April 23, 2025 • 32 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load. The
Michael Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Let's talk about health from moment showing welcome back to
crazy democrats. I don't want to be preachy. I don't
want to be the voice of the zealot. But I
am a believer in health and wellness. Hey, aren't you
the guy who spokes to gars and drinks bourbon?
Speaker 1 (00:54):
I am? I am.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
And there are a lot of things that are not
understood by people. I have people who weigh three hundred
pounds who will say to me, if I post that
I'm eating a bowl of ice.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Cream, you say, you eat that ice cream, you get fat.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
No, I'm not, because I understand how food works. I
understand the house and whys of when to eat and
how much to eat, and what foods to eat, and
how to balance those things. And it bothers me that
in this country, the richest nation in history, we have
(01:36):
replaced what is good and natural in the world, what
God gave us. We have replaced with things that are
not only not good, they're actively bad for us. This
damn red dye. I learned about red dye several years ago.
Speaker 3 (01:57):
And.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
It is it is it is awful, but it's only
one of many things that are absolutely awful. My wife
has a rule of thumb, and that rule of thumb is,
if it's not provided by God, if it's not even
natural food, it's not good for you. Now does that
mean I don't drink it Old Mexican coke or doctor Pepper?
Speaker 1 (02:20):
I absolutely do. Those tobacco leaves that they dry and
wrap I burn. Are they great for you?
Speaker 3 (02:26):
Know?
Speaker 4 (02:26):
I don't.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
Everything I eat is not great for me, but I
know when I'm doing it that it's an indulgence. Do
you understand the difference? You understand the difference, because it's
important that you do. Kelly Means was on Doctor Phil
where he said the food industry spends millions of dollars
on nutrition research to normalize addictive foods.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Let me get this straight.
Speaker 5 (02:49):
You're saying that the major beverage companies, food companies, all
of them are bribing the scientists, bribing the regulatory agencies too,
in endorse their formulas, their ingredients for food to say
that they're good, say that they're okay, And in fact,
those ingredients are meant to addict people to the foods
(03:12):
that they're selling.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
It's the express purpose.
Speaker 4 (03:14):
I was shocked as a junior employee to see a
list of names of professors from Harvard and tough Nutrition
School from Stanford, and as a junior employee working for
the food companies is concilling.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
I steered money to those schools.
Speaker 4 (03:24):
The food industry funds nutrition researcher in this country eleven
times more than the NIH. We are allowed to find
a nutrition research who's not directly paid with the direct
consulting agreements bribes, and their research is predominantly funded by
the food industry.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
I can tell you from.
Speaker 4 (03:39):
Working for this industry that that's not out of a
phone drop at.
Speaker 1 (03:41):
Goodwill for unbiased research.
Speaker 4 (03:43):
The food industry is spending one hundreds of millions of
dollars on nutrition research to enhance their bottom line. It's
to normalize these addictive foods.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
And that's my setup for this make America healthy again.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
FDA Commissioner Marty McCrary has announced that the Trump administration
is moving to ban essentially all all artificial food dyes
of the US food supply at the direction of RFK Junior.
If you don't know already, this stuff is horrible for
you and doesn't need to be there a.
Speaker 6 (04:09):
The FDA is taking action to remove petroleum based food
dyes from the US food supply and from medications. For
the last fifty years, American children have increasingly been living
in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals. The scientific community
has conducted a number of studies raising concerns about the
correlation between petroleum based synthetic dyes and several health conditions
(04:33):
such as attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance, cancer,
genomic disruption, GI issues as I've seen in the hospital,
and allergic reactions.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
For example, this Lances.
Speaker 6 (04:49):
Study conducted a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled study on
food dies and concluded that artificial colors in the d
I quote result in increased hyperactivity.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
So why are we taking a gamble?
Speaker 6 (05:08):
Parents, moms and dads have also tried to raise attention
to the issue. Some parents have observed that these chemicals
cause hyperactivity and even aggressive behavior, and that it subsides
when the chemicals are removed from the diet of the child,
and sometimes even reoccurs when those petroleum based chemical dyes
are reintroduced. As I know from my experience taking care
(05:31):
of children. As a doctor, you have to always listen
to the mom. Other studies have found that artificial colors
that create vibrant colors mess with the child's developing brain
to make ultra processed foods more attractive.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
Even when the child already feels full.
Speaker 6 (05:53):
These studies have associated food colors directly with obesity and diabetes.
While America's children are sick and suffering, forty one percent
of children at least have at least one health condition
and one in five are on medication. The answer is
not more ozepic, more ADHD medication, and more antidepressants. There's
(06:15):
a role for those medications, but we have to look
at underlying root causes. The fn FDA stands for food.
Now there's no one ingredient that accounts for the child
chronic disease epidemic.
Speaker 1 (06:29):
And let's be honest, taking petroleum.
Speaker 6 (06:32):
Based food dies out of the food supply is not
a silver bullet that will instantly make America's children healthy,
but it is one important step. This administration is not
interested in continuing down the path of doing the same
old things. As we watch our nation's children get sicker,
we need fresh new approaches cancer and diabetes. And young
(06:55):
people is going up at an alarming rate, and nobody
seems to know why. We have to turn our attention
to underlying causes such as chemicals and toxins that children
are exposed to, not just more insulin and chemotherapy. And
let's not forget that the best way to lower drug
(07:15):
prices is to stop taking drugs we don't need. Thirty
states concerned about this very issue have introduced bills or
laws with a patchwork of standards for food companies. So
the food industry, which has many good people, has asked
(07:35):
for clarity. So today the FDA is taking the following steps.
Number One, establishing a national standard and timeline for the
food industry to transition from petroleum based food dyes to
natural alternative.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
The King of ding It and this other guy, Michael Barry,
these are the kind of gosh, you're like a smacking ass.
Speaker 2 (07:59):
J Bochar went from being called a kook for pointing
out the problems with the MR in a quote unquote vaccine.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
It's not a vaccine.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
The vaccine that was approved for use in the United
States was not the product that was shot into your
arms that caused so many people to die.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
It's important to understand that.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
I know it's hard for people to believe that, and
it's kind of like the deep state spying on your
phone calls and internet usage. You just prefer not to
think about it, because if you thought about it and
had to confront it, it's frustrating and scary. I didn't
take the stupid clot shot because I didn't hand it.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
I don't have happy feet in the pocket.
