December 9, 2025 • 36 mins
Jon Justice is back discussing the Netflix Paramount drama and all the nonsense coming from Jasmine Crockett.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I got checking off of.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
I as a headosexual male, like the smell of women.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
Why am I getting beat with the hot dog? Oh?
Those poor people? He has a fine took us. Oh,
Twin Cities News Talk. Hey, I'm eleven thirty and one
oh three five FM. I don't know what happened there.
I just decided to play a couple of random drops,
(00:30):
and then Brett, who was back in the master control
booth this morning, decided to join in.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
You gave me the green light, and I went in
there and did it.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
I'm kind of in that mood. I'm kind of in
that mood this morning. Here as we start our show
from the six five to one carpet plus Next Day
install studios on Twin Cities News Talk. This December, according
to those that do the meteorology thing, this December could
be the coldest one yet in more than ten years.
(01:03):
This is perfect for ice enforcement, just saying it doesn't
stop the protesters from going and just ticking everybody off
by chanting and screaming and playing musical instruments and banging
on drums outside of the Hilton down by Mall of America,
where they assumed that ice was staying. You probably did
(01:24):
you see the videos videos on that I did not, Okay, yeah,
and again it's just such a jerk move. I understand
from an activist perspective, this is what activists do, but
it really does demonstrate how they just don't care because
it's not like it's only ice in those hotels. It's
the same attitude that people have when they go on
they block freeways. You're guys gonna make everybody else mad,
(01:45):
but they don't care. It's just it's all about making
themselves personally feel better. But getting back to the weather
really quick. So they had this big storm rolling in
and I know that it's a big storm because I
watched a TikTok video this morning of a guy saying,
this is going to be a big storm. We'll see
how the whole thing shakes out. It's weird though, because
(02:05):
I don't recall I couldn't. I don't remember a time
when like, over the course of the past few days,
it's just like been consistently snowing, like not a lot,
but it's just been like it's not on the map.
I went and got my car washed on Sunday. He
dropped my mollendo off over a cub and I buzzed
(02:25):
over to the holiday and went through the went to
the drive through a car washing. It was nice and sunny.
It was cold out, but nice and sunny outside. But
I only did that because I looked at the I
looked at the app and it showed that, you know, well,
it's gonna be fine. And then suddenly now it's just
snowing all the time. I left this morning and there
was like a half inch in the in the driveway.
You think I'd be used to this by now, living
(02:46):
in Minnesota for as long as I have, it just
seems weird. I don't remember like the sort of the
consistent snowfall, even when it's not turning up on the
UH on the weather app. But it's supposed to get,
you know, much worse later on this afternoon. My thing
is that winter just came so fast.
Speaker 3 (02:59):
Yeah, like literally three weeks ago, I was out golfing
in like fifty to sixty degree weather.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
Yeah, and now it's just miserable. The switch got the
the switch got flipped. So I was having a conversation
with one of the neighbors over the weekend. I was
walking the dog and they were out chiseling the d
I would say shoveling, but they weren't shoveling. They were
chiseling because you were at the point where you had
the chisel because the ice was just so packed in
on the driveway. And we were having a conversation of like,
(03:28):
the past two Christmas holidays, it seems as if we
didn't have any snow. I think the year last year
we didn't, and then the year before I think there
was like a light dusting. And I was talking with
them like, I wonder if all of this snow we'll
stick around before Christmas is saying, yeah, I think we're
pretty much guaranteed to have a white, white Christmas this year.
All right, on the show this morning, a little bit
(03:48):
of a change, Devin Gartzenstein Ross, we were going to
be talking AI. We'll be doing that on Thursday.
Speaker 4 (03:55):
Now.
Speaker 1 (03:56):
There was a report this morning on Fox News right
before the show started that Time at magazine may pick
for a person of their of the year. AI might
be their Person of the Year in a bid for
Time Magazine to just remain relevant because it's pretty much
the only reason why anybody pays attention to them. Once
once a year, when they pick their person of the year.
(04:17):
If you've seen Time magazine at the you know, doctor's
office or dermatologists or wherever, it's like down to like
pamphlet levels of thickness. So David will be on Thursday's show.
We had to make the change. He had some family issues,
so he'll be on Thursday. This morning, though, at seven thirty,
we will be talking with our adopted senator from Wisconsin,
(04:41):
Ron Johnson. It's an honor of Brett. Yeah see, there
you goes see, I got youa Wisconsin. I don't have
the docta back, but yeah, I don't have it, but
I know Conny, so uh yeah. Ron Johnson joining us
this morning at at seven thirty. Of course, we'll talk
a lot of fraud. We have a couple of stories
regarding the wasteful expenditures courtesy of the Minneapolis City Council,
(05:06):
including I don't have this slated to discuss until much
later in the in the eight o'clock hour. However, I
do have a dollar amount that the Minneapolis the City
Council has spent on planning alone for George Floyd Square,
Like they haven't done anything to fix it, just what
(05:29):
they've spent in planning on doing something. And also one
hundred and fifty thousand dollars for a city paid prints
sing along can't support law enforcement. Got to give that
money to violence interrupters. But we are going to spend
millions on planning the future of George Floyd Square and
(05:50):
hundreds of thousands of dollars for a print sing along?
What you know? It's just what a fantastic use of
your taxpayer dollars. It seems to be a running theme
where we at with the bubble machines. Have not heard
much from the bubbler machine. We dropped that idea. Well
they don't work very well in these temps. Well, yeah,
I think they'd just be Yeah, they just did the
(06:10):
big into big ice balls, and I.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
Can't believe the mayor didn't think about that.
Speaker 1 (06:15):
By the way, I heard the I heard the ice
ball this year with a US Immigration and Custom sinforcement
was was rather successful. See what I did there. We'll
talk ice later on in the hour. My prediction.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
I don't know where you went where you put the
walk a walk?
Speaker 1 (06:31):
Yeah, the pages have gotten all. That's all kind of
it's kind of all. It's kind of all over here.
I'll do this for you. Hell yeah, do that one,
and we'll do that one and that one instead. I
do have an update. I was the nailed it yesterday.
I shared with you a couple of different immigration stories,
and I mentioned that it was an easy prediction, but
needless to say, I was right. I mentioned that both
of these stories were going to become points of controversy,
(06:53):
and they've become points of controversy, and we have further clarification.
We had the ice raid in Burnsville, we had the
Augsburg College situation, so we have continued controversy and clarity
on both of those issues. Coming up next, though, we'll
talk briefly before we laugh at Jasmine Crockett running for Senate.
(07:14):
She's already pulled down her launch video. I have the
audio to share with you. Coming up, we'll talk briefly
about the hostile takeover potentially of Warner Brothers Discovery. You
had Netflix saying that they were going to purchase Warner
Brothers Discovery for some eighty two billion. Now you have Paramount.
Paramount is challenging Netflix with a one hundred and eight
(07:38):
billion dollar hostile bid. There is a political angle on this,
and I know this because I was listening to one
of the podcasts that I listened to that are pop
culture related, movie related, and they were very very concerned
about Paramount taking over taking over Warner Brothers Discovery, very
(08:00):
very worried. They believe that would be a rubber stamp
for President Donald Trump type programming, wherein you have the
other take of people believing that Netflix will be the
complete opposite. So we're going to dive into that. I'll
share with you some details before we mock Jasmine Crockett
and we get to your comments as well. You can
email me Justice at iHeartRadio dot com and of course,
(08:23):
if you're listening on the iHeartRadio app, you can leave
us a talk back. Was brought to you by Lyndahl Realty,
and we will get to those coming up next right
here on Wednesday's news Talk Am eleven thirty and one
oh three five FM. Good Morning Trump, Good.
