Munro On Padilla

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Let's get right to the Project Hotline. Welcome back to
the show. Breitbart News immigration expert Neil Monroe. I appreciate
you taking time to come on this morning.

Speaker 2 (00:09):
I love to do this.

Speaker 1 (00:11):
And you know, I did notice when our liaison confirmed this.
She said, here's you know, the latest on ice operations
and article, you know, recent articles, our current lead story
on Senator Alex Padilla's stunt at Gnomes presser. And the
word stunt jumped right out to me. Is that a

(00:35):
belief being bandied about it?

Speaker 2 (00:37):
Right?

Speaker 1 (00:37):
But this was a stunt, It was planned, it was calculated.

Speaker 2 (00:41):
Ah. Yeah, So I'm sitting as a typewriter yesterday. Word
am I going to use this? And I picked stunt
because Padilla is a very active proponent of more migration.
He sees himself as a leader of the migration community
in California. He works closely with the investor groups that

(01:06):
want to import more renters, consumers, and workers. And so, yeah,
it's a stunt. I mean in Washington, he's a senator.
That's a really powerful job. He can get her on
the phone anytime of day. He can summon her to
his office, he can have her out of hearing. He

(01:27):
can have his people go down. He has lots of
ways to get at her. But what's happening this weekend
is the Democrats are organizing a national rally in many
cities and towns against Trump's immigration policy. And so he
used this stunt to get more publicity. And afterwards he

(01:51):
gave a brief press conference where he said, We're going
to have all these events all around the country, and
I'm urging everyone to avoid violence. Yeah, it was a
stunt designed to generate sympathy and publicity for the pending
parades and pending demonstrations.

Speaker 1 (02:12):
And he did get fifteen minutes one on one time
with noam Am. I right about that, I've been saying,
I hope so I read that he did. Afterwards they
sat down. Why were there no cameras rolling for that?

Speaker 2 (02:29):
This excellent point. They do like to talk away from
cameras so they can be very frank with each other.
But the stunt allowed him to portray himself as a
victim of the administration's policies, and I suspect it will
generate himself sympathy. He showed himself nobly asking a question.

(02:53):
He showed himself being man handled and pushed that, and
I gotta believe that going to build sympathy for him
among the immigrant community that he cares most about it. Now,
Paginia doesn't do much. You hardly know the guy. He
doesn't participate in much politics beyond immigration politics. But every

(03:16):
chance he gets, he stands up and he calls for
more amnesty, more migration, more aid and welfare four migrants.
He's his parents brought him to America. He was parents
from Mexicans, and they brought him to America illegally, but

(03:36):
he got legal and then he got appointed senator. He
was a House member, and then when Kamal Harris got
elevated vice president, he got picked to be president to
be senator, and then and then he got subsequently elected.
And so it's highly likely there's nothing there's nothing accidental.

(04:03):
There's nothing planned about Padilla's rise to become a senator.

Speaker 1 (04:09):
You know what was frustrating me?

Speaker 2 (04:10):
Right? Nothing unplanned?

Speaker 1 (04:13):
What was? But it's still frustrating me. And again we're
I'm with the bright part News immigration expert Neil Monroe
is that I'm not seeing full video and maybe you
saw every clip that I see begins with him already
in the throes of being removed. What did I miss
before that? What are we all missing before that? Like,

(04:35):
it's really important that we all see the minute leading
up to at least a minute leading up to that.

Speaker 2 (04:41):
Right, there's whole videos that came out late last night,
and basically what happened was like, so it's a large room,
level room. He comes in from the right. That means
all the reporters blocked the view of him. So the
initial video of him break it through the circle of

(05:03):
people at the very front, but there's more videos of
him coming in and you know, it was completely on
this sorry, and it was very much, very much a stunt.

Speaker 1 (05:16):
So he was so he wasn't neil, I apologize for
stumping all over you right there. I just want to
make sure I even I have a clear picture, but
those listening do too. He wasn't standing in that room
for the entirety of the thing. And at this point
tried to get a question going and was you know, rebuffed.
If I saw sixty seconds prior to everything that I'm seeing,

(05:40):
that's when he entered. He came barging in.

Speaker 2 (05:43):
Yes, he came in through a door, walked up through
the crowd, and the security for the security guys asking
his question. And by the way, the security guys don't
recognize no Senor Padilla from California. Like the security guys
are all was thinking, there's a guy with a gun.
I have to react to that, and some ways they

(06:05):
were very restrained. They bundled him back and pulled him
back through the crowd.

Speaker 1 (06:14):
I completely agree. I completely agree with that. You know,
the description from so many Democrat senators saying he was
violently manhandled. It's like were you ever removed from a
club when you were young. That's not violently. And one
of them he even threw back, like he shoved the
guy back. It could have been uglier for him being.

Speaker 2 (06:34):
R He's a big powerfect guy. So you know, in
a way you would have expected it if you if
you push your way through a crowd towards the cabinet member,
a national security camp, remember who has plenty of security guys,
all of who know that the Democrat that Democratic base

(06:57):
keeps yelling we need to kill Trump, like these guys
are on. These guys are being not going to take chances.
So it's all very unfortunate, but it was deliberate, and
it's deliberate because Democrats are determined to stop Trump's mandate
on immigration policy. I mean trumble. Their party now is

(07:21):
addicted to migration. They have spent so much money on
over Day. It's their support is built on migration, on
the expectation of migration, and that means they're there. So
it's very difficult for the party members to turn around
and say, you know, this migration business has made Americans poor,

(07:46):
it's damaged our technology, and it's made this unpopular. So
perhaps we should change policy. But they can't. If anyone
were to say that in the Democratic Party, they'll get
thrown out a window from a very high building very fast.
They're completely They've selected themselves to believe that migration is

(08:08):
a good thing and anyone against it is the biggot.
You can see the way they talk about it now
in out in California. They're saying, oh, it's terrible, the
president is supporting people who haven't committed a crime. Now,
when you say that, what you're saying is anyone in
the world can come into the United States and stay

(08:30):
as long as they want, and work and buy a
house as long as they want, as long as they
don't commit a crime. That's basically open borders for non criminals.
If you have any side that has open borders is
no longer a democracy because what happens is, let's say
it is a problem. We have a problem with education.

