Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
It's that time. Time, time, time, luck and load. The
Michael Dairy Show is.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
On the air.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
You've got the vaccination? Are you okayman? You see know
it works? Or you you know or or or a mom.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
And dad understands your bad I this work. It's just time.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
Jab I'm trying to.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
Spend the summers trusted in her Locker won't help me understand.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
I won't help me understand. Rambling your bad.
Speaker 5 (01:02):
If if if.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
Your kid wanted to find out whether or not there
were there's a man on the moon or whatever, you
know something, or you know whether those aliens are here?
You know who are the people they talked to beyond
the kids who loved talking about it.
Speaker 6 (01:17):
No, con was a bad dude and he ran a
bunch of bad boys.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
You can't come understand sleep. Democrats claimed that.
Speaker 7 (01:48):
President Trump's Big Beautiful bill will cut Medicare for millions
of Americans. President Trump said, no, no, no, no no. The
only thing that's going to be cut is waste, fraud,
and abuse. You know I have seen this. I served
on Houston City Council for six years, for those of
(02:08):
you who don't know, and every time there would be
the equivalent of the seven hundred dollars Air Force toilet
in a in a plane. Every time you'd say, hey,
why are these checks being mailed to people who are
dead and cashed and you know we got to cut that,
the immediate reaction is you don't want to help old people,
you don't want to help poor people. They know what
(02:30):
they're doing. These ad hominem attempts or attacks are designed
to keep you from ever looking at the fraud. Nobody
publicly justifies fraud, even if they benefit from it.
Speaker 1 (02:44):
So what do they do.
Speaker 7 (02:47):
They criticize you for hurting the poor or the minorities,
or the this or the that. Well is that who's
committing the fraud? Anyway, here's the audio. It's it's five
to oh three ramon medicaid.
Speaker 8 (02:59):
We're not touching a thing.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
All that one is one day, three hours.
Speaker 9 (03:03):
We don't want any waste fraud for abuse, very simple
waste fraud abuse.
Speaker 10 (03:09):
Other than that, we're leaving it medicare we're leaving in it.
All we're after and this is for the good of it.
There's a lot of waste fraud interviews. That's all we're doing.
We're not touching it. The Democrats are going to destroy it.
Speaker 7 (03:21):
President Trump was asked about the arrest of Democrat Congressman
La Monica MacIvor for assaulting an ICE agent. See what
should have happened is he should have pummeled her in
the head. We've reached a point where bad people do
bad things and everyone else pulls out a camera. If
(03:41):
people get in response to what they do, they get.
When Daniel Peney choked out that that idiot on the subway,
that should be the answer every single time. And this
nonsense would stop, all right, five oh.
Speaker 10 (03:53):
Five with the arrest of a commress woman, Frank Commiers room,
did you see her?
Speaker 1 (04:01):
She was out of control?
Speaker 9 (04:03):
Those days are over, the days of globe, the days
of globe, God did the days of work are over?
That woman I don't I have no idea who she is.
That woman was out of control. She was shoving federal agents.
He was out of control. The days of that crap
are over to this country.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
We're gonna have law and order.
Speaker 7 (04:21):
Speaking of Jake Tamper, MacIver was on Lamonica maciv was
on MSNBC with Jen Psaki. Pasaki was part of the
internal Biden cover up machine.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Never forget that, and they.
Speaker 7 (04:36):
Blame the rank and file ICE agents who she assaulted.
These are government employees who cannot speak out themselves, cannot
defend themselves, and she and she had she blames them
for the fact that she assaulted them. There is, by
the way, among Democrats, a hatred of law enforcement. Law
(04:59):
enforcement should never democrat, because these people hate you. If
you are law enforcement, Democrats hate you. They love George Floyd,
they hate you.
Speaker 11 (05:09):
When you look back at video, I'm sure you were
just digesting it all in the moment when you were
doing all those interviews that day.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
You probably talked to your colleagues as you pieced together
what happened.
