Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and loud. So
Michael Varry Show is on the air. I don't saw
the wings. You saw the garage. I see the garage,
but I don't saw the garage.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
You are speaking incorrectly.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
You are more to ring the King's English.
Speaker 3 (00:28):
See see shut up.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
I think that you punch. I think you punch. I
think you're okay with you. You okay, we're punching, you.
Speaker 4 (00:37):
Know, I think, And I love Colin, and I think
towards the end he started to punch a little harder.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
But like it's there grooves.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
I mean, like this dude has to be knots over
the head, like.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Hard right, like there is no niceties with him, like
at all, Like you you go clean off on him.
Speaker 4 (00:55):
Right because we in these hot ass Texas streets, Honey,
y'all know we got governor hot wheels down there, come
on now, and the only.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
Thing hot about him is that he is a hot
ass mask, honey.
Speaker 4 (01:12):
So so yes, yes, yes, yes, twice.
Speaker 1 (01:22):
Three times.
Speaker 4 (01:33):
But the fact that you literally are going to plan
enemy attacks on a signal chat and then you don't
even know who's in the signal chat, and then y'all
gonna come at us and act like people of color
are the problem, are that women are the problem. Like baby,
you probably need a good black woman in the room
who can check you and tell you that, first of all,
you shouldn't be doing this on signal or anything else.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
But y'all still mad about Hillary's servers. That is that
what I hear? Yeah? So anyway, Literally, I.
Speaker 4 (02:04):
Don't know if like your homeboy was drunk at the
time that he was sending these messages or what, but
clearly this administration is not ready for prime time. There
has been no oppression for the white man in this country.
You'll tell me which white men were dragged out of
(02:25):
their homes.
Speaker 1 (02:26):
You'll tell me which one.
Speaker 5 (02:27):
Of them got dragged all the way across an ocean
and told that you are gonna go at work, We
are gonna seal your wives, We are gonna rape your wives.
That didn't happen. That is oppression. We didn't ask to
be here. We're not the same migrants did y'all constantly
come up against. We didn't run away from home. We
(02:49):
were stolen. So yeah, we are gonna sit here and
be offended. When you want to sit here and act
like and don't let it escape you that it is
white man on this side of the aisle telling us
people of color on this side of the aisle that
y'all are the ones being oppressed, That y'all are the
(03:09):
ones that are being harmed.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
Your wounds.
Speaker 6 (03:14):
Twice, three times.
Speaker 1 (03:19):
There's something very rich about Jasmine Crockett declaring that the
Trump administration is not ready for prime time. There is
something very rich. Indeed. You know, a democratic republic should
(03:41):
have representation from all the various groups and constituencies, and
Jasmine Crockett represents one of those that is a very
large one, and she does it well. She's not as
stupid as she cuts up and pretends to be. That's
(04:02):
a role she's playing. It comes out of a form
of the menstrual role. The menstrual role was where a
black person historically, or a white person painted in blackface
would appear to do the yes massa kind of thing,
the sort of subjugated supplicant personality that today is considered
(04:28):
so awful, But that was very popular on the stage
and eventually in the screen, and of course in literature.
Then there became then that morphed a couple of times,
and the one that Jasmine Crockett plays, which Tupac played.
If you see early videos of tupocular shock, you won't
(04:48):
believe that that's actually him. But there have been other
artists and athletes and politicians who do the I'm bad,
I'm street, I'm street, I'm keeping it real thing, and
that's kind of what she does. But on the issue
(05:09):
of the Trump presidency, they had their president had his
cabinet meeting today. Ramona and I were talking about this
before the show. This is a really special thing we're
witnessing here, folks. I want to put a bow on
it to draw special attention to him. We are watching
the president conducting the nation's business on live television in
(05:34):
a very open and honest way. I am a true
believer in transparency. I am a true believer that when
things are made public, you have an opportunity for people
to investigate them. You have an opportunity for lies to
be exposed, but you also have the opportunity for people
(05:55):
to feel invested. There's a sense of truthfulness to this,
there's a sense of trust to this, and the fact
that the president has these people bringing there. You know,
when Elon said in the email to government employees, Tell
me what you've done. Tell me five things you've done
(06:17):
this week. That was a very telling reaction that we saw.
There were government employees, mostly women, who lost their minds.
How dare you say this? This has triggered me. That's
how we know you're the problem. If you can't do that.
Our team all said, I didn't ask, they all sent me.
Here's by five things. As a way, if you're going
(06:40):
to have an effective organization, you've got to have motivation.
Excellence in anything a military, a sports team, a business organization,
a church, a family, a school. Excellence requires a number
of things. Motivation, team work, sacrifice, accountability for failure, measuring
(07:06):
so that you can have accountability. Trump is Trump is
showing you how to conduct an organization's business and using
the nation as a way to do it. Folks, we've
never seen anything like this. This is truly very special.
Don't blink or you'll miss it, because Trump will be
(07:26):
gone and this time will be gone, and you will forget.
You will forget how beautiful this is to watch. You
will forget how special this is. And I think it's
important for people like me to point out how special
it is so that we don't take it for granted.
I am a big believer in stating the opposite. I
(07:46):
am an over communicated obvious. I am an over communicator
because I think it's very important that things not be overlooked,
and sometimes that requires saying, hey, so you know that
book that was delivered to you. I bought that and
I drove six hours to get it because I knew
(08:08):
it was important to you. And I don't mind. That's
how much I love you, as opposed Tobode going, oh,
I got this book. One who gives and then they
don't appreciate what Trump is doing with this. This is glorious. Folks, snowflakes,
prepare for a complete meltdown with Laura of The Michael
Berry Show.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
It's edator.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Elizabeth Warren, Democrats from Massachusetts, was on c NBC calling
this is clip four to ten, calling for the FED
to cut rates long criticizing Trump. We're publicly talking about
the Fed. You see, we just keep Democrats. We just
(08:49):
keep catching Democrats criticizing Donald Trump. We're doing exactly what
they do.
Speaker 2 (08:56):
Best way to signal that is go with a big
rate cut.
Speaker 7 (08:59):
One point that many viewers wanted me to ask you
about is if we're criticizing the presidential candidates for sort
of wanting more influence over the FED.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
I'm talking about Trump in particular.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
Here.
Speaker 7 (09:12):
Is it appropriate for senators to be writing a letter
expressing a viewpoint that is putting pressure on the FED
to do something that is seen.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
As overtly political because it comes from one party?
