AM Show Hr 2 | Commandments, Blockbuster, and Nadler Says Goodbye

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
It's that time time, time, time, luck and load. So
Michael Very Show is on the air.

Speaker 2 (00:26):
Jonathan Signs is the president of Texas Values and he
joins us. Now a law going into effect yesterday related
to the Ten Commandments in schools. What I want to
do is go very slow, so we explain that everyone
understands what is required versus what is allowed, who the

(00:50):
exemptions are, and more.

Speaker 1 (00:53):
Jonathan siins, welcome to the program.

Speaker 3 (00:56):
Great to be with you, Michael.

Speaker 2 (00:57):
So the law that passed relates to I heard your interview.
I rarely get to listen to our morning news, but
I did this morning. Was able to this morning, and
I thought it was fantastic and I.

Speaker 1 (01:11):
Learned a lot.

Speaker 2 (01:13):
But I still had some questions, and I'd like to
start over as if no one heard that interview and
go through that because I noticed there were about twelve
hundred school districts and it only applies to eleven.

Speaker 1 (01:25):
Let's start with what the law says.

Speaker 3 (01:29):
Yeah, absolutely, and yeah, you're right.

Speaker 4 (01:31):
There might have been a few people that were not
awake at six twenty in the morning, but some of
us were. There's a new state law in the state
of Texas that went into effect yesterday, September first. Now,
it's very common that new state laws go into effect
on September first during a legislative year, which is an
odd number year life this year twenty twenty five, and
so that's the significance of that date. So it's not

(01:51):
anything particular about this law. Just about every state law
goes into effect September first, unless it has over a
two thirds vote. Now, this bill did with bipartisan support.
We did have some Democrats along with the Republicans that
supported this law.

Speaker 3 (02:05):
The bill numbers Senate Bill ten.

Speaker 4 (02:07):
And if people have more information, Ten Commandments, Texas dot
Com is the website we have set up with a
lot of good information.

Speaker 3 (02:13):
But it's real simple.

Speaker 4 (02:15):
Every classroom in the state of Texas public school, classroom
K through twelve is required to display the Ten Commandments. Now,
it's not any version, it's not any wording. The law
itself has specific wording for the Ten Commandments. And the
significance of that, Michael, is this is the language of
the Ten Commandments monument that's on the Texas Capitol Grounds

(02:37):
on the northwest side, just outside of the Texas Capital
in Austin and our capital city. And that's significant because
that language on those ten Commands, on that Ten Commandments
monument was upheld by the US Supreme Court by a five.

Speaker 3 (02:53):
To four vote. As a matter of fact, that case
was argued at the U.

Speaker 4 (02:56):
S Supreme Court by Governor Greg Abbott, who at the
time was our two in general of the State of Texas. Now,
the size of it, it's required to be at least
sixteen inches by twenty inches, and it is required to
be displayed in a conspicuous place right. In other words,
they can't cover it up, they can't hide it in
a corner so no one can see it. The goal
is for it to be displayed so it's visible. Now,

(03:19):
the law does not require kids to read. It doesn't
require kids to acknowledge it. You don't have to walk
into the classroom and check mark that you noticed it
that day. But it is required for it to be displayed.
And it's in every public school classroom. It's not you know,
in the gym somewhere or one place. It's in every classroom. Michael,
We think that could be close to three hundred thousand

(03:40):
classrooms throughout the state of Texas twelve hundred school districts.
There are a lot of school campuses, and so that's
what the law requires. And it's about the historical relevance
and the connection of the Ten Commandments from the Old
Testament of the Bible, and very common when you think
about references to law and government and culture in American history.

(04:01):
That's long been the case. As a matter of fact,
the US Supreme Court has a depiction of the Ten
Commandments on its capital, on its building, and so we
believe if it's good enough for the Supreme Court, it
should be good enough for the classroom.

Speaker 2 (04:14):
Well, it's an interesting question the separation of church and state,
to the extent that this is a religious issue, and
you know, you think of Jefferson's letter to the Baptist
at Danbury and the separation of church and state, and
this is something most people do not understand. Was a
separation because the Anglican Church had been the King's church

(04:37):
when they wouldn't honor his divorce, and so he simply
made himself the head.

