Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Briani, you're a good person.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
But you know, when somebody gets it and take some
of my idiosyncrasies and some of my habits and throws
them back up against me, that's just pretty damn good.
(00:28):
And I would say to you that means despite all
your laughter and denials, you're listening.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
He's still here.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
He's still here. You may think that during the break.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
That and I would say, about half the time, I
am thinking about the next topic, because again I've got
a dozen things here or more probably I don't know
how manybody got more than a dozen things here that
I want to talk about.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
Yeah, you didn't even get to the nipple story from Yes,
I know.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
And quite frankly, there's there's a couple of things here
that today that have caught my eye. But someday there
are some days that because of I mean, the first
thing I do before I leave the studio at the
bottom of at the bottom of the segment is I
(01:23):
checked text messages once again to see what's new. I
try to do that every time. I'm not very religious
at it, but I try to do it. So this time,
as I'm doing my little walk around, stretching my legs
and taking a whiz and doing whatever I'm doing. It's
it makes me want to go back again to this
(01:43):
story about the murder, because now you've made me think
about something else. I kind of alluded to this earlier,
but I want to do it a little more succinctly,
or or maybe a little more in depth. Probably won't
be succinct. I can't do anything socinctly. So according to
(02:04):
the modern left and according to some conservatives, even in
this audience, you kill the fascists of Hamas for slaughtering Jews,
and the Israelis go after those terrorists, and it's called genocide,
(02:31):
particularly by the left and some.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
Putative conservatives.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
But you go kill a CEO and a father of two,
and somehow that becomes justice. Now, how else am I
to make sense of this weird idolization, this weird let's
put him on a pedestal. Luigi Mangioni when killed Brian Thompson, seriously,
(03:03):
because the swooning over maggione is is I think a
new low for those who are irrespective of your political persuasion.
Let's drop the left and the right for a moment,
irrespective of your political persuasion. Somehow, it's a new low
for whomever that now sees that somehow the killing and
(03:26):
him is justice, because go back to the.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
To I bet that woman wishes she had never sent
me a text message.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
But when when she says that she feels or senses
or understands that the murder and everyone who's ever been
denied a healthcare claim feels.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
A little bit of justice. So we little bit of.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Justice was afrase she used. I've been denied claims. I've
had to fight for claims. I was on the verge
of suing a hospital for some stuff that they did,
and I've never really told you the details about it,
(04:11):
but man, I was. I had a knockdown drag out
with the CEO and a an administrator at a local hospital,
to the point that I was escorted out of the
(04:33):
hospital by a security guard.
Speaker 1 (04:36):
And that was when I made the decision. Yeah, okay,
you've had it now.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
We reached an agreement. But nonetheless, I've been pushed to
the brink.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
I never thought about shooting anybody.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
In fact, I don't know for a fact, but my
guess is if I was in my normal state of
dress and backpack and everything else, I was probably concealed
carrying that day and probably could have easily pulled out
a weapon. But they never never even crossed my mind.
I wasn't being threatened. I was having an argument over
(05:15):
a legal matter. So here he gets slain. The CEO
gets KP murdered on the streets of Manhattan last Wednesday,
fifty years old father, the CEO of United Health Care
for I think three maybe four years, and even before
the identity was known. Leftists were just swarming social media
(05:40):
to make excuses for that attack.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
He was unarmed, he was shot in the back. How cowardly.
Speaker 2 (05:48):
At least you know looked you're gonna kill the guy
because you think that his company, Luigi, you think that
his company wronged you by either approving or disapproving acclaim.
I don't know what the circu senses are, but apparently
has something to do with your back. Should have gone
spying one, you dumb ass, go around and face him
(06:09):
face to face. He had no security detail. He was
walking along along what was it six forty five or
seven forty five in the morning, on a dark street
in Manhattan. You could have easily walked to him and
facing face to face and said, you know what, you
screwed me kaboom. You could at least had the guts
to do that, but you do you could not even
do that. And then when it was revealed that he
(06:30):
had that he had etched into the casings on his
AMMO denied defending to pose a slogan that's used to
is the name of a book, as used to describe
the tactic of delaying health care claims. Then all the
lefties were wild, and some have even embraced those three
D words as a rallying cry to support the killer.
(06:54):
Now that and the Lawyer was on air yesterday saying that, yeah,
there are apparently some people raising money trying to pay
for my legal fees.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
Even some of the mainstream commentators.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Even some of the mainstream ut talking heads in pundits,
while while not quite dancing on the streets over his death,
did wonder out loud if the gleeful reaction, well, it
kind of makes sense, doesn't it. You heard Taylor Lorenz
in the last hour talking about CEO down talking to
Beer's Morgan about how she felt joy it is death,
(07:27):
and when Morgan pushed back, only then does she begin
to dial it down, which in and of itself is
a topic in and of itself. That's a topic about
how oh online everybody is. Oh the way, man, we're
masters of our universe. I find that with people that
don't like what I say online and kept me in
fact the next story, I hope to get to you
(07:49):
before the hour's over. It is a great example of that.
The Guardian newspaper said the reason that Thompson's death listed
in so little sympathy was that he was the face
of an unfair system and for those who are quote
shocked by the satisfaction Thompson's murder has inspired, she had
(08:12):
a terse request, spare me the pearl clutching.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
Well, if it's pearl clutching.