Speaker 5 (08:36):
Morning, and I love your show.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
Paramount sky Dance on Monday launched a hostel bid worth
one hundred and eight point four billion dollars average to
acquire Warner Brothers Discovery, challenging Netflix and the seventy two
billion I thought it was eighty two billion. Ah, give her,
(09:02):
what's ten billion? Dollars the seventy two billion takeover deal
with the company just announced a few days ago. Paramount
said yesterday that it was going right to Warner Brothers shareholders,
take our money with a thirty dollars per share in
cash offer for the entirety of Warner Brothers Discovery, including
(09:26):
its global networks segment, asking them to reject the deal
with Netflix. Now. That is the same bid that a
Warner Brothers rejected in favor of the offer from the
Netflix merger that would alter the US entertainment landscape. The
show continues for a Tuesday here on Twin City's News
Talk Am eleven thirty and one oh three five FM.
(09:48):
John Justice from the sixty five to one carpet plus
Next Day Install Studios, We've got bretton the Master control
booth this morning. Paramount criticized the offer from Netflix, saying
that it exposes the Warner Brothers Discovery shareholders to a protracted,
multi jurisdictional regulatory clearance process with an uncertain outcome, along
(10:09):
with a complex and volatile mix of cash and equity.
You're fascinating to talk to, okay, Paramount said had submitted
six proposal of proposals to Warner Brothers Discovery over the
twelve week period now on Friday, when Netflix struck the
deal to buy Warner Brothers Discovery, that's the Hollywood Giant
(10:31):
between Harry Potter, HBO Max. The cash and stock deal
is valued at about twenty seven dollars and seventy five
cents per Warner's share, unlike the paramount offer of thirty
dollars per share. Donald Trump said on Sunday that the
deals struck by Netflix to buy Warner Brothers Discovery could
be a problem because of the size of the combined
(10:52):
market share. So I'm listening to it's a podcast called
The Big Picture. Staunch lefties on here, right, but they're
really really dumb in terms of their politics. They don't
follow closely enough, So it's very much just surface level
commentary whatever it's kind of. It's the kind of commentary
you get from like Foe of the show Phil, who
(11:13):
just watches whatever liberal or outlet he chooses, like MSNBC
and at leaves talkbacks randomly that have nothing to do
with what I'm talking about on the show, regurgitating what
he watched from his media overlords on TV. So the
political take from the lefties on My Big Picture podcast
was you have the fact that they're worried Paramount would
(11:37):
be a Trump rubber stamp on future Paramount content. And
I think this is only stemming from the fact that
Paramount has a majority of the shows like the ones
that Taylor Sheridan rights Land Man, You've Got The King
of Tulsa. And these aren't even necessarily staunchly conservative shows.
(11:57):
They just they're not overtly shows. I think that I
think Taylor Sheridan happens to be a conservative, but it's
not like when you watch those shows, you're watching something. Hey,
this is quality family, conservative content, not even clothes. It
just doesn't have all the injection of the politics that
you typically see when it comes to Netflix. So apparently
liberals are very worried about Paramount taking over, even though
(12:20):
Paramount has vowed to release thirty films a year, wherein
immediately the conservative take of Netflix buying Warner Brothers and
Discovery would be this monopoly that would be formed, and
the Netflix wocification of exclusively streaming content destroying quality storytelling
(12:46):
on the big screen and little screen through overly politicized correctness,
and a lot of that is stemming from just what
we've seen Netflix produce over the years, and more specifically
the Obama's influence on a lot of the Netflix programming.
So I don't have a take either way on any
of this. I tend to sort of lean more towards
(13:10):
the free market when it comes to stories about how
this will shake out. The criticism of Netflix taking over
companies this large and creating this entertainment monopoly, I understand them,
and they're distressing for me as well with what we've
seen in terms of the again wocification of content created
by Netflix, but that has diminishing returns over a long
(13:33):
enough timeline. They have a new show up on the
example that everybody's pointing to right now, which I don't
know who's watching this, I guess if you want to
make yourself feel better as a white liberal. But there's
a series and I forgot what it's called, but there's
a series on Netflix right now that is about a
trans man coal miner. This will be a biological woman
(13:57):
identifying as a man who apparently were in the coal mines. However,
they have to navigate the overly conservative views of the
town of which the coal mine is supplying. The jobs
for Yeah, it sounds awful. It just it just sounds
(14:18):
it just sounds bad, and there's a point of diminishing return.
I mean, you may get an influx of individuals watching
that on the left who again want to make themselves,
make themselves feel better about themselves. But he that is
in May, You're not going to grab a wide audience
going and doing that. So certainly we'll be keeping an
eye on this story to see how things shake out.
I have no prediction on how this whole thing is
(14:39):
going to I don't think any of this is going
to get done for any you know, for a long
period of time, because there's going to be antitrust issues
regarding this. It's going to have to go through the
courts as people decide whether or not they are creating
a monopoly lot one hundred and eight billion dollars. It's
just again, we've lost we've lost all concept. When you
(15:03):
have deals like this that are making major headlines of
one hundred and eight billion dollars, it really does diminish
the ability, as we talked about on yesterday's show, to
really comprehend how much money that is. I mean, we're
still looking at the billions the one two to six
to eight billion in terms of fraud here in Minnesota.
When you combine that with a one hundred and eight
(15:24):
billion dollar bid for this entertainment company, it really diminishes
the fact that, you know, one billion dollars is still
a heck.
Speaker 6 (15:32):
Of a lot of money.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
All right, coming up, Jasmine Crockett is running for Senate.
We'll talk about this. We have some audio to share.
She launched her first promo video and then abruptly went
and took it down. I'll play for you the audio.
I'm gonna let you know, however, what this is before
I share it with you when we get to your
(15:54):
talkbacks coming up in just a moment here on Twin
City's News Talk. So the launch video for Jasmine Crocketts
Senate campaign. After the redistricting. She was being redistrict out
of her house seat, so she wants to maintain a
role in politics. She has to go and run for Senate.
So she uploaded this and then quickly deleted her launch video.
It's nothing more than a forty four second audio loop
(16:16):
of President Donald Trump calling her a low IQ person,
with Jasmine Crockett standing in profile, just a headshot until
the end of the forty four seconds is over. She
turns her face to the camera and like smiles, and
then then it shows her logo for Crockett for Senate campaign.
(16:37):
You know, in a staunchly conservative area where Trump won
by some fourteen points, it is a rather odd way
to approach your launching of your campaign by basically promoting
that you are the anti Trump. So here's the audio.
We'll get to your comments coming up next from the
(16:57):
iHeartRadio app here on Twinsday's news Time Game eleven thirty
and one to three five FM.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
How about this new one. They have their new star, Crocket.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
How about her?
Speaker 5 (17:06):
She's a new star of the Democrat Party, Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 1 (17:09):
They're in big trouble, but you have this woman Crockett.
Speaker 2 (17:13):
She's a very low IQ person.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
It's just stay at the day. I'm not definitely a
low IQ person. Crocket. Oh man, oh man.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
She's a very low IQ person.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Somebody said the other day she's one of the leaders
of the party. I said, you gotta be kidding. Now,
they're going to rely on Crockett. Crockett's gonna bring them bed.
Let's all about this. That's all. That's all that it
was until she turns to face the camera and her
logo pops up.
Speaker 7 (17:41):
Shouldn't I understood what was kind of pushing them there?
And so I do want people to know that just
because someone has committed a crime, it doesn't make them
a criminal. That is completely different. Being a criminal is
more so about your mind. Say, committing a crime can
(18:02):
come for a lot of different reasons.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Yeah, Trump's not wrong when he says that she's a
low IQ individual. Let me put it this way though,
I mean, that's maybe that's an unfair assessment for Jasmine Crockett.
She just doesn't bother to educate herself. She doesn't care.
