October 24, 2025 • 34 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Michael Very Show is on the air.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
Here is Johnny.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
I am the danger. I am the one who knocks.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
We'll do it lit, and we'll do it live.
Speaker 5 (00:28):
Last year I spent more money on spilled liquor in
fires from one side of this world to the other
than you may. You're talking to the rolics wearing diamond
ring wearing jet stealing, whoa wheeling, daling livings in right
jet flying sun of a gun, and I'm having a
hard time. Hold me Alegators doing this.
Speaker 3 (00:50):
Book said this one aful She can tell that away.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
That I was bad at the bowl, add of the bowl,
bad of the bowl, bad of the bowl.
Speaker 6 (01:14):
My dog.
Speaker 7 (01:15):
Now that'll be the end of it. I will not
look for you. I will not pursue you, but if
you don't I will look for you. I will find
you and I will kill you.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
A minute.
Speaker 3 (01:31):
That I'm bad of the bone, bad of the bowl, bad.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
The by ray, what again, I tell you, I double again.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
Folks, we have a sighting as rare as Bigfoot or
a yetty not the cooler. One time Beaver Applin, the
owner of Bucky, sent me a YETI cooler with loaded
up with Bucky's stuff inside, and because I'm such a
nice guy, I gave it all to him. And so
(02:12):
now he rummages through the stuff I get in the
mail to see what he can have because I don't
want to receive anything. So he's like, you don't want that, No,
I don't, you can have it. So anyway, he's I
guess he probably needs another cooler. From the sounds of it. Anyway,
this is a sighting of something as rare as Bigfoot
or a Yeti or the lock Nest Monster, an abominable snowman.
(02:38):
What I'm about to play for you is as rare
as anything I've seen in twenty years of doing this
radio program. ABC News in Milwaukee was reporting on the
police shooting of a young black man, as the news
often does. But what is unusual and commendable and gives
me hope is that the family of the young black
(03:02):
man who was shot and killed by an officer that
once they reviewed the tape and saw that their son
had absolutely provoked this whole thing and the officer was
completely in the right, they commended the officer. They didn't
play victim. They didn't call Ben Crump they said, Yah,
(03:24):
you can't do what our boy did. You won't survive.
You can't pull a gun on a cop because he
pulls you over on a parking ticket. And this is
amazing the fact that his family did this. I guess
it's sad that we have to make such a big
(03:44):
deal that they did it because it's not what typically happens. Nevertheless,
it makes me quite happy, I must say.
Speaker 8 (03:53):
Once we got an opportunity to actually see the video,
there weren't many questions.
Speaker 9 (03:57):
One day after an off duty Milwaukee police officer shot
and killed twenty six year old Elijah Wilkes, Wilkes's family
and their attorney went before the cameras.
Speaker 8 (04:09):
I don't think I've ever come before and did a
press conference and said this, but we will acknowledge that
we do believe that this officer involved shooting was justified.
He made a decision that he should not have made,
and that's just something we had to live with.
Speaker 9 (04:24):
Milwaukee Police showing Wilkes's mother, an attorney b Ivory Lamar
dash camera video from that off duty officer's personal vehicle Friday,
showing the moments before Wilkes's death. It all started with
a minor car accident near forty ninth and Mill Road
Thursday morning.
Speaker 8 (04:39):
He kind of aggressively maneuvered into this left lane and
essentially cut off the off duty officer.
Speaker 9 (04:47):
At that point, the pair pulled over and then, describing
the video, Lamar says, Wilkes got out of the car
and pulled a gun.
Speaker 8 (04:53):
He does slapped the off duty officer with the firearm,
after which the video does depict Eliza pointing the firearm
at the off duty officer. The off duty officer did
respond what we believe in the court is with his
training and did fire off several shots.
Speaker 9 (05:12):
The family's attorney says it's unclear to him if Wilkes
ever shot his gun.
Speaker 8 (05:17):
I don't recall specifically seeing an exchange of gunfire. I'm
not saying it didn't happen, but I did see him
point the gun in the officers the wrection for sure.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
The only that's my only, my only brother.
Speaker 8 (05:34):
Oh my brother was well.
Speaker 9 (05:35):
I got Wilkes's family grieving but recognizing the consequences of
his decision.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
I love the format that Tucker Crlson has, where instead
of a requirement to be in the same place, same
chair every night, he can do these long form interviews,
and I think he's done a really good job with
some of them and digging deep in people that may
(06:01):
not be a newsmaker that day, but are worthy of
some time. Steve Toathe in Houston running against Dan Crenshaw
in Congressional District two, he had a really good sit
down with him. He had a conversation with a fellow
named Tim Burchett. I'd never heard of this guy until
the last couple of years, but he's a Republican from Tennessee,
(06:24):
and he brings up what this keeps coming up again
and again, that these members of Congress are engaged in
sex parties orgies, and that what happens is that this
is being set up by people who want to be
able to blackmail them. Now, if it's not true, it's
(06:48):
a real weird thing for people for members to keep
saying that it is happening, and then the media doesn't
want to touch it. But why would you keep saying
that it's not true. It doesn't make you look good
to say, Hey, they're having sex parties in Congress. I
need you to know these folks have been compromised. You
(07:09):
need to understand these folks have been compromised anyway. Anyway,
just give this a listen.
Speaker 10 (07:16):
People that members of Congress are sleeping with, either legally
or not, are employed by forces that want to control
members of Congress.
Speaker 6 (07:24):
That's what they used to do. And now I'm pretty
sure you know. I knew of instances where that happened
when I was in the legislature. And now they do
it for the employment agencies. Through employment agencies, I mean
just I mean they employ them. So what I'm saying
they employ them? Yeah?
Speaker 10 (07:41):
No, I mean I know a bunch of members of
Congress I can right off the top of my head
I can think of with spouses in this or that.
Speaker 6 (07:48):
And they might be incredibly qualified. But the reality is
America's not buying that. Nobody should. But again, twelve percent
of the population votes, this is what you get.
Speaker 10 (07:58):
I have noticed, just having spent my life in DC,
that people's personal lives are getting weirder in the Congress.
Speaker 7 (08:04):
Have you noticed that?
Speaker 10 (08:04):
Without without implicating anyone by name, I don't think I'm
imagining this. It's not just sleeping with your schedule or
it's weirder than that. Now, have you noticed that I try.
Speaker 6 (08:13):
To stay in my office as much as possible at
of it.
Speaker 10 (08:15):
Well, I just want to say, for the record, I
never heard of anybody participating in an orgy in Washington
in my entire life, and I've heard a lot about it.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
Allow me to introduce myself.
