Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
It's that time time, time, luck and load. The Michael
Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Let's talk about health from homent showing. Welcome back to
crazy Democrats. I don't want to be preachy. I don't
want to be the voice of the zealot. But I
am a believer in health and wellness. Hey, aren't you
the guy who spokes the guards and drinks bourbon?
Speaker 1 (00:54):
I am? I am.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
And there are a lot of things that are not
understood by people. I have people who weigh three hundred
pounds who will say to me if I post that
I'm eating a bowl of ice cream, say you eat
that ice cream, you get fat. No, I'm not because
I understand how food works. I understand the house and
(01:17):
whys of when to eat and how much to eat,
and what foods to eat, and how to balance those things.
And it bothers me that in this country, the richest
nation in history.
Speaker 3 (01:34):
We.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Have replaced what is good and natural in the world,
what God gave us. We have replaced with things that
are not only not good, they're actively bad for us.
This damn red dye. I learned about red dye several
(01:55):
years ago.
Speaker 4 (01:57):
And.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
It is it is, it is awful, But it's only
one of many things that are absolutely awful. My wife
has a rule of thumb, and that rule of thumb is,
if it's not provided by God, if it's not in
natural food, it's not good for you. Now does that
mean I don't drink an old Mexican coke or doctor pepper?
Speaker 1 (02:20):
I absolutely do. Those tobacco leaves that they dry and
wrap I burn? Are they great for you?
Speaker 5 (02:26):
Know?
Speaker 1 (02:26):
I don't.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
Everything I eat is not great for me, but I
know when I'm doing it that it's an indulgence. Do
you understand the difference. You understand the difference, because it's
important that you do. Kelly Means was on Doctor Phil
where he said the food industry spends millions of dollars
on nutrition research to normalize addictive foods.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Let me get this straight.
Speaker 6 (02:49):
You're saying that the major beverage companies, food companies, all
of them are bribing the scientists, bribing the regulatory agencies too,
in endorse their formulas, their ingredients for food to say
that they're good, say that they're okay, And in fact
those ingredients are meant to addict people to.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
The foods that they're selling. It's the express purpose.
Speaker 7 (03:14):
I was shocked as a junior employee to see a
list of names of professors from Harvard and tough Nutrition
School from Stanford, and as a junior employee working for
the food companies has been selling, I steered money to
those schools. The food industry funds nutrition researcher in this
country eleven times more than the NIH. We are lowed
to find a nutrition research who's not directly paid with
the direct consulting agreements of bribes, and their research is
(03:36):
predominantly funded by the food industry.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
I can tell you from.
Speaker 7 (03:39):
Working for this industry that that's not out of a
phone throop that goodwill for unbiased research. The food industry
is spending one hundreds of millions of dollars on nutrition
research to enhance their bottom line. It's to normalize these
addictive foods.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
And that's my setup for this make America healthy again.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
FDA Commissioner Marty McCary has announced that the Trump administration
is moving to ban essentially all all artificial food dyes
of the US food supply at the direction of RFK Junior.
If you don't know already, this stuff is horrible for you.
It doesn't need to be there a.
Speaker 8 (04:09):
The FDA is taking action to remove petroleum based food
dyes from the US food supply and from medications. For
the last fifty years, American children have increasingly been living
in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals. The scientific community
has conducted a number of studies raising concerns about the
correlation between petroleum based synthetic dyes and several health conditions
(04:33):
such as attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance, cancer,
genomic disruption, GI issues as I've seen in the hospital,
and allergic reactions.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
For example, this Lances.
Speaker 8 (04:49):
Study conducted a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled study on
food dies and concluded that artificial colors in the diet
quote result in increased hyperactivity.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
So why are we taking a gamble?
Speaker 8 (05:08):
Parents, moms and dads have also try to raise attention
to the issue. Some parents have observed that these chemicals
cause hyperactivity and even aggressive behavior, and that it subsides
when the chemicals are removed from the diet of the child,
and sometimes even reoccurs when those petroleum based chemical dyes
are reintroduced. As I know from my experience taking care
(05:31):
of children, As a doctor, you have to always listen
to the mom. Other studies have found that artificial colors
that create vibrant colors mess with the child's developing brain
to make ultra processed foods more attractive.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
Even when the child already feels full.
Speaker 8 (05:53):
These studies have associated food colors directly with obesity and diabetes.
While America's children are sick and suffering, forty one percent
of children at least have at least one health condition
and one in five are on medication. The answer is
not more ozepic, more ADHD medication, and more antidepressants. There's
(06:15):
a role for those medications, but we have to look
at underlying root causes.
Speaker 1 (06:21):
The f and FDA stands for food.
Speaker 8 (06:25):
Now there's no one ingredient that accounts for the child
chronic disease epidemic. And let's be honest, taking petroleum based
food dies out of the food supply is not a
silver bullet that will instantly make America's children healthy, but.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
It is one important step.
Speaker 8 (06:40):
This administration is not interested in continuing down the path
of doing the same old things. As we watch our
nation's children get sicker, we need fresh new approaches.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
Cancer and diabetes.
Speaker 8 (06:54):
And young people is going up at an alarming rate,
and nobody seems to know why. We have to turn
our attention to underlying causes such as chemicals and toxins
that children are exposed to, not just more insulin and chemotherapy.
And let's not forget that the best way to lower
(07:15):
drug prices is to stop taking.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
Drugs we don't need.
Speaker 8 (07:21):
Thirty states concerned about this very issue have introduced bills
or laws with a patchwork of standards for food companies.
So the food industry, which has many good people, has
asked for clarity. So today the FDA is taking the
following steps. Number One, establishing a national standard and timeline
(07:43):
for the food industry to transition from petroleum based food
dyes to natural alternative.
Speaker 3 (07:50):
The King of ding It and this other guy, Michael Barry,
these are the kind.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
Of gush you're like, just smack an ass. Jay Bochar
went from being called a kook pointing out the problems
with the MR in a quote unquote vaccine.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
It's not a vaccine.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
The vaccine that was approved for use in the United
States was not the product that was shot into your
arms that caused so many people to die. It's important
to understand that. I know it's hard for people to
believe that, and it's kind of like the deep state
spying on your phone calls and internet usage. You just
(08:31):
prefer not to think about it, because if you thought
about it and had to confront it, it's frustrating and scary.
