Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
But I'm just going to be completely ennous character because
I know this is an emotion that many of you have,
and all of you are spread across a spectrum. You know,
where you are is where you are, but it's not
necessarily the same as a guy next door. Every person
that voted for Donald Trump does not share the same
reaction to where we are right now. And that's okay,
(00:24):
because in order to get to fifty point one percent
of the votes, or you know, in order to get
to two hundred and seventy electoral votes, but fifty point
one in enough states to get there, let's still say
we have a majority. And you know that's important. When
when when you're going to get over half the people
(00:45):
to vote for your guy, you're going to have to
have some people who vote for your guy who don't
love your guy as much as you do. What you
don't want to do is say to those people, if
you don't love my guy as much as I love
my guy, then I I want you on my team.
Because that's exactly what the Democrats did. The Democrats over
(01:06):
the last few years have said we're going crazy. We're
going to jump off a cliff, and we expect everyone
else to jump off a cliff with us. And when
people said, hey, WHOA, well, I'm not ready to jump
off a cliff. Yet they attacked, They insulted, they canceled,
they humiliated, they questioned, they they did all these terrible things.
(01:29):
And so a number of people defected who were naturally
drawn to that side. Joe Rogan thought Bernie Sanders was great.
That's not where he is today. Elon Musk reliable supporter
of the left. Hey, there were the guys that liked EV's.
Now they've changed on EV's. Isn't that funny? So when
you understand that when I questioned some things, it is
(01:54):
not that I don't want Donald Trump to be our president.
I do. It's that I want him to be our president,
and I want everything that's good for our country to
be done. And I get frustrated. So I'm going to
play you a clip from Representative James Comer, who's a
Republican from Kentucky. And and I know some of you
are going to feel, and it's okay to feel this
way that it doesn't matter what he says, nothing ever
(02:16):
gets done. We were promised in a press uh in
a in a press appearance by the Attorney General BONDI
that we were going to get the Epstein documents that day,
and we didn't get them that day. And then she said, well,
they were on my on my desk, but we didn't.
And then and then they summoned some prominent bloggers and
(02:37):
uh uh and and media personalities and they went to
the White House and they got binders and they showed
them sty all. They all went to their social media
accounts and here's me with my binder. I got the
details inside. It's Epstein. Ah okay. So then we waited
on them to tell us because I thought we were
going to release the details. But maybe we're not going
to release the details. We're going to give binders to
(03:00):
people that have big social media flog okay whatever. I
just want the list out there. I want the people
shamed who were involved in the Epstein scandal, the pedophiles.
So then those people went back and they went to
their social media pain and everybody was hyped up. We excited, Well,
here we go, it's going to be exciting. And then
there was nothing in al Capone's vault. It was sheets
(03:22):
of paper with all the words blacked out, like you
just took a black magic mark. Everything was redacted, So
technically I guess we got the Epstein files because whatever
was behind those black blocks was the Epstein information, but
we couldn't read it. Nobody could. Well, why have the
(03:43):
press conference? Why hype people up? So now people have
lost interest and I think a lot of people feel dejected.
I thought we were going to release this. We understand
that there are some people we like that are going
to get burned in the process. We got that, we
do so anyway, he says that they have subpoenaed Biden
staffers to get to the bottom of who authorized the
(04:06):
use of the auto pen to sign official documents. Now,
I understand we're frustrated. I understand we've been promised a
lot of things we haven't been delivered yet. But I
will say this to his credit, Comer is the one
who doggedly stayed on the Hunter Biden issue and ended
up causing a lot of problems for Hunter Biden and
(04:26):
Joe Biden in the Democrat brand. He did do some
good in that way.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
The FORUR staffers aren't well known staffers. These for staffers
operated behind the scenes. But while we're starting with them, Sean,
we believe these are the staffers that were responsible for
using the autopin Someone got documents and manually placed them
in the machine and pressed the power button to sign
Joe Biden's signature. That was not Joe Biden. That was
(04:52):
done by staffords. That would be done by any staffords.