Speaker 7 (05:19):
I mean, did you even know who you were surrounded
by at the time.
Speaker 11 (05:23):
It was fast, It happened so fast. I mean, I
was just talking about this where Red Bonnie Watson the
other day. We were on a segment together and we
were playing they were playing the video back, and we
were just talking about how it was so disheartening to
see that, to see that episode. It was a very
tint situation. We were trying to ask questions, trying to
get explanation from the officials that were there, and it
(05:45):
was just so chaotic and ice and Homeland Security definitely
escalated the situation, calls, the chaos and the confrontation, and
it just was so unnecessary. So it's really hard to
play the videos back. It's very hard to watch, especially
when we're just showing up to do our jobs, you know,
an oversight visit that should have been simple.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
The Democrat cabal continues.
Speaker 7 (06:09):
Congressman Democrat Dan Goldman was on MSNBC and he called
the arrest of Monica of La Monica McIver worse than Watergate.
You cannot make this stuff up, worse than Watergate.
Speaker 12 (06:26):
This is a member of Congress who was executing her
constitutionally authorized and statutorily authorized oversight duties. The law says
that members of Congress can show up unannounced at Department
of Homeland Securities facilities to do their oversight.
Speaker 1 (06:43):
That's what she did.
Speaker 12 (06:44):
After this whole horrific assault that they're talking about. She
had an hour long tour of the facility. And here's
the Speaker of the House who is not defending the
institution from what is so clearly politicized prosecution. Yet again,
the Republicans in Congress have just completely turned over all
(07:07):
of their own authority as a separate and equal branch
of government to Donald Trump's weaponized government, and they will
continue to tow this line. It's the same reason that
they put forward all of this bs about Joe Biden
weaponizing the federal government, because we all know that it
(07:27):
was Donald Trump who did it, and it is certainly
Donald Trump was doing it now and you are not
seeing anything coming out from this Trump administration about any
politicization or weaponization of the government during the Biden administration.
All we're seeing is them doing that. But they're trying
to create a dynamic where they've convinced the public that
(07:50):
this is just a quid pro quoso to speak, this
is tit for tat. Well, they did it, so we're
doing it. That's vs. That is absolutely not the case.
This is as bad as it's ever been. This is
worse than Watergate. This Department of Justice is corrupt and
it is politicized, and it is If the Republicans in
Congress don't stand up to Donald Trump and say you've
(08:14):
gone too far, I don't know that we'll ever be
able to come back from this complete.
Speaker 8 (08:23):
Allow me to introduce myself.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
My name is Mitch Michael Perry, Genius.
Speaker 7 (08:30):
That's the subject of corrupt, criminal, violent, and very very
not smart Democrats. Let's talk about the Attorney General of
the State of New York, Letitia James big tish they
call her. I don't know if that was the guy
at Payless Shoes where when she pulled out her big
o club feet he called her big big tit.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
I don't know where. Maybe it's just because she's fat.
I don't know.
Speaker 7 (08:55):
But she's the one who led the law fair against
Donald Trump, not the remember fat Fanny Willis in Atlanta
Fulton County. Do you start to notice how many fat
black women are in law enforcement, you know, district attorney
and attorney general positions, and they're fat, and they happen
to be black, and they're really dumb. I don't know
(09:18):
what the trend is. I don't know if that's a
qualification or a glitch in the matrix. I don't know anyway,
So she now says, yeah, I did put that I
live in Virginia on those loan documents, you know, on
the mortar trobe. I mistakenly, she says, she mistakenly claimed it.
Do you mistakenly say that you live in Vermont? If
(09:41):
you live in Arkansas. If you are listening to me
right now and you live in Florida, do you mistakenly
fill out documents for a mortgage and Idaho and claim
you live in Idaho. I don't know anyone who does that,
and there's no mis She benefited by making that statement,
(10:03):
because mortgage companies don't want to lend you money on
a property in a state where you don't live. If
you live in a home, you're far less likely to
lose it to foreclosure because where you live but your
second home, the data shows you're far more likely to
let it go into foreclosure because you're going to pay
(10:24):
your primary mortgage first, so the loan terms differ.