Speaker 2 (08:17):
To be concerned that we live in an era of
such casual cruelty and digital spite that tens of thousands
of people will happily taunt the colleagues of a murdered
man with a cacman emoji. Well, I guess I'm a
pearl clutcher, and I guess I'm a little worried about
living in a society where there is so little respect
(08:37):
for life that you take your issue no matter how
harmful you know. We have there's a there's a general
rule in the law that for every wrong there needs
to be a remedy. And so if there's not a
statutory remedy like a legal a written remedy at common law,
(09:00):
you have a general remedy for you know, if there's
a tort or you've been harmed in some way, or
there's been a contract breach, that you have a remedy
to go correct that breach. Now you're not gonna win
every one of them, but at least you have a
process in a civilized society to resolve that dispute. And
that's what makes us different from every other country in
(09:23):
the history of mankind in that we understand that, you
know what, do process fairness, Trying to resolve disputes and
differences other than at the OK Corral is the way
to do it. And I'll admit it makes me a
little nervous the things that I live in a country
where we're delving into that kind of look and you're
(09:44):
listening to the guy that every Friday at nine am
plays taxpayer release shots where people whose lives are threatened
exercise the god given right of self defense and they
kill other people. So don't come at me about I'm
(10:05):
wishy washy about self defense because self defense has absolutely
nothing to do with this case. Instead, it's just vigilanti justice.
It is true vigilante justice. And I don't care how
unfair you think a system is. We have a system
by which we can correct it. But you know what,
too many people have become too damn lazy, excepting this
(10:25):
last election, to do anything about it. And this last
election showed that if you really get fed up enough,
you actually can't affect change. It should go without say,
(10:46):
but apparently it doesn't. That killing people is not a
reasonable response to social problems. Josh Shapiro, the governor of Pennsylvania,
who said, in America, we do not kill people in
cold blood to resolve policy differences or express a viewpoint. Now,
(11:06):
I think the first part of that statement is kind
of master of the obvious, and we don't kill people
just to resolve a policy difference. Well, duh, do we
really have to repeat that? But I think the second
point deserves a little more attention, and that is, in America,
we do not kill people or express to express a viewpoint.
(11:30):
This is why I'm so adamant about free speech and
these limitations on free speech or these attempts to censor.
Of course, people are going to boil over. You know,
this program is cathartic for me because I can come
in here and tell you exactly what I think and
can do it without I think, can do it without
(11:51):
fear of physical harm. So this beatification of a murder
suspect speaks to a really serious moral malady in the
digital world, which does lead me to what I wanted
to talk about about in the digital world yesterday. I'm
pretty sure I'm sure them is. Yesterday I talked about
(12:16):
this whole thing about range riders that taxpayers in Colorado
are going to pay for so that they can go
protect the cattle of cattlemen in this state from the
wolves that the dumass voters on the Front Range approved
because obviously reural Colorado didn't vote in the majority for
this to reintroduce wolves into the state. So now taxpayers
(12:40):
are going to pay to reintroduce the wolves, and then
taxpayers are now going to have to pay for so
a wolf kills and it has to be proven, obviously,
but if a wolf kills a cow or a bull somewhere,
and you can prove that connection, then we are going
(13:02):
to reimburse the owner of that cattle for the death
of that cot at a at the hands or at
the teeth of a wolf. But now, because we want
to try to reduce those costs, we're gonna now hire
ten or more or even double that range riders to
go around and try to protect the cattle from the wolves.
(13:25):
And I spent quite a bit of time talking about
how stupid that was, and in fact used an article
that Corey had done on the Colorado Accountability Project explaining
exactly just how stupid that was. So Corey Gaines wrote
a really great article about it, and I shared that
with you yesterday. Well here we go again. Let me
(13:51):
back up. Let's first go to what I posted on
x yesterday. Let me find my bookmarks, let me just
get my profile at place to do it. So I
posted this. Oh, actually this was on Tuesday. So we're
(14:11):
now spending taxpayers hard earned money to protect rancher's livestock
from a predator that did not kill their livestock until you,
meaning Governor Polis and your husband and your cronies at
color Out Parks and Wildlife, spent more taxpayer money to
reintroduce wolves to make your husband the animal rights activists
happy happy, happy husband, happy life, happy wife, happy life
(14:34):
at the expense of hard working Colorado's so very democrat
of you. Well, that elicited a response from someone called
still in View, who wrote, but we need to actually
view this situation through a lens of reality. Don't get
(14:56):
me wrong, I detest Polus and his action as governor
and the for Colorado, but the real data does not
reflect anything immeasurable significant for losses in comparison to a
real natural habitat restoration effort percentage representation. If we consider
the eighteen livestock deaths from wolves against the total livestock population.
(15:21):
For cattle, if we assume all eighteen or cattle, this
would be approximately zero point zero zero zero zero seven
percent of the total cattle population in Colorado. For sheep,
if all eighteen or sheep, it would be about zero
point zero zero seven two percent of the total sheep population.
Also of note that the state reimburses now listen closely,
this is where this is where I decided to interact
(15:43):
with this Yahoo. Also of note that the state reimburses
for losses proven over deaths to those to these predators,
so there can be no quote loss claimed in truth, huh,
until there's no loss because the states want to reimburse
(16:04):
a rancher for a proven death by one of these predators.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
I was flabbergasted.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
Now he went on to say that, you know, I
grew up hand and mouth raising our eggs, foul pigs, cattle,
dairy products, and even all the vegetables meat I have
personally dispatch catless antles that I have butchered eating. And
that is not counting the animals we had an inflat fish.
The point is the point being made is uh, the
point being made is what would mankind do destroy every
(16:36):
single thing that might take the life of any all
foreign introduced species, so our stock would be able to
displace all wildlife of profit?
Speaker 1 (16:41):
What next?
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Weather engineer the winners and trump storms away that take
measurement far more stocks every year than predators ever do.