Speaker 11 (08:26):
My name is Mitch Michael Berry Genius.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
So this was a couple of weeks ago, and I
can't get this interview out of my head. It was
it was Katie Porter, gubernatorial candidate in California, and she
was on something called Inside California Politics. And there there
had been a couple of videos that I think there'd
only been two at that point that had dropped, uh,
(08:52):
the one of her berating the reporter, the other of
her severely berating the uh, the woman who works for her,
And it was it was quite a window into her
dark soul. How she how she spoke to this woman.
(09:13):
I mean, wow, this was really really nasty stuff, and
shockingly so. And what's amazing is she's gone from presenting
herself as this, you know, wonderful, decent, kind person to
(09:35):
now having been exposed, and it makes everything she says
make more sense. And and by the way, it's always
the case these lefties talk about I just care about people. No,
you don't.
Speaker 12 (09:54):
You do.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
You care about criminals, not victims. And by the way,
you know the old Adam Smith line, kindness to the
criminal is cruelty to the victim, and that should be
on the desk of every judge. I should have to
stare at that because they all have this Susan Sarendon.
(10:17):
You know, they want to have a conjugal visit with
some guy on death row before he's going to be
smoked the next day, because they he's just he just
did the best with what he could. He didn't have
any opportunities. Well, you know what, same was true of
the victim. Victim was doing the best he could with
his life too. But it didn't stop your guy, did
(10:37):
it didn't stop your guy from doing a terrible thing,
did it?
Speaker 13 (10:40):
Should California voters feel confident that there aren't any more
Katie Porter videos out there.
Speaker 12 (10:48):
Well, what I know is that I could have done
better in those moments. I'm going to be focused on
earning their votes and earning their trust. That's true in
every election. I've only ever had tough elections, So I'm
absolutely that I'm going to have to continue to show
them I'm going to have to answer every question. I'm
glad I got to continue that interview and finish that
interview and answer all her questions. And that's what I'm
going to continue to do to show Californians not only
(11:11):
that I understand their problems, but that I have the
will and the strength of character to actually get something
done about them.
Speaker 13 (11:18):
But not just the CBS interview, the interview with the staffer.
Can voters be confident that there won't be another one
of those videos that's going to come to light?
Speaker 12 (11:27):
What I do know is that I could have done
better in that situation.
Speaker 14 (11:30):
That's not a no.
Speaker 13 (11:31):
So is there potentially another video that we're going to see?
Speaker 12 (11:34):
Nikki, I'm going to be honest with you. I know
that that video and that video was several years ago,
as you know, and I apologize to the staffer that's
super important to me, and will continue to try to
hold myself to do better. That's what I can promise.
Speaker 13 (11:50):
But not that there's not going to be any more videos,
because that's what people are wondering. Are we going to
see something.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Else like that?
Speaker 12 (11:58):
I can tell you what I've told you, which is
that I am taking responsibility for this situation, and I'm
also not going to back down from fighting back for California,
from being tough. I don't think this is a moment
where the same old, same old is going to cut it.
But that doesn't change the fact that what I did
to that stuff her was wrong. I've acknowledged it to
(12:19):
her in that moment, and I'm acknowledging it now.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
So I've had this in my stack for a little bit.
It's the last week or two. But Gavin Newsom in
California made the statement that Elon Musk and Joe Rogan
left California because California has a progressive tax and not
a regressive tax like Texas and Florida. So he admits,
(12:45):
he admits that he taxed these two individuals out of
residing in a place with beautiful weather, that people at
some point have had enough, and that he has pushed
past that point. Elon is a major employer, and you
(13:07):
drove him out of your state. You know how hard
that was to get him to leave California with its
wonderful weather, but he did it because it was that bad.
And Joe Rogan, I think he was very happy in California,
and you drove him out as well and loads more. No,
(13:28):
here's the here's the line.
Speaker 15 (13:30):
California is a progressive tax structure.
Speaker 16 (13:32):
That's the real reason these a lot of these folks
left right, come on, let's have this conversation. They don't
like progressive packs, they like regressive tax policy. Where's Rogan
lived in one of the most regressive tax states in
America that tax poor people more. Poor people are taxed
more than the richest one percent in Texas, places like Florida.
(13:54):
That's what they celebrate. They promoted they are high tax states,
but not for them. You can't claim California as a
high tax state, high tax for who the one percent
progressive tax state. Regressive taxes persist in these red states,
particularly as large red states, and I think that is
(14:15):
a state of mind that also is something that I
believe in and needs to be promoted in relationship to
your question around wealth and income inequality. And I'll tell
you it was interesting I had on my podcast Steve
Bannon who was making a case. He didn't say the
word California, but he sure as hell sounded like someone
making the case for California's tax policy. Again, the same
(14:39):
policy that Elon Musk and Rogan and all these guys
to cry and criticize.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
So Fauci comes up a fair amount these days.
Speaker 10 (14:51):
Robert F.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Kennedy Junior keeps bringing him up. And I came across
this audio that was in my files from a while back.
It's a flashback to the eighties, and this is Anthony
Fauci saying, you know, because he's doctor Fauci trusts the science.
He's the science that children can get AIDS simply by
(15:16):
being near someone. Well, as you know, this isn't true.
But what's important here is that he's just lying. He
lies about so many things. I do trust the science,
he's not the science.
Speaker 17 (15:37):
Starting to see as we're seeing virtually as the months
go by, other groups that can be involved, and seeing
it in children is really quite disturbing. Let me say,
other close contact.
Speaker 4 (15:48):
Give me some examples.
Speaker 17 (15:49):
Well, for example, if the close contact of a child
is a household contact, perhaps there will be a certain
number of cases an individual who are just living with
and in close contact with someone of AIDS who are
risk of AIDES, who does not necessarily have to have
intimate sexual contact or share a needle, but just the
ordinary close contact that one sees.
Speaker 15 (16:10):
Jackie Jack a crash that killed Congresswoman Jack.
Speaker 12 (16:15):
You or.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
You've probably figured out. We over prepare for the show
with more stories than we can ever get to and usually,
you know, stuff gets left on the cutting room floor,
and that's fine, you move on. It's not relevant anymore.