As I mentioned a moment ago, she is the equivalent
of your you know, your dfller, your Democrat just watches
(18:26):
the mainstream liberal news channels and just takes away whatever
they're told by the groups of individuals that are writing
the scripts in the production meetings that hand it over
to whatever the talking head is on MSNBC or CNN.
Like what she's saying here, being criminals about a mindset.
Committing a crime can come for a lot of different reasons.
(18:48):
This is just another angle of your your own God,
there are no set standards. Crime is flexible in terms
of whether or not it's right or wrong, depending on
what your motivation is. She's not very articulate in the
way that she presents this. Another problem that you have, though,
is the fact that she's on like some podcasts, this
(19:08):
is the uh and I'm looking at the mic, the
mic holder and the clip that I pulled for you
from Eric Daughtry on X from the Getting Better podcast
or whatever. The problem is there the host of the
podcast just for a non their head and goes, oh, yeah,
she has her Democrat identity privilege where people just don't
(19:31):
bother to question, They just go and take it at
face value. Jasmin Crockett did file paperwork to run for
the Democrat primary and the US Senate in Texas, facing
a Representative at James on tell A Rico and other candidates.
Crockett emphasized the importance of focusing on the general election
and increasing voter turnout to win in Texas. She's not wrong.
(19:54):
Crockett's decision to run for the Senate will leave behind
the thirtieth congressional district, with represent Mark Visa planning to
run in the newly drawn thirtieth district The Senate race
is expected to be one of the most expensive in
the twenty twenty six national cycle, with predictions of it
costing seven hundred and fifty million dollars. That's how much
(20:19):
it costs to get a hack like this elected in office.
Swin City's News Talking Am eleven thirty and one oh
three five FM from the sixty five to one Carbon
plus Next Day Install Studios.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
Hi Dan from Texas. Hey, don't write off Jasmine yet.
There's a lot of Republicans who do not like Cornin,
and if he doesn't do something to get them out
come out to vote, we could end up with that
nut job.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
Oh listen, I'm not riding off Jasmine Crockett. I think
the Democrats right now are experimenting, to be honest with you,
It kind of started with Kamala Harris replacing Joe Biden
last year, having Tim Jong Walls be the be the VP,
Like could they get away with it? And they didn't.
People saw through all of it to Trump one handily
(21:10):
that election. More recently, you look at the Tennessee District
race and the special election was that last week two
weeks ago, Aften being afton Bain. However, you want to
describe that nutbar Van Epps won handily, but aften Bean
did close the gap. I mean, I think Van Epps
won by like nine points, whereas prior that district had
(21:33):
gone to the Republican by twenty two. That's in large
part because of the money that was spent by Democrats
to go and discredit the Republican candidate without course correction
from Democrats, which I don't see happening. This is the
future of the Democrat Party and in the absence of
more qualified Democrat candidates hack like hacks like Jasmin Crockett
(21:53):
Aten Bean, they have an opportunity to win, and they
are hacks. Here's another clip from Crockett. I'll just go
ahead and play it without even setting it up. It
speaks for itself.
Speaker 7 (22:06):
When Texas turns blue, it won't be because of any
one candidate, but because of each and every one of
you doing your part. Turning Texas blue is what I
want to talk to y'all about today. Now there are
those that say, ain't no way, we didn't try it
(22:27):
a fifty kinds of ways. Let me be clear, y'all,
ain't never tried at the jac way.
Speaker 1 (22:33):
That's all she has This is part of her campaign announcement,
completely low energy, hardly anybody there. She's a product of
her social networking influencing. It's the only reason why she's popular.
It's not because of policy. No, she's an influencer. We've
shared the stories on the Air of individuals he used
(22:55):
to be with her campaign and how she really is
just ignorant to being a politician. She wants to be
a social media star politician more than she does actually
want to go and govern and help the people within
the area that she represents. And that's indicative in the
area she currently represents, because it's a mess there. But
(23:16):
that's not what her game is. Her game is what
you're hearing here, and this will continue. As I mentioned,
in the wake of not having other qualified Democrat candidates
step up. There's an interesting dichotomy between what I'm describing
here and what we're dealing with in terms of the
governor's race. And we'll talk about this after the discussion
(23:39):
with our adopted Senator from Wisconsin, Ron Johnson. There's a
piece in the Star Tribute this morning as they continue
to carry the water for Tim Walls talking about the
GOP candidates because none of them are really going and
igniting a large group of Republican voters on fire. And
that's more indicative of walls. That says more about Walls
(24:03):
than it does any of those candidates. And we'll get
into that later on. But in this case, you have
Democrats that are reluctant to go and challenge Jasmine Crockett,
even though I'm sure there are those that would love
to for the very reason that I just mentioned. She's
a social media star and a darling among ignorant Democrat
based voters who don't bother to look at the issues.
(24:26):
They're just enamored by the doing nothing with my fingers
star power that she represents.
Speaker 7 (24:33):
We we used to telling us what I can't do,
but they have no idea what Crockett's crew will do.
So I just want to be clear, faull hate us
in the bank, listen up real loud. We gonna get
this thing done.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
That's a lot of a lot of energy going on
in that room. Can they tell us that Texas is read?
They are lying? Okay? And how is she gonna do
with that all of that? She's just gonna do the
Jasmine Crockett way. That's how it would be like me
going on, I don't know it is for a bad example.
Maybe you don't even need the analogy because it's just
(25:14):
so obvious. But if somebody comes to me and be like, John,
how do we beat Governor Tim Walls next year? Depending
on the candidate? Well, you know what, guys, you just
got to do with the John Justice way. Well what
is that? Well, we're just gonna make sure that a
Republican wins. Well how are you gonna do that? Well,
we're gonna do it my way. Well how is that? Well,
you listen to me on the radio. You'll find out.
I wouldn't have any answers anymore than Jasmine Crockett does
(25:37):
at this point in time to the previous clip that
we shared. Oh actually I still have it up there.
I can go ahead and play it again for you.
Speaker 7 (25:45):
Instood what was kind of pushing them there? And So
I do want people to know that just because someone
has committed a crime, it doesn't make them a criminal.
That is completely different. Being a criminal is more so
about your mindset. Committing a crime can come for a
lot of different reasons.
Speaker 8 (26:08):
Hey, John, committing adulterate does not make you an adulterer.
Murdering someone does not make you a murderer. Deep Thoughts
by Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 5 (26:21):
Good morning, John and Brett. Any individual who comes up
with a statement as ridiculous as stating just because.
Speaker 1 (26:29):
You commit a crime, you're not a criminal, should never.
Speaker 5 (26:33):
Be allowed into political office and is representative of why
we should all be scared to death of the left
of center that is in our country. You commit a crime,
it is tangible. Is something that you have to be
punished for.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
Period.
Speaker 9 (26:52):
Hey John, you said that Jasmine Crockett needs to educate herself.
I think she's the first one to point out to people.
Do She's got a whole bunch of degrees no matter.
I think her issue, aside from needing to be as
far away from politics as possible, is she used to
live in reality world for a little bit. She needs
(27:12):
to put down the protest pamphlet and and just be
a normal human.
Speaker 6 (27:18):
I don't think she can do that.
Speaker 1 (27:19):
For the most part, it really depends on the person.
This is. This is a This is not a generalized
blanket statement that applies to everybody. Let me just say
that upfront. But for the most part, depending on who
the individual is, you can have an individual who racks
up a ton of degrees but is a complete and
total moron. We see this happen all the time. I
have a piece later on this morning from like the
political go to guy here in Minnesota and Minneapolis, and
(27:44):
it's a perfect example of you know, for a really
smart dude, you're still kind of a bias hack. I
went to the Academy of Radio Broadcasting. I didn't walk
out of there being an expert in radio. Did it
do me any good?
Speaker 6 (27:57):
No?
