The WOR Saturday Morning Show with Larry Mendte - - 8 - 16 - 2025

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is a podcast from wor Now the wr Saturday
Morning Show.

Speaker 2 (00:06):
Here's Larry Minty. Welcome to Saturday Morning. On today's show,
former New York Governor David Patterson endorses Eric Adams in
the mayoral race, which is strange because he endorsed former
Governor Andrew Cuomo in the primaries. What changed? We'll have
the governor just ahead. A new book written by the

(00:29):
editor in chief of Breitbart News called Breaking the Law
details the weaponization of the law to try and stop
Donald Trump. I'll talk with Alex Marlow coming up. Did
you know there's a right and a wrong way to sleep? Well?
According to doctor Gregory Poland, there is, and sleeping the
wrong way can affect your health and career advice expert

(00:53):
greg gan Grande has advice for when and if you
get rejected for a job. But first, let's talk with
David Patterson, former governor of New York. Governor. Thanks so
much for joining us, sir, I appreciate your time.

Speaker 3 (01:07):
Good morning, Riarry.

Speaker 2 (01:08):
How are you so? I'm a little confused, That's how
I am this morning. I thought you were all in
on Andrew Cuomo.

Speaker 3 (01:14):
Well, a lot of people have talked about that and
what happened was that in earlier in the year, the
New York County Leader Keith Wright, asked me if I
would join him in endorsing Governor Cuomo because at that
time he was fifteen points ahead in the Democratic primary
and he just seemed to be steamrolling his way through it,

(01:37):
so there was no reason not to endorse him, and
also governed to stay for eleven years quite well, so
we did that. However, in twenty twenty one, my endorsement
for mayor in the Democratic primary was Eric Adams, and
I had planned on endorsing him again, but because of
his legal problems and he was out of the process,

(01:58):
he withdrew from running in the primary. So Culomo was
the best available candidate to endorse. So when the County
Leader asked me to do it, I was happy to
do it. But now we're in the general election, neither
Adams nor Cuomo is on the Democratic line, and Adams
being the candidate that I wanted from the very beginning,

(02:18):
that's why I endorsed him.

Speaker 2 (02:19):
Oh that's interesting, but he's way behind at this point.
That didn't play at all into the decision. I mean,
I would think if you wanted a Democrat that could
defeat Zorin Mamdani. At least, the polls right now show
Andrew Cuomo has is the better choice.

Speaker 3 (02:36):
I think if it's a one on one race that
either one of them could beat Zorini Mamdani. But the
thing is kind of interesting. At the press conference, Mayor
Adams pointed out that he is in the polls right now,
ninety four days before the general election. He is at
the same level that Mamdani was in ninety four days

(02:59):
before the end of the primary season. So he does
have a chance to do it now. I will say
that he has a difficulty and you could really see
it yesterday because he, you know, was talking about being
the voice of the people, and you know, he's done
a lot of really positive things. But at the same time,
he vetoed the increase for transportation workers for businesses that

(03:24):
delivery workers, and the city council raised their minimum wage
and he vetoed it, so you know, the business community
would obviously like that, the city council obviously will hate that.
Where As in twenty twenty one he was pretty much
getting support from the city council members individually, and he

(03:45):
was getting support from business leaders who saw him as
a reasonable person and when the other choices were Maya
Wiley among others, they saw him as the best choice.
But in this situation, he's in a sense, it's asking
New Yorkers of different views to both vote for him,

(04:07):
and that's going to be very difficult because you know,
when you veto somebody's legislation, they take it personally, particularly
people who thought they would get an increase in wages.

Speaker 2 (04:21):
So you think he made a mistake.

Speaker 3 (04:23):
Well, it's it's a mistake if he doesn't win, but
it's also what's making it the pathway to victory difficult
for him. I think he can do it, and he
was a candidate that I thought would govern the city best,
So I didn't really assess who was going to win

(04:45):
and who's.

Speaker 4 (04:45):
Going to lose.

Speaker 3 (04:46):
But what I will say is when you look at
the pathway to victory for him, it's situations such as
what I just described that are going to make the
journey difficult. Now, he's hardworking. I accidentally ran into him
about an hour after the press commerce. He was doing
a commercial on some street we were driving down. But

(05:09):
the point is that he's going to have to make
up his mind for sure who he is going to
be between now and November, so when people go to
the polls, they'll know what they're getting.