I didn't take the stupid clot shot because I didn't panic.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
I don't have happy feet in the pocket.
Speaker 2 (08:44):
I don't trust the government, and I don't just not
trust the government when Donald Trump tells me not to
trust the government, or when there's a study that comes
out that says I shouldn't have trusted the I don't
trust them ever, and that's probably a better default setting
for you. So Jay Budicharia has called for a halt
(09:05):
to the mr NA platform itself. That is not a
good means by which to compound a dosage as a
quote unquote vaccine. It is very, very dangerous, and it
lives on forever. And the evidence is showing, as more
(09:26):
and more people are dropping dead with this damn shot
that it did way more damage than the actual COVID itself,
which was nothing worse than the flu would have done.
I know, I know those are crazy thoughts, Michael, it
can't be true. There's no way they're all lying to us.
You'd be surprised here he is. Oh, by the way,
(09:49):
he's now the NIH director. He went from crazy kook,
according to Joe Biden, to he's the National Institute of
Health director.
Speaker 1 (09:56):
He is the new doctor Fauci, and.
Speaker 2 (09:59):
He ain't getting paid aid by the pharmacy companies. Wait
till you hear what they're up to just a moment
after this clip.
Speaker 3 (10:05):
The COVID vaccines themselves, if you look at the actual
uptake around the world, certainly the United States, it's collapsed standard.
I don't think we take that much more in the
sense that very very very very few people are still
taking these things, and certainly children. The uptake was never
very very high, which is which is actually really quite
a good thing, at least in the United States. So
(10:27):
I think in that sense, the m RNA vaccines for
COVID are already in the minds of the public in
the marketplace, effectively dead. The money that Pfizer is getting
from them, the money that majernals getting from them, is
collapsed from the astronomical levels they got in twenty twenty
one to me. The next step is the MR and
a platform itself. So I've been looking very carefully at
(10:50):
the data that have started to come out on you know,
so the theory, like I'm just telling you what the
theory is versus the reality. The theory is that I
give you this MR and a code. Your body, your
cells produce the antigen that eye the scientists wanted to produce.
Your your immune system reacts to it and then trains
(11:10):
it to react to that anigen, which is similar to
the some of the covid covid virus nergen, right, And
that's why that's the theory of the protection. The reality
is that the dose of the antigen that's produced that
you're induced by one m r and a strand it
could be one, one, two, three, five, there's no control
(11:32):
over it.
Speaker 1 (11:34):
The dose of the anigen.
Speaker 3 (11:35):
The dose of the m RNA you may have some
control over, but the dose of the anigen almost none
because you don't have control over how many copies are
made of the energen per per string. The biodistribution of
it also is not controllable. Right, So you see evidence
of harms in lots of different body systems because the
(11:55):
one reason might be because the bio distribution of where
these anigens are made is controllable. And the third thing
is that the fidelity of the proteins made by the
code is it for the mRNA technology is not perfect.
You often get antigens and proteins that are not in
the code itself because they're skipping frame shifts and other things.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
And so from a.
Speaker 3 (12:19):
Regulatory perspective, how is a regulator do you say, Okay,
you can give this product to people, even though you
don't know the dose that you're giving to people, even
though you don't know where it's going in the body,
and even though you don't know that you're producing the
target energen that you want to produce.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Right, And so.
Speaker 3 (12:39):
As a future platform, okay, there's a Nobel prize or
order for the mRNA technology begin with that allowed it
so that it would actually produce the energens without your
body sort of overreacting and with this immune overreaction and
destroying it or just getting rid of it. There's going
to need to be two or three more Nobel Prize
winning advances before this is ready for prime time, I think.
(13:02):
So that's the next step is making sure that regulators
understand that when they improve products with this MR and
a platform, they're proving platforms where the manufacturer has no
idea what the dose they're giving, no idea where it
goes in the body, and whether the anig in itself
that they're supposedly producing is actually produced not just off
target and also not also off target antigens as well.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
I know that's a lot of science speak, but I
think you get the point. Pfizer's CEO, Albert Borlow, this
is the kind of stuff that if we told you
they were doing it, they would say, oh, those crazy
conspiracy theorists. And it turns out they are the conspiracy
(13:49):
theorists are undefeated the oh there they go again, crowd.
They haven't won one yet. So this is the CEO
of Pfizer speaking at the World Economic Forum, where else
promoting Are you ready for this, folks? Promoting and ingestible
(14:11):
that means you eat it chip that will track a
patient's compliance. See, this has always been about control, never health,
never safety. Always about control. We need to know that
you're taking the meds. Because you're taking the meds is
(14:32):
how we get rich. And so in order to know
if you're taking the medge, We're going to plant a
chip in them. This is some sci fi Aldest Huxley
level crazy stuff.
Speaker 4 (14:44):
FDA approved the first electronic pill, if I can call
it like that. So it is a basically biological ship
that it is in the tablet and once you take
the tablet and this alveys into your stomach, sends a signal,
but you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of
that compliance. The instudance combines to know that the medicines
(15:06):
that patients should take, they do take them. It is
fascinating what happens in this film.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Good thing.
Speaker 2 (15:14):
He doesn't sound like a Bond villain. Huh ram can
you put a little Bond theme song under him and
have him talk? That is Bond villain central casting in
how very appropriate?
Speaker 1 (15:31):
Yeah, again, the father CEO pil.
Speaker 4 (15:35):
If I can call it like that. So it is
basically biological ship that it is in the tablet and
once you take the tablet and this always into your
stomach set sends a signal, but you took the tablet.
So imagine the applications of that compliance. The insurance compinies
to know that the medicines that patients should take they
(15:55):
do to take them. It is fascinating what happens in
this field.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
This is Michael Verie show enjoy it.
Speaker 2 (16:09):
A new study show what men have always known. Good
natured ribbing is good for a friendship. It increases the
likelihood that that friendship will last.
Speaker 1 (16:24):
I'll play the clip and I have a lot to
say about this.