Speaker 2 (08:44):
I don't trust the government, and I don't just not
trust the government when Donald Trump tells me not to
trust the government, or when there's a study that comes
out that says I shouldn't have trusted the I don't
trust them ever, and that's probably a better default setting
for most of you. So Jay Bodicharia has called for
a halt to the mr NA platform itself. That is
(09:09):
not a good means by which to compound a dosage
as a quote unquote vaccine. It is very, very dangerous,
and it lives on forever. And the evidence is showing,
as more and more people are dropping dead with this
(09:30):
damn shot that it did way more damage than the
actual COVID itself, which was nothing worse than the flu
would have done. I know, I know those are crazy thoughts, Michael,
It can't be true. There's no way they're all lying
to us. You'd be surprised here he is. Oh, by
the way, he's now the NIH director. He went from
(09:52):
crazy kook according to Joe Biden, to he's the National
institut of Health director. He is the new doctor Fauci,
and he ain't getting paid by the pharmacy companies.
Speaker 1 (10:01):
Wait till you hear what they're up to just a
moment after this clip.
Speaker 7 (10:05):
The COVID vaccines themselves, if you look at the actual
uptake around the world, certainly the United States, it's collapsed standard.
I don't think we take that much more in the
sense that very very very very few people are still
taking these things, and certainly children. The uptake was never
very very high, which is which is actually really quite
a good thing, at least in the United States. So
(10:27):
I think in that sense, the m RNA vaccines for
COVID are already in the minds of the public in
the marketplace, effectively dead. The money that Pfizer is getting
from them, the money that majerials getting from them, is
collapsed from the astronomical levels they got in twenty twenty one.
To me, the next step is the MR and a
platform itself. So I've been looking very carefully at the
(10:50):
data that have started to come out on you know,
so the theory, like I'm just telling you what the
theory is versus the reality. The theory is that I
give you this MR and a code. Your body, your
cells produce the antigen that I the scientists wanted to produce.
Speaker 1 (11:07):
Your your immune system.
Speaker 7 (11:08):
Reacts to it and then trains it to react to
that anigen, which is similar to the some of the
the covid covid virus nogen, right, And that's why that's
the theory of the protection. The reality is that the
dose of the antigen that's produced that you're induced by
one MR and a strand it could be one, one, two, three, five,
(11:32):
there's no control over it. The dose of the anergen.
The dose of the mRNA you may have some control over,
but the dose of the anigen almost none because you
don't have control over how many copies are.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Made of the energen per per string.
Speaker 7 (11:45):
The biodistribution of it also is not controllable. Right, So
you see evidence of harms in lots of different body
systems because The one reason might be because the bio
distribution of where these antigens are made is controllable. And
the third thing is that the fidelity of the proteins
made by the code is it for the mRNA technology
(12:08):
is not perfect. You often get antigens and proteins that
are not in the code itself because they're skipping frame
shifts and other things. And so from a regulatory perspective,
how is a regulator do you say, Okay, you can
give this product to people, even though you don't know
(12:28):
the dose that you're giving to people, even though you
don't know where it's going in the body, and even
though you don't know that you're producing the target energen
that you want to produce.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Right, and so as.
Speaker 7 (12:39):
A future platform, okay, there's a Nobel Prize awarder for
the mRNA technology begin with that allowed it so that
it would actually produce the energens without your body sort
of overreacting and with this immune overreaction and destroying it
or just getting rid of it. There's going to need
to be two or three more Nobel Prize winning advances
(12:59):
before this is ready for prime time, I think. So
that's the next step is making sure the regulators understand
that when they improve products with this MR and a platform,
they're proving platforms where the manufacturer has no idea what
the dose they're giving, no idea where it goes in
the body, and whether the anig in itself that they're
supposedly producing is actually produced, not just off target and
(13:21):
also not also off target antigens as well.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
I know that's a lot of science speak, but I
think you get the point. Pfizer's CEO, Albert Borlow, this
is the kind of stuff that if we told you
they were doing it, they would say, oh, those crazy
conspiracy theorists. And it turns out they are the conspiracy
(13:49):
theorists are undefeated the oh there they go again, crowd.
They haven't won one yet. So this is the CEO
of Pfizer eating at the World Economic Forum, where else promoting?
Speaker 1 (14:05):
Are you ready for this, folks?
Speaker 2 (14:08):
Promoting and ingestible that means you eat it, chip that
will track a patient's compliance. See, this has always been
about control, never health, never safety. Always about control. We
need to know that you're taking the meds. Because you're
(14:31):
taking the meds is how we get rich. And so
in order to know if you're taking the medge. We're
going to plant a chip in them. This is some
sci fi Aldest Huxley level crazy stuff.
Speaker 8 (14:44):
FDA approved the first electronic pill, if I can call
it like that. So it is a basically biological ship
that it is in the tablet, and once you take
the tablet and this alves into your stomach, sends a signal,
But you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of
that compliance. The insturdance combines to know that the medicines
(15:06):
that patients should take they do take them. It is
fascinating what happens in this field.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Good thing. He doesn't sound like a Bond villain. Huhm.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
Can you put a little Bond theme song under him
and have him talk? That is Bond villain central casting
in how very appropriate?
Speaker 1 (15:31):
Yeah, again the father CEO bill, if.
Speaker 8 (15:35):
I can call it like that. So it is basically
biological ship that it is in the tablet, and once
you take the tablet and this alves into your stomach,
that sends a signal, But you took the tablet. So
imagine the applications of that compliance. The insurance compinies to
know that the medicines that patients should take they do
(15:56):
to take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
This is Michael Verie show. Enjoy it.
Speaker 2 (16:09):
A new study shows what men have always known. Good
natured ribbing is good for a friendship. It increases the
likelihood that that friendship will last. I'll play the clip
and I have a lot to say about this.
Speaker 9 (16:28):
New study finds that friends who often playfully insult each
other are three hundred percent more honest and loyal. Research
shows that we should all absolutely relentlessly roast our friends.
Contrary to popular beliefs, psychologists believe that friends who grill
each other with frequent, good natured jokes might have stronger friendships.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
After all, have I told you how much older you
are than me? Lately?