Speaker 1 (04:41):
Of the church.

Speaker 2 (04:43):
The idea was to keep the state out of the
church and never the church out of the state, and
our founders were clear about that, including Jefferson's letter, but
including all of the religious references on documents on currency,
on buildings, as you noted much later, of course, the
Supreme Court building and the Ten Commandments. But it's important

(05:03):
to understand the point was to keep the state out
of the church, not the church out of the state.

Speaker 3 (05:10):
Well, that's right.

Speaker 4 (05:11):
And look, here's also something that's important when you have
a document that has historical relevance. And the Supreme Court
has said that. In the case of Van Orden versus Perry,
which was the case that went up to the US
Supreme Court that related to the Ten Commandments monument on
our Texas Capitol grounds that was upheld at the US
Supreme Court in two thousand and five, the Court was
very clear about this, and they've said it numerous times

(05:34):
that when you have a document that's historically relevant, even
if it has some connection to religion, the government can't
tear it down, they can't attack it, they can't use
that as their reason for not allowing it because it's
religious in nature, and it can't be sort.

Speaker 3 (05:49):
Of a heckler's veto either. Right.

Speaker 4 (05:50):
You can't have people coming in and saying, oh, but
that document in that display and symbol has something for
religious Because of that reason, we want the government to
take it down, and we want to force the government
to take it down. The US Free Court said that
is hostility to religion. To your point, that's not what
Thomas Jefferson and vision. That's not what the founders and vision.
But for decades, Michael, that's what the ACOU has gotten

(06:12):
away with in other groups. Right, And there's no coincidence
that New York lawyers from the acl you have been
the ones that have filed the lawsuit against the Texas
tan Commandments law. But there's established precedent here, and there's
no doubt that there's a historical connection in relevance. I mean,
you have David Barton, numerous scholars, people that testified in
the court hearing in San Antonio on this bill that
I was at a couple of weeks ago, made it

(06:33):
clear there's a historical connection. Just because there's also something
religious in nature is not a valid reason for the
courts to try to take that down or to not
allow this to be displayed in publicol classrooms when it's
historically relevant. And the fact that some people don't realize
that is even more reason why it should be displayed

(06:53):
so people are aware.

Speaker 3 (06:54):
Of this history.

Speaker 1 (06:55):
That's absolutely true, Jonathan signs with Texas Values.

Speaker 2 (06:59):
It's important to understand that the freedom of expression of religion,
and that freedom from the parishioner, from the Christian is
as important as they perceived. But I don't recognize freedom

(07:19):
to avoid being offended. We're not requiring anyone to worship,
We're not requiring anyone to bend the need, we're not
requiring anyone to bow.

Speaker 1 (07:31):
To idolatry or wear religious symbols.

Speaker 2 (07:34):
What is being asked is to stop the expression of it.
It's also important, and you made this point I think
this morning, that you cannot take Christian teachings out of
world literature, out of thought, out of politics. So many
of the first places we see those concepts offered were

(07:55):
offered in the Bible, and so you cannot simply rip
those out because us your Jewish, Muslim, uh, some other
group agnostic, atheist, and you don't like Christian Satanists, and
and and then finally we've.

Speaker 1 (08:09):
Got the pure power play. You've got.

Speaker 2 (08:11):
I think a lot of people who are non Christian
of other organized religions who simply want to say you can't, well, no,
that's not going to be tolerated.

Speaker 1 (08:20):
State state tuned Jonathan Science, Texas as an old college.

Speaker 3 (08:26):
Michael Perry, Kai.

Speaker 1 (08:32):
Jonathan Science.

Speaker 2 (08:33):
It's the president of Texas Values. One of eight hundred
and thirty laws that went into effect this UH legislative
session Biennial Legislatives legislative session. As we've mentioned, that's every
two years, our legislature meets. Currently in a special session.
The second Governor has called at the end of the session.

