12-16-24 - 7am - Mass Psychosis on Drones

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
Good morning again, Michael.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
You know, over the years, I've needed a farmer, I've
needed a doctor, I've needed a truck driver, but I've
never needed a governor that was a singer and a
dancer and just played photo ops.

Speaker 1 (00:16):
Just another opinion. Have a good day, Michael.

Speaker 3 (00:19):
Thank you for your service. Just to put things in perspective,
we could have Tim Walls, remember him.

Speaker 1 (00:32):
For argument's sake.

Speaker 4 (00:33):
You kind of do have a president who plays for
photo ops. Remember when he the former president Trump, current
president elect Trump, when he.

Speaker 3 (00:44):
Does that, what she now start referring to it. You're right.

Speaker 4 (00:47):
He did the whole irs tax plan where he had
the big stack in the room of papers this is
what you were paying, and has a little tiny stack.

Speaker 1 (00:56):
It's the same thing. So we cannot.

Speaker 3 (00:58):
Reagan did the same thing by time with regulations too.

Speaker 4 (01:00):
Yeah, we can't bitch about one and not bitch about
the other. So it's the same thing. In my books,
it's just a photo op.

Speaker 3 (01:06):
It's just a photoop. But at least here, dragon, Dragon,
I gave you the numbers behind the reality of the photoop. Yeah,
all right, thank you. I really don't know how to
start this. This comes from the New England psychologist. Mass

(01:31):
formation psychosis is a term that was used on the
Jill Rogan podcast by doctor Robert Malone. Remember doctor Malone.
Doctor Malone was part of the group. What were the
doctors called, I forget what they were called now, but
these group of doctors that said, wait a mane, all
the stuff that we're doing with COVID is wrongheaded, stupid.
It's the exact opposite of what we should be doing.

(01:53):
We ought to be very narrowly focused. The vaccine does
not work. Blah blah blah. I mean and and he
along with several other doctors were just vilified for that.
But what is mass formation psychosis? It's not a scientific
term found in the research literature. In fact, putting the

(02:15):
term into scopists or PUBMD research databases will give you
zero results. Whether that's still you know, I haven't checked
lately to see whether that's really still true or not.
It's it's suggests a large scale event. I would equate

(02:36):
equate it to like mob psychology. That's a pop psychology
term to describe the behavior of crowds and specific limited
time environments. You know, the mob psychology of January sixth,
the mob psychology of almost anything. One person shoves, another
person shoves, pretty soon you got a brawl. The mob

(03:00):
psychology that I witnessed the very first time I went
to Moscow the World Cup quarterfinals or semifinals. I don't
know what was going on. They weren't being played in Moscow,
but they were watching it on big screen TVs and
jumbotrons in a stadium on one of these boulevards leading
into toward Red Square, and people just started panicking because

(03:26):
the crowd was upset that Russia had lost, and my
security detail and I got got in the middle of it.
It was really bizarre, So go back to New England psychologist.
Psychosis is when a person's thoughts or how they perceive

(03:46):
the world are abnormal in so much as the person
may have difficulty understanding what is real and what is not.
Psychosis is extremely rare, experienced usually by people with schizophrenia.
Most people don't experience psychosis or anything like it in
their lifetime. Putting these two together and what we get

(04:07):
is what more commonly referred to as mass psychogenic illness,
or in pop psychology terms, mass hysteria or mass delusion.
These are the terms that have some research basis. So
whether you want to call it mass formation, psychosis, mass
psychogenic illness, mass hysteria, mass delusion, could that be what

(04:31):
we're witnessing. So what are we witnessing? On October thirty,
nineteen thirty eight, Orson Wells famous War of the World's
Halloween broadcast, and in that broadcast, which is cut into
a previous program, I think they were waiting on the radio.