But sometimes as I'm going through my stack, used to
(16:40):
love to hear Rush talk about his stack, and then
he would take his his pages, he would pop them
on the desk, and I don't I don't know why,
but I loved everything he did. But that's one of
the things that that I think of sometimes when I
look at the stack of documents that I print everything
out and and that's, you know what, all the stuff
(17:02):
our team has prepared. But I came across something that
I gave it a listen again, and I noticed something
that I want you to pay close attention to. See
the prosecution of Tish, James Big Tish, and the fact
(17:23):
that the Democrats, the indictment of Jim Comey. The Democrats
engaged in a weaponized Department of Justice, thirty four indictments
they brought against Donald Trump. They dragged him to court
after court after court after court for nothing. And now
(17:46):
and now they're losing their mind. They didn't they they
cheered on, they danced on Donald Trump's grave, and now
they know, they know that what they did. When you
go for the king, you better take him out when
they tried, and they know that he is the one man.
(18:09):
There's no other Republicans that would He is the one
man with his boot on their throat that is going
to step down. He is going to crush them and
he does not care whether that upsets people, the teeth
gnashing and lamentations, he does not care. It's going to
be justice and he's going to do it and he's
not going to take the high road. He is going
(18:31):
to take them out. So with that in mind, I
think about the people whose names keep coming up again
and again and again as being engaged in wrongdoing. And
of course you've got Hillary Clinton, we know that, But
(18:51):
there's Barack Obama and the idea that Obama was committing crimes,
high crimes at the highest level, the broadest scope, the
biggest crimes, literally undermining democracy. But of course why wouldn't
(19:15):
he be because we go back to the inimitable words
of Rush Limbaugh. Whatever they're accusing you of doing, they
are doing. Isn't that amazing? Isn't that amazing how that works?
So Barack Obama went on I guess the final podcast
(19:38):
of WTF with Mark Marin. I don't like Mark Maren.
I don't think he's funny as a comedian, and he's
angry liberal who lives I think in Los Angeles. But
they're big buddies. So Obama goes on his podcast and
I don't want you. You can listen to the words,
but I just want you to listen carefully to the tone.
(20:00):
This is a very different Barack Obama, and I submit
he is scared to death because he more than Trump,
more than anyone, He knows what all he's done. He
just doesn't know what all they know of what he's done,
(20:22):
and he knows there's a good chance they're going to
find out a lot of it. So just listen to
his tone as much as his words.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
We don't want, you know, kangaroo courts and trumped up charges.
That's what happens in other places that we used to
scold yeah for doing that. You know, we want like
our court system and our Justice Department and our prosecutors
to be and our FBI to be just playing things
(20:49):
straight and looking at the facts and not meddling in
politics the way the way we've seen later lately. And
I think if enough people start not not not just
being in a fetal position, but also not being just
not worrying about it and detach and detached from it,
(21:11):
but but being vigilant but also saying, you know what
we Yeah, we can stand up to this. You know,
we can call it like we see it. Yeah, you know,
you know we need we need people who have whatever
platforms they have to be able to say no, that's
(21:33):
not who we are, and to be willing to get
attacked on x by whoever for doing that. And it's
not easy, Yeah, because sometimes you fear for your life.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
That's four oh two, right is that for? Yeah, that's
four o two. This one's four oh three. This is
Barack Obama also on the podcast with Mark Maron, and
I want you to see what he's doing. He's trying
to position himself to Middle America as more likable. So mister,
you know, put on your boots, get out in the street, protest,
(22:10):
rise up violence. Now. He says that he and Michelle
offend the left because they have such old fashioned values,
you know, the people on the left. They don't like
that we're so traditional. Are you gonna make me say it?
You are the least traditional couple ever in the White House.
(22:32):
Just listen to this.
Speaker 4 (22:34):
So much of our culture now, so much of what
we teach our kids is geared around buying stuff and
having stuff and posting it on Instagram and then winning.
To right, what winning is now defined solely by material goods,
(22:59):
how much you got, and to some degree fame. That's
become another currency, right. And I do think part of
what our conversation needs to be more about is, and
it used to come out of the church or the
stories we told our kids, was this sense of, oh,
(23:19):
you know what, character matters, Honesty matters, community and family
and loyalty and kindness matters. Those are the stories that
that's part of our political project, right, is reaffirming that stuff.
(23:45):
I think you were asking how I navigated some of
these conflicts, and I'd get attacked from the right and
I'd get attacked from the left. One way I did
that was trying to tell people what I really thought.
But you know the other thing was I actually had
(24:05):
some pretty old fashioned values. Even if I had you know,
progressive or new fangled ideas. If I talked about trans issues,
I wasn't talking to down to people and saying, oh,
you're a bigot. I'd say, you know what, it's tough
(24:28):
enough being a teenager. Let's treat all kids decently. Why
would we want to see kids bullied or shamed? Why
would we want to do that? Why wouldn't we want
to just you know what if it was our kid? Right?
And I think spending more time talking about why those
(24:51):
values are important, not being cynical about them, not being
ironic about it, but saying no, no, that stuff matters,
that would make a difference.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
For Michael Berry shows is just market.
Speaker 15 (25:05):
We have.
Speaker 11 (25:05):
According to the best scientists in the world, we have
twelve years. What they're telling us is if we don't
get our act together in the next seven or eight years.
Is that the scientists are telling us that if we
don't act incredibly boldly within the next six seven years.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
Or confronting climate change before it is too late, within
the ten years that we have left to us, the.
Speaker 16 (25:31):
World is going to end in twelve years if we
don't address climate change.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
How damn you?
Speaker 15 (25:37):
It's you know that movie The Day after Tomorrow it's today.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
You have stolen my dreams.
Speaker 3 (25:43):
Science tells us we have nine years.
Speaker 15 (25:47):
There will be no future for the bronx.
Speaker 4 (25:50):
There will be no livable future for generations.
Speaker 16 (25:55):
This is a climate dam emergency.
Speaker 11 (25:57):
Iowa, Nebraska, brod swats, swats of the Midwest.
Speaker 9 (26:01):
Are drowning right now underwater. Farms, towns that will never
be recovered and never come back.
Speaker 11 (26:09):
We are talking about severe droughts which will prevent farmers
in the Midwest from going to food that we need.
We're talking about extreme weather disturbances.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
The science is clear.
Speaker 11 (26:20):
What this moment is about, Joe, is that the scientists
are telling us they underestimated the severity of the crisis.
Speaker 16 (26:28):
In the ten years we have left to us, as
the science and scientists tell us, is.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
The answer we need.
Speaker 15 (26:34):
We need other industries to transition to get to ultimately
a complete.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
Zero emissions by twenty twenty five.
Speaker 11 (26:43):
We need to cut global emissions in half by twenty thirty.
