June 3, 2025 • 34 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Time, Time, Time, Luck and Load.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
The Michael Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
CNN's Harry Inton has been doing a lot of polling
and then being rather honest about the results, which favor
Trump and are very damning for Democrats. So a couple
of days ago he laid out some new polling data
(00:51):
showing that Republicans have closed the gap with Democrats as
the party of the middle class. Now, this turns out
to be very, very important, and the reason is because
most Americans view themselves as being middle class. We use
(01:16):
this term offhandedly. It is it is a shortcut for
people that are not fabulously wealthy or on food stamps.
Everybody in between sees themselves as middle class, but they're
not not. If you use the technical definitions, life is
(01:41):
very different.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
If you are.
Speaker 3 (01:44):
If you are you make fifty thousand dollars a year,
you whether combined or individual, make fifty thousand dollars a year,
or if you make a hundred and thirty, huge difference
in standard of living, in ease of living, and there's
(02:09):
a big difference between one thirty and three hundred. Now
the differential is reduced in the aggregated margin because taxes
increase as you make more, so it has the effect
of compressing. So there is a certain amount of progression
(02:29):
of a compression in a graduated progressive income tax. I
still would like to see a flat tax. Ten percent
is a nice, round, simple number. No more write offs,
no more. And somebody asked me the other day, surprised me.
Very smart now, he said, why why wouldn't we Just
(02:51):
who would have a problem with a flat tax of
ten percent? I said, well, I'll tell you very simply,
CPAs tax lawyers and all sorts of other lawyers lobbyists,
and the reason it never happens members of Congress. And
(03:11):
he said, why don't members of Congress want a flat tax?
Make life easier easier? They don't want life to be easier,
they don't want life to be harder. They have created
a problem that only they can solve. You see, when
taxes are punitive, when they are awful, when they are
(03:32):
at albatross around your neck, you'll spend any amount of
money with that congressman to get a carve out for
your business or your industry. And that's what they want.
It's exactly right. So back to it. So you think
about how far we had to come for polling to
(03:54):
show that Republicans are now even with Democrats with the
middle class. That's crazy. Now, what's really interesting is how
Democrats dominate among people with graduate degrees. The more quote
unquote education you get in this country, the dumber you get.
(04:18):
And that's not by accident. Our universities are now a
cattle call for inculcation of liberalism. They're indoctrination camps. But
this polling data is very good, very very good news,
very important news. I want you to give this a listener's.
Speaker 4 (04:39):
Four months of the Donald Trump presidency, that you expect
that Democrats are at this massive lead on the economy,
It ain't so.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
It ain't so the party that is.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
Closest to your economic views. And no, remember of twenty
twenty three with the Republicans by eleven points. Now it's
still within that range, still within that margin of urk
plus eight point advantage for the Republican Party. How is
that possible, Democrats?
Speaker 2 (04:59):
How is that possible?
Speaker 4 (05:00):
After all the recession, because after the stock market's been
doing all of this, after all the terrorfts that Americans
are against, and Republicans still hold an eight point lead
on the economy. Are you kidding me.
Speaker 5 (05:10):
This is a CNN this is new CNN Polland how
is that when we look for trends, how is that
trending with other data that you're pulling in.
Speaker 4 (05:16):
Yeah, if it was just this one CNN pall, that
would be one thing. But take a look at Rutter's ipsos.
What do we see here? Party with a Better Economic Plan? Well,
it may have twenty twenty four, just before Donald Trump
was re elected president, Republicans had a nine point advantage.
Look at where we are now and may have twenty
twenty five, the advantage actually went up by three points.
Now Republicans have a twelve point advantage when it comes
(05:39):
to the Party with a Better Economic Plan. And again,
this is after months of supposed economic uncertainty, in which
the stock market's been going bonkers, in which the tariffors
that Americans or against have been going on. And yet
despite all of that, the Democrats are down by twelve
points on the economy.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
This speaks the.
Speaker 4 (05:55):
Democratic problems on the economy better than basically anything that
you could possibly look at. The Republicans still holding advantage
on the all important key issue of the day. And
that is the reason why even if Donald Trum's approval
ratings are a little bit lower than they used to be.
Republicans are not out of the ballgame, because they still
have a clear advantage on the economy, whether you look
at CNN's polls or whether you look at the IPSOS
(06:17):
poll right here in which they have a twelve point
advantage on the economy.
Speaker 5 (06:20):
Kit and also in the CNN data does show that
Republicans are gaining ground in an area that is key
relating to all of this, which is when it comes
to the middle class.
Speaker 4 (06:29):
Yeah, you know, historically speaking which is the party of
the middle class, has been a huge advantage for Democrats.
I have polling from NBC going all the way back
since nineteen eighty nine when Democrats had a twenty three
point advantage twenty sixteen, seventeen point evantage. But by this
decade we've already started seeing declines. Back in twenty twenty
two where you saw that Democrats led but only by
four points, well within the margin of error. And now
(06:50):
in our latest CNN poll among registered voters, which is
the party of the middle class, it is tied. This
I think speaks to Democratic gills more.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Than anything else.
Speaker 4 (06:57):
They have traditionally been the party of the No more.
Speaker 2 (07:01):
Donald Trump and the.
Speaker 4 (07:02):
Republican Party have taken that mantle away, and now a
key advantage for Democrats historically has gone audio smigos, and
now there is no party that is the party of
the middle class. Republicans have completely closed a gap.
Speaker 3 (07:12):
Cake how mostly just not being insane, and that's always truth,
Mostly just not being completely utterly insane. The Democrats allowed
(07:32):
themselves to state publicly, repeatedly that men are women if
they tell you they are, and that women are men
if they tell you they are, And that if a
boy wants to compete against a girl, he can now
be in a girl's competition, and when they always do
(07:54):
is a bigger, stronger, faster. Of course, that there are
differences between the two races. They picked the nuttiest things possible,
no pun intended, the nuttiest things possible to take the
claim want, and they lost voters because of it, and
I hope they continue to. I don't want them to
(08:14):
be rational, because then they might win back those voters.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
Allow me to introduce myself.
Speaker 4 (08:21):
My name is Victor Michael Berry.