Speaker 2 (16:51):
Off? So Stephen Levitt of Freakonomics fain would hear that
and rightfully say, you have to know the difference between
correlative and causative. You have to know what two things
happened to parallelites each other, and you have to know
(17:12):
the things that cause the other ones.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Right.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Being black and obese are factors that are often correlative.
There are many black people who are also obese. They're
not obese because they're black. Their blackness did not cause
their obesity. They just happened to both occur in that
one person, which happens a lot.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
And we know the reason, and the reason is diet,
and you.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
Have cultural norms of diet that lead to obesity. We
know that poor whites have a rate of obesity that
is many multiples of rich whites. Why poor people tend
to eat fast food and fatty food, rich people tend
(18:08):
to eat more refined food. Refined is probably not the
word I meant there, what would be called cleaner foods.
They're going to eat more salmons and vegetables. There's a
lot more that goes into that. Correlative means they both happen,
they correlate. Causative means it causes that people who eat
(18:31):
fast food as opposed to people who are black, many
of whom do eat fast food. People who eat fast
food have a much higher rate of obesity. Okay, the
fast food is causative, not just correlative. So when you
hear a study that says good natured ribbing occurs in
(18:52):
relationships that are three hundred percent more likely as friends
platonic non dating to last, it doesn't mean that if
you have a friendship on the rocks, y'all should start
ribbing each other because a friendship won't last anyway. What
it does mean is this, it's not the ribbing that
makes the friendship last. Ribbing is a manifestation of love
(19:16):
and of trust. One of the things the Left has
managed to do in this country, and they have managed
to do it, is to resegregate society. Blacks over here
and whites over here. Blacks hate the whites because the
whites are all trying to kill them, or so they're told.
The data does not support that, quite the opposite, quite
the inverse. And whites fear blacks because the data shows
(19:40):
that they're more likely to be attacked than anyone else,
and that blacks are more likely to do it. And
so what you end up with is people who don't
find any common ground, and so they don't live near
each other, they don't worship with each other, they don't
go to school with each other, they don't work with
each other. So they don't make friendsh and that's exactly
(20:02):
what the Left wants. Because you have to separate blacks
from the herd. You cannot let blacks integrate into society
if you're the Democrat party, because for you to control
ninety nine percent or ninety some high number, ninety percent
or more of a population, you cannot let them blend
in with other influences on their value system.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
We know that when.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
Black people leave all black neighborhoods and move to neighborhoods
that are all white except for them, they're the first
one in. We know that their politics tend to change.
We know that when blacks leave the all black church
and start going to all white churches or mixed churches,
we know that as a whole, not every single person,
(20:48):
but many, their politics will change. The worship experience may change.
We know that when blacks enter the workforce in an
all white environment that they tend to change their value
systems regarding a number of things. And we know that
as blacks move out of all black influence in their lives, school, work,
(21:10):
neighbor family, church, we know that their attitudes with regard
to crime and punishment tend to change. We know that
their attitudes on American patriotism and opportunity and sacrifice and
thrift and all of these things tend to change.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
Well.
Speaker 2 (21:35):
We know it, and the people who need to accumulate
power on their backs.
Speaker 8 (21:40):
Know it.
Speaker 2 (21:41):
So how do we hold on to people who are
going out into the world. If your child is leaving
home and moving forward states away, your influence on them
is going to change, right, Well, if they're slaves, which
is how they view blacks, Let's be very clear, that's
how the Democrats view blacks. They they own those people.
(22:02):
And if you don't believe they own them, and you
want to see the slave master engage in the violence
of the slave master, you watch a black independent.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
You watch how white liberals will shred them. They will
call them the nastiest names.
Speaker 2 (22:19):
They will attack their sexuality, they will attack their manhood,
they will attack their brain, they will claim.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
They are traitors to the race.
Speaker 2 (22:30):
If you are not aware of this because you've not
seen it firsthand, trust me on this.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
Believe me. This is true.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
It is absolutely true. They view black people as their pets.
They view black people as the votes they can count
on for ideas that they can't get the average white
people to vote for, so they have to go over
there and build their power base on blacks Hispanics, who
(23:02):
they have to convince you don't fit in. Whites don't
like you. They all they want to deport you, even
though you've been here for eight generations. They want to
deport you.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
Gays.
Speaker 2 (23:11):
Uh, they create young people. They have created a coalition,
but in order to maintain the power over that coalition,
they have to keep d Really, it's a sci fi novel.
It's it's like something Huxley would write. It is the
control of your brain through through this. It's it's like
(23:34):
in U a clockwork orange when when uh, lovely, lovely
Ludwig Vaughan is taken from something that Malcolm McDowell, your
your Your lead character loves to images that are and uh,
poison is put into his body, causing him to throw
up as he hears that, so that his favorite classical
(23:56):
piece becomes the most hated thing to him. They retrained
his brain, and they retrained the brain of liberals, especially blacks,
young people, women. Every day in this control the Michael
Berry Show.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
We'll listen some good news if you needed it today.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Pete Hegseth, the Defense Secretary on Fox News, says the
Trump presidency has caused good people to want to join
our military, to serve our country, to wear our uniform,
to defend us against enemies, the.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Army, Air Force, Marines.
Speaker 3 (24:37):
You were up one hundred and eight percent in November,
one hundred and nineteen percent in February one hundred and
eight percent after election, one hundred and five percent.
Speaker 1 (24:45):
With the Navy, with the Marines.
Speaker 3 (24:47):
Up one hundred and twelve percent and one hundred percent
they are through the roof the US Air Force one
hundred percent of its goal, same thing in February, and
Space Force is also over one hundred percent.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
I think the.
Speaker 3 (25:02):
Warfighters are happy to have a warfighter up top. Mister Secretary,
with all this controvers.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
Everything's swirling around, have you ever doubted your decision to
take this job? Oh, not for a minute.
Speaker 10 (25:14):
I didn't hesitate when the President asked me, and I
haven't hesitated for a moment. Because those numbers are reflection
of why we're here. We call it the Trump bump. Internally,
the reality is when war fighting and lethality is brought
back and it's serious that what we're doing here is
serious about getting after soldiering and war fighting. American people
(25:34):
want to come back in, they want to sign up.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
These recruiting numbers don't surprise me.
