All Episodes

October 25, 2024 • 34 mins
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
It makes me sad and a little frightened to hear
Carly Copps defending her department after especially now with Mason County.
But after twenty twenty, twenty seven hundred the fraudulent ballots
were leaked out but then disappeared, and then a dozen
or so Pole watchers signed after David saying that she

(00:22):
didn't allow them to do their job right.

Speaker 2 (00:26):
She bugs me. This whole thing bugs me.

Speaker 3 (00:31):
Well, you gotta be bugged about it. But it kind
of goes back to the last hour about how we
end up in these positions where things that we vote
for are just ignored or vice versa, things we vote
against are done. Yeah, it makes me think I'm going

(00:58):
to do I want to do something else other than
what I was going to do right now. My plan
was to talk about I was going to talk about
the town hall that Kamala Harris did with CNN. I

(01:18):
really had not watched the whole thing, so I watched
the whole thing yesterday afternoon. Just really curious, but in.

Speaker 2 (01:26):
Line with.

Speaker 3 (01:29):
The question about how does the deep state, the administrative state,
become so anaesthetical to basic American constitutional principles, and how
do they get there? What we ought to think about
is this, so we know that Vice President Harris's campaign

(01:50):
is in kind of deep doo doo right now, which
means that we might be in for one hell of
a post election.

Speaker 2 (02:00):
DC show.

Speaker 3 (02:03):
If she loses the presidential election, there will be absolute,
I think, observable out in the open intra Democratic Party
in fighting unlike anything we've seen before. And I think

(02:23):
there are all sorts of reasons for that one. I
don't think she would. I really do not believe that
she was the choice of a majority of the Democrat
leadership or the donor class. But I do believe, as
demented as Joe Biden might be, he pulled a fast one,

(02:44):
and I think that, Look, you gotta trust me on this.
People in DC are vindictive. Well, Michael, how do you
know that? I don't know. I wonder how I know that.
But Joe Biden, as affable as he may have been

(03:05):
as a US Senator, is as almost anybody will tell you,
a vicious, mean, old bastard. He really is. He puts
on a show. He is the public show. He's like
John McCain. You know I've told you before. God rest
his soul. But I despise John McCain because John McCain

(03:26):
would present this public persona as you know, the American
war hero. Behind the scenes, he was a total a hole,
total ahole. I watched the way you know what the
theory about, you watch someone and how they treat the
white staff. I would watch members of Congress and watch
how they would treat their staff. Now, I understand that

(03:50):
sometimes you might get mad, but you know, if I
really got mad at Dragon for something, even though he's
not technically my staff, if I was really upset with Dragon,
I wouldn't say anything on the air.

Speaker 2 (04:00):
I would never do that to Dragon.

Speaker 3 (04:04):
I would pull him aside and I I tell him
to sit down and shut up and listen for a
minute for it. You're just like, huh, let's screw you.

Speaker 2 (04:12):
And walk off.

Speaker 4 (04:13):
I'm not listening on air.

Speaker 2 (04:14):
Why would you listen off air?

Speaker 3 (04:17):
But McCain and Biden, those people were just there was
the public persona and there's the private persona. And I
say that because we know from reliable sources that Kamala
Harris is a horrible boss. So go back to Nancy

(04:40):
Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and Barack Obama pushing Joe Biden aside.
Remember that's not the first time he's been pushed aside.
He was pushed aside in twenty sixteen by Barack Obama.
So now this time he gets pushed aside by Barack
Obama and the donor class. George Clooney, Nancy Pelosi chucks him.

(05:02):
They all push him aside, So he knows that the
thing he can do to get back at them is
to circumvent and put them in a box with regard
to who they might want to be the nominee. Now,
I have no empirical evidence of this whatsoever, but I

(05:23):
believe it deep in my soul that Nancy Pelosi and
the donor class wanted anybody but Kamala Harris. Why would
you choose someone that could not even earn one delegate
in twenty sixteen or in twenty twenty, twenty, nineteen, twenty twenty,

(05:45):
and has proven herself as vice president to be a
complete dips and particularly Nancy Pelosi, because Nancy Pelosi knows
Kamala Harris intimately because Nancy Pelosi is the Dean of
California politics.