Speaker 3 (08:23):
Genius is Mark Elias. Those of you who follow politics,
many of you know his name is the devil. According
to the New York Times quote, Mark Elias has done
more than any single person outside of government to shape
(08:48):
the Democrat Party and the rules under which all campaigns
and elections in the United States are conducted. Now understand
that what they're applauding is killing voter ID laws and
allowing an environment where cheating is rampant. And that's why
(09:13):
he fights any voter ID any election integrity, because you
have to leave the door unlocked for the burglars to
get in. His job is to keep the door unlocked.
In April of twenty fifteen, so a year before, year
and a half before the election that Donald Trump would win,
(09:36):
Hillary Clinton was hired by Mark Elias as the attorney
of record and general counsel for her twenty sixteen presidential campaign.
She's got to make sure she can cheat. A year later,
April of twenty sixteen, the Washington Post reported that Elias
on behalf of the Democrat National Convention Committee. Sorry and
(09:56):
the Clinton campaign hired something called Fusion GPS that would
conduct research, and that research would lead to the creation
of what came to be known as the Steele Dossier.
Remember Christopher Steele, He was the disgraced supposed British spy
who had to admit under oath that he lied. Elias
(10:20):
played a key role, the lawyer, in funding this quote
unquote research. It was all made up. That research produced
now debunked claims about Donald Trump's ties to Russia. This
was the Russian collusion case. So what they did is
(10:42):
Elias pays Steel, pays a fusion GPS, a group of
former Democrats or group of Democrats former media members. They
find a disgraced former spy and they get him to
put his name on the dossier as if he was
(11:02):
hired by the media. Hey, who is Donald Trump? Is
there anything out there we need to know? Let's ask
one of the spies. So the spy comes back with
the report which was already created for him, that says, yes,
the Russians controlled Donald Trump. Trump must not be president.
He is under the control of the of the Russians.
(11:22):
The Russians are taking over America. Ah okay, So all
of this happens, and all of it would end up unraveling.
Remember they even Eves dropped on Donald Trump by using
Carter Page as the subject. All this Carter Page is
(11:44):
a bad guy. We got a spy on him because
they knew Carter Page was coming into meetings with President Trump,
who was not the president yet at Trump Tower. Well,
if you're Eves dropping on Carter Page, you're also Eves
dropping on the presidential candidate. This was the deep state
try I aim to get something on Trump that they
then hand to Hillary's lawyer, who then hands it to
(12:06):
the media, and Trump is finished because they were scared
to death. Well, President Trump now talking about the Department
of Justice is weaponization against him and that he's going
to do something about it. He mentioned Mark Elias by name,
and that clearly has Mark Elias scared to death because
(12:27):
he deleted his aggressive x account. He's not on Twitter
anymore because he realizes, uh, oh, the walls are closing in.
Speaker 6 (12:39):
They spied on my campaign, launched one hoax and disinformation
operation after another, broke the law on a colossal scale,
persecuted my family, staff and supporters, raided my home mar
A Lago, and did everything within their power to prevent
me from becoming the president of the United States, with
(13:02):
the help of radicals like Mark Elias, Mark Pomerants, and
these are people that nobody's ever seen anything like it.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
So many others.
Speaker 6 (13:14):
But these are people that are bad people, really bad people.
They try to turn America into a corrupt, communist and
third world country.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
So now he's got him scared. He's not forgiving and forgetting.
You remember the name Peter Strasak. He's the one that
was like a horny teenager who was screwing Lisa Page,
who was a married lawyer for Department of Justice. And
she was texting him, what are we gonna do if
(13:47):
Trump becomes president?
Speaker 2 (13:48):
What are we going to do?
Speaker 3 (13:51):
And he was responding, don't worry, I got an insurance policy.
I and my friends at the FBI are going to
prevent Donald Trump from being president. Remember all this, Remember
that smirky, creepy smile when he was testifying in front
of Congress. Well, this is the head of the CIA,
John Ratcliffe, who was a member of Congress when all
(14:15):
that happened six years ago. As a congressman. He's questioning
Peter Strausick. And listen to this exchange.
Speaker 7 (14:24):
The approximately fifty thousand text messages that I've seen with
your personal beliefs, like f Trump stopped Trump in Pete's Trump,
go ahead and confirm on the record that none of
that occurred on an official FBI device or on official
FBI time.
Speaker 8 (14:38):
Go ahead and do that, sir, No, they did, many
of them did it.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Oh they did.
Speaker 3 (14:41):
Okay, so do Sally.
Speaker 4 (14:44):
No.
Speaker 7 (14:44):
I'll give you a chance at the end. So what
you really meant to say was that when you said
you never crossed that bright, inviolable line, what you meant
to say was, except for fifty thousand times, except for
hundreds of times a day where I went back and
forth expressing my personal opinions about effing Trump and stopping
Trump and impeaching Trump on official FBI phones on official
(15:09):
FBI time. Other than that, you never cross that line.
I'm sure there are thirteen thousand FBI agents out there
that are beaming with pride and how clearly you've drawn
that line. Agents, structor, You're starting to understand why some
folks out there don't believe a word you say, and
why it's especially troubling that you, of all people, are
at the center of the three highest profile investigations in
(15:32):
recent times that involve President Trump, and that you were
in charge of an investigation investigating gathering evidence against Donald Trump,
a subject that you hated, that you wanted to f him,
to stop him, to impeach him.
Speaker 3 (15:47):
And do you see why that might.
Speaker 7 (15:49):
Call into question everything you've touched on all of those investigations.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
So what the left will do when an asset like
this is burned? Is zy go Oh was a lone wolf.
He was acting alone.
Speaker 9 (16:01):
It was all.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
He answered that question. He was a flashback to Peter
strausik answering, Oh no, no, no, no. Everybody was in on
what I was doing.
Speaker 8 (16:13):
At every step, at every investigative decision. There are multiple
layers of people above me, the assistant director, executive assistant director,
deputy director, and director of the FBI, and multiple layers
of people below me, section chiefs, supervisors, unit chiefs, case agents,
and analysts, all of whom were involved in all of
these decisions.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
Michael, do I have a story for you? My brother
in law murdered too Native American to Michael Barry show,
Now you have my attention. Cheryl Atkinson was at CBS
News in two thousand and six when she started reporting
on things that caused the Democrats and the establishment problems.
(16:52):
She ended up getting pushed out at CBS News and
some horrible, horrible things happened to her. She did a
story about flu deaths among the elderly continuing to climb
after getting the flu shot. We're never going to stop
(17:15):
revisiting COVID. This is why the Jews constantly remember the Holocaust,
the premise being if you forget, it will happen again.