Speaker 1 (10:30):
She lied. That's a crime.
Speaker 7 (10:33):
It's mortgage fraud, the very thing she charged Trump for
which he didn't commit, she was actually committing. Thank you
Rush Limbaugh for teaching us that whatever they claim you're doing,
they themselves are already doing.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
That's how you know.
Speaker 13 (10:52):
As you know, we follow lawsuit against down the Farmer
for the proof found Trump and his family can't be
secure four hundred and fifty four million out a judgment
against him, which is on appeal and could pay. The
case is on appeal I have no idea when that
case will be decided. This investigation into me is nothing
(11:15):
more than retribution. It's baseless. It has to do with
the fact that on a power of attorney, I mistakenly
indicated that I was a state of Virginia, and but
prior to that, I had indicated to the mortgage broker that,
in fact, in bold cap letters, that I am not
a resident of Virginia and will be And in the
(11:36):
mortgage application I indicated that I would not live in
Virginia and I was not a resident. They just took
the the the power of attorney and they're using that
as a basis for enforcement for their investigation, when in reality,
the power of attorney it was never used to determine
my eligibility for a mortgage for my niece for a
(11:57):
home in the state of Virginia. Nie seem as children
and look on I want.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
To hear at that of all.
Speaker 7 (12:04):
Another story of democrats assaulting law enforcement. Two members of
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu's administration. Boy, she's something else, this woman.
She including one of them who works with the office
providing civilian oversight of the city's police department. She hates
cops were fired after being arrested on domestic violence charges
(12:29):
last week. The mayor, This left wing nut mayor of
Boston named Michelle Wo says there was an internal review
that was done. As a result, their employment status was
terminated by a city translation.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
They have video of her beating up a cop.
Speaker 7 (12:45):
Marwa ku de Nazar, chief of staff at the city's
Office of Police Accountability or really just police hatred, was
charged with assault and battery on a cop and domestic
assault and battery. Kudenasar is an anti police activist and
a Black Lives Matter supporter, so naturally Wu appointed her
(13:08):
chief of staff for the city's Office of Police Accountability.
In other words, every time someone's arrested they claim the
cops beat them up, it goes to this department to go, yep,
we don't need to review it.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
We just assume it happened.
Speaker 7 (13:21):
Chulan Hwang was charged with assault and battery on a
family or household member. He was a neighborhood business manager
for the city's Office of Economic Opportunity and Inclusion. According
to the city's website, do they have anybody white left
(13:41):
in Boston?
Speaker 1 (13:43):
You got Michelle Wu, the mayor.
Speaker 7 (13:45):
You got Marwa Kudenasar the chief of staff for the
Police Hating Operation, and Chulan Hwang was the city's Office
of Economic Opportunity and Inclusion. I mean, listen, I'm the
only white person in the family, but my goodness, is
there anybody left in municipal government in this country that
(14:07):
is white? I only ask because all these people hate
the white South Africans coming here. It is kind of funny.
I realize that racial discussion makes most people uncomfortable. I
do it every day. I enjoy it. I think it's fun.
It's fun because it's so awkwards, like talking about farts
or picking your nose or anything else. ABC God struck
(14:29):
me down with a call for talking like that.
Speaker 1 (14:32):
ABC five in Boston with the story, and that.
Speaker 14 (14:35):
Employee actually worked in the office that's supposed to provide
civilian oversight of the Boston Police Department. The chief of
staff for the City of Boston's Office of Police Accountability,
twenty six year old Marwa Kudinazar feacing a judge charged
with assaulting a Boston Police officer and her boyfriend. Early
(14:57):
this morning, Boston police responded to an apartment in Chinatown
for a report of domestic violence after Marwa called nine
one one. Inside, they say they found Marwa and her boyfriend,
Chulan Wang, the neighborhood business manager for the city's Economic
Development Office. According to the police report, Marwa had marks
(15:19):
on her wrists and Chulan had bite marks on his body.