Speaker 1 (27:57):
Not really taught me a little tiny bit, but it
took hands on training. It really took teaching myself being
around individuals and watching other people and how they do
the work, and listening to those who'd been doing it
a lot longer than I did. I learned a lot
more by actually working in radio, just as an intern
(28:17):
and then a part timer, than I ever did at
the Academy of Radio Broadcasting. No, all that's happening here
is Jasmine Crockett is going and reaching out to the
lowest IQ Democrat based voters, speaking of which.
Speaker 10 (28:31):
Hey, John and justice is to throw from etan prairie.
You know, I will be willing to put up one
hundred thousand dollars to have job Ben, Jasmin Crockett.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
And your favorite red guy he's orange.
Speaker 10 (28:45):
President Donnie Trump to take an IQ test. Would you
be willing to match that?
Speaker 1 (28:53):
No, I'm not putting up what worlds? Yes, if I
had one hundred thousand dollars and we wanted to do
IIKU to Q tests of the two individuals, sure I'd go.
I would go ahead and put it on. I'm not
doing that, nor could you get either of them to agree? Yes, Brat,
would you like to OWAI in?
Speaker 3 (29:09):
I mean, Phil, if you've got an extra one hundred
thousand line around, then there's that I'll take five or ten,
maybe twenty, just out of good charity, good will, redistribution
of wealth.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
So, Phil, which is it? Is it that Jasmin Crockett
is an idiot and you also believe Trump is an idiot?
But you just think that Trump is a bigger low
IQ idiot than Jasmin Crockett Or do you actually genuinely
believe that Jasmin Crockett is an intelligent individual? There's another
clip from Jasmin Crockett recently.
Speaker 7 (29:37):
Just this past week. I saw I don't remember which celebrity,
but it was actually a celebrity and I was like,
I don't know that that's not necessarily a bad idea,
but I'd have to think do it a lot. One
of the things that they proposed is black folk not
have to pay taxes for a certain amount of time,
because then again, that puts money back in your pocket.
But at the same time, it may not be as
objectionable to some people about actually giving out dollars. But
(30:02):
obviously then you start dealing with the different tax brackets
and things like that. And that's one of the reasons that,
you know, we argue that reparations makes sense because so
many black folk not only do you owe for the
labor that was stolen and killed and all the other things, right,
but the fact is like we end up being so
far behind, right, and so it's like, how do you
(30:23):
bring forest people exactly? And so it's like, if you
if you do the no tax thing for people that
are already say struggling and aren't really paying taxes in
the first place, it doesn't really exactly.
Speaker 10 (30:36):
Maybe they may want those those checks like they got.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
Exactly, why stopping no taxes for any one particular group,
you know? Why why not free housing for one particular group?
Speaker 6 (30:48):
You know?
Speaker 1 (30:49):
You know, why not more free groceries for one particular
meeting of the minds in.
Speaker 11 (30:56):
That clip, I don't know if Jasmine Crockett is a
low IQ individual or whether or not she cares.
Speaker 6 (31:06):
Well.
Speaker 11 (31:07):
Let's be clear, Democrats don't have to be smart. They
just have to be good at using words to make
things sound like something when they're really meaningless or ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (31:23):
Well, and it is a really good example of just
the state of the Democrat Party right now. They have
taken this approach of nothing but opposition to President Donald
Trump and Republicans, completely dismissed the issues, and then when
they talk about the issues, like with what Jasmine just
mentioned there about having to have the black community not
(31:47):
pay any taxes, there is no further thought to any
of that. They're just over the top, grandiose ideas, the
same type of stuff that Zokron Mom Donnie would go
and propose without any means to actually go and make
that happen. And unfortunately the base of voters for Democrats
are too stupid to go and see through it, and
they just lap it up. On top of that, you
(32:09):
have a whole crop of new voters, individuals reaching voting
age heading into their early twenties that have been indoctrinated
through what has arguably become the worst of our public
education system right now, with the amount of indoctrination that's
been taking place, who are susceptible to this type of
(32:29):
personality influencer, star politician who has no interest in discussing
the issues, seriously, grandiose ideas, and they're anti Trump. That's all,
that's all that they got.
Speaker 6 (32:44):
Hey, John, I agree with him. I am an engineer
by degree, but I'll tell you what, from personal experience
working with a lot of people, some of the best
engineers I've met don't have an engineering degree. Just because
you've got a piece of paper and you're able to
pass a few exams doesn't make you a practicing individual
of that degree. Have a great day.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
Christopher Nolan movie director, Batman Trilogy, Tenants, Oppenheimer, Interstellar, just
to name a few.
Speaker 6 (33:15):
Right.
Speaker 1 (33:16):
Arguably he's doing, Uh The Odyssey is his next big
movie coming out right Arguably one of the biggest directors
in Hollywood right now, ok, most well respected. Never had
any formal training in making movies, didn't go to college
for it. No, basically was was self taught. Just as
a just as a just as a case and case
(33:38):
in point there. I like me some Christopher Nolan. I
mostly do.
Speaker 2 (33:43):
Sometimes it depends. I go to the theater and I
leave and I'm like, I don't know what.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
I just watched? Can you pick?
Speaker 2 (33:50):
Can you is there?
Speaker 1 (33:50):
Is there one particular one I'm putting you on the spot,
but huh, Tenant Tenant? Tenant is a great watch if
you have subtitles on MMMM, because then you can actually
follow what's going on. Yeah. I loved the Batman trilogy. Yeah,
Fantastic Unbelieving, Yeah yeah. Inception is one of my favorite
films ever. Fantastic Tennant is a tough one. You gotta
(34:13):
watch it with subtitles on. Okay, maybe they'll have to
revisit because in the theater, I was like, what the hell?
I know, well, because Christopher Nolan does this thing and
I'm gonna wipe out all movies and I'm gonna make
that Friend of the Show upset. But Christopher Nolan does
this thing where he makes a word of a mainstream movie.
He makes all this money, and you know, gains more respect,
and then the studio says, you can go make whatever
you want. And then he goes and makes a movie
like ten, and then he goes back and does a
(34:34):
movie like the Oppenheimer. That's just kind of his hism
that's been going on in Hollywood forever. By the way,
Steven Spielberg, I think, was probably one of the first
directors to deploy that type of strategy. I'll make you
a you know, straightforward blockbuster. You're gonna make a ton
of money, but then I'm gonna go make Munich. It's
just kind of what Spielberg does, as I predicted yesterday.
We'll get back to more of your comments coming up
(34:56):
in just a moment. Series of incidents in evolving ICE
agents draw come planes from twin cities. I'm looking at
an article from Bring Me the News again. Two different
ICE Immigration Correction enforcement actions are gaining attention. The story
says reports include agents pointing guns at witnesses at Augsburg
(35:16):
University campus and breaking down a door to a Burnsville home.
These were both stories that we highlighted on yesterday show,
and I'll bring you the latest details regarding this. DHS
has come out as I suspected, and in the wake
of Augsburg University complaining about the ICE actions on campus,
DHS says the administrator tried to obstruct a man wanted
(35:41):
for detainment. That particular individual, by the way, was an
illegal alien sex offender. So details on this coming up.
We'll get to your talkbacks from the iHeartRadio app. Those
are brought to you by Lindahl Realty and from Caro Levin.
Lou Ragose has another report and a subsequent article from
Bill Glahn dove tailing off of it at center of
(36:03):
the American experiment regarding what we talked about extensively yesterday,
and that was the Star Tribunes report that they could
only come up with one hundred and fifty two million
technically in fraud that has taken place, not billions. Well,
both Bill Glon, Lure Goose and others, as we did yesterday,
pushedback with the facts regarding that particular issue. It's all
(36:24):
coming up ahead of my conversation with Wisconsin Senator Ron
Johnson at seven thirty here on Twinsday's News Talk Am
eleven thirty and one oh three five FM. They have
what's called a Trump derangement problem.