That's not at all what we're talking about. I'm talking
about the fact that taxpayers are paying to bring a
predator back into the eco cycle, and those predators are
now killing cattle and sheep, and now taxpayers are paying
(17:06):
to reimburse for the loss of that animal. And now
we're also paying for range riders. So that they can
cover this humongous area of land to try to prevent
any other predators. Well, then why do we have And
by the way, the point is taxpayers are paying all
of this, But he doesn't get.
Speaker 4 (17:27):
That flickering after this United Healthcare CEO shooting and all
the immense amount of attention that it's getting, put this
Benoni being this whole hero out of nowhere.
Speaker 1 (17:41):
Do you think there's going to be there? Do you
think there will be?
Speaker 3 (17:44):
Condycat cries?
Speaker 2 (17:48):
Absolutely, although I don't know that a lot of people
have the wherewithal the means or the guts to go
do it. Not that it takes in guts necessary. But
you see that he was captured. So wait till he
starts showing up in a trial, or wait till he's convicted,
(18:08):
Wait till he spends the rest of his life in
prison for a for a what's a second degree murdering
in New York but the equivalent of a first degree murder?
Wait wait, will people at that point start, Oh, maybe
I don't want Maybe I don't want.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
To do that.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
So back to this discussion about the wolves. So you know,
I'm reading this response to my comment about taxpayers paying
for all of this, and how wrong I think that is.
And he ends or she I don't know which.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
It is. Also of note.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
That the state reimburses for losses proven over deaths to
these predators, so there can be no loss claimed in truth.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
Hell, how can you possibly.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
In this day and age think that because the state
reimburses for a loss, that there can be no financial
loss if you're being truthful. Where the f does the
money come from that the state of Colorado is going
to use to pay for that. It's either from the
(19:20):
licenses paid by hunters and fishermen and others, or from taxes,
income or otherwise that are paid by the people in Colorado.
It comes out of the private sector's pocket books. So
the government can now cover the loss to the rancher
(19:40):
and now pay for the education that the range riders
are going to provide about I guess trying to tell
farmers and ranchers how to you know, imagine this?
Speaker 4 (19:49):
Can you?
Speaker 2 (19:50):
I think about the farmers and ranchers, I know, and
you've got some government employee coming on telling them, the
farmers and ranchers, how to protect your cattle and your sheep.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
Yeah, watch that. I want to watch that.
Speaker 2 (20:03):
They may not shoot them, but that may be where
they pull out the ten gage and say, get off
my property, and the range riders are now going to
start educating us.
Speaker 1 (20:16):
You don't need to educate me. I don't own any cattle.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
So this idea that somehow, because the state makes the reimbursement,
that there is no loss. That's the kind of ignorance
that we face in this society where it's just, you know,
the governments, this magical mystery tour over here that just
takes care of everything, and they just well, and in
(20:43):
many cases they do just print money or they hide
the money. Like I told you earlier in the program,
they're hiding twenty five million dollars from us. It really
belongs to us. So maybe they're gonna take it out
of that little slush fund they're maintaining somewhere. But then
this story apparently has more legs than I can imagine,
because I woke up this morning and.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
Cory Games was at it again. Here's his headline.
Speaker 2 (21:09):
Polus blames the ranchers for the high cost of wolf reintroduction.
You damn farmers and ranchers, you're the problem. Remember yesterday
when I told you about how much. Jared Polis hates
rural Colorado, and he in particular hates farmers and ranchers.
Here's the headline and here's the story. Corey writes. If
(21:34):
only the ranchers in this state, would you know, if
you don't subscribe to to Corey's Colorado Accountability Project, you
really need to go do that. Just go search Colorado
Accountability Project. If only the ranchers in the state would
have knuckled under him quietly, acquiesced to the will of
animal rights activists and those along the front Range, we
could have had our wolves on the cheep.
Speaker 1 (21:56):
That at least is what the governess thinks.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
At a recent meeting of color Counties, inc, Polis had
this to say, Quoting an article from The Fence Post,
Poulis said, quote, this could have cost a lot less
if ranchers would not have said, oh, don't get those
wolves from Wyoming, don't get them from Idaho. We probably
(22:19):
could have done it for a quarter of the cost.
There and there's still time. Ranchers, I mean, if their organizations,
Middle Park and those guys say to the say to Wyoming,
give Colorado wolves, they probably would have. The only reason
they're not is that they hear from ranchers that they shouldn't,
so that drives up the costs. Ranchers, farmers, cattlemen, sheep murders,
(22:46):
all all you sheep farmers. It's your fault. The governor
just told us it's your fault if you just kept
your mouth shut and just accepted what the state thought
was best, because they always know what's best. Why, we
could have saved money. So it's your fault, this disgusting money.
(23:11):
If we've reached the point where we're going to blame
people who have legitimate objections to government programs, and we
implement the programs anyway, and then it costs money. And
by the way, it always costs more than expected. Remember
(23:31):
the Colorado covers all program, the Medicare medicaid program that
was going to cost fifteen million dollars now costs fifty
one million dollars. I mean, who could have seen that coming.
I mean most government programs, they estimate the cost, let's say,
fifteen million dollars, and then when you actually implement it
two or three years later, usually the cost has gone down.
It's usually like, you know, one point five million. I mean,
(23:54):
that's the way it always works, right in sarcasm, Corey writes,
But anyone in agriculture who has paid any attention to
what police has done for that industry since his election
knows that's not how he operates. He ignores, he turns
(24:14):
a blind eye and a deaf ear at best, and
yet still somehow complains when he reaps what he has sown.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
So want to hear it.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
Straight from the horse's mouth, Corey says, I reached out
to Colorado County's Inc. And got an audio recording of
the meeting from them. It's linked below. So you want
to hear just exactly what the governor has to say about.