The officers say Marwa told police Chulan had cheated on her,
so she went on a date with his boss earlier
that evening, and when she got back to his apartment,
he took her phone and her car keys. According to
the report, Marwa told police he held onto her risks
(15:41):
and wouldn't let go, and I was biting him in
self defense. Officers took Chulan into custody on charges of
domestic assault and battery, but they say Marwa became angry
and said she was lying, called nine one one again,
asking for a supervisor to respond. They say she told
police we both worked for the City of Boston. We
(16:04):
both work for the Mayor's office. Officers say Marwall blocked
the door, then struck and swore at police officers, leading
to her arrest. After she was taken outside in handcuffs.
Police say Toulon uttered from the back of the cruiser.
We both worked for the city. This is unnecessary.
Speaker 12 (16:23):
Now.
Speaker 14 (16:23):
Both employees pleaded not guilty in court tonight. Again they
are on unpaid leave as the city investigates, and Justin
Mayor WU calls the allegations incredibly disturbing.
Speaker 7 (16:36):
Remember me, remember Scott Man, you know what, my Bengo
card from ten years ago would have never predicted that
Elon Musk would be, in one way or another involved
(16:56):
with the United States government, that in one way or
another he would be close to Donald Trump, that in
one way or another he would be the guy exposing
government fraud from within. Didn't see that happening. If you
know anything about Elon, he like many other people on
(17:16):
the outside, very successful movie stars. In the light, they
tend to gravitate toward the Democrat Party. Republicans don't do
a good job of bringing them over, and they tend
to be very naive about politics, so they tend to
agree with the left that yeah, Republicans are mean and evil,
(17:38):
and it's not until the Democrats attack them personally, which
happened to Elon, that they start to realize, Wait a second,
I'm on the wrong side of history here.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
I have really enjoyed.
Speaker 7 (17:51):
The progression of Elon Musk and the use of his
talents to contribute to electing Trump and getting things done.
I have he participated in a Q and A at
the Cutter Economic Forum when he made a savage statement
about Bill Gates, who have been criticizing the cuts to USAID.
(18:15):
And I really like this because Bill Gates is portrayed
by media as you know, this avuncular figure that is
just a good person and he has his foundation and
he wants to help.
Speaker 1 (18:26):
He is a monster. Bill Gates is a monster. You know.
Here's what he said.
Speaker 4 (18:34):
I do want to ask you about USAID and the
comments that Bill Gates made the other day, which and
I know that you called him. I know you've said
that already.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
I wanted.
Speaker 15 (18:49):
And I'm just who does Bill Gates think he is
to make comments about the welfare of children, given that
he is before a quence of Jeffrey.
Speaker 4 (18:58):
Fsc Okay, Well, he's he's he said he regrets those and.
Speaker 8 (19:05):
He spent he spent a lot. He spent a lot of.
Speaker 4 (19:08):
His own money on philanthropy around the world over the years.
Speaker 1 (19:12):
Bill Gates' relationship is not secret.
Speaker 7 (19:16):
The Today's Show did a solid for Melinda Gates when
They reported that it was a catalyst for Bill's divorce.
Melinda Gates had some good pr people, and they threw
Bill Gates into Greece. And by the way, he needed
to be thrown into grease. He needed to be devalued
(19:38):
as an asset for evil. We don't need him telling
us to take shots that he profits off of.
Speaker 16 (19:46):
This morning, new questions are swirling around the state of
Bill and Melinda Gates' marriage leading up to last week's
divorce announcement. The Wall Street Journal reporting Melinda began talking
to divorce attorneys roughly two years before the filing, The paper,
citing people familiar with the matter and documents it reviewed.
NBC has not yet independently seen or verified those documents.
(20:10):
Last week, the multi billionaires announced in a joint statement
they were ending their twenty five year marriage because we
no longer believe we can grow together as a couple
in this next phase of our lives.