(08:54):
One of the laws that passed related to the Ten
Commandments in the classroom. Let's leave the exempted schools out
for a moment. Jonathan reading at Tencommandments dot com, it
says every public school classroom will be required to display
a Ten Commandments poster or framed copy, and each school

(09:14):
district must accept conforming posters or framed copies that are
privately donated, so it is required that they post these.

Speaker 1 (09:26):
But there are individuals.

Speaker 2 (09:28):
I know, there's a woman, the Great Rape, Great right,
the good Therapists is what always the I can't remember
the name of it. They're different groups know in Houston,
in the Houston area that are donating these, Jonathan, you
may know of others, but they are required to post
the Ten Commandments.

Speaker 1 (09:46):
I was not aware of that. I thought they were
allowed to but speak to that if you would.

Speaker 3 (09:50):
Well, that's absolutely right.

Speaker 4 (09:52):
And we're one of the organizations that have been doing
some donating as well. We donated six thousand posters to
conra ISD And I want to make sure everyone's clear.
Other than the eleven school districts, which in the you're
listening audience, I'm not sure how far the reaches, but
greater Houston area, it's Houston, ID and SI fare and
then like Travis and the Austin area north side in

(10:12):
San Antonio, Austin.

Speaker 3 (10:14):
ID and a few others.

Speaker 4 (10:16):
So the other eleven hundred and eighty nine school districts
in the state of Texes are required to follow this law. Now,
the law does not require the school districts to purchase
the posters. Now they're only a dollar each, and we've
got a great website set up. We've got a vendor
that a lot of great groups like David Barton and
others are using.

Speaker 3 (10:32):
Rick Green.

Speaker 4 (10:33):
Our website is ten Commandments Texas dot com. And when
you go to that website, you can pick a certain
school district. You can purchase the Ten Commandments posters for
a dollar each, and it helps us figure out who's
helping wear. But the idea is to have them donated
to the school. Now, school districts could choose on their
own to purchase them. We just didn't want the law
situated in a way that required them to purchase to
use tax dollars and for you know whatever, you know

(10:55):
arguments people might make about that. This just makes it
easier and there are a lot of people that want
to do that. There are thousands of them that have
already been posts purchased in it throughout the state. This
is an effort that's been going on for several months.
A lot of school districts have already purchased or had
their posters donated. They're getting ready to put them up.
But that's how the law works, and that's how it's
designed to work, is have people donate them, bring them

(11:16):
to the school district, the superintendent, the administration building, and
if they're conforming to the law.

Speaker 3 (11:20):
Which the website we have makes it really easy.

Speaker 4 (11:22):
If you order from the same vendor that we're using,
a lot of people are that's what you get a
dollar each. So ten Commandments Texas dot Com is the
website and a lot of people are excited about it
because they recognize the value of having the Ten Commandments displayed. Again,
students are required to read it, they're not required to
believe it. They're not even required to acknowledge that they
saw it in the classroom. But Michael, it's not all

(11:43):
that different than what we have in curriculum. As part
of our curriculum, students are required to learn about the
connection of the Ten Commandments to America's law and founding
in our government and culture. The Supreme Court has said
that that's permissible. And as you acknowledge right that, you know,
whether people believe one religion or other, this is primarily
about the historical connection.

Speaker 3 (12:03):
Whether you know, when there.

Speaker 4 (12:04):
Are people of whether they're that are not Jewish or
not Christian, that are from different other faith that recognize
the significance of the Ten Commandments and the impact it's
had on a lot of law and policy in government, so.

Speaker 3 (12:15):
It should be no different here in Texas well.

Speaker 2 (12:18):
I think that's that's absolutely right. You know, I go
back to the Roy Moore case that launched Roy Moore
to to national fame and notoriety. This is an issue
that doesn't go away the core religious values of the
founders of this country are still the core religious values
of a majority of believers. And these are beyond the

(12:43):
Christian faith. These are good rules to live by, Jonathan
Science Texas values.

Speaker 1 (12:47):
Thank you, my man.