It's not a question of re entering the Paris of Court.
That's fine.
Speaker 8 (26:52):
Who cans and it's been nobody knows how to get
rid of them, to know how to get.
Speaker 5 (26:58):
Cows to stuff far exactly.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
I don't think how much time do we have?
Speaker 7 (27:03):
How much time does the human rights have?
Speaker 14 (27:05):
I can't imagine there will be a human on the
planet in ten years.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
We are in the beginning of a mass extinction.
Speaker 11 (27:11):
If the laugh at Jodan and missing the point, this
is an existential crisis bingo.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
That is a combination montage compilation of Democrats warning that
we're running out of time because of climate change, which
they've always done. You see, if you have a general
academic conversation about climate change, then they can't get you
to spend a lot of money and close down our
companies overnight. But if they tell you got to do
(27:40):
it right now, act fast, while supplies last, this offer
won't last, then you'll do it right now right. Everything
is about getting you to act immediately while supplies last.
This won't last today only right. So that's what they're
doing with climate change, because they're selling that too. Right.
Is author and scientist Greg Brayden talking about climate change that, yeah,
(28:05):
climate change is real, but it's not created by humans.
Speaker 15 (28:09):
Climate change. As a geologist, I'm very passionate about this.
You believe in it. Climate change is a fact I've
been talking about. Kay No I've been talking about since
nineteen seventy nine. It's also a fact that humans are
not causing it. Humans are not causing it, and the
real scientists know this. It's not the cows do. I'll
just I'll tell you. I mean, Nason knows this. NASA
(28:30):
knows that over ninety percent of the CO two there
is an increase in CO two. It's just I made
a statement and I want to I just want to
justify this. Is there more CO two in the atmosphere
now than there was ten years, twenty fifty, one hundred
years ago. The answer is absolutely yes. Is the bad thing?
The answer is no. Is it the most we've ever had?
We're right about four hundred and forty parts per million
(28:52):
right now. In geologic history, we're looking Cretaceous over a
one thousand, or the Jurassic over a thousand parts per million,
Triassic two thousand heart's per million. The earth was lush,
the earth was green, life was abundant during that time.
And what we see in geologic history, and this is
fascinating me. There are times when CO two levels are
high and the temperatures are low, and times when just
(29:15):
the oppose is happening it's not necessarily a one to
one correlation. Where's the CO two coming from? Massa nose
I've I've got a bunch of videos on this. Over
ninety percent of the CO two is coming from the
oceans warming warm water, holds less gas. Here's the kicker.
The oceans are warming from underneath, not from the top.
(29:37):
If it was from the CO two on the top,
you know the warming of the air, it would be
coming from the top. It's warming. The glaciers are melting
from underneath. The CO two is coming. The oceans are
warming from underneath from tectonic processes that happened about every
twelve five hundred years that people just don't want to
talk about. It is a tectonic process that begins in
(29:59):
the core, translates perturbations into the mantle, into the crust.
The weak areas the crust, you see more tectonic activity,
more volcanic activity.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
Energy Secretary Chris Wright was on CBS Mornings when he
said the Department of Energy is returning thirteen billion dollars
of Biden's green new scam to the Treasury, thirteen billion dollars.
(30:32):
There is so much waste built in so many of
your dollars that have been squandered. And by the way,
they don't take this money out and set on fire.
They give it to their donor groups. That's how they
raise money. They raise money because they give money. So
(30:53):
that's you know, these people don't care about the Green
New Deal. They just care about getting rich and they'll
give some of it back. It's a kickback schemes. That's
what our government has become. A kickback skin.
Speaker 18 (31:02):
My Department of Energy has announced we're going to return
over thirteen billion dollars to the taxpayers. That's over one
hundred dollars per American family. This was money passed and
slated to be energy subsidies, but we need the subsidies
have been corrosive because they've not only cost taxpayer money,
but then they've led to more expensive electricity bills.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
We lose twice. So we're doing everything we can.
Speaker 18 (31:25):
In the Trump administration to stop the rise in energy prices.
Speaker 14 (31:28):
So money that was going to go to green energy,
to subsidize green energy is instead going back to the Treasury.
Speaker 4 (31:34):
Yes, so.
Speaker 14 (31:37):
I thought that green energy was going to be put
in all the above, like a part of the energy
dominance platform, is this take it off the table.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
What's going on with green energy?
Speaker 18 (31:49):
And again I don't agree with the name, but with
solar and wind and electric vehicles, which is where most
of the money has gone. They've just barely gotten the
three percent of United States energy in two and a
half percent of global energy. So it's just been a
massive malinvestment. We've made electricity more expensive, We've pushed industries
and jobs out of our country. Haven't moved the needle
(32:10):
on global greenhouse gas emissions. It has been As the
President said, I think he rightfully characterizes it as a scam.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
I used to love when Rush would play montages of
the leftist media reading the Democrat talking points. It really
drove home the point. That's where I first learned that
none of what you hear in the media is authentic.
They're all reading from literal talking points, and Rush would
show it and his team laid that out for you
(32:41):
so beautifully. Well you're seeing that now now that Antifa
has been declared a terrorist organization. First the Democrats said, no,
don't declare I'm a terrorist organization. And then they realized, oh,
the public is for this. The public's is very much before,
so then they they changed no, no, they're not terrorists too. Oh,
we don't know who they are. And now the latest
(33:04):
incarnation is I don't even think Antifa exists. It's not
even a thing. Really, that's that's quite the movement. What's
what's the old line? There's many a slip TwixT the
cup and the lip. That's a that's a real quick
movement in very short order. Anyway, here's the compilation.
Speaker 3 (33:22):
There's no Antifa.
Speaker 2 (33:23):
This is an entirely imaginary organization. There is not an
Antifa like I.
Speaker 10 (33:27):
Don't even know what antipa is.
Speaker 4 (33:29):
There is no group.
Speaker 14 (33:30):
It's not even like far right groups like the Proud
Boys and oath Keepers.
Speaker 8 (33:33):
Compared to right wing extremists, Antifa linked violence is rare
and limited.
Speaker 15 (33:36):
It isn't an organization.
Speaker 16 (33:38):
It is a it is a in many ways mythology.
Speaker 12 (33:41):
It's not like the Proud Boys or the oath Keepers.
Speaker 9 (33:44):
You know, they're defined terrorist organizations with leadership that let
that you know, leads violence.