Speaker 2 (05:23):
You'd think he would have figured that out in four
years of mayor. And I want to go back to
your example. You gave a second ago where you said
murmurs or in mom Donnie. He came up from one
percent in the polls to win it. Nobody knew who
he was. Everybody knows who Eric Adams is, and according
to the polls, they're rejecting him. And I think they're

(05:44):
rejecting him because of his ties to Donald Trump. Do
you think that's the case.

Speaker 3 (05:49):
Yeah, you see, that's another problem. Today he made a
comment because there was a twenty year old high school
student who went for his regular check in with the
immigration and he was picked up and now he's in
a prison in Pennsylvania. And Adams defended the you know,

(06:11):
immigrants who are in the system going through the process
from the you know, the Justice Department or whoever it is,
whisking them off to another state and putting them in
a prison without any due process. So he had the
right point of view there, but then you know, when
it comes to the the the other issues that you know,

(06:35):
particularly previously, he has stood up, you know, more so
for the administration than the rights of people. And you know,
if you're listening to this discussion, whatever your point of
view is, you have to have one. You can't have
you know, two or three. And I think that's causing

(06:56):
the problem. And I will say this Larry that his
his appearance on Fox News with Tom Holman, where the
interviewer asked Holman, what will you do if Eric Adams
doesn't get this immigration situation under control? And Holman suggests
that he was going to put his foot up a

(07:17):
part of the mayor's body. He just kind of sitat
there and took it. And that kind of got around
as if he was afraid to actually say anything back.
And it took I think a long time for him
to get through it. I think he's through it now.
But time is costly when you're running for office.

Speaker 2 (07:35):
I get it, but I also get that things aren't
serious until September. Hey, after you made this decision, or
maybe before it, did you talk to former Governor Cuomo
about it?

Speaker 5 (07:46):
Oh?

Speaker 3 (07:46):
No, I didn't. His office called my office suggesting that
I had said that the candidate with the lowest poll
numbers should get out of the race. In September. This
was at a previous press conference. I never said that.
What I said was that the candidate with the highest

(08:09):
pull numbers next to Mamdani the other candidate, should get
out and let that person run one to one, which
actually would have benefited Governor Cuomo. But his staff is
so out of touch with reality that they call up
and start making these allegations, and they didn't check the facts.

Speaker 2 (08:25):
First, and it sounds like they're a little upset with you.
So you're not going to be having dinner with Andrew
Cuomo anytime soon.

Speaker 3 (08:33):
No, but I'm not the only one.

Speaker 2 (08:36):
Who else is on that list.

Speaker 3 (08:38):
I'm curious just about everybody else is running against him.
He you know, he just does these things that you know,
you just you know, can't understand what the logic of
it is. And unfortunately it really really hurt him. He
didn't go to any of the debates, he didn't participate
in the public forums. He wasn't campaigning on the streets,

(09:01):
you know. He was calling up heavy donors and making
a lot of money and putting out a lot of commercials. Yeah,
you're right, but right now, from time to time when
people go to the polls, they're not thinking about that,
they're thinking more grassroots. Yeah, and they saw Mamdani as
an alternative to his conduct.

Speaker 2 (09:20):
Yeah, he didn't write on a good campaign at all.
Governor Patterson, thanks so much for your time. It was
great to talk to you.

Speaker 3 (09:26):
Hey, Larry, we'll do it again please.

Speaker 2 (09:28):
Former Governor of New York David Patterson coming up next.
It's important you know the right way to sleep. It
can make you live longer. We'll talk with doctor Gregory
Poland from the Mayo Clinic.

Speaker 1 (09:40):
Next, here's Larry Minty with more of the Wor Saturday
Morning Show.

Speaker 2 (09:46):
How do you sleep on your side, on your back
with your mouth open closed? Apparently sleeping the right way
is important. Here's doctor Gregory Poland from the Mayo Clinic.
Doctor Poland, thank you so much for joining us. Good
morning to you. Always a pleasure. So how do I sleep? Wrong?

Speaker 5 (10:05):
Most Americans do? It's pretty surprising that we don't know.
Here are typical things. Stop looking at screens before you
go to bed, or even worse, when you're lying in
bed getting ready to go to sleep, the room should
be darkened, no light. You might want some so called

(10:26):
white noise in the background. It should be on the
cool side, and the best position to sleep in is
on your side, not on.

Speaker 2 (10:35):
Your back, Doctor Paulin, nobody does any of those things.