Speaker 10 (25:38):
They don't surprise me one bit They're a reflection of
a yearning from the American public of young people to
be proud of their country, to be proud of their military,
to make sure when they serve their.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
Given everything they need.
Speaker 10 (25:50):
That's why we've I've fought for the budget that the
Defense Department requires, and the President said, we'll have our
first trillion dollar budget because my kids, my fourteen year old,
if he joins, he's going to have a great military,
He's going to have peace through strength because of the
historic investments of this president's own. No, I haven't blinked,
and I won't blink because this job is too big
(26:12):
and too important for the American people, and I'm grateful.
Speaker 2 (26:17):
The good doesn't end. They took your money and they
took over the student loan debt business. Barack Obama did
thatb and the reason is not to help the students. Again,
it's about power. The government got into the student loan
business because a government powerful enough to give you a
(26:38):
loan to go to college is powerful enough to keep
you from getting that loan if you say or do
anything we don't like. You're out there telling people not
to take the clock shot. Well, we'll meet through the
FBI with Facebook every week, and have you deplatformed. You're
(27:01):
out there suggesting that the clock shot doesn't work, or
this or that or this or that. Well, guess what,
you don't qualify you're a social justice score suggests that
you're not a good risk for a student loan.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
But I've paid back every loan.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
No, no, no, no, you don't understand. This is a
metric that has nothing to do with whether you'll pay
it back. We're never going to make anybody pay it back.
We just call it a loan. And then after you
get the loan and you go through your re education
camp when you get.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
Out, if you show you're a good.
Speaker 2 (27:37):
Soldier or our communist Marxist progressivism, then we'll forgive your
student loan, but only a little bit at a time,
so you keep voting for us, because otherwise you might
forget how grateful you're supposed to be. Well, what about
the guy that graduates high school or doesn't and goes
(27:58):
to work with his daddy as a plumber, starts at
the bottom sweeping up, stays late, drives his dad to
the job, learns the business. Eventually his dad hands it
over to him. He pays his dad out and as
his dad retires and he didn't go to college, he
didn't get to wear the toga and have fraternity parties.
(28:22):
He just pays taxes and those taxes are then redirected
to the kids who go to fraternity parties. Why is
that just if you want to go have a four
year party? So bit, I'm not against it. My oldest
son is at the University of Texas right now, and
I'm proud to pay for it, and I'm lucky I
can't pay for it, to be completely honest, we started
(28:44):
saving when he was two years old, and I'm delighted
he's having the experience and he's making a lot of
contacts and he's learning a lot of things. And it's
my dream that one day he'd be a filmmaker. But
that has to be his dream. We'll see, because I
think you can really change the world through film. But
(29:04):
we'll see what he does with his degree when the
time comes. But I don't believe the government should have
gotten in the student loan business to start with. And
I don't believe the government should pick winners and losers.
Oh you don't have to pay your student loans back? Well, well,
what about everybody else? We got to pay our credit cards,
we got to pay our house, we got.
Speaker 1 (29:23):
To pay our car.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
And you go, yeah, but we told all the young
people to vote for us. What And you know what's
amazing about that? I just saw a staff fifty five
percent of young men eighteen to twenty one voted for
Donald Trump, not Kamala Harris. Fifty five percent eighteen to
twenty one. That is a massive change in historical numbers.
(29:50):
You remember what Winston Churchill said, if you're eighteen and
not an if you're thirty five and not a liberal,
you have no heart.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
Thirty five.
Speaker 2 (30:01):
Sorry, if you're eighteen and not a liberal, you have
no heart. If you're thirty five and not a conservative,
you have no head. Young people are notoriously hard to
get to vote right, to get to think about big issues.
They drive past the homeless guy at the bus shelter
screaming craziness and say.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Let's stop and help him, mama, let's bring him home
with us.
Speaker 2 (30:25):
Because they're young and dumb, they had learned they will,
you hope they will. It's a transition period, you know.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
Well, now that's a whole different meaning. Transition period or moment.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
Lord help us all what times we're living through. But
here is Carolyn love Att, the White House Press Secretary.
I guess we'll take this one to the break. I
just rose them up against a break. I play this
for you to tell you that Trump's doing what he
said he would. And you know he doesn't have to
do all this. Our folks are gonna love Trump because
he won and defeated Kamala. Everything he does, he's making
(30:57):
enemies more enemies by doing this. Then he gains fans
because our people are already with him. But he's doing
it because it's the right darn thing to do. So
I'll take it to the break on Carolyn Levitt with
the President doing what he.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
Promised you to do.
Speaker 11 (31:14):
In other news, the Trump administration has announced we will
put an end to Joe Biden's illegal student loan bailout attempts.
No student loan has been referred to collections since March
of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (31:26):
That comes to an end on May fifth.
Speaker 11 (31:28):
The Department of Education will resume involuntary collections for borrowers
with defaulted federal student loans. The student loan portfolio controlled
by the federal government is nearly one point six trillion dollars,
but fewer than four out of ten borrowers are in repayment.
This is unsustainable, unfair, and a huge liability for American taxpayers.
(31:50):
Debt cannot be wiped away. It just ends up getting
transferred to others. So why should Americans who didn't go
to college or went to college and responsibly paid back
their loans pay for the student loans of other Americans.
The Trump administration will never force taxpayers to pay student
loan debts that don't belong to them. Student loan borrowers
need clarity, and we're finally giving it to them. Borrowers
(32:12):
will now be clearly expected to repay their loans, and
those who default on their loan obligations will face involuntary collections.
The government can and will collect defaulted federal student loan
debt by withholding money from borrowers, tax refunds, federal pensions,
and even their wages. America is thirty six trillion dollars
in debt. We must get our fiscal house in order
(32:33):
and restore common sense to our country. If you take
out a loan, you have to pay it back. It's
very simple. President Trump will not kick the can down
the road. Anymore.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
That's true of everything he's doing. It's a great way
to end the show, and good night
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load. The
Michael Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Let's talk about health from moment showing welcome back to
crazy democrats. I don't want to be preachy. I don't
want to be the voice of the zealot. But I
am a believer in health and wellness. Hey, aren't you
the guy who spokes to gars and drinks bourbon?