Speaker 2 (36:35):
Have you heard about that problem?
I got checking off of.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
I as a headosexual male, like the smell of women.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
Why am I getting beat with the hot dog? Oh?
Those poor people? He has a fine took us. Oh,
Twin Cities News Talk. Hey, I'm eleven thirty and one
oh three five FM. I don't know what happened there.
I just decided to play a couple of random drops,
(00:30):
and then Brett, who was back in the master control
booth this morning, decided to join in.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
You gave me the green light, and I went in
there and did it.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
I'm kind of in that mood. I'm kind of in
that mood this morning. Here as we start our show
from the six five to one carpet plus Next Day
install studios on Twin Cities News Talk. This December, according
to those that do the meteorology thing, this December could
be the coldest one yet in more than ten years.
(01:03):
This is perfect for ice enforcement, just saying it doesn't
stop the protesters from going and just ticking everybody off
by chanting and screaming and playing musical instruments and banging
on drums outside of the Hilton down by Mall of America,
where they assumed that ice was staying. You probably did
(01:24):
you see the videos videos on that I did not, Okay, yeah,
and again it's just such a jerk move. I understand
from an activist perspective, this is what activists do, but
it really does demonstrate how they just don't care because
it's not like it's only ice in those hotels. It's
the same attitude that people have when they go on
they block freeways. You're guys gonna make everybody else mad,
(01:45):
but they don't care. It's just it's all about making
themselves personally feel better. But getting back to the weather
really quick. So they had this big storm rolling in
and I know that it's a big storm because I
watched a TikTok video this morning of a guy saying,
this is going to be a big storm. We'll see
how the whole thing shakes out. It's weird though, because
(02:05):
I don't recall I couldn't. I don't remember a time
when like, over the course of the past few days,
it's just like been consistently snowing, like not a lot,
but it's just been like it's not on the map.
I went and got my car washed on Sunday. He
dropped my mollendo off over a cub and I buzzed
(02:25):
over to the holiday and went through the went to
the drive through a car washing. It was nice and sunny.
It was cold out, but nice and sunny outside. But
I only did that because I looked at the I
looked at the app and it showed that, you know, well,
it's gonna be fine. And then suddenly now it's just
snowing all the time. I left this morning and there
was like a half inch in the in the driveway.
You think I'd be used to this by now, living
(02:46):
in Minnesota for as long as I have, it just
seems weird. I don't remember like the sort of the
consistent snowfall, even when it's not turning up on the
UH on the weather app. But it's supposed to get,
you know, much worse later on this afternoon. My thing
is that winter just came so fast.
Speaker 3 (02:59):
Yeah, like literally three weeks ago, I was out golfing
in like fifty to sixty degree weather.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
Yeah, and now it's just miserable. The switch got the
the switch got flipped. So I was having a conversation
with one of the neighbors over the weekend. I was
walking the dog and they were out chiseling the d
I would say shoveling, but they weren't shoveling. They were
chiseling because you were at the point where you had
the chisel because the ice was just so packed in
on the driveway. And we were having a conversation of like,
(03:28):
the past two Christmas holidays, it seems as if we
didn't have any snow. I think the year last year
we didn't, and then the year before I think there
was like a light dusting. And I was talking with
them like, I wonder if all of this snow we'll
stick around before Christmas is saying, yeah, I think we're
pretty much guaranteed to have a white, white Christmas this year.
All right, on the show this morning, a little bit
(03:48):
of a change, Devin Gartzenstein Ross, we were going to
be talking AI. We'll be doing that on Thursday.
Speaker 4 (03:55):
Now.
Speaker 1 (03:56):
There was a report this morning on Fox News right
before the show started that Time at magazine may pick
for a person of their of the year. AI might
be their Person of the Year in a bid for
Time Magazine to just remain relevant because it's pretty much
the only reason why anybody pays attention to them. Once
once a year, when they pick their person of the year.
(04:17):
If you've seen Time magazine at the you know, doctor's
office or dermatologists or wherever, it's like down to like
pamphlet levels of thickness. So David will be on Thursday's show.
We had to make the change. He had some family issues,
so he'll be on Thursday. This morning, though, at seven thirty,
we will be talking with our adopted senator from Wisconsin,
(04:41):
Ron Johnson. It's an honor of Brett. Yeah see, there
you goes see, I got youa Wisconsin. I don't have
the docta back, but yeah, I don't have it, but
I know Conny, so uh yeah. Ron Johnson joining us
this morning at at seven thirty. Of course, we'll talk
a lot of fraud. We have a couple of stories
regarding the wasteful expenditures courtesy of the Minneapolis City Council,
(05:06):
including I don't have this slated to discuss until much
later in the in the eight o'clock hour. However, I
do have a dollar amount that the Minneapolis the City
Council has spent on planning alone for George Floyd Square,
Like they haven't done anything to fix it, just what
(05:29):
they've spent in planning on doing something. And also one
hundred and fifty thousand dollars for a city paid prints
sing along can't support law enforcement. Got to give that
money to violence interrupters. But we are going to spend
millions on planning the future of George Floyd Square and
(05:50):
hundreds of thousands of dollars for a print sing along?
What you know? It's just what a fantastic use of
your taxpayer dollars. It seems to be a running theme
where we at with the bubble machines. Have not heard
much from the bubbler machine. We dropped that idea. Well
they don't work very well in these temps. Well, yeah,
I think they'd just be Yeah, they just did the
(06:10):
big into big ice balls, and I.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
Can't believe the mayor didn't think about that.
Speaker 1 (06:15):
By the way, I heard the I heard the ice
ball this year with a US Immigration and Custom sinforcement
was was rather successful. See what I did there. We'll
talk ice later on in the hour. My prediction.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
I don't know where you went where you put the
walk a walk?
Speaker 1 (06:31):
Yeah, the pages have gotten all. That's all kind of
it's kind of all. It's kind of all over here.
I'll do this for you. Hell yeah, do that one,
and we'll do that one and that one instead. I
do have an update. I was the nailed it yesterday.
I shared with you a couple of different immigration stories,
and I mentioned that it was an easy prediction, but
needless to say, I was right. I mentioned that both
of these stories were going to become points of controversy,
(06:53):
and they've become points of controversy, and we have further clarification.
We had the ice raid in Burnsville, we had the
Augsburg College situation, so we have continued controversy and clarity
on both of those issues. Coming up next, though, we'll
talk briefly before we laugh at Jasmine Crockett running for Senate.
(07:14):
She's already pulled down her launch video. I have the
audio to share with you. Coming up, we'll talk briefly
about the hostile takeover potentially of Warner Brothers Discovery. You
had Netflix saying that they were going to purchase Warner
Brothers Discovery for some eighty two billion. Now you have Paramount.
Paramount is challenging Netflix with a one hundred and eight
(07:38):
billion dollar hostile bid. There is a political angle on this,
and I know this because I was listening to one
of the podcasts that I listened to that are pop
culture related, movie related, and they were very very concerned
about Paramount taking over taking over Warner Brothers Discovery, very
(08:00):
very worried. They believe that would be a rubber stamp
for President Donald Trump type programming, wherein you have the
other take of people believing that Netflix will be the
complete opposite. So we're going to dive into that. I'll
share with you some details before we mock Jasmine Crockett
and we get to your comments as well. You can
email me Justice at iHeartRadio dot com and of course,
(08:23):
if you're listening on the iHeartRadio app, you can leave
us a talk back. Was brought to you by Lyndahl Realty,
and we will get to those coming up next right
here on Wednesday's news Talk Am eleven thirty and one
oh three five FM. Good Morning Trump, Good.
