of Love during the BLM
rights right before the election. They're doing the same thing
before the midterms, and Democrats are trying to get the

(35:24):
Hispanic votes, so that's why they're using Mexican flags.

Speaker 4 (35:27):
And by the way, if you're wondering who the Party
for Socialism and Liberation, what their philosophy is, it says
right on their website if you go to their website.
They believe in the overthrow of capitalism by any means,
and they believe that the only way to really overthrow
it is through revolution. So what they're trying to do
is they're trying to get a national revolt. They're trying

(35:48):
to they're trying to end capitalism the only way they
know how to do it, and then that is through revolution.
This is what they're trying to do. And there are
billionaires including George sorrows Or are funding this kind of stuff.
And the Communist Party of China no to involved because
obviously they would love to overthrow the United States as well.
So it's pretty clear who's behind this stuff. The question

(36:09):
is why don't we do more to stop it? All right, listen,
leave it at that for today, y'all have a great day.
Try to stay dry. I know the rain's been crazy,
you know, watch out for water on the roadway. We'll
see you tomorrow morning, right nearly at five AM over
on news radio seven forty ktr H. Hope to talk
to you tomorrow afternoon at four. You're on Am nine
fifty KPRC.