Speaker 1 (00:54):
I am? I am.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
And there are a lot of things that are not
understood by people. I have people who weigh three hundred
pounds who will say to me, if I post that
I'm eating a bowl of ice.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Cream, you say, you eat that ice cream, you get fat.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
No, I'm not, because I understand how food works. I
understand the house and whys of when to eat and
how much to eat, and what foods to eat, and
how to balance those things. And it bothers me that
in this country, the richest nation in history, we have
(01:36):
replaced what is good and natural in the world, what
God gave us. We have replaced with things that are
not only not good, they're actively bad for us. This
damn red dye. I learned about red dye several years ago.
Speaker 3 (01:57):
And.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
It is it is it is awful, but it's only
one of many things that are absolutely awful. My wife
has a rule of thumb, and that rule of thumb is,
if it's not provided by God, if it's not even
natural food, it's not good for you. Now does that
mean I don't drink it Old Mexican coke or doctor Pepper?
Speaker 1 (02:20):
I absolutely do. Those tobacco leaves that they dry and
wrap I burn. Are they great for you?
Speaker 3 (02:26):
Know?
Speaker 4 (02:26):
I don't.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
Everything I eat is not great for me, but I
know when I'm doing it that it's an indulgence. Do
you understand the difference? You understand the difference, because it's
important that you do. Kelly Means was on Doctor Phil
where he said the food industry spends millions of dollars
on nutrition research to normalize addictive foods.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Let me get this straight.
Speaker 5 (02:49):
You're saying that the major beverage companies, food companies, all
of them are bribing the scientists, bribing the regulatory agencies too,
in endorse their formulas, their ingredients for food to say
that they're good, say that they're okay, And in fact,
those ingredients are meant to addict people to the foods
(03:12):
that they're selling.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
It's the express purpose.
Speaker 4 (03:14):
I was shocked as a junior employee to see a
list of names of professors from Harvard and tough Nutrition
School from Stanford, and as a junior employee working for
the food companies is concilling.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
I steered money to those schools.
Speaker 4 (03:24):
The food industry funds nutrition researcher in this country eleven
times more than the NIH. We are allowed to find
a nutrition research who's not directly paid with the direct
consulting agreements bribes, and their research is predominantly funded by
the food industry.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
I can tell you from.
Speaker 4 (03:39):
Working for this industry that that's not out of a
phone drop at.
Speaker 1 (03:41):
Goodwill for unbiased research.
Speaker 4 (03:43):
The food industry is spending one hundreds of millions of
dollars on nutrition research to enhance their bottom line. It's
to normalize these addictive foods.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
And that's my setup for this make America healthy again.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
FDA Commissioner Marty McCrary has announced that the Trump administration
is moving to ban essentially all all artificial food dyes
of the US food supply at the direction of RFK Junior.
If you don't know already, this stuff is horrible for
you and doesn't need to be there a.
Speaker 6 (04:09):
The FDA is taking action to remove petroleum based food
dyes from the US food supply and from medications. For
the last fifty years, American children have increasingly been living
in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals. The scientific community
has conducted a number of studies raising concerns about the
correlation between petroleum based synthetic dyes and several health conditions
(04:33):
such as attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance, cancer,
genomic disruption, GI issues as I've seen in the hospital,
and allergic reactions.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
For example, this Lances.
Speaker 6 (04:49):
Study conducted a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled study on
food dies and concluded that artificial colors in the d
I quote result in increased hyperactivity.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
So why are we taking a gamble?
Speaker 6 (05:08):
Parents, moms and dads have also tried to raise attention
to the issue. Some parents have observed that these chemicals
cause hyperactivity and even aggressive behavior, and that it subsides
when the chemicals are removed from the diet of the child,
and sometimes even reoccurs when those petroleum based chemical dyes
are reintroduced. As I know from my experience taking care
(05:31):
of children. As a doctor, you have to always listen
to the mom. Other studies have found that artificial colors
that create vibrant colors mess with the child's developing brain
to make ultra processed foods more attractive.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
Even when the child already feels full.
Speaker 6 (05:53):
These studies have associated food colors directly with obesity and diabetes.
While America's children are sick and suffering, forty one percent
of children at least have at least one health condition
and one in five are on medication. The answer is
not more ozepic, more ADHD medication, and more antidepressants. There's
(06:15):
a role for those medications, but we have to look
at underlying root causes. The fn FDA stands for food.
Now there's no one ingredient that accounts for the child
chronic disease epidemic.
Speaker 1 (06:29):
And let's be honest, taking petroleum.
Speaker 6 (06:32):
Based food dies out of the food supply is not
a silver bullet that will instantly make America's children healthy,
but it is one important step. This administration is not
interested in continuing down the path of doing the same
old things. As we watch our nation's children get sicker,
we need fresh new approaches cancer and diabetes. And young
(06:55):
people is going up at an alarming rate, and nobody
seems to know why. We have to turn our attention
to underlying causes such as chemicals and toxins that children
are exposed to, not just more insulin and chemotherapy. And
let's not forget that the best way to lower drug
(07:15):
prices is to stop taking drugs we don't need. Thirty
states concerned about this very issue have introduced bills or
laws with a patchwork of standards for food companies. So
the food industry, which has many good people, has asked
(07:35):
for clarity. So today the FDA is taking the following steps.
Number One, establishing a national standard and timeline for the
food industry to transition from petroleum based food dyes to
natural alternative.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
The King of ding It and this other guy, Michael Barry,
these are the kind of gosh, you're like a smacking ass.
Speaker 2 (07:59):
J Bochar went from being called a kook for pointing
out the problems with the MR in a quote unquote vaccine.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
It's not a vaccine.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
The vaccine that was approved for use in the United
States was not the product that was shot into your
arms that caused so many people to die.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
It's important to understand that.
Speaker 2 (08:24):
I know it's hard for people to believe that, and
it's kind of like the deep state spying on your
phone calls and internet usage. You just prefer not to
think about it, because if you thought about it and
had to confront it, it's frustrating and scary. I didn't
take the stupid clot shot because I didn't hand it.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
I don't have happy feet in the pocket.