Speaker 1 (24:42):
You, you farmers, and you damn farmers and ranchers. Well, well,
it's not playing.
Speaker 3 (24:57):
Well, let's see if double click there, Michael, No, just
it's a it's it's on.
Speaker 2 (25:02):
It's on as Google drive. Oh here, it's it's downloading now.
But I don't hear anything. Am I plugged in? We
plug a microphone on. You know what, as much as
(25:23):
I like you, you're the biggest ass in the whole building.
It's just absolutely a horrible human being. Let's see if
I maybe it's still downloading, thinking I played it earlier,
it's so good. You gotta hear this. Let me see
if I can Let me see if I can play
(25:44):
it with No, I can't play with that Google thing.
Oh I did horrible radio. Anyway, maybe tomorrow you'll get
to hear what Jared Pola says that the the point
is he does not care about farmers and ranchers. He
(26:08):
wants to blame them for the cost of the program
that now granted. Voters along the Front Range approved the program,
they voted it and in so he's just doing simply
what he and his husband wanted to get done. They
convinced a bunch of dumbass voters in the Front Range
that will never touch a cow, probably probably a bunch
of vegans to begin with that, Oh my gosh, we
(26:30):
need to bring wolves back in, knowing full well that
they're predators, knowing full well they're going to attack cattle
and sheep and so, but we'll reimburse you for it.
So two lessons. Jared Polus h Rule Colorado. He despises cattle.
Cattleman and sheepman. He despises both, and he wants to
(26:53):
blame them for the cost of the program that his
husband pushed voters to approve, and then some y'all who
tells me on Twitter on x that, well, the state's
paying for it, so there can be no loss if
I'm being truthful. Okay, I guess I just don't understand
(27:14):
how government gets funded. Maybe someday somebody will teach me
that corn morning ding gong.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
So serious question.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
If Texas is going to start regulating these toys, what's next?
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Durables so bad?
Speaker 2 (27:32):
A woman, I don't know it, just as a woman
trans woman, I don't know. You see, you never know
these days. Has died following a hoax pipe bomb threat
against Marjorie Taylor Green, the Republican congresswoman from Georgia. An
unknown individual allegedly sent a threat from a Russian IP
(27:55):
address to the Rome, Georgia Police Department, claim I mean
that a pipe bomb was inside the congresswoman's mail box
at home. Well, a female bystander died when her vehicle
collided with the bomb squad unit responding to the what
turns out to be a complete hoax. Sergeant David Matroka,
(28:16):
member of the Floyd County Bomb Squad, collided with the
vehicle while heading to the police headquarters. The collision involved
his personal gmccer the mas of protegee driven by a
sixty six year old woman, Tammy Pickles Pickle Seimer, whose
succumbed tour injuries. At the hospital, doctors treated her for
minor injuries and then discharged her.
Speaker 1 (28:37):
Obviously.
Speaker 2 (28:37):
The congresswoman expressed sorrow over the events on social media,
saying I'm heartsick right now. My prayers are with her family.
The officer was injured in the entire Rome Police department.
These violent political threats, she said, have fatal consequences. It's
an undue strain on our law enforcement, who must treat
them seriously. The officer was responding to my life, and
(29:01):
now a woman has lost her life because of this
despicable act. So here's what I mean. Obviously, that's a
tragedy and it's awful, and these hoaxes are out of control.
The cops described the message as having a subject line
that said for Palestine. Well that's pretty precise. It detailed
(29:28):
the materials used for the device and gave the details
about its location. Now what's concerning is the bomb threat
included Green's home address that initially went unnoticed in the
police department. Spam folder. You get you get a bomb
(29:50):
threat and it ends up in the chunk folder.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
Now Green says that this marks her ninth instance of.
Speaker 2 (30:01):
You know, swatting is where you get these fake emergencies
that are reported to the cops. Most often it's you know,
a domestic disturbance, you know, like the husband, like Michael's
beating up tamera, and you know, and we've heard gunshots
or whatever. You got to throw in the gunshots, so
the cops come in with guns ablazing. It's horribly dangerous,
(30:24):
but this is the world we now live in, and
I don't know what, if anything, can be done about
it except to be aware of it. You can see
there's a on X you can see the video of
the the bomb squad guy, you know, checking around and
checking for bombs and doing all that.
Speaker 3 (30:41):
But with the person who's sent in the fake threat
be charged with murder.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Great legal question.
Speaker 2 (30:54):
That I would start with the question of who caused
the accident. The proximate cause of the accident was the
bomb squad guy who was driving a personal vehicle, which
I found interesting. Maybe they don't have a bomb squad
truck in Rome. Or was the female who died. Was
(31:16):
she the cause of the accident. Was she drunk driving?
Was she failed to pay attention? Was the bomb squad?
Because this was when he's going back to the police department.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
She was going through a green light where the bomb
squad member was running the red light to go.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
He was going back to the police department. Oh wait,
oh yeah. See that's why I say. That's why I
say it's so it's not as if he was racing
to the scene to pay it right, It's that everything's
over all clear, he's going back and the accident occurs.
I don't think you can charge I don't think. I mean,
(31:49):
you can make an argument that but for the hopes
he would not have been on the road that day.
Speaker 1 (31:54):
If you could prove.
Speaker 3 (31:55):
That might stop some of the hoaxes. If somebody gets
charged with murder for it, yeah it could.
Speaker 2 (32:02):
But again, I think the more disturbing thing is this
is her ninth attempt or not her attempt, but the
ninth attempt at swatting Marjorie Taylor Green simply for being
because she's outspoken and she's a conservative. How many swatting
stories do you hear about liberals
Briani, you're a good person.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
But you know, when somebody gets it and take some
of my idiosyncrasies and some of my habits and throws
them back up against me, that's just pretty damn good.