So we believe and have good reason to believe, these
are the four staffords that were responsible for that. We
want to ask them who gave you the authority to
use Joe Biden's signature, and we'll go from there. Obviously,
we believe that some of the names, the chief of
staff and perhaps the first Lady were involved in a
(05:14):
lot of the decision making. If that's where the trail leads,
then we'll bring them in as well. But we're going
to get answers to all the questions that every American
deserves answers to. But again, we're going to see where
the trail leads. We followed the money, we found the
shell companies, we found the bank accounts. We're going to
do the same thing with this outopan who was giving
the authority for use of the outopen Remember Sean, there
(05:37):
was more activity in the last one hundred days of
the Bidy administration than the first three and a half
years of the Biden administration. Many of the far reaching
executive orders were signed during the last one hundred days,
and they were all signed by the auto pen We
don't believe that you could sign a legal document with
an autopin. If I issue a subpoena, I have to
(05:58):
fly to Washington, d C. To manually sign my signature
on that subpoena. Anything pertaining to the law has to
be signed by a person we know the autopenance. What
I can tell you tonight is the four staffers that
we've asked to come in for transcribed interviews, they have
all laggered up. They are taking this very seriously and
(06:18):
this is going to be a battle to get to
the truth.
Speaker 1 (06:23):
Look, I want every detail revealed. I want every person exposed,
and there is a value to that, and I want
those people exposed, and then I want them prosecuted. I'm
sorry to say it pains me to say. I don't
believe anyone will ever be prosecuted in any of it.
(06:47):
I don't believe anyone will ever be prosecuted. I think
the details will be revealed and there will be much
pearl clasping and that there will be gasps that will
go out, there will be suggestions that careers have been ended.
They won't. But at the end of the day, I
(07:08):
fear look. Comber's committee uncovered shell companies that received money
from the Chinese, by the Bidens, from the Ukrainians, from
the Romanians. They followed that money trail and it led
directly to Joe Biden ten percent for the big guys.
What we heard over and over again, how much did
(07:29):
they confirm was sent to Joe Biden? Ten percent? But
did they impeach him? No, they didn't. Now there were
some there was some legal jeopardy for FRONT. I don't know.
I guess I'm just frustrated. I like you, I just
want justice done. I want my country.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
Story Kung m Michael Bay good show on Bulk Lump.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
One thing you hear from former Democrats is they didn't
realize their party was the party of hate and division
until it became personal for them. Well, we can't wait
for every one of you bastards to come under attack
to finally convert, right, You need to come up. You
need to be able to convert without them having to
(08:16):
attack you based on other people being attacked Jake Tapper
told Jay Plemmons, I don't know whose guy is about
his experience and uh, well, let's see if he moves
to the writer or not. No doubt it. But he's
talking about how awful the people on the left are,
as if somehow he just figured that out.
Speaker 3 (08:33):
I went on a left leaning podcast that She'll Remain nameless,
and we were talking about my kids, because I think
they were both people without kids. And they asked me
about my son and I said he was you know,
he's a football player and he wants to be a policeman.
And their joke was about my fifteen year old son, Oh,
how does he feel about minorities? Like the idea that
(08:54):
he wants to be a policeman. Therefore he's racist my son,
And like you know, that was the big laugh, And
then I got dragged into common and all that stuff,
and I thought to myself, this is why losing elections.
Like my football playing son, who has no political views,
he's fifteen. He thinks about World War two and gaming
(09:18):
and playing linebacker. That's his world. You're deciding he's a
racist because he wants to be a cop. And why
does he want to be a cop? He wants to
be a cop because he wants to help people, you know,
and he thinks that's the best way he can help people.
And that's how the Democratic Party talks to men, not
just white men, but men.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
You know. Defunding NPR and PBS is such a powerful
move in a grand scheme of things. It doesn't add
up to be that much money, but it is symbolic.
The Left claims, because they can't stand this, the defunding
of NPR and PBS is an attack on free speech
and a violation of the First Amendment. No, you, taxpayer
(10:00):
shouldn't have to pay for something that talks about you
like you're a monster. Anyway, It's been a while, but
I don't believe the First Amendment says anything about the
government funding media organizations. But let's check, shall we Congress
shall make no law respecting number one, an establishment of religion? Okay,
it doesn't violate that or prohibiting the free exercise thereof Okay,
(10:25):
there's no religion trying to be exercise or abridging the
freedom of speech or of the press. Well, no one
is abridging the freedom to publish. We're just abridging taxpayer
dollars paying for it. Yeah, we can make a law
of that effect, or the right of the people peaceably
(10:46):
to assemble and to petition the government for a redress
of grievances. Nope, nothing in there about funding media organizations.
Now here's an argument I haven't heard in a while.
Staff writer for the National Review, David French. Boy, is
this sissy, this little wimp? He was on MSNBC where
(11:06):
he said defunding NPR is reminiscent of the red scare.