Speaker 7 (09:24):
What is the difference there to explain why that is
appropriate but not from the I.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
Will make two points here.
Speaker 8 (09:33):
The first is that we are making an economic argument here,
and you and I have talked many times about this.
It's a consistent economic argument reminding the FED of their
legal obligation to follow two parts. Right. They have a
two part mandate here, and that's part of my job
in oversight as a senator. That's what I'm supposed to do.
(09:57):
I also want to be clear, I'm doing this right
out in public. Everybody can see it, you can see
exactly when it happens. That is very different from someone
saying I want to be able to squeeze behind closed doors,
and I want to be able to do it for
political reasons.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
I think those two are very different.
Speaker 8 (10:15):
But understand I ain't saying anything in private that I'm
not saying right out there in public for everybody to evaluate.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
I keep saying this again and again and again. The
Democrats keep getting busted for criticizing Donald Trump over things
they themselves have done. Here's a little flashback from the
archives of AOC. This is clip four h six. This
is AOC saying that the Biden administration should ignore the
(10:44):
Supreme Court when they handed down a ruling that she
didn't like. Now, Trump says, you know, the court can
enforce their own rule. I don't like it, and they're
calling it a constitutional crisis when it's exactly what he
said before. Or that's clip four h six.
Speaker 9 (11:01):
That I believe that the Biden administration should ignore this ruling.
I think that we know the courts have the legitimacy
and they rely on the legitimacy of their rulings, and
what they are currently doing is engaged in an unprecedented
(11:22):
and dramatic erosion of the legitimacy of the courts. It
is the justices themselves, through the deeply partisan and unfounded
nature of these rulings, that are undermining their own enforcements.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
So what you're saying the Biden administration should ignore this court?
What does that look like? What does that actually mean?
Speaker 2 (11:43):
You know, I think.
Speaker 9 (11:45):
The interesting thing when it comes to a ruling is
that it relies on enforcement, and it is up to
the Biden administration to enforce, to choose whether or not
to enforce such a ruling.
Speaker 1 (11:59):
Speaking of him hypocrisy, Senator Adam Schiff went on with
Bill Maher and had the audacity, I mean, this is
real audacity here to say I don't think Biden should
have given pardons. It sets the precedent, and now Trump
can do it. If you didn't think he should give pardons,
(12:22):
why did you accept one? You criminal?
Speaker 10 (12:27):
Given the ongoing political tensions and Trump's actions towards his critics,
do you think President Biden's preemptive pardons turned out to
be more important than initially expected. Let's first tell people
what that means. Preemptive pardons that was pretty unprecedented. Right
before he left office, Joe Biden pardoned you and a
(12:49):
number of people who he thought Trump would go after.
Speaker 11 (12:53):
No, I take the opposite of you. I don't think
he should have given the pardons at all. Really, no,
I don't think he should have, and I was vocal
about that at the time.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
Can you refuse a pardon.
Speaker 11 (13:04):
That's less clear because in the case of the Jeneral
sixth Committee, he pardoned essentially the whole committee. But I
didn't like it, both because we were enormously proud of
our work on the General sixth Committee, but more than that,
establishing a precedent that on the way out the door
you're going to pardon any number of people gave him
(13:27):
even greater latitude on his way out of the door
to pardon everyone around him. Chief Justice Roberts, in that
immunity decision, I think, which will go down in infamy,
already gave this president permission to be lawless.
Speaker 1 (13:42):
But the abuse of the.
Speaker 11 (13:44):
Pardon power essentially gives him an opportunity to.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
Tell everyone around him.
Speaker 11 (13:49):
Then when I'm on the way out the door, I've
got your back.
Speaker 1 (13:53):
And so I.
Speaker 11 (13:53):
Think part of why you see such willingness among the
people around him to engage in lawful lawless action is
they're confident they'll get a partner on the way.
Speaker 1 (14:04):
Democrats are trying to create a civil war, and it's
a bad idea because our people are are better armed,
and you might think to yourself, well, Michael, their thugs
are out shooting up the streets every day. Their thugs
are turning their gun sideways. They shoot a hundred times
(14:25):
and only hit a few. Our people served in the military,
law enforcement, and they hunt squirrels and a lot of
bigger things. If there was a civil war, it wouldn't
end well. And I don't want that to happen. I
want to be very clear on that. But these kind
of statements right here by the very dumb and ugly
Frederica Wilson from Florida. This kind of stuff right here,
(14:50):
there are people that when they hear this, they do
the wrong thing. That's a clip four o nine I couldn't.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Give and out of the phone numbers to the House
of Representatives and to the.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
Senate, it's one number.
Speaker 8 (15:07):
That number you call and you threatened me, and you
say this is wrong.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
This is not a marror, This is not what we
stand for.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
We need a change. You have to do that. It's
gonna take the people. We've done.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
I'm done. I'm talking. I talked myself up Blivia. We
need the people living upside.
Speaker 4 (15:40):
The people are taking into the streets and the phones
and writing letters.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
That's what we did.
Speaker 12 (15:47):
I looked at him, and they looked at me, you know,
and I just looked at her and I have to
just get your stuff and get it out to Michael
Marys over and got a newspaper and I wrote it up.
I slapped him on the nose, I said, faddom.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
Well, I told you about a statement Marco Rubio said
over the weekend on Meet the Press with Christian Welker.
This is going to be clip five oh four Marco Rubio,
And the question was why hasn't President Trump imposed sanctions
on Russia? And I thought this was a very good
(16:23):
I wasn't sure how he would do at Secretary of State.
I'm not a fan of his, but I think he's
done a very I think he's I think he's shown
himself to be a more serious person than anyone expected.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
Given the frustrations that he is voicing.
Speaker 7 (16:38):
Mister Secretary, Why hasn't he imposed sanctions yet?
Speaker 6 (16:43):
Well, because I think we're still hoping to see that
this effort works out in diplomacy and now we can
bring these two sides closer together. I mean, the minute
you start doing that kind of stuff, you're walking away
from you You're walking away from it. You've now doomed
yourself to another two years of war, and we don't
want to see it happen. I think what important and
really ways is there is no other country, There is
(17:03):
no other institution or organization on the earth that can
bring these two sides together.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
No one else is talking.