(04:52):
I think they were waiting to listen to Charlie McCarthy
or something. Orson Wells, reading directly from Just Reading as
the narrator just reading War of the World, claimed that
martians had landed in New Jersey, in a little place
called Grover's Mill. So people, unlike the people who were

(05:18):
thrown into mass panic by the broadcast, which media historians
now say was very actually far fewer people than long assumed.
A group of aboard, a group of board teenage boys,
was apparently thrilled that something exciting had finally happened in
their small town, so they all gathered in Grover's Mill.

(05:41):
There was no sign of an alien landing. There was, however,
a farmer who was either writing a tractor or pushing
a plow, depending on which version of the story you
read about the boys approached him and said they were
looking for the Martians. The farmers kind of looked befuddled
and said, what martians. Unfortunately, in twenty twenty four, many

(06:01):
people in New Jersey have the privilege of being as
blissfully offline as the nineteen thirties farmer that was tending
to his fields, because in New Jersey, drones are unavoidable.
Even if he refused to look up at the sky,
everything is overtaken by reports of drone sightings over nuclear
power plants, military facilities. On X last night, I almost

(06:24):
said Twitter on X last night doctor Naomi Wolf, whom
I do have a lot of respect for doctor Wolfe,
but she's also somewhat of a nutjob. Naomi and Wolf
and I have gone round and round before about the
politicization of natural disasters. Now I happen to think she's

(06:45):
right about it. We've turned natural disasters into this is
one of her theories. We've turned natural disasters into political events,
which is why, you know, presidents feel an obligation for
every little disaster, You've got to run and be present.
And now we've come to expect that FEMA is going
to run in and take care of every little disaster,
their cars everywhere, and this drone anyway, So let me

(07:10):
finish with uh doctor Wolf. So Naomi, Naomi is now claiming,
at least on x last night, that the drones are
now in fact, Drudge has it up drums drones hunting
for radiation. And she took a map that she got
from the Environmental Protection Agency and she blew it up.

(07:36):
I couldn't replicate the map. I couldn't. I couldn't find
exactly where she got it. I mean, I know the
source from the EPA, but I couldn't quite duplicate the
same map. And the map shows spikes of gamma rays
or spikes of radiation in certain areas that are that
might be considered either slightly above normal or way above normal.

(07:58):
Where those could be any number of things, Uh, you know,
it might be overall hospital. Maybe they just got some
new deliveries of radioactive material, I mean, any number of
things that cause a radioactive spike. Remember the congressman or

(08:18):
I don't think he was a congress I think he's
actually a state rep that claimed an Iran owned mothership
was sending the drones from offshore. Have you ever stopped
and thought about the term mothership? When I say mothership, drag,
Let me ask you, when I say mothership, what.

Speaker 1 (08:37):
Do you think of alien?

Speaker 3 (08:39):
Yes? Do you ever think about a ship offshore as
being a mothership?

Speaker 1 (08:46):
Oh?

Speaker 3 (08:47):
No? Do you ever think about a nuclear submarine as
being a mothership? And I think in our popular vernacular,
mothership indicates that it's a hovering day over somewhere like
e T And you know or I.

Speaker 1 (09:05):
All saw the movie Independence Day?

Speaker 3 (09:06):
Yeah? Or Independence Day? Or what's the thing of the
third what's the movie of the third kind? Close Encounters
of the Third kind? Remember how the ship came down?
The mothership came down, and it dropped down, and those
little creatures came walking down the steps and I what's
the actor's name?

Speaker 1 (09:28):
Right?

Speaker 3 (09:28):
Yeah? Yeah? Uh so Dreyfus, you know, looks I gotta go,
I gotta go. And he walks in, he walks into
the show. Have you thought of So that's the Iranians?
And of course they also claim that it's China. Now
let me ask you another question. Have you ever heard

(09:49):
of a company? Let me find this tap hang on,
hang on the DJ, DJ, the world's largest drone manufacturer,
has more than seventy percent, almost three fourths of the

(10:10):
global market share of drones. DJI drones are used in music, television, film,
as well as by military and the cops.

Speaker 1 (10:23):
But.

