The Climate

Today on the Jimmy Barrett Show:

• Marc Marano on the climate

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Well, what we need is more common sense.

Speaker 2 (00:06):
Common breaking down the world's nonsense about how American common sense.

Speaker 3 (00:13):
We'll see us through with the common sense of Houston.
I'm just pro common sense for Houston. From Houston.

Speaker 2 (00:24):
This is the Jimmy Barrett Show, brought to you by
viewind dot Com.

Speaker 3 (00:29):
Now here's Jimmy Barrett.

Speaker 4 (00:31):
You know one thing I found from the question of
today we did on our morning show today and kat
r h By the way, Happy Monday. Kids go back
to school this week. I'll we'll talk a little bit
more about that is that is the day progresses. But
I want to talk about this first because I had
a lot we had a lot of fun with this
this morning. One thing I've found about people in music
is we have very definitive opinions right about what we

(00:53):
like and what we don't like for whatever reason, and
a song that we really like can easily become one
that we believe to be the worst song ever. Because
most of the songs that our listeners listened to this
morning is the worst songs ever were all songs that
were big hits. They were big hits when they came out,

(01:17):
so to me, a lot of the hate comes not
just because you no longer like the song. You think
it's been overplayed, over used. One of the songs that
always seems, for example, to make this list is We
Built This City by Starship formerly known as Jefferson Starship

(01:37):
formerly known as Jefferson Airplane. See how they evolved and
We Built This City was a catchy tune. It was
a big hit back in the eighties. But it was
a big hit because they did a customized version for
the big radio stations around the country, so they would
play the song because there's a part of the song
in the long version of the song where they're doing

(02:01):
audio from a radio station disc jockey from a radio
station they were using. They used audio in the original
version from a San Francisco station, so you know that
station's planet. Then they did customized versions for all the
major markets where they put in audio from whatever that
big top forty station in that market was, so they
guaranteed they'd get played. But I think what really took

(02:25):
We Built the City to the next level is how
many commercials have you seen in the last couple of
years that were built on that song, including was it
Sharman the toilet tissue? To me when you get to
the point where your song is being built for we
quilt this city instead, we built this city talking about

(02:45):
quilt the charman or some toilet paper. When you get
to the point where your music is being used for
toilet paper ads, then I think, you know, okay, at
this point, we're just cashing in. We're just trying to
make as much royalties off of this song as we can,
and that and that usually the hate to another level.
Also played this morning a little bit MacArthur Park, the

(03:06):
original version, which was done by Richard Harris, the actor,
because he was the only one willing to record it.
Lots of other people turned it down. They just weren't
willing to record the song because it had these weird
lyrics like MacArthur Park is melting in the dark all
though sweet green icing flowing down. Someone left the cake

(03:29):
out in the rain. I don't think that I can
take it because it took so long to bake it,
and I'll never have that recipe again. It's like, what
what is he talking about? But that song got to
number two in the entire country when it first came out,
and not a summer made it even worse by doing
a disco version. Of it in the seventies, so you

(03:53):
just never know. I mean again, some of the worst
songs ever seen. Farrell Happy made the list. Same thing, overplayed,
completely overplayed. Lots of songs made the list. But we're
asking our listeners this morning on katrh go ahead and
name a song, several songs, whatever you want. Here were
songs of all time according to you.

Speaker 1 (04:12):
This is Mike and Alvin, Texas and I'd like to
nominate virtually every school alma matera for worst song ever.

Speaker 5 (04:20):
Hey, good morning, it's Vincent from Westbury. The worst song
in the world is Wonderwall by Oasis, because Oasis is
the worst band in the world. Have a good week.

Speaker 3 (04:35):
Good morning, Brian from Rosenberg.

Speaker 5 (04:37):
Here all right.

Speaker 6 (04:37):
Agonizing songs that instantly come to mind. What's Up by
Three Non Blonds, Friday by Rebecca Black, Barbier Girl by Aqua,
All Rap Anything by Justin Bieber, Have a Phenomena.

Speaker 3 (04:49):
Wait, guys, you get the best of what you do later.

Speaker 7 (04:51):
Dang from The White Blind l Richie, which is very
man low makes be won a.

Speaker 8 (04:57):
Few skip from Webster The Final Countdown by Europe. They
play that song every time there's a sporting event. Over
and over again, and the Cars for Kids jingle is terrible.

Speaker 9 (05:09):
Also.