Speaker 5 (10:41):
That's the problem. And you know, we do have a
lot of sleep problems. We are a nation of chronically
tired people. And in its worst manifestation is this concept
or diagnosis of sleep apnea, which is about thirty to
forty million people in the US experience.

Speaker 2 (11:02):
Well, describe what sleep apne is.

Speaker 5 (11:04):
First, this is the collapse of the airway and so
you see symptoms like snoring, waking up with a dry
mouth because of mouth breathing, irritability, and the risk of
this is of cardiovascular disease. A recent study showed about
a fifty percent increase risk of cognitive issues, diabetes, depression.

(11:28):
It's a diagnosis that carries significant issues with it, but
it's treated by using SEPAP, by using positive pressure air
to keep that airway open. But in kind of a
fun study, a recent investigator published a study on conk
shell blowing. That's right, a conk shell. Regularly doing that

(11:51):
over about a six month time period significantly improved sleep
mild to moderate sleep apnea. And there's a new drug
that's coming out called ad one oh nine, which seems
to keep the airway from collapsing. This is important because
a lot of people avoid getting evaluated for sleep apnea

(12:12):
because they say, I don't want a machine on my face.

Speaker 4 (12:14):
Can't you do some kind of breathing exercises like the
thing they gave you after a surgery, You know those
things you blow into with the ball flying up.

Speaker 5 (12:21):
I think you're right that anything where you have to
purse the lips and blow out hard is going to
activate and strengthen those upper airway muscles, and that seems
to be the common denominator underlying sleep app Let's.

Speaker 2 (12:37):
Move on to the to the topic I was also
trying to avoid, how you say congestion pricing is actually
helping us that has health has health benefits as well.
You realize many people in this city hate congestion pricing.

Speaker 5 (12:53):
I know, I know. I mean, I'm in Manhattan a
week every month and I get an ear full of it.
But I must say it's a lot more pleasant walking
around Manhattan. So here's what they found. Not surprisingly, noise
complaints decreased by seventy percent, And you know noise pollution rated. Yeah,

(13:16):
carbon pollution went down two and a half percent, walking
went up almost ten percent. And importantly, again not surprising,
I guess car crashes and injuries to pedestrians decreased by
fifty percent five to ZHO. So you know, I know
it's controversial. I know it's been a problem for some people,

(13:40):
but their benefits to having less cars on the road
and doing more walking.

Speaker 2 (13:45):
You're really batting the thousand. Let's move into the next one.
Hell hand so it's going to kill us two.

Speaker 5 (13:51):
It's still of you know, interesting information. Right, there's a
New Jersey company. They sell their hand fold products under
the moniker of Derma Clean, Derma Right Clean, Foam Parry Genie.
These are soaps that often have something like vitamin E
or preservative in them, that are contaminated with a common

(14:15):
bacteria called Berkholderia. But it's an opportunistic bacteria, meaning that
in people who are immunocompromised, particularly who have lung issues,
it can be a deadly infection, leading to pneumonia and
sepsis and septic shock. The problem with this particular bacteria

(14:37):
is that it is multiply drug resistant, so the manufacturer
did the right thing issuing a recall of Evidently four
lots of their products are thought to be contaminated. So
again look for Derma Clean, Derma Right Clean Foam or
Parry Genie and if you have those products, return them

(14:58):
to where you got them.

Speaker 2 (15:00):
Well, that was very important information. You made a big
comeback right there at the end. Good time, nice job.
Thank you so much, Doctor Gregory Polden, health and medical
expert who is a leader in vaccines and infectious diseases
at the Mayo Clinic, and he's also president. That's what
I'm sure why you're in town once a week at
the Atria Research Institute in New York, Doctor Poland, thanks

(15:23):
so much.

Speaker 5 (15:23):
Thank you.

Speaker 2 (15:24):
There's a new book out on the weaponization of the
Justice Department to stop Donald Trump, and it's already making news.
We'll talk about it with its author Alex Marlow from Breitbart.
Is your job search not going as well as you want?
Have you been rejected for a job recently? Career ad

(15:44):
vice expert greg gan Grande tells you how you can
learn from that.

Speaker 1 (15:49):
Coming up back now to the WOOR Saturday Morning Show
with Larry Minti, The Weaponization.

Speaker 2 (15:56):
Of the Justice Department was recently exposed by lessified documents
found in burn bags at the Justice Department in Washington,
d C. It is also being exposed in a new
book called Breaking the Law, written by best selling author
Alex Marlowe, who is the editor in chief of Breitbart News.