So let's go to Cheryl Atkinson's CBS News all the
way back to when she was at CBS. Now she's not.
(17:36):
She's at Sinclair now and basically independent. But here she
was back in two thousand and six. But think about
this for a moment. I have long argued the flu
shot is ineffective at a minimum, if not harmful. What
if you're more likely to die if you're old if
you get the flu shot than if you don't.
Speaker 9 (17:57):
It stands the reason that flu deaths among the elm
should have taken a dramatic dip, making an X graph
like this. Instead, flute deaths among the elderly continue to climb.
Speaker 2 (18:08):
WHOA, it was hot yesterday.
Speaker 9 (18:10):
Here's what scientists have found over twenty years. The percentage
of seniors getting flu shots increase sharply, from fifteen percent
to sixty five percent. It stands to reason that flu
deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip
making an.
Speaker 3 (18:24):
X graph like this.
Speaker 9 (18:26):
Instead, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
It was hard to believe.
Speaker 9 (18:31):
So were searchers at the National Institutes of Health set
out to do a study adjusting for all kinds of
factors that could be masking the true benefits of the shots.
But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got
the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths
among the elderly. It's not what health officials hope to find.
NIH wouldn't let us interview the study's lead author, so
(18:52):
we went to Boston and found the only co author
not employed by NIH, doctor Tom Reikert.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
We realize that we had sendiary materials.
Speaker 9 (19:02):
Doctor Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations.
Speaker 2 (19:05):
It helped.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
We were trying to do something mainstream, that's for sure.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
Were you surprised astonishment?
Speaker 9 (19:11):
Did you check the data a couple of times to
make sure?
Speaker 6 (19:14):
Well?
Speaker 1 (19:14):
Even more than that, we've looked at other countries now
and the same is true.
Speaker 9 (19:17):
Fast study soon to be published finds the same poor
results in Australia. France, Canada and the UK, and other
new research stokes the idea that decades.
Speaker 2 (19:28):
Of promoting flu shots and.
Speaker 9 (19:29):
Seniors and the billion spent haven't had the desired result.
The current head of National Immanizations confirmed CDC is now
looking at new strategies that stop short of calling the
present policy of failure.
Speaker 3 (19:42):
There's an active dialogue into how we can do better
to prevent influenza and its complications in the elderly.
Speaker 9 (19:48):
So what's an older person to do? The CDC says
they should still get their flu shots, that it could
make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected
in the total numbers. But watch for CDC the likely
in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in
a roundabout way by vaccinating more children and others around
them who could give them the flu. Cheryl Atkinson, CBS
(20:10):
News Washington.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
There was a glitch in that audio. I don't know
if you heard that, but the point is I was
raised to believe in doctors. I had a wonderful doctor
growing up. It was Marty Rutledge, wonderful, wonderful doctor, and
(20:34):
he cared for my mother until she passed on September
nineteenth like she was his own mother, and he's cared
for my father for as long as I've been alive
as well. Well, that's not true. I was delivered by
a doctor by the name of Raleigh Allen a small
town of Texas, in small town of Orange, Texas, and
his lead nurse was Barbara. They end up marrying and
(20:59):
they moved away and he sold his practice, as often
happened back then. That was back when doctors owned their practice,
when doctors could be doctors, and he sold his practice
to a young, up and coming doctor who kind of
you know, you would get introduced to doctor Rutledge because
doctor Allen was out or whatever. And what they do
is get you comfortable with this with the new doctor
(21:21):
until eventually he bought him out. Stockbrokers and financial advisors
do this. It's a transition, and that gives the lead
doctor an exit strategy, and that was done for quite
some time. Then the practice of medicine was taken over
by the financial industry. And so doctors are by and large,
(21:41):
almost exclusively just employees today, and that affects everything. If
you look at who's leading the charge with social or
economic issues in this country, that's not a member of
the media or politics. It's an individual who owns their
own business. A lot of cops, firefighters, public employees. They
(22:06):
are prohibited from their free speech rights. They are prohibited
from expressing themselves and contributing to the public conversation by
their very employer. That's wrong. You should still be able
to have an opinion. But I got to tell you,
I am surprised how often I see people get upset
(22:27):
when they see a cop post something on social media.
Aren't you a cop? Yeah, you should be saying things.
What kind of idiot are you? So you want us
to have entire conversations without a huge group of people
contributing to it. Why, I mean, you don't have a
(22:49):
problem with elected officials stating their opinion if you truly
believe in collaboration, if you try believe that the best
result will occur when everyone contributes. Why would you want
to silence certain people? Well, because you don't truly believe that.
(23:11):
And this is how we grow to understand that. Well,
my doctors growing up were wonderful and I still have
I'm happy to say, incredible doctors who are are friends
of mine and care about me and go above and
(23:31):
beyond to take good care of my health. And I
encourage you to have as close a relationship with your
doctors as you possibly can, to have doctors before you
need them, because by the time you need them, you're referred,
you're already in a bad way. I encourage you to
read as much as possible about health and wellness and
(23:51):
exercise and food and diet and nutrition in pharmaceuticals, because
we are past the point of you just being able
to trust the science and trust the experts. We are
long past that. Coming up in the next segment, and
it's going to take the entirety of the next segment,
(24:12):
but it's important. It's the former medical director of the
Cleveland Clinic and he's literally crying as he apologizes to
his patience for administering vaccines, because the thing about it
is it's first, do no harm. You've got people who
(24:33):
took the COVID vaccine who had no business taking it.
They didn't need to. The likelihood of them dying was
so low because they were neither obese, nor elderly, nor compromised.
Give me no compromise. Do you know many people died
the flu every year, So these people should not have
(24:53):
taken the vaccine, but you had a whole industry pushing
them to do it. And this goes to my further
to my theory, learn on your own. Don't trust people
with the financial incentive to do some talk radio the
Michael Verie Show, I've got to shorten this intro because
I want you to hear the entirety of this. It's
(25:13):
a former medical director of Cleveland Clinic offering a tearful
apology to his patients or administering vaccines. I think a
lot of doctors, if they were honest, would come forward
and say, maya Colpa, my bad, I made a mistake.
I care about you, I love you, but I made
a mistake. I'd admire this man for this.