Speaker 2 (06:03):
So what does Biden do.

Speaker 3 (06:05):
Biden boxes them in by coming out and tweeting the
day after he sends that letter out that he won't
seek the nomination or he's going to withdraw his nomination,
that I support Kamala Harris. Well, what are they going
to do now? They're going to go after the half black,
half Asian female that's the current sitting vice president. They

(06:29):
cannot do that. They simply politically cannot do that without
having the fight that I think they're going to have
if they lose, having that fight before they lose, which
would guarantee that they lose, follow that they're stuck. So

(06:49):
the recriminations if she loses, which I think she's going to,
will be extraordinary, finger pointing, backstabbing, excuse making, panic, all
the I mean, the sleazy, widespread gossip peddling that you
think about what was said about John McCain after he
lost in two thousand and eight. Now, how do I

(07:12):
know that this is going to happen Because it happened before,
but on a smaller scale. In December of twenty nineteen,
when Harris dropped out of the twenty twenty Democratic Park
primary prior to the Iowa caucuses, there was already this
windfall of horrible gossip gossip about her leadership style, or frankly,

(07:35):
the lack of a leadership style, all this staff dysfunction,
inexcusable mismanagement of her campaign, even the meddling of her
control freaks, sister Maya. All that was going on, and
quite frankly, you think about everything I just talked about,
everything that I just mentioned, is what we witness going

(07:57):
on right now. All of the gospel about her leadership,
her leadership style, her campaign style or the lack thereof,
all the staff dysfunction going on right now, all the
inexcusable mismanagement of.

Speaker 2 (08:11):
The current campaign. That was all going on back in
twenty nineteen, in twenty.

Speaker 3 (08:15):
Twenty now, frankly, I think we saw a little bit
of the same thing back in twenty sixteen, when somehow
Hillary Clinton managed to lose what they believed was a
completely winnable election, you know, to a game show host,
to a TV star. Hillary Clinton lost despite enjoying every

(08:39):
conceivable advantage you could possibly think of. The only real
difference between the two events is that the recriminations in
twenty sixteen were kind of muted. Let's you know, let's
after all, it's Hillary. The Clintons were still kind of
you know, they were big deal back then. See what

(09:05):
you will about the Clintons, but they're nothing. Is not
loyal Kamala Harris. I don't think she's loyal at all,
Kamala Harrison. I know every politician's out for themselves, but
the Clintons at least understood the larger picture. Kamala Harris
doesn't understand the larger picture. It's all Kamala Harris twenty

(09:26):
four to seven, but her. Imagine Harris's post primary implosion
that we saw in twenty twenty, but now think about
that same implosion playing out right now, but on a
national scale, one in which Democrats again lose the White

(09:47):
House to Donald Trump, the guy that they spent his
entire four year presidency trying to keep him off his game,
keep him from governing in teach him one, two three,
let's just keep himpeaching him, all of the lawfare, everything
going on. Now, if she loses to that guy, that

(10:13):
threat to democracy, that guy that is Hitler, that guy
that is which I find the threat to democracy to
be such hilarious. I mean, I can't you talk about
cognitive dissonance. It's simply amazing. But this time the party
is going to have an all out, full blown public
intraparty fight. Now there will be, you know, because Harris

(10:39):
is losing dramatically to men and in particular to black men.
So there'll be the accusations of bigotry and racism and
you know, misogyny and all of that. There'll be all
of that, and that'll make them somehow feel better about
themselves to claim that we'll be lost, because you know,
black men are misassts, black men are just dummies. Democrat

(11:06):
leaders will be obligated to blame the voters because they
can never admit they were wrong. It's why, for example,
as much as I have argued, in fact, the Cato
Institute agrees with me that the Department of Homeland Security
should be dismantled. So one of the smartest think tanks

(11:29):
in the entire country agrees with me that the creation
of the Department of Homeland Security was a gigantic mistake
and it should be dismantled, and all those disparate agencies
should go back to square one and we should just
let them function as they were originally intended to function.
But do you think that will ever happen. No, Because
just like I tell you that programs are like cancers