Speaker 8 (20:21):
The Journal, citing.
Speaker 16 (20:22):
Several people, reporting that one source of concern for Melinda,
a global advocate for women and girls, was Bill's dealings
with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. According to documents obtained
by the journal, Melinda and her advisors held a number
of calls with divorce lawyers in October twenty nineteen. The
same month, The New York Times first reported that Bill
(20:43):
met with Epstein on numerous occasions starting in twenty eleven,
after Epstein had served time for soliciting prostitution, the Times
reporting one stay at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse lasted late into
the night, according to more than a dozen.
Speaker 8 (20:57):
People familiar with the relationship.
Speaker 16 (21:00):
In late twenty nineteen, Gates was asked about his meetings
and relationship with Epstein at one of the paper's forums.
Speaker 17 (21:07):
You know, I made a mistake in judgment that I
thought that those discussions would lead literally to billions of
dollars going to Global Health. Turned out that was a
bad judgment, That was a mirage.
Speaker 1 (21:19):
None of that money ever appeared.
Speaker 17 (21:20):
And I gave him some benefit by the associations, So
you know, I made a doubly wrong mistate.
Speaker 7 (21:27):
There even PBS, even left wing PBS, so he's probably
bought off in one way or another, asked Bill Gates
about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. This actually surprised me.
I don't want to get PBS too much credit, but
this surprised me.
Speaker 18 (21:45):
It was reported that you continue to meet with him
over several years, and that, in other words, a number
of meetings. What did you do when you found out
about his background.
Speaker 17 (21:59):
Well, you know, I've said I regretted having those dinners,
and there's nothing, absolutely nothing new on that.
Speaker 18 (22:08):
Is there a lesson for you, for anyone else looking
at this?
Speaker 1 (22:15):
Well he's dead.
Speaker 7 (22:16):
So South Africa has been in the news a lot
since we're on the Elon subject, as white South Africans
have fled the country to escape what is a genocide.
But American democrats don't care because as long as blacks
are killing whites, they think it's justified.
Speaker 1 (22:39):
I think they're cheering it on.
Speaker 7 (22:42):
Elon Musk was born in South Africa, and he says, look,
I was born in South Africa, but I can't get
a license to operate Starlink, which is the internet provider,
because I'm not black. I can't get a license there
to operate star because I'm not black. He then asked
(23:04):
the moderator if that was wrong, and he.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
Wants her to weigh in.
Speaker 7 (23:12):
She makes excuses and refuses to answer the question. Is
this a hard thing to understand? Surely it's wrong? Surely
that's not appropriate. Surely that's not good and decent, decent
and justin fair that a white person can't get a license.
(23:35):
She doesn't deny what he says, Oh, that's not true.
You can get a license. She doesn't deny that. She
says instead, well, she doesn't say anything. We're gonna take
this one to the break because I want you to
listen carefully, and I want you to notice. We've got
(23:57):
to make people comfortable talking about the tr ruth. We've
got to make people comfortable confronting the truth. She doesn't
want to agree. Yeah, that sounds pretty left up, because
then she'll be ostracized from polite liberal society in media,
and that's sad.
Speaker 15 (24:17):
Now I'm in the sobsid situation where I was going
to South Africa but can get a license to operats
in starlink because I'm not black.
Speaker 8 (24:23):
Well, it looks like that's It looks looks like that.
It looks like that's about to change.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
I just asked you a question, Please answer. Does that
seem right to you?
Speaker 4 (24:33):
Well, those rules were designed to bring Those rules were
designed to bring about an era of more economic equality
in South Africa, And it looks like the government has
found a way around those rules for you.
Speaker 1 (24:48):
Ask your question.
Speaker 8 (24:50):
Is this is your interview. Everyone wants to hear.
Speaker 15 (24:52):
From your question, yes or no?
Speaker 8 (24:55):
Not for me to answer.
Speaker 4 (24:57):
I have got a question for you about about your
government works.