Speaker 6 (17:09):
To both sides but us, and no one else in
the world can make something like this happen. But the
President this is a very significant responsibility and a really
important opportunity, and we want to make sure that we
work it all the way through, that we don't walk
away from something that can actually work or that can
actually lead to peace. But we also don't want to
continue to spend time on something that's not going to.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Get us there.
Speaker 6 (17:32):
So throughout this process it's about determining do both sides
really want peace and how close are they or how
far apart they are after ninety days of effort here
over ninety days of effort, That's what we're trying to
determine this week. There are reasons to be optimistic and
there are also reasons to be concerned.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
It's complicated that this was.
Speaker 6 (17:50):
An easy war to end that would have been ended
by someone else a long time ago, but right now
the only one who can bring these two sides together
to end this war, is our president, President Trump. We're
doing everything we can to see if we can get
that done here over the next few days.
Speaker 1 (18:04):
Scott besson This is gonna be clipped. Five oh six.
Scott Bessant was on ABC this week with Martha Raddits,
and he made a statement that I think was very interesting.
He said, the US has a barbell economy. If you
think of a barbell economy being big on one end,
(18:28):
big on the other, and skinny in the middle of
the part that you actually hold to lift the barbell.
I think this is a very very good explanation. I
did an explanation on the Morning Show if you want
to go listen on the podcast about where I think
AI is taking us and how that affects kids. And
(18:53):
I think it would be worth if you take any
of my advice on anything else. It's probably most useful
thing I've said this week. I'm tay you to go
check it out.
Speaker 13 (19:05):
The President is looking forward to the jobs of the future,
not the jobs of the past. The goal is to
bring back high performance manufacturing jobs or create high performance
manufacturing jobs right now.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
How long does that take? I mean that is such
a concern. How long does it take to bring that
to the US.
Speaker 13 (19:24):
Well, is there a plan, of course, but it's a process.
Right now, the US has a Barbell economy. We have
a very advanced financial system. We have a tech the
exploration and development that is the envy in the world.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
On the other side, we are a.
Speaker 13 (19:43):
Natural resource economy led by energy, which the previous administration
tried to stifle. And in between is where working class
Americans have lost out and we want to bring back
these manufacturing jobs or create these manufacturing jobs of the future.
And we are meeting with companies that want to do.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
This every day. This is also Scott Bessant, Treasury Secretary,
on ABC This Week with Martha radd at the same interview,
and he's calling out the stock market coverage. I told
you about the poll it showed that Trump was getting
beat up on the economy is getting beat up because
(20:23):
the media is telling you the economy is terrible by
statistical measures.
Speaker 14 (20:28):
It's not.
Speaker 13 (20:29):
And look at the some of the things that are
being published. There was a story ten days ago that
said this is the worst April for the stock market
since the Great Depression. Ten days later, the Nasdaq is
now up on the month of April, and I haven't
seen a story that says, oh, stock market has biggest
(20:49):
bounce back.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
Ever, so it certainly has gone back and forth.
Speaker 1 (20:55):
I think a lot of this is media driven. Just
a fun little quote from Elon because this is clip
number five oh eight. You get taxed on what you earn,
you get taxed on what you buy, and you get
taxed on what you own. It's all taxes because it's
a game for them. They're taking your money and playing
with it.
Speaker 15 (21:15):
You get taxed on what you own, you get taxed
on what you buy, and you get taxed on what
you own. Taxes, taxes, taxes, you know, and then what
does it get spent on? A bunch of the stuff
you can get spent on you don't even agree with.
So you know, that's why we need to We need
to reduce the size.
Speaker 1 (21:33):
Of government and to spend less money and.
Speaker 15 (21:36):
Uh, let the people keep a lot more.
Speaker 1 (21:38):
Of their hard earned money. Yeah. So I'm still mad
over doctor Oz losing the Pennsylvania Senate race. Not because
I'm a Doctor Oz fan, I'm not, but because I
think some people got into Trump's ear and convinced him
to support doctor Oz. He does love celebrities, and doctor
Oz was never popular the base, and that cost us
(22:03):
that election. We did it anyway. Now he is the
Medicaid and Medicare administrator, and I like this. He's pointing
out billions of dollars in fraud worse than Usaid, and
I believe this. I think Medicare and Medicaid are are
agents of fraud. I think the people who need help
(22:23):
don't get it. Elon was talking about how they've got
AI bots now that are going in and applying for
Social Security dependent coverage, Medicare, Medicaid and they can't get
a handle on how much it is yet, but it's
(22:43):
a lot of money.
Speaker 3 (22:44):
Apparently my mission is to protect the most vulnerable, because
I'll tell you, as a heart surgeon, the most expensive
care is bad care. You've got to pay the person
who's doing a bad job, you got to pay someone
else who's capable to fix the problem, and you got
to pay for the comp lo gations. And there's so
many things we can do to improve care in America.
And folks watch this program. I've probably written seeing and
(23:07):
pretty good testimonials out there about well, what is what
has been done?
Speaker 1 (23:11):
In the past does not work well. But here's the goodness.
Speaker 3 (23:14):
We can empower beneficiaries, give you tools, and that's coming
down the pike at you.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
We can make sure providers have better.
Speaker 3 (23:20):
Opportunities and incentivize them to do the right thing because
oftentimes in CMS we unfortunately gotten folks to do things
wrong because we pay them for doing things incorrectly.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
But right now, my main.
Speaker 3 (23:33):
Focus, without any question, is to wage a war on fraud,
waste and abuse. Okay, that's what's required. All hands on deck.
It's a massive issue. You know, hundreds of billions of
dollars potentially out there, not all of us going to
be collected.
Speaker 1 (23:49):
At once, but we've got a war room right now.
Speaker 3 (23:52):
Focus very much on things that are going to really
bother you. If you thought usaid was a problem. Some
of the issues that we are discovering, some of the
things that CMS has been funding through Medicare and Medicaid
and the exchanges.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
We'll bring a little shiver to you.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
We're gonna add a.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
Little bit about these ore houses. I know all about.
Ramon wants to know what around the world.