Speaker 10 (25:35):
For my big issues regarding vaccines, and these are the
things that I'd like to highlight. Number one, there is
no education in medical schools that I am aware of,
and being an educator at the Cleveland Clinic, Learner College
of Medicine and Case Western Reserve University, I am not
aware of education around vaccines, their contents, safety record, informed consent,
(26:02):
or the vaccine injury compensation program.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
We do not discuss that.
Speaker 10 (26:07):
In nineteen eighty six, Congress enacted legislation removing all liability
from pharma related to vaccine adverse events.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
What are we taught about vaccines?
Speaker 10 (26:20):
We are taught to memorize the vaccine schedule.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
We don't discuss that almost four.
Speaker 10 (26:29):
Billion dollars with a bee has been paid to vaccine
injured patients since nineteen ninety two. For medical professionals, we
expect fair balance, but vaccines seem to be absolved from
that consideration.
Speaker 2 (26:48):
Number two.
Speaker 10 (26:50):
There appears to be a conflict of interest regarding payments
to providers for completing vaccine schedules and correlary to that
which would be Number three. Patients are being dismissed from
practices because of quote unquote vaccine safety concerns. If you
(27:12):
bring up a question about a vaccine and you decide
not to vaccinate your child, you may be at risk
of being terminated from that practice.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
Absolutely deplorable and disgusting.
Speaker 10 (27:25):
Number four, and again to the Dailey family, I'm really sorry,
but employers are forcing employees to receive the flu vaccine
or face corrective action or job loss. The fact that
your dad was six months from retiring.
Speaker 2 (27:41):
Is number five.
Speaker 10 (27:46):
There's a lack of informed consents, and I was one
of those providers who didn't provide safety sheets. Before vaccinating,
I would tell the parents, these are the vaccines today.
We're going to give you three VA seems in one
leg and two in the other. And then after vaccinating
either the child or the adult patient, here's your information sheet.
(28:08):
And again, to be completely transparent with you, I had
no idea that there was even a mention of the
compensation program or a telephone number to call. Absolutely deplorable
on my part, and I apologize to my patients.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Number six.
Speaker 10 (28:28):
There's a lack of transparency regarding vaccine complications, and worse,
you're being shamed as patients for suggesting that you were
harmed by a vaccine. If I see a patient in
the office and diagnose strep throte and give them penicillin
(28:50):
and either the mom or the patient themselves calls and
tells me that they developed a rash, there is zero question.
The chart now states they have an l to penicillin
and we'll never be given it again. Why don't we
believe parents and patience when they tell us they have
had an adverse event regarding a vaccine. It doesn't make
(29:14):
sense to me as a medical professional. I apologize for
the being emotional. Number seven. Actually I don't apologize. Number seven.
Why do the placebos and vaccine studies contain the adjivis
(29:36):
like mercury and aluminum. Aren't placebos supposed to be inert?
In other words, if you're comparing let's say, the Hepatitis
V vaccine against the placebo, why does the placebo contain
a metal?
Speaker 11 (29:49):
If the concern could possibly be the metal itself that's
triggering the autoimmunity that doctor lyons Wiler had so eloquently
spoke about.
Speaker 2 (30:01):
Number eight.
Speaker 10 (30:03):
Why has the rate of autism spectrum disorder gone from
one in one thousand in nineteen nineties I was taught
to one in forty eight in twenty seventeen. Is there
a link between the toxins in vaccines and this significant
increase in the diagnosis not only of ASD. We certainly
(30:24):
know about us all risk of giambreat but what about
attention deficit disorder, mood disorders in children, and just the
overall chronic disease epidemic in this country. I mean, we
are a very sick population, and I'm not trying to
be dramatic, but we're currently spending three and a half
trillion dollars on healthcare and what honestly, folks, are we
(30:48):
getting for that. As a physician and all physicians, we
take the hippocratic oath and we say no premium no chieri.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
First, do no.
Speaker 10 (30:57):
Harm and not providing in form consent regarding a vaccine
and then ultimately discovering patients had adverse reactions to that
intervention is a direct violation of ADOS. There's much work
to be done in this area as pharma is literally
(31:18):
racing to provide us with more life saving vaccines.
Speaker 2 (31:24):
Let me tell your friends.
Speaker 10 (31:26):
They are working on over one hundred and forty vaccines
at this time.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
Beware this is coming.
Speaker 10 (31:36):
Throughout two tenty seventeen, I received a tremendous outpouring of
support from literally all over the world. I just want
to say thank you to everyone for helping me keep
my chin up during a difficult year. My partner, doctor
Jessica Hutchins, who is working with me at Inspire Wellness,
my family of course, Michelle from OAMF and Stephanie doctor
(32:04):
lyons Wiler have been in my corner and what I
now realized that this has been the kick in the
behind that I personally needed to get out from under
a multi billion dollar conglomerate in order to really do
the work that I feel needs to be done, both
in educating the public and taking care of my patients
any that have any chronic disease, but in the way
(32:27):
that I really feel they need to be treated, not
based on protocols, and not under the thumb of a
watchful eye telling me I must do this or do
that or risk termination.
Speaker 2 (32:40):
Please don't feel sorry for me. I believe the universe
is calling me to do a higher purpose, and.
Speaker 10 (32:48):
I will begin realizing that dream this coming Monday on
January fifteenth, when my new medical practice, Inspire Wellness, opens
in Beachwood, Ohio. I will continue to fight for the
rights of all patients, including the right to informed consent,
and along with that, we must push to uncover the
truths around vaccines, the real safety and efficacy data, not
(33:11):
the ones that either the government or Big Pharma wants
us to see. And we must begin to truly understand
the direct link if there is one that I do
believe that occurs in at risk populations for developing neurodevelopment
mental disorders like yan Bereat that mister Bailey suffered from
(33:33):
autism spectrum disorder ADHD mood disorders as I spoke about.
But folks all chronic disease. This is all on the
table and we must keep our eyes and ears open.
Speaker 2 (33:48):
And as I learned when I first.
Speaker 10 (33:50):
Stepped into the Wellness Institute, be open to new ways
of thinking. And that's what we all need to do
in medicine, reported
Time, Time, Time, Luck and Load.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
The Michael Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
CNN's Harry Inton has been doing a lot of polling
and then being rather honest about the results, which favor
Trump and are very damning for Democrats. So a couple
of days ago he laid out some new polling data
(00:51):
showing that Republicans have closed the gap with Democrats as
the party of the middle class. Now, this turns out
to be very, very important, and the reason is because
most Americans view themselves as being middle class. We use
(01:16):
this term offhandedly. It is it is a shortcut for
people that are not fabulously wealthy or on food stamps.