Speaker 3 (10:25):
US lawmakers have raised concerns about the national security risks
posed by DJI drones. There's also unique International jet tank.
These are all different Chinese companies, but Dji is the largest,
and politicians are really concerned about DJI drones. And the

(10:56):
drone mania that we now are with missing is remarkably bipartisan.
And it's also become a sporting ground. You know, I
I've avoided this because one I what what I'm about
to tell you I think is going on. You're gonna
think you're listening to infowark wars, or that you're listening

(11:18):
to I don't, I don't know some you know, George
Nori or something. I don't. I don't know, I don't
know what. I don't know what you're you're gonna think
and cried Frank, Hey, I don't care what you're gonna think.
The drone sightings have also become a sporting ground for
armchair pundits eager to ride on elected officials of all

(11:39):
political stripes. Richard Blumenthal, you know, the guy led about
serving in Vietnam all the way to Congressman Marjorie Taylor
green All suggesting the drones ought to be shot down,
which then cause neurosis amongst skeptics who were concerned that
people are gonna start shooting at commercial airliners mistaken for drones.

(12:01):
And then I thought about this, well, let me finish.
New Jersey's Democrat Senator Andy Kim less than a week
after taking the oath of office, went on a drone
watching excursion in Hundredon County, spending your tax dollars to
go on a drug watching excursion. And after the excursion,
he told the press that he saw multiple unexplained and

(12:24):
unidentified flying objects. But then UFO enthusiasts on social media
have finally found a news cycle where they can truly shine.
They quickly corrected him and told to him he was
likely misidentifying airplanes. And I even gotten to Alejandro may
orcus I hadn't gotten I briefly mentioned John Kirby last

(12:45):
week and adamal Kirby's the spokeshole for the National Security Council,
basically saying the way I read it was, you're all crazy,
You're all nuts, But none of that explains everything. What if,
just what if there really are a swarm of drones?

(13:09):
And what if it has nothing to do with the Iranians,
has nothing to do with the Mothership, It has nothing
to do with cops or movies or general surveillance or
sending a drone up because you know, it's much easier.
Even though people love the helicopter chases, it's much easier

(13:32):
to use a drone to chase, you know, a car,
or to chase the suspect that's fleeing on foot, you know,
like maybe somebody that's shooting a CEO executive and and
running through the alleys of midtown Manhattan. Well, rather than
using a police helicopter, you know, drones a lot easier
to use. And then stop and think about this. You

(13:52):
know when I go to the undisclosed location that the
night sky is so oh glorious and it's kind of
sentimental for me because it reminds me of my childhood
growing up in rural Oklahoma where I could see everything.
I mean, you go to New Mexico, you stand in
our front yard, you can see these galaxies, you can

(14:16):
see the Milky Way, you can see if you just
like let your eyes gaze at the sky, don't look
at any particular star or formation or anything. You would
be amazed at the movement in the sky. Satellites everywhere,

(14:38):
going every rich direction you can imagine. And I love
spotting a satellite and just watching it across the sky.
I've taken my nikon and set it up on a
tripod and opened the shutter and left it open for
you know, three or four hours enough to capture the stars,

(15:01):
you know, doing a semicircle across the mountains surrounding in
the undisclosed location, and you invariably capture these streaks of
light going, you know, in cutting across the stars as
the as they revolve around the earth, or the Earth

(15:21):
revolves around them, or you'll catch the red and white
blinking of an airliner. Nobody in the city, nobody in
Denver looks up and sees that. And in New Jersey
with all the lights of Manhattan just you know, just
a few miles away, what do you think you look?

(15:41):
So if you see something in the sky in man
you know, in New Jersey, and you never really look
up at the sky, and suddenly you see all the
lights why it's all unexplained. What is this?

Speaker 1 (15:54):
What is it?