(00:28):
And I would say to you that means despite all
your laughter and denials, you're listening.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
He's still here.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
He's still here. You may think that during the break.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
That and I would say, about half the time, I
am thinking about the next topic, because again I've got
a dozen things here or more probably I don't know
how manybody got more than a dozen things here that
I want to talk about.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
Yeah, you didn't even get to the nipple story from Yes,
I know.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
And quite frankly, there's there's a couple of things here
that today that have caught my eye. But someday there
are some days that because of I mean, the first
thing I do before I leave the studio at the
bottom of at the bottom of the segment is I
(01:23):
checked text messages once again to see what's new. I
try to do that every time. I'm not very religious
at it, but I try to do it. So this time,
as I'm doing my little walk around, stretching my legs
and taking a whiz and doing whatever I'm doing. It's
it makes me want to go back again to this
(01:43):
story about the murder, because now you've made me think
about something else. I kind of alluded to this earlier,
but I want to do it a little more succinctly,
or or maybe a little more in depth. Probably won't
be succinct. I can't do anything socinctly. So according to
(02:04):
the modern left and according to some conservatives, even in
this audience, you kill the fascists of Hamas for slaughtering Jews,
and the Israelis go after those terrorists, and it's called genocide,
(02:31):
particularly by the left and some.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
Putative conservatives.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
But you go kill a CEO and a father of two,
and somehow that becomes justice. Now, how else am I
to make sense of this weird idolization, this weird let's
put him on a pedestal. Luigi Mangioni when killed Brian Thompson, seriously,
(03:03):
because the swooning over maggione is is I think a
new low for those who are irrespective of your political persuasion.
Let's drop the left and the right for a moment,
irrespective of your political persuasion. Somehow, it's a new low
for whomever that now sees that somehow the killing and
(03:26):
him is justice, because go back to the.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
To I bet that woman wishes she had never sent
me a text message.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
But when when she says that she feels or senses
or understands that the murder and everyone who's ever been
denied a healthcare claim feels.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
A little bit of justice. So we little bit of.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Justice was afrase she used. I've been denied claims. I've
had to fight for claims. I was on the verge
of suing a hospital for some stuff that they did,
and I've never really told you the details about it,
(04:11):
but man, I was. I had a knockdown drag out
with the CEO and a an administrator at a local hospital,
to the point that I was escorted out of the
(04:33):
hospital by a security guard.
Speaker 1 (04:36):
And that was when I made the decision. Yeah, okay,
you've had it now.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
We reached an agreement. But nonetheless, I've been pushed to
the brink.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
I never thought about shooting anybody.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
In fact, I don't know for a fact, but my
guess is if I was in my normal state of
dress and backpack and everything else, I was probably concealed
carrying that day and probably could have easily pulled out
a weapon. But they never never even crossed my mind.
I wasn't being threatened. I was having an argument over
(05:15):
a legal matter. So here he gets slain. The CEO
gets KP murdered on the streets of Manhattan last Wednesday,
fifty years old father, the CEO of United Health Care
for I think three maybe four years, and even before
the identity was known. Leftists were just swarming social media
(05:40):
to make excuses for that attack.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
He was unarmed, he was shot in the back. How cowardly.
Speaker 2 (05:48):
At least you know looked you're gonna kill the guy
because you think that his company, Luigi, you think that
his company wronged you by either approving or disapproving acclaim.
I don't know what the circu senses are, but apparently
has something to do with your back. Should have gone
spying one, you dumb ass, go around and face him
(06:09):
face to face. He had no security detail. He was
walking along along what was it six forty five or
seven forty five in the morning, on a dark street
in Manhattan. You could have easily walked to him and
facing face to face and said, you know what, you
screwed me kaboom. You could at least had the guts
to do that, but you do you could not even
do that. And then when it was revealed that he
(06:30):
had that he had etched into the casings on his
AMMO denied defending to pose a slogan that's used to
is the name of a book, as used to describe
the tactic of delaying health care claims. Then all the
lefties were wild, and some have even embraced those three
D words as a rallying cry to support the killer.
(06:54):
Now that and the Lawyer was on air yesterday saying that, yeah,
there are apparently some people raising money trying to pay
for my legal fees.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
Even some of the mainstream commentators.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Even some of the mainstream ut talking heads in pundits,
while while not quite dancing on the streets over his death,
did wonder out loud if the gleeful reaction, well, it
kind of makes sense, doesn't it. You heard Taylor Lorenz
in the last hour talking about CEO down talking to
Beer's Morgan about how she felt joy it is death,
(07:27):
and when Morgan pushed back, only then does she begin
to dial it down, which in and of itself is
a topic in and of itself. That's a topic about
how oh online everybody is. Oh the way, man, we're
masters of our universe. I find that with people that
don't like what I say online and kept me in
fact the next story, I hope to get to you
(07:49):
before the hour's over. It is a great example of that.
The Guardian newspaper said the reason that Thompson's death listed
in so little sympathy was that he was the face
of an unfair system and for those who are quote
shocked by the satisfaction Thompson's murder has inspired, she had
(08:12):
a terse request, spare me the pearl clutching.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
Well, if it's pearl clutching.