Everybody in between sees themselves as middle class, but they're
not not. If you use the technical definitions, life is
(01:41):
very different.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
If you are.
Speaker 3 (01:44):
If you are you make fifty thousand dollars a year,
you whether combined or individual, make fifty thousand dollars a year,
or if you make a hundred and thirty, huge difference
in standard of living, in ease of living, and there's
(02:09):
a big difference between one thirty and three hundred. Now
the differential is reduced in the aggregated margin because taxes
increase as you make more, so it has the effect
of compressing. So there is a certain amount of progression
(02:29):
of a compression in a graduated progressive income tax. I
still would like to see a flat tax. Ten percent
is a nice, round, simple number. No more write offs,
no more. And somebody asked me the other day, surprised me.
Very smart now, he said, why why wouldn't we Just
(02:51):
who would have a problem with a flat tax of
ten percent? I said, well, I'll tell you very simply,
CPAs tax lawyers and all sorts of other lawyers lobbyists,
and the reason it never happens members of Congress. And
(03:11):
he said, why don't members of Congress want a flat tax?
Make life easier easier? They don't want life to be easier,
they don't want life to be harder. They have created
a problem that only they can solve. You see, when
taxes are punitive, when they are awful, when they are
(03:32):
at albatross around your neck, you'll spend any amount of
money with that congressman to get a carve out for
your business or your industry. And that's what they want.
It's exactly right. So back to it. So you think
about how far we had to come for polling to
(03:54):
show that Republicans are now even with Democrats with the
middle class. That's crazy. Now, what's really interesting is how
Democrats dominate among people with graduate degrees. The more quote
unquote education you get in this country, the dumber you get.
(04:18):
And that's not by accident. Our universities are now a
cattle call for inculcation of liberalism. They're indoctrination camps. But
this polling data is very good, very very good news,
very important news. I want you to give this a listener's.
Speaker 4 (04:39):
Four months of the Donald Trump presidency, that you expect
that Democrats are at this massive lead on the economy,
It ain't so.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
It ain't so the party that is.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
Closest to your economic views. And no, remember of twenty
twenty three with the Republicans by eleven points. Now it's
still within that range, still within that margin of urk
plus eight point advantage for the Republican Party. How is
that possible, Democrats?
Speaker 2 (04:59):
How is that possible?
Speaker 4 (05:00):
After all the recession, because after the stock market's been
doing all of this, after all the terrorfts that Americans
are against, and Republicans still hold an eight point lead
on the economy. Are you kidding me.
Speaker 5 (05:10):
This is a CNN this is new CNN Polland how
is that when we look for trends, how is that
trending with other data that you're pulling in.
Speaker 4 (05:16):
Yeah, if it was just this one CNN pall, that
would be one thing. But take a look at Rutter's ipsos.
What do we see here? Party with a Better Economic Plan? Well,
it may have twenty twenty four, just before Donald Trump
was re elected president, Republicans had a nine point advantage.
Look at where we are now and may have twenty
twenty five, the advantage actually went up by three points.
Now Republicans have a twelve point advantage when it comes
(05:39):
to the Party with a Better Economic Plan. And again,
this is after months of supposed economic uncertainty, in which
the stock market's been going bonkers, in which the tariffors
that Americans or against have been going on. And yet
despite all of that, the Democrats are down by twelve
points on the economy.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
This speaks the.
Speaker 4 (05:55):
Democratic problems on the economy better than basically anything that
you could possibly look at. The Republicans still holding advantage
on the all important key issue of the day. And
that is the reason why even if Donald Trum's approval
ratings are a little bit lower than they used to be.
Republicans are not out of the ballgame, because they still
have a clear advantage on the economy, whether you look
at CNN's polls or whether you look at the IPSOS
(06:17):
poll right here in which they have a twelve point
advantage on the economy.
Speaker 5 (06:20):
Kit and also in the CNN data does show that
Republicans are gaining ground in an area that is key
relating to all of this, which is when it comes
to the middle class.
Speaker 4 (06:29):
Yeah, you know, historically speaking which is the party of
the middle class, has been a huge advantage for Democrats.
I have polling from NBC going all the way back
since nineteen eighty nine when Democrats had a twenty three
point advantage twenty sixteen, seventeen point evantage. But by this
decade we've already started seeing declines. Back in twenty twenty
two where you saw that Democrats led but only by
four points, well within the margin of error. And now
(06:50):
in our latest CNN poll among registered voters, which is
the party of the middle class, it is tied. This
I think speaks to Democratic gills more.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Than anything else.
Speaker 4 (06:57):
They have traditionally been the party of the No more.
Speaker 2 (07:01):
Donald Trump and the.
Speaker 4 (07:02):
Republican Party have taken that mantle away, and now a
key advantage for Democrats historically has gone audio smigos, and
now there is no party that is the party of
the middle class. Republicans have completely closed a gap.
Speaker 3 (07:12):
Cake how mostly just not being insane, and that's always truth,
Mostly just not being completely utterly insane. The Democrats allowed
(07:32):
themselves to state publicly, repeatedly that men are women if
they tell you they are, and that women are men
if they tell you they are, And that if a
boy wants to compete against a girl, he can now
be in a girl's competition, and when they always do
(07:54):
is a bigger, stronger, faster. Of course, that there are
differences between the two races. They picked the nuttiest things possible,
no pun intended, the nuttiest things possible to take the
claim want, and they lost voters because of it, and
I hope they continue to. I don't want them to
(08:14):
be rational, because then they might win back those voters.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
Allow me to introduce myself.
Speaker 4 (08:21):
My name is Victor Michael Berry.
Speaker 3 (08:23):
Genius is Mark Elias. Those of you who follow politics,
many of you know his name is the devil. According
to the New York Times quote, Mark Elias has done
more than any single person outside of government to shape
(08:48):
the Democrat Party and the rules under which all campaigns
and elections in the United States are conducted. Now understand
that what they're applauding is killing voter ID laws and
allowing an environment where cheating is rampant. And that's why
(09:13):
he fights any voter ID any election integrity, because you
have to leave the door unlocked for the burglars to
get in. His job is to keep the door unlocked.