Speaker 9 (16:28):
New study finds that friends who often playfully insult each
other are three hundred percent more honest and loyal. Research
shows that we should all absolutely, relentlessly roast our friends.
Contrary to popular beliefs, psychologists believe that friends who grill
each other with frequent, good natured.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Jokes might have stronger friendships. After all, have I told
you how much older you are than me? Lately?
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Off?
Speaker 2 (16:53):
So Stephen Levitt of Freakonomics fain would hear that and
rightfully say, you have to know the difference between correlative
and causative. You have to know what two things happened
to parallelites each other, and you have to know the
things that cause the other ones.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Right.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Being black and obese are factors that are often correlative.
There are many black people who are also obese. They're
not obese because they're black. Their blackness did not cause
their obesity. They just happened to both occur in that
one person, which happens a lot. And we know the reason,
(17:41):
and the reason is diet, and you have cultural norms
of diet that lead to obesity. We know that poor
whites have a rate of obesity that is many multiples
of rich whites. Why poor people tend to eat fast
(18:04):
food and fatty food, rich people tend to eat more
refined food. Refined is probably not the word I meant there,
what would be called cleaner foods. They're going to eat
more salmons and vegetables. There's a lot more that goes
into that. Correlative means they both happen, they correlate. Causative
(18:28):
means it causes that people who eat fast food as
opposed to people who are black, many of whom do
eat fast food. People who eat fast food have a
much higher rate of obesity. Okay, the fast food is causative,
not just correlative. So when you hear a study that
says good natured ribbing occurs in relationships that are three
(18:54):
hundred percent more likely as friends platonic non dating to last,
it doesn't mean that if you have a friendship on
the rocks, y'all should start ribbing each other, because a
friendship won't last anyway. What it does mean is this,
it's not the ribbing that makes the friendship last. Ribbing
is a manifestation of love and of trust. One of
(19:19):
the things the Left has managed to do in this country,
and they have managed to do it, is to resegregate society.
Blacks over here and whites over here. Blacks hate the
whites because the whites are all trying to kill them,
or so they're told. The data does not support that,
quite the opposite, quite the inverse. And whites fear blacks
because the data shows that they're more likely to be
(19:42):
attacked than anyone else, and that blacks are more likely
to do it. And so what you end up with
is people who don't find any common ground, and so
they don't live near each other, they don't worship with
each other, they don't go to school with each other,
they don't work with each other. So they don't make fringe.
And that's exactly what the Left wants, because you have
(20:04):
to separate blacks from the herd. You cannot let blacks
integrate into society. If you're the Democrat Party, because for
you to control ninety nine percent or ninety some high number,
ninety percent or more of a population, you cannot let
them blend in with other influences on their value system.
(20:26):
We know that when black people leave all black neighborhoods
and move to neighborhoods that are all white except for them,
they're the first one in. We know that their politics
tend to change. We know that when blacks leave the
all black church and start going to all white churches
or mixed churches, we know that as a whole, not
(20:47):
every single person, but many, their politics will change, the
worship experience may change. We know that when blacks enter
the workforce in an all white environment that they tend
to change their value systems regarding a number of things.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
And we know that as.
Speaker 2 (21:05):
Blacks move out of all black influence in their lives, school, work,
neighbor family, church, we know that their attitudes with regard
to crime and punishment tend to change. We know that
their attitudes on American patriotism and opportunity and sacrifice and
(21:30):
thrift and all of these things tend to change. Well.
We know it, and the people who need to accumulate
power on their backs know it. So how do we
hold on to people who are going out into the world.
If your child is leaving home and moving forward states away,
your influence on them is going to change. Right, Well,
(21:54):
if they're slaves, which is how they view blacks, Let's
be very clear, that's how the Democrats view blacks.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
They they own those people.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
And if you don't believe they own them, and you
want to see the slave master engage in the violence
of the slave master, you watch a black independent. You
watch how white liberals will shred them. They will call
them the nastiest names. They will attack their sexuality, they
(22:23):
will attack their manhood, they will attack their brain, they
will claim they are traitors to the race. If you
are not aware of this because you've not seen it firsthand,
trust me on this.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
Believe me. This is true.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
It is absolutely true. They view black people as their pets.
They view black people as the votes they can count on,
or ideas that they can't get the average white people
to vote for, so they have to go over there
and build their power base on blacks, Hispanics, who they
(23:03):
have to convince you don't fit in, Whites don't like you.
They all they want to deport you, even though you've
been here for eight generations. They want to deport you.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
Gays.
Speaker 2 (23:11):
Uh, they create young people, They have created a coalition,
but in order to maintain the power over that coalition,
they have to keep d Really, it's a sci fi novel.
It's it's like something Huxley would write. It is the
control of your brain through through this. It's it's like
(23:34):
in a clockwork orange when when uh, lovely, lovely Ludwig
Vaughan is taken from something that Malcolm McDowell, your your
your lead character loves to images that are and uh
poison has put into his body, causing him to throw
up as he hears that, so that his favorite classical
(23:56):
piece becomes the most hated thing to him. They retrained
his brain, and they retrained the brain of liberals, especially blacks,
young people, women. Every day in this control the Michael
Berry Show, Well.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
Listen some good news if you needed it today.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Pete Hegseth, the Defense Secretary on Fox News, says the
Trump presidency has caused good people to want to join
our military, to serve our country, to wear our uniform
to defend us against enemies.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
The Army Air Force Marines.
Speaker 5 (24:37):
You were up one hundred and eight percent in November,
one hundred and nineteen percent in February one hundred and
eight percent after election, one hundred and five.
Speaker 1 (24:45):
Percent with the Navy. With the Marines up one hundred and.
Speaker 5 (24:48):
Twelve percent and one hundred percent they are through the
roof The US Air Force one hundred percent of its goal,
same thing in February, and Space Force is also over
one hundred percent. I think the warfighters are happy to
have a warfighter up top. Mister Secretary, with all this
controvers everything's swirling around, have you ever doubted your decision.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
To take this job? Oh, not for a minute.