Speaker 4 (05:11):
You know, I don't mean to dissign advertisers, but I
kind of have to admit that that's pretty the cars
for Kids jingle, I think, But you know what, I
think sometimes they make them that way on purpose because
they're they're trying to be memorable. And I guess that's memorable,

(05:31):
But I don't know if memorable in a bad way.
Is that good for business or not? I'm not sure.
All right, there's some of them, trust me, we had
plenty more.

Speaker 10 (05:40):
Hey, Jimmy Brian on Light Conroe.

Speaker 11 (05:42):
I have two songs.

Speaker 1 (05:44):
Number one is anything from the band Outcast, who, by
the way, doesn't belong on the Rock and Roll Hall
of Fame, and.

Speaker 10 (05:50):
Number two Zombie by the Cranberrys.

Speaker 11 (05:53):
Have a great day, Hey guys from the east Side.

Speaker 10 (05:57):
My least favorite song would have to be Macarina.

Speaker 9 (06:01):
Feet from New Averlely and we were Swinging in by
John Anderson and the.

Speaker 5 (06:07):
Cars for Kids jingle.

Speaker 10 (06:08):
Good morning, guys, this is Henry fro the Spring again.
Another little miserable, rotten piece of so called music is
Having My Baby by whoever sung that?

Speaker 9 (06:21):
Y'all have a.

Speaker 3 (06:22):
Great day, Keep it up, love this talkback feature.

Speaker 12 (06:25):
This is Jay from Deer Park.

Speaker 9 (06:27):
My nominees for worst Songs are Bogy Boogy Choo Choo
Train or Achy breaking Heart from Billy Ray Cyrus.

Speaker 4 (06:37):
Yeah, Billy Ray got a couple of mentions for Akey
break you heard that made the list to same thing
overplayed regardless of how you felt about it. Was catchy,
it was a big hit when it first came out,
got overplayed, people got tired of it. That that's how
you end up on the worst song list. Yeah, there's this.
I mean, otherwise, why would you purposely like a really,

(06:59):
really bad song. I don't know. I don't know, but
there's plenty of bad songs out there that get lots
of airplay and therefore we just get tired of hearing it.
We probably could have done a whole show just on
that one topic. If you want to leave me some comments,

(07:20):
feel free to you know, feel free to do so.
We can keep adding to the list here. We This
probably won't be the last time we do this, all right,
quick little break? Uh? Mark Morano from Climate Depot not
this next segment, but in our third segment today is
coming up. We're gonna get his assessment of the new
EPA under President Trump, but we'll have other things to
do first, back with more in a moment, Jimmy Barrett

(07:41):
Show here at NAM nine fifty KPRC. All right, we're
going to follow up here in the beginning of this

(08:02):
segment anyway. Look follow up from a story that we
broke on Friday on KTRH and reiterated again here on
AM nine fifty KPRC. And that is what the Commissioner,
Tom Ramsey said about removing Lena Hildago from office. They
voted unanimously to censor her last week, but Tom Ramsey,

(08:28):
when we talked to him on Friday morning, he wanted
to do more than censor her. He wanted to he
may let it be known that he would like to
find a way to remove her from office. And as
it turns out, there are several different things that you
can do that would qualify as being removed from office.
One of them is public is drunkenness, which tells me
how old that's statued. Is that drunkenness would be one

(08:50):
of those things, either either in public or in private.
Drunkenness was listed as one of the things you could do.
But here's the report Commissioner Ramsey, who they didn't quote
very much in this report. Maybe maybe they don't like
talking to Tom Ramsey. I don't know. I love talking
to Tom Ramsey. Here's a report from our television partner
KPRC too.

Speaker 13 (09:11):
The Commissioner Tom Ramsey says, it is the court's quote responsibility.
So look at the possibility of having Judge Lena Hadaga
removed from office, and Stave Statue says to begin that process,
someone would need to have send a written notice.

Speaker 14 (09:26):
I would like to move to censor County Judge Lena Aldago.

Speaker 13 (09:30):
Harris County Commissioner Tom Ramsey the first to call a
vote censuring Judge Lena Hidalgo.

Speaker 12 (09:37):
I'm I suppose.

Speaker 3 (09:39):
Ramsey now going a step further.

Speaker 13 (09:42):
He's looking into ways of possibly removing Hidalgo from office.
After this week's commissioner's meeting.

Speaker 15 (09:48):
Thank you especially to all the kids who took the
time to come and all the educators.

Speaker 9 (09:52):
Yips, come on down.

Speaker 3 (09:53):
Let's see if she says yes or no. Come come
on down over here. I'm yes.