Speaker 13 (24:14):
Is whistling bungholes, spleen splitters, whisker biscuits, honkey riders, hohoskerdos whosker,
don'ts nips and dazers with it without the scooter.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
Stick or one single whistling kidd he chasing. I consume
a lot of media as you do. I read a lot,
observe a lot, talk to a lot of people, and
many times I will hear something and I will pull
it for you or have our team pull it so
that you can. You can see my point because I
(24:45):
think hearing it. If I say Bernie Sanders is talking crazy,
in your mind, you remember he's talking crazy. You may
remember his his crooked finger, but it's not until you
hear him that it really hits home. This is four
oh eight. This is a flashback from NBC News in
(25:06):
nineteen eighty three and then Senator Bernie Sanders in twenty nineteen. Now,
yes it's a consistent message, but we're forty two years
later from the NBC News story and six years later
from the Bernie Sanders story. These people have been predicting
(25:26):
the end for a very long time. Clip four oh eight.
Speaker 8 (25:30):
The Federal Repour Today predicted possible catastrophic warming of the
Earth by the nineteen nineties with a strong climate change with.
Speaker 16 (25:38):
The scientists are telling us that we don't get our
act together within the next eight or nine years. We're
talking about cities all over the world, major cities going
on the water.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
And let me see I can pull this. I made
a list. I found a list actually of times the
left has claimed this came from doctor Simon Goddek. Fifteen
times the climate experts were dead wrong nineteen sixty nine.
Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue stream by
(26:11):
nineteen eighty nine, and in nineteen seventy urban citizens will
need gas masks by nineteen eighty five. Also nineteen seventy,
decaying pollution will kill all the fish. Also in nineteen seventy,
ice age coming by two thousand, nineteen seventy two, oil
depleted in twenty years. Nineteen seventy four. Space satellites show
(26:35):
a new ice age is coming fast. Remember they used
to claim it was ice. Some say the world will
end in fire. Some ice is coming for a lot
of people. You know what, you make a very good
point wrong. I was thinking you haven't contributed anything, but
you did contribute. That would it be weird if I
(26:56):
quoted one of my favorite poems at this point. Some
of the world will end in fire, some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire, I hold with those
who favor fire, but if I had to perish twice,
(27:16):
I think I know enough of hate to say that
for destruction, ice is also great, and would suffice. You
want to hear it again? Okay, No, I might mess
it up this time. Usually when I recite something, I
get it the first time, and then it's Robert Frost,
by the way, great American poet. Let's see if I
(27:39):
can remember it. I'll try to do it this time
without stopping at the end of the lines. I like
to stop at the end of the lines, but you
know the poetry. People don't like that. Some say the
world will end in fire, some say in ice. From
what I've tasted of desire, A hold with those who
favor fire, but if it had to perish twice, I
(27:59):
think I know enough of hate to say that for destruction,
ice is also great, and wood suffice? Or do you
like the old fashioned traditional? Some say the world will
end in fire, some say an ice. From what I've
tasted of desire, I hold with those who favor fire,
but if it had to perish twice. I think I
(28:21):
know enough of hate to say that for destruction, ice
is also great in wood suffice. Silly little poem. But
since we're talking about the left and them claiming that
everything's going to burn up, let me go back to
my list over here. Where were we at nineteen seventy
They had us all dying by two thousand. What they
(28:43):
learned over the years was that when you predict the
end of the world in thirty years, nobody pays attention.
So they started saying sooner and sooner and sooner. Then
nineteen eighty these are the predictions acid rain kills life
in lakes, nineteen eighty nine, New York City's West Side
Highway underwater by twenty nineteen. None of these came true. Also,
(29:08):
nineteen eighty nine, rising seas will obliterate nations by two
thousand if no action is taken. Oh, the rising of
the seas. That's always a big one. Two thousand children
won't know what snow is anymore. Oh, okay, two thousand
and five. Manhattan will be underwater by twenty fifteen. Wait,
you told us it would be underwater by twenty nineteen,
(29:31):
and we're not even getting Okay, change the gold Post.
Two thousand and nine. Al Gore predicts an ice free
Arctic by twenty fourteen. Also two thousand and nine, Prince
Charles warrens, we have ninety six months to save the
world eight years. We're all going to die in eight years.
It's not the first bad decision he's ever made. Twenty fourteen,
(29:53):
only five hundred left, a day's left before climate chaos.
But sure we've got some new al Gore audio. Here
was a flashback to two thousand and nine. This will
be clip number four oh five. Flashback to two thousand
and nine al Gore and John Kerry predicting an ice
free Arctic twenty thirteen.
Speaker 17 (30:14):
There is a seventy five percent chance that the entire
North Polar ice cap during summer, during some of the
summer months could be completely ice free within the next
five to seven years.
Speaker 14 (30:31):
You have sea ice which is melting at a rate
that the Arctic Ocean now increasingly is exposed. In five years,
scientists predict we will have the first ice free Arctic summer.
Speaker 1 (30:43):
This has something to do with all the environmental nonsense
Elon Musk was on with Joe Rogan. This is five
oh three. George Soros has figured out how to hack
the system. And it took Elon to figure this thing
out because he thinks on a very high level, and
so does George Soros. You need non governmental organizations in
(31:06):
order to get government money. Elon is suggesting that Soros
isn't pumping money into America. He's just using seed money
to create these NGOs. And then he gets all this
money from our government for the NGOs and he spends
(31:27):
it's just like marketing. He spends a percentage of it
on uh on buying politicians. But isn't this interesting? This
is five oh three the Elon Musk On with Joe Rogan.
Speaker 15 (31:37):
It's kind of a hack to the system where you know,
someone can get an NGO stood up for a fairly
small amount of money. Like George Soros was really good
at this, Like he really George Soros is like a
system hacker, Like he figured out how to hack the system.
He's a genius at arbitrage. I mean these ases. He's
pretty old, but genius at albatrage. So he figured out
(31:59):
that you leverage this small amount of money to create
a nonprofit then lobby for the politicians to send a
ton of money to that nonprofit.
Speaker 1 (32:09):
So you can take what.
Speaker 15 (32:10):
Might be, you know, a ten million dollar donation to
a nonprofit to create a nonprofit and leverage that into
a billion dollar not an angio.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
A nonprofit is a weird word. It's just a non
governmental organization.
Speaker 15 (32:25):
And then you can the government can continues to fund
that every year, and it'll have a nice sounding name
like the Institute for Peace or something like that, but
really it's a graph machine.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
And what are their requirements with that money? What do
they have to do? Just really no requirements at all,
So they just get grants and the government just assumes
that they're doing good work.
Speaker 15 (32:48):
I think a lot of people in the government know
that they are not doing good work, but they it's
a giant graph machine.
