Alexander Marlow an American media executive who is the editor-in-chief of Breitbart News and an author. Marlow began his career as Andrew Breitbart's editorial assistant, a position he held for four years. He was hired in 2008 as Breitbart's inaugural managing editor and served as its first employee. Marlow is the former host of Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM. Marlow was born to a father whom is Catholic and his mother is Jewish. For high school, he attended Harvard-Westlake School. While a student there, he befriended Andrew Breitbart, who hired him as the first employee at Breitbart News to do odd jobs and minor copy editing. He says that at the time his job was mostly being a ''glorified personal assistant'' to Breitbart, which subsequently developed into an editorial position as the site became more successful. As editor-in-chief of Breitbart, Marlow has indicated the key narratives for the website include immigration, the Islamic State, race riots, traditional values, and Hillary Clinton. Marlow has stated Brietbart is not intended to influence, but to report and highlight stories that conservatives consider important, particularly those involving trade, spending, and immigration.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is a podcast from wor Back now to the
WR Saturday Morning Show with Larry Minty. The weaponization of
the Justice Department was recently exposed by classified documents found
in burn bags at the Justice Department in Washington, d C.
It is also being exposed in a new book called
(00:21):
Breaking the Law, written by best selling author Alex Marlowe,
who is the editor in chief of Breitbart News. It's
honored to meet you, Sarah. Thank you so much for
joining us this morning. Yeah, Larry, great to be on
with you. What's amazing timing for your book, because case
after case right now against Donald Trump seems to be
(00:42):
falling apart, and weaponization seems to be exposed each time.
As you know, the Justice Department is considering criminal charges
against New York Attorney General Letitia James here in New
York because of her because of that ridiculous real estate
civil case against President Trump. I understand that the case
(01:03):
started with what your book found out. Is that right?
Speaker 2 (01:06):
I don't know for sure, but it is a wild
coincidence that I called for Tish James to be to
be prosecuted and to be investigated for conspiracy against rights
on the book came out Tuesday, and then they announced
the investigation on Friday. It seems wildly coincidental that that
would be the case, But I guess I don't know
(01:27):
exactly what was the final precipitating event, but it's great news.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
Tell us what you found, tell us what the problem
with the case is.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Yeah, So I called, are there eight reasons why I
think that James should be prosecuted? And the first one's
the most obvious one is that she was elected as
the number one legal authority, the top law enforcement official
in the state of New York when those powerful states
in the Union, the state were Donald Trump was the
most famous and powerful resident of the state for a
(01:56):
long time. And she said, flat out the number one
issue in this country is defeating Donald Trump. Nothing else matters.
And then she immediately gets to work trying to do this,
and she uses this novel legal approach where she essentially
prosecutes him for a victimless crime. Now I don't think
it was a crime at all, but she says that
Trump had undervalued these properties to gain better rates on
loans or something, but there were no complaints against Trump.
(02:19):
These corporations that were essentially the victims here, According to James,
liked working with Trump. They thought he was a whale.
They loved doing business with him. Trump never owed anyone
a penny in that regard. But she claimed that he
had undervalued certain property in order to get advantages. But
her calculations there were absurd. For example, she and judge
(02:42):
and Goern in the case said that he'd undervalued mar
A Lago at eighteen that it's worth eighteen million or
twenty eight million, and Trump had said as worth seven
undred three nine million. Well, I did comps with the
real estate market. One acre properties in that area go
for about forty million. Two acres go for about two
hundred million. So how big is mar A Lago. It's
seventeen acres, and it's historic and it goes from the
(03:04):
lake all the way to the ocean. I mean, it's
just an amazing property of historic significance. Could be worth
two billion dollars and they think it's worth twenty million,
which is obviously a lie. During all this time, James
is going to the White House regularly, and she's in
the end that Levy's a cruel and unusual punishment against Trump.
Cruel and usual puishment can be in the civil case too,
(03:25):
four hundred and sixty four million dollars for a victimless crime.
She's just trying to bankrupt them in order to rig
an election. That's what this is all about. Well, i'll
tell you what.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
The Appella judges looking at this case seem to agree
with you, and we're just waiting for their ruling to
come out. It's been almost a year now, which is unprecedented.
We're trying to figure out what's holding them up. But
they said a lot of the things you just said.
Let's get to the biggest fraud of all. It's unraveling
right now before our eyes, the Russian collusion probe against
(03:54):
Trump that's being exposed as a lie. What did you
find out in your book that we're all learning now.
Speaker 2 (04:03):
Yeah. One of the things that's so essential here is
that without the Russian collusion hoax, there would be no
law fair against I'm sorry, there would be lawfair, absolutely,
but there would be no criminal conviction against Trump. This
convicted felon branding is all from the Stormy Daniels case,
the business records case, which was called the hush money case,
(04:23):
but it was not about hush money. Hush money is
not illegal and It doesn't imply guilt if you do
hush money, so it's important to note that. But this
case that led to the thirty four felony conviction against
Trump never would have happened if not for the Russia
collusion hoax. The key to the case was access to
the Gmail account of Michael Cohen, Trump's fixer and former lawyer.