Speaker 2 (08:44):
I don't trust the government, and I don't just not
trust the government when Donald Trump tells me not to
trust the government, or when there's a study that comes
out that says I shouldn't have trusted the I don't
trust them ever, and that's probably a better default setting
for most of you. So Jay Bodicharia has called for
a halt to the mr NA platform itself. That is
(09:09):
not a good means by which to compound a dosage
as a quote unquote vaccine. It is very, very dangerous,
and it lives on forever. And the evidence is showing,
as more and more people are dropping dead with this
(09:30):
damn shot that it did way more damage than the
actual COVID itself, which was nothing worse than the flu
would have done. I know, I know those are crazy thoughts, Michael,
It can't be true. There's no way they're all lying
to us. You'd be surprised here he is. Oh, by
the way, he's now the NIH director. He went from
(09:52):
crazy kook according to Joe Biden, to he's the National
institut of Health director. He is the new doctor Fauci,
and he ain't getting paid by the pharmacy companies.
Speaker 1 (10:01):
Wait till you hear what they're up to just a
moment after this clip.
Speaker 7 (10:05):
The COVID vaccines themselves, if you look at the actual
uptake around the world, certainly the United States, it's collapsed standard.
I don't think we take that much more in the
sense that very very very very few people are still
taking these things, and certainly children. The uptake was never
very very high, which is which is actually really quite
a good thing, at least in the United States. So
(10:27):
I think in that sense, the m RNA vaccines for
COVID are already in the minds of the public in
the marketplace, effectively dead. The money that Pfizer is getting
from them, the money that majerials getting from them, is
collapsed from the astronomical levels they got in twenty twenty one.
To me, the next step is the MR and a
platform itself. So I've been looking very carefully at the
(10:50):
data that have started to come out on you know,
so the theory, like I'm just telling you what the
theory is versus the reality. The theory is that I
give you this MR and a code. Your body, your
cells produce the antigen that I the scientists wanted to produce.
Speaker 1 (11:07):
Your your immune system.
Speaker 7 (11:08):
Reacts to it and then trains it to react to
that anigen, which is similar to the some of the
the covid covid virus nogen, right, And that's why that's
the theory of the protection. The reality is that the
dose of the antigen that's produced that you're induced by
one MR and a strand it could be one, one, two, three, five,
(11:32):
there's no control over it. The dose of the anergen.
The dose of the mRNA you may have some control over,
but the dose of the anigen almost none because you
don't have control over how many copies are.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Made of the energen per per string.
Speaker 7 (11:45):
The biodistribution of it also is not controllable. Right, So
you see evidence of harms in lots of different body
systems because The one reason might be because the bio
distribution of where these antigens are made is controllable. And
the third thing is that the fidelity of the proteins
made by the code is it for the mRNA technology
(12:08):
is not perfect. You often get antigens and proteins that
are not in the code itself because they're skipping frame
shifts and other things. And so from a regulatory perspective,
how is a regulator do you say, Okay, you can
give this product to people, even though you don't know
(12:28):
the dose that you're giving to people, even though you
don't know where it's going in the body, and even
though you don't know that you're producing the target energen
that you want to produce.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Right, and so as.
Speaker 7 (12:39):
A future platform, okay, there's a Nobel Prize awarder for
the mRNA technology begin with that allowed it so that
it would actually produce the energens without your body sort
of overreacting and with this immune overreaction and destroying it
or just getting rid of it. There's going to need
to be two or three more Nobel Prize winning advances
(12:59):
before this is ready for prime time, I think. So
that's the next step is making sure the regulators understand
that when they improve products with this MR and a platform,
they're proving platforms where the manufacturer has no idea what
the dose they're giving, no idea where it goes in
the body, and whether the anig in itself that they're
supposedly producing is actually produced, not just off target and
(13:21):
also not also off target antigens as well.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
I know that's a lot of science speak, but I
think you get the point. Pfizer's CEO, Albert Borlow, this
is the kind of stuff that if we told you
they were doing it, they would say, oh, those crazy
conspiracy theorists. And it turns out they are the conspiracy
(13:49):
theorists are undefeated the oh there they go again, crowd.
They haven't won one yet. So this is the CEO
of Pfizer eating at the World Economic Forum, where else promoting?
Speaker 1 (14:05):
Are you ready for this, folks?
Speaker 2 (14:08):
Promoting and ingestible that means you eat it, chip that
will track a patient's compliance. See, this has always been
about control, never health, never safety. Always about control. We
need to know that you're taking the meds. Because you're
(14:31):
taking the meds is how we get rich. And so
in order to know if you're taking the medge. We're
going to plant a chip in them. This is some
sci fi Aldest Huxley level crazy stuff.
Speaker 8 (14:44):
FDA approved the first electronic pill, if I can call
it like that. So it is a basically biological ship
that it is in the tablet, and once you take
the tablet and this alves into your stomach, sends a signal,
But you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of
that compliance. The insturdance combines to know that the medicines
(15:06):
that patients should take they do take them. It is
fascinating what happens in this field.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Good thing. He doesn't sound like a Bond villain. Huhm.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
Can you put a little Bond theme song under him
and have him talk? That is Bond villain central casting
in how very appropriate?
Speaker 1 (15:31):
Yeah, again the father CEO bill, if.
Speaker 8 (15:35):
I can call it like that. So it is basically
biological ship that it is in the tablet, and once
you take the tablet and this alves into your stomach,
that sends a signal, But you took the tablet. So
imagine the applications of that compliance. The insurance compinies to
know that the medicines that patients should take they do
(15:56):
to take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
This is Michael Verie show. Enjoy it.
Speaker 2 (16:09):
A new study shows what men have always known. Good
natured ribbing is good for a friendship. It increases the
likelihood that that friendship will last. I'll play the clip
and I have a lot to say about this.
Speaker 9 (16:28):
New study finds that friends who often playfully insult each
other are three hundred percent more honest and loyal. Research
shows that we should all absolutely relentlessly roast our friends.
Contrary to popular beliefs, psychologists believe that friends who grill
each other with frequent, good natured jokes might have stronger friendships.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
After all, have I told you how much older you
are than me? Lately?
Speaker 2 (16:51):
Off? So Stephen Levitt of Freakonomics fain would hear that
and rightfully say, you have to know the difference between
correlative and causative. You have to know what two things
happened to parallelites each other, and you have to know
(17:12):
the things that cause the other ones.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Right.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Being black and obese are factors that are often correlative.