In April of twenty fifteen, so a year before, year
and a half before the election that Donald Trump would win,
(09:36):
Hillary Clinton was hired by Mark Elias as the attorney
of record and general counsel for her twenty sixteen presidential campaign.
She's got to make sure she can cheat. A year later,
April of twenty sixteen, the Washington Post reported that Elias
on behalf of the Democrat National Convention Committee. Sorry and
(09:56):
the Clinton campaign hired something called Fusion GPS that would
conduct research, and that research would lead to the creation
of what came to be known as the Steele Dossier.
Remember Christopher Steele, He was the disgraced supposed British spy
who had to admit under oath that he lied. Elias
(10:20):
played a key role, the lawyer, in funding this quote
unquote research. It was all made up. That research produced
now debunked claims about Donald Trump's ties to Russia. This
was the Russian collusion case. So what they did is
(10:42):
Elias pays Steel, pays a fusion GPS, a group of
former Democrats or group of Democrats former media members. They
find a disgraced former spy and they get him to
put his name on the dossier as if he was
(11:02):
hired by the media. Hey, who is Donald Trump? Is
there anything out there we need to know? Let's ask
one of the spies. So the spy comes back with
the report which was already created for him, that says, yes,
the Russians controlled Donald Trump. Trump must not be president.
He is under the control of the of the Russians.
(11:22):
The Russians are taking over America. Ah okay, So all
of this happens, and all of it would end up unraveling.
Remember they even Eves dropped on Donald Trump by using
Carter Page as the subject. All this Carter Page is
(11:44):
a bad guy. We got a spy on him because
they knew Carter Page was coming into meetings with President Trump,
who was not the president yet at Trump Tower. Well,
if you're Eves dropping on Carter Page, you're also Eves
dropping on the presidential candidate. This was the deep state
try I aim to get something on Trump that they
then hand to Hillary's lawyer, who then hands it to
(12:06):
the media, and Trump is finished because they were scared
to death. Well, President Trump now talking about the Department
of Justice is weaponization against him and that he's going
to do something about it. He mentioned Mark Elias by name,
and that clearly has Mark Elias scared to death because
(12:27):
he deleted his aggressive x account. He's not on Twitter
anymore because he realizes, uh, oh, the walls are closing in.
Speaker 6 (12:39):
They spied on my campaign, launched one hoax and disinformation
operation after another, broke the law on a colossal scale,
persecuted my family, staff and supporters, raided my home mar
A Lago, and did everything within their power to prevent
me from becoming the president of the United States, with
(13:02):
the help of radicals like Mark Elias, Mark Pomerants, and
these are people that nobody's ever seen anything like it.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
So many others.
Speaker 6 (13:14):
But these are people that are bad people, really bad people.
They try to turn America into a corrupt, communist and
third world country.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
So now he's got him scared. He's not forgiving and forgetting.
You remember the name Peter Strasak. He's the one that
was like a horny teenager who was screwing Lisa Page,
who was a married lawyer for Department of Justice. And
she was texting him, what are we gonna do if
(13:47):
Trump becomes president?
Speaker 2 (13:48):
What are we going to do?
Speaker 3 (13:51):
And he was responding, don't worry, I got an insurance policy.
I and my friends at the FBI are going to
prevent Donald Trump from being president. Remember all this, Remember
that smirky, creepy smile when he was testifying in front
of Congress. Well, this is the head of the CIA,
John Ratcliffe, who was a member of Congress when all
(14:15):
that happened six years ago. As a congressman. He's questioning
Peter Strausick. And listen to this exchange.
Speaker 7 (14:24):
The approximately fifty thousand text messages that I've seen with
your personal beliefs, like f Trump stopped Trump in Pete's Trump,
go ahead and confirm on the record that none of
that occurred on an official FBI device or on official
FBI time.
Speaker 8 (14:38):
Go ahead and do that, sir, No, they did, many
of them did it.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Oh they did.
Speaker 3 (14:41):
Okay, so do Sally.
Speaker 4 (14:44):
No.
Speaker 7 (14:44):
I'll give you a chance at the end. So what
you really meant to say was that when you said
you never crossed that bright, inviolable line, what you meant
to say was, except for fifty thousand times, except for
hundreds of times a day where I went back and
forth expressing my personal opinions about effing Trump and stopping
Trump and impeaching Trump on official FBI phones on official
(15:09):
FBI time. Other than that, you never cross that line.
I'm sure there are thirteen thousand FBI agents out there
that are beaming with pride and how clearly you've drawn
that line. Agents, structor, You're starting to understand why some
folks out there don't believe a word you say, and
why it's especially troubling that you, of all people, are
at the center of the three highest profile investigations in
(15:32):
recent times that involve President Trump, and that you were
in charge of an investigation investigating gathering evidence against Donald Trump,
a subject that you hated, that you wanted to f him,
to stop him, to impeach him.
Speaker 3 (15:47):
And do you see why that might.
Speaker 7 (15:49):
Call into question everything you've touched on all of those investigations.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
So what the left will do when an asset like
this is burned? Is zy go Oh was a lone wolf.
He was acting alone.
Speaker 9 (16:01):
It was all.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
He answered that question. He was a flashback to Peter
strausik answering, Oh no, no, no, no. Everybody was in on
what I was doing.
Speaker 8 (16:13):
At every step, at every investigative decision. There are multiple
layers of people above me, the assistant director, executive assistant director,
deputy director, and director of the FBI, and multiple layers
of people below me, section chiefs, supervisors, unit chiefs, case agents,
and analysts, all of whom were involved in all of
these decisions.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
Michael, do I have a story for you? My brother
in law murdered too Native American to Michael Barry show,
Now you have my attention. Cheryl Atkinson was at CBS
News in two thousand and six when she started reporting
on things that caused the Democrats and the establishment problems.
(16:52):
She ended up getting pushed out at CBS News and
some horrible, horrible things happened to her. She did a
story about flu deaths among the elderly continuing to climb
after getting the flu shot. We're never going to stop
(17:15):
revisiting COVID. This is why the Jews constantly remember the Holocaust,
the premise being if you forget, it will happen again.
So let's go to Cheryl Atkinson's CBS News all the
way back to when she was at CBS. Now she's not.
(17:36):
She's at Sinclair now and basically independent. But here she
was back in two thousand and six. But think about
this for a moment. I have long argued the flu
shot is ineffective at a minimum, if not harmful. What
if you're more likely to die if you're old if
you get the flu shot than if you don't.