(04:45):
And how did they get access to that because Cohen
was wrapped up in the Russian collusion hoax where he
was being investigated by Robert Muller's special counsel and the
DOJ for being a Russian asset and doing a fear
of violations, etc.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
Being an unreasured for an agent. They were looking to.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
That and that's what ended up spawning the information that
was necessary to bust Trump in that case. That was
a bogus case, but it never would have happened at
all if not for the Russia collusion hoax. So the
Russia hoax haunts us to this day and it will
continue to unless people are held to account.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
Was there some collusion in all of this where all
of the parties speaking to each other as these cases
were going on.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
Fantastic question, and I know the answer. But I don't
know the answer. The answer is yes, it's very obvious
that it is. All six of the cases have some
connection to the White House. The one that got the felonies,
the family convintion case, the Stormy Daniels case. The DOJ
sent in a ringer, this guy named Matthew Colangelo, who
was in line to maybe be an FBI director or
(05:45):
perhaps a Supreme Court justice, when the top guys the
DOJ one hundred thousand person organization, and they sent him
down to Manhattan's District court to work for Alvin Bragg
to try to bust Trump. Obviously this was coordinated. It's
not a coincidence that something like that happens. Then you
see people like Kiss James, regular White House visits, the
Georgia Rico case, the Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis's boyfriend, and
(06:09):
a person who was on the case as an attorney,
regular White House visits. What are they talking about at
these visits? Of course they're talking about how to get Trump.
But do I know exactly how much they were coordinating?
Speaker 1 (06:20):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
I don't have subpoena power, but those who do need
to figure it out because it's quite obvious there was
widespread collusion across cases.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
There has been some reporting that the raid on mar
A Lango was to reclaim the documents that were discovered
by Toulsey Gavard that uncovered the Democrats manufacturing Russia Gate.
Do you have any information on that?
Speaker 2 (06:42):
Uh, yeah, I don't know exactly yet, but of course
it makes sense to me, of course that it feels
like that that would be something that's worthy of looking into.
And this is why what I hope my book is
a catalyst for is that there's too many unanswered questions
where the public should not tolerate that because until the
question is getting answers, it means there's no accountability.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
It means your two tiers of justice.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
It means people like Donald Trump are held to different
standards than not just you know, the Joe Biden's and
the James Clappers and the James Comey's and all those
people who clearly committed crimes and got away with it.
They got money for it, they got contributorships and TV
for it, but even people like the rest of us,
normal people. He's held a different standard, and that is
not fair. It's unacceptable, and we have to get past
(07:27):
that that's.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
A great point. Alex Marlowe, editor in chief of breit
Bart News, two time New York Times best selling author.
His current book is Breaking the Law, exposing the weaponization
of the Justice Department against Donald Trump. Sarah, thank you
so much for your time today. Really appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
Thanks Larry.
Speaker 1 (07:45):
This has been a podcast from wor
This is a podcast from wor Back now to the
WR Saturday Morning Show with Larry Minty. The weaponization of
the Justice Department was recently exposed by classified documents found
in burn bags at the Justice Department in Washington, d C.
It is also being exposed in a new book called
(00:21):
Breaking the Law, written by best selling author Alex Marlowe,
who is the editor in chief of Breitbart News. It's
honored to meet you, Sarah. Thank you so much for
joining us this morning. Yeah, Larry, great to be on
with you. What's amazing timing for your book, because case
after case right now against Donald Trump seems to be
(00:42):
falling apart, and weaponization seems to be exposed each time.
As you know, the Justice Department is considering criminal charges
against New York Attorney General Letitia James here in New
York because of her because of that ridiculous real estate
civil case against President Trump. I understand that the case
(01:03):
started with what your book found out. Is that right?
Speaker 2 (01:06):
I don't know for sure, but it is a wild
coincidence that I called for Tish James to be to
be prosecuted and to be investigated for conspiracy against rights
on the book came out Tuesday, and then they announced
the investigation on Friday. It seems wildly coincidental that that
would be the case, But I guess I don't know
(01:27):
exactly what was the final precipitating event, but it's great news.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
Tell us what you found, tell us what the problem
with the case is.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Yeah, So I called, are there eight reasons why I
think that James should be prosecuted? And the first one's
the most obvious one is that she was elected as
the number one legal authority, the top law enforcement official
in the state of New York when those powerful states
in the Union, the state were Donald Trump was the
most famous and powerful resident of the state for a
(01:56):
long time. And she said, flat out the number one
issue in this country is defeating Donald Trump. Nothing else matters.
And then she immediately gets to work trying to do this,
and she uses this novel legal approach where she essentially
prosecutes him for a victimless crime. Now I don't think
it was a crime at all, but she says that
Trump had undervalued these properties to gain better rates on
loans or something, but there were no complaints against Trump.
(02:19):
These corporations that were essentially the victims here, According to James,
liked working with Trump. They thought he was a whale.