Speaker 15 (33:52):
It's not a highly organized movement. It's a moniker. It's
it's it's it's not a unified group like the Proud Boys,
m
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Michael Very Show is on the air.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
Here is Johnny.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
I am the danger. I am the one who knocks.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
We'll do it lit, and we'll do it live.
Speaker 5 (00:28):
Last year I spent more money on spilled liquor in
fires from one side of this world to the other
than you may. You're talking to the rolics wearing diamond
ring wearing jet stealing, whoa wheeling, daling livings in right
jet flying sun of a gun, and I'm having a
hard time. Hold me Alegators doing this.
Speaker 3 (00:50):
Book said this one aful She can tell that away.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
That I was bad at the bowl, add of the bowl,
bad of the bowl, bad of the bowl.
Speaker 6 (01:14):
My dog.
Speaker 7 (01:15):
Now that'll be the end of it. I will not
look for you. I will not pursue you, but if
you don't I will look for you. I will find
you and I will kill you.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
A minute.
Speaker 3 (01:31):
That I'm bad of the bone, bad of the bowl, bad.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
The by ray, what again, I tell you, I double again.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
Folks, we have a sighting as rare as Bigfoot or
a yetty not the cooler. One time Beaver Applin, the
owner of Bucky, sent me a YETI cooler with loaded
up with Bucky's stuff inside, and because I'm such a
nice guy, I gave it all to him. And so
(02:12):
now he rummages through the stuff I get in the
mail to see what he can have because I don't
want to receive anything. So he's like, you don't want that, No,
I don't, you can have it. So anyway, he's I
guess he probably needs another cooler. From the sounds of it. Anyway,
this is a sighting of something as rare as Bigfoot
or a Yeti or the lock Nest Monster, an abominable snowman.
(02:38):
What I'm about to play for you is as rare
as anything I've seen in twenty years of doing this
radio program. ABC News in Milwaukee was reporting on the
police shooting of a young black man, as the news
often does. But what is unusual and commendable and gives
me hope is that the family of the young black
(03:02):
man who was shot and killed by an officer that
once they reviewed the tape and saw that their son
had absolutely provoked this whole thing and the officer was
completely in the right, they commended the officer. They didn't
play victim. They didn't call Ben Crump they said, Yah,
(03:24):
you can't do what our boy did. You won't survive.
You can't pull a gun on a cop because he
pulls you over on a parking ticket. And this is
amazing the fact that his family did this. I guess
it's sad that we have to make such a big
(03:44):
deal that they did it because it's not what typically happens. Nevertheless,
it makes me quite happy, I must say.
Speaker 8 (03:53):
Once we got an opportunity to actually see the video,
there weren't many questions.
Speaker 9 (03:57):
One day after an off duty Milwaukee police officer shot
and killed twenty six year old Elijah Wilkes, Wilkes's family
and their attorney went before the cameras.
Speaker 8 (04:09):
I don't think I've ever come before and did a
press conference and said this, but we will acknowledge that
we do believe that this officer involved shooting was justified.
He made a decision that he should not have made,
and that's just something we had to live with.
Speaker 9 (04:24):
Milwaukee Police showing Wilkes's mother, an attorney b Ivory Lamar
dash camera video from that off duty officer's personal vehicle Friday,
showing the moments before Wilkes's death. It all started with
a minor car accident near forty ninth and Mill Road
Thursday morning.
Speaker 8 (04:39):
He kind of aggressively maneuvered into this left lane and
essentially cut off the off duty officer.
Speaker 9 (04:47):
At that point, the pair pulled over and then, describing
the video, Lamar says, Wilkes got out of the car
and pulled a gun.
Speaker 8 (04:53):
He does slapped the off duty officer with the firearm,
after which the video does depict Eliza pointing the firearm
at the off duty officer. The off duty officer did
respond what we believe in the court is with his
training and did fire off several shots.
Speaker 9 (05:12):
The family's attorney says it's unclear to him if Wilkes
ever shot his gun.
Speaker 8 (05:17):
I don't recall specifically seeing an exchange of gunfire. I'm
not saying it didn't happen, but I did see him
point the gun in the officers the wrection for sure.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
The only that's my only, my only brother.
Speaker 8 (05:34):
Oh my brother was well.
Speaker 9 (05:35):
I got Wilkes's family grieving but recognizing the consequences of
his decision.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
I love the format that Tucker Crlson has, where instead
of a requirement to be in the same place, same
chair every night, he can do these long form interviews,
and I think he's done a really good job with
some of them and digging deep in people that may
(06:01):
not be a newsmaker that day, but are worthy of
some time. Steve Toathe in Houston running against Dan Crenshaw
in Congressional District two, he had a really good sit
down with him. He had a conversation with a fellow
named Tim Burchett. I'd never heard of this guy until
the last couple of years, but he's a Republican from Tennessee,
(06:24):
and he brings up what this keeps coming up again
and again, that these members of Congress are engaged in
sex parties orgies, and that what happens is that this
is being set up by people who want to be
able to blackmail them. Now, if it's not true, it's
(06:48):
a real weird thing for people for members to keep
saying that it is happening, and then the media doesn't
want to touch it. But why would you keep saying
that it's not true. It doesn't make you look good
to say, Hey, they're having sex parties in Congress. I
need you to know these folks have been compromised. You
(07:09):
need to understand these folks have been compromised anyway. Anyway,
just give this a listen.
Speaker 10 (07:16):
People that members of Congress are sleeping with, either legally
or not, are employed by forces that want to control
members of Congress.
Speaker 6 (07:24):
That's what they used to do. And now I'm pretty
sure you know. I knew of instances where that happened
when I was in the legislature. And now they do
it for the employment agencies. Through employment agencies, I mean
just I mean they employ them. So what I'm saying
they employ them? Yeah?
Speaker 10 (07:41):
No, I mean I know a bunch of members of
Congress I can right off the top of my head
I can think of with spouses in this or that.
Speaker 6 (07:48):
And they might be incredibly qualified. But the reality is
America's not buying that. Nobody should. But again, twelve percent
of the population votes, this is what you get.
Speaker 10 (07:58):
I have noticed, just having spent my life in DC,
that people's personal lives are getting weirder in the Congress.
Speaker 7 (08:04):
Have you noticed that?
Speaker 10 (08:04):
Without without implicating anyone by name, I don't think I'm
imagining this. It's not just sleeping with your schedule or
it's weirder than that. Now, have you noticed that I try.
Speaker 6 (08:13):
To stay in my office as much as possible at
of it.
Speaker 10 (08:15):
Well, I just want to say, for the record, I
never heard of anybody participating in an orgy in Washington
in my entire life, and I've heard a lot about it.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
Allow me to introduce myself.