Speaker 1 (09:58):
The Commissioner of Realness, No Commissioner Ramsey, no commissioners, no
commission eliss no.

Speaker 3 (10:04):
Judge and there's a way for him to do so.

Speaker 13 (10:06):
State statue says a county judge could be removed from
office for incompetency, official misconduct or intoxication. There would need
to be a petition, than hearing than assamon a KPRC too.
Ramsey said the reasons for her removal are obvious. He
then lists several points he says give reason, such as
numerous outbursts with colleagues, county officials, and others, plus the

(10:30):
inability to effectively conduct Commission's court meetings within the rules
of decorum and decency. Ramsey goes on to say to
do nothing would be irresponsible and, in his opinion, a
dereliction of his duty as a commissioner. We tried speaking
with the judge to get her thoughts on the meeting,
censure and possible removal.

Speaker 12 (10:48):
Is a judge here by chance?

Speaker 13 (10:50):
Commissioner Ramsey said, he's looking at ways of trying to
remove the judge. Is that something you would support?

Speaker 14 (10:56):
Look, I don't know anything about that right now. I
think yesterday we took a very decisive step and an
issuing a censure. I think that hopefully will communicate that
the people of Harris County deserved better.

Speaker 15 (11:12):
I believe that in our democracy those decisions should be
left to the voters.

Speaker 13 (11:17):
Now, we have yet to hear from the judge's office.

Speaker 2 (11:19):
Now.

Speaker 3 (11:19):
When we reached out to Commissioner Rodney.

Speaker 13 (11:21):
Allis for comments, his office told us that they did
not have her comments at this time.

Speaker 4 (11:26):
Yeah, I wonder where lean Hildago was. Then she wasn't
in her office. They went to her office to try
to see if she would not that she would have
if she would consent to an interview. I think she
was at the bar because I think I don't know
about the mist contact part, but in competency shouldn't be
that hard to show for her that you should be

(11:48):
able to prove in competency as relates to Lena Hildago,
I don't think she's a drinker. I don't know if
her meds are fully adjusted, so, you know, but that's
that's no reason to get rid of somebody. Maybe that's
the problem. Maybe she has seeds are med suggested. I'm
trying to give her the benefit of some kind of
it down here. I don't know why I am, but
I am so. Certainly Commissioner Ramsey is still interested in

(12:13):
removing Lena Hildago from office. So we'll be following that
one to see if that one goes anywhere. That'll be
very interesting to see. All Right, So maybe this segment
is gonna come under the umbrella of government behaving badly.
I think we'll just call that this is government behaving badly?
What else? What else? What are the branches of government

(12:34):
have been heaving badly? Well, we got the whole Russia
hoax thing otherwise now being called by Larry Elder among others,
as Obama Gate, now that we know the origins go
back to Barack Obama, that he was in on it
from the beginning, although this has got Clinton campaign written
all over it. Jadvance, the Vice President, was on one

(12:59):
of the Sunday talk shows I Forget with Burria Bartiromo,
So I guess Sunday Morning Futures is what he was on,
talking to her about whether or not he believes there
should be indictments.

Speaker 7 (13:09):
I absolutely want to see indictments, Maria. Look, of course,
you've got to have the law follow the facts here.

Speaker 12 (13:14):
You don't just indict people to indict people. You indict
people because they broke the law.

Speaker 7 (13:18):
But if you look at what Tulsi and cash Betel
have revealed in the last couple of weeks, I don't
know how anybody could look at that and say that
there wasn't aggressive violations of the law. What they basically
did is they defrauded the American people in order to
take Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points and turn them
into intelligence by defrauding the American people, defrauding the intelligence

(13:43):
agencies lying about what the Intel said. They would take
something that supported a Hillary Clinton campaign talking point, and
they would overemphasize it and exaggerate it. They took anything
that actually contradicted that narrative, and they buried it deep
and through that they actually laundered Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign
talking points through the American intelligence services. That's a violation

(14:06):
of the people's trust. That's a violation of what our
intelligence services should be doing. And I absolutely think they
broke the law. You're going to see a lot of
people get indicted for that. Here's the thing that we
should really bother the American people. What do you want
our intelligence community to be doing. I want them to
be catching bad guys. I want them to be making
sure that terrorists aren't going to kill innocent American civilians.

Speaker 12 (14:27):
I don't want them laundering Hillary.

Speaker 7 (14:29):
Clinton's campaign talking points into the American media and giving
them this air of legitimacy.

Speaker 12 (14:35):
It is sick and it's disgusting.