David French is one of these guys that posed as
a conservative for a long time, as long as Conservatives
didn't do anything. When the populist Tea Party started, David
French lost his mind. And then he said, well, I
have a black child that I adopted because he needs
credit that he adopted a black child, and people say
(11:28):
bad things about my black child. Please, dude, that's not true.
People say bad things because you are a supposed conservative.
You keep saying that, and all you do is trash
Trump because you have no influence with him, and because
you're not really a conservative, you're part of the problem,
not the solution. David, listen to this.
Speaker 4 (11:47):
I've not seen anything like this in my adult lifetime.
I think we're looking at a comprehensive attack on free
speech that is maybe most reminiscent of the Red Scare.
And you know, the one thing that is so particularly
pernuite about it is that Donald Trump is very shrewd,
politically shrewd in his attack. He's taking on a lot
of institutions that a lot of Americans don't like. So,
(12:09):
for example, elite universities, You're not exactly going to get
millions of Americans in the streets for elite universities or
white shoe law firms. People are going to be in
the streets for white shoe law firms or for big
media outlets where he sued them for defamation, et cetera,
or retaliated against them. So he's choosing many of these
politically unpopular targets. But that's the classic move of the censors.
(12:31):
If you go back to the Red Scare, this was
a frontal attack on free speech aimed at some of
the least popular speech in America. This is how authoritarianism begins.
It begins not by taking on the popular voices. It
begins by taking on the unpopular voices. And I'm not
saying that NPR doesn't have millions of listeners, and there
are many people who love Harvard, but there are These
(12:51):
institutions are very much in the crosshairs of Trump's base,
So he's playing to his base here, which makes it
politically sustainable, even while it's a direct attack on the Constitution.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
Every now and again, an old news story will pop
up on social media because of the absurdity of the
person being interviewed, and it'll go viral because somebody will
post it and a lot of people won't notice, they
won't remember. But on our team, anytime I try to
post something or say something with something that's years old,
Chad will always catch it and go you can post
(13:24):
that if you want, but you do realize that's for
twenty twelve none. I'm always embarrassed, like, why did not check?
So here's an example about a woman named Sweet Brown
and a fire. Again, it's an old story, but it's funny.
Speaker 5 (13:37):
One resident describes her horrifying experience when she first realized
the complex was on fire.
Speaker 6 (13:42):
Well, I woke up to go give me a cold pop,
and then I thought somebody was barbecue it. I said,
oh Lord Jesus is a fire. Then I ran out
and I didn't grab no shoes or none. Jesus a
raying for my life and then a smoke Gegger I
God brug guides.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
Well, this isn't that kind of story. This is the
story of seventeen year old Trayvon Johnson. The story is
from back in twenty seventeen. Okay, poor Trayvon was shot
and killed during a home invasion. I don't celebrate that.
That's sad. But you start breaking into people's homes, you're
gonna get shot and killed. It's just gonna happen. And
the story is from CBS Miami. It's making the rounds
(14:23):
again to try to create a George Floyd type situation
until people figure out how old it is. It's from
twenty seventeen.
Speaker 7 (14:29):
I don't care she how her gun license, her ris
or any of that. Day is way beyond law, way beyond.
Speaker 8 (14:34):
Relatives of seventeen year old Trayvon Johnson are angry. The
teenager was shot and killed last night by a homeowner
who police said was protecting her property.
Speaker 7 (14:43):
He was not close to that like this. He had
a future ahead of him. Trayvon had goals and he
was a very funny guy. He was very big on education.
He loved going to school, he loved learning it.
Speaker 8 (14:51):
Last night, Miami Dad, police say the d a Dorsey
Technical College student, burgle rise to home south of seventy
ninth Street near nine ninety five, just blocks away from
where he lives. Detectives say the fifty four year old
homeowner was alerted of the break in by her security system.
With officers already on their way, she rushed home to
check things out, and police say.
Speaker 5 (15:09):
She was armed.
Speaker 8 (15:10):
She observed a subject exiting the home.
Speaker 4 (15:12):
Through the rear.
Speaker 8 (15:13):
According to detectives, there was a confrontation and one shot
was fired. Johnson was pronounced dead at the hospital.
Speaker 7 (15:19):
It was wrong.
Speaker 5 (15:20):
She did not have to shoe him.
Speaker 7 (15:21):
It's no reason as she should have waited and say,
I think he walked out in the yard, especially already,
then why would she shoe him.
Speaker 8 (15:26):
Relatives say they don't believe Johnson stole anything from the home,
but detectives would not confirm that.