Speaker 11 (08:26):
My name is Mitch Michael Berry Genius.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
So this was a couple of weeks ago, and I
can't get this interview out of my head. It was
it was Katie Porter, gubernatorial candidate in California, and she
was on something called Inside California Politics. And there there
had been a couple of videos that I think there'd
only been two at that point that had dropped, uh,
(08:52):
the one of her berating the reporter, the other of
her severely berating the uh, the woman who works for her,
And it was it was quite a window into her
dark soul. How she how she spoke to this woman.
(09:13):
I mean, wow, this was really really nasty stuff, and
shockingly so. And what's amazing is she's gone from presenting
herself as this, you know, wonderful, decent, kind person to
(09:35):
now having been exposed, and it makes everything she says
make more sense. And and by the way, it's always
the case these lefties talk about I just care about people. No,
you don't.
Speaker 12 (09:54):
You do.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
You care about criminals, not victims. And by the way,
you know the old Adam Smith line, kindness to the
criminal is cruelty to the victim, and that should be
on the desk of every judge. I should have to
stare at that because they all have this Susan Sarendon.
(10:17):
You know, they want to have a conjugal visit with
some guy on death row before he's going to be
smoked the next day, because they he's just he just
did the best with what he could. He didn't have
any opportunities. Well, you know what, same was true of
the victim. Victim was doing the best he could with
his life too. But it didn't stop your guy, did
(10:37):
it didn't stop your guy from doing a terrible thing,
did it?
Speaker 13 (10:40):
Should California voters feel confident that there aren't any more
Katie Porter videos out there.
Speaker 12 (10:48):
Well, what I know is that I could have done
better in those moments. I'm going to be focused on
earning their votes and earning their trust. That's true in
every election. I've only ever had tough elections, So I'm
absolutely that I'm going to have to continue to show
them I'm going to have to answer every question. I'm
glad I got to continue that interview and finish that
interview and answer all her questions. And that's what I'm
going to continue to do to show Californians not only
(11:11):
that I understand their problems, but that I have the
will and the strength of character to actually get something
done about them.
Speaker 13 (11:18):
But not just the CBS interview, the interview with the staffer.
Can voters be confident that there won't be another one
of those videos that's going to come to light?
Speaker 12 (11:27):
What I do know is that I could have done
better in that situation.
Speaker 14 (11:30):
That's not a no.
Speaker 13 (11:31):
So is there potentially another video that we're going to see?
Speaker 12 (11:34):
Nikki, I'm going to be honest with you. I know
that that video and that video was several years ago,
as you know, and I apologize to the staffer that's
super important to me, and will continue to try to
hold myself to do better. That's what I can promise.
Speaker 13 (11:50):
But not that there's not going to be any more videos,
because that's what people are wondering. Are we going to
see something.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Else like that?
Speaker 12 (11:58):
I can tell you what I've told you, which is
that I am taking responsibility for this situation, and I'm
also not going to back down from fighting back for California,
from being tough. I don't think this is a moment
where the same old, same old is going to cut it.
But that doesn't change the fact that what I did
to that stuff her was wrong. I've acknowledged it to
(12:19):
her in that moment, and I'm acknowledging it now.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
So I've had this in my stack for a little bit.
It's the last week or two. But Gavin Newsom in
California made the statement that Elon Musk and Joe Rogan
left California because California has a progressive tax and not
a regressive tax like Texas and Florida. So he admits,
(12:45):
he admits that he taxed these two individuals out of
residing in a place with beautiful weather, that people at
some point have had enough, and that he has pushed
past that point. Elon is a major employer, and you
(13:07):
drove him out of your state. You know how hard
that was to get him to leave California with its
wonderful weather, but he did it because it was that bad.
And Joe Rogan, I think he was very happy in California,
and you drove him out as well and loads more. No,
(13:28):
here's the here's the line.
Speaker 15 (13:30):
California is a progressive tax structure.
Speaker 16 (13:32):
That's the real reason these a lot of these folks
left right, come on, let's have this conversation. They don't
like progressive packs, they like regressive tax policy. Where's Rogan
lived in one of the most regressive tax states in
America that tax poor people more. Poor people are taxed
more than the richest one percent in Texas, places like Florida.
(13:54):
That's what they celebrate. They promoted they are high tax states,
but not for them. You can't claim California as a
high tax state, high tax for who the one percent
progressive tax state. Regressive taxes persist in these red states,
particularly as large red states, and I think that is
(14:15):
a state of mind that also is something that I
believe in and needs to be promoted in relationship to
your question around wealth and income inequality. And I'll tell
you it was interesting I had on my podcast Steve
Bannon who was making a case. He didn't say the
word California, but he sure as hell sounded like someone
making the case for California's tax policy. Again, the same
(14:39):
policy that Elon Musk and Rogan and all these guys
to cry and criticize.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
So Fauci comes up a fair amount these days.
Speaker 10 (14:51):
Robert F.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Kennedy Junior keeps bringing him up. And I came across
this audio that was in my files from a while back.
It's a flashback to the eighties, and this is Anthony
Fauci saying, you know, because he's doctor Fauci trusts the science.
He's the science that children can get AIDS simply by
(15:16):
being near someone. Well, as you know, this isn't true.
But what's important here is that he's just lying. He
lies about so many things. I do trust the science,
he's not the science.
Speaker 17 (15:37):
Starting to see as we're seeing virtually as the months
go by, other groups that can be involved, and seeing
it in children is really quite disturbing. Let me say,
other close contact.
Speaker 4 (15:48):
Give me some examples.
Speaker 17 (15:49):
Well, for example, if the close contact of a child
is a household contact, perhaps there will be a certain
number of cases an individual who are just living with
and in close contact with someone of AIDS who are
risk of AIDES, who does not necessarily have to have
intimate sexual contact or share a needle, but just the
ordinary close contact that one sees.
Speaker 15 (16:10):
Jackie Jack a crash that killed Congresswoman Jack.
Speaker 12 (16:15):
You or.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
You've probably figured out. We over prepare for the show
with more stories than we can ever get to and usually,
you know, stuff gets left on the cutting room floor,
and that's fine, you move on. It's not relevant anymore.