There are many black people who are also obese. They're
not obese because they're black. Their blackness did not cause
their obesity. They just happened to both occur in that
one person, which happens a lot.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
And we know the reason, and the reason is diet,
and you.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
Have cultural norms of diet that lead to obesity. We
know that poor whites have a rate of obesity that
is many multiples of rich whites. Why poor people tend
to eat fast food and fatty food, rich people tend
(18:08):
to eat more refined food. Refined is probably not the
word I meant there, what would be called cleaner foods.
They're going to eat more salmons and vegetables. There's a
lot more that goes into that. Correlative means they both happen,
they correlate. Causative means it causes that people who eat
(18:31):
fast food as opposed to people who are black, many
of whom do eat fast food. People who eat fast
food have a much higher rate of obesity. Okay, the
fast food is causative, not just correlative. So when you
hear a study that says good natured ribbing occurs in
(18:52):
relationships that are three hundred percent more likely as friends
platonic non dating to last, it doesn't mean that if
you have a friendship on the rocks, y'all should start
ribbing each other because a friendship won't last anyway. What
it does mean is this, it's not the ribbing that
makes the friendship last. Ribbing is a manifestation of love
(19:16):
and of trust. One of the things the Left has
managed to do in this country, and they have managed
to do it, is to resegregate society. Blacks over here
and whites over here. Blacks hate the whites because the
whites are all trying to kill them, or so they're told.
The data does not support that, quite the opposite, quite
the inverse. And whites fear blacks because the data shows
(19:40):
that they're more likely to be attacked than anyone else,
and that blacks are more likely to do it. And
so what you end up with is people who don't
find any common ground, and so they don't live near
each other, they don't worship with each other, they don't
go to school with each other, they don't work with
each other. So they don't make friendsh and that's exactly
(20:02):
what the Left wants. Because you have to separate blacks
from the herd. You cannot let blacks integrate into society
if you're the Democrat party, because for you to control
ninety nine percent or ninety some high number, ninety percent
or more of a population, you cannot let them blend
in with other influences on their value system.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
We know that when.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
Black people leave all black neighborhoods and move to neighborhoods
that are all white except for them, they're the first
one in. We know that their politics tend to change.
We know that when blacks leave the all black church
and start going to all white churches or mixed churches,
we know that as a whole, not every single person,
(20:48):
but many, their politics will change. The worship experience may change.
We know that when blacks enter the workforce in an
all white environment that they tend to change their value
systems regarding a number of things. And we know that
as blacks move out of all black influence in their lives, school, work,
(21:10):
neighbor family, church, we know that their attitudes with regard
to crime and punishment tend to change. We know that
their attitudes on American patriotism and opportunity and sacrifice and
thrift and all of these things tend to change.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
Well.
Speaker 2 (21:35):
We know it, and the people who need to accumulate
power on their backs.
Speaker 8 (21:40):
Know it.
Speaker 2 (21:41):
So how do we hold on to people who are
going out into the world. If your child is leaving
home and moving forward states away, your influence on them
is going to change, right, Well, if they're slaves, which
is how they view blacks, Let's be very clear, that's
how the Democrats view blacks. They they own those people.
(22:02):
And if you don't believe they own them, and you
want to see the slave master engage in the violence
of the slave master, you watch a black independent.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
You watch how white liberals will shred them. They will
call them the nastiest names.
Speaker 2 (22:19):
They will attack their sexuality, they will attack their manhood,
they will attack their brain, they will claim.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
They are traitors to the race.
Speaker 2 (22:30):
If you are not aware of this because you've not
seen it firsthand, trust me on this.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
Believe me. This is true.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
It is absolutely true. They view black people as their pets.
They view black people as the votes they can count
on for ideas that they can't get the average white
people to vote for, so they have to go over
there and build their power base on blacks Hispanics, who
(23:02):
they have to convince you don't fit in. Whites don't
like you. They all they want to deport you, even
though you've been here for eight generations. They want to
deport you.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
Gays.
Speaker 2 (23:11):
Uh, they create young people. They have created a coalition,
but in order to maintain the power over that coalition,
they have to keep d Really, it's a sci fi novel.
It's it's like something Huxley would write. It is the
control of your brain through through this. It's it's like
(23:34):
in U a clockwork orange when when uh, lovely, lovely
Ludwig Vaughan is taken from something that Malcolm McDowell, your
your Your lead character loves to images that are and uh,
poison is put into his body, causing him to throw
up as he hears that, so that his favorite classical
(23:56):
piece becomes the most hated thing to him. They retrained
his brain, and they retrained the brain of liberals, especially blacks,
young people, women. Every day in this control the Michael
Berry Show.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
We'll listen some good news if you needed it today.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Pete Hegseth, the Defense Secretary on Fox News, says the
Trump presidency has caused good people to want to join
our military, to serve our country, to wear our uniform,
to defend us against enemies, the.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Army, Air Force, Marines.
Speaker 3 (24:37):
You were up one hundred and eight percent in November,
one hundred and nineteen percent in February one hundred and
eight percent after election, one hundred and five percent.
Speaker 1 (24:45):
With the Navy, with the Marines.
Speaker 3 (24:47):
Up one hundred and twelve percent and one hundred percent
they are through the roof the US Air Force one
hundred percent of its goal, same thing in February, and
Space Force is also over one hundred percent.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
I think the.
Speaker 3 (25:02):
Warfighters are happy to have a warfighter up top. Mister Secretary,
with all this controvers.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
Everything's swirling around, have you ever doubted your decision to
take this job? Oh, not for a minute.
Speaker 10 (25:14):
I didn't hesitate when the President asked me, and I
haven't hesitated for a moment. Because those numbers are reflection
of why we're here. We call it the Trump bump. Internally,
the reality is when war fighting and lethality is brought
back and it's serious that what we're doing here is
serious about getting after soldiering and war fighting. American people
(25:34):
want to come back in, they want to sign up.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
These recruiting numbers don't surprise me.
Speaker 10 (25:38):
They don't surprise me one bit They're a reflection of
a yearning from the American public of young people to
be proud of their country, to be proud of their military,
to make sure when they serve their.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
Given everything they need.