Speaker 7 (15:30):
You have to understand, you have to look at it
from every child's point of view that was raised.
Speaker 5 (15:34):
In the hood.
Speaker 7 (15:35):
How he gonna get his money to have clothes to
go to school.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
The moment you justify a home invasion by your loved one,
as that's the only way he can make money. You
have just told me that you are broken, and if
a group of people share that belief, they are broken,
they are bankrupt. You cannot exist on this basis. Well, yeah,
of course we broke in and stole things. You can't
(15:59):
shoot us for that. That's our job. How else are
we going to eat? The Michael Berry shows race obsession
is a cancer on this country that affects every aspect
of life. We talk everything that should work and doesn't
not everything. Many things are paralyzed or reduced inefficiency as
(16:25):
a result of race policing. You can't get proper policing
in big cities any longer for a number of reasons.
People are hired who have no business being officers because
they have to meet quotas of people who are not
white males. And by the way, it's not just a
(16:46):
black issue. There is also the female issue, and we
don't have enough women doing this, so we have to
stick women doing this. I still think that it should
be required that the NFL should have to have I mean,
women make up half the population and zero percent of
(17:06):
the NFL players. Can you believe that I think they
should be required to pull from the powder puff leagues
and put women. And they have to be on the
offensive line. You can't stick them out at receiver, or
you can't just have them be a kicker. They have
to be on the offensive line. And if one of
them's you know, if you got a Warren Sap coming
(17:30):
across that d line or Randy White, the manster so bit,
because there's no difference. Everybody's the same. And you know,
we need boys and girls, and we need equality and
all that. We require it to every other industry. Why
shouldn't we require it there. This is not to say
(17:51):
that women are less than, inferior than or anything else men.
It is to say there are things that men naturally
do better than women and have historically. And by the way,
that also gets to the percentage of people who want
to do the job. You know, people love to point
(18:12):
out the seventy percent number. And by the way, Thomas
Sol's the one who said this, I'm stealing his work.
I'm appropriating it. I'm giving it credit attribution where it's due.
The reason for the pay disparity is not because two
people are doing the same job and the woman is
getting paid less. It is that women have typically entered
(18:36):
the workforce into jobs that pay less, and men have
entered into jobs that are more dangerous and tend to
pay more. I have a friend whose son is one
of the guys who climbs up to the top of
the cell phone towers and replaces the light bulbs up there.
This is the kind of stuff that you know, drones
(18:56):
and robots are going to replace. He makes a fortune
do it that. Now you might think to yourself, gosh,
he only works whatever it is, seven days a year. Yeah,
but for those seven days, he's got to climb all
the way up there by himself and climb all the
way down. Do you know why he's paid so much
(19:17):
because they think the company, the cell phone company, thinks
he's really really handsome. No, because the company thinks, you know,
this is a guy who needs to make a lot
of money because he should be able to buy things
in his life, and so we're going to donate it
to him. Nope, because you can't find other people to
(19:39):
do it. The reason minimum wage has to be mandated
to be higher than the market would require is that
these are jobs that anyone can do, and until there
is a dearth of people. At that rate, you're asking
to be paid more than the market will bear. So
(20:01):
when the demands became too much and they involved political
pressure and the economics were not there to justify that.
Because the same people who want fast food employees to
make twenty thirty forty make up the number one hundred
dollars an hour are the same people who will complain
how much it now costs at a fast food restaurant.
(20:23):
I will complain how much waterburger costs, but I ain't
trying to get the government to demand that people get
paid more to work there, because I understand that those
two are in tandem. The input of labor is going
to cost you more. But you know what, this is
going to be a moot point in very short order
(20:43):
because you now have robots that can replace the fast
food employee. And you know what worries me about that
there are a lot of people working in the kitchen
in a fast food restaurant that when they don't have
a job because a robot has replaced them, water are
they going to do all day? So the issue of
race and how much we struggle with it. Democrat National
(21:06):
Committee Vice Chair David Hogg he's the little kid that
used the school shooting to create glory for himself, and
the Democrats lifted him up out of that. He was
on the Breakfast Club where he called that genius Jasmine
Crockett just amazing. Now you may say, why would he
(21:29):
do that? He has to if you're a white liberal,
you have to say that every black politician or anything
of the sort is fantastic. Now, not Wesley Hunt, No
you don't. You don't have to like a West Point graduate,
black Republican conservative, but Jasmine Crockett. You have to say
you think she's just swell.