Speaker 10 (25:14):
I didn't hesitate when the President asked me, and I
haven't hesitated for a moment. Because those numbers are reflection
of why we're here. We call it the Trump bump. Internally,
the reality is when war fighting and lethality is brought
back and it's serious that what we're doing here is
serious about getting after soldiering and war fighting. American people
(25:34):
want to come back in, they want to sign up.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
These recruiting numbers don't surprise me. They don't surprise me
one bit.
Speaker 10 (25:39):
They're a reflection of a yearning from the American public
of young people to be proud of their country, to
be proud of their military, to make sure when they
serve their.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
Given everything they need.
Speaker 10 (25:50):
That's why we've I've fought for the budget that the
Defense Department requires, and the President said, we'll have our
first trillion dollar budget because my kids, my fourteen year
If he joins, he's going to have a great military,
He's going to have peace through strength because of the
historic investments of this president's own. No, I haven't blinked
and I won't blink because this job is too big
(26:12):
and too important for the American people, and I'm grateful.
Speaker 2 (26:17):
The good doesn't end. They took your money and they
took over the student loan debt business. Barack Obama did that.
And the reason is not to help the students. Again,
it's about power. The government got into the student loan
business because a government powerful enough to give you a
(26:38):
loan to go to college is powerful enough to keep
you from getting that loan if you say or do
anything we don't like. You're out there telling people not
to take the clock shot. Well, we'll meet through the
FBI with Facebook every week and have you deplatformed. You're
(27:01):
out there suggesting that the clock shot doesn't work, or
this or that or this or that. Well, guess what,
you don't qualify you're a social justice score suggests that
you're not a good risk for a student loan.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
But I've paid back every loan.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
No, no, no, no, you don't understand. This is a
metric that has nothing to do with whether you'll pay
it back. We're never going to make anybody pay it back.
We just call it a loan. And then after you
get the loan and you go through your re education
camp when you get out.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
If you show you're a good soldier.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Or our communist Marxist progressivism, then we'll forgive your student loan,
but only a little bit at a time, so you
keep voting for us, because otherwise you might forget how
grateful you're supposed to be. Well, what about the guy
that graduates high school or doesn't and goes to work
with his daddy as a plumber, starts at the bottom,
(28:02):
sweeping up, stays late, drives his dad to the job,
learns the business. Eventually his dad hands it over to him.
He pays his dad out as his dad retires, and
he didn't go to college. He didn't get to wear
the toga and have fraternity parties. He just pays taxes
(28:23):
and those taxes are then redirected to the kids who
go to fraternity parties. Why is that just if you
want to go have a four year party? So bit,
I'm not against it. My oldest son is at the
University of Texas right now, and I'm proud to pay
for it. And I'm lucky I can't pay for it,
to be completely honest, we started saving when he was
(28:45):
two years old, and I'm delighted he's having the experience
and he's making a lot of contacts and he's learning
a lot of things. And it's my dream that one
day he'd be a filmmaker. But that has to be
his dream. We'll see, because I think you can really
change the world through film. But we'll see what he
(29:06):
does with his degree when the time comes. But I
don't believe the government should have gotten in the student
loan business to start with. And I don't believe the
government should pick winners and losers. Oh, you don't have
to pay your student loans back, Well, well, what about
everybody else? We got to pay our credit cards? We
got to pay our house, we got to pay our car,
and you go, yeah, but we told all the young
(29:27):
people to vote for us. What And you know what's
amazing about that? I just saw a stat fifty five
percent of young men eighteen to twenty one voted for
Donald Trump, not Kamala Harris. Fifty five percent eighteen to
twenty one. That is a massive change in historical numbers.
(29:50):
You remember Winston Churchill said if you're eighteen and not
an if you're thirty five and not a liberal, you
have no heart.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
Thirty five.
Speaker 2 (30:01):
Sorry, if you're eighteen and not a liberal, you have
no heart. If you're thirty five and not a conservative,
you have no head. Young people are notoriously hard to
get to vote right, to get to think about big issues.
They drive past the homeless guy at the bus shelter
screaming craziness and say, let's stop and help him, mama,
(30:22):
let's bring him home with us. Because they're young and dumb,
they had learned they will, you hope they will. It's
a transition period, you know. Well, now that's a whole
different meaning. Transition period or moment. Lord help us all
what times we're living through. But here is Carolyn love Att,
the White House Press Secretary. I guess we'll take this
one to the break. I just rose them up against
a break. I play this for you to tell you
(30:44):
that Trump's doing what he said he would, and you
know he doesn't have to do all this. Our folks
are gonna love Trump because he won and defeated Kamala.
Everything he does, he's making enemies more enemies by doing this.
Speaker 1 (31:00):
Then he gains.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
Fans because our people are already with him. But he's
doing it because it's the right darn thing to do.
So I'll take it to the break on Carolyn Levitt
with the President doing what he promised you to do.
Speaker 11 (31:14):
In other news, the Trump administration has announced we will
put an end to Joe Biden's illegal loan bailout attempts.
No student loan has been referred to collections since March
of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (31:26):
That comes to an end on May fifth.
Speaker 11 (31:28):
The Department of Education will resume involuntary collections for borrowers
with defaulted federal student loans. The student loan portfolio controlled
by the federal government is nearly one point six trillion dollars,
but fewer than four out of ten borrowers are in repayment.
This is unsustainable, unfair, and a huge liability for American taxpayers.
(31:50):
Debt cannot be wiped away. It just ends up getting
transferred to others. So why should Americans who didn't go
to college or went to college and responsibly paid back
their loans pay for the student loans of other Americans.
The Trump administration will never force taxpayers to pay student
loan debts that don't belong to them. Student loan borrowers
need clarity, and we're finally giving it to them. Borrowers
(32:12):
will now be clearly expected to repay their loans, and
those who default on their loan obligations will face involuntary collections.
The government can and will collect defaulted federal student loan
debt by withholding money from borrowers, tax refunds, federal pensions,
and even their wages. America is thirty six trillion dollars
in debt. We must get our fiscal house in order
(32:33):
and restore common sense to our country. If you take
out a loan, you have to pay it back. It's
very simple. President Trump will not kick the can down
the road anymore.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
That's true of everything he's doing. It's a great way
to end the show, and good night
It's that time time, time, luck and load. The Michael
Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Let's talk about health from homent showing. Welcome back to
crazy Democrats. I don't want to be preachy. I don't
want to be the voice of the zealot. But I
am a believer in health and wellness. Hey, aren't you
the guy who spokes the guards and drinks bourbon?