(11:52):
that just grow and grow and grow, that those programs
can never be admitted to be inefficient, ineffective, or just
plain ass wrong. But we can't be fooled. There will
be there'll be bull crap about how we the voters

(12:12):
fail the Democrat parties progressive and inclusive vision, that somehow
we're the racists, somehow we don't understand that we're that
we're homophobic. There were racists that were transgender phobic. We're
all these phobias that we that we hate people that
come here, that we hate immigration, not illegal immigration, we
hate immigrants, we hate them all. But what will be

(12:37):
happening behind the scenes all the Democrat campaign bosses, the
party leaders now't every single one of them individually and
as groups be out for blood. It'll be it'll be
infighting with infighting. It'll be the larger group fighting among themselves,

(13:02):
and within the groups, they'll be fighting individually among themselves too.
They'll be selling out everybody. Why because they want to
ensure that they never have to go through this again.
It'll be that old adage, Well we're gonna, you know,
pass the wall so this never happens again. You know
how much I hate that bull crap. There's nothing new

(13:23):
under the sun. Things always happen again, but this time
the Democrats will implode and it'll be every man for himself,
every woman for themselves. There will be all these whisper
campaigns going on. And then we haven't even talked about
another group, the posters and the cabal. Well, actually, let

(13:45):
me just say the cabal. All the New York Times do.
The reporters will just be stumbling over themselves to find
fault to blame, fault to figure out, and we tried
to tell them. They'll become advocates and they'll become excuse
makers for Kamala Harris's failure. Think about who's going to

(14:12):
cop the blame for her not going, for example, to
the Al Smith dinner, which even drew laughs from Trump's
most animated critics. How do you what do you think, Chuck,
Chuck Schumer sat right there next to that, to that dias,
right next to Donald Trump as Trump made fun of him.

(14:34):
And if Trump becomes president, oh my god, Chuck Schumer,
he is the He is one of the most vindictive
people in the entire country. Think about remember that attempt
at calling everything brat I'd never heard I remember it.

(14:54):
Maybe I asked dragon, I asked somebody, where the hell
did that term come from?

Speaker 4 (14:59):
What?

Speaker 3 (15:00):
What's the new slang that I've missed about? The term
bratt and all that branding which went where did you
hear that?

Speaker 2 (15:07):
Again? No? That went nowhere.

Speaker 3 (15:11):
Her lack of appearances, her lack of interviews, her unwillingness
to talk, her unwillings to answer questions. Who's going to
be responsible for actually telling Kamala Harris, it's a good
idea for you to go talk to Brett behar.

Speaker 2 (15:25):
How did that turn out?

Speaker 3 (15:27):
And who's going to be held accountable for having done
the prep work? Or I might even ask was she
even allowed to do well? Maybe they tried to do
prep work. I would bet you, I'd bet you my
kingdom that she probably sat down for prep work for
remember she took a day off she was or whatever
it was that she took a couple of days off

(15:49):
to prep I think it was for Brett Bear And
she may have sat down and sat there for thirty
minutes and probably finally got mad, told him to literally
f off, and got up in what made herself a
ham sandwich? Think about the Atlantic article and how that

(16:13):
has been the Atlantic article saying that General Kelly said
that Donald Trump called that Mexican American soldier you know
who pays efing that much money for, you know, a funeral.
I'm tired of being ripped off. And now we've had

(16:36):
even even people who say that General Kelly is the
kind of person that had that been said at the time,
he would have said he would have brought it out
publicly at that time. There's no credibility to that story whatsoever.
Who's going to answer for the you know, the war

(16:57):
the so called war criminal Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz.
Who's gonna take responsibility for embracing them? This loss will
be epic, not because of the vote count.

Speaker 4 (17:12):
I know the trend lines are looking really good, but
my gut tells me that they're gonna lie, cheat and steal.

Speaker 2 (17:21):
I don't know what do you do when you're desperate.