(08:52):
We want better education, but getting better education is very
difficult because it requires six in the unions. They're required
doing lots of things, helping people get married, helping people
are in decent wages in jobs. But those are really
difficult problems to fix. So the Democrats have a different solution. Now.
They say, let's just import more Indians and Chinese, and

(09:16):
some of them are clever enough to do all the
difficult jobs. And then let's import more Mexicans so they
can work in the fields and we don't have to
build farm machines anymore. Nextic immigration is just an addiction
for the Democrats. Every problem is answered by more immigration,
and it's it will of course wreck the United States,

(09:40):
but the party is just not able to handle the
idea that you know, should fix the teachers' unions. We
should spend more money on productivity rather than welfare. We
should not promote people who don't study, who don't do
very well in school did since they just still want

(10:02):
to do, and immigration provides them an answer, an alternative
and easy alternative, like they keep hitting the crack pipe
every time they came across a public policy problem.

Speaker 1 (10:13):
Uh, you know, it was interesting. I was watching one
one feed in particular yesterday, Connecticut Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy.
I'm sure he's made it into an article or two
of yours in the past before. Yep, I don't know
what his life would be like without Trump. He lives
and breathes for daily attacks on Trump, and I did

(10:36):
get this feeling. He kept calling what happened to Padilla
yesterday a defining moment in our nation, and he was
seizing this moment, and I feel many were. Booker was outraged.
He was very theatrical yesterday. I mean there was like
a scene out of Glen Gary, Glen Ross that was
mammut what Corey Booker was doing yesterday. And I watched

(10:59):
Chris Murphy take to the floor and everything was a
defining moment. And I honestly feel this might be inappropriate,
but I honestly feel like when Israel then attacked Iran,
it was so interesting to see they felt like, well,
our moment just we were just eclipsed. Our moment just
got stolen. All eyes go to this right now. And

(11:20):
it was insane to see that Chris Senator Murphy's next tweet,
because there was just five or six in a row
about what a defining moment. This was what happened to Padilla.
His next tweet wasn't about Israel or Iran. It was
about how Israel shows so little regard for Trump's leadership

(11:45):
that this happened.

Speaker 2 (11:49):
Yes, to some extent, they are they played theater. They
act wounded and outraged, but you know there's a lot
of that. And yet under Murphy, huge numbers of white
collar Americans have lost their jobs to VISA workers, h

(12:10):
one B workers, and OPT workers. It's gutting large parts
of Connecticut's professional cast. But that's the problem. He doesn't
want to deal with the business guys like bringing in
foreigners for white collar jobs. It's the foreign white cars
stay quiet, they never complain, They always do what the

(12:33):
bosses say. And that's just if you're in the c
suite up there in a major corporation. It's just nicer
to have these foreign workers who never say anything, who
never say no to you, who always work on the weekend,
so they get their white collar migrants and Murphy says
nothing about us. So, yeah, it's theater.

Speaker 1 (12:57):
But my point beyond that too, the history onics beyond
that was everything has to be spawned not just by him,
but really largely by him. But okay, how do I
tweet about, you know, Israel attacking Iran? Well, Trump failed.
Everything's got to be motivated by Trump or a result

(13:21):
of Trump, a result of something he did do.

Speaker 2 (13:24):
That part of that. What they've got there is this
is very early in the two year election cycle. Okay,
the next election isn't until twenty six Yeah, so for
the first several months of this year or this administration,
Democrats are doing stuff to make their base happy. They're
doing stuff to reanimate and make their base excited. And

(13:47):
their base consists of basically radicals, a collection of radicals.
Normal people don't get to work up a politics early
after an election year. But they want to excite their base.
They're going to shout about green this and migration data
and social justice this. It's like they're doing their calisthetics

(14:09):
before the twenty twenty sixth election, and they hope that
they can do all this without the ordinary Americans noticing
how radical they are being, and that way, if they
get their people up, all worked up and excited, they'll
run into the twenty twenty six election all excited, and

(14:29):
then the Democrats will start aiming their theatrics as ordinary voter.
But for the moment, this is the time to excise, reanimate,
and reward their radical base and the radical basis. There's
so many segments of society. I mean, let me said,

(14:51):
think of them. To a large extent, American politics consists
of the middle of the country voting Republican. I mean
the middle of the population, ordinary people who don't care
much about politics, who has said, spend their time on
a whole bunch of other things, raising families, going to work, fishing.

(15:11):
But the democratic it consists of all the groups on
the periphery. I mean, there's the queer groups, which used
to be merely gay rights. There's the wild environmentalists to
want to stop energy production. There's all sorts of racial
and migrant groups who say what's group for, what's important

(15:36):
is what's good for my little group. And so this periphery,
this coalition of the periphery, the coalition of the marginal groups,
comprises the Democratic Party and to get this coalition excited,
they need to find one issue that everybody hates in
the party, and that one issue is Trump, and especially

(15:57):
on Trump on migration,