Speaker 2 (12:48):
Oh oh, Jonathan, before you appreciate it. But hold on,
I forgot to ask you. There the schools that are
exempted from them from this, what is that about?

Speaker 4 (12:57):
Yeah, well, and it's not I don't I'm not picking
on you for using the word exempt.

Speaker 3 (13:01):
That's probably accurate.

Speaker 4 (13:02):
But the relevance is there was a group of families
that I assume were recruited or got connections with the ACLU,
and they had their New York lawyers come in and
argue against the Texas Commandments law. They filed a lawsuit
against specific school districts. It doesn't have anything to do
with those school districts not liking it. Maybe some of
them don't, but they the school districts did not suit
to stop the law.

Speaker 3 (13:22):
Being enforced or going into EVEC.

Speaker 4 (13:24):
Some families did, some parents and so on that didn't
like it, and the ACOU doesn't like it as well.
And so there was a court ruling about two and
a half weeks ago by a judge in San Antonio,
who said, for now, until I see more evidence and
this trial moves along, I'm going to say that in
those particular school districts that the Ten Commandments law is
not to go into effect. But this happens all the time.

(13:46):
If you're not a party to that lawsuit, the rest
of the state has to follow this law. As of yesterday,
the Texas turn General Kin Paxton put out a letter
making that clear that all the other school districts are
required to follow this law. And it's not a to
your point, it's not a you know, maybe we think so.
The law says you have to display the poster of
the Ten Commandments. Now that's assuming that it's been donating

(14:07):
or one's been provided for them to hang up. And
so that's why we're doing a lot of work to
get the word out.

Speaker 3 (14:12):
And I want to mention another thing too.

Speaker 4 (14:13):
We've got an event coming up at the end of
September where David Barton, who knows this issue well, is
going to be talking about it, giving people more insight.
But in the meantime, if you're getting, you know, mixed
signals from your school district, or they're telling you something different,
whatever the case is, reach out to our organization. Our
friends at First Liberty Institute at Telly Shackelford are doing
the same thing. We're here to walk you through it
and give you that protection and for you to say, hey,

(14:35):
tell your school district the law requires this if you're
not one of those eleven. But again, the website ten
Commandments Texas dot com, we've got a lot of great information.
You know.

Speaker 2 (14:45):
I feel the need to say this, having been through
a few of these over the years. I think marching
up to the school where you don't have children and
screaming you have to have the Ten Commandments on the
wall is going to be a lot less productive short
and long term for our cause than saying, hey, can

(15:05):
I help you fund these? Or can I go out
and raise the money to fund them? As you said,
it's a dollar apiece. It's not that much, you know,
one per classroom. But for those people who are going
to be screaming and hollering that the school district has
betrayed us, the law doesn't require them to do that. Well,
I guess it does require them to do it, but

(15:27):
it gives them the option of private donation. Why wouldn't
we do that? Why wouldn't we make it easy to comply?
Jonathan signs Texas Values. Thank you very much, my man,
God bless you a seat.

Speaker 3 (15:39):
Well.

Speaker 2 (15:40):
The man that Donald Trump refers to as fat Jerry
Jerry Nadler, who interestingly is the first gnome to ever
be elected to Congress.

Speaker 1 (15:50):
Yeah, he's a fellow that wears his pants up just
above his nipples. Yeah, Jerry Nadler.

Speaker 2 (15:56):
He was involved in the Trump impeachment, in fact, he
led it. He's a little fellow that wattles. He's seventy eight,
and he will not be running for re election next year.
What's that, Well, he won't be running You're right, he
won't be running anywhere anytime.

Speaker 1 (16:17):
He would not be playing knock and Run, that is
for sure.

Speaker 4 (16:22):
EHS the four hour system from Michael Arry Shoe and
other leading companies. He said, this.

Speaker 3 (16:31):
Where you do what you do.

Speaker 1 (16:34):
Sit back. Let me tell you a quick story. It's amazing.