They loved doing business with him. Trump never owed anyone
a penny in that regard. But she claimed that he
had undervalued certain property in order to get advantages. But
her calculations there were absurd. For example, she and judge
(02:42):
and Goern in the case said that he'd undervalued mar
A Lago at eighteen that it's worth eighteen million or
twenty eight million, and Trump had said as worth seven
undred three nine million. Well, I did comps with the
real estate market. One acre properties in that area go
for about forty million. Two acres go for about two
hundred million. So how big is mar A Lago. It's
seventeen acres, and it's historic and it goes from the
(03:04):
lake all the way to the ocean. I mean, it's
just an amazing property of historic significance. Could be worth
two billion dollars and they think it's worth twenty million,
which is obviously a lie. During all this time, James
is going to the White House regularly, and she's in
the end that Levy's a cruel and unusual punishment against Trump.
Cruel and usual puishment can be in the civil case too,
(03:25):
four hundred and sixty four million dollars for a victimless crime.
She's just trying to bankrupt them in order to rig
an election. That's what this is all about. Well, i'll
tell you what.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
The Appella judges looking at this case seem to agree
with you, and we're just waiting for their ruling to
come out. It's been almost a year now, which is unprecedented.
We're trying to figure out what's holding them up. But
they said a lot of the things you just said.
Let's get to the biggest fraud of all. It's unraveling
right now before our eyes, the Russian collusion probe against
(03:54):
Trump that's being exposed as a lie. What did you
find out in your book that we're all learning now.
Speaker 2 (04:03):
Yeah. One of the things that's so essential here is
that without the Russian collusion hoax, there would be no
law fair against I'm sorry, there would be lawfair, absolutely,
but there would be no criminal conviction against Trump. This
convicted felon branding is all from the Stormy Daniels case,
the business records case, which was called the hush money case,
(04:23):
but it was not about hush money. Hush money is
not illegal and It doesn't imply guilt if you do
hush money, so it's important to note that. But this
case that led to the thirty four felony conviction against
Trump never would have happened if not for the Russia
collusion hoax. The key to the case was access to
the Gmail account of Michael Cohen, Trump's fixer and former lawyer.
(04:45):
And how did they get access to that because Cohen
was wrapped up in the Russian collusion hoax where he
was being investigated by Robert Muller's special counsel and the
DOJ for being a Russian asset and doing a fear
of violations, etc.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
Being an unreasured for an agent. They were looking to.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
That and that's what ended up spawning the information that
was necessary to bust Trump in that case. That was
a bogus case, but it never would have happened at
all if not for the Russia collusion hoax. So the
Russia hoax haunts us to this day and it will
continue to unless people are held to account.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
Was there some collusion in all of this where all
of the parties speaking to each other as these cases
were going on.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
Fantastic question, and I know the answer. But I don't
know the answer. The answer is yes, it's very obvious
that it is. All six of the cases have some
connection to the White House. The one that got the felonies,
the family convintion case, the Stormy Daniels case. The DOJ
sent in a ringer, this guy named Matthew Colangelo, who
was in line to maybe be an FBI director or
(05:45):
perhaps a Supreme Court justice, when the top guys the
DOJ one hundred thousand person organization, and they sent him
down to Manhattan's District court to work for Alvin Bragg
to try to bust Trump. Obviously this was coordinated. It's
not a coincidence that something like that happens. Then you
see people like Kiss James, regular White House visits, the
Georgia Rico case, the Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis's boyfriend, and
(06:09):
a person who was on the case as an attorney,
regular White House visits. What are they talking about at
these visits? Of course they're talking about how to get Trump.
But do I know exactly how much they were coordinating?
Speaker 1 (06:20):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
I don't have subpoena power, but those who do need
to figure it out because it's quite obvious there was
widespread collusion across cases.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
There has been some reporting that the raid on mar
A Lango was to reclaim the documents that were discovered
by Toulsey Gavard that uncovered the Democrats manufacturing Russia Gate.
Do you have any information on that?
Speaker 2 (06:42):
Uh, yeah, I don't know exactly yet, but of course
it makes sense to me, of course that it feels
like that that would be something that's worthy of looking into.
And this is why what I hope my book is
a catalyst for is that there's too many unanswered questions
where the public should not tolerate that because until the
question is getting answers, it means there's no accountability.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
It means your two tiers of justice.
Speaker 2 (07:05):
It means people like Donald Trump are held to different
standards than not just you know, the Joe Biden's and
the James Clappers and the James Comey's and all those
people who clearly committed crimes and got away with it.
They got money for it, they got contributorships and TV
for it, but even people like the rest of us,
normal people. He's held a different standard, and that is
not fair. It's unacceptable, and we have to get past
(07:27):
that that's.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
A great point. Alex Marlowe, editor in chief of breit
Bart News, two time New York Times best selling author.
His current book is Breaking the Law, exposing the weaponization
of the Justice Department against Donald Trump. Sarah, thank you
so much for your time today. Really appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
Thanks Larry.
Speaker 1 (07:45):
This has been a podcast from wor
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.