Speaker 7 (14:37):
It hurt the intelligence community, it hurt the American people,
and it hurt the first Trump administration. We've got to
have consequences for it, or we're just going to see
the same play repeated again and after again.

Speaker 16 (14:47):
How significant did it impact the president's first term, because remember,
a lot of people didn't want to work in the administration.
He was always on defensing I didn't close or what
kind of an impact was there to actual policy and
the impact on the American people.

Speaker 12 (14:59):
Certa had an impact.

Speaker 7 (15:00):
Maria, the president likes to say this, and I really
think it hits the nail on the head that as
much as he got accomplished, and I think the first
Trump administration was a major, major success for the American people,
he was both governing but also fighting to survive. Imagine
if he was able to put one hundred percent of
his efforts and his attention on just doing the job

(15:20):
of President.

Speaker 12 (15:21):
Of the United States.

Speaker 7 (15:21):
He had to fight back against the fake Russia collusion
hoax pretty much his entire administration. That distracts resources, that
distracts from the Department of Justice. That means the intelligence
community is focused on that instead of on catching bad guys.

Speaker 12 (15:34):
It definitely had an impact.

Speaker 4 (15:36):
And you know what's amazing, not just during his first administration,
but after his first administration once he announced that he
was going to run for president again, and they wrapped
everything back up and he beat them. He beat them all,
won the election, and now in his second term is
getting the things done that he couldn't get done in
the first term. That is provided, of course, that Republicans

(16:01):
can keep control of the House for his you know,
for the second two years of his term is four
year term, because if Democrats take control, then it's you know,
we're going to go back to the old impeachment stuff
and it'll be a mess. So anyway, I hope he
passes a lot more between now and the midterm elections,

(16:21):
so at least know that we've got that much done,
all right. Also under the title of government behaving badly.
James Comer also on Sunday Morning Futures, talking with Maria
Bartarrama about the Epstein situation, about subpoenas for Bill Clinton

(16:43):
and Hillary Clinton and a whole lot of other folks.
As it relates to Jeffrey Epstein. Here's James Commer.

Speaker 1 (16:51):
We've asked them to come in in October. We've given
them specific date. What makes the subpoena special and historical
is that they came as a result of.

Speaker 3 (16:59):
A bi partisan vote.

Speaker 1 (17:01):
The Democrats made a motion, like we knew they would,
to subpoena the Epstein documents, which Republicans support. Scott Perry
from Pennsylvania amended that motion to include subpoenas for most
Bill and Hillary Clinton, as well as six former Attorneys generals,
and the Democrats voted for it. Now they're they're scared
and trying to say they didn't vote for it, but
they did. It's on record and that helps us in

(17:23):
court if the Clinton's try to fight this subpoena, which
we presume they will. Uh this this subpoena came as
result of a bipartisan vote, which has never happened before
in the House Oversight Committee. So we're looking forward to
hearing from the Clintons. The American people want to know
what went on Epstein Island. We know Clinton went there
many times. We just want to ask Bill Clinton what

(17:44):
he saw when he.

Speaker 3 (17:45):
Was there and who all was involved.

Speaker 16 (17:49):
Well, I mean, look, there's a lot of information to
be gained from an interview under oath with Hillary and
Bill Clinton, that's for sure. Would you also get into
Russia collusion?

Speaker 3 (17:59):
We would like to ask about that.

Speaker 1 (18:02):
I'm sure their lawyers are going to be negotiating the terms.
The subpoena was issued a few days before the Russia
collusion story really broke, but certainly we're going to ask as.

Speaker 3 (18:13):
Many questions as we could ask.

Speaker 1 (18:15):
This is an opportunity to get the Clinton's under oath,
which people have been trying to do for a long time.

Speaker 3 (18:19):
So hopefully we'll be able to do that.

Speaker 1 (18:21):
We'll get answers to a lot of questions that the
American people have.

Speaker 4 (18:26):
Well, first of all, Bill and Hillary they're going to
fight that subpoena for as long as they possibly can.
And then if they do come in, you know there
are going to be questions that they're going to take
the fifth on and just refuse to answer. And why
would you, I mean, anybody else who's come in front
of James Covers Committee so far, who's taken the fifth
that nothing's happened to them, has it? No, So you

(18:49):
know nothing's going to happen to the Clintons either, But
just the fact that they might get in there and
squirm a little bit that gives you a little satisfaction,
not a lot, but a little. All right, quick, little break.
We're a visit with my Brano from Climate Depot coming
up next year on AM nine fifty KPRC and the
Jimmy Bird Show. Mark Briandos with US Climate Depot, And

(19:29):
I'm really curious, Mark, we haven't talked to you in
a while. I don't know that we've even talked to
you since President Trump took over. Certainly we haven't talked
since Lee Zelden took over as the head of the
Environmental Protection Agency. What kind of job do you think
he's doing so far?