Speaker 2 (08:17):
To be concerned that we live in an era of
such casual cruelty and digital spite that tens of thousands
of people will happily taunt the colleagues of a murdered
man with a cacman emoji. Well, I guess I'm a
pearl clutcher, and I guess I'm a little worried about
living in a society where there is so little respect
(08:37):
for life that you take your issue no matter how
harmful you know. We have there's a there's a general
rule in the law that for every wrong there needs
to be a remedy. And so if there's not a
statutory remedy like a legal a written remedy at common law,
(09:00):
you have a general remedy for you know, if there's
a tort or you've been harmed in some way, or
there's been a contract breach, that you have a remedy
to go correct that breach. Now you're not gonna win
every one of them, but at least you have a
process in a civilized society to resolve that dispute. And
that's what makes us different from every other country in
(09:23):
the history of mankind in that we understand that, you
know what, do process fairness, Trying to resolve disputes and
differences other than at the OK Corral is the way
to do it. And I'll admit it makes me a
little nervous the things that I live in a country
where we're delving into that kind of look and you're
(09:44):
listening to the guy that every Friday at nine am
plays taxpayer release shots where people whose lives are threatened
exercise the god given right of self defense and they
kill other people. So don't come at me about I'm
(10:05):
wishy washy about self defense because self defense has absolutely
nothing to do with this case. Instead, it's just vigilanti justice.
It is true vigilante justice. And I don't care how
unfair you think a system is. We have a system
by which we can correct it. But you know what,
too many people have become too damn lazy, excepting this
(10:25):
last election, to do anything about it. And this last
election showed that if you really get fed up enough,
you actually can't affect change. It should go without say,
(10:46):
but apparently it doesn't. That killing people is not a
reasonable response to social problems. Josh Shapiro, the governor of Pennsylvania,
who said, in America, we do not kill people in
cold blood to resolve policy differences or express a viewpoint. Now,
(11:06):
I think the first part of that statement is kind
of master of the obvious, and we don't kill people
just to resolve a policy difference. Well, duh, do we
really have to repeat that? But I think the second
point deserves a little more attention, and that is, in America,
we do not kill people or express to express a viewpoint.
(11:30):
This is why I'm so adamant about free speech and
these limitations on free speech or these attempts to censor.
Of course, people are going to boil over. You know,
this program is cathartic for me because I can come
in here and tell you exactly what I think and
can do it without I think, can do it without
(11:51):
fear of physical harm. So this beatification of a murder
suspect speaks to a really serious moral malady in the
digital world, which does lead me to what I wanted
to talk about about in the digital world yesterday. I'm
pretty sure I'm sure them is. Yesterday I talked about
(12:16):
this whole thing about range riders that taxpayers in Colorado
are going to pay for so that they can go
protect the cattle of cattlemen in this state from the
wolves that the dumass voters on the Front Range approved
because obviously reural Colorado didn't vote in the majority for
this to reintroduce wolves into the state. So now taxpayers
(12:40):
are going to pay to reintroduce the wolves, and then
taxpayers are now going to have to pay for so
a wolf kills and it has to be proven, obviously,
but if a wolf kills a cow or a bull somewhere,
and you can prove that connection, then we are going
(13:02):
to reimburse the owner of that cattle for the death
of that cot at a at the hands or at
the teeth of a wolf. But now, because we want
to try to reduce those costs, we're gonna now hire
ten or more or even double that range riders to
go around and try to protect the cattle from the wolves.
(13:25):
And I spent quite a bit of time talking about
how stupid that was, and in fact used an article
that Corey had done on the Colorado Accountability Project explaining
exactly just how stupid that was. So Corey Gaines wrote
a really great article about it, and I shared that
with you yesterday. Well here we go again. Let me
(13:51):
back up. Let's first go to what I posted on
x yesterday. Let me find my bookmarks, let me just
get my profile at place to do it. So I
posted this. Oh, actually this was on Tuesday. So we're
(14:11):
now spending taxpayers hard earned money to protect rancher's livestock
from a predator that did not kill their livestock until you,
meaning Governor Polis and your husband and your cronies at
color Out Parks and Wildlife, spent more taxpayer money to
reintroduce wolves to make your husband the animal rights activists
happy happy, happy husband, happy life, happy wife, happy life
(14:34):
at the expense of hard working Colorado's so very democrat
of you. Well, that elicited a response from someone called
still in View, who wrote, but we need to actually
view this situation through a lens of reality. Don't get
(14:56):
me wrong, I detest Polus and his action as governor
and the for Colorado, but the real data does not
reflect anything immeasurable significant for losses in comparison to a
real natural habitat restoration effort percentage representation. If we consider
the eighteen livestock deaths from wolves against the total livestock population.
(15:21):
For cattle, if we assume all eighteen or cattle, this
would be approximately zero point zero zero zero zero seven
percent of the total cattle population in Colorado. For sheep,
if all eighteen or sheep, it would be about zero
point zero zero seven two percent of the total sheep population.
Also of note that the state reimburses now listen closely,
this is where this is where I decided to interact
(15:43):
with this Yahoo. Also of note that the state reimburses
for losses proven over deaths to those to these predators,
so there can be no quote loss claimed in truth, huh,
until there's no loss because the states want to reimburse
(16:04):
a rancher for a proven death by one of these predators.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
I was flabbergasted.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
Now he went on to say that, you know, I
grew up hand and mouth raising our eggs, foul pigs, cattle,
dairy products, and even all the vegetables meat I have
personally dispatch catless antles that I have butchered eating. And
that is not counting the animals we had an inflat fish.
The point is the point being made is uh, the
point being made is what would mankind do destroy every
(16:36):
single thing that might take the life of any all
foreign introduced species, so our stock would be able to
displace all wildlife of profit?
Speaker 1 (16:41):
What next?
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Weather engineer the winners and trump storms away that take
measurement far more stocks every year than predators ever do.