Speaker 9 (17:57):
It stands the reason that flu deaths among the elm
should have taken a dramatic dip, making an X graph
like this. Instead, flute deaths among the elderly continue to climb.
Speaker 2 (18:08):
WHOA, it was hot yesterday.
Speaker 9 (18:10):
Here's what scientists have found over twenty years. The percentage
of seniors getting flu shots increase sharply, from fifteen percent
to sixty five percent. It stands to reason that flu
deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip
making an.
Speaker 3 (18:24):
X graph like this.
Speaker 9 (18:26):
Instead, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
It was hard to believe.
Speaker 9 (18:31):
So were searchers at the National Institutes of Health set
out to do a study adjusting for all kinds of
factors that could be masking the true benefits of the shots.
But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got
the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths
among the elderly. It's not what health officials hope to find.
NIH wouldn't let us interview the study's lead author, so
(18:52):
we went to Boston and found the only co author
not employed by NIH, doctor Tom Reikert.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
We realize that we had sendiary materials.
Speaker 9 (19:02):
Doctor Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations.
Speaker 2 (19:05):
It helped.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
We were trying to do something mainstream, that's for sure.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
Were you surprised astonishment?
Speaker 9 (19:11):
Did you check the data a couple of times to
make sure?
Speaker 6 (19:14):
Well?
Speaker 1 (19:14):
Even more than that, we've looked at other countries now
and the same is true.
Speaker 9 (19:17):
Fast study soon to be published finds the same poor
results in Australia. France, Canada and the UK, and other
new research stokes the idea that decades.
Speaker 2 (19:28):
Of promoting flu shots and.
Speaker 9 (19:29):
Seniors and the billion spent haven't had the desired result.
The current head of National Immanizations confirmed CDC is now
looking at new strategies that stop short of calling the
present policy of failure.
Speaker 3 (19:42):
There's an active dialogue into how we can do better
to prevent influenza and its complications in the elderly.
Speaker 9 (19:48):
So what's an older person to do? The CDC says
they should still get their flu shots, that it could
make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected
in the total numbers. But watch for CDC the likely
in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in
a roundabout way by vaccinating more children and others around
them who could give them the flu. Cheryl Atkinson, CBS
(20:10):
News Washington.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
There was a glitch in that audio. I don't know
if you heard that, but the point is I was
raised to believe in doctors. I had a wonderful doctor
growing up. It was Marty Rutledge, wonderful, wonderful doctor, and
(20:34):
he cared for my mother until she passed on September
nineteenth like she was his own mother, and he's cared
for my father for as long as I've been alive
as well. Well, that's not true. I was delivered by
a doctor by the name of Raleigh Allen a small
town of Texas, in small town of Orange, Texas, and
his lead nurse was Barbara. They end up marrying and
(20:59):
they moved away and he sold his practice, as often
happened back then. That was back when doctors owned their practice,
when doctors could be doctors, and he sold his practice
to a young, up and coming doctor who kind of
you know, you would get introduced to doctor Rutledge because
doctor Allen was out or whatever. And what they do
is get you comfortable with this with the new doctor
(21:21):
until eventually he bought him out. Stockbrokers and financial advisors
do this. It's a transition, and that gives the lead
doctor an exit strategy, and that was done for quite
some time. Then the practice of medicine was taken over
by the financial industry. And so doctors are by and large,
(21:41):
almost exclusively just employees today, and that affects everything. If
you look at who's leading the charge with social or
economic issues in this country, that's not a member of
the media or politics. It's an individual who owns their
own business. A lot of cops, firefighters, public employees. They
(22:06):
are prohibited from their free speech rights. They are prohibited
from expressing themselves and contributing to the public conversation by
their very employer. That's wrong. You should still be able
to have an opinion. But I got to tell you,
I am surprised how often I see people get upset
(22:27):
when they see a cop post something on social media.
Aren't you a cop? Yeah, you should be saying things.
What kind of idiot are you? So you want us
to have entire conversations without a huge group of people
contributing to it. Why, I mean, you don't have a
(22:49):
problem with elected officials stating their opinion if you truly
believe in collaboration, if you try believe that the best
result will occur when everyone contributes. Why would you want
to silence certain people? Well, because you don't truly believe that.
(23:11):
And this is how we grow to understand that. Well,
my doctors growing up were wonderful and I still have
I'm happy to say, incredible doctors who are are friends
of mine and care about me and go above and
(23:31):
beyond to take good care of my health. And I
encourage you to have as close a relationship with your
doctors as you possibly can, to have doctors before you
need them, because by the time you need them, you're referred,
you're already in a bad way. I encourage you to
read as much as possible about health and wellness and
(23:51):
exercise and food and diet and nutrition in pharmaceuticals, because
we are past the point of you just being able
to trust the science and trust the experts. We are
long past that. Coming up in the next segment, and
it's going to take the entirety of the next segment,
(24:12):
but it's important. It's the former medical director of the
Cleveland Clinic and he's literally crying as he apologizes to
his patience for administering vaccines, because the thing about it
is it's first, do no harm. You've got people who
(24:33):
took the COVID vaccine who had no business taking it.
They didn't need to. The likelihood of them dying was
so low because they were neither obese, nor elderly, nor compromised.
Give me no compromise. Do you know many people died
the flu every year, So these people should not have
(24:53):
taken the vaccine, but you had a whole industry pushing
them to do it. And this goes to my further
to my theory, learn on your own. Don't trust people
with the financial incentive to do some talk radio the
Michael Verie Show, I've got to shorten this intro because
I want you to hear the entirety of this. It's
(25:13):
a former medical director of Cleveland Clinic offering a tearful
apology to his patients or administering vaccines. I think a
lot of doctors, if they were honest, would come forward
and say, maya Colpa, my bad, I made a mistake.
I care about you, I love you, but I made
a mistake. I'd admire this man for this.
Speaker 10 (25:35):
For my big issues regarding vaccines, and these are the
things that I'd like to highlight. Number one, there is
no education in medical schools that I am aware of,
and being an educator at the Cleveland Clinic, Learner College
of Medicine and Case Western Reserve University, I am not
aware of education around vaccines, their contents, safety record, informed consent,
(26:02):
or the vaccine injury compensation program.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
We do not discuss that.
Speaker 10 (26:07):
In nineteen eighty six, Congress enacted legislation removing all liability
from pharma related to vaccine adverse events.