(16:18):
It's honored to meet you, Sarah. Thank you so much
for joining us this morning. Yeah, Larry, great to be
on with you. Well, what's amazing timing for your book,
because case after case right now against Donald Trump seems
to be falling apart, and weaponization seems to be exposed
each time. As you know, the Justice Department is considering
criminal charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James here

(16:42):
in New York because of her because of that ridiculous
real estate civil case against President Trump. I understand that
the case started with what your book found out. Is
that right?

Speaker 4 (16:54):
I don't know for sure, but it is a wild
coincidence that I call for James to be prosecuted and
to be investigated for conspiracy against rights on The book
came out Tuesday, and then they announced the investigation on Friday.
It seems wildly coincidental that that would be the case.
But I guess I don't know exactly what was the

(17:16):
final precipitating event, but what's great news.

Speaker 2 (17:20):
Tell us what you found, tell us what the problem
with the case is.

Speaker 4 (17:23):
Yeah, So I called either eight reasons why I think
that James should be prosecuted, And the first one's the
most obvious one, is that she was elected as the
number one legal authority, the top law enforcement official in
the state of New York, one of those powerful states
in the Union, the state where Donald Trump was the
most famous and powerful resident of the state for a

(17:44):
long time. And she said, flat out, the number one
issue in this country is defeating Donald Trump. Nothing else matters.
And then she immediately gets to work trying to do this,
and she uses this novel legal approach where she essentially
prosecutes him for a victimless crime. Now I don't think
it was a crime at all, but she says that
Trump had undervalue these properties to gain better rates on
loans or something. But there were no complaints against Trump.

(18:08):
These corporations that were essentially the victims here, according to James,
liked to working with Trump. They thought he was a whale.
They loved doing business with him. Trump never owed anyone
a Penny in that regard, but she claimed that he
had undervalued certain property in order to get advantages. But
her calculations there were absurd. For example, she and judge

(18:30):
and Goern in the case said that he'd undervalued mar
A Lago at eighteen that it's worth eighteen million or
twenty eight million, and Trump had said it's worth seve
hundred three nine million. Well, I did comps with the
real estate market. One acre properties in that area go
for about forty million. Two acres go for about two
hundred million. So how big is mar A Lago. It's
seventeen acres, and it's historic and it goes from the

(18:52):
lake all the way to the ocean. I mean, it's
just an amazing property of historic significance. Could be worth
two billion dollars and they think it's worth twenty million,
which is obviously a lie. During all this time, James
is going to the White House regularly, and she's in
the end that Levy's a cruel unusual punishment against Trump.
Cruel and usual punishment can be in the civil case too,

(19:13):
four hundred and sixty four million dollars for a victimless crime.
She's just trying to bankrupt them in order to rig
an election. That's what this is all about. Well, i'll
tell you what.

Speaker 2 (19:20):
The Appella judges looking at this case seem to agree
with you, and we're just waiting for their ruling to
come out. It's been almost a year now, which is unprecedented.
We're trying to figure out what's holding them up. But
they said a lot of the things you just said.
Let's get to the biggest fraud of all. It's unraveling
right now before our eyes, the Russian collusion probe against

(19:42):
Trump that's being exposed as a lie. What did you
find out in your book that we're all learning now. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (19:51):
One of the things that's so essential here is that
without the Russian collusion hoax, there would be no law fare.
I'm sorry, there would be lawfier, absolutely, but there would
be no criminal conviction against Trump. This convicted felon branding
is all from the Stormy Daniel's case, the business records case,
which was called the hush money case, but it was

(20:11):
not about hush money. Hush money is not illegal and
it doesn't imply guilt if you do hush money, So
it's important to note that. But this case that led
to the thirty four felony conviction against Trump. Never would
have happened if not for the Russia collusion hoax. The
key to the case was access to the Gmail account
of Michael Cohen, Trump's fixer and former lawyer. And how

(20:34):
did they get access to that because Cohen was wrapped
up in the Russian collusion hoax where he was being
investigated by Robert Muller's special counsel and the DOJ for
being a Russian asset and doing a fear of violations, etc.
Being an unreasured for an agent. They were looking to
that and that's what ended up spawning the information that
was necessary to bust Trump in that case. That was

(20:55):
a bogus case, but it never would have happened at
all if not for the Russia collusion hoax. So the
Russia hoax haunts us to this day and it will
continue to unless people are held to account. Was there
some collusion in all of this where all of the
parties speaking to each other as these cases were going on.
Fantastic question, And I know the answer, but I don't