Speaker 3 (15:55):
What could it possibly be? What if I told you
that my theory is that it all has to do
with the defense budget, and it all has to do
with say, oh, let's just not necessarily him only. But

(16:19):
what if I told you that I think it might
have to do with the fact that there's a certain
former CEO of Google of Alphabet, Eric Schmidt, who is
in the business of coming up with new drone technology
to support the military industrial complex to United States Air Force,

(16:46):
United States Marines, Navy, you know, all the services, so
that they can do things cheaper and they can eliminate
Chinese drones to providing them American alternative to Chinese drone
And it hasn't yet been publicly acknowledged.

Speaker 2 (17:06):
So psychosis says, what you believe versus what is reality?

Speaker 1 (17:12):
Isn't that a push up? Bra Hey, these are your listeners.

Speaker 3 (17:22):
I don't I don't listen to back, so I don't know.
But Goober number forty nine seventy six says Mike, for
you and Glenn Beck disliking each other, you two certainly
think alike. He discussed this on his Friday show. Well,
I didn't know that, but Beck and I have somewhat
buried the hatchet. Yes, the nationally syndicated program on Saturday

(17:45):
is now carried on the Blaze Radio Network. Yes, followed
by Glenn Beck's podcast. So I don't know, a little
reconciliation going on. Maybe I don't know, but yeah, I'm
very I'm very happy to be on the Blaze Radio Network.

(18:07):
Back to Oh, I got too many? I got too
many clips here? Back to Forbes. Let's start the Forbes
SoundBite over Eric Schmidt, former CEO, one of the founding
CEOs at Google, is now working on And somebody made
a comment because they refer to it as a stealth

(18:27):
drone project. Well, maybe they want to get rid of
the word stealth since we all apparently are seeing them.
But if you ever thought about and there is a sense,
although it's nine minutes long, there's some drone so called
expert that says these drones are all looking for a
missing nuclear warhead, Well stop and think about that for

(18:51):
a moment. I've heard people argue that that's what's happening,
and they don't want to tell us that that's what's
happening because that will cause mass panic. And everybody will run. Well, now,
go back to what Dr Naomi Wolf posted on x
yesterday about the map that shows these little spikes that

(19:13):
are occurring on the East Coast, spikes of radioactivity. If
you're testing and you can just cause a spike in
radiation that's not harmful, then what a great way to test.

(19:35):
Go hide it in urban areas, cause the spikes and
see if the drones can find them. And Dragon made
a great point during the break too. You buy a
new red car. All you see on the highway now
are red cars. What was the other example?

Speaker 1 (19:53):
You use tidepods.

Speaker 3 (19:55):
Yeah, the tidepods. That's a great example. So a couple
of y'all who dumbass kids swallow tide pods and then
hits the Newton. It's only one hundred kids across three
hundred and fifty million Americans. One hundred kids do it,
But then it hits the news and everybody talks about
the story, and suddenly everybody's swallowing tight pods.

Speaker 1 (20:17):
Thousands of kids are doing it.

Speaker 3 (20:19):
Yes, a thousand dumbasses are now doing instead of just
a couple of hundred dumbasses, which shows human nature. Now
knowing how many times have I told you there are
no coincidences in Washington, DC. So if the National Defense
Authorization Act is up, in fact, it it may it

(20:43):
may have passed. I'll double check and see. I think
it's passed. Say, and we're gonna spend almost nine hundred
billion dollars on the defense budget, almost a trillion dollars
the defense budget. And as part of that.

Speaker 5 (20:56):
Today on Forbes, ex Google ceo Eric Schmidt is working
on a secret military drone project. Ex Google ceo Eric
Schmidt has been quietly plotting a new defense tech effort,
a self military drone project. This according to four sources
with knowledge of the effort. The project's existence has not
been previously reported, and it has.

Speaker 1 (21:18):
Yet to publicly launch.

Speaker 5 (21:19):
The clandestine project intends to provide an American alternative to
Chinese drones.