Speaker 1 (00:54):
I am? I am.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
And there are a lot of things that are not
understood by people. I have people who weigh three hundred
pounds who will say to me if I post that
I'm eating a bowl of ice cream, say you eat
that ice cream, you get fat. No, I'm not because
I understand how food works. I understand the house and
(01:17):
whys of when to eat and how much to eat,
and what foods to eat, and how to balance those things.
And it bothers me that in this country, the richest
nation in history.
Speaker 3 (01:34):
We.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Have replaced what is good and natural in the world,
what God gave us. We have replaced with things that
are not only not good, they're actively bad for us.
This damn red dye. I learned about red dye several
(01:55):
years ago.
Speaker 4 (01:57):
And.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
It is it is, it is awful, But it's only
one of many things that are absolutely awful. My wife
has a rule of thumb, and that rule of thumb is,
if it's not provided by God, if it's not in
natural food, it's not good for you. Now does that
mean I don't drink an old Mexican coke or doctor pepper?
Speaker 1 (02:20):
I absolutely do. Those tobacco leaves that they dry and
wrap I burn? Are they great for you?
Speaker 5 (02:26):
Know?
Speaker 1 (02:26):
I don't.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
Everything I eat is not great for me, but I
know when I'm doing it that it's an indulgence. Do
you understand the difference. You understand the difference, because it's
important that you do. Kelly Means was on Doctor Phil
where he said the food industry spends millions of dollars
on nutrition research to normalize addictive foods.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Let me get this straight.
Speaker 6 (02:49):
You're saying that the major beverage companies, food companies, all
of them are bribing the scientists, bribing the regulatory agencies too,
in endorse their formulas, their ingredients for food to say
that they're good, say that they're okay, And in fact
those ingredients are meant to addict people to.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
The foods that they're selling. It's the express purpose.
Speaker 7 (03:14):
I was shocked as a junior employee to see a
list of names of professors from Harvard and tough Nutrition
School from Stanford, and as a junior employee working for
the food companies has been selling, I steered money to
those schools. The food industry funds nutrition researcher in this
country eleven times more than the NIH. We are lowed
to find a nutrition research who's not directly paid with
the direct consulting agreements of bribes, and their research is
(03:36):
predominantly funded by the food industry.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
I can tell you from.
Speaker 7 (03:39):
Working for this industry that that's not out of a
phone throop that goodwill for unbiased research. The food industry
is spending one hundreds of millions of dollars on nutrition
research to enhance their bottom line. It's to normalize these
addictive foods.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
And that's my setup for this make America healthy again.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
FDA Commissioner Marty McCary has announced that the Trump administration
is moving to ban essentially all all artificial food dyes
of the US food supply at the direction of RFK Junior.
If you don't know already, this stuff is horrible for you.
It doesn't need to be there a.
Speaker 8 (04:09):
The FDA is taking action to remove petroleum based food
dyes from the US food supply and from medications. For
the last fifty years, American children have increasingly been living
in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals. The scientific community
has conducted a number of studies raising concerns about the
correlation between petroleum based synthetic dyes and several health conditions
(04:33):
such as attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance, cancer,
genomic disruption, GI issues as I've seen in the hospital,
and allergic reactions.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
For example, this Lances.
Speaker 8 (04:49):
Study conducted a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled study on
food dies and concluded that artificial colors in the diet
quote result in increased hyperactivity.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
So why are we taking a gamble?
Speaker 8 (05:08):
Parents, moms and dads have also try to raise attention
to the issue. Some parents have observed that these chemicals
cause hyperactivity and even aggressive behavior, and that it subsides
when the chemicals are removed from the diet of the child,
and sometimes even reoccurs when those petroleum based chemical dyes
are reintroduced. As I know from my experience taking care
(05:31):
of children, As a doctor, you have to always listen
to the mom. Other studies have found that artificial colors
that create vibrant colors mess with the child's developing brain
to make ultra processed foods more attractive.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
Even when the child already feels full.
Speaker 8 (05:53):
These studies have associated food colors directly with obesity and diabetes.
While America's children are sick and suffering, forty one percent
of children at least have at least one health condition
and one in five are on medication. The answer is
not more ozepic, more ADHD medication, and more antidepressants. There's
(06:15):
a role for those medications, but we have to look
at underlying root causes.
Speaker 1 (06:21):
The f and FDA stands for food.
Speaker 8 (06:25):
Now there's no one ingredient that accounts for the child
chronic disease epidemic. And let's be honest, taking petroleum based
food dies out of the food supply is not a
silver bullet that will instantly make America's children healthy, but.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
It is one important step.
Speaker 8 (06:40):
This administration is not interested in continuing down the path
of doing the same old things. As we watch our
nation's children get sicker, we need fresh new approaches.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
Cancer and diabetes.
Speaker 8 (06:54):
And young people is going up at an alarming rate,
and nobody seems to know why. We have to turn
our attention to underlying causes such as chemicals and toxins
that children are exposed to, not just more insulin and chemotherapy.
And let's not forget that the best way to lower
(07:15):
drug prices is to stop taking.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
Drugs we don't need.
Speaker 8 (07:21):
Thirty states concerned about this very issue have introduced bills
or laws with a patchwork of standards for food companies.
So the food industry, which has many good people, has
asked for clarity. So today the FDA is taking the
following steps. Number One, establishing a national standard and timeline
(07:43):
for the food industry to transition from petroleum based food
dyes to natural alternative.
Speaker 3 (07:50):
The King of ding It and this other guy, Michael Barry,
these are the kind.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
Of gush you're like, just smack an ass. Jay Bochar
went from being called a kook pointing out the problems
with the MR in a quote unquote vaccine.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
It's not a vaccine.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
The vaccine that was approved for use in the United
States was not the product that was shot into your
arms that caused so many people to die. It's important
to understand that. I know it's hard for people to
believe that, and it's kind of like the deep state
spying on your phone calls and internet usage. You just
(08:31):
prefer not to think about it, because if you thought
about it and had to confront it, it's frustrating and scary.