Speaker 5 (08:36):
Morning, and I love your show.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
Paramount sky Dance on Monday launched a hostel bid worth
one hundred and eight point four billion dollars average to
acquire Warner Brothers Discovery, challenging Netflix and the seventy two
billion I thought it was eighty two billion. Ah, give her,
(09:02):
what's ten billion? Dollars the seventy two billion takeover deal
with the company just announced a few days ago. Paramount
said yesterday that it was going right to Warner Brothers shareholders,
take our money with a thirty dollars per share in
cash offer for the entirety of Warner Brothers Discovery, including
(09:26):
its global networks segment, asking them to reject the deal
with Netflix. Now. That is the same bid that a
Warner Brothers rejected in favor of the offer from the
Netflix merger that would alter the US entertainment landscape. The
show continues for a Tuesday here on Twin City's News
Talk Am eleven thirty and one oh three five FM.
(09:48):
John Justice from the sixty five to one carpet plus
Next Day Install Studios, We've got bretton the Master control
booth this morning. Paramount criticized the offer from Netflix, saying
that it exposes the Warner Brothers Discovery shareholders to a protracted,
multi jurisdictional regulatory clearance process with an uncertain outcome, along
(10:09):
with a complex and volatile mix of cash and equity.
You're fascinating to talk to, okay, Paramount said had submitted
six proposal of proposals to Warner Brothers Discovery over the
twelve week period now on Friday, when Netflix struck the
deal to buy Warner Brothers Discovery, that's the Hollywood Giant
(10:31):
between Harry Potter, HBO Max. The cash and stock deal
is valued at about twenty seven dollars and seventy five
cents per Warner's share, unlike the paramount offer of thirty
dollars per share. Donald Trump said on Sunday that the
deals struck by Netflix to buy Warner Brothers Discovery could
be a problem because of the size of the combined
(10:52):
market share. So I'm listening to it's a podcast called
The Big Picture. Staunch lefties on here, right, but they're
really really dumb in terms of their politics. They don't
follow closely enough, So it's very much just surface level
commentary whatever it's kind of. It's the kind of commentary
you get from like Foe of the show Phil, who
(11:13):
just watches whatever liberal or outlet he chooses, like MSNBC
and at leaves talkbacks randomly that have nothing to do
with what I'm talking about on the show, regurgitating what
he watched from his media overlords on TV. So the
political take from the lefties on My Big Picture podcast
was you have the fact that they're worried Paramount would
(11:37):
be a Trump rubber stamp on future Paramount content. And
I think this is only stemming from the fact that
Paramount has a majority of the shows like the ones
that Taylor Sheridan rights Land Man, You've Got The King
of Tulsa. And these aren't even necessarily staunchly conservative shows.
(11:57):
They just they're not overtly shows. I think that I
think Taylor Sheridan happens to be a conservative, but it's
not like when you watch those shows, you're watching something. Hey,
this is quality family, conservative content, not even clothes. It
just doesn't have all the injection of the politics that
you typically see when it comes to Netflix. So apparently
liberals are very worried about Paramount taking over, even though
(12:20):
Paramount has vowed to release thirty films a year, wherein
immediately the conservative take of Netflix buying Warner Brothers and
Discovery would be this monopoly that would be formed, and
the Netflix wocification of exclusively streaming content destroying quality storytelling
(12:46):
on the big screen and little screen through overly politicized correctness,
and a lot of that is stemming from just what
we've seen Netflix produce over the years, and more specifically
the Obama's influence on a lot of the Netflix programming.
So I don't have a take either way on any
of this. I tend to sort of lean more towards
(13:10):
the free market when it comes to stories about how
this will shake out. The criticism of Netflix taking over
companies this large and creating this entertainment monopoly, I understand them,
and they're distressing for me as well with what we've
seen in terms of the again wocification of content created
by Netflix, but that has diminishing returns over a long
(13:33):
enough timeline. They have a new show up on the
example that everybody's pointing to right now, which I don't
know who's watching this, I guess if you want to
make yourself feel better as a white liberal. But there's
a series and I forgot what it's called, but there's
a series on Netflix right now that is about a
trans man coal miner. This will be a biological woman
(13:57):
identifying as a man who apparently were in the coal mines. However,
they have to navigate the overly conservative views of the
town of which the coal mine is supplying. The jobs
for Yeah, it sounds awful. It just it just sounds
(14:18):
it just sounds bad, and there's a point of diminishing return.
I mean, you may get an influx of individuals watching
that on the left who again want to make themselves,
make themselves feel better about themselves. But he that is
in May, You're not going to grab a wide audience
going and doing that. So certainly we'll be keeping an
eye on this story to see how things shake out.
I have no prediction on how this whole thing is
(14:39):
going to I don't think any of this is going
to get done for any you know, for a long
period of time, because there's going to be antitrust issues
regarding this. It's going to have to go through the
courts as people decide whether or not they are creating
a monopoly lot one hundred and eight billion dollars. It's
just again, we've lost we've lost all concept. When you
(15:03):
have deals like this that are making major headlines of
one hundred and eight billion dollars, it really does diminish
the ability, as we talked about on yesterday's show, to
really comprehend how much money that is. I mean, we're
still looking at the billions the one two to six
to eight billion in terms of fraud here in Minnesota.
When you combine that with a one hundred and eight
(15:24):
billion dollar bid for this entertainment company, it really diminishes
the fact that, you know, one billion dollars is still
a heck.
Speaker 6 (15:32):
Of a lot of money.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
All right, coming up, Jasmine Crockett is running for Senate.
We'll talk about this. We have some audio to share.
She launched her first promo video and then abruptly went
and took it down. I'll play for you the audio.
I'm gonna let you know, however, what this is before
I share it with you when we get to your
(15:54):
talkbacks coming up in just a moment here on Twin
City's News Talk. So the launch video for Jasmine Crocketts
Senate campaign. After the redistricting. She was being redistrict out
of her house seat, so she wants to maintain a
role in politics. She has to go and run for Senate.
So she uploaded this and then quickly deleted her launch video.
It's nothing more than a forty four second audio loop
(16:16):
of President Donald Trump calling her a low IQ person,
with Jasmine Crockett standing in profile, just a headshot until
the end of the forty four seconds is over. She
turns her face to the camera and like smiles, and
then then it shows her logo for Crockett for Senate campaign.
(16:37):
You know, in a staunchly conservative area where Trump won
by some fourteen points, it is a rather odd way
to approach your launching of your campaign by basically promoting
that you are the anti Trump. So here's the audio.
We'll get to your comments coming up next from the
(16:57):
iHeartRadio app here on Twinsday's news Time Game eleven thirty
and one to three five FM.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
How about this new one. They have their new star, Crocket.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
How about her?
Speaker 5 (17:06):
She's a new star of the Democrat Party, Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 1 (17:09):
They're in big trouble, but you have this woman Crockett.
Speaker 2 (17:13):
She's a very low IQ person.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
It's just stay at the day. I'm not definitely a
low IQ person. Crocket. Oh man, oh man.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
She's a very low IQ person.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Somebody said the other day she's one of the leaders
of the party. I said, you gotta be kidding. Now,
they're going to rely on Crockett. Crockett's gonna bring them bed.
Let's all about this. That's all. That's all that it
was until she turns to face the camera and her
logo pops up.
Speaker 7 (17:41):
Shouldn't I understood what was kind of pushing them there?
And so I do want people to know that just
because someone has committed a crime, it doesn't make them
a criminal. That is completely different. Being a criminal is
more so about your mind. Say, committing a crime can
(18:02):
come for a lot of different reasons.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Yeah, Trump's not wrong when he says that she's a
low IQ individual. Let me put it this way though,
I mean, that's maybe that's an unfair assessment for Jasmine Crockett.
She just doesn't bother to educate herself. She doesn't care.
As I mentioned a moment ago, she is the equivalent
of your you know, your dfller, your Democrat just watches
(18:26):
the mainstream liberal news channels and just takes away whatever
they're told by the groups of individuals that are writing
the scripts in the production meetings that hand it over
to whatever the talking head is on MSNBC or CNN.