Speaker 3 (21:25):
Is intended to provide an American alternaty to Chinese drones. Now,
if the only place or you can only get the
best drones from Dji, the Chinese manufacturer of drones, what
do you do? Well, you first have to prove your concept.

(21:49):
You then have to prove you know, you've got to
get some prototypes. You have to prove that the prototypes
work and that they can do what you want them
to do. And if those are your prototypes and you're
testing them, of course you're not gonna shoot down your
own prototypes. Have you ever thought about that? Everybody keeps
asking why don't we just shoot them down? Maybe because

(22:12):
they belong to us, maybe because they're part of this product.
I'm not saying anything. I'm just trying to give some
rational explanation of what's going on here. And I think
it's a combination of everything, mass formation, psychosis or just
a psychosis, or just a mass hysteria. And now suddenly
everybody sees drones everywhere, even the drone people, whether you're

(22:37):
a professional drone operator or you're an amateur drone operator,
Now your curiosity has been piqued. So now you go
launch a drone to go up and see if you
can see what it is, so like the tides thing.
Instead of having one hundred drones, now you've got a
thousand drones. And I've seen all the phots. I saw
a photo recently and then I heard the story always

(22:58):
on this morning coming in. So I saw a video
on X yesterday of somebody landing, and I forget whether
it was who knows where it was, LaGuardia, Kennedy, Newark,
I don't know, I don't care, but they were landing
somewhere and it showed what they wanted to make it
appear to be a drone that was flying right toward,

(23:19):
you know, their airliner. And suddenly, you know, the light
shone and reflected in the you know, the kind of
whatever that material is they use on windows in airliners,
and then it caused this reflection where you really couldn't
see anything, and then it disappeared. My very first thought
when I saw that was fake. AI. Someone used artificial

(23:43):
intelligence to create a video that looks like that. I mean,
I'm just cynical enough. The first thing I thought was fake.
And then somebody was saying on that drivel Fox and
Friends this morning about how well you know I was flying.
I forget whether I was flying from New York to
Miami or Miami back to New York or whatever. And

(24:04):
as we were getting ready to land in Miami, I
looked over and there was a drone, a tiny drone
that was at the same altitude we were. Really you
suppose the FAA notified the pilot that there was a
drone you know to your right at you know, flying

(24:26):
at you know, thirteen hundred feet or twenty three hundred
feet or whatever they were. They're getting ready to land
in Miami. I just suddenly all of these things are
coming out very few people. Forbes has only been able
to confirm that very few people know. You've heard me
use the term special access program. A special access program

(24:50):
is a secret program within a top secret program. Like
I had special Access program clearances for all sorts of things,
including some of our nuclear secrets going on at Los
Alamos and Lawrence Livermore, but I couldn't tell my staff
about those things because they didn't have the They might

(25:12):
have had a top secret clearance, but the top secret
clearance didn't give them special access. You had to have
special access to have that program. I've been in meetings
where I've been asked to leave because even though I
had the same clearance as everybody else, I didn't have
the special access. One of those meetings I remember, in particular,
the very first time it happened to me was in

(25:32):
the Pentagon. We're getting I don't even remember what the
briefing was about, but you know, Wulfawitz is giving the
briefing about some program that we got going on, and
you know, I'm fascinated by it. And then suddenly the
program stopped, I mean, the lecture of the briefing stops,
and then they called out, like I don't know, there

(25:53):
were like maybe fifteen people in the meeting, and they
called out like four of us. I was one of
four people, Claire Brown, we need you to leave. We're
now going to discuss a particular special access program within
this larger program. I didn't have clearance for that. So
even though I had the top secret special compartmentalized info classification,

(26:19):
I didn't have the special access to the to a
particular part of that program. Sold Me and three others
were asked to leave the room, and then when they
finished that, then were brought back into the room. So
very few people out a fifteen I'm just guessing fifteen people.
Only eleven people had the had the access, and then everybody,
nobody else in Depentagon had access to it, just those