Speaker 3 (17:28):
I think the lie cheating steel too. And that's why
the whole beginning of the program about the Mason County
ballots really bugs me. Now again, if you didn't hear,
Mason County discovered a dozen ballots that uh and the

(17:54):
way they discovered it was people called the county clerk's office, Hey,
we have got in our ballot, or they got an
email that said their ballot had been cast when they
had not cast the ballot. So a dozen people come
forward about missing ballots, and it turns out that they
were able to intercept only because somebody called. Now remember

(18:18):
only because somebody called. Were they able to intercept twelve ballots?
And three of which was it three that went through
and got counted anyway?

Speaker 2 (18:34):
Right? Correct? Yes? Yeah? So three? Yes, three went through? Yeah,
count them?

Speaker 3 (18:37):
So so twenty five percent of them got counted and
passed the you know, went went past this gold standard
of you know, signature identification when the ballots got cast
and counted and buried in the nine news story is
those three.

Speaker 2 (18:56):
Ballots cannot be uncounted. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (18:59):
I don't understand why because if you can identify those
three ballots, isn't.

Speaker 4 (19:09):
There some I think they can identify the signature card.
But once you separate the signature from the ballot, then there.

Speaker 2 (19:18):
There's no bar code or anything at the t right.

Speaker 4 (19:21):
So those three are the ones that made it through,
but the other nine, they're like wait a minute, yeah, so.

Speaker 2 (19:27):
There is so there's no way to it.

Speaker 3 (19:28):
You're You're right, there would be no one way to
uncount them because they're now in that massive ballots that
have already been casting counted. But here's what I think
is different this year. The lying and cheating will and
the fraud will continue as it has in the past.

(19:48):
But I think there's there are too many eyes. There
are too many, and I I refuse and I'm not
going to get off on the machines. The electronics are
of that, but there are just too many eyes watching
this time, and there are too many questions that could
be raised. And I also think that if Trump pulls

(20:14):
this off, even if it's within two or three points,
the problem they will have is if it is an
electoral landslide. If he picks up Nevada, which I think
he has a decent chance of doing, but if he
picks off Wisconsin, Michigan in particular, Pennsylvania, obviously North Carolina,

(20:37):
and Georgia, that becomes an electoral sweep. And so now
you're talking about three hundred plus electoral votes versus not
nearly close to two hundred and seventy on the Democrat side,
and that's going to be hard to challenge and I
think that's how we get by in this election. But

(20:58):
there will still be Oh it'll be glorious, absolutely glorious,
because let me think about the opposite. If Trump loses,
and it's clear, I mean, lets it's not close, it's clear.
She sweeps the Upper Midwest, she gets Nevada, she gets Pennsylvania,

(21:22):
and thereby again is by three or four points two points,
But nonetheless she sweeps the electoral college three hundred and
forty electoral College votes. Whatever, I'd have to calculate what
it could be. But whatever, that number could be upwards
of three hundred.

Speaker 2 (21:38):
That would be.

Speaker 3 (21:38):
Hard to challenge. But here's the difference. The difference on
the Republican side is that Trump has already announced and
said that if he loses, he's.

Speaker 2 (21:51):
Not running again. He's done. And I think that's the
right decision.

Speaker 3 (21:56):
I think that's the right decision for him personally, based
on his age and the fact that he's now gone
through all of this stuff and the lawfare. If he loses,
the lawfair will boom come down even harder. So the
right thing for him to do legally, personally everything is
to then step aside.

Speaker 4 (22:15):
Why do you think the law would try and come
down on Trump even harder. At that point, he's not
going to run again. He's already stated he's not going
to run again. So what's the point in trying to
have the machine fight him?

Speaker 3 (22:27):
Because if they can financially break him, that's that's like
the mafia putting the horse's head in the bed. We're sending,
we're sending, They're sending this thinguma.

Speaker 2 (22:42):
They say there's no real need to do so.