Speaker 2 (16:39):
How recent the year two thousand is and how far
away in so many, so many dimensions. That was the
year of the big tech bubble. That was a year
of y two k. It was all going to come
to an end, and it didn't. That was the time
when kids in their with a backpack at a coffee

(17:02):
shop in Portland or San Francisco could register a name
of a major noun and create a platform and get
paid amounts of money that my dad could have never
imagined in the old fashioned show up early, stay late
at work, hard to do your job, be honest, don't steal,
don't do drugs, make the company money. It was a weird, weird,

(17:26):
weird time. Well, Americans love movies, I would argue we
loved movies more then than we do today per capita individually.
But that was a time when we were still in
the VCR stage, and so the watching of a movie

(17:46):
meant that you either either the network bought it, which
usually by that time it was so old, and then
you had commercials in there. Nobody wanted to watch a
movie that way, although I remember watching Trading Places that way.
I remember watching forty eight Hours that way. So you
wanted a movie on demand, so you'd go to the
local video store. We didn't have a Blockbuster where I

(18:09):
lived because we were out in the country. But a
girl I went to school with, Nancy Gray, her mom
rented out a little modular unit and there were a
surprisingly large number of movies for the size of this
modular unit. And we would go up there and it
was their initials. It was like kN N or whatever.
We'd go up there and we'd rent our movie, and
they were this was a small I mean small community.

(18:32):
This wasn't even a town. This was really more an
orange field community. And you'd rent your movie and you'd
bring it back and there were never any fees and
it was wonderful. Well, at about this time, so Blockbuster
was the dominant company in the industry by far.

Speaker 3 (18:49):
Fact.

Speaker 2 (18:50):
Ramon has always said over the years, if he ever
got fired from radio, he'd go to work for Blockbuster.
He loves movies and he always thought that would be cool. Well,
they shot Blockbuster out from under him in the year
two thousand. While all of that is going on, Read Hastings,
who will get back to in a moment and Mark
Randolph go to Blockbuster. They're dying, they're losing money, their

(19:12):
burn rate is out of control, and they have no
viable future. They see no way out of this. They
go to Blockbuster and offer to sell Netflix for fifty
million dollars. The Netflix concept at the time was not
in any way digital. They would mail you three, five, seven,
depend on your package. They would mail you a movie

(19:35):
in a CD and you would watch the movie and
they had this cool little wrapper paper that it was in.
I alos thought that was a Nia Sava And you
would turn your movie around and send it back prepaid postage,
and you would pay a membership a subscription per month
in order to do this, no late fees. That movie
could sit on your on your TV top for three months.

(19:58):
You didn't get any new movie, but you didn't get
billed extra either. The Netflix CEO, I'm sorry. The Blockbuster chairman,
John Antioco laughed Netflix out of his office famously, are
you kidding me? You people are a net on my behind?

(20:19):
Get out of here? And who would have thought how
fortunes would change? But in July of that year, at
about the same time, Blockbuster did do a deal with
the company you've probably never heard of. The chairman of
that company at the time called it the killer app

(20:39):
for the entertainment industry. Blockbuster's chairman, who laughed Netflix out
of his office, said this was the ultimate bricks, clicks
and flicks strategy. No chicks ramon and none of the
other stuff either. The chairman of Oracle no less than

(20:59):
Larry Ellison committed his private company in Cube Corp. To
provide the critical computer hardware and two million dollars in cash,
talking about how proud he was to be part of
this endeavor. So the company with whom that Blockbuster did this,

(21:21):
this Blockbuster deal that was so excited about, was a
company that had gravitated into broadband and they were trying
to get into They were trying to find ways to
monetize fiber optic, which they called broadband. Two years earlier,
in nineteen ninety eight, they acquired Portland General Electric, an

(21:44):
Oregon utility that had a budding fiber optic network for
phone and data traffic in the Pacific Northwest. So they're
starting to get broadband bannedwidth and they're starting to think, well,
we got to find things to put on this. We
want people to use our data by day for business

(22:06):
and work and by night to watch movies. Well who
better to do that with than Blockbuster. So they go
to Blockbuster in July and two thousand and sign a
deal with Blockbuster. Blockbuster will provide the movies, and then
the customers would have a TV set top box, so

(22:26):
they're getting their data same way that you later got
your data. You probably get it from someone else today.
But this was competing with everyone's internet and all the
dial up and the data providers. This company that teamed
up with Blockbuster is going to provide basically the back
end the technology, the infrastructure.