Like what she's saying here, being criminals about a mindset.
Committing a crime can come for a lot of different reasons.
(18:48):
This is just another angle of your your own God,
there are no set standards. Crime is flexible in terms
of whether or not it's right or wrong, depending on
what your motivation is. She's not very articulate in the
way that she presents this. Another problem that you have, though,
is the fact that she's on like some podcasts, this
(19:08):
is the uh and I'm looking at the mic, the
mic holder and the clip that I pulled for you
from Eric Daughtry on X from the Getting Better podcast
or whatever. The problem is there the host of the
podcast just for a non their head and goes, oh, yeah,
she has her Democrat identity privilege where people just don't
(19:31):
bother to question, They just go and take it at
face value. Jasmin Crockett did file paperwork to run for
the Democrat primary and the US Senate in Texas, facing
a Representative at James on tell A Rico and other candidates.
Crockett emphasized the importance of focusing on the general election
and increasing voter turnout to win in Texas. She's not wrong.
(19:54):
Crockett's decision to run for the Senate will leave behind
the thirtieth congressional district, with represent Mark Visa planning to
run in the newly drawn thirtieth district The Senate race
is expected to be one of the most expensive in
the twenty twenty six national cycle, with predictions of it
costing seven hundred and fifty million dollars. That's how much
(20:19):
it costs to get a hack like this elected in office.
Swin City's News Talking Am eleven thirty and one oh
three five FM from the sixty five to one Carbon
plus Next Day Install Studios.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
Hi Dan from Texas. Hey, don't write off Jasmine yet.
There's a lot of Republicans who do not like Cornin,
and if he doesn't do something to get them out
come out to vote, we could end up with that
nut job.
Speaker 1 (20:47):
Oh listen, I'm not riding off Jasmine Crockett. I think
the Democrats right now are experimenting, to be honest with you,
It kind of started with Kamala Harris replacing Joe Biden
last year, having Tim Jong Walls be the be the VP,
Like could they get away with it? And they didn't.
People saw through all of it to Trump one handily
(21:10):
that election. More recently, you look at the Tennessee District
race and the special election was that last week two
weeks ago, Aften being afton Bain. However, you want to
describe that nutbar Van Epps won handily, but aften Bean
did close the gap. I mean, I think Van Epps
won by like nine points, whereas prior that district had
(21:33):
gone to the Republican by twenty two. That's in large
part because of the money that was spent by Democrats
to go and discredit the Republican candidate without course correction
from Democrats, which I don't see happening. This is the
future of the Democrat Party and in the absence of
more qualified Democrat candidates hack like hacks like Jasmin Crockett
(21:53):
Aten Bean, they have an opportunity to win, and they
are hacks. Here's another clip from Crockett. I'll just go
ahead and play it without even setting it up. It
speaks for itself.
Speaker 7 (22:06):
When Texas turns blue, it won't be because of any
one candidate, but because of each and every one of
you doing your part. Turning Texas blue is what I
want to talk to y'all about today. Now there are
those that say, ain't no way, we didn't try it
(22:27):
a fifty kinds of ways. Let me be clear, y'all,
ain't never tried at the jac way.
Speaker 1 (22:33):
That's all she has This is part of her campaign announcement,
completely low energy, hardly anybody there. She's a product of
her social networking influencing. It's the only reason why she's popular.
It's not because of policy. No, she's an influencer. We've
shared the stories on the Air of individuals he used
(22:55):
to be with her campaign and how she really is
just ignorant to being a politician. She wants to be
a social media star politician more than she does actually
want to go and govern and help the people within
the area that she represents. And that's indicative in the
area she currently represents, because it's a mess there. But
(23:16):
that's not what her game is. Her game is what
you're hearing here, and this will continue. As I mentioned,
in the wake of not having other qualified Democrat candidates
step up. There's an interesting dichotomy between what I'm describing
here and what we're dealing with in terms of the
governor's race. And we'll talk about this after the discussion
(23:39):
with our adopted Senator from Wisconsin, Ron Johnson. There's a
piece in the Star Tribute this morning as they continue
to carry the water for Tim Walls talking about the
GOP candidates because none of them are really going and
igniting a large group of Republican voters on fire. And
that's more indicative of walls. That says more about Walls
(24:03):
than it does any of those candidates. And we'll get
into that later on. But in this case, you have
Democrats that are reluctant to go and challenge Jasmine Crockett,
even though I'm sure there are those that would love
to for the very reason that I just mentioned. She's
a social media star and a darling among ignorant Democrat
based voters who don't bother to look at the issues.
(24:26):
They're just enamored by the doing nothing with my fingers
star power that she represents.
Speaker 7 (24:33):
We we used to telling us what I can't do,
but they have no idea what Crockett's crew will do.
So I just want to be clear, faull hate us
in the bank, listen up real loud. We gonna get
this thing done.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
That's a lot of a lot of energy going on
in that room. Can they tell us that Texas is read?
They are lying? Okay? And how is she gonna do
with that all of that? She's just gonna do the
Jasmine Crockett way. That's how it would be like me
going on, I don't know it is for a bad example.
Maybe you don't even need the analogy because it's just
(25:14):
so obvious. But if somebody comes to me and be like, John,
how do we beat Governor Tim Walls next year? Depending
on the candidate? Well, you know what, guys, you just
got to do with the John Justice way. Well what
is that? Well, we're just gonna make sure that a
Republican wins. Well how are you gonna do that? Well,
we're gonna do it my way. Well how is that? Well,
you listen to me on the radio. You'll find out.
I wouldn't have any answers anymore than Jasmine Crockett does
(25:37):
at this point in time to the previous clip that
we shared. Oh actually I still have it up there.
I can go ahead and play it again for you.
Speaker 7 (25:45):
Instood what was kind of pushing them there? And So
I do want people to know that just because someone
has committed a crime, it doesn't make them a criminal.
That is completely different. Being a criminal is more so
about your mindset. Committing a crime can come for a
lot of different reasons.
Speaker 8 (26:08):
Hey, John, committing adulterate does not make you an adulterer.
Murdering someone does not make you a murderer. Deep Thoughts
by Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 5 (26:21):
Good morning, John and Brett. Any individual who comes up
with a statement as ridiculous as stating just because.
Speaker 1 (26:29):
You commit a crime, you're not a criminal, should never.
Speaker 5 (26:33):
Be allowed into political office and is representative of why
we should all be scared to death of the left
of center that is in our country. You commit a crime,
it is tangible. Is something that you have to be
punished for.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
Period.
Speaker 9 (26:52):
Hey John, you said that Jasmine Crockett needs to educate herself.
I think she's the first one to point out to people.
Do She's got a whole bunch of degrees no matter.
I think her issue, aside from needing to be as
far away from politics as possible, is she used to
live in reality world for a little bit. She needs
(27:12):
to put down the protest pamphlet and and just be
a normal human.
Speaker 6 (27:18):
I don't think she can do that.
Speaker 1 (27:19):
For the most part, it really depends on the person.
This is. This is a This is not a generalized
blanket statement that applies to everybody. Let me just say
that upfront. But for the most part, depending on who
the individual is, you can have an individual who racks
up a ton of degrees but is a complete and
total moron. We see this happen all the time. I
have a piece later on this morning from like the
political go to guy here in Minnesota and Minneapolis, and
(27:44):
it's a perfect example of you know, for a really
smart dude, you're still kind of a bias hack. I
went to the Academy of Radio Broadcasting. I didn't walk
out of there being an expert in radio. Did it
do me any good?
Speaker 6 (27:57):
No?