Speaker 3 (22:44):
There's no need to do so in terms of Trump,
but there's a need to do so in terms of
any other potential for the next people that might challenge
that exactly. That's why they will do it. Plus there's
also the personalities involved in the law. Fair do you
think Kamala Harris? I think she's actually been asked if
she would pardon Donald Trump, and I forget what her

(23:08):
answer was, but it's pretty much a non answer. But
Jack Smith, Jack smiths fighting for his life right now
because Judge Cannon in Florida has ruled his appointment unconstitutional.
The Department of Justice, if they were smart, you know what,

(23:30):
do you know what the Department of Justice could do?
They could take Jack Smith right now and move take
away his title as special counsel, put him under an
existing say US attorney, and then say here is a

(23:50):
and I know I'm giving you generalities without giving you
the specificas of why this would work. The challenges he
was improper appointed under the Constitution, that he's not an
officer under the Constitution, and the Special Council, the Special
Council law has expired, expired in like nineteen ninety eight

(24:12):
or something, and he's violating the appropriations clause of the Constitution.
He's just been given a blank check, and so they're
just taking money from everywhere just to pay whatever whatever
he wants, all in violation the Constitution. I think Judge
Cannon's decision to dismiss it on constitutional grounds was appropriate,

(24:33):
but the DOJ could fix it. The DOJ could fix
it by simply taking him and bringing him on as
an employee subservient to a constitutionally appointed US attorney.

Speaker 2 (24:51):
Problem solved.

Speaker 3 (24:53):
Why would they not do that, because that's an admission
that the original appointment was wrong. So now they're caught
between the rock and a hard place. So now they
have to appeal to try to preserve their ability to
keep appointing people like that. Now I think the court
will rule against him. I think it'll be it could

(25:13):
be seventy two, but probably sixty three that the appointment
was unconstitutional. But the point I'm trying to make is this,
you got all of these things going on that if
Kamala Harris wins, they'll continue that stuff and it'll be
even worse, and they'll consolidate their power, and this country
will be on the precipice of no longer being a

(25:35):
constitutional republic. I mean, we'rerong that precipice now, but we'll
be falling over.

Speaker 2 (25:39):
The edge.

Speaker 3 (25:41):
Trump and if Trump loses. The other point that I
wanted to make was this to make America great again.
Cause the populism, the anti administrative deep state, the fight
against the cabal, the fight against those who don't represent

(26:05):
the people. It's a new populism and that is not
going to go away.

Speaker 2 (26:14):
Now. I don't know who the air apparent is, jd Vance.
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (26:20):
He just goes back to being a US senator. So
what does he do? Is there another governor out there?
Is there is there another non politician out there?

Speaker 2 (26:32):
Doesn't really make any difference.

Speaker 3 (26:35):
Will have those political battles and there will be somebody
that will rise to the top. But the most important
thing to remember is and this is why I think
there will be no in fighting on our side. Oh
there'll be the maneuvering. They'll get me wrong, everybody, because
it'll be it'll be open season for twenty twenty eight
on the Republican side, and everybody will want to be

(26:58):
the air apparent.

Speaker 2 (27:00):
But the cause will remain the same.

Speaker 3 (27:05):
It won't be like we're going from a Ronald Reagan
conservatism to a George W. Bush pseudo conservatism. It's not
that at all. It's an entirely new movement and I
don't think that disappears in the least. There'll be minor

(27:26):
adjustments here or there, as there will be in any
political movement. But on the Democrat side, if they lose
this one, they lose it because they were the threat
to democracy. They were the ones that ousted their nominee,

(27:47):
and they were the ones that got stuck with a
nominee that didn't get any votes in twenty twenty, and
they're stuck with a nominee that the powers that be,
including the Cabal, didn't really want. The vice president doesn't

(28:07):
have a network of loyalists her only loyalists, and I
think it's minimal are in California, and I frankly think
that most of those in California are not really deep
seated supporters of her. She's been tolerated, that's all. She's
been tolerated. She loses, she doesn't have a network that

(28:32):
brings her back. In twenty twenty eight, she'll be done.
And remember politics abhors a vacuum, so her loss will
create a vacuum that will cause this amazing, glorious infighting
in the Democrat Party. Kamala Harris, all of her aides,

(28:54):
they'll be on a deserted island, all by themselves. All
of their strategies, all of their ideas, all of the
management style. Everything will be like on some sort of
island where we're going to put all of all the lepers.
She'll be the leper of the Democrat Party. A post

(29:18):
Harris defeat, she doesn't have anything to offer the Democrats.
There's not even a reserve of good will, nothing at all.
So they the Harris people, will try to pin it
on the party leaders, and the party leaders will try
to pin it on her, and that will begin the

(29:39):
shot that will be heard through the Democrat Party.