(21:15):
know the answer. The answer is yes. It's very obvious
that it is. All six of the cases have some
connection to the White House, the one that got the felonies,
the family conviction case, the Stormy Daniel's case. The DOJ
sent in a ringer, this guy named Matthew Colangelo, who
was in line to maybe be an FBI director or
perhaps a Supreme Court justice when the top guys the

(21:36):
DOJ one hundred thousand person organization, and they sent him
down to Manhattan's District court to work for Alvin Bragg
to try to bust Trump. Obviously this was coordinated. It's
not a coincidence that something like that happens. Then you
see people like Kiss James, regular White House visits, the
Georgia Rico case, the Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis's boyfriend, and

(21:57):
a person who was on the case as an attorney,
regular White House visits.

Speaker 2 (22:00):
What are they talking.

Speaker 4 (22:01):
About at these visits? Of course they're talking about how
to get Trump. But do I know exactly how much
they were coordinating.

Speaker 2 (22:08):
I don't know.

Speaker 4 (22:09):
I don't have subpoena power. But those two do need
to figure it out, because it's quite obvious there was
widespread collusion across cases.

Speaker 2 (22:16):
There has been some reporting that the raid on Maro
Lango was to reclaim the documents that were discovered by
Toulsey Gavard that uncovered the Democrats manufacturing Russia Gate. Do
you have any information on that?

Speaker 4 (22:31):
Uh, yeah, I don't know exactly yet, but of course
it makes sense to me, of course that it feels
like that that would be something that's worthy of looking into.
And this is why what I hope my book is
a catalyst for is that there's too many unanswered questions
where the public should not tolerate that because until the
question is getting answers, it means there's no accountability. It

(22:51):
means you're two tiers of justice. It means people like
Donald Trump were held to different standards than not just
you know, the Joe Biden's and the James Clappers and
James Comey's and all those people who clearly committed crimes
and got away with it. They got money for it,
they got contributorships and TV for it. But even people
like the rest of us, normal people, He's held a

(23:11):
different standard, and that is not fair, it's unacceptable, and
we have to get past that.

Speaker 2 (23:16):
That's a great point. Alex Marlowe, editor in chief of
breit Bart News, two time New York Times Best selling author.
His current book is Breaking the Law exposing the weaponization
of the Justice Department against Donald Trump. Sarah, thank you
so much for your time today.

Speaker 4 (23:32):
Really appreciate it. Thanks Larry, still to come.

Speaker 2 (23:34):
Career advice columnist Greg g and Grande says, don't sulk
when you get turned down for a job, learn from it.
Greg is next.

Speaker 1 (23:43):
Here again is Larry Minty with the wr Saturday Morning Show.

Speaker 2 (23:49):
Welcome back. Remember this job rejection is not the end,
it's only the beginning. That's according to career advice expert
Greg gm Grande. And the topic is dealing with job rejection.
Everybody has been through this and it's tough not to
take it personally, and sometimes it's tough to get up

(24:12):
and try out for the next job because you don't
want to go through it again. What is your suggestion, Greg,
to those people?

Speaker 6 (24:18):
Such an important topic, Larry, thank you for giving it
airtime today, Because the average job seeker experiences lots of rejection.
And so the first thing to know is that's normal
and they may not make you feel better, but you
should understand why. There often is lots of rejection before

(24:42):
you land the right job, and that's because the competition
is so fierce. It doesn't mean you were doing anything wrong.
It doesn't mean you were rejected. It doesn't mean you
couldn't do the job. It just they may have hundreds
of great applications, and they may interview ten to twenty

(25:02):
fifteen great candidates, and then it's just a matter of
who feels like they fit better, who has a better
connection with the boss, or who has a particular skill
or an experience that they're looking for that you have
no control over. If you haven't done it, then it's
not your fault. So get a thicker skin, become more resilient,

(25:26):
because the worst thing you can do in the job
search is to walk into an interview feeling like down
and negative, because it comes across and you want every
interview to show up in your best, most positive, optimistic way.

Speaker 2 (25:42):
For a lot of people, and I know people looking
for jobs right now. For a lot of people, that's
easier said than done. After a few rejections, it's difficult
to shake it off. The more rejections, the more difficult
it is to shake it off. They start questioning their
own ability, they start questioning themselves. I mean, what do
you say to them, how do they shake it off.