Speaker 9 (21:52):
Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 1 (21:53):
I love her.
Speaker 9 (21:54):
She is amazing. I think that people want to see
somebody who fights and clothes at the Ultimately, I think
that's what Jasmine does. And we need a hell of
a lot more people that are out there that are
willing to do just that and.
Speaker 1 (22:07):
Call she's just a warrior. Republish she's just a warrior.
Speaker 6 (22:11):
She is screw that.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
We need more people to call out the bull. She's
a warrior. Oh, good job, David. We may keep you there.
You can keep hold of the black vote by saying
that that this this person who is an embarrassment to
anyone Black that she's great. I just love her. Oh,
I love her so much. Do you though that seems
(22:33):
like a lot, David, I think you're trying too hard.
So the aforementioned Jasmine Crockett was on MSNBC where she
promised to go after Donald Trump's family if the Democrats
take the House next year.
Speaker 4 (22:50):
It's next year of the House and or Senate.
Speaker 10 (22:53):
Do you think they're going to push for investigations.
Speaker 8 (22:55):
Into Trump's family and the whole crypto acquisition that he has.
Speaker 11 (23:01):
Getting Well, Alex, I'm glad you asked. I'm listen so
long as we end up taking the House, which I
fully anticipate that we will do, and we are going
to work hard to obviously help our Senate colleagues as well. Then,
as someone who serves on the Oversight Committee and hopes
(23:21):
to lead the Oversight Committee, I can guarantee you that
we will do what we are supposed to do as
constitutionally sworn members of the House, which means that we
will conduct oversight. That means that we will investigate. We
will look at whether or not this president himself has
violated the emoluments Clause as relates to say such things
(23:41):
as getting a four hundred million dollar plane from the Qataris.
We also will make sure that we're looking into all
these business deals that they have going on. I mean,
think about it this way, Alex. They were going after
Hunter because he sat on a board. Think about how
much money they are raking in. Whether we're talking about
the next golf resort that they're setting up in Qatar,
(24:05):
or whether we're talking about them leveling gaza as they've
talked about and talked about how it would be great
beachfront property, whether we're talking about this crypto scam, the
scam that people didn't even want to walk into and
show their faces. Let me tell you there is no
shortage of things for us to dig into.
Speaker 1 (24:25):
I'll tell you what, Jasmine. You can have unlimited power
if you can spell emoluments and tell me what it is.
Did you notice she paused before she said that word.
He was worried. Now, how did we practice this again?
Speaker 10 (24:45):
Mack it go? You and the girls all get pretty
at closing time When you're listening to the Michael Berry Show, We've.
Speaker 1 (24:53):
Talked about the Saint George Floyd's death, and what's interesting
about that is you remember super spreaders. We couldn't go
to church because church was a super spreader. But at
the very time media was reporting you mustay home, politicians,
(25:20):
you must stay home, fauci, you must stay home. But
then we had all these black riots and quote unquote
protests that turned into riots, and they were they were allowed,
they were condoned, they were covered as if it was
(25:42):
so important. There's so much black anger and we must
let it out. And so we're gonna have the cops
at the at the perimeter and they're gonna do their thing,
and this is going to be great until they turned
on the cops, and then the cops had to you know,
scram because you know, look who's in charge here. Well,
it made for an interesting paradox. So there was the
(26:04):
juxtaposition of you can't go to church because if people
go into a church, everyone in the country will get
COVID and you'll kill grandma, and we're not gonna let
you do that. You're just you're reckless. You can't do that, Okay,
So no church, no going to the job, no going
to school, no going anywhere. Okay. But then George Floyd
dies and you got these massive funerals because he was
(26:27):
such a great man. We had to have funerals everywhere. Wait,
how does this compute? Did COVID? Was COVID such a deadly,
horrible virus that would kill every everybody who got COVID
you just gonna die right on the spot. You couldn't
get it. There wasn't a ninety nine point eight percent
(26:48):
survival rate, just like the flu, just like the cold.
In fact, it was no worse than the flu, not
as bad as the flu. But that's okay because some
people still don't believe that, because if you're told something
often enough, you believe it. Don't go ask a Palestinian
kid if there are any good Jews, because the Jews
are the devil, and that's all they've ever been taught.
(27:10):
And that's it. Once that is sufficiently ingrained, it's practically
indelible in your mind. There are still people who believe
that COVID was highly deadly. Well that's not true, Michael.
I know somebody that died. We all do. But first
of all, you don't know if they died from the
shot or COVID. And do you know how many thousand
(27:32):
people die per year from the flu? Look it up?