Speaker 8 (25:01):
And the amount of savings. Do you like raciless loves?
This is not for me to answer.
Speaker 4 (25:08):
Come on now, you wouldn't be trying to dodge the question.
Speaker 8 (25:15):
Your chorge an't sure.
Speaker 1 (25:17):
And the words that were taken by Robert f. K.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
These children speak Chinese and spanness, Michael.
Speaker 7 (25:24):
Just when you think there's hope for Canada, just when
you think Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney says every financial
decision should take climate change into account, going as far
as wanting to take money away from companies who he
(25:46):
deems part of the problem. Did you notice that we
haven't heard about climate change in a while. But what happened? Oh,
we had all these other things we had to talk about.
But now that we're bored of that, we're back.
Speaker 5 (25:58):
We need to ultimately get to a point where where
every financial decisions taking climate change into account, the impact
on the transition. And we actually dropped the adjectives sustainable
because it's just what financial professionals do. Secondly, on the
risk side, we need the banks to look at the
risks around the climate transition, which then flipped to opportunities
On the opportunity side. It's really about looking for and
(26:20):
at transition plans from all companies and backing those who
are part of the solution and taking capital away from
those who were.
Speaker 19 (26:27):
Part of the problem.
Speaker 7 (26:28):
Reminder that climate change started out as global cooling. When
they couldn't sell that, they switched to global warming because
people feared heat more than they feared cool. This is
Leonard Nimoy Spock in nineteen seventy seven warning that an
ice age is coming, and then five years later than
(26:49):
rather warning that you're all going to burn up.
Speaker 15 (26:51):
What clients are telling us now is that the threat
of ice age is not as remote as they once thought.
During a lifetime of our grandchildren, Arctic cold and perpetual
snow could turn most of the inhabitable forces of our
planet into a polar desert.
Speaker 20 (27:08):
Concern about rising temperatures on planet Earth heated up a
hearing here in Washington today. For years, scientists have theorized
about the dangers of the so called greenhouse effect, the
warming of the Earth's atmosphere due to the burning of
coal and oil.
Speaker 7 (27:22):
And here is the great legendary Paul Harvey reporting on
studies proving there was not global warming in nineteen ninety two,
and with the willing compelicity of.
Speaker 21 (27:38):
Headline hungry media. A recent crisis of the month had
to do with global warming.
Speaker 1 (27:48):
An ozone hole is opening up over the.
Speaker 21 (27:50):
United States, we were told, the effects of which were
already measurable in an increase in skin cancer. On the contrary,
destroying chlorine around the polar vortex has been declining since January.
A major objective of a recent Shuttle mission was to
(28:12):
determine the scope and scale of the so called ozone whole,
and the silence since has been deafening from those whose
livelihood depends on creating crises.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
Recent data from.
Speaker 21 (28:26):
The upper atmosphere research satellites affirms that any problem is
less it's not greater. Ozone levels fluctuate all of the time,
partly because of volcanic activity and solar flares. But MIT's
Technology Review has made an exhaustive study worldwide ocean temperature
since eighteen fifty one has concluded that there appears to
(28:50):
have been little or no global warming over the past century.
In fact, and that rise in world surface temperature during
the last century, which was about one percent, almost all
occurred before nineteen forty, and that was before aerosols, and
that has since been reversed. Former NASA chief Robert Jastro
(29:13):
and former SCRIPTS director William Nirrenberg, past President of the
American Academy of Sciences Frederick SIPs All have concluded in
a scathing rebuke of those who make money by predicting
global warming. Quote, if we allow ourselves to be influenced
by press release, we could spend a trillion dollars over
(29:38):
the next decade destroying what's left of the American economy
in an utterly unnecessary attempt to repeal the Industrial Revolution.
Speaker 7 (29:48):
Now it's climate change because it covers heating and cooling.
This is then Senator John.
Speaker 1 (29:53):
Kerry who's gotten rich off this just like al Gore
from two.