Speaker 12 (19:45):
Wow?

Speaker 11 (19:45):
I mean, this has been the most amazing thing to watch.
I've been involved in these issues since nineteen ninety two
when I started working back for Rushman By the television
show and I've never seen and I worked on Capit Hill.
I've dealt with Obama ETA administrators. I've dealt with George Bush,

(20:05):
George W. Bush, EPA administrators in person, and I can
tell you going back to the creation of the EPA,
the Environmental Protection Agency, when Richard Nixon created it in
the early nineteen seventies, we have never had a more
consequential EPA chief than LEEZ Elden, someone who actually understands
all of these issues and understands that global warming has

(20:28):
hijacked the environmental agenda to the point where we're worried
about UN treaties and trace amounts of carbon dioxide with
humans detail instead of East Palestine, instead of lead in
the drinking water, instead of toxic waste cleanup. The original
mission had been hijacked in service to this global UN
climate agenda. And Lee's Elden has come in and blown

(20:51):
away Trump's first term and everything he's done from A
to Z, whether it's auto stop start, whether it's going
after the methane or eliminating the if you meet restrictions
on methane that the EBA was about to do, whether
it's getting rid of the ev mandates, whether it's getting
rid of the corporate average fuel economy, whether it's getting

(21:12):
rid of every climate scenario, whether it's getting rid of
the heart of the whole thing, the Endangerment finding, which
Obama did in two thousand and nine, which says human
breath is basically a pollutant we exhale carbon dioxide that
can now be regulated under the Clean Air Act. He
is the most consequential EPA chief. I believe he's the
most consequential Trump Cabinet member thus far eight months into

(21:33):
his administration.

Speaker 4 (21:34):
Oh that's a lot of praise. And I think he
goes down in history as the politician who didn't get
the most done, got the most undone. He has undone
so many harmful things.

Speaker 11 (21:48):
Great way to put it, and I will go one
step further that only has he undone it because in
Trump's first term they undid a lot of things. He
is going Lee's Outen is going for ermadence, in other words,
a future president aoc or.

Speaker 9 (22:04):
They go after the danger final they go which is
the basis for regulating carbondots and at the flute under
the Clean Air Act, which was never designed to do
is just sort of pulled out an unelected bureaucracy fiance order.
And also they're going after the entire United Nations Climate
Treaty process that George H. W. Bush got it into

(22:24):
the Real Earth Summit when he signed that back in
nineteen ninety two. So we get out of the Ding
climate process and we get out of the so called
to endanger findings, and that's president. No matter how climate
activists they are are going to have a whale of
a time trying to get it back in. That's the
brilliance of Trust two point zero, and Lee's elders that far.

Speaker 3 (22:45):
So it's still going to be up to Congress, isn't it.

Speaker 4 (22:48):
In order to be able to make these things permanent,
you can't do it by executive order. I don't think
Lee Zelding can do it by whatever orders he puts down.
How do we make these changes that he's instituted at
number one and number two? What do you think if
you had to pick one decision or that's been undone
so far as the most important one, which would you pick?

Speaker 11 (23:09):
Well, probably because of the endangerment finding, that would be
the number one pick, but that hasn't officially happened yet.
But the number one pick is clearly the California Waiver,
which allowed California and ten Democrat blue states to set
the entire auto industry and force ev bands on America.

(23:30):
That was actually Congress stepping up as a mentioned of
permanence to change the Congressional Review Act and President Trump
administration going along with it. So that was a great move.
It permanently killed makes it very difficult to try to
come back with gas powered car bands. Beyond that, what
you're talking about permanence is exactly what he's trying to do.

(23:52):
And that's why the getting us out of the UN.
If we get out of the UN Climate network, you
need another treaty to get it back in. That gives
us permanent's because the whole UN nineteen ninety two got
us involved in the sustainable development. It got us. It
created the birth of the entire UN Climate treaty process
where we go all.

Speaker 4 (24:11):
Over the world.