Look it up? There's a report that came out, I believe,
out of the University of Michigan over this past weekend
that said the COVID shot had a negative efficacy rate
of twenty six point nine percent. Do you know what
that means. That means that the number of people who
(27:55):
died from the shot was higher than the number of
people who are perceived to have lived through COVID or
I mean, through the flu as a result. Well, I
think the number's far worse for COVID, but you'll never
find out. But back to the point, because there's other
stuff I want.
Speaker 4 (28:15):
To get to.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
So you couldn't go to church because that made it
a super spreader event, but you could have George Floyd
memorials and riots as a result of it, and it
was all condoned, blessed by local governments, by local media.
Here is a montage of the George Floyd protests versus COVID.
Speaker 7 (28:39):
Racism has been a pandemic for far, far longer than.
Speaker 5 (28:42):
COVID, from the front lines of one pandemic to the
front lines of.
Speaker 12 (28:46):
Another, all across the country.
Speaker 2 (28:48):
We're all going to be kneeling in honor of the
Black Lives Matter movement.
Speaker 5 (28:53):
I don't hear the treatment plan is different, but the
priority to save lives is the same. These are life
saving measures.
Speaker 1 (29:07):
What I believe is more a deadly disease than coronavirus
is hatred.
Speaker 10 (29:12):
As protesters across the country and around the world raise
their voices over the killing of George Floyd, concerns over
the coronavirus take a back seat.
Speaker 12 (29:21):
Let's verify did the recent protest contribute to the svirus?
Speaker 1 (29:26):
Concerns over the COVID virus take a back seat. The
whole country. We were all gonna die. You had to
close your business. You couldn't go to church. We were
dragging pastors to prison, jail, but the P and the
P sounded good. You couldn't go to school. They weren't
(29:50):
allowing you to bury your loved ones. You couldn't go
to the hospital as they died and hold their hand
as they went off to heaven. They had to die
alone because COVID was the worst thing ever. And concerns
you just slipped that. Concerns over COVID have taken a
(30:14):
back seat to what blacks being mad play this again.
Speaker 10 (30:18):
Concerns over the coronavirus take a back seat let's verify.
Speaker 12 (30:22):
Did the reason on the world read.
Speaker 1 (30:24):
One about fifteen twenty seconds earlier? I wanted to hear
that COVID is the worst thing ever. You're all going
to die, and as a result, nothing can happen in life.
You can't get married, you can't bury your loved one,
you can't be there with your loved one while they're dying.
None of that can happen. Y'all don't understand. This is
the worst thing to happen to history of mankind. Everything
has to shut down. Okay, Well they're they're having riots
(30:46):
over there and you're not stopping them. Oh well yeah,
but you got to understand slavery measures.
Speaker 10 (30:56):
What I believe is more a deadly disease than corona
virus is hatred. As protesters across the country and around
the world raised their voices over the killing of George Floyd,
concerns over the coronavirus take a back seat.
Speaker 12 (31:10):
Let's verify did the recent protest contribute to the spike
in coronavirus cases? The study from NBERUS data from protest
in over three hundred large cities across the US. The
study found no evidence that recent protest have led to
the spike in the number of coronavirus cases.
Speaker 1 (31:30):
It's so powerful, the force of the propaganda behind this,
and in fact what they've done, which is very powerful. First,
you established that racism is Hitler, and we all know
that Hitler should have been killed sooner because then millions
of lives would have been saved and World War II
(31:52):
would have been averted. So first you establish racism is Hitler,
and then all you have to do is say he's
a racist. Jim Comey said that the FBI needs to
do things to shut Trump down because Trump is white
supremacist adjacent. So he doesn't want to say he's white
(32:15):
supremacist per se, although many people will. But he's white
supremacist adjacent. What does this mean. Anybody who questions DEI
affirmative action, all of this nonsense that leads to plane crashes,
a military that can't function, everything else. Anyone who questions
(32:36):
those race based programs that racist. Anyone who questions that
is then called a white supremacist. And we all know
that's bad. That's Hitler, right, that's the Klan, that's Hitler.
It's awful. And then the minute that happens, once racist
equals Hitler, and you equals racist. I can do whatever,
I can break any law because you're about this is
(32:57):
how this they're really really evil.
Speaker 8 (33:00):
M hmm.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
And once you understand how that game is played and
that look at the lies they told over Joe Biden.
Nothing they ever say should ever be trusted