Speaker 7 (29:56):
Thousand and nine warning about an ice free the Arctic
summer in five years. If we don't, we won't have
any ice in the Arctic. Turns out we have more
now than we ever did.
Speaker 22 (30:06):
In five years, scientists predict we will have the first
ice free Arctic summer that exposes more ocean to sunlight.
Ocean is dark, it consumes more of the heat from
the sunlight, which then accelerates the rate of the melting
and warming, rather than the ice sheet and the snow
(30:26):
that used to reflect it back up into the atmosphere.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
Then there was Harrison Ford.
Speaker 7 (30:31):
If Leonard Nimoy was in on it, he was gonna
get on it, and he gave a speech at the
Global Climate Action Summit because he knows.
Speaker 2 (30:39):
Stop for God's sake, the denigration of science.
Speaker 1 (30:44):
Stop giving power to.
Speaker 2 (30:46):
People who don't believe in science, or worse than that,
pretend they don't believe in science for their own self hinterest.
Speaker 7 (30:53):
Now, to his credit, here is the co founder of Greenpeace,
doctor Patrick Moore, calling the hysteria over climate change a
complete fabrication.
Speaker 23 (31:06):
China is building huge hydroelectric dams which don't have the
emissions of coal plants. So many of these countries are
doing their bit without wasting all this money on wind
and solar energy, which is unreliable and prohibitably expensive in
the long run.
Speaker 8 (31:21):
Why is this consensus out there?
Speaker 23 (31:23):
Look, if we had definitive proof that CO two was
causing serious problems, and we could prove it. Don't you
think they would write that down on a piece of
paper somewhere so people could read it. They don't have
definitive proof period in science. I'm a student of the
philosophy and history of science, and I know that the
scientific method has not been applied in such a way
(31:44):
as to prove that carbon dioxide is causing the Earth
to warm.
Speaker 9 (31:47):
Do you think in a few years, by fifty years
from now, that was a really stupid period in our
history when we try to change all our energy policies
to cut this guest.
Speaker 23 (31:57):
I am firmly of the belief that the future will
show that this whole hysteria over climate change was a
complete fabrication.
Speaker 7 (32:05):
And finally, this one's my favorite. This is Weather Channel
founder John Coleman on CNN with Brian Stelter. If you
haven't heard this one before, you are in for a treat.
Speaker 24 (32:17):
I don't think there are two equal sides to climate change.
The scientific consensus is that it's real. The debate is
over what to do about it, and the press has
to be careful about creating this notion of sides. But
Coleman's platform as a co founder of a channel dedicated
to Weather is unique, and so is the channel's declaration
that nippoly is climate change is happening. So this morning,
(32:37):
both players are here, Coleman and the CEO of the
Weather Channel, David Kenny. First, let me bring in John Coleman.
He's in San Diego this morning. Thank you for being here.
Speaker 19 (32:46):
It's nice to be on CNN. Hello to all your viewers.
I resent you calling me a denier. That is a
word meant to put me down. I'm a skeptic about
climate change, and I want to make it darn clear.
Mister Kenny is not a scientist. I am. He's the
CEO of the Weather Channel. Now, I was the founder
of the Weather Channel. If the co founder, and.
Speaker 24 (33:06):
I'm glad you did because I am addicted to the
Weather Channel.
Speaker 12 (33:08):
I love.
Speaker 19 (33:10):
Now hold on just a minute.
Speaker 1 (33:11):
I'm not done.
Speaker 19 (33:12):
And CNN has taken a very strong position on global warming,
that is that it is a consensus. Well, there is
no consensus in science. Science isn't a vote. Science is
about facts, and if you get down to the hard,
cold facts, there's no question about it. Climate change is
not happening. There is no significant man made global warming. Now,
(33:38):
there hasn't been any in the past, and there's no
reason to expect any in the future. There's a whole
lot of maloney, and yes it is. It has become
a big political point of the Democratic Party and part
of their platform, and I regret it to become political
instead of scientific, but the science is on my side.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
Thank you, and good night.