That's not at all what we're talking about. I'm talking
about the fact that taxpayers are paying to bring a
predator back into the eco cycle, and those predators are
now killing cattle and sheep, and now taxpayers are paying
(17:06):
to reimburse for the loss of that animal. And now
we're also paying for range riders. So that they can
cover this humongous area of land to try to prevent
any other predators. Well, then why do we have And
by the way, the point is taxpayers are paying all
of this, But he doesn't get.
Speaker 4 (17:27):
That flickering after this United Healthcare CEO shooting and all
the immense amount of attention that it's getting, put this
Benoni being this whole hero out of nowhere.
Speaker 1 (17:41):
Do you think there's going to be there? Do you
think there will be?
Speaker 3 (17:44):
Condycat cries?
Speaker 2 (17:48):
Absolutely, although I don't know that a lot of people
have the wherewithal the means or the guts to go
do it. Not that it takes in guts necessary. But
you see that he was captured. So wait till he
starts showing up in a trial, or wait till he's convicted,
(18:08):
Wait till he spends the rest of his life in
prison for a for a what's a second degree murdering
in New York but the equivalent of a first degree murder?
Wait wait, will people at that point start, Oh, maybe
I don't want Maybe I don't want.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
To do that.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
So back to this discussion about the wolves. So you know,
I'm reading this response to my comment about taxpayers paying
for all of this, and how wrong I think that is.
And he ends or she I don't know which.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
It is. Also of note.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
That the state reimburses for losses proven over deaths to
these predators, so there can be no loss claimed in truth.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
Hell, how can you possibly.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
In this day and age think that because the state
reimburses for a loss, that there can be no financial
loss if you're being truthful. Where the f does the
money come from that the state of Colorado is going
to use to pay for that. It's either from the
(19:20):
licenses paid by hunters and fishermen and others, or from taxes,
income or otherwise that are paid by the people in Colorado.
It comes out of the private sector's pocket books. So
the government can now cover the loss to the rancher
(19:40):
and now pay for the education that the range riders
are going to provide about I guess trying to tell
farmers and ranchers how to you know, imagine this?
Speaker 4 (19:49):
Can you?
Speaker 2 (19:50):
I think about the farmers and ranchers, I know, and
you've got some government employee coming on telling them, the
farmers and ranchers, how to protect your cattle and your sheep.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
Yeah, watch that. I want to watch that.
Speaker 2 (20:03):
They may not shoot them, but that may be where
they pull out the ten gage and say, get off
my property, and the range riders are now going to
start educating us.
Speaker 1 (20:16):
You don't need to educate me. I don't own any cattle.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
So this idea that somehow, because the state makes the reimbursement,
that there is no loss. That's the kind of ignorance
that we face in this society where it's just, you know,
the governments, this magical mystery tour over here that just
takes care of everything, and they just well, and in
(20:43):
many cases they do just print money or they hide
the money. Like I told you earlier in the program,
they're hiding twenty five million dollars from us. It really
belongs to us. So maybe they're gonna take it out
of that little slush fund they're maintaining somewhere. But then
this story apparently has more legs than I can imagine,
because I woke up this morning and.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
Cory Games was at it again. Here's his headline.
Speaker 2 (21:09):
Polus blames the ranchers for the high cost of wolf reintroduction.
You damn farmers and ranchers, you're the problem. Remember yesterday
when I told you about how much. Jared Polis hates
rural Colorado, and he in particular hates farmers and ranchers.
Here's the headline and here's the story. Corey writes. If
(21:34):
only the ranchers in this state, would you know, if
you don't subscribe to to Corey's Colorado Accountability Project, you
really need to go do that. Just go search Colorado
Accountability Project. If only the ranchers in the state would
have knuckled under him quietly, acquiesced to the will of
animal rights activists and those along the front Range, we
could have had our wolves on the cheep.
Speaker 1 (21:56):
That at least is what the governess thinks.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
At a recent meeting of color Counties, inc, Polis had
this to say, Quoting an article from The Fence Post,
Poulis said, quote, this could have cost a lot less
if ranchers would not have said, oh, don't get those
wolves from Wyoming, don't get them from Idaho. We probably
(22:19):
could have done it for a quarter of the cost.
There and there's still time. Ranchers, I mean, if their organizations,
Middle Park and those guys say to the say to Wyoming,
give Colorado wolves, they probably would have. The only reason
they're not is that they hear from ranchers that they shouldn't,
so that drives up the costs. Ranchers, farmers, cattlemen, sheep murders,
(22:46):
all all you sheep farmers. It's your fault. The governor
just told us it's your fault if you just kept
your mouth shut and just accepted what the state thought
was best, because they always know what's best. Why, we
could have saved money. So it's your fault, this disgusting money.
(23:11):
If we've reached the point where we're going to blame
people who have legitimate objections to government programs, and we
implement the programs anyway, and then it costs money. And
by the way, it always costs more than expected. Remember
(23:31):
the Colorado covers all program, the Medicare medicaid program that
was going to cost fifteen million dollars now costs fifty
one million dollars. I mean, who could have seen that coming.
I mean most government programs, they estimate the cost, let's say,
fifteen million dollars, and then when you actually implement it
two or three years later, usually the cost has gone down.
It's usually like, you know, one point five million. I mean,
(23:54):
that's the way it always works, right in sarcasm, Corey writes,
But anyone in agriculture who has paid any attention to
what police has done for that industry since his election
knows that's not how he operates. He ignores, he turns
(24:14):
a blind eye and a deaf ear at best, and
yet still somehow complains when he reaps what he has sown.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
So want to hear it.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
Straight from the horse's mouth, Corey says, I reached out
to Colorado County's Inc. And got an audio recording of
the meeting from them. It's linked below. So you want
to hear just exactly what the governor has to say about.