(26:41):
fifteen people. So when they mentioned special access programs, the
very first thing I think is, oh, so, when as
much as I think Alejandro Majorcis is an ahole and
should be well wasn't should be MPD. They should have
convicted him. Uh, he really may not know, Admiral Kirby,

(27:04):
even though he's the spokesperson for the National Security Council,
he may not know. But let's hear from Eric Schmidt himself.
Let's hear from Eric Schmid himself after the break. Mike,
I'm convinced that these drones are not from Mars, They're
not from Jupiter. They got to be from Uranus. There's
no other explanation. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. And

(27:28):
by the way, it's Uranus, not my Anu's. So there
we got drones line atter button. Yeah, before I go
back to Eric Schman, I'm a fan. I may go
to Eric Schmidt after the break because I want to
say something to put this in perspective when and I
was gonna do this this morning, but I just I

(27:50):
just didn't care enough. How about that? How many I
mentioned Alejandro Mayorcus. How many times have we heard Alejandro
Majorcus or any number of officials in the government tell
us the border secure when we know that it is not.
How many times have did Joe Biden tell us that

(28:11):
he was not going to pardon his.

Speaker 1 (28:12):
Son have how many freaking times has the.

Speaker 3 (28:18):
Government lied to us? So of course people are skeptical,
people are cynical, and people don't believe anything. I get that.
And then you go back to the whole idea of
mass formation, psychosis or mass hysteria, or whatever you want
to call it. And particularly in a day where everybody's

(28:40):
got a phone, everybody's on social media, everybody sees something
or knows somebody that knows somebody that knows somebody, and
things get repeated. Now we've got artificial intelligence. How do
you know I'm really doing this today? How do you
I'm really in here in the studio today? You don't.
In fact, I may have just decided. I may have
just said, hey, artificial intelligence, take my voice. You've got

(29:04):
my voice, and come up with an hour's worth of
story about drones. So our skepticism, our cynicism, feeds into
the mass hysteria and just look, I would probably suggest,
except then we'd have the whole problem of what Now

(29:26):
the FAA is going to be involved, and then we're
gonna send the National Transportation Safety Board to investigate. But
I would say, even though it's one of ours, and
it's one of Eric SCHMIDTZ and we're all trying to
investigate and see if it will work. Just go shoot
one down. Just shoot one down, so you can at
least say, hey, we looked at it and there's nothing
to it. But then the NTSB and everybody else will

(29:48):
get involved, and it'll make matters even worse. Think about
the NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act. When we get
back and you Eric Schmidt talked about the program, and
you talk about why and what he's trying to develop,
then a sudden you might you might start thinking to yourself,

(30:10):
maybe this isn't why we're shooting them down. Because now,
again juxtaposed that statement with we knew we had a
Chinese spy balloon coming across the Aleutian Islands, through Canada,
through Big Sky Country, all across you know, military installations,
and we kept we were told over and over again,

(30:31):
nothing to see here, nothing to worry about, don't worry
about it. And then when it gets out over the Atlantic,
then we then we blaffed out of the air with
you know, some missile off a fighter jet that we
missed first, and then we spent five million dollars ten
million dollars on one missile and it misses, so we
do another one. So of course we're skeptical, and I
expect you to even be skeptical about what I'm saying.

(30:55):
But if it was, well, I was gonna say something stupid,
which wouldn't be unusual for me, I know, But if
it really was, like, uh, you know, the Iranians who
have threatened to assassinate Donald Trump, the Iranians who are
building a nuclear program, and that Biden is funding them.

(31:17):
Do you not think that somebody would give the order
somewhere to blow one of those out of the sky?
Except are you if you own one, if you're Eric Schmidt,
when you're spending millions and millions of dollars to develop
these new drones, and you're doing it in conjunction with
say DARPA, DARPA, you know, the Defense Research Group. No,

(31:39):
you're not gonna tell the FAA. You're gonna tell the FAA.
You're gonna see some drones. Leave them alone. Yeah, they're
not gonna get harms away. Nothing's going to happen