Speaker 2 (29:44):
I would bet.

Speaker 3 (29:46):
That she loses post election sometime, maybe not immediately, but
she'll start leaking out somebody that she trusts in the cabal.
Will I'll start talking to her about what she saw
during the Biden administration. When did you see Joe Biden
starting to really get bad? When did you see him

(30:09):
starting to lose it? And she will just whether she's
telling the truth or lying doesn't make any difference to me.
But she'll start screaming like a stuck pig. And Biden
and that family they'll still be full of vengeance, so
they'll be in fighting. So you've got every aspect, every
little subgroup of the cabal fighting. You got every little

(30:34):
identity political group in the Democrat Party. They'll all be fighting.
It'll be all these told you sos, including James Carvell.
He'll be out on some I told you so to her,
and he told me it was time for a break.

Speaker 5 (30:50):
I'm willing to bet that the same people that called
July sixth in the insurrection are going to take it
much further than that Amala does not win the presidency.

Speaker 3 (31:07):
I almost went that far. I think there are certainly
groups that will do that. You think about Black Lives Matter.
You know, there's a story, In fact, I'll probably do
this story tomorrow on the National Show. But there's a
story that I've got my pos about about the money

(31:27):
that was raised by Black Lives Matter and how it's
all disappeared.

Speaker 2 (31:31):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (31:32):
That interesting, Well has actually disappeared. It just didn't go
to do Black Lives Matter work. It went to the organizers.

Speaker 2 (31:40):
Isn't that great?

Speaker 3 (31:41):
Yeah, talk about a money laundering scheme, but some really
good text messages based on this conversation nineteen oh two, Mike,
isn't it possible that the Democrats might in some way
be relieved I Kamala loses, so they're not stuck with
her in twenty twenty eight?

Speaker 2 (32:00):
Yeah, I think so.

Speaker 3 (32:02):
I think there is a but's that's also bad news
for us because we're well maybe we're not, but I'm
assuming that we either maintain the House or lose the
House and get the Senate, or in the best of
all worlds, we keep the House and gain the Senate,

(32:24):
because if we don't, then what we saw back in
Trump's first term is going to be you know, wash
rents repeat, and they will block every single thing they
can in the Senate or in the House, depending on
how those those two bodies turn out in the elections

(32:47):
forty three forty four, Mike, I don't think the left
wants to win. They would rather play defense, sabotage the
Trump administration four years and groom the perfect Marxist candidate
for an election when they don't have to run against
Bidenomics in the current failure. That's why they put Harris
there in the first place. Well, I actually think I
wouldn't I agree until you say that's why they put

(33:07):
Harris there in the first place. They didn't put Harris there.
Joe Biden put Harris there. He locked them in. I
know this is hard to really believe, but trust me,
I'm just knowing how these people think and work. Once
you nomin once he threw Biden. Once he threw his
support behind a black Indian female, they had no choice.

Speaker 2 (33:36):
They couldn't. They're stuck.

Speaker 3 (33:39):
Unless they wanted to piss off every idea that the
group possible. They were stuck. So I don't think they
put Harris there. They were stuck with Harris there. This
one is a great question for which I have no answer.

(34:00):
Gouber four thousand, Mike, But what happens to the ballot
that the actual true voter of that ballot votes? Will
the true voter be rejected or do they get a
replacement and then there is an extra ballot slash vote.
I have no clue, no clue what they do. But yeah,
if my ballot gets illegally cast and I come forward

(34:24):
and I can prove it, do I get a ballot?

Speaker 4 (34:27):
But?

Speaker 3 (34:28):
Yeah, I do. I'm entitled to vote. Well, what happens
to that one that got counted
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.