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and loud. So
Michael Varry Show is on the air. I don't saw
the wings. You saw the garage. I see the garage,
but I don't saw the garage.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
You are speaking incorrectly.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
You are more to ring the King's English.
Speaker 3 (00:28):
See see shut up.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
I think that you punch. I think you punch. I
think you're okay with you. You okay, we're punching, you.
Speaker 4 (00:37):
Know, I think, And I love Colin, and I think
towards the end he started to punch a little harder.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
But like it's there grooves.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
I mean, like this dude has to be knots over
the head, like.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Hard right, like there is no niceties with him, like
at all, Like you you go clean off on him.
Speaker 4 (00:55):
Right because we in these hot ass Texas streets, Honey,
y'all know we got governor hot wheels down there, come
on now, and the only.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
Thing hot about him is that he is a hot
ass mask, honey.
Speaker 4 (01:12):
So so yes, yes, yes, yes, twice.
Speaker 1 (01:22):
Three times.
Speaker 4 (01:33):
But the fact that you literally are going to plan
enemy attacks on a signal chat and then you don't
even know who's in the signal chat, and then y'all
gonna come at us and act like people of color
are the problem, are that women are the problem. Like baby,
you probably need a good black woman in the room
who can check you and tell you that, first of all,
you shouldn't be doing this on signal or anything else.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
But y'all still mad about Hillary's servers. That is that
what I hear? Yeah? So anyway, Literally, I.
Speaker 4 (02:04):
Don't know if like your homeboy was drunk at the
time that he was sending these messages or what, but
clearly this administration is not ready for prime time. There
has been no oppression for the white man in this country.
You'll tell me which white men were dragged out of
(02:25):
their homes.
Speaker 1 (02:26):
You'll tell me which one.
Speaker 5 (02:27):
Of them got dragged all the way across an ocean
and told that you are gonna go at work, We
are gonna seal your wives, We are gonna rape your wives.
That didn't happen. That is oppression. We didn't ask to
be here. We're not the same migrants did y'all constantly
come up against. We didn't run away from home. We
(02:49):
were stolen. So yeah, we are gonna sit here and
be offended. When you want to sit here and act
like and don't let it escape you that it is
white man on this side of the aisle telling us
people of color on this side of the aisle that
y'all are the ones being oppressed, That y'all are the
(03:09):
ones that are being harmed.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
Your wounds.
Speaker 6 (03:14):
Twice, three times.
Speaker 1 (03:19):
There's something very rich about Jasmine Crockett declaring that the
Trump administration is not ready for prime time. There is
something very rich. Indeed. You know, a democratic republic should
(03:41):
have representation from all the various groups and constituencies, and
Jasmine Crockett represents one of those that is a very
large one, and she does it well. She's not as
stupid as she cuts up and pretends to be. That's
(04:02):
a role she's playing. It comes out of a form
of the menstrual role. The menstrual role was where a
black person historically, or a white person painted in blackface
would appear to do the yes massa kind of thing,
the sort of subjugated supplicant personality that today is considered
(04:28):
so awful, But that was very popular on the stage
and eventually in the screen, and of course in literature.
Then there became then that morphed a couple of times,
and the one that Jasmine Crockett plays, which Tupac played.
If you see early videos of tupocular shock, you won't
(04:48):
believe that that's actually him. But there have been other
artists and athletes and politicians who do the I'm bad,
I'm street, I'm street, I'm keeping it real thing, and
that's kind of what she does. But on the issue
(05:09):
of the Trump presidency, they had their president had his
cabinet meeting today. Ramona and I were talking about this
before the show. This is a really special thing we're
witnessing here, folks. I want to put a bow on
it to draw special attention to him. We are watching
the president conducting the nation's business on live television in
(05:34):
a very open and honest way. I am a true
believer in transparency. I am a true believer that when
things are made public, you have an opportunity for people
to investigate them. You have an opportunity for lies to
be exposed, but you also have the opportunity for people
(05:55):
to feel invested. There's a sense of truthfulness to this,
there's a sense of trust to this, and the fact
that the president has these people bringing there. You know,
when Elon said in the email to government employees, Tell
me what you've done. Tell me five things you've done
(06:17):
this week. That was a very telling reaction that we saw.
There were government employees, mostly women, who lost their minds.
How dare you say this? This has triggered me. That's
how we know you're the problem. If you can't do that.
Our team all said, I didn't ask, they all sent me.
Here's by five things. As a way, if you're going
(06:40):
to have an effective organization, you've got to have motivation.
Excellence in anything a military, a sports team, a business organization,
a church, a family, a school. Excellence requires a number
of things. Motivation, team work, sacrifice, accountability for failure, measuring
(07:06):
so that you can have accountability. Trump is Trump is
showing you how to conduct an organization's business and using
the nation as a way to do it. Folks, we've
never seen anything like this. This is truly very special.
Don't blink or you'll miss it, because Trump will be
(07:26):
gone and this time will be gone, and you will forget.
You will forget how beautiful this is to watch. You
will forget how special this is. And I think it's
important for people like me to point out how special
it is so that we don't take it for granted.
I am a big believer in stating the opposite. I
(07:46):
am an over communicated obvious. I am an over communicator
because I think it's very important that things not be overlooked,
and sometimes that requires saying, hey, so you know that
book that was delivered to you. I bought that and
I drove six hours to get it because I knew
(08:08):
it was important to you. And I don't mind. That's
how much I love you, as opposed Tobode going, oh,
I got this book. One who gives and then they
don't appreciate what Trump is doing with this. This is glorious. Folks, snowflakes,
prepare for a complete meltdown with Laura of The Michael
Berry Show.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
It's edator.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Elizabeth Warren, Democrats from Massachusetts, was on c NBC calling
this is clip four to ten, calling for the FED
to cut rates long criticizing Trump. We're publicly talking about
the Fed. You see, we just keep Democrats. We just
(08:49):
keep catching Democrats criticizing Donald Trump. We're doing exactly what
they do.
Speaker 2 (08:56):
Best way to signal that is go with a big
rate cut.
Speaker 7 (08:59):
One point that many viewers wanted me to ask you
about is if we're criticizing the presidential candidates for sort
of wanting more influence over the FED.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
I'm talking about Trump in particular.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
Here.
Speaker 7 (09:12):
Is it appropriate for senators to be writing a letter
expressing a viewpoint that is putting pressure on the FED
to do something that is seen.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
As overtly political because it comes from one party?
