Dunham Biles - Attorney Joins Houston's Morning News

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
So I think it was constitutional law attorney Jonathan Turley,
who said that the Democrats pulled the greatest political con
job in history with a Russian hoax, but now it
is finally unraveling, joining us to talk about it, Attorney
Done in Biles. I don't know how much the mainstream
media is reporting on the story. I doubt if they're

(00:20):
reporting out it hardly at all. Dunham. So, I'm sure
there are plenty of Americans who have no idea, you know,
unless you are tuned into the news or tuned into
a conservative talk station, probably have no idea what the
world we're talking about. But at the end of the
day here it's pretty clear who's responsible for the Russian hoax.
You've got Hillary Rodham Clinton who approved it, You've got
George Soros and other Democrats who paid for it, and

(00:43):
you've got the FBI who's complicit in it all. There
should be charges almost a media on this. Shouldn't there Oh.

Speaker 2 (00:50):
There should be. There has to be a reckoning, and
they are certainly investigating potential charges, including lying to Congress,
and hopefully we will see some action sooner than later,
because to me, this is the greatest threat and scandal
to our republic. It makes Watergate look like the two

(01:10):
bit break in that it was.

Speaker 1 (01:13):
Yeah, I think maybe the I'm sure there's always going
to be hesitation in charging somebody as far up the
food change as Hillary Clinton or maybe even president former
President Barack Obama. I mean, if he also knew about
this and signed off on it at the end of
tail end of his administration, then he could be complicit
in this as well.

Speaker 2 (01:34):
Well. In the case of President Obama, he almost certainly
has immunity, just as a Supreme Court said of Trump.
So that's probably not going to happen. But for others
we may see chargers.

Speaker 1 (01:47):
Okay, what kind of charges do you think could be brought?

Speaker 2 (01:51):
Right right now? We have a couple of problems. One,
we have a statue of limitations, given how far this
goes back. I mean, let's not forget they started this
before Trump even took office. He's simply been elected at
that point. Uh, And so I think on the line
to Congress, there's a five year statute of limitations. So
some of these folks have made statements in twenty twenty

(02:13):
and beyond, and so they're certainly looking at that. Other
than that, it's not clear what other charges they may
may be looking at.

Speaker 1 (02:20):
Okay, is there a statute of limitations on treason?

Speaker 2 (02:25):
No, but but the treason under the Constitution would require
aiding and the betting enemies and at the time of war,
and so I don't think we're going to see any
treats in charges.

Speaker 1 (02:37):
Okay, Are there any other the charges that could potentially
be brought. They do not have a statue of limitations,
not that.

Speaker 2 (02:44):
I'm aware of at this time, but but I assume
there there may have been. Right when you get into governments,
there are all sorts of regulations about how they conduct
themselves and so forth, and so I don't know, but
there could be an abuse of of their authority and
their intern regulations and perhaps a misuse of government funds.

Speaker 1 (03:04):
Okay, well, it sounds like the best we could probably
hope for is a stern lecture.

Speaker 2 (03:09):
Well, I think fortunately, you know, the director of the CIA,
John Ratcliffe, is my former mayor in Heath, Texas and
my former congressman, and I know him a bit. And uh,
I think no one has a stronger character and Cander
and I assume he and the President and others are

(03:31):
are bound and determined to get to the to the
bottom of this, and as Justice Brandeis once said, sunlight
is the best disinfectant, and we need very strong disinfectant.
Things need to change. I think that's what's gonna That's
what this is going to require. President Trump came into
office wanting to drain the swamp the first time, and
this requires a reckoning at the CIA and the FBI

(03:52):
and the change in culture that I hope is being brought.

Speaker 1 (03:56):
To well, it requires. What really requires is so the
complete dismantling of the deep state, one of the most
difficult possible things you could ever hope to do.

Speaker 2 (04:06):
Yes, that's exactly what it requires. And it's nearly impossible,
right because those people we get to elect people, they
come in and out, but the deep state stays there
for decades at a time, and they are in trench.
And that's that's that's part of the problem. They see themselves. Unfortunately,
it's more important than us, poor plebeian to get to vote.

(04:27):
And that's what's disturbing about this, right is that whether
it's then President Obama or the Secretary of State or
Director Comy and others seemingly thought that they knew better
who should be president than the people who voted, and
they set forth it would appear on the path to
try to impact the president before he ever got into
office and destroy his presidency because they thought they knew better.

Speaker 1 (04:51):
Yeah, thank you sir, appreciate your time as always, Turney
Dunham Biles at seven twenty seven