Speaker 1 (27:57):
Not really taught me a little tiny bit, but it
took hands on training. It really took teaching myself being
around individuals and watching other people and how they do
the work, and listening to those who'd been doing it
a lot longer than I did. I learned a lot
more by actually working in radio, just as an intern
(28:17):
and then a part timer, than I ever did at
the Academy of Radio Broadcasting. No, all that's happening here
is Jasmine Crockett is going and reaching out to the
lowest IQ Democrat based voters, speaking of which.
Speaker 10 (28:31):
Hey, John and justice is to throw from etan prairie.
You know, I will be willing to put up one
hundred thousand dollars to have job Ben, Jasmin Crockett.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
And your favorite red guy he's orange.
Speaker 10 (28:45):
President Donnie Trump to take an IQ test. Would you
be willing to match that?
Speaker 1 (28:53):
No, I'm not putting up what worlds? Yes, if I
had one hundred thousand dollars and we wanted to do
IIKU to Q tests of the two individuals, sure I'd go.
I would go ahead and put it on. I'm not
doing that, nor could you get either of them to agree? Yes, Brat,
would you like to OWAI in?
Speaker 3 (29:09):
I mean, Phil, if you've got an extra one hundred
thousand line around, then there's that I'll take five or ten,
maybe twenty, just out of good charity, good will, redistribution
of wealth.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
So, Phil, which is it? Is it that Jasmin Crockett
is an idiot and you also believe Trump is an idiot?
But you just think that Trump is a bigger low
IQ idiot than Jasmin Crockett Or do you actually genuinely
believe that Jasmin Crockett is an intelligent individual? There's another
clip from Jasmin Crockett recently.
Speaker 7 (29:37):
Just this past week. I saw I don't remember which celebrity,
but it was actually a celebrity and I was like,
I don't know that that's not necessarily a bad idea,
but I'd have to think do it a lot. One
of the things that they proposed is black folk not
have to pay taxes for a certain amount of time,
because then again, that puts money back in your pocket.
But at the same time, it may not be as
objectionable to some people about actually giving out dollars. But
(30:02):
obviously then you start dealing with the different tax brackets
and things like that. And that's one of the reasons that,
you know, we argue that reparations makes sense because so
many black folk not only do you owe for the
labor that was stolen and killed and all the other things, right,
but the fact is like we end up being so
far behind, right, and so it's like, how do you
(30:23):
bring forest people exactly? And so it's like, if you
if you do the no tax thing for people that
are already say struggling and aren't really paying taxes in
the first place, it doesn't really exactly.
Speaker 10 (30:36):
Maybe they may want those those checks like they got.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
Exactly, why stopping no taxes for any one particular group,
you know? Why why not free housing for one particular group?
Speaker 6 (30:48):
You know?
Speaker 1 (30:49):
You know, why not more free groceries for one particular
meeting of the minds in.
Speaker 11 (30:56):
That clip, I don't know if Jasmine Crockett is a
low IQ individual or whether or not she cares.
Speaker 6 (31:06):
Well.
Speaker 11 (31:07):
Let's be clear, Democrats don't have to be smart. They
just have to be good at using words to make
things sound like something when they're really meaningless or ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (31:23):
Well, and it is a really good example of just
the state of the Democrat Party right now. They have
taken this approach of nothing but opposition to President Donald
Trump and Republicans, completely dismissed the issues, and then when
they talk about the issues, like with what Jasmine just
mentioned there about having to have the black community not
(31:47):
pay any taxes, there is no further thought to any
of that. They're just over the top, grandiose ideas, the
same type of stuff that Zokron Mom Donnie would go
and propose without any means to actually go and make
that happen. And unfortunately the base of voters for Democrats
are too stupid to go and see through it, and
they just lap it up. On top of that, you
(32:09):
have a whole crop of new voters, individuals reaching voting
age heading into their early twenties that have been indoctrinated
through what has arguably become the worst of our public
education system right now, with the amount of indoctrination that's
been taking place, who are susceptible to this type of
(32:29):
personality influencer, star politician who has no interest in discussing
the issues, seriously, grandiose ideas, and they're anti Trump. That's all,
that's all that they got.
Speaker 6 (32:44):
Hey, John, I agree with him. I am an engineer
by degree, but I'll tell you what, from personal experience
working with a lot of people, some of the best
engineers I've met don't have an engineering degree. Just because
you've got a piece of paper and you're able to
pass a few exams doesn't make you a practicing individual
of that degree. Have a great day.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
Christopher Nolan movie director, Batman Trilogy, Tenants, Oppenheimer, Interstellar, just
to name a few.
Speaker 6 (33:15):
Right.
Speaker 1 (33:16):
Arguably he's doing, Uh The Odyssey is his next big
movie coming out right Arguably one of the biggest directors
in Hollywood right now, ok, most well respected. Never had
any formal training in making movies, didn't go to college
for it. No, basically was was self taught. Just as
a just as a just as a case and case
(33:38):
in point there. I like me some Christopher Nolan. I
mostly do.
Speaker 2 (33:43):
Sometimes it depends. I go to the theater and I
leave and I'm like, I don't know what.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
I just watched? Can you pick?
Speaker 2 (33:50):
Can you is there?
Speaker 1 (33:50):
Is there one particular one I'm putting you on the spot,
but huh, Tenant Tenant? Tenant is a great watch if
you have subtitles on MMMM, because then you can actually
follow what's going on. Yeah. I loved the Batman trilogy. Yeah,
Fantastic Unbelieving, Yeah yeah. Inception is one of my favorite
films ever. Fantastic Tennant is a tough one. You gotta
(34:13):
watch it with subtitles on. Okay, maybe they'll have to
revisit because in the theater, I was like, what the hell?
I know, well, because Christopher Nolan does this thing and
I'm gonna wipe out all movies and I'm gonna make
that Friend of the Show upset. But Christopher Nolan does
this thing where he makes a word of a mainstream movie.
He makes all this money, and you know, gains more respect,
and then the studio says, you can go make whatever
you want. And then he goes and makes a movie
like ten, and then he goes back and does a
(34:34):
movie like the Oppenheimer. That's just kind of his hism
that's been going on in Hollywood forever. By the way,
Steven Spielberg, I think, was probably one of the first
directors to deploy that type of strategy. I'll make you
a you know, straightforward blockbuster. You're gonna make a ton
of money, but then I'm gonna go make Munich. It's
just kind of what Spielberg does, as I predicted yesterday.
We'll get back to more of your comments coming up
(34:56):
in just a moment. Series of incidents in evolving ICE
agents draw come planes from twin cities. I'm looking at
an article from Bring Me the News again. Two different
ICE Immigration Correction enforcement actions are gaining attention. The story
says reports include agents pointing guns at witnesses at Augsburg
(35:16):
University campus and breaking down a door to a Burnsville home.
These were both stories that we highlighted on yesterday show,
and I'll bring you the latest details regarding this. DHS
has come out as I suspected, and in the wake
of Augsburg University complaining about the ICE actions on campus,
DHS says the administrator tried to obstruct a man wanted
(35:41):
for detainment. That particular individual, by the way, was an
illegal alien sex offender. So details on this coming up.
We'll get to your talkbacks from the iHeartRadio app. Those
are brought to you by Lindahl Realty and from Caro Levin.
Lou Ragose has another report and a subsequent article from
Bill Glahn dove tailing off of it at center of
(36:03):
the American experiment regarding what we talked about extensively yesterday,
and that was the Star Tribunes report that they could
only come up with one hundred and fifty two million
technically in fraud that has taken place, not billions. Well,
both Bill Glon, Lure Goose and others, as we did yesterday,
pushedback with the facts regarding that particular issue. It's all
(36:24):
coming up ahead of my conversation with Wisconsin Senator Ron
Johnson at seven thirty here on Twinsday's News Talk Am
eleven thirty and one oh three five FM. They have
what's called a Trump derangement problem.
Speaker 2 (36:35):
Have you heard about that problem?
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com