Speaker 7 (09:24):
What is the difference there to explain why that is
appropriate but not from the I.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
Will make two points here.
Speaker 8 (09:33):
The first is that we are making an economic argument here,
and you and I have talked many times about this.
It's a consistent economic argument reminding the FED of their
legal obligation to follow two parts. Right. They have a
two part mandate here, and that's part of my job
in oversight as a senator. That's what I'm supposed to do.
(09:57):
I also want to be clear, I'm doing this right
out in public. Everybody can see it, you can see
exactly when it happens. That is very different from someone
saying I want to be able to squeeze behind closed doors,
and I want to be able to do it for
political reasons.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
I think those two are very different.
Speaker 8 (10:15):
But understand I ain't saying anything in private that I'm
not saying right out there in public for everybody to evaluate.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
I keep saying this again and again and again. The
Democrats keep getting busted for criticizing Donald Trump over things
they themselves have done. Here's a little flashback from the
archives of AOC. This is clip four h six. This
is AOC saying that the Biden administration should ignore the
(10:44):
Supreme Court when they handed down a ruling that she
didn't like. Now, Trump says, you know, the court can
enforce their own rule. I don't like it, and they're
calling it a constitutional crisis when it's exactly what he
said before. Or that's clip four h six.
Speaker 9 (11:01):
That I believe that the Biden administration should ignore this ruling.
I think that we know the courts have the legitimacy
and they rely on the legitimacy of their rulings, and
what they are currently doing is engaged in an unprecedented
(11:22):
and dramatic erosion of the legitimacy of the courts. It
is the justices themselves, through the deeply partisan and unfounded
nature of these rulings, that are undermining their own enforcements.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
So what you're saying the Biden administration should ignore this court?
What does that look like? What does that actually mean?
Speaker 2 (11:43):
You know, I think.
Speaker 9 (11:45):
The interesting thing when it comes to a ruling is
that it relies on enforcement, and it is up to
the Biden administration to enforce, to choose whether or not
to enforce such a ruling.
Speaker 1 (11:59):
Speaking of him hypocrisy, Senator Adam Schiff went on with
Bill Maher and had the audacity, I mean, this is
real audacity here to say I don't think Biden should
have given pardons. It sets the precedent, and now Trump
can do it. If you didn't think he should give pardons,
(12:22):
why did you accept one? You criminal?
Speaker 10 (12:27):
Given the ongoing political tensions and Trump's actions towards his critics,
do you think President Biden's preemptive pardons turned out to
be more important than initially expected. Let's first tell people
what that means. Preemptive pardons that was pretty unprecedented. Right
before he left office, Joe Biden pardoned you and a
(12:49):
number of people who he thought Trump would go after.
Speaker 11 (12:53):
No, I take the opposite of you. I don't think
he should have given the pardons at all. Really, no,
I don't think he should have, and I was vocal
about that at the time.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
Can you refuse a pardon.
Speaker 11 (13:04):
That's less clear because in the case of the Jeneral
sixth Committee, he pardoned essentially the whole committee. But I
didn't like it, both because we were enormously proud of
our work on the General sixth Committee, but more than that,
establishing a precedent that on the way out the door
you're going to pardon any number of people gave him
(13:27):
even greater latitude on his way out of the door
to pardon everyone around him. Chief Justice Roberts, in that
immunity decision, I think, which will go down in infamy,
already gave this president permission to be lawless.
Speaker 1 (13:42):
But the abuse of the.
Speaker 11 (13:44):
Pardon power essentially gives him an opportunity to.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
Tell everyone around him.
Speaker 11 (13:49):
Then when I'm on the way out the door, I've
got your back.
Speaker 1 (13:53):
And so I.
Speaker 11 (13:53):
Think part of why you see such willingness among the
people around him to engage in lawful lawless action is
they're confident they'll get a partner on the way.
Speaker 1 (14:04):
Democrats are trying to create a civil war, and it's
a bad idea because our people are are better armed,
and you might think to yourself, well, Michael, their thugs
are out shooting up the streets every day. Their thugs
are turning their gun sideways. They shoot a hundred times
(14:25):
and only hit a few. Our people served in the military,
law enforcement, and they hunt squirrels and a lot of
bigger things. If there was a civil war, it wouldn't
end well. And I don't want that to happen. I
want to be very clear on that. But these kind
of statements right here by the very dumb and ugly
Frederica Wilson from Florida. This kind of stuff right here,
(14:50):
there are people that when they hear this, they do
the wrong thing. That's a clip four o nine I couldn't.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Give and out of the phone numbers to the House
of Representatives and to the.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
Senate, it's one number.
Speaker 8 (15:07):
That number you call and you threatened me, and you
say this is wrong.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
This is not a marror, This is not what we
stand for.
Speaker 2 (15:22):
We need a change. You have to do that. It's
gonna take the people. We've done.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
I'm done. I'm talking. I talked myself up Blivia. We
need the people living upside.
Speaker 4 (15:40):
The people are taking into the streets and the phones
and writing letters.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
That's what we did.
Speaker 12 (15:47):
I looked at him, and they looked at me, you know,
and I just looked at her and I have to
just get your stuff and get it out to Michael
Marys over and got a newspaper and I wrote it up.
I slapped him on the nose, I said, faddom.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
Well, I told you about a statement Marco Rubio said
over the weekend on Meet the Press with Christian Welker.
This is going to be clip five oh four Marco Rubio,
And the question was why hasn't President Trump imposed sanctions
on Russia? And I thought this was a very good
(16:23):
I wasn't sure how he would do at Secretary of State.
I'm not a fan of his, but I think he's
done a very I think he's I think he's shown
himself to be a more serious person than anyone expected.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
Given the frustrations that he is voicing.
Speaker 7 (16:38):
Mister Secretary, Why hasn't he imposed sanctions yet?
Speaker 6 (16:43):
Well, because I think we're still hoping to see that
this effort works out in diplomacy and now we can
bring these two sides closer together. I mean, the minute
you start doing that kind of stuff, you're walking away
from you You're walking away from it. You've now doomed
yourself to another two years of war, and we don't
want to see it happen. I think what important and
really ways is there is no other country, There is
(17:03):
no other institution or organization on the earth that can
bring these two sides together.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
No one else is talking.