Speaker 11 (24:11):
I'm going to Brazil and November because of that nineteen
ninety to treaty for the top thirty the UN Climate Summit,
which the Brazilian government not making this up, clearcut thousands
of acres of rainforest to put in a new highway
so that they could take in all the international globalists
flying in on private jets and limousines in order to

(24:31):
showcase how they're preserving the Amazon. They're at the clear
cut thousands of acres to show the world how they're
saving the Amazon. That's in November. But the point is
it's going to be hard if we get rid of
in danger of fighting, get rid of the UN Climate
Treaty process. Suddenly the next president has a mass Plus
Congress is now starting to act on some of this,
which makes an act of a future Act of Congress

(24:52):
to undo this. So we are light years ahead of
Trump one point zero. One last thing about Zelden, the
thing he's still believe about is the greatest thing. I
didn't even mention his narrative crafting. He has shifted the
entire global warming debate from oh yeah, well, of course
climate changes real too. This is a scam, it's a religion,

(25:13):
it's a con, it's a cult. And the media can't
touch him because he's so strong in his narrative framing
on that. And that's a site to behold. I've wished
for an EPA director for decades to do that, and
we finally have one.

Speaker 3 (25:27):
Well, that's good.

Speaker 4 (25:28):
We've got some of this under our control now here
in the United States. What about the rest of the world,
Mark Morano, The rest of the world seems to be
buying all this stuff cloak line and sinker. How do
how do we turn the rest of the world around?

Speaker 11 (25:40):
Well, the good news is because it's it's when you
have a leader like Trump and with busting the narrative.
They just came out with a new Department of Energy
report which is the first global ever anywhere in the
globe pushback to the United Nations Climate Science Study the IPCC.
The first one of those came out in nineteen ninety.

(26:01):
These are all the ones that are basis for use
for everything, for meat restrictions, for energy restrictions, for freedom
of movement restrictions, the gas part carbon. The Department of
Energy had a team of high level sidists from formerly
Obama administration, former NASA, Georgia Tech who put together a report,
the Consensus Busting Report, which is the shot heard around

(26:25):
the world. Now it's the first government pushback to the
United Nations reports. And so what this means is very simple.
Now the world has a template and now we have
an actual climate debate. So even in Canada we're seeing
the carbon tax run by wef that stooge. He's not

(26:46):
a puppet master, he's a puppet master of the WEF
Mark Carney zeroed down their climate Carbert tax to zero
even in Canada. In Germany, the elections went to a
climate skeptic. In England has a huge rise. The EU
had made gained by climate skeptics, they had to halt
their Green Deal. France is looking the same way. In Argentina,

(27:06):
they pulled back the entire delegation of the UN summit
and they've rejecting the UN. So Trump is having a
global effect. We have a long way to go. There's
still going to be UN climate treaty, there's still going
to be europe virtue signaling, but there's now a resistance,
an underground similar to the French resistance against the Nazis.
I just made a Nazi reference, which I guess you

(27:28):
can take away points for me on that. But that's
what this is like, is that there was no allowing
of descent for decades, and now you have the United
States leading the global descent and we're seeing real world consequences.
The Poland Canada just showed like only four or five
percent of the public's actually scared of global warming. These
are historic loads of people in Canada worried about global warming.

Speaker 4 (27:51):
Congratulations sir, you're the first person who successfully manas to
find a Nazi Trump reference that was positive for Trump.

Speaker 3 (27:58):
That was positive.

Speaker 4 (28:00):
Yes, that's never been done before. You've done the impossible.
Oh too funny.

Speaker 11 (28:07):
It's funny because all of the UN scientist, Michael man
Uk Guardian, all the corporate media, they're comparing Trump to
Hitler and Stalin right now because he's challenging the consensus.
It's bizarre. If you go to Climate DEEPO, I explain it,
but it doesn't make much sense. Anyone who wants to
open debate and free speech now suddenly is being compared

(28:29):
to Joseph Stalin.

Speaker 4 (28:31):
It really is quite amazing. I think the elites are
sensing that they're losing control and they don't Obviously they
don't like you very much because to me, the whole
climate change thing was always about how much money can
we make from this and how do we how do
we control the population. Well, if the population is going
to start thinking for itself again, they've got a problem,
don't they.