Speaker 2 (26:18):
What are we taught about vaccines?
Speaker 10 (26:20):
We are taught to memorize the vaccine schedule.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
We don't discuss that almost four.
Speaker 10 (26:29):
Billion dollars with a bee has been paid to vaccine
injured patients since nineteen ninety two. For medical professionals, we
expect fair balance, but vaccines seem to be absolved from
that consideration.
Speaker 2 (26:48):
Number two.
Speaker 10 (26:50):
There appears to be a conflict of interest regarding payments
to providers for completing vaccine schedules and correlary to that
which would be Number three. Patients are being dismissed from
practices because of quote unquote vaccine safety concerns. If you
(27:12):
bring up a question about a vaccine and you decide
not to vaccinate your child, you may be at risk
of being terminated from that practice.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
Absolutely deplorable and disgusting.
Speaker 10 (27:25):
Number four, and again to the Dailey family, I'm really sorry,
but employers are forcing employees to receive the flu vaccine
or face corrective action or job loss. The fact that
your dad was six months from retiring.
Speaker 2 (27:41):
Is number five.
Speaker 10 (27:46):
There's a lack of informed consents, and I was one
of those providers who didn't provide safety sheets. Before vaccinating,
I would tell the parents, these are the vaccines today.
We're going to give you three VA seems in one
leg and two in the other. And then after vaccinating
either the child or the adult patient, here's your information sheet.
(28:08):
And again, to be completely transparent with you, I had
no idea that there was even a mention of the
compensation program or a telephone number to call. Absolutely deplorable
on my part, and I apologize to my patients.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Number six.
Speaker 10 (28:28):
There's a lack of transparency regarding vaccine complications, and worse,
you're being shamed as patients for suggesting that you were
harmed by a vaccine. If I see a patient in
the office and diagnose strep throte and give them penicillin
(28:50):
and either the mom or the patient themselves calls and
tells me that they developed a rash, there is zero question.
The chart now states they have an l to penicillin
and we'll never be given it again. Why don't we
believe parents and patience when they tell us they have
had an adverse event regarding a vaccine. It doesn't make
(29:14):
sense to me as a medical professional. I apologize for
the being emotional. Number seven. Actually I don't apologize. Number seven.
Why do the placebos and vaccine studies contain the adjivis
(29:36):
like mercury and aluminum. Aren't placebos supposed to be inert?
In other words, if you're comparing let's say, the Hepatitis
V vaccine against the placebo, why does the placebo contain
a metal?
Speaker 11 (29:49):
If the concern could possibly be the metal itself that's
triggering the autoimmunity that doctor lyons Wiler had so eloquently
spoke about.
Speaker 2 (30:01):
Number eight.
Speaker 10 (30:03):
Why has the rate of autism spectrum disorder gone from
one in one thousand in nineteen nineties I was taught
to one in forty eight in twenty seventeen. Is there
a link between the toxins in vaccines and this significant
increase in the diagnosis not only of ASD. We certainly
(30:24):
know about us all risk of giambreat but what about
attention deficit disorder, mood disorders in children, and just the
overall chronic disease epidemic in this country. I mean, we
are a very sick population, and I'm not trying to
be dramatic, but we're currently spending three and a half
trillion dollars on healthcare and what honestly, folks, are we
(30:48):
getting for that. As a physician and all physicians, we
take the hippocratic oath and we say no premium no chieri.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
First, do no.
Speaker 10 (30:57):
Harm and not providing in form consent regarding a vaccine
and then ultimately discovering patients had adverse reactions to that
intervention is a direct violation of ADOS. There's much work
to be done in this area as pharma is literally
(31:18):
racing to provide us with more life saving vaccines.
Speaker 2 (31:24):
Let me tell your friends.
Speaker 10 (31:26):
They are working on over one hundred and forty vaccines
at this time.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
Beware this is coming.
Speaker 10 (31:36):
Throughout two tenty seventeen, I received a tremendous outpouring of
support from literally all over the world. I just want
to say thank you to everyone for helping me keep
my chin up during a difficult year. My partner, doctor
Jessica Hutchins, who is working with me at Inspire Wellness,
my family of course, Michelle from OAMF and Stephanie doctor
(32:04):
lyons Wiler have been in my corner and what I
now realized that this has been the kick in the
behind that I personally needed to get out from under
a multi billion dollar conglomerate in order to really do
the work that I feel needs to be done, both
in educating the public and taking care of my patients
any that have any chronic disease, but in the way
(32:27):
that I really feel they need to be treated, not
based on protocols, and not under the thumb of a
watchful eye telling me I must do this or do
that or risk termination.
Speaker 2 (32:40):
Please don't feel sorry for me. I believe the universe
is calling me to do a higher purpose, and.
Speaker 10 (32:48):
I will begin realizing that dream this coming Monday on
January fifteenth, when my new medical practice, Inspire Wellness, opens
in Beachwood, Ohio. I will continue to fight for the
rights of all patients, including the right to informed consent,
and along with that, we must push to uncover the
truths around vaccines, the real safety and efficacy data, not
(33:11):
the ones that either the government or Big Pharma wants
us to see. And we must begin to truly understand
the direct link if there is one that I do
believe that occurs in at risk populations for developing neurodevelopment
mental disorders like yan Bereat that mister Bailey suffered from
(33:33):
autism spectrum disorder ADHD mood disorders as I spoke about.
But folks all chronic disease. This is all on the
table and we must keep our eyes and ears open.
Speaker 2 (33:48):
And as I learned when I first.
Speaker 10 (33:50):
Stepped into the Wellness Institute, be open to new ways
of thinking. And that's what we all need to do
in medicine, reported
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
True Crime Tonight
If you eat, sleep, and breathe true crime, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT is serving up your nightly fix. Five nights a week, KT STUDIOS & iHEART RADIO invite listeners to pull up a seat for an unfiltered look at the biggest cases making headlines, celebrity scandals, and the trials everyone is watching. With a mix of expert analysis, hot takes, and listener call-ins, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT goes beyond the headlines to uncover the twists, turns, and unanswered questions that keep us all obsessed—because, at TRUE CRIME TONIGHT, there’s a seat for everyone. Whether breaking down crime scene forensics, scrutinizing serial killers, or debating the most binge-worthy true crime docs, True Crime Tonight is the fresh, fast-paced, and slightly addictive home for true crime lovers.