I didn't take the stupid clot shot because I didn't panic.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
I don't have happy feet in the pocket.
Speaker 2 (08:44):
I don't trust the government, and I don't just not
trust the government when Donald Trump tells me not to
trust the government, or when there's a study that comes
out that says I shouldn't have trusted the I don't
trust them ever, and that's probably a better default setting
for you. So Jay Budicharia has called for a halt
(09:05):
to the mr NA platform itself. That is not a
good means by which to compound a dosage as a
quote unquote vaccine. It is very, very dangerous, and it
lives on forever. And the evidence is showing, as more
(09:26):
and more people are dropping dead with this damn shot
that it did way more damage than the actual COVID itself,
which was nothing worse than the flu would have done.
I know, I know those are crazy thoughts, Michael, it
can't be true. There's no way they're all lying to us.
You'd be surprised here he is. Oh, by the way,
(09:49):
he's now the NIH director. He went from crazy kook,
according to Joe Biden, to he's the National Institute of
Health director.
Speaker 1 (09:56):
He is the new doctor Fauci, and.
Speaker 2 (09:59):
He ain't getting paid aid by the pharmacy companies. Wait
till you hear what they're up to just a moment
after this clip.
Speaker 3 (10:05):
The COVID vaccines themselves, if you look at the actual
uptake around the world, certainly the United States, it's collapsed standard.
I don't think we take that much more in the
sense that very very very very few people are still
taking these things, and certainly children. The uptake was never
very very high, which is which is actually really quite
a good thing, at least in the United States. So
(10:27):
I think in that sense, the m RNA vaccines for
COVID are already in the minds of the public in
the marketplace, effectively dead. The money that Pfizer is getting
from them, the money that majernals getting from them, is
collapsed from the astronomical levels they got in twenty twenty
one to me. The next step is the MR and
a platform itself. So I've been looking very carefully at
(10:50):
the data that have started to come out on you know,
so the theory, like I'm just telling you what the
theory is versus the reality. The theory is that I
give you this MR and a code. Your body, your
cells produce the antigen that eye the scientists wanted to produce.
Your your immune system reacts to it and then trains
(11:10):
it to react to that anigen, which is similar to
the some of the covid covid virus nergen, right, And
that's why that's the theory of the protection. The reality
is that the dose of the antigen that's produced that
you're induced by one m r and a strand it
could be one, one, two, three, five, there's no control
(11:32):
over it.
Speaker 1 (11:34):
The dose of the anigen.
Speaker 3 (11:35):
The dose of the m RNA you may have some
control over, but the dose of the anigen almost none
because you don't have control over how many copies are
made of the energen per per string. The biodistribution of
it also is not controllable. Right, So you see evidence
of harms in lots of different body systems because the
(11:55):
one reason might be because the bio distribution of where
these anigens are made is controllable. And the third thing
is that the fidelity of the proteins made by the
code is it for the mRNA technology is not perfect.
You often get antigens and proteins that are not in
the code itself because they're skipping frame shifts and other things.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
And so from a.
Speaker 3 (12:19):
Regulatory perspective, how is a regulator do you say, Okay,
you can give this product to people, even though you
don't know the dose that you're giving to people, even
though you don't know where it's going in the body,
and even though you don't know that you're producing the
target energen that you want to produce.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Right, And so.
Speaker 3 (12:39):
As a future platform, okay, there's a Nobel prize or
order for the mRNA technology begin with that allowed it
so that it would actually produce the energens without your
body sort of overreacting and with this immune overreaction and
destroying it or just getting rid of it. There's going
to need to be two or three more Nobel Prize
winning advances before this is ready for prime time, I think.
(13:02):
So that's the next step is making sure that regulators
understand that when they improve products with this MR and
a platform, they're proving platforms where the manufacturer has no
idea what the dose they're giving, no idea where it
goes in the body, and whether the anig in itself
that they're supposedly producing is actually produced not just off
target and also not also off target antigens as well.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
I know that's a lot of science speak, but I
think you get the point. Pfizer's CEO, Albert Borlow, this
is the kind of stuff that if we told you
they were doing it, they would say, oh, those crazy
conspiracy theorists. And it turns out they are the conspiracy
(13:49):
theorists are undefeated the oh there they go again, crowd.
They haven't won one yet. So this is the CEO
of Pfizer speaking at the World Economic Forum, where else
promoting Are you ready for this, folks? Promoting and ingestible
(14:11):
that means you eat it chip that will track a
patient's compliance. See, this has always been about control, never health,
never safety. Always about control. We need to know that
you're taking the meds. Because you're taking the meds is
(14:32):
how we get rich. And so in order to know
if you're taking the medge, We're going to plant a
chip in them. This is some sci fi Aldest Huxley
level crazy stuff.
Speaker 4 (14:44):
FDA approved the first electronic pill, if I can call
it like that. So it is a basically biological ship
that it is in the tablet and once you take
the tablet and this alveys into your stomach, sends a signal,
but you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of
that compliance. The instudance combines to know that the medicines
(15:06):
that patients should take, they do take them. It is
fascinating what happens in this film.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Good thing.
Speaker 2 (15:14):
He doesn't sound like a Bond villain. Huh ram can
you put a little Bond theme song under him and
have him talk? That is Bond villain central casting in
how very appropriate?
Speaker 1 (15:31):
Yeah, again, the father CEO pil.
Speaker 4 (15:35):
If I can call it like that. So it is
basically biological ship that it is in the tablet and
once you take the tablet and this always into your
stomach set sends a signal, but you took the tablet.
So imagine the applications of that compliance. The insurance compinies
to know that the medicines that patients should take they
(15:55):
do to take them. It is fascinating what happens in
this field.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
This is Michael Verie show enjoy it.
Speaker 2 (16:09):
A new study show what men have always known. Good
natured ribbing is good for a friendship. It increases the
likelihood that that friendship will last.
Speaker 1 (16:24):
I'll play the clip and I have a lot to
say about this.