Speaker 11 (28:53):
They do. And here's why we can go back at
history now and say, hey, the COVID lockdowns may have
been a good No, I haven't been drinking kool aid.
What I'm saying is they were so over the top,
they so nakedly embraced the climate style authoritarian lockdown in
the name of COVID that they literally opened red pills

(29:14):
the entire global population. It was because of the overreach
of COVID lockdowns that the public woke up. You had
Joe Rogan interviewing climate skeptics in twenty seventeen, eighteen nineteen.
He was a believer. Why did Joe Rogan believe because
he'd said, well, NASA website said it's real, the best scientists.
Fast forward to Joe Rogan today and he's like, Yeah,

(29:37):
the CBC is a bunch of liars, And I mean
they now realize that big government institutions serve the interest
of the state, and they don't. They're not actual scientific bodies.
And so what happened was the public was not going
to allow any more of his nonsense and virtues stigling
after what we witnessed live from the public health dictators

(29:59):
during COVID life lockdowns, and even people like Robert F.
Kennedy Junior wanted to jail climate deniers and corporate CEOs.
He then, when he ran for president twenty twenty two
or three said, I'm not going to talk about climate
because the agenda has been hijacked by the World Economics
form in the United Nations forgitlitarian ConTroll of society boom.
COVID lockdowns led to this whole collapse with a climate agenda.

(30:22):
So that's the one thing we can thank the COVID
lockdowns for.

Speaker 4 (30:25):
I agree with you on that one. Mark Baronove out
of time, love talking to you as always. Thank you
for so much, sir, all.

Speaker 11 (30:32):
Right, appreciated, Thanks for less you bet.

Speaker 4 (30:33):
Mark Brono Climate Depot back with more in the moment.
Jimmy Bartt show here run am nineteen fifty KPRC shooting

(31:01):
on Friday in Atlanta, and when I originally heard the story,
all I heard was at Emory University and that the
cop had been shot and killed. And that's about all
I heard about the story until I got into work
this morning and had a chance to kind of follow
up to see exactly what happened. As it turned out,

(31:21):
the guy responsible for the shooting was evidently a disgruntled
COVID nineteen vaccine recipient. This occurred right near the campus
of Emory University, so I guess I can see why
they would include Emory University in this. But it was
right between the CDC offices and the CBS where he

(31:45):
evidently opened up fire, not inside the CDC building but
outside of the building, and a police officer responded. He
shot and killed the police officer. Evidently he had left
to notice something along those lines that indicated that he
was depressed and that he was blaming the COVID nineteen

(32:07):
vaccine for his depression, that he'd had some health effects
from getting the COVID nineteen vaccine that he was still
dealing with.

Speaker 3 (32:16):
Now.

Speaker 4 (32:17):
I've heard a lot of things as it relates to
COVID nineteen vaccines, not the least of which is heart
problems and other issues that have resulted from that. I
haven't heard about any mental health issues. So he just
may have had mental health issues of his own and
decided that blaming the COVID nineteen vaccine was what he
wanted to do. I don't know plenty of other problems

(32:38):
with the COVID nineteen vaccine personally. Of course, the main
problem was just the fact that we're all pretty much
put in a position where we were forced to get it,
and people lost their jobs, who refused to get it,
and well the know. The rest of his history is
the only too well known. But here is a report
from ABC News about the shooting in Atlanta, which now
is evidently related to the COVID nineteen vaccine.

Speaker 15 (33:01):
The chaotic scene unfolding just before VM Friday afternoon. Multiple
gunshots were ported at this CVS, across the street from
the Centers for Disease Control Headquarters and Emory University in Atlanta.

Speaker 13 (33:13):
It was everyone just screating, go go, like everyone's hands
out the window, like just keep going. You can literally
hear the gunshots like flying over our head.

Speaker 15 (33:24):
Now Benton was at work a few doors down from
that CVS.

Speaker 6 (33:27):
A lot of gunshots is about ten to fifteen rounds
and just kept going for like an eleven second period.

Speaker 15 (33:33):
Investigators say officers found the suspect shooting multiple rounds into
CDC buildings. You can see they boarded up the front
door where a gunfire punched through the glass.

Speaker 3 (33:42):
The CBS is directly across the street from the CDC.

Speaker 17 (33:45):
Some of the bullets striking several buildings on the property,
bullet holes dotting the windows. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation
identifying the suspected shooter as Patrick Joseph White, a thirty
year old from Kennesaw, Georgia, a suburb of Atlanta.

Speaker 6 (33:59):
You heard on the news, and I just never thought
that it would have been a guy right down the street.

Speaker 15 (34:04):
Police say he was found dead at the scene from
a gunshot wound, which they say may have been self inflicted.
Investigators saved the suspect sean and killed thirty three year
old officer David Rose, a military veteran who joined the
DeCamp County Police forces than a year ago. He leaves
behind a pregnant wife and two children. Floor tributes left
at the scene, signs thanking him for his service and sacrifice.