Speaker 1 (24:42):
You, you farmers, and you damn farmers and ranchers. Well, well,
it's not playing.
Speaker 3 (24:57):
Well, let's see if double click there, Michael, No, just
it's a it's it's on.
Speaker 2 (25:02):
It's on as Google drive. Oh here, it's it's downloading now.
But I don't hear anything. Am I plugged in? We
plug a microphone on. You know what, as much as
(25:23):
I like you, you're the biggest ass in the whole building.
It's just absolutely a horrible human being. Let's see if
I maybe it's still downloading, thinking I played it earlier,
it's so good. You gotta hear this. Let me see
if I can Let me see if I can play
(25:44):
it with No, I can't play with that Google thing.
Oh I did horrible radio. Anyway, maybe tomorrow you'll get
to hear what Jared Pola says that the the point
is he does not care about farmers and ranchers. He
(26:08):
wants to blame them for the cost of the program
that now granted. Voters along the Front Range approved the program,
they voted it and in so he's just doing simply
what he and his husband wanted to get done. They
convinced a bunch of dumbass voters in the Front Range
that will never touch a cow, probably probably a bunch
of vegans to begin with that, Oh my gosh, we
(26:30):
need to bring wolves back in, knowing full well that
they're predators, knowing full well they're going to attack cattle
and sheep and so, but we'll reimburse you for it.
So two lessons. Jared Polus h Rule Colorado. He despises cattle.
Cattleman and sheepman. He despises both, and he wants to
(26:53):
blame them for the cost of the program that his
husband pushed voters to approve, and then some y'all who
tells me on Twitter on x that, well, the state's
paying for it, so there can be no loss if
I'm being truthful. Okay, I guess I just don't understand
(27:14):
how government gets funded. Maybe someday somebody will teach me
that corn morning ding gong.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
So serious question.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
If Texas is going to start regulating these toys, what's next?
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Durables so bad?
Speaker 2 (27:32):
A woman, I don't know it, just as a woman
trans woman, I don't know. You see, you never know
these days. Has died following a hoax pipe bomb threat
against Marjorie Taylor Green, the Republican congresswoman from Georgia. An
unknown individual allegedly sent a threat from a Russian IP
(27:55):
address to the Rome, Georgia Police Department, claim I mean
that a pipe bomb was inside the congresswoman's mail box
at home. Well, a female bystander died when her vehicle
collided with the bomb squad unit responding to the what
turns out to be a complete hoax. Sergeant David Matroka,
(28:16):
member of the Floyd County Bomb Squad, collided with the
vehicle while heading to the police headquarters. The collision involved
his personal gmccer the mas of protegee driven by a
sixty six year old woman, Tammy Pickles Pickle Seimer, whose
succumbed tour injuries. At the hospital, doctors treated her for
minor injuries and then discharged her.
Speaker 1 (28:37):
Obviously.
Speaker 2 (28:37):
The congresswoman expressed sorrow over the events on social media,
saying I'm heartsick right now. My prayers are with her family.
The officer was injured in the entire Rome Police department.
These violent political threats, she said, have fatal consequences. It's
an undue strain on our law enforcement, who must treat
them seriously. The officer was responding to my life, and
(29:01):
now a woman has lost her life because of this
despicable act. So here's what I mean. Obviously, that's a
tragedy and it's awful, and these hoaxes are out of control.
The cops described the message as having a subject line
that said for Palestine. Well that's pretty precise. It detailed
(29:28):
the materials used for the device and gave the details
about its location. Now what's concerning is the bomb threat
included Green's home address that initially went unnoticed in the
police department. Spam folder. You get you get a bomb
(29:50):
threat and it ends up in the chunk folder.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
Now Green says that this marks her ninth instance of.
Speaker 2 (30:01):
You know, swatting is where you get these fake emergencies
that are reported to the cops. Most often it's you know,
a domestic disturbance, you know, like the husband, like Michael's
beating up tamera, and you know, and we've heard gunshots
or whatever. You got to throw in the gunshots, so
the cops come in with guns ablazing. It's horribly dangerous,
(30:24):
but this is the world we now live in, and
I don't know what, if anything, can be done about
it except to be aware of it. You can see
there's a on X you can see the video of
the the bomb squad guy, you know, checking around and
checking for bombs and doing all that.
Speaker 3 (30:41):
But with the person who's sent in the fake threat
be charged with murder.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Great legal question.
Speaker 2 (30:54):
That I would start with the question of who caused
the accident. The proximate cause of the accident was the
bomb squad guy who was driving a personal vehicle, which
I found interesting. Maybe they don't have a bomb squad
truck in Rome. Or was the female who died. Was
(31:16):
she the cause of the accident. Was she drunk driving?
Was she failed to pay attention? Was the bomb squad?
Because this was when he's going back to the police department.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
She was going through a green light where the bomb
squad member was running the red light to go.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
He was going back to the police department. Oh wait,
oh yeah. See that's why I say. That's why I
say it's so it's not as if he was racing
to the scene to pay it right, It's that everything's
over all clear, he's going back and the accident occurs.
I don't think you can charge I don't think. I mean,
(31:49):
you can make an argument that but for the hopes
he would not have been on the road that day.
Speaker 1 (31:54):
If you could prove.
Speaker 3 (31:55):
That might stop some of the hoaxes. If somebody gets
charged with murder for it, yeah it could.
Speaker 2 (32:02):
But again, I think the more disturbing thing is this
is her ninth attempt or not her attempt, but the
ninth attempt at swatting Marjorie Taylor Green simply for being
because she's outspoken and she's a conservative. How many swatting
stories do you hear about liberals
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.