Speaker 10 (25:50):
That's why we've I've fought for the budget that the
Defense Department requires, and the President said, we'll have our
first trillion dollar budget because my kids, my fourteen year old,
if he joins, he's going to have a great military,
He's going to have peace through strength because of the
historic investments of this president's own. No, I haven't blinked,
and I won't blink because this job is too big
(26:12):
and too important for the American people, and I'm grateful.
Speaker 2 (26:17):
The good doesn't end. They took your money and they
took over the student loan debt business. Barack Obama did
thatb and the reason is not to help the students. Again,
it's about power. The government got into the student loan
business because a government powerful enough to give you a
(26:38):
loan to go to college is powerful enough to keep
you from getting that loan if you say or do
anything we don't like. You're out there telling people not
to take the clock shot. Well, we'll meet through the
FBI with Facebook every week, and have you deplatformed. You're
(27:01):
out there suggesting that the clock shot doesn't work, or
this or that or this or that. Well, guess what,
you don't qualify you're a social justice score suggests that
you're not a good risk for a student loan.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
But I've paid back every loan.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
No, no, no, no, you don't understand. This is a
metric that has nothing to do with whether you'll pay
it back. We're never going to make anybody pay it back.
We just call it a loan. And then after you
get the loan and you go through your re education
camp when you get.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
Out, if you show you're a good.
Speaker 2 (27:37):
Soldier or our communist Marxist progressivism, then we'll forgive your
student loan, but only a little bit at a time,
so you keep voting for us, because otherwise you might
forget how grateful you're supposed to be. Well, what about
the guy that graduates high school or doesn't and goes
(27:58):
to work with his daddy as a plumber, starts at
the bottom sweeping up, stays late, drives his dad to
the job, learns the business. Eventually his dad hands it
over to him. He pays his dad out and as
his dad retires and he didn't go to college, he
didn't get to wear the toga and have fraternity parties.
(28:22):
He just pays taxes and those taxes are then redirected
to the kids who go to fraternity parties. Why is
that just if you want to go have a four
year party? So bit, I'm not against it. My oldest
son is at the University of Texas right now, and
I'm proud to pay for it, and I'm lucky I
can't pay for it, to be completely honest, we started
(28:44):
saving when he was two years old, and I'm delighted
he's having the experience and he's making a lot of
contacts and he's learning a lot of things. And it's
my dream that one day he'd be a filmmaker. But
that has to be his dream. We'll see, because I
think you can really change the world through film. But
(29:04):
we'll see what he does with his degree when the
time comes. But I don't believe the government should have
gotten in the student loan business to start with. And
I don't believe the government should pick winners and losers.
Oh you don't have to pay your student loans back? Well, well,
what about everybody else? We got to pay our credit cards,
we got to pay our house, we got.
Speaker 1 (29:23):
To pay our car.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
And you go, yeah, but we told all the young
people to vote for us. What And you know what's
amazing about that? I just saw a staff fifty five
percent of young men eighteen to twenty one voted for
Donald Trump, not Kamala Harris. Fifty five percent eighteen to
twenty one. That is a massive change in historical numbers.
(29:50):
You remember what Winston Churchill said, if you're eighteen and
not an if you're thirty five and not a liberal,
you have no heart.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
Thirty five.
Speaker 2 (30:01):
Sorry, if you're eighteen and not a liberal, you have
no heart. If you're thirty five and not a conservative,
you have no head. Young people are notoriously hard to
get to vote right, to get to think about big issues.
They drive past the homeless guy at the bus shelter
screaming craziness and say.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Let's stop and help him, mama, let's bring him home
with us.
Speaker 2 (30:25):
Because they're young and dumb, they had learned they will,
you hope they will. It's a transition period, you know.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
Well, now that's a whole different meaning. Transition period or moment.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
Lord help us all what times we're living through. But
here is Carolyn love Att, the White House Press Secretary.
I guess we'll take this one to the break. I
just rose them up against a break. I play this
for you to tell you that Trump's doing what he
said he would. And you know he doesn't have to
do all this. Our folks are gonna love Trump because
he won and defeated Kamala. Everything he does, he's making
(30:57):
enemies more enemies by doing this. Then he gains fans
because our people are already with him. But he's doing
it because it's the right darn thing to do. So
I'll take it to the break on Carolyn Levitt with
the President doing what he.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
Promised you to do.
Speaker 11 (31:14):
In other news, the Trump administration has announced we will
put an end to Joe Biden's illegal student loan bailout attempts.
No student loan has been referred to collections since March
of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (31:26):
That comes to an end on May fifth.
Speaker 11 (31:28):
The Department of Education will resume involuntary collections for borrowers
with defaulted federal student loans. The student loan portfolio controlled
by the federal government is nearly one point six trillion dollars,
but fewer than four out of ten borrowers are in repayment.
This is unsustainable, unfair, and a huge liability for American taxpayers.
(31:50):
Debt cannot be wiped away. It just ends up getting
transferred to others. So why should Americans who didn't go
to college or went to college and responsibly paid back
their loans pay for the student loans of other Americans.
The Trump administration will never force taxpayers to pay student
loan debts that don't belong to them. Student loan borrowers
need clarity, and we're finally giving it to them. Borrowers
(32:12):
will now be clearly expected to repay their loans, and
those who default on their loan obligations will face involuntary collections.
The government can and will collect defaulted federal student loan
debt by withholding money from borrowers, tax refunds, federal pensions,
and even their wages. America is thirty six trillion dollars
in debt. We must get our fiscal house in order
(32:33):
and restore common sense to our country. If you take
out a loan, you have to pay it back. It's
very simple. President Trump will not kick the can down
the road. Anymore.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
That's true of everything he's doing. It's a great way
to end the show, and good night
Popular Podcasts
Cold Case Files: Miami
Joyce Sapp, 76; Bryan Herrera, 16; and Laurance Webb, 32—three Miami residents whose lives were stolen in brutal, unsolved homicides.  Cold Case Files: Miami follows award‑winning radio host and City of Miami Police reserve officer  Enrique Santos as he partners with the department’s Cold Case Homicide Unit, determined family members, and the advocates who spend their lives fighting for justice for the victims who can no longer fight for themselves.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.