Speaker 6 (17:09):
To both sides but us, and no one else in
the world can make something like this happen. But the
President this is a very significant responsibility and a really
important opportunity, and we want to make sure that we
work it all the way through, that we don't walk
away from something that can actually work or that can
actually lead to peace. But we also don't want to
continue to spend time on something that's not going to.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
Get us there.
Speaker 6 (17:32):
So throughout this process it's about determining do both sides
really want peace and how close are they or how
far apart they are after ninety days of effort here
over ninety days of effort, That's what we're trying to
determine this week. There are reasons to be optimistic and
there are also reasons to be concerned.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
It's complicated that this was.
Speaker 6 (17:50):
An easy war to end that would have been ended
by someone else a long time ago, but right now
the only one who can bring these two sides together
to end this war, is our president, President Trump. We're
doing everything we can to see if we can get
that done here over the next few days.
Speaker 1 (18:04):
Scott besson This is gonna be clipped. Five oh six.
Scott Bessant was on ABC this week with Martha Raddits,
and he made a statement that I think was very interesting.
He said, the US has a barbell economy. If you
think of a barbell economy being big on one end,
(18:28):
big on the other, and skinny in the middle of
the part that you actually hold to lift the barbell.
I think this is a very very good explanation. I
did an explanation on the Morning Show if you want
to go listen on the podcast about where I think
AI is taking us and how that affects kids. And
(18:53):
I think it would be worth if you take any
of my advice on anything else. It's probably most useful
thing I've said this week. I'm tay you to go
check it out.
Speaker 13 (19:05):
The President is looking forward to the jobs of the future,
not the jobs of the past. The goal is to
bring back high performance manufacturing jobs or create high performance
manufacturing jobs right now.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
How long does that take? I mean that is such
a concern. How long does it take to bring that
to the US.
Speaker 13 (19:24):
Well, is there a plan, of course, but it's a process.
Right now, the US has a Barbell economy. We have
a very advanced financial system. We have a tech the
exploration and development that is the envy in the world.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
On the other side, we are a.
Speaker 13 (19:43):
Natural resource economy led by energy, which the previous administration
tried to stifle. And in between is where working class
Americans have lost out and we want to bring back
these manufacturing jobs or create these manufacturing jobs of the future.
And we are meeting with companies that want to do.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
This every day. This is also Scott Bessant, Treasury Secretary,
on ABC This Week with Martha radd at the same interview,
and he's calling out the stock market coverage. I told
you about the poll it showed that Trump was getting
beat up on the economy is getting beat up because
(20:23):
the media is telling you the economy is terrible by
statistical measures.
Speaker 14 (20:28):
It's not.
Speaker 13 (20:29):
And look at the some of the things that are
being published. There was a story ten days ago that
said this is the worst April for the stock market
since the Great Depression. Ten days later, the Nasdaq is
now up on the month of April, and I haven't
seen a story that says, oh, stock market has biggest
(20:49):
bounce back.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
Ever, so it certainly has gone back and forth.
Speaker 1 (20:55):
I think a lot of this is media driven. Just
a fun little quote from Elon because this is clip
number five oh eight. You get taxed on what you earn,
you get taxed on what you buy, and you get
taxed on what you own. It's all taxes because it's
a game for them. They're taking your money and playing
with it.
Speaker 15 (21:15):
You get taxed on what you own, you get taxed
on what you buy, and you get taxed on what
you own. Taxes, taxes, taxes, you know, and then what
does it get spent on? A bunch of the stuff
you can get spent on you don't even agree with.
So you know, that's why we need to We need
to reduce the size.
Speaker 1 (21:33):
Of government and to spend less money and.
Speaker 15 (21:36):
Uh, let the people keep a lot more.
Speaker 1 (21:38):
Of their hard earned money. Yeah. So I'm still mad
over doctor Oz losing the Pennsylvania Senate race. Not because
I'm a Doctor Oz fan, I'm not, but because I
think some people got into Trump's ear and convinced him
to support doctor Oz. He does love celebrities, and doctor
Oz was never popular the base, and that cost us
(22:03):
that election. We did it anyway. Now he is the
Medicaid and Medicare administrator, and I like this. He's pointing
out billions of dollars in fraud worse than Usaid, and
I believe this. I think Medicare and Medicaid are are
agents of fraud. I think the people who need help
(22:23):
don't get it. Elon was talking about how they've got
AI bots now that are going in and applying for
Social Security dependent coverage, Medicare, Medicaid and they can't get
a handle on how much it is yet, but it's
(22:43):
a lot of money.
Speaker 3 (22:44):
Apparently my mission is to protect the most vulnerable, because
I'll tell you, as a heart surgeon, the most expensive
care is bad care. You've got to pay the person
who's doing a bad job, you got to pay someone
else who's capable to fix the problem, and you got
to pay for the comp lo gations. And there's so
many things we can do to improve care in America.
And folks watch this program. I've probably written seeing and
(23:07):
pretty good testimonials out there about well, what is what
has been done?
Speaker 1 (23:11):
In the past does not work well. But here's the goodness.
Speaker 3 (23:14):
We can empower beneficiaries, give you tools, and that's coming
down the pike at you.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
We can make sure providers have better.
Speaker 3 (23:20):
Opportunities and incentivize them to do the right thing because
oftentimes in CMS we unfortunately gotten folks to do things
wrong because we pay them for doing things incorrectly.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
But right now, my main.
Speaker 3 (23:33):
Focus, without any question, is to wage a war on fraud,
waste and abuse. Okay, that's what's required. All hands on deck.
It's a massive issue. You know, hundreds of billions of
dollars potentially out there, not all of us going to
be collected.
Speaker 1 (23:49):
At once, but we've got a war room right now.
Speaker 3 (23:52):
Focus very much on things that are going to really
bother you. If you thought usaid was a problem. Some
of the issues that we are discovering, some of the
things that CMS has been funding through Medicare and Medicaid
and the exchanges.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
We'll bring a little shiver to you.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
We're gonna add a.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
Little bit about these ore houses. I know all about.
Ramon wants to know what around the world.