Speaker 1 (22:47):
Blockbuster is going to provide the content.

Speaker 2 (22:52):
Well, the infrastructure provider said they would go to the
big movie houses, the distributors. Weinstein at the time was
a major one, but you know what they all are, Fox, Miramax,
all of the companies that were distributing these things, and
they would sign up all these deals and get the

(23:13):
content so that you could have that coming into your home.
How that was built is a little more complicated than
it's worth telling about right now. So this company that
had acquired a utility company with the budding optic fiber
optic network for phone and data traffic. Remember we're about
to be in the voiceover IP days. We're starting to

(23:37):
think of a new about how we're going to watch movies,
how we're going to consume information. We're already moving away
from the newspaper. How we're going to consume information, how
it's going to be delivered to us, how fast it's
going to be delivered to us.

Speaker 1 (23:54):
Well, eventually it.

Speaker 2 (23:55):
Would be to our phone, but at this point we're
talking about delivering it to a computer. Well, the company
that cut the deal with Blockbuster, they then immediately so
they took an investment from a company called CIBC Worldwide
or CIBC world I forget exactly what it doesn't matter,

(24:15):
and that is from a bank in Toronto. They get
an investment of one hundred and fifteen million dollars from
this bank. At this point, the company is not making
a penny, not one penny. They get that one hundred
and fifteen million dollars and then they go and create
a side company which they call Operation Braveheart. They dump

(24:39):
all of that into there and make this look like
they have just booked one hundred and fifteen million dollars
in profits, which is what they did their fourth quarter
earnings for two thousand and first quarter earnings of two
thousand and one. So all the money they were losing
was offset by all this money they had supposedly made,

(25:00):
which was just an investment.

Speaker 1 (25:02):
And the company that did all that can run the
Michael Arry Show maybe million dollar record sale.

Speaker 2 (25:15):
Now the final pre trial hearing for Ryan Ralph being held.
His trial expected shortly if he doesn't lead out, which
I would imagine he will.

Speaker 1 (25:31):
Do you remember the name Ryan Ralph?

Speaker 2 (25:33):
Well, I'm not in favor of making people famous for
doing bad things. I wonder how many people remember the
incident itself. September fifteenth, twenty twenty four, a Secret Service
agent shot four rounds at Ryan Ralph, who was hiding
with an SKS style rifle in the shrubbery at Trump

(25:54):
International Golf Club in West Palm Beach.

Speaker 1 (25:58):
He had his gun.

Speaker 2 (26:00):
Through the fence pointed at Trump, who was walking between
the fifth and sixth holes at his golf course. He
just didn't have a good shot yet to pull the trigger,
but he was planning to. When the shots come whizzing
at him, he turns and runs, and he flees, and

(26:22):
he takes police on a chase where he is later caught.
It would turn out that he has a disturbing connection
to Ukraine, as do a lot of Americans. Where he's
gone back and forth. He has recruited to get Americans
to go there. He's raised money for Ukraine, a war
that is not our war, sure has torn this country

(26:44):
apart and costs you a lot of money. Well, that
isn't attempted assassination. You don't have to pull the trigger
to be there. And it will be interesting to see
as his trial begins. That is less than a year
ago and how quickly it's been pushed from the news

(27:06):
because the people deciding what goes on your TV screen
do not wish to tell the stories that cut against them.
And that's why we don't allow what is in the
news to be to determine what we talk about. We
might talk about things that they also happen to be covering,
but we're not going to cover things simply because a

(27:29):
news director who voted for Kamala Harris and Joe Biden
and Obama twice is covering it on their network. And
that seems to be real hard for some people to understand.
But we are clear on that we had seven killed
in over fifty shot in Chicago, and yet Brandon Johnson,
the mayor, and the governor JB. Pritzker are resisting President

(27:53):
Trump's efforts to send in the National Guard and clean
it up. As we have mentioned, the President has a
pre conference early this afternoon one o'clock Central. One of
the things that is being rumored is that it relates
to Chicago in him sending in the National Guard. I
would be surprised if he sends in the National Guard

(28:15):
when they're insisting that he not not to say he
couldn't do it. It's been done before, the famous Little
Rock School desegregation case and others.