But sometimes as I'm going through my stack, used to
(16:40):
love to hear Rush talk about his stack, and then
he would take his his pages, he would pop them
on the desk, and I don't I don't know why,
but I loved everything he did. But that's one of
the things that that I think of sometimes when I
look at the stack of documents that I print everything
out and and that's, you know what, all the stuff
(17:02):
our team has prepared. But I came across something that
I gave it a listen again, and I noticed something
that I want you to pay close attention to. See
the prosecution of Tish, James Big Tish, and the fact
(17:23):
that the Democrats, the indictment of Jim Comey. The Democrats
engaged in a weaponized Department of Justice, thirty four indictments
they brought against Donald Trump. They dragged him to court
after court after court after court for nothing. And now
(17:46):
and now they're losing their mind. They didn't they they
cheered on, they danced on Donald Trump's grave, and now
they know, they know that what they did. When you
go for the king, you better take him out when
they tried, and they know that he is the one man.
(18:09):
There's no other Republicans that would He is the one
man with his boot on their throat that is going
to step down. He is going to crush them and
he does not care whether that upsets people, the teeth
gnashing and lamentations, he does not care. It's going to
be justice and he's going to do it and he's
not going to take the high road. He is going
(18:31):
to take them out. So with that in mind, I
think about the people whose names keep coming up again
and again and again as being engaged in wrongdoing. And
of course you've got Hillary Clinton, we know that, But
(18:51):
there's Barack Obama and the idea that Obama was committing crimes,
high crimes at the highest level, the broadest scope, the
biggest crimes, literally undermining democracy. But of course why wouldn't
(19:15):
he be because we go back to the inimitable words
of Rush Limbaugh. Whatever they're accusing you of doing, they
are doing. Isn't that amazing? Isn't that amazing how that works?
So Barack Obama went on I guess the final podcast
(19:38):
of WTF with Mark Marin. I don't like Mark Maren.
I don't think he's funny as a comedian, and he's
angry liberal who lives I think in Los Angeles. But
they're big buddies. So Obama goes on his podcast and
I don't want you. You can listen to the words,
but I just want you to listen carefully to the tone.
(20:00):
This is a very different Barack Obama, and I submit
he is scared to death because he more than Trump,
more than anyone, He knows what all he's done. He
just doesn't know what all they know of what he's done,
(20:22):
and he knows there's a good chance they're going to
find out a lot of it. So just listen to
his tone as much as his words.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
We don't want, you know, kangaroo courts and trumped up charges.
That's what happens in other places that we used to
scold yeah for doing that. You know, we want like
our court system and our Justice Department and our prosecutors
to be and our FBI to be just playing things
(20:49):
straight and looking at the facts and not meddling in
politics the way the way we've seen later lately. And
I think if enough people start not not not just
being in a fetal position, but also not being just
not worrying about it and detach and detached from it,
(21:11):
but but being vigilant but also saying, you know what
we Yeah, we can stand up to this. You know,
we can call it like we see it. Yeah, you know,
you know we need we need people who have whatever
platforms they have to be able to say no, that's
(21:33):
not who we are, and to be willing to get
attacked on x by whoever for doing that. And it's
not easy, Yeah, because sometimes you fear for your life.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
That's four oh two, right is that for? Yeah, that's
four o two. This one's four oh three. This is
Barack Obama also on the podcast with Mark Maron, and
I want you to see what he's doing. He's trying
to position himself to Middle America as more likable. So mister,
you know, put on your boots, get out in the street, protest,
(22:10):
rise up violence. Now. He says that he and Michelle
offend the left because they have such old fashioned values,
you know, the people on the left. They don't like
that we're so traditional. Are you gonna make me say it?
You are the least traditional couple ever in the White House.
(22:32):
Just listen to this.
Speaker 4 (22:34):
So much of our culture now, so much of what
we teach our kids is geared around buying stuff and
having stuff and posting it on Instagram and then winning.
To right, what winning is now defined solely by material goods,
(22:59):
how much you got, and to some degree fame. That's
become another currency, right. And I do think part of
what our conversation needs to be more about is, and
it used to come out of the church or the
stories we told our kids, was this sense of, oh,
(23:19):
you know what, character matters, Honesty matters, community and family
and loyalty and kindness matters. Those are the stories that
that's part of our political project, right, is reaffirming that stuff.
(23:45):
I think you were asking how I navigated some of
these conflicts, and I'd get attacked from the right and
I'd get attacked from the left. One way I did
that was trying to tell people what I really thought.
But you know the other thing was I actually had
(24:05):
some pretty old fashioned values. Even if I had you know,
progressive or new fangled ideas. If I talked about trans issues,
I wasn't talking to down to people and saying, oh,
you're a bigot. I'd say, you know what, it's tough
(24:28):
enough being a teenager. Let's treat all kids decently. Why
would we want to see kids bullied or shamed? Why
would we want to do that? Why wouldn't we want
to just you know what if it was our kid? Right?
And I think spending more time talking about why those
(24:51):
values are important, not being cynical about them, not being
ironic about it, but saying no, no, that stuff matters,
that would make a difference.
Speaker 2 (25:01):
For Michael Berry shows is just market.
Speaker 15 (25:05):
We have.
Speaker 11 (25:05):
According to the best scientists in the world, we have
twelve years. What they're telling us is if we don't
get our act together in the next seven or eight years.
Is that the scientists are telling us that if we
don't act incredibly boldly within the next six seven years.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
Or confronting climate change before it is too late, within
the ten years that we have left to us, the.
Speaker 16 (25:31):
World is going to end in twelve years if we
don't address climate change.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
How damn you?
Speaker 15 (25:37):
It's you know that movie The Day after Tomorrow it's today.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
You have stolen my dreams.
Speaker 3 (25:43):
Science tells us we have nine years.
Speaker 15 (25:47):
There will be no future for the bronx.
Speaker 4 (25:50):
There will be no livable future for generations.
Speaker 16 (25:55):
This is a climate dam emergency.
Speaker 11 (25:57):
Iowa, Nebraska, brod swats, swats of the Midwest.
Speaker 9 (26:01):
Are drowning right now underwater. Farms, towns that will never
be recovered and never come back.
Speaker 11 (26:09):
We are talking about severe droughts which will prevent farmers
in the Midwest from going to food that we need.
We're talking about extreme weather disturbances.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
The science is clear.
Speaker 11 (26:20):
What this moment is about, Joe, is that the scientists
are telling us they underestimated the severity of the crisis.
Speaker 16 (26:28):
In the ten years we have left to us, as
the science and scientists tell us, is.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
The answer we need.
Speaker 15 (26:34):
We need other industries to transition to get to ultimately
a complete.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
Zero emissions by twenty twenty five.
Speaker 11 (26:43):
We need to cut global emissions in half by twenty thirty.