Speaker 13 (24:14):
Is whistling bungholes, spleen splitters, whisker biscuits, honkey riders, hohoskerdos whosker,
don'ts nips and dazers with it without the scooter.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
Stick or one single whistling kidd he chasing. I consume
a lot of media as you do. I read a lot,
observe a lot, talk to a lot of people, and
many times I will hear something and I will pull
it for you or have our team pull it so
that you can. You can see my point because I
(24:45):
think hearing it. If I say Bernie Sanders is talking crazy,
in your mind, you remember he's talking crazy. You may
remember his his crooked finger, but it's not until you
hear him that it really hits home. This is four
oh eight. This is a flashback from NBC News in
(25:06):
nineteen eighty three and then Senator Bernie Sanders in twenty nineteen. Now,
yes it's a consistent message, but we're forty two years
later from the NBC News story and six years later
from the Bernie Sanders story. These people have been predicting
(25:26):
the end for a very long time. Clip four oh eight.
Speaker 8 (25:30):
The Federal Repour Today predicted possible catastrophic warming of the
Earth by the nineteen nineties with a strong climate change with.
Speaker 16 (25:38):
The scientists are telling us that we don't get our
act together within the next eight or nine years. We're
talking about cities all over the world, major cities going
on the water.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
And let me see I can pull this. I made
a list. I found a list actually of times the
left has claimed this came from doctor Simon Goddek. Fifteen
times the climate experts were dead wrong nineteen sixty nine.
Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue stream by
(26:11):
nineteen eighty nine, and in nineteen seventy urban citizens will
need gas masks by nineteen eighty five. Also nineteen seventy,
decaying pollution will kill all the fish. Also in nineteen seventy,
ice age coming by two thousand, nineteen seventy two, oil
depleted in twenty years. Nineteen seventy four. Space satellites show
(26:35):
a new ice age is coming fast. Remember they used
to claim it was ice. Some say the world will
end in fire. Some ice is coming for a lot
of people. You know what, you make a very good
point wrong. I was thinking you haven't contributed anything, but
you did contribute. That would it be weird if I
(26:56):
quoted one of my favorite poems at this point. Some
of the world will end in fire, some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire, I hold with those
who favor fire, but if I had to perish twice,
(27:16):
I think I know enough of hate to say that
for destruction, ice is also great, and would suffice. You
want to hear it again? Okay, No, I might mess
it up this time. Usually when I recite something, I
get it the first time, and then it's Robert Frost,
by the way, great American poet. Let's see if I
(27:39):
can remember it. I'll try to do it this time
without stopping at the end of the lines. I like
to stop at the end of the lines, but you
know the poetry. People don't like that. Some say the
world will end in fire, some say in ice. From
what I've tasted of desire, A hold with those who
favor fire, but if it had to perish twice, I
(27:59):
think I know enough of hate to say that for destruction,
ice is also great, and wood suffice? Or do you
like the old fashioned traditional? Some say the world will
end in fire, some say an ice. From what I've
tasted of desire, I hold with those who favor fire,
but if it had to perish twice. I think I
(28:21):
know enough of hate to say that for destruction, ice
is also great in wood suffice. Silly little poem. But
since we're talking about the left and them claiming that
everything's going to burn up, let me go back to
my list over here. Where were we at nineteen seventy
They had us all dying by two thousand. What they
(28:43):
learned over the years was that when you predict the
end of the world in thirty years, nobody pays attention.
So they started saying sooner and sooner and sooner. Then
nineteen eighty these are the predictions acid rain kills life
in lakes, nineteen eighty nine, New York City's West Side
Highway underwater by twenty nineteen. None of these came true. Also,
(29:08):
nineteen eighty nine, rising seas will obliterate nations by two
thousand if no action is taken. Oh, the rising of
the seas. That's always a big one. Two thousand children
won't know what snow is anymore. Oh, okay, two thousand
and five. Manhattan will be underwater by twenty fifteen. Wait,
you told us it would be underwater by twenty nineteen,
(29:31):
and we're not even getting Okay, change the gold Post.
Two thousand and nine. Al Gore predicts an ice free
Arctic by twenty fourteen. Also two thousand and nine, Prince
Charles warrens, we have ninety six months to save the
world eight years. We're all going to die in eight years.
It's not the first bad decision he's ever made. Twenty fourteen,
(29:53):
only five hundred left, a day's left before climate chaos.
But sure we've got some new al Gore audio. Here
was a flashback to two thousand and nine. This will
be clip number four oh five. Flashback to two thousand
and nine al Gore and John Kerry predicting an ice
free Arctic twenty thirteen.
Speaker 17 (30:14):
There is a seventy five percent chance that the entire
North Polar ice cap during summer, during some of the
summer months could be completely ice free within the next
five to seven years.
Speaker 14 (30:31):
You have sea ice which is melting at a rate
that the Arctic Ocean now increasingly is exposed. In five years,
scientists predict we will have the first ice free Arctic summer.
Speaker 1 (30:43):
This has something to do with all the environmental nonsense
Elon Musk was on with Joe Rogan. This is five
oh three. George Soros has figured out how to hack
the system. And it took Elon to figure this thing
out because he thinks on a very high level, and
so does George Soros. You need non governmental organizations in
(31:06):
order to get government money. Elon is suggesting that Soros
isn't pumping money into America. He's just using seed money
to create these NGOs. And then he gets all this
money from our government for the NGOs and he spends
(31:27):
it's just like marketing. He spends a percentage of it
on uh on buying politicians. But isn't this interesting? This
is five oh three the Elon Musk On with Joe Rogan.
Speaker 15 (31:37):
It's kind of a hack to the system where you know,
someone can get an NGO stood up for a fairly
small amount of money. Like George Soros was really good
at this, Like he really George Soros is like a
system hacker, Like he figured out how to hack the system.
He's a genius at arbitrage. I mean these ases. He's
pretty old, but genius at albatrage. So he figured out
(31:59):
that you leverage this small amount of money to create
a nonprofit then lobby for the politicians to send a
ton of money to that nonprofit.
Speaker 1 (32:09):
So you can take what.
Speaker 15 (32:10):
Might be, you know, a ten million dollar donation to
a nonprofit to create a nonprofit and leverage that into
a billion dollar not an angio.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
A nonprofit is a weird word. It's just a non
governmental organization.
Speaker 15 (32:25):
And then you can the government can continues to fund
that every year, and it'll have a nice sounding name
like the Institute for Peace or something like that, but
really it's a graph machine.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
And what are their requirements with that money? What do
they have to do? Just really no requirements at all,
So they just get grants and the government just assumes
that they're doing good work.
Speaker 15 (32:48):
I think a lot of people in the government know
that they are not doing good work, but they it's
a giant graph machine.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!