Speaker 9 (16:28):
New study finds that friends who often playfully insult each
other are three hundred percent more honest and loyal. Research
shows that we should all absolutely, relentlessly roast our friends.
Contrary to popular beliefs, psychologists believe that friends who grill
each other with frequent, good natured.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Jokes might have stronger friendships. After all, have I told
you how much older you are than me? Lately?
Speaker 3 (16:51):
Off?
Speaker 2 (16:53):
So Stephen Levitt of Freakonomics fain would hear that and
rightfully say, you have to know the difference between correlative
and causative. You have to know what two things happened
to parallelites each other, and you have to know the
things that cause the other ones.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Right.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Being black and obese are factors that are often correlative.
There are many black people who are also obese. They're
not obese because they're black. Their blackness did not cause
their obesity. They just happened to both occur in that
one person, which happens a lot. And we know the reason,
(17:41):
and the reason is diet, and you have cultural norms
of diet that lead to obesity. We know that poor
whites have a rate of obesity that is many multiples
of rich whites. Why poor people tend to eat fast
(18:04):
food and fatty food, rich people tend to eat more
refined food. Refined is probably not the word I meant there,
what would be called cleaner foods. They're going to eat
more salmons and vegetables. There's a lot more that goes
into that. Correlative means they both happen, they correlate. Causative
(18:28):
means it causes that people who eat fast food as
opposed to people who are black, many of whom do
eat fast food. People who eat fast food have a
much higher rate of obesity. Okay, the fast food is causative,
not just correlative. So when you hear a study that
says good natured ribbing occurs in relationships that are three
(18:54):
hundred percent more likely as friends platonic non dating to last,
it doesn't mean that if you have a friendship on
the rocks, y'all should start ribbing each other, because a
friendship won't last anyway. What it does mean is this,
it's not the ribbing that makes the friendship last. Ribbing
is a manifestation of love and of trust. One of
(19:19):
the things the Left has managed to do in this country,
and they have managed to do it, is to resegregate society.
Blacks over here and whites over here. Blacks hate the
whites because the whites are all trying to kill them,
or so they're told. The data does not support that,
quite the opposite, quite the inverse. And whites fear blacks
because the data shows that they're more likely to be
(19:42):
attacked than anyone else, and that blacks are more likely
to do it. And so what you end up with
is people who don't find any common ground, and so
they don't live near each other, they don't worship with
each other, they don't go to school with each other,
they don't work with each other. So they don't make fringe.
And that's exactly what the Left wants, because you have
(20:04):
to separate blacks from the herd. You cannot let blacks
integrate into society. If you're the Democrat Party, because for
you to control ninety nine percent or ninety some high number,
ninety percent or more of a population, you cannot let
them blend in with other influences on their value system.
(20:26):
We know that when black people leave all black neighborhoods
and move to neighborhoods that are all white except for them,
they're the first one in. We know that their politics
tend to change. We know that when blacks leave the
all black church and start going to all white churches
or mixed churches, we know that as a whole, not
(20:47):
every single person, but many, their politics will change, the
worship experience may change. We know that when blacks enter
the workforce in an all white environment that they tend
to change their value systems regarding a number of things.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
And we know that as.
Speaker 2 (21:05):
Blacks move out of all black influence in their lives, school, work,
neighbor family, church, we know that their attitudes with regard
to crime and punishment tend to change. We know that
their attitudes on American patriotism and opportunity and sacrifice and
(21:30):
thrift and all of these things tend to change. Well.
We know it, and the people who need to accumulate
power on their backs know it. So how do we
hold on to people who are going out into the world.
If your child is leaving home and moving forward states away,
your influence on them is going to change. Right, Well,
(21:54):
if they're slaves, which is how they view blacks, Let's
be very clear, that's how the Democrats view blacks.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
They they own those people.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
And if you don't believe they own them, and you
want to see the slave master engage in the violence
of the slave master, you watch a black independent. You
watch how white liberals will shred them. They will call
them the nastiest names. They will attack their sexuality, they
(22:23):
will attack their manhood, they will attack their brain, they
will claim they are traitors to the race. If you
are not aware of this because you've not seen it firsthand,
trust me on this.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
Believe me. This is true.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
It is absolutely true. They view black people as their pets.
They view black people as the votes they can count on,
or ideas that they can't get the average white people
to vote for, so they have to go over there
and build their power base on blacks, Hispanics, who they
(23:03):
have to convince you don't fit in, Whites don't like you.
They all they want to deport you, even though you've
been here for eight generations. They want to deport you.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
Gays.
Speaker 2 (23:11):
Uh, they create young people, They have created a coalition,
but in order to maintain the power over that coalition,
they have to keep d Really, it's a sci fi novel.
It's it's like something Huxley would write. It is the
control of your brain through through this. It's it's like
(23:34):
in a clockwork orange when when uh, lovely, lovely Ludwig
Vaughan is taken from something that Malcolm McDowell, your your
your lead character loves to images that are and uh
poison has put into his body, causing him to throw
up as he hears that, so that his favorite classical
(23:56):
piece becomes the most hated thing to him. They retrained
his brain, and they retrained the brain of liberals, especially blacks,
young people, women. Every day in this control the Michael
Berry Show, Well.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
Listen some good news if you needed it today.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Pete Hegseth, the Defense Secretary on Fox News, says the
Trump presidency has caused good people to want to join
our military, to serve our country, to wear our uniform
to defend us against enemies.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
The Army Air Force Marines.
Speaker 5 (24:37):
You were up one hundred and eight percent in November,
one hundred and nineteen percent in February one hundred and
eight percent after election, one hundred and five.
Speaker 1 (24:45):
Percent with the Navy. With the Marines up one hundred and.
Speaker 5 (24:48):
Twelve percent and one hundred percent they are through the
roof The US Air Force one hundred percent of its goal,
same thing in February, and Space Force is also over
one hundred percent. I think the warfighters are happy to
have a warfighter up top. Mister Secretary, with all this
controvers everything's swirling around, have you ever doubted your decision.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
To take this job? Oh, not for a minute.