Speaker 6 (26:06):
Well, it is good to question how the interview went
and what might have been some of the reasons why
it could have been it was just difficult competition, or
maybe you are not showing up in the right way.
Maybe your response is the way you're telling your story,

(26:28):
which is what interviews are all about. It's not about
reciting what's on the resume, but it's about how are
you coming across because that's what the interview is about.
They want to see what is it going to be
like to work with this person every single day, How
did they think, how do they act, what's their personality
like and so, and how do you describe what your

(26:50):
strengths are and what your experiences are and what you
learn from different experiences. So it's good to evaluate after
every interview, Okay, how did I perform that interview? Was
I showing up in the best way? Did I give
good responses? And then if you need to make some adjustments,
that's what you should be doing. But also recognizing, as

(27:12):
I said before, you will create a self fulfilling prophecy
of more rejection if you let it get to you
where you're showing up that way. So I understand it's hard,
but you need to when it's showtime. For those thirty minutes,
you need to have a smile. You need to be
upbeat and optimistic, and you should never reveal that you've

(27:36):
been looking for a long time and you can't seem
to find the right thing. Nobody wants to hire someone
who seems like you know nobody else wants to hire.

Speaker 2 (27:45):
It's interesting you made it sound you made it sound
like going on an interview interview was like a blind date.
I mean, how am I going to get along with
this person? Do I want to spend time with this person?
But it makes a whole lot of sense. It does
make sense that you need to get along with the
person interviewing you because their jobs on the line too.
If you end up being a real jerk in the

(28:07):
office that they have to deal.

Speaker 6 (28:09):
With, that is the whole point of the interview. If
you've gotten to the interview stage, that means you've gone
through a certain amount of vetting where they believe what's
on your application and your resume enough that, Okay, we
believe this person has the experience to do the job.
Now let's meet them and see what they would be
like to work with and then how they think and

(28:30):
let's pressure test it even more. Let's give them some scenarios.
Let's ask them to talk about different situations in their career.
And so how you tell those stories is the difference
between a strong interview and one where you might walk
away not getting a job offer.

Speaker 2 (28:46):
I talked to a couple people recently that are looking
for jobs, and they're getting frustrated because they go online
to these job sites or they go to LinkedIn, and
there's all of these jobs that they feel like they're
qualified for, sometimes over are qualified for, but they believe
they just get lost in thousands of people applying. Is
that the case? Is there a better way?

Speaker 6 (29:07):
It's absolutely the case. It's one method for looking for
a job, and everyone who is looking for a job
certainly should apply to anything they see on these job
boards like LinkedIn, but too many people rely on it
as their primary source for job hunting. So just as
you're able to sit wherever you are and look at

(29:28):
hundreds of listings and with one click apply to hundreds
of jobs, tens of thousands of job applicants are doing
the same thing, and companies are getting so inundated with
applications When they post something on LinkedIn, for example, they're
using screening software because they don't have the staff to
actually sort through, so it is the least effective. It's

(29:52):
something that should be part of the job search, but
not your primary job search. Looking for some connection to
network and some way try to get to the person
who is actually doing the hiring through a little bit
of sleuthing by looking up that company and that department
and the people who work there, and try to apply

(30:13):
sort of back channel would be a more effective way
than just sending a resume over the transom through LinkedIn
or these other jobs.

Speaker 2 (30:21):
Tending directly to a person is good. Calling that person's
probably a bad idea, right.

Speaker 6 (30:26):
Well, you probably won't get through, but if you can.
I wouldn't mind if somebody called me through my work
contact information and left a message or try to reach
me and said, hey, listen, I love your company, I
love the work you do, and i'd love to come
work for you. I see you have a job opening.

(30:48):
I stand out and I just love an opportunity to
spend fifteen minutes to talk to someone. Wouldn't mind that
at all.

Speaker 2 (30:56):
Well, you're a good guy. I think you're the exception
to the rule, though I don't I don't think. I
think that's a pretty bold move to make bott You're
the expert, Greg gian Grande, career advice expert with us
every Wednesday at nine thirty five. Thanks a lot, Greg, Well,
that wraps up Saturday Morning for this week. Thanks so
much for listening, and thanks as always to producers Peter

(31:17):
Airolano and Natalie Voka for helping to put together the show.
I'll be back Monday morning from six to ten for
Minty in the Morning. Hope you joined us.

Speaker 1 (31:26):
This has been a podcast from wor