It's not a question of re entering the Paris of Court.
That's fine.
Speaker 8 (26:52):
Who cans and it's been nobody knows how to get
rid of them, to know how to get.
Speaker 5 (26:58):
Cows to stuff far exactly.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
I don't think how much time do we have?
Speaker 7 (27:03):
How much time does the human rights have?
Speaker 14 (27:05):
I can't imagine there will be a human on the
planet in ten years.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
We are in the beginning of a mass extinction.
Speaker 11 (27:11):
If the laugh at Jodan and missing the point, this
is an existential crisis bingo.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
That is a combination montage compilation of Democrats warning that
we're running out of time because of climate change, which
they've always done. You see, if you have a general
academic conversation about climate change, then they can't get you
to spend a lot of money and close down our
companies overnight. But if they tell you got to do
(27:40):
it right now, act fast, while supplies last, this offer
won't last, then you'll do it right now right. Everything
is about getting you to act immediately while supplies last.
This won't last today only right. So that's what they're
doing with climate change, because they're selling that too. Right.
Is author and scientist Greg Brayden talking about climate change that, yeah,
(28:05):
climate change is real, but it's not created by humans.
Speaker 15 (28:09):
Climate change. As a geologist, I'm very passionate about this.
You believe in it. Climate change is a fact I've
been talking about. Kay No I've been talking about since
nineteen seventy nine. It's also a fact that humans are
not causing it. Humans are not causing it, and the
real scientists know this. It's not the cows do. I'll
just I'll tell you. I mean, Nason knows this. NASA
(28:30):
knows that over ninety percent of the CO two there
is an increase in CO two. It's just I made
a statement and I want to I just want to
justify this. Is there more CO two in the atmosphere
now than there was ten years, twenty fifty, one hundred
years ago. The answer is absolutely yes. Is the bad thing?
The answer is no. Is it the most we've ever had?
We're right about four hundred and forty parts per million
(28:52):
right now. In geologic history, we're looking Cretaceous over a
one thousand, or the Jurassic over a thousand parts per million,
Triassic two thousand heart's per million. The earth was lush,
the earth was green, life was abundant during that time.
And what we see in geologic history, and this is
fascinating me. There are times when CO two levels are
high and the temperatures are low, and times when just
(29:15):
the oppose is happening it's not necessarily a one to
one correlation. Where's the CO two coming from? Massa nose
I've I've got a bunch of videos on this. Over
ninety percent of the CO two is coming from the
oceans warming warm water, holds less gas. Here's the kicker.
The oceans are warming from underneath, not from the top.
(29:37):
If it was from the CO two on the top,
you know the warming of the air, it would be
coming from the top. It's warming. The glaciers are melting
from underneath. The CO two is coming. The oceans are
warming from underneath from tectonic processes that happened about every
twelve five hundred years that people just don't want to
talk about. It is a tectonic process that begins in
(29:59):
the core, translates perturbations into the mantle, into the crust.
The weak areas the crust, you see more tectonic activity,
more volcanic activity.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
Energy Secretary Chris Wright was on CBS Mornings when he
said the Department of Energy is returning thirteen billion dollars
of Biden's green new scam to the Treasury, thirteen billion dollars.
(30:32):
There is so much waste built in so many of
your dollars that have been squandered. And by the way,
they don't take this money out and set on fire.
They give it to their donor groups. That's how they
raise money. They raise money because they give money. So
(30:53):
that's you know, these people don't care about the Green
New Deal. They just care about getting rich and they'll
give some of it back. It's a kickback schemes. That's
what our government has become. A kickback skin.
Speaker 18 (31:02):
My Department of Energy has announced we're going to return
over thirteen billion dollars to the taxpayers. That's over one
hundred dollars per American family. This was money passed and
slated to be energy subsidies, but we need the subsidies
have been corrosive because they've not only cost taxpayer money,
but then they've led to more expensive electricity bills.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
We lose twice. So we're doing everything we can.
Speaker 18 (31:25):
In the Trump administration to stop the rise in energy prices.
Speaker 14 (31:28):
So money that was going to go to green energy,
to subsidize green energy is instead going back to the Treasury.
Speaker 4 (31:34):
Yes, so.
Speaker 14 (31:37):
I thought that green energy was going to be put
in all the above, like a part of the energy
dominance platform, is this take it off the table.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
What's going on with green energy?
Speaker 18 (31:49):
And again I don't agree with the name, but with
solar and wind and electric vehicles, which is where most
of the money has gone. They've just barely gotten the
three percent of United States energy in two and a
half percent of global energy. So it's just been a
massive malinvestment. We've made electricity more expensive, We've pushed industries
and jobs out of our country. Haven't moved the needle
(32:10):
on global greenhouse gas emissions. It has been As the
President said, I think he rightfully characterizes it as a scam.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
I used to love when Rush would play montages of
the leftist media reading the Democrat talking points. It really
drove home the point. That's where I first learned that
none of what you hear in the media is authentic.
They're all reading from literal talking points, and Rush would
show it and his team laid that out for you
(32:41):
so beautifully. Well you're seeing that now now that Antifa
has been declared a terrorist organization. First the Democrats said, no,
don't declare I'm a terrorist organization. And then they realized, oh,
the public is for this. The public's is very much before,
so then they they changed no, no, they're not terrorists too. Oh,
we don't know who they are. And now the latest
(33:04):
incarnation is I don't even think Antifa exists. It's not
even a thing. Really, that's that's quite the movement. What's
what's the old line? There's many a slip TwixT the
cup and the lip. That's a that's a real quick
movement in very short order. Anyway, here's the compilation.
Speaker 3 (33:22):
There's no Antifa.
Speaker 2 (33:23):
This is an entirely imaginary organization. There is not an
Antifa like I.
Speaker 10 (33:27):
Don't even know what antipa is.
Speaker 4 (33:29):
There is no group.
Speaker 14 (33:30):
It's not even like far right groups like the Proud
Boys and oath Keepers.
Speaker 8 (33:33):
Compared to right wing extremists, Antifa linked violence is rare
and limited.
Speaker 15 (33:36):
It isn't an organization.
Speaker 16 (33:38):
It is a it is a in many ways mythology.
Speaker 12 (33:41):
It's not like the Proud Boys or the oath Keepers.
Speaker 9 (33:44):
You know, they're defined terrorist organizations with leadership that let
that you know, leads violence.
Speaker 15 (33:52):
It's not a highly organized movement. It's a moniker. It's
it's it's it's not a unified group like the Proud Boys,
m
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.