Speaker 10 (25:14):
I didn't hesitate when the President asked me, and I
haven't hesitated for a moment. Because those numbers are reflection
of why we're here. We call it the Trump bump. Internally,
the reality is when war fighting and lethality is brought
back and it's serious that what we're doing here is
serious about getting after soldiering and war fighting. American people
(25:34):
want to come back in, they want to sign up.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
These recruiting numbers don't surprise me. They don't surprise me
one bit.
Speaker 10 (25:39):
They're a reflection of a yearning from the American public
of young people to be proud of their country, to
be proud of their military, to make sure when they
serve their.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
Given everything they need.
Speaker 10 (25:50):
That's why we've I've fought for the budget that the
Defense Department requires, and the President said, we'll have our
first trillion dollar budget because my kids, my fourteen year
If he joins, he's going to have a great military,
He's going to have peace through strength because of the
historic investments of this president's own. No, I haven't blinked
and I won't blink because this job is too big
(26:12):
and too important for the American people, and I'm grateful.
Speaker 2 (26:17):
The good doesn't end. They took your money and they
took over the student loan debt business. Barack Obama did that.
And the reason is not to help the students. Again,
it's about power. The government got into the student loan
business because a government powerful enough to give you a
(26:38):
loan to go to college is powerful enough to keep
you from getting that loan if you say or do
anything we don't like. You're out there telling people not
to take the clock shot. Well, we'll meet through the
FBI with Facebook every week and have you deplatformed. You're
(27:01):
out there suggesting that the clock shot doesn't work, or
this or that or this or that. Well, guess what,
you don't qualify you're a social justice score suggests that
you're not a good risk for a student loan.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
But I've paid back every loan.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
No, no, no, no, you don't understand. This is a
metric that has nothing to do with whether you'll pay
it back. We're never going to make anybody pay it back.
We just call it a loan. And then after you
get the loan and you go through your re education
camp when you get out.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
If you show you're a good soldier.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Or our communist Marxist progressivism, then we'll forgive your student loan,
but only a little bit at a time, so you
keep voting for us, because otherwise you might forget how
grateful you're supposed to be. Well, what about the guy
that graduates high school or doesn't and goes to work
with his daddy as a plumber, starts at the bottom,
(28:02):
sweeping up, stays late, drives his dad to the job,
learns the business. Eventually his dad hands it over to him.
He pays his dad out as his dad retires, and
he didn't go to college. He didn't get to wear
the toga and have fraternity parties. He just pays taxes
(28:23):
and those taxes are then redirected to the kids who
go to fraternity parties. Why is that just if you
want to go have a four year party? So bit,
I'm not against it. My oldest son is at the
University of Texas right now, and I'm proud to pay
for it. And I'm lucky I can't pay for it,
to be completely honest, we started saving when he was
(28:45):
two years old, and I'm delighted he's having the experience
and he's making a lot of contacts and he's learning
a lot of things. And it's my dream that one
day he'd be a filmmaker. But that has to be
his dream. We'll see, because I think you can really
change the world through film. But we'll see what he
(29:06):
does with his degree when the time comes. But I
don't believe the government should have gotten in the student
loan business to start with. And I don't believe the
government should pick winners and losers. Oh, you don't have
to pay your student loans back, Well, well, what about
everybody else? We got to pay our credit cards? We
got to pay our house, we got to pay our car,
and you go, yeah, but we told all the young
(29:27):
people to vote for us. What And you know what's
amazing about that? I just saw a stat fifty five
percent of young men eighteen to twenty one voted for
Donald Trump, not Kamala Harris. Fifty five percent eighteen to
twenty one. That is a massive change in historical numbers.
(29:50):
You remember Winston Churchill said if you're eighteen and not
an if you're thirty five and not a liberal, you
have no heart.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
Thirty five.
Speaker 2 (30:01):
Sorry, if you're eighteen and not a liberal, you have
no heart. If you're thirty five and not a conservative,
you have no head. Young people are notoriously hard to
get to vote right, to get to think about big issues.
They drive past the homeless guy at the bus shelter
screaming craziness and say, let's stop and help him, mama,
(30:22):
let's bring him home with us. Because they're young and dumb,
they had learned they will, you hope they will. It's
a transition period, you know. Well, now that's a whole
different meaning. Transition period or moment. Lord help us all
what times we're living through. But here is Carolyn love Att,
the White House Press Secretary. I guess we'll take this
one to the break. I just rose them up against
a break. I play this for you to tell you
(30:44):
that Trump's doing what he said he would, and you
know he doesn't have to do all this. Our folks
are gonna love Trump because he won and defeated Kamala.
Everything he does, he's making enemies more enemies by doing this.
Speaker 1 (31:00):
Then he gains.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
Fans because our people are already with him. But he's
doing it because it's the right darn thing to do.
So I'll take it to the break on Carolyn Levitt
with the President doing what he promised you to do.
Speaker 11 (31:14):
In other news, the Trump administration has announced we will
put an end to Joe Biden's illegal loan bailout attempts.
No student loan has been referred to collections since March
of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (31:26):
That comes to an end on May fifth.
Speaker 11 (31:28):
The Department of Education will resume involuntary collections for borrowers
with defaulted federal student loans. The student loan portfolio controlled
by the federal government is nearly one point six trillion dollars,
but fewer than four out of ten borrowers are in repayment.
This is unsustainable, unfair, and a huge liability for American taxpayers.
(31:50):
Debt cannot be wiped away. It just ends up getting
transferred to others. So why should Americans who didn't go
to college or went to college and responsibly paid back
their loans pay for the student loans of other Americans.
The Trump administration will never force taxpayers to pay student
loan debts that don't belong to them. Student loan borrowers
need clarity, and we're finally giving it to them. Borrowers
(32:12):
will now be clearly expected to repay their loans, and
those who default on their loan obligations will face involuntary collections.
The government can and will collect defaulted federal student loan
debt by withholding money from borrowers, tax refunds, federal pensions,
and even their wages. America is thirty six trillion dollars
in debt. We must get our fiscal house in order
(32:33):
and restore common sense to our country. If you take
out a loan, you have to pay it back. It's
very simple. President Trump will not kick the can down
the road anymore.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
That's true of everything he's doing. It's a great way
to end the show, and good night
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!