WSJ Goes After DOGE

Chris dissects the Wall Street Journal's latest editorial on Doge, revealing how media giants are coordinating narratives and using cancel culture tactics to target critics. He explains how the WSJ hired a former State Department/USAID reporter to scour social media for controversial past posts from figures working with Elon Musk and Doge—and why this exposes deep state media collusion. www.watchdogonwallstreet.com

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
The Watchdog on Wall Street podcast explaining the news coming
out of the complex worlds of finance, economics, and politics
and the impact that we'll have on everyday Americans. Author,
investment banker, consumer advocate, analyst, and trader Chris Markowski.

Speaker 2 (00:16):
Yeah, the Conservative air quotes Wall Street Journal, they're going
after Doge.

Speaker 3 (00:24):
Wow. Gee, maybe Markowski's onto something about this big club
and all these media outlets being connected.

Speaker 2 (00:35):
Anyway, today in their editorial page is still they're vote
a very.

Speaker 4 (00:39):
Well, you know, Doze is dozes. You know, they're they're
rooting out waste and fraud. But they better be careful
because judges might stop them and they might not want
to push too far.

Speaker 1 (00:53):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (00:54):
Okay, what was the name of that that bad witch
that took over for Hogwarts there, the old lady that
was evil? Yeah, it sounded that. It's like the op
ed was kind of like written by her. I can't
forget her. I mean, it's a bad sub reference if
I can't remember her name. You know, I'm talking about
if you ever watched Harry Potter anyway, Yeah, and how

(01:16):
about this one? The Wall Street Journal hired hired a reporter,
hired a reporter that just so happened to get leftist reporter,
worked worked for the State Department, worked for USAID to
go after and scour I'm not making this up. Scour

(01:40):
the internet of any of the people that they know
that it's working for, Elon Musk and Doge and look
to see if they say anything controversial throughout their lives
on social media, looking to dos them. Oh yeah, have
them canceled. Wall Street Journal did this because they're conservative,

(02:02):
and they got one. They got some kid twenty five
year old said some things that you know on his
Internet feed, but I got a showing off. Again, he's
twenty five years old. He did this when he was younger,
some things that they could call racist or controversial. Nothing

(02:24):
really too out of the ordinary, old bent most certainly
not nearly as bad as the stuff that the leftists
say about people on the right. But again, that's what
they're going to do. Now, that's what And this is
the Wall Street Journal, all in their conservative right. Sure
they are, Oh no, they're not on the take. No way,

(02:47):
couldn't be. Watchdog on Wall Street dot Com