(34:27):
Faith Aboubay ABC News at Lance ask.

Speaker 4 (34:29):
Okay, so there's the story on it. I saw some
protesting from people who work at the CDC. Well, I
get I guess maybe protesting is a little strong. It
wasn't so well what it was it was, it was protesting.
They had signs anti RFK Junior signs. They yo, this
guy was blaming the vaccine and making the CDC a target. Meanwhile,

(34:55):
the CDC, least the workers there are blaming RFK Junior
for making them a target. For his stance on vaccines
or his stance on the COVID nineteen vaccine. See how
that goes full circle there, the blame going full circle
on that thing. Now, like I said, I have no
reports that tell me that the COVID nineteen vaccine is

(35:19):
related to any depression issues, but who knows. We may
find out that's side effect too. That's one of the
stories I have for you before we wrap it up today.
Here's another one, artificial intelligence. I saw Greg Guttfeld talking
about this on this show the other night. We're getting

(35:40):
ready to open a AI. Apple's going to open up
an AI what you would call it's not a factory, obviously,
it's it's you know, it's some form of artificial intelligence
that they're going to be working on here in Houston,
which will bring jobs and maybe create a little bit
of an energy shortage. But you know, we're all subjected

(36:02):
to AI. Right now. You can generally tell when something
has been produced by artificial intelligence, but we will probably
get to the point where you really can't tell the
difference between what is real and what is AI generated.
I see on reels on Facebook. I've spent a lot
of time on ex or the other social media sites.
But I do see the reels on Facebook, and I

(36:25):
see a lot of AI generated usually disasters, you know,
like ships running aground, you know, people being hit by
tidal waves, that kind of stuff, And you can tell
that's done by AI, you really can. But they'll come
a point where, you know, the line between reality and
AI is going to blur. Greg Guttfeld was riffing on

(36:47):
his show about that.

Speaker 18 (36:48):
Nothing online or even heard over a phone, will ever
be trusted again because AI can replicate it, and it's
already happening everywhere with pictures myself included. Now here are
some of me and Kat and Tyris with a baby.
You can tell it's fake because Tyros is never that happening.

(37:12):
Here's another one. Who the hell is that random white
guy with me that is not her husband? Does her
husband know? I don't know who that man is. I
don't know who's fallen for these things. But they need
to send me their credit card info immediately. But as
AI improves, and it will, it becomes a tool to

(37:33):
trick us. How will you know what's real if your
son calls and says he's been left on the side
of a deserted Highway by Larry Kudlow.

Speaker 12 (37:40):
And he needs cash.

Speaker 3 (37:42):
How will you know.

Speaker 18 (37:43):
It's even him even when you can.

Speaker 3 (37:45):
See his face.

Speaker 18 (37:47):
Well, whether we like it or not, we're going to
have to do something that we hate, engage in human contact.

Speaker 3 (37:52):
The only way to be sure that we're.

Speaker 18 (37:54):
Dealing with real people is to see them and to
talk to them. It may be that we'll have to
adopt the practice of the mafia, relay information face to
face on little scraps of paper, and then communicate our
dismay by putting horses heads in people's beds. And what
are the fear of being replaced by AI in the workplace?

Speaker 3 (38:14):
Well?

Speaker 18 (38:14):
AI is a pattern recognition machine. It pours over data
and finds patterns to predict what's next. Meaning if your
job consists of Monday being no different than Tuesday, then
you're in trouble. But maybe this is a gift because
it will force you to be creative, meaning being unpredictable,
because that's the only thing AI cannot replicate our show.

Speaker 3 (38:36):
For example, AI can't do.

Speaker 18 (38:38):
This because it's impossible to predict. One minute it's hilarious,
the next it's absurd, then it's incredibly stupid. Usually when
I ask female guests to do math. I know that's
a stupid joke. So if you don't want to lose
your job to AI, you will need to regularly change

(38:58):
what you do. Then AI can never do it. AI
is really just a cover band copying what's already be done,
which is why our AI stands for always interesting, whether
it makes any.

Speaker 3 (39:10):
Sense or not.

Speaker 4 (39:12):
Okay, so the key, the key to defeat AI is
to be unpredictable. Okay, I'll try to be more unpredictable
because I would like to defeat AI. All right, listen, y'all,
have a great day. Thank you for listening to appreciate it.
See you tomorrow morning bright nearly five am over on
news Radio seven forty kt RH. We are back here
at four on AM nine fifty KPRC.