Speaker 1 (28:27):
I would be surprised.

Speaker 2 (28:28):
However, if he does that, I would more expect him
to make a formal request that which is the reverse
of how this typically works, or for him to say
that within seventy two hours he will be sending in
the National Guard. But either way, the proofs in the

(28:49):
pudding with Washington d C not only how much safer
the district has become, but how happy the people are
with the results, extremely extremely happy. Yet another mainstream media
narrative about Donald Trump destroyed. The New York Times reports

(29:10):
that the federal investigation into John Bolton actually began under
the Biden administration after US intelligence collected evidence suggesting that
he had mishandled classified material. You know Frank Lucas, the

(29:31):
notorious drug dealer that American gangster was modeled on that
Denzel Washington played him, and actually Frank Lucas consultant on
the project. There was so much cash that was being
managed that when they were counting when it was only
ladies who counted the cash, or when they were cutting

(29:52):
the drugs, because it was so expensive, so valuable with
the street value, he didn't want any stolen. That the
ladies would have to cut the drugs in string bikinis,
so there wouldn't be any room for them to secret
funds out of there or drugs. Well, when you're working

(30:13):
for the drug boss and you're cutting up the heroin,
you're gonna end up dead if you steal the heroin
and take it out of there. Likewise, if you work
in American intelligence, that intelligence is worth more pound for
pound than heroin is. It's worth more to our national security,
but it's monetizable and cutter. Or Qatar, the same country

(30:38):
that funded the films of Kami Mundani's mother and is
now working to get him elected. That same country seems
to be one of the places that Joel that John
Bolton allegedly was selling American secrets to. It's also the

(30:58):
place you'll remember when we traded for bo Burgdal. Remember
we sent the bad guys back the ISIS members or
I guess they were isis remember where we sent them
cut her? That country, the same university, that the same
country that has an interest in Texas A and M
university campus. That country has repeatedly in the same vein

(31:24):
as China, engaged in activity that is against American interests.
To put it lightly, to put it very likely, the
mainstream media going out of their way to pay tribute
to the Minneapolis school shooter, you know, the guy that
looks like Eric Stoltzon mask by making sure they use

(31:47):
the correct pronouns. Jake Tapper defends calling the shooter she
saying on air she identifies as a female wants her
name to reflect that idea.

Speaker 5 (32:01):
Another piece of the puzzle as to who the shooter
was in Minneapolis, Starterbuting says, according to court records, because
there's been some confusion about what the shooter's name was,
Robin Westman's mother applied to change your child's name in
twenty nineteen. It was at one point Robert Paul Westman.
But since she identifies as a female and wants her
name to reflect that identification was underage, it's now Robin west.

Speaker 1 (32:26):
We'll see if I can find the article.

Speaker 2 (32:30):
But the new York Post had a piece where he
came out before he died and said he regretted this
whole trans thing and said that he had been brainwashed.

Speaker 1 (32:46):
It was also a breakup with.

Speaker 2 (32:50):
A partner of some sort before that, but it appears
that he regretted the path he had taken, as young
people often do, right, but in this case, perhaps he
had gone too far down that path. With the use

(33:11):
of hormones and the like. When you're a boy who
transitions to a girl and now you want to transition
back to being a boy, it's not an easy undertaking.
Hormones are very very powerful, and he apparently regretted it,

(33:33):
regretted it terribly. We've also seen transhooter after transhooter Nashville, Aberdeen, Denver, Iowa, Lakewood.
We've seen shooter after shooter on these very